The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.202 W Francis St.HPC42-94- 2 6 L 1,0 - g 10 .cl , 64. A=02- r I RECORDS OF PROCEEDINGS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DECEMBER 14,1994 Meeting was called to order by chairman Joe Krabacher with Donnelley Erdman, Les Holst, Jake Vickery, Linda Smisek, Martha Madsen, Roger Moyer and Tom Williams present. INVENTORY ROUND II Bob Hughes and Gideon Kaufman presented letters and discussed the Bavarian Lodge at 801 W. Bleeker, the Trustee Housing and Race Track. The consensus was that a legal description will be provided and the information will be brought back to the Board. The Bavarian Lodge was dropped from the inventory but the Trustee Housing and Rack Track will be added. The Colorado Midland Right-of-way was discussed and Chairman Joe Krabacher stated that a new legal should be done stating the easement should start from the middle and then so many feet on either side of that. Tony Zurcher: The tracks are going and you can barely see where the railroad was. It should be looked at in the spring. Roger: The right-of-way is part of the nordic trail system. The Board recommended to not include 1101 E. Cooper Ave., 1001 E. Hyman and 407 W. Hallam to the inventory. MOTION: Donnelley made the motion that a resolution be brought back to the board for approval; second by Roger. Passes 6 to one, Les opposed. Motion carries. Tom Williams did not vote as seven members were seated. 202 W. FRANCIS STREET, PARTIAL DEMOLITION Jake: I would like to state that I have a problem discussing this project as it is 60% demolition and our code states that you cannot go over 50%. Gretchen Greenwood: We are not touching the historic portion of the house. It is the 1960 section that needs to be demolished. Amy: The Planning Director interpreted the code and stated that we should review the partial demolition. Roger: Their alternative would be to pay the additional fees. Amy: They would not be able to meet those standards because as Joe said you cannot prove that the building is not structurally sound, they can't meet the standards. What would happen is that they HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DECEMBER 14, 1994 INVENTORY ROUND II ......... 1 202 W. FRANCIS STREET, PARTIAL DEMOLITION .... 1 435 W. MAIN - L'AUBERGE - SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT PH . 4 316 E. HOPKINS AVE. HOWLING WOLF - MINOR .... 11 NOVEMBER 23RD AGENDA APPROVAL ....... 14 303 E. MAIN STREET - DISCUSSION ...... 14 130 S. GALENA ........................ 16 18 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DECEMBER 14, 1994 would have to wait until we amend the code which holds them up for a project that we do not necessarily want to hold up. Jake: There have been a lot of people that have been in the same boat as here that had to reduce the size of their demolition. I would be willing to review it if there was some way to engineer a review that would be conditional pending legal interpretation. Joe: The applicant has to take the risk if the approval has some problems with it. Gretchen: We will take that risk. Amy: We should tack on something to the motion that states that we want it verified by the city attorney as being OK. I want to do this appropriately as it was noticed and I had phone calls. Gretchen: We truly want to preserve the old part of the structure and I brought a model to demonstrate the concept behind that; we do not want to build on top of the old buildings and do a monster home. We want to have a very strong designation between what is old and what is new. In order to do that we are asking for a site coverage variance and a few other variances and setbacks and parking. We decided to go to the Board of Adjustment for all -of those variances. We hope to get your endorsement for this project as we go to the Board of Adjustment for our variances. Les: This makes sense to me. Roger: I concur. Gretchen Greenwood: The stable and 52 foot long miners cabin will be restored. The stable is 20 feet above grade to the ridge and that is the highest point that we will be going. The cabin also has a 14 foot extension. In the 60's additions were added which makes the building over its FAR. It has an existing percentage of site coverage right now of 56% and it has FAR square footage of 3,478 sqft. which is over around 200 feet. We want a comple tely separate architectural concept from the miners cottage. We do not want to put anything on top of the cabins. I have always discussed- with Amy having some kind of flexibility with site coverage which would make for better projects in the west end. With the variation of 9% we are able to keep the house very low and able to not have to build on top of the miners cabin. I also want to point out that our site coverage is hal f of what is allowable. So it is a hardship on us and we do want to preserve the historic both from the inside and out. We want to expose the inside of the buildings glsb and it will be obvious what is exactly old and what is new. There i s evidence that something wrapped around the house and we want to add the porch as it is a corner site. There is a window that will be 2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DECEMBER 14, 1994 restored. Tom Congdon, owner: The only alternative would be to stay as we are and add one bedroom and keep fixing the thing. It is 110 years old. Donnelley: How do you plan on getting rid of the snow problems that you have created. Gretchen: This building is designed to preserve the historic buildings rather than designing a sloped roof. We will build. a lot of heated french drains and will deal technically with it in another way. Jake: Does this fall under ordinance 35? Amy: Yes. Gretchen: I have no problem with going through that review process. Tom Congdon: The neighbor Morey Tobin is a good friend and we cannot destroy his yard so we will dig under the old structures and build them up. The joists are unpealed logs laid on stdne foundations. Jake: In terms of things that you are doing to the stables and the house itself can you summarize that. Gretchen: We haven't spent a lot of time on the window design but will be glad to come back. Joe: With partial demolition we have a one step process and Jake is trying determine the scope of the project which effects the partial demolition. Tom Congdon: We need your- support for the Board of adjustment. Joe: If this committee feels this is appropriate we will review it on a conceptual basis with the understanding that the applicant will come in and show us the detailihg of the windows etc. on the historic portions. Les: You are saving two wonderful old buildings, reduce the site coverage 7%, an employee upstairs and a porch on the old building and get rid of a car. Chairman Joe Krabacher opened the public hearing; no comments. Public hearing closed. 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DECEMBER 14, 1994 MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC grant partial demolition approval to 202 W. Francis lots R, S, Block 48, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colo. with the following conditions: (1) That the applicant understand that this is a design review and that HPC request that the Board of Adjustment look closely at this project. We find that the variances requested are encouraged, that the Board of Adjustment grant these variances for the following reasons: (1) In opinion this is an excellent project of preservation of an historic structure and the blending of the structure with a new design. (2) That FAR is in fact being reduced. (3) An employee housing unit on an upper level is being provided which is certainly unusual in this community. (4) We find no problem with the fact that one parking space is being asked to be withdrawn and that we feel this is a strong project in the goals that we are trying to achieve as the HPC and the blending of old and new; second by Les. DISCUSSION Jake: I want to go through the variances one at a time. As I understand it you are reducing your site coverage. Gretchen: We are going from 50% to 49%. Jake: It is currently a non-conformity and you are reducing the non-conformity. The HPC supports the reduction. Jake: I will add a few thoughts for the Board of Adjustment. It should be stated in the motion that HPC approves demolition of the non-historic elements. The applicant will return for more detail review. The applicant will return for ordinance 35 review. We also need conformation of the legality of the partial demolition and interpreted by the city attorney. AMENDED MOTION: Roger amended his motion to state that we approve partial demolition of the non-historic element and as far as the other items they are inclusive except for the legality. The legality of the demolition to be finalized and reviewed by the city attorney; second by Les. All in favor, motion carries. Jake: The applicant is reducing nonconformities and improving the situation. 