The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.316 E Hopkins Ave.HP-1992-02JLU 12 ti 0 1 flur-All.NO ; ALZZULO Ase : 2,] P' ltÂ©-02 --= 2737-073-29-008 - L I n 0 0-yn /4Â« LE 1-VV ' R p -52 8 26 1 . 0 0 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: , CASE NUMBER: DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID : .2 73 7 - 076-09- CÂ©F PROJECT NAME~'~~~5~Â·1Â·e,~~ 1 77. A- +c> Project Address: 5/G 2 Noettbu \,04 0 + . 1~ OLIC 90 APPLICANT~-2,; 2>2 k 46 7-ine~- Applicant Address: REPRESENTATIVE: Representative Address/Phone: TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: Description HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Date: Historic Preservation Officer: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: v[[ MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and Council Thru: Amy Margerum, City Manage44- Thru: Diane Moore, City Planning Direct From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer g~.4 Re: Ordinance adopting Landmark Designation for 316 E. Hopkins Ave. Date: February 10, 1992 SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends adoption of an ordinance to Landmark Designate 316 E. Hopkins Avenue. The historic resource meets three of the six Landmark Designation standards. COUNCIL GOALS: Landmark Designation meets Council Goal #10, the preservation of our community's historic character. BACKGROUND: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A). Any structure or site that meets one or more of the standards may be designated "H", Historic Landmark. The Planning Office finds that this historic resources meets three of the six standards, as follows: B. Architectural importance: The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character. Response: The principal structure is best described as a typical one story Aspen "miner's cottage", with gable and window proportions illustrative of traditional Aspen character. We find that the outbuilding, due to the extensive and incompatible modifications, does not contribute to the architectural importance of the parcel. E. Neighborhood character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: The contribution this small scale residential structure and open space makes to the Commercial Core Historic District is considered to be a valuable cultural asset. Only 10 historic cottages remain in the District, each balancing and supporting the historic character and scale of Aspen's commercial neighborhood. The 300 block of East Hyman alone contains four residences, three of which have been adapted to commercial use. Adaptive uses of historic resources are considered significant components of the character of the Aspen community. F. Community character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: Aspen' s "miner' s cottages" are signatures of our town. The preservation of these small scale, vernacular resources is critical to the character and economic vitality of Aspen, and are particularly unique located within the Commercial Core Historic District. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: None. The applicant is not eligible for a designation grant, nor are they seeking any variations or incentives at this time. ADVISORY COMMITTEE VOTE: Both the HPC and the Planning and Zoning Commission have unanimously recommended Landmark Designation by City Council. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that Council adopt the ordinance for Landmark Designation for 316 East Hopkins Avenue. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to adopt Ordinance , Series of 1992, granting "H" Historic Landmark Designation for 316 East Hopkins Avenue." City Manager's comments: memo.cc.316eh.ld.2 â€¢ L ORDINANCE NO. (Series of 1992) AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING 316 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE AS "H'*, HISTORIC LANDMARK PURSUANT TO DIVISION 7, SECTION 7-701 OF CHAPTER 24 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, Margaret Johnson, owner of 316 East Hopkins Avenue, Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen has filed an - application for landmark designation pursuant to Section 24-7-701 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the structure and property at 316 East._Hopkine. Avenue_ ___ is listed in the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures, as amended in 1986; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Committee unanimously recommended historic landmark designation at a duly noticed public hearing on October 23, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended historic landmark designation at a duly noticed public hearing on December 17, 1991; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 24-7-702, the City Council has found that the Landmark Designation Standards B, E and F have been met: the structure reflects an architectural style that is of traditional Aspen character, the property is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the property is critical to the character of the Aspen community; and WHEREAS, City Council wishes to pursue those recommendations and complete the designation process. *' I NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1 That the existing structure and property at 316 East Hopkins Avenue, Lot 0, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado be and is hereby granted "H", Historic Landmark Designation. Section 2 That the Zoning District Map be amended to reflect the rezoning described in Section 1 and the -Planning .Director shall be authorized and directed to amend said map to reflect said rezoning. Section 3 That the Planning Director shall be directed to notify the City Clerk of such designation, who shall record among real estate records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office a certified copy of this ordinance. Section 4 That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdicti6n, such . portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5 That a public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the day of , 1992, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior 2 .. .. to which hearing notice of the same shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the day of 1991. John Bennett, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk FINALLY adopted, passed and approved this day of , 1992. John Bennett, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk ord.316eh.ld 3 .. . MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and Council Thru: Amy Margerum, City Manager Thru: Diane Moore, City Planning Directo]10~~ From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/~Â¢~ Re: Ordinance adopting Landmark Designation for 316 E. Hopkins Ave. Date: January 13, 1992 -1 *11-31 i a goft - 33 - )-71 CO j f k-- , u-Ka. UA . SUMMARY:. The Planning Office recommends adoption of an ordinance to Landmark Designate 316 E. Hopkins Avenue. The historic resource meets three of . the six LAndmark Designation standards. 7 COUNCIL GO*LS: Landmark uesignation meets Council Goal Â¢10, the preservation of our community's historic character. BACKGROUND: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A). Any structure or site that meets one or more of the standards may be designated "H", Historic Landmark. The Planning Office finds that this historic resources meets(three)of the six standards, as follows: ~ Architectural importance: The Â§&99929Kv or site reflects an Architectural . stvle, that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character. Response: The principal structure is best described as a typical one story Aspen "miner' s cottage", with gable and window proportions illustrative of traditional Aspen character. We find that the outbuilding, due to the extensive and incompatible modifications, does not contribute to the architectural importance of the parcel. (~) Neighborhood character: The structure or site is a 2-ignificant componenk of an 11istâ‚¬Kirally gignifie.Ant neighborhogiand the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. -. Response: The contribution this small scale residential structure and open space makes to the Commercial Core Historic District is considered to be a valuable cultural asset. Only 10 historic cottages remain in the District, each balancing and supporting the historic character and scale of Aspen's commercial neighborhood. The 300 block of East Hyman alone contains four residences, three of which have been adapted to commercial use. Adaptive uses of historic resources are .. considered significant components of the character of the Aspen community. ~o the -Ensgrvirtion Df=the_charagterofthe..Aspen--Â¤Qmmunity Community character: The structure or site is critical because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: Aspen' s 'Lminer' s _cottages" are signatures of our 12]92.- The preservation of these small scale, vernacular resources is critical to the character and economic vitality of Aspen, and are particularly unique located within the Commercial Core Historic District. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: None. The applicant is not eligible for a designation grant, nor -are they seeking any variations or incentives at this time. ,/1GvISORY COMMITTEE VOTE: Both the HPC and the Planning and Zoning Commission have unanimously recommended Landmark Designation by City Council. ,~RE66MMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that Council adopt the ordinance for Landmark Designation for 316 East Hopkins Avenue. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to read Ordinance , Series of 1992, granting "H" Historic Landmark Designation for 316 East Hopkins Avenue." "I move to adopt Ordinance , Series of 1992, granting "H" Historic Landmark Designation for 316 East Hopkins Avenue." City Manager's comments: memo.cc.316eh.ld ' D 0 . ORDINANCE NO. (Series of 1992) AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING 316 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE AS "H", HISTORIC LANDMARK PURSUANT TO DIVISION 7, SECTION 7-701 OF CHAPTER 24 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, Margaret Johnson, owner of 316 East Hopkins Avenue, Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen has filed an application for landmark designation pursuant to Section 24-7-701 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the structure and property at 316 East Hopkins Avenue is listed in the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures, as amended in 1986; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Committee unanimously recommended historic landmark designation at a duly noticed public hearing on November 27, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended historic landmark designation at a duly noticed public hearing on December 17, 1991; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 24-7-702, the City Council has found that the Landmark Designation Standards B, E and F have been met: the structure reflects an architectural style that is of traditional Aspen character, the property is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the property is critical to the character of the Aspen community; and WHEREAS, City Council wishes to pursue those recommendations and complete the designation process. , NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1 That the existing structure and property at 316 East Hopkins Avenue, Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado be and is hereby granted "H", Historic Landmark Designation. Section 2 That the Zoning District Map be amended to reflect the rezoning described in Section 1.and the Planning Director shall be authorized and directed to amend said map to reflect said rezoning. Section 3 That the Planning Director shall be directed to notify the City Clerk of such designation, who shall record among real estate records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office a certified copy of this ordinance. Section 4 That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such . portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5 That a public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the day of , 1992, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior 2 . to which hearing notice of the same shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the day of 1991. John Bennett, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk FINALLY adopted, passed and approved this day of , 1992. John Bennett, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk ord.316eh.ld 3 5 .6 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer,LE Re: 316 E. Hopkins: Landmark Designation (public hearing) Date: December 17, 1991 SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Landmark Designation for the parcel located at 316 E. -il,ma-: Ropki,U. APPLICANT: Margaret Johnson, represented by B. Joseph Krabacher, Krabacher, Hill and Edwards, attorneys LOCATION: 316 E. Hyman, Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen LOCAL DESIGNATION STANDARDS: Section 7-702 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations define the six standards for local landmark designation, requiring that the resource under consideration meet at least one of the following standards: A. Historical importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. Response: Our records do not indicate this parcel being associated with a person or significant historical event. It is referred to as the "Annie Krapf" house, however, no additional historical information on this owner is found in our inventory files. B. Architectural importance: The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character. Response: The principal structure is best described as a typical one story Aspen "miner' s cottage", with gable and window proportions illustrative Of traditional Aspen character. We find that the outbuilding, due to the extensive and incompatible modifications, does not contribute to the architectural importance of the parcel. 0 . 0 0 C. Architectural importance: The structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type or specimen. Response: We find that this standard does not apply in this case. D. Architectural importance: The structure is a significant work of an architect whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Response: Our records do not indicate an architect was involved in the design or construction of this cottage. E. Neighborhood character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: The contribution this small scale residential structure and open space makes to the Commercial Core Historic District is considered to be a valuable cultural asset. Only 10 historic cottages remain in the District, each balancing and supporting the historic character and scale of Aspen's commercial neighborhood. The 300 block of East Hyman alone contains four residences, three of which have been adapted to commercial use. Adaptive uses of historic resources are considered significant components of the character of the Aspen community. F. Community character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: Aspen' s "miner' s cottages" are signatures of our town. The preservation of these small scale, vernacular resources is critical to the character and economic vitality of Aspen. I I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend Landmark Designation for the parcel at 316 E. 4/mili# Ave. # 4 Et*4 Additional cbmments: memo.pz.316eh.ld , .. 4 . HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 316.EH Photo Information: ASP-CC-2-9 Township 10 South Range 84 West Section 7 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Annie Kranf House/On Location Hair Salon Full Street Address: 316 East Hopkins Legal Description: Lots O. P. Block 80 City and Townsite of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Commercial Core Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residence Architectural Style: Victorian Miner's Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1 Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irregular rectangle Landscaping or Special Setting Features: No Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): Single qable shed with shed addition; rolled asphalt and vertical board. new retail. modifications with fixed qlass For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Cross qabled; asphalt shinqles Walls: Clapboard with decorative shingles Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): Red brick corbeled Windows: All new: 2 3-sided bavs. sidelights, storefront tvpe Doors: 2. transom / 1/2 light / wood panel Porches: Shed entrance on turned posts with cut out brackets General Architectural Description: Victorian Miner's Cottaqe with extensive modifications to accommodate commercial use. i . 1 , Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 316.EH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Commercial Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential 'Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1884 - 1885 Actual X Estimate Based On: Building style MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Date unknown. but changed from residential to commercial use with associated modifications in the 1980'8; bav windows. doors. canopy - dates unknown Additions and Date: Rear shed addition. date unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is dligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D_ E_ Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation 1-1 __ Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 11 - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The historical signi- ficance of this former residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it. nor of its architecture. although it is represen- tative of Aspen's Mining Era. It illustrates the home/environment and lifestvle(s) of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver minina industrv. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: March 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - Citv of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner 0 . 4 .. â€¢0 4* MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer 1-8 0 6444 Re: 316 E. piymani Landmark Designation (public hearing), Minor Development approval for the demolition of the non- historic outbuilding and redevelopment Date: October 23, 1991 SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Landmark Designation, Minor Development approval for the demolition of the non-historic outbuilding and redevelopment to include three parking spaces. The applicant is requesting exemption from the Demolition Standards (Ord. 9, Series 1991.) No changes are proposed to the c.1885 cottage, the principal structure on the parcel. Exemption from the Demolition Standards means an applicant is not required to meet the Standards for Demolition, but still requires HPC approval for the demolition and redevelopment. APPLICANT: Margaret Johnson, represented by B. Joseph Krabacher, Krabacher, Hill and Edwards, attorneys LOCATION: 316 E. Hyman, Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen LOCAL DESIGNATION STANDARDS: Section 7-702 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations define the six standards for local landmark designation, requiring that the resource under consideration meet at least one of the following standards: A. Historical importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. Response: Our records do not indicate this parcel being associated with a person or significant historical event. It is referred to as the "Annie Krapf" house, however, no additional historical information on this owner is found in our inventory files. B. Architectural importance: The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character. 111 . 