The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutminutes.apz.19710202 RECORD Of PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM" CF.HOECKELB.B.!tL.CO. Study Session Planning and Zoning Commission February 2, 1971 Meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman James Adams at 5:10 p.m. with Vic Goodhard, Irwin Ha~iand, Charles Vidal, William Tharp and Planner Herb Bartel. Resident Housing, Harley Baldwin - Mr. Baldwin was present and informed the Commission he had been retained by Spar Consolidated Mining Company to do a site analysis of the land on Ute Avenue in the vicinity of the Hoag Subdivision. Drawings showing units consisting of 648 sq.ft. including 2 bedrooms, bath, kitchen and living room for resident housing and one acre of hostel units. Hostel units would be rented by the night and bedrooms would include 4 bunks. Under the City regulations, project would not meet the requirements for parking. Cost for underground parking would be more than the cost of the hostel units. Plan to keep the project as pedestrian oriented as possible since its location is near the business area. Mr. Bartel pointed out the requirements the planning and Zoning Commission should request from the applicant: (1) Clear clarification on access. (2) Make sure utilities can be extended to this area. (3) Outline clearly the areas where variances may be necessary. Mr. Beldwin explained the project would be in phases. Hoag Subdivision - The following information was brought to the attention of the Commission: (1) dates of sale were November 15, 1968; (2) area was annexed to the City in 1967; (3) subdivision regulations in effect at that time were passed in 1965, newest regulations were passed in 1969. From the previous meeting, Mr. Blanning is willing to dedicate Lot 2 to the public. Mr. Bartel stated he would talk to the County Commissioners to see what ownership problems maybe involved with thisland, Ute Cemetery. Problems discussed at the last meeting were: access to lots 5 and 6; Ute Avenue is 60' wide and feel this is sufficient at this time, however plat should show a 10' reservation for right of way in the future; and should have letters from all utility agencies that they can serve this area. Mr. Fritz Benedict was present and stated at one time there were problems with Lots 5 and 6 with avalanches. Mr. Bartel explained the City can enter into agreements assuring that the thi.ngs required will be done. Question was raised as to legal problems since the lots are already sold. Mr. Bartel explained there would be a problem if the plat were not record- ed and the City failed to enforce its own regulations. Commission agreed to send the plat back to Mr. Blanning to consider and make adjustments of the three points in question. Mr. Bartel explained the Commission will need to outline the problems again at the next reg- ular meeting. Malls - Discussed the underground parking being under Rubey Park or Wagner Park. Mr. Bartel explained each block eliminates about 32 parking spaces. - 1 - ,-- RECORD Of PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves fQRM50 C.F.HOECKELD.D.81L.CO. P & z, 2/2/71, continued. Discussed allowing buildings to jut out into the mall area thus eliminat- ing straight lines and making the , malls look like streets made into malls. Commission agreed it would be better to outline a complete mall area and set up a schedule for different phases of the complete mall area over a period of time. Commission agreed the complete mall area should be from Mill to Spring and Main to Durant. Mr. Bartel stated the proposed mall area should be inserted in the Master Plan. Commission instructed planner Bartel to prepare the phase mall plan based on the area outlined above and the 1st phase to be as outlined in the mini bus report. Western Colorado Regional Planning Commission correspondence was considered relating to regulating mobile homes. Commission stated they were behind what the Regional Planning Commission is trying to do. Tharp moved to adjourn at 6:45 p.m., seconded by Vidal. All in favor, meeting adjourned. /~ / ~~ Lorraine Graves, Secretary 7 -~- 3rd Draft 2/8/71 STREAM MARGIN REGULATIONS Amend all zoned districts: 11-1-5 (a) R-40; 11-1-5 (b) R-30; 11-1-5 (c) R-15; 11-1-5 (d) R-PC; 11-1-5 (e) R-6; 11-1-5 (f) R-MF; 11-1-6 (a) AR-l; 11-1-6 (b) AR-2; 11-1-7 (a) C-l; 11-1-7 (b) C-C; 11-1-7 (c) C-2; 11-1-8 Park; to include the following performance standards: Performance Regulations for Stream Margins District All permitted and conditional uses within the stream margins district overlay of this zoned district are subject to the additional performance regulations contained in the Stream Margins District as set forth in the Supplementary Regulations 11-1-9 (g). Supplementary Regulati.ons 11-1-9 : (g) Stream Margins District: Intention - to guide develop- ment and encourage appropriate use of land in proxi- mity to designated natural water courses, to promote safety from flooding, to prevent impediment of natural water flow, and to insure provisions for adequate stream protection. All lands within 100 feet, measured horizontally from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, shall meet the following requirements prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. A development plan shall be submitted to the Buil- ding Inspector which shows the following information: . .. . .' . - 'd. .._.../_____~, _.~.,._.....>> .. - 2 - (a) Boundary of the property for which building is reques ted; . (b) Contours on at least a 5' contour interval; (c) Existing and proposed improvements; (d) Construction procedure to be used; (e) Existing trees and shrubs. 2. The Building Inspector shall refer said develop- ment plan to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its review and comments. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall submit its comments in writing to the Building Inspector within thirty days of the date of receipt of said development plan. 3. In reviewing the development plan the Building Inspector and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the following guidelines and stan- dards: (a) Buildings are located so as not. to be subject to flooding; (b) Trails can be provided along the stream where stream access is an important element of the open space plan; (c) Vegetation is not removed or any slope and grade changes made that will produce erosion of the stream bank or area adjacent to the stream; ",- '. .. .. . . _.~,. ._-~. "-"~~"-'--~'~'-""-- . - 3 - (d) Stream channel capacity changes are artificially produced and stream sedi- mentation and suspension loads are not increased; (e) Pollution of the stream will not occur; (f) Development not interfere with important natural changes to the stream which are occurrip.g. (g) The value of the stream as an important natural feature be preserved. 4. The Building Inspector shall, after careful con- sideration of-the Planning and Zoning Commission comments, approve or disapprove the development plan. Approval shall bind the development of the real property to be in compliance with the approved plan. Building permits shall not be issued in the case of disapproval and reasons for such disapproval shall be given in writing by the Building Inspector. I