435 W. MAIN - L'AUBERGE - SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT PH Amy: This site was previously called the Swiss Chalet and is in the Main Street Historic District. At some point this site might 4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DECEMBER 14, 1994 want to be designated historic as the cabins were built in the 50's. It is zoned office and the applicants are proposing to do an expansion which includes the addition of 13 lodges in the character of the existing detached lodges as well as 206 sqft. addition to . the existing manager residence which is previously approved by HPC in addition to the laundry. This project will be going on for a GMQS allotment competition. The lodge may at some point have historic significance as its detailed as a chalet style architecture and I think it should stay that way. On the two story cabins proposed they reference victorian architecture and also the windows are six feet above the street and you do not see an entry way so I propose a restudy of that and eliminating the victorian detailing. Also proposed that the two story cabins be located at the rear of the site. I do support the applicants concept that they stick with detached small cabins because that is what is compatible with what is on the site. I feel personally that the design has become complex with a lot of roof lines and possible they combine some of the buildings into a single mass to give variation on the site. I also though we should support the applicants request at P&Z that the number of parking spaces be reduced. Some of the cottages actually have two parking spaces and it turns the site into a parking lot. Grass-crete should be used where possible. Beyond that I will let the committee discuss it. I recommend tabling with the conditions I described realizing thht the applicant does have a January 13th deadline for GMQS. Gideon Kaufman, attorney: We have had discussions with neighbors and have taken into account their concerns. It is zoned office and in the growth management plan we plan on doing a conditional use to allow lodges in the office zone. David Gibson, architect: The managers Michael and Tracey Haisf ield are here as resources on the operation of the lodge. 'There are a lot of pedestrian amenities on the site and they will be retained. The existing cabins have a lot of character and river rock fireplaces. We tried to space the buildings and make an interesting rhythm. We are using corrugated roofing. The urban cottage fabric of Aspen has changed to a larger fabric on Main Street and it has happened on every block except ours. We have 1/4 of the allowable build out and it occupies a full block. We had looked at keeping the cabins and maxiinumizing the office potential of the site. It would propose 50 parking spaces and would require eight or ten employees. Upon doing the drawings it really has a distressing scale change to it so we backed away from that option. We are proposing 13 new cabins. There are two fountains that will be visible while walking through. In order to vary some of the height of the buildings we have been proposing 1 1/2 story buildings for the two center cabins and along the back. We are flexible in our designs and the neighbors concerns. We will remove the cabin to the east #22 and would propose 12 instead of 12 5 lul PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 202 WEST FRANCIS STREET PARTIAL DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, December 14, 1994, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 Pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the second floor meeting room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by Tom and Noel Congdon requesting to demolish a portion of the existing house and to relocate the barn at 202 West Francis Street ; Lots R&S, Block 48, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Amidon at the Aspen Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St-, Aspen, CO. 920-5096. s/Joseph Krabacher. Chairman Aspen Historic Preservation Committee === Published in the Aspen Times on November 25, 1994. City of Aspen Account 4 Chek L,n 64Â£Â» wrod 11 3 zz_ . /+70-U' HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DECEMBER 14, 1994 C restored. Tom Congdon, owner: The only alternative would be to stay as we are and add one bedroom and keep fixing the thing. It is 110 years old. Donnelley: How do you plan on getting rid of the snow problems that you have created. Gretchen: This building is designed to preserve the historic buildings rather than designing a sloped roof. We will build a lot of heated french drains and will deal technically with it in another way. Jake: Does this fall under ordinance 35? Amy: Yes. Gretchen: I have no problem with going through that review process. Tom Congdon: The neighbor Morey Tobin is a good friend and we cannot destroy his yard so we will dig under the old structures and build them UP. The joists are unpealed logs laid on stone , foundations. Jake: In terms of things that you are doing to the stables and the house itself can you summarize that. Gretchen: We haven't spent a lot of time on the window design but will be glad to come back. Joe: With partial demolition we have a one step process and Jake is trying determine the scope of the project which effects the partial demolition. Tom Congdon: We need your support for the Board of adjustment. Joe: If this committee feels this is appropriate we will review it on a conceptual basis with the understanding that the applicant will come in and show us the detailing of the windows etc. on the historic portions. Les: You are saving two wonderful old buildings, reduce the site coverage 7%, an employee upstairs and a porch on the old building and get rid of a car. Chairman Joe Krabacher opened the public hearing; no comments. Public hearing closed. 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DECEMBER 14, 1994 MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC grant partial demolition approval to 202 W. Francis lots R,S, Block 48, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colo. with the following conditions: (1) That the applicant understand that this is a design review and that HPC request that the Board of Adjustment look closely at this project. We find that the variances requested are encouraged, that the Board of Adjustment grant these variances for the following reasons: (1) In opinion this is an excellent project of preservation of an historic structure and the blending of the structure with a new design. (2) That FAR is in fact being reduced. (3) An employee housing unit on an upper level is being provided which is certainly unusual in this community. (4) We find no problem with the fact that one parking space is being asked to be withdrawn and that we feel this is a strong project in the goals that we are trying to achieve as the HPC and the blending of old and new; second by Les. DISCUSSION Jake: I want to go through the variances one at a time. As I understand it you are reducing your site coverage. Gretchen: We are going from 50% to 49%. Jake: It is currently a non-conformity and you are reducing the non-conformity. The HPC supports the reduction. Jake: I will add a few thoughts for the Board of Adjustment. It should be stated in the motion that HPC approves demolition of the non-historic elements. The applicant will return for more detail review. The applicant will return for ordinance 35 review. We also need conformation of the legality of the partial demolition and interpreted by the city attorney. AMENDED MOTION: Roger amended his motion to state that we approve partial demolition of the non-historic element and as far as the other items they are inclusive except for the legality. The legality of the demolition to be finalized and reviewed by the city attorney; second by Les. All in favor, motion carries. Jake: The applicant is reducing nonconformities and improving the situation. 435 W. MAIN - L'AUBERGE - SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT PH Amy: This site was previously called the Swiss Chalet and is in the Main Street Historic District. At some point this site might 4 RECORDS OF PROCEEDINGS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DECEMBER 14,1994 Meeting was called to order by chairman Joe Krabacher with Donnelley Erdman, Les Holst, Jake Vickery, Linda Smisek, Martha Madsen, Roger Moyer and Tom Williams present. INVENTORY ROUND II Bob Hughes and Gideon Kaufman presented letters and discussed the Bavarian Lodge at 801 W. Bleeker, the Trustee Housing and Race Track. The consensus was that a legal description will be provided and the information will be brought back to the Board. The Bavarian Lodge was dropped from the inventory but the Trustee Housing and Rack Track will be added. The Colorado Midland Right-of-way was discussed and Chairman Joe Krabacher stated that a new legal should be done stating the easement should start from the middle and then so many feet on either side of that. Tony Zurcher: The tracks are going and you can barely see where the railroad was. It should be looked at in the spring. Roger: The right-of-way is part of the nordic trail system. The Board recommended to not include 1101 E. Cooper Ave., 1001 E. Hyman and 407 W. Hallam to the inventory. MOTION: Donnelley made the motion that a resolution be brought back to the board for approval; second by Roger. Passes 6 to one, Les opposed. Motion carries. Tom Williams did not vote as seven members were seated. 