0. .0 Response: The principal structure is best described as a typical one story Aspen "miner's cottage", with gable and window proportions illustrative of traditional Aspen character. We find that the outbuilding, due to the extensive and incompatible modifications, does not contribute to the architectural importance of the parcel. C. Architectural importance: The structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type or specimen. Response: We find that this standard does not apply in this case. D. Architectural importance: The structure is a significant work of an architect whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Response: Our records do not indicate an architect was involved in the design or construction of this cottage. E. Neighborhood character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: The contribution this small scale residential structure and open space makes to the Commercial Core Historic District is considered to be a valuable cultural asset. Only 10 historic cottages remain in the District, each balancing and supporting the historic character and scale of Aspen's commercial neighborhood. The 300 block of East Hyman alone contains four residences, three of which have been adapted to commercial use. Adaptive uses of historic resources are considered significant components of the character of the Aspen community. The HPC may find that the outbuilding, which has been used for small business purposes in the past, contributes to the character of the alley and therefore the community, overall. Generally, these are found in areas that are predominately residential The recent renovation of the corner outbuilding 1/2 block north to an architect's studio may support the importance to retain the outbuilding as a contributing . resource to the character of the neighborhood. The HPC should evaluate the loss of this building in terms of this Standard for Landmark Designation. Staff feels that even with the demolition of the outbuilding, the parcel retains its historic significance and meets this standard. F. Community character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: Aspen' s "miner' s cottages" are signatures of our town. The preservation of these small scale, vernacular resources is critical to the character and economic vitality of Aspen. The HPC may find that the outbuilding, which has been used for small business purposes in the past, contributes to the character of the alley. The recent renovation of the corner outbuilding 1/2 block north to an architect's studio may support the importance to retain the outbuilding as a contributing resource to the character of the neighborhood. MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND EXEMPTION FROM DEMOLITION DISCUSSION: Earlier this year, Council adopted Ordinance 9 which added an exemption provision to Sec. 7-602 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. This exemption made it possible for non-historic resources, considered to be non-contributing to the character of the resource, to be approved for demolition HPC without having to meet the rigorous standards for demolition. The application requirements still must be met, which includes the approval of a redevelopment plan, if required. The HPC has determined that all demolition requests require a redevelopment plan for approval. RESPONSE: The outbuilding proposed for demolition is 300 sq. ft., with a 113 sq. ft. enclosed porch. It is not habitable according to code, and encroaches onto the property to the west (La Cocina). The structure itself has been altered significantly over the years, and retains very little of its original architectural integrity. The applicant argues that the demolition and removal of this structure in order to provide three parking spaces may enhance the economic viability of the more significant resource on the parcel, the historic cottage. Parking spaces are at a premium in the 4 .. commercial core, and the Planning Office feels that alley-accessed parking, screened by buildings, may be the most preferred way to provide space in the core. The HPC may argue that additional surface parking to provide for more automobiles downtown may not enhance the traditional character of the district or help to strengthens the city's auto-dissincentive goals. The "redevelopment" plan, included in the application, does not indicate any vegetative screening or materials. The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant minor development approval subject to a detailed design submittal of the parking area, prior to the issuance of any building permit. Existing landscaping shall be identified, as well as proposed vegetation and all surface treatments. Finally, removing this structure entirely does not preclude the new construction of a secondary "cottage" style building in the future. Staff feels it is appropriate for the HPC to require, or strongly encourage, the applicant to restore the exterior siding and front porch within a defined time frame, in exchange for the demolition of the outbuilding. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC: 1) recommend Landmark Designation for the parcel at 316 E. Hyman Ave. 2) grant demolition approval for the non-historic outbuilding located at the alley at 316 E. Hyman, finding the structure to be exempt from meeting the Demolition Standards in Section 7-602. 3) grant minor development approval subiect to a detailed design submittal of the parking area prior to the issuance of any building permit. Existing landscaping shall be identified, as well as proposed vegetation and all surface treatments. 4) strongly encourage the restoration of the cottage wood horizontal clapboard siding and front porch. Additional comments: memo.hpc.316eh.ld.md . 1 I , 71 ~t~1 9- I w r - 4 4 ... 4-- I ~4140 4 42 2 - . .4 Â· ,1 Al'maâ€¢ENT 1 U~PPgaMOI RIN 00 0 1) hoject want ]16 East Hopkins , 2 ) Project Iocation _ 316 East Hopkins, Lot h, Block 80 City and Townsite of Aspen (indicate street address, lot & block :u,ber, legal description diere appropriate) 3) Present Zoning CC 4) Iot Size _3(20 sq. f t. 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # Margaret Johnson c/o Brooke Peterson 315 East Hyman Ave., Aspen, Colorado 81611 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # B. Joseph Krabacher, Krabacher, Hill & Edwards P.C., 201 North Mill Streets Suite 201, Aspen, Colorado 81611, (303) 925-6300. 7) Type of Application (please dieck all that apply): Cor*litional Use Conieptual SPA Conoephial Historic Dev. Special Revia.r Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Oonceptual PUD _1_ Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final ED Historic Danolition Mcnntain View Plane Subdivision X Hishec Designatirâ€¢1 -- 9*f'* Yf~f? APP '6 -. lilli 41 Ocnhnininmization Text/Map Ameniment GUS Allatinent Iat Split/Int line -GDOS E=ption Adjustment XXX Exemption for Demolition under 8) Description of Existing Uses (rnmber and type of existing structures; OrdinanCE approodmate sq. ft.; Iumber of bedroams; any previous approvals grarted to the No. 9 properkA - Series 01 990 1991. historic cottage of ~90 sq. ft. . 1, and non-historic out building of,nn sq. ft., with marlitinnAl flnnr ArPA of 113 sq. ft. within enclosdd porch." 9) Description of Develoiment Application Exemption from Demolition Standards under Ordinance No. 9 Series of 1991 for non-historic out building 10) Have you attached the following? x Response to Attachment 2, Minim= Submission Contents X Respanse to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Oontents x Resporse to Attadment 4, Review Stardards for Your Application LAND USE APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM DEMOLITION STANDARDS PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 9, SERIES OF 1991 AND MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL I. Minimum Submission Contents for all Development Applications. A. The Applicant's name is Margaret Johnson, Trustee of the Duane Robert Johnson and Margaret Whitfield Johnson Revocable Trust, and her address is c/o Brooke A. Peterson, 315 East Hyman Ave., Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-8166. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a letter stating the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. B. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur is 316 East Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado also known as Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. C. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a title insurance commitment disclosing the ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur and listing names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel. D. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a survey map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. E. Attached as Exhibit 4 is the Historic Architectural Building/Structural Inventory Form for the residence located at 316 East Hopkins. F. Attached as Exhibit 5 is the Andrews and Anderson report on 1991 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. II. Specific Submission Contents and Review Standards. A. This is an application for exemption from demolition standards, for the proposed demolition of a non-historic outbuilding consisting of approximately 300 square feet and a covered and enclosed porch of approximately 113 square feet, located on the north (alley side) portion of Lot 0, Block 30, City and Townsite of Aspen. The Applicant proposes to demolish the existing outbuilding pursuant to the exemption from the demolition standards set forth in Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1991, as codified in Land Use Code Â§ 7-602(E). B. The Applicant proposes to provide voluntarily a parking area on the north end of the subject parcel for three off- street parking spaces. The parking spaces are illustrated on the enclosed drawings, Exhibit 6. F 41 1- f'.1, ... c. The Applicant is applying for an exemption from the demolition standards pursuant to Land Use Code Â§7-602(E). The following information shows that the application meets the conditions for the exemption of Â§7-602(E): 1. The Applicant is simultaneously applying for Historic Landmark Designation of the miner's cottage located on the south end (Hopkins Street) side of the lot. The landmark designation has significant benefits to the City of Aspen for many reasons, including: ( 1) the prominence of the cottage on the north side of East Hopkins Street in the 300 block; and (ii) the cottage is located next to the similarly small scale miner's cottage housing La Cocina Restaurant. With the proposed redevelopment of the south side of East Hopkins Street in the 300 block, wherein the Lily Reid cottage is being relocated to the corner, the preservation of the 316 East Hopkins cottage will be important for the Aspen downtown commercial core area as well as the 300 block of East Hopkins. 2. The existing historic cottage requires substantial maintenance and repairs. In order to facilitate the preservation of the existing cottage, the Applicant proposes to demolition the 300 square foot non-historic shed located on the alley in order to provide alley parking. The continued viability of the historic cottage will be greatly enhanced by landmark designation and the enhanced financial ability of the new owners to maintain the most important asset located on the lot -- the historic cottage. 3. The present owner of the property is elderly and retired in Arizona. She recently suffered the loss of her husband and is anxious to sell her long-time Aspen property. Initially, the Bank of Aspen proposed to purchase the property for $350,000.00. The owners of the hair salon located in the historic cottage, Peter Rizzuto and Tuvia Stein, exercised their right of first refusal to acquire the property. The contract to purchase requires HPC approval for the demolition of the non-historic shed before the transaction can close. 4. The Applicant has conducted a study of the value of the property with and without the demolition of the non-historic shed. A ... report to be prepared by Scot Barringer of Barringer, Ryan and Vance Investment Counselors will illustrate the detrimental economic effect of not permitting any demolition of the shed. Although the economics of the transaction are not necessarily the concern of the HPC, this information illustrates the fact that the proposed owners of the property will be able to take care of deferred maintenance and maintain the historic cottage as an historic landmark. 5. The Inventory Form for the property describes the shed as: "single gable shed with shed addition; rolled asphalt and vertical board, new retail, modifications with fixed glass. "As to the date of that addition, the inventory states: "date unknown. " As stated in the Inventory Form, the historic significance of the property is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, but rather the home-environment and life style of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated by the silver mining industry. Removal of the non-historic shed will not adversely affect the essential historic character of the property since the main cottage will remain and will become a local historic landmark. 6. The structure is not identified on the 1986 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. In addition, the structure is not proposed for addition to the 1991 Inventory. See Exhibit 5. The Report on the 1991 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures prepared by Andrews and Anderson dated July 8, 1991 does not identify the non-historic outbuilding as a proposed addition to the 1986 Inventory. Accordingly, the City's expert consultants agree that the shed is non- historic and non-contributing. 7. The structure is non-contributing to the Historic District as shown by the 1986 and 1991 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. The out-building has no architectural significance because it is constructed of non-historic materials including "barn wood" vertical siding and has non-historic roof shapes and facades. Although the scale and small size of the shed may be compatible with the residential historic neighborhoods in Aspen, it is out of place in the downtown commercial core of Aspen. The structure does not have all utilities and is semi-habitable, although it has in the recent past been leased to the Log Furniture Company and is considered net leasable square footage. 8. The structure does not contribute to the overall character of the Historic District because it is located on the alley and is not visible from the primary facade. The demolition of the non-historic shed will not impact the character of the Historic District because the existing historic cottage will remain on the subject parcel and will be eligible for landmark designation. Although there are other structures located on the alley, the alley is predominated by the existing Bank of Aspen building which is non- historic and the non-historic addition to the Elli's building. 9. The alley structure is also located in the eC Commercial Core Zone District of the City of Aspen. The CC Zone District has the highest intensity of zoning uses, and a small scale shed, although attractive to some, conflicts with the underlying policy of the CC Zone District to allow intensive development. The CC Zone District has no minimum side yard set backs and development is typically lot line to lot line. Likewise, there is no minimum front yard or minimum rear yard setback, (with the exception of trash/utility service areas) so it is consistent with the underlying policy of the CC Zone District to permit the shed to be demolished. 10. The shed currently encroaches on the adjoining property occupied by La Cocina Restaurant as shown on the improvement survey plat enclosed as Exhibit 3. In all likelihood, the shed would be required to be demolished in the future since one of the primary bearing walls would be need to be demolished to remove it from encroaching on the adjoining property. 11. The demolition of the non-historic outbuilding is necessary for redevelopment of the parcel because the building is located directly on the alley where the Applicant wants to locate three off-street parking spaces. Although not directly an HPC historic concern, the City of Aspen desperately needs off-street parking in the commercial core, and the application deserves serious consideration even though the redevelopment is for parking spaces. The Applicant is voluntarily providing the parking spaces, and nothing in this Application should be construed as a binding commitment upon the Applicant or any subsequent owner to maintain the parking spaces shown on the drawing. 12. The redevelopment is being reviewed by the HPC pursuant to this Application. In addition, all future development of the property will be reviewed by the HPC since the property is located within the Historic Overlay District for downtown Aspen. 13. Photographs of the non-historic out building are enclosed with this application and illustrate the state of disrepair of the structure and the non-historic features of the structure. 14. The shed is presently not in compliance with the Uniform Building Code. An estimate of approximately $50 per square foot has been prepared by the Applicant's architect of a cost to bring the shed into compliance with the Uniform Building Code. The costs clearly illustrate the economic impossibility of saving the shed. The HPC should focus its concern instead upon preserving the historic cottage due to its prominent placement on the 300 block of East Hopkins Street. Landmark designation will insure that the cottage is never demolished. III. Review Standards for Minor Development For Voluntary Addition of Parking Spaces. A. The Applicant is voluntarily providing at least three off-street parking spaces which will be a substantial benefit in the downtown CC Commercial Zone District due to the present traffic and parking congestion. The proposed parking area is compatible in character with the historic cottage since it will simply be a flat parking area without any competing structure or improvements. The â€ž. parking is compatible with development on adjacent parcels for the same reasons. B. The proposed voluntary parking area and spaces are consistent with the character of the neighborhood, which includes occasional off-street parking throughout the Commercial Core. C. The proposed parking does not detract from the cultural value of the historic cottage because it will not compete in architectural style, size, facade or placement with the historic cottage. The cultural value of the historic cottage will be enhanced if the application is approved since the owner will have additional funds with which to take care of deferred maintenance and repair of the historic cottage. D. The proposed parking does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of the historic structure since parking is associated with numerous historic structures in Aspen. Further, the parking will be located off-street and to the rear of the primary facade. The alley is heavily travelled by Bank of Aspen customers and the parking will not adversely affect the importance of this alley. Dated: November <_, 1991 -., HILL, 27 EDWARDS P.C. Tr- B. Joseph Krabacher 201 North Mill Street, Suite 201 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-6300 bjk/documents/landuse.316 316 East Ho~kit* Avenue .0 Lot 0, Blk. 80, City of Aspen Pitkin County, Colorado -~ 75Â·0~495 k 7 7. E ~ h JO. 76' Yellow Plastic Cap Rebor & 1 Slory 1.5Â· Shed < COV Forrh Lot N Lot 0 Lot P 3,016 sq. ft. 8 0.069 Acs.+/- f & . 0.0 .. m 1 Story Wood. ~. Frame House r 4 . d Â· â€¢Â· .2. ..... 0 7 Scribed 87*k in Concrete i Â·. Walk - Rebor & -=ZEN . Yellow Plostic Ccp â‚¬ost Hopths ~ ~ in Concrete =7 Scribed Avenue Legend ond Notes: - S Indicates found monument ce described. - G Indicates set monurnint Nbar and cop LS. 15710. - & hdkates control point - Survey Orieniction based on found monuments cs shown. - Easements shown cre from TRfe Commitment Case No. PCT-5689 CJ Issued 8-27-91 by GRAPHIC SCALE Pl#dn Counly Title. Inc. 0 10 20 40 ' 1 1 1 Surveyoe, Certificate: 4 Kenneth R Wilson, be(ng o Regist ered Land Surveyor fri the 2,0,~ H R.le.Am n. Siote of Colorado. do hereby cirtily that this improvement survey woe mode under my *upe,visfon end b he ond correct 1 0 the basi ~~~iuM <:~d~ of my ben.f and knowledge. 1 further cortij> that the Impmvement: on th, above describ,d porc,l on the date, : LS 15710 3Â¢r ~ ecept utiIFty connections orâ€¢ enthO, withfn the boundaries of the parcel, except cs *hown. thet ther. or, no mcroachments upon .51% 14 S 14*50'49~ S 14'50*45' ~ . . EL Â· . . ' 1 ... 4, ,â€ž A:;,&1' 11 f ..20.' 11 .1 , 1<1 .....li.~.':1)1;#râ‚¬q m#y;~ - 4 L . 1 , Â· 1, Â·Â·.,Â·,i. &46 itt i ... .... .. . v Â·Â· I . I ... Â· . , '2.. 44 ' b . I I -,/..1/ I C 1 ' '.i . V . . I ' .rkÂ· f,94. MI Â· Â· Â· 0 Â·r 1. . . 4.:' ''.444Â£ ...4 . . I ... 1 . 1 Â· . . 4 Â· Â·Â· 1,; 115 . . .4 >" L Â·. 0 .. e 0.-- .. . . -..4.. ... . ., '.~ .: . d , .1 1 . 11<2 ~.i 1- 0 . 1 1.. 1 0.6 I , 1 ./ , .1 4 4.0.15 1 0 ..ein,-Â·.: , .I . a. .0 -' 1 ' I . ' , 1.. 4 , : " 2, 1 * .. ...H :'f....a'll. .1 .. 1 4!(7 '1.. . ~ 6..1 7>Efly' 4-'.2,02&*eav,:6,1 %#~1*PRMji~;:;4*, AnÂ·anÂ·ac.t, ~uill;i ) siÂ·..i,2.1 ,&.1 . . .. I. ./ --: . f---.â€¢v--1-2':.."p 'P Â·~' '' â€¢ â€¢ Â·Â·~ . i ..1 <'. ... 421. 1,4 9 4 % ..:- ' GLÂ·.a: icj?i{(#we#e,I,ji,:I: *Â·. Â·t.~ :Â· ~Â· I*Â· : fflk Â·Â· 3.2 <J...1.1....:, <.4..it.. . ;t. .. P i F.2/ 'f 41 a 1 11 ./ . 1 1 . . . Â·Â· Â·, Â·Â· Â·Â·Â· ' Â· Â· ,0 Â· Â· Â·*4Â· :Â· . t IpÂ· , r' 13 It , : .:thr)'1; . . 