The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.210 S Galena St.HPC003-99PN: 2737-182-13003 Case HPC003-99 % 41-*. I-/%'-'S r=â€¢-~â€¢â€¢Â·---r=nor HPC 240 S. a,leo,69 2/0 S, 0,- 142 9.0- SE- 2: P 11 7 L PARCEL ID:~2737-182-13003 : DATE'RCVDE]2/24/99 # COPIES:|2 CASE NO~HPC003-99 CASE NAME:1Elk's Lodge Minor HPC PLNR:|Amy Guthrie PROJ ADDR:|510 East Hyman CASE TYP:~HPC Minor STEPS:~- OWN/APP: Elks Lodge #224 ADR1510 E. Hyman Avenue C/S/Z: ~Aspen, CO 81611 PHN:~925-3516 REP:]Jack Miller ADR:~P.O. Box 4285 r C/S/Z:IAspen, CO 81612 PHN:j925-6930 FEES DUE:~125 (hpc) FEES RCVD1125 STAT: F- REFERRALS~ REFi BY| DUE:| MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED , 1 1 â€¢ DATE OF FINAL ACTION:1 CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS| Â· Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·"Â·Â· Â·Â·72Â· PZ: BOA: CLOSED:| BY: ~ DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: | ' PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN: RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 210 S. GALENA STREET, ELK'S BUILDING, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 1999 WHEREAS, the applicant, Elk's Lodge #224, represented by Jack Wheeler, has requested minor development approval to build a stair accessway on the roof of the Elk's Building, located at 210 S. Galena Street. The property is a designated landmark and is located within the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated March 10, 1999, recommended a decision be made after a site visit was conducted, and WHEREAS, the HPC did conduct a site visit on March 10, 1999, and at the regular meeting ofthe Historic Preservation Commission on March 10, 1999, the Commission considered and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 6 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development approval for the Elk's Building, at 210 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, be approved as shown on March 10, 1999, with the following conditions: 1. The mechanical equipment on the roof must be painted a dark color to blend in with the roof. 2. The Elk's must come into full compliance with the previous approval regarding the exterior patio on the east side. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of March, 1999. Approved as to Form: City Attorney HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Chief Deputy Clerk ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF. March 10, 1999 Elizabeth Plotke-Giordani, owner was sworn in. The proposed improvements enhance the entire downstairs area. MOTION: Roger moved to approve the minor development for the windows at 205 S. Mill Street know as Campo De Fiori as submitted; second by Christie. All infavor motion carried 6-0. Four exhibits were entered into the records. 210 S. GALENA - MINOR DEVLEOPMENT Amy relayed that a site visit was done today. The enclosure is needed for safety reasons. They need a better way to get to the roof to fix the mechanical equipment. Presently there is only a ladder. Staff recommends approval with the condition that all the mechanical equipment on the roof be painted in a dark color. It would help unify everything when looking up the street. Jack Miller, 894 McLaughlin Rd. Basalt was sworn in. In noticing the roof lines there is a lot of mechanical equipment on the roofs with the restaurants etc. and he is in favor ofpainting the mechanical equipment. The Elk's has made an effort on the inside of the building by cutting out some space in order to get the enclosure as subtle as possible. It is not visible from the Hyman Mall. Suzannah stated that dark colors such as dark brown or charcoal have been used in painting out mechanical equipment. Amy stated that the Elk's previously had approval for the courtyard garden out in front o