The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutminutes.apz.19710720 FOIlM,a C.F.HOECI(ELB.B.1l:L.Co. .~- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Regular Meeting Aspen plannin~' &. Zonin~-=-j:;ommi ssi on July 20, 1971 Meeting was called to order by Chairman Robin Molny at 5:05 P. M. with James Adams, James Breasted, Vic Goodhard and Anthos Jordan. Also present City/ County Planner Herb Bartel. Minutes Charles Worth, Stream Margin Reguest - Lot 16 Black Birch Estates Red Butte East Subdivision Lift No.1 Alternatives Breasted moved to approve the minutes of July 6th with the correction of Rubey Park in the index column be changed to parking. Seconded by Jordan. All in favor, motion carried. Charles Collins arrived. Charles Worth, Stream Margin - Request for Lot 16, Black Birch Estates - Chairman Molny read the motion made on the last request for Lot 12. Mr. Bartel explained he and Clayton Meyring, Building Inspector, had reviewed the site this date and lot is situated similarly to the one prev- iously approved with an increase in elevation of about 8' and across from Lot 12. Mr. Bartel further reported the Corp of Engineers will be in Aspen shortly to establish the program for the flood plain study. Suggest the Board set a tine limit on approval as by the next building season, the flood plain study may have been completed. Adams moved that the Commission approve this site as a buildable site, however, approval runs through only the current building season and recommend to the Building In- spector to seriously consider requiring that the building on Lot 16 be set back sufficiently from the edge of the present course of the streem and that the buildings on this lot be built in such a way to protect from flooding, i. e. no basements, lower floors be elevated etc., set on pilings of some sort and that there be an agreement in writing promoted by Mr. Worth with the owner of this lot and future owners that the City will not be held responsible for flooding. Seconded by Collins. All in favor, motion carried. Red Butte East Subdivision - Final Plat was submitted. Mr. Bartel informed the Commission the City Engineer has commented the final plat is okay; checked on the deed as to restrictions which does not allow for cluster develop- ment (one acre sites). The final plat shows easements and further shows Red Butte Drive so there are no access prob- lems. Breasted moved to approve the final plat of the Red Butte East Subdivision subject to the conditions of the City of Aspen Subdivision Regulations. Seconded by Adams. Roll call vote - Jordan aye; Adams aye; Breasted aye; Collins aye; Goodhard aye; Molny aye. Motion carried. Lift No. 1 Alternatives - Mr. Bartel pointed out #1 is a short range plan whereas Alternatives #2 and #2 are long range. No. 1 would be to utilize existing ski corporation bus system with pick up and drop off at Wagner Park and a shift system from Wagner Park to the lift if necessary. Parking across from the Skiers Chalet for employee and local parking and utilize the land obtained by the City for 2 hour parking (visitor). Do what can be done in November at FOIlM!O C.F.HOECI(ELB.B.B:L.CQ. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Regular Meeting, Aspen Planning &. Zoning, 7/20/71 Goals Task Force Objectives PUD Uhfelder Const. ,~~.~_....__.,'--~,. a Minimal expense. Other plan calls for outlying parking areas and mini buses with 2 hour parking in this general area. Mini buses would shuffle people between the two parking areas. Another plan is for parking under Wagner Park and shuffle people up to the lift and also a transit system. Adams moved to recommend to the City Council that Plan #1 be adopted for the 1971 and 1972 season and feasibility on financing be done by the Finance Department on Plans #2 and #3 and Plans #2 and #3 be reviewed by Voorhees. Seconded by Goodhard. All in favor, motion carried. Goals Task Force Objectives - Mr. Bartel explained at the last study session he had submitted the program on quality skiing. Objective #4 was discussed and the Commission re- quest a more definitive interpretation be inserted as re- lates to economy. Also request the word maximum be modified. Collins moved that the Commission accept the tentative objectives as submitted by resolution and recommend that the Planner and Goals Task Force proceed with development of the programs for the balance of the objectives. Seconded by Goodhard. Collins moved to amend the motion to allow Herb Bartel to change the woraing in Paragraph 4. Seconded by Goodhard. All in favor, motion carried. Main Motion - All in favor, motion carried. Commission agreed to hold a study session next