Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.205 S Mill St.HPC7-953«-3 844) Chanin' s HPC Exemption 2737-073-38-704 HPC7-95 Bal -16 2 - 6 4 P . .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 04/13/95 CASE NUMBER: HPC7-95 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2737-073-38-704 PROJECT NAME: Chanin's HPC Exemption Project Address: 205 S. Mill St. APPLICANT: Paul Chanin & Mill St. Plaza Assoc. Applicant Address: REPRESENTATIVE: Scott Smith, Gibson & Reno 925-5968 Representative Address/Phone: 210 E. Hyman, #202 Aspen, CO 81611 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: X HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: .. SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT 4 Development Application for Exemption from HPC review (Please attach supplemental information, i.e. sketches, samples, catalogue details or any information which may be of assistance in approving the development activity. Please provide a detailed description of the proposed activity.) Applicant' s name: ~0504 0#NO jACc,HMEc:rS (;1777(/; SO:77- 5m,-r«) Address and day phone: 2 /0 6, +4'/FAAN 94,ZZ,02. A·5pEN Property owner: 98TAULANT : PAULWAAN / N bVILD (NG: M#U 57: PLAZA AMoGIATES Is applicant authorized to represent owner in this application?_YES Address of property: 526>16 6.MILL- 67 . ASPEN Name of property, if applicable: Milt ST#Regr FLAZA/CHANINS REST;4 URANT Is this an Individually Designated Landmark? NO Located within the Commercial Core Historic Overlay District? VES Located within the Main Street Historic overlay District? Ne i Does the proposed development meet the standards specified in Paragraph #2 in Attachment #4? Explain in detail the proposed development: coN Vales 1 eN of' '34-4 S, P. 8 O€>F=- ·c,€,sM- -rt, 8*TE Fus A- SEAriNG: AREA , . Ir#e 'B\LL- vr. pLAZA Be-rAtl-, APD/T#ohf ~E~EL.oW ~THIS. t:> ez-~L~ 0616\NAU~ 9,MoluE:P A 8,52>r DEA¥- ANVE 01•1 -ni€ O'Re/NAL p £-AN~ < j vty 11 , 199 4~ A NEAU 925¥:>f~ WILL Atft APD EEC) IN 81 ISTINGr U..4 N©61.U OpeN ING;5 06 -t+E f·ESTAVAA NT W)ALL- fb* Accas. 4- -4- 6 61€=LU SH=Arr 670'481>RAIL_ WILL. 15£ 41=Dep 074 -r•p el=:=- f Ht -E>)11 sTIA€~ DELIC- PAf„ per- (uh U-( TD vn f7 0H Fmi l t:Tl n e, fA ILA A-1- *THE. VWU- ':99-, f LAZAh , A Thank you. Planning staff will notify you if further information is requested. exempt.app 4 'T- MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 205 S. Mill Street, Chanin's- Minor Date: April 26, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to change an existing window to a door and to create an outdoor deck with railing. This structure is not historic, but is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Paul Chanin & Mill Street Plaza Associates. LOCATION: 205 S. Mill Street. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Section 7-601 has recently been amended through Planning and Zoning Commission, Resolution 6, Series of 1995. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: The proposal involves changing a window to a door and installing a new railing around a roof deck. The door and railing will match those existing on the building. Staff finds the modification Will be compatible with the existing structure. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposal provides the opportunity for added liveliness, which contributes to the character of the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for .. development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal has no impact on the historic significance of any historic structure. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal has no impact on the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted. Additional Comments: .. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 26,1995 205 S. MILL, CHANIN'S - MINOR Donnelley: This is a minor development for a railing and deck changes. MOTION: Jake moved that HPC approve the minor development application as submitted for 205 S. Mill Street with one condition that the doors that are outward swinging be made to swing inward; second by Roger. DISCUSSION Jake: If outward doors are left open it causes clutter and I feel the inward door are a cleaner solution. Donnelley: In this case one can swing 90 degrees and the other would swing 180 back against the fenestration of the inside. Functionally they work better outward swinging. This is not an egress deck so they could go either way. There is always the problem with weather on inswinging doors. Roger: I don't see a problem if they open inward. Donnelley: You only see it from across the street not from the sidewalk. Dave Gibson: We may desire screens in the summer over the doors in which case the screens would then be on the outside. MOTION WITHDRAWN MOTION: Roger moved that HPC grant minor development approval for 205 S. Mill Street as presented, second by Linda. Motion carries 4-1. Jake opposed.· 434 W. SMUGGLER - PARTIAL DEMOLITION Sven stepped down due to conflict of interest. . MOTION: Roger moved that HPC approve partial demolition of the non historic garage at 434 W. Smuggler Lots K and L Block 33 City and Townsite of Aspen as drawn; second by Jake. All in favor, motion carries. 834 W. HALLAM - POPPIE'S BISTRO - CD-PH Amy: We looked at this project about a year ago and the applicant has been working with city council and was given an increase of FAR to match what is allowed in the office zone district so that they could do an employee unit. I am recommending approval with some 5