Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.HP.203 S Galena St.HPC 21-98
2737-073-46001 HPC 21-98 61221, 203 S. Galena - Minor Review Cacci 1% 6 ·d P -37 ASPEN HISTORI- .'RESERVATION COMMISS 4 MINUTES OF JULY 8. 1998 Pat Millington moved the house and it was then added on to. The Schuwmacher's bought the house from Pat. Gilbert relayed that the proposal is a distinct element and could be removed at anytime. MOTION: Roger moved to approve the proposed changes at 505 N. Eighth Street with the following conditions: 1. That the improvements will be substantially in conformance with the drawings submitted with the application, as shown in Sheet No 3.1: 2. The roof material will match the existing roof with a modified pitch as shown in the drawings. 3. Any additional significant changes from those proposed in this application shall be considered "signwcant" and will require a conceptual and final review of the HPC before proceeding with construction; 4. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval unless otherwise amended by a decision-making body having the authority to do so. The proposal meets all four development review standards; motion second by Mary. All in favor, motion carried 7 - 0. 203 S. GALENA - MINOR REVIEW - GUCCI Julie Ann Woods, planner presented. The proposed change is the second store front on Galena St. as well as facade changes to the Hopkins St. side. The existing wood door and frame would be replaced and a sign placed in the transom area above the door. On the Hopkins St. side the store front is old but the door is not. Sworn in were: Brian O'Tuama Emma Oneil Lee Pearce 2 ASPEN HISTORI - _'RESERVATION COMMISL N MINUTES OF JULY 8. 1998 Brian stated that photographs were not found in the Historical Society archives. It is believed that the door on the Hopkins Street side is not original. The proposed changes to E. Hopkins would unify the entire area. Roger informed the board that in 1965 when he moved here there was a drive-thru and two pumps on the corner of Galena and Hopkins. There was also an upholstery shop and R.O. Anderson had his office on the first floor. The second floor was empty. What is there on Galena is not historic as there was originally an overhead door. He stated that he feels the Hopkins St. side is original but the door is not historic. - Julie Ann relayed that two over two windows were very typical for that era and she feels that window on Hopkins Street is old. Heidi inquired about the shiny material proposed and its reflectiveness. She also had concerns about the paint color being changed from the different colored store fronts. Other members had concerns about the proposed glass doors on Galena with the Gucci signature. Melanie stated changing the store fronts to something extremely contemporary in an historic building is inappropriate. The material selection competes with the historic building. Susan relayed that in the past other stores have been denied their signature i.e. McDonald's and the Holiday Inn. Emma stated that the door would be contemporary. The proposal is to use the international Gucci door set back from the street line. The Hopkins Street door would be flush with the facade, wood and glass. Mary felt that the design should be restudied as it is too contemporary for the historic building. The signage would be regulated by the Zoning officer. Gilbert felt that the doors on Galena would be more in character if they were the same fabric that is existing but he also feels there is some opportunity to have some kind of signature. Galena St. is acceptable but the Hopkins elevation needs restudied to maintain the historic quality that is there now. Roger relayed that this is a significant landmark building. The openings have been restored as close to the original as possible. In his opinion the mullions and wood detailing on Galena should not be changed. The job of HPC is to retain the historic integrity o f the building which means signature 3 ASPEN HISTORI- FRESERVATION COMMISS_. N MINUTES OF JULY 8. 1998 doors should not be substituted. On the East Hopkins side the original openings should be retained. Suzannah had no concerns on the Galena side except for the paint and the Hopkins side should be preserved. Lee Pearce relayed that he feels the historical integrity of the building can be retained. He requested latitude with the signature hardware and the board had no problems if it was within the appropriate scale and color. MOTION: Mary moved to table with a restudy of the discussion at this meeting the minor development for 203 S. Galena - Gucci to July 22, 1998; second by Melanie. All in favor, motion carried - 7-0. Mary stated that color is addressed on certain projects when the entire building is being reviewed. She suggested a worksession. 920 W. HALLAM - PH - CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT Heidi stepped down Jeffrey was seated. Mitch Haas, planner presented. The site currently contains three separate structures. The main house was built in the 1880's and there is a garage that was moved to the site but is an historic structure. A shed sits partially on the property and partially in the alleyway and that was used as a concession stand for the Ski area and then moved to this site in the 40' s. There is a request for a partial demolition of the lean-to shed onto the garage. There are two on-site relocation's, one is to move the houses forward and to the center of the lot and raise its elevation by about 18 inches. The garage would move to behind the relocated house, attached by a breezeway. There is an off-site relocation request involving the shed that sits mostly in the alley and the applicant has not yet determined a location to move it to. There is an historic landmark lot split requested creating a 3,432 square foot lot to have a new structure built and 7,616 square foot for the historic house and the relocated garage behind and a new structure to its east. Also, there is a design variance requested for the volume standard. Three variances are requested one for the sideyard setback on lot B due to the lightwells. The 4 ASPEN HISTO] : PRESERVATION COMMI ON MINUTES OF JULY 22 . 