Tuesday to discuss quality skiing, growth policy and Zoline preliminary pms. PUD - Commission request the Secretary schedule a public hearing for August 17th. Uhfelder Construction - Chairman Molny reported this con- struction has been brought to his attention by citizens. The stream margin regulation was effective on April 20th. Mr. Uhfelder obtained his building permit on March 9th and fulfilled his building permit on June 7th. City Attorney Kern is checking into which date should be considered, the March date of June date as relates to the regulations. The plot plan shows the Roaring Fork River being about 10' away from the building at the closest point. In checking the site the stakes appear like the river will touch the build= ing. Also following the March date, the City adopted the Uniform Building Code and requires a certified survey. This application appears to be an obvious attempt to circumvent the City ordinance. Property located at the end of Waters Avenue. The City Attorney is also checking to see if there are any violations in this case. Also, one of the adjoin- ing property owners feel the building is being built on dis- puted land. Private citizens are checking into a perhaps federal violation of streams. -2- ..- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FOIlM!O C.F.HOECI(ELB.B.Il:L.CO. Regular Meeting, Aspen Planning &. Zoning, 7/20/71 It was pointed out the citizens in seeing this building built practically in the stream by feel this is the result of the stream margin regulations which is not the case. Jordan moved the Planning and Zoning Commission strongly express their concern and would appreciate the City Attorney looking at this in depth. Seconded by Collins. All in favor, motion carried. Adams moved to adjourn at 6:45 P. M., Seconded by Breasted. All in favor, motion carried. /{<..-~%~ ~ Lorraine Graves, Secretary ,,..,.~,--".'I""r.'~~'!' L,; ~. ',. ,"J"""""'!(':'~ 7''''"t"'~.'1'!'' ,,__~,.__<<-1!i;,....._ ,"~.~.~ "'. ...,,~~~ ---"""-" " ~ " "'-- .,. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FOR JOSEPH T. ZOLINE The Zoline Property includes 79.52 acres, located north of Highway 82 and west of Maroon Creek. Access to the property will be from Highway 82 (south-east corner of property) and from the county road at the north boundary. Utilities are easily accessible to the property with city water near the south property line and Metro Sanitation main going through the property. The development consists of two (2) separate parcels, or clusters, of 90 lots each, thus g~v~ng a total of 180 lots. 1. Each lot shall be 50 feet square and will contain one single family dwelling unit. 2. Each dwelling unit shall contain approximately 1600 square feet of building area, plus a private court of approximately 900 square feet. 3. All roads shall have a 60 foot right-of-way and will meet city specifications. 4. Each unit provides two (2) parking spaces. Cluster #1, south-east corner of property, contains 15.16 total acres. This can be broken down into the following: 1. 90 lots occupy ............................... 5.16 acres 2. Roads occupy ............................... 4.24 acres 3. Commons area (open area within the cluster) occupies 3.44 acres , TOTAL 15.16 acres Cluster #2, north-west corner of property, contains 16.26 total acres. This can also be broken down into the following: 1. 90 lots occupy ... ............. ........... ... 5.16 acres 2. Roads occupy ........ ........ .......... .... 5.77 acres 3. Commons area (open area within the cluster) occupies 5.31 acres TOTAL 16.26 acres , " [,1 I i , 1 ---------_._,~--~----- ----'--, -.." - I 1 1 l i With the above mentioned figures in mind, we now find the following totals regarding covered area in relationship to open area: 1. 2. Total Project area ................. Total area occupied by lots, roads and commons area ................. 79.52 acres 31.42 acres 48.10 acres It might be pointed out that in applying an R-PC-4o classification (residential planned community) as is indicated in our present zoning ordinance, it would allow 1.10 dwelling units per net acre. In the defini tion of this type of district, for density calculations, a single family dwelling or a 2 family dwelling could be construed as a single family dwelling unit therefore allowing 2.20 family units per net acres. Since this is a cluster development, we would also be allowed an increase of 1/3, thus giving a total density allowance of 2.93 family units per net acre. The density as shown in the development, however, approaches a density of 2.25 family units pet acre which is below the above stated maximum. 3. Leaving a total open space area of ..... -2-