The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.234 W Francis St.HPC14-93i. --. Vidor Final Significant Dev. -1 HPC14-93 234 W. Francis -- <*ip~ c 483 48- C Ul P . Li j . 4 4 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET, City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 05/03/93 CASE NUMBER: HPC14-93 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2735-124-17-003 PROJECT NAME: Vidor Final Significant Development Project Address: 234 W. Francis, Lots K, L & M, Block 48 APPLICANT: Quentin Vidor Applicant Address: 925 Gibson Ave., Aspen, CO REPRESENTATIVE: John Schenck, Charles Cunniffe Architects Representative Address/Phone: 520 E. Hvman Aspen, CO 81611 925-5590 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: - 3-Â¥6 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Thru: Diane Moore, City Planning Director From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 234 W. Francis: Final Review of Significant Development Date: May 12, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests final development approval for structural enhancements to the roof and fouhdation of the main house and remodel of its upper level and attic, structural enhancements of the outbuilding as well as remodeling and creation of an addition to the outbuilding, temporary relocation of the outbuilding, creation of a deed restricted accessory dwelling unit and one new on site parking space. The proposed addition to the outbuilding requires a setback variance. This parcel is an Aspen Historic Landmark. APPLICANT: Quentin Vidor, represented by John Schenck of Charles Cunniffe Architects. LOCATION: 234 West Francis, Lots K, L, M, Block 48, Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. SITE, AREA AND BULK INFORMATION: Please refer to the supplement provided by the applicant. The applicant must verify the new FAR figure for the Zoning Plan check within the building permit application. PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: The HPC granted Conceptual Development approval to the 234 West Francis project on April 14, 1993, with the condition that the architect restudy the new windows on the west elevation. See attached minutes. ADDITIONAL COMMISSION REVIEWS: The applicant must receive a Conditional Use approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission for the carriage house dwelling unit. The project is on the P&Z agenda for May 18, 1993. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All four Development Review Standards as well as the Standards for Relocation must be met in order for the HPC to grant approval. For temporary relocation, the Standards require that an engineer declares the building able to withstand the move, that a plan for relocation be submitted, including preparation of the temporary site, and a bond be secured to insure safe relocation. Attached are the applicant's response to the Development Review Standards and conditions, revised drawings, and request for partial demolition and setback variance approval. Development Review Standards REVIEW STANDARDS: Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations defines the four standards for Development Review. All four of these standards must be met in order for the HPC to grant approval for the proposal. The applicable guidelines are found in Section VI, Residential Buildings-Renovation and Restoration, in the Historic District and Historic Landmark Development Guidelines. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor areas, HPC shall find that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. Response: The parcel has been designated an Aspen Historic Landmark, and therefore redevelopmdnt must not compromise those features of the structure and site which are the basis Of its architectural or historic significance. The proposed changes which will be visible on the exterior of the Vidor residence entail a new window on the north facade of the main house, raising the carriage house 1 1/2' and installation of a new stone veneer foundation, a shed addition and a new entrance and windows on the north facade of the carriage house, and on the west facade, replacement of an existing second story door with a new window. All new materials are to match existing materials. Existing wall sections will be removed to install said new windows as well as the addition. The applicant also proposes demolition of an existing trellis. Staff finds that the design and scale of the proposed changes are, in general, in keeping with that of the existing buildings. However, as discussed in the Conceptual Development Review, the desirability for small, square new windows rather than double hung as typical on the other buildings is in question. Similarly, the double door on the north facade of the carriage house seems unnecessarily wide. '12*AS-% t.-- / The addition is small, and along with the other alterations proposed, is not easily visible from the public way. Its location along the north facade of the carriage house is appropriate, and therefore a setback variation should be allowed. As the existing historic outbuilding is one foot from the east lotline, a precedent for this type of development has been set. Provision of a supplemental parking space at the rear of the lot is a benefit to the residents, and in keeping with Aspen Land Use Code. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposal is sympathetic to the physical characteristics of surrounding parcels and the established development patterns of the neighborhood in general. Small, connected additions which have developed over the lifetime of a building are typical of this area. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract form the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed changes do not negatively impact the value of this property in terms of its importance to local history, or destroy those characteristics which led to its designation as an Aspen Historic Landmark. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or JUCD .Ul- diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff finds that the proposed alterations do not significantly affect the integrity of the structure and do not destroy a great amount of original building fabric. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Final approval as proposed, finding the Development Review Standards have been met. 2) Final approval with conditions. 3) Table action to allow the applicant time to revise the proposal in order to meet the Development Review Standards. 4) Deny Final Development approval, finding that the Development Review Standards have not been met. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the HPC approve the Final Development Plan after further discussion of window and door design, and with the condition that the applicant secures the required bond necessary (amount to be determined by the HPC) for temporary relocation of the carriage house and submits a temporary relocation plan prior to receipt of a building permit. The relocation plan should include sufficient interior cross bracing to stablize the outbuilding. Also, construction of the additional dwelling unit is contingent on Planning and Zoning approval. Additional comments: Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of April 14, 1993 the condition that the architect submit drawings to the monitor and restudy the fenestration on the south elevation; second by Martha. All in favor of motion and amended motion, motion carries. DISCUSSION Bill: For clarification Jake is concerned about the thickness of the detailing on the north and south elevation. 234 W. FRANCIS - CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT Kim: The principle residence is going to be remodeled inside and the majority of work will be focused on the carriage house and the addition to make a bathroom and legal living quarters. Staff agrees with the request for a setback variance. John Schenck, Project Manager for Cunniffe & Associates: This house is at 234 W. Francis and is the Davis-Waite house and built 1896 by Governor Waite and he was the only populist governor. We want to keep the historic style of the house. On the main house the structural engineer stated that the house needs under pined. The interior remodel requires the roof to be restructured. The client also has requested an additional window on the north side of the structure. On the carriage house we want to make this deed restricted dwelling unit and that requires a bathroom and in doing so we will add a 9x9 ft. bathroom. We have it located on the eastern edge of the building on the north side trying to hide it from street view and keep the context of a small building. The cottage needs raised to make head room for a nice accessory dwelling unit and loft space that the client has requested. We propose to do that by putting in a stone base or water table under the existing structure and also building a new foundation. Since we are building a new foundation we are going to use storage in the basement. We also have a window at the western elevation of the carriage house. We will try to match the details and proportions of the existiri building. A door has also been proposed to enter into the back yard. We will add a parking space even though it is not required. The total of the ADU would be 694 Sq. Ft. CLARIFICATIONS: Roger: You said you had roof modifications, will the roof be opened up or what? John Schenck: I am not exactly sure but if it does get opened up it would be replaced as is. Roger: The carriage house does not have a foundation presently. Does the existing house have a foundation? 9 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of April 14, 1993 John: The ground has sunk and has reached to the point of the siding. The structural engineer said the foundation is just sinking. Roger: You are underpinning from the inside. John: Yes, we will underpin from the inside of the original house and for the carriage house we would lift it straight up and replace it and move it to the side. Roger: You would have to have a bond and we wanted you to be aware of that. Martha: On the landuse form it says no-onsite parking? John: That is existing and we would provide parking and conform to the code. Chairman Bill Poss opened the public hearing. Belinda Freischman, neighbor: I am thril J--' wity. this proposal and it is such a treat to see something that isn't lot line to lot line in the west end. It is wonderful to have clients that want to preserve the old house. Our fears were that they were aoing to raise the little house and destroy our view of the mountain. Our house is a duplex and we face Smuggler. Our co-owners face the alley Ck ' A .i we ao not want them looking at the parking. Esther Devoul: How far does the carriage house go on the east property line. John: One foot from property line. Esther: Where is the eight feet addition on the carriage house going? John: It is going on the alley side. Esther: Then in actuality the view from my place will not change. Public: I am also concerned about the parking area and the view from the duplex. John: We will preserve all the trees on that edge. Martha: I am not clear where the setback on the drawing is. John: The setback on the side yard is a ten foot setback. Our 10 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of April 14, 1993 addition is nine feet wide and nine feet deep. Roger: On the existing conditions it states that the property is non-conforming on the rear. It also states that it is two feet from the east property line and the out building is situated one 4 - -1- =-- - + h C s 17 2 t.,2 oper.1 line. Bill: It is more compatible to have the small addition closer to the property line and it allows more of the carriage house exposed from the rear and from the alley and other areas. Jake: What is above the existing front door? John: There is a door to the attic space and we are taking the little door out and putting in a square window. The three piece window would get a door in its place. Roger: How high are you raising the house for the foundation? John: One foot six inches. MOTION: Roger made the motion that the HPC grant approval of the conceptual proposal as submitted for 234 W. Francis Lots K &M Block 44 and to grant the 8 foot setback variance for the carriage house addition with the condition that the relocation review criteria are met at final review. That means you have to have an engineering report and submit a bond; second by Martha. DISCUSSION Jake: I would like to have a restudy of the divided light windows on the west side. They are casements, divided light and the proportions are different. Roger: I would put that in the motion but you cannot see them due to vegetation. Jake: When you have this much site area I find it a stretch to get a variance unless you have good reason. Roger: Because it is a non-conforming site it doesn't bother me. Bill: You also have to look at the historic nature of the site. I feel it is more compatible on the end and you are not increasing the non-conformity and it preserves more of the carriage house. Roger: Also if you take into consideration what the neighbors said the view plane from the condominium unit on the south side neighbor, facing the north side of the carriage house where the 11 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of April 14, 1993 addition is going on, the addition is kept to the back and it keeps the open space in the yard and their view plane is less interrupted. Jake: What do you think about the comments on the windows? John: I think they have some merit but do not know exactly how they would be dealt with at this point and we will restudy it. AMENDED MOTION: Roger amended the motion to include restudy of the fenestration on the west side (windows); second by Martha. All in favor of motion and amended motion carries. Bill Poss: This is a good project, John. COMMUNICATIONS Bill: The award week will be May 9th through the 15th and Roxanne has been hired to set it up. The Historic Trust will pay Roxanne $800. to coordinate the banquet and cocktail party and draw up a council proclamation and press coverage. She has also been hired to get our character guidelines going and Diane got an extension until June. A one day workshop with Nori Winter will be scheduled. Roger: I have a statement to make, it is our job to read the memos in the packet and we should not have to read them at the meeting, just ask questions and clarifications. MOTION: Jake made the motion to adjourn; second by Martha. All in favor, motion carries. Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Assistant City Clerk 12 W. 1 ' iM ARCHITECTURE PLANNING April 30, 1993 INTERIORS Ms. Kim Johnson Planning Office City of Aspen 130 S Galena St. Aspen, Co 81611 Re: Vidor Residence 234 West Francis Dear Kim, Please find enclosed an H.P.C. application for final review of significant development for the Vidor Residence also known as the Davis-Waite house. If you have any questions, please contact us. sife* 1 *Q#4' Schenck 869 Captain CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Â· 520 EAST HYMAN AVENUE Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â· 303/925-5590 FAX 925-5076 4 , IAND Ublf AFFIIIXZNIIIal 11]iRM I I 61) Project Name Vido model _ - - '-- pe /9 j to, rd) Project location 234 W. Francis, Lots K, L, M, Block 48 'i Â· Agpen.-Colorado (indicate street 363ress; lot & block unrber,.legal desciption where appmpriate) 3 ) Present Zoning R-6 4) Iat Size 9000 sq. ft. 