The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.215 W Hallam St.HP-1990-1611 --.-----,-- (45â‚¬: li P-(990 - tt> L 215 W. Hallam - Block 50 -*444~~~~~ ADA . 0 1 11 H r- il . 1 1 J Il_ i ./ IL_j sutherland faIIinincorporated agithotÂ©Â©tul[7Â® 1280 ute avenue aspen colorado 81611 303/925-4252 Conceptual Development Application - Sloviter Remodel 215 W. Hallam St. ASPEN, COLORADO fr.1 /01'17Â·1.~NNi'l' 1 -7-JID IJUE A.y:INECCTICÂ·N IÂ·DIÂ·:-: SLOVI , REMODEL j Project !â€ž.in-3 Proj rX=t Location 215 W. Hallam Street East 1/2 of Lot F. and all of Lot FB1ock50 Citv of Aspen (irrlicate street address, lot & block rn.mber, legal description where appropriate) It ) Pirsent Zoni-n~ R- 6, Historic Overlay Dist ri c~ Lot Size 4,646 Sq Ft 5) Applicant's Name, ,Mdress & Ihone # David & Elaine Sloviter, dba S.T. Pobin Associates, 1358 Robinhood Road, Meadowbrook, Pa. 19046 Tele: 215 938-7666 C) Repr~esentative's Name, Address & Phone # Sutherland, Fallin, Inc. 1280 Ute Avenue. Aspen, Co. 81611 Tele: 393 925-4252 D) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditioral Use Conceptual SPA E- Cbneeptlial Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline - Conoeptilal ICI) - Minor Historic Dev. _ _ _ Stream Margin Final RJD Historic Demolition M:xmtain View Plane Subdivision Historic Designatian 1 Cor-*icminiumization - Text/Map Amenlmerrt GUS Allotment Lot Split/Lot Line - GUS Ebeuption Adjustnfnt 8) Description of Dcisting Uses (rumber and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft.; number of bedroans; any previous approvals granted to the property). 1 Shed approximately 153 sc ft: 1 Attached carport approximately 450 sq ft 1 Two-Story single family dwelling plus attic 2,575 sq ft Partial basement approximately 160 sq ft; 5 Bedrooms; no previous annrovals granted. 9) Description of Development Applicatian Alterations and addition to a single family historically designated structure. ... 1 (1) ] Iar'e you attached the following? Yes Reaxnse to Attachment 2, Minimirn Subm ssion Contents Yes Respanse to Attadment 3, Specific Sublission antents ves Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application ATTACHMENT 2 Minimum Submission Contents for All Development Applications All Development Applications shall include, at a minimum, the following information and materials. 1. The applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 5. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the Development Application. attach2.applications May 16, 1990 Roxanne Eflin City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Roxanne, I am Jeannie Bascom Barnes of TroIlhagen Tree Ranch, 4054 "G" Drive, Crawford, CO. 81451. My phone number is 1-921-6000. I am the owner of the home at 215 W. Hallam. I am designating David and Elaine Sloviter, D.B.A. S.T. Robin, 1358 Robin Hood Road, Meadowbrook, PA., 19046, phone number 215/245-8833, and architects Sutherland, Fallin, Inc. to act on my behalf, but at no cost to me, in making a remodel application before the HPC for my property located at 215 W. Hallam Avenue, Aspen, Colorado. The legal description is Block 50, the East 16.46 feet of Lot E and all of Lot F, City of Aspen. Attached is a copy of my Title Insurance Policy naming me as the owner, the legal description, and a vicinity map locating my property. This information is submitted in accordance with Attachment 2, Land Use Application Form. Sincerely, 43 L/. ~2Â©f/1. /2 6 0.,Â·-~72Â£' 6'34L~ 419~2/2, tr/.2.- Jeannie Bascom Barnes JBB/es 0516100 ,enclosure S. T. ROBIN ASSOCIATES 1358 Robin Hood Road Meadowbrock, PA 19046 May 15, 1990 Aspen Historic Preservation Ccomittee 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 To Whom It May Concern: RE: 215 WEST HALLAM ASPEN, COLORADO David and Elaine Sloviter, deing business as S. T. Rebin AssÂ¢ciates, at the address 11sted above (215/938-7666), dc hereby designate the following as c representative authorized to act cn cur behalf in all dealings before the Aspen Historic Preaervation Committee: Sutherland, Fallen, Inc. 1280 Ute Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-4252 Ve~ truly yours, PA Davld Slotlter ~UM'7~Â» Elaine Sloviter /8 - .U â€¢t- ..../*'- ~ FC] COMMONWEAL 9 6 fr 9)15 oR, 6 e ---1 LANDTITLE INSURANCE CGI)MFA I. 1 A Peli.â€žKe G, out, Holdings (Â»11,.inÂ¥ COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective date: 04/04/90 0 8:00 A.M. Case No. PCT-4581 2. Policy or policies to be issued: (a)ALTA Owner's Policy-Form B-1970 Amount $ 550,000.00 (Rev. 10-17-70 & 10-17-84) or 10/21/87 Premium $ 1,455.50 PROPOSED INSURED: DAVID SLOVITER AND ELAINE SLOVITER (b)ALTA Loan Policy, Amount $ TBD (REV. 10-21-87) Premium $ 50.00 PROPOSED INSURED: TO BE DETERMINED (c)Alta Loan Construction Policy, 1975 Amount $ (Rev. 10-17-84) Premium $ PROPOSED INSURED: Tax Cert. $ 10.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: JEANNYE A. BASCOM 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: THE EAST 16.46 FEET OF LOT E, AND ALL OF LOT F, BLOCK 50, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 303-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules Fax 303-925-6527 A and B are attached. Authorized officer or agent 49Â£~J. U.uÂ« 1 . ~31 COMMONWEAL 8 L-~ LAND TITLE INSURANCE COM 0 C~Ire,=.2 A Reli.,ixe (Liotio holding Con).3.,ir, SCHEDULE B-SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: 1. Deed from' : Jeannye A. Bascom to : David Sloviter and Elaine Sloviter 2. Release by the Public Trustee of; Deed of Trust from : Jeanne A. Bascom To the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin For the use of : World Savings and Loan Association, A Federal Savings and Loan Association and/or assigns To secure : $165,000.00 Dated : August 31, 1983 Recorded : August 31, 1983 in Book 451 at Page 205 Reception No. : 252814 3. Release by the Public Trustee of; Deed of Trust frcm : Jeannie A. Bascom To the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin For the use of : Alpine Bank, Carbondale To secure : $65,000.00 Dated : October 31, 1988 Recorded : November 7, 1988 in Book 577 at Page 850 Reception No. : 305665 4. Release by the Public Trustee of; Deed of Trust from : Jeannie A. Bascom To the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin For the use of : Ute City Mortgage Company and/or Assigns To secure : $15,000.00 Dated : January 4, 1990 Recorded : January 9, 1990 in Book 611 at Page 271 Reception No. : 318806 5. Certificate of Nonforeign Status of Individual Transferor signed by Jeannye A. Bascom 6. Deed of Trust From : David Sloviter and Elaine Sloviter To the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin fpr the use of : To Be Determined to secure : To Be Determined continued , r...71:,zrÂ·-1 ~ 1 /71 COMMONWEAL U L.--~ LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMi & *Il'/Â£.U $ â€¢Â·/1,31/ 'Â· ti~'llÂ£' Holibit/;% Locv I.,f 7. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990) has been paid or exempted. 8. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale, Notice to County Assessor, as required by H.B. 1288, Notice to County Assessor, has been complied with and that no fees or penalties exist or are currently due. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 1 PG.2 i the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-4581 A and B are attached. S 9/*#.El i TRI COMMONWEAL f, 1--1 LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY tilm-==# A. Reli.mae Gloul; rk,Id,ng, Cl)'rn,utly SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the -premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proiosed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in Deed to the City of Aspen, recorded in Book 59 at Page 118 as follows: That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws. 8. Reservations and exceptions as contained in Deed to the City of Aspen, recorded in Book 183 at Page 464 as follows: That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws. 9. Reservations and exceptions as contained in Deed to the City of Aspen, recorded in Book 194 at Page 233 as follows: That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws. ,. continued t ~. COMMONWEAL F. L--1 LAND TITLE INSURANCE CCM[Acd A Rel,-I. r (,141,0 44Â£1119% COmp.4.1Â¥ 10. Terms, conditions, restrictions, reservations, provisions and obligations as set forth in Easement Agreement by and between Jeannie Bascom and The City of Aspen, for the purposes of a non- exclusive perpetual easement for an above ground electric transformer and the right of ingress and egress to and from said easement over and across the lands by available roads and lanes therein, recorded December 11, 1986 in Book 524 at Page 888. 11. Terms, conditions, restrictions, reservations, provisions and obligations as set forth in Ordinance No. 62 (Series of 1987) designating 215 W. Hallam Street as a Historic Land Mark Structure, recorded December 7, 1988 in Book 580 at Page 241. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 PG.2 i The Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-4581 A and B are attached. :y.r-9 FEB COMMONWEAL r '--1 LAND TITLE IN SURANCE COMPArvt A Ped.ilke LIC>l!~' tid.1,11Â¥% Clat,411~y SCHEDULE B-SECTION 2 CONTINUED Exceptions numbered NONE are hereby omitted. The Owner's Policy to be issued, if any, shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: ( 1 ) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1 . (2) Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners' closing under circumstances where it is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said transaction, the Company will be deemed to have provided "Gap Coverage". This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-4581 A and B are attached. Commitment For Title Insurance Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, herein called the company, for a valuable con- sideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Seliedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies o f title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate 120 days after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall be issued, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Company has caused its Corporate Name and Seal to be hereunto affixed; this instrument, including Commitment, Conditions and Stipulations attached, to become valid when countersigned by an Authorized Officer or Agent of the Company. .COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Â·~ Attest: f \GWAG: President Conditions and Stipulations 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudieed by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose stich knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other niatter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to aciluire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for tile policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject.to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipulations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or polic'ies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated hy reference and are maile a part of this Conimitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or Indy bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or tile status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. American Land Title Association Commitment 1966 Cover Page Form 1004-8 , \ 1 *--7- Ir I . 