f the entry elevator and it is not in compliance with the landscaping that they told the Board they would use. There is an area of brick on the wall that is deteriorating that needs repaired. Amy suggested that the previous condition be included in the new motion. MOTION: Roger made the motion to approve the application for the Elks Lodge # 224 at 210 S. Galena as submitted with thefollowing two conditions: 2 ASPEN HISTORI RESERVATION COMMISS MINUTES OF, March 10,1999 â€¢ That the mechanical equipment on the roof be painted a dark color to ~ blend in with the roofÂ· â€¢ That the Elk's willcomeinwithfull compliance with the previous approval regarding the exterior ratio on the east side. Heidi second the motion. All infavor, motion carried 6-0. Three exhibits were entered into the records. 406 E. HOPKINS - ISIS - AMENDMENT TO FINAL Geoff Lester and Charles Cunniffe were sworn in. Amy stated that the two monitors Suzannah and Roger had concerns with the pent house apartment on top of the building. Windows were approved and the applicant is proposing to change some windows due to light issues and add one double and one single skylights. They are also proposing a light fixture for the apartment. Charles informed the Board that the previously approved windows had a nine foot headheight and they are now lowered to 8'6". Because the windows have no horizontal view the pent house got squashed down into the building. When you look at the pent house you look at the parapet. The owner is one ofthe principle partners and has purchased the pent house. His concern with the unit is the lack of view. The five new windows to the west are needed for light and view. The rooms inside of the proposed windows are a bedroom and a guest bedroom. Susan stated that it seems like too many windows are being added for the light. Geoff felt that the proposal is not extraordinarily significant due to the fact that they are barely visible from the street level. Amy also stated that on the south faGade the four windows are going to reach the floor and that is a modest change. Heidi stated that the only visible area would be from Jimmy's Restaurant across the street and visually you see irregularity in the window pattern. 3 1Â£ 15) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer PÂ« RE: 210 S. Galena Street, Elk's Building- minor review DATE: March 10, 1999 SUMMARY: The applicant, Elk's Lodge #224, requests HPC approval to create a better accessway to the roof ofthe building than currently exists. The subject building is a designated landmark and is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Elk's Lodge #224, represented by Jack Miller. LOCATION: 210 S. Galena Street. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Ilistoric Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: Please be aware that there are several notes on the drawings that relate to previous work. The only issue being reviewed is the new stairway. The applicant requests HPC approval to extend an existing stairway to the roof of the Elk's Building, including an enclosure for the stairs. Currently, the only way to access the roof is by a ladder to a hatch. This has posed safety issues, particularly when installing or removing mechanical equipment from the roof. The proposal is to extend an existing staircase on the Galena Street side. Another stair in the building, which is on the Mason and Morse side, is thought to be more visible to the street. The existing elevator only extends to the third floor and to take it to the roof level would involve significant costs and require an addition on the elevator tower. The architect has designed the staircase to have the lowest profile possible. On March 108, in time for the 12:45 site visit, the Elks will place story poles on the roof so that HPC can