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # Ouentin Vidor 925 Gibson Ave: , Aspen, CO 81611 920-7768 6) Representativels Name, Address & Rhone # John Schenck @ Charles Cunniffe Architects 925-5590 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Oorxlitional Use . Conoeptual SPA Conoepbial Historic: Dev. Special Review Final SPA X Final Historic Dev. 8040 GreÂ£filine Concentual POD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final POD - Historic Demolition Mourrtain View Plane Subdivision Historic Desigraticn Condominiumization - Texti/Map Ainpl-~imerit QQS Allotment Int Split*ot line. - GMOS Exarption Adjustment 8) Desciption of Existing Uses (rnober and type of existingÂ· struch,res; approximate sq. ft.; amber of bedroans; amr previous approvals granted to the property)-.Â· . The property consists of a main house with an attached free market unit, as well as an unnatached outbuilding presently used for storage. The house, free market unit and outbuilding consist of approximately 2523 sq.ft. 9) Description of Develognent Application Structural enhancement to roof & foundation of main house. Remodel of Â·main house upper level and attic. Structural enhancements of outbuildinq. Remodel and addition to outbuilding, creating a deed restricted A.D.U. Addition of one parking space (not required) 10) Have you attached the following? Response to AttachmentÂ· 2, Minimum Submission Oontents Respcnse to Attachmerit 3, Specific SUhniSSion OIItent-S / Response to Attachment 4, Ieview Standards for Your Application - . SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear. fully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11 "x1 r format. APPLICANT: Quentin Vidor ADDRESS: 925 Gibson Ave., Aspen ZONE DISTRICT: R-6 LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 9000 sq.ft. EXISTING FAR: 3114.5 97. ft. ALLOWABLE FAR: 3660.0 sq. ft. PROPOSED FAR: - - - - ~ 323.9.7 sq. ft. EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: 20% 1 PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: 21% EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commerdal): PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Prindoal Bldg.: / Accessory Bldo: 12 ' -9" PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princioal Bldg.: / Accessorv Bldc: 14 ' -3" PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: 2% - entry trellis EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 6 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: 0 ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: ADU bath addition Front: .16' Front: 10' Front: Rear: U ' Rear: 10' Reac Side: 0'/1' Side: 10' Side: 2 ' Combined FronURear: 16' Combined Fri/Rr: 30' Combined Fronl/Rear: EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ Side setbacks, rear setbacks, combined front/rear ENCROACHMENTS: VARIATIONS REQUESTED (elioible for Landmarks Onlv: character comoatibility findina must be made by HPC): FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: i .. Rear: Open Space (Commerdal): 7 Side: 2 ' Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined FrIJRr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): I. GENERAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS A. A letter of consent to representation is attached as Exhibit 'A'. B. The street address and legal description of the proposed project is: 234 W Francis Lots K,L,M, Block 48 Aspen, Co 81611 C. Disclosure of ownership is attached as Exhibit 'B'. D. A vicinity map locating the subject parcel is attached as Exhibit 'C'. E. Description of Proposal 1. Main house a. Reinforcement of foundation by means of underpinning. b. Reinforcement of roof structure along with some modifications to ceilings. c. Reinforcement of floor and wall structure as necessary. d. Remodel of interior spaces on upper level and attic. e. Addition of one window on the North side of house. 2. Outbuilding a. Conversion of outbuilding to a deed restricted Accessory Dwelling Unit. b. The building will be raised 1'-6" and a new foundation poured (basement). The increase in height is necessary to accommodate a new loft space. The exposed foundation will be covered with a stone veneer. c. The existing canopy or trellis will be removed and a new canopy will be built at the entry. d. A new door and window will be added to the North side of the building. e. A new bath approximately 9' x 9' will be added on the North side. In keeping with the design intent and the character of the site, this addition is located within the side setback and will require a variance by the H.P.C. f. The interior remodelling of the outbuilding will include the addition of a kitchen and a loft. F. Compliance with relevant review standards 1. Design compatibility with existing structure. The main house will not change in appearance since the work is limited to the interior with the exception of one window which will be similar to existing windows. The outbuilding will increase in height (1'- 611 ) and gain a stone base which is not uncharacteristic of Victorian design. The loft space which dictates the height increase, creates desired space without a large addition to the original form. The bath addition utilizes a shed roof which works with the existing gable without detracting from it. 2. Consistency with neighborhood character. The visible additions and changes to the Davis-Waite house have been kept to a minimum to reduce the impact on the neighborhood. 3. Enhancement of the cultural value of the structure The proposed work to the Davis-Waite house Will increase the cultural value of the property in that the structural modifications will extend the life of the house. Turning a relatively unused outbuilding to an Accessory Dwelling Unit provides much needed living space which will not be neglected. 4. Enhancement of the architectural integrity of the structure The architectural integrity and Victorian character of the historical structure remains intact as the proposed additions are limited and unobtrusive. G. Proposed materials The major building materials on the proposed addition will match existing materials. H. Effect of proposed details on the original design The proposed details of the new addition shall have little or no effect on the original design of the outbuilding, as they will mimic the existing details as closely as possible using modern building techniques. I. Effect Of proposed details on character Of neighborhood The proposed details shall have a minor effect upon the character of neighborhood. The details of the addition will blend in with the original design of the historic building. 3. Conformity of final development with representations of conceptual review. The final development plan for the proposed additions at 234 W. Francis conform to the initial representations made during the conceptual review. The only changes to the proposal are at the detail level and as a result of the request to study specific areas by H.P.C. 1. Conformity to conditions as placed by H.P.C. a. Secure a letter from a structural engineer stating that the building is sound enough structurally to withstand a relocation. This condition has been met and is labeled as exhibit 'G'. b. Acquire a bond for relocation of the existing outbuilding, insuring the structure financially. The bond will be procured once the amount has been established. C. Look at the appropriateness of the proposed windows and doors for the outbuilding, studying the proportion and style attempting to match the existing conditions more closely. The proportions of the door on the north side were changed and a transom window was added to match the existing style more closely. We concluded, however, that the double hung style was not appropriate to the proportions and size of the adjacent windows. This is apparent on the elevations labeled as exhibit'F'. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS A survey prepared by Alpine Surveys, Inc. along with floor plans and elevations drawn from field measurements showing existing conditions is attached as exhibit 'D'. III. EFFECT OF PROPOSED DESIGN ON HISTORICAL STRUCTURE AND NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER The proposed addition and remodel of the Davis-Waite house is planned to remedy structural problems incurred over the years and to create more usable space for the owner and tenants. The main house remains relatively unchanged on the exterior. Modifications to the outbuilding occur out of sight from the street. The addition of one on-site parking space is planned to accommodate the A.D.U. although this is not required. It is the intent of the applicant to maintain the historic character of the building and to restore it to ensure its continuing presence in the Historic district of Aspen. The existing conditions are illustrated as Exhibit 'E'. The proposed development is illustrated as Exhibit 'F'. IV. APPLICATION FOR PARTIAL DEMOLITION The applicant is requesting approval of the demolition of a trellis at the entry to the outbuilding to be replaced by an entry feature more in character with the building. V. APPLICATION FOR SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE The applicant is requesting a variance for the East side yard setback. Presently the property is nonconforming on rear, combined front and rear, and both side setbacks. We have proposed an addison to the outbuilding which will occur 2' -0" from the East property line. The outbuilding is situated 1'-0" from this same property line. The proposed location preserves the character of the structure and is in keeping with the layout of the entire property. EXHIBIT A W. Wa February 17, 1993 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INITERIORS To Whom It May Concern, As Owner of Lots K.L,M, Block 48, Aspen Township, also known as the Davis Waite house located at 234 West Francis Street, Aspen, Colorado, we authorize Charles Cunniffe Architects, 520 E. Hyman, Suite 301, Aspen, Colorado, 81611, (303) 925-5590, to represent our interests in the minor historic development of the aforementioned property. s incer#*% A(A I V â‚¬ L.X *Â«\AA MrT Quentin Vidor 925 Gibson Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 920-7768 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Â· 520 EAST HYMAN AVENUE Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â· 303/925-5590 FAX 925-5076 1 'r-11 I Ul ... 163 , 16' ,Â·NI ILL_L-L--1 \ JU , 4, t:Ar-111,11 5 ..., - ISSUED BY M Commonwealth . POLICY NUMBER Land Title Insurance Company 128-053556 OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE. CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STJPULATIONS, COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation, hefein called the Company, insures, as of Datc of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding tile Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate Of interest described in Schedule A being vcstcd other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect iii or lien or encumbrance on the title; 3. Unmarketability of the tirle; 4. Lack of a right of u=55 to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extenl provided in the Conditions und Stipulations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COMMONWEALTH LAND -rITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused itS corporate name and scal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers, the Policy to become valid when countÂ£:rxigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Attest: By: A juu,il,l / ALLOÂ·(/9 Secretary ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Prcudent EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following mailers are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fca or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building und zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, usc, or Â¢njoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any )mprovement now or hereafter erecled on thÂ© land; (iii) a separation m ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protcction, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or govornmental regulationh, except to thÂ¢ extent thal a nolte of the enforcement thereof or u notice at a detect. hen or encumbrance resulting ; from a violation or alleged violation affecting rhe land has been recorded in Thc public records al Dak of Policy, (b) Any governmental police powcr not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land ha; bcon recorded in ih: public ICCOr,11 -11 D.UC of Policy, , 2. Flights of eminent domain unless notioÂ© of the cxircise thereof has becn recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would bc binding on the rights of u purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects. liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or othcr matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to ihc Company. not recorded in the public records at D.le of Policy, but known to the in:sured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by thÂ© insuted claimant prior to ThÂ© date the insured claimant became an in&ured under Lhut policy, (c) resulting in no 10.5 or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Poliqy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have bccn sustained if the insurod claimant had paid value fur thc estate or intereft insured by this policy. Â· American Land Title Association Owner'$ Policy (10-21-87) Face Page Valid Only If Schedule A, B and Cover Arc Attached Form 1141-2 ORIGINAL -- - -- W &<1191.PARRULVJ ALVU .3441 UL=il,Wl,ha (c) Whenever the Compa 11 have brought an action or inlerposed a 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS. defensa as required or pe by the provisions of this policy, the The following terms when uscd in this policy mcan: Company may pursue any 1 _ tion to final <Icterminalion by u court uf competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discrelion, ' (a) "insured": The insured named in Schedule A, and. subject to any to appeal from any adverse judgment or order. rights or defunacs the Company would have had against the named insured, thasÂ¢ who succeed to ihe interest of the named insured by operation of law (d) In all Cabc5 wherc this policy permits or requires the Company to as distinguished from purchase including, but not limited to, heirs, prosecute or provide for thÂ¢ d:funÂ® of any action or proceeatng, the distribuiccs, devisccs, survivors, personal rcprosentativcs, ncxt of kin, or insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosccutÂ¢ or provide corporatÂ© or fiduciary SUCCCS:or). defense in the action or proceeding. and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of the insurcd for this purpose. (b) 'Insured claimant": an insured claiming lost or damage. Whenever requested by the Company. the insured, at thÂ© Cumpany's (c) '*knowledge" or "known": actual knowledge, not constructive expen;c, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (i) in any action or knowledge or notice which may be imputed to an insured by reason of the proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnciscs, prosecuting or public records as defined in this policy or any other records which impart defending the action or procceding, or cffecting settlement. and 01) m any construclivc notice of matters affecting tho land. other lawful act which in thc opinion of the Company may be necessary of (d) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule A. and desirable m establish the title to the estate or interest as insured. 