Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19640512 " RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORll!1 C.F.HOECKELB.B.l!.L.CD. JOTIlT BEETIJITG OF THE CITY AND COUNTY PLANNING CO}1!ITSSIONS BAY 12, 1964 CITY HALL, ASPEN, COLORADO Present were: Jack T.o/alls, Francis '!Ihitaker, Hayor Harald Pabst, 'i.fillism ;icEachern, Richard Lai, Edgar Stanton, Fritz Benedict, Bil Duna.ray, Hendy I.lorse, and City Administrator, John Kerrigan. The meeting "'as called to order at 8:00 P.N. by Chairman, Jack '...JaIls. lfT. TITalls opened the meeting by saying that ;'Jr. Harry Taylor talked to him regarding future plans for a forestry survey. He wishes to meet with the Commission to discuss the items that have been planned for the future, perhaps at the last meeting of this month. eJr. Taylor stated that the plans are ",ell along the "'ay for this year, but that the future plans of his Office could be discussed with the members. l-lr. "'JaIls reminded the members of the meeting ,:ednesday, Hay 13, 1964, wi th the City Council at 4: 30 ? I:. at City Hall. A general discussion ensued regarding changing future meeting times to 8: 00 P.II., instead of 7: 30 P. H. Er. v.fhi taker moved to change the time to 8: 00 je. Ii. This motion Has seconded and passed. ,Jr. '..Jalls passed out lists of the Citizens Advisory Committee to the members. }.Jr. c"Ieiner Hill be here in July with the final drafts for a master plan for Aspen, and IeI' .i:,Jalls thought it 'JQuld be an excellent idea to form a Citizens Advisory Committee and place educational material in their hands so that they could be Hell informed before Hr. '"einer arrives. It '.ras felt to be imnortant that the Citizens Advisory Committee should contain a good cross-section of people so that not just one class of interests are represented. The former Citizens Advisory Committee 1-.ras broken dOHn into tourist, residential, business, parking, recreation, education, streets, highway, and parking. The members of the nrevious Citizens Advisory Committee, as the list stood, Here passed. I':r. l.'alls said that he had gotten no response to his letters to !'Jr. ',~einer for six ",eeks. I.Jr. Eerrigan stated that Er. '.:einer was in ",Urope at the present time on a speaking tour. A discussion followed as to leI'. ::; 3' ~ ,.' s capabilities in presenting 0. .""?r plan for Aspen. It ",as stated that he has been paid $13,5'10.00 to date. It lr,THB decided to tablef'urther discussion until after lTr. ~)allG and r'T. ~\c:hitaker meet n8:-...rt Friday TNith 'r. Jim Hiles. A further discussion ,.Jill then be held on Lay 26th. Fritz Benedict introduced a model and map sho',.iir~g the Aspen Alps and its environs. Plans have been made by the !1.s,)8n Alps to construct another sixteen u,~ts on land on the other side of Ute Avenue. They ",ill provide off-street parking for 20 cars, and ~ish ]e~ssion to pave a 25' ,Jidth of Ute Avenue and landscape it for use as a circulation street Hith no parking. They also plan to make a bridle path parallel to ute Avenue. The total length of the street is approximately 60 feet. :Jr. Lai felt this might take aHay too much parking area. He also felt that ",hile this was a gooa idea, it should be made conditional and not set a precedent for fear that the parking facilities on other streets might b8 usurped in this maTh~er. i~. Kerrigan stated the street shoul8 be made ~nde enough to allow :for future parking. 111' .:,'hi taker moved that the Planning COTnmission reco~~end this type of use of the street ,Jith the conditional clause that it Hould revert back to parking on the sides of the street, should the need ever arise. }~. Lai seconded this motion and introduced an m'~endment to have the matter brought up every 4 or 5 years. This arr~8nd- ment 1,ras not seconded. T'lr. ~,'Thi taker's motion was seconded and carried. The members felt that the street should be 26' l~de and that the City Council should decide on Hhat materials ",ould be used for paving. It ,;as ;,Tr. ':all' s feeling that the street covering should conform in const- ruction to the same materials used on the rest of the City's streets, i.e., soil cement base 1~ th aSDhal t . 1 7 ".....,~, RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM \~ C. F. HOECKEL B. B. Ii L. CO. Page 2 I,"ay 12, 1964 T:r. Stanton brought up the problem of City and County boundary lines going through property, arbitrarily, and not by blocks. He cited the problem of the property at 6th and Hopkins as an example. One-half of this block is zoned in the City as Tourist, and the other half lies in the County and is zoned Residential. This works a hardship upon the O"Jner as he is governed by b,ro sets of rules. l:r. Kerrigan said this annexation had been brought up before City Council, but that they were not interested in changing just one-half block. He did not know what the County thought about the matter. I,:r. \ialls stated that the Planning Conmlission had recommended to the City Council that they annex the property. Ix. \~alls called a recess for five minutes and discussion on the above matter continued. T)1e meeting was again called to order by lJ1'. ,} aIls, who introduced the petition of Block 70, Aspen To"~site, in regard to two dormatories, as the necessary procedure had been followed by the City Attorney, and they are now petitioning again for annexation. It Has stated that the old City Council had looked favorable upon this annexation, but that formal annexation had never taken place. ;,:r. ';.fhi taker suggested that the Planning Commission go out and look over this property first before taking any action as there might be some difficulty Hith a density problem here. I'Jr. '...falls also suggested action be delayed in order to check on the 26' height of the property. He advised the members to look at the property and then return to this petition for annexation at the Hay 26th meeting. Hr. Hhi taker said that he had attended a regional planning commission the previous evening, but there had been no quorum. This meeting Has in re- gard to zoning for the Frying Pan. There had been some talk about the possibility of a Federal grant that Hould cover 2/3 of the cost of this zoning. Eagle County Has most agreable and Hould like to check further into the matter. This would include 3agle and Aspen Counties and the Cities of Aspen and Basalt. 1.Jr. Horse asked if this plan could include Narble in Gunnison County. Hr. Hhitaker said he would discuss this matterl,Jith J im i'.~il es . III'. 'd alls brought up four topics for discussion "lith the City Council on Hednesday, as follo,lS: 1. Building Review Ordinances 2. Density Control 3. Curb Cut Ordinances 4. Height Limitations The meeting Has adjourned at 9:15 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Francis Hhi taker, Secretary Recorded by lIarje L. Houle 18