study whether the stairs will be visible to the street. HPC members can also go into the building to see the current roof access. Staff will reserve making a recommendation until the story poles are viewable. There is already significant mechanical equipment on the roof, none of which is currently painted a dark color, as HPC has requested of recent installations on other buildings. It would be appropriate to address the roof as a whole with this review. Staff requests the applicant address whether there is any possibility of installing a snow melting system on the steps to the roof or any other method that avoids creating a stair enclosure. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed stair will not have a significant impact on the neighborhood, but its location so near to the parapet wall and its visibility from the street must be addressed. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the historic significance of the building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development must avoid having any affect on the architectural character of the historic structure by having a very limited visibility. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that HPC conduct a site visit on March 10111 to see the story poles and existing conditions at the Elks Building. The applicant must provide information as to any way that the stair enclosure can be avoided, such as snowmelting the steps. Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated March 10, 1999 B. Application JACKI .ER & ASSOCIATES, A. I.A. JM , ARCHITECTURE/PLANNING P.O. BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO. 81612 303-925-6930 February 24, 1999 Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development 130 South Gatena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Elks Lodge Roof Stair Enclosure Dear Amy: Please consider this letter as a request for approval of a stair enclosure on the roof of the Elks Lodge 224 to access and service the many pieces of mechanical equipment installed there. Currently, there are two commercial kitchens, Hardrock and Elks, with three commercial bars and lounges in the building with extensive associated air circulating and filtering equipment located on the roof This equipment requires frequent maintenance and is currently accessed by a ladder and roof hatch which is in itself a very dangerous situation for workmen access, but is compounded when equipment has to be removed or installed. This is a major liability to the maintenance people as well as the lodge. The proposed location of the stairs is limited to expanding the existing Gatena Street stairwell rather than the Hyman Street stairwell due to street visability. The stair has been designed to turn 90Â° on a landing which creates an angled roofperpendicular from Galena Street on the building faâ„¢le. This creates a minimum of street exposure and is probably most visible from the third floor of City Hall, along with the multitude of existing air handling units. This location creates the least visible intrusion while other solutions bring the enclosure nearer to the parapet. The enclosure will be painted a low impact light aqua or blue whichever the HPC favors. The access to the roofis through a locked, secure door on the third floor controlled by an officer ofthe lodge. The Elks Lodge will install a framed story pole replica ofthe enclosure for members ofHPC to visually review. Please contact me with any additional questions. Sincerely, <4ck Miller JACK MILLER & ASSOCIATES / 1 t ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM ' 1. Project name 6-1 kg Lodge * 22+ 2. Project location 610 E #4 EMQh (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning NA 4. Lot size NA 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number el \Â« Loate 12 5-3 SIC 6. Represen~ative's name, address, and phone number J 4 C k 12'1114â‚¬ r 42 9 Â·6430 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. 