202 W. FRANCIS STREET, PARTIAL DEMOLITION Jake: I would like to state that I have a problem discussing this project as it is 60% demolition and our code states that you cannot go over 50%. Gretchen Greenwood: We are not touching the historic portion of the house. It is the 1960 section that needs to be demolished. Amy: The Planning Director interpreted the code and stated that we should review the partial demolition. Roger: Theirjalternative would be to pay the additional fees. Amy: They would not be able to meet those standards because as Joe said you cannot prove that the building is not structurally sound, they can't meet the standards. What would happen is that they HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE DECEMBER 14, 1994 0 would have to wait until we amend the code which holds them up for a project that we do not necessarily want to hold up. Jake: There have been a lot of people that have been in the same boat as here that had to reduce the size of their demolition. I would be willing to review it if there was some way to engineer a review that would be conditional pending legal interpretation. Joe: The applicant has to take the risk if the approval has some problems with it. Gretchen: We will take that risk. Amy: We should tack on something to the motion that states that we want it verified by the city attorney as being OK. I want to do this appropriately as it was noticed and I had phone calls. Gretchen: We truly want to preserve the old part of the structure and I brought a model to demonstrate the concept behind that; we do not want to build on top of the old buildings and do a monster home. We want to have a very strong designation between what is old and what is new. In order to do that we are asking for a site coverage variance and a few other variances and setbacks and parking. We decided to go to the Board of Adjustment for all of those variances. We hope to get your endorsement for this project as we go to the Board of Adjustment for our variances. Les: This makes sense to me. Roger: I concur. Gretchen Greenwood: The stable and 52 foot long miners cabin will be restored. The stable is 20 feet above grade to the ridge and that is the highest point that we will be going. The cabin also has a 14 foot extension. In the 60's additions were added which makes the building over its FAR. It has an existing percentage of site coverage right now of 56% and it has FAR square footage of 3,478 sqft. which is over around 200 feet. We want a completely separate architectural concept from the miners cottage. We do not want to put anything on top of the cabins. I have always discussed with Amy having some kind of flexibility with site coverage which would make for better projects in the west end. With the variation of 9% we are able to keep the house very low and able to not have to build on top of the miners cabin. I also want to point out that our site coverage is half of what is allowable. So it it a hardship on us and we do want to preserve the historic both from the inside and out,: We want to expose the inside of the buildings also and it w 3 11 be obvious what is exactly old and what is new. There is evidence that something wrapped around the house and we want to add the porch as it is a corner site. There is a window that will be 2 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 11/18/94 CASE NUMBER: HPC42-94 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2735-124-17-006 PROJECT NAME: Congdon Minor Historic Partial Demolition Project Address: 202 W. Francis . APPLICANT: Tom and Noel Congdon 303-861-8140 Applicant Address: 1300 E. 7th Ave., Denver, CO 80218 REPRESENTATIVE: Gretchen Greenwood 925-4502 Representative Address/Phone: 520 Walnut Street . Aspen, CO 81611 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: -IE 4) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 202 W. Francis Street, Partial Demolition DATE: December 14, 1994 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for partial demolition of the historic house at 202 W. Francis, the Edwin Frost house. This parcel has been included on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" since 1986. It is classified as a "supportingâ€¢1 resource. NOTE: The Board of Adjustments will hear the applicant' s request for a site coverage variance, for rear and sideyard setback variances and for waiver of one parking space on December 15th . HPC must make a recommendation to Board of Adjustments regarding that request. The applicant could achieve all but the site coverage variance through HPC if the property were Landmark Designated. Staff finds that the variances do help in achieving a fairly low impact addition (in terms of massing) to the historic structure, but recognizes that some board members are cautious about awarding setback variances. APPLICANT: Tom and Noel Congdon, represented by Gretchen Greenwood. LOCATION: 202 W. Francis, Lots R and S, Block 48, City and Townsite of Aspen. Partial Demolition PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW: No partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, established pursuant to section 7-709, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay District shall be permitted unless the partial demolition is approved by the HPc because it meets the applicable standards of Section 7-602(C). The applicant proposes to demolish 60% of the existing structure , This exceeds the Land Use Code' s definition of partial demolition. It is the finding of Staff and the Planning Director that this project may be reviewed as a partial demolition, because the additions to the original house are not historic and the intention of the demolition standards were specifically meant to protect historic structures and address negative impacts to them. It is not appropriate to consider this a total demolition, as the proposal is to remove additions and expose the original building. HPC's role is to determine whether or not the portions of the building proposed for demolition can be sacrificed without compromising the character of the resource and to insure that all negative impacts on a historic resource which result from partial demolition are minimized. It is not within the Board's power to review design elements of the new construction which do not relate directly to the demolition. Standards for Review of Partial Demolition 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation Of the structure. Response: The Inventory form describes the house as having had major alterations, including changes in materials and a number of additions which have been constructed to the east and rear of the original house. The characteristic mass and scale of the original house is still visible along West Francis Street. (See attached Sanborne map of the site in 1904.) The applicant proposes to demolish the 1970's additions and to retain and add on to the historic house and stable. The new construction is set in the same area of the existing additions and will not result in further demolition of the historic house. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic importance of the structure or structures located on the parcel. Response: The applicant intends to replace the non- original windows in the south gable with double hungs of a more authentic scale. All the windows on the west elevation are proposed to be removed, due to the building code's requirements for a structure near the property line. A double hung window is to be added on the east and the applicant proposes to wrap the existing front porch around the house. On the stable, the proposal is to add windows on the east and north and replace the skylights on the south. Staff supports these changes, but recommends the applicant further discuss the removal of the windows on the west with Building. Some exceptions can be made for historic structures. Staff does not agree that there is much evidence to support wrapping the front porch around the structure. Unfortunately, the house is on a cut-line on the 1904 Sanborne maps and is somewhat difficult to read. The architect has taken a contemporary approach to the addition, partly to help distinguish the new from the old. The height of this addition is 20', which is very compatible with the historic structure. Staff's main concern with any negative impact created as a result of the partial demolition is the size of the large array of windows immediately behind the original structure on the east elevation. The sudden change in solid-to-void relationship is somewhat incompatible with historic structure. B. Impacts on the architectural integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel. Response: Any additional demolition to the historic structure is very limited in this proposal, therefore this standard is met. ALTERNATIVES: HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the application for Partial Demolition as submitted. 2) Approve the application for Partial Demolition with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations to be offered). 4) Deny Partial Demolition approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the application with the following conditions: 1) Do not construct a wrap-around porch 2) Restudy the window array on the east in terms of its impacts on the historic structure. Additional Comments: IN I -J. 11 I- 1 119 - :44%22-4- k -1 4 - A, E-7 4 4-M - rE' 2 - 1 1 11.... 1. -0 -1 O crl 'P S - L 2 41 ILL] 113 k & 4 '=/4 P h. Ch 0 4 4 0 -4-9 0 k . 01 Cy ja - . A-'<1 Z A 1 ... i .Alj -10 4,2.1 - Tly! .1 41-5 4,0 r ,-1 : 1-- 'jifg 1 - tk! *, 10 %1 1 1 1 1-1 .-I 215 217 227 123 129 135 CP W. FRANCES ST. i 4-' W. Pipe === ==I. ==== ====== = == = === ..= =/. =. .. ===A .. 2-0 1 01 120 llc 84 .2 .4 0 F, ,/ a4/1 4 10. \ 4 .:.,im p ~202 3 0 0 -- Ul -1 1 1 1 1 --- 5--= - 2 5 4 Â£ F % %1- t' 0 0 7 1 01 0 C r / 11% J 1 .. C -~1 a 0 . Lo r~ 6 07 14,1-1 h -1-nj h % 4 1~ 0 2 k A k kl -1.. 1.- 2 \ /\1 E-71 ri F-i a A E-3 f 133>4 5 4% 0 - Ul f Ul 1 4 1 4 1 0 li -EL-- 75' \ 9 . 0-2-1_Â»Â·14 ><~* Th C Gltj 0 ~ $ < 2~ ..OLEZE=1 1-L_ <34 4 420 434 14 510 516 522 526 Q 75' [---r lilli I 0 1 %/N; 00* lob 400 IAND USE APPLICATION FORM / 3)l prdle$509=se C ON 4 CON M.