The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.210 S Galena St.HPC54A-892 1 0 6 61Â«le ve. 9- l, Vt 3+0 South Galena Street Historic Designation 2737-182-13-001 ,5/*5 54A-89 - -In 0 0 01"rti h 5-(--2. 6 f qÂ«_ CON Â¢ F --73(C P h r 4 I 'W .lu w CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 5/18/89 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: 2737-182-13-001 54A-89 STAFF MEMBER: PROJECT NAME: 210 South Galena Street Historic Designation Project Address: Legal Address: Lots K, L & M, Block 94 APPLICANT: Elks Club No. 224 -- Applicant Address: 210 S. Galena St. REPRESENTATIVE: Ed Irwin-Same as above. Michael Doyle Representative Address/Phone: Haqman Yaw Architects 210 S. Galena 5-2867 PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: N/A NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date U l 5)81 PUBLIC HEARING: Q#Â© NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: Paid: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFERRALS: City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept (GW) Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept (GJ) City Electric Building Inspector Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Other Aspen Consol. Energy Center S.D. DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: == FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: 9 -/7 - Pt INITIAL: 94/7-3 7 1 City Atty City Engineer )< Zoning Env. Health Housing Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: CASE DISPOSITION TO: File From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: 210 S. Galena St. (The Webber Block, a/k/a The Elks Building) - Landmark Designation Date: August 15, 1989 On August 14, 1989, Council unanimously passed Ordinance 49. Series of 1989, officially designating 210 S. Galena St. (The Webber Block, a/k/a The Elks Building) as a historic landmark- HPC and P&Z unanimously recommended landmark designation during meetings in June and July of 1989. No conditions of approval were included. cd.210sg , MEMORANDUM To: Aspen City Council Thru: Robert S. Anderson, Jr. , City Manager A.Zi=-- From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office 34 Re: Historic Landmark Designation, Ordinance 49: 430 W. Main St., 406 W. Smuggler, 210 S. Galena, Second Reading, Public Hearing Date: August 14, 1989 SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of Ordinance #49, Series of 1989 on Second Reading, which combines three Landmark Designations in one Ordinance. The applicants for 430 W. Main and 406 W. Smuggler have applied for the $2,000 Designation Grant. LOCATIONS: 430 W. Main St., Lots K, L, and M, Block 37, City and Townsite of Aspen 406 W. Smuggler St., Lots P & Q, Block 33, City and Townsite of Aspen and Lots 16 and 17, Block 33, Hallam's Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen 210 S. Galena St. (The Webber Blocks, a/k/a Elks Building), Lots K, L, and M, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen APPLICANT: 430 W. Main St. - Glenn A. Beck 406 W. Smuggler St. - Christie Ann Kienast 210 S. Galena St. - The Elks Club #224, represented by Ed Irwin APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Historic Landmark Designation (Note: A Landmark Designation grant of $2,000 is also being requested by the applicants of 430 W. Main and 406 W. Smuggler), which should be granted by Council at second and Final reading of the Designation Ordinance. HISTORIC EVALUATION RATING: 430 W. Main St. - '13" 406 W. Smuggler St. - "3" 210 S. Galena St. - Exceptional These historic properties will become Aspen's 96th, 97th and 98th Designated Historic Landmarks respectively. PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: All three structures have received f HPC and P&Z recommendations for designation during meetings in June and July, 1989. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A) of the Land Use Code. Any structure or site that meets one ( 1) or more of the standards may be designated as a Historic Landmark. Staff finds that the following criteria is applicable to the historic resources as noted below: 430 W. Main St. - Standard A. (Historical Importance), Standards E. (Neighborhood Character) and F. (Community Character). 406 W. Smuggler St. - Standard E. (Neighborhood) and F. (Community Character) 210 S. Galena St. - The Webber Block meets all six Standards, and is currently in the process of being nominated to the National Register of Historic Places Standard A. Historical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. Response: 430 W. Main St.: Although we find that 430 W. Main is not "commonly" associated with a person or event of historical significance, in our research we have discovered the following interesting historical facts that relate to and meet this review Standard: a. The parcel was original owned by B. Clark Wheeler, town founder and the earliest "Wheeler" entrepreneur b. Referred to as the "M. 0. Berg" residence, it was originally constructed in 1892 at a cost of $5,000.00. Mr. Berg was the proprietor of The Mint (a saloon) in downtown Aspen. "At The Mint you could find the best wines, liquors, beer and cigars". Mr. Berg came to Aspen in 1885. c. The Beck family has owned the property since 1945. 