The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.314 S. Galena St.HPC34-93314 S. Galena - -- HPC34-93 CP , 901 \17 -5 C 1 P 1 1 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 08/20/93 CASE NUMBER: HPC34-93 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2737-182-24-006 PROJECT NAME: Volk Building Minor Development Project Address: 314 S. Galena APPLICANT: Leslie Rudd Applicant Address: 314 S. Galena, Aspen REPRESENTATIVE: Scott Lindenau Representative Address/Phone: 303 1/2 E. Main St. Aspen, CO 81611 920-9428 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: t .Villiill... MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 314 S. Galena, Minor Development Date: August 25, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to replace existing fixed windows on the second and third floors with new windows which swing open. In addition, rounded awnings are proposed over the arched windows on the second floor and squared awnings like those already existing on the building are proposed for the third floor. New awnings will be identical in color to those in place. APPLICANT: Leslie Rudd, represented by Scott Lindenau, architect. LOCATION: 314 S. Galena, south 68 feet of Lots K and L, Block 95, City of Aspen. ZONING DEPARTMENT ISSUES: The awnings proposed for the south facade may be problematic if they are not truly retractable. Fixed awnings over city property require an encroachment license. (The other awnings hang over private property.) PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: The building is adjacent to several Aspen Landmarks and is located in the Commercial Core Historic District. Windows currently in place are compatible in scale with those on neighboring historic buildings, and no change in dimension, materials or color is proposed. Awnings have already been determined appropriate for this building and have been installed on the first floor. Generally, surrounding buildings do not have awnings on the upper levels, but there are a few examples in the District, such as the new Katie Reid building. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Awnings are typical of the District and have been used historically on commercial buildings. This is a very active corner, and additional color or detail on the building is likely to make the space even more interesting. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: This proposal does not affect the value to this community of any historic resource. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: No historic resource is directly affected by this proposal. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered.) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted. Additional Comments: A/TACBMENT 1 . 0 LAND USE APPLIa:ITal FUM n~ . 1) Project Name \lou\; 6.Utupt N 6- - - 2) Project IÂ£)cation GN,GÂ·NA N LO G? 6 g. 301Â· 9. el-t# NA (indicate street address, lot & block nunber, legal description Were appropriate) 3) Present Zoning 4) Iot Size 5) Applicant's Name, Aairess & Ehone # 6 06 ua A-upp 3 (1' i. 61 ALÂ·eN 4 AW eni, (/0 0/0 (1 61 Bepresentati,nals Name, Address & phone # C.>0171-T A. L'(ND(j NA U 17 0 27 'It E , *47,4 54. 