(26 FDANCE 2) Project Iocation â€¢~02 W. '*~Pe,9/Fet~ LoÂ® A # 4 64000 Â¥5 GCN Â¢ -7Dwa/>RE OF AtAW (indicate street address, lot & block ramber, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning /4'- 42 4) Iot Size 6 800 69 4 4* 5) ~MpAicares teme, Maress & 26)re i 7Â»01 0 No EL CoN *00 N 1300 EAST 77M AVE. DENVEA, CO 80118 841Â· alt'.O 6) Representative's Name, Address & Rione # 8#M7-(#EN 98621NG*&00 520 WALNLCT .ST-- /MPEN %5 Â· 4501 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use - Conceptlal SPA - Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review - Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline - Conceotlial PUD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin - Final PUD V Historic Demolition Dbuntain View Plane Subdivision Historic Designation axkianiniumi zation _ Xxt/Map Amenhant (24JS Allotment Lot Spliti/Lot Line - ag ExÂ£=ption Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing stzuctures; approximate sq. ft.; rumber of bedroars; any previous approvals granted to the property). 9 ce. QqhkcACK - 9) Description of Development Application 4 le. *CO.tot - 10) Have you attathed the following? V- Respanse to Attadment 2, Minimum Submission Cbntents ~~2* Response to Attachment 3, Specific Subnission Contents 6/*- Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Applicatian NOV-11-94 FRI 12:06 ST... 4,6, PARISH LAND CO, FAX NO, 30 0934 P, 01 November 10, 1994 Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department city of Aspen To whom it may concern: This letter authorizes Gretchen Greenwood to represent Tom and Noel Congdon in the approval process for our residence located at 202 West Francis. Thank you for your help. S~~rely, EL icl Tom and Noel Congdon CONGDON RESIDENCE ZONING ANALYSIS EXISTING,PROPOSED AND ALLOWABLE ZONING REQUIREMENTS (Per Aspen Land Use Regulations) ADDRESS: 202 W. FRANCIS LOT SIZE: 6000 SQ.FT. ZONE DISTRICT: R-6 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWABLE- BEDROOMS 4 3 N/A ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT 0 1 1 PARKING 1 2 3 FLOOR AREA SO.FT. 3,478 3,240 3,240 PERCENT OF SITE COVERAGE 56% 49% 40% SITE COVERAGE SOâ€¢FT. 3,350 2,950 2,400 SIDE YARD SETBACK MINIMUM FT. VARIES SEE VARIANCE 6.66 TOTAL FT. VARIES REQUEST 15 FRONT & REAR YARD SETBACK MINIMUM FT. 10 SEE VARIANCE 10 TOTAL FT. VARIES REQUEST 30 HEIGHT FT. ABOVE GRADE VARIES TO 20 FT. VARIES TO 20 FT. 25 FT. r SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear. fully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"x17-, OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"*17" format. APPLICANT: 7Om A NOEL CoNWODN ADDRESS: 05& W Â· FRANGI S ZONE DISmICT: A-9 LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): EXISTING FAR:, . 3,+78 99Â· # ALLOWABLE FAR: i Z 40 9.19. PROPOSED FAR:' ' *,02,40 :,9. 10. EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: 5+ 3 90 PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: *44 4 0/0 EXISTING % OFOPEN SPACE (Commercial): PROPOSED%OFOPENSPACE(Commer.): EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princinal Blda.: 20 #FÂ· / Accessory Bldg: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: PrinciDal Bldg.: % 0 1~9 /Accessory Blda: PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: 05'6 EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: J SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: ~ to Front: Front: Rean Rear: Rear: Side: Side: Side: Combined Front/Rear: \44<,dr5 Combined Frt/Rr: Combined Front/Rear: Â£ EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ PN=r D F #04 frE neme- s rrS ENCROACHMENTS: ove:g pr w/Â£ VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eligible for Landmarks Only: character Comoatibility lindina must be made by HPC): FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: - SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commerdal): d Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): i Combined Frt./Rr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): 1 HISTORIC PARTIAL DEMOLITION APPLICATION ATTACHMENT 2 1. Attached please find a letter from the applicants, Tom and Noel Congdon, stating that Gretchen Greenwood is authorized to act on their behalf. 2. The street and legal address of the proposed development is as follows: 202 W. Francis St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Lots R and S, Block 48, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado 3. A Certificate of Title will be submitted under separate cover. 4. Attached please find the Vicinity map locating the subject parcel. 5. The proposed development includes a new addition and the restoration of an existing miner's cabin and stable on the property. Currently, the historic miner's cabin is not recognizable due to additions that were added to the residence in the 1970's. At that time of construction, there was no review process that encouraged the restoration and delineation of an historic building to a newer addition. In this proposal, the miner's cabin, that sits at the south west of the lot, and the stable, that sits at the very northeast part of the property, will be restored and exposed to its historic roots. The proposed addition will replace the construction that was built between the two historic buildings. This new addition will be a distinct architectural difference from the architecture of the Victorian miner's cabin and stable. Our goal in this proposed design, is to expose the original miner's cabin, both inside and outside of the building. The miner's cabin will remain in its original location. The 52 foot length of the old building makes it impossible to be moved for the addition of a new foundation. Therefore, the old wood foundation will be removed, while the building is underpinned and a new foundation will be added, by hand digging the excavation, underpinning the existing building and pouring a new foundation. The roof of the original cabin will be restored, and there are no new structures being added to this roof. The only attachment will be at the eave line of the east side roof eave, where a new roof from the adjacent structure will meet the eave line and a new drainage system will be added, to allow these two roof planes to drain water. This detail will not be seen from the street. Two double hung windows will be added to the south elevation of the miner's cabin, replacing a newer out of scale window. The windows that exist on the west elevation will be removed, and there will be no windows added to this west side. Due to the close proximity of the property line to the west wall, windows along that side are not allowed per Uniform Building Codes. Skylights will be added to the west roof toward the rear of the roof structure. The structure to the east of the miner's cabin that resembles the old miner's cabin, with the same size footprint and roof line will be removed, to further expose the true old building. There is evidence that the existing porch used to wrap around the side of the building to the east of the cabin. The porch will be restored around the side along with an old double hung window that existed on the east side of the building. The old stable at the rear of the property will remain in its original location. A slab on grade foundation system was added to the structure at some point in its history. The east elevation will remain as it exists now, with the old barn doors restored and new windows added for the new use of the building. New windows on the east and north side of the building will be added. Existing bubble skylights along the south roof will be removed and flat skylights that follow the slope of the building will be added. The new addition will attach to the stable at one corner of the building, not affecting the original form of the stable building. Drawings illustrating the proposed development and the proposed partial demolition and relocation are as follows: 1. Existing Survey of Site: Including Areas to be demolished 2. Existing South and East Elevation 3. Existing North and West Elevation 4. Existing Main Level Floor Plan 5. Proposed Site Plan: Illustrating the requested Setback variances 6. Proposed South Elevation 7. Proposed East Elevation 8. Proposed North Elevation 9. Proposed West Elevation 10. Proposed Main Level Floor Plan 11. Proposed Upper Level Floor Plan 12. Proposed 1/4" Scale Studio Accessory Dwelling Unit 13. An 1/8" architectural model will be presented at the HPC meeting. Specific Submission Contents for the Partial Demolition is attached as Attachment 3. The compliance with Partial Demolition Review Standards of this proposal is attached to this Development application as Attachment 4b. In addition, to the HPC application, the Board of Adjustment Variance request application is enclosed for the review and endorsement of the HPC for this development plan. The drawings that will be submitted to the Board of Adjustments are the same as drawings that are enclosed in the HPC application. ATTACHMENT 3 Specific Submission Contents: Application for Partial Demolition 1. The name of the structure proposed for partial demolition the Congdon residence. 2. The structure that is proposed for partial demolition was built in the 1960's and 70's. The old miner's cabin that will be restored was built in the 1890's and the stable that will be restored was also built in the 1890's. 3. A report from the licensed engineer regarding the construction plan will be submitted under separate cover. 