Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19731204 " /"-\ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM I! C.r.HOECK:ELB.B.& L. CO. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning & Zoning December 4, 1973 Meeting was called to order by Chairman Jim Adams at 5:10 p.m. with Bruce Gillis, Bryan Johnson, Jack Jenkins, and Spence Schiffer. Also present City/County Planner Herb Bartel and Assistant PLanners Donna Baer and John Stanford. Johnson made a motion to approve the minutes of November 20, 1973, seconded by Jenkins. All in favor, motion carried. OLD BUSINESS Ord. #19 Bartel stated that copies of Ordinance #19, with the amend- ment incorporated in it, were presently available. Could be picked up in the Building Department. Geri Vagneur arrived. Mixed-Residential Inventory Bartel stated that at the study session the previous week, several members had indicated that they would work on the inventory for the area shown on the Ordinance #19 map as mixed-residential. Stated that John Stanford has prepared the outline of what the Planning Office would like to have the Commission look at. Stated that copies of aerial photographs and address maps have been prepared. Requested that those working on the project meet with Stan- ford. Ord.#19 Review - Episcopal Church Bartel stated that this project had come before the advisory board, and that they didn't see any problems with the first stage of that project. Jenkins made a motion to approve the preliminary and final plans of the first stage of this project, seconded by John- son. All in favor, motion carried. TRAILS GRANT- IN-AID APPLI- CATION Bartel explained that the Parks Department and the Planning Office had prepared a $25,000 Grant-in-Aid application for trails. Stated that the Council had budgeted $25,000 and that they were trying to match that with land and water conservation funds. Stated that the application was in, but for action to be taken on the application by the State, needs comments from the Com- mission. Bartel submitted letter to the Commission, to Mr. O'Malley of the Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation. The letter read as follows: "The Planning Commissions of the City of Aspen and the Coun- ty of Pitkin have reviewed the City's Grant-in-Aid Applica- tion by the Department of Parks and Recreation for multi- purpose trail and footbridge. This application is in com- pliance with the Aspen Trail System Plan which has been a- dopted by both the City of Aspen and Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commissions. There has been extensive use of the multi-purpose trail ex- tending to the high school and city parks complex funded by the Division of Game, Fish and Parks in 1972. The funds requested in this application will help continue the devel- opment of this much needed trail system for the Aspen area which will benefit not only residents of the community but it's visitors from the State and nation." ,-,,"-,~--~,,'~'--'._-""-"'~----- FORM'! C.F.HOECKELB.B.&L.CO. Regular Meeting VIEW PRESENTATION UTE VILLAGE CONDOMINIUMS - Preliminary Plat -- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Aspen Planning & Zoning December 4, 1973 Bartel explained that these are funds for construction, and not land acquisition. Funds are for the footbridge at the end of East Hopkins, and trail construction through the golf course. Stated that that trail could be extended either along the highway to the airport, or across the golf course property down to the bridge that Henry Stein has placed over the Roaring Fork and then over to the Rio Grande right-of- way. Need not be a dead-end trail system. Bartel pointed out that the County was working on the ease- ment acquisitions within the County. Gillis made a motion to authorize Chairman Adams to sign the letter submitted by Bartel, seconded by Vidal. All in favor, motion carried. Joan Lane questioned if the trail would connect through the town. Bartel stated that it would not in this application. Bartel submitted map of the proposed view preservations that the Planning Office had gone over with the Commission in a study session. Public hearing date was set by the Commission for January 15, 1974. Bartel stated that he would give a copy of the map to Sandra Stuller for the Bar Association, and a copy to Ted Mularz for the Architects Collaborative. Ms. Baer pointed out that this project had come before the Commission for conceptual a;::'proval under Ordinance #19 pre- viously. Ms. Baer stated that the project was on Ute Avenue adjoining Ute Cemetary. Stated that this was a request for 77 units, with a mixture of condominium apartments and two single-family dwellings. Ed Baker, representing Alpine Land