HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19640827
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
100 Leaves
FORM 5~ C. F. H OECKEL B. B. ft l. co.
~OINT MEETING CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND PITKIN COUNTY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
THURSDAY, AUGUST 27, 1964
ASPEN CITY HALL
Meeting convened at 7:30 P.M. Present were, Jack Walls, Fritz Benedict, Sam
Caudill, Richard Lai, Wen:iy Morse, Bill McEachern, Edgar Stanton, Francis Whitaker.
A discussion of the present sewer district was held, an:i a report was made that
the Trustees of the District are not in favor of enlarging'it, but feel that the
growing needs of Aspen an:i the County require a new District. The present
facility is to reduce its services according to the information furnished the
joint Commissions since the Sanitation District's trustees feel that this
facility is now overloaded. The Commissions discussed the possibility of making
an annexation fee for all new sewer district users, an:i that this fee would be
earmarked for new capital investment. A committee was appointed to meet with the
Sanitation District Board of Trustees to discuss these various problems. This
committee consists of Messrs. Whitaker, Stanton, Caudill an:i Walls.
The next subject was that of the sub-division regulations. Mr. Walls presented
the County Planning and Zoning Commission members with a rough draft of the City
sub-division regulations for study. It was the feeling of the County members
that they would like time to read an:i study the zoning regulation with a view to
making any additions or adjustments to them. It was noted that the County has to
consider hillside conditions which involve road widths, etc. Also a requirement
for perculation tests was suggested. Also brought up was the question of whether
any control for large tracts of land exists. Mr. Stanton said that he would check
with County Attorney Delaney on these matters.
Mr. Walls reported on the Master Plan, reading a letter from Mr. Dick Brown of
the State of Colorado Department of Commerce an:i Development, who made a final
report in this letter concerning Mr. Wiener's work to Mr. Miles. In this final
report he stated about 39.7% was due Mr. Wiener. Mr. Walls also reported on
the status of acquiring a new planner. He stated that letters have been written
to a large number of approved city planners. He would like to see this number
reduced to three or four applicants who would then be asked in for interviews.
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Edgar Stanton
recorded by Edgar Stanton
42