11- (lic improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute rcal property. Thc Company is prejudiced by the failure of the insured !0 furnish th: required term "land" docs not inchidÂ¢ any property beyond the lines of the area cooperation, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy described or referred to in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interdst, estate shall {erminate, including any liability or obligation Lo def'end, prosecute, or or easement in abuttlng streets, roads. avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such waterways, but nothing herein shall modify or limit the extent to which a cooperation. right of access to and trom thc land is insurÂ«1 by this policy. 5. PROOF OF LOSS OR DAMAGE. (c) "mortgagÂ¢": mortgage, dccd of trust, trust dced, or other security 1n addition to und ufter the notices required under Section 3 M these injtrumcnt. Conditions and StipulationÂ¥ have been provided the Company, a proof of loss or damap signed and sworn lo by the insured claimant shall he (0 "public records": records established undcr state $(atules al Datd of furnished to the Company wilhin 90 days after the insured claimant shall Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relatintl aÂ»certain Lhc facla giving risc to the loss or damage, Thc proof of loss or to real properly to purchasers for value and without knowledge. With respect to Section i (a) (iv) of the Exclusions From CovenBe, "public durna&:e shall describe the defec[ In. or lien or encumbrance on the tide, or other matter insured against by this policy which constituteb ihe basis of fecocds" shall also include environmental prptection liens tilcd in thc loss or damagd and shall Statc. to the extent possible, the basis of records of the clerk of the United States district court for the district in calculating the amount of the loss or damage. lf the Company is prejudiced which the land is located. by the failure of thc insured claimant to provide the required proof of loss (g) "unmarkctability of thC title": an alleged or apparent matter ililecting or damage, the Company's obliptions to Lhc insured under {he policy shall the title to thÂ¢ land, not excluded or excepted from coverage, which would terminate, including any liability or obligation to del-end, prosccuw, or entitte a purchaser of the estate or interest described in Schedule A to be contlnuc any litigation, with regard to the inatter or Inatters roloiring such released from tlie objigation to purchase by virrue of a contractual proof of loss or damage condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. In addition, the insured claimant may reasonably bc required lo submit 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE AFTER CONVEYANCE to examination under oath by any authoflad representative of the Company and shull produce for examination. inspection and COpying, M OF TITLE. such reasonable times und place& 5 may be designaud by any :iuthorized ThÂ¢ covcrage of this policy shall continue in forCÂ¢ 45 of Date of Policy in rÂ©presÂ©ntativÂ¢ of the Company, all records. books, led*Grs, checlas, favor ot' an insured only w ton; as the insured relain& an estate or ulterest cormspondcni and mumorunda, whether bearing a daw before or Mitcr in ihe land, or holds un indebtedness secured by a purchase Inoney Datc of Policy, which reasonably pertain to the !051 or damage. Further. if mortgage given by a p.urchaser from the insured, of only so long as thc requested by any authorized representative of thC Company , the insured insured shall have liabillry by reason of covenants of warranty madc by ihc claimant shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized iniurÂ©d in any transfer or conveyance of the estate or interest. This policy reprcsÂ¢ntativc of the Company Lo examine , inspect und copy all recoids, shall not continut in force in favor of any purchaser from the insured of bookg, ledgers, checks. correspondence and memoranda in the custody or either (-A an estate or interest in the land. or (ii) an indcbtedncss secured by control of a third party. which reasonably pertairi to the loss or dilmilge. a purchase moncy mortgage givcn to the insured. All information designated as confidential by the insured claimant provided 10 the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GaVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT. unless, in the reasonable judgcmcnt of ihc Compuny. il is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the insured chlimant to subinit for The insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in case of examination under oath, producc other rcasonably requesled information any litigation as set forth in Seclion 4(a) below, fii) in case knowledge shall or grant pcrmis.lion to Xcure reasonably necestiary informalion frem third come to an insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is parties as required in this paragraph shall ter:ninak any liability of the adverse to the tilk to the estatc or interest, as insured, and which might Company under this policy as to that claim. causc loss or damage for which thc Company may be li#ble by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if tilic to the estate or intercyt, ai insured, is rejecled tls 6. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; unmarketable, If proinpl notice shall not be given to the Company, then as TERMINATION OF LIABILITY. to tho inlurcd all liability of tho Company shall torminatÂ© with retrd to In case of a claim under this policy. the Company shall have the the matter or matters fur which prompt notice is required; provided, following options: however, that failure to notify thc Company shall in no casc prejudicc thc rights of any insured under this policy unless the Company shall be (a)To Pay or Tender Payment of thÂ¢ Amount of Insurance. prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice To pay or tender payment of thÂ© amount of insurance under this policy togclhcr with any costs. attornÂ¢ys' fes and expenses incurred by 4. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OP ACTIONS; DUTY OF the insufed claimant, wh!*h w,re authorized by [hc Company. up to thu INSURED CLAIâ€¢ANT TO COOPERATE. time of payment of tender of payment and which thu Company is obligated to pay. (a) Upon written request by the insured und subject to tho options Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all liability und contained in Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations, the Company, obligations to the insured under this policy, other than to make the at iu own cost and without unreasonable delay. shall provide for tho payment required, shall terininate, including any liability or obligation to defense of an insured in litigation in which any third pany asserts a claim defend. prosetute, or continue any litigation, and lite policy Shall be adverse to Ihe litic or interal as insured, but Only us to those stated causes surrendered to the Company for cancellation of action alleging a defect, lien or encumbrance or other matter insured (b) To Pay or Otherwise SolllÂ¢ With Parties OlhÂ¢r than thÂ© fusured or ae,inst by this policy. The Company shall have {he right to select counsel With the Insured Claimant. 01 us choice (subject to the right of the insured to object for reasonable (i) to pay or otherwise -ttlc with olhcr parties for or in the nitin: cause) to represent the insured as to Those stated causes of action and shall of un insured claimant any claim insured against under 016 policy, lusÂ¢lher not be liable for and will not pay the fccs of any other counsel. The with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses nicurred by (}ic insured Company will nat pay any fee:, costs or expenses incurred by the insured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to time of p.tyinctit in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not insured and which the Company is obligated to pay; of against by this policy. (ii) to pay or othcnvisc scttle with the insured claimant the loss or damage provided for under this policy. together wirh any costs, artorncys (b) The Company shall have the right, at its own cost, to institute and fccs and expenses incurred by tha insured claimant which wcre allthoriad prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act which in its by thc Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is opinion may be necessary or desirable to Â¢5!ablish the tizle [0 the estate Or obligated to pily. mterevt, as msurcd, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage 10 the insured. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of Lhe oplions provided for The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this in paragraphs (b)(i) or (i:), thÂ© Company'a obligations to the insurvd under policy, whether or no{ 11 11911 bc liable hereunder. and shall not thereby this pohcy for tho claimed losi or damage, other than thÂ¢ paymÂ¢nls concede liability or waive any provision of this policy. If the Company required to be Inade, shall terminate, including uny liability or obligation lo shall excrcisc its righls under this paragraph, it shall do ga diligently. defend, prosecute or continue any litigation. Conditions and Scipulitions Continued Inside Cover Â¥ 0-/WhZ 1 ' 93 13: 20 1â€¢HEELER SQ LA,1 APEEN P.4/8 //1.5-0 . #349697 10/15/92 12:50 Rec $10.00 BK 691 PG 525 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $117.50 laRRAN'TY DEED THIS DEED, made this (1 day of DC-T- , 1992 between John Hall, whose address is 1 â‚¬3 61 4 -c-+f Apen .1.0;PA. 20 , ("Grantor"), and Quentin Vidor, whose address is 2 Upper Hook Road, Rhinebeck, New York, 12572 (-Grantee-): WITNESSETH, That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to the Grantors in hand paid by the Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the Grantee, his successors and assigns forever, all the real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in Pitkin County, Colorado, described as follows: LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 48, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises above bargained and described with the appurtenances unto the Grantee, his successors and assigns forever. And the Grantor, for himself, his heirs, executors, and administrators, does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the Grantee, his successors and assigns that, at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, he -, 1 is well seized of the premises above conveyed, has good, sure, 0 -$= perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, JU In A in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful 4, 4 authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner 1 4 ID B and form as af oresaid, and that the same are f ree and clear from N all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature so ever, EXCEPT: 1. F#*PM /4*Al /4**/ Uâ€¢Y*bA/4 7/ AKÂ¥d / *Mi /4*N,//4*#plit*1/ 0/44*##****40 //// *AA..9 /9/4 /49*Â¥ /UD.Perw;*/ mi/MAN*X/AN /00493; i M87*AM /9,/ BAÂ¥/ Any //// 94*An /*PAgi* /4*'*UÂ¥g /4444*113&44 /// 1992 Taxes due and payable in !993 2. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deeds from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 85 and Book 59 at Page 122 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws." 3. Encroachments as shown on Survey from Alpine Surveys, Inc. dated September 24, 1992 as Job No. 91-65. The Grantor -shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above:bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee, his successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all gender. Signed and delivered this l k day of OCT 1992. -\ John Hâ‚¬li, Declaration Received silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, D $117.50 - - a /66- .lu.uu BK 691 PG 526 STATE OF (<2 |~ ~crolq ) )SS. COUNTY OF Los /Â·ty jqeks) gh The foregoing Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this day of Octote/- , 1992, by John Hall. Witness my hand and official seal. c My commission expires : CA/<AG 193 , 1 Notary Padiliâ‚¬ 0/ . 1 ~.~~Ii: OFFICIAL SEAL ~ I. .. bl F 0 47 2,44\ CHRISTY L GOWDY K O 13*22*31 Ne.y p...Cdomia V L Â· It-tri 01 20 10 * 09. kNnC.C.LCIN OU< Lrlw rle LL, 1 1*1 CommonweaiutÂ® LE Land Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE A-OWNER'S POLICY CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER PCT-6929C2 10/15/92 @ 12:50 P.M. $ 1,175,000.00 128-053556 1. NAME OF INSURED: QUENTIN VIDOR 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY Is: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN: QUENTIN VIDOR 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 48, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. D-Â·t- Lag j. Ma nV 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Countersigned Authorize<JAgent ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-1766 THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER ON THE COVER SHEET. Form 4100 i ir-I[\ ILI 1 JJ 1 J AL rl; IL-L_~-L-1 \ Wu -1 IF, ... -6-' . ~ CommonwealthÂ® Land Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLICY NUMBER PCT-6929C2 10/15/92 @ 12:50 P.M. 128-053556 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, enchroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Taxes for the year 1992 not yet due or payable. 7. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deeds from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 23 at Page 240, Book 59 at Page 85 and Book 59 at Page 122 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1, 2, 3&4 ARE HEREBY OMITTED. Form 4100 1 '.. 1, I L'.LI JU .U . 5-,- -- ... -- ---.... - (Contiaued) 7; DETERMINATION, EXTENT OF UABILITY AND CONSURANCE (b) When liability and Â£hc extenc of loss or darnage has heen definitely This policy is a contract of indemnily against actual monetary loss or fixcd in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or ditmasc sustained or incurred by the insured clalinant who has suffÂ«cd lu.s damage shall bc payable within 30 days lh:rcafter. or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy and only to 13. SUBROGATION UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT. the extent herein described, (a) Thc Company's Right of Subrogation. (a) The !iability of the Company under this policy shall not exceed the least of: Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim undcr this policy. all right of subroption shall vest in the Company unaffected by (i) Â¢hc Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A; or, any act of the insured claintant. (ii) the differencc between the villuÂ¢ of the insured estate or interest as The Company shall be subtogated lo and be entitled to all rights and insured and the valuc of the insurcd estate or inierest subject to the d:fect, retnedics which the injured clainiant would have had auuinst any person or lien or encumbrance insured again51 by this policy. property in respeci to the claim had this policy not been issued. 