Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19720718 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FQRMIO C.F.1l0ECI(ELa.a.l!. L. CO. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning and Zoning July 18, 1972 Meeting was called to order by Chairman Robin Molny at 5:00 p.m. with James Breasted, James Adams and Victor Goodhard. Also present City/ County Planner Herb Bartel. Breasted moved to approve the minutes of July 11th as prepared and mailed by the Secretary. Seconded by Goodhard. All in favor with exception of James Adams who abstained. Motion carried. Starodoj Subdivision - Submission of preliminary and final plat was made. Mr. Bartel pointed out the 6' easement narrows down in one spot to 2' and 3' in order to follow the property line. Pedestrian and utility easement provided. Connection to Metro District will be made. Anthos Jordan arrived. Surveys by the utility companies have been made, letter not ready at this time. Mrs. Irene Tagert will submit letter stating that she is in fact the owner of the property in order to clear the title. Provision for maintenance of the road was shown on the plat. Letter stating the owner will construct wells if construction is begun prior to connection to the City Water System, to be submitted. Adams moved to approve the preliminary and final subdivision plat based on the following conditions: (1) three permiter corners be monumented; (2) applicant submit affidavit of clear title; (3) letter from utility companies approving the placement of utility easements; (4) applicant submit letter relating to water wells stating that if City water is not supplied, will drill well. Seconded by Breasted. All in favor, motion carried. Starodoj Subdivison, Lot 1, Stream Margin - Adams moved that the Commission approve this site as a buildable site, however, approval runs through to November 1, 1972 and recommend to the building inspector and applicant that the structure be moved as far as practical to the east from the edge of the present course of the stream and the buildings on this lot be built in such a way to protect from flooding, i.e. no basements, lower floors be elevated etc., set on pilings of some sort and that there be an agreement in writing promoted by the owners of this lot that the City will be relieved from the responsibility of flooding. Seconded by Goodhard. Applicant submitted letter holding the City harmless. Adams moved to amend the motion to exclude any reference to pilings in the motion. Seconded by Goodhard. All in favor, motion carried. All in favor, motion carried. Kastelic, Landscaping - Mr. Kastelic was present and stated after thinking about the landscaping decided to bring in a backhoe and straighten up the trees and level off the area and let it grow back as it was. Commission stated they had no disagreement with this. ~-~ =----~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FOllM" C.F,HOECKHa.B.ltl.Cn. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning and Zoning July 18, 1972 Metro Sanitation District Expansion - Chairman Molny stated articles appearing in the Dever Post, Rocky Mountain News and local papers prompted this on the agenda and further request Mr. Ken Ash be present to answer questions of the Commission. Articles appeared from a report by the Environmental Protection Association which Mr. Ash stated was never submitted to the two local districts. Mr. Ash discussed with the Commission the tentative expansion plans which call for tertiary treatment irrigation water and enlargement of capacity of the plant to 2 million gallons a day. Mr. Ash further reported they have applied for federal funding. Mr. Bartel warned the Commission they should hear the other side of the story on this issue prior to making any decisions. Water Line Extension Criteria - List of the criteria was submitted. Commission discussed how to proceed i.e. discussions with Dale Rea or water attorney. Commission agreed to save expense by starting with the small items listed on the criteria first. Commission further agreed to meet with the City Manager next week, Tuesday at 5:00 p.m. Adams moved to adjourn at 6:25 p.m., seconded by Breasted. All in favor, meeting adjourned. Go~-l' . orraine Graves, ~_~J ity Clerk , I . j). OUTLINE OF PROCEDURE WATER EXTENSION CONSIDERATION CRITERIA Review Master Plan recommendations for utility extension in area concerned: Planning consideration Determine overall effect on other services and utilities: Sewage disposal, fire, transportation considerations Determine water line size required for proposed project,. ~urrounding area as planned per Master Plan and potential population served by 18 in. line: Water Engineer Consultant- Review of cost of construction estimates: Water EDgineer' Consultant Review how project will be paid for: City Personnel Determine if present water treatment and supply facilities are adequate to service proposed line and if not, what genccal capital improvcments ~'lOuld be required, approximate cost and timing: /Water Engineer Consultant and City Personnel Determine land ovmership along proposed right-of-way and cost of acquisition: Planning Office and County Assessor Obtain legal opinion based on water rights law as related to means of preservation of City owned water rights: Attorney Examine feasibility of attempting to control nature of developments along ~-mter line extension by City: Planning Office and Attorney Evaluate the character, location and extent of the proposed water line extension: Planning Office, Water Engineer Consultant, and City Personnel