0 ... .. . . .. . I I :.' -I , .:1â€¢ I . 1. ~,Â·' tr,' .... 7,/ 1.. r F.... , I Â· -/ 0 2 /::: ' .2/:*4:/ 'KI: t .' / 2 ... U. 4 4 .g b M. 1.9- I - .Â·'Â·1 I.:'1. 3....t. c" . Â· 4. , , ..:. .-Â· i â€¢ 1,1 51~ .1 * R/,1 :fpr.U? 1.!1:it..ti- L. ., I. â€ž f % . . ..:.. 4. I I ., .' 2..0~1 '1:6 0 , 4 41 .i :Â·Â·itat Â·ti:;el <.9;4@I. I . . 1, , I. . - r 'Â· 4 , ITEÂ·. 0 $ i . 1 1 5.: bil 216 mal- flctÂ·Kms UN, ION* f /G?M' 91*6 Slug\1% (,4.4 -j *.... 1,1 Ill 1 -ScaME. i - I." I ' I - . . 1 I . *I. 44 .-, HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 316.EH Photo Information: ASP-CC-2-9 Township 10 South Range 84 West Section 7 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Annie Krapf House/On Location Hair Salon Full Street Address: 316 East Hopkins Legal Description: Lots O, P, Block 80 Citv and Townsite of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Commercial Core Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residence Architectural Style: Victorian Miner's Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1 Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irregular rectangle Landscaping or Special Setting Features: No Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): Single qable shed with shed addition; rolled asphalt and vertical board, new retail, modifications with fixed qlass For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Cross qabled; asphalt shingles Walls: Clapboard with decorative shingles Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): Red brick corbeled Windows: All new: 2 3-sided bays. sidelights. storefront type Doors: 2. transom / 1/2 light / wood panel Porches: Shed entrance on turned posts with cut out brackets General Architectural Description: Victorian Miner's Cottaqe with extensive modifications to accommodate commercialuse. i q : Â¥*â€¢ *Tz.4 1*Â¥ Ii, .. 5 ti t; Ft-ty-7- ... Page 2 of 2 State Site Number _ Local Site Number 316.EH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Commercial Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1884 - 1885 Actual X Estimate Based On: Building style MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Date unknown. but changed from residential to commercial use with associated modifications in the 1980's: bay windows. doors. canopy - dates unknown Additions and Date: Rear shed addition. date unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Key Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 11 - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The historical signi- ficance of this former residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it. nor of its architecture, although it is represen- tative of Aspen's Mining Era. It illustrates the home/environment and lifestvle(s) of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: March 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin. Historic Preservation Officer/Planner P C-1 6 6 C.2 -"- STREET EE. MA i M 6-FÂ«~ j -_11~_~220-2.-r-3 -_ ~7 F___-- ------------1- 101 11 11 1 11 4 6 Ti i.':~ 174 â‚¬170:49 / LP ELL\'5 4 -363- ~ C sc>fr - 601 Li / 14 r wes / 1 4-1 - -4 Aci . 00 / b CE $ 1 044 11-7- 't. 41 A5 9 (, 2 11 1 (U/) / ~ LA--tt%19 _ --I- 1 10- -7 1 Â»30 7904.7 x -Â« / A \ ffi 0 LI id .3 - 1 4 50% ~ 13- 4-2 _ 1- 11- -45,0 -- - I-1-7 X 4. r 30~tdA 23 SIU 1205 iCE\)~'- , i, 11 :, 4. 1â€žACos Ttle HUT<,A . 1 1 4 K Â« r_x 86) \9 @f;t - 3 .#.V. E. 41epkiNs Ave. X ~OALLT NO /4 - (641-g,L DOW 4,6 (_l NEW 11 \~1 070 (1/ AtÂ·4 TREET ... INDEX OF EXHIBITS 1. Letter of Authorization from Owner. 2. Title Insurance Commitment. 3. Improvement Survey Map. 4. Historic Architectural Building Structure Form for 316 East Hopkins 5. Andrews and Anderson Report on 1991 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures 6. Bill Poss & Associates' Schematic Drawing. bjk/documents/landuse.316 41:-- - -r r - -s- i_ irt'& *- "-6 kbri-2 7/ 9 w .-4 - - -I'. 316 East /pkins Avenue Lot 0, Blk. 80, City of Aspen Pitkin County, Colorado 0..t 1 7~ E Â·322 76, Rebar & ti . yellow Plastic cop 1 Story 1.5Â· Shed < COV, 4 Porrh Lot N Lot 0 Lot P , 3,016 sq. ft. 8 0.069 Acs.+/- & . 40 1 Story Wood. 0, Frame House , . d ..8. r ..... 0 7 Scribed 02*4 2 in Concrete -2** A- a . Rebor & e t . Yellow Plastic Cop Eost 7' Scribed ~ 0 in Concrete - Hopkins Avenue Legend ond Notes: - S bdicates found monument as descr*>ed. - * Indicates .t monument rebor and cop LS. 15710. - & indkates control point - Survey Orientation based on found monuments 08 shown. - Easements shown cre from TRie Commament Cose No. POT-5689 CJ Issued 8-27-91 by GRAPHIC SCALE P/Bdn Count' Title, Inc. 0 10 20 40 1ll Surveyor'i Certlncate: 4 Kenneth R. Mison, being c Registered Lond Surveyor in the '59!!.UN n. Slate of Colorado, do hereby cirtily thal this improvement survey wos mode under my super~sion and b true and correct to the best ~GIST,42:f:GA of my ben.f and knowledge. 1 further c,rtil> that the knprovements on the above discribod Doref on the dcle. Ixcept uti#ty connictions orâ€¢ Inthly wIthin the boundarin of i LS 15710 1Â¢r the parcel, except as shown. that ther, or, no Incroachments upon 1. thi discribed prem/,es by *nprowmmts on any adjoining pmmim except ce hdjectid, ond that th,re b no apparent *funce or 0%2Â·2 sURvelÂ¢:.9 *Ign of any -sement crossing or burdening ony port of mid parc,l, Ircepl os noted. r OF.66059> 21-40 lA)1 14 Or K,+Ath R. WIlson LS. 157*0 JOB # 91144 File kroimp #64 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. - E-EIRS 1001 GRAND AVE., SUITE 2-E ) SURVEYORS GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO. 81601 (303) 945-1004 s= GM GORDON MEYER S 74=5 ' S 14'250'49" LAW OFFICES KRABACIIER, IIILL & EDWARDS PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION JEROME PROFESSIONAL BUILDING 201 NORTH MILL STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 B. JOSEPH KRABACHER TELEPHONE THOMAS C. HILL (303) 925-6300 JOSEPH E. EDWARDS, 111 (303) 925-7116 TELECOPIER OF COUNSEL (303) 925-1181 JOSEPH E. EDWARDS, JR. November 21, 1991 Roxanne Eflin Historic Preservation Planner City of Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena, Third Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: 316 East Hopkins Dear Roxanne: I have been doing some research on the history of the alley structure located on 316 E. Hopkins. I wanted to provide you with some additional information that I discovered before you complete your review of the development application. I am enclosing a copy of a 1972 survey by Jim Reser. It shows the shed and the encroachment onto the adjacent La Cocina property. In 1972, the shed had a square footprint. As you can see by comparing this survey with the current survey prepared by Ken Wilson, there have been substantial additions to the shed since 1972. It appears that both of the porches have been added and that the shed itself has been enlarged to the west. The current shed has a rectangular footprint, and was added on to two or three sides since 1972. If you have any questions, please give me a call. KRABACHER, HILL & EDWARDS, P.C. By: -\â‚¬MEL-/- BJK/ch B. Jos*ph' Krabacher Enclosures as recited ALLEÂ¥ h , f ' 4 ... r N-73-04 1 "W Cy:Â»4=R t.cr =r 4(21 lee,0.% 1 ...Â· I r R.KeTC CAP 1 . .=1 . 1 - Â· W U ; SCALE. p ' 10~ 1 . PR Fwi . ./Â·,4:19 1 KÂ·45.0 , â€¢' 7 1 Scer ' te,Râ€¢<15 21.12Â£3 CN Ma.NO LCT C:yir *irS 1 . W./6 2 4.1, Wace RA,Â£61/ 1 4 ~ -,02Vee:z,5 7=.- i . r-nar-- - 1140 0 0 ~=-gn/â€¢Â·r -rl#,~r THIS ,~Lâ€¢.1 -,4..~-r-1TZ:Ca' R::PeÂ©er,ITO A S..,teer CM LOUÂ© h.1 , N, C,~0.1 - so "1 f. . I. 4, . rt,6/120 Uâ€¢,Cem. MÂ·r' CLM-~tv'SON 01 MA=.2-1 '21 + crri c-,â€¢S=,34 1, ptâ„¢UN CCUNT-b, CX,-Câ‚¬Arth L.UN-- . I . elz ' :' ". ' ~~te I '/i./ ... ... JAJAL:5 M %O=-RÂ· LS 98.4 l 42 . 44*A 1 f .Irt*.-, .A 1 fl- 91- 31 1 . / I "126.=/6/49 1 . 4.0, COLO'. 00*Â©0 1 , 1 L.gr L Lar M | LOr N LOT O 1 1 . ul Â· U E - ba . . 1 L-=C;A,res. Or2UJU;22 04 LCXS )-1 IN 98 . -.. Z ' Â· - 14. 1 - I al .. I f 4.: I .3. " I 1 1 - 8 TRI-Cc ... 72-27-1 f r. ASPEN 1 5O2vE *1 2 k I I _ty %.7 Â· . 9 / .. . 1 1 2 + le 1 /1 1Â·mÂ·04+N Pre.0,6-2//'2.2 ' = Gale 6 1.4.0, X N 5/CONALK 2104<4'9721 4 1 41<1 x H=,UL 6 1 ,.1 ..1 .. +3., t.%1~.0 . ALLEÂ¥ A N-73.041 1.W C CCÂ»4=,2 1<37- :nr 4,0.71 e .. e 'ter ee.e-42 f... I ' .-' -0. , â€¢ I .4 r R.MOTC CAP I 1 . 1 0 u :: 6 1 11 1 25-1 1 ----* . ... . - 0 1 . .'0! 0 JO =0Â«=7 /; 5-1- 1 SCAL.1 / ' 100 | =Â»JRJNC:5 CAeÂ£:3 04 fel-NO LCDT CCÂ» !MS:S I . /13 ~jecze fmALE EriEL + 1. 1 1 --7â‚¬32Veâ‚¬:=5 -d=-1 ,rl- Â»7.- $:2=F'~St:DeNT:5 A -4-Ii,reEN- Cr U,0.-S W p N. e.-CX-- sO, 7->lt:D 0 1ri c...en F.r 71Â·4Â»7 7>4'S ..-/41 Â·./._-3-'C 'J -LA- CITYC,-,ept,Â·1 Pl-n<JN COL-NTh, C~3.0~ZACD,11.Le- . 1 Â· Re.+20 LNCe=:=R. her' Cur-=RE'r=>CN O.1 MACZE:-1 21 + 23 1 Â· 19-72 1 . 1 1 : GAMES M tert L-0 964 l. 4 - 1 1 1 . h 1 1 1 . <2 1 1 t 1 1 1 OLOCK- Â©O I' 1 l.cr M Lor N LOT O . 1 . 1 -4 . rd . . I . Ng;CrumeCN tbS DAâ€¢N 98 - : 1: Tr,ret I . 4 - r Z -. ALÂ£Â»d TRI-CO MANAGEMENT, INC. 1 72-977- I . ASPEN - PUEBLO C0 L0 RA 0O Eceve . Larn W Â»C N, CTY CF *emeN- 1 , -0.1 0.- 1.Vi SCA. r t'Â·d 1 1 coA,tw Ft.0,6-2 11' 0.7 61 1 1 60572 *~44'*92<-FZ.'972. L 44â€¢CES X NX=NAUL h-De x . s,Ce.,AU< 11 1 1 A. 17 P. 1, 1= An 1 1 1, '1 316 East :Tfk~s Avenue 10. Lot 0, Blk. 80, City of Aspen Pitkin County, Colorado 73Â»9~Â®' 4 ti 40. 16. R.bor I reflo. Aost,C COP D- c Lot N Lot 0 Lot P 3,016 sq ft. 8 0.069 Acs + /- F & 00 1 Story Wood Frame House I . . *r Scrbed aâ‚¬CA h Cbncrvt, .0. Rebor / Y.No. Plostk Cop Cost lt) in Concrete - *f Stribed lâ€¢,â€¢nd ,â€¢d Not. 8 D*at- R=md morwrr-1 0/ /"crbed I b,dkele, -t monurnent r,bor Ind cop LS. 15710 A b#Afof- con 40/ po.h f Sur=, Orimlotion Dc,â€¢d - found monurr-nt, I *hown E.-n,nb .hown .1 *om â„¢, CbmmR,n,nt Cli' No PCT-5689 0 /1-4 8-27-/1 by GRAPHIC SCALE -in Cwmb' Wiz k 0 1020 40 1 1 Sur'OveÂ» Artne": '.SS=.... F.T ) L De.-A R ..O.6 6.4 . *bler* 1,4 Se-yor h thâ€¢ Stâ‚¬** d CWorodo, * h,eâ€¢b, cirt/6 that EN, h,prov,m/nt *wrY,y meâ€¢ mod, -der 0.9 -rpefÂ¥~fon Ind h bve Ind corr,el to th. bid /**/i; /;;@A 0 117 6011" -d kno-de' 1 'Wrther c.elity that tAâ€¢ liti hÂ¥no,nent, w - obon /00â€¢64 porrf 08 - *10, aic*f ,Â£4 CO-CÂ«ofâ€¢: Ire -tht, 'Rhb the Doundcrie â€¢f 0- -G< 4, - 0-4 0,0 D-v - Mo =crvoct,nont, upon . â‚¬~1.1 , 1 Iâ€¢, /â€žcrh,d Vim/,- 4, APâ€¢,-ment, In 07 odjobing pnmi,91 ~~'DeÂ·:-suâ€¢wrio:Â·.4' / /#C,0/ /, hk#04. /nd /it /-, h .0 **OF,n! -M-H /< Ar d Il -Nmml Hidy w D,~01*g ,9 'Irl 0 -B /0-l -c.t . ..1.4 villizi"562:*SifFIEEEZE;;000/v /0,4Â«y-40 11)1 14 0. Jilr- le,;nom R Brbon LS. 15710 JOB # *1144 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. D' 'L.â‚¬,EMS 1001 GRAND AVE., SUITE 2- E GLENWOOD SPRINGS. CO. 81601 (303) 945- 1004 ..0,4....1 ..r w S 1080 S 14.50'49. 1 lilli S--Â·Â· Â· *@Il ~ LAW OFFICES ~ ~ BROOKE A, PETERSON APROFESSIONALCORPORATION 315 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN.COLORAD081611 1303) 925-8166 TELEFAX:(303) 925-1090 HAND DELIVERED October 9, 1991 City of Aspen Planning Office 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Lot O, Block 30. City and Townsite of Aspen To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that the undersigned is the attorney for Margaret Johnson, Trustee of the Duane Robert Johnson and Margaret Whitfield Johnson Revocable Trust, owner of the above referenced property. In that capacity, on behalf of my client, Margaret Johnson, I authorize the potential purchasers of the property, Mr. Peter Rizzuto and Mr. Tuvia Stein to make land use applications to the City of Aspen involving this property. Of course, nothing contained herein shall constitute pre-approval of any conditions which may be attached to any approval for any application. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, A P*6fess~on~l - ration BM : /Aia#le, 1 - 1 /Bfooke A. Pererson - ~'CommonwealthÂ® Land Title Insurance Company COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective date: 08/27/91 8 8:00 A.M. Case No. PCT-5689 03 2. Policy or policies to be issued: (a)ALTA Owner's Policy-Form B-1970 Amount $ 350,000.00 ( Rev. 10-17-70 & 10-17-84) or 10/21/87 Premium $ 1,068.00 PROPOSED INSURED: PETER RIZZUTO AND TUVIA STEIN (b)ALTA Loan Policy, Amount $ (REV. 10-21-87) Premium $ PROPOSED INSURED: (c)Alta Loan Construction Policy, 1975 Amount $ (Rev. 10-17-84) Premium S PROPOSED INSURED: Tax Cert. $ 10.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: DUANE ROBERT JOHNSON AND MARGARET WHITFIELD JOHNSON, TRUSTEES OF THE DUANE ROBERT AND MARGARET WHITFIELD JOHNSON REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 15, 1989 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOT 0, 6-OCK 80, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 303-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules Fax 303-925-6527 A and B are attached. Authorized officer or agent J J A-D c k. L.-J GL17 bla '\ tt~) U 1 /-~ 1- M - 1 7 I 2 CommonwealthÂ® ~ , 0 0 23 Land Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE B-SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: 1. Deed From : Duane Robert Johnson and Margaret Whitfield Johnson, Trustees of the Duane Robert and Margaret Whitfield Johnson Revocable Trust Dated June 15, 1989 To : Peter Rizzuto and Tuvia Stein 2. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990) has been paid or exempted. 3. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale, Notice to County Assessor, as required by H.B. 1288, Notice to County Assessor, has been complied with and that no fees or penalties exist or are currently due. 4. Certificate of Nonforeign Status signed by the Transferors. 5. Termination Statement for Financing Statement from Zee For Hair, Ltd., and Zee, John, individually, debtors to Rizzuto, Peter, and Rizzuto, Ellyn. secured party, filed January 15, 1984 in Book 459 at Page 854 as Filing No. 08122. giving a notice of a security interest pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code. 6. Good and sufficient termination of the Assignment and Consent Agreement recorded in Book 459 at Page 837. Said termination shall be executed by Duane R. Johnson and Margaret W. Johnson. 7. Good and sufficient termination of the Collateral Assignment and the attached Promissory Note shown as Exhibit "A", recorded in Book 459 at Page 841. Said termination shall be executed by Peter Rizzuto and Ellyn Rizzuto. NOTE: Trust Affidavit for the Duane Robert and Margaret Whitfield Johnson Revocable Trust, disclosing the names and address of the trustees, recorded August 16, 1989 in Book 599 at Page 729, shows the following: Duane Robert Johnson and Margaret Whitfield Johnson 1116 East Cinnabar Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85020 continued P -6 - - ~ CommonwealthÂ® Land Title Insurance Company NOTE: Verification of the above Trust Affidavit for the Duane Robert and Margaret Whitfield Johnson Revocable Trust, disclosing the names and address of the trustees, recorded August 16, 1989 in Book 599 at Page 729, shows the following: Duane Robert Johnson and Margaret Whitfield Johnson 1116 East Cinnabar Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85020 This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 1 PG.2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. POT-5689 03 A and B are attached. ~ CommonwealthÂ® ~ 0 0 0 Land Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in the Deeds form the City of Aspen recorded in Book 23 at Page 132 and in Book 59 at Page 252 as follows: That, no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 PG.1 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-5689 03 A and B are attached. + + -'*. --- *- 10- FRI CommonwealthÂ® Ug Land Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE B-SECTION 2 CONTINUED Exceptions numbered NONE are hereby omitted. The Owner's Policy to be issued, if any, shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-2; NOTE: Each title entity shall notify in writing every prospective insured in an owner's title insurance policy for a single family residence (including a condominium or townhouse unit) (i) of that title entity's general requirements for the deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to unfiled mechanics or materialmens liens, except when said coverage or insurance is extended to the insured under the terms of the policy. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons indicated in the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. Upon receipt of these items and any others requirements to be specified by the Company upon request, Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the Owner's policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requirement upon any title insurer to provide mechanics or materialmens lien coverage. NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners' closing under circumstances where it is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said transaction, the Company will be deemed to have provided "Gap Coverage". Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122); (a) The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District; (b) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained from the County Treasurer of the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (C) Information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners. the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: A Tax Certificate will be ordered from the County Treasurer by the Company and the costs therefor charged to the proposed insured u.nless writte.n instructions to the contrary are received by the company prior to the issuance of the Title Policy anticipated by this Commitment. This* commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-5689 03 A and B are attached. .. 0. Commitment For Title Insurance Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, herein called the company, for a valuable con- sideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate 120 days after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall be issued, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Company has caused its Corporate Name and Seal to be hereunto affixed; this instrument, including Commitment, Conditions and Stipulations attached, to become valid when countersigned by an Authorized Officer or Agent of the Company. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ~ Attest:*u &2 6/674 97 11 92 44 Secretary President Conditions and Stipulations 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incuned pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the pohcy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipulations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. PA 3 American Land Title Association Commitment - 1966 Cover Page Form 1004-8 00 00 A REPORT ON 1991 BA'ENTDRY OF HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCIURES -15x*4 /il Yr~ /7 -U I ' tIIIrI 1 I .:< / - 'jit/9 8 1 /i/1 , ASPEN Â· COLORADO J ANDREWS & ANDERSON L- -J .- D--4 In ' 4 6.. .. I .... 0 , I 0. 0. Andrm & Andenon 806 Panridir CIrcle Golden, Color,do 80403 303Â·27&4378 1 July 8,1991 Ms. Roxanne Elin Planning/Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen Planning Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Roxanne: With this transmittal we conclude the work performed by Andrews & Anderson for the 1991 update of Aspen's Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. Accompanying this letter, you will lind the following: 1. the remaining forms from the Ute Avenue Area, Smuggler Mountain, East Aspen Townsite, the area west of Castle Creek Hallam Lake and the Commercial Core, all of which have now received their final review and which are ready for fnal typing (for this portion of the project) 2. catalogued negatives for all photos taken by Andrews & Anderson (rolls ASP-A through ASP-H and ASP-K through ASP-U) and catalogued negatives for three rolls taken by one of yow Commissioners (roll 1 - Hallam Lake and rolls CC-1 and CC-2 - Commercial Core) 3. a copy of the 1893 Bird's Eye View of Aspen 4. two maps of the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures and one map of the 1986 update 5. the 3-ring binder which includes copies of most of the National Register forms on Aspen 6. a Inal report which outlines our methodology, findings, and recommendations and which includes a master list of the inventoried sites 7. our fmal invoice for the project 8. the Main Street District forms, which were mistakenly sent back to us in this last batch of forms Please let us know if you need any additional interpretation of the enclosed information. Although the scope of our work on this project was of a limited nature, we have given our recommendations careful consideration in the context of Aspen's sometimes exceptional historic resource and its current economic realities. Once again, thank you for getting us involved in the update, for your hospitality, and for the opportunity to work in a very unique mountain community. If any future projects aim in the direction of our expertise, we would be delighted to be considered for them. Sincerely, 1 -1, 96*A-/1+Ke , I el-- Deborah Andrews Nanon Adair Anderson AIA *-4 -8.