1! (b) In thÂ¢ event the Amount of liuiurance stated in Schedule A at the requested by the Company. the irwurcd claimant Jiall trantfur lo ihe Date of Policy is less than 80 percent of Ihc value of the insured estate or Company all rightx and remedies agains[ any person or property ficcessary interest or thÂ¢ full consideration paid for the land, whichever N less, or if in ordar to r}crfect this fight of subrogation. The insured claiI,tant 5hall subsequent to thi Date of Policy an improvement is crecled on the land permit the Company to sue, compromise or Settle in the name of the which increases Â¢hc value of Ihe insured diare or intercit by at least 20 msured claimant and to usc the name of the insured claimant in any percent over ihc Amount of insurance stated in Schedule A. then this transaction or litigation involving these rights or remcdle: Policy is subject to the following: If a payment on account of a claim dad not fully cover the loss of the (i) where no subscquont improvement has bccn made, as to any partial insured claimant. the Company shall he subrogated to these rights atid loss, tho Company shall only pay the loss pro rata in the proportion that remedies in [he proportion which the Companys puyment bears to the the amount of insurance at Dutc of Policy bcars to the total value of the whole amount of whe loss. insurcd estate or interest at Date of Policy; of If loss should result from uny act of ihc insured claimant, as suited (ii) where a subiequent improvement has been made, as to any partial above, that act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that event, loss, the Company shall only pay the loss pro rata in the proportion thal shall be required to pay only thu[ part nf any losses insured against hy 111,1 120 porecnt ot the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A bcars to the policy which shall exceed the amount, if any, 1051 lo l}te Company by lum of the Ainount of Insurunce stated in Schedule A and the amount reason of the impairment by the insured claimant of che Comp:Iny's right cxpcnded for the improvement. of subrogation. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to costs, attorneys' fees (b) The Company's Rights Against Non-insured Obligot's. and expenses for whiÂ©h the Company is liable under this policy, and shall The Compliny's right of subrogation agains[ non-in:tured obligors <112111 only apply to that portion of any loss which exceeds. in thÂ© aggragatÂ¢, 10 exist and shall include, without limitation. the rijghts of the in>,ured tu percent 01 the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A. mdomnities, guarantics, 0[her policic, of Insurance or honds, (c) The Company win pay only those costs, attorneys' fees and expenses nOIWith,tanding any terms or con<litions contained in iliose mstruments incuIrcd in accordancc with Section 4 of these Conditions and Stipulations. which providc tor subrogation rights by reason of this policy, 8. APPORTIONMENT. 14. ARBITRATION ff the land dcscribcd in Schedule .4 consists of two or more parÂ¢c|K Un!Â¢SS pcohibitcd by applicablc law, ciliter tlic Company or ihÂ¢ insured which are not Uscd its a single size, and K loss is established affecring one or may demand arbitration pursuant to thC Title Insurance Arbitration Rules more of thÂ¢ purects but not all. ihc tass shall be computed and settled on a of the American Arbitration AS50Ciation. Arbitrable mal[erS may include, pro rata baw. lis if the amount of iniurance under thi; policy was divided but are not limited to, any cont,oversy or claim Nlween the Company i,ind pro Fala as lo the value on Date of Policy of each separate parcel to Lhe the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any Â®rvice of ille whok, exclusive of any improvements madc subsequent to Dale of Policy. Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of u poky unless u liability or value has otherwise been agreed upon as to cach parcel provision or other obligation. All urbitrable matters when the Amount of by the Company and ihc insured at the time of the issuance of this policy Insurance is S!.000.000 or Icss shall be arbitrated al iliÂ¢ option of either the und Shown by an express statentent or by an endorsement attached to this Company or the insured. All arbitrable maller, when thÂ¢ Amount of policy. Insurance is in excess of S!,000,000 shall bÂ¢ erbitraled only when agreed to 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. by both thÂ© Company and the insured. Arbitration purs,lhnt 18 thi: policy and under the Rula in c,Tect on the <latc the demand for urbitralion is (a) li the Company establishes Thc title, or removes the ulleged defect, made or, ut the option of the insured. [hc Rules in effect lit Date of Policy lien or encumbrance, or cures Ihc luck of a right of *occss to or from the shall bc binding upon the parties, The award may include attorneys' fc:ch land, or cures the Claim of unmarketability of tide, all as insured, in a only if the laws 01 the state in which Lhe land is localed permit :1 court to reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigalion und the award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment Upon the aw,ird Completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall' have fully performed its rendered by the Arbitraloris) may bo entered in any court having obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss jurisdiction thereof. or dam.Agc cau=d thereby. Thc law of the silwi of the land shell upply to an Mbitration under iht (6) fn the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company Titic Insurance Arbitration Rules. or with the Company's conknt, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damaSÂ¢ pntil there has beat a final deicrnlination by a court Of A copy of the Rules may be oblained from [he Company upon rcquot. competent Junsdiction. and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE the tirk its insured. CONTRACT. (c) Th, Company shall not be liuble for loss or damage to any insured for liability volunuirily assulned by th, insured in settling any claim or suit (u) This policy togeiher with al[ endorsemenls, if any, attached hqrÂ¢lo without the prior writlen consent of thÂ© Company, hy the Company ls the entire policy and contract between the insured Ulld the Company. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION be construed as a whole. OF LIASILITY. (b) Any cluirn of loss or dumagc, whether or not bitsÂ·cd on ncy.Â®ence, All payments under [his policy, except payments made for Costs, und which arisca out of thc stillus of thu mIc to the estate ar Interest attorneys' fccs und expenses, shall reducc the amount of the insurance pro covercd hereby or by any aclion assefting such claim. shall be restricted to 141110. this policy. (c) No amendment â€žf or endorsement lo this policy Lan 1% m.idc 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE. except by a writing endors:d her-emi Of alluchÂ¢d herclo signed by eiliter like If :he insured acquires Litie [0 the estate or interest in Natisfaction of [hc Pres,dont, u Vice President, the: Secret,try, an Abbistant Sccretury, or indebledness secured by tlte insured mortgage, orany part thcreof, it is express- validating officer orauthorized signatory 01 the Company, ly understood {hac the amount o f li,s,iranie under {lus policy shall be reduced by any amount the Company may pay undcr any policy Insurins a mortgage to 16. SEVERABILITY. which excepcion is taken in Schedule D Or IO which ihe insured has agreed. abbu:ned, 0, taken subject, or which is hereuiter execured by in in.ured and In the evunt any provision of [Ike Dolicy N held invalid or unenforeeable which h a charge or lien on the estate or interew described or referred [o in under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include th,it provi- Schedule A, and the amount so paid shall bc deemed a payment under ihis sion and all other provisions shall remutn in full force and effect. policy. 17. NOTICES, WHERE SENT. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS. All notices required to be given the Company lind any staternent in (n) Nor)ayment shall be,nade withom producing ihispolicy for endotscment writing required to bc furnished tile Company shall include the number 01' of the payment unless the policy has been los[ or destroyed, in which case proof this policy and shall be addressed to Commonwealth Land Title Insltrance of lois or destruction sha]} bc furnshal to the sazisfaction of tho Company. Compaily, Eight Penn Conier, PhiladÂ¢}phia, Pennsyl/unia 19103-2198. NM 1 American Land Titlu Aisociation Owner's Policy (10-21Â·87) Cover Page Valid On!Â· I f Face Page. Schedules A und R Afe .Atiached EXHIBIT C *J. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS Park 7 1 ,N ine \ 94 2 0 b /f f g Â·,con 44 -54- te t \ .t '6 2- u 44 8 #-w 4 + ,Ad % Creek Ounn 9 060 4 49 Snow unny c: Stâ€ž11 + 4649 44 94 96 A.P.1 4 2 1 Hunt,r 3 o In,tltut~ . 9 b OJ CT L CATION 4 Mulle * Tent Hallam 4 Not every street or road is LaU * VV ANC S named on maps or listed in street guides. Construction of streets and roads may be in . 0 Nonâ€¢ St 05 progress in certain areas. : 4.;r.Mr, / 4% 4 f 88,8 4, 16 4 R.list ,% Don * d1 Smugglâ€¢r â€¢tn Ad Aspen . A. k O 7 i cf *' 51 4 Pk> #!~ *m V r 5 5 2 4* 4 k 1 0 f i . nt Se 00 p.th 3 2 /1 - Wk, r ' Mal V d i li M#44 H 4 4.37 0-4 P j. a -r-3 5 0 45 Abv Sum,~711 8 P 0 , ,/ -' *30 > 1 VICINITY MAP -Â«3 4% t Cryâ€¢tal Lat, Ad _ F. 1 Ag 1 Â¥r & %44 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Â· 520 EAST HYMAN AVENUE Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â· 303/925-5590 FAX 925-5076 Creek 411 ' JOIURN ALLEY BLOCK 48 1(,t/~,t) KI BAR + C.AP â€¢ -----I r -- I 07 8 LS 9013 3 5 5 75' 09' 11" r 90 0 4 4 Illar.10 110[K 11%111*. 14 FLOOR DECK / 1. 13 6 111 1 LOT M e--1 .... 0 (801 + ill :? 1 1 L &#15 OF BEARING Â· Fa,NO norlltlr NFS 43 5HOW+I ICALEÂ· Câ€¢ 10 LOT L -15 1////- SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE: )5 1~1Â»~-L 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TH15 MAP ACCURATELY DEPICa A SURVE MADE UNDER Mr SUPERVISION OM BEFTEMBEK 18 1991, 7 i~&'i</ f 'l i OF LOT K,L ,M BLOCK 48, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. : LOCATED EMTIRELY WITHIN Thi[ BOUNDARY LIME5 OF THE THE TV\/0 5TORY FRAME HOUaE WAS fOUMP TO BE , ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTT. THE LOCATION AND Â¥11 4 . DI MEMSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVENTS, 71 0 - 61 4 1 1 1 !1 1 ~ 111 1 EASEMENT5, RIGHTÂ·OFÂ·WAY IM EVIDENCE OR KNOWN 30,4.' 1 / / ./ . % l ~~ C:7 COVERED c.0110 1 ' 10 ME, AND ENCROACHMENT5 BY OR ON TH[ THESE 5-loop 1 PREP'll.5ES AKE ACCURAT H-Â¥ bl-IO\A/M. llllll .(FAWL 51'AcE ttilk:r i // 4' 2 -5~~RYf~f~~f . 1 10 B i J'% 6 â‚¬Â»/FRAME HOUSE, /5 2 ; (Â« Â«7./li f /.44,9.... i 1,1 . . 1/ /TlY O.H.Â·\.Cy // , ", " '~Â«/1~:,I STORY FRAM[10.Â· r , ~: <,. . /5TORAGE/MISC.*' ~ .~, t////NX? OB, \.0/ , 4 killitifillf ,-- L; ''','.''' \ 4.?tâ‚¬. SURVEYS,\\Â·t. BY" 1 - fr>%2049 1 St?TEMBER \8,\991 - /17 1 1 6 10,1 J -5.Lk/1'ECE::ile:EF6EaEEEF i b O,At ///:/I 'it' IIi . l .. NOTE: PITKIM COUNTY POLICY * For-5781 WAS USED PREPARING LOT K THIS SURVEY. _ FOUND N 75'01'll"W 90.0 1 HEKE67 CERTIFY THAT- A VtbUAL IM5PECTIOM YVAS PERFORMED OrTY MOMUMENT unDER elf SuPEAVISION Ort SEFFE.IMBE R 21 /991 OF T KIE ABO DE5CRIBED PROPERn. rio CHAr-96Â·Â£5 Vâ€¢/ERE POunD El(GEPr ,S .5 '10013,44.. ia â€¢' FRANCIS STREET Dtpt EMBER 29 0 :991 L:~ -2.015\ /~ - ALPINE bURVEYS 1,10. BYâ€¢ , ,- t1015W'fl~-- A , X , MOTE: *91/1.097 Pll-KIM COUNTY POLICY no, PCT-691962 v/AS l/bELO IN PRU,Aire 1-HI5 BURVEY. EXHIBIT D 6;0 EXHIBIT E EXISTING CONDITIONS 62-11 =A : *-1'â€¢95 *,A 92-Izl iN i j - J I iTT 1 "1 + --=IIi . 1 pol,Â·L S>CPâ€¢'*f 001-:L 8 6444+ "e-,I Â® Ill* - .9-,1 21-'Pb , a "O-4 * 7004 #Al --5 -- 1.- MQM*14 114 brqld-Ilr14 1110 â€žSlb e J'rs -914 AL Â® d.*It nit,4 8 'MI9 it 11 -- t Eit 1 11 1 1 t I T- 14Nlp 1*ClwtÂ·f if I T 1. 1 1 n.-1 1 Amon_ > 9< < \. - U.es#T.. -,1 _ T 1,#m:tr.14%-3 11 --- 1 . 1 - { 04 it- - ~ Ttl.Er" =Pe=rf 1 1 Uirs I 1-1 111. #41/44 -- *D?Â·oc:*\ d 41 P t 31 Â¢m"=1 1- ~ .1 ~1 1 1 0 -3 r -2/ 0 0 -11 - \ 11. -1 tlep~ 4 Feorl 1 1:i Ilk 1 1 MI,ATE+1 4.-1- - 1'112:*1 - 1 1-1 1-Â·16 A , erÂ»r ron'Â»Â· 0 0 ~4 1 195?020 Cigloarlriop 'L;H@ ~A -f, er,r Fel'Â» | 1 ke==1 - 1 1 IiI , fs 91=r - u, 4 Et 1 R'*p *49.0 7 1 4 ' -4 1- 1 U 12'MI,4 1 1 1 0 4 1 1 1 ---- 14-B (AP >11 \>i â‚¬ 7, 7 1- 7 70 SIT=F uP _ - 1-191!-14 rfor< --I- 507Â»F- 1 PIM#. PÂ»6% - 1 1 F- po p.t~- pqqry<f [--- -----I- --1 1Â»114 ploof plÂ»+1 Ul" . 1 L n" 1 . 1 S t 1 15911- PKTO,2 f \ 1~- -\ -5*HOM Â¥ 2 - - \1 1 1 , -ar -TD -*Xit)-I-7 l - L - 3 - -*Ppert * 3 /71 -r, i < Ny L Iii - 1*â‚¬198Â· MiCBmil 1 _1[2-Int.1-4*L. 81-All=_2161 d _-140_u_LE 94.2 U. 1'-Â£90 -1 0 - 3*ae_.013 _ r --- 1 1 1, 1 . 1 1 1 iii I 1 1 1 't t 1 1 i k--1 Â»771(7-PÂ»Â»714 11-1.*459 1 AA,~T- -U-- -----9 - -t*Sm*<-7*Ajfecti 40.r F . â‚¬ W[2 3- '=PR PLÂ»1 - 51 026-07~ ooT-ta<big. 411= [Lo'/ j X 1,#'2\1 / -3-- - 4/7 \24 -- . 1. I 1 1 1 -1 ' -- i 1 .1 1 1 . - -- L #/ - -- I 11 1 1 2 =--1- - C NoATH ELÂ©VAGI 014 1 11 l 7 -- - A 11 1.- LliSÂ« ElÂ»Â«~1 614 Â»~j~9015- ~~20*- - t- 1 j #ni Y I . 4 - -- FÂ»sT- P.1-29,62[71019 TAM:BIT I CARRIAGE HOUSE ADDITIONS Sell#Â·IDhf, 33,INNO) S313VHD -266 I 31Jan,WO) O Oct,NfAÂ» ' 4 **ES4 22Â£9â‚¬ZZ/EOE:XÂ¥3 - 8ELE-8U/EOE 3131Â·0180) 3013nT131 Â· E982)C]8 Â· -3/Iy 00',3010) 8 00[ 92*Â¥â€¢41 11 +91 9l05-526/EOE :X,d Â· 0655-526/EOE :3131 Â· 11918 0) 'NMÂ¥ IOE 31]nS Â· NVWAH '3 025 Sl)31IH)ZIV 333!NNn) S312!VH) *34*3*t,1 4231/\ -11*LE 9119.4.61 . A 1 , 1 " .0 -1- 7, It U L .. 1 U Wmat --1 9101- -.-Algr ''tr < f lilli k. . V A =r-16 1 lf] 11111; r -,-=~rri -42 Â« 1 -- I h f.2--r It l 4- "O 12-6,1 7 1 4 1 1 L 1 LI 1 1 It 1 0 N 1 4-Q-MY . f 14 ffeijAMU 1401 iC)31!HEHY 333*NNA) S 318Â¥H) '266 1 ELLIMAWO) O 2ZZ9-8Zl/EOE XV3'8ELE-GU/ELE JIllÂ·8180) 3a3nTEL Â· E982)al Â· 3/1Â¥ 00â‚¬10) 8 OOE 6114â€¢'Â»=1 *M +2% 9L0S-526/EOE XW Â· 0655-526/EOE 3111 Â· 11918 0) 'NldlÂ· IDE 31!nf Â· NVWAH '31025 Sl)31:H)2!V 3:IJINNn) S312IVH) 161:264-02 -d OdIA 1 ik & il 0-6 L 1- 1 #2 1 1 1-2 I A -531.3/2.4 - Â©V 4.4/. EL . .-4- .g * â‚¬:2...~ ,**41*ARI'Â·."/Aty.1.4,- -5 .i~ .. 6 r,Â· ---- 4*IiÂ·, .15.-, '4-71 1 a: 4 1 *5.. ~ *" -76 E:i thi 4 4 1 Ht44 X Exlerl per 'AE~ Pif- - --.----- -4- l -A I i ' i 3 * tiCâ„¢* A-A 11 1 4+ 1 XI 1 1 1 , , h \ :. 1 4- ' 11 1 11 1 1 -4=11 11 1 013 1 1 1 1 9 U 1 < 1 - ' 1 1 Li 1 1/\ 7 1- 1 VIDOF- 12.Â»1 gelta CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ~ 520 E. HYMAN Â· SUITE 301 Â· aPEN, CO 81611 + TE[Â£ 303/925-5590 Â· FAX: 303/925-5076 23+ W.i _ F~wt:15 300 W COLORADO /2 Â· BCD(2863 Â· TELWRIDE CO81435Â·EUf 303/728-3738Â·FAX:303/728-6722 ~ M=P 944 1 COW?â€¢6*0 Â©COPNRTTE 1992. CHAMS CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 1 . .' ,at.â€ž_-"'i,p.Â·-*Â»â€žz,~6'rÂ·â‚¬rd:e/â€¢e@4-# f- 1 ' ' ~11 - U ZL 1 0 A* facror# A-A 4 1- Ut + 8 1- i p V D 04+ 1966;Stâ‚¬* CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS /1. 520 E. HYMAN Â· SUITE 301 ASPEN. CO 81611 TELE 303/925-5590 Â· FAX- 303/925-5076 2,4 4 9414,0 1 9 300 W. COLORADOAVE. Â· Â¤2863 - TELLURIDE (081435Â·mt.E. 303/728-3738Â·FAX:303/728-6722 Wa O COPYWRITE 1992. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCH{TECTS AGP#14 1 (Ad;12â€¢00 33 ~ C r C . 1 3 1 1 1-7 -ill 7 1 0 -r - #?12 ! 1 - .4. :I 41.-+ 1.T i 14 Z 1 ----- 1 1 1 1 c 41-elli -4 1 1 it . 93 45" -- - .- ---7â€ž r. ==4 a' /1 1 7-41 1 N.7.2 .. 576 61- - 1 . w Gr 0/ I 11 Â· .- 1 -9 4 6 L ExlsT/,da 30'UDIk-|61 . j VI PDF- ~6 1 g-PIC@- CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS /. 