The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.316 E Hopkins Ave.HPC 4-961 ----=.a - 316 E. Ho~~~ins~~~- Howling Wolf 2737-073-29-008 11'96 4-96 7 C~END,-C-- / 7 BOA 1-1 P , 5-2_ F A \ ./ 5 \ 0 1 / / 101 F 00 exivige D axsr, eXIST: 'N INOMEN MEN 5TDRAOE 1 1 - ~r-* 1 -ELI EXATI NS rhÂ»-- EXIST NE 5 -11~ 1-7 095*62 7-F2Â»,8 PARSINe AND SEWER ON E,RADE .l' ~ W P. 5>41 61-, EXISTINe - - MANAOLES E, 5X I ST, 80/04 ~ - ..1 3. r'.1 t.. 7 RESS, RESTAURANT- It ReVOVE FREP 8%157, , 1. 1 AS.BA .: - 1. ~- ~..,1 1/NA P IK- 1 N j - COOL,.ER 4 If ..i 81< 1 ST! Ne , 1< 1 75 05 N (EXTER'Oâ‚¬j Â¢ | El n 1. 1- * O I e - 0/1 0/90 r. %11/ 1- I. 1 1,2 CONSTRUCTION 69 EAS 1<176Â»51\1 ADD ITION = 9 53 SA, FT 57-Kies 4 coMMON AREA - 33 4 M, FT, ~_ F '~T FLOOR PLAN-EXISTING .... .7 / \\N ' OUTDOOR 194/ N~/~ 8471 0 = 812,/TB Sâ‚¬ FT 1 , & 5-Tr R,65 BOOV DEMO = 94 51, 93 ' -.+ I.I.-i EX:Sm NITO+EN De'V[ O = 119 5â‚¬Â· FT \ 1 4 , . \ 1 .. - C 4. ..rt 1010 In- --- - 1-72 0 UU 5-rA[R ..ND.1- -9Â»- l. / SACK 5/AR 5-TA i R NO, 1- DOWN -7. 2 i : I Â·1 7 TRASHÂ· , b '1 ' 0 AREA ~ -h D Â·' " Ill .. 11 ALSTROM/GROUP j 1 - 4-- 1 ,!3~ 1.1 - Â· 312 F A. A. B. C. 1 Â· 23: . 1%1204 EANDICAP 1 . OUTOCDR bAR g \ ASPEN, CO 81611 r b<--7 970/ 925 1745 TEL f ~ ENT BA iNCE DOOR. - , 1 .. 970/ 925 4578 FX K 2>< *FRioae X 1 J c A// proiect e X - hieal \ MASS DOOR 1 '11 HOWLING WOLF 1 r. 8=4 1 i 2-1 .1 /1 INe - -Â· 6494-Fl ON A. 1 - 04- / ADDITION ~ -.. CONCRETE - 3 date .4 1 . RAMP . \ / IN{N TE S SONi \ r 4 18FE896 1~ NE,k.4 1<I-ru~s~ ASS 1 1 -1. 1 - NIEIN si / 11.- n ININDON X (23 D" x 20 11/ I. , BASS 0 1 -4-- 1 _P- - ~ / ./ P\'INDOIN ISDA drawing no. 2 4 .Fi .1 b Al 1 sgÂ« Â· 81'AIN / 4 # .114 , 11 - Â£--- 1-4 li .R / 1 1\ 11 PAVERS ININâ‚¬*x 4 141 ' . 18 L s#rk le-c-|< 58450 1 1. | NK ~ u, u I Â· 4 * 561 AL - Â£ I 4 1 1. 1 .//.4,)#TYE .//1.1/li 3 , In -\2=141 1 -1 / . S 11 1 ./1 1 1 - Â«f -v ~33 ieeT p-r: Aiâ‚¬+4Â· f errGE ~ FIRST FLOOR PLAN-NEW CONSTRUCTION 6~ , 1/4":1'-0" s*441 *44:'41 9 <49'le,4 r ' t,1 % .422 MeNip 16 -* la 1 1,431, 6 : 4â€¢4& ? ''1'.9445 .,2 Â·z.#uÂ·.024 -3. ~ W.t"ira;K*piTÂ»140 4 - - 4. , \ - P , . 4 GENERAL NOTES 1. General Contractor and all subcontractors shall layout and field verify all dimensions prior to construction. Do not scale drawings. Contact Architect or Engineer concerning discrepancies or missing information. Verify all dimensions and utility line locations prior to construction. 2. All work shall comply with applicable local, state, and national codes and conform with material and equipment manufacturers' recommendations. 3. REVIEW WITH OWNER WHICH FEES HAVE BEEN PREPAID. 4. All rees (Building Permit, Tap, etc.), materials, Labor, finishes, cleanup, etc. as necessary 5. All articles of the current document "General Conditions of the Contract for Construction" noted NIC (not in contract) or by Owner. for the full completion of this work shall be included in this contract and bid unless AIA Document A201 (1987 Edition) shall be part of these contract documents. 6. These documents contemplate a finished piece of work of such character and quality as is reasonably inferable from them. The Contractor acknowledges that his proposal includes sufficient money allowance to make his work complete and agrees that ... 1 inadvertent discrepancies or minor omissions shall not be the cause for additional SITE NOTES charges.or claims. The contract includes all work whether specifically noted herein or implied as generally necessary for the full completion of this work. 7. Where detailed information is lacking. Contractor before proceeding with the work, shall 1. Do not scale drawings Contact Architect for clarification of missing or conflicting refer the matter to the Architect and Owner who will together furnish information or a information. decision with reasonable promptness. 