The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.208 1/2 E Main St.HPC 16-98CASE STATUS SHEET Case No. /7 /0 /4 x90 4233 91 E N A-AL-n Representative's Name: 7,1 i.. fr 1.k ,/ .: ... Representative' s Phone: â‚¬ 15 -(014-7 Fax: DATE ACTION OR ACTIVITY Re.Â·u#, (f~u-â‚¬~0 , Ac,-wÂ· C w~ 1, Ce, Â¢ 7)Â» fU />th.,4 /<1 ' 4-492:0---,1::t;Fra- i< 4-31, ---JI Â°Il- /-0/,< , Aj f 0 A A.â‚¬ â‚¬ G//./5 6 Ary-6 -3 6,/ cO=,O. Ch ..Ak< ty *#45/*utt, J I ' a- ph-*- d Ae#.24-4* f'Adl ffÂ».5 . ON rl ---1 m Le 0 -J r I U) OI 1-1-1 N "10 P. O 0 0 OVI L . 86 A Ap 139 -2083 E. Main Street 073 HPC 16-98 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT AT 208 1/2 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. ~, SERIES OF 1998 WHEREAS the applicant, Claudette Carter, represented by Tim Semrau, has requested minor development approval for the property located at 208 1/2 E. Main Street, which is located within the Main Street Historic District; and WHEREAS all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof, and WHEREAS, Julie Ann Woods, in her staff report dated June 10, 1998, recommended approval as proposed; and WHEREAS, the application was reviewed at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on June 10, 1998, at which the Commission considered and approved the application with conditions, by a vote of 6-0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development approval for 208 1/2 Main Street, Aspen, Colorado, be approved with the following conditions: 1. The siding shall match the existing rusted metal along the north elevation and the vertical wood siding along the west elevation. 2. The roof material will match the existing tin, with a modified pitch as shown in the drawings. 3. All material representations made by the applicant in this Â®plication and during public hearings shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by a decision-making body having the authority to do so. 4. The exterior door will be that as shown in the photograph submitted as an Exhibit to the record, which is a wood door with a single light with rounded corners at the top of the light. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of June, 1998. Approved as to form: City Attorney HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1/1 1 1 7*AudÂ« 9%4 Chhirhitf ' ATTEST: \f ~Â«4 f~ f 1Â«-,141Â« Chief Deputy Clerk ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 10. 1998 Heidi stepped down. Julie Ann Woods, planner presented. There is an existing fence with a roofed enclosure and the proposal is to install a solid wall and door and enclose it as part of the permanent structure. This outbuilding is very old and it would not increase the FAR. Existing materials will be used. The structure is being used as an office. The proposal does not detract from the historic significance of the building. The siding will match the existing and a tin roof is proposed. Tim Semrau was sworn in. Tim Semrau architect for the project relayed that this was the Black Shack studio. The enclosure would become an office. Photos ofthe proposed door were presented for the records. MOTION: Jeffrey moved to approve the minor development for 208 1/2 E. Main with the following conditions to be met: 1. The siding shall match the existing rusted metal along the north elevation and the vertical wood siding along the west elevation. 2. The roof material will match the existing tin, with a modified pitch as shown in the drawings. 