520 E. HYMAN Â· SUITE 30 I Â·ASPEN, CO 8161 1 Â· TELE- 303/925-5590 FAX. 303/925-5076 234 Id. 1=P>*ttr Is 300 W. COLORADONE - 80(2863 Â· TEUURIDE. CO81435Â·ELE. 303/728-3738-FAX:303/728-6722 , al A!67841 644*90 O COPYWRfTE 1992, CHARLES CUNNIFFEARCHITECTS 114 91-4 %Â»91 3- -J i r .AMI 04 /2 i E i , 1 N 2 1 V L 2* 6 ' 9 1 nor I 6, 11 1,11'rl + f -11 1 1, 1 1 .Ill! 1 i r F Tit 4 14 1 4-4 - -----I -1 -- -11 1 f 1 1 1 I 11 L I t F ' / f P 1,1- 1 \ 11 1 1 . \ I. 1-6~ i It El 1 1-1 0 -70 1 .1 -1 8 1 1 1 - /1 0/1 7 th J 9/ 41 2 -2 -2 212- t--~-Fl-!7 U F Â£ i k L . 1. 95 4 1 ' I, 1 61 ' 1 4 11 '1 It 1111,11 1 I NEW , E><15711,48< 13>111LDING-~ 4 ADDU ' VI DDIA P.Â» 1 IDIErlÂ» CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 520 E HYW\N Â· SUITE 301 Â· ASPEN, CO 81611 - TELEÂ· 303/925Â·5590 Â· FAX: 303/925-5076 300 W. COLORADOAVE Â· 8CK2863 TEUURIDE (081435 TELE. 303/728-3738Â·FAX: 303/728-6722 PePE-14, a>i=19Â©0 Â© COPYUmnE 1 992, CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS -iwism-bl = r . 1-1 1 11 11 1 ~11 11! lili Ii'.111 -i lilli illl!lll1 ..1 11 lili : i il ! i '~ ' ' ~. li if :1 1.1 1 . .'11 ./ 1 - 1,- ..141 f.1 ' 4 %'11 , > 1 - 71 - r 2 1. 1 i /31-11 1 5 ; *11 . l V'pop- Peâ‚¬~ DiE!#6#5 -CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS /1. 520 E. HYMAN Â· SUITE 301 Â· ASPEN. CO 81611 Â· TELE- 303/925-5590 - FAX: 303/925-5076 1-311- U..19Â¥1310[S _-_r - 300 W, COLORADOAVE Â· 83(2863 Â·TELLURIDE. (081435Â·JELEÂ·303/728-3738Â·FAX: 303/728-6722 ija Pe:li#:/1,4 CÂ«.00*Ptio - Â© COPAURITE 1992, CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHKECTS r'*IN At>P H / NEW E-><1 574% 1251)11-DIA<:31 \ ADDIT/cd ' 1 U 1/ 143 ' ~1 1 ' i 1*Â·~1 ' - 11 10 / 3 - 141 L 4 / -1-J ' - - - ----J- VI Pe Ez- Mei p tapof= CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 520 E. HYMN Â· SUNE 301 ASPEN, CO 81611 Â· TEUR 303/925-5590 FAX- 303/925-5076 "+ U Â· P'KNE /5 300 W COLORADO AVE Â· BC@(2863 Â· TELLURIDE CO81435-mE 303/728-3738 -FAX 303/728-6m Â©COPYWRITE !992. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHfTECTS ek|gâ‚¬l pÂ·Igh 2t-101-9 Mari 1* 1,-1 ADP' rl . J MAIN HOUSE ADDITIONS 1 1 fidi, i 0- 1 7 j CP*- -201787.Â· -- 0 //4-31---1 0 - -2 0 d#t=MOK -Â£ - 1 1 I_ I - 1. - 0 r- 4 /1 rf,#fit#<*pri- - -r N. M . --1-----1----0 11 11 11 1.l 11 11 1 1 11 1 1 L---+ 4-9 4 -- -------+ 1 1 -- -t #4 ~---------1 4 11 /7 11 ~ 04 ly 204-Clap<820' 1 1 -28003<= 1 1 1 1 0 P It \\ 1 1 . 11 91.9. , 1 1 1 UPPER LEVEL PLAN r .. d.& - 7 / 1 ./ ~ 11 22 - - - -1 1 j 77--0 - -. 1 -1 . 111 1 1 1 /* 1 2 i j 'Il:~tj f, 1 11 7 111 1 11 5641*72#3-07 1 li Fl . 1 1 It 1 1 -14 --- -- -- I +1 4tz --+ - rl 11 11 1 1 1 1 A 11 1/ , /l 0- A 11 1 1 - ~ 1 11 1 1 1/ it - 11 11 11 11 - --22* NEUM=,VED 4.ALLS " |' 11 /1 -r .hx : 67 1 >14 4 AL* Le \11 11 11 - 11 11 /.I , 1 , 1 , A-7-*0 21 1>4 4.10 liD 1 * 1 '-' -12~1EIn 11 . . Â»-r*r'tr~ - -4,/%340%11/1- 301104-- -51-- * . I 1- Â·Â·- . , 0 (4 I- 24,1 11.-3 v .74 fi~, F4 1 1 :1 42=1 -0 Existing Floor Area Ground Floor 1316.6 sq.ft. Second Level 946.0 sq.ft. Attic 260.0 sq.ft. 2522.6 sq.ft. Outbuilding 485.4 sq.ft. Overhangs (3.0" +) 106.5 sq.ft. Total Existing Floor Area 3114.5 sq.ft. Accessory Dwelling Unit Floor Area Existing Outbuilding 485.4 sq.ft. New Loft & Stair 113.8 sq.ft. New Bath 81.0 New Volume 14.4 sq.ft. Total ADU 694.6 sq.ft. Proposed Floor Area Main House (Existing) 2522.6 sq.ft. ADU (Existing & New) 694.6 sq.ft. Overhangs (Existing) 106.5 sq.ft. Overhangs Removed - 84.0 sq.ft. Total F.A.R. 3239.7 sq.ft. Total Proposed F.A.R. 3239.7 sq.ft. Allowable F.A.R. 3660.0 sq.ft. site Coverage Site Coverage Existing 1802 sq.ft. Site Coverage Proposed 1883 sq.ft. Allowable Site Coverage (R-6) 30% of 9000 sq.ft. 2700 sq.ft. Yard Requirements Minimum Side Yard 10 ft. Total of Both Side Yards 30 ft. Front & Rear Yards 10 ft. Total Front & Rear Yards 30 ft. EXHIBIT G , PATTILLO ASSOCIATES STAUCTUAAL CONSULTANTS April 28, 1993 r- - 6 1 - 7-r--_ - : . ~. ~ -.' n r--1 1 4.-4 lili :'i APR 2 9 1993 .H P p 'J 1 - CHA:-124 (.Ll :ih 4 3 4,1300 ASPEN. CO Charles Cunniffe & Associates 520 East Hyman, Suite 301 Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 234 WEST FRANCIS AVENUE CARRIAGE HOUSE To whom it may concern: It is the professional opinion of the undersigned that, with reasonable care and adequate bracing, the timber portion of the Carriage House structure located at 234 West Francis in Aspen may be successfully moved from its present foundation and moved again at a later date to a proposed reconstructed foundation at its previous location. A reasonable value for this 480 square foot building, considering reconstruction using original materials to its present condition, is approximately twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). This office is available to assist the owner and contractor with review of the bracing plans and inspection services at the time of the move. Sincerely, PATTILLO ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. 40 IATHEW St'.t'. APÂ»24- 47 r 0 ..<22121 % CE. Rot)eIR M. Pattillo, P.E. :~*2 16794 g* 'rt V % 96St n RMP/kmk ...) '. e .,9/ .44%Â· ONAL :3-7, C OU..ifF<. 4'747/misilmÂ¥*P; P.O.BOX 751 â€¢ GLENWODO SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 â€¢ (303] 945-9695 â€¢ FAX [303} 945-4921 *m;/11:11 1 00.UNÂ¥,Of. 1 \1 0 1-- lij 13 ' 1--' 1 I ' 1 ' I 1 -- 1 1 1 1 11-- 1 1 1 2 LI - - 2 -12[ El' - -- - -- --~ - -1 t_-- -L_f 1 W tÂ»[-1 Et-Eh/AF 101-4 1 1 1 11 '3%% - % U- -r- 1 1 --- --.-----% --- 1 1 j - . - -t- PE19-4- -EE,1-6Â»5â‚¬rl o N' 04[:9*- Lks-{Em 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 --- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f P 11 -- ----- 90(flit M.1--B\,Â«EION - _ lili 1 1 1 . - -1. \ 1 -Vt I dj -F - ---T -----~~ J r . E .t'. 11, -- 32 I lili ln:| P I oor- .-1-T-+ 1. ---- 0 - - --- - U - - .-1 1 - - 1 - - EAVE 810-;DÂ»KE 100 9\11 = 1,- CD,1 tut 4/ 11 \<X 41 - ~ il i 0 1 - - -44% --r - dw 2- . 41 LA /3 - 7.1-rÂ»..4%4. I i I \/ 1 -1-7-1-7 17--l-n~ 1 -lip -i # k [ i 4 i-Â·-1.- 1- E-1 1-- 1- 1 _L_-p.LT __2_~--_1.. ~ 1 1 It __1_ / 1 ---A- .il---*-*-- - -__1 i III - 1 1 1 1 - 7 4 - 1 .1- - - - - 1--- - - r -4 0 JUST .LAIT-66(3 ...â€ž .....__--- -- - jÂ·-Â·- 1 1 1 _11 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 -- - --- ~ 1 -11 -Ifil li Il r - + 1 1 / 1 -JI i - 1_ 1 1 *- U 1- 61 - -- --1 - - == f E El L ul-- _ - MATou 1 Historic Preservation COmmittee Minutes of May 12, 1993 feet on center, wood slats closely spaced between the piers. Fence six feet high painted and stained to be compatible with the residence unlike the existing condition. This is off the letter of November of 1992. Roger: On the east side we made them take out a large deck and nothing was approved. Amy: They will have to comeback to HPC. Les: They also cut down some large trees. 409 E. HOPKINS - EXTENSION OF CONCEPTUAL Bill stepped down. Joe stepped down. Donnelley chaired. MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC extend the conceptual development approval for 409 E. Hopkins until January 30, 1994; second by Don. All in favor, motion carries. 234 W. FRANCIS - VIDOR - FINAL DEVELOPMENT Bill seated. Joe seated. Amy: I feel this is a good design but I still have concern *about the proportions of the windows on the carriage house; the two on the north elevation and the one on the west. John Schenck, project manager: The proportions need to remain the same as conceptual due to the interior restraints that we have. There is a loft over the one window on the north side. Below it are the kitchen counter tops. We did change the door as suggested. It is taller and narrower which is appropriate. Les: On the west elevation of the main building on the north side of it there is a double hung window and are your proposing any changes? John: No changes are proposed. Roger: The only change to the original house is the additional window on the north side which is next to an existing window. Martha: Is there an accessory dwelling unit proposed? John: On the rear portion of the main house there is a free market j 2 {' r 4'.Ii-3Â· Historic Preservation COmmittee 119 Minutes of May 12, 1993 apartment which will require P&Z approval. MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC grant the final development approval for 234 W. Francis as submitted with the following conditions: 1) That a relocation plan of the carriage house be submitted prior to a building permit. That a stabilization plan of the outbuilding be included and also that the construction of the additional dwelling unit is contingent on Planning & Zoning approval and that the applicant secures an appropriate bond set by staff; second by Don. All in favor, motion carries. Conceptual Development - 1080 Power Plant Road City Shop Amy: I feel this is a really good design and I asked you to consider the Secretary of Interior Standards because the design guidelines do not address industrial buildings. This is also eligible for the National Register and a very important property in Aspen. Dave pointed out to me that there is oil staining on the brick and there have been some repairs over the years of patching the building which are inappropriate. This would be a benefit top the historic building. The new buildings are extremely ' 0 6 compatible and an improvement to the site. My only comment on the 4 design is that if you look at the site plan the cold storage shed overlaps but does not connect the historic building and I wondered if Dave could explain why that occurred. Dave Gibson, architect: Affidavit of mailing presented to Amy Amidon. Amy: The notices were incorrect and the attorney has advised us that the final development will be a public hearing. The neighbors did receive their notice and they knew that it was today. It was just not in the newspaper in time. Dave: The historic building is the theme in the centerpiece for the whole complex. We want it to stand forth as a prominent element and take design que's from it. We pick up on the brick with the administration building. The best materials are on the street level and are of a smaller scale. The area in question is where the two buildings slide by each other. They do not structurally attach. We tried a notch but it was dark and did not do what we intended it to do. The existing building is over a 100 years old and has had wear. On the east side we have oil staining whoch goes all the way through the brick. There is no possibility of cleaning it and I would propose that it get removed. There is non-matching brick that was added in different locations on the front and on the north side we have a 40 foot long concrete addition. On the south side it has been the least touched. A 3 PATTILLO ASSOCIATES STFRUCTUFRAL CONSULTANTS pu-------- ---- October 7, 1993 AFT - C 1993 1 Il 1.1 Charles Cunniffe & Associates 520 East Hyman, Suite 301 - --- Aspen, Colorado 81611 Attention: John Schenck RE: 234 WEST FRANCIS, CARRIAGE HOUSE PAE PROJECT #92070-A Dear John: To provide stability for the subject structure prior to lifting and moving from its existing position, internal cross-bracing should be undertaken by the contractor. The cross-bracing should occur in two horizontal planes: at the underside of the existing ceiling joists and at the bottom of the wall. Vertical cross-bracing should be undertaken in two locations in the north- south direction at approximately the quarter points of the building length. No cross-bracing is required in the east-west direction, due to the recent installation of sheathing and studs along these two long walls. Horizontal bracing may consist of 2x4's nailed to the sole or top plates of the walls which would run diagonally between the corners of the building. The vertical bracing may consist of 2x4 cross braces at each location. or minimum 1/4 inch steel cable also placed in an "X" fashion. The location of these braces should occur at or very near the location of the lifting beams. The points at which the lifting beams make contact with the north and south exterlor walls should be fixed securely, to prevent slippage on the carrying beams. If cables are used for bracing. eye lags minimum 1/2 inch diameter by 3 inch length, should be anchored into either the header beam or sole plates on each side. If 2x4 braces are used, angle plate connectors should be lagged into the header beam at the top and bottom with a bolted connection from the outstanding angle leg to the 2x4 brace. This completes my recommendations. Proper installation of bracing is important to assure the stability of the structure during the moving operation. Please feel free to contact ne should you have any further questions. Sincerely, PATTILLO ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. .2209<TAL65â€žLp*Y.& ArdIST%.35 1; *47*4*ts- ..C 1*2 16794 04 Robert ~. Pattillo, P. E. lur,h Â»:n W.8 -F 412:*NAL ~LA RMP/kmk 96â€¢ f "00â€ž4- Apar NOTE: FAXED 10/7/93 TO 925-5076 AT 1:00 PM P.12:2:we P.O. WCD<751 â€¢ GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81 802 â€¢ (303] 945-9685 â€¢FAx (302] 945-4921 TOTAL P.01 \1 ~) < MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 234 W. Francis, Ammendment to "Significant Development" approval DATE: August 25, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for an ammendment to the final "Significant Development" approval granted on May 12, 1993. Changes are detailed in the, attached "Description of Proposal," and new drawings. Also attached are the drawings previously approved by HPC. A setback variance will be required to approve this ammendment, as the addition sits one foot from the property line. This same variance was awarded by HPC at final review. APPLICANT: Quentin Vidor, represented by John Schenk. LOCATION: 234 W. Francis Street, Lots K-M, Block 44. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTION: HPC granted final approval on May 12, 1993. Planning and Zoning Commission granted conditional use approval for the carriage house dwelling unit. DevelÂ®pment Review Standards 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor areas, HPC shall find that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. Response: The "Historic District and Historic Landmark Development Guidelines" state, "Locate additions to original houses so that they do not alter the front facade." Although the j en'trance to the building is towards the west, the main public view is along West Francis Street. Placing the addition on this, the south elevation, has a significantly greater visual impact on ( the building than was created by the earlier proposal. The addition becomes a main feature of the building, and impression that it is the primary entrance, changing the the new entrance door placed on this side creates the orientation of the building. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The concept of converting this carriage house into an Accesory Dwelling Unit is certainly of benefit to the neighborhood and the community. There are not a large number of parcels which retain their outbuildings, and this carriage house should continue to read as an accesory structure, with its access facing the house and with a simple "main" facade which does not compete with the house. , 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal itself does not detract from the historic value of this structure, but the location of the proposed addition does impact public perception of the original function of this building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The changes proposed do not seem to have a greater affect on the architectural integrity of this building than those which .were approved earlier. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the ammendment as submitted, finding the Development Review standards have been met. 2) Approve the ammendment with conditions. 3) Table action to allow the applicant time to revise the proposal in order to meet the Development Review Standards. J 4) Deny the ammendment, finding that the Development Review c Standards have not been met. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC deny the ammendment, finding that Review Standard 1 has not been met. Additional Comments: PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 234 WEST FRANCIS STREET AMENDMENT TO FINAL SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 25, 1993, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the second floor meeting room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by Quentin Vidor, 234 West Francis Street, Aspen requesting approval of an Amendment to the Final Significant Development Approval for 234 West Francis Street, Lots K-M, Block 44, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Amidon at the Aspen Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO. 920-5096. s/William J. Poss, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on August 6, 1993 City of Aspen Account j Tgr '9 1/Tn#nY .gu'lludsv eq, ul pullâ€¢Uqnd 291MUADO) UOgEAJeeaid opols,H uadsÂ¥ irego 'ssod 'f u.re~IlVA/: 9605-016 0 0 hedâ„¢ *15 ru -air'D S 0Â£1 PNJO Buluurld url,Id/uodsv 041 le uopituY ,[u~' PEâ„¢00 'Uouputio]Ul 124.14 -103 Â·ua<34 to allsâ€ž.01 pur 410 'Â»]pola 'W-)1 901 120,15 sput.13 190/A kEE JOJ Ino,ddY luauldo -1*00 luret;UNIS Irut:1 941 01 juauipueurv We JO Imoidde Euuser,bai uadsÂ¥ 709.49 spue.:1 ,$0,0* kEZ 'JOPIA ut,uwÂ© Aq pantulqns uollumiddy Ur Japtsuoo 01 'oprioloo 'uedsv Â·150Â·115 ruate'D E OEI 7141 410 'Ulooi Bul 120.1, 1001; puo:>09 041 Ut aanwuto) uollwasall DPolst}4 uedâ„¢ 041 /30]eq u.]d 00 5 11: uiliaq 01 Butpaut e i. 'Â£661 'SZ linBnv. 9[rps@upe,â€¢A uo piall aq 111. But -J /@4 :>tiqnd Â¥ 1-11 NRAID 1Â£1323}Â·1 Sl 3DUON 1Â¥AO>lddÂ¥ 1N3WdO-13A3(] .LNVOUINDIS 1VN11 O.L .LABW -(]N3WV 1331!19 SIONV}bl 193Ai YEZ :311 aoLLON onand 4 . 41 "i ,*!=:ft- I Â·, i ,> f 2 ,+ - Â·W 'MI -fi--- > filto.. 12% * F _ 1#'zi ' "hi 11,6117-- - 44#6-3-ubil.-Ul ' il 61 .41 7 L- c Historic Preservation Committee < Minutes of April 14, 1993- the condition that the architect submit drawings to the monitor and restudy the fenestration on the south elevation; second by Martha. All in favor of motion and amended motion, motion carries. DISCUSSION Bill: For clarification Jake is concerned about the thickness of /~~'~ the detailing on the north and south elevation. 234 W. FRANCIS - CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT Kim: The principle residence is going to be remodeled inside and the majority of work will be focused on the carriage house and the addition to make a bathroom and legal' living quarters. Staff agrees with the request for a setback variance. John Schenck, Project Manager for Cunniffe & Associates: This house is at 234 W. Francis and is the Davis-Waite house and built 1896 by Governor Waite and he was the only populist governor. We want to keep the historic style of the house. on the main house the structural engineer stated that the house needs under pined. The interior remodel requires the roof to be restructured. The client also has requested an additional window on the north side of the structure. On the carriage house we want to make this deed restricted dwelling unit and that requires a bathroom and in doing so we will add a 9x9 ft. bathroom. We have it located on the eastern edge of the building on the north side trying to hide it from street view and keep the context of a small building. The cottage needs raised to make head room for a nice accessory dwelling unit and loft space that the client has requested. We propose to do that by putting in a stone base or water table under the existing structure and also building a new foundation. Since we are building a new foundation we are going to use storage in the basement. We also have a window at the western elevation of the carriage house. We will try to match the details and proportions of the existirg building. A door has also been proposed to enter into the back yard. We will add a parking space even though it is not required. The total of the ADU would be 694 Sq. Ft. CLARIFICATIONS: Roger: You said you had roof modifications, will the roof be opened up or what? John Schenck: I am not exactly sure but if it does get opened up it would be replaced as is. Roger: The carriage house does not have a foundation presently. Does the existing house have a foundation? 9 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of April 14, 1993 John: The ground has sunk and has reached to the point of the siding. The structural engineer said the foundation is just sinking. Roger: You are underpinning from the inside. John: Yes, we will underpin from the inside of the original house and for the carriage house we would lift it straight up and replace it and move it to the side. Roger: You would have to have a bond and we wanted you to be awarre of that. Martha: On the landuse form it says no-onsite parking? John: That is existing and we would provide parking and conform to the code. Chairman Bill Poss opened the public hearing. ~K is proposal and Belinda Freischman, neighbor: I am thrilt it is such a treat to see something that isn't lot line to lot line / in the west end. It is wonderful to have clients that want to preserve the old house. Our fears were that they were Going to raise the little house and destroy our view of the mountain. Our house is a duplex and we face Smuggler. Our co-owners face the alley c...â€ž we ao not want them looking at the parking. Esther Devoul: How far does the carriage house go on the east property line. John: One foot from property line. Esther: Where is the eight feet addition on the carriage house going? John: It is going on the alley side. Esther: Then in actuality the view from my place will not change. Public: I am also concerned about the parking area and the view from the duplex. , John: We will preserve all the trees on that edge. Martha: I am not clear where the setback on the drawing is. John: The setback on the side yard is a ten foot setback. Our 10 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of April 14, 1993 addition is nine feet wide and nine feet deep. Roger: On the existing conditions it states that the property is non-conforming on the rear. It also states that it is two feet from the east property line and the out building is situated one r--- +hc sir. Froper.1 line. Bill: It is more compatible to have the small addition closer to the property line and it allows more of the carriage house exposed from the rear and from the alley and other areas. Jake: What is above the existing front door? John: There is a door to the attic space and we are taking the little door out and putting in a square window. The three piece window would get a door in its place. Roger: How high are you raising the house for the foundation? John: One foot six inches. MOTION: Roger made the motion that the HPC grant approval of the conceptual proposal as submitted for 234 W. Francis Lots K &M Block l . 44 and to grant the 8 foot setback variance for the carriage house addition with the condition that the relocation review criteria are met at final review. That means you have to have an engineering report and submit a bond; second by Martha. DISCUSSION Jake: I would like to have a restudy of the divided light windows on the west side. They are casements, divided light and the proportions are different. Roger: I would put that in the motion but you cannot see them due to vegetation. Jake: When you have this much site area I find it a stretch to get a variance unless you have good reason. Roger: Because it is a non-conforming site it doesn't bother me. Bill: You also have to look at the historic nature of the site. I feel it is more compatible on the end and you are not increasing the non-conformity and it preserves more of the carriage house. Roger: Also if you take into consideration what the neighbors said the view plane from the condominium unit on the south side i neighbor, facing the north side of the carriage house where the 11 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of April 14, 1993 addition is going on, the addition is kept to the back and it keeps the open space in the yard and their view plane is less interrupted. Jake: What do you think about the comments on the windows? John: I think they have some merit but do not know exactly how they would be dealt with at this point and we will restudy it. AMENDED MOTION: Roger amended the motion to include restudy of the fenestration on the west side (windows); second by Martha. All in favor of motion and amended motion carries. Bill Poss: This is a good proj ect, John'. COMMUNICATIONS Bill: The award week will be May 9th through the 15th and Roxanne has been hired to set it up. The Historic Trust will pay Roxanne $800. to coordinate the banquet and cocktail party and draw up a council proclamation and press coverage. She has also been hired to get our character guidelines going and Diane got an extension until June. A one day workshop with Nori Winter will be scheduled. Roger: I have a statement to make, it is our job to read the memos in the packet and we should not have to read them at the meeting, just ask questions and clarifications. MOTION: Jake made the motion to adjourn; second by Martha. All in favor, motion carries. Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Assistant City Clerk 12 I .1 1 1, . .,e ' 4.4 f 1 -A . kji' 4 A,JW* r Â· , 1 N ti 1 F -I.th .6 /... .. 1 1 I. L , 3/ '* - F 4112/:4 / / -* i ,.111' 1. --- 5 11 F 4. 1~ ili AlÂ£ 3 0 f. Il j ; t *43 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS August 26, 1993 Ms. Amy Amidon c/o The Pitkin/Aspen Planning Office 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Vidor Residence Dear Amy, This is to verify that we have mailed proper notice to every neighbor within 300 ft. of the property located at 234 W. Francis Street, Aspen, Colorado. The notice was mailed more than 10 days prior to the H.P.C. meeting on August 11, 1993. ( li,y Cohn)Schenck Job/Captain My Commh,Pr -- 11M r,47 *: 4 ouu CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Â· 520 EAST HYMAN AVENUE Â· SUITE 301 Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â· 303/925-5590 FAX 303/925-5076 . Au-m-f.:,, 1 51 L . (7 i , 03 , P 3~~ --1 1 -SI 0 1 1 -1 1 %-1 ~ .1 --t' 1,0 ~f-- J. i 1 - C ~ -- 41 - - - V 0-=EE+ 2 - = - 527 1 Im k -- - _ -a-946 z - 1 I ' 1 1 #9Â» - 1 -3 18 1 LOT K- - MT- 41_ .11=EJM 2- .1 1 . : .1 1 P 1. 1, I FF,Ntle SF,=Ir -L 11 1 1 l 1 1 ~,ra-#J i Â«1 a.i a-APP rove<~ Â£5 ./1 '. a \\ *L>/9 1 VI Ozpp- KiES I EÂ©-MEFE CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 520 E. HYMN Â·SUITE 30 I Â· APEN. CO 81 61 1 - TELE 303/925-5590 - FAX 303/925-5076 2.61- U. PÂ» F+64 ci 300 W. COLORADO AL Â· Â¤ 2863 - TEUURIDE CO81435-mLE 303/728-3738 -FAX- 303/72F6722 /Age, rl, 21â‚¬,LOPAD o O COPÂ·rWRTTE 1992. CHMAES CL~NN,FfE ARCHITECTS Er -1 ~ 4-23~ I 151 -- VUU-Â»V WJ +MCI-09 LE)31]HDEV 3331NNn) 531#VH) 7661 3113/71*30) O 5 15'444 -M +Hz. alg-BU/[0â‚¬ *3Â·8[lf-BU/[0Â£ 3111-5[,1801 30!Wn]31 Â· [982~Ce 3Â¥OOm-)01 -m 00Â£ 9L0S-SZ6/EOf -M - 0655-5(6/EOE --3131 11918 0) 'N119/ - 10Â£ 31.18 - NV?LAH 3 025 Sl)311H)ZIV 33=IINNnZ) S3-IUVH) -â‚¬61:26$994 -Blod lA 1 1 . bit 0-0 L 1- Z 4 1 1 1 1-2 1 A 2,1 1 _ 23 ~ 1 f / 1 00 48. - S .19. 7?11*%&*f.24.-AR)Â¢P. -74'W.-2 a.*. ..... 7- 1-------4 4/6 7.~9â„¢4*1--993.-9-1-, ' - X 14314 ty '~'4'/- ~ .9 r, r -47, , I . tch 0 4 1 -=t--WO tÂ·IN-1 ir.EE~ 01 1 4 In. 1 . . 1 4-1~ - A 1 1 1 I Itt 1 1 9- I = ,-1,0 7 4 - - . . ~ ees:Flle 14 A.A- 1, /\.) i J . E 1 I t - t -1, i - i 11 1 0 -- $1 1/ U 1 11 l 1 . 1 1 1 2 1 9 1 20 =_F 1 l -7 r.-7 VI [36912-4 12#61 [3*r4CLEi CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ~ 520 E. HYMAN -SUITE 301 Â· ASPEN, CO 8161 1 TELE. 303/925-5590 - FAX 303/925-5076 ~ 2 3,4 1,4.- _ FIW9191 300 W. COLOR~DOAâ‚¬ Â· 800<2863 - TEUDRIDE (081435Â·TELE 303/728-3738Â·FAX 303/728-6722 ,&6PEN ) Câ‚¬20,5712Â»PO O COP'ry~nE 1992. CtÂ·Â©A LES CUNNIFFE /â€¢20â‚¬ECI . 1 5 1 0 Â»\- 9*Grwe A-A (1 r f-f R = j V :D de- MTÂ£~1 PSâ‚¬.tE:: CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS /4. 520 E. HYMAN Â· SU{TE 301 - aPEN. CO 81611 - TELE: 303/925-5590 Â· FAX 303/925-5076 2,4 14. fi*Ar'Â£:1 1 9 300 W. COLORADOALE Â· BG<2863 Â· TEUURIDE (081435Â·TEE)03/728-3738Â·FAX: 303/728-6722 843 AGPW, CASÂ®ADâ‚¬::3 O COP,UNUTE 1992. CH,RLES CUNNIFfâ‚¬ AROÂ·ImECTS Â«61Â· -1-UN-1 207 - r 14-- ' ~ ' 1 1 1 i. 11 1 1 i -I f'.4 ~ 14,1 4--+ , 1 -i- t. 31 li- - -.--- CAZ 1 IiI 0 1 1 -F-v I 1 ! jr 1 93 101, a, .7- ..Lf=77<--711 . 1 N.TE . 1 !' 1 S; 76 X aT 2= OLU 01 I 71 0 Hil> C C 0m 1 2 ExisT/tda 30\UDILId:1 0 I VI POS- 9331 TE-P'g:A CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 520 E. HYMAN Â· SUffE 301 Â· ASPEN, CO 81611 Â· TELE 303/925-5590 - FAX. 303/925-5076 23,4 W. 1=Â·F+Ate IS 300 W. COLOR'DO Aâ‚¬- Â· 83<2863 Â· TELLURIDE (081435 -TELE 303/778-3738, FAX- 303/728-6722 AST#, 644*p O O COPYWRITE 1992. CN~RLES CUNNIFFE IRCHfTECTS >1 . N!,b 4 1 Ash 7 31Â· 1 1 1.1 - 11 ~ .1 1 11' Il 4, 6 111:IiI) r n (1 4 -L-4 , [ W . : 1- .1.4 \\ 'I y 21 1 ly 1 ' . b.#\ /Â» 1 7/ 21 7/- - - - LJL : I .1 f: i W I i i 11 1 I i i I ; 1 1 < Meg . i E><15-TI kIA 12>131LDIAM-1 ADDLI ' \/1DOIA FfIG I Dr*lort CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 7. 520 E. HYMAN Â·SUITE 301 Â· ASPEN. CO 81611 - TELE- 303/925-5590 - fA)C 303/925-5076 2.54 U. FFÂ«Â©1 5....... 300 W. COLORADOPUE Â· 8CK 2863 Â· TELLURIDE (081435Â·mE: 303/728-3738Â·FAX- 303/728-6m GRE A~- rÂ» k 1 r i 1 /-0 A.-ri /i '312 Plan 81-KLL<& rigH L Neld 6,817Â« 5-11#ales Â·------Â·~1 -- M-:' ---~~4~~kkifDO New ADO'-1 EXISTIA<M IBUIL-DINCd, ~[) 1 4 1:it (/ C 14 1 11111 ! 111111.11,1.1 1 -4 Viltilit --- 11 1 111 1 Â£ 1 1 1 r : i il . '' i 1 1 11 & B â‚¬, 2 9 1 3 ' , il - 04 1 , (F , - o i JO > f 1 10 1 1-1 Il R I t , L, 1 1 --1 Â£*ii 2 2 11. 1.11 i lili 1 . - 1 - 1 - VIPOI~- FEâ‚¬l D]Er'Â£42 -CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS W. 520 E. HYMAN - SUTE 301 Â· ASPEN. CO 81611 Â· TELE: 303/925-5590 Â· FAX: 303/925-5076 - . 1-2,1- _Id. -!=194*46.-- â€ž .- 300 W. COLORADOAÂ£Â·820(2863Â·TEUURIDE. C081435Â·la.Â£ 303/728-3738Â·FAX- 303/728-6m iM pe,Yte C.Ouofzt#Acio ---- O COPYWRfTE t 992. 01-ES CUNNIFFE ARCHTECTS r'*KI At>p; H 7, / Ue\3 E->45pkt>1 Bl) 1 LD 14<:St \ ADDi T 1 cd ' 471 }--l 1 1 1 l U FF I UU i E C f 0 0 4 U ; 1 4 k . T TNI / L m L CO 3 1 _00 .18 - -I~- I< i j VI Po p- F.lel m Ffc En CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS I. 520 E. HYMAN Â· SUITE 301 - ASPEN. CO 81611 - TELE. 303/925-5590 Â· FAX. 303/925-5016 #D+ U. P'Pâ€¢+Ott 300 W. COLORADOAE Â· 80% 2863 Â· TEULRIDE CO81435Â·TEE 303/128-3738Â·FAX: 303/728-6122 ~M '68 2 11 4:*OR.40 O COPYWR{TE 1992. CHARLES CUNNIFFE W.HITECTS rlo ~ 1vngÂ« + 31 r' e W Am cP' rl July 21, 1993 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING Ms. Amy Amidon INTERIORS Planning Office City of Aspen ' 130 S Galena St. Aspen, Co 81611 Re: Vidor Residence , 234 West Francis Dear Amy, Please find enclosed an H.P.C. application for amendment to final approval of the Vidor Residence at 234 west Francis. We received this approval on May 12th of this year. Included are the changes and explanations for them. If you have any questions, please contact us. Since:pe] v, rrT 71 chenck Job Captain j CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Â· 520 EAST HYMAN AVENUE Â· SUITE 301 Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â· 303/925-5590 FAX 303/925-5076 Project Location: 234 W Francis Lots K,L,M, Block 48 Aspen, Co 81611 I. Description of Proposal 1. Outbuilding a. Conversion of outbuilding to a deed restricted Accessory Dwelling Unit. b. The building will be raised 1'-6" and a new foundation poured (basement). The increase in height is necessary to accommodate a new loft space. The exposed foundation will be covered with a stone veneer. (no change) c. The existing canopy or trellis on the east side will be retained where previously a smaller porch was to be added. d. A new window will be added to the North side of the building. (no change) Where previously a door was to be added, there will now be a window matching the size and character of the existing window, which is currently in very poor repair. Both windows will have operable shutters. These shutters Will contribute to the privacy of the occupants, as well as retaining the historical presence of the building. e. A new bath approximately 9' x 9' will be added on the South side. In keeping with the design intent and the character of the site, this addition is located within the side setback, requiring a variance. This variance was approved by the H.P.C. on May 12th for the addition previously on the north side. f. There will also be a new entry door at the south side of the building with a covered porch, the roof Will extend from the bath addition. g. The interior remodelling of the outbuilding will include the addition of a kitchen and a loft. II. Compliance with relevant review standards 1. Design compatibility with existing structure. The outbuilding will increase in height (1'- 611) and gain a stone base which is not uncharacteristic of Victorian design. The loft space which dictates the height increase, creates desired space without a large addition to the original form. The bath addition utilizes a shed roof which works with the existing gable without detracting from it. The Windows that are being removed at the south side Will be imitated at the bath addition in the same position in elevation. The windows will be replaced with a modern, more efficient window. These new windows will maintain the size and character Of the original units as closely as possible. 2. Consistency with neighborhood character. The visible additions and changes to the Vidor residence have been kept to a minimum to reduce the impact on the neighborhood. While previously less visible from the street, the changes will be screened from the street and neighbors through the use of existing and new foliage where necessary. 3. Enhancement of the cultural value of the structure The proposed work to the Davis-Waite house will, increase the cultural value of the property in that the structural modifications will preserve this historic landmark. Turning a relatively unused outbuilding to an Accessory Dwelling Unit which provides much needed living space that Will not be neglected. 4. Enhancement of the architectural integrity of the structure The architectural integrity and Victorian character of the historical structure remains intact as the proposed additions are limited ; and unobtrusive. 5. Effect of proposed details on the original design The proposed details of the new addition shall have little or no effect on the original design of the outbuilding, as they will mimic the existing details as closely as possible using modern building techniques.(no change) 6. Effect of proposed details on character of neighborhood The proposed detailm shall have a minor effect upon the character of neighborhood. The details of the addition will blend in with the original design of the historic building. III. Effect of proposed design on Historical structure and neighborhood character. The proposed addition and remodel of the Davis-Waite house is planned to remedy structural problems incurred over the years and to create more usable space for the owner and tenants. The main house remains relatively unchanged on the exterior. Modifications to the outbuilding occur out of sight from the street. The addition of one on-site parking space is planned to accommodate the ADU although this is not required. It is the intent of the applicant to maintain the historic character of the building and to restore it to ensure its continuing presence in the Historic district of Aspen. The proposed development is illustrated as Exhibit 'A'. 1 U /M -21.- - CO -I.B.- --44 -;-00 9/46" 0 :%. 44 8 - 1-3. 0 75 W -re"â€¢ 9 #c,- '., r /0 i ... p 47 -%. i ./-/I I 13 1 1- li lilli 0 - 3: u 'LIE 1 . a --1 /4 R + Lin:~. - -1 i. 1, 22,1 1 A--t-- NORTH_ELEVATION I I'll 40:52'Â·ju'li~~- - -*'I~'919 1 -14~,2~~Â·Â·Â·~Â·IÂ«L . M .r . ../.- '1'1 lili 41'NE' : 61 1 9111/ c 1 - . [F====3 -IP-& A-N Â·CN / Â¥7.I-xft --AL,f- 5,=0P Â«r.:ma 1 JO- -6 , SITEZBQQEELAN 1.-10 O Â·3-3 p=== = - U 00-- 11 1 1, 41 :al .2 11 1 9- 1 1.11 -Il. --7N , - Fi @33 Fl P. nl--24 V-- - 9 1' 11 11 d i 1, 1 11 . /-1 11 --â€ž 1 11 .1 1, Fit--11' 1 ; 4 t-:; T A " ~~~'"1 ..0 k.- 11 " 1, h uj 1 11 4 1 11 11 --th =7 10 11 11 11 11 1 . Il â€¢ p â€ž " 11 #./.- F~~~' . I r.-1 1 & 4 j- , ..1 â€ž11 N. , U UPPER-LEVEL_ELAM ATIia LAN 1 1/4.-1'-O ,/4--1'-0 (A- 0 UILCHN.Q.-SECION lilli (Mir '-1 51031!HZ)21Â¥ 3331NNAD 5313Â¥HD .'."thÂ» $ /.1'L'01 }â„¢ t.1/0)104'1"/ 1-~ ,â€¢â€¢ ocrÂ»Ox>) - 00, @. /M 0-fr Â¢ I 1 1 I..;,//,E....~ le W 1 ..... --1 0 1 -. I 1 4, 6,-1. ,-1 5 f -- 1 --' , 1 47-------71 1 L-1-1'lilli 1 ..1 1-1 W. b *17 / 1 1 1 -/ 1 1,11,11 4 e L--------7 BASEMENT_PLAN ENIBLLEMEL-ELAN T LQELLEMEL.ELAN ul -1 â€ž.W 1 '. -I. 10 - L_-___2_2â‚¬352..... A 11 --1 -f ' -.0 ....5-~TrIT....ifir 11 - * - I w -, .L I , 7 - au- .-r - ... ..----r- ...1-, -Â¥ 1 r- nO -,- 4 1*-1'wrâ‚¬( 0-1.11 1 72 EASI. ELEMArlQN WES-LELEVATIQU 1/4Â·-1 -0 3 - 4 - I --- I --- - - DUILDING-SECTION-6 ----- v 02Â»*- I=El 7=r 4-=1 --1 -4 3 bum, ~2724--- EhEEZE52 IJW~WIN<. 1 1 i,, E-, - -e-I = - rA r ,-'Â« );t , %1 - 4 1 -- 64- 1 11 -I Â· . lilli .'. 2 lilli IW NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH.ELEVATION I.-/ k.---- S.1331!H33Â¥ 3331NNAD 53121Â¥HD ......ial vo ..H./ m, t'â€¢i. i' 0,-inu 1-Z .00 6â€¢Of...).0) 4~Â©Ct .'01 'â€¢1 '-i~ t -1. I I /â€¢i. 0, I.$, 1. 1,1/1 /â€¢-â€¢14 )08 .t /1 - *- ""~7 -I- 70:=UT, P U --54 , FI FLAN , -Chtt, Ll \-3\-[ - ,#Tâ€¢ - /11\/ 10'â€ž- - -0 1 - ----1._.-4 - .... 2.211*<i +IMI ...rir. 6 t244 f ' -4 -4 -.18\ M 1 1 1 -Miv-t --1 7,1.-- â€¢4-4-1 â€¢-râ€¢-,r ..M - T ---" 11 9-nÂ»Â»~ , 907 - -7 1.1 'i 11 1 l~J~~.u-i lili ' ' : ill I Â® â€ž327t~ Vt:=PH5:Â·EÂ·Â·t- 2 2*R' 0.1.4- C-1 601-1-IT- e VE=1-1 1-!A-L- 7 7 '14 ' p- G EXS,- ,-4 WS_ _ 0\ #Pe B rÂ».1 2-" W.+ 2. 6- -,1.--- 9 E Ill.. .C...r .Â£Â¥2-9 ..=*.141 -r.-- 1, Â£:tr -21 0 5<3>-<,-~4Â·.v, b MA-0 11 1 -[1 +1 ~ J,A.I' Â· / ij,- 1 /f 1 :~22t.4 -0 1111 I 1 1 i' 1 / 1.7 '-40 - 1 1 Â» 5 3 1 4 1 7 . L / 1Â«1 - + . 1 G) JAMb G 59< 9,7 Ire L.A -1- /El JAP'ID e rEU 2.â€¢ 6 UN.1- rn-WAL /*/a l::9 Ptii -I ~ â€ž*612--l Arr~ ~n_69 . t--we .....â€ž41 md 1 -1,".4-1. 6 r 1 --I------ Ili 4- M-' Mmmullf-+ -2.Illt'ElllIIAÂ·d| ' '' '111511!~ 4 'b ' -' d. 4- A 12%8 41 39 4 4, 4 1 IIi ! 1 1 11 . 440 ill I ---- 1-mr" LJ,r-.#---44 -rulÂ·' M .*I ~-0 - C.7 I ..L:-1 I - I ..6 hoLÂ¥ W. . -1.1. +<1<Ft/ 0 . . I -D ,-L. H/'Â»4'1 " '1 A. i ' Râ€¢â€¢4,â€¢1202 . -4 4' 9.-*0 /0 111 / \ A I 22,31:1 *51171: Â·- 4 -+I â€¢Â·eÂ·Â·'- ; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~;~ 2Uill 5-35:Â·'1;ZI. 3,2-'m L ,)8 151.-'.CM ..11 ..1.... Â«LI[ \-=249 . 1, 1 1 N, , 4 0 6'M- 9 %191-,rt; , 4- ~ elit. 9 N+-12 06 ILA 1-1- (7 Sed'r lor' G PEU W Â»44- G tzY.L- 91"r loe lilli Of 51O311HDMV 3331NNAD 531MVHD 1% â€¢C* 0. *Â¥ â€¢. 11, -I-/V $12-- m ti.ma LS La 4/9, / /13- 1 1/ - / 1 1 0 3 11.11 1 +6 IllEE~1 , Lai "1_ NORTH Blt-1104 eul/Tit A-"4â‚¬ ION 9 11 4 -- 00 2 y ID 00 Z W UM,=r el-CA/â‚¬124 :0â€¢:190=. 1809# 1 ' re;194+ #WE:N#â‚¬TION :WNKÂ·+44 *(B=. ~- - C= 11 + - > 2 ....IM . 7 <-, ..INIZ- ZM!. SCUT# BL-}mv>'<reptÂ·4 E-Â·ST- P=LEN+F 10>' '1 11 1 1 N{ ) AB4 'INT 01 1 1 510311HDBY 333!NNAD 53121Â¥HD s IDHV>4.2 2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Minutes of August 25, 1993 Meeting was called to order by chairman Bill Poss with Donnelley Erdman, Linda Smisek, Jake Vickery, Martha Madsen, Roger Moyer and Karen Day present. Joe Krabacher and Les Holst were absent. 234 W. FRANCIS, AMENDMENT TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT - P.H. Amy: The applicant forgot the affidavid of mailing but will drop it off. It is a public hearing because you are reviewing a side yard setback variance. The change involves moving a shed addition to the carriage house from the north side of the building to the south side of the building. They are keeping the trellis which you allowed them to demolish. I felt this change had a significant effect on the character of the building. I have suggested that HPC deny this amendment finding that review standard one has not been met. John Schenk, Cunniffe & Assoc: The addition is to the south side which is the street side. The owner requested this because he desires to make a nicer unit more secluded from the occupant. We tried to accomodate this as minimal as possible. On the historic map it shows the original entrance of the cottage on the north side which we are not exactly replicating however it does give some precedence to it. To give the occupant more privacy we wanted to place a new gate at the street entrance, keeping the renter out of the yard for the owner. The map indicates that there were additions to the back. Chairman Bill Poss opened the public hearing. Clinton Vidor, owner: After living in the house several weeks I want more privacy and want the carriage house oriented that it fronts the streetand away from the back yard. I don't want people looking in the back yard. It is a question of privacy. There will be no changes made to the main house. Amy: Do you have to have the windows on the bathroom and if they are eliminated that would give privacy. John: I suppose but that wasn't the choice that we had made. Clinton Vidor: It is also the question of space and having the L shape come right into the yard. John: There were also doors to the back and how there are windows on the new plan. Amy: Are you close to the front setback. Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of August 25, 1993 Amy: The chimney is a major element. Clinton Vidor: That would not work because I like the spacea between the house. I will think about it but I am confused about what is compatible. Amy: You will notice throughout town that changes are not made to the primary elevation and in this building are the south and the west. That was why it was approved to put it on the back side of the building. Bill: The building now has its own character. Clinton Vidor: It is not functional to me as it stands. I could compromise on the basement window well. Erin Hazen, attorney for applicant: I would ask that this be tabled instead of denied so we can come back with revisions. The applicant has a new idea on the yard and what his needs are since he has been living there. Bill: The addition of the bathroom on the front of the building makes a large statement. If the bathroom remained on the back and you did something to the windows of the side for privacy we might be willing to consider the entrance if it was understated. It does not meet standard number one. A simple overhang is appropriate. Roger: our job is to maintain the historical significance of the landmark. Clinton Vidor: I could perhaps have the bathroom to the back tucked in and no windows looking out at my back yard assuming we get the entrance. Bill: That is basically what we had approved before so you are only amending the entrance on the west elevation to the south elevation. Roger: That would work. Clinton: Could we leave the door and not use it. Amy: I would prefer that. MOTION: Don made the motion that the HPC approve an amendment to the final development of 234 W. Francis and that the bathroom remain where it was under the original proposal and a primary entrance be added to the south facade and such entrance be a very 3 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of August 25, 1993 Bill: Can you demonstrate that the variation if granted is more compatible in character with the historic landmark than it would be if you were to development in accord with dimensional requirements. John: We are not increasing the non-conformity and also it is more appropriate to have their addition on the end of the setback. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS MOTION: Jake made the motion that HPC approve the amendment to the final of 234 W. Francis finding that it meets all the standards; second by Karen. Motion failed 5-2. DISCUSSION Amy: I feel this is a change as to what was approved earlier. I thought the ideas was to tuck additions to the back of buildings and it changes the entire character of the building having the entrance on the side. It does not seem like an outbuilding anymore, but a separate structure. Don: I agree that this is a change on the street elevation and does not meet standard number one. John: This was a separate building and there was an entrance on the east side. Amy: Obviously they are separate buildings but I was referring to how they relate to each other. Roger: Possibly do a walkway off Francis and try to work a compromise. Amy: We try to do additions to the rear and not dominate the structure. Roger: Is there room on the east end of the building for the bathroom so that it is on neither side. Clinton Vidor: Move the building toward the main house and put the bathroom on the back and keep the entry. Roger: In that way you will still have your yard and could landscape and maintain the same historic character. John: I don't know if that will work due to the chimney. 2 Historic Preservation COmmittee Minutes of May 12, 1993 apartment which will require P&Z approval. MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC grant the final development approval for 234 W. Francis as submitted with the following conditions: 1) That a relocation plan of the carriage house be submitted prior to a building permit. That a stabilization plan of the outbuilding be included and also that the construction of the additional dwelling unit is contingent on Planning & Zoning approval and that the applicant secures an appropriate bond set by staff; second by Don. All in favor, motion carries. Conceptual Development - 1080 Power Plant Road City Shop Amy: I feel this is a really good design and I asked you to consider the Secretary of Interior Standards because the design guidelines do not address industrial buildings. This is also eligible for the National Register and a very important property in Aspen. Dave pointed out to me that there is oil staining on the brick and there have been some repairs over the years of patching the building which are inappropriate. This would be a benefit top the historic building. The new buildings are extremely ~ compatible and an improvement to the site. My only comment on the design is that if you look at the site plan the cold storage shed overlaps but does not connect the historic building and I wondered if Dave could explain why that occurred. Dave Gibson, architect: Affidavit of mailing presented to Amy Amidon. Amy: The notices were incorrect and the attorney has advised us that the final development will be a public hearing. The neighbors did receive their notice and they knew that it was today. It was just not in the newspaper in time. Dave: The historic building is the theme in the centerpiece for the whole complex. We want it to stand forth as a prominent element and take design que's from it. We pick up on the brick with the administration building. The best materials are on the street level and are of a smaller scale. The area in question is where the two buildings slide by each other. They do not structurally attach. We tried a notch but it was dark and did not do what we intended it to do. The existing building is over a 100 years old and has had wear. On the east side we have oil staining whoch goes all the way through the brick. There is no possibility of cleaning it and I would propose that it get removed. There is non-matching brick that was added in different locations on the front and on the north side we have a 40 foot long concrete addition. On the south side it has been the least touched. A 3 L--1 F -1 x X x 9 - B x r T--7 .7 A 2, - *-------st AN/1144 009*1 1' 1, fi -1 ~ i 11 6 /-f- 1 12 - --1 r .1 1 > / 1, A -9 Â·'r m 1 1 1, 1. 