Company, developers of this project, was present. Stated this would be a low-density de- velopment on a 7.65 acre site on Ute Avenue, with a high- density development to the west already in existence. Baker stated this would be a mixture of condominium apart- ments for permanent residents, on which they would covenant no short term rentals. The 18 units with parking across the street. Stated that there were plans for two tennis courts. Baker further stated that there would be 43 townhouses, with a mixture of 2,3, and 4 bedrooms. Also 14 patio houses aId 2 single-family dwellings. Baker stated that the most recent zoning allows 29 units per acre, but they are proposing just slightly over 10 units per acre. Baker stated that no one's view of Independence Pass would be blocked or any other scenic view. Open space on the plat would be preserved by covenant. Stated that 22% of the de- velopment is devoted to lower cost housing. -2- --- -----~~._,~..,-,-.~'"~-'". "'"' -- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM!! C.F.HOECKELB.B.&L.CO. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning & zoning December 4, 1973 Baker stated that Greenway is provided between the develop- ment of the river, as proposed in the Roaring Fork Green- way Plan. Further stated that the dedicated public walk- ways is included in'the Greenway along the river. Baker pointed out that there is an 8" sanitary sewer 150' from the western corner of the site, and located within ute Avenue is a new 12" water main, and 4" gas main. Anticipated development schedule would be to begin within 1 year and complete construction within 3 years. At this point, Baker submitted floor plans for the Commission review. Gillis questioned Baker as to whether or not they were plan- ning on using the patio space for drainage. Dick Fallon stated that they would be using interior roof drainage. Chairman Adams stated that the main access would be off of Ute Avenue. Ms. Baer stated that the Planning Office was recommending tabling of this project for the following reasons: (1) this site is in a major channel under the new urban run-off de- velopment plan, and the Engineering Department would like time to analize and work with the applicant to determine the size and the location of that drainage channel through the site, which may result in some significant site plan altera- tions; (2) City cannot supply this site with water due to lack of water pressure. Feels this needs to be investigated further with the City's water consultants; (3) depending upon a decision under Ordinance #19 review. Ms. Baer stated there were some other subdivision considera- tions: (1) need some elevations to determine the view plane; (2) utility easements have to be shown and described. Schiffer questioned Ms. Baer as to when these plans were sub- mitted to the Planning Office. Ms. Baer stated that they were submitted October 31st. Pat Maddalone was present and questioned the problem of water pressure, and why they weren't informed of this pro- blem before. Ms. Baer stated that she did inform someone connected with the project at the meeting of their Ordinance #19 presen- tation. Ms. Maddalone questioned when they will be able to get water to this site. Ed DelDuca, Assistant City Engineer stated taht the consul- tants are working on this now. Stated that the consultants were Wright-McLaughlin. Schiffer stated that he had a concern with the timing pro- cess. Questioned if the Commission tabled this project, don't they have a time limit of 30 days. -3- -",~-'-" ~', RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORMIG C.F.HOECKELB.B.&L.CO. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning & Zoning December 4, 1973 Ms. Baer stated that she did have to act within 30 days. ding further information. not believe the Commission would Stated it would be tabled pen- Vidal stated that he would like to abstain due to conflict, but stated that the Commission should try to get a formalized procedures as far as the status and timing of different pro- jects is concerned. Should develope a method to avoid mis- understanding. Bartel stated that the 30-day limit is in the Ordinance #19 review specifically, and would check on the preliminary plat. DelDuca stated that it would be to the benefit of the devel- opers if they waited, since the run-off plan could change their site plan considerably. Ms. Maddalone questioned Bartel on if they were obliged to provide the drainage ditch, what compensation would the de- veloper get? Bartel stated that compensation was a legal consideration. Schiffer, after checking the Code, stated that failure of the Commission to act within 30 days constitutes approval. Bill Dunaway questioned the