04- i\% - \ FIGURE 11[.2 1 60 'INVENTORY OF, HKSTORIC S~ES A STRUCTURES : ' LEGEND 1 i l! -9 i 1986 UPD~E . <~ ~~ , designated . &90/94 RAWBj XSPEN, COL-g59 Â° Ezge.QeaLSIOK!.LUM not yet designated o ' designated A not yet designated a pat/ARED er TDâ‚¬ Al.~.,p,TKI", PLAiliI.0,4'FLE Â· thiAWLSIER&19{93 designated Â· 0 leo , --- not yet designated o Contrbufric Structtres O , f = ' ~ EXiSIm_tiSmfE_PE[ECIS .vmÂ»10 1. man skeet 2. corr,nercial core < J' tEICAC-21213MCIS-LEg=1.-C<Xisiguil'[1Â£3, 3.west bleeker/hanam street A y 4.haltam lake 5.corâ„¢nunity church 6.lift 1 / I. 8 02 0* /,1 J - - rrEA - 21 - - 2-1, \~Â·Â·Mf ' fi~it>. .. Ptl . n â€¢ .-. t\Â·\ '31 i UA . . 6-Sbw/.>h. < Cts 1 - 11_47 - N . t \I~*FINfiv-7 mil. L .. :r-O m=T-TI ~ Ill Wlill 't t,~ . 1 k :- - - , , :41.. ------- - 1 111 Vvo 4-f 1. .- 1 , L , - 1 U -*lU__1114 11 ' 7 ] i33)13.1 !trtzier,44 W ; 013118 f [[[ffli! 11]JIUIW i [1Â£Ll[=~ -21 - ---4-e, 64*An â€¢ , ./ ' 1,~-~~, /Lug,11-11 00 0 i: ilil.EL J Â·{2114!Ull.li'lÂ® Gag,!id . 'Â®11%1.[illitilll [1Â¥IHill] -111!Ililli .... - 2 - . 93 EW.U] tlileil OCREE [IIWI]h r:ED, ' 11 , -1, ~ 13-3.1311.iki!(!ijil/11 - *tglli~ {=].1111~Illm wi~[U ER[[gipmml-[1 -,Elfiil 11~11~11111111"F'~ ~ -1-1-15.7-T -- .- L--2\ rT-7-TZ-TU-77 ; nmT~N 1\ ~ -- It i ~ifil[II 0Â¥133Â·:IKTI~N~T[1 l;-W-till i [[Il[II!]. E.IRD11 3â€ž:, -j z !11 h, fl i ~ ,<r - - l 111'11 HERE --Â·# / [Eli PliliRE Fill~:,i<-- ilaTiii~ UA1131 61)11111 [Â®[Ill] ffif[Cil Â®Ift[t-3]1~1 [1~t 15 W. HALLAM ST. 1 * 1.41 leâ‚¬Â®11] a mi 123} --mUTTITI mTInff mwillin]~2%~A [THI iTHT-Tififil I Dr ff[Im]{1 j Mi REKS{-l=21-1.-1 fl,FAh--fÂ·-iIFfrf?~i?L~X - Nij>kx , - r.1-44 1 1 ULDLLJ i i Th-U l-- uy 1 ,-0 q /-,6.15 '7~1 /. - 1 . ..., 0-1*11 1-1 GIl ~itz-1 f 0 --- / P . _ 1476 - CONEF:'TUAI- 095'-0 r-ME-NIT F>AN . 41.ovl-r.EK <Bh/loroet---i Â¢ 15 W. Â·14.Â«14-AMI ST. .. / %*-- :ir 2-. MAY--]'5, Il=M le 1 , t- *$- 4- - li 1 - . - 1 4 l.' -0 ..4.- . 1. - - 11Â·Â·f ' l \ u \ 7- (+ 1 I f; 1!1 1 if, ?l , V ~1 J , , .1l 1 - f.r f.,4,397,16.2544 / =7- / -- r - f.--1 , ~ #!flÂ·'~ 34-:3 -- Â· 9, ai / L; ~ r - , /*24> 283Vvi - 7- I . I . /*i.r ----2 -. . 0.)/%- - Ir 9.-- -- 4; It 2~ /..,f.,7 k. / '13 r.--- -- .ir - , --\ /. : . .-.. . .. Z// 1 - ' 1'.. I I 'Al lt,i,k' -- . Rit.1 1 I . 1 . j Jfi }f ;t* : ~â€¢-444(14:Â· r:iÂ· 0 1 . . 1 fowl -464*04 6,~.. ' -- Â£' I\\11/7J 4 -- 5 .-/ -4 1--1.-"I Miu -- 4 1 -- I 1 1 4 -- 1 - ' . Y ~, - a. . 4 1 :1 -- Af tu '' 2244.-~.7. . I 1. + r - 462 2-7:-9 1 *011 1 E. 7 Fm . =7=N 14.81 0/ !1 1 , . .Â£4btfs:,1[< -RE& i 44:&~,dd'w A j ~\ Â«4.,941: /)1/ / fli. A-1 -7/45492-*.''v..r N"11'f/5.f<'f... 1 ,, r.Â· * r. p- ! IzR/XED:.'.Tribidip'; ..Afi ' i -1 . r ..44 -. 4- Â£2'/A' 2.3 " 444 ( <Fj-<1~ + -M--* --- 1 r-:Â«./r.LEX 1 i 11 1 - 1 .1 _22*- L! 1 1 1 1 1 ~-- 1 1-1 1 1 1 i 1 '1 - -..I.-----I. 1 -\ tzz> F }L.)- Lati 6077 N A LL - DEV ELOP>ME:rAT F L- .4 5,4 4 - 7 5 .10 . 2 1 1 V./C:407 14-A C- LA M â‚¬72(E-F . . _ SUn--1 C<LAÂ·NIC). PA LL!>4- Na . CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 215 West Hallam Street Aspen, Colorado May 15, 1990 The following is the Description of Development called for in the Significant Historic Development Application Package Contents specifically for Attachment No. 2, Attachment No 3a and the Review Standards in Attachment No. 4. This report has also addressed the requirements listed in the Aspen Municipal Code Section 7-602 (B) 4,5 and 6. Applicant believes The Development Plan has met all the required review criteria in a sensitive and forthright manner and the Plan is in compliance as documented herein and on the attached Conceptual Submission drawings dated 4/25/90. The intent of this Plan is to create a four bedroom, four and one-half bath single family residence with an attached two-car garage. Due to the applicant's program requirements, the cash-in-lieu option in Ordinance No. 1 has been elected. The Development Plan is designed to comply with the allowable Floor Area Ratio of 2,861 square feet, on-site parking for one car per bedroom, allowable height limit of twenty five feet and allowable site coverage of forty nine percent. The existing structure is composed of three basic elements: 1. An existing two-story frame structure originally built in the late 1800's. It presently contains a partial basement, first floor, second floor and attic with five bedrooms and two bathrooms, whose total floor area (except basement) is approximately 1,670 square feet of F.A.R. type space. 2. A one-story attached addition, constructed in the middle 1960's ,consisting of a living room and a two-car carport. This addition exists along the rear east side and south portion of the two-story structure and excluding the carport, is approximately 905 square feet in area plus approximately 450 square feet of carport. 3. A one-story shed on the alley at the southwest corner of the property consisting of approximately 153 square feet. Conceptual Development Plan May 15,1990 215 West Hallam Street Page 2 The condition of each of these three elements and the proposed Development Plan for each is as follows: 1. Original Two-Story Structure. A photo of this house is shown in the middle of page 58 of the Historic District and Historic Landmark Development Guidelines booklet as an example of aluminum siding "possibly protecting original materials that could be uncovered." It is proposed that whatever siding is disclosed during demolition would become the siding to be used on the entire house; we are assuming it will be the typical clapboard siding expected from its era, but its condition at this point is unknown. Whether it is partially or completely salvageable, will be determined during demolition and with the advice of HPC. The existing house is in poor condition and would presently meet few of Aspen's current building and zoning requirements and will require extensive renovation to do so. The front facade is characterized by a shingled gable with no major trim at the eaves, rake or windows. We intend to retain the gable shingles and two windows with slight modifications in trim and height as shown on the attached drawings. The existing shed roofed front porch appears to have been added to the front and is to be removed. The existing entry door and entry vestibule appear not to be original, however, the small roof over the entry does appear to be part of the original structure. The entire element would be removed and replaced by a new L-shaped porch as shown on the drawings and incorporating a new front door in approximately its original location of a design compatible with the era. We are proposing that "Tuscan" type wood columns with a simple wood railing be used in keeping with a stronger simpler design for the house. - The new two-story addition to the east and south would have its roof slope matching the original roof and repeating the eave detailing; new and existing roofing will be wood shingles. The two new gables proposed on the front and east side would repeat the cut-shingle detail as shown on the drawings. The two existing brick chimneys will be relocated and the original bricks will be reused as their condition permit; the new chimney for the living room fireplace will be brick to match as closely as possible the other chimneys. Conceptual Development Plan May 15, 1990 215 West Hallam Street Page 3 New windows will be wood, double-hung of vertical proportion at the front and east side in combination with various smaller squares and more contemporary french doors and dormer windows at the rear portion of the house. Exterior corner trim, door and window trim will be consistent on the old and new structures. An encroachment license is requred to allow the existing iron fence and gate to remain in the City right-of-way along Hallam Street. An encroachment license is requested along the west property line. The existing building encroaches approximately four feet into the required five foot setback. All other setbacks are in compliance with the R-6 zone. Due to the west wall being less than three feet from the property line, no windows are allowed under the Uniform Building Code. Therefore, the existing windows will be removed. An additional requirement for the west wall is that the Uniform Building Code requires a one hour construction rating. Because of the two requirements, the existing siding will have to be removed, a new rated wall sheathing installed and new siding installed over. A wood fence presently exists (recently installed) along the south half of the west property line and along the south property line at the alley which will remain. The fence will attach to the new addition in order to enclose the rear yard and will be removed along the alley to facilitate the new driveway as shown on the attached drawings. The changes described above will, in our opinion, enhance and improve an important and heretofore somewhat neglected element of our community's past and will have a positive impact on the historic nature of the structure and of the neighborhood. 2. Existing One-Story Element The entire one-story element will be removed and replaced with a combination one and two-story addition plus a new two-car attached garage. The driveway that exists off Hallam Street will be abandoned. The curb cut will be replaced and a new driveway constructed off the alley at the southwest corner of the lot as shown on the attached drawings. The yard area along the east side and at the rear will be extensively relandscaped as shown on the attached first floor plan. An encroachment variance is requested for the basement window well that is required for exiting within the last side yard setback. Conceptual Development Plan May 15, 1990 215 West Hallam Street Page 4 All parking required (four spaces) will be on-site at the alley end of the property. No variance is requested. While the new addition will have a slightly more contemporary feeling, it will in no way detract or diminish the cultural value or architectural integrity of this or any of the other surrounding structures in the area. And in fact, will reflect more so the character of the outlining neighborhood. Again, it is important to note here that all materials to be used on the addition will match those currently on the front of the house. 