4. An economic feasibility report that provides: A. The estimated market value of the property is $800,000.00. B. There is no economic feasibility to reuse the part of the structure that was built in the 1960's. It is feasible to reuse the old Miner's Cabin and The old Stable. C. There have not been any appraisals made on the property in many years. D. There is no information available that determines whether the property does yield a reasonable return on investment. 5. A development plan is being submitted as part of this application. ATTACHMENT 4b Review Standards: Application for Partial Demolition 1. This development plan minimizes the amount of demolition to the old buildings. The demolition of the newer part of the building that is currently between the old buildings, does not distinguish the old buildings. Through the demolition and redevelopment of the old buildings, the miner's cabin and stable will be historically visual, while the addition between these two old buildings will be of more modern design, thus further delineating the old from the new. 2. The development plan mitigates the following: a. The major part of the demolition to this parcel will be the structure that was built in the 1970's, between the two old buildings. b. The architectural integrity of the structures are maintained due to this development. PROPOSED VARIANCES FOR 202 W. FRANCIS ST Description of Development Proposal The development at 202 W. Francis includes a new addition and the restoration of a Victorian miner' s cabin and stable that was built on the property in the late 1800's. Currently , the historic miner's cabin and stable buildings are not recognizable due to additions that were added to the old buildings in the early 1970's. At that time of construction, there was no review process that encouraged the restoration and delineation of an historic building to a newer addition. In this development, we propose to expose the old miner's cabin and stable to its historic roots, both inside and outside the buildings. This will be accomplished by removing the non historic additions from the original historic buildings and by rebuilding a new addition between these two old structures, that does not compete or swallow up the old buildings. The proposed new addition will be a distinctly different architectural style from the Victorian style of the miner's cabin and stable. The result will be a strong distinction between what is old and what is new. The miner's cabin, which sits at the western side of the property will remain in its historical location. It will also retain its historic height. The stable which sits at the north east corner of the property currently sits outside the property line. The stable will also remain in that existing historical location and retain its historical height. A concrete slab on the existing grade is the current foundation system for the stable. Therefore, it is impossible to relocate the building. The building will be remodelled in its existing location. It is the intention of our overall design to accomplish two goals. The first is not to allow the addition that is added on to the rear, to swallow up the miner's cabin. We have purposely designed the addition to the north of the miner's cabin, to prevent any construction from being built on top of the old roof. The second goal is not to create a tall house, that would be considered a "monster house". We have purposely kept the new roof height to the same roof height as the stable, in order to maintain a small scale presence from the street. cont. Page 2 The result of this development plan will be a 3 bedroom house, one car garage, carport and 1 studio accessory dwelling unit (A.D.U.). The following drawings are attached for your review: 1. Existing Survey of Site: Including Areas to be demolished. 2. Existing South and East Elevation 3. Existing North and West Elevation 4. Existing Main Level Floor Plan 5. Proposed Site Plan: Illustrating the requested Setback variances. 6. Proposed South Elevation 7. Proposed East Elevation 8. Proposed North Elevation 9. Proposed West Elevation 10. Proposed Main Level Floor Plan 11. Proposed Upper Level Floor Plan 12. Proposed 1/4" Scale Studio Accessory Dwelling Unit 13. An 1/8" architectural model will be presented at the HPC meeting. In order to develop this property without losing the historical identity and importance of the miner's cabin and stable, the following variances are requested. VARIANCES REQUESTED 1. VARIANCE OF 9% ON ALLOWABLE SITE COVERAGE TO 49% TOTAL Percent of Allowable Site Coverage: 40% or 2,400 sq.ft. Percent of Existing Site Coverage: 56% or 3,350 sq.ft. Percent of Proposed Site Coverage: 49% or 2,950 sq.ft. cont. Page 3 The hardship justification for granting this variance is due to the existing historic buildings on the property. This proposal specifically preserves the buildings in their entirety, including the roofs and overhangs of the old miner's cabin and stable. There is no construction proposed for the top of these existing buildings. The roof of the old miner's cabin is only 15 feet above grade, which could allow for a significant addition on top of this structure. The proliferation of huge additions on top of these modest miner's cabins in the West End, are not only out of scale, but the history and architectural significance of the miner's buildings are removed forever. By allowing a 1 0% variance on the allowable site coverage, the miner's cabin can be preserved as well as the stable, and the architectural heritage of this West End property can be maintained. In addition, this property as existing, has a total site coverage of 3,350 square feet. This development proposal will reduce that number by 400 square feet. Because this property sits on a corner, the site coverage impact is minimal. There is another 19 feet of lawn from the property line to both the paved areas of First Street and Francis Street. The preservation methods supported by the Historic Preservation Commission and this application, supports minimal demolition to old buildings, when new additions are built on to these structures. By allowing the site coverage variance, there is no need to have to add on top of these old buildings and they will be able to be preserved. This proposal improves the existing site coverage condition and the historic integrity of the miner's cabin and stable, as well as the architectural heritage of the West End. cont. Page 4 2. VARIATION ON THE TOTAL FRONT AND REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT Allowable Total Front and Rear Yard Setback: 30 feet with a minimum requirement of 10 feet. Existing Total Front and Rear Yard Setback: The existing total front and rear yard setbacks are non conforming. The dimensions vary from a total of 24 feet to 11'-6". Proposed Total Front and Rear Yard Setback: The proposed variance request is the following: A variation of 8'-6" on the total front and rear yard requirement for a distance of 10 feet; a variation of 4'-0" on the total front and rear yard requirement for a distance of 18'- 6" for the rear property line. These dimensions are illustrated on the drawing labelled Site Plan, Exhibit B. The hardship justification for granting this variance is due to the fact that the old miner's cabin has always been historically located in its present position on the property. This location will be preserved as part of the historic restoration of this proposal. The miner's cabin has always been located from 11'-6" to 16'-0" from the south property line. The 52'-0" length of the cabin makes it impossible to move the building on top of a new foundation, therefore the building will remain where it is, and a new foundation will be built underneath it. As has been outlined in this proposal, the new addition will be built to the north of the miner's cabin and will not encroach on the old miner's cabin. The new addition meets the rear yard minimum requirement of 10 feet. The stable will not be relocated within the property line, as the building sits on a concrete structural slab foundation. This proposal calls for the demolition of a building that is presently attached to the stable. This non historic building will be removed, thus reducing the non conformity and encroachment of part of the building. No setback variances are requested for this part of the building, as the building will be remodelled in its existing location. cont. Page 5 3. VARIATION ON THE TOTAL SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT Allowable Side Yard requirement: Minimum side yard requirement is 5'-0" and 6.66"(for a corner lot at the side yard). Total requirement of both side yards is 15 feet. Existing Side Yard requirement: Side yard along west property line is 9" to 4' -0". Side yard at the stable is 0'-0". Proposed Side Yard Variation: The variation is as follows: A Total Side Yard setback variation of 10'-0" on the total Side Yard setback requirement, for a distance of 7'-0" at the east property line at the stable building. These dimensions are on the drawings labelled Site Plan, Exhibit B. The hardship justification for granting this variance is due to the historical location of the stable on the property. The stable has maintained its position on the northeast corner of the property since it was built. No side yard setback is being requested for the west setback at the miner's cabin, because the building is not being moved or changed from its original location. In addition, no side yard setback is being requested for the portion of the stable that sits on the east property line for a distance of 10 feet, because the building is remaining in