The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.315 E Hyman Ave.HPC41-94-3,5 6 10{Y'vuw Aoe &â‚¬e . 14 PC 4 \-9-4 r Su Casa Minor Historic Developme ,~ 315 E. Hyman K HPC41-94 Â·:f Â¢' 0 ~ i ' 51, 1 66 K R,P, 5- 1 4 1 HV pw +L Li 10, 490,6 OdllfÂ»'107 ' raÂ·'*4 I go rg,Â« 21#blli '7 4 145 - /31 11:213*gA Â·0*r' MI â‚¬ 119651 44*A'- ra g i 11.10'J-,219 0,4 '44 92 â‚¬) 11tl 11Â·bl /20 -- 01 Â·,19 MAW '294/<2'1 */0311 ' 026:'Marl' fc' r'Z'I,KN,4 aglb 610@M/1 1Â«gj J. 0,38 +1+21/ 11 -34 8 pneAA 114,7 4 64 4,/1,2 92 11 i rl J, 1 Â·41,2 74*j 9*21Â·FlygU i i 1-1131%1-girri= /2 f#*4~~al~ r~~~~ rfJ - 0,141 Fvil/AgÂ·l,a c hj,if)-1~4 4-4- 91*1.~ L.4- li *12. 4004 F \. 07, L 1 37 1 .0,9 O,4 23 % -4 1 11] 11 1 1 11 1 li li 1: 41 3 B - 11 1 !1 17- P 11 1 1 1/C \ fl i.1 4 1 i 14 1 1.- n 1 . 4 , ~ 1,~ 0031>4 ~22 - - Jrwerd~eÂ»-- / i . --- r'lÂ»a~ 10,21 1 f 1182'-rean gair'll' Mari ' 62010 0.44 ~ geng 11984 Â·,4,111 [1414 1- 11 111 11 _ 0 5 6-1 - ' lilli 11'111: O ' - 6 : -- 9 1 // 0 n \ /7\ / h 2/0 , A a p,Jag~ _ Fl 1 1 - -' 1 C - - -- 4/ 1 Iy, 11 /4. 1 r. /7 - 1 lillil It 1 111 11, .- -4------I- -,/ . 9 784*9 -7 lilli lillil lilli -I- 4 9.10+ Illlllllllllllll /. 1 - lilli' 1 1 1 1 11 IT- i 1 2,1 1 -1 lili . ' 4,0.t' '*440.Allll/li l.:440*64, CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 11/15/94 CASE NUMBER: HPC41-94 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2737-182-17-002 PROJECT NAME: Su Casa Minor Historic Development Project Address: 315 East Hyman APPLICANT: Eric Casper 920-1488 Applicant Address: 315 E. Hyman REPRESENTATIVE: Representative Address/Phone: = TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 315 E. Hyman, Benjamin's Deli- Minor Date: November 23, 1994 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for the installation of a temporary airlock at Benjamin's Deli. This building is not historic, but it lies within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Eric Casper. LOCATION: 315 E. Hyman Avenue, Lots E-G, Block 82, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: The airlock is designed to match the size and shape of the existing entrance opening. It will be constructed of an aluminum frame and clear plexiglass panels, with clear weather curtain on the front. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposal entrance is temporary and will not have a long-term impact on the character of the Commercial Core Historic District. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: This proposal has no impact on the cultural value of any adjacent historic structures. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal has no impact on the architectural integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any Of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted, with the condition that the airlock may only be in place between November 1 and April 15. Additional Comments: Pzrmallkyr 1 . . IAND USE APPLICATICM FORM . 1) project Name '~501)65~MA \ 91 '6 -1--)2 1. - Ul vi 1-:â‚¬4/~ (-4541 la a La . 2) Project location 43 1 9-3 -~33: R-4-1 - 7 L/L.4 <531/ 1 /6670 1 .0 2-Â« TEÂ· --/9 i f~>\ ont--1 582--- . 0--14-19-~ c:LA_Â£6, 2-6 44- ;2*pul (indicate street address i lot & blodc omber, le*l desdription tere apprcuriate) 3) Pm:Sent Zoning LI/0 / 4) I. Size @, /200 S.7 -8- , r--1 -1 5) Applicant's Name, Aairess & Ehone # . F)-1 i.. 1 1 VZ 9. 1 32-4 1 61 â„¢Umsentative's Name, Adiress & phone # 124,1 l O r ../* Â«tr.2-1/ 7) Typd of Application (please chedc all Oat apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA _ Concep921 Historic Dev. Special Review - Final SPA - Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD ,2<_ Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin * Â· Final IUD _ Historic Demolition Mlmtain View Plane Subdivisirn - Historic Designaticn rÂ¥â€¢vhniniumixal-im Teoct~ap Amendment .-- GUS Allotment Iot Split/Iot line - GUS Elemptian Adjustment uescription of Ekisting Uses Â· Â«imber and-type of existing structures - agmcimate sq. ft.; Inmber of bedrooms; arÂ¥ previcus approvals granted to the property). ~1-149-240 L,1 v -9 137 1, luc. 4-12 ur ,2 .1 \ .O----~ 6-45, c -4 1 4-17 1 pa.v17.4 < Goo-0-A=Ai*Â«1 & ' brlâ‚¬LOGL ul 4 , 1/27(2:z>l 1 - f offirÂ» 19.66 9) Description of Develoiment Application -f-nAAy,0 Vrot'- -4 cal V I Ools= 1 - 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attadnment 2, Minimm Sulnission Ocntents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Suhnission Cbntents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards far Your Application 1Ill'lll HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE NOV. 23, 19954 Les: Could it be painted out? Stephen: We can do that. Roger: What is this going to be? Stephen: A Coffee House and we will serve food. MOTION: Les made the motion that the HPC approve the minor development for a walk-in refrigerator on the rear of 316 E. Hopkins Ave. with the condition that it be either painted or covered to reduce the aluminum glare; second by Linda. All in favor, motion carries. 315 E. HYMAN - BENJAMIN'S DELI - MINOR DEVELOPMENT Roger: The framework for the airlock which projects out four feet is that going to anodized clad like the existing windows? Amy: It projects 6.4 ft. out and doesn't state what color. Roger: A condition of approval should be that it match the color of the building. Also what is the material of the entry? Amy: Plastic like Boogies. It is only to be up during the winter months and at the work session you agreed upon a three year review and then the person would have to come back again. Les: We need a separate book that has airlock approvals in it and we are going to end up with thirty or forty of them and it will be totally out of hand. Roger: I'll take pictures with my camera this winter so we can have a record. MOTION: Linda made the motion that HPC approve the airlock for 315 EÂ·. Hyman Benjamin's Deli as submitted and that the aluminum or clad match the existing building. It should be used from Nov. 1 st through April 15th, subject to review in three years; second by Les. All in favor, motion carries. Roger: All of these should have a clause that we have the option to reopen them and rej ect them as we see fit within the three year period. Amy: You should give approval for a period of time then have another review. 2