1998 Motion second by Heidi. Roger, no Heidi, yes Suzannah, yes Susan, yes Motion carried four to one. 203 S. GALINA - GUCCI - continued from July 8, 1998 Julie Ann Woods, planner presented. Sworn in: Jack Palamino, Associate with Ted Guy and Associates Harley Baldwin, owner o f the building. Julie Ann relayed that the concern from the last meeting was that the Hopkins Street side window was historic. On Galena St. a wood door will be installed. The Gucci handles are still proposed for the wooden door. Essentially the store fronts will match. On the Hopkins St. side they are going to keep the same windows with muttons and the door would be changed out to another wood and glass door. The sign would be affixed to the transom. Harley Baldwin relayed that he did not feel the proposals were out of scale. He bought the Brand Building in 1971 and it was a garage and body shop and the corner was a gasoline station. He is trying to create new uses for old spaces. He asked the board to reconsider and take out the two over two windows on the Hopkins St. side (the large window) and put in a single window. When Tim Cantrell did the subshop his recollection is that the three over four window was added. He also stated that he will clean up the block facade. 4 ASPEN HISTO1.-2 PRESERVATION COMMISu-ON MINUTES OE JULY 22. 1998 Susan questioned the Gucci lettering over the window as opposed to being placed over the door. Jack Palamino relayed that on the Galena Street side the signage is over the door but with respect to the Hopkins Street there is more Visibility over the window. An exact model o f the door handle was presented to the board. The concern of the majority o f the board is the transom window and detailing of the sign on the Galena Street side. The size of the door pull needs to be restudied as it is quite large. Heidi had a concern with the shiny material selection for the lettering and also the paint colors should be uniform throughout the storefronts. Susan felt that the historic four window panes on the Hopkins Street side should remain. Roger and Gilbert supported modification to the Hopkins Street side large four pane window if research is found that it is not an original window. Roger' s concern is that the technical painting procedure be reviewed. He also was opposed to the door handle. Suzannah relayed that she had no concerns with the Galena Street side. Regarding the Hopkins Street side she would consider looking at a different design for the window and could approve the dark brown color but feels the Galena Street side should be consistent with the existing color. Susan relayed that if changes are proposed for the Hopkins Street side that they be presented to the entire HPC board. Harley Baldwin relayed that the window is new because he built it. He is not sure whether it was replacing what was existing or not. The window does not flow with the cemetry o f the building. MOTION: Heidi moved to approve the development at Gucci's 203 S. Galena as follows: 5 ASPEN HISTOR - PRESERVATION COMMIL.JN MINUTES OF JULY 22. 1998 To approve the Galena Street side as submitted in the drawing with clarification and possible restudy of the door pull (too large). Everything else as show per the drawing in the packet, exhibit I. On the Hopkins Street side, approval of the drawing, exhibit I with restudy of the door pull (too large). Unless they can show that it is not an existing store front they can bring it back to the commission for the window design. It is also recommended that the paint should be consistent with the rest of the building; motion seconded by Jeffrey. Jeffrey,yes Heidi, yes Susan, yes Roger, yes Suzannah, no Gilbert, no Motion carried 4 to 2. Harley stated in the context of the building the door pull is not too large, you will hardly see it. He also stated that he would give the board a certified letter stating that he put the Hopkins street side window in. Harley stated that on the Elks building they basically did the same proposal, took out the two over two's and replaced them with one single window. Heidi relayed her concern that evidence needs to be given to the board relating to what the existing opening looked like. A photograph etc. should be obtained. 735 W. BLEEKER - LD - CONCEPTUAL REVIEW - PH David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney relayed that the affidavit of notice has been presented as Exhibit II. Gilbert stepped down. 6 MEMORANDUM /7 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission ' t.: - THRU: Stan Clauson. Community Development Director 64 1 v FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Director ~~f~,/-7 [Acting Historic Preservation Officer] RE: 203 S. Galena St.-- Minor Review (continued from July 8, 1998) DATE: July 22, 1998 SUMMARY: The applicant has modified his proposal in order to more sensitively address the review standards. The Galena Street elevation will now have wood and glass doors which will extend from the transom downward to the new lower street level. The area underneath the beadboard will have stone to match the front elevation, and the entry walk will be colored concrete to match the existing. A metal grate will be inset into the concrete at the entrance to minimize dirt from being tracked into the shop. The E. Hopkins Street elevation will remain as is, but will have a new wood and glass door added as well as the Gucci sign attached in the transom area. Both street elevations will be painted the dark brown color submitted on the material sample board and the door pulls will remain as nickel-plated brass with a satin finish. APPLICANT: Gucci International, represented by Bryan O'Touma of Gensler Architects. (For this meeting the owner, Harley Baldwin and local architect Ted Guy will represent Gucci). LOCATION: 203 S. Galena St. (Brand Building) PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. The subject building is an historic landmark, and is within the boundaries of the Commercial Core "H," Historic Overlay District. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the 1 historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The proposed changes to the two storefronts are compatible in general design, massing and volume, and scale with the adjacent parcels within the "H," Historic Overlay District. There are no variances being requested, and the setbacks are as established by the existing building. t 2. Standard: The proposed development rdects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood Of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed development will have little to no affect on the character of the neighborhood. The building exists, and was recently remodeled. The Galena St. improvements will generally be in keeping with the adjacent storefronts, although painted a slightly different color. The E. Hopkins St. elevation will remain essentially as is, except for a replacement door which will match the Galena St. door. This elevation will likewise be painted the dark brown which is Gucci's signature color. A new sign will be pin-mounted in the transom, and staff has requested that the applicant provide a drawing detailing this addition. If the drawing is not attached to the packet, it will presented at the meeting. Likewise, the applicant will be forwarding a sample door pull and a larger paint sample for presentation at the meeting. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the pardel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed change would not detract from the historic significance of the designated historic structures located on the parcel or from those located on adjacent parcels. In fact, the E. Hopkins St. elevation will remain essentially the same, except for a new coat of paint a simpler door design which will enhance the historic significance of the building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof· Response: The proposed development will not diminish the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: • Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2 • Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. • Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) • Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. - RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the proposed changes to 203 S. Galena (including the E. Hopkins St. elevation), with the following conditions: 1. The improvements are substantially in conformance with the drawings submitted with this application dated July 10, 1998; 2. That any significant changes from those shown could result in a project which would require significant review which would re4uire both a conceptual and final review by the HPC; 3. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by a decision-making body having the authority to do so. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the proposed changes to 203 S. Galena St. with the conditions recommended in the staff memorandum dated July 22, 1998." EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" - The revised application, dated July 10, 1998. Exhibit "B" - Historic Architectural Building/Structure Form (Inventory) g:/planning/aspen/l,pdcases/minor/203.g.doc 3 MEMORANDUM -- GenS|er Project Project Number Gucci Aspen 06.8042.001 Memo To Date Aspen Historic Preservation Commission July 13, 1998 Attention Telephone No. Julie Ann Woods Subject File Revisions to Application for Minor Development Review Memorandum / Discussions / Observations We thank the Aspen HPC for their review of the proposed alterations to the S. Galena Street and E. Hopkins Avenue storefronts. The proposed alterations have been revised according to the HPC's direction and are outlined below, and illustrated on the attached elevations. All finishes indicated below are shown on the enclosed finish sample board, and are keyed to the elevations. In addition, for the HPC's information, a mockup of the proposed door pull and a larger sample of the proposed storefront color (PT-3A) will be sent to your attention prior to the next meeting of July 22, 1998. A. The revised proposed alterations to the S. Galena St. storefront are as follows: a) Replace existing doors with new wood and glass doors. All dimensions and profiles of the new doors will match those of the existing, except the overall height, which will be increased by approximately 8" to compensate for the removal of the entry step. b) Install new MT-3 door pulls and kickplates on doors. c) Repaint all wood storefront elements PT-3A. d) Install MT-1 Gucci letters on transom above door (pin-mounted). Letters will be lit from above by light fixture concealed in the existing painted wood soffit above the entry. B. The revised proposed alterations to the East Hopkins Ave. storefront are as follows: a) Existing wood storefront will remain with the exception of the existing non-historical door. b) Replace existing door with new wood and glass door to match those on the S. Galena Street facade of the building. c) Install new MT-3 door pull and kickplate on door. d) Repaint all wood storefront elements PT-3A. e) Install MT-1 Gucci letters on transom above window (pin-mounted). In addition to the above proposed alterations, Gucci may wish in the future to erect awnings on both storefronts. These would be of similar type to and would align with the adjoining existing awnings on the Brand Building. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or comments. Gensler will rely on these notes as the approved record of matters discussed and conclusions reached unless written notice to the contrary is received by Gensler within seven calendar days of the issue of these notes. Distribution: Per attached transmittal Prepared by: Date Issued: Brian O'Tuarna 7/13/98 s:\068042\current\memos\m071398.doc One Rockefeller Plaza Suite 500 Tel: 212. 492. 1400 New York New York 10020 Fax: 212. 492. 