1 Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the ' property) 9. Description of development application Refuer-09,0 9 67 /107/j/76976/ni 411-24 K.MIY -Y,joldfure 40 Â«cae a 42 rerv/,ce Pk,â‚¬01AWA\CQI â‚¬Â«, lrÂ· rM ' 1-~66 f, 10. Have you completed and attached the following? 4 Attachment 1- Land use application form -7- Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 4 Response to Attachment 3 4 Response to Attachment 4 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Elks La dpa 4 1+2-4- Address: 6(0 E u' +1 *tonl Zone district: , 14<A Lot size: Existing FAR: Allowable FAR: Proposed FAR: Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: Proposed % of site coverage: Existing % of open space: Proposed % of open space: Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: Accesorv bldg: Proposed max. height: Princioal bldq: , Accessorv blda: Proposed Â°/0 of demolition: Existing number of bedrooms: Proposed number of bedrooms: Existing on-site parking spaces: On-site parking spaces required: 44 Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: A//4 Front: H/4 Front: NA Rear Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined ~ FronUrear: Fronurear: FronUrear: Side: Side: Side: T ; Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: -/ Sides: h/ Sides: Â»* Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Â·Â· Variations requested: ~*42â‚¬UerÂ·~Flf O Pwi ,/111146,0,1 0-2.4/ 3S~/P' -0 ylolo<ove 40 02(err %14>erul Ge 14120|44 Flica# â‚¬4Vlr (rÂ» roc'~, (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) r '514 ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF 1 113 - 5,<7â‚¬-06 \ 1r44191 [I] 11 Yo.11~.---14 ---el 6. 2 \ . , I a .po Mer c i n - ./ /- UE-ld coMMUÂ· 1 \ 1, c. t 01'fr Â· ..A *"it , 1 1 1.0\ 2 642.- or-Â£*L. 67- Ne,v '*94.V. OtÂ¢r.,}111-. -"~ 02&#44 1 tÂ»,>'â‚¬f~ PÂ« F \\ 1\\ I I \ *Â·rk~%22Â£ oF AS \ \1 cr â‚¬,IPEWAL/fla 1:>15, . FE = - '. d g cle-'4Â·~TSÂ£, C + \27 1Â¢MMO,EU' t 1Uiputte - Ii,/1 4 01Â© Ct< 14 ' 1 f-:Ats. 8- Lowsfe Pir-koN/COUS: 1 )2Â¢20'r .../13 g (-3 1 1 /4-- 83Â£11/Aty I I I 4. 0 1 /' Â· wn-ti HI I I f} .If 1.- --BRIST.. MEMORANE 10â‚¬ CRA 214- .* 428/1.fv R'Â»F; 11:> 'REM,4 W J 6 - . 1 -- ~ ED<01-- a â‚¬64'm,47 0 4 - -g---1 -~ L+; 2~ -~f-1 Â».ft#:-64:Tel / -1 4 -.+ P /6.-9. ' \ , 1471 Â»,84 ble expsT. t 11 - r~ 9~ 1=10 , ,/~ ROOF M+Mt.pi Â· \ . 1.6.1 -IJ- - \A\ 1 1% 1 \ 1 I : , 1 â‚¬~ION <#rkS:LEE**1 -~ - - we W toh'(R. tq -f> I 6-r eek . 4 ,, , . 1 \7~ -. , ..10 ' ../ , 1 I kÂ¢*9*~ '1 J I ..4 ..\\\.1 4~, Â¥ . ' C.gA 1 , , . 1.- 1 - 91 1 Â»14'/.1 Z= 1 1 1 - ID 4 1 4 4 ' , It I. \ 1 . 252%419*NO fr'ADIFÂ¥'111.71.Â·Â·Â·Â·, . EXhett?1 ~ekt'rtÂ· Me?FAL. Ck>PING. ~ 0 EAST ~'610/:2:ReptgarNL. Â· [22 Af'Eit.JPRER IR9*4~1*4Petr: 4 - I flf- - .* C.,ANO' I .:i :f .1.:1 -- ....04 1 + 111 1 R~00418,Â· 9447Â· MMY'I- v DAMAGREy *74,71)8'Â¢MT 11 4, <111-1 1. 14 1 05Â·CORAMÂ¥â‚¬1, .90,4~1 AT Â»i p ' Â· < Â· .FM~AP?EfF 'p'SOUTH a- WEST h /.7 5+411~'n#01~44 FJXREM' ANID Mt.13+*14:Hs: ' : ' b V 1.24 (1'. '... .iÂ·. .. : 1: k .11...1.1 11.1, .11 11'.1 .....11,111.11....11,111 Ill lili .=1111 ..1.,L......11. -- f VA. (-- EXI fir 51'Ell.b 1 7- cok~KIEOFIC , I \ 1 ,>fm A r,- 4 4 \ 7 N -1 . ". I -1 2/ *--, : HYMAN WENUE W Water W faÂ¥ Fli 44 Al,4<S 6 U LOIN 4 JACK MILLER & ASSOC. ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 4 (14,1 49 .tat/-25;.-2-.14;~ â‚¬ 4 --- - -- He>V Â·2412- 2%6(KL.lf:Ze- 1 -AS" E,ACM FActÂ·1 FexAGFET - 2 . 0 , 111'., 1 1 41421!111 . ---PtooF 2%75-E BLOC- 11 1 11 , It, / 14-5 '- 5- 1 0 --- - -- --.- . #-. ----6.1 m ..6 7/. - - -i - 11 1 0\ r----1 r-~il .---- .- 317 - r:=71 - 1=--1 -----v A42.0 WOR' S~F n * IP-I~~~ i -~ICI~ = -~ 11 - *123 1 3- FaES-r-052497Â©Â· 1 .- 75 11 1 L - - F 2 6- CLEAN i N G. ~ - - F-Tr IE In 26=6u --- L:lf- -9- L- *- iBI-~ f Au ~~at l--2*~i 8 242 - 21- 1.-1,1 - r 1; 11 1- 4 +Iii ill P -- L.= tu Â· 1 ----JL ~ -Â·= e~ i--_- z -U - U,&1Ulf .. *-Mao LeuiL /Eate= - i Z 1 + - - 1 1 0 3 - //1 1- ' er'-n--El.7 -1 411:381 CA I 11 1 -1 - NEW CL-Ac) wose WINC)(O\AJE AL[*bE 0 - 5 - d - -" 14< - U -6- +Ngs anci Â£'~ LEVELS. - u 1 < 9-0. -2.nt, 1-244 1/6-12 -1. - el =t- I.- L. -Ci .- _ r-21 =5 1--3 GL. 1 66 OL, 79 - - - NEBU ~ u - .- 1 - 5 *-A 1 =- il--- - GLÂ· 111 1' 66. GU GL. - 9 ill-JET.WAK-- - -_-9 3 - 1Â« CEÂ» _ -- - 1 - .-*-- Il . ;91 1 .... I - -I - 1 . 1 . 11 .n I. Â£=*I- li.*- :1.1 1 1 1111.11. 11 i ! ~ 111 Ground t.eukl 111' ' - 1 NEW ST=KE SLLS 6- INFIL-L- 2 L~ p~iNT EX-Ter. CMU -WAER-MILLEFC&ASSOC<- WEST ELEVATION ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 ' , 5/53/11 - 81~* *TNE. '6*~c,10:Â£~pe- \4- ~, 45, f - - 9%1 Phok FiL,M ReAR gLEÂ»Art>rl -U 1 Â·r Al k HAN 2- 1 K 5 .i ft/EtÂ£V TOWER REÂ¥ON" 1 -7 -1-1--r~ f UN ITE -3, GEar-T-_ -ft-- A -7-39-- ~~:--nEEHETTE~~-t. -Inzi~-2_if - I.Ii- 1 -lic.-UiI, r.Â·7-1=11 - - --; 6~.--=123- -R--2 - + ---+- 2- 7---_-1--7--7-: -- - ---- ~- -- -- - ----- U - , - - 1 -- Â·-Â· Â· - KE J.1~~ 2 --Â«93%3=-tg' --- Â· Â·i--- ------Â· .1 - .7 1.-16.-=Ir.2-1-r ==t. Z.n-4--111 Â·. Â·~ . '- --- 1 t 1- -- (-4 ---1-uzj=.fp ~i-------- -+c --r E-==~=--=22=-- -T2-- -- - ' aft----Â»- 43.-9---Â·72 ...RE; - i e ,.. T,& 7 .-7 -----77,27_-- * 0. ,~27-=H==1=- -=72-1-1 . 1 r--_. - --: ... u -- --r_---.s~=-E'.--~~-_EE= 9-UTE-------I _=I---2-- ~-~ -- -7- 1"332222U -4~ J E-- -- .Â· 0 4-F -- I - -Â»â‚¬22-71:7:..E - -- i 1 - , 1 22-20-2: 1-Ull 1-=~;9--12-01-1 1;kAa-- Â·-2-Â»rÂ»-i, Â·1 ------ 4.--. --- ..Â· .. .-t 4 . -2- 23 1 22222'- ~ - Â· - ...... 2--~-{2*}:. {-4**4.-2 1-=-2-1 3.4-:.-1---=UL .. 11 - *.-r- 2.1--/ Â·-- .- . 1-2 1 Â· 411...~- -: .-6-_. - 421 -- LL=-1-5*~~ E--3---.-9 - ---- -r---J-=n -- 1-=~ 3 -El-f13vg=.-r.9--2-1.-=:=222-_a =5 Zi . '- I --.+.I- ,-*.-' -,1 =-'9=.-' I -t---Â·.1ul tr- 1-- - 1-=--2-=E=Ir,-7-- 9- - ' 1 1---4- - - Â· -1.74'.4,"7~-~~1 -77- --1 - - -- -- . 2i/ 1-E- :.. -- ----.---- .Â·Â· ifÂ·-JL.re;te,797- Ia.... 211--Eg:U- _.... --2*G==--4---- 3--1 1!.. Lat~- . '..' 1~, 1 - -2 --- --ZLL --7 --1.ZE-----rf- -- - ---r =~4.-2.--i--4-4ifi? ilm: . ! . -4 ---- . /-2-7- I H--9.--- =:L-7.-/,4- i 1 -Itt>F-TH ---ECEÂ«El-3'HI-(A Lu al) 5/gs .4 2 (1- 0 U =u. -64*% gull-Pl Ha __fl_ JACK MILLER & ASSOC. ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS - BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 1/15/49 ~ 'pL- L-- 9-4 /9/- 7)-~l :~ }fi fili : -1.- / , - - AZ:f - - - -al- \-/42mgll OU 11 -- <2- 61.1 86 - .i . 771 , I. , . . 1 E 1. <ci Le-> i.>562 # 53 6 - *Fa:P fums r -- -- 11 - -V - -- --- ------ - .-** 2*J,76 6,1 1 - %- Â·/2.T a. 4 7-4' ii 952$0> Acc.ems Â·00 /- Koo F (Fo grg txÂ»gh = --L 1 1 L 4. f L 7--4 1 17 81* C q'#amoU 4, 5 I ~|I- < 92 -\ & 14 11 60 1 1 ~>4_ - Nev iVALL 2/V>ouvj --41.MIRS. I ...1 J -2 % 1 1 * r 1 12Â£11 FED},1 <6FUP ..41 It Fi- 0'0 R (145~~ V:OR ) I &4 1 9/2 219!7~ 1 1 ~< -"-Exi â‚¬12; 51-*1 Avekl- m< iT -3 GPANG FU:2~1 01* R Â¢ 42.. (1-HI FRP FU232.1. -t-62 Â«) A I 't = 3/,6" --0 Ell<5 01-111,541-la JACK MILLER & ASSOC. ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 â‚¬,(14,(614 21141-- ' , ALk 4-1- . - Bv OIG rA FAm.'r u J li 1 40--1 P 07<1Â·Gr,- Fu>Pn 4~ .Al. t I. 4/ -1,â€ž-Mh, 4 1% 1 - 1-- __ 0 1, -1 1L I GUU LAM<' - , 191 -1 1 r , 1/ P , . , ' t--1 , ' <-- - tox i 9,Â·T i dc, twr. (t . 1 AASOARY WALL --1 . â€¢i ' ~ 4LIO'/1 ~AD i -L- 1.- 1 %19 HEÂ»/ 1/9-lull4 0 c <,3 Ilt'< -1 41, 4/ = 0 %5 \ 1 #41 1. . /O - ., . , 1 -4' - _1 -1 / To. Fid. FL, -4 0 - Fril? - 9 3 18 w 0 ~ /13'- 14' - ./ .. P 1 Ar d 41----- 3- w Af 1 1 --- 1 j}.4 -- - 034 h U 1+ / _7 W - to W le dh//51 -- 2 k P. 114'-o" [3~/ . 8 219 -1 W In tÂ£' â‚¬. 3 (U to W 1, j P- / -- - -0 A ' -i~/2.-1:ki:d.-*. ~ los'- 64' 6.11/ 2 \[=4~31,311 , -Yll U a i tr--- -A -2-9 wl 9 9 -Â¢-1'\.24 malit .. - 0 /001-0. 8*g.-150 11-121H 01 JACK MILLER & ASSOC. ~ STAIR #2 - SECTION 3/IC *- [6 01' ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 , 2 -%&-11 *1155 PPOPeg[) ' 0 1 / 2 -~ It U , - A 1 -3-J triâ‚¬rc foo r I. gy i ft J .<0 5% 7 2* 5 6, a. = % 1 .,7-h:4 1 , 11 47 0 1- - -1 . 1- . 1 UNE or: GUU-4 J J._'fli- --f~t~ t. th'/51-6 u/,1"12-p, LÂ» 11 1% 7/1 lipl Â· <4 'I J 1~ 111 bâ‚¬y-- i . /2. 7-6 /1 : s][ Il 9221-~ 1 , 1 \1 L-4.Â«141 7\\ L.*241 1 1 \0 I 2 -41 - 1- -JII 1 J -- I -4 '11 ~ , â€¢ \ L Ill- - X15'TIN, - --- -- /ALL, ' ---- , ' 1 944 1>l-11101145 JACK MILLER & ASSOC. Â® STAIR #2 - SEOTION ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 '11Â·* 1 %\ 4- - 7~1F--1 JACK...._LER & ASSOCIATES, A.I.A. ARCHITECTURE/PLANNING JM P.O. BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO. 81612 303-925-6930 February 24, 1999 Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Elks Lodge Roof Stair Enclosure Dear Amy: Please consider this letter as a request for approval of a stir enclosure on the roof of the Elks Lodge 224 to access and service the many pieces of mechanical equipment installed there. Currently, there are two commercial kitchens, Hardrock and Elks, with three commercial bars and lounges in the building with extensive associated air circulating and filtering equipment located on the roof. This equipment requires frequent maintenance and is currently accessed by a ladder and roof hatch which is in itself a very dangerous situation for workmen access, but is compounded when equipment has to be removed or installed. This is a major liability to the maintenance people as well as the lodge. The proposed location of the stairs is limited to expanding the existing Galena Street stairwell rather than the Hyman Street stairwell due to street visability. The stair has been designed to turn 90Â° on a landing which creates an angled roof perpendicular from Galena Street on the building faGade. This creates a minimum of street exposure and is probably most visible from the third floor of City Hall, along with the multitude of existing air handling units. This location creates the least visible intrusion while other solutions bring the enclosure nearer to the parapet. The enclosure will be painted a low impact light aqua or blue whichever the HPC favors. The access to the roofis through a locked, secure door on the third floor controlled by an officer ofthe lodge. The Elks Lodge will install a framed story pole replica ofthe enclosure for members ofHPC to visually review. Please contact me with any additional questions. Sincerely, ~7~ck Miller JACK MILLER & ASSOCIATES Aspert Flks ?Eabge #224 IME'~81 February 24, 1999 Amy Guthrie HPC/Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Amy: Mr. Jack Miller has the Aspen Elks Lodge permission to speak for us regarding our HPC application for the rooftop deck application. I have also enclosed our check in the amount of $125.00 as payment for the application fee. Thank you. Sincerely, Thomas D. Hines D.V.M Asset Manager 510 E. Hyman Avenue, Suite 300 â€¢ Aspen, CO 81611 â€¢ 970 925-9071 â€¢ 970 925-8678 (FAN ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name 611= bogie * -12-4- 2. Project location 610 E H-4 Fbt u h l (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning NA 4. Lot size NA 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number EA #c lod?.â‚¬ 125.3944 V 6. Representative s name, address, and phone number J 40# 8,Â·ll I Le Y 425Â·4430 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Y* Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. 1 Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the ' property) 9. Description of development application Se/u.e#/p, 9 4 /11/ j/7/'/,lu,PPI LI+64 KKAY â‚¬ncldfure 40 6/cce a 42 rer/\Ce MA eD |AA/A \ CO | 2~ u! r Â· ryi FOG Â£ , 10. Have you completed and attached the following? 4 Attachment 1- Land use application form 4 Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 4 Response to Attachment 3 v Response to Attachment 4 < 1 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Av olicant Elks La dpe 6 102-4- Ac dress: 910 S v Al *101 VI Zone district: ' hi IA Lot size: Existing FAR: Allowable FAR: . Proposed FAR: Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage. Proposed % of site coverage: Existing % of open space: Proposed % of open space: Existing maximum height: Principa, bldg: Accesory bldg: Proposed max. height: Princioal bldg: Accessory blda: Proposed Â°/0 of demolition: Existing number of bedroorns: Proposed number of bedrc oms: Existing on-site parking sp 1CeS- On-site parking spaces required: \/ Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: /94 Front: /*A Front: NA Rear: Rear: Reac Combined Combined Combined FronUrear: FronUrear: FronUrear: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined~ Sides: *-/ Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: V ariations requested', 2.4~ U e 6-~1 Flf a pw i vi l l/W U M,, 4/1.4/ f~21 F -6ylO|Ofore +0 Â«ccerr %16â‚¬rul 62 nle OIAA141(01 86:ivlr (rÂ» redÂ·~, (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking wai ers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) - New ASPHALT SHINGLE Roof 9-- * 1 1 m E-Lf-Â£,/Ttitt-'Â·louEÂ· 1 / / 1 1 - I - 1 I / .. --C *-4 :ler C lEÂ· 4 -4 , 1,0 -- NELJ COMMU - /2,2 +6 1 11 i 5% 4 1Â·75499: (C V 1 14't" s T-Es u 60 , 4.L New eAW. SAr ATL'. -4 ORMNe + UÂ»â‚¬,m PÂ©ofÂ° M Â·Â·-/ Bre 1~,crz:,49 1.114Ls MAFFSr /r IHACA-tt AldEA OF + [-FE= DIPEDâ€¢44(96 1,>el 1Â¢15#0/El:' 1- KNIC'W-EP I.. C ,h.1 01*499'. /' .\ -1 Â¢ *<jor< 14 u . LOWERâ€¢ Fec;OF 46 f F= Fits. 8- ST Ir-hoN COUS: . Â· i ....Â· 0%h q 1 /4--, WAEAO> i w 1111 117 \ ' ' EMTS'11 MEMERANE r = -1 B<~OF TO EEMAI N . E><19- 0(2 1 1 6 ><imi#rphz:Lill .:Ii: 34â‚¬1(226.ZA:Blid. Ff)'>r COL. -4 4. ~ :/ / /5 1. 1 / 'â€¢ , .1 7 SEAL .OFfb... Â©~eT. ROOF'Â·M,â€¢5'C,1.i-41 , 4--71- - 11 11 1 1:'. .17 19 1 .. % 1 -_ 31 9.-I .1 -.2/01 ~ -Al~n*kls ,_L Ne ,>dbAE. 4~ON Â· tatiO64@SAC' ~ ~ .~ , h . 11\ , .*i. ' i \ \ \ -1,-~1-~-mam~~-11,F-a.1-P' Wrpe/MÂ· 47*#217*im~r w 11///~r-- 41 -1 Jr ffi - . . ./.LL.=--- . 1 1 1 4 1 , REFNI?it:I#*19 431901.FÂ¥ -7-Â·Â·Â·Â· Â· . . Â· 0%#im/:Dfle'964 COPINGâ€¢ . 1... $ +EL ~MUPPeR,t 144*hâ‚¬B*P~TI ~- , , . EAST el|051. Rept,C~*tu. . 1 . 1 ---- -- 0- wLAC -COL- -'5'<~~Â·~~1 - ' - 1- -- - CAN rD' 4\/9 i =L . + 1 1 K...... 1 Â·/ 0* i L=-1 I Â£ \ \ I eNT- , , '11'' ..H. RE&$11*.,ent:f. Mal'41,4 PS j 4 0 '4;14#*b e.lsT. , 44\ * 'rt'.re 4-* r-00.CORAm:9+5 9011*~4421 AT \ Sj.,1-r. lÂ·Mlwpl"Al- lug.EM ; .hip . A 1 2\ .laNTARETFâ€ž, SolorrH 8-:49*7 Â·. ~ 9 2 \ .. 1 ..# tLE 97X 81413Â»712,Na ' ' ~~< Â·-1 1, V I.Yr , -I . -- PNÂ·l-- Exitsr 5,0 14' Y-ook]KIECric 1 ,-1 1 ./171 - /-r--Â£ F 11 / 1 -------<4*47) 1/ - :_34 L Ip,-1. 6, HYMAN -AVENUE Water W Â· W - prof 84 J *1<5 00 11-PIMI 31 JACK MILLER & ASSOC. ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 .,1 <12,/44 49 5 -1 f\>=Eft LL. - 44 -1 i 1.1 04 60,0: Ille,1- l' Ii_0]42 - 2 6 -]U 2 10 .' 4 1 (%8 ki '11 - 0% - . 34 / L ,~ ~~// i al' 0 0 c 0 '1 --lu) D. 5 1- 4 - .11 41 / i, 11- 011) 8 1203 al< Fo Wj ' 1 0 p tn 81 - 2 6141, i 9 0/ 2 9 1 7 1 n Id :4 ~&4~ W '~ 0512 T i l .I mER Â·, I 9 11 4 P lilli 1 1 1/ 1 d 1 # *-Ifti tn A ni----4 1 1 a 1 1 1115.12! 1 lili . i 1 6 11' ~~~[EPLIJ~ Il ' ~ ==1 -0 PM 1 1 1 Ii.. r, .1 ': 4.11.11 i~ illd~'1 in" 1.11 1 j .1 2 --1 L 7 i bl -Firlfr--Fi]1:I .1 11 9 1 i '1 1 1 11 g 111& 111.11 i l'f , M Â·, 4 It W '1 11 1%1 1 -4 ~~! ~ ~~ i~ ~32- 1 ' - /11 ; I -|, Lil lii Lii 1 -1 1 '1 . Â·, ni ! DIi 'T' 1 1 1 11 1 1 , 1' 2 :8 F '11 ETÂ® 11 4, 1,1 1 11 _ -lf H ' 4 ; 1. \ ---- 7 1 1, 1 4 f. 1 IL 11 1 1 111 E I !,4, i 1. .1 , .1 r, 1 4 t, 11 IL lili. . f., . . 4)3 1 1 di h ELit ~~ 1 ~ ELIU] D ~ 3 to 13 1 . 01 . 3 0 0 16 13_J il lib 7 0112 JI i .J p '. 1 1"9? Ilil I ~1 li j FU=Inl 1 - 1 Z >< ~ j~ g f - i. o W ual D , 111 I 11~ i iÂ· 1 J j ',il~ - ' N fril, 15,. ; 1 al Â£ r----4-~ .lh zi 8 13 1 t z le L k 'I: 1 01 1 1 11 1 1.11 9 1 f M' 0 1 0 2 ~ 1 }1 1 1 1, r 11 -- - - . 1 1 ... 1 9*~m-Ip:14-~=- . J 111 "' 4 212_ *1 -6 Ir-1 + mil L----1 4 M 'r--1 e , '11 1 ~11 '5/1,1, 1 , .11 . ' 11 1 irr,Â·i - 1 ,1.11 Ef __I Ill -103 * j. 1,0 - D r 21/4 31 :1 1:11;1 Hil 1-11,0 1 1 i' 1. 1 81919 CK)'N S]33NNV-Id NOIIVA WIGI Â£LSHAA 69/22/2 ' I Ne\Y STAlg 974Â£,LlaSU /:25- 14-- - 95'--P*.5- k PlADM REAA EleÂ«-t:>H - ~'41'St ill .- 0, 1~ - - -A -- - 4 p +--1- Al M &+ANPLING . rl - UNITN 1 \9 1, 1 R/ELE.V. TOWER BEYON" 1 41 1 i --46 4- 11 1 0 -2,1 1-11 . .FS 1 72*- 1. 1-1 - ~R--T--EZZLÂ© 3.0--76Â·--r--. Â©,Â· ~-f/~~~-~<2_c ~~21 --3 --444â‚¬~-fulâ‚¬Lf-1- 2/ ---IZEILLIZZZ-=*-}~l- ):=- -1.- -. - -li' .1 I. I.** '-.- . - I ~ pl--:u u j.1- IL ~.1-9 flo.-3~ re=-2213-1-1 --012--2..ifEEPEI=-9 2---Jit.--- - rÂ·-n - â‚¬-97= â‚¬ J-' . -- 472--22 -t 14~Eft-59.-~1~33-61--rrEI.-4-2-~- . '11.--/-- -421.! i; .i-- L-~- --EJ--I.r--Il--Lf. - .. *-I---- ---1 - - . - 1 . ..- ---41Â· .1.1 I.. i.--2-1.-- -./.-/.....- I./ . Â· L ---.-B--- .. . .------ -1460Â· :_..9-5--3.-full--2.Z Â·' - -u :. _ _. _'._c-J-*f~~gj~7~*]43-1 Ii:21*32--33 F --. -- -r-- ~--:-5-1._u:,1.-1 --t RE==au i --2-HÂ¥rrit -- et.ExoN-0-3,14 - (A L.ue:f) 2 @101<4 01)11- pl Ha JACK MILLER & ASSOC. ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 -2/1.2//49 / el-Gl. 7 - Azf - /\ 1 _ !dealok) -Â» 61-188 .f:R-L---311- r 1, ELAS, 6.-j vob- 4 53 + 4 24,/Â·77% M r.1 j -~rf>~4.- ~ /2.T a. 4 7-6. 4 r go,F (EM'&76 Â¢20002.1 â‚¬66080=> ACLERS To 11 Leut 10 1 111 11. 11 --_3 Nef VAW- OV#iNG ~427[tob.1 1 6,7 11 1 .1 It. 1 - 4Tht taS. -i ' /441/7'*..,2.-1/'-/1"'i/ G.//E 1 1 1 . .-+LL NIT FED,4 599 /5,4. 1 lt-.90,C (Nmy' ccog) . 1.1-il (92 64/1~ E- 1 1 1' 1 1 --41--- !5Â¥1 â‚¬22 STAI Avell.Â· D P a>< i T 13 6*WAN O FLar:. Â£2*1 8 + <2 (11+1 Ftp 74234 -12 1*2 FA lit = 3/lA li - - ELICS PU1 1/[3>11-1 49 JACK MILLER & ASSOC. ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 '2+M,(44 j e f 1 Lt 4 0 ,17ng=-_1_ - 10 -1-/ I , <iN b ~ EN trÂ» rAIKAPSÂ·T -- NK*94- Â»74 ADP -1 44 Â· 7- AL \4.* ./ I . 2 1 1 1- 1 -9 r 11 itxu ' Â· . 11 , 8.416 4 r 1 ?i 730 -1-jk - <-- -- E-X 1 9--r 1 4 + EAT. &145>01Â·11<Y WALL '. .1 1 11 - / 11 1\ ' \1 -J 1/ . 8 4 112*/ L.Pi-1,>114 c> c~/ 1 ,- Of i 4M '12 .r 626 i - 1 11 ~-4 . I - T.o. Fid. 1 4 /25'-0 - ~:.125- -Q-ir:*jac.f. :.A~ - 4.-4 - 90 ..If) le W 0 1 0 /23,-1 4 . 1 a,I A = 3- W tg W 24' P.- V 4511 / 3 9 , 9 - Â·ILA .. . 011 || A - 3 K/,9 .-Â·- 1 - 10 W 11 Â«Aff . in 1 ---7 - 02 uj 7 - / 1 W 2 M W 6\ to 0 1,01- 104 r lf) 08) \3 41.-- 3% , Did/ lo W A ' 54 2~84.2. -*- 6.W tb rÂ« J / 1 4411 111 1 .. Â¢ los'- 04 \\\ 150 i INk \44*4lth=:42 lo I W 1 n L \44111 99 Nn'X/ht . \711 -I 8.1-<9 Â·-150 11-121 H 01 JACK MILLER & ASSOC. ~ STAIR #2 - SECTION 3/t< - [1.. di' ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612, - . 2-4>14- '' 4,404Â£-20'pe i . j k I I Â£ ./ 'i U h A. + f *B, wrd Foof 0 * 0>0 gr= 19 , 4 54 y.3, -rVi h G L. . / . .= 9 Z - 4- aÂ¥ , .1 4-1 l-/Na of GUU- G J 711=9Â»L -4- 1\24-\ 1,4-4-94 %131 .1 h 1 2 3><, rfa tv,t u~~0â€ž p 1 1Â»f 1% 2 --3 ..nA'&-0....dit. . . 1 .\118 \7.NA&:PIX--7 1 1 1 2 --1--4 13 U 1 12 -1.-2 -- 1 ------- - L -- r i.,T-114, - /ALL : I E.1,1<5 -15i-111031145 - JACK MILLER & ASSOC. Â® STAIR #2 - SEOTION ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 1