210 S. Galena St.: The Webber Block was considered the third most important structure in value to be built in Aspen during the silver mining era. It was built for $40,000 by Henry Webber, who came to Aspen from the east as a shoe and 2 boot merchant. As his business grew, so did his prominence in the community. Webber was also responsible for the construction of his home, Pioneer Park (400 W. Bleeker) and the Webber Building (now the Isis Theatre). 210 S. Galena was the location of many of Aspen's service-oriented businesses, including the 1892 Aspen National Bank, Allan's Drug Store, attorneys, engineers, etc. The Post Office was located here from 1926-1959. The Elks purchased the building in 1912 for back taxes. Standard B. Architectural Importance. The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character. Response: 210 S. Galena St.: The Elks Building has long been considered one of Aspen's finest Victorian-era structures, massive in form and material, eclectic in design, and unique in detail. The Elks Building is a significantly distinct historic resource to Aspen's Commercial Core Historic District, and a visual landmark since its construction. Traditional Aspen materials (red brick and Peachblow sandstone) speak clearly to its heritage. Standard C. Architectural Importance. The structure of site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type or specimen. Response: 210 S. Galena St.: While traditional in Victorian massing and form, this structure embodies unique eclectic details making it one of a kind! The prominent corner entrance, topped with a projecting turret and corner dome with balustrade, and the lunette arch centered at the west elevation parapet are element which best illustrate the structure's unique style. The masonry craftsmanship is excellent; unique brick detailing (corbeling and "checkerboarding") appear between the upper floors at the predominant southwest corner. The cornice and parapet detailing are also significant details. The structure is a three-bay design, with a balanced fenestration pattern to enhance each bay and provide the upper floor rhythm. The storefront design is relatively unchanged, with the exception of the new windows recently installed for the main floor Esprit retail space. Standard D. Architectural Importance. The structure is a significant work of an architect whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. 3 Response: 210 S. Galena: We find the historic Webber Block clearly meets this standard. The structure was designed by architect William Quayle, who also designed the Italianate Pitkin County Courthouse, two of Aspen's most significant historic resources. It is interesting to note that both interiors have also remained relatively unaltered in 100 years. Standard E. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: 430 W. Main St.: The Main Street Historic District, established in 1975, is considered as one of Aspen's most significant historic districts, primarily due to its high visibility and entrance to town. This structure is located within the context of this district, and is a contributing factor to its overall integrity. The preservation of this historic structure is a critical element in the continued integrity of the "Main Street" historic character. 406 W. Smuqqler: Located immediately adjacent to the proposed Hallam Lake District, 406 W. Smuggler is next to another designated landmark structure, and within a block containing two additional historic resources. The Planning Office finds that the preservation of this cottage is a critical element in the continued integrity of the West End neighborhood's historic character. The structure has received some modifications over the years to the front and rear, yet retains many of the original architectural elements and scale. 210 S. Galena St.: The Commercial Core Historic District's integrity consists of magnificent structures such as the Webber Block. Aspen's very image is founded on these irreplaceable historic resources. We find that the preservation of this building speaks to the heart and soul of our community, and are very encouraged with the pending renovation plans. Standard F. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of 4 historical or architectural importance. Response: 430 W. Main St.: The Inventory file in the Planning Office states that the structure's architectural significance lies in its representation of a "type, period or method of construction", and that it contributes to the significance of an historic district. Staff finds this structure is representative of Aspen's early mining era and illustrates the family/home environment and life styles dominated by the silver mining industry. 