1472 TRANSMITTAL Gensler TO Attention City of Aspen Community Development / Julie Ann Woods Historical Preservation Commission Address City State Zip 130 S. Galena Street Aspen CO 81611 Project Project Number File Gucci 06.8042.001 Subject Revised Minor Development Reyiew Application For Your: O Approval and selection 0 Use a Record O Review / Comment O Distribution ¤ Information Action Required: O Indicated on item transmitted O Comment and return to Gensier O No action required O Sign and return to this office 0. See remarks below 2 For Application Review Delivered Via: n Messenger O Mail O UPS 2 Express C Hand carried o Pick-up Quantity Description / Remarks Dated 1 each Revised Proposed S. Galena & E. Hopkins Elevations 1 Finish Materials Board 1 Memorandum containing written description of revised proposed development ,c. 4-l'/• • Transmittal Copies To: Enclosures Delivered Via: 0 Messenger a Mail O Far L. Pearce / Gucci Copies of above O Express O Hand carried O Pick-up 2 Messenger O Mail 0 Far E. O'Neill / Studio Sofield Copies of above 0 Express ¤ Hand carried O Pick-up O Messenger O Mail 0 Far H. Baldwin Copies of above 0 Express O Hand carried O Pick-up If enclosures are not as described, please advise Gensler immediately. Prepared by: Date: Brian O'Tuama (ext. 8684) 7/13/98 s:\068042\current\transmit\hpc.doc One Rockefeller Plaza Suite 500 Tel: 212.492.1400 New York New York 10020 Fax: 212.492.1472 t>64: 6.f S HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 203.SG Photo Information: ASP-CC-1-6, 7&8 Township 10 South Range 34 West Section 7 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Hyman Block / Brand Building Full Street Address: 203 South Galena Legal Description: Lots G, H, I, Block 88 Citv and Townsite of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Commercial Care Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Commercial Architectural Style: Victorian with Romanesque influences Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 2 Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irregular square Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Corner building - storefronts on South Galena and East Hopkins Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Flat Walls: Rough faced; coursed sandstone; A-A-B-C-C bay spacing on east facade; diagonal corner entrv; D-B-E-A-A bav spacing on north facade; bays are framed bv 2-story stone vilasters; on both east and north facades. parapet steps un 5 feet after A bays; sandstone is corbelled to form dentils at paraget level Foundation / Basement: Sandstone Chimney(s): Unknown Windows: Windows on 1st floor east are fixed one over one wood storefront with each bav representing a different commercial estab- lishment; windows on 1st floor north facade are one over one double hung. typically all 2nd floor windows are one over one double hung Doors: Transom full light double wood entry at corner and typically for individual store entries Porches: N/A General Architectural Description: Use of sandstone as primary material tvvifies commercial architecture demonstrating strength and stability (original use as a bank). Dentil detailing out of sandstone at roofline allows for play of light and shadows with change of natural and artifical liqht. The use of sandstone throughout is a definite statement of strength but more important is a feature Victorian architecture; use of different materials and textures for different affect. The roofline detailing, the sandstone dentils displaying varying light/shadow patterns. The color of the sandstone changes dramatically with varying intensity of light. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 203.SG FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Commercial Architect: Unknown Original Use: Commercial Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Construction Date: 1891 X Actual _ Estimate _ Assebsor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS ~ Minor X Moderate Major Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: First floor alterations of facade, date unknown Additions and Date: NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation 1 1 1-1 - Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic Or Z.1 - architectural integrity. 0 - Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is " retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: Built for David H. Hyman. an earlv promoter of Aspen. this two-story stone structure was completed in 1891. The First National Bank moved from the Aspen Block into the Hvman Block in 1891. The second floor consisted of a large hall which housed the Patriotic Order Sons of America (P.O.S.A.), a lodge dedicated to "society purposes and social gatherings." During the 1920's. M. H. Brand owned the building and operated a Conoco gas station on the corner. Today numerous shops occupy the space. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * Recorded By: Date: January 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner \ i ' 711,'3C~ 0) 1 -\ li / e '4 -4,{jzt:_.-,4.,7- · 3~ , 1 3 4 i UJU-'i 'Ki .3.'-= i I ; 1 - · U. 1 1 NA.· 4 k . i 1 1 . 1 . I f 170£1. I i 3*Le : - 03 - 4 11 1 ! 1 LOVED i (342 - 1 -9- '-3 / uLL ' ~~ ~ b.1 - h.1 '--' 2 1 I ' 28 46 3 . 2 £ i ~•- a , / C>CO 1 - T . t 7(11-K (3: 1 - 1-, . J t-ti ~.124/ ,(1 - WLEE-Y X ' L- .9 ./ BLE:C- EL- -2.COLL 9/ / /. 2 R t } I , ACA N 43 6- 11 C , ,~ r- --/ 1 1 0 0 0 CO ! 9 , 1-2/$ 1 x 7912.9 E. -441_MU- i=r~ . ~ 1 ) T 41 1 /1 2 / (, f.4,01 /4 ~DO /U . 1- ,-/ %- - U 1 1. , NEW 4 /CTO C·;21 k - W t-4 a r + . M £ 11 ··· /- ··"R««€--RlE $«4·6:·t„,A••- 1 - n ME .1 . ~, t..1 It - . l. - -3-3--~~&9"'/7-~_ - 9. r/ 6 -- r I«1.33>0336%*12 »6 M--*~- Il 'I- .- - - Un - 6) .1 , 1-------.-1~.1~ . -4,61.1 - ...,U- » 1-L - */7,$ im= ir 1% _- --- --"~*272 u -:-64-4 . 125~~aa.-Mi 3.3~'P-*iWME•C.¥47 1 14€1~44%~ty .ty- t, I. D ! *-r- , - 4- ' 1 021 + - . ,- » -~r= - A• r.~AS---:17-1 .~ .ZE:.1232- -- , E J ' 1 tL- . - n .-2 1 - - Ll . 1 , - - 4 9. 1. 1 e Im 91 -- - & 1 ,--4 - 22 1/;- .,1 2] ' EXISTING WOOD - RECESSED 1! 1 EJEJEJELIJEEJEELLEE]ELLI ' CORNICE SIGN LIGHT 1 LUE« LI-]I-E 1 4 (PT-JA) 00 43« EXISTING STONE EXISTING - I I 1 111 'h i ·'61 1 1~:!l lid E LIGHT (TYP.) ' ~~ '~ NEW SIGN PIN-MOUNTED \\\\ ~ ||| [liCEEL 4 6«j<*'-« ICI] ON TRANSOM BAR (MT-1) SIGN MT-1 12 11 NEW WOOD & GLASS 1 1 DOORS TO MATCH EXISTING. (PT-JA) 11 NEW DOOR PULLS f u (MT-3) EXISTING WOOD E 00 STOREFRONT (PT-3A) U J - DISPLAY WINDOW 0 INSIDE A 47 V Af->91 4 11 A U NEW KICKPLATES (MT-3) 46 -,4 (600:8,#4,3 1 °th -ri lial- 4 1 ka Mulf 1. SECEON THROUGH ENTRY 2. S. GALENA STREET ELEVATION 3. PLAN DETAIL U=C C I- O h-F-D-----4r---1 203 & GALINA Sr. JULY10,1998 Gender 61-UDIC] S OFIELD - - NEW SIGN PIN-MOUNTED ON TRANSOM BAR (MT-1) il EL- EXIST STONE 1~ng-- 7 -J=- | L.-!1_2~ 1-_ EXIST WOOD LINE (PT-JA) + - FI - --IJ '1 4 EXISTING STOREFRONT TO - 1 i 1 1 U REMAIN (PT-JA) 1 11 11 1 1 : ~i NEW WOOD & GLASS 111 4-4 DISPLAY - DOOR TO MATCH GALENA ST. l i 1 11 1 1 1 il '1 1 ENTRANCES (PT-jA) EXIST. STREET 1 LIGHT FIXTURE - l 1 11 1 7[-4 L-22 (MT-3) NEW DOOR PULL 1 1 11 1-- 1 9233=11~ NEW KICKPLATE 11 (MT-3) '- "' i 0--mr- - 1. SECTION THROUGH STOREFRONT 1 2 1 1 6--2 , Lm 3. DETAIL OF NEW STOREFRONT - E. HOPKINS AVE ELEVATION 4 It==U N !11 11'j 1 1 111 1 f i - -0 1 1 1 1 1 r--f------------ AN EXISTING JPPER WINDOWS " - - I-- TO REMAIN (PT-3A) -- .i r 3 1.14 1 i 7-7---17 -- 4 1 1 :U i r! ~ U 1 1 -li-1 34 ;1 1 1 111,1 !1 00 3 C Y 7. 