an existing location. cont. Page 6 4. VARIATION ON THE OFF STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS Allowable Off Street Parking requirement: 1 per bedroom Existing Off Street Parking: Total number of existing bedrooms are 4. Total existing parking spaces is 1. Proposed Off Street Parking: Total number of proposed bedrooms is 3. Total proposed parking spaces is 2. A variation of 1 space is requested. The hardship justification for granting this variation on the parking requirement is again due to the preservation of the historic quality of the property. The property originally had an east lawn. Through the removal of the non historic additions on the old structures, the historic lawn will be restored. It is encouraged by the Aspen zplanning Department that garages and carports be accessed off the alley. This proposal concentrates the parking to alley at the rear of the property, where the garage and carport are being developed. In order to meet the parking requirement, parking would have to be developed on the east historic lawn, and this would destroy the historical integrity of a corner lawn for the historic residence as well as for the West End neighborhood. The off street parking provided in this proposal is increased from the present number of one parking space to a total of two spaces. In addition, the need for more parking at this property is less because it is a corner lot. SUMMARY OF VARIANCE REQUESTS FOR 202 W. FRANCIS 1. A VARIATION ON THE SITE COVERAGE REQUIREMENT OF 40% BY 7% TO A TOTAL SITE COVERAGE OF 50% OR 3,000 SQUARE FEET. 2. A VARIATION ON THE TOTAL FRONT AND REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT AT THE REAR PROPERTY LINE FOR THE FOLLOWING DIMENSIONS: A. 8'-6" FOR A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET AT THE REAR PROPERTY LINE, AND 4'-0" FOR A DISTANCE OF 19 FEET AT THE REAR PROPERTY LINE. 3. A VARIATION ON THE TOTAL REQUIREMENT FOR SIDE YARD SETBACK AT THE EAST PROPERTY LINE AT THE STABLE, FOR THE FOLLOWING DIMENSION: A. 10'-0" FOR A DISTANCE OF 7'-0" ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE AT THE STABLE. 4. A VARIATION OF ONE (1) PARKING SPACE ON THE OFF STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS. .. County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY } SS. POSTING OF A PUBLIC HEARING State of Colorado } FOR A PITKIN COUNTY DEVELOPMENT PERMIT The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: 1, 8*27atteN <PRE E N Woon being or representing an Applicant for a Pitkin County Development Permit, personally certi fy that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as notice of the public hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subj ect property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the sign was posted and visible continuously from the 3cfÂ·/> day of N[Wa,685~ , 141~1, to the /5+h day of PECâ‚¬mbe-Â·r , 1994& (Must be posted for at least 15 days before the public hearing) . LIT\ L J l.. Applj,tant's Sig,Apdre V L./ . I Subscr'bed and sworn tg before me this 19.5-4 by ,2LYLof -2=21-~,q WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL - a,Z - My commission expires: ->flll a , l .14 4 - * )40 - Â¥-1/00'AAP) 4-1- Not~ Public' s Signature l - S 04 2 -7/L'< 1,ta.an_ Address CÂ»Â¤n J CDR LU- t< ./-4 1 County of Pitkin > > SS. AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY State of Colorado > PUBLIC MAILING FOR A PITKIN COUNTY DEVELOPMENT PERMIT The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: I. 4 Re-1-châ‚¬,1-1 (>ftâ‚¬flot' 006~ being or representing an Applicant for a Pitkin County Development Permit, personally certify that a public mailing to all landowners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property, 15 days prior to the hearing. 40. 4--11 Ap#licant' s dignature U V Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14 day oflkÂ».4,4, 1914 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: -h/Lit Q L Q,94 CÂ»ywe~ K flu-+1 Â· ~ No~ ry Public' s Signaturd SU (t d. -h/44 - Address Ctof#1 Co 314(/ Saturday-Sunday, November 26-27, 1994 â€¢ The Aspen Times 154 9 Public Notice PUBUC NOTICE the property encumbered by said Deed of Any or all of the above described lands may 84 West of the 6th P.M.; 855 Gibson. Owner: PUBUC NOTICE . 7 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Bill McDonough Trust. be exchanged If values are equal. If the values Ralph & Lynne Whipple RE: 202 WEST FRANCISÂ·STREET 1~ARTIAL has Illed a Petition with the Basalt Water Con- THE LIEN CREATED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST are unequal, either party tnay equallze the val- Northeast part ol Lot 1, Sunny Park SubdiviÂ· DEMOUTION AND RELOCATION : servancy District requesting the inclusion into BEING FORECLOSED MAY NOT BE A FIRST ues by making a cash payment. Tms payment sion; 101 Park Ave. Owner: Dieter Bibblg. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pib;ic hear- said District of the following described lands UEN. may not exceed 25 percent of the value of the Lot 1, Block 2, Riverside Addition and all that Ing will be held on Wednesday, Decemfer 14, located In the County of Pitkin, State of Col- THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that 1 lands transferred out of Federal ownership. part of Regent St. lying southerly of and adja 1994, at a meeting to bedin at 5:00 pm hlore orado, to wit: will, at 10 0'clock a.m.,on the date of December Floodplains and/or wetlands may be involved, cent to said Lot 1 projected southerly to the the Aspen Historic Preservation Committie in A tract of land situated in Lot 15, Section 9 14, 1994, at the South front door, Pitkin County and may fall under the requirements of Execu- southerly line ol Regent St. Also the northerly the second Iloor meeting room, City Hall, 130 S. and Lot 4, Section 16, Township 9 South, Range Courthouse, 506 East Main St., Aspen, Col- tive Orders 11988 and 11990. I5' of Lots 9, 10, 11 and the northerly 15' 01 the Gatena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an 85 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Pitkin orado, sell at public auction to the highest and Persons claiming such properties or having westerly hall of Lot 12, Block 2, Riverside Addi application submitted by Tom and Noel Cong- County, Colorado, described as tollows: best bidder for cash, the real property valid objections to this proposed exchange tion; 106 Park Ave Owner: Tim Mooney, don requesting to demolish a portion of the Beginning at a point whence the 1/4 Corner described above, and all Interest of said must file their claims or objections with James A tract of land In Section 7-10Â·84, being a part existing house and to relocate the barn at 202 between said Section 9 and 16 bears S63Â°33'E Grantor, the heirs and assigns of said Grantor, Webb, Forest Supervisor, San Juan National 01 Tract 40, East Aspen Addition & the Sunset West Francis Street; Lots R & S, Block 48, City 1,015.80 teet; thence S20Â°14'W 615.22 teel to the tor the purpose of paying the indebtedness pro Forest, 701 Camino Del Rio, Durango, Colorado Lode, U.S.M.S. No. 5310, and also sometimes and Townsite of Aspen. For turther Information, center of the Roaring Fork River: thence vided in said Note and Deed of Trust, attorneys' 81301, no later than 45 days from the first date described as part of Lots 1.2 & 3, Block 5 and contact Amy Amtdon at the Aspen Pitkin Plan- S67Â°49'E 85.73 leet along the center of the Roar- fees, and the expenses of sale, and will deliver of publication of this notice. part of Lots 3&4, Block 6, and a part of Queen ning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO. 920- ing Fork River to the confluence with the center to the purchaser(s) a Certificate of Purchase, Published In The Aspen Times on November St., Hughes Addition; 935 King St. Owner: Ernst 5096. of Woody Creek; thence N62Â°05'E 67.09 feet all as provided by law. 4,11,18 and 25, 1994. Kappell. s/Joseph Krabacher, Chairman along the center of Woody Creek; thence THE LAW FIRM OF BLOOM MURR & ACCO. A tract of land In Section 18, Township 10 Aspen Historic Preservat~on Committee N45Â°06'E 188.40 feet along the center of Woody MAZZO, P.C. IS ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT A PUBLICATION NOTICE South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M.: Aspen Published In The Aspen Times on November Creek; thence N16Â°46'E 74.15 feet along the cen- DEBT AND ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED Notice is hereby given that the Forest Ser- Grove Cemetery. Owner: c/o Ramona Markalu- 25,1994. . ter of Woody Creek; thence N36Â°09'E 56.10 feet WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. vice, United States Department of Agriculture, nas along the center of Woody Creek; thence Date: October 25,1994 ts considering an exchange 01 land and inter- A tract 01 land situated in the NWI/4 of Sec- N43'21'E 34.16 feet along the center of Woody Thomas Cart Oken, Public Trustee ests in land with Robert D. LIndner Ranches tion 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of.j PUBUC NOTICE Creek; thence N54Â°56'E 28.11 feet along the cen- Pltkin County State of Colorado under the authority of the General Exchange the 6th P.M.; Red Butte Cemetery. Owner: c/o RE: CHARLIE & WINSTON SUBDIVISION ter of Woody Creek; thence North 119.97 leet; First Publication Date: November 4, 1994 Act 01 1922 as amended by the Federal Land Jane Stapleton. EXEMPTION FOR A LOT SPLIT ' thence N34Â°42'E 114.92 teet; thence N71Â°58'W Last Publication Date: December 2, 1994 Policy and Management Act of 1976. The lands A tract of land situated In the east 1/2 of Sec- NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a' public hear- 237.38 feet to the point ot beginning. By: Judy James, Deputy Public Trustee under the jurisdiction of the Forest Service that tion 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West 01 Ing will be held on Monday,, December 12,1994 Sald Petition shall be heard at the regular Joseph A. Murr, Esq. are being considered for exchange are the 6th P.M., and In the west 1/2 of Section 12, at a meeting to begin Mt 5:00 pm before the meeting of the Board ot Directors ot said Dis- Bloom Murr & Accomazzo, P.C. described as: T.37 N., R.3 W., NMPM, HInsdale Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th Aspen City Council, City Council Chambers, trict on December 12, 1994, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. 