3. Existina Shed Element The existing shed is in very poor condition and due to the size of the lot, was not able to be accommodated as part of this development plan. The applicant will attempt to offer it to the public for removal in the hope that it could be used elsewhere. HALLAM STREET Â¥/ALUI ./ I 1 1 111/1///0,0 /NE *a / 4 *6 Â° ~ 49Â§9Â«Â« 7 1 1 -! U- 111111 111 "11 1941-Jt; 1 ilig) lin.1./ AA -Â·e~= il i j 1 / i /Lul/// Â»: F dd # 44 ~ 94-/*4 -~ 1 W. . ./1* .OUND ~IONUIAINTS . SMOWN ..Ll-Â£.LLL .._11.L 8URyEYOR'SyERTIFIgATE- OF LOI F, IDC. 60. ClrY OF ..., COLOR& r,â‚¬ h'h) Sh,h . Ht/t. CEâ€¢TIFY THIT <Â»1 ./1 4 19-, A SUIVEÂ¥ I. I.foâ‚¬ LN.. # Ii.#ISION OF 'Ht EA5' MAL F OF LOt E A~O ~4 L 0' 0/ I i ./. ~ .... MOUSE .. FOON. /O ...ATED ..........IN TIE ~ ...T,0.-O ./E NS 'ANS OF k' Bu.' Di NG' r./.ov E. IT. EAbiltENt S, Rigâ€¢~TS i~ WAY +N b,Ct4lt vÂ·R â€¢No*â€¢4 16 - AND . E.......41Â§ Bill.. .... PNE.I./ I. ACC....' SHOWN c D 22-~-~] 1 ' rÂ· j .UE W-EVS - D, ..5 â€¢ -st' 1 ....}r 1 0 ;h .e4 r 'H Â· --,Wl. 1, 9 ..2, ic - 4. L â€¢000"'11 FC*IND MEÂ®AM ./.U CAP TE.~,-, L. ..4 â€žCE,TI ALLEY BLOCK 50 57<11â‚¬T~iN/1 co,Â·4[3>,TiogÂ·ti 1 Alpine Surveys, Inc. SI'll' 4 4 /5 . I ..... â„¢. IMPROvEMENT SURIEY Job No 89 44 oraft~d '5 5 8. E g EAST HALF OF LOT E AND ALL OF Po. Ofrk. ek= 1730 LOT F, BLOCK 60. CITY OF ASPEN 00/1 8/SCOM Ase- Cok.â€¢do 8012 303 925 2688 0 00, / 1.-So 49 f llc .U n - 1.....,.1.-1/ 1.'U...UU - 1 0-3 4 1* Â« 1 1 tij h N 7 ' 4 tittli_Ft-~ LF/// a :-3 I r=i r- '0 i t. L f 1 r --> ---- ff\ 11-31 a al / F ti j 39<49; 94irt 9 3 i -1Th- -6--41 N 1 1#= -U ,j , , I fli; 5 CONCEPTUAL SUBMI-TAL- H.P.C. . ....... 9....... 0.1. F..1.,00. . 215 HALLAM STREET ASPEN, COLORA .1144262mmiA1uumit#&.HAN##almÂ£/Milliwill"/1/1 b.4 4 1 1 i 9 /1 1 4 1 4.-- - - ----- -9-7 fil i .... -11 4 - 1 3 2-1 1 0 11 ----- ----ull-- i ICS 0 1. 0 il /4 1 41 1 4!1 .-1 -i -3 ti i z 11 I IE=El-1 { S + GY-1-1 ul. -4 - m E C -- 1 i * 1 4 5 -EF--1 0-]PTLIi ff-frl j 1 :; L--1 Itt tdEf Ir * -d , in Lij d . - 113==E-j 0 1 1 CONCEPTUAL SUBWTTAL- MAC. ~ .....~*.- '1... d.1. *'.â€ž>~. . e' 215 HALLAM STREET |~'"7711 1~4('r:0'., ..â€¢*~~Fm~111111,1~ff'~L~' ',i,Â·~, i'' | ASPEN. COLORADO . t C:r-Ez~Â© & m 11 -~1-1~1 1 11 G i j il 1 -4 - u' 1 1\ - tb 1 4 --- - - 11 1 4- -11 i i I I - 2 t i '7 li 14--- ; \#. f-----~ H. [ 31 - 4 + 1\ 1 Â£;~k CONCEPTUAL SUBMITTAL - H.P.C. 6.te'.V'.don. Dy ~~ j.1 4 'ia::~~1. *1:&â€žEmiaÂ®#.20;,~~, -ii;r 215 HALLAM STREET Lit/liligillililli1illigieel'lizillibillbill'illill:Ic/T..1 ASPEN, COLORADO -2<27--B (211Â·LL 52~4LjÂ»hÂ·â€¢g -*ay; 0+-0729. br91_1Â»11.4 S -<I -t~-L -~P'~4.-4Â¥ Â·TO .. 12/1.0.rrt/Â» P -3 4 1 :@PL-72 .*- ....Â·-4 "p.64 7. bt /*rtil'. 4 __ .....el .ug,1 rb, r 111 kill -t> 0.2 *â€¢v,Â»ee 7- -3 11 1 95 Be RerÂ·.1 3.83 1 1 11 11 1 //A ----, 4 - ~49 C Â· ./1.4 .Â·Nck=,â€¢-. -24 'tr l 1 1 ,--- 1 1 2- c.-4 41-/ .bil. rl 1 - --- . - 1 4 -6 16- t.,an --1.â€žr- - I. -lb ..../.1...0 _ ,Â«1 /4 /46%~H EueÂ·wr-1,Â»-1 1/- 2 -11*It j 1! 51 1 11 --6 4- ,&~,1 I i , 1 XII =3Â§ 9 .41 151 4*14:4:*--Â·-'. t iii 21 - :rm== Â» 1 NT - -rr-- ---- â€ž 1 1 .1 a. 2.-U, -L..0. 4 - r; i ; xi 04 1 0,5rt. ..2. 4. .a .ove,0 - . ( f.)-14 A.'pi -â€žIi 11 5 %m .r r-w:*=â€¢CL . ;----1- :S L - -reis el--12,47 -ID 12~MAIN -rÂ© U â€¢EMe,tO j -- 32 p.,It,rIA4 ,]26*j 4/Â£>/2110Â»4 1% %13 di-, .rÂ·,1 chkd /*. EXIDTING CONDI-TIO,46 5 . Ini luoÂ¢~~. ~-0 1 -9 -...h-ry -1,11 I ..11 r..E. 1 1300W38 .PAk *F. H r- 1 1 4 1 112 111 '3 EF- fil 1 Â¢,1 111 & L. 1-:i /& 1 t: 2 - 1,1=Â« -1 ~Ex lip 1 5 11 , 1 4 -1 9! A .1 , -- ~-4 1 r ju Fl 'll 1 -51 \ f t I - --- .,i .i= - - 3 1 1 9 4-4 =24 L @â€¢ 512 < 1-1 1 - =-i 't gk t , SE bit ' 3 if M - i-- 7##,3.= 1 /2~~ f 1 i 5 1 - --4 // D 1-3 N 1-1- 1 ill -1/ 1 E 01 1 1 - L J L \ 7, 3 | pl 0. 0 0 1 j? 0 6 %44 4 1 1 g 40 96 . J 9 1 4 C,le Ii-il,Irâ€¢~ ~/ CONCEP:IJALSÂ·JBMITTAL-HP.C. M ibiz SLOVITER REMODEL ~~~*1'A~!*+Â»*2*t-At*FJ:21*.41.*V= 1 1 --m-#374%,prry/'ye'Z,i Al 215 HALLAM STR ' ASPEN i .OLOP .1-221 4 Arric < 4 I- . #01 . - 4 1 \. ~ Or=zl--U i QI ' I gy . 1 11 i 4 > . Z 1 1 L '' . 1 1 , 1 -=k 21.1-3 /1B1. CONCEPTUAL SUBMIT,AL - H,PC. ~~ 215 HALLAM STREET :f-#F#/49 Hl=, 7 /Â·:i;4(~411Tlil<(40~Wki~Td.4]i,Â·.1 -%'11 ': i,1.Â·,Â¥0Â·~Â·104 ASPEN COLORADO .: ceae.j*M-m~z:x-Ii.J. 1 =Â·42.Y3-3-Â·44 .1 494 -rÂ·wo 9-r H.:u,8. 1 . 3 ,Â£Â·1 L> 1 ..3 .. ' woo 212 I -7- + 10 1 41 4 2-- E-- blr/#-4~ /0.6 ,eÂ·reÂ·â€¢c,Q . CUDS 0 47--/ .li~. - i -*--1 ~ L. Ll )1 F--12--Ft--0-J - ,~7*--lr~''~h~\ l-]- 11 1 DE V."AÂ¥ ,71 ~--41 )/A./. , .lia# 1-1 L j I ---2 ~â€¢i--'~5 I '1 JU El- 1. r ...... 1 1 -r,~ c- c-â€¢.e -F[ 2 j Wilw~*. 1- - 1 1 I,& ru 1--~|ArÂ«=.-â€¢Â·rf fll~lrl 1 -1 1.231 1 6- 1 2 1 -'f =4==434. /#/FU'Ape. r â€¢1 't <2 J 311 1 E}~ Dj - 4- 1 I f- - f . 712 ' hi ty r]C-3 1 6 7~-0 0, 1 â‚¬ 7 r-1 - -9 1 >} f N [_l 5 c ** O ....4 . LIV 1â€¢40 IM#r _ i 1 1 - ~ LI--Ill 1 %- - =======- Â¤ . - =--=-J , L.. w.=2 -7 0 OW 01.1.- -4 - b - 0 - #A pl~,-rn-' 9 â‚¬J-'\ ,- -- .- 11 A.4 ' 41 P I - --Tâ€ž--7Â¢r----,=-Ir- *aia -- -13 - --t~-*1 --0 - - J .2 /9 0 1.1 1 1 12-1 1 ff-<<~ -0. 1-23 ---_1< FE:21 *1 W ' .O- --I- I W 93 i . :9 11 1-1 . Â·1 1 , 1... Z ' 'CÂ».O, -~0*-r. / 1 / g W B Â· 31 1 : > m P it- =-SCI< Â°L Â«A /234 Rev, fÂ·to..r6~ UNpert CorÂ·lfreuCT-,0,4 g 10 /10,/ 80 1 ;4.b - ...2#â‚¬ L â€¢Ul, 5 is 90 ... kir- ==0 -17 1 2 chU 1 1 .....6 liTC.-15.1 1 8 r[- - \. NWD M u, rl 0-d'H- 1Â¥11%8rS :- 1300~38 H O 80103 N3dSV 1 Ul S INV-1-1VH -4. : 4 â‚¬ 1 h==11 -i,7 m=~F-c===6 #t;= i .=1/ ................--- - l T--11 1 1 4 i 7 1 - 2/4 /,11 1 // / - *__121*==-64 1 T--26 0,1 y ~ :-- - -Ill , I *4\ '1' -1 1,1 -jill- 42. L.3 ' 1 $1'Fl i . b . -3 01 3 12. r-UF 11 16 . 1,rp . Colrugl - I 1 1 0 i ' 11- 1 - F -- .... \ . =f . M,- -L- -- 1 ~Â· U-r-7'M -41 flo-- - -X -$-----------9---r 'e-~- T~ /6MA,- 1 1 .422_ ' '7. I-Z : // 11- PIn---7- T U >. :1 ! 1 -- 1 2't i & CONCEPTUAL SUBMITTAL. - H.P.C. ~~ mil////2.~~M * %~Wint . 0 't~ h SLOVITER REMODEL 4 M'-4-1:92-*%/ Il 0!Mi~ ~ 215 HALLAM STREET - 1*iciinfle flu ASPEN, COLORADO NV-led kED-Id 0 CS +P - a./4/0 11 11 4. " ~.1 Ii. 1 la , ./ 371 # / -Tr--1 X , 423..4 In e.~~1,=Â·IL O~IM.Ir : f-i - . ./..=Clj-Â£.. /- 1 f , Wl - *-0 - - __s .- ...1.-=p .-4.. Â£11#4~i . 1\ 4 1 wrr~- Ab- - '- ,~ L 1 - ---- - , " 1 --- L . i34,9%: '11 1 i -7 LJ,- 11 11 1 ~r-71 i :1- 2 1 lu mmil ' ijkÂ·%Â· 1 |LIZ . ~=- & 7=:' .1:7.,9::...,1 .1 . .*t,->4 / .... 4, i Â· , Â·U 141 / %' 1 M ' r 1 11 ' 1 11 1 lili .1 -5 .*44 " 1 11 . ] ' .0 %Â¢ 9 - .4 ~12 NOITH (r-K,FT )4 1,1.1'-01 4 --Â·---- W - ~ .~~1 IlliE#bi2: Fl "-,7- 9? f A / 11 \4 . \1 Â£ IlL / #Vt r--, *-...Ili EEF- 1 . I.'I ..A 9,Â·,e im 1 1 # 30 4 _~_--jiffÂ« R " --1 ;.-5-lk- -i rm=VI- -1 ---- --2-- w tz 9 'aacc>-0 =-11 CC J LU -r .I Il 11 o Â£ 11 - __ _. _]k-1 E---0 I 1- In --1 6.--+Lk -.1 *C U) . 1 1 g -11 1 1 1, 90 -07 Call U I -O 0Â»9-- g 1012'= ltd 1. ... ...P 1 13.11 11 chhd 1 1 11 L t .-- 1 0 0, 11 â€¢h,~t~ 1 1Â¥111*905 1Â¥nld30NOO 00 1 N3dSÂ¥ 4- + Â·1 A -- - r L = /2 1 I â€ž i. , .i L , r~ ix] 1 -g \ , -Ill C 1 ID .1 1 F 11.1 1 i ' 21-----u_-- .29~7$ -1 1 --1 1 *11 1 - 1 4--Il --, 11 4 , 1 1 12 1, 1 11 - - 1-1-- Ill 11 , 1 1-,1-- Lil 1 1 L 11 0 11 Â·j* i 4 4 1' 1 2* - - i _ iy - 1-,4- 1 L- 11 i- Lh 11 4 i-4- - -rrig 2 1 ---= 1 . 1\ i 14 1 i 2 â‚¬ i :l 111 El -- % '* 1, l i +23 +B 0-0 iT -9 - f L_ 1 11 --1 T, r,â€¢-47 , 1 1 11 i / -] 4 l f 1 Â£ 1,/ 4 1 r, 1 3 1 /f'/ 4 JI i 2--1 l, * t 02 f t. SLOVITER REMODEL FÂ·*DMIT#FAL .0 6.Â»444*--M..,......1 ...,.. -1 /1 r _ 215 HALLAM STREET â‚¬-67 lot-l b.......4.1~1'10001<Fric.3,/.4...../66-7 ATTACHMENT 3a Specific Submission Contents: Conceptual Development Plan for Significant Development to Historic Landmark or in Historic Overlay District A Development Application for a Conceptual Development Plan for Significant Development shall include the following: 1. A sketch plan of the proposed development showing property boundaries and predominant existing site characteristics. 2. Conceptual selection of major building materials to be used in the proposed development. 3. A statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure (if applicable) and/or character of neighborhood. 4. A statement as to which of the following categories of significant development the development application falls under: a. Erection of an awning, canopy, sign, fence or other similar attachments to, or accessory features of, a structure that, in the process of erecting, cause original materials of the structure to be destroyed or removed; b. Erection or remodeling of combinations of or multiples of any single feature of a structure which has not been determined to be minor; c. Expansion or erection of a structure wherein the increase in floor area of the structure is more than two hundred and fifty (250) square feet; d. Construction of a new structure within an H, Historic Overlay District; and e. The development of the site Of an Historic Landmark which has received approval for demoli- tion, partial demolition or relocation when a development plan has been required by the HPC pursuant to Section 7-602(B). att3a.significanthistoric ATTACHEMENT 3a Item 1 The site information is shown on the Proposed Site Plan Sheet 2. Item 2 The building materials are shown on the Elevations Sheets 10&11 and described in the Conceptual Development Plan. Item 3 The affect of the project on the historic structure and character of the neighborhood is described in the Conceptual Development Plan. Item 4 a. Not applicable. b. The project involves remodelling. c. The project will have an addition. d. The project is not a new structure. e. The project will require demolition work. . 1 ATTACHMENT 3b Specific Submission Contents: Final Development Plan for Significant Development to Historic Landmark or in Historic Overlay District A Development Application for a Final Developmont Plan for Significant Development shall include: 1. An accurate representation of all major building materials, such as samples and photographs, to be used for the proposed development. 2. Scale drawings of the proposed development in relation to any existing structure. 3. A statement of the effect of the details of the proposed development on the original design of the his- torie structure (if applicable) and character of the neighborhood. 