Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19710817 ~ FORll ~o C. F. 1l0ECK EL B. e. II L. CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Regular Meeting Aspen Planning & Zoning August 17, 1971 Meeting was called to order by Chairman Robin Molny at 5:05 P. M. with Charles Collins, Victor Goodhard and Anthos Jordan. Also present City/County Planner Herb Bartel and Assistant Planner,Fred Wooden. Minutes Hoag Subdivision, Final Plat Aspen Hills Annex- ation, Zoning Jordan moved to approve the minutes of August 3, 1971 as prepared and mailed by the Secretary. Seconded by Goodhard. All in favor, motion carried. Hoag Subdivision, Final Plat - Mr. Bartel reported since the last submission all conditions have been met by the applicant with the exception of a deed to the City or letter of committment relative to the Cemetery. The following wording, as suggested by City Attorney Kern, has been added to the plat: "No building permit will be issued by the City of Aspen for any lot within this sub- division until a committment has been entered into with the Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District for an extension of a sewer line to serve the lots within this subdivision." This wording has been agreed to by the applicants in the form of letter agreements submitted by each landowner. It was informally agreed the water connections would be on the same basis as the sewer connections as outlined above. Mr. James Blanning pointed out, as relates to the 60' ease- ment, the plat does contain a reserve clause for a 10' strip for widening of Ute Avenue of one side only. The other side is the Cemetery side which will be public land. James Adams arrived. Collins moved to approve the plat as submitted conditioned upon the submission of a deed to the City of Aspen for Lot 6, known as the Cemetery, and also the requirements as set forth in the file as pertains to sewer development be met. Seconded by Jordan. All in favor, motion carried. Aspen Hills Annexation, Zoning - Chairman Molny opened the public hearing. Planning Department reviewed with the Commission the annexation plat and it was reported present- ly on the site is a 16 unit apartment building. Area is presently zoned RMF. Surrounding County zoning is R-15 and there is some R-30 in this area. At the time this was annexed, owners of the property were in the process of developing the land and confusion arose as to whether this land was in the City or County. Building permit was issued by the City and a variance for height was approved by the City Board of Zoning Adjustment. Chairman Molny closed the public hearing. Adams moved the Aspen Hills Annexation be zoned RMF. Seconded by Goodhard. All in favor, motion carried. Commission request the Planning Office check out the de- tails on this annexation as to what area was actually in the City and the County. FORll!O C.F.HOECKELB.B.aL.CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Regular Meeting, Aspen P & Z, 8/17/71 PUD & Commercial Planned Neighbor- hood Planned Unit Development and Commercial Planned Neighbor- hood - Mr. Wooden pointed out the proposed amendment sets a three phase program with no bonuses on density but flexibility provided in setbacks and height limits. Page 3 sets out the general provisions for procedure. Density and use will be the same for each zoned district cas now allowed. Chairman Molny opened the public hearing. William Dunaway questioned the 30 days notification at the bottom of Page 12 on final development plan. Commission request the Planning Staff change this to 15 days to provide for continuity of procedures. Mr. Wooden and Commission agreed to add on Page 17 an additional section (4) to read: "New information available that would materially improve the final development plan." Chairman Molny closed the public hearing. Mr. Bartel reported an amendment of Commercial Planned Unit Development will be submitted in the near future and prior to the next building season. Discussed the 27,000 square feet minimum for PUD as out- lined in the proposed ordinance. Mr. Bartel reported this could be a flexible thing under the ordinance if the sit- uation would warrant going to a smaller piece of property. Renovation of buildings could come under this but only if a major project. One is not required to go PUD if he has 27,000 square feet or more, PUD is optional. Under this ordinance you could not have combined uses i. e. resident- ial and commercial. Councilman Jack Walls was present and stated he would take issue with the language on Page 11 (d) which could be con trued to mean the Planning and Zoning Commission has architectual control at the time of the final development plan. Mr. Wooden point out basically this ordinance is talking about Planning and Zoning having the right to approve the site plan. Mr. Bartel reported this is general language to cover i. e. a complete change in material from what was submitted prior. Chairman Molny stated he felt this would pertain to size and bulk as relates to the site plan. Commission agreed to vote on this proposal and make a recommendation to Council at this time and any major changes desired by any Commission members be channeled through Mr. Bartel's office. Chairman Molny suggest any member of the Commission who owns property of 27,000 square feet or more should abstain on the motion. -2- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves fORM 10 C.F.HOECKELB.B.&L.CO. Regular Meeting, Aspen P & Z, 8/17/71 Collins moved that the Commission recommend adoption of the proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance for PUD and CPN as presented. Seconded by Jordan. Chairman Molny request the Secretary send copies of the proposed amendment to the absent members. Roll call vote - Jordan aye; Adams abstain; Collins aye; Goodhard abstain; Molny aye. Motion carried. Stream Margin Request Stream Margin Request - Mr. Wooden outlined the property as being located at the end of East Hopkins on the north side of the street. Thirty-five feet between the house and the river. Request to build approximately 8 x 10 laundry and bathroom addition. Addition would not affect the footage between the house and river. Recommend approval of this request. Adams moved to approve and allow this addition on the con- dition that excavation dirt not be moved towards the river. Seconded by Collins. All in favor, motion carried. Zoline Annexation Petition Zoline Annexation Petition - Copy of the petition was sub- mitted. Chairman Molny stated the annexation would have to wait until such time as the PUD is effective. Mr. Bartel pointed out with this kind of an annexation the City should have a AF zoning classification. Chairman Molny stated perhaps the City should consider leaving the north portion in the county under AF zoning. Parking Requirements Parking Requirements - Mr. Bartel stated he had discussed financing to meet parking requirements under the new leas- ing procedures of the City for the developer ,with Mr. Logan Bailor of the Bank of Aspen. Mr. Bailor states it would be difficult to loan the kind of money that may be required, in the normal course of obtaining a loan, there is no way to include parking fees in the loan. City Attorney Kern will be reviewing the program as relates to options of providing parking and leasing. Questionable whether the City can require on a mandatory basis leasing from the City. Flood Plain Study The following resolution was submitted by Mr. Bartel: FLOOD PLAIN STUDY RESOLUTION WHEREAS flood control standards should be practiced to promote orderly development along the Roaring Fork River and its tributaries, and WHEREAS new construction along the Roaring Fork River and its tributaries has occurred to such an extent that it is essential to designate the limits of the natural drain- age courses to protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the area, and -3- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM 10 t.r.HOECKELB.B.IlL.CQ. Regular Meeting, Aspen P & Z, 8/17/71 WHEREAS, the city of Aspen has the authority to adopt regulations for the purpose of avoiding hazards to persons and property from flooding and the authority to protect the natural drainage courses of the area; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Corps of Eng- ineers is hereby requested to conduct a Flood Plain Study of the Roaring Fork River and its tributaries to determine the limits of natural drainage courses subject to develop- ment pressures, and the Colorado Conservation Board is hereby requested to designate a high priority for conduct- ing said study. Chairman Molny stated the study could take a whole year but they could come up with a flood plan opinion on a certain area within a week or two if necessary. Adams moved to let the City Council know the Planning and Zoning Commission endorses this resolution and hope they resolve same. Seconded by Goodhard. Mr. Bartel pointed out the County will be adopting a similar resolution. All in favor, motion carried. Study Session Study Session - Commission agreed to meet on August 31, at 5:00 P. M. to discuss the Fothergil/Cutting zoning and a presentation by the City Manager of the Capital Improve- ments program. Proposal for street circulation for amendment to the Master Plan was submitted by Mr. Bartel. Commission agreed to schedule this for the study session on the 31st. Transporta tion Committee Transportation Committee - Mr. Bartel reported as relates to the request by Council for recommendations on signa- lization and traffic circulation, Mr. Voorhees has re- quested a complete inventory of traffic light locations and additional traffic counts. At this time, do not have report back from Voorhees. Mr. Jordan requst the Commission consider the City util- izing the building at the old No. 1 lift for public rest- rooms for this winter. Councilman Walls and Mr. Jordan to discuss this with Council on August 23rd. Adams moved to adjourn at 7:00 P. M., seconded by Goodhard. All in favor, meeting adjourned. ........., r;l J~/~ 4.~~ Lorraine Graves, Secretary