3. Atl material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by a decision-making body having the authority to do so. 4. The photograph of the proposed door presented is Exhibit III for the records. Roger second the motion. All infavor, motion carried 6-0. 10 /.....4 .1 0 - . A , 4 d 4 1, 1 k ,A Â¢ 4 ... 4- AÂ¢ - 1 - A t. ..1 , i 1 1 .1 . 1 '' I .i *4\ EX 04441,1.Â»2.S~;3 14 j) 0%*Al .-44 .10 ,%1:la* 11,4.:21.2.Z~ % 4//0,4 4 /61 4/44-0-6Â« fti: Â«F-- N--- Â© MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission H rtel 54Â¢4 THRU: Stan Clauson. Community Development Director ~ ~~Â£~~,Q., FROM: Julie Ann Woods. Deputy Planning Director c 011# [Acting Historic Preservation Officer-] 7- - fIL-10 RE: 208 1/2 E. Main Street (Behind Gracy's)--- Minor Review i ~ f k-f. rf- DATE: June 10. 1998 i 4 ki *0 of ,)Â»011.1 SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to fully enclose the existing courtyard on the 3 A. 6- ,(- northwest corner of the outbuilding and return it to its original form using existing materials. A new exterior door and a new window (both of which will be relocated from k.,w,h,/ the interior of the courtyard) will be added. The enclosure will be approximately 60 square feet in size. well within the 250 s.f. limitation for minor review. The applicant is - making this request in order to increase the office space of the tenant, Tim Semrau, at this location. APPLICANT: Claudette Carter, represented by Tim Semrau. LOCATION: 208 1/2 E. Main Street (small outbuilding behind Gracy' s in the alley) PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H." Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. The subject building is not an historic landmark, but falls within property that is landmarked (202 and 208 [Gracy's] E. Main) and is within the boundaries of the Main Street "H," Historic Overlay District. Though this building appears old, it was not included in the original inventory and is not considered landmarked. The only reference on the inventory sheet (see Exhibit "B") is "livestock shed, approximately 120 square feet". 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to jive hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this 1 section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The proposed changes to the livestock shed office are compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with the adjacent parcels within the M, Historic Overlay District. There are no variances being requested, and the setbacks will not extend beyond the existing dnclosed floorplan as indicated on the attached site plan (see sheet A-1 of application). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character Of the neighborhood Of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed development will have little to no affect on the character of the neighborhood. The office building exists, and the small addition will just formalize the enclosure with a more substantial roof and walls. The existing door and window located within the interior of the courtyard will be re-used. The enclosure will be clad with rusted metal siding to match the existing along the north elevation. The west elevation will be wood-sided to match the existing (using materials from inside the courtyard). The roof will have a slight change in pitch. but will match the existing tin roof (please refer to drawing A-3 of the application). The zoning officer has reviewed this proposal and has indicated that there will be no net increase in floor area as the enclosure with roof struc.ture was already included in previous FAR calculations. Once completed, the change should be relatively imperceptible to persons who travel through the alleys. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed change would not detract from the historic significance of the designated historic structures located on the parcel or from those located on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity Of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development will not diminish the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 2 â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the proposed changes to 208 1/2 E. Main Street. with the following conditions: 1. The siding shall match the existing rusted metal along the north elevation and the vertical wood siding along the west elevation. 2. The roof material will match the existing tin, with a modified pitch as shown in the drawings. 3. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by a decision-making body having the authority to do so. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the proposed changes to 208 1/2 E. Main Street with the conditions recommended in the staff memorandum dated June 10, 1998." EXHIBITS: Exhibit "A" - The submitted application. Exhibit "B" - Historic Architectural Building/Structure Form (Inventory) 3 F)Â¢vt ~ 0,1- ft.~ " .....Al ,/;y -ta.E==sk '-aBW-0-2...=:Ag> ac:.im,..A - 135.*.-46,-"A..E -,-r-.-2 -*Cy=- 11!/ Ah li C *# 1.-M i -h - Â·i C 61 4 4 0 Â·. + 1 . 'f-Â¢ 7 -4. .Elt. I. " ''92.47 /R.,puil& A~ -6.-1.-I'/2~ 4 UÂ»*~%71Â»li-~: .If~*t0F ~PE *3.~ 4, / sept_.,~=-1.-* -2223*#-,Â·28.- A $ ./,na,/4<i~ . I.;.-*. *' ./. 1.+I~'.'i'./ ffil~~2'25..Â·<'~,L'~Ir. - 4 -/ 1.11 1,1. .. 96.- 43 - - K+Ff/~f 02$ 1-SWY'wi - - 1. 3 emrau 1.,ut|ding 4 0-- el....1.- 208 1/2 E. Main, Aspen, Co 81611 "plan/design/build" {970] 925-6447; Fax; {970] 925-6437 5/20/98 To; Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development From; Claudette Carter RE; Minor remodel of Gracy's office. Timothy Semrau, of Semrau Building and Design, is my authorized representative for the Gracy' s office project. I am the owner of Gracy' s. Claudette Carter 110(_ L_- :LLI .2 L \-Â· i 1, ., i ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Application Package Contents Following is an application for minor development review at HPC. Included in this package are: 1. Attachment 1- Application form 2. Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 3. Attachment 3- Description of general requirements for a complete development application 4. Attachment 4- Description of specific requirements for a complete development application to HPC 5. Attachment 5- Applicable review standards on which HPC wiil base its decision 6. Attachment 6- General summary of the HPC review process 7. Attachment 7- Definition of minor development To submit a complete application, fill out Attachments 1 and 2. include all items listed on Attachments 3 and 4, and provide any other information necessary to clarify the project. A pre-application conference is strongly recommended so that the appropriate review process and submission requirements can be discussed. In addition, other reviews, such as those before the Planning and Zoning Commission. which may be required by the Aspen Municipal Code can be identified at this time. A consultation with the Zoning Officer and Building Department is also recommended early in the application process. TWO COPIES OF ALL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS IN A FORMAT NO LARGER THAN 11"X17" ARE REQUIRED. FOR GRAPHICS WHICH ARE LARGER THAN 11"X17," SUBMIT TWELVE SETS OF PRINTS. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: C LAU O E -TEE CA-AT e /L Address: 0207,204 2 08,/1- E..MA-/rj (~-O -9-73 Sof QFS Ccee(C .-RcAO, , Zone district: - B A-SALT-) Lot size: 6300 5 2 Existing FAR: 3600 94 en - Allowable FAR: -:64â€¢Â·6~:--- PA & 5~9 0 0 Proposed FAR: 31.00 3610*00* 1.r /uder A-01:/, 17(0 0 - Existing net leasable (commercial): Re â€¢AA, wi 1-ke â„¢+4 f - Proposed net leasable (commercial): C.- Existing % of site coverage: .i a Proposed % of site coverage &Â£ u Existing % of open space: -L Proposed % of open space: IL Existing maximum height: Princioal bida- Accesorv blda: Proposed max. height: princical blda Accessorv bida: Proposed 3/0 of demclition: Existing number of bedrocms- Proposed number of bedrooms: Existing cn-site parking spaces: On-site parking spaces required: Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: Front: Front: Rear: Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined Front/rear: Front/rear FronUrear: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Variations requested: (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5Â°/0, height variations under the cottage infil program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone distMcts) U V 0 17 r i O t./ tr- ~A< -+1 '.--- r /--67.<-.~ N K W .4 1.I, L -A M--S I <31Â¢ 76.11 kiiÂ§ 1 P I l l 4-2:Unal--11:2>-- h ~ 1 I -- f i:- . l , I nnril /1 4--1- 4 2 1-4 N .--1- 1 4 Loi / + - * ta iL 1 11 4 1 I i: --~--~ f tn ~-~ 1 - 0 1~ 1 Â· 4/ // P %9 941 i 1 jONi~ ~{2 Wn-1~ ~~10 ~;n~~ ~MNju12~ ~35Â¢9~ ~ o I ,#3 4 Lz--. ./1 " 11 il 1 1 .1- k -t i T E Bl#lig~ 4 U C.1 La~~* I tr~I tiq i GrÂ·Z 3 - M...Le ' j L.-4 1 li 1-1 / 4 ---215MB,ect - -- - - 41 =iâ€ž0,791*INL 1 :' [ l-t-~1 I ~h, - 1 0 ~*1' Unn g~ 1 VAO[M r - __., 45#,s U 1 ---1 0 1\ lk, L.G.. . 9 --ki n D~~ 111-_n 11'L\-- h A w HUY# .12 ' 6 1.3 tzi \ k.m.r ---<12 fijell valal - -TfU:2=r---*--Nut I =m , -- ry 9 U'.4. -l- .-1- - 11 1 I 01 - -1 E- 41 U 0 1--KnÂ·,D q N 1 01 A ls fut'1. 24Â»1 47 ~f246u ~ 1 *i '1 __lu Cze 1 nAt-Â» D tfAV-- 131 ' r~Enti 1 Ji L.2-6 Â·464 ~35- ij5 g'64 tj - ~'~ -3 1 Ii[ 1 N. - L - 1 Iri j 1 h -7-~11 61 !-11.11 *lu> - - U- -7 1 1 -~ * 6-1 2 - L_G / Il , I I H| 1 ul V. hY*#fl~Eli'ti9.9549#16,21 <4-6 Vc 0(N,Ti : _~1*r-~ IIi h 1 1-* , 83 < u LI [ EJ 1 Jâ€¢ j rÂ®Ad- 4.---Â·-7 J I n A 1-nl *Ira~-- - EX ti- 1 6 ll- " B . HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 202.208.EM Photo Information: ASP-B-27 & 29 Township 10 South Range 84 West Section 7 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Turlev / Bowes Residence Full Street Address: 202 and 208 East Main Legal Description: Lots L, M, Block 73 City and Townsite of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Main Street Historic District Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residence Architectural Style: Victorian Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1 Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): "r.J" Shaped Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Picket fence, not original Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): 1-story simple gable with concrete masonry roof/vertical wood siding; livestock shed; approximately 120 square feet For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Cross gabled with asphalt shingle Walls: Clapboard Foundation / Basement: Brick for 202; unknown for 208 Chimney(s): 2-lat center of Main (N-S) gable; brick with corbelled ton Windows: 2 shallow-prolecting bay with shed roof with one-over-one double hung window. supported by scroll brackets at front (south); one-over-one double hung, typical, wood slider added Doors: 2 at 