-1 ~ ..,- a. 0 --0 CONIENTS METHODOLOGY SUMMARY OF DATA & OBSERVAnONS - RECOMMENDATIONS SAMPLE FORM (A&:A PURVIEW) VERIFIED DEMOUSHED BULDINGS RECOMMENDED =DROPS' FROM THE INVENTORY 1991 MASTER LIST 1 . 1 1 -1 2 -ell*foo:~ 7- .â€¢ .........rÂ· Â¥ 0-- M.4 4 ./. 4 t. .. .... METHODOLOGY In January of 1991, the architectural studio of Andrews & Anderson was retained by the City of Aspen to update specific information for the 1991 Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. lo sum, the 1991 Inventory was to survey all properties which were previously listed on the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures and the 1986 Inventory Update, and was to identify and inventory any new sites noticed during the course of the field survey. 11 was Aspen's responsibility to combine 1991 survey data, collected by A & A with previously-recorded inventory information on a ne,&, more comprehensive inventory form created by the Aspen Historic Presen'ation Omce. The specific portions of the new form for which Andrews & Anderson had responsibility are highlighted on a blank form on pages 5-6. In general, the pur'view of Andrews & Anderson included field survey and photography for approximately 300 sites in 10 geographicany-distmct areas of the City and its environs. The 10 areas included: the Community Church district, the Commercial Core Historic District, East Aspen Townsite, Hallam Lake, the Main Street Historic District, Shadow Mountain, Smuggler Mountain, Ute Avenue, the area west of Castle Creck and the West End. For each site, Andrews & Anderson provided the following: 1. photography and pboto-cataloguing 2. architectural and/or site description 3. USGS toI,ographic map location 4. Seld survey information on the extent of site and/or architectural modifications 5. a recommendation' for a 1991 local Kignificance rating , The process listed below describes the order of work undertaken during the course of the project: 1. initial recoonnaisance and photography of the sites is performed by Andrews & Anderson Z architectural and/or site descriptions are checked for accuracy and consistency back at the Golden, Colorado studio of Andrews & Anderson; photographs and negatives are labeled according to Colorado Historical Society standards; reviewed forms and attached photographs are returned to Roxanne Efiin, Historic Preservation Officer for Aspen/Pitkin : 3. in Aspen: forms are entered onto the computer file; data from previous inventories (Le. 1980 and 1986) is entered onto the same flle 4. forms are returned to Andrews & Anderson for a second check; AkA reviews the portion of the forms for which they are directly responsible before returning the forms to Aspen for fnal typing of this phase of the project Andrews & Anderson recognizes that through the above-stated process, a major portion of the 1991 Aspen Inventory of i Historic Sites and Structures was accomplished. It is important to note that there is still research and coordination to be undertaken, outside of A & A's purview, before the Inventory is complete. Recommendations for completing the Inventory may be found on pages 3-4. , 1 j * The definitions for local ratings on the 1980 and 1986 inventories varied slightly, but it was agreed between the Historic Preservation Officer and Andrews & Anderson that the following rating system be employed for the 1991 Inventor): . O Significant listed on or ma) be eligible for the National Register 8 Conlributing: resource has maintained historical or architectural integrity O Supporting- resource has maintained-some element(s) of its historical integrity and in general, is "retrievable~ with substantial effort , 1 . 46 . .... SUMMARY OF DATA AND OBSERVAMONS The 1991 Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures yielded survey forms representing a total of 267 properties which remain on, or were recommended to be added to, the inventory. This is a net decrease of 4 from the 1986 inventory count of 273 forms*. The following is a breakdown of the 307 sites surveyed by Andrews & Anderson: 234 revisions and upgrades of the 1986 Inventory Update forms _32 recommended for addition to the Inventory 266 SUBTOTAL 13 recommended Inventory'drops"* (see page 8); (Andrews & Anderson recommendations) 28 verified demolitions (sce page 7) 309 PROJECTTOTAL: SITES INVENTORIED IN 1991 The majority building type on the inventory is single-family residential. In key residential districts, Le. the Community Church district Hallam Lake, Smuggler Mountain; the West End and Ealt Aspen Townsite, this is virtually the only building type. In the Main Street Historic District, the majority of buildings, though largely originally single- family residential, are now commercial conversions. In the Commercial Core Historic District, the majority of buildings were and remain commercial storefront. Properties from the outlying districts, Le. Ute Avenue and the area west of Castle Creek include buildings and site features from Aspen's mining era (Le., farm buildings as well as cemeteries, brewery ruins, power plants, railroad bridges, and mine sites). The Shadow Mountain area includes early ski-era lodges and Boat-Tow #1, in addition to its mostly residential buildings . Some general observations can be made, based on the limited time expended in updating this inventory: 1. The overall Historic Resource for the City of Aspen can be considered to be at risk due to economic pressures which are unique to the City's current ski-resort persona. 1 The general pressure is towards both commercial and residential expansion. The I pressures manifest themselves in alterations to an invidual building's style/materials/ detailing, to its scale, to its context, and finally as a threat to its very existence. These pressures also manifest themselves as a parallel force affecting and altering the style, 1 scale and contenural characteristics of any given district. 2. An immediate focus of the Aspen Planning Department's Historic Preservation Officer over the past three years has been to close gaps in guidelines and to address clear and cohesive preservation goals. The development of a loophole-free system of legal and economic incentives is vital for the management of the above referenced erosion of historical conten and of individual resources. 3. The degree of threat and speed of erosion differs from survey district to survey district. Those districts which remain relatively stable (although by no means unaffected) include the Commercial Core, Main Street, and the outlying areas (if only because these areas are not yet in the path of development pressures). The most at risk areas include the East Aspen Townsite (eight demolitions and seven recommendations to drop due to loss of historic integrity since 1986), and the West End (twelve demolitions and four recommendations to drop). The remaining districts can be considered to fal] somewhere in the middle range of this continuum. ' Please note that two 1986 Inventory sites were not resurveyed (The Aspen Institute and Riding Ring Rodeo Grounds) "Properties recommended to be dropped were evaluated qualitatively based on the following criteria: (1) Integrity of material, de:ailing- style features; (2) Integrity of massing and scale; (3) Integrity of conten and contribution to conten. 2 -- -- ----- '--- .-Il- - --I. ---.4 ....4. m . I .. . - 3- .... RECOMMENDAnONS The recommendations resulting from the completion of this inventory fall into the follov*ing categories: 1. COMPLETION OF THE 1991 INVENTORY ; 2. ONGOING INVENTORY MANAGEMENT 3. HISTORIC RESOURCE PLAN AND INTERFACE WITH OVERALL PLANNING DEPARTMENT GOALS 1. Completion of the 1991 Inventory should include: i a. Completion of the 1991 Inventory forms (possibly by a summer intern) as soon as possible. Attached is a sample inventory form highlighting the areas for which A&A was specifically responsible. The remaining areas require review, coordination and completion. b. Assembly of missing National Register Nomination Forms as well as identification of new properties which may be eligible (see A & A'& 1991 rating recommendations on 'Master List, pages 9-15) and a strategy for completing nominations for those properties. c Update of the City of Aspen Historic Inventor) Map, preferably with a graphics revision to improve legibilit> and usability. Ideally, this mapping would be easily overlayed with the Cily Planning and Zoning mapping system. i i A 1991 or 1992 summer project to inventory and map the City irrigation ditch system so that it can be incorporated into the inventory and into the Historic Resource Plan. e. A summer 1991 documentation of Aspen Grove Cemetery, Ute Cemetery, and the Durant Mine, all of which were inaccessible at the time of this inventory due to snow. 2. An ongoing inventory management program is recommended so that properties and districts can be better tracked over time, and more informed decisions can be made regarding the fate of an individual property, or the course of the overall Historic Resource Plan. a. Assignment of permanent control numbers to each inventoried property would allow tracking of any given property through its "life'. Some of the data to be tracked could include: the site's significance rating, contiguous historic resources, dates of changes in status, date of entry onto the inventory, number of sites on the inventory, etc Note: A system other than or in addition to the property address system is suggested. b. Every 5 years the inventory and inventory map should be completely updated. c The inventory tracking system should be tied to the Building Permit system so that resource updates occur on a continual basis and so that "red flags" are raised when a resource is threatened. 3. A Historic Resource Plan is recommended which would dovetail with overall City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Goals. The Plan would be incorporated into and reviewed at the time of any master planning. This Plan could address, but not be limited to the following: a. A Goal Statement which is consistent with overall Planning Goals, but specific to Aspen's Historic Resource b. A Statement of Objectives which derive from that Goal Statement and which are time- specific c Provisions for ongoing coordination with Planning and Zoning d A statement for and description of a historic property ranking (Le. landmark significant, contributing; and supporting) which would include the implications of that rinking on any legal and economic controls and/or incentives c. Provisions for the development of a comprehensive package of controk incentives, public relations and public education, which will be supportive of the best preservation and utilization of Aspen's Historic Resource and consistent with the community's vision of its future. 3 .....4 ....7 .......0 ... . 1 ... tr.. 4 1. C 1 2 1 3 . '. - f.Â¥7 - h , , 0. 0. RECOMMENDATIONS continued The above recommendations by no means intend to be comprehensive, nor do they presume to take the place of more in-depth findings by those with greater understanding of the community and its resource. It is simply intended that they provide assistance, as deemed appropriate, with the on-going work of preservation planning. i . 1 i 1 1 4 --- . Â·Â·Â· -Â· -â€¢â€¢ -- . -; 4 - .-. - Z t 1 -- HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: - Local Site Number: â€¢ 1009. Dhoto-Information: LUP-* _ 001 v= )89*.ht*-10-569th-Rarige--r Wâ€¢â€¢t-Section 4' A USGS Quad Name Ampen Year _1960-~JONSA-~fp 15' - by j.s . Wilding-or- Structure - Name : . _ 199 485 prowlded Office rcu~bcy of fltage/~rcti,in nverlay-0 ty map In Full Street Address: Legal Description: city . 2 Aspen County ..Pitkin HÂ¢Â®:ttit Diâ€¢trict/Neighborhood Name: 0*ner: Private/State/Federal * Owner'; Mailing Addroms: - &RCIXTECTOUL DESCRIPTION < p Suilding.Type: Architectural Style: Dimensions: 1: - X W: - Square Feet: Number-of-Stories: * *uilding Plan (Footprint, Shape): * Landscaping or Special Setting Features: * Associated-Buildings-,- Features or Objects -_. Describe Material ana tunction (map number / name) : * /or. the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the~ description as appropriate: tdof: * Walls: * *oundation / Basement: * thimney (s) 1 * Ofily)4Â· ~indows: * - field _ nbst-va tionb- w- firum boors: * torches; * t;*herar:Architictural Description: * . V 5 . 1 * .. -I. $ - ......970.-9.-UU....<.W - I .1- Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number * FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current U..: * Architect: *Unknown . Original Us.: * Builder: *Unknawn Intermediate Use: Construction Date: 3 ACtual 1 Estimate 1 Asseesor Ejood On: * RODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS < 6 atal hinor * Moderate * - Majot - * - Moved * 4#WE# photo - bascribe Modifications and Date: . * Ans to 'atiuas or Compafit *ddition, and Date: * m title! obscrz NATIONAL/sitÂ¥k REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA __ Is listed on _ National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; . State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A__ B C _ D__ E Map Ill Local Rating and Landmark Designation T ' ' _ Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register I--l Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Ll - architectural integrity. 0 - Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. 1 Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: * , a,enninted rinnrinxt, ing lilitgrigil int ormation: * Other Recording Information . Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records: Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * CY or N) Justify: * Recorded By: * Date: * Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - Cltv of Aspen 7 Project Manager: Roxanne Â£'flin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner 6 ~ 6Â£t:w-:Â·~Â· ._ â€ž I . 00 00 VERIFIED BUILDING DEMOLmONS Address Area Block 110 North Spring East Aspen Townsite 21 1018 East Hopkins 25 Â· 28 718 East Hopkins : 720 East Hopkins 28 . 624 East Hopkins 29 . 624 East Hopkins 98 . 111 816 East Cooper 835 East Cooper 112 7th & West Smuggler West End 9 831 West Blecker ' 12 726 West Bleeker 17 515 North Fith 20 517 West North Â· 26 . 27 501 West Smuggler 34 437 West Smuggler . 325 West Francis 35 . 407 West Hallam 36 215/219 West Hallam 50 113 West Bleeker ' 58 .. 639 North Fourth 99 i 170 North Park Smuggler Mountain 4 Sunny Park N. . 940 Matchless Drive 3 Alpine Acres 930 King na 300 West Hopkins Shadow Mountain 45 . 915 South Mill na 222 East Hallam Community Church 71 203 East Hallam 72 220 Puppy Smith Hallam Lake na Note: A&A could not locate 120 North Spring, East Aspen Townsite, Block #21 1 i 7 i I . . RECOMMENDED ~VENT0R3 ' 'DROPS' Address Area Blocl # 824 East Hyman - - L Z T' ' East Aspen Townsite 31 990 East Hyman- 3, z. Q. 41< 32 1020 East Hyman - A,Â·05 - 151. le 11 â€¢ 33 . 1031 East Hyman - 26/ 34 1001 East Hyman - c bo tk 34 . 719 East Hopkins - ch, c L 104 . 801 East Hyman - --4 ..~ . 111 407 West Hallam (demo?) - 4*un9* West End 36 . 327 West Hallam - 120 43 305 West Hallam _ 1 43 ".0 r , 51 205 West Blecker - rl v.t>~ 232 East Hanam - r' 6 Â£ r Community Church 71 . 209 East Blecker - c; vor 73 855 Gibson3 Wct.lj'i- Smuggler Mountain na Â· na 860 Gibson / 1 T\ 1. ro â‚¬ loi,;.cliv. 1 WL 1 1 J 8 1 ... 0- ,. . .....J ---1 ./ ..4 .. ... 0..., . .. ... 1 ASPEN: 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS?, Â· AREA: BLOCK: NAT. REG 80 86 91 SUP. STRUC. 00 100 Zait Bleeker Church 65 : N 101 EaMt Hallam *Church 65 Â· N 9 0 105 Eaâ€¢t Hallam Church 65 N O . lid East Bleeker Church 65 . N O QÂ· 12j East Haliam Church :65 N 126 East Bieeker Church :65 N -0 .-.+ 127 Eant Hallam Church 65 N O,0 0 . .. .i 1jl East Haliam .Church 65 N ~ . ~ ~ # 134 East Bleeker (Church 65 ... . N. O.0 6 2iÂ¢ Eaâ€¢t Hallam Â·Church 71 N 000 It 200 EaBâ‚¬ Bleeker Church 72 : Y .1. . . .. 214 *aâ€¢t Bleeker Church 72 .. 2#j *ait Hallam Church :72 N ~ ~ O I O , 232 East Bleeker :Church :72 N 0 0.0+ <0 227 Eaâ€¢t Bieeker :Church :73 N O,0.00 202 North Monarch *Church :78 N I I.2 2i2 North Monarch Church 78 N 218 North Menarch Church 78 N 310 East Main Commercial Core 79 N 330 East Main Commercial Core 79 Y 101 South Mill :Commercial core 80 N 302 Eagt Hopkins Commercial Core :80 N 30j East Main Commercial Core 80 Y 1- 108 *agt liopkinM commercial Core .80 : N 0- 309 Eaet Main :Commercial Core :80 N 315 Ea.t Main :commercial Core 80 316 East Hopking commercial Core 80 N 300 East Hyman Commercial Core 81 : N 309 East Hopkins Commercial Core .81 314 EaÂ®t Hyman commercial core :81 328 Eaet Hyman .Commercial Core :81 Y 100 South Mill Commercial Core 87 N 406 East Hopking C-mmercial Core :87 N 203 South Galena ~ Commercial Core 88 Y 204 South Mill :Commercial Core Â· 88 Y ' 208 South Mill .Commercial Core 88 Â· N 209 Rni,th Cal/na Commercial Core 88 N â€¢0000 ..6&â€¢61.01â€¢40 â€ž.h.lk.4.*,I,.4,ZXZZZ,ZZZEZZXZZZ,ZZZ .4.0400000400.<1<4440 ....4.0.004.0.0 Â«440 -- .----J ....... ......11 ... ...1 ......4 .... ./.4.,0 .. I I. - .1 1. . -0.1 - ASPEN: 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS, AREA: BLOCK: NAT. REG SUP. STRUC. 426 East Hyman commercial core 88 . N N 432 Enet Hyman Commercial Core Â·88 *F N ~~ . . N 301-309 *outh dilena commerciai core 89 N N 4ij *amt Hyman :commercial Core 89 Â¥. N 420 East Cooper .Commercial Core 89 :. . . . Â¥ 4 i 423 EaÂ®t Hyman :Commercial Core 89 1 506 Eamt Main :Commercial Core :92 Y A; .3 104 South Gaiena Commercial Core 93 t1 130 South Galena commercial Core 93 .N Q n n- 530 Eaet Hopking :commercial Core 93 vÂ·v ... <4 N -O 0.0 532 East Hopkins :Commercial Core :93 5jj *60â‚¬ Main :Commercial Core .93 : H A . A.A : N 554 East Hopkine :commercial core '93 U 220 South Gaiena :commercial core :94 Â¥. .7, 304-j08 South Galena ~~~ :Commercial core 95 N 312 South Galena Commercial Core 95 N 501 Eaet Hyman Icommercial Core 95 ,.t 405-407 south Hunter :Commercial Core 96 501 East Cooper commercial core 96 Y i 531 East Cooper :Commercial Core 96 N ~ 5337 Eamt Cooper :Commercial Core 96 : N 820 East Cooper .Eait Aspen Townmite 111 N 824 Eaet Cooper East Aspen Townâ€¢lte 111 : N 935 East Cooper :East Ampen Townsite .118 : N 939 *ast Cooper :East AMpen Townsite 118 * .N. 1012 kagt Hopking East Aspen Townâ€¢lte 25 : N Bil *aâ€¢t Hopkins East Aspen Townsite 31 . N 819 Eaet Hopkine East Aspen Townette 31 :~' N 920 Eaet Hyman Eaet Aepen Townette 32 1022 East Hyman East Aspen Towngite j3 : N 1000 Eaâ€¢t Cooper East Aspen Towneite Â·34 i N N 1006 Eaet Cooper East Aspen Townâ€¢ite 34 1020 kant Cooper East Aspen Townette 34 303 South cleveland East Aepen TownBite Â·35 : N . 305 South Cleveland East Aspen Townelte 35 : N ...... 1. 4 307 South Cleveiand Eaâ€¢t Aâ€¢pen Townelte 35 N 918 Eaet Cooper :Eamt Aepen Townette 35 : N F1OO4 kant Durant East Aepen Townette 37 N e- 4-1031 gaet Durant East Ampen Townette 40 ~ N 623 East Hopkins East Aepen Townelte 99 N 625 Eaet Hopking East Aspen Townâ€¢lte :99 N N 0..0 18..an Tnwnal+A 99 -- 240...2.4 loilll'<]<0000010001000i 1101 1000 540...0. 4 <1â€¢<t).000000000000111 011000 246....O. â€¢41â€¢0â€¢40400060600000000 00000 ZzzzZzzzZzzzZZzzz â€¢,hz â€¢z ZHZZ *â€¢H+Z*z >'Z Zzzk .. . 1 1. ASPEN, 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS: Â· AREA: BLOCK: NAT. REG 80 86 91 SUP. STRUC. 1101 East Durant :Eaâ€¢t Alpen Townelte na N-- Y 2~_600 Â· *ait * Ilidker (0'~ 46~~ ~~''*0'- :East Aepen Townette na : N :- .- 64 Y 4 Durant Mine :Pia=t Aâ€¢pin Towneito na N N , 701 North Third Hallam Lake 100 : N N , 707 North Third Hailam Lake 100 . N N 311 Glileâ€¢ple :Hallam Lake :102 N .A 610 North Third/329 Lake Hallam Lake 102 N N 620 North Third Hallam Lake 102 N Y 640 /6rth Third Hallam Lake 102 N -- N ... 710 North Third ,Hallam Lake 102 N a N 206 Lake *venue Hallam Lake 103 Y . N 210 Lake Avenue Hallam Lake 103 : N Y 212 Lake Avenue 'Hallam Lake 103 N 220 Lake *venue Hallam Lake 103 N '~ ~- N 00 240 Lake Avenue Hallam Lake .103 N 320 Lake *venue Hallam Lake 103 N N 330 Lake Avenue :Hallam Lake 103 N O'~ ~ &~ Y 514 North Third :Hallam Lake 40 N N Hallam Lake 40 Y 525 North Second N 1 42j North Second ' Hallarn Lake 41 N I~I- N 202 West Francie Hallam Lake * 48 IN 8,8 ; 8- N 225 We/t Smuggler :Hallam Lake 48 N N 229 Weit Smuggler Hallam Lake 48 N N It@+ 234 West Francti Hallam Lake 48 Y Y Y 201 Weâ€¢t Francle Hallam Lake 49 Y a - 120 Weâ€¢t Francle :Hallam Lake 55 Y 126 Weit Francis Hallam Lake 55 .11 -0 0.0 i 4i4 North Firet Hallam Lake 55 N * * A- Y 1 100 West Hallam Hallam Lake 56 N A A Af Y 12j West Francie Hallam Lake .56 N O 0 8- Y 124 Weet Hallam Hallam Lake 56 Nooo- Y 135 Weet Francle Hallam Lake 56 N ~~~+ N jid Glileâ€¢ple Hailam Lake ~ 91 00 Y N 330 Gilleeple :Hallam Lake 91 N Y 9-101 puppy smith N Y Hailam Lake .na to- 220 Puppy smith Hallam Lake na N N C ~* Aâ€¢pen Brewery Ruinn Hallam Lake na N N 6 Triangle Park Hallam Lake na N N 706 Weet Main Main Street 18 N N 734 Weet Main Main Street 18 N N 2701 West Main., Main Street 19 N Y ' ff D. ~,,,,,, *2 19 N Y A L....1...L . , 004.004..001 â€¢Illooolo 004.0 011100'10 6,â€¢004.. 