4. A statement of how the Final Development Plan conforms to the representations made during the conceptual review and responds to any conditions placed thereon. att3b.significanthistoric ATTACHEMENT 3b The Final Development Plan will be submitted with the Final Historic Application. ATTACHMENT 4 Review Standards: Development in H, Historic Overlay District or Development Involving Historic Landmarks No approval for any development in the H, Historic Overlay District or involving Historic Landmarks shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met. a. The proposed development is compatible in character- with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area, HPC shall find that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements; and b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development; and C. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic struc- tures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. e. Historic District and Historic Landmark Development Guidelines have been adopted by the City Council for use by HPC. Applicants should consult these guidelines in addition to the above standards. 1 A e,-16~J-- r.1.h r 117rg #\ >27 l'Ef ' r,27.1.23 117 --11'11 11 11 ILIEZE MIR- 5~ 418 nuyer s Resource of Aspen / Snowmass, Inc. ) . . . Working exclusively for the real estate buyer. March 5, 1992 Roxanne Eflin Historic Preservation Officer Aspen/Pitkin Planning OfRce City Hall Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Roxanne, Thank you for meeting me on March 2nd, and moreover for your assurances and encouragement on the completion of the 215 W. Hallam property. We are also encouraged that your office would lookfavorably upon consideration of glazing changes on the east and south sides of the currently permitted building project. We look forward to our continuing good relationship in completing a project of benefit to ourselves and the community. Sincerely, /1 3 6 y 4 /: j 1~ ~i \/0003 7/VO Michael Cooper Buyer's Resource of Aspen / Snowmass, Inc. 601 East Hyman Avenue Â· Aspen, Colorado 81611 9- (303) 925-8100 Â· Toll-free 1-800-626-0220 Â· FAX (303) 920-4601 4 1: WANTED 771715 INVESTOR or LENDER Historic residential project in Aspen's West End. All necessary permits and approvals are already i in place to insure a short-term commitment. High return through either high interest rate, major participation, or a combination of, both. ..:. $250,000 to $300,000 needed for--4 -. -.t. f - .Â· Â·Â·Â· -Â·- -or,Â· this secure investment. t-Â· - . . Call: David SloviterÂ· 2 -- Â»' 23.-u. ~ - ..'2211.11 4 U 215/245-8448(day) 37 73 IT U-2-2 -222 737. 215/938-1244 (evening) 1 1 CEO..><AA *L - Â«\ 13'- 6 -7 - EC 1~ 1 I U '' --7 - 1 - ft AL lili.. ,>4111 1-] 1 71 'IiI \11 , b \\ \! bl . -8 b\42 -1 _1_Li_UJ._111113-1- - - - j \ 111 + 7 -- . Z-ZI==11=--# 1 j ~ \4 1 1 rh 2 4 2* -LE.F. , \ 11 2 : 1 ILL 1 ' 'Iii- 11 :I thi 1 --1 3 11 Pl 1 1 I 9 11 4 1% ~ IlÂ«f.fullrrj ~\ ll L --- -- ~----'.-,--11--,--- ------- ~ >N - 1 ] INI / 1 11 1 , \ , 1 :1 \111 i 44 fle \ 1 . 1 /1 1 \ 1 \ 1 1. 3 1 1 El Il___--I~--~_ ~ 1 I . ---1, 1 -- 1.4. -- \ 1 - fl .1 - f \ 4 .Â»t L . 1 L. ...1 'll C t 4 43 1 1 X 2E I f 0 ,/0/ 1 l' li 1 ir %1 l il 1l 94! U 11 0 0 7 li I 1 4 - 14\ 1-/401 0 - ---- - -- - 61-29\ )\8 -21 ~-120\ tI-4 3 4 - -- .2.Z=//~ ,a_ - --~ /==ZIL- ---3----- +------- - -- 41\ -=EZE:Z~ \ - \ - \ PFU_-ru- I 1 1----1 i Ezzzz~Z--.-2-ZE~ 1~--#-- ----- r--1 1 - ~ 1-i Kim-mim-m1u ~0 -1 1 1~~ 11 ' 1.-2==r---I- i - )-4 Â»-r-t~ t===-113====rl---1 -- ...: 7-.. - b Hi-1 -4 W: 1-1+- L_1 I 319-41- 11 1 11 11 CZ~ZZIZZE- -_ 1-_ _~- --.~ hu'--11- 41-! -4.- r\OETÂ¥\I- 5-Lt-V Arr- \ On -_(\2254\4593 -- --1 --- - - - - *UTi-4 220-24+4 0 = * LL-1 h.1 1 AUL.- ' 2 UNE 1<5 ODD . ..9/. Â»,4, 1 14'.6 1 -0430 8. Gatena '+41*},4.4**<44*,04~146,4q,f"36, BUILDIQO')0*64~A#6PLICA~ < 9 ..91 ,-14**Â¥, General Aspen, CO 81611 ' '< ASPE 4TKIN REGIONAL BUILDING Â¤ ATMENT Perrnit Construction 1 20-5440 t, ~ ~.~ , â€ži , , pITKIN COUNTY [3 CITY OF ASPEN 0 - 0 71*Mpplicantp complete numbered spaces only. le-Z: ~.~~. JOB ADDRESS 1. 4 ~ 214- W, Ufru-,rÂ¥,1 ST- LEGAL LOT NO. BU)CK TRACT OR SUBDIVISION ~ ( El SEE ATTACHED SHEET) DESC ' 1 5-D \ Cra OF 115 feig 2. OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE 3. DAVID LAÂ·vnBER-T 1.0 * &) i -tr~9 6 FtsfeR 92 7 -wr * CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. 4. 9/410 LAÂ·moeÂ·Â« 5 M /891 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER Ml'L.9DRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. 5. ~IMâ‚¬ELAâ‚¬40 j Qit/,1 l LW VTE AWE &(04 9 M,425-2 -39-7 MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. 6. MAgeâ‚¬r f ~proc Lic 10' ViludgeRP GUWAU; 963-9,43 2637-7 CLASSOFWORK: CENSUS CODE TOTAL FEE ' 7. O NEW O ADDITION ~ALTERATION E REPAIR C] MOVE m WRECK USE OF BUILDING ....AA-MECK FEE PERMIT FEE 3% USE TAX DER 8. St/4 LE 61011 el *5/06Â» CE ~ 9-35. 6% 1 46<7. st VALUATION OF WORK s. % 400,000 (6200,000 E-'t.â‚¬i~ 1,98&(0ns#udion Occupancy Group Lot Area U-kl R -3 t 1 94 9 sc 10. Remarks 1415 4 REQUEST BA (Total Square Ft.) Size of Building No. of Stories .Occ. Load KeWivAL op -[Hi O,15'KIAL 3 Crl â‚¬/6 4 AIDCi, PEAr#Fr- ALL- Dâ‚¬ynouT,aN , EXISTING O Yes 0 No NO. OF BEDROOMS Use Zone Fire Spa nklers Required: '2. w'*AdÂ·t . al/AVA-hON UT,Unlgs 4 AiNDA'no,u 4 t,JORK- 1+Â» ) SWEDJ Coyn'LE7Tti) No. 0/Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACESÂ· M EVIOUSL'l. ~ 09> -FE-Â·Ch*- *\L\,3, 1 Covered ~ Uncovered ~ ru55-)2,- Bh~- OP- v\R)12..Krjer SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATE ' ZONING Mor 6â‚¬rf- rÂ·q,- 4-~49 6,1'A .4 4:4Â·. u k Â£â‚¬ /229-7 I Fixture Count: PARK DEDICATION V HEALIH DEPARTMENT ..Ub FIREPLACE PLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED APPROVED FOR ISSUANCEE FIRE MARSHAL 13Â¥ SPRINKLER 1-/ 3 fl L DATE WATER TAP -4+ 44 9001-90 Al.,3 4061 - I--1 4 NOTICE OTHER Aue< & 14, 44 Lf#le SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING , * ot il, Rk-clap 64.IcÂ¢ 0,<41,8 * be_ wed 61,- -#cco HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. VELECTION OF METHOD FOR PAYMENT OF USE TAX THIS PERMITBECOMES NULLAND VOID IFWORKOR CONSTRUCTION Wf MONTHLY USE OF QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120/180 DAYS, OR IF CON- n STRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A C] DEPOSIT METHOD: 3% OF 25% OF PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOW PERIOD OF 120/180 DAYS ATANYTIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. AT ISSUANCE. FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL MATERIALS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND COST MUST BE FILED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECI ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WORK. GENERAL CONTRACTORS CHOOSING THIS METHOD WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT MUST REPORT AND REMIT TAX FOR ALL SUBCONTRACTORS PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF THAT DO NOT OBTAIN THEIR OWN PERMIT. ANY OTHER STAT&*R LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PER- FORMANCE O~ ~ASTRU~ION. j NW *4.4 i 1 ~14 9 f EXEMPT ORGANIZATION U EXEMPT: STATE & PITKIN COUNTY RESALE NO. SIGNATURE ~ C~'~ACTOR 0Â¥UTÂ·HORI;~AGENT (DATE) THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED. |1 7/ 1: -.1- J WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE SIGNATURE OF OWNER (IF OWNER BUWER) / (DATE) 11 -4 PlaTtecl Valick,- Permit Validation 3% Use Tax Deposit Validation ID1 Tl Tbv' +3 1 ' 1-1 /#56 - -1 Lr-0 U ~92350 65 WHITE-FtLE COPY GREEN-FINANCE DEPT. PINK-BUILDING DEPARTMENT YELLOW-ASSESSOR GOLD-CUSTOMER I .1 i, I i r December 6, 1990 :*'"*,44 E.E.' Â·.: ;Auts : Â·: Â·Â·.Â· DEC 1 0 1990 ~'..44.144 Mr. Gary Lyman ~22 72 '44% Building Department City of Aspen 42:L,fl~. ki~ci,Lf<~7:Fw <' : ' Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Gary: ~'h'-~~-4. RE: 215 WEST HALLAM STREET ! nw =, .'"r .1 1 ASPEN, COLORADO A In order to remedy the present situation, we propose to do 4 the following in addressing your two main concerns. As you tPNE,~~,- Â·~ ~ â€ž ~.iÂ·"f! have explained to me, your concerns center primarily around 1 /7 r 14-1 MMOA,Abmvim@7414**a maintaining the integrity of the existing structure and eliminating what is perceived as an "attractive nuisance". 1. Sheath the walls and roof with half inch CDX plywood. 2. Apply 30 lb. felt where appropriate. ~.4<.212Â¢RÂ·,rtÂ·~d':.i;~ftÂ· ~ .1.3.-' ...4 1... I. I 3. Flash existing building at grade line. ~Ple~,.3 S.T. ROBIN Associates 3 4. Erect a 41 high snow fence around the property. This fence would be erected to include the wrought iron fence at the front of the property if necessary. Â¥24:?Pkâ‚¬':'f 'ly*t ..rÂ·*'01<Â·. r ,5,3.-:':.74 1 ,y,4. â€ž....Â».~..- Â·,:.Â·, Â·-,Â·,* Â·-f .' We are constantly pursuing the acquisition of financing so 0~358 Robin Hgod Road 4 that we can resume our project. We are currently speaking ~%itk?~-fi*Lw k4446d to four different sources. It is our hope that we will be I /1 4. ~0~:.Â·0 able to have proper financing in place so that we can resume F#914.***,-,F'*3ffif 4,:,'.~:12 construction within ninety days or as shortly thereafter as weather permits. *.r:.,Â·'.9,+ 0,'Â·,43 -5'Â·P'~:90,2-'Â·d We can assure you of our full and prompt cooperation in addressing kin.":Â·'iiÂ·-*-49:+ygke.<N,< '.59,41Â·-~~'7 any concerns that you have regarding our project. Sincerely, , , '~~~1Â·1,>Â·*3*61 -'2'-.2~.PA19046~1 2/'It /40Â·kL 0114*ttÂ¢Gft*Â·49% ~ en-Â·'e .Â· 43 >d;Â·sÂ·iÂ·.i-tri<%4... '.:Â·r e G:â€¢ ;%4 David Slo*iter Tal 215.938.7666,3 /els -103,4~~~51?23,Â·Â· -e. i.-.Â·*=. cc: Edward M. Caswall, Esq. Ms. Roxanne Eflin /4/uffty.44'L.A.J.,1.2" 4... fic< w**4*%. ~;' FAX 215.938.7622 123Â¢. â€ž 1*. 1.-, 1.44 .-' ..:....-* : ' 2, - / I'. Efitit#%44%491:3: 70 -4 --15-4:54.-*-241-f -'- Â·Â·yÂ· r..,ST *944Â·-1.r, '. t.:. I 0144,#44.