2. Property lines, utilities and topography shown are representative of information taken from a survey prepared by Alpine Survey. Please refer to the survey for this information, 8. No change from these documents shall be made without the Contractor having first notify the Architect of any discrepancy or variation between the drawings and actual 9. Final cleanup shall return the entire project to normal for a "first class' level of received permission in writing from the Owner and / or Architect. site conditions. maintenance. 3. Building footprint to be laid out by a certified surveyor. 10. For the Owner's records submit copies of permits, licenses, inspection reports, notices, 4. Architect shall verify building location after layout is complete and before the Contractor and correspondence with regard to regulations and standards bearing upon the begins any site clearing. Notify the Architect in advance to arrange inspection. 5. Surveyor shall lay out building footprint and location within the excavation prior to placing performance of the work. foundations. 4. Exterior walls to be 2 x 6 at 160 O.C. unless otherwise noted refer to Structural. 3. All dimensions are to face of framing unless otherwise noted. 6. Contact utility companies to field verify location of respective service lines prior to beginning construction. , 5. Interior walls to be 2 x 4 at 16" O.C. unless otherwise noted refer to Structural drawings. 7. Contractor shall insure positive drainage away from and around structure. Notify the 6. Interior or exterior walls at shower or bathtub surround walls to be at 120 o.c. to facilitate Architect whenever this is not possible. Ponding of surface waters shall not be â€ž 7. Coordinate joist placement with plumbing fixture layout. installation of wonderboard tile substrate. permitted within 40 feet of the building perimeter. , .4 1 8. Hold all plumbing traps as high as possible. Coordinate with cabinet accessories. 8. Dimensions are indicated to the nearest 1/4'. Layout all corners square or at 45 degree angles as indicated unless noted otherwise. 9. Refer to Structural Engineer for soil requirements at all slabs on grade and for Concrete, Wood. and Roof Load , and Foundation design requirements. X -- 60*5079 UCTION ..A FLEÂ« S RMANGO STOR,/ 6-7Â»11~/GORRI DOR 775 54Â·Fn L . 4 , P+OINLINe 1/NO>F ETC)g,â€¢em Del 5&, 77- / 1,101--F 5-TAIR ~ CORRi DDIR. 191 59,rT, TOTAL 1> IS 1,- EVE 12- 1 -703 64 FT <*ROSÂ©) f 1 1 1 +1/\4 -1- - t Ill X f 47 COFFES > . /. 2 41 1. JIL ..4 / CRAINA 4.1 .5 KNANCO - -/ > 0 11 1 1 . 4 s *Me -, c. surg065 ~ D-roneT f ,/i I I i I / \/. ' 1 /ll d . . r; . I AGG ESS : IN ,/1 , â‚¬ 21 r - Â·Â·Â·. ALSTROM/GROUP PRIVATE 5TORAes 1 - DOOR - _ - - - â‚¬ 312 F A. A. B.C. 5-r:AIR~*% IAUP A :1; ( 102 SR, FT) -5 STAIR NO :2, U 4 - 1. I / ./ r I 2- LOCKERS 1.-_1( '' -; ASPEN, CO 81611 -7- C -- - 1/SK,ele 1 2~</t.. 75 \Vubit.4 kw JJ /WhllÂ·\HH.liN -I-- â€¢ 2.. lk,E xi*mi f -t ..,. b- \1 11 Â·~.1.tr i Il a 11 1,11>IA 4 L ~i 41 11$ '~ - ~ 970/ 925 4578 FX 970/ 925 1745 TEL - 1 90*~!Dp* 2 .. -7---- --- - ~1 1 21~ 0~ Â·~ prolect r BIT CORRIC)Of .' .4 1 - . t 1 .Â· 1 HOWLING WOLF 2 ADDITION . date 1 2 1,1 QUOR Â»IND 1 . 3 ORY STORAee PDOC) 5-1.OR, -eâ‚¬Ve,9405 5 RYANCO 1- 18 FEB96 .. 01*61â‚¬-IN INA>K N PRI\Â»TE STOR,AGE . 8 >< 10 (68-[ 62 . FT j â‚¬ drawing no. < 4# a Z===5~ I <70 , A2 L ED . 1 4 ch h/[504 55'<E C EREASS ) '. %: % r \ 1 1 F: cio Â·Â· i r j 4-_-1 -_- - -___- t' .. 4 1 : .. - , BASEMENT PLAN-NE W CONS T RUC T /ON -4-- + 1/4":1'-0" 1 .1 , h ./ 1.:S.,cit* a 17 M.. - A %1 '.: W . . - - - . I I . . J ,Â·Â· ,. 6 - 7 I 1- - 1 1 0 I . ... lili 1)\\ , 1 / 990 OP-L--- ==2-40 // 1. r 'j 1 / / // . 1 / ./ -- I. I \ / i - - / / 1 \ \ r 1.\ I A -- . Â· Â· / - 6 6 / \ 0 1-1/ . -- - Ult ft 2 1 lu 8,<15-Fl Ne TD am,~Al N 1 4- -~ NORâ„¢ ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4":1'Â·0" 1/4":1'-0" 4 7 - 1/4 COD F/%ICE â‚¬ ' -- COURTYA@D AND EXTERfOF& STAIR ~ /Â«SPHALT SHi NeLE ROO r Â· . ' ' t i - ' