Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19660322 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FOR"''' C.F.HQECKEL8.B.llL.CO. PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND JDNING COMMISSION Meeting was called to order at 8:07 P.M. at the District Court room of Pitkin County Court House. (See notice of Public Hearing on record in Planning and Zoning Files) Planning and Zoning Members present were: Francis Whitaker, Chairman King Woodward Jack Walls, Secretary Thomas Benton William McEache~ Mr. Whitaker opened hearing by reading Public Notice from Aspen Times, and explaining that this was a City Hearing only and that a separate hearing would be held by County Planning and Zoning Commissipn at a later published date. Meeting was turned over to Jerry Brown for presentation 0 f the Master Plan. Jerry Brown explained that this was not an Ordinance only a plan. Meeting was turned back to Chairman for questions from the floor. Letter was read from Aspen Institute objecting to a proposed relocation of the Highway 82 through Hallam Lake adjoining the institute property. Mr. Harry Uhlfelder objected to cul-de-sac at Hallam street at the corner of Highway 82. Jerry Brown explained the reason for this cul-de-sac. Mrs. Philip J. Schied was against one way streets, but she approved of the cul-de-sac at Hallam Street. Mr. C. M. Clark spoke against the low density units proposed in Buiiness and Tuurist Zones. Jerry Brown explained reason for density numbers. Mr. Luke Anthony - against density units proposed. Mr. James Moore - Started to:~ead a letter but it was for County Planning and Zoning Commission. . Mr. HCliI'rJl' Uhlfelder-Snowbunny Subdivision it would form a hard- ship on the property owners, since duplex have been built in the past. Mr. Luke Anthony- wanted to know about R.M.D. Zone at the bend in the Roaring Fork. would a complete plan have to be made for a 2 acre site. Mr. James E. Moore wanted to have a little more time to look over the plan. J.l!'rry:.!tis'iilered that he should have been at the city citizens advisory commission, and explained cooperative planning. Mr. Moore - wanted to know why business zone was not expanaed to the west. Mr. Luke Anthony wanted to know how the master plan would be adopted by t he Planning and Zoning Commission. 88 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FOR"''' C.F.HOECKHB.B.ltL.CO. Page 2 March 22 Public Hearing Mr. Robert O. Roy- Will this plan be coordinatid with the County. HoWl' Mr. Judge Shaw - Does the adopting of the plan make this law? Francis read from the statutes. Mr. Shaw asked if his property could be condemned for a parking structure. Mr. Whip Jones - Asked to have a commtitee to obtain a feasibility report on the 750 square feet per dwelling unit. Mr. Clymer - regarding the set back in the new industrial zone at the airport. would we still have to maintain the established setback. Mr. Clymer asked if this could be changed; before highway is changed? Mr. Lapdkeck - Does the School District have the final selection of a school site. Mr. Brown answered that they would be asked to consult with the Planning and zoning Commission but that the final decision would be thiers. Mr. Johesas ked - How do we change the master plan in the future? Can this beput on the ballot for a public vote? Mr. Anthony asked- What will the Planning and Zoning be doing before we adopt the Master plan. Mrs. Shaw - Why was the partic ular lots picked for parking area? On what basis were these sites selected? Mr. Brown explained. Public Hearing closed at 10:54 P.~ Recess Regular Busines meeting convened at 10 :59 P.M. Mr. Walls moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission instruct the City Attorney to draw up a proper resolution for the adoption of the Master Plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion was seconded by Benton; Motion carried. A letter from Mr. Leon WUrl, City Administrator was read.(dated March 8, 1966) A special meeting was discussed for next week to meet wath Jerry Brown to discuss problems and ask questions at 4:30 P.M. Tuesday March 29. Building Review: Crystal Palace, Block 81, Lots K & L Plans hav~ng been rev~ewed prev~ous to meeting by plan check committee. Brought to vote to be accepted. Walls abstained; Woodward, yes; Whitaker, yes; McEachern, Yes; Benton, Yes. 89 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FOR"''' C.F.HOECKELB.B.&L.CO. Page 3 Public Hearing and Regular meeting March 22, 1966 Motion was made that plans be returned to ~Building Inspector, by Benton, with recommendations that the plans not be approved because parking requirements have not been met. Seconded by Woodward. Motion carried by vote as previously written. Walls Building Block 94 Lot D Benton moved that plans be sent back to Building Inspector due to the fact that off street parking spaces have not been supplied. Seconded by Woodward. Vote: Walls, abstained; Woodward, yes; Whitaker, Yes; McEachern, Yes; Benton, Yes. Note to be made that will correct minutes of August 16 meeting to Bob and Carla Cutting lots to E and F Block 10~. Berumen Annexation: Mr. Berumen said that there is a survey prepared by Roger Manke(City Surveyor) of the East Aspen Patent showing established right-of-way, in this area. This will be discussed with Jerry Brown at March 28, meeting. Building inspector Henry.W. Thurston has the map. Woodward moved that meeting adjourn at 11:30 P.M./motion seconded and carried. submitted, s 90