-Â· .4 . -79;-1.1 3,1. '' CITYJAEJASPEN 15 1~eet 1 303~ney 19Aq#EMBISPqi)*hx CERTIFIED - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED November 14, 1990 Elaine and David Sloviter 1358 Robinhood Road Meadowbrook, Pennsylvania 19046 Re: 215 West Hallam Street, Aspen, Colorado Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sloviter: This office has been asked to review and bring to your attention the legal implications arising from the current status of the rehabilitation project relevant to your property at 215 West Hallam Street in Aspen. Both the Aspen Historical Preservation Committee and Building Department, along with this office , are very concerned as to your intentions regarding the property. The City's concern arises from the fact that recent inspections of the project have indicated that no work is presently being undertaken on the property and that certain aspects of the work heretofore completed exceeded development approvals. Speci- fically, the approval for the partial demolition of the historic structure mandated that the majority of the exterior material remain intact. However, inspections of the property show that all of the exterior materials have been removed and disposed of leaving nothing of the historic structure except the century-old balloon framing. No effort is being made to protect the remain- ing portion of the structure from the weather which, given the nature of our Colorado winters, will result in the complete loss of a valuable historic resource. Pursuant to Section 303 of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, work equal to 10% of the value of an entire construction project must be completed during each 60 day period following the commencement of work under a valid building permit. Additionally, no work shall be undertaken in variance to that work authorized under the permit. Based upon the facts as pre- sently before the City, your project may be deemed to be aban- doned and your permit expired. Furthermore, your failure to comply with the terms of your building approvals and permit constitutes a misdemeanor offense pursuant to Section 7-142 of the Municipal Code. Finally, it is clear that in its present I~~ recycled paper Letter to Elaine and David Sloviter November 14, 1990 Page 2 gondition the structure at 215 West Hallam imâ‚¬--unsalp'andÂ«22*Zh ,;6 27162- *F rstitutes E-nEff*ance 'as defined by Section 203 of the Uniform- m ~~Bu-ilding-C-ode-and--Section 13-89 of the Municipal Code. 1.) , The City would like your cooperation in remedying the present 0 0/0 ~ 4/ situation. First, steps must be taken immediately to secure the R 7/ 4 structure and render the property safe. If no additional work is to be undertaken on the rehabilitation project, appropriate measures must also be taken now to protect what remains of the historic structure from the weather. Absent your timely coopera- tion, the City will be compelled to pursue all available legal remedies. I would like to suggest that you or your legal counsel contact Roxanne Eflin in the Planning Department and/or Gary Lyman in the Building Department upon your receipt of this letter (telephone: 303/920-5090 and 303/920-5440, respectively). Time is of the essence. In that this matter involves important legal issues and potential sanctions, I strongly urge you to consult with legal counsel regarding your rights and liabilities. If you choose not to utilize counsel and you desire additional information from this office, please feel free to give me a call. Thank you. Very truly yours, - -*-i -- Edward M. Caswall City Attorney EMC/mc CC: Gary Lyman, Building Department Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office 41 , C (7 3 , ~ 31-01 h i f 4 Al i dieli,2 1 cAL-(M- 6-6( - i V\. totivatf 93 k,j p;wtyie ' FlatguÂ£Â© au_ uf oui &0-ttwit-/ Â»3% tht* /fyi - ll.. 7% Ati 4- f fkcul/t 1 15-- A l\4_ i' v*ju~Ch ~ttkt f t. 00 ~ #wÂ» 1 ~# . 1 J 6 4-7, 4, 40> tlvvi#91014_ uui 01- fgaw#& . 44 904 1 76 Aut f,4 /0Â¢ju<-9 CO~*-&64 ; 6Â»ice TAR-~ Â· 3 October 11, 1991 Mr. Agar Brown Coldwell Banker 720 E. Durant Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 215 W. Hallam St., HPC approval deadline Dear Mr. Brown: This letter is to confirm the date of the Final Development approval granted by the Historic Preservation Committee for the property at 215 W. Hallam St. The HPC's approval was granted on July 11, 1990, making the 18 month deadline through January 11, 1992. No re-approval process will be necessary by the HPC if the building permit process is valid. Questions regarding the building permit should be directed to Gary Lyman, Chief Building Official. Jed Caswall, City Attorney, should be contacted for legal questions. On behalf of the HPC, I would like to encourage you and your client to take on this project as soon as possible, prior to the winter. The century-old framing system has been left exposed far too long. We are anxious to assist where we can. Sincerely, Roxanne Eflin Historic Preservation Officer MEMORANDUM To: Jed Caswall, City Attorney From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Gary Lyman, Chief Building Official CC: Amy Margerum, Planning Director Re: 215 W. Hallam St. (Historic Landmark): Violations to Land Use Regulations, UBC and Municipal Code Date: October 10, 1990 SUMMARY: The applicant received approval from the Historic Preservation Committee for Signification Development of a Historic Landmark at 215 W. Hallam. The development activity involves a substantial rehabilitation and addition to a modest 2- story structure. A building permit was granted for such work, however, work progressed past the limit of the HPC approval, which required the majority of exterior materials to remain preserved on the structure. The only historic portion of the structure remaining is the century-old balloon framing. All exterior clapboard siding has been removed off-site. Work has now stopped, and the structure is in a dangerous state of near collapse. Winter is fast approaching, and it is apparent that a full "demolition by neglect" is about to occur. Significant violations of the UBC and Municipal Code have also been sited by the Chief Building Official. A summary of each of these violations is detailed below. Both Gary and I are requesting your assistance, as per our meeting last week, in preparing a letter to the applicant/owner to immediately correct such violations. i 1) Section 7-601, Significant Development, Historic 1-1 Preservation Provisions, Aspen Land Use Regulations 0 27 Section 7-602, Demolition/-Partial_ Demolition (exceeded approvals) , Historic Preservation Provis ions, Aspen Land Use Regulations rx 43) Section 7-603, Insubstantial Amendment to Development order (not done), Historic Preservation Provisions, Aspen Land Use Regulations 4) Section 7-606, Minimum Maintenance Requirements, Historic Preservation Provisions, Aspen Land Use Regulations 5) Section 203 (UBC) - Unsafe Buildings and Structures: Open Foundation hazard Historic Structure is unsafe 6) Section 306 (UBC), Special Inspections: (a) General: In addition to the inspections required by Section 305, the owner or the engineer or architect of record acting as the owner's agent shall employ one or more special inspectors who shall provide inspections during construction on the following types of work: (14): Special cases: Work which in the opinion of the building official involves unusual hazards or conditions (b) Special Inspector shall be a qualified person who shall demonstrate his competence to the satisfaction to the building official for the inspection of the particular type of construction or operation requiring special inspection Due to the special hazard of the delicate nature of the historic resource, weather deterioration, etc. licensed engineer (State of Colorado)_ to examine the historic structure and submit a full report as to what is needed to completely preserve without damage or further deterioration, at the owner's expense. 7) Section 7-141, Building Code Amendments, Aspen Municipal Code: Work equal to 10% of the valuation of the entire project must be completed each 60 day period thereafter, until completion of the project or said project shall be deemed abandoned and the permit expired. (foundation fill-in) 8) Section 7-247, Violations and penalties, Aspen Municipal Code: (B) A violation of any of the provisions of the code shall constitute a misdemeanor punishable upon conviction by a fine not exceeding $300 or by imprisonment not exceeding 90 days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. A separate offense shall be deemed committed on each day or portion thereof that the violation of any of the provisions of this code occurs or continues unabated after the time set for abatement of the violation. 2 .. 42% 91 0 44- . - d Gat 2-. _*f- -6* s _ = 6 , .4/ 3~ . 62%201- 24. (63 74- 0, Al-_03066-,_c~04~ - r , 4-\- -0 13 ~ 6 Pofflopn 5-~ ~ t~0(/5~~11 /AAL, 0 gic,0/ls 7-Al;1 Â£d.4 pÂ·Â¢cl/ --ff-291â‚¬f=z-*,1-0 141-f- fic#-4 ~44 -i-*_ai-mo*ft--glifickx .<hk, 61 /-91 I // _ul_rUÂ»L _-urdÂ« n-kARIJAA & A A Â·Â·4- 7 - ~-*UUV V.L/v \. /1 vq Vt---- t . Da-/dulÂ«ce >811-1,4 64-~57 U U eÂ«_ja.___~2lf~~t. r J 4 8% 209- .. T l IA t- C 4-al.- Al _i?L Â»_- i 1%% capit #4* - i-_--- ~ fri - 4--f-j-ttit-4 -â€ž_ V 9 - - IL- 7~ _ _ 1 -i ditÂ·~ 4--2 *35*' -- 044 9-11* ___-__ _- -_ _____ ~ -__-alit__-6,5 13-4Â«f ------ ---- -- -------- - r EL--91}814 ~ Ir MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Conceptual Development amendment: 215 W. Hallam, front porch Date: June 27, 1990 SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting HPC's amended Conceptual Development approval for the front porch (only) of the project at 215 W. Hallam, which was approved Conceptually at the last meeting. The roof pitch has been reduced from 8:12 to 4:12, and the Tuscan columns have been replaced with simple three-part columns. DISCUSSION: The HPC voted to grant Conceptual Development approval with a number of conditions to be met at Final, one of which was the restudy of the front porch. The applicant has submitted a revised facade elevation, indicating changes in the front porch, and is requesting the HPC approve these conceptual changes. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds these porch alternations are more in-keeping and appropriate with the HPC's direction from the last meeting, and recommend that the HPC grant approval for the revised conceptual facade elevation. - 4 /7,1 9 p - 0 3 1 SUTHERLAND, FALLIN, :. ILIEFFE Â®F F[EARIÂ©[a]OF'FAIL 1280 Ute Avenue ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 --PNE.14.00__-I~_.DJ (303) 925-4252 ATTENTION p ANNIE Els{-14 TO 11'R C , 6 rr'/ of- bafER -22*131L_-PRM-PDO--- \10 4. 64>E.NA Â£30 - AaFF-M co WE ARE SENDING YOU * Attached 0 Under separate coÂ·,er via 44 AND (Ar'RE>~1 the following items: C] Shop drawings 43 Prints C] Plans m Samples D Specifications [3 Copy of letter C] Change order n COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 3 CP ' 1 6 80 - 264 1Â£>ED 66012374 8-LE,VA*36)14 , 1 0 'c-Â·J.. - '.i /0 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: m For approval El Approved as submitted El Resubmit copies for approval C] For your use O Approved as noted [3 Submit-copies for distribution - ]66 As requested Â£ Returned for corrections m Return corrected prints m For review and comment [3 C] FOR BIDS DIF 19 m PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKA 1~.OP<Â£y4 KLE, 8 YA.j hil,1 1- Al.Otlc E . -TE}.Gr Tl-lfreE- AYE.E_ 9-M,0 AFF-611 OP fNG 4 DF'Â»1014, NE-, 4-laVE. AdDÂ©(Ef:*er.D l N 1-U F. tHEA.G,FD C.E>,rt Â«loq , -Tly. 13 2,61- AVE- A COA. C F~Â£+1Â« 3-148- 614)IM Alit JA, U L C 14 H,F . U*Vt:- . Cid AN,reFID NE-) P>EL M.r)ry:5 - (/314071Â£917:hu Â¥ H (114 1,4F Â¢31-- F-/14:E) Pne_LI+ Pe-fA,f Ll ki,6 . NUTI, â‚¬,P,CONO 62* 4 c (E>ACFF Nfb wXDPÂ· 44 f~Pe . c \Aut C k.l \AV- H-Odâ‚¬- - t.OP4 Eâ‚¬Ff) fROM 4-4 1 1 -Th g) & 12- -) f -. COPYTO CO c) 1 7 SIGNED: /4/41 -01:<._A j f U enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify u, at once. r-7>. t\/ /1 r.) 1-714 T.. 3/J (,20-- - . 