410 17th Street, Suite 2400 County, CO.,Sec. 14: NE1/4 NWI/4, Sec. 22: Lot P.M.; 101 & 220 Puppy Smith. Owner: Aspen City Hall, 130 S. Galena, Aspen to consider an at the Days Inn, 950 Cowen Dr., Carbondale, Denver, Colorado 80202 5, Sec. 23: NW1/4 SWIM, Lot 5; T.36 N., R.3 W., Center for Environmental Studies application submitted by VEJ & AID Partner- Colorado, when and where all persons Interest- Published In The Aspen Times on November NMPM, Archuleta County, CO., Sec. 2: A portion A tract ot land In Section 12, Township 10 ship, LLC, c/o Andrew Doremus, 85 Glen Gary ed shall appear and show cause, In writing, why 4, 11, 18, 25 and December 2, 1994 of Lot 1. Total acreage Is 1 10 acres, more or South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.MI: the Aspen Drive, Aspen, CO, requesting approval of a Sub- said Petition should not be granted. The failure less, All federal lands are located in the San Meadows property is bounded by Meadows division Exemption for a Lot Split to create two of any person to file a written COUNTY COURT, Juan National Forest, Hinsdale and Archuleta Road, Gillespie Street, Roaring Fork Road and 6,000 square foot lots. The property Is located objection shall be taken as an assent to the PITK]N COUNTY, COLORADO Counties, CO. the RoarIng Fork River, In Aspen, CO; Aspen at Lots F, G, H & 1, Block 43, City and Townsite Inclusion of the above described lands within Case No. 94C304 The Lindner lands are described as: T.34 N., Meadows Trustee Housing, Chalet Ilousing & of Aspen. For further Information, contact Kim the District. Written objections may be filed in PUBUC NOTICE R.4 W., NMPM, Archuleta County, CO., Sec. 20: Riding Ring. Owners: The Aspen Institute, Inc., Johnson at the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, advance of said meeting by mailing or delivery IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR THE A portion of the SW 1/4 SE1/4, Section 29: the Music Associates of Aspen, the Aspen Cen- 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920-5100. to the Basalt Water Conservancy District at 302 CHANGE OF NAME OF: NWI/4NE1/4; T.41 N., R.10 W., NMPM, Dolores ter for Physics, and Savanah Limited Partner- s/John Bennett, Mayor Eighth Street, Suite 310, Glenwood Springs, Col- Nancy Lee Dobson, Petltioner. County, CO., A portion of Sections 1 and 6. ship. Aspen City Co(inell orado 81601 . Public Notice Is hereby given that by an Total acreage Is 1 19, more or less. At! National Northeast 1/4 ot Section 11, Township 10 Published In the Aspen Times on November BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT Order of the County Court 01 County, Colorado, Forest System lands are located In the San Juan South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M.; Maroon 25, 1994. By: s/Barbara MIck entered on November 2, 1994, in the above-enti- National Forest. If additional nonfederal lands Creek Bridge on the Highway 82 right-of-way. Barbara Mick, Secretary tied action, the name of Nancy Lee Dobson was are necessary to equallze the exchange, lands Owner: Colorado Department of Transporta- Published in The Aspen Times on November 18, changed to Puja Dhyan Parsons. in Pltkin and Gunnison Counties, Colorado will tion. PUBUC NOTICE '. 25 and December 2, 1994. Nancy B. Adams, Clerk of the Court/Deputy be acquired from Mid-Continent Resources In: A tract of land Including portions of Lots A-1 RE: 435 WEST MAIN STREET CONCE)TUAL Clerk T.9S., R.89 W.. 6th PM, Pltkin County, Colorado, less the south 20' of Lots A-C, Block 32; Lots A-1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NOTICE OF PUBUC TRUSTEF.'S SALE Published In The Aspen Ttmes November 11, Sees. 31, 32, or 33; T.10 S., R.89 W., 6th PM, and O-S of Block 39; Lots H&1 and part of F, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hear- No.9+19 18 and 25, 1994. Pitkin and Gunntson Counties, Colorado, Sees. Block 47: and Lots K.0 and P-S, Block 54: all In ing will be held on Wednesday, December 14, To Whom It May Concern: This Notice Is 3,6,7,8,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,25 or 36. the City and Townsite ot Aspen: known as the 1994, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 P.M. before given with regard to the lollowing described NOTICE OF FINAL PAYMENT Any or all 01 the above described lands may Midland Railroad Right-of-Way. Owners: the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee In Deed of Trust: After thirty (30) days from November 11, be exchanged if values are equal. If the values Thomas Cleary, Paul Young 111, Michael and the second floor meeting room, City Hall, 130 S. Original Grantor of Deed of Trust (Borrower) 1994, City of Aspen Water Department, Owner, are unequal, either party may equalize the val- Sharon Flack, Randolph Marten, Andrew McK- Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an Ronald P. Wallace and Stace Yater-Wallace will pay to Condon Construction, Inc., Contrac- ties by making a cash payment. This payment elvey, Walter Paepcke Life Insurance Trust, Fer- application submitted by ALH Holdings Compa- Original Beneficiary of Deed ol Truit Bruce J. tor, the full balance due on the project, Tity of may not exceed 25 percent of the value 01 the nando Gonzalez Parra, Ramon Gonzalez and ny requesting approval of Conceptual Develop- Shipman, Inc. and American Wine Merchants Aspen Water Department, Aspen Mountain lands transferred out of Federal ownership. Margarita Parra, Kitty and Walter Sherwin, ment Review to add several new cablns tor Current owner of the evidence of debt Tank Dralnline", Specification No. 980AWT06. Floodplains and/or wetlands may be involved, Mark and Jennifer Sherwin, and Staspâ‚¬n Limit- lodge use. 435 West Main Street Is located on secured by the Deed ol Trust Bruce J. Shipman. All persons having claims for labor, rentals, ser- and may fall under the requirements of Execu- ed Partnership. Lots A-1, Block 38, City and Townsite of Aspen. Inc. and American Wine Merchants vlees, or materials furnished under this Con- live Orders 11988 and 11990. OTHER For further intormation, contact Amy Amldon Date of Deed of Trust August 14, 1990 tract, who shall not have been paid therefore, Persons claiming such properties or having Lots 1, 2, 13 & 14, Block 9, Eames Addition; at the Aspen Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Gale- Recording Date of Deed of Trust March 20. shall present the same to the Owner in writing valid objections to this proposed exchange 720 S. Aspen. Owner: Holland House Ski Lodge. na St., Aspen, CO. 920Â·5096. 1991 and verified prior to date specified above, or must file their claims or objections with Jo Lot 1, Anderson Subdivision; 1101 E. Cooper. s/Joseph Krabacher, Chairman County of Recording PitkIn the Owner shall be free of all liabilities for Bridges, Pagosa District Ranger, San Juan Owner: Albert & Edwin Anderson. Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Reception No. ol Recorded Deed of Trust attempting to obtain payment to such persons National Forest, P.O. Box 310, Pagosa Springs, Lot 3, Aspen Mountain PUD; 915 S. MIll St. Published In the Aspen Times on November 331164 by the Contractor. CO., 81147, within 45 days after date of the first Owner: Savanah Limited Partnership. 25, 1994. Book and Page of Recorded Deed of Trust Published In The Aspen Times November 11, publication of this notice. Lot 1, Oden Lot Split; Aspen Brewery Ruins. 1. ....,1 9. 1.0. P, i hlk, h~,1 In The Agnell Timeg_in Nnvember Owner: Oden & Comoanv. Â¥ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CASE #94-16 TOM & NOEL CONGDON BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 196 2, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the SECOND FLOOR MEETING ROOM, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: Date: DECEMBER 15, 1994 Time: 4:00 p.m. Owner for Variance: Appellant for Variance: Name: TOM & NOEL CONGDON GRETCHEN GREENWOOD, ARCH. Address: 1300 EAST 7TH AVE DENVER, COLO. 80218 Location or description of property: 202 WEST FRANCIS, LOTS R & S, BLOCK 48 Variance Requested: PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE R-60 ZONING CATEGORY. SEC.8 5-201(4). FRONT YARD REQUIRED SETBACKS ARE 10 FEET, TOTAL OF 30 FEET. SEC.5-201(5). SIDE YARD SETBACK IS 5 FEET MINIMUM, TOTAL 15 FEET. SEC 5-201(6) MINIMUM SITE COVERAGE IS 40% OR 2,400 SQUARE FEET. PARKING REQUIRED IS 1 SPACE PER BEDROOM. APPLICANT APPEARS TO BE REQUESTING THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES: (SEE ATTACHED) Will applicant be represented by counsel: Yes: No: X The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Jan Carney Deputy City Clerk 1. A VARIATION ON THE SITE COVERAGE REQUIREMENT OF 40% BY 10% TO A TOTAL SITE COVERAGE OF 50% OR 3,000 SQUARE FEET. 2. A VARIATION ON THE TOTAL FRONT AND REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT AT THE REAR PROPERTY LINE FOR THE FOLLOWING DIMENSIONS: A. 8'-6" FOR A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET AT THE REAR PROPERTY LINE, AND 4'-0" FOR A DISTANCE OF 19 FEET AT THE REAR PROPERTY LINE. 3. A VARIATION ON THE TOTAL REQUIREMENT FOR SIDE YARD SETBACK AT THE EAST PROPERTY LINE AT THE STABLE, FOR THE FOLLOWING DIMENSION: A. 10'-0" FOR A DISTANCE OF 7'-0" ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE AT THE STABLE. 