0400044.041 . 0.- I.-/0 11-0- . 1 ..... ASPEN: 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS: AREAr BLOCK: NAT. REG 80 86 91 SUP. STRUC. 604 Wâ€¢st Main Maln Street 24 N N , 612 West Main Main Street 24 N : Y 616 Weet Main Main Strâ€¢â€¢t :24 N N 611 Weet Main :Main Street 25 1 NA Y 627 Went Main :Main Street 25 :N N 633 Weet Main Main Street 25 N A N 500 West Main Main Street 30 N ~+ N 518 West Main Main Street .30 N N N '~ ~ 527 Went Main Main Street N 400 Weet Main :Main Street .37 : N N 430 Weet Main Maln Street 37 : N N (300 Weet Main :Main Street 44 N N 320 Weet Main Main Street 44 Y Y 1128 West Main Main Street 44 N N 332 Weet Main Main Street 44 Â· N .+ N 331 Weet Main Main Street 45 N N 205 Weet Main .Main Street Â·52 N N 211 Went Main Main Street 52 N N 122-132 Eamt Main Main Street 58 N N -8 125 Weet Main :Main Street 59 N N 1&5 Weet Maln Main Street 59 N 128 Mast Main Main Street :66 N N N 202-208 Eagt Main Main Street 73 Â· N N 216 Rait Main Main Street 73 N N 165 South Monarch Main Street 74 N , 0- N 201 Eamt Main :Main Street 74 N ~I N 221 Eant Main :Main Street 74 N I+ N 227 Eaet Main Main Street 74 :N N 205 South Third Street .Shadow Mountain 39 Y Y 325 Weet Working Shadow Mountain 46 :NN 200 Weet Hopkins Shadow Mountaln 52 N N 212 Weet Hopkins Shadow Mountain 52 Â· N <) N 222 Weet Hopking Shadow Mountain 52 Â· N . N ~L< 205 West Hopking Shadow Mountain 53 N O .O+ N 214 West Hyman :shadow Mountain 53 N O 0 N /7-2 i 6 Wemt Hyman shadow Mountain 53 N - 09 0 N 311 South Firet Street Shadow Mountain 54 NO ~ ~- N lj4A Weet Hopkins Shadow Mountaln 59 N QI N 134b Went HopkinM Shadow Mountain 59 N -el N 135 West Hopkins Shadow Mountain 60 NOOO+ Y 101 Eaet Hopking Shadow Mountain 68 NQQO N . AA N I. 57.. -, '17- - O.00.0. li40â€¢00â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢Oâ€¢00â€¢00â€¢â€¢00 000000"0400104*00'00*"0000'0400 6*4 490:.1:'4: O.00.0 J ./ .0 , ASPEN: 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS : AREA: BLOCK: NAT. REG SUP. STRUC. 118 Eaâ€¢t Cooper Shadow Mountain 69 NÂ·N' 124 East Cooper Shadow Mountain 69 N Y 1 lio South Agpon Shadow Mountain 7 Eameâ€¢ N Y Lift #One/Boat Tow :Shadow Mountain :7 Eamee :Y Y ' 135 Raet Cooper Shadow Mountain 70 Y Y 208 East Hopking Shadow Mountain 74 N N 214 Zaet Hopkins Shadow Mountain 74 N Y " * 201 Eant Hyman Shadow Mountain 76 N Y 1 9~QCI-101-109 Juan Street Shadow Mountain :na N -1- N 00. N 470 North Spring Smuggler Mountain :1,2,3 Oklahoma FlatÂ® N 950 MatchleeÂ® Drive Smuggler Mountain 2 Alpine Acren Y : 936 Matchleeâ€¢ Drive Smuggler Mountain 4 Alpine Acree Y 920 Matchleâ€¢â€¢ Drive Smuggler Mountain 5 Alplne Acree : N 0,0,0 N 390 North Spring .Smuggler Mountain 5,6 Oklahoma Flate N QQ 0+ Y 230 North Spring Smuggler Mountain 7 Oklahoma Flate N Q () N 100 North Park Smuggler Mountain na N 0;0 Y 101 North Park Smuggler Mountain na NOO N ~- ~ 106 South Park Smuggler Mountain na N-- N 165 North Park .Smuggler Mountain na N O . N J 17 Queen :Smuggler Mountain :na . N 520 Walnut :Smuggler Mountain na N N 9 .8 0- 557 Walnut Smuggler Mountain na N N N N 590 North Mill/Ampen*kiectric Smuggler Mountain na 590 North Mill/sheeley Bridge; Ismuggler Mountain na Y N 1 â€¢tÂ· 920 King :Smuggler Mountain na N Y 925 King Smuggier Mountain na .NN 935 King :Smuggler Mountain :na N Y 980 Gibeon .Smuggler Mountain na N O,0,0 N 990 Gibeon :Smuggler Mountain na :NY t--LA.PÂ®n Grove Cemetery Smuggler Mountain na N N 7 720 Bay Smuggler Mountain Oklahoma Flats N Y N N 1280 Ute Avenue/Explosives diora Ute Avenue na *4~-1500 Ute Avenue Ute Avenue na N N Glory Hole Park Ute Avenue na N N na N N Ute Cemetery Ute Avenue 1080 Power Plant/Cagtle Creek Po weet of Caetle Creek na N N Marolt Barn and Salt Shed west of Caetle Creek na Y - Y Marolt Houge weet of Caetle creek na N-~~+ Y Red Butie Cemetery weet of Cantle Creek na N Q ()? ~+ N GUL-Rlo Grande Railway Bridge weet of Caetle creek na Y - -- N 834 Weet Hallam West End 10 N O *It Went End 15 N () __Q-j(1_-_-_ Y inn W.-0- .ran,-4. 2.01.0404 11.11000 11.00 lilli 5.04..4 4 I l i.0000 01001 1.10 g :44..44.4 0 6009..40.0060 00000<.<11 --- ... ..1 .. . J , t ASPEN, 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MARTI:R LIST ADDRESS: AREA: Â· BLOCK: NAT. REG 80 86 SUP. STRUC. t 0 8 701 Weet Smuggler West End 15 : N 7ij Wâ€¢â€¢t Francis West End 15 N 71% Weit #muggler W.st End 15 N . 716 weit Franctâ€¢ We.t End 15 N O 716 Weet Haliam Weet End 16 N O 117 North sixth Weet End 18 N N 735 West Bieeker :West End 18 505 North Eigth Weet End 2 Â· N 610 Weet Smuggier Weet End 20 N 21 N 421 North Fifth ,West End 609 Wegt Smuggler West End 21 N 610 Weet Francts :Weit End 21 ' N .7 . 629 Weet Smuggler :West End 21 N , 610 Weet Hallam West End 22 N N 620 West Hallam :West End 22 601 West Hallam West End 620 West Bleeker West End 23 Y 23 121 North Fifth :West End 24 N 635 Weet Bleeker :West End 24 N Qt -8 500 Weit Franciâ€¢ :West End 27 NA A 5ij Wemt Smuggler .Weet End 27 N 522 West Francis fWÂ®Â®t End 27 . N 0:0- Ji9 North Fourth ~ ~ West End 28 N 504 West Hallam West End 28 N 52j Weet Francis :Weet End 28 NOQ 530 Weet Haliam West End 28 N 533 Weet Francle :Weit End 28 *~ NO O 0+ N 0. 500 West Bleeker :West End 29 .N O,0 525 Weet Hallam :Weet End 29 53j Wegt Haliam West End 29 N Q () _ l 120 North Fifth West End 30 N - . ........ 513 Weet Bieeker Weet End 30 N * 1 .1 N 400 West Smuggler :West End :33 406 Weet Smuggler West End 33 , 0.1 k.. Il 4j4 Went Smuggler :Weet End 33 N O ... .N. 0 - i 515 North Third Wegt End 33 420 Weet Francie Weet End 34 N O, 432 West Francie Weet End 34 Y 401 Weet Hallam Weet End 36 N O 421 Wemt Hallam Weet End 36 ' N O 442 Went Bleeker Weet End 36 : Y * N . 2 00.00<100â€¢00 .400.. â€¢0064..06.666â€¢â€¢ 000000â€¢â€¢00'0000,00.0 00'000 0000"â€¢00 04.000â€¢â€¢00.0 - -4 0. -9- . . ..0 - ..... ASPEN: 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS: AREA: BLOCK: NAT. REG 80 SUP. STRUC. 334 West Hallam Weet End 42 Y 321 Weet Hallam Weet End 43 N 331 West Bleeker West End 44 Y 214 Weit BleÂ®ker Weet End 50 N 229 Weet Hallam West End 50 N 2jj West Hallam Wemt End 50 N 21 j West Bleeker West End 51 N 215 Weet Kieeker Weet End ,51 N 217 Weet Bieeker West End 51 N 2jj Went Bleeker :West End :51 N 121 West Bieeker :Weet End 58 N 129 Weet Bieeker West End 58 N 131 West Bieeker WeÂ®t End 58 N , 500 Weet North Weet End 99 N . T 515 Gillemple Weet End 99 N . 1 ... ...... I. 1 20040000'00 00... 2â€¢4â€¢4066â€¢06 000000110 000..0 4 Z . N Z Z ...,)(ZE Z )1 91. - m /1.-7 1 1 r i 1 I -7. A ATmal,ENT 1 IANO APPLICATION KIEN .. 1) Project Name , , 316 EMt Hopkins 2) Pmject Icatial_ 316 East Hopkins, Lot 0, Block 80 City and Townsite of Aspen (indicate street aMress, lot & block nmber, legal description â€¢here appropriate) 3) Present Zoning CC 4) Lot Size _3000 sa. f t. 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # Margaret Johnson c/o Brooke Peterson 315 East Hyman Ave., Aspen, Colorado 81611 6) Representative s Name, Address & Ehone # B. Joseph Krabacher, Krabacher, Hill & Edwards P.C., 201 North Mill Street, Suite 201, Aspen, Colorado 81611, (303) 925-6300. 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Conoeptual SPA Conoepblal Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD x Minor Historic Dev. Stizeam Margin Final ED Historic Danolition Mountain yiew Plane Subdivisirn -1_ Historic DesignatifIR - Ser,yifeAfl, d.e i +1 ~4 1 ation Text/Map Amendaâ€¢ent QUS Allotment Iot Split/Iot line - GUS E=ption Adjustment XXX Exemption for Demolition under 8) Description of Ekisting Uses (number and type of existing structures; Ordinano approocinate sq. ft.; nmber of bedrooms; any previous approvals granted to the No. 9 property)- Series o 990 1991. historic cottage of ~90 sq. ft. .- ,, and non-historic out building ofann sq. ft.,with Arlrlifinnml flnnr Arem of 113 sq. ft. within enclosdd porch." 9) Description of Develginent Application Exemption from Demolition Standards under Ordinance No. 9 Series of 1991 for non-historic out building 10) Have you attached the following? x Response to Attachment 2, Minininn Submission Oontents x Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents x Response to Attachment 4, Review Starxlards for Your Application 1111111 LAND USE APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM DEMOLITION STANDARDS PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 9, SERIES OF 1991 AND MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL I. Minimum Submission Contents for all Development Applications. A. The Applicant' s name is Margaret Johnson, Trustee of the Duane Robert Johnson and Margaret Whitfield Johnson Revocable Trust, and her address is c/o Brooke A. Peterson, 315 East Hyman Ave., Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-8166. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a letter stating the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. B. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur is 316 East Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado also known as Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. C. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a title insurance commitment disclosing the ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur and listing names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel. D. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a survey map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. E. Attached as Exhibit 4 is the Historic Architectural Building/Structural Inventory Form for the residence located at 316 East Hopkins. F. Attached as Exhibit 5 is the Andrews and Anderson report on 1991 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. II. Specific Submission Contents and Review Standards. A. This is an application for exemption from demolition standards, for the proposed demolition of a non-historic outbuilding consisting of approximately 300 square feet and a covered and enclosed porch of approximately 113 square feet, located on the north (alley side) portion of Lot 0, Block 30, City and Townsite of Aspen. The Applicant proposes to demolish the existing outbuilding pursuant to the exemption from the demolition standards set forth in Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1991, as codified in Land Use Code Â§ 7-602(E). B. The Applicant proposes to provide voluntarily a parking area on the north end of the subject parcel for three off- street parking spaces. The parking spaces are illustrated on the enclosed drawings, Exhibit 6. C. The Applicant is applying for an exemption from the demolition standards pursuant to Land Use Code Â§7-602(E). The following information shows that the application meets the conditions for the exemption of Â§7-602(E): 1. The Applicant is simultaneously applying for Historic Landmark Designation of the miner's cottage located on the south end (Hopkins Street) side of the lot. The landmark designation has significant benefits to the City of Aspen for many reasons, including: ( 1) the prominence of the cottage on the north side of East Hopkins Street in the 300 block; and (ii) the cottage is located next to the similarly small scale miner's cottage housing La Cocina Restaurant. With the proposed redevelopment of the south side of East Hopkins Street in the 300 block, wherein the Lily Reid cottage is being relocated to the corner, the preservation of the 316 East Hopkins cottage will be important for the Aspen downtown commercial core area as well as the 300 block of East Hopkins. 2. The existing historic cottage requires substantial maintenance and repairs. In order to facilitate the preservation of the existing cottage, the Applicant proposes to demolition the 300 square foot non-historic shed located on the alley in order to provide alley parking. The continued viability of the historic cottage will be greatly enhanced by landmark designation and the enhanced financial ability of the new owners to maintain the most important asset located on the lot -- the historic cottage. 3. The present owner of the property is elderly and retired in Arizona. She recently suffered the loss of her husband and is anxious to sell her long-time Aspen property. Initially, the Bank of Aspen proposed to purchase the property for $350,000.00. The owners of the hair salon located in the historic cottage, Peter Rizzuto and Tuvia Stein, exercised their right of first refusal to acquire the property. The contract to purchase requires HPC approval for the demolition of the non-historic shed before the transaction can close. 4. The Applicant has conducted a study of the value of the property with and without the demolition of the non-historic shed. A .. report to be prepared by Scot Barringer of Barringer, Ryan and Vance Investment Counselors will illustrate the detrimental economic effect of not permitting any demolition of the shed. Although the economics of the transaction are not necessarily the concern of the HPC, this information illustrates the fact that the proposed owners of the property will be able to take care of deferred maintenance and maintain the historic cottage as an historic landmark. 5. The Inventory Form for the property describes the shed as: "single gable shed with shed addition; rolled asphalt and vertical board, new retail, modifications with fixed glass. "As to the date of that addition, the inventory states: "date unknown. " As stated in the Inventory Form, the historic significance of the property is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, but rather the home-environment and life style of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated by the silver mining industry. Removal of the non-historic shed will not adversely affect the essential historic character of the property since the main cottage will remain and will become a local historic landmark. 6. The structure is not identified on the 1986 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. In addition, the structure is not proposed for addition to the 1991 Inventory. See Exhibit 5. The Report on the 1991 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures prepared by Andrews and Anderson dated July 8, 1991 does not identify the non-historic outbuilding as a proposed addition to the 1986 Inventory. Accordingly, the City's expert consultants agree that the shed is non- historic and non-contributing. 7. The structure is non-contributing to the Historic District as shown by the 1986 and 1991 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. The out-building has no architectural significance because it is constructed of non-historic materials including "barn wood" vertical siding and has non-historic roof shapes and facades. Although the scale and small size of the shed may be compatible with the residential historic neighborhoods in Aspen, it is out of place in the downtown commercial core of Aspen. The structure does not have all utilities and is semi-habitable, although it has in the recent past been leased to the Log Furniture Company and is considered net leasable square footage. 8. The structure does not contribute to the overall character of the Historic District because it is located on the alley and is not visible from the primary facade. The demolition of the non-historic shed will not impact the character of the Historic District because the existing historic cottage will remain on the subject parcel and will be eligible for landmark designation. Although there are other structures located on the alley, the alley is predominated by the existing Bank of Aspen building which is non- historic and the non-historic addition to the Elli's building. 9. The alley structure is also located in the CC Commercial Core Zone District of the City of Aspen. The CC Zone District has the highest intensity of zoning uses, and a small scale shed, although attractive to some, conflicts with the underlying policy of the CC Zone District to allow intensive development. The eC Zone District has no minimum side yard set backs and development is typically lot line to lot line. Likewise, there is no minimum front yard or minimum rear yard setback, (with the exception of trash/utility service areas) so it is consistent with the underlying policy of the CC Zone District to permit the shed to be demolished. 10. The shed currently encroaches on the adjoining property occupied by La Cocina Restaurant as shown on the improvement survey plat enclosed as Exhibit 3. In all likelihood, the shed would be required to be demolished in the future since one of the primary bearing walls would be need to be demolished to remove it from encroaching on the adjoining property. 11. The demolition of the non-historic outbuilding is necessary for redevelopment of the parcel because the building is located directly on the alley where the Applicant wants to locate three off-street parking spaces. Although not directly an HPC historic concern, the City of Aspen desperately needs off-street parking in the commercial core, and the application deserves serious consideration even though the redevelopment is for parking spaces. The Applicant is voluntarily providing the parking spaces, and nothing in this Application should be construed as a binding commitment upon the Applicant or any subsequent owner to maintain the parking spaces shown on the drawing. 12. The redevelopment is being reviewed by the HPC pursuant to this Application. In addition, all future development of the property will be reviewed by the HPC since the property is located within the Historic Overlay District for downtown Aspen. 13. Photographs of the non-historic out building are enclosed with this application and illustrate the state of disrepair of the structure and the non-historic features of the structure. 14. The shed is presently not in compliance with the Uniform Building Code. An estimate of approximately $50 per square foot has been prepared by the Applicant's architect of a cost to bring the shed into compliance with the Uniform Building Code. The costs clearly illustrate the economic impossibility of saving the shed. The HPC should focus its concern instead upon preserving the historic cottage due to its prominent placement on the 300 block of East Hopkins Street. Landmark designation will insure that the cottage is never demolished. III. Review Standards for Minor Development For Voluntary Addition of Parking Spaces. A. The Applicant is voluntarily providing at least three off-street parking spaces which will be a substantial benefit in the downtown CC Commercial Zone District due to the present traffic and parking congestion. The proposed parking area is compatible in character with the historic cottage since it will simply be a flat parking area without any competing structure or improvements. The parking is compatible with development on adjacent parcels for the same reasons. B. The proposed voluntary parking area and spaces are consistent with the character of the neighborhood, which includes occasional off-street parking throughout the Commercial Core. C. The proposed parking does not detract from the cultural value of the historic cottage because it will not compete in architectural style, size, facade or placement with the historic cottage. The cultural value of the historic cottage will be enhanced if the application is approved since the owner will have additional funds with which to take care of deferred maintenance and repair of the historic cottage. D. The proposed parking does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of the historic structure since parking is associated with numerous historic structures in Aspen. Further, the parking will be located off-street and to the rear of the primary facade. The alley is heavily travelled by Bank of Aspen customers and the parking will not adversely affect the importance of this alley. Dated: November , 1991 EDWARDS P.C. B. Joseph Krabacher 201 North Mill Street, Suite 201 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-6300 bjk/documents/landuse.316 INDEX OF EXHIBITS 1. Letter of Authorization from Owner. 2. Title Insurance Commitment. 