11 1 4 1 I EXISTING WINDOWS TO REMAIN (PT-JA) LAI 1 !.d , 1 i H 000 1 11 4. PLAN DETAIL ' ' ~ UL___-__2__-1 2. E. HOPKINS AVE ELEVATION O o 7»-4 203 & GALENAST ENCO. JULY 10,1998 sru Dios OFIELD 00 Facsimile Transmittal Date #of Pages 4 TO From ~ 0«ce Ecvt'k 5-41 -e A-u-13 D-,1 Co./Dept. Co./Dept. ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY 74 4 1 A[ A DEVELOPMENT Phone # Phone # 970-920-5994 37 00 0-7 - 3/4 -7 Fax# Fax # 30-7 ' 19 13 970-920-5439 NOTES Bru. c r / rcy 1 c-.4- frot,0.1 C 47 C-€ 2 3 -,-6.vAP·£*J UU J A VLC: home/admin/forms/FAX.doc Facsimile Transmittal Date # of Pages 1<,11906 4 To From Oak Al, 0- 8 Co./Dept. Co./Dept. 40«. IC.r Af DEVELOPMENT ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY Phone # Phone # 970-920-5096'Sl- O 2 12- 4 91 - B(,31 Fax# Fax # 211 412- 14 7 8 970-920-5439 NOTES Dr 75- 0 kl-</ u th I 44* r-h·06 rte·«t . I ' & fi,; rn -1- 13 1 4 ·a 6 l.r€£0 . J A. 63 -4 VLC: home/admin/forms/FAX.doc 2/ L 772 y9-£ 4 2% , FROM :GENSLER 617 737 0510 1998.07-20 17:09 #584 P. 01/03 FACSIMILE TRA..SMITTAL Gensle, Date To See below 7/20/98 Attention See below Facsimile Number 1lme See below 5:00Irn Project Project Number Gucci Aspen 06.8042.001 Total number of pag,35 (Including cover page) - Flle 3 Subject See below Descr*non 0 Lee Pearce GU¢ei (212) 230-9389 Jenna LaPietnl Gucci (212) 230-9389 Bill Sofield Studio Sofield (212) 473-0300 Emma O'Neill Studio Sofield (212) 473-0300 Harley Baldwin (970) 920-1821 Ted Guy Theodore K. Ony ATAPE (970) 927-4813 Bruce Barth Theodore K. Guy AIA ME (970) 927-4813 Tim Chiddix Swanson Rink (303) 832-7563 Marla Stauth Swanson Rink (303) 832-7563 Teriy Nelson Johnson Schwmghammer (212) 643-1553 Julie Ann Woods City of Aspen Commtinity DevjHPC (970) 920-5439 John Bricker O.ensler Barry Mc Counick Gensler Tony Rod:iguez Gensler Message As rnquested, sketches showing additional information are Elowing: 1. Stone patching atarea of removed step and additton of matwellinrecessed entrance at the S. Galina faca•le. 2, Signage letters motmted on existing transom at E. Hopkins facade . iMP-TANTA,ONFIDENTIAL: Tha me,Imm i. ir,Imded (89 1, 11,1 ume of lhe Hlv,Aml or angly la IhEll It 18 ach*m~I,U. If you hava Ieoelyed *ili commt,11*m in *,ar, Phagia nollfy 0,#iIA imrreMIstaly at em IN,phtne number setforth below. WI wil ba h,ppy to afringe for Ihe Iwium ef 11,1, maaega lo un st no God to yow, Aom: Bnan O'Tumna #yow do nol receive ail pages, please MII 8 woon as possible. Askfor: Brian O'Tuama 2AndIDA:&urinff==staimbibition.,IC* Ork: Rockefeller Pl@za Suite 500 Tol: 211492. 1400 New York Now York 10020 Fax: 212. 492. 1472 omo m O 00 mo 31 810 0 FROM : GENSLER 617 737 0510 1998.07-20 17:10 #584 P. e2/03 - NEW WOOD AND GLASS DOOR TO MATCH EXISTING r - - PATCH WITH STONE TO MATCH EXISTING -- - AT AREA OF REMOVED STEP ·· 11111'€lilli'l (E) Reige1Tgrt -T®:1.344 a 444.FAA e« 841#04(E SCALE: 1"=1'-0" RECESSED MATWELL ~ MATCH SIDEWALK FINISH STAINLESS STEEL GRATE 1- 1 11.. -1 E- TOP TO BE FLUSH WITH SIDEWALK j. ---- , -- 1 1. 1 j 1 4 - --- 7 1 T 1 1 - 6. 4, puti Ff 6 - AAW»-616 sT- EHTICA#15.-E- SCAL#- 1 ~Ul L eli .1 - GUCCI 200&0*UNAST. ASPEN,©Ol JULYm 1998 ~enaler ~ muoiD.¤F-11:LO 0 '- --L- •t: ........• FROM : GENSLER 617 737 0510 1998,07-20 17:10 #584 P.03/03 t 11.11 11. 11.11 1 „111 Il Ill 11 3_3 1 - 1 ]1 11 11 110~~-If-- ~~ - 11 -IF 11 1 = h.1 - - IE / / 17»-9 0/ EXISnNG WOOD AND gp Q U C 'jOI 1 / 1 , j / MT-1 LETTERS - ·· --r 7[ l_ PIN-NOUNTED GLASS LIGHT TO TO DISTING REMAIN 21 -28*NsoM ]EJ 26 F.- ~ 1$ TO EXISTING TRANSOM 1 71. ?En- MT-1 LETTERS PIN MOUNTED JI r-=1 0 +1 L 12 EL rL 0 Z 0 Zzi < 1 EXISTING WOOD TRANSOM TO REMAIN ~ELEVATION_ SCALE: 1/4.-1'-0" 1 4 i EXISTING WOOD AND GLASS LIGHT TO REMAIN 8. [+OFI<1146 AVES-- E+4TAA»E- ~SECJION SCALE: 1"=1'-0" GUCCI 203&GALENASE ASPEN.{JO. KILY 20 1998 Genster · RTUE'a e orIELD "& **u R-/.d LIUIL]ELL]ILL]E EXISTING WOOD RECESSED EJEJE]CILIJO-00 O CORNICE SIGN LIGHT J (pT-jA) 20021000 00 EXISTING STONE EXISTING LIGHT (TYP.) NEW SIGN PIN-MOUNTED , 1.- 0 j ON TRANSOM BAR (MT-9 * SIGN nfl MT-1 1 NEW WOOD & GLASS 0 DOORS TO MATCH EXISTING. (PT--3A) NEW DOOR PULLS (MT-3) A EXISTING WOOD O 00 STOREFR()NT (PT-3A) m:j - DISPLAY WINDOW INSIDE NEW KICKPLATES (MT-3) 2. S. GALENA STREET ELEVATION 1. SECTION THROUGH ENTRY ==»20-4 3. PLAN DETAIL f'-. GUCCI © 0124-a 203 & GALENA 5r. -ASPEN,CO- JULY10,1998 Gensler STUDIOS OFIELD .14. - NEW SIGN PIN-MOUNTED ON TRANSOM BAR (MT-1) 1 1 1[ :liu 11 1 " - EXIST STONE /3000- -00 El[LIE Joi P---1 1 1- EXIST WOOD LINE (PT-3A) 3- : F-- 11 1 il I T Ly ' 1[ EXIST!NG STOREFRONT TO 4428 ~ h REMAIN (PT-jA) E9' DISPLAY 4 NEW WOOD & GLASS i i WINDOW i DOOR TO MATCH GALENA ST. ENTRANCES (PT-3A) EXIST. STREET - 1 LIGHT FIXTURE 00 6 NEW DOOR PULL (MT-3) 1 1 liE==En ,-. NEW KICKPLATE (MT-3) - L_ -!2 1. SECTION THROUGH STOREFRONT 1 I 1 1 2 1 1 1 Lu~ 11 0 3. DETAIL OF NEW STOREFRONT - E. HOPKINS AVE ELEVATION 1 -1; 3 2 <1 0 1 1 1 1 =1 ILL] - A--' ' dj I 1 Yual I I , 1 251 7' 1 6=== En-lEi D 11 1 1 1 E-1 0.11 EXISTING UPPER WINDOWS 20- M TO REMAIN (PT-3A) -c]7 " 1! 1 0~01 ' 1 IE]1 - 0 F~ 71 ! 1, 1 3 1 1 0 2 ~ ' if 1 -] 1, 'A=.W 1 1 1 '1 -Er- i~ TrUT . 1 21' SCE 7 -7 -0-10 1 hi E 12 0111-11 1 1 1 1 1 :1 i 1 1 EXISTING WINDOWS - TO REMAIN (PT-3A) 1 -3 ' 11 --1 --En 111 1 11 111 000 11 1.- 4. PLAN DETAIL ' _ 2. E. HOPKINS AVE ELEVATION GUCCI 0 b-0---d 203 & GALENA 5r. --- JULY 10,1998 - Gen~er · STUDIOS oFIELD C 1,9, 6.1- 1//jilu@im@ 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson. Community Development Director FROM: Julie Ann Woods. Deputy Planning Director - - Ux-0 D \*friI~) [Acting Historic Preservation Officer] RE: 203 S. Galena St.--- Minor Review DATE: July 8,1998 SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to make modifications to two different storefronts: one faces S. Galena St. and the other is the entrance of the former Smuggler Bar on E. Hopkins St., across from the fire station. The S. Galena storefront is immediately south of the Luis Vuitton store. The applicant proposes to replace the existing door and frame and add a raised metal sign in the transom area above the doors. The E. Hopkins storefront is proposed to be similar in detailing as the S. Galena St. side, but would have a single door and a new display window. APPLICANT: Gucci America, Inc., represented by Bill Sofield, Gensler Architects. LOCATION: 203 S. Galena St. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. The subject building is an historic landmark. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The proposed changes to the S. Galena St. storefront will match the existing storefronts along this street, and are compatible in general design, massing and 1 volume. scale and site plan with the adjacent parcels within the "H," Historic Overlay District. The existing painted wood and glass doors will be replaced with metal and glass with metal pulls. The doors are approximately eight (8) inches taller than the existing doors, and therefore a new, narrower transom will be installed above the doors. The Gucci sign will be affixed to the transom window. and a new downcast light will shine from the wood soffit above the entry. The storefront will be re-painted. The E. Hopkins storefront would have the existing door 320 windows replaced with a new painted wood and glass door, transom and window.- \lhe profile and detailing will match the existing S. Galena St. storefront. The same type 'of sign and recessed lighting would be concealed in the existing wood soffit. The application indicates that the existing door and storefront are not original to the building. Staff agrees that the door is not original, but is not convinced that the storefront is not original detailing. Though the proposed improvements would indeed provide more harmony between the building's facades, staff is hesitant to endorse approval to the E. Hopkins St. facade unless it can be conclusively determined that the facade is not original to the building. If it cannot be conclusively determined, then staff would recommend a re-study of the facade and door. using the existing windows and kickplate. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character Of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed facade improvements to the S. Galena St. elevation will have little to no affect on the character of the neighborhood. The building exists, and the improvements will be consistent with the other storefronts along that street. Although the proposed improvements to the E. Hopkins St. facade will have little or no affect on the character of the neighborhood. replacement of historic materials does diminish the character of a structure. Again, staff recommends that this elevation be re-studied. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed changes to the S. Galena St. elevation would not detract from the historic significance of the designated historic structures located on the parcel or from those located on adjacent parcels, as the improvements to this structure were previously approved by the HPC last year. However, the E. Hopkins elevation was not part of the improvements reviewed by the HPC at that time. Staff believes that the removal of historic detailing in this storefront could detract from the historic significance of the Brand Building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity Of a designated historic structure or part thereof. 2 Response: Please refer to item 3 above. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: • Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. • Approve the 'Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. • Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) • Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the proposed changes to the S. Galena St. facade only, with the following conditions, 1. That the improvements will be substantially in conformance with the drawings submitted with the application, dated June 26,1998; 2. Any additional significant changes from those proposed in this application shall be considered "significant" and will require a conceptual and final review of the HPC before proceeding with construction; 3. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by a decision-making body having the authority to do so. Staff further recommends that the applicant provide conclusive evidence that the existing E. Hopkins St. storefront is not original to the building. If it cannot be concluded that these are not original features, then staff recommends that the facade be restudied, addressing the continued use of the historic materials. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the proposed changes to the S. Galena St. facade of the Brand Building, 203 S. Galena St. only, with the conditions recommended in the staff memorandum dated July 8, 1998. I further move to direct the applicant to restudy the E. Hopkins St. facade unless it can be concluded that the existing materials are not original to the building." EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" - The submitted application. Exhibit "B" - Historic Architectural Building/Structure Form (Inventory) 3 £*H &* rr R ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1 Project name Gucci 2. Project loCation 203 S. Galena Street. Aspen. CO 81611 Lot G, H &I ; Block 88, City of Aspen (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning Commercial Core 4. Lot size 9,105 sq. ft. 