4: A VARIATION OF ONE (1) PARKING SPACE ON THE OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS. r . . 7 0 --21 - -'A :-7- / 1 .$).* * .. t. - LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED A SURVEY CONTROL CM TY MONUMENT I UTILITY BOX MANHOLE 1 0 WATER VALVE CUT UTILITY POLE DECIDUOUS TREE 0 WOOD FENCE METAL FENCE CONIFER TREE A NO TITLE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED 4 POSTED ADDRESS. -202- CP + SPOT ELEVATION l 1. j 4-1 k 4 4.. LIC ft. k. k 3 t + 4 CERTIFICATION 4 JOHN HOWORTH, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM FIELD NOTES OF A SURVEY PREFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION DURING Al X-:Der , 1994 THi S SURVEY VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED. SIGNED THI 4_132__DAY OF Ak.)6O5V , 1994 94 vidijo JOAN U .OWORT, PLS 25947 2 U aH/.-PE-t> t-R E.r- 1 #DI C~-red, ,~ 7Forme:+P Dll 1 Dp i H 2 9:'2'T-FF= i rrT- DEPOS!,TED THIS___ DAY OF , 1994, IN BOOK OF THE COUNTY CLERK S LAND SURVEY PLATS/RIGHT OF WAY SURVEYS AT PAGE____ AS RECEPTION NUMBER , THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT OF PAVEMENT -7) CURB - COMPLIES WITH SECTION 38-51-i 02 COLORADO R&VISED STATUES. AH/-P~ t-RX, AL /gl=oee pr-rcH 1 N 2 SECT'ON !2, TOWNSHIP IO SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P M. 1 14 7165,0-T-00Â£Â» . 44.~.OTI NG H '07Â£='R' a. COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER *U I LP I NG 137 FEÂ·M /- 1 IN Â»UDLE>- Cl:~59 *~70Â·91 ING INC>larrEA>- 0*141-11.46:, DUIL-PING 51 08. PE,MOL1014&1> FDMVI/NG:Â·1+F-y \217- / /// 0 --Â·pd CITY MONUMENT Sw # CORNER BLOCK 55 BL ILD ING PERMIT SURVEY FRAA L /L, r. - oF - <1 LOTS R AND S, BLOCK 48, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITK{N COUNTY COLORADO. , CONTAIN;NG 6,000 SO FT ./- 0, PREPARED BY - I + ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, IF f 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET , ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITH+N THGEEI YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER 9UCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION PHONE/FAX (303) 925-3816 BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN ~~ W YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE i DATE JOB CERT IF I CAT ION IS VO ID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE ~'~ 8/94 24209 SURVEYOR. - h L 5.64.. 24 + A . . I 4 . C : . 0 .. . ... . I tr I . 0 W # .. * 1 : P.A. e I . 0140:110*th 0. . . I. e I e n e n .0 .0 2 r .0 . .. .. .-h: 2 0 4.1.4 .4 ." 0 : 'D; . - . ~L:12 J .1.1- 1 1. , 981144-rop'( |62~02Â£ S AND STRUCT122 \ FIGURE 111.2 ---1-* \tz:=1- - LEGEND -0- 11986 UPD 1 E=*Rlignal.Â§10!9110[12 ASPEN, COL . not yet desi,mted o . 1 desionated I . 1 -0 - . I 1 Eal=L==1. -:i not yet designated a / de-,6 0 - I I 2433 7 15$1-\ not yet designated O 0 200 -0 I 1 EAK,TrialiSIKBZMDISIBICID A . 1 a 3.west bleeker/halarn street !102EZIMil~111:sUm2~81Â¤1 4.h-m lake . 0.-Ill j . Scommunity church 999 61,1 1 . . I - . '716 - tal. W. PheAt c/S .. 1. li.1,1 Yal ........ \ . I ..-- ( LOAN ek op L-. 4 . n 1...... .1 . 11 11.1 1 .lit. . 1. I 7.0- .....1 .-I/ --* /1,1-1 6.6 U -2 -1111/113 1 1 ' i irtilit -- ME 0 ?Rcze) Frvâ€¢r-â€¢â€¢1!â€¢r rrÂ· '**!: ui-U. mIUm}'=if mwmÂ·.,b. 1. :: ' ..i.i"110 â€¢d! . 1 - . 1 b <In' [1:m @1311] I -- IrrrnÂ·r./1 I .:, [6WH!;,3:WHI? diuttiu [mpio mulll[ inwol 1. Igilim JIm n 1,1 lilifir[[2!IÂ·lizi. ligui liu nui le:lilild.GIZE' .:22 Â· t . 11 , --- nT,IT,T,T [Eiggllil#igi ifigim.[iNi] {([WIGI 1~ . a,-aut-22'i- - . Mil.Ki mâ€¢in - u.~npoll.J..,,~-. j!!IImiEiNgWRB.Mam"Qgpi - - - Lglg-1.J~ â€¢ -3 .. Â· [[U[80 [Imlmt'Imu:*1Â·mutim Â·mwlm INWEI, mi*,willlÂ® : -. 2-. i fir' =1 - Â®Jim &1"141 111'Â»akmmwimallitl INQY-11. U]Lit:J.4,811111Â· Uill:R , 7111' 111~1!i -- - 27 - - N, o <Mce ' M i.0 lii,E J 1-711@E~%1~- 1@i 0[Ullth ullitiLLI' Ulliti[LI.luttlitlf "1 :Lie*ttÂ·WIt l_Z_J Wam I e.. mwirq .. UN"DIJ. -9.*11 'Emlip.=.=]I *im@-mili.mÂ®!1Â· --- - -01 F irmr,TTE' 0. MxmailmUITII ~ 4 immi'2.Ell Mi -11'1111111. Â¢ I -DREL lilli .BimIN] WIM 1 . -- -4...1 12om mai-Â·m,Wn Im[[0 IIIE{Pl{Ell - . 1 . - '6>xv ' ic>~ a itifoit .... nitm .:-r</Eb/- . NG>b.Â©it- -Â£,1 2 'Uu,1 - . N/A X09*V- - .i- 1/ 1- 00/r , 1.f- 1 . I lifiy-- -- p 0 --- 111.19 -------- / 1 . <. 07<14'TINc. buP *r/Â» P.5 #lzE i Ne O 1-7 0 IN 140* ap- BIN 1 ~, 420 4/* -E--3,1.-17; f 1 - - I -- Gretchen ~r _eit-N -=------2=---===1 1-g -/ \24% NX ~-- -\ It -41~ Greenwood lu==ZE===--~~=93- \1 & Assixtates. Inc 201 North Mill Street Suite 207 Aspen. Colorado 81611 303-925-4502 1-11 111 1111111 '~ 11111 I AÂ» 1 01-1 fÂ·* r..1 0 f. -1 H- 0 6 4 V r -T- 1 â‚¬_P -1-**1*1[LN e oip 47/6.3&6 ~ 0* 141'1 Ne MIN F K 's e- E~ IN ~ 6 1 4 1*r'- - - -EJEFIWi _63.. *185 - - forâ‚¬ u,Be -4 54*~2 SCALE: - -- -0 0 0 ._2 1- -1---- Efe .r-m-- -,u ioy-r=TFIT------1/'-- JOB: -- DATE ISSUED. 4 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY -5 rio 1 ~ --- - --.6=fLM_-,25- ftef- -- REVISIONS . 09 0* mlo, 1 --0 1 Mlril../'7' -27:VI>i.m------,~- ------ -- - Â£ 0, / 14 9 7%/0.-Ph 6 L 4 f - lo /1. ri 10 4" 6 0 .JT H :.-, A & v 'Â»- , 6 [1 -========7= -- 074 1 Â«F I Ng i - A< ler-LAR__--i,LE---Ml-tiffh_-ezELEL_~_ fl ./21\\ 1 - = Gretchen I '--1 )~-~~ - 2 Greenwood - -- - - - - - - & Associates, Inc. 201 Narth Mill Street Suite 207 Aspen, Giloradâ€ž 81611 303-925-4502 1 EL --- --~~.-1 --A ' _Â«19 -0 1 HI C> .jÂ·*Â»-2~24 4- Â«LulÂ«fÂ«_-~_ *Tr-BAE, -- - - /7 1==-UÂ»\ /:/214 -\N' - - - 1- - I 1 - -- Ellc~47- --Ht - 1~_1-2 --- - , '~ - -- SCALE: 9-f 4-- I-1 10<Â»UFUN--09-1 JOB lili DATE ISSUEDÂ· /// / DRAWN BÂ¥. --- -- 1 M lili 11 #IL+111 CHECKED BY REVISIONS. L IL_JL_lll TRJE --i 9><~ tort \ 34 9 _ E r _Â«-IL-35 9 6 -V./70 \ f' Pl Â»<1Â«r-1 Nt> --I-'ll--I-~-I--I'- 42-2/1 4-1 1 2->47 (; 4 flo pkrly L-Irk t) . 0 4 - 11 f-Ii-'.64.-- 9.2. L==1 31 EL r-1 - | ELI='Q":'"2= -ILL . _ L_ _. ~ p- 18= I Gretchen Eli Greenwood & Absociates, Inc 201 North Mill Street Suite 207 i i-14'.r FA 303-925-4502 Aspen, Colorado 81611 7 Et, 41 -0' i 4 ~4 1,t25 1 ' 1 1 M . . --9 ~~~- - - -4> 11 4 ~<y' eor *W ' I I *lrf'oF 1#/ M..â€ž W 44 .u//1, 110 -Ipt 1 - 11 - 1- - e, E-- 1 [1 1 2 u - 1 FE. . IJA 11 11 -1 -1 . ~ SCALE 10 6; JOB: ' DATE JSSUED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY: REVISIONS: p'- lAi = L gil 14-*74. , 0,>4 A-ihe Mly-IN l.E,vf l- Fl,Â£201. Fl-t-hi 09< I afl H e 16 L 171,1 .MS Zi 101 1 e Ill/~ 214 201Â»Mld F 4 1 Â£51 '31 I 4 0 , ,01+111 14Â·gl, I ~12216| 1-,54|- bl,9 *44 -100 42#,~Aldle,0-~01 46 r 1 Ila-1 L ' . 1 L. J -'167<314,&' 0 - 47% 1 .i *8114 1:. , : -1 n 9 1 '- :.' 1 1143 ---1-~ t.1 4141.1*1*01 1 1 !t â‚¬ 12141- NO ! 11671,1 = 14Â£2lb,12k,h *8 -- E R i ..:... 0 1 ,9% h.1-N,53 . . . 1 . 1-,del- NO 4 1 141-6121+ , e HI-1493 1 4 tidi0 96 1. . 11+11 1 / . 0 V c C 0,1 - 6= *9 - . . Fl" Ng 1,5 +E MIHE,ge cr,IN 412#65 . 4 . k f ~7!~Ir_~_1~~ 444it 7~IREIJ - .I I..1/ / - Ill'11 1#7 - 9\ 11 1 - .m t~ 2-Im_ una + -- -- --- 1--1 1-11- 4 t=-=it--- iÂ·Â·===iÂ¢-pur-,Ari=r- 7- LIt[ E 1!fliell[, it=,ij:.4 ~Gi~Ui.Slf-= IDf-==aft: Go 9 09 & 9 47 0 4-Ft[ 014- EL, V'r~F 1 0 1%1 r 1 -, 0147 M IN *g-19 Abpo, -- . 01, p â‚¬Â»TY-P b & 1 2 it it 1 1 h.illi- 1 1 11 ~ 1 It 1 1 Fr >Â¥14111 ~ i 1 \NX '11 L--- 1 Â»- B ...72===31===4 --1 1 ..4 , .~ 1.5-1 --Im,4 11. . , 4 1 '11 li 1=96 77 + --I_I_ _ -Â·ri- 1 JEVI1ETI~.AZfj ~ m .14,0 *4.......~ \,44*â€¢.M-#AlÂ¥40'.1,+9,1,4.Wid#{ 44441* Iml +1.1,1tll - - - FforeÂ»0 9 6 0'rer- --0Â¢ Le _E-0 Vr-71 21>l_ FE,"Â«150' 01/7 e..2-Pt, , 4 9 , 1 1, 1 1.. 11 P 1 1 1 1 < l19///2 1 111 11~ 11 1., 11] UHA.:L i 1 ./. 'vii,4,..., 1 ..4 + r . , ., 1 ~ ~,. >i.,1~till'--1:~~J-'1''~-,~ { ~ ~ T_ ~ ~~~~ 7~] I. . f *07061,9 g 012*Fft & 6-0,vr-riorl 1//,01 It & 1 -6 .. / 2'17 P ll-1 0 H I Ar 1 -I+42 1 11 1 1 <VE 7 - ' 1, ~i ~1 #lE L ,]1~1111 I (' --/ : 11.-4 2 .4 &51 .li =, - r i J Â·h.4, - , LJ[. -1,-En - - -6 1 -+ [T - ' 1,51 i -~' I Â·----------------Â·---------- UEEE*=4'I 1 1111 1 AL 1 1-1------ -- - -- ---- --------.--------=22-- , ~ , 44Â·4â€¢4,4,â€¢--lp*lw4r;4e*.12,11 UuilL_-*rnt:â„¢=*C:lt.6.1,+,44,4,4*Aa -*:lt,A..'-tt~,4,40 L.lt-Â£,4-Â·" tlÂ· 1~ 1 4 -41 A l Â· 4 /' - t j' ~.4.11.a- L 42 ' 1-0146, MI 1 +4 &019 0,1,1 Al 1 FRQ Foe FP k.110*-0 41-0-vrT I oN Poll 11 1 1 M r 1-0 0*1 fLOY'06 url rr ---1--3 -5- f-'rigH BN 0 /1-V : Fl A,HA izvt Â· 4-F P Fl- l 0-11Â» r 4<11=1.1 4 1 PN -4,- 1 .i ! 1 1 - 1 Â· pr--1-- 1 1 1 1.4 . i $ r,#9 1 G p'-1 UPEX& O, ./ m . 44 : FEN 10 1,/ 1 Kls KMI U f - Il Ilri ./ il - - 11 11 - 2 1. 1.- iNJ~/Lid .--T-~2 -1=U U 1 37~ ] 4 *ED PN PwravoH - 0 -* 19Â·1 H LEÂ». 01, FLoole FL, 14 - M PE 911 97 2/# 0 - 'LOI F-'1*4 kid: 1,9 er. ' J -- + --1 9%m 4. %1,1 rl,off* UN rr 1- PH [ 9,67 4- F Ne'T- 1 f I 1 2 it 1 0 11 :1 0 ..1 6 r!-3 1 0 Â»L, pey I E-0 1119-4 ~1 MarF D AM 1 - 1 11 ; ..1 . T b , 6 1.JO, U -LL _ 1013> ppwoM ~ Ll FFE,le LE,v' 8,1, FL- 201~ Fl-r H 99 11â€¢'LO 11 r I Mer 'FE F Fi/-Nzzle BT. 14*49 004 1441& 21Â»'Ld 11 N 0 3 4 4 0 11 j 1Â»1 d U OO 0- 0- 2 Id[LLe 4--'-i -1.1 38. k .