3. Improvement Survey Map. 4. Historic Architectural Building Structure Form for 316 East Hopkins 5. Andrews and Anderson Report on 1991 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures 6. Bill Poss & Associates' Schematic Drawing. bjk/documents/landuse.316 1 0. 0. LAWOFFICES BROOKE A. PETERSON APROFESSIONALCORPORATION 315 EASTHYMANAVENUE ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 (303)925-8166 TELEFAX: (303)925-1090 HAND DELIVERED October 9, 1991 City of Aspen Planning Office 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Lot O, Block 30, Citv and Townsite of Aspen To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that the undersigned is the attorney for Margaret Johnson, Trustee of the Duane Robert Johnson and Margaret Whitfield Johnson Revocable Trust, owner of the above referenced property. In that capacity, on behalf of my client, Margaret Johnson, I authorize the potential purchasers of the property, Mr. Peter Rizzuto and Mr. Tuvia Stein to make land use applications to the City of Aspen involving this property. Of course, nothing contained herein shall constitute pre-approval of any conditions which may be attached to any approval for any application. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, A Ppjfess~lon~l Cori~oration By: p,lae.lt,F - .e A. Peferson 2 ~ CommonwealthÂ® ~ ~ * 0 Land Title Insurance Compmy COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1â€ž Effective date: 08/27/91 @ 8:00 A.M. Case No. PCT-5689 C3 2. Policy or policies to be issued: (a)ALTA Owner's Policy-Form B-1970 Amount $ 350,000.00 (Rev. 10-17-70 & 10-17-84) or 10/21/87 Premium $ 1,068.00 PROPOSED INSURED: PETER RIZZUTO AND TUVIA STEIN (b)ALTA Loan Policy, Amount $ (REV. 10-21-87) Premium $ PROPOSED INSURED: ( c )Alta Loan Construction Policy, 1975 Amount $ (Rev. 10-17-84) Premium $ PROPOSED INSURED: Tax Cert. $ 10.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: DUANE ROBERT JOHNSON AND MARGARET WHITFIELD JOHNSON, TRUSTEES OF THE DUANE ROBERT AND MARGARET WHITFIELD JOHNSON REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 15, 1989 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOT 0, BLOCK 80, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 303-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules Fax 303-925-6527 A and B are attached. Authorized officer or agent Et E-J X 41_,c OP ~ CommonwealthÂ® I Land Title Insurance Compmy SCHEDULE B-SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: 1. Deed From : Duane Robert Johnson and Margaret Whitfield Johnson, Trustees of the Duane Robert and Margaret Whitfield Johnson Revocable Trust Dated June 15, 1989 To : Peter Rizzuto and Tuvia Stein 2. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990) has been paid or exempted- 3. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale, Notice to County Assessor , as required by H.B. 1288, Notice to County Assessor, has been complied with and that no fees or penalties exist or are currently due. 4 Certificate of Nonforeign Status signed by the Transferors. 5. Termination Statement for Financing Statement from Zee For Hair, Ltd., and Zee, John, individually, debtors to Rizzuto, Peter, and Rizzuto, Ellyn, secured party, filed January 15. 1984 in Book 459 at Page 854 as Filing No. 08122, giving a notice of a security interest pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code. 6. Good and sufficient termination of the Assignment and Consent Agreement recorded in Book 459 at Page 837. Said termination shall be executed by Duane R. Johnson and Margaret W. Johnson. 7. Good and sufficient termination of the Collateral Assignment and the attached Promissory Note shown as Exhibit "A", recorded in Book 459 at Page 841. Said termination shall be executed by Peter Rizzuto and Ellyn Rizzuto. NOTE..: Trust Affidavit for the Duane Robert and Margaret Whitfield Johnson Revocable Trust, disclosing the names and address of the trustees, recorded August 16, 1989 in Book 599 at Page 729, shows the following: Duane Robert Johnson and Margaret Whitfield Johnson 1116 East Cinnabar Avenue Phoenix. AZ 85020 continued 3 CommonwealthÂ® . . Land Title Insurance Company NOTE: Verification of the above Trust Affidavit for the Duane Robert and Margaret Whitfield Johnson Revocable Trust, disclosing the names and address of the trustees, recorded August 16, 1989 in Book 599 at Page 729, shows the following: Duane Robert Johnson and Margaret Whitfield Johnson 1116 East Cinnabar Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85020 This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 1 PG.2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-5689 03 A and B are attached. He ~ CommonwealthÂ® Land Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. Reservations and exceptions as contained in the Deeds form the City of Aspen recorded in Book 23 at Page 132 and in Book 59 at Page 252 as follows: That, no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 PG.1 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-5689 03 A and B are attached. , I f~ CommonwealthÂ® ~ 0 0 0 121 Land Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE B-SECTION 2 CONTINUED I Exceptions numbered NONE are hereby omitted. The Owner's Policy to be issued, if any, shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-25 NOTE: Each title entity shall notify in writing every prospective insured in an owner 's title insurance policy for a single family residence (including a condominium or townhouse unit ) (i) of that title entity's general requirements for the deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to unfiled mechanics or materialmens liens, except when said coverage or insurance is extended to the insured under the terms of the policy. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons indicated in the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. Upon receipt of these items and any others requirements to be specified by the Company upon request, Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the Owner's policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requirement upon any title insurer to provide mechanics or materialmens lien coverage. NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners' closing under circumstances where it is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said transaction, the Company will be deemed to have provided "Gap Coverage". Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122); (a) The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District; (b) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained from the County Treasurer of the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (C) Information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: A Tax Certificate will be ordered from the County Treasurer by the Company and the costs therefor charged to the proposed insured u.Bless written instr.uc.t.ions to the c.on.trary-are. r.e.ce.i v.ed.. by... t.he c.omp.any.. prior to the issuance of the Title Policy anticipated by this Commitment. This* commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-5689 C3 A and B are attached. .. Commitment For Title Insurance Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, herein called the company, for a valuable con- sideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to ill Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate 120 days after the effective date hereo f or when the policy or policies committed for shall be issued, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Company has caused its Corporate Name and Seal to be hereunto affixed; this instrument, including Commitment, Conditions and Stipulations attached, to become valid when countersigiled by an Authorized Officer or Agent of the Company. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY . Attest:~*9/Â¢2 +fred ByÂ»//2 President Conditions and Stipulations 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipulations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. PA 3 American Land Title Association Commitment - 1966 Cover Page Form 1004-8 Fti,IllillinHUNHHI,linim i,iii,ili,ii,ii,il '!UNHUNHIPUPHI,Inlilh Â· i.likÂ·..1 1 â€¢ illriril,â€žâ€žâ€žâ€žâ€žHunnullIW'mu~Inunullunlmu~: â€¢ .n, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i,nunnii.,ii,i,hunnunipurmunnunnui, i ,~~â€žp INunpunnunnunnuni,Numim,1 1 I I||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||I|~||||INHHHPHHHNHHHNHHHNHHHNHHH HHI||1||JUPPNMH '1 'i,1,"|||||||||I|||~~||~|||||||IMmUmnmm~m|U|~|||||||||~|||~|||||0'' IF 4 w. = COMMITMENT = FOR ~ TITLE E - r INSURANCE = 3 = American Land Title Association = ~ 1966 i. . = .........1 Issued by CommonwealthÂ® Land Title Insurance Company i = Title Insurance Since 1876 HOME OFFICE ~ EIGHT PENN CENTER = E PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2198 1 5 8 1004-8 Lii,~21 &3 L ~~ 1 I ,ri,Ii,i, ~iÂ·Ii,Ii,Ii,Ii,Ii,illi~:i,Ii,Ii,Ii,ilÂ·,11,!Ii,Ii,Ii,Ii,rii,Ii,Ii,irr,Â·li~~Ii,11!i,Ii,Ii,Ii,ii,ii,ii,iii,i:~i,i~ii~,i i i,ii,ii,i, i,i~ ii i,ii,ii,ii i,ii,ii,i:,i iii,ii, i,ii,ii,ii,ii,ii,ir,i,Â·,i,p. . , 'pHUNHUNHUNHUNHUNHHI â€žHIP " UNPHIN P '1 H, i. i H I~~Ill~ , 4 ' .i"~ . 1,1'I' lin PHUM|||I|I||'||'|||||||||||||||||||'|~~||||~||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||/ Â· ,& 3 1 316 East Hopkins Avenue Lot 0, Blk. 80, City of Aspen Pitkin County, Colorado 30.76. Rebar & ti . yellow Plastic Cap 1 Story 1.5' * Shed < COV' 4 Porch .-- . I .-/ Lot N Lot 0 Lot P , 3,016 sq. ft. 8 0.069 Acs.+/- f & 4 . 00 1 Story Wood. p. Frame House r 0.3 . 4 . 8. 7 . 7 Scribed Brick in Concrete . Walk â‚¬0444 3. . Rebar & e k'' Yellow Plastic Cop 63't *04;78 A~ni/e 4 in Concrete 7' Scribed Legend and Notes: - S indicates found monument cs described. - Â® indicates set monument rebar and cop LE 15710. - j indicates control point - Survey Orfentatior, based on found monuments as shown. - Easements shown cre from 77tle Commitment Case No. PCT-5689 (3 Issued 8-27-91 by GRAPHIC SCALE PRIdn Counb, Title. Inc. 0 10 20 40 1 1 Surveyoes Certincote: 41172IT!*,91 FEET ) 4 Kenneth R. Wilson, being c Registered Land Surveyor in the State of Colorado. do hereby cortic> thai this *nprovement survey '*1(&,2 74>:RA was mode under my supervision and is true and correct to the best H / a....ew" of my belief and knowledge. 1 further certij> that the 0904 Improvements on the above described porcel on the date, . : LS 15710 3Â¢r~ except uti/* connections ors entirefy within the boundaries of the parcel. except as shown, that there cre no encroochments upon v.a 3 1 the dicribed premises by knprovements on any adjoining premises ~ 80Rveld.:QO except as indicated. and that there is no apparent evidence or sign of any easement crossing or burdening any port of said parcel, except as noted. '44:34:EC'(59 t~DALLWJ2 lk) ~ /4 Or,#177=67 K+neth R. wnsoA La 15710 JOB # 91144 File krarmp #64 r SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. ' EMGNEERS SURVEYORS 1001 GRAND AVE., SUITE 2-E GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO. 81601 (303) 945-1004 SONUESER GORDON MEYER ~ â€¢ S 1 Â£50'49~ S 14'50'49' 1 4 . 'I i 0. 0. HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 316.EH Photo Information: ASP-CC-2-9 Township 10 South Range 84 West Section 7 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Annie Krapf House/On Location Hair Salon Full Street Address: 316 East Hopkins Legal Description: Lots O, P, Block 80 City and Townsite of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Commercial Core Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residence Architectural Style: Victorian Miner's Cottaqe Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1 Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irregular rectangle Landscaping or Special Setting Features: No Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): Single qable shed with shed addition; rolled asphalt and vertical board, new retail, modifications with fixed glass For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Cross qabled; asphalt shingles Walls: Clapboard with decorative shingles Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): Red brick corbeled Windows: All new: 2 3-sided bays, sidelights. storefront type Doors: 2, transom / 1/2 light / wood panel Porches: Shed entrance on turned posts with cut out brackets General Architectural Description: Victorian Miner's Cottage with extensive modifications to accommodate commercialuse. ... Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 316.EH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Commercial Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1884 - 1885 Actual X Estimate Based On: Building stvle MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Date unknown, but changed from residential to commercial use with associated modifications in the 1980's; bav windows, doors. canopv - dates unknown Additions and Date: Rear shed addition, date unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation 123 Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 11 - architectural integrity. 0 _ _ Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The historical signi- ficance of this former residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although it is represen- tative of Aspen's Mining Era. It illustrates the home/environment and lifestvle(s) of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: March 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin. Historic Preservation Officer/Planner 0- EP El 6 50) L.2 -rl-Â· 46â‚¬- <45;1--6 L->--l-AL .. .. STREET - 736' v E. MAIA al <INA 1 . -cÂ«241Â«147--co uny=_- - - 101 It < Il 14 ' 'h 41 On i --95-26-- -4*_ I os 01 ~P ELL \'5 6 F Cib - 0 0, CAD (8 1~ 06 1 - fLEs / HS ' U ENC#,1 - \1 )U 1 1-7 -*/ 7-Â» - i.----lill- ---I--.i-- il--i-% 7904.7 x ///Of-- / -1 1 100 -A \ ' . 1/ \ -1\. 111- 1 0 ...\ 11-. 45Â·Â° 308 6 gu '. Ott(. 108 ' LAGou N A \ 11 - .4 Bl)*rof , ie'f. I. ~ ~ C K 1 80' 0 r-* Mt'/ 1 (FF i 1 A t) E. 4\OpKiNs Ave. X - \~9(JALLY /4-0 (4 - d)#TA E>019 4.6 (l i |.- li ') f., /\Bull V 1 CTO El Al,4 0. .. 5 . r .. A REPORT ON 1991 INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCIURES f . s'6- . bv 7.2 f*- -1 . - , 1 ' 7.00% 'M Im /44261- ///l ASPEN Â· COLORADO i 1 1 1 1 .i ANDREWS & ANDERSON j 1,- . , A *r... 0 Andrews & Anderson 806 Partridge Circle Golden, Colorado 80403 303-27&4378 1 July 8, 1991 Ms. Roxanne Eflin Planning/Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen Planning Department BO South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Roxanne: With this transmittal, we conclude the work performed by Andrews & Anderson for the 1991 update of Aspen's Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. Accompanying this letter, you will find the following: 1. the remaining forms from the Ute Avenue Area, Smuggler Mountain, East Aspen Townsite, the area west of Castle Creek Hallam Lake and the Commercial Core, all of which have now received their final review and which are ready for final typing (for this portion , of the project) 1 2. catalogued negatives for all photos taken by Andrews & Anderson (rolls ASP-A through ASP-H and ASP-K through ASP-U) and catalogued negatives for three rolls taken by one of your Commissioners (roll 1 - Hallam Lake and rolls CC-1 and CC-2 - Commercial Core) 3. a copy of the 1893 Bird's Eye View of Aspen 4. two maps of the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures and one map of the 1986 update 5. the 3-ring binder which includes copies of most of the National Register forms on Aspen 6. a final report which outlines our methodology, findings, and recommendations and which includes a master list of the inventoried sites 7. our final invoice for the project 8. the Main St:reet District forms, which were mistakenly sent back to us in this last batch of forms Please let us know if you need any additional interpretation of the enclosed information. Although the scope of our work on this project was of a limited nature, we have given our recommendations careful consideration in the context of Aspen's sometimes exceptional historic resource and its current economic realities. Once again, thank you for getting us involved in the update, for your hospitality, and for the opportunity to work in a very unique mountain community. If any future projects aim in the direction of our expertise, we would be delighted to be considered for them. Sincerely, /&6=$94#MUS j Deborah Andrews Nanon Adair Anderson AIA . CONTENTS page METHODOLOGY 1 SUMMARY OF DATA & OBSERVATIONS 2 RECOMMENDATIONS 3-4 SAMPLE FORM (A&A PURVIEW) 5-6 VERIFIED DEMOUSHED BUILDINGS 7 RECOMMENDED"DROPS" FROM THE INVENTORY 8 1991 MASTER LIST 9-15 1 i 1 - '1 ., tf. METHODOLOGY In January of 1991, the architectural studio of Andrews & Anderson was retained by the City of Aspen to update specific information for the 1991 Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. In sum, the 1991 Inventory was to survey all properties which were previously listed on the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures and the 1986 : Inventory Update, and was to identify and inventory any new sites noticed during the course of the field survey. It was ? Aspen's responsibility to combine 1991 survey data, collected by A & A with previously-recorded inventory information on a new, more comprehensive inventory form created by the Aspen Historic Preservation Office. The specific portions of the new form for which Andrews & Anderson had responsibility are highlighted on a blank form on pages 5-6. In general, the purview of Andrews & Anderson included field survey and photography for approximately 300 sites in 10 geographically-distinct areas of the City and its environs. The 10 areas included: the Community Church district, the Commercial Core Historic District, East Aspen Townsite, Hallam Lake, the Main Street Historic District, Shadow Mountain, Smuggler Mountain, Ute Avenue, the area west of Castle Creek, and the West End. For each site, Andrews & Anderson provided the following: 1. photography and photo-cataloguing 2. architectural and/or site description 3. USGS topographic map location 4. field survey information on the extent of site and/or architectural modifications 5. a recommendation* for a 1991 local significance rating The process listed below describes the order of work undertaken during the course of the project: 1. initial recoonnaisance and photography of the sites is performed by Andrews & Anderson 2. architectural and/or site descriptions are checked for accuracy and consistency back at the Golden, Colorado studio of Andrews & Anderson; photographs and negatives are labeled according to Colorado Historical Society standards; reviewed forms and attached photographs are returned to Roxanne Ellin, Historic Preservation Officer for Aspen/Pitkin 3. in Aspen: forms are entered onto the computer file; data from previous inventories (i.e. 1980 and 1986) is entered onto the same file 4. forms are returned to Andrews & Anderson for a second check; A&A reviews the portion of the forms for which they are directly responsible before returning the forms to Aspen for final typing of this phase of the project Andrews & Anderson recognizes that through the above-stated process, a major portion of the 1991 Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures was accomplished. It is important to note that there is still research and coordination to be undertaken, outside of A & A's purview, before the Inventory is complete. Recommendations for completing the Inventory may be found on pages 3-4. 1 * The definitions for local ratings on the 1980 and 1986 inventories varied slightly, but it was agreed between the Historic Preservation Officer and Andrews & Anderson that the following rating system be employed for the 1991 Inventory: O Significant: listed on or may be eligible for the National Register 2 8 Contributing. resource has maintained historical or architectural integrity O Supporting: resource has maintainedigme element(s) of its historical integrity and in general, is "retrievable" with substantial effort 1 1 11. M' w.' 1,1. . 