1*pec \ etoll 7) 9Ypd of Application (please dieck all that apply): i Conditional Use Conceptal SPA ancept,lal Historic Dev. Special Review Final SRA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Congeptllal RID Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Â· '-.-I--- Final POD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivisicn Historic Designation Condaninilmnization- - Teoct/MÂ® Amendment GUS AllotmNIt Iat Split/Int Line (2433 Eboamptian Adjustment 8) Description of Fbcisting Uses Â· (rl=ber and type of existing structures; approocimate sq. ft. 1 nmber of bedrooms; any previaE approvals granted to -the property). Ferm L.; Pdwae, 40' 1 eefuLE, 9) Description of Develognent Application Wâ‚¬ AGE U 9410'- 0 96(Able \61 vorpe,6 VA Offue=-7 8 MAG WC 8)<lef-106- WI/14/Sw w'D f Fel**F*te Aw/4 L,vD-5.Â· 10) Have you attached the following? Besponse to Attadmait 2, Mininim Sulnission Contents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submissian contents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application Ii'lilli 3 1 14 1.1 1 Sco;t 1,nden aw 3 0 3 1/2 e main St aspen 81612 303 Â· 920 1428 August 17, 1993 Amy Amidon HPC Committee Pitkin/Aspen P+Z Aspen, CO 81611 The client Leslie Rudd proposes to add awnings and operable windows to his offices at 314 S. Galena to reduce heat and glare intake as well as to provide fresh air to the interior. Window design or color will not be altered and the awnings are to be the same color as the neighboring retail shops within the same building. Currently, none of the windows in either floor are operable and there are no aÂ¥nings. 6-Â»44-4~194- Scott A. Lindenau, Representative. The F leisher Company C Â£ 1//1 1/lt'raal Real / .li'te m 4.<pi'/ 1 August 18, 1993 Mr. Scott Lindenau Studio B 303 1/2 East Main Aspen, CO 81612 RE: Alterations to Volk Plaza Dear Scott: This letter will serve as authorization for Leslie Rudd of Coulter Enterprises to: 1) install operable exterior windows to their existing space; 2) add exterior awnings to the building that are identical in color and design to the existing awnings. Scott, as the architect and direct representative of Leslie Rudd and Coulter Enterprises, you are responsible for informing me of any deviations from the above alterations to the building. Should you have any additional concerns, please do not hesitate to call me any time. Sin~ -1".4 Brent C. Sullivan, CCIM Property Manager BS:kl 20() fitist Alci/ji Streel â€¢ Aspe,1, Cohu-ado 8161 j â€¢ 303/925-2 /22 â€¢ 1 Â£11 920- 1628 . LESLIE RUDD August 18, 1993 To Whom it May Concern: Please be advised that Mr. Scott Lindenau, of Studio B, is serving as my representative. Should you need to speak with me regarding this matter, please contact me at my office 925-5866. . Sincerely, 46:,Ski OUL 1 Leslie Rudd (Prepared at his request in his absence) i LGR/c 1 . i Aspen City Government Building Department 130 South Galena St. Aspen, CO. 81611 , 1 1, â‚¬ A / LE, ~177 ' / i . Iii. ..... ..1 ... lA) ------- - 1 4 1 -1- 3*~Â·,>c Â«-:4Â·Zg -' 1 1 1 --Ii/ - FRjEZE. l_161-11 9 .1 SEE ELEd C*16% ' 1 '01'11 1 . t i 12 ! 11: 1 .. ./ .. ltÂ·<~44 1 li 11 1Â· ..j.1- ' '1 T . 4 1 1 1 --114.,1 Â»r Â· 4 2-7. -- 1 - I titrrE.Â· UC;Oed_ t-re.'Fi 4 *p - -â„¢13-/ .7 NOTE.' jx?â€¢<L , ---4- 'iA-9 -1 - Â» dthl **2,25 0â‚¬-1 4 '' P, f 68.3 3Â·. f y 14: ' .