406 W. Smuqqler: The Inventory file in the Planning Office states that the structure's architectural significance lies in its representation of a "type, period or method of construction". Planning Office records indicate the structure was relocation of the present site from its original located at 7th and W. Hopkins in 1973. We find that even though the structure's historical significant has been diminished due to this relocation, it is representative Of Aspen's Mining Era, illustrating the family/home environment of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated by the silver mining industry. 210 S. Galena St: Aspen's Commercial Core has a distinct character which is unmatched by most other resort communities. Galena Street contains eleven of Aspen;s most significant historic resources, their preservation is essential to the character, image and vitality of our entire community. The Planning Office commends each applicant for seeking Landmark Designation, and encourages the sensitive and careful renovation of these structures to insure their preservation for decades to come. DESIGNATION GRANT APPLICATIONS: Both of the applicants for the residential structures at 430 W. Main and 406 W. Smuggler have requested a designation grant in the amount of $2,000. The funds are proposed to assist in the costs of exterior maintenance and repair. The provision of the Land Use code, via Ordinance 42, Series of 1987, allows designation grants for historic residential structures rated "4" or "5"; a maximum of ten (10) grants per year. So far this year only two designation grants have been made, with less than six (6) grants expected in total. Both of these structures are currently rated "3". Both applicants have stated their interest in utilizing the funds for renovation, precisely the intended use for this incentive program, and are 5 very supportive of the historic preservation program in general. The HPC supports all incentives for historic preservation, and the Planning Office feels strongly that in the spirit of this incentive provision, designation grants should be awarded to these two applicants. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: "Move to approve Ordinance 49, Series of 1989, on Second Reading." "Move to approve the $2,000.00 Designation Grant for both 430 West Main Street and 406 West Smuggler Street." CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS: memo.cc.430wm.406ws.210sg.FR 6 ORDINANCE NO. (Series of 1989) AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING 430 WEST MAIN STREET, 406 WEST SMUGGLER STREET AND 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET, AS H, HISTORIC LANDMARK PURSUANT TO DIVISION 7, SECTION 7-701 OF THE LAND USE CODE. WHEREAS, Glenn A. Beck, as owner of the real property described as 430 West Main Street, Lots K, L, and M, Block 37, City and Townsite of Aspen; Christie Ann Kienast, as owner of the real property described as 406 West Smuggler Street, Lots P & Q, Block 33, City and Townsite of Aspen and Lots 16 and 17, Block 33, Hallam's Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen; and The Elks Club #224, as owner of the real property described at 210 South Galena Street, Lots K, L, and M, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen, have filed an application for historic landmark designation pursuant to Section 7-701 of the Land Use Code, and WHEREAS, the property at 430 West Main Street was listed in the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures, as amended in 1986, and has received the historic evaluation rating of "3'I; the property at 406 West Smuggler Street was listed in the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures, as amended in 1986, and has received the historic evaluation rating of "3"; and the property at 210 South Galena Street was listed in the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures, as amended in 1986, and has received the historic evaluation rating of "Exceptional"; and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Committee recommended historic designation for 430 West Main Street and 406 West Smuggler Street at a duly noticed public hearing on May 24, 1989, and recommended historic designation for 210 South Galena Street at a duly noticed public hearing on June 14, 1989; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recommended historic designation for all three structures at a duly noticed public hearing on July 5, 1989; and WHEREAS, City Council wishes to pursue those recommendations and complete the designation process. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1 That the property at 430 West Main Street, described as Lots K, L, and M, Block 37, City and Townsite of Aspen; and the property at 406 West Smuggler Street, described as Lots P and Q, Block 33, City and Townsite of Aspen and Lots 16 and 17, Block 33, Hallam's Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen; and the property at 210 South Galena Street, described as Lots K, L, and M, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen, be granted H, Historic Landmark Designation. Section 2 That the Zoning District Map be amended to reflect the rezoning described in Section 1 and the Planning Director shall be authorized and directed to amend said map to reflect said 2 rezoning. Section 3 That the Planning Director shall be directed to notify the City Clerk of such designation, who shall record among real estate records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office a certified copy of this ordinance. Section 4 That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5 That a public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the day of , 1989, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing notice of the same shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the day of 1989. William L. Stirling, Mayor 3 ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk FINALLY adopted, passed and approved this day of , 1989. William L. Stirling, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk ord.430wm.406ws.210sg 4 I - MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Landmark Designation: The Elks Building (Webber Block) 210 South Galena St., Public Hearing Date: June 14, 1989 LOCATION: 210 S. Galena St., Lots K, L, and M, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen APPLICANT: The Elks Club #224, represented by Ed Irwin APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Landmark Designation for the 1891 Webber Block, now known as the Elks Building, located at 210 S. Galena. HISTORIC EVALUATION RATING: Exceptional, eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places SUMMARY: The Elks Will be submitting an application for Significant Development in the near future, which will include a proposal for an exterior elevator shaft, similar to the Wheeler Opera House, and some minor exterior renovation work. The Elks Club will be relocating to the third floor; the remainder of the building's use will remain virtually the same. PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW: Landmark designation is a three-step process, requiring recommendations from both HPC and P&Z (public hearing at P&Z level), then first and second reading (public hearing at Final reading) of the designation ordinance by Council. An application for GMQS Exemption is required to be submitted, which may be approved by the Planning Director (Ordinance #16, Series 1989). HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A) of the Land Use Code. Any structure or site that meets one (1) or more of the standards may be designated as a Historic Landmark. Staff finds that the application meets all six (6) of the Landmark Designation Standards. Standard A. Historical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. Response: The Webber Block was considered the third most important structure in value to be built in Aspen during the silver mining era. It was built for $40,000 by Henry Webber, who came to Aspen from the east as a shoe and boot merchant. As his business grew, so did his prominence in the community. Webber was also responsible for the construction of his home, Pioneer Park (400 W. Bleeker) and the Webber Building (now the Isis Theatre). 210 S. Galena was the location of many Of Aspen's service-oriented businesses, including the 1892 Aspen National Bank, Allan's Drug Store, attorneys, engineers, etc. The Post Office was located here from 1926-1959. The Elks purchased the building in 1912 for back taxes. Standard B. Architectural Importance. The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen Character. Response: The Elks Building has long been considered one of Aspen's finest Victorian-era structures, massive in form and material, eclectic in design, and unique in detail. The Elks Building is a significantly distinct historic resource to Aspen's Commercial Core Historic District, and a visual landmark since its construction. Traditional Aspen materials (red brick and Peachblow sandstone) speak clearly to its heritage. Standard C. Architectural Importance. The structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type or specimen. Response: While traditional in Victorian massing and form, this structure embodies unique eclectic details making it one of a kind! The prominent corner entrance, topped with a projecting turret and corner dome with balustrade, and the lunette arch centered at the west elevation parapet are elements which best illustrate the structure's unique style. The masonry craftsmanship is excellent; unique brick detailing (corbeling and "checkerboarding") appear between the upper floors at the predominant southwest corner. The cornice and parapet detailing are also significant details. The structure is a three-bay design, with a balanced fenestration pattern to enhance each bay and provide the upper floor rhythm. The storefront design is relatively unchanged, with the exception of the new windows recently installed for the main floor Esprit retail space. Standard D. Architectural Importance. The structure is a significant work of an architect whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Response: We find the historic Webber Block clearly meets 2 - this Standard. The structure was designed by architect William Quayle, who also designed the Italinate Pitkin County Courthouse, two of Aspen's most significant historic resources. It is interesting to note that both interiors have also remained relatively unaltered in 100 years. Standard E. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: The Commercial Core Historic District's integrity consists of magnificent structures such as the Webber Block. Aspen's very image is founded on these irreplaceable historic resources. We find that the preservation of this building speaks to the heart and soul of our community, and are very encouraged with the pending renovation plans. Standard F. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: Aspen's Commercial Core has a distinct character which is unmatched by most other resort communities. Galena Street contains eleven of Aspen's most significant historic resources; their preservation is essential to the character, image and vitality of our entire community. The Planning Office commends the applicant for seeking Landmark Designation, and encourages the sensitive and careful renovation of the structure to insure its preservation for decades to come. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval for Landmark Designation of 210 South Galena Street. memo.pz.210sg 3 Aspen Elks Lodge i !4 210 S. Galena St., #21 Aspen, CO 81611 Lodge 920-4384 ;94'53& 4 7~kE Office 925-3516 , Eloi /1 ,1101iAÂ¥ ~1-2~' STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING COUNTY OF PITKIN ) I, Ed Irwin, being duly sworn, state that, on June 20th, 1989, I mailed by first class postage prepaid, a Notice of Public Hearing before Planning and Zoning the Town of Aspen, Colorado, to all adjacent property owners of Lot's K ,L, & M Aspen, CO 81611. f--1 ~ /--34,-ih360 4..1 j Ld <v rial STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 5th day of July, 1989 by LEd | r LU, 3 Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 2-Wiz. to<ARY'U/4 424 Notary Public PUBLIC NOTICE RE: LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, July 5, 1989 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission in the Second Floor Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St. , Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application from Elks Club No. 224 requesting historic landmark designation for the property located at 210 South Galena Street. This property consists of Lots K, L & M, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 920-5090. s/C. Welton Anderson. Chairman Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission === Published in the Aspen Times on June 15, 1989 City of Aspen Account ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 May 30, 1989 Ed Irwin Elks Club No. 224 210 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado RE: Historic Designation Dear Mr. Irwin, This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that your application is complete. We have scheduled your application for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission at a public hearing on Tuesday, July 5, 1989 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to your application is available at the Planning Office. The public hearing notice requirements for this application are posting of a sign on the property and mailing of notices to property owners within 300' of the property. A notice will be mailed to you for this purpose. If you have any questions, please call Roxanne Eflin. Sincerely, Debbie Skehan Administrative Assistant CC: Michael Doyle Â£0-'12UU-~MEW.r i I - -- USE APPLMATION FURM 1) Project Name Elks Building 2) Project location 210 S. Galena Aspen Lots K.L. & M. Block 94 (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning C C 4) Lot Size 98('Ingq ft 5) Applicarres Name, Address & Phone # Elks Club No. 774 210 S. Galena 925-4384 6) Representative's Name, Address & Ihone # Ed Irwin. 210 S. Galena 925-3516 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptlial FUD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final RID Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivision 6- Historic Designatlan ~ Cor~Â£=iniumization - Text/Map AmerxlnEnt -% Iot Split/Lot Line - (2'CS Eharption Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft.; rimber of bedroans; any previous approvals granted to the property). Basement - Mech 252 sq.ft., Elks Club 1278 sq.ft., Rest./Stor. 4797 sq.ft. Ground level - FitÂ« 71RR cq ft., retail 4072 sq.ft. 2nd. Floor - Elks 2364 sq.ft., Office 3250 sq.ft. 3rd. Floor - Office 5614 sq.ft. 9) Description of Developnent Application Add new stair/elev. tower west of the Building in existing empty lot. Reconfigure existing interior spaces to the following; Move all Elks functions to the third floor, 2nd. floor becomes all offices. Ground level becomes all retail. Basement becomes storage for ground level retail. Clpmn pntire building. Replace existing store front at Elks Club to approximately match new store front at Espirit. Add new exit stair on north side of building. 