4.1.,4, " - 1 4 . SUMMARY OF DATA AND OBSERVATIONS The 1991 Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures yielded survey forms representing a total of 267 properties which remain on, or were recommended to be added to, the inventory. This is a net decrease of 4 from the 1986 inventory count of 273 forms*. The following is a breakdown of the 307 sites surveyed by Andrews & Anderson: 234 revisions and upgrades of the 1986 Inventory Update forms _32 recommended for addition to the Inventory 266 SUBTOTAL E i 15 recommended Inventory 'drops"** (see page 8); (Andrews & Anderson recommendations) 28 verified demolitions (see page 7) 309 PROJECT TOTAL: SITES INVENTORIED IN 1991 The majority building type on the inventory is single-family residential. In key residential districts, i. e. the Community Church district, Hallam Lake, Smuggler Mountain, the West End and East Aspen Townsite, this is virtually the only building type. In the Main Street Historic District, the majority of buildings, though largely originally single-family residential, are now commercial conversions. In the Commercial Core Historic District, the majority of buildings were and remain commercial storefront. Properties from the outlying districts, i.e. Ute Avenue and the area west of Castle Creek, include buildings and site features from Aspen's mining era (i.e., farm buildings as well as cemeteries, brewery ruins, power plants, railroad bridges, and mine sites). The Shadow Mountain area includes early ski-era lodges and Boat-Tow #1, in addition to its mostly residential buildings. Some general observations can be made, based on the limited time expended in updating this inventory: 1. The overall Historic Resource for the City of Aspen can be considered to be at risk due to economic pressures which are unique to the City's current ski-resort persona. The general pressure is towards both commercial and residential expansion. The 2 pressures manifest themselves in alterations to an invidual building's style/materials/ detailing, to its scale, to its context, and finally as a threat to its very existence. These pressures also manifest themselves as a parallel force affecting and altering the style, scale and contextural characteristics of any given district. 2. An immediate focus of the Aspen Planning Department's Historic Preservation Officer over the past three years has been to close gaps in guidelines and to address clear and cohesive preservation goals. The development of a loophole-free system of legal and economic 1 incentives is vital for the management of the above referenced erosion of historical context and of individual resources. 3. The degree of threat and speed of erosion differs from survey district to survey district. Those districts which remain relatively stable (although by no means unaffected) include the Commercial Core, Main Street, and the outlying areas (if only because these areas are not yet in the path of development pressures). The most at risk areas include the East Aspen Townsite (eight demolitions and seven recommendations to drop due to loss of historic integrity since 1986), and the West End (twelve demolitions and four recommendations to drop). The remaining districts can be considered to fall somewhere in the middle range of this continuum. * Please note that two 1986 Inventory sites were not resurveyed (The Aspen Institute and Riding Ring Rodeo Grounds) **Properties recommended to be dropped were evaluated qualitatively based on the following criteria: (1) Integrity of material detailing, style features; (2) Integrity of massing and scale; (3) Integrity of context and contribution to context. 2 j RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations resulting from the completion of this inventory fall into the following categories: 1. COMPLETION OF THE 1991 INVENTORY 2. ONGOING INVENTORY MANAGEMENT 3. HISTORIC RESOURCE PLAN AND INTERFACE WITH OVERALL PLANNING DEPARTMENT f GOALS 1. Completion of the 1991 Inventory should include: i a. Completion of the 1991 Inventory forms (possibly by a summer intern) as soon as possible. Attached is a sample inventory form highlighting the areas for which AkA was specifically responsible. The remaining areas require review, coordination and completion. b. Assembly of missing National Register Nomination Forms as well as identification of new properties which may be eligible (see A & A's 1991 rating recommendations on "Master List", pages 9-15) and a strategy for completing nominations for those properties. c. Update of the City of Aspen Historic Inventor> Map, preferably with a graphics revision to improve legibilit) and usability. Ideally, this mapping would be easily overlayed with the City Planning and Zoning mapping system. 1 d. A 1991 or 1992 summer project to inventory and map the City irrigation ditch system so that it can be incorporated into the inventory and into the Historic Resource Plan. e. A summer 1991 documentation of Aspen Grove Cemetery, Ute Cemetery, and the Durant Mine, all of which were inaccessible at the time of this inventory due to snow. 2. An ongoing inventory management program is recommended so that properties and districts can be better tracked over time, and more informed decisions can be made regarding the fate of an individual property, or the course of the overall Historic Resource Plan. a. Assignment of permanent control numbers to each inventoried property would allow tracking of any given property through its "life". Some of the data to be tracked could include: the site's significance rating, contiguous historic resources, dates of changes in status, date of entry onto the inventory, number of sites on the inventory, etc. Note: A system other than or in addition to the property address system is suggested. b. Every 5 years the inventory and inventory map should be completely updated. c. The inventory tracking system should be tied to the Building Permit system so that resource updates occur on a continual basis and so that "red flags" are raised when a resource is threatened. 3. A Historic Resource Plan is recommended which would dovetail with overall City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Goals. The Plan would be incorporated into and reviewed at the time of any master planning. This Plan could address, but not be limited to the following. a. A Goal Statement which is consistent with overall Planning Goals, but specific to Aspen's Historic Resource b. A Statement of Objectives which derive from that Goal Statement and which are time- specific c Provisions for ongoing coordination with Planning and Zoning d. A statement for and description of a historic property ranking (Le. landmark, significant, contributing, and supporting) which would include the implications of that ranking on any legal and economic controls and/or incentives e. Provisions for the development of a comprehensive package of controk incentives, public relations and public education, which will be supportive of the best preservation and utilization of Aspen's Historic Resource and consistent with the community' s vision of its future. 3 .,0 .1. -'. RECOMMENDATIONS continued The above recommendations by no means intend to be comprehensive, nor do they presume to take the place of more in-depth findings by those with greater understanding of the community and its resource. It is simply intended that they provide assistance, as deemed appropriate, with the on-going work of preservation planning. i 1 1 f : 1 4 6-'- &-.-Ii.: -I....'l/ ...... HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: _ Local Site Number: * Dhcito- In formation: LASP-* of Ringe/S overlay_ enl ry map-may not De-4-00%. Office. tr-69*shiv-10 -Sauth--Razige--*- Weat-Sectiori < 0 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 19600i 1 s. r*PfP ing 15' b-WildingTor. structure-Namet i Full Street Address: pcti:a . nr Oqided ~7:-~t,6- Legal Description: overlay . AL Y City A r.ourac' Aspen county __ Pitkin H.Â¢,~~:Â§PiE District/Neighborhood Name: . * 0*ner: Private/State/Federal * Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION < 0 Suilding.Type: * Architectural Style: * Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: biumber-of L Stories: * Fuilding Plan (Footprint, Shape): * Landscaping or Special Setting Features: * Associated- Buildings-,t-, Features or Objects - . Describe Material ana *linction (map number / name) : * IFor. the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in therdescript:Lon as appropriate: ~66f.: * Walls: * toundation / Basement: * thimney(s): * cnly)-6 Windows: * fiela-o bset a t\Orth 4- (trum boorst * Otorches: * Â©ineralÂ¥Architectural Description: , * V 5 . b.----- b --14'' '0-1* â€¢' e. Â·r ./.W 4. T.. 1 ...., I. , 4 Page 2 of 2 State Site Number -- Local Site Number * FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY current use: * Architect: *Unknown original use: * Builder: *Unknown Intermediate Use: Construction Date: 1 Actual 1 Estimate 1 Assessor Raood On: * kt,4 eÂ°to ate RODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS < Minor -L Moderate -* A Majot; 3 *-7 Moved * bescribe Modifications and Date: * Â· nrks LO Additions and Date: * or co Id observations mpafiÂ£ llc NATIONAL/S~~~REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on __ National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; _ State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B_ C_ D_ E Map Local Rating and Landmark Designation KE- __t Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or 11 - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. - Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: * aginni arprl Contaxti ingl Mlitgrigal Information: * Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records: Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * Recorded By: * Date: * Affiliation: Aspen Historic Prnservation Committee - Citv of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Â£:flin, Historic Prevervation Officer/Planner 6 . .. VERIFIED BUILDING DEMOLITIONS Address Area Block 110 North Spring East Aspen Townsite 21 1018 East Hopkins 25 718 East Hopkins 28 720 East Hopkins 28 624 East Hopking 29 624 East Hopkins 98 816 East Cooper 111 835 East Cooper 112 7th & West Smuggler West End 9 831 West Bleeker 12 726 West Bleeker 17 515 North Fifth 20 517 West North " 26 501 West Smuggler 27 437 West Smuggler 34 325 West Francis 35 407 West Hallam 36 215/219 West Hallam 50 113 West Bleeker 58 . 639 North Fourth 99 170 North Park Smuggler Mountain 4 Sunny Park N. 940 Matchless Drive 3 Alpine Acres 930 King " na 300 West Hopking Shadow Mountain 45 915 South Mill " na 222 East Hallam Community Church 71 203 East Hallam 72 220 Puppy Smith Hallam Lake na Note: A&A could not locate 120 North Spring, East Aspen Townsite, Block #21 7 . 4 .. RECOMMENDED INVENTORY "DROPS" Address Area Block # 824 East Hyman- A'u-sp East Aspen Townsite 31 990 East Hyman -46 2-- jugf 32 1020 East Hyman - AAX - t.r Id, 11 â€¢ 33 1031 East Hyman - 4 ,Â·wa 34 1001 East Hyman - c CUL â€¢ 34 719 East Hopkins - ch<ck 104 801 East Hyman - c:tv 7 111 407 West Hallam (demo?) -- 422Â¥f West End 36 327 West Hallam - A 43 305 West Hallam .- 2 43 205 West Bleeker - olv~ 51 232 East Hallam - 04Â°r Community Church 71 209 East Bleeker - ol v 0 r 73 855 Gibson ~ fo ~>61, Smuggler Mountain na 860 Gibson / na . 6 oo e Ale-el,e~' < 421Â¢-4 8 f./0 ,./., - . I , ASPEN: 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS: Â· AREA: BLOCK: NAT. REG 80 86 Â· 91 SUP. STRUC. 100 Eaet Bieeker Church 65 N Y 101 East Haliam Church 65 NY 105 East Haliarn Church 65 N Y 110 Eaet Bieeker Church 65 N Â· Y 123 East Haliarn Church :65 N Y 126 East Bleeker Church :65 N ~+ Y 127 East Hallam :Church :65 N N ijl East Hallam Church 65 N Y 134 East Bieeker :Church 65 N Y 216 East Hallam Church 71 NY 200 East Bieeker Church 72 Y N 214 East Bieeker *Church 72 N * ' A f+ Y 223 East Haliam :Church 72 N Y 232 East Bleeker Church .72 N ..044. Y 01 221 East Bieeker :Church 73 N Q+ Y 202 North Monarch Church :78 N Y 212 North Monarch church 78 N Y 218 North Monarch Church 78 N N 310 East Main commercial core 79 N N 330 East Main Commercial core 79 Y N 101 South Mill :Commercial Core :80 N N N 502 East Hopkins Commercial Core 80 N 303 Eaet Main Commercial Core 80 Y - N 308 East Hopkine Commercial Core 80 : N N 309 East Main :Commercial Core 80 N N j15 East Main Commercial Core 80 " 0 . ~ N &16 Eaet Hopkins Â·Commercial Core 80 N N 300 East Hyman Commercial core 81 N 22 309 East Hopkins :Commercial Core 81 No:~ N 514 East Hyman :Commercial Core 81 N O.0 N j28 East Hyman .Commercial Core 81 Y N 100 South Mill :Commercial Core 87 Nat N 406 East Hopkins cÂ· mmercial Core 87 N 6 N 203 South Galena commercial core 88 YA N 204 South Mill Â·Commercial core .88 YA N N 208 South Mill Commercial Core 88 N * N 209 South Galena Â·commercial core :88 N Q . N 0000'00â€¢00â€¢ 000040<1â€¢0400 .00. 0.0004.0,04.0. .Â«410 00.0. ..40 o......0..6:06..0.â€¢40 ...... . +1 .. ASPEN: 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS: AREA: BLOCK: NAT. REG SUP. STRUC. 426 East Hyman Commercial core .88 N N 432 East Hyman :Commercial Core 88 N :. : 0- N 303-309 South Galena Commercial Core 89 N N 4ij Eaet Hyman :Commercial Core 89 Y N 420 East Cooper :Commercial Core :89 Y : N 42j East Hyman :Commercial core .89 N N 506 Eaet Main ~Commercial Core 92 Y N 104 South Galena Commercial Core 93 N N 130 Â§6uth Galena Commercial core 93 Y : N 530 Eaet Hopkins :Commercial Core :93 N N 552 East Hopkins :Commercial Core 93 NO N 5jj East Main :Commercial Core 93 N N 534 East Hopkins :Commercial Core :93 N N 220 South Galena :commercial core 94 Â¥ ' Â¥f N 304-j08 South Galena Commercial Core 95 N * N 312 South Galena Â·Commercial Core 95 N * N 501 East Hyman :Commercial Core 95 Y '~7 N 405-407 South Hunter :Commercial core 96 Y N 501 *aet Cooper :Commercial Core 96 Y N -' 531 East Cooper Commercial Core 96 N N .... 5337 East Cooper :Commercial core 96 N N 820 East Cooper East Aspen Townsite 111 N Y 824 East Cooper East Aspen Townsite Â·111 N Y 955 East Cooper East Aepen Townsite 118 N N 939 Eaet Cooper East Aepen Towneite 118 N Y 1012 East HopkinB :East Aspen Townsite 25 N N 811 Eaet Hopkins :East Aspen Townsite 31 N N di# East Hopkins :East Aspen Townsite .31 : N ' Y 920 East Hyman :East Aspen Townsite 32 N N 1022 East Hyman East Aspen Townsite 33 N ' 07 N 1000 Eaet Cooper East Aspen Townsite .34 N Y 1006 East Cooper East Aspen Townsite 34 N Y 1020 Eaet Cooper East Aspen Townsite 34 N 30j South Cleveiand :East Aspen Townsite 35 N N 305 South Cleveland :East Aepen Townsite 35 N N 307 South Cleveland :East Aspen Towneite 35 N : N A 918 East Cooper 'Eaet Aspen Townsite 35 N -- Y 1004 East Durant Â·East Aepen Townsite 37 N - N 0*-- ' 1031 East Durant East Aspen Townsite 40 N N 62j East Hopkins East Aspen Towneite 99 N N 625 East Hopkins :Eaet Aspen Towngite 99 N N Y 635 East Hooking East Aspen Townsite Â·99 N Y 01 ...0.â€¢4â€¢6040â€¢14Â·â€¢0â€¢40<[00660Â·6:0 000000Â·0 00000 * 40...0.4400 <ls<~Â·00000000 0 1110 1000 240,0.0,440 41 O.141 11<0<0000010001 0001 1101 1000 ... ..... ......1 , ./ + I ..' 0 - Â·' 4 . ASPEN: 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS: AREA: BLOCK: NAT. REG 80 86 91 SUP. STRUC. 66 1 1101 East Durant :East Aspen Townsite na :East Aspen Townelte na 00 600**ast ~leeker(Â¢'ibul~i.... ... .. .~. Durant Mine -East Aspen Towneite na N 701 North Third :Hallam Lake 100 N 707 North Third :Hallam Lake 100 N . : 0-4 jil Gillespie .Hallam Lake 102 N 610 North Third/329 Lake Hallam Lake 102 N 620 North Third Hallam Lake 102 N 640 North Third :Hallam Lake 102 N 710 North Third Hallam Lake :102 206 Lake Avenue :Hallam Lake :103 Y . 210 Lake Avenue :Hallam Lake :103 N 2i2 Lake Avenue :Hallam Lake 103 N n 220 Lake Avenue .Hallam Lake 103 N . 240 Lake Avenue Hallam Lake 103 N 320 Lake Avenue Hallam Lake 103 N 330 Lake Avenue Hallam Lake 103 N Â·-Â· 514 North Third ~ ~~ Hallam Lake 40 N. .- . ...t. 525'North Second *' :Hallam Lake Y 1 423 North Second :Hallam Lake 41 N .- 202 West Francle .Hallam Lake 48 N 0% 225 West Smuggler .Hallam Lake 48 N 0- 229 West Smuggler Hallam Lake 48 N . Q+ 234 West Francle Hallam Lake i48 Y 201 West Francie Hallam Lake :49 ~ ~ 1 .4 120 West Francie :Hallam Lake 55 N 126 West Francis Hallam Lake 55 N .... : O.. O: . 414 North First Hallam Lake 55 N 100 Weet Hallam Hallam Lake 56 N 4 < 12j West Francle .Hallam Lake 56 N 124*West Hallam Â·Hallam Lake 56 N 135 West Francle Hallam Lake 56 N 314 dillesple Hallam Lake 91 330 Gillespie :Hallam Lake 91 N y lot Puppy Smith Hallam Lake na N ~4 220 Puppy smith .Hallam Lake na N C) Aspen Brewery Ruing Hallam Lake na N Triangie Park Hallam Lake na N 706 Weet Main '~Main Street 18 N i8 N 734 West Main Main Street lili'flal '701 West Main..-,Â· Main Street 19 N 709 West Main Main Street 19 N . 0 004â€¢004.000 1 000.0 3 0044004400 OIliloool 004.0 ..0.0 .000044â€¢ 00.0.1110..10 0 60004â€ž r 60 46:04000<14.04 ~W N Z Z Z Z Z >4 Z Â·Z Z H Z Z Z Z >4Â·Z Z Z Z Z Z >1 >4Â·>1 >1 >4 >4 >4 >1 Z >1 >4 >4 Z Z Z Z Z >1 >4 ./.9 I. . 1 . ASPEN: 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS: AREA: BLOCK: NAT. REG 80 86 SUP. STRUC. 604 West Main Main Street 24 N N 612 West Main Main Street 24 N Y 616 West Main :Main Street 24 N N 611*West Main Main Street 25 N Y 621 West Main :Main Street 25 N N 6jj West Main Main Street 25 N N 500 West Main Main Street 30 N N 518 West Main Main Street 30 N N 527 West Main Main Street 31 N N 400*West Main Main Street 37 N N 430 West Main Main Street :37 N 4 300 West Main :Main Street :44 N N c- 320 West Main Main Street 44 Y Y 328 West Main .Main Street 44 N 352 West Main Main Street 44 N I *+ N 3jj West Main Â·Main Street 45 N N 205 West Main IMain Street 52 N 'Q N 211 West Main :Main Street 52 N N 122-132 East Main .Main Street 58 N - N -â€¢ 125 West Main :Main Street 59 N - N 115 West Main Main Street 59 N . I- N 128 East Main Main Street 66 N N 202-208 East Main ~ Â·Main Street 73 N 0 . N 216 East Main Â·Main Street 73 N N .... . t....... ..- 165 South Monarch :Main Street 74 N O N 201 East Main :Main Street 74 N ~+ N 221 East Main Main Street 74 N 0+ N 227 East Main Main Street 74 N N 205 South Third Street : Shadow Mountain 39 Y Y 325 West Hopkins :Shadow Mountain 46 N N 200 West Hopkins .Shadow Mountain 52 N N 212 West Hopkins Shadow Mountain 52 N N 222 Weet Hopkins Â·Shadow Mountain 52 N N ~ja- 205 * West Hopking :Shadow Mountain 53 N 00 0+ N 214 West Hyman :Shadow Mountain .53 N N 4- 216 Wesâ‚¬Hyman ~ ~ : Shadow Mountain 53 N OO? OO N 311 South First Street Shadow Mountain 54 N U , . V- N lj4a West Hopkins Shadow Mountain 59 NOâ€¢A N 134b West Hopkins Shadow Mountain 59 N -00 N 135 West Hopkins Shadow Mountain 60 NO 0 0+ Y 101 East Hopkins :Shadow Mountain 68 N 0'0 0 N lij East Hopking Â·Shadow Mountain 68 N Ill- r 0.00.0.0<1:001 0..0000.. O.04000'001 0.00. ..20<00 .1 0 0-0 00.0.0.00 2 04Â«44:04,43 : 440:4 .4. 6 0.00.0 ..... ...4â€ž. ..... . ......14 .0 - ..4 .. ASPEN: 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS: AREA: BLOCK: NAT. REG 91 SUP. STRUC. 118 Eaet Cooper Shadow Mountain 69 N ~- N 124 East Cooper Shadow Mountain 69 N Y lid South Aspen :Shadow Mountain 7 Eames N Y Lift #One/Boat Tow :Shadow Mountain :7 Eames Y Y 135 East Cooper :Shadow Mountain 70 Y : - Y 208 East Hopkins Shadow Mountain 74 N N 214 East Hopkins Shadow Mountain 74 N Y - 201 East Hyman Shadow Mountain 76 N Y <4 101-109 Juan Street Shadow Mountain na N Â· N -7 470 North Spring Smuggler Mountain 1,2,3 Oklahoma Flate N N 950 Matchless brive Smuggler Mountain 2 Alpine Acres N Y 930 Matchlege brive Smuggler Mountain 4 Alpine Acrea N ': Y 920 Matchless Drive :Smuggler Mountain :5 Alpine Acres :NQ N 390 North Spring Smuggler Mountain :5,6 Oklahoma Flate N Q 0,0+ Y 230 North Spring Smuggler Mountain 7 Oklahoma Flats NQ N 100 North Park Â·Smuggler Mountain na .0 . .. N 101 North Park Smuggler Mountain na N N ~~ 165 North Park :Smuggler Mountain na N: N 106 South Park Smuggler Mountain na N N = 17 Queen :Smuggler Mountain na N : ~7 Y 520 Walnut :Smuggler Mountain na N N ...... 557 Walnut ~ Smuggler Mountain na N N 590 North Mlit/Aspen Electric Smuggler Mountain .na .N N 590 North Mill/Sheeley Bridge Smuggler Mountain na Y N 920 King :Smuggler Mountain na NY 0 925 King Smuggler Mountain na N N 935 King .Smuggler Mountain :na NY 980 Gibson Smuggler Mountain *na N Q N 990 Gibson .Smuggler Mountain :na N Y fht- h Aspen Grove Cemetery Smuggler Mountain na N N 720 Bay Smuggler Mountain Â·Oklahoma Flate N Y 1280 Ute Avenue/Explosives Stora Ute Avenue na N N Â©2- 1500 Ute Avenue Ute Avenue na N N N N Giory Hoie park :Ute Avenue :na Ute Cemetery :Ute Avenue na N 1080 Power Piant/castle Creek Po:west of Castle Creek :na N O N Maroli Barn and Salt shed .west of Castle Creek na Y -Il Y Marolt House :weet of Castle Creek na N -ililt Y Red Butte Cemetery west of Castle Creek na N O 07 8+ N N OVL Rio Grande Railway Bridge west of Castle Creek na N 834 West Hallam West End 10 N O A.-A+ 700 We.t FrancinA ~ Â·West End 15 N O.1 02.0 Y 2.01...041000 001:01111100 11:001-1:1 1 :004..404 10.00 0001:. 11:. 0 0000 ) 001 <34..4<1:.<10.00 600<3â€¢.eâ€¢00 60000000<1â€¢ .. - 0 -3 ASPEN: 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS: AREA: BLOCK: NAT. REG SUP. STRUC. 701 West Smuggler West End 15 N N 712 West Francis 'West End 15 N Y 715 West Smuggler :West End 15 N N 716 West Francis :West End :15 N Y ,V 716 West Haliam West End 16 N Y li7 North Sixth :Weet End 18 N n N 735 West Bleeker West End 18 N Q N 505 North Eigth West End 2 N ;~ N 610 West Smuggier :West End 20 N .