-2040Â· Â· 2-174. '. !1 h < 07> N '--Â· i=Eid=-.~-,t r- L. 222~-- J 3- -Â¢Â· L., nl--1 _ 1 1 -- b Â· -,0~291 > /2,17-1 ' A U - 1! /4 1 Â·i ! I - -1 1 L -_--2 4-1k Â»--Â·- --4 v /"~Â¤ . 'Â·ri 4... y-il k./ Ill-. --2 J --=. -f i- / 1 1 : HI 1 '11 .1 --4 i - 7-- .-.ir #] rTAU22~213,3, rs,-+--------4-" r.u....-, i--; +~ I ~~~ li 1 11 1 1 lit .:11 ! 1 4.---_ 3# 1 F ukr L I L *5HEJ 1 -! r m -- i - Itt --- ..11 11 9 i 11 -1 11 y:Â»12 11- 1.1 4-2\ Â»9-~~ , , r 35-3 1 1 . 1 4 11 4 A 4.C ; 4 ~ ~ -"~~~_4~1 , k iii ' ~ 9/ 4 1 4, 1/11' 1 1 (74 ] 91 12/ -' 1 - , 02211;1 9 1|1- 1. 1 .-'-Ih 1-1,1 l 1 1 3 V b. l: - 11 11 - . 4 - +324'_. - 1-Â·)-T -91041 J 12- 1.4.19 jo,\ 922* 0 + 2- f 54.-5,1.<(4Â« 5/2'7Â»'v'.â‚¬13 7 022-Â·ED,//1 1-70.Â·/v' \ Â»14.Â·Â« g r , a '74< /19 L~-* -I ' 6.- 1,4,- to 42Â»1. ' --4-- aF' 1.,= /0' , - ,- - --1-hk L - C LL 1 4 /2. 1 r 2*4 k. 4045, T,4 ; g..0 F, .62 lic'.-â‚¬ 2â‚¬61.- 44&4225Â£ 0 -- -- 01- ...~. 1;~262-=P-,toÂ«41 11-:- ..I---- , P .- 2 - lk, 1-71- .- 1,/ 07\ 1 11_..1 -- . i ,6562~'454**42Â«- - - 2--/. E .:- -2>- -. v..= -Pu -- -1 -2 ~ . " ,Â» sh,Â·/42 Â£44,1122= j 1 / % P .... 45:45'a...,â‚¬. ' 'al //5 -43 -- --. - 1 4::--~-'I--4 1 . - .- Az~TAL Ki~ IA-9- - --4 ------- -- --- r=,Â· '4 A- Â£26.-=.-----3 E--33222-J-IP+7_2 1 1 1 1, ~ 11.-'.-- /1 1 72144 - 1 Ir 11 r 1 11 IiI ~*2 4 2- ~*>ge> 069,*40 1, 11 i[ 0 â‚¬41 1 -2 612 882 AP)/40 zil .. 1 . 1/4 1 1 Deon'- 1 . /1 ~-1â‚¬7El-EE -= 11 ---~ 1 -1, 11 - - - 1 - -i_. FulÂ»r 27,_ 21 20Â«54 -1) -r C>Â¢ RN Tro U.-4 8 ,-H .JAN* i, - 19 ju ~ _ _4 â‚¬%Â·--<2F--a.0-- Ckc<-- 8.afo, 4/ f h a ,- 34 if-3- .la EL 4 $ 4 4 -- - 4.-- gu, 1 i' ti .22.-EVA /70Â·, 4 <5,6 ._ 2 /6 1 // f O ,Â· , 3. : i Â·r -- 1 1 11 1, 1 : 1,1 1 i 1 1 2 4 15 ill# . 1 1 e -=---, -1- 4--11-1 34 Â£ 1% 1.: 0 1 T 'It 1 - 1 lili li ------1 1 4/1 1 W Z 1! F / /F 1 1 !: ~ 1. '4 I 1 T // 1 11Â·. t' If ~ 1 :1\ r 4/ r -- I k .1 , 1 + C - -i <- . -. - i 14% 1 11 P K h-Az~U_~U=L_-- 14 \ 1 1 -2-1 \1 WL--In -:7 I , 11 + - 1 11 1 ir; 11=:i .' ' It-4 1 2.-1 .- .-1 1 1 1, 41 41 El L 4.1, -111 ' 4(.1 k , M, ..~L- '-~--t~V**- : '0' 19*-7 - - 4, 1 ,-1 1.. 4 41 1 ''I 04 0. 4 f I 4, L 11 1 Sh 3 t L._.- -(Trin--- - 1 1 1 bl 7 9 --2 - 4-- 9 ...4- --/ . '1 , ~~ A \ 9 --25'. 11 -1 t--i -- 4 .4% -2 I T 44 *11 4 Q 4 (44 1 \3 1 2 :.90 .! Ik k X t.9 \- 25'JI 04-4,4 93 ':' G /'-!i-, 4/ iiI P -4 - 1 1 1 0. . t!~ .- \9]~ ' ;41]4, 4:-41=+:/IE=Ul '~ . \ 1 , 11 1 ~. ~ fil - \1 1 I . 6~ 131 41 i U 1. . 1 .F .1, 4 1.: /6 11 4 il 11 'M .-' I ~ i Â· 1 1 . * :j 1 s 1 4- . 1 it. , A 1. 41 U.1 . '4 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 . 411:p J 4 11 14., 4040,11 1 : 4-1 Et 6.-11111111.41:1 '11~.1 Â·41\ A ~ r 1-4 - 7. - 41*. \& A 7 1%/7 1 .-421 1 t. t . .; 1 1 1123Â£.-Ally 11 4 43 .,19: - 41 w L 7- . i. f: 1 2 1 4 11 1 1 - ' ' i : I -abla, ~1. 1 '101'.15 'il' 414\ -.4-T A- :1 - 1 <1 1 1 HL r 1, 1111 4 +1 1_ 0 P , 1% - -- .- 2_t-OiL-i. liz_t 1 r\,9./..1 ftÂ¥, 1 Â·1 Itt 6, 73 F-3 2 - i .1 -,4 lt. PON 1 0 Â£ It 0 1Â£ #'571 f 1 Iii f i d' 911 - uu!111,11;11'11 -49(/5 8,12,46,> *UL Ec,|11*.A<n~3 - -- _flaÂ·/ 00Â»TRAgrl-ME ..m - 16 - .H C H.tr e -441*14)09Â·:4 10 / '' 1, f. 1 4 T I I-ri. -1- TUILEULE 111-tritt r -TUT"- "-1 1 4--4 '' 1 , -t----Â«1 N 1 1 '20 7 0 45 (1 ' r H C L o V h 7 to ti UP Q, 0 I / 1/ 1 M f re ' L 44'Mi 1-144 6H "21.5 90909 *12 AD j *c, r~ 01, 9.0 + tt :1 1 42/ 0 , 102 04;.ri DOWÂ·Iâ‚¬ 2 , A .:/ H f.'