10) Have you attached the following? X Response to Attadiment 2, Minininn Subniss-irn Conterrts Response to Attachment 3, Specific Subnission Occtents x Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application HAGMAN YAW MEMORANDUM ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 TO: Historical Preservation Committee FROM: Michael Doyle AP RE: Elks Building Renovation DATE: May 18, 1989 This memo will serve to introduce the Elks Building to the Committee and to explain why we feel it merits designation as a historical landmark. The Elks Building was completed in February 1891, and was then known as the Webber block, after its owner, Henry Webber, who was to become mayor of Aspen. It was sold in 1892 to a group of investors which formed the Aspen National Bank. It was then known as the Bank Building until it was purchased for back taxes by the Elks in 1912. The Aspen Post Office was located in the current Espirit space from 1924 to 1959 and by virtue of its central location was a very popular meeting place for locals. The Elks Building is of brick and Peachblow sandstone construction, designed by architect William Quayle, who was also the architect of the County Courthouse. When completed, the building was thought to be third in value in the city, behind the Wheeler Opera House and the Hotel Jerome. The exterior of the building has changed remarkably little as witnessed by the series of photographs attached. Because of the above mentioned, we feel the Elks Building complies with all of the "Review Standards: Application for Historic Designation". ~1~111111 . 4'i ...11 + 8,01'U '3>-13.- .. - - ........ -"0*0Nmni,kÂ©* /6~4-i##Jib- r.=41-4. Itg= 0 -44\ .r - - :-eNâ‚¬~---s-*ce_ -2-..~.,2.*j71 9ifit r 6-,@ -~~92#M@PrjMk Tjiti u#$ 2 :ell ffM-- 2 2--01 1 - + 11:... .... CS@.Ils'Fâ‚¬Eyltr t-[,7- 1â‚¬ 'a,f i 31121; 1: f -r-â€¢ 4 -1- * :004 1-1.1.-~- f .f _ - 1 -I. _ r 7.. :R.00'St. 2,2..:4 - 1 p - . 7ilillillri- - ).... G f37Â·3 49â‚¬660 tiock .,3/' . f 6%141Â·pf ic, 41 7<14Â¥4 ' 5 0/3 (9 .tÂ·C=Â·042-%Â·- 1- Â·I - Â· Â·.lf'h. '-*'/6.-:=4-1-7 ~ L. r.....- .--I -- 2.iI,-TE#Wht.KiLE<JE...pr}1.-tijifEE:*Â·7=2Â·r.7 -- 1- p_ rid,.Â£<248*7-4 wid- ~-anplit-Thd~~21Â· .14Â·-- ~ * 9==fi;-.m=2,.. m 4 kmy vt,Sp'~ ht 1 1 3: . 4 1.- 1 ~'41. .,I 1 4 33 F= UMB.gjill// :86,Â»d-=4.1.- A . . L. 0-JL *Lib 11! EL_ I- -r lusliii- f *19 1 1 ' 7..... *W-102* . ---4-4=:2=~F#~:. - '251. 17 - 1 9 K, {D j -Pfr Gn 4 2 / c/f.~ -.- + 1, F+frt.*pr--,. z t LER:17':diu:5 -:.=Â·Â·Â·Â·~t=..Â·Nit!11~il},11 ~ ' -1225 =i L -- f -,41 2/.,2 ~1~tÂ«~t 1 ~~~ -- ~ZW 1 41 am â„¢ 1 M 't. 14?991&,16611:1 -2 Flm; 343133 1 i>44,il~. M.d.lh 1 / UA - -*Al-_ LE - - 0 01 ==Â»42-/.7-......:~.4 / --4- ' ---"" 'L..ot.,Aili.*+143119 . \ 0.Â· 3 411 3~11:'Â· 1 * . ). i...1 rK.J .i . 1 \\ ~ . .0=. 2231 i. . ' '-L . F.-F p.Â· 1 . i . -- -1.-0 . , -- F-orri;fl'Itai,1/11#Â»Â·t :PI[.ik IN-Ii B.--- 0 . . 1./ . 1 ...;1 - #11/4 -- J - . L â€¢â€¢ 44.Il - Â· t-,n,-sti'u~7~~- ,.7 1. ; 4 p.*E2-*1*fwi L L J .m~MEÂ»ffm -2 fi I EMLITTPPETFT&-r-MTS~~C#~g I Deve- r 2. I ,+1 . 0. k':- -*te#/tijaugij(#9Â£t;~4Â»â€¢7*533Â£5*jlr~rarl J im A.4.-# m.3-flj .3 91 4 EN â€¢cs'l:c_, â€¢jlK-1.1- I..! E- bl ..... Â·,1.11 , 4 40''r,4 m7//1//6&*--~6/*841 . ~,I.F.~ - LÂ¢22~22 A - ----322=-gbe-Di~,. Cro, , ill 'li; 1 - h=*aa. (Â© 4 19 Ly \1' Aspen Elks Lodge #, 1 210 S. Galena St., #21 Aspen, CO 81611 Lodge 920-4384 ? i,nt? Office 925-3516 f E ENK f i A,Ili A Â¥ TO whom it may concern: Address of the corporation is as above. The Chairman of the Trustees is Ed Irwin and his office is at the above address. The legal description is Lots K,L, & M, Block 94 Aspen. Sincerely, (GO n. C./ Ed Irwin Trustee Chariman ,-r.7,1 wyersline Insumnce @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective date: 05/16/89 AT 8:00 A.M. Case No. PCT-3444 2. Policy or policies to be issued: (a)ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 3-1970 Amount $ PRO FORMA (Rev. 10-17-70 & 10-17-841 or 10/21/87 Premium S PROPOSED INSURED: ASPEN LODGE NO. 224. BENEVOLENT and PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (b)ALTA Loan Policy, Amount S (REV. 10-21-87) Premium S PROPOSED INSURED: (c)Alta Loan Construction Policy. 