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Gucci America, Inc. 685 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212)230-9326 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number Bill Sofield 380 Lafayette Street, PH#2 New York, NY 10003 (2121473-1300 7. Type of application (check all that apply) Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD x Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) Retail, storage & gallery (basement) Retail, gallery (first flonr) Residence / condominiums (second floor) 9. Description of development application See attached Memorandum 10. Have you completed and attached the following? x Attachment 1- Land use application form x Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form x Response to Attachment 3 x Response to Attachment 4 11111111 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Gucci America, Inc. Address: 203 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 Zone district: Commercial Core Lot size: 9.105 sq. ft. Existing FAR: N/A Allowable FAR: N/A Proposed FAR: N/A Existing net leasable (commercial): Unchanged Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: N/A Proposed % of site coverage: N/A Existing % of open space: N/A Proposed % of open space. N/A Existing maximum height: Princioal blda: UnchangedAccesory blda: N/A Proposed max. height: Princioal blda: Accessory blda: Proposed % of demolition: Existing number of bedrooms: N/A Proposed number of bedrooms: N/A Existing on-site parking spaces: N/A On-site parking spaces required: N/A Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: Front: Front: Unchanged Rear: Rear: Rear Unchanged Combined Combined Combined FronUrear: FronUrear: FronUrear: Unchanged Side: Side: Side: Unchanged Side: Side: Side: Unchanged Combined Combined Combined Sides: S ides: Sides: Unchanged Existing nonconformities or encroachments: None Variations requested: None (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.lt, site coverage variance up to 5°/0, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zon e districts) MEMORANDUM Gensler Project Project Number Gucci Aspen 06.8042.001 Memo To Date Aspen Historic Preservation Commission June 25, 1998 Attention Telephone No. Julie Ann Woods ... Subject File Application for Minor Development Review Memorandum / Discussions / Observations Written Description of Proposal Note: All finishes indicated below are shown on the enclosed finish sample board, and are keyed to the elevations. A. The proposed alterations to the S. Galena St. storefront are outlined as follows: a) Replace existing painted wood and glass doors with new metal and glass doors (MT-4) with metal pulls (MT-3). b) Align transom over entrance doors with the existing storefront window transoms. Finish of new transom to match new doors (MT-4); transom dimensions to match existing storefront transom dimensions. c) Repaint wood storefront (PT-3A). d) Install polished stainless steel Gucci sign (MT-1), pin-mounted on transom above door and lit from above by lighting concealed in existing painted wood soffit above entry. The existing doors are approximately eight inches shorter than the- door opening due to the previous removal of the entrance step to create an interior floor level with the sidewalk. The proposed new doors, which are Gucci's worldwide standard entrance door type, have bottom rail proportions similar to the existing doors. Since the doors are recessed from the sidewalk building line, are dark in color and are constructed from materials o f high quality, finish and durability we consider that they in are keeping with the character and history of the neighborhood. The sign treatment and paint color are similarly appropriate - restrained in appearance and respectful of the building's character. B. The proposed alterations to the East Hopkins Ave. storefront are outlined as follows: a) Replace existing clear-finished and painted wood and glass door and large painted wood window with new painted wood and glass door, transom and window Profile and detailing of storefront to match the existing S. Galena St. storefronts. Paint to be PT-3A, pulls to be MT-3. b) Install polished stainless steel Gucci sign OVIT-1), pin-mounted on transom above door and lit from above by lighting concealed in existing painted wood soffit above entry. The existing door and storefront are not original to the building (see photo board of pre-existing condition). We believe that the proposed facade treatment improves the overall harmony between the building's facades and that the scale of the proposed storefront window is more appropriate to a retail store. In addition to the above proposed alterations, Gucci may wish to erect awnings on both storefronts in the future. These would be of similar type to and would align with the adjoining existing awnings on the Brand Building. Gensler will rely on these notes as the approved record of matters discussed and conclusions reached unless written notice to the contrary is received by Gensler within seven calendar days of the issue of these notes. Distribution: Per attached transmittal Prepared by: Date Issued.· Brian O'Tuama 6/25/98 s:\068042\current\memos\m062598.doc One Rockefeller Plaza Suite 500 Tel: 212.492.1400 New York New York 10020 Fax: 212.492. 1472 .... .. re J '4 /: 2%<32~ -17 -- - . ...73 - . 94 . & f J '-1 .. tter/-, - c~ 'OUS.....4 - - 1 - = .6/1 1 . .A· - --- - 32 fi.~&:1£~=,)'VI.'-&.~- -27-73_·~~. -- 4 -aw_L_ -/ bi&931....imy#at- - ..../.. ,1....1.- 40& ''- 0'-~ 27-re SJ 1 :1. . .61' 1.r .tr. - I I. ' B-:. -e ..:.r&24$2.43.2.7' .01:p-·:·,- 34 .-·43=:c.t·, 9.. ..%lili:4' 1 - 5 beff.+-93~ 2 - f - 1 8 · ....t.'~+ ' *--66 - 1 1 - --"e. , ~97 Fd ~-: 3 - 2,7...·ti,.... . *.--/ 1-»ki, ... 4 I -- I " 11.-'.2. 't r. ' ~ ~ ·-·. ·;4 ::E -~-h.; 1 ·'. , _ , , -y -7 1 , - 8!imiS~~~2 #ar - .: <z==)=116:me,FF.- --- 1 2 7 L lis~ 3Fet :=r. 1t 11, 01 0 - -- M-£-1 * * j- ./= 1.-- -- - 4 :*i IWI _ i~ 1.DING : 7 .t-r 14--2 1 . 1 1,1,11Uullimit'Ill![IN.!1 1- i -* -4 -*=ee- i 1 - 77:. 4 . :fl =a|grvr C. . 9313.,0, - . . 1,~1 L . .7 --1 ~ -- 1 ke:liall'..ba .4, . == m : 1 6/El:,1 1.t -4 , il' 1".21 + I- --I -'' I. [Cll'g ~ 1- 1 1 Al , 1 -I . 8 . 1 4, .. 11 . 1 1 .... ... - "-G·,91 -01&$42- 1£71.-7/t.:3 :23*€2.-1-AM-· -.1+-Cr~95"P:"9»- - < --- f'-' - - EXISTING WOOD RECESSED -. 4741 M.-MY.ILIC--=77* kif#rrin-! -7-----2.-0'Flity·-->dS=.-=.·«......e. ipy BEarp-. - CORI\,lICE - te - .1, - -'- --* 0 -- »f- 9 - ./ *i SIGN LIGHT 2,91€v' r/5-01-#,84- - _*1- . 9 1 PT-3A 1 *.- - - 941 =#unita~~>3*Jez<-*b---'-"-2-*i.*4: 2--=.ga![0»r= .2 Zttli I. ..-- . .-- -- ---- ... - Ja.-':t].415>Sni: .0-·v. ir--== 4€2.2-%=19122'41--*77#43;19*-'4~Z€, Fra::%*-7 =.4.- - €» EXISTiNG STONE - - - 1.-- 1 I EXISTING ¢ 44714*jill 11' All'11_1111 #1 -' LOTS 1 1 · 1,4 111 L 1111 . CLE A R GLASS (TYP) i \\ I 1 \\ -7 14. rl. UL *21 4 -44 SiGN :G ULC_ SiGN 1 1 0. 11 %.1.9, MT-1 r MT-1 i - DOORS AND FRAME ' MT-4 1 DOOR PULLS MT-3 , EXISTING WOOD STCREFRONT PT-3A *e.... lili , lili. 1.: <AM#£ ai--_~~431,5,,~.T~Er,-~-F,l~11 ~ .w·ck- S-- - -- -tr- - 54*4*416£tjg&4% ' - DISPLAY WINDOW INSIDE SHEER AND MOHAIR DRAPERIES INSIDE 1 2 PA I C NIA STREET ELEVATION 1. SECTION THROUGH ENTRY E-R :11 1 1 P A 3. PLAN DETAIL GUCCI 0 0=02 1 1 4 1 203 & GALENA ST. ASPEN, CO. JUNE 26,1998 Gensler · STUDIOS OFIELD SSSUSERSSS 4 L.1,4.. 