202: transom-over-1/2 lite-over-wood panel 1 at 208: 1/2 lite-over-wood panel Porches: 202: Shed running north-south, open supported by turned posts with arched decorative wood 208: Small shed. enclosed, supported by turned posts and decorative brackets General Architectural Description: Both residences are tvvical of Victorian Miner's Cottages in Aspen. Examples are double door entry front qable with prolecting qable clapboard siding, fish scale detail; two residences connected together by 1 story, flat roofed breezeway. The street faces off both buildings, and they basically remain in their original appearance. The front qables with projecting bay window. trimmed in horizontal clapboard with fishscales in qable; a cross qable with centrally located chimney. double front entry, turned posts and gingerbread detail on porch and typical long. narrow double-hung windows. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 202.208.EM FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Commercial Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Construction Date: Lot L - 1891 Lot M - 1892 X Actual _ Estimate X Assessor MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Additions and Date: Extensive rear additions, one flat roof (202) and one shed ( 208);2 residences 1 oined together ; dates unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B__ C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 21 - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: * Associated Contexts and Historical Information: Important as examples of Victorian residential architecture in Aspen. 202 East Main was built for W.E. Turlev, proprietor of a furniture. carpets. glassware. etc.. store (manv advertisements in old Aspen papers). He was also chairman of the County Commissioners, elected for three veras, and the County Coroner for four years. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin Countv Court- house Records; Sanborn & Sons Insurance Maps; "Historical & Descrip- tive Review of Colorado's Enterprising Cities." p. 124. July 1893. Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: March 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner . W.E.Turley W.E.Turley - Furniture and Carpets, Queensware, Glassware, Lamps etc.; Undertaking and Embalming, Keene Block, Corner Hyman/Galena. 'Among the foremost establishments in its important branch of trade should be mentioned that of W.E.Turley, established 1n the spring of 1881. The premises occupled are spaclous and well arranged. They are 40 x 21_fkmt-*_ba.sepre#16-*shal*Ts*-re 11.- wl-th-anot her-basement-next dir. .-Also Mr. Turley is proprletor -of the leading undertaking esta-blishment in Aspen, which _ ; establishment is 20 x 32 feet. He employs six assistants. ' Mr. Turley is a native of Mlssourl, and is an I.0.0.F. and Elk. He is chairman of the county commissioners, and was elected for three years. He was county coroner four years.' , . Resource: Historical and 0-esâ‚¬Â¥I-*trÂ¥rRe-*tew--uf---CbI-orado's Enterprising,Cities published in Denver July 1893 p.124 - . ----- 0 - - -- -1 - ./-. - - . . --- I ., . ASPEN MAIN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION STUDY name of building \4 #12.-Ene-Lgy Ame of builder, owner Or designe-F 208581 3 :,7 St. - address 8\k 73 \01- M block, lot Justification of the estimated date of construction: .Research source Date of construction 1. Assessor Card 1868 2. Assessment Tax Record ~892- 3. Sanborn & Sons Ins. - Appeare on 1895) 189% nol- on 1990 Maps . 4 1 826. 