~ N 421~ North Fifth West End 21 N * Y 609 West Smuggler West End 21 N O 0+ Y 610 West Francis -Weet End 21 N : ~07 N 629 West Smuggler .West End :21 N C) Y 610 West Hallam West End 22 N Y 620 West Hallam Weet End 22 N Y 601 Meet Hallam West End 23 N N 620 West Bleeker :West End 23 Y Y 121 North Fifth :West End 24 N N 635 West Bleeker :West End .24 NY A 500~ West Francis :West End 27 'i 39.7. ~ Y 5ij West Smuggler .West End 27 N ~ N . ....t 522 West Francie :West End 27 N - N U 319 North Fourth Weet End Â·28 N N .. 504 West Hallam Â·West End 28 NQ~~+ Y 523 West Francie West End 28 Y N 000 530 West Hallam :West End 28 N 1.1 1- N 533 West Francis :West End 28 N Q O-0+ N 500 West Bieeker West End 29 NO (I - Y 525 West Hallam West End :29 NO Y 533 Wegt Haliam :West End 29 N Y 120 North Fifth West End 30 NY 513 West Bleeker Â·West End 30 N Y 400 West Smuggler :West End Â·33 N Y 406 West Smuggler Â·West End :33 N N 434 West Smuggler West End 33 N Y 515 North Third West End :33 N Y 420 West Francis Weet End 34 N - Y 432 West Francis West End 34 Y ~- Y 403 West Hallam West End 36 N O- Y 421 West Hallam West End 36 N 0- Y 442 West Bleeker Weet End 36 Y*Y 350 Went Ualiam Weet End 42 N Y * 20000000â€ž000 000'00'00 014â€¢0000'00 :00.0 0 .000..0 00040*000â€¢00.0 2 60â€¢coioâ€¢â€¢â€¢ â€¢â€¢406â€¢â€¢O â€¢oâ€¢ 00001'000 --1 -. . . ASPEN: 1991 HISTORIC INVENTORY MASTER LIST ADDRESS: AREA: BLOCK: NAT. REG 80 86 91 SUP. STRUC. 334 West Hallam West End 42 Yoem Y 323 West Hallam :West End 43 N Â· 8- N 331 West Bleeker .Weet End 44 Y I Y 214 West Bleeker :West End 50 N ~ ~A Y 229 West Hallam West End 50 N Q N 2j3 West Hallam West End 50 N '1 N 213 West Bleeker West End 51 N Y 215 West Bleeker .West End 51 N Y 217 West Bleeker West End :51 N : Y 233 West Bleeker :West End 51 N Y 121 West Bleeker West End 58 N .., Y 129 West Bieeker West End 58 N 131 West Bleeker West End 58 N N N 500 Weet North West End Â·99 N 0 ~0 N 515 Gillespie West End 99 NO~* Y 0400 0000 000001.10000 boâ€¢ 0600.â€¢ 91. 6 'V - 1 1< i b. .14 49,1. ,., , 4 - 1 1 - I. .Â·. 1 2. 7 ; ..Â· Â·Â· 1,7.7 &1%11.55 1 1 . .,' i t; ' 4" :34. . , 1 . 0 ,:, f -. 9.1. Â·Â· 1 Â·- 1 1 . . Â· - l, Â· ... I I , li ........ 41 . .Â·... . 1 - 1 - . 't . 0 .:;. C .. , ..Â¥ ..1 .. 7.r , . . 1..., .4 /2 - i 1 I . ' Â· 11 â€¢ ./.4 . al . ... i I .... ..... .1* k -A...:. .0 . 1 01 , ' , 7 . ... 111%19,7.5 4 , . 'Â·. -'Â·'*1â€¢1'tâ€¢Â·2keâ€¢ p . . . /fi i , . 0 , 7/, '/.4 1,"44. .'' Â· lit:?44; Â¥,1406*14 9 4 6â€¢ . Â· .rli &%' . .1 & Â· Â· ,â€¢ i .., Â·4. 1. 1 , 4 4 , Â· I.* ..... .. .. 1 0 4 ''' I . 1 ..'1Â¥t':~44 . 2 1. . 1, .'/ '.' I .... . 1. ... 2 1.. 4 . . p- ._ T*32 :;lf-~-.. :1'J.:&1~ -~ , . r Â· . Â· 1 . . L. 1 . 4 , , , ....# 4,L..Â¥3*Dikkt:95:4*'~ 41'--- *Â·:,Â·.1--4- I ..1 11 ;t ,- â€¢ , 1 1 ... . .. ..0 2 J..1.:-, . ... .1 ..: 0 , -, /,- 1* : " , I 3. f> " 11 4 .. :J.1 1 43*11...1 4. - I- ' 't ..r, 1 Â· n. 1 râ€¢<-tteLF I n, 1. . . . 11 .... 1 9 ~ Â·4 Â·Â·Â·b Â·, .m n .. .. U:49 --+Aa _21.u. -An .... .1 '~" '1 4 0 /'a/// e,r,Â· 1 1 '.1 1. 1'. 1 Ve . 40Â·, 1 ''-, 1.'" ... ... I - Â· 44';Â·i 9 0 1 4 Of' ... 1 . 1 ' ./ *. p.... ' ''',1 . N 1 0 . . ' ' 'Â·Â·~ I 'Â· Â·;â€¢<Â·~UAÂ·â€¢ 9-.Â· /4'f,Â·'â€¢Â·Â·,â€¢iÂ·â€¢Â·Â·Â· ... 1 ,i,,,1':/.2/,t'â€¢.:ialtugh ".1 . I - .1 ,,.1 ,...9 .472 .4 '47Â· ' + 4 -- 0 . r.: 4 - $ 59, 1, 'k 1Â¢Â·. f. 4 . 1 bji RN' MT +ICFWNS Er ph - **40 f MS?MAA. FMW{6641\ms# (mveds WA -SCH#MEÂ· 1 9 . I Abbey /- Al'ky kNe~046101MUIT I 1--:-=-r . 1 1 1 3-_ EXI,-7/Ho- oNIE,&476 47 ---2-1 L 1 JOUTIDult DINC,-_-119 '* â€¢ an 1 FÂ·EMOVIE-P. 1 / lili -r FlwrE)2.Ty LINE - _ENcll*AMENT 41' r - - -4 -19':~ V 1 10 \ \ 0 - -ID M 'teMOVEP-,1 fgoâ€žEd_ vou.INTAF-1 8,1%3 11 ~ VtÂ¥/ .All b -_ - 1_ 1 \\ I V 1 0 , i , 1 4 -/11$ L..--7.-I-I-. . /7 /\ 1*.. AA ~ 3 1%%1*T})14 -1.RE,E* - (~lv,- ~ \1 1 i ' Dy 1 : * uj/2*10.r,9 .f i , exleT!14& ON,-41-OFÂ¥ Woot' FBAMBC MIROF'* COTTAM . 2.0 NOBETE # | OEWALK _ w' 3/39 %99 409* Â§ and associates #**42*r OEVELOVMENT FLAM N OVEMDE K %71 1<111 y 1 4.,7 -r_vs[1Â¥ntry-_1199â‚¬DNâ‚¬72-- -0 . LA COCINA, INC. 308 EAST HOPKINS NOV 2 7 1~Â·d ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 November 21, 1991 Margaret Johnson 316 East Hopkins Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Alley Shack Dear Margaret: Thank you for showing us your proposed plans for demolition of the shack located on the back of your property. As the owner of the adjacent property to the west, I am pleased to see that you are going to demolish the alley shack that encroaches on my property. The demolition of the shack will resolve the encroachment problem to my satisfaction. I have reviewed the potential problem of the encroachment with my attorney and we believe that there will be a problem keeping the shed if the HPC does not approve the demolition. Although I have worked with you in the past regarding the encroachment, if the HPC does not approve the demolition I will need to ask you to remove the encroachment. I certainly do not want my property encumbered with a shack that the HPC will not allow to be demolished, since I will need all of my property free from any HPC approved shack. I believe that you will find that removal of the encroaching wall of the shack will probably result in demolition anyway since the shack does not appear to be structurally sound. Although I do not know when the shack was built, there have been additions and changes since 1972 when Jim Reser surveyed it. I am sending a copy of this letter to the HPC to let them know that I am in support of the demolition for several reasons. First and foremost, it will resolve the encroachment problem. Second, I do not believe the shack is historic in any respect. It does not have the historic shape or roof of the traditional carriage houses in Aspen, the windows are all relatively new, and there have been additions to the shack in the past years that are clearly not historic (such as the plywood sheets that were put on the west wall that encroaches on my property). -0 0 Margaret Johnson November 21, 1991 Page Two In summary, I will be forced to ask you to remove the shack from my property if the HPC does not permit it to be demolished. I believe that the HPC should allow it to be demolished since it is not historic. Very Truly Yours, By: ~~/~/ ~~ gRN. Nicholas Lebby, #e~ident .. "26 -1 The Bank of Aspen Mich,tri T. T,'re,5 November 22, 1991 Margaret Johnson 316 East Hopkins Aspen, CO 81611 Re: HPC Application for Demolition Dear Ms. Johnson: This letter is written for the benefit of the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee ("HPC") to indicate the support by the Bank of Aspen for the proposal to demolish the shed located on the alley of 316 E. Hopkins. As the adjacent property owner to the east, the Bank of Aspen fully supports the application for the demolition. We believe that the application should be approved for the following reasons: 1. The shed is non-historic. 2. The City of Aspen desperately needs off street parking in the downtown commercial core area. 3. The shed appears to be not structurally sound, with a sagging roof, and inadequate utilities for any tenant in the winter. If you need any additional support for your application, please let us know. Very truly yours, L -V. 41 .LA j <-1 Michael 4. Taets President & CEO CC: Historical Preservation Committee AFFIDAVIT I, B. Joseph Krabacher, hereby certify that I posted the public notice for Landmark Designation on 316 E. Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 10 days prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on December 17, 1991. 2 .1131Â£L B. JoseÂ¢h/KDAbacher STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed, sworn and acknowledged before me this /7Â»> day of December, 1991 by B. Joseph Krabacher. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 4/44/91 6.On ae J . PAÂ«-44 ./. Notary Public / .. -0-' ' 1.- : : bjk/docuriehts/affidavit.316 E. Â·- e AFFIDAVIT I, B. Joseph Krabacher, hereby certify that I posted the public notice on 316 E. Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 10 days prior to November 27, 1991. B. Joseph Krabacher STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed, sworn and acknowledged before me this day of November, 1991 by B. Joseph Krabacher. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 4441 9.- 21Â»,04 6 j Notary Public r bjk/documents/affidavit.316 th :,7 or' Wr AFFIDAVIT I, Cheryl Heiberger, hereby certify that I served true and correct copies of the Public Notice attachd hereto by depositing true and correct copies of the same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, on the 12th day of November, 1991 addressed to the addressees attached hereto as Exhibit A. L-,1.FAA G..DCIbl ti Cheryl Reiberger410/7YA , STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed, sworn and acknowledged before me this 12th day of November, 1991 by Cheryl Heiberger. WITNESS my hand and official seal. 6 v/mo~.My commission expires: 3/40/93 ... ;L,054.0>~-7 - Notary Public f th.r.9... blk/dccuments/affidavit.316 .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 316 E. Hopkins, Landmark Designation NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, November 27, 1991, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the Second Floor Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by Margaret Johnson requesting landmark designation for the parcel located at Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen, also referred to as 316 E. Hopkins St. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/William J. Poss, Chairman Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on November 7, 1991 City of Aspen account pub.notice.316eh.ld PUBLIC NOTICE LIST 316 East Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado Amoco Tax Department 600 South Cherry, Suite 915 Denver, Colorado 80222 Carl and Catherine Bergman P.O. Box 1365 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Mountain States Communications P.O. Box E Aspen, Colorado 81612 The Hotel Jerome, Ltd. Partnership c/o Market Corporate Real Estate 285 Riverside Avenue Westport, CN 06880 Louis Schainuck 800 South Monarch Aspen, Colorado 81611 Louis Schainuck 805 Sandune Lane Corona Del Mar, California 92625 James E. and Alberta Moore P.O. Box 707 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Elizabeth Jones P.O. Box P Aspen, Colorado 81612 The Forge Partnership P.O. Box 3159 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Chitwood Plaza Company c/o The Fleisher Company 200 East Main Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 M&W Associates 205 South Mill, Suite 301A Aspen, Colorado 81611 Marjorie Jenkinson 403 West Hallam Aspen, Colorado 81611 Harry W. Bass, Jr. c/o Meredith and Cochran P.O. Box 35688 Dallas, Texas 75235 Nicholas and Gertrude Kuhn P.O. Box 8016 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Can Am Developments 135 East Cooper Aspen, Colorado 81611 William and Florence Beaumont P.O. Box 4695 Incline Valley, Nevada 89405 La Cocina, Inc. P.O. Box 4010 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Bank of Aspen 119 South Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Richard and Alison Meeker P.O. Box 2329 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen Properties, Inc. P.O. Box 10502 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Sandra and Peter Johnson 215 South Monarch, Suite G-103 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Gooding Investment Co. 1200 17th Street, Suite 2660 Denver, Colorado 80202 Kelly Properties P.O. Box 8429 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Robert Brining 215 South Monarch, Suite 203 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Robert L. Orr 500 Patterson Road Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 Donald Davidson 215 South Monarch, Suite 203 Aspen, Colorado 81611 LPC. Company P.O. Box 362 Aspen, Colorado 1612 William L. Seguin P.O. Box 4274 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Deborah L. Seguin 8331 Fredericksburg Road San Antonia, Texas 78229 Donald W. Davidson P.O. Box W Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen Arcade c/o Larry Brooks 1148 4th Street Santa Monica, CA 90403 Mill Street Plaza Associates 205 South Mill Street, Suite 301 A Aspen, Colorado 81611 Crystal Palace Corporation P.O. Box 32 Aspen, Colorado 81612 City of Aspen Planning Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Harley A. Baldwin, II 205 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Sabatini Sport Company 208 South Mill Aspen, Colorado 81611 Wendelin Associates 9 Old Cross River Road Snowmass Center Katonah, New York 10536 Pietrzaka Aspen Building Limited Partnership P.O. Box 9790 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Mountain Enterprises - 80 B 4001 Classen Blvd. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118 Michael Kantzer 6501 Vista Del Mar Playa Del Rey, California 90293 Aspen Art Investment 1450 Sierra Vista Drive, Suite B Aspen, Colorado 81611 David and Kathleen Denson 170 East Gore Creek Vail, Colorado 81657 Hillis of Snowmass 170 East Gore Creek Vail, Colorado 81657 Peter and Ellen Goldstein 150 Metro Park #3 Rochester, New York 14623 bjk/documents/notice.316 . AFFIDAVIT I, Cheryl Heiberger, hereby certify that I served true and correct copies of the Public Notice attachd hereto by depositing true and correct copies of the same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, on the 2nd day of December, 1991 addressed to the addressees attached hereto as Exhibit A. 01.~.J Cl~ hiÂ«J Cheryl Ifeiberger 0 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed, sworn and acknowledged before me this 2nd day of December, 1991 by Cheryl Heiberger. WITNESS my hand and official seal. 041'WI" 1;'/;iF, 426..11*ff#ommission expires : 3/20/9 3 f Â«.. ....P % y :Â·QOTARY \ i i fÂ·Â·,/10 0 LIC / o <f Notary Public . ... 6 y 0, CoL, 00 41/1/1 bjk/4626I~nts/aff idavi t.316 0. 0. , PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 316 E. Hopkins, Landmark Designation NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, December 17, 1991, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission in the Second Floor Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by Margaret Johnson requesting landmark designation for the parcel located at Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen, also referred to as 316 E. Hopkins St. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/Jasmine Tvqre. Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on November 28, 1991 City of Aspen account pub.notice.316eh.ld PUBLIC NOTICE LIST 316 East Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado Amoco Tax Department 600 South Cherry, Suite 915 Denver, Colorado 80222 Carl and Catherine Bergman P.O. Box 1365 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Mountain States Communications P.O. Box E Aspen, Colorado 81612 The Hotel Jerome, Ltd. Partnership c/o Market Corporate Real Estate 285 Riverside Avenue Westport, CN 06880 Louis Schainuck 800 South Monarch Aspen, Colorado 81611 Louis Schainuck 805 Sandune Lane Corona Del Mar, California 92625 James E. and Alberta Moore P.O. Box 707 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Elizabeth Jones P.O. Box P Aspen, Colorado 81612 The Forge Partnership P.O. Box 3159 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Chitwood Plaza Company c/o The Fleisher Company 200 East Main Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 M&W Associates 205 South Mill, Suite 301A Aspen, Colorado 81611 Marjorie Jenkinson 403 West Hallam Aspen, Colorado 81611 Harry W. Bass, Jr. c/o Meredith and Cochran P.O. Box 35688 Dallas, Texas 75235 Nicholas and Gertrude Kuhn P.O. Box 8016 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Can Am Developments 135 East Cooper Aspen, Colorado 81611 William and Florence Beaumont P.O. Box 4695 Incline Valley, Nevada 89405 La Cocina, Inc. P.O. Box 4010 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Bank of Aspen 119 South Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Richard and Alison Meeker P.O. Box 2329 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen Properties, Inc. P.O. Box 10502 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Sandra and Peter Johnson 215 South Monarch, Suite G-103 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Gooding Investment Co. 1200 17th Street, Suite 2660 Denver, Colorado 80202 Kelly Properties P.O. Box 8429 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Robert Brining 215 South Monarch, Suite 203 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Robert L. Orr 500 Patterson Road Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 .. I t Donald Davidson 215 South Monarch, Suite 203 Aspen, Colorado 81611 LPC. Company P.O. Box 362 Aspen, Colorado 1612 William L. Seguin P.O. Box 4274 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Deborah L. Seguin 8331 Fredericksburg Road San Antonia, Texas 78229 Donald W. Davidson P.O. Box W Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen Arcade c/o Larry Brooks 1148 4th Street Santa Monica, CA 90403 Mill Street Plaza Associates 205 South Mill Street, Suite 301 A Aspen, Colorado 81611 Crystal Palace Corporation P.O. Box 32 Aspen, Colorado 81612 City of Aspen Planning Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Harley A. Baldwin, II 205 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Sabatini Sport Company 208 South Mill Aspen, Colorado 81611 Wendelin Associates 9 Old Cross River Road Snowmass Center Katonah, New York 10536 Pietrzaka Aspen Building Limited Partnership P.O. Box 9790 Aspen, Colorado 81612 .. - Mountain Enterprises - 80 B 4001 Classen Blvd. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118 Michael Kantzer 6501 Vista Del Mar Playa Del Rey, California 90293 Aspen Art Investment 1450 Sierra Vista Drive, Suite B Aspen, Colorado 81611 David and Kathleen Denson 170 East Gore Creek Vail, Colorado 81657 Hillis of Snowmass 170 East Gore Creek Vail, Colorado 81657 Peter and Ellen Goldstein 150 Metro Park #3 Rochester, New York 14623 bjk/docunents/notice.316 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 316 E. Hopkins, Landmark Designation NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, December 17, 1991, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission in the Second Floor Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by Margaret Johnson requesting landmark designation for the parcel located at Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen, also referred to as 316 E. Hopkins St. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/Jasmine Tvqre. Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on November 28, 1991 City of Aspen account pub.notice.316eh.ld .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 316 E. Hopkins, Landmark Designation NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, November 27, 1991, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the Second Floor Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by Margaret Johnson requesting landmark designation for the parcel located at Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen, also referred to as 316 E. Hopkins St. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/William J. Poss. Chairman Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on November 7, 1991 City of Aspen account pub.notice.316eh.ld L- LAW OFFICES 1.4-Â·4' Â¢414 fps-1Â§74: KRABACHER, HILL & EDWARDS , K'09 1 2'Q, 152 ..41 - PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION - ,f-,n2 JEROME PROFESSIONALBUILDING - ' 2 8.M r TE.1 \CAN~ 1346003| 4 201 NORTH MILL STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 City of Aspen Planning Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Nov i o PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 316 E. Hopkins, Landmark Designation NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, November 27, 1991, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the Second Floor Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by Margaret Johnson requesting landmark designation for the parcel located at Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen, also referred to as 316 E. Hopkins St. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/William J. Poss. Chairman Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on November 7, 1991 City of Aspen account pub.notice.316eh.ld This file is not yet available electronically. Please contact the City Clerk's Office to access this file. Physical Address 130 S Galena Street 2nd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 970-429-2687 Hours Monday - Friday 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.