8.'ANK''ar A," - - SIGN MT-1 1- 1 2 -:-- H .1- EXIST STONE n.1 1 4/32/6 -1 1, .. I. -*- I. .- 37rm-2- EXIST WCOD UNTIL PT-JA 44£*AfF /1 k 1 1 1 4. 9.- RE.=77-17 1 . - 1 , 1 . ' WOOD BEAD BOARD t.. r.-: ~ 3-1 PT-JA - e. I - CLEAR GLASS -2-4»-9 0 -u c'c 1 „ 14' :- 14 - 1 ~ ,r GL--1 1 11 1 1 ID '% 5 4. 9 1 11 1 ·7 •.h 19 · 57 -'/ .,4 CLEAR GLASS |il ~ 6- 1 9-, y.. - GL-1 DISPLAY ¥t , 73. 151 WINDOW ' i ! WOOD DOOR AND ' 1 1 $ 4: 0 t' 2%20 7©-4 4 11 1;21 t:' 7 FRAME PT-JA : ' i :sr' . ... - .. EXIST. STREET -- LIGHT FIXTURE - 1.1 , 214 DOOR PULL . -4 .:11 . 1 1 - 1 MT-3 WOOD STOREFRONT -1 Al. TO MATCH EXIST PT-JA - 'e 1. SECTION THROUGH STOREFRONT 5. LOWER STOREFRONT DETAIL *52=44.2>-4 - -- 1 ====£ 3. DETAIL OF NEW STOREFRONT - E. HOPKINS AVE ELEVATION ~ EXISTING UPPER WINDOWS .-i :1. 11 ' i TO REMAIN - : SHEER DRAPERIES ' ! (OFFICES) 1 IN UPPER WINDOWS i. -1 1 i~ ,.i · I 61 ] 1 : :1 6 1 3 1 r , 4 14 1 I,i 1 1 i i ' l 11 1 p . ..~ ·-·~:14,1:~ 141,· li~ill':SP ·: 1 MOHAIR DRAPERIES Ill'll I ; lili 1 -L-- - * BEHIND ic 5 2 ~2 DISPLAY WINDOW i , 1 1 1 1 lili ill ~ GL-1 TYP 1 1 1 1 , 11 HI Ill 1 4 4. PLAN DETAIL 1 1~,·~' , 1 1=Tizilimmt 11 1 1 j 2. E. HOPKINS AVE ELEVATION GU C CI 012 4 I 203 & GALENAST ASPEN, CO. Geni,ler - STUDIOS OFIELD - SSSUS ERS SS lUFoilfi~'- l 1 , a - t. 00 1 1 1- P. rr (f) Z 35 5 - - # /1 M (/1 a * 23 m Z __1 rn Z 11] nE a 8 3 G T z < O Ul EL (/1 [1 Ld i Ca pi E ~ 33 0 (n zo - 0%61% 1 r' ) # 1- 1- E- 0 5 5 0 312~*f:k 3©1%:! 11 e , . . i ': ··~~-17-:·.7:,C:.1' i y. 3 2 *.r·.33'2~95{9~14 J.Tkif·> ~ 4.'·' 1'101 ' r y 58% 1 , + 1,/ · ' ·· ' i·,·i·;·~~- 2~k ..(-9-j'·),-t-394#F.·I@tryl»02·...21 i . 1 :1 - 1 Ill- 1, .., ;:R ~1: 1,3¥11;ti , :1.-6.·•·,-02·, '.r.i,8'19#41:,i.:·t . :%11(·4:21· ~ 1189 '*'··. · i i :'P'V 4 - I. I 1.1 , .,91. 7 .. .....n...l ~. TM'.1:.19Ii..,!35,~> 6:::.~,7·3-:.4:,4 ;;r·.4.~.RE:·tr·*p *.*-> ld# 6 42'9". 9~:-4. 4 1 .b . )0 1.1,1.L.%?-4 :~1.4<.it,k.),1.!NA***31'1~~t~~Lks:~~:0<%#f#Wi 1..3Fpf & .;t.: 0 ·;i,...,~~ ·I,0>.1.92$641€ ',454*JANZi*m··I,eica:,fi:*f +N /3,· ., ' E- Z .L. 5 0 , . C LI- CK -.1 On .CD In KLU h 1 V M 0 1 0 0 CO Ul 3 « -1 -1 O 0 w CD LU CL E- - d - Ul 00 W --1 3 .a ' 1 '' '.... 5 . 6 2 4 1 ./ ... ..; f.,¥,V,1, " 'r 4 .- 1:, 1..,Ph.:t.;#lt 94171 j.i.-4 't h .·.: = id.% 2'·%, .~ . • •L 1 ~ I-' 41***40 49&6414' L E < 4 · 2 f.522 f :,8>~9.t.fi . 4.-17,&Br··. . 520»y€~1 ' 04:0$ 7., I ~i.;4;-,'~§ 4%,1.11,3*'j·g:-4*2 ·.W•267*j. ..ke-·t'•,-:de 0 =ssaasniss VE-ld „ODION]AA. P6ZZ# 12380IV-1 4 11¥Md 1NIVd VE-ld HSIN13 13~IVN3 SS019-I~3S 1-19 HSINIE 03HSI1Od 'M~)3 STOREFRONT FINISH 013130 6010 Facsimile Transmittal Date # of Pages 7(-119 3 1 TO 12 From 7 M -1-_A JE-ge /4 - 42*,». Co./Dept. Co./Dept. ASPEN/PrI'KIN COMMUNITY 6 4 I k, DEVELOPMENT Phone # Phone # 192* %(9 31 970-920-5090 Fax# Fax # 492-!47-b 970-920-5439 NOTES 1 p-t«~86,-0# F & C~re 0 / - 1-v t. 0 ,> 9 , ir~ 0--i-* 87 ,ADY-~(19&**L ¢ A j 44. A VLC: home/admin/forms/FAX.doc TRANSMITTAL Gensler Hn To Attention City of Aspen Community Development / Julie Ann Woods Historical Preservation Commission Address State Zip City 130 S. Galena Street Aspen CO 81611 Project Project Number File Gucci 06.8042.001 Subject Minor Development Review Application For Your: O Approval and selection 0 Use 0 Record O Review / Comment ¤ Distribution ¤ Information Action Required: O Indicated on item transmitted O Comment and return to Gensler O No action required O Sign and return to this o#ice O See remarks below 9 For Application Review Delivered Via: O Messenger ¤ Mail 0 UPS 0 Express O Hand carried n Pick-up Quantity Description / Remarks Dated 1 Attachment 1: Completed Land Use Application Form. 1 Attachment 2: Completed Dimensional Requirements Form. 1 Per Attachment 3: 1. Letter from Gucci America, Inc. (applicant). 2. Street address & legal description are contained in Attachment 1. 3. A disclosure ofownership statement, ifrequired, is available from: Mr. Harley Baldwin 209 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 tel (970) 920-9797 4. 8 14" x 11" Vicinity Map. 1 Per Attachment 4: 2. Finish Materials Board. 3. Scale drawings ofproposed development at S. Galena St. & E. Hopkins Ave. facades, photographs of existing conditions. 4. Memorandum containing written description ofproposed development. 1 Check for Application review ($120.00). Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions. Transmittal Copies To: Enclosures Delivered Via: 0 Messenger n Mail 0 Far L. Pearce / Gucci Copies of above 0 Express O Hand carried O Pick-up 0 Messenger O Mail 0 Fax E. O'Neill / Studio Sofield Copies of above O Express O Hand carried O Pick-up O Messenger 2 Mail O Fax H. Baldwin Copies of above O Express O Hand carried O Pick-up If enclosures are not as described, please advise Gensler immediately. Prepared by: Date: Brian O'Tuama (ext. 8684) 6/25/98 s:\068042\current\transmit\hpc.doc One Rockefeller Plaza Suite 500 Tel: 212.492.1400 New York New York 10020 Fax: 212.492.1472 G UC CI 685 Fifth Avenue phone 212-826-2600 New York, NY 10022 25 June 1998 RE: Gucci Aspen, Co. Job No. 9857.00 To Whom it May Concern, Please be advised that Mr. William Sofield of Studio Sofield is authorized to act on the behalf of Gucci America, Inc. in all presentations pertaining to the Aspen Historic Commission review proceedings. William Sofield Studio Sofield 380 Lafayette Street New York, NY 10003 212.473.1300 Should you tave any questions or require clarification please do not hesitate to contact ~~s office. Sincerel# .I 04 Lle M. Pearce - Director of Store Planning, Gucci America, Inc. cc : Ted Guy - TGA Architects Brian O'Tuama - Gensler Assoc. Architects V 3. <4> N4 f . , h h /1,4- t 9 « 444 : id, 12 1.. ' -Md 14 4 76'ow-t V-Dr ' X .t . 0 t , -444.41 4 01.54 '. . 4*F '. *L MS.(01* _ 14, Ah,$,0.i. 8/ 2 h 1 :44. . . 14:* ri i ; 8 Mwai: I \, g .1 1 That 4 1 7/ 1 \ i 1., J-9: , 1 79 , l< I f.10,1-, 4 . (1 , , - r <~4 . 1,- /,(/ ~ '-/ ~4~' I: - ' Afi : ..~ '~ p~ 4 4. 4 k. .-0 . S Ff i, 1,44. 4 ' f EifiWI. - 4, / 44 Ji 2» , -40% 0 301'kh k, 4- 4(-%,L 44 i >41 /5 4. 9*~~1~4 *60 a a 1/ 19. > 1 1/ . s 3 1 '' i Mion•, 1 *, i ~ ,· · z.,7 v 8, ~ i"lii- ' Ik . 2 S: Jlk J* «· ~1.i. *. H'#.A~&~t~ I ' SITE LOCATION VICINITY MAP NTS