14 1 O L.-1 i 11 i,1 -1 A - - .1,1~ 1 - 1 - Peere- - 19435[0Â» Aâ‚¬,1 ~ 11\\ X 1 \ wr 1 ~ > 1 0 oil 11 i X 1 -- h 4Â» 1 11801 4 4/11-1 -- - - -7 lili[K 41 4 4: 12 5 "111111. ;,Mwj'll'll 1,12Â©96=4.- - U V ' lA - 1 1 x :1 -r. 6 ---- -4 till - < / 1 41 fLITEÂ»r' ErÂ»Â·r EnÂ» . 2 LJ ' ' - ' In - 1 -,1 CF vrer- of XIIX - - r-1 - .1~__ ' bl :t K -- 0 - X -- -- -1, -- ---- X -- - - - - =r EÂ»PD %97 9 1715/ scrr: 19-Â« r -4 -0- ) j n LL) -4 4 7 10! M i rM -lL-[1 1 -- -- - - 4- 4 â€žL #cr-=4 1----4 f j El -O 61 40 14 9.â‚¬ 6446 9-9 4 7' 'E;* UP - ltÂ£Ap G 7Lep C U -------- i __-_t E A -1 Its up 1 > 1 ~ 1 1 - 0 i 1 1 - --il 1 1 412*.2.- 2.*65 Oun- *46714 =IN FA A 4 7 1 7'* 979 [IP' | / 1 1 - - 1 N< wv,14 eri U 454*% ovÂ»K P-- - - -- - --- - -- -- - Poof , 7'-0 Folf- i Â£22114-d I'-51 *11-1- 3 1.-51 r 4*4 â‚¬ 1 -0 -eÂ»06 7.\O' 1 --- U=-- 1 DRAWING FIM# P~+60 5 49 *Llivlb f~lae- 6,- 045 1 1 fforf -1 ANTIÂ« JOB NO. 9301 f I Fe Â·51-mf rÂ»r' DATE 1 1 -4//A SHEET NO. AB1 SHEET OF Â©C()PYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS (0 --3 Sl)31Â»OMV 33:!INNRE) SB-IMVH) 9Z05-5Z 6/E 0 E XV:1 06 5 5 - E Z 6/E0 E 3131 [19[8 03 'N3dSV LOE 31InS NVINAH *3 6 157%9@a 1 .121 74 104 Z956-WEL/EOE :XVI Â· WELE-9ZZ/â‚¬0Â£ :3131 - 5Etly OD 'laIMA1131 Â· Â£98Z XOEI '3AV OaVNO-IOD 'M 00Â£ j'. ~%\ , 1 11- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $ 131 1 4 1 4 > 11 - ti - th 1 f i --- - - 4 - - 1 1 47 . 4-1--4 - OU 74/ 1 1 - 1 1 5791 1 1 1- 1 7 64 ''i ' -' 1 . 41 /3-1 1 1 1 N 1 -===1- 1---4 47 - 1 1 - 0 1 1 LI 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 92 i 2 03 1 0 V I Dot P.*31% ABOE CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS m %00 2 70 3 mz Z P O V 0 0 / 1 71 2221- 41 7 BANc C s - N + 9 reÂ·N , C 01-â‚¬38-Do 520 E. HYMAN SUITE 301 ASPEN, CO 81611 Â· TELE: 303/925-5590 Â· FAX: 303/925-5076 300 W. COLORADO AVE,. BOX 2863 - TELLURIDE, CO 81435 Â· TELE: 303/728-3738 Â· FAX: 303/728-9567 9 6 0- 1-tÂ¥â€¢-1 51)31IHDNÂ¥ 13:dIN N [13 531MVH) 1HDIMAdo 3 @ 133HS 1 >i I p/3 3 -- 3 i IT ' -- -il-- 9 1% 1 1,1 , i i 1 lili , r 11 1 1 i 1 1 j 11 - 1 1 Â£ rtD E :1 -- - 7 1~11 11 - 1! 1 1 14 - r U - AN ./ 1 1 - - 11\ 1 -12 A 4-0 10--liN 1 2 1 -4 - .1 i. 111 ;1 -4 1 1 1 1. .Â«I - - - 1 1 11 1 1 1 '-I--. 1 1 11 0 1 - - E n f - --1 ! /7 1 /7 - 4 ! - 1% ----- 1 -- 1 it 1 1- L -1 i--_L / - 1 I l En -T-:- 14 - _ .4 - 1 1 - . 11 01 1 FL : i / 4 1: 1-: - 14 7- 9 -Â» M F.Jil/2 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 - - -.#- 1 1 il , 4 1 - / - b -lf" 1,1 li m 1/4 11 1 1 1 1 / ~ Â»Â«Mil - l. -:- 1/ 1 ' 4 1 i~ ~N 1 1~ --37'ill i :11 1 11 ~ .9 1- / 1 1 1 , 1 --- 1 -~' 1 i 1 '' ihi' 13 1 11 24 i 1 12~f: U It , I _nl 1, 1, 1 t~----1~ .-~ 1~ : 71 1 dj 1 023 1 n 1,1 1 111 1 11 11 -- 03 1 -- 4 . f 1 11 1 1 Ill '1 11 1 1 Â·IIA-- 1 + 111 111 11 1 1 -1 -11 lili -- 111 11 -- 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 \ r 1 1 1 11 -~1 -- I 11\1Â« 7_-2_1~24-1 : 1 1 r ! 1 . - 4 7 -9 7 -1 7 11, .'11 i. '11 1 .1 'll ~ 1 il -- - 4 :1 -0--nfl- 4 - 1 .1 1 1 1. 41-1-4 1~ 1 1 1 - 1 -- P .ir Â· 1 $111 \ I 1 1 4 ____ 1__ 1 1 1 " 1 1 It 1 ' 1 1 - - 1 r $ 1 11.1 1 1 4,11 1 1 1 1 11 F f.l I I 03 i# VIDOF\ CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS m 7 31, - 11 --- Ii - 1 1 1 -1 h -t- i-_\ li 1 %t 0 3 0 0 W 4-1 m g F- MH 61 s - CO C 0 40 FNa 520 E. HYMAN SUITE 301 Â· ASPEN, CO 81611 TELE: 303/925-5590 FAX: 303/925-5076 300 W. COLORADO AVE. Â· BOX 2863 Â· TELLURIDE, CO 81435 Â· TELE: 303/728-3738 Â· FAX: 303/728-9567 24'le:>or pdal _1Â¥62.-12 -1641 MI 51)31IHDMV 313INNAD S31}IVH) 1HDIMAdOD) 0 *ON 133HS DNI/V\VZIa ~ 1 - 1 1-1 - .4 4% 1 A 2 ---- - T 1-1 -- 4 - l - - W 1 . \ 0 3 e I m Ji 1 A 1 11, fi -- 2 1 -1 1 11 1 r IIi 1 W -41 - - 1 7- 7 111 -----11 9 4 2 - .i 1 1 -- - :11'il-: 21. 'ti 0 Il f -217 1 1 I -- - f f /.f . 1 0 1 lili / 1 1 1 r . - 1 111, 1 -1- 11 -- 5 1 1 1 / _ 12 - iii f 1 -1 -\4 0 . 71 4GE--, 7- 0 u r F ~ -~ 1 7-\N 4-4 L 1 - 41 j 1 -_ -4 \ 1 n. 1 1 4 - e j CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 5 - 1 - 0 - . 1 24 01 6 -- V |Dot *61 D E Klc E- m Z 0 \9 0 I 0 -1 m - 2 334 1.41 9-Fb/*Us - /Â» PERIl I (20[33 FADO 520 E. HYMAN SUITE 301 ASPEN, CO 81611 TELE: 303/925-5590 FAX: 303/925-5076 300 W. COLORADO AVE. BOX 2863 Â· TELLURIDE, CO 81435 Â· TELE: 303/728-3738 Â· FAX: 303/728-9567 401-4/12[7*1 411105 51331]HDPIV 3#INNA) 5313Â¥H) LHDIMAdO_) @ 'ON 133HS DNIMV>la irt: A 44 & . :1 . . 1, k , - 1 j r ---i - -, ~AYÂ· 1 7 - 3 X ,~Z A 3 4 -- 1-Â¥1 11 ''11 , AN/INgr BeplaasM !~1 111111 A F. -r L th > 0 !1 11~ 1 1 &2 14 46 1 11 7--1 - 11 1 0 h 1 1 1 1 5*rf,4416 7 ~ X 1 -2 , 11 412 M Y tff KAMOVED 1*erÂ» *Aa 22231\14\ ----j X 4-I 1 1 A X br-=11 , . . 1 XI 1 -1- Nlap' A Foorl 1242. 4 --11-11 11 .PE+ ~ "_-5 BAT \.. ----- 4:12 1 - ' 0," 1 4 u 4!12. PFT 11 111' lil ---' 1 1, K.*1*71 ; 11 11 lilli ! I. 11 1 C j erâ€¢Â·rbr Mol,â€ž _lt -1 1 ), 1 2 01.11 -- /32 9-YE=v- Uf LI=-- Â» T A K 21 X - 4 )< M X X 21*14 64#0&~- 9 6850~p sTrd*-Â¢T S FrFL/leor itÂ»r 1-L--'0- %d 4 4 -4 1 GE[ j {) 0 0 9 - 1, 1411-'Pow To Be 44 ba; C ;Ary, -1 4 9*NNUP .6.:ser "'a A Â£- i PIMI,4 -8-LY RMOVED _ 9- 1-Â· It-41 -_____ W _3 ..2- - 7 f. 6146) 141 FLAT CK< 8 94 - 1 I 4.A, G 71* -174 /*MA#Pp L CO I 7" 91Er LIP 1 - 1 i -t- 1 -+--itic 1% 1 1 1 1 "ap L->1 1 1 1 2 7~< 1 7 - 7 fl 1 /9 i CL -r.u-Le 70 2. )1 132*Â¥-- 2.2 x65 01 *011611>â€¢4 ?PNOW 0 &0 7" SEEP UP_ ~ | - 1 24%~* /*MOVED --1 - 4- 0- - 1-'v'144 1.a>rl 1 1 -----1 ' 1 1 N 4 tal=Â«.1 0,1 - 00 6 - i fo m Fwic, ap MYÂ»Â· ~ i *44. / 1 4" 1 --- i *p,Â© 8 7-io' 4*APS 710'' FIA. P-6. ' 1--- 11 | 1 ~-l | DRAWING PMMOUM O, 8,4& 1 1 JOB NO. 9301 DATE fitÂ« :A-=9. r-Â«4 - 1 ic'Vt/' 4-'== 1'-01, SHEET NO. D1 . 2 . SHEET OF - Â© COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS N-y 1 101 -7\ 12 Litelds 9 9057%94=b Sl)31IHI)2IV 33=IINNA) 53-RI-'HZ) 9Z 05-5 Z 6/Â£0 E :XY:I Â· 0655-SE6/â‚¬0Â£ 3131 - LI.919 OD 'N3dSÂ¥ Â· LOE 31InS NVINAH '3 Â£956-9ZZ/EOE :XV:I Â· 8Â£ZE-82Z/Â£0Â£ :3131 Â· 019 03 '3 alkl n 1131 Â· Â£98i XOG Â· '3AV OaÂ¥210100 'M 00Â£ .I - - 117==1.t===-11 1 1 2 1 14#17 1 1 $Â» 1 41 4 2232 I + 34 1 1 f f 0. 1 W 14 1 - 1 1 1 / / , -11 1 1 - 4/ ' / A / / 11 1 1 11 k / 1 It $ - 11 1,1 z z 2/ a 1 - 1 J 1 11 1 1 -4 3 <-_ji - -- 11 *.-i- 1 ~1 11 11- k 4 9 El 1 1 1, : 11 1 - ~ 34 li j 11 - 11- -lig -4 1 - , & 7 UCi 222.2 11 41 F 2/ 6 1 1 1 1 07 11 'i 1 ' 1-1 34 CI -- 11 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 St IiI I 4.--% 1 -4 $ /51 1 s.2 11 1 0,11-1----------1 11 --*-------Il------14 --- 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 1 . E & I j ' A 1 1 95 -0 V I Dolt P.Â»pIP Al\'DE CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ~ 00 0 rn Z p r. 2 1O EN 1 1 2â€ž U 7 940 1 6 ~ -1 Â»09* 1 60.1-0(:Â«130 520 E. HYMAN Â· SUITE 301 ASPEN, CO 81611 Â· TELE: 303/925-5590 FAX: 303/925-5076 300 W COLORADO AVE. BOX 2863 Â· TELLURIDE, CO 81435 Â· TELE: 303/728-3738 - FAX: 303/728-9567 4414 -aW-t=[ clÂ»I-3 51)31IHOMÂ¥ 3 MINNAD 6313VHD 1HDIMAdol @ 133HS *ON 133HS 1 111 f 1 11 8 1 11 111 -1 Uâ‚¬ 11 14 8 -========= =111 di , U 7--4 1-9,11 111 III-H_ - 1 -'or 1" E 1-~ 1 ~1 1-~ ~ 1 1-t Lai_2~ 7 . 273 1 A W 111 - -- I I 1 F 3 11 -- -1 i ,~' .7 1! e 1 - U ,3 4 - 1 1 11 4 -- t\\ r ID 1 71 :> j 1 1 1 -7 /2 Efitz A lilli 1 4 11 0 lili : i 5 Hi 1 11 ' ~ L , ---==24= Z 11 11 - \ 1 1 ---17 \ I I ] Al E 0 111~- 1 11 11 - 1 -- 11 i ; 11 , 1 -4- - -r Mrflf 11 1 11 11 . 1 :1 ; 1 1 1- -,1 2.1 : 1 ~~ 7 1 1 . ~ 1-t - V ' -0 : 1 1 Â£ /1 1 it i Ily' / 4 -19 11,1 11'' 1 4 1 1 1 1 ..1 111111 1,1 14 / 04 : 41111 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1.1 . . It . 1 i ; ; 111 1 + ill 1 11 lilli 11 1 1,11.1 11 1 1 11 L H 2 111~1~r -- j j 11 1-1 1 11 IIi tt Iii 1 =- H - I 5-'-7-1- Â« . h I W 1: ~ , EDI 1 4 11 1 111 1 1 -- - 1 1 --- - - Ill- : i, 1 1 : 11 L -r , IA 111 1 11 1 ~ 111) ' 11 '11 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 --- 1 i\\ 1 1--11 \ 0 1,11111 I lili j IL.- INK 1! .1 -Â» i i i 11 i lilli 1 1 : - -Iii 11111,11 1, -- 1 h i 0 1 3-1 1 1 11 1 1 ==~ 1 lic=~- 1 -1 1 LI _ _ 1 -L_L ~ -- 1 i ' -7 El 1 -1* 4 -~ lili El _ i. 1 lip= = = 4= - iii 11 1 -11 n' 1 1 111 1 lit = = -1 * -=in i t~ l Fi <~|, /-: ~1 , 1 1 1 11 : 111 1 1 I i -11:= affEEL ill 11 1,1 ,i !}: ~~ 1 1 1 1 1 11 lilli 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 11 ---- p -li 1 1 . 1 --- ---7-74 : 4 1 1 1 111- 1 1 it I ,w It ill ji 1 ~ ''::t - 4 111 111 1-4~ li (1~il,ill,; 1-,1 fil .1 1"3Sy ---------- 126, 1 |1 m -4 - f 111 111 1 4 - -Ii - - - - - 4 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS E 93 f -ir ~ - VIDDE R..661 De %40 6 81 9= 34% 2 z O 4 1 9 0 9 9 D - 21 0 234 4| 9-Fi#~401, - 1-26 FE,14 1 COLOFiÂ«Do 520 E. HYMAN SUITE 301 ASPEN, CO 81611 TELE: 303/925-5590 FAX: 303/925-5076 300 W. COLORADO AVE. BOX 2863 Â· TELLURIDE, CO 81435 Â· TELE: 303/728-3738 Â· FAX: 303/728-9567 Al O I Â»AEMâ‚¬l _LSÂ»44 51331IHDMV 33HINNn) S31NVHD iH912!AdO) 0 / : c (-), 1 4 1 1,10 1 2 1 1 1,~ ..Z 10 9 1- - 11 - m 1 o -6-1 P . 9 iI lit ~ IC ,mZ, <2 0 1 1 _ ' m r b < 11 11 , , 1 11 iÂ·.0 Z 1 4 \ 4 1 f L -'\* 11 *ir-----t 1 77 1 4 -----11 1 4 v ! , 1 1 1\ 1 T t f --4 1 1 1 :0 1, . 11 1 1, \ ! 1 1 ' rl, t'j, : \ 11 1 , j ilm .4 OIl 11 j 1 f IJ 2 4_ X 7:.1~1 5 ~Ac-k -4 4 1 1 4 EY k iw-r! 1 2 0 i 4 I li E lill li 4, _' //__ 1, ~ F + -4/11 1 111 rt 1 1 1 3 1 -- - 1 1 11 1,1 : 1 11 I'l . 11 1 1 1 1- 1 1 111 . 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 - - ----7 1 / 4 3 1 1 , ~ ~. ~ l Â·tti 1! 1.i 1, - F 11 . tilj -1 Ii' .1 i i 1 1 -1 1,) 11-1 11 1 1) 1 11 ' U L 4 V z N 1 11 1- 71 / 11 11 11 -- i_ 11 -6 1 -"- 11 47 -- -- -- -0 1 1-1 Z 19 1 Â· 4 4 I r 1 1 4 -----4 4--- g, ALRY __. T : FF" 1 k N l- K, \4 1/ 2 2/2 4,4 1 7/1 -. - 9 --------- f f- 1 -- - - 1 Â«2807Â»9 1//9 - - i i V r- U 12 1 dz -1 %. 1 i 00 1 f/j m -1 0 3 , 'ilt/ L \ 6 0 -7_I Z 03 I 1 1-----f- ~-- - 1 - ---- r-- ull, 1 A-f# 17- \ ' E-- / 1 V-1- -\ y -I . m - ;K 0 lEi :,r is - 716/1 1 0 g f #iti/%31/.r- 11 ~ qÂ» Â¥ 0 11 213 Â£-D . i Â§-911Â«9 1 L-Â£=; 5/ -1 .A \102 g \11-14 K + *7744- 1 01=7 1- M'%01 Z 24,-Wy'__3 -2 77 V.~24â‚¬. E f -/ 1 51 - r ~IJAIT g k k k /\ 49044 4Â»434744 Â· ,/C-/\ 3,2 1-1/ - 14 .// r.\43Â» K U3 FFÂ«1 6 55 5Â»-87 2 I- Â© 9 0 1/1 Â»B. BRS I DA. 316* CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS A Co m Z Â¢O 71â‚¬ PI ++OLI~~ 1 - 0 2 04 41. fyf01 s 520 E. HYMAN SUITE 301 Â· ASPEN, CO 81611 Â· TELE: 303/925-5590 FAX: 303/925-5076 AE'.7 04-0...2 0 300 W COLORADO AVE.. BOX 2863 - TELLURIDE, CO 81435 Â· TELE: 303/728-3738 Â· FAX: 303/728-9567 4**/#6Â£/2/JAL': 133HS Olliv Â»pÂ»al-fr 41Â©uea ON 133 HS Sl)31IH)?[V 333INNAD 9311Â¥H) 1H 290*. 4,4///~.1~/~~ 1 342 1 23 Â£11 1, - .< 4 ie-5 iv, 1 Â·F.) . ,:O" O -00 1-1 49.1 - C â€¢ t jâ‚¬ 4.4 * . 1 11 . if'â€¢ 1 . . . 1 EA 1 60,7 4-*_ , arrtâ€¢:r 4 =â€¢1. I=+24.Prl E Le 0 en it 21 b. 111 iN *- 9 0- 0 -i +k Al,2 . L ..Fill vilili 1 I MPL-1 ADD' i f 1 1 1 14(4Â»SE HI ' Â°F r i 64-j 1 MÂ»< To rl eer i 600- 1 11 - 1 _BILDINECT 1/4-=11-0- - - -- --_._ZE--1111- -- - - 7**4 -1 - .FY,1,--4 - 3 DRAWING-~ ~ -- - ' ~ Arrelll ,-Pirg ~ Ir====1 I --- - ----- I - 1-' -a #- I - 1 11 -# - _ litarl 11 - I||c,usi&q||-- ------ 8 -- - --4 ~ E - - Merm: 6.Xie.Iri r'A AIMÂ»Ale To Â» --- - 1.11.:s~rnÂ»t +41,100~-J-Â·----7-~7 ~ 1 1 - 1 2----Id%=-7----- RN'jacnID Â£ = A 111 /, 111 118*~ _ - -- U. M o. 1-- Ii*,Â·-IliIA~i ic - --- - .-2*MT 1-7 2 - = Ex~sTINcq COKIST; -- 4 -21 neq,11 ~11,>461.~ e K . = NEW CoNs-F Lau 164 - -0 _~=-111ILI IL>-i_ f--29=- ~ ' '-42 9 IJOB NO. 4,4 1 1 5 11 50(1.A ~--- 1DATE 3/9/ee ~ 12~-13 -- LL 2- - =J 19 Â» --- SHEET NO. f PIEN *04 ll 1 ' 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 IiI 1 0 NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION SHEET OF 1/4-=1'-O" 1 /4"= 1'-O- Â©COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 9Â£05-5E6/EOE XV:I 0655-5E6/Â£0Â£ 3131 [[919 OD 'NldSV Â· [0Â£ 31InS NVINAH '31 025 L956-UZZ/EOE :XVH Â· 9{ZE-UZZ/Â£0Â£ :3131 Â· 5Â£1719 OZ) '3(]INA1131 Â· E.99E XOEI Â· 7/\V OGVBOIOD M 00Â£ ... .. I.-.- *.Ii---- .- -- I.---2~5 -Fif 41 it 1 0 irl- 0 -- ~ jr - 4 4 .> 1.Al 1 qi Mi 1 ~1 1-~ 9 1-.1 - 11 1 , f. 3111 . 1 ' 4 . 1~. , %1 I -7 ~. -.~. , _ 1 13 . 4 - a. 1 11 - r- . ............../1 - 1 -I'll.~ I .2/1 ' # 1-1 .................. ................ -, 0 . 1...11111~1 BÂ·it 1 .: W. . . 1.16 UP-, --CE- t --Â·Â·Â·~--w.... w,=n -======*F*---r.~ . . *..A... .....- Â·. . M..................Â·-. .-.................-..-22~2 ./ -I-1.1-1 1-1,11-1 L . a - . . - ... .. . I . 0. . I . -- '~ -X 11 Illillillill--iÂ®t .. ... I. . I ticlillillillillillillillill &11 1.1-9 - 1 j 11.11' '1- . -__-d......*...__... Â·1 ....'I...........I'# .........4--I'll---+-I Uil j~1,1- -1. -1 - . lim, . : , 4 1 1 --al"~led./16-* 1 1 . 0 .. 4.-il--*- -Â£3*--=-a- 1-/-------2- >14 4 R . 'IN,U'. ..1. ...ii 7 I. A L c ' - ff#----- 0 rel 70 Af 11.1 PX'Appe-rp M,Â» 5><al \1/\ LA\4 1. 1 4 12Â£0327 5//1 1 N-le M Tri 1 1 01 1 1 954<. ,>62\117 / 7/ . V. ' - 41/ .Â«9 /Fh *643 3 Exef~744 UAL 4 1 Uh #942 G PENj >G 1Â»41- ;9/9 .27 mp Â« 13# -D"t I '-0. //rÂ« - 1 LS:MU / -FIÂ« 464395 A& AEA D Â» "; 6Tfucr, 4,-AÂ·~ 9),lptu 4 4+1''AIA .,+W.fly (1117 t~#4 174 r! TO 1Â»:r,Â» ax 4 -1 -- M~lot *14 Â£110 - -r\Â·Â·-- 1, f PEU J-11*DOW. 9 ~ C,/ /jin~ (/7 7 /"79 +--1-2 r=-111 - r 71- *fal J 1,1 41 Fr 1 1 11 1 1 1 19*-4 *r""1 1Â»INe,oâ‚¬rit, to e,Le,1 LE 11 16 . / XE tor *<4 L.,--*ax- , 7 VE# J r--3 JAIM> G *,5571744 2,AlÂ©- - JAIN, 9 PED.J 2.>< 6. 6440- HFU \- 4 ''01 c. glrm 0 Â»46 (__f ' -I-- Â»\111@11111 2 0 1 1.> t.0 -- 1 "#Wri 4 I 't 'o E & 1 1 Al 11191 4 erp Â»-p f 101 +Elip 1,54- i 1 $. 1 4 1 1 1 . 1YEÂ¢6- FH, WA U 711 ~ Te -1-A -19,~3*=24j% - MAI, M,T IC" a'411 11'tlm'Â©o,t - Ae,~71.0 64, f, 1 u ) JU r -T 77 / j 71 * r 0 8*419, 4.01-10 pol.114[D . < 44 - . 9. 47*ucr. 1 DRAWING )3 0 4 1- -, 29 4[114.~-1 5$*Al L.6 13 6 1 .... JOB NO. 9601 - M. 10' 0, - % D,1 1 + U 9 0 e Der, 0 [13, 4 4-:v#-1- 1 / 0,92 DATE \2.0 . r 0- I I 1 SHEET NO. 3 ~tit~-~ // I 14 Â« _ 4 - 9 % .C E 1 O N I O 641- O @<IMIÂ» '4*4- 1 0 1,14 9 NEU 2,6 LA 1- 1.- ~ 14â€¢ 1.0 SHEET OF Â© C(}PY RIGHT CHARLE5 CUNNIFFE ARCHITECT5 Sl)31!H)2IV 33:liNNFE) SB-IMVH) 9Z0S-SE6 EOE :XY:I Â· 0655-5Z6/Â£0Â£ :3131 Â· L[9[9 OD 'N3dSV 101 31IAS NVINAH '3 08 0 3 <~#gASV sio~qU 'MI 442 Â£956-WEL/EOE :XY:l Â· BEZE-AZZ/Â£0Â£ :3131 Â· Sit' 19 00 '3 a I ZI n 1 1 3 1 Â· Â£99Z XOEI -3/\V OGVNOIOD 'AA 00Â£ ep 14 -e d 19 2 4 -4 06 1 A