HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19720101
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
100 Leaves
FO~M 10 C. F. HO~CKEL 8. B. It L. co.
Regular Meeting
Aspen Planning and Zoning
January 4, 1972
Meeting was called to order by Chairman Robin Molny at 5:10 p.m. with James
Breasted, Charles Collins, Anthos Jordan and Victor Goodhard. Also present
Herb Bartel, City/County Planner, and Adams Krivatsy, Consultant Planner.
Minutes
Goodhard moved to approve the minutes of December 28th as
prepared and mailed by the Secretary. Seconded by Breasted.
All in favor, motion carried.
Historic Zoning
Historic Zoning - Chairman Molny opened the public hearing.
There being no comments, Chairman Molny closed the public
hearing.
Mr. Bartel outlined that the City needs to concern itself
with historical preservation of buildings, sites and areas
because of the lack of same in the master plan. The general
approach to historic zoning is: (1) Amendment to the zoning
code; (2) Formation of the historic preservation commission
and development of community support; (3) Designation of
public and quasi public buildings; (4) Total inventory of
buildings, sites and areas and hearings on those designat-
ions. Item #4 maybe years away. It is not the intent of
this regulation to create museums.
This regulation would be an overlay of the existing ord-
inance. The Historical Preservation Commission would do
the inventory work and there would be joint hearings re-
quired between the Planning and Zoning Commission and the
Historical Preservation Commission. The designations would
have to be related to the Master Plan and other zoning re-
quirements. Applications for building permits would require
approval of the HP Commission and appeals would be directed
to the courts, not the Board of Adjustment.
Request the Commission review the fees included in the ord-
inance, rules of procedure are not a part of the ordinance.
This would be accomplished by by-laws of the Commission.
Breasted suggested associate members be allowed on this
commission, associate members beings citizens from the
County. Mr. Bartel replied this would come under the rules
of procedure and should not be a part of the ordinance.
James Adams arrived.
Molny questioned if the public hearings could be left out
when the owner requests designation. Mr. Bartel explained
there would be only 2 public hearings.
On Page 6, Mr. Molny questioned the Commission having to
make a decision within 30 days, and if the building could
revert to its original status if the Planning and Zoning
failed to make a decision. Mr. Bartel explained it could
not revert to anything because at that point it has not
been designated. Following discussion, the Commission'
agreed to leave the sentence out.
-'-<--~----
~-
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
100 Leaves
FQRIIlII C.1'.HO(CKELB.B.&L.CO.
Regular Meeting, Aspen P. & Z, 1/4/72
Mr. Molny questioned if there could be a joint public
hearing but the decision be made on an independent basis -
Planning and Zoning recommendation and HP Commission
recommendation.
Mr. Adams stated he disagreed with having another Commiss-
ion. Mr. Bartel explained the purpose of the HP Commission
is to build the case before the Planning and Zoning as to
why such a building, site or area should be designated.
On Page 10, Mr. Molny questioned boards having jurisdiction
over permits which would require investment in plans,
provision should be made for preliminary plans.
Chairman Molny questioned the requiring of a public hearing
for minor improvements, or remodeling, i. e. hanging of
a door, etc.
Page l3K - Line was left out.
Commission request Mr. Bartel to submit an addendem for
Planning and Zoning members to review.
Commission agreed under Section 11-1-13 to amend the fees
to $50.00.
View Control
View Control - Mr. Krivatsy previously outlined to the
Commission the real considerations being Aspen Mountain
and the entrances to the City. Also through traffic, routes
to the mountain, route to the Institute and historic tours.
Basically dealing with the C-C and C-l zones as they are
part pedestrian and part vehicular with tourist accommo-
dations and the lifts. Parks are definitely considered as
permanent places for viewing but are pleasant only in the
summer time. In the winter time it would be the downtown
area and the best areas being the north/south streets. In
addition to parks, need to look at public facilities such
as City Hall, Post Office, City Market parking lot and priv-
ate places such as Hotel Jerome block, Carl's Pharmacy,
Wheeler Opera House. A typical Aspen block could also be
created where the view of the mountain is protected. View
easements could be used, block design. The open space re-
quirement in the zoning ordinance does not necessarily pro-
mote a view of the mountain, set backs would seem to make
the street wider and could get a better view of the mountain,
i. e. the Wieners tube situation. Arcades are a detriment to
view. The 25' height limit in the residential areas is not
a problem but the parking is. There should be landscaped
areas that are attractive to pedestrian environment.
View as relates to traffic centers mainly around Garmisch
Street, Main Street and Third Street. Landscaping, color,
scale of buildings and landmark buildings. New buildings
should not be allowed to block the view.
The setback requirement of the highway should be landscaped
-2-
,-~,,,,,,,,--=--,,,,,~-~------,~~,"~'"
"
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
100 Leaves
FOltll'l C.f.HOECKELB,B.liL.CO.
Regular Meeting, Aspen P & Z, 1/4/72
or screened. Should look at leasing the area near Shadow
Mountain.
Two questions arise in the transition between the urban
area and slope of Aspen Mountain. (1) Where should develop-
ment stop; (2) Scale of development in the transition
zone.
The first step the Planning and Zoning might make would be
to try and encourage a typical Aspen block. The historic,
esthetic and cultural concerns should be refined and in-
corporated in the ordinance as an overlay.
Commission stated they felt this was a worthy project.
Mr. Bartel stated he would be mailing out more materials
on this subject prior to the next meeting.
Adams moved to adjourn at 6:30 p.m., seconded by Goodhard.
All in favor, meeting adjourned.
(/~ /I~
Lorraine Graves, Secretary