Commission as to whether or not there was any time limit on re-application. Chairman Adams stated that the Commission could table the project now, and make a decision within thirty days. Bartel stated that even though it is not specifically spelled out in the Code, the Commission could table the project and act on it within eO days. Johnson made a motion to table the consideration of the pro- ject with the condition that the Commission act on it with- in 30 days, seconded by Schiffer. All in favor, motion carried. RIVERVIEW CON- DOMINIUM - Exemption Ms. Baer stated that this project was requesting subdivision exemption. Ms. Baer submitted the following recommendations on the project: (1) E. Hopkins, additional ROW for cul-de-sac per Engineering Department specifications. (2) Agreement to join in future street improvement district. (3) Revised description to meet "as built" trail, including an extension back to Hopkins along west property line. (4) Agreement to join in future sidewalk improve- ment district. (5) Condominium map should acknowledge that water supply has not been verified by the City. (6) Include in homeowners' association agreement a responsibility of the association to monitor and maintain dry wells according to an established schedule. (7) Agreement to join in future drainage improvement district. Ron Austin, Attorney representing the developer, stated that -4- .. ....._....,-~,---'-_._._~~- -~-~-"''''- . ." ~,~,._,"~.",..,,~,._....,___._,,~.._. ~.._.., ~.,,"..__.._ . o. " "'"' RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM I! C.F.HOECKELB.B.Il:L.CO. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning & Zoning December 4, 1973 the developer would agree to those conditions. DelDuca stated that the trail was constructed with the ap- proval of Fred Wooden, former Assistant Planner. Easement that is dedicated is not where the trail is constructed. Austin stated that the applicant agrees to adjust the des- cription according to the already constructed trail. Chairman Adams stated that this project is an already-con- structed project. Gillis stated that he was disappointed in the maintenance of the trail, and feels it should be cleaned up. DelDuca stated that the trail was approved before snowfall. Schiffer questioned if the City Attorney had read the con- dominium declaration. Austin stated that he felt she would have no objections. Stated that the condominium declaration is ready to be re- corded. DelDuca stated that the Engineering Department would like to have the easement granted on the plat. Schiffer made a motion to accept this proposal, subject to final approval of the Planning Office and redefinition of the trail easement, seconded by Vagneur. All in favor, motion carried. CONCEPT 600 - SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION Bob Gruetter was present representing the developer. Ms. Baer pointed out that Concept 600 was in the same situ- ation as Riverview Condominiums. Ms. Baer submitted the following recommendations from the Planning Office: (1) An agreement to join in future street improve- ment district. (2) pedestrian easement from Main Street along wes- tern boundary and vacated Hunter Avenue. (3) Condomonium map should acknowledge that water supply has not been verified by the City. (4) Implementation of an approved drainage plan; a performance bond should be submitted. (5) Agreement to join in a future drainage improve- ment district. Gruetter stated that they had everything worked out that needs to be, with the exception of the dedication of the pedestrian easement. Stated that they agreed to post a $1,000.00 bond for the dry well. DelDuca questioned if the City had the right to go onto the property. Ms. Baer stated taht they could put that in the agreement. Gillis made a motion to approve, subject to the recommen- -5- ,...,.,.,,,,.--,--.~..,.....,.- _...._.~>~=.--..----,.--._,., - RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves fORM \~ C. F. HOECKEL B. B. II l. CO. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning & Zoning December 4, 1973 dations of the Planning Office being met and approval of the City Attorney, seconded by Vagneur. All in favor, motion carried. CITY PROPERTY - 11>, ACRE SITE Bartel stated that the Planning Office had published notice that the Public Hearing on the II>, acres would be held. Stated that they did not nold a Public Hearing on the pre- liminary plat. Bartel stated that this would be re-published, due to the fact that they could not get signatures on the plat in time for the public hearing. Gillis made a motion to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Johnson. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. ~e~ ----~--,..,.-