1975 Amount S (Rev. 10-17-84) Premium S PROPOSED INSURED: Tax Cert. S 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: ASPEN LODGE NO. 224. BENEVOLENT and PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOTS K. L AND M. BLOCK 94. CITY AND TOWNSITED OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN. STATE OF COLORADO Countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN. CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 303-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules A and B are attached. Authorized otfich* or agent iorm 100 Litho in U.S.A. )35-0-100-0041/2 111(Ill<11+e-.1(~T~(111(111(111(IriLallCill(i11(LTHI.TICIT:(111(Ill<Ilk '49)yers title Insurance @rporation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B-SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: PRO FORMA This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 1 PG.1 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-3444 A and B are attached. Form 100 Litho in U.S.A. 035-0-100-0041/2 17,1 - Impyers line Insumnce @rporation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B-SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements. or claims of easements. not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies. conflicts in boundary lines. shortage in area. encroachments. and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien. or right to a lien. for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects. liens. encumbrances. adverse claims or other matters. if any. created. first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment. charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patent recorded October 26. 1887 in Book 59 at Page 64 and recorded March 29. 1889 in Book 59 at Page 549 as follows: That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold. silver. cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws. 8. Mineral reservations as contained in Deeds recorded June 10. 1891 in Book 98 at Page 496. in Book 105 at Page 129 and in Book 106 at Page 482 as follows: The full free and perpetual right to dig. work. search for. mine and remove all ores and mineral bearing rock and earth underneath the land. 9. Terms. conditions. obligations and provisions of Notice of Historic Designation as set forth in instrument recorded January 13. 1975 in Book 295 at Page 515. 10. Terms. conditions. obligations and provisions of Leases as set forth in instruments recorded November 17. 1985 in Book 499 at Page 976; July 23, 1986 in Book 515 at Page 21. Continued Form 100 Litho in U.S.A. 035-0-100-0041/2 ~wyerglitle Insurance @rporation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 11. Terms. conditions. obligations and provisions of Encroachment Agreement. as set forth in instrument recorded July 11. 1986 in Book 514 at Page 353. rhis commitment is invalid unless Schedule 3-Section 2 PG.2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-3444 A and B are attached. Form 100 Litho in U.S.A. 035-0-100-0041/2 ~m~~mm~mm~-m~7mm~-TmTm77177nrmE-ITTETTnTrnTE~-mr-UTETiir-FirriTETTTmTiETnE ~guyers litte Insumnce @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B-SECTION 2 CONTINUED Exceptions numbered NONE are hereby omitted. The Owner's/Mortgage Policy to be issued. if any. shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust. if any. required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in parents or in Acts authorizing issuance thereof: water rights. claims or title to water. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No.PCT-3444 A and B are attached. Form 100 Lithoin U.S.A. 035-0-100-0041/2 /1 / liwyrs 11ue Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND. VIRGINIA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policyor policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payrnent of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the Identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policiescommitted forshallissue, whichever f irst occurs, providedthatthe falluretoissuesuchpolicyorpoliciesisnot the faultof the Company. This Commitmentshall not be validorbindinguntilcountersigned byanauthorized off iceroragent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officeroragentof the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage," when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall failtodisclosesuchknowledgetotheCompanyin writing,theCompanyshallbe relieved from liability foranylossordamage resulting fromanyactof reliance hereontotheextenttheCompanyisprejudiced by failureto sodisclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge tothe Company, or i f the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at itsoptionmayamend Schedule Bof this Commitmentaccordingly, butsuchamendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon In undertaking in good faith Ca) to comply with the requirements hereof, or(b)to elim i nate exceptionsshown in Schedule B, or(c)toacquire orcreatethe estate or interestor mortgage thereon covered bythis Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and the Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. Imtprs 11tle InsuÂ¢6~e Grporat lon Elotecte 4 QAkru 6-vÂ£ president â‚¬ Attest: ~0 gv Â£ fj> Secretary I 1, . 11/ Ill | Ill ! 1 li 1 1 1, 1 1 N ! I li I 1.11 1 1.14 1 1 1, . 1 Il _11Llik_1111_11!-L_I LL_LULL_1LL-LLL-LLL-LL[L-I LLU_LLL11LL 9090-890-L-9â‚¬0 EI 3AOO lIN A>70013 88-L 6 . .. -Il-.~- 6 4 .. '***** --------~~~~~ Â¥4 11 ' ....9 2 4-4 - -61/â€ž44 N/: 7 \, + a - 21-9 Hi 4. .1 * 0 4%51 r :y wyers line Insumnce @poration ROCKY MOUNTAIN COMMITMENT --- FOR - -- - TITLE INSURANCE