4. other [Bird's Eye; town maps, Aspen Times , etc.) DATE OF CONSTRUCTION (explanation if necessary) d;.FEâ‚¬>re-rt dwanIng appear:s or) 1892/ 1896 M ap + 1640 * 50 fne-1- Cyne. bell,0.ar) 1 841 eF 18 93 L Information leading toward ownership: Research source - Grantor, grantee records -- - 1 . . t , . 0 . I .. + * I 4 ---M#1# - . -B -1 + -:1___ - - -- I .i. N:. i. : ., U: 1 //.. ! TVO 1 1 LA12.1 , 2<,4 1 L-:u' 1 ' Â· 1 ~ hli,/,4 i 1 ! ,221=1 , M/,4 : 1 1 1 11 1/ al L----_a 6 .-L. 1 .33 -2, - 0:0: I - 1,94.1.'fj -:7 MAIN ' -7 r-5 r 2 4# v I , \ \ / 1 2 11-_ _ 2 2_tr Â»-23Â»=. - \_.1 f 2-01_ l.. <2' Lo-\ / / - 2-24 - . J - 1 - /1 3 Asc rt-- 10,1 1 L__1 ' X :1 1 1 1 )2.w .: , /1 11 i 11 1 -X--1 1 1-4,/ i 1 33 J L.oT L, 79( 1 YWA - - fl i / 4% r ' /1 1 c - :#.Â· i F'; : ,~c-- , , 4-7- ''-. '' 1 -*' . ./ 41 1 I h.ulu /_00/411-.,Â«_i i -, 1 1 - t 1 / tcrÂ·' 4.' 1 1 4 I --4 1 i i\, tri;34> COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SUPVEY Colorado Preservation Office 00 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203 ARCHITECTURAL/HISTORICAL COMPONENT FORM -6 . ~ IMPORTANT: USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GREEN INVENTORY RECORD FORM FOR FOR RECORDING HISTORIC STRUCTURES AND DISTRICTS. USE SEPARATELY FOR RECORDING STRUCTURES LOCATED WITHIN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES. 1) Resource No. 5PT-114 2) Temp No. 381 3) Name W.E.TURLEY House 4) Address 208 East Main Street 31 District Name Main Street Historic District I. INTEGRITY: 6). Condition : Good * Fair Deteriorated 7) Original Use Residential 81 Present Use Residential 91 Original Site * Moved DateCs) ef Move: N/A 10) Unaltered * Altered Explain: N/A II. DESCRIPTION# 111 Building Materials Wood 121 Construction Date 1892 131 Architect/Builder unknown 14) Architectural Style(sl Victorian Miner's Cottaqe 15) Special Features/Surroundings: T.ypical Victorian Miner's Cottaqe features of double door entry (main and parlor room); front qable with projectinq bay window. horizontal clapboard sidinq, fishscale detail in qable; cross gable with centrally locatpd chimnpy, turned posts and qinaerbread detai 1 on porch. 161 Archaeological Potential: Yes No Unknown * Explain: III. CULTURAL ACTIVITIES: Key the resource type (ie: house, barn, shed, school. church, etc) to the cultural activity theme and sub-theme category associated with it, 17) THEME Residential 18) SUB-THEME Urban 19) TYPES Single-family 5PE-*14/ 012..2-,3.-Â· 4 -Â·dÂ·- -4 . -01* 233 RESOURCE NO._ Â·-r, . . 7,41.12 , - . Frame Number 9 Roll Number 11 2... 7 -9 Facade Orientation South 6. Â·4 Fron I ' er 3 fit h IV. SIGNIFICANCi: Assess whether or not the resou~ce has any historical or architectural merit by checking appropriate categories and justifying below. Include any relevant historical data. 20) Architectural Significance: 21) Historical Significance: Represents work of a master Associated with significant persons Possesses high artistic values _ Associated with significant events or * Represents a type, period, or patterns method of construction * Contributes to the significance of an historic district The historical importance of this residential structure is that it was built-for W.E.Turley, proprietor of a furniture, carpets, glassware etc. store ( many advertisements in old Aspen papers). He was also chairman of the county commissioners, elected for three years and the county coroner for four years. The architectural significance of this Victorian Miner's Cottage is that it basically remains in its original appearance and the design materials and layout are typi cal of an Aspen Victorian Miner's Cottage. The front gable with projecting bay window, trimmed in horizontal clapboard with fishscales in gable; a cross gable with centrally located chimne: double front entry, turned posts and gingerbread detail on porch and typical long, narrow _ double hung windows. 