1 00 98 ill h~ 1 - 11 il . L NO . / 1 \ 4/ 14 5 3 03 \/ r -3 -L--9 1}41 - ~1 f__ - - .Nti H \ . K / 1 A\ 1 - 1 I . 4' -lf- --11. .L] - -~1 Hq -1 1-1------ i 1 .1 If 1 1 , r 1 11 1 ! i i 4 3 1 i , t 4 4112411 -11 -1 , 11 '- - i.1 1-1. 6- \ I \ 111: 1.4 -TT-f TI-E 1 D-7.. .:1 IiI. 7 - 2~1 lu lilli - L W. X 'tr . 1 1 1 1 S] 1 1 1 11 1 1 11.1 1 1 - C) f..4% 1 P: 122 9 . 2 ./ 9. 'VII ' '\1~ 0 - 11 3 11 114[ 1 11 'V illil i i 1 I 7 1 ----+ H' 1 n Eas 1 ,[ U Z \3 ' pre, 1973?6'-0 7 11 0 , 22:.1 44 - Size ....'"9*'& 411"libul di Pi .Â·1*~ , â€¢ -11'Urr."===7-- 1 -2,4.-Er~: ~ 1 . k 7-1 0 -i67---31*~ '-r* ; l> ~r-1 i: 8" Doubil--~ir* -=-'-fr i .15.3. ~31 0 4Â» *t/26 r t 4Â· '21 Â·Â· *.Dgiz-+P..4 !:JIIA.' f -3 314" 72,1,1,4 - 7 --- .---=12*INWI L.,Â·Lr-L-A-,9...n--rÂ·L.~-L.~LAI. Â·Lru - 1 i Â· Par.111!- -11 1 59~7 4 - =,344 4 W . ' .:Ir, ..12.4 7 1 i E//1 5 4 4 D . i - h '3 I *f 4 6 * The finishing touch for traditional homes. Available in either flat head or peak h,04- --~;~~ 'i mo, Crafted from Western pine, penta-treated, and carton packed. HB&G window Ped:'/1,/"/I 1 1 ./?pa': designed to extend over 2" wide brick mould. No vertical trim other than brick mould *Ii,~1' j*Â·4 ill 9 Elp ; y.. 4 49. 9. .....MVE'.... S mfÂ·~%52 .1 . em *Fe' * limmilillilillillillillillililill& 4 E -*A, *48 1: I le ac '1 k ..14 ' ./Fl 6 'â€¢Cly <1 9 .. : *42>*f I... L.= -1.1 1 C â‚¬ 2 1.. I. ..i 411, '1 /f ....Â·,*5Â· I I , 2, 1-ah,5 - . 41 1 i'â€¢p,--1-' , 4 ~1.11 I lili 1111141 .......r d. ,/2 . '/-aI"*'W 40.~ f { N 6%10 22. ~ 1 ' 11 *O*Â·,Ir 'U.Â·Â·. 4 2<40 - *r- 2--D- - Â·Â· i t /4 :6*14$:1 "- / . ~ 15. . t- --8./.,/./., -i HB&G turned posts are made from select Western pine or fir. All piecesaretreated â€¢e4*0** ~ 7 5 E-~42 2 r ti Uk.9 3~ - repellent preservative for long life. No. 100 Post and New Orleans Post available in 40 (34**94 t~ F F..:4.: r- + 5" (41/4 " net) and 6" (51/4" net) widths. On 8'_No. 100 Turned Post, 42" bottom (w/14' /Â¥ Â· available on request. \\\ = \E -=.11 1 '54,4Wil -1 1 1 ' 41 4 MeiÂ· - ';,2-1 >a 14" 14" 24" 24" 24" - .it = Ball P &5/1-1, 3.Ye . = '. 1~a.'4... Top 41~ Newel N.* ' E . Lit' Â·f*$'..2.04 ' ..lili'/ ' R bi *6&? 4,1 ' t B CE@,1 ':., - 41" 41" -il-/. 7FS?l'7'* ' 1 , 7-I 94 f'/.' I ' t., I 40" 40" 40" Em 4 A ji f.463 -1Â· 0.,4...~ _~ N.n- B WI *~ Â·Â·' ~~,- #7964'~; 7. li / .-*Ii. .'/7./.- 55" . I ..= t.~ 7.!i 1*? .,1 . t.Â·Â·*.112Â¥*tvÂ»' 1- Â·Â· 32" 44" 56" - 41" 53" r-----LEJ '*~ 9 -P - A.,11,1-41. 2' t: 7./4 . A 1 Â·J''MÂ·Â·.iht Â·0 . .-I .-j --- I M V ..41#*; ' I -Aeâ€¢ 1d2l. / :1 i E I 'Â»c & ' Â·Â·.*Â·. *.Â·taÂ· , New No. Lamp < Istern p~ ~ ~* 100 Post OrleansÂ· H kiln-d<, . 'i' e.*pwr --. - 5 1 1,,/1? PA Â·:. 4 "3-27- 7 P 1 1 - Â·./. .. ...' I - -1 -, .4 . 4 + .*Â¥ . C C ... I - 1 ......... /2-Â·94Â·.Â·Â£.b 22Â¥%. Â·.t .T Wia'. Â·4... 4r, Â· :. '34% ...%**1'f~,10'il , ,/Le .1 â‚¬:#01991 . ?28= 41= 237 - . 1.64 ' r 4 ... i . 4,1 1/*al/F :.--4 ... J - ' 2 -*. 24-i . AL -- I -' 4- 3,*ef.-I 1-TIE .7...r.*:~' _~ + - 5 . < .4 .4< ..912 I . '. f '., '.d*%,- 3 &.,i *Glf-4-- .h, TEÂ» 41-*'.~ . 0, Â¢*Ail#*SCA'ltilit:>4*634 ~ : ... 0 50 4 lit' . *ai Ar,le:SIN, Â·re ,-901 +4-#. h I. I 1.9..4,2... 4, ' Â· "1 4~. Â·4â‚¬ I I W f 1 ffiktrAlide.Sl;'~fÂ·#.'~1?1-ti}FT:...5;4~.79 4 *r# 9NIZAWN-... i: . 1.40% 5 2 , .. 7"Ir-Fi-4 '209 2:6; i,r-. 1-Â· Â· .sri*i .8 - . --/ 7- I r-y- 1 3Mt '-' - mz . Â·52 - 10 - frk*#Stim 6~ 0#AT ' If~-~tj?%.2, ~t . 41~::.4*Â£%.LBAT,#~:?Aq#fea ~1 2'%1:, :1%11'~ ~.i. Â· < - '~1?j'22Â·â‚¬ Z.Â· $5. wkidaw~fpdditidhti'EL#*,1t.~2? f â€¢ ' ..Â·......1; . ...... A.-â‚¬. . . .4 44 ....9 -7... 2- 0-24Â·".ve/*9Â£. ~.- - j P =61 4,g ?4412/2 .**4 631~i . . . I .--'/ ' AQ'' >i' 2.W %94' /2-â€ž.94:Â·.,t ~4 71 -I.*tfoh627$,:*pÂ·jr,*2Â·,2~. :i - +4**Q 7 1 . 1 f Â· 1/.140 '$. I '4 0 A.%i*- - - &11.#41 'fr/-~ .:ill"ho galkka#WREam* Â· 1 1 1,~111: 1 tsy 9 -3 414/6&Haditir#11Â§9).1.20 141 rl .1 $ .. ./. : i . 4. .1/.:.61 . - '4.... 1. L.7. _' i 4 Ckbutir Staticase . ki . . .2. 1- . ~ 1-4 c:* -1 ./ XY. 1 $4# a . .1 1 1 /11 7-/i,21Â©X â€¢ 44 Â· A.9 i~' 1+ j'*lti~ ~{8~Â¢444Â¢4#Â¢04(#9*j fi Iff.Â».r i De~af i.in~<34Â·4-Grfljit Â·4 I i -k. â€¢â€¢â‚¬Â· .40 G t . |rl ./ . -4 I . ./ I -4 -4 - '1.1 7 ' 4 16 1 y, 0 . Â·i. 4Â·.t' 47' :â‚¬i' I 0- fc Se'l:.Â·. r ./ . 0'' --- - 41Â· f. 35&*11* ''Â· A-4 4%*.-1.-_ ),AÂ· * â€¢ 6 1 - lili Ii- JI ' ...,1 0"3.-I Iii -F# .-3-t~Â¥*2231*:ft 1 'T.Â·-shÂ·%~TRE-2-~b'~-1â‚¬Â·.-40 1 . ... 1 : , c .â€ž--:.*IE:Fl I ' 80,1 , I . ... . t Â·Â·Â· 6/WI:/t#P ' :. I. k ... . 1 4. i f 1 1 144" ill* 4 -1 Â·20,3 .U 1 rÂ¥,2 Fl ':Â¥fifgm ..i. f fi. 1 - :arer ,/ I '1 -ff,192*F,2 - 1 6, - l -.1 ;3Â·$4 ' v' c ' f..........-;-t-=C=Â»C *â‚¬ ./ C 1 2 Times Daily Thursday, Septerrber 13, 1990 Austers hope to use Crowley's loose lips IOn the Record= I~j Calm down By SCOTT CONDON patented mining claims in the A former City Market employee Med guilty to disorderly conduct , I: valley. However, those owners Times Daily Staff Writer Jim and Merrilee Auster are - I '4 have not applied yet to develop yesterday in connection with an altercation with a store manager. Fined in the incident was Cedar Hodge, 19, who admitted he lost hoping that a Pitkin County s _-,- ..~ ' ~ their land. his temper, but added that he was provoked. commissioner's loose lips will , 3 'I~~~ 3~ County Manager Reid Haugh- Aspen police went to the market Sept 6 on a complaint that Hodge help them convince a judge to 9*= ey has previously told the Times would not leave the store, was shouting obscenities and had block the county's proposed con- *, Daily that the Austers were threatened a manager, saying "I'm going to get your ass, I'm going to demnation of their land. targeted for condemnation kill you.Â» The Austers claim that com- because they posed the only Hodge said in Aspen Municipal Court yesterday that he did say missioner Fred Crowley admit- 14 4-r f' 1 ~ Â£ '- development threat in Hunter those things, but had details to add. Hodge said he went in only for ted in public meetings on Oct 24 K el, ~7 t~ Creek Valley, a popular recrea. something to eat and cigarettes and that the manager began follow- and Dec 12 that their property -4 4- ing him. Hodge said he's previously been accused by his bosses of theft tional area. in the Hunter Creek Valley -brir, =.~ in the store, but that he was innocent, and cleared of suspicion in an Haughey and Assistant Coun- investigation. 'would be worth several million -=_2 dollars," according to courtdocu- U- ty Attorney Tim Whitsitt have But, he said, several people were still slandering him with the ~Ea 1 -2: ments they filed this week. 4 declined to disclose what the accusation. - a.- n--,1-,20 Agims. the _-*I__.~*,, * county's appraisal indicated the Hodge said he was called a Â«thier and that the manager "started Austers' land is worth. cussing at me." To 1 -l .- 1.ov/ Hodge said he was on his way out when Jim Auster Whitsitt said he didn't want police arrived. to disclose information that Judge Brooke ] formed once they decided the could benefit the Austers in true, he had reaso experts could be hired; court. learn a bit of sell â€¢ and overstepping their Hodge was still bounds by condemning land to they want for their land. They was fined $75, w The Austers won't say what but quitbefore ap expand US National Forest. The Austers live in a tepee on said the property cannot be private property surrounded by r,placed because nothing with a Deputy to ot US Forest Service land. Their similar view is available around Pitkin County property, called an inholding, is Aspen. capacity as a car, up the Hunter Creek Valley The Austers' response to the Aspen, told Asm about three miles northeast of condemnation attempt asks a supervision had Aspen. judge to schedule the issue for a Glidden said h The commissioners say they trial by six jurors to determine a probably been r are condemning the land proper price forthe land, ifthe "exploded" plast because they want it to remain judge doesn't dismiss the case. have been explof open space and free of develop- The same resi, ment. The Austers have applied The Austers, famous for rep- son who destroy to build a home on the property resenting themselves in legal but the application was tabled matters against the county and Unfortunate by the commissioners. district attorney's office, hired Arrested for D The Austers claim it is not fair two attorneys to represent them Pedro Nevarez-I that the county is condemning in the condemnation suit. Their Nevarez-Lujai their land while ignoring similar response was filed by Robert R Grand Avenue b inholdings in Hunter Creek. At Duncan of Denver and Donald M sought by cops least three other people own Ostrander of Aurora. being sought in ort~ ad work in the area: itkin County crews will chip seal and River Road through Sept 14. Expect Late Spa iuld exercise caution and drive slowly n zones. only one news only times drivers won't experience Qua 3nwood Canyon is from noon Friday norning and evening rush hours each Non will stop are from 6-6:55 am and y. At all times, drivers can expect one ght, two delays of a maximum of 15 Tlent is converting the two-lane high- 0-0 more information about Glenwood 148. i ie US Forest Service has closed the itorized traffic with the exception of 3 pass is open. 3-6345 for road and weather informa- 4% '01. 205 r news coverage new fall 1 /)alby 605 all Daily 505 Lianne Barnes, E Main Street ~ Box E >lorado 81612 25-6240 News tips: 925-6660 -4/.i y-Friday and circulated In Aspen, Basall id Springs and Snowmass Village ix E, Aspen CO 81612. Shorter, typewritten :he right to edit, cut or not publish any letter signature and telephone number of the author w Jane Wilson ...... Downvalley Bureau ,r Frank Martin ...... Chief Photographer 1 Roy Willey..................... Photographer ,r Kim Foss ..... Photographer/Lab Tech Â·r Barbaa Schmid...... Production Manager r Su Lum ............ Advertising Manager i r Lauren Cassatt .... Business Manager r Chris Cassatt ............. Cartoonist 4 , r John Rule .......................... Cartoonist eserved. Member of the Associated Press. on use of local news in the Times Daily. 205 S. Mill Â· Mill Sti Crash kills Georgie Leighton / 4 C===13"y r- Â·F.*,t:,34#1111,Im-Im f.....--- I b attack fizzles 40 one was hurt in the attack, which work. The two tossed Tuesday at the jail tured two less-than-professional gas failed to perform properly. abs. One of the projectiles "was found still Witness Watches Bombing burning slightly on the south side of the Â° witness saw a male subject throw new work release facility" attached to the , what appeared to be Molotov cocktails jail, Halbert said. de standing at the northwest corner of That Molotov cocktail was -in a depar- *ourthouse," Chief Halbert said. ture from the norm - made with a plastic bottle. Remains of the bottle were "burned Ike Molotov cocktail, named after for- and melted," Halbert said. Â· Soviet foreign minister Vyacheslav Shaking The Town otov, is a cheap and easily made bomb The second bomb was "thrown over the inally designed for attacking armored building and landed in the jail exercise icles. It typically features a gas-flled yard, where several people observed it ss bottle with a fuel-soaked cloth fuse. land," Hall)ert said. d fuse is lighted, the bottle thrown; That bomb did not burst, Hall)ert said. n it strikes its target, the glass breaks Officers found a 12-ounce glass Michelob the fuel explodes in a fireball. beer bottle. Though there was no fuel t least that's how it's supposed to I continued on page 15 9/, p . 1*VA.WI#.1 4 . >.4'~Â¥. .t 1 r,1,1, k 3 f : -.. 1.# 1 > I .. 41 , :r. >. r ..S , - ..M# 2 4 ./ 0 lie . 6. a -*. I. 3 6 f ..9... 4 - =1 .. k . - - %7:/,f Al- 7 . ..2.F -,r :. C $ 3 9 f j .L N 1 . 4 :-N y + I -- -4,5':- 74 11/ , . r i 4 .' t 4. 1 4t 1 k. 910< k: 1 1.../.* 1 im,t fit .Â¥/r ,~ 4/ . .,4 It': MAJOR REMODEL: Harry Mayer Construction crews work yesterday afternoon to remodel a house built in 1889 at 215 West Hallam Street. To comply with city Historic Preservation Committee regulations, the front wall and the side wall, seen at the left in the photo, must remain. Pete McCIain photo ' iti- r 1358 Robin Hood Road Meadowbrook, PA 19046 July 9, 1990 Ms. Roxanne Eflin Historic Preservation Planner ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Roxanne: RE: 215 WEST HALLAM STREET ASPEN, COLORADO It is our understanding that the only remaining aspect of our proposal before HPC is to resolve the disposition of the shed that is currently on our property. We are interested in resolving this issue as promptly as possible so that we may proceed with our project and would like to outline various possibilities for doing so. We have looked into a variety of possible uses for this shed on our property and have been unable to determine how it could be incorporated into our remodeling project without having a detrimental effect. The lot size is not very large to begin with and there is no appropriate place on the property for this shed to be placed in its present size. Due to the historic nature of the shed, we are very willing to pursue offering it to any interested party, public or private, who would like to have the shed transported to their property. We would propose advertising the availability of the shed in the Aspen Times and the Aspen Daily News in the hope of finding some historically minded person. We would pay the cost of dismantling and transporting to a new site. We feel that we could begin demolition and excavation without disturbing the shed while we pursue finding a new home for it. It is, of course, necessary to consider what should be done if, after a reasonable amount of time and newspaper advertisements, we are unable to find a proper home for the shed. One possibility is to simply dispose of it. This would be regrettable from an historical point of view, but if no proper new location can be found, it must be at least considered as an alternative. Please keep in mind that according to the previous owner, the shed had been extensively repaired and is not remotely in its original condition or made of the original materials. A second alternative would be for us to dismantle the existing shed and rebuild a smaller storage shed using the original exterior materials. , Ms. Roxanne Eflin July 9, 1990 Page Two This could be erected in the southwest corner of the property and could serve as a small storage shed. While not exactly being the original shed, it would at least serve as a representation of the outbuildings that were common in the West End at the end of the last century. It might be necessary for us to receive variances regarding building on the property line or deleting a parking space, but these are variances which are within the authority of HPC to grant. I can assure you that we are most interested in cooperating with you in finding a solution that both works for our project and is historically sensitive to the preservation of the unique aspects of the West End. Siacerely yours, AjQLER & f, 4-- David Sloviter /els 4 . MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Conceptual Development: 215 W. Hallam, Public Hearing Date: June 13, 1990 PROJECT SIJMMARY: The proposal involves an e>stensive renovation and new addition to this vernacular 2-story QUeen Anne, a near twin of its neighbor immediately to the west. During the 1960's, incompatible additions were added to this structure, along with aluminum siding. The proposal attempts to be sensitive to the original form and details of the facade, while incorporating a more contemporary addition to the rear. The existing carport will be removed, along with the drive and curb cut off Hallam. Access will be relocated to the alley; a new 2-car attached garage is proposed. The applicant will be offering the 153 sq. ft. detached shed off the alley for relocation. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Conceptual Development approval for the remodel of the principal structure, involving partial demolition and a new addition, and the relocation of the 153 sq. ft. shed at the alley. A side yard setback is also requested for the basement light well. An encroachment license will be required by the City for the front fence. LOCATION: 215 W. Hallam St., the East 1/2 of Lot E and all of Lot F, Block 50, City and Townsite of Aspen. APPLICANT: David and Elaine Sloviter, dba S. T. Robin Associates, represented by Sutherland, Fallin, Inc., Architects ZONING: R-6, "H" Designated Landmark (designated in 1986 with the condition that the aluminum siding be removed within two (2) years of designation. That condition will be met with this proposal.) SITE, AREA AND BULK CHARACTERISTICS: Lot area: 4,500 sq. ft. Allowed FAR: 2,861 sq. ft. Existing FAR with shed: 2,728 sq. ft. Proposed FAR: to be submitted FAR to be demolished: to be submitted EXISTING CONDITIONS: The principal structure currently encroaches into the west side yard setback. It is clad in aluminum siding, which will be removed to expose the underlying siding. Provided this clapboard is in good enough condition to . preserve, the applicant intends to retain it. During the mid-1960's, an incompatible addition was added to this house, including a carport, driveway and curb cut in the front. The proposal includes the removal of all these additions and the carport. The new garage (proposed to be attached) will be accessed off the alley. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The applicable Guidelines are found in Section VI. Residential Buildings - Renovation and Restoration, beginning on page 47. The Development Review standards are found in Section 7-601 of the Land Use Code, and are reviewed below (staff's comments follow): 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay district or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area, HPC shall find that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. Response: Setback, spacing. landscaping and fences: The proposal generally meets the Guidelines addressing setback and spacing. A variation is being requested for the existing sideyard encroachment. A complete, detailed landscape plan will be required for Final Review, including fencing and curb replacement details. The parking plan agrees with the Guidelines (no parking variation is being requested). Guideline E.2 states "Preserve...wherever possible historic outbuildings." The HPC should be prepared to discuss the preservation of the small shed with the applicant. Rooflines, Doors and materials: The proposal appears to meet this Guideline. Staff recommends the use of wood shingles (as proposed), stained dark. Detailed information on the doors, particularly the front door, shall be included in the Final application. Windows: The Guidelines state: "Make every effort to preserve and repair existing windows. Maintain the original number of window panes. Avoid changing the position of the windows." Staff strongly recommends that all original windows be preserved. It appears that the applicant intends to remove and replace every window, with the exception of the first floor facade. Most are not historic; it appears as only 6 or 7 are. The upper facade window should be preserved. The replacement of the 60's windows 2 . appears compatible. Porches: The Guidelines state: "Maintain front porches as an important facade element. Unless reconstruction is necessary, do not removed original porches. Preserve original porch materials. Decorative elements that are not known to have been used on the residence should be avoided." Staff recommends that the front porch be restored. The front porch of this structure is probably its most important facade detail. Every effort should be taken to restore this element. Photos and other means of investigation should be researched by the applicant to accomplish this goal. In our opinion, the "L" shaped porch does not appear to retain the original small scale character of the front porch as it was original designed. The proposal indicates Tuscan columns, which we find possibly too heavy for this small porch. Possibly a thinner, unturned column would be more appropriate, however, research for restoration may uncover the exact details and proportion. With the extent of other changes taking place, staff feels strongly that the gabled facade, including windows, roof form, and front porch, should be preserved and restored. Materials: The Guidelines are very specific on materials. "Maintain original siding. Replace decoration where it is know to have existed. Simplified modifications may be used where historic elements have already been lost." With the exception of the unknown siding situation and the front porch, the proposal appears to meet the Guidelines, however, a complete detailed description of materials shall be required for Final review. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Staff finds that the proposal is generally reflective of the neighborhood. A new home of slightly larger scale is being constructed directly to the east of the subject parcel. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structure located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: Any elimination of aluminum siding on a historic resource in Aspen is applauded. Certainly the cultural value to the community of this somewhat "hidden" resource Will be enhanced. Careful consideration in landscaping must also be given to enhance the entire parcel. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a 3 1 designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The partial demolition involved is extensive, although the applicant states that not more than 50% of the existing structure will be removed. In our opinion, the removal of the 1960's additions and carport will enhance the integrity of the historic structure. However, we feel that without careful and sensitive consideration for the architectural characteristics of the historic resource, our net gain may not be as great as should be. Staff is generally favorable of the proposed addition, with the following exceptions: 1) The HPC should consider whether a detached garage is more compatible and appropriate in this situation. The rear massing may be reduced to be more compatible on this small lot. 2) The front porch should be restudied. A restoration of the porch is appropriate and should be investigated thoroughly. 3) Staff believes the 2nd floor facade gable dormer alters the simple, vernacular character of this structure as viewed from Hallam. Its elimination should be studied. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider the following alternatives: 1. Approve the Conceptual Development as submitted 2. Approve the Conceptual Development and side yard setback variation, with the conditions as stated below in Staff's recommendation, to be submitted for Final Development review. 3. Table action to a date specific, to allow the applicant further time to study the proposal 4. Deny Conceptual Development approval finding that the application does not meet the development review standards. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant Conceptual Development approval and side yard setback variation with the following conditions, to be submitted for Final Development review: a) Complete FAR breakdown: Proposed FAR to be demolished and new proposed total FAR b) Partial demolition details and sequencing information c) Removal of aluminum siding. Test section shall be removed and photographed for Final 4 review by the HPC. Clapboard (if any) underneath shall be preserved, primarily on the facade. d) Restored front porch. Information on the research conducted shall be submitted with Final application. e) Restudy of 2nd floor facade gable dormer for purposed of elimination. f) Historic windows shall be retained and preserved g) Detailed information on historic doors, and plans for their preservation h) Restudy of attached garage and rear massing; detached garage may be preferred. i) Exact materials representation made in application, and brought to Final Development review. j) Information and details on excavation. Letter of guarantee or bond may be required. k) Detailed landscape plan, fencing and curb replacement details 1) Applicant's plan for "offering" outbuilding to community, for relocation. m) Support letter prepared by staff in favor of the encroachment license for the front fence memo.hpc.215wh 5 architecture suthei d, fallin, inc. & planning 1280 ute avenue June 13, 1990 aspen 81611 colorado 303/925-4252 Ms. Roxanne Eflin Historic Preservation Planner Historic Preservation Committee Aspen City Hall â€¢ 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Proiect #90-07 Sloviter Residence Aspen, Colorado Dear Ms. Eflin: This letter will certify that the posting requirement under the Public Hearing Notice Requirements has been fulfilled. Please find attached a list of adjacent property owners as furnished by the Assessor's Office. Please note that two mailings were made: one was made 15 days prior notification to the Aspen School District and the second was made to all other adjacent land owners. Also attached is a photograph documenting that the sign was posted on the property as required by the Public Hearing Notice Requirements. xz-Si~retvours, - *---.t~~~~~~y'52d3x__~ Richard A. Fallin Vice President RAF:gc Encs. ./ * V PUBLIC NOTICE DATE . 3.o TIME - D :... PLACE/414.91. pr , PURPOSE DICâ‚¬.7--A_ 2.1,Â·.-c=-'Evl . 3 1 ri)92/NIC PRELL.,Ance. f ' 7 1---4-'77-, f -4 : 1 ey F - . I - -- 1_lili 1111611111 111 1*l il i 1 1111(Â®I t 1-1--1 --\ 1 7( E- su 11 - Phn. ,#.-30 - viv . 1 11 -1 nA, 11 / 1 e \ . . . A.Ch N - I M. A - U. I -- 'HO L L.AlÂ« 67. [ ' : D )14 : ' T'j m / 0 11.r 1 4 y I 1 1 . . . Â£ . 1 -7sr73 1 1 ilit i Z . 1 y! 1 -1 , ' t. 1 CIr, W. BLEEKER ST. , 1ii;E 1---- . . au~ 1 1 1 i,1 -- Iii''i-' 111 ul .4 i , 1 9: ~iv 64# ' 3 Es i!! Ight :le!4 i ~ i I : 1 gri i i. --, . __-J ac L_L_---Uti-g- -L_.=-_u 101 1,15 - 4 r- /1 |ti liz 1 1 i li 1/1 li jib< i Miii li ''t: 0 &'iii; 11 .1 11 -- '# It 2 1'. l! 11 1! .I! 11 ' ' 1!.i! / . ..' MAIN ST l 1 6 El-T--1---rl m 1 ~ 11 FI-T--r-3- 1- i 'il: ill ~ ~ A VIO q Â£ r 'Si 6-,0 Y. i./. CÂ·tâ€¢â€¢ CÂ· r $ i 0 116(93'i 1 -1 - PA RK 1 ill:!li Ii! lilli: 1 1 j e kn<41 4941,2 [5 , lili!Â£ 1 1 .!lili I Â·i U i 0--! < AVE. - ----- 11 ' i i' l' ,: i I ,Â· i:li â€¢*:: 17. ott'..,Litic'I , i 1 1 1 11 . j [ 1(461 -1_- _tÂ»~>d,1- :-,1_ l...4XSE-La_i_=_.-i T~~T'~~~- -7- 0 1 1 - A i i-i/, 1 1 . I'lli':lit - iIi I Â£ 11 i r. fk illmin)0~P.41, 5' ! 1 1 i i ]Et 1 f.t : ' I ti i i: s E j ,,1 1 0 L._L._L._....1-11. .:'i,~: . __2 . -,0 ------------ ---9-------4--1---1 W. HYMAN . AVE. .ft. 1 I 1/0 ->UU' 1 1 0 98.---- 6 .1 1 L kNS- , 1 ' Cl' , j. ..7. , 14141 , K ' 1 - te 12 Fr- 1 7 . 1 Â· 1 . is :Nlid 84 412 - 4/I - .4-4. AM 302 / duo,L44 4,4 Atie60: 60:~2 1 tX- . 9/ 60* 0,2 3 - (44 <2.2,44- fo 4 96% 63 u,kit~ I )6-a.. 61 20 1 22 93 F, G, ix .3, Â« 3/7 4,z~ 4 076/-21 a) D 11). 8614 a. 44.413)6)) 4 5 - g. pl . aU 6% 514 *24- B) 6) 2 24 u -tal A 69 - 'aL. M. Al# AD,3 - 990Â»3/ 41 Â« 32-58 1- ' )101 6~1'k ,& 8)612- 0 , 3, E - 94* <.S. 02Â£44 44 6 8)b) 2 54/7 724Â® 62Â·ie luit 72 7*02- AM> - Agi E h. 84 6 20 3 - 44,4 - 40Â·t,g Vme*g. 1<(Pl. 6 902. Il * 2288 104 4 616)2 LLM - 644 pl. 2 362 A. Pb A- 424 99 4%-4- 15 -JL -4,2 0 0 64/1 - 2240 4-234 2.035 42Â· k)a,Â£&00.-, 4ek co 8,6,) A 274- b, AE - 1* + AaaÂ® 60.=L )769- 64,1 4.- 12 2Â£4*- bad+v >24 4-8055 tla=.at,n-- \â‚¬06*93/1 2,9 W . 11&~0~ #t&[5 8)6)) d,A'I - 300 E. Uy~ 8) b)) K,L - ,&44. UrÂ· PAc . 4900 V tÂ·>u)~A.Â»u 82. -7~04 6,442 1 92 460 M j pal A - Agrec * 02 ELÂ»t eD 64 )2.69 Su.- lit j WL s 4 002- 0/A)) D,A+P _ 414 Â»0 44 Ro,it )11 Ee /5 8)611 OR#-7, D,R,5 - luka,1 10<1.~ , 3~144 244 luAU,Q. aÂ»,1., PaI 400 ~&*~17/Lboukk, (4 4 458 m 244 59 4,â‚¬r.- *>kd,2,4.2~f 2 3% M. 44 . 6 06 1 j 3 - B. AW. -'#t / + 233 Â« 244 7 -1244~ 424.4 8)6) 1 ,64 RÂ· 424,~ k- 3449 Â»Pele. +U-4 , 6 8 )00% F- Â»13Â«- w. Ake AB I Â«01+ Ae- 46.,72 78209 6.- J 144% Lâ‚¬422 4 779-7 (*Â« [b 8)6/2 Ag_ - 6.14 4 42201.Â« da,4 - 2 60 W. 72002_ 4Â« 4 816/J 8415 4 ..%1%8 - &6,2 jjzy, 1 1 21 BoublÂ« 4-- 2* 044Â«4: 70//6 RLMA) 4%14 m ~2_ f D 6Â¢ 3,2-9 6 44. 4 8)6) 2 2-el 57-0,4 6~~~~;4144; 4-as buy-C OFF%-ce 5.c~.. ,2 , c-46 51;2 2 -720. R>cy-* 300 - -AB~Â« G 1- / PUBLIC NOTICE RE: CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF 215 W. Hallam NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, June 13, 1990, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the Second Floor Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by David Sloviter and Elaine Sloviter (dba S. T. Robin Associates) on behalf of Jeannye A. Bascom as represented by Sutherland Fallin, Inc. for the conceptual development of the property known as 215 W. Hallam, described as the East 1/2 of Lot E and all of Lot F, Block 50, City and Townsite of Aspen. The proposal requests approval for partial demolition and a new addition located primarily to the rear, which includes a two-car attached garage. Alterations are proposed for each elevation. The existing outbuilding located near the alley is proposed to be demolished. A side yard setback variation is being requested to allow for a basement light well along the west side yard. No parking variations are being sought. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/William J. Poss Chairman, Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on May 24, 1990 City of Aspen account pub.notice.215wh SUTHERLAND, FALLIN, :. [L[EFFLLu Â®[F F[RUMME[@OFFAIL 1280 Ute Avenue ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 OUNE, 12) 330 93.07 (303) 925-4252 ATIENTION KOK ANNIE. EF{-4 4 RE:,Â·, TO R,2 C. Orr/ op Mâ‚¬14 eloY TTE-.11 12â‚¬M DDEL \700 47, CAGE,NA Â£31~. bef?Er\, co WE ARE SENDING YOU /EL Attached m Under separate cover via ~-46140 (AftE>(~ the following items: El Shop drawings â‚¬ Prints m Plans [3 Samples El Specifications m Copy of letter m Change order n COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 3 (PÂ· 1 8 Â·90 - WE-v %,ED NCILTU FL-Ez>Al-1(94 1JN 1 8 1 00 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: C For approval El Approved as submitted m Resubmit copies for approval El For your use E] Approved as noted El Submit-copies for distribution *I As requested C] Returned for corrections E Return corrected prints El For review and comment [3 m FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 120<AN KI.A. : 9Â©l j ht w .~ ~ kintv E . 114Â·Ar TUâ‚¬/ZE A,YZE_ mt-M,0 AF-.Ene OP fkr-c 4 DF.*10114, NE_, 4-1,6,VE. ADDU:44:f:.f> l N 114 F 13Â·NEd.Cf/FD CE-VtÂ«10314, .TI-l,F. 'P} 76-71- 4(2 E A- (-CN.C F~ E-MZÂ·7 7-14Ew 6--=Lt)M MÂ» 1/4+Uct.1 449.. ILLAW . 0/JANARD lE) 8EL M.ne-,L Ctil\(41 Â«WAN Â¥ hlintl-1 H F Â«r F=>1497 FOeEU Pe,1-Al. 1,1 ki./0 . UU<17, eP-,COW-) 62* 4 c PhiC E P Nfi V.COP 61 .,OPE . c \Au IC U VAV - b\-C>dE_-'Le*4612.Ff) f]2-OM 4-1 1 1 -Tr) gl K tz- . COPY TO SIGNED: - \.- U enclosures are not as noted, kindly notif-at once. CAVID fa\Nt CD 1 r MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Conceptual Development amendment: 215 W. Hallam, front porch Date: June 27, 1990 SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting HPC's amended Conceptual Development approval for the front porch (only) of the project at 215 W. Hallam, which was approved Conceptually at the last meeting. The roof pitch has been reduced from 8:12 to 4:12, and the Tuscan columns have been replaced with simple three-part columns. DISCUSSION: The HPC voted to grant Conceptual Development approval with a number of conditions to be met at Final, one of which was the restudy of the front porch. The applicant has submitted a revised facade elevation, indicating changes in the front porch, and is requesting the HPC approve these conceptual changes. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds these porch alternations are more in-keeping and appropriate with the HPC's direction from the last meeting, and recommend that the HPC grant approval for the revised conceptual facade elevation. 1 - dSLOVI1132:0 CE t * Pl NCI JÂ« - - Vehe, 12Â« 5341'-472 WNED. 4- 910)140 f.. 1 ~\1 f -tl,teRE. Rc,WEEE) Aâ‚¬604[- -RE) G/ze*fr- t --- '1 A AL . 3(la@ A kli/%- ~Ol;*r~l 42-0,\ al,Shn . d.0.24 ((ro be. 1â‚¬3137231 ) 94 V iu - 2 1 S\ 1 1- i 9 4 /. 0*