< 6-4 3 1 2 3 90 4 7t r "(. 2 9,0,4. r. 00,4. 8.6 4,(Th' 97:62- to 4104 14.- t. , Ft K. fri' i.,9 ' 't 1 ..wÂ·, i,lil 6 *F# Hlf //- UU/* 14 9 4/44<171 klwt gA# 1 POr - Ocut,L \A 11.*M ' 4 li Tit'?Â·41-ti'*+1:411Â·441' 44 11].Mitilitti~illitil~ Â·-- Â·~Â· 1, 1 . 1 1., ' Â·~â€¢ 9 Â·44P' -MIT" . '84 n l hv-7 Â· fÂ·t i i. ..1 49/. 6, ---0 R.2 4/ C + it-, *w,7 + ' r,Wil, 5Â£ 14 4 ,,pi~*22/ / _-7-E-7----_tr- 2 -7---7Â·--2---~~'EN:-Â·ZU--Â·731 -'TÂ· Â·-7. +144*4*H~tfttli: ~+1 11.ttl; i. J ~-- 9,9.9 ilill'j'illi''1ili 2/2 *L - 2- /.1 3 11// 1 1 A \I .41\721 411 .-i ./74",4.//wixfulli_ ; ~ 2 ~ , t2 - ./. 1 ' *11./a PrlÂ· i tsÂ« -- -37 5.-3/M.=mtâ‚¬f\Xt 1 Mo M>f ?1070%50 4,00rHW66T 1/011 f \. 0 11'1111'111,1,11,1,1:fill lit, 111,1,2 r.til!UL_ 9*N 41 Â¥16Â¥ 4.4 4:r 11 \ -04.'21 09(UKkitt 'OJ \ 1 Â·1 '3Â©94 -Â· L.L.' 144,U *,-4-1 i,Â·k y r. 1 1 .....1 7 #Cer 6 6 6 V /1 T /2 N --- --I- - 0,) 1 0 I \-0 7 Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of August 25, 1993 MOTION: Don made the motion that HPC recommends approval of landmark designation of the proposed Lot 1, Sund lot split East Aspen Addition also know as lots D&E Block 35 finding this site and the rock thereon meets local designation standards A, E and F; second by Roger. AMENDED MOTION: Don amended the motion that HPC encourage other boards to consider incentives if deemed necessary during the HPC approval process; second by Roger. All in favor of motion and amended motion except Jake, motion carries. Karen: I also feel there should be a plague in front of the rock which states the historic significance. Jake: I feel the 500 feet that we are proposing does not work with the rock. The duplex could be placed on the lot without the rock and let this be a single family house. Alice Horn: There is a multi-family project next to the duplex lot and that is his major reason for not wanting the single family on that site. Chairman Bill Poss closed the public hearing. 314 S. GALENA - MINOR DEVELOPMENT VOLK BLDG - AWNING Amy: The application involves windows that swing out on the second level of the building and also awnings. Scott Lindenau, architect: None of the windows currently are operable and I am designing offices on the second floor and a large conference room on the third level and need air circulation. We will keep the windows the same design and the same color j ust make them operable. The awnings on the second floor are arched and we would like to make them the same color as the first floor. MOTION: Roger made the motion to approve the minor development for 314 S. Galena as submitted with details to be worked out with applicant and Staff such as the awnings being operable; second by Martha. All in favor, motion carries. Amy will be the monitor. 234 W. FRANCIS, AMENDMENT TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT - P.H. Amy: The applicant forgot the affidavit of mailing but will drop it off. It is a public hearing because you are reviewing a side yard setback variance. The change involves moving a shed addition to the carriage house from the north side of the building to the 2