22) List Any Associated Cultural Group:_ none V. REFERENCES=: Historical and Descriptive Review of Colorado's Enterprising Cities - July 1893, p. 124 1 u Pitkin County Abstract of Lots Books (title search) Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps ..9.*ft ?41- J . ..7 r -- ~ ~- Â· - >I; 1 -1.17'to RECORDER John P. Stanford DATE_ JO/23/80 -4.. IN~ DRY OF HISTORIC SITES & STRU C~ES ANALYSIS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE - ASPEN, COLORADO 1980 RESOURCE NUMBER: -- - 4 , -. NAME OF STRUCTURE/SITE/PROJECT: .-/ -A 7 ; I LOCATION: , *.. ' Block - i\,A 'k c. Lot , - Street Address RESOURCE INTEGRITY: 0= None,N/A /1= Notable /2= Excellent /3= Exceptional (Maximum - 3 Points) DEGREE _OF SIGNIFICANCE SCORE I. 7-7 Historically Associated with Events of Significance to: . LOCALE 0123 . REGION 0123 . STATE 0123 . NATION 0123 SUBTOTAL 1Â»1 II. f--7 Historically Associated with Individuals or Groups which are Significant to: . LOCAL 0 1 2 3 . REGION 0T23 . STATE 0123 . NATION 0123 SUBTOTAL ETT III. / / Embodies Distinctive Characteristics of: . TYPE/STYLE ARCHITECTURE/CONSTRUCTION 0123 . PERIOD OF ARCHITECTURE 0123 . METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION 0123 SUBTOTAL li-f IV. 7-7 Represents the Work of a Significant Craftsman/Wilder/Architect: . LOCALLY 0123 . REGIONAL 0123 . NATIONAL 0123 SUBTOTAL- rET V. /-7 A Noteworthy Surviving Example of a Styl e Becoming Rare in the Locale or is Identified with a Street Scene or other Landscape 0~23 T71 VI. Possesses High Artistic Value 0123 E TOTAL POINTS I Z I /17 1 - 6 Points = NOTABLE . DATE: 7, -I. 9-7 J 4-7 7-12 POINTS = EXCELLENT f-/ 13 - 18 POINTS = EXCEPTIONAL 22~112~t '. 0- 1 6..: 1 -4 I./W '' L â€¢ pr- .0 1% I , 3 ... ..*' .. , 14.,1'.r , - 44 --I.:- ./-//*I - 4 F 4- 2-'.Â£~4-'. ./.Â· t - i., I e y .13 kt. .1-- 2 4 Â·. / i t / 1- 1 0. 1 3* I . 4322/A 0 7*%~tezer.If-fi-flut<-9-4 4~1-:--Â· 5/24&447#gr. .. ''1,1.....3-2.i. 0.--:~6. 41,12.326;Fli62#*3262*hz:".:tÂ·-9(FILJ~~AID,424. . ~ ~ .+4,<*9&1Â·r -ic:>Â·<tr-:i.'.~;59Â·..LctuE:~2/a~Â·4Â£4tAS.7+2: ... 19* 449: 3.-. 2 9 7 /17 - I , 7, 3 1..3 0-C/c .. BUILDING DESCRIPTION AND fa: PLACEMENT-COST--RECORDv- RESiDENTIAL G..0 0,--- '4491 N AIN 0 ,1 6 1,1,91. 01.CNIPTION 'r $'cl , s ., Pâ€¢ISICAL CDâ€¢.6,1,04 Â· GAO#6-0-,CAN-intrCH /LOG Ne . . :,11 1 .''I f .....Uloa - l=2'On - Â¥, AM' r , 47 I 1,4.Ii. Nurn... bil..., .... . AMEA-*â€¢iâ€¢ OUILOING â€¢ C..... C.0.'in' :10'. - I J I . M Â£; c r9 4 (7d --4..21.12:â€¢'RE@--__ 93...._.___ 1--!2'-/02- 1- 19 1.......1,01 .0,1,7â€¢.,1 .'.9, v...., G Go,4 19 1 ............ /6. i ... I P'.'.D , E.'.11./1 ./ ,/. '.'.' 12 1 ........... . d F\ ............. LE#EiÂ«--Miti_*8979999--.- 4-+ ; 1 -,4 ->j:~Mfl"i-LI-- 15L t!~1L_.1,9 co;~, 1 1 1!1 lili JIll 1 1, . 601. N i I 1 '1.-9-,1.-L- 1 5 ' GC 00, I I! 1,3 câ€¢ 1 C! k...N Fig ~| i C 2 p' bel. i-1 2-2-ly_i 22-22 . C 1 6, :. ... -1- 6-t-:C-.--1-74-1.-I-I-Z-- 1, C.0"7;- F I . '.1 fill" 1 i ICL-r'.1. 1 lilli, 0 : I ./. r. 1. i , D.....1.~74 -1- I . .0,/16. ........ ......... 7 1 - 101" 1 1 Câ€žI.' : S,%'..f b./.1 / .3 . Mir{ AOJJ:,filr,T :C~i.1,1 0.5 1 1 I I .... 3.4. ../ 4 0. .. QUAN, it,Â·, ' 6, â€¢*.14104 Ar.19Â· , ....a.11 Â¥ - .1- :711.,C ..0, . 1 . ..1 ...... J hiâ€¢,01â€ž I i " C , ' 6.â€¢'.90 0Â·â€¢â€¢ 1 6 0. - 1 . . 2 .11 1..... .... , 10/At 1 Â·/11 ... 1 (In ./ATIN' * CODLIN@ 1 ... 1, 1 ....1... . . ..... . .... ., 0 , .1/4 - Titi'.ZEt/Â£ -ri 4 3 "90Â· .1., -Â·-Â·Â· 8 'r,/i 6,Â·Â·,4 .--Zi-- -~I 7 Â·Â·Â· I. 1 .... el..... ..... 1,1. ..<. o. .,:2 : v ' ' '-' OOLLâ€¢â€¢ ADJUITI,4, G.,u,Al.GN, . -- ......1 . . I -r Ai "i/ U I ... ...1.0 /7 B , Â¢0;r 503, i,iâ€¢00, 117--1- - OVANnlÂ¥ -1, -E=== LI=== 1 U., 4, 0 01 , " .,TrIll 1 0,1 . 4 1 1 , w.g r.,â€¢ee. e ' S..c 114'.. CO.1 1 - I ~1-1-- 0- A ' 11.... i.uir â€¢ 1 . 1. J i .'. Thi-AL ; 444/ 1..1 1-- 1 1 . ..,1,Â¥1'.'.1 ,1/. ...6 ,4. lili. ' &1- +lit 1 - 1 . tÂ·/1-,1.,I ..,.,,., ' , 1 4, I lf. FINU P . 239.-0 - - I . ' I Iri, , COM M TltiONS .. .- 1, 19 1. 0.Â· ------i 2--Il--ELi.2--f jO/-23Â£162--- +' 1 "r, 1 142 - - 1) /3- 41 17__ f C, 'irâ€¢.,0. 5'1 4'll_. 1.wr.i~u IF" 4,2 - 1.r,tu !!11 re'.2 2,## 112. ._131L_ w.â€¢t Â·4 -1 ' 111. 4'.g - 1 - 4,14 4. .0.,1.. - - --- I-- -- .. .. \ I - . ".0,1.11 8 C.91'.11 /.... .,1 1,61,1,71.1,Â¥i /Ii,li, 1â€¢/ROVE,ICNIS 0â€¢*i....le 4â€¢0 4 h Uâ€¢â€¢1 u/ . C N .. -2 iI_ " *' 60"r...L 1 PE'.CCIA,LON . ..w,mc, 1 . . 1....0 1 1 Â¥.11. . li'. . 60.0 IC./.,1....,/4.1 IICI, t....... .- ..... ,Â·......., C..,â€¢.. Â£ 1, 6, ; -/-73- i. ./1 GOOJ to , 7:. -50 n 1 11,60 7 7 F '2 1" 1 TOTAL #CH'Ct g '44 1 65 ,- Â· Â· , 1 .. A . -r'f C Chairman Aspen Historic Preservation Committee c/o Aspen Planner P.O. Box V Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Sir: As owner (,t) of the real property si tuated on Lots /4 L , A-l' in Block 74 Aspen, Colorado I/we request that the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee investigate the historical significance of said property for possible designation as an H, Historic Overlay District. Owner(s) .-- -76 Date: 4 L.1,47 .S- / d ' I- * i . f kE,9-5Z6 (046) xej/Lf#9-gZ6 (0L6) ouotid I I9Ig opulo[oj 'uadsv .0 1 1- ' ~I9IB Opeloloo 'uadse 'upetu ise@ 3/I BOY o 1/. UJUIN .3 Z/I 802 i ~ d ~ 1 UNIsap puu Bulplinq ne.Imas aMJJO st&78.19 El Â«4 S â‚¬-1 k J T -I + 2 0-9 0 9-9 12.-ELLIEJUU -4- 4 1 04 Q E- W Z C.) WO ? FE O 0 de 40 rk 0 2 E 9- 23 Â« 0 i .- I 1 1 04 1. -br-,' --* 4-- 1 V 2 9--Al Â· 1 06 -:> 0 2 SNIISIXE[ GIDIArIO DWILSIX~ ID-6 13179 11 11 _31 VOF Ill'! i i Lâ‚¬*9-516 (OL6) xej/L#9-516 (0L6) guotid II9I8 OpeJoloo 'uadsv 7 t I WIg opE.[0[00 'uqdse 'uletu 1sea Z/I WOE u!EW .H Z/I 803 In HS 4 1 1 ~Uillsap pue Nulplinq neimas .MJJO SIK:)019 5 ... cr 0 1 rn 0-j & 2 #kisj 4 C 13 \Uâ‚¬ \112 VATi J 91.cl- J 13, 2/ -2 1 4011 4 .E 0 LJ 10 0 ~ 22 Ek .02 13 , -- St ' X 'L i ; 1 10 413@L 1 . N =- 1 26 141 - 3 1 C .g t Z 37: i- - 6 -=-- - i; 9 // ~H' # / Ila O 4 4 3 z -0 0 3 /- 4 - / 1 9 4011,14 It yj Â§- gue k. R // 1 41 , 1/ #J 1 . -- 4 1 0.- 41 / toc -) Ts#f 1 1 1 . 22 2 1 rt- 17 A M M 41 O i # Â«~4 2 2- LA , 1 9 1 I. 1 . 0 4 . 4 \It i \{\ 2 - 1. \\\ NOILVA113[ HLXION uniual 04 BU!11!xa 4 4 r 1 * 1 . m 1 Â»3 i & C 0 Z \ I 19 i : 1 2 . r rN * 3 \9 -1 / 1 't F *,r FiE 9 5 "- - r- i 1 1 i. m m rn ESÂ· tracy's Office semrau building and design 208 1/2 E. Main - Aspen, Colorado 81611 208 1/2 east main, aspen, colorado 81611 ,~ 1 0 9 phone (970) 925-6447/fax (970) 925-6437 2 I t NOI.LVASITIGI H.DION 6ulpling 6u!1$!xa semrau building and design . 208 1/2 east main, aspen, colorado 81611 4\ - Phone (970) 925-6447/fax (970) 925-6437 NOTE: ALLEY WAS FORMERLY PART OF EXI5T!NG ENCL05ED COURTYARD EXETNG OFFICE - EXISTING 20371 5 L,7 0 j ENCLOSED E , Nfl /, J PARKING f FL U P /Â» COURTYARD EXISTING OFFICE /-- LOT LINE Chz LU I C.0 LU e Ul GRACY;5 - --1 <I 3, LU 1-1.3 0 0 [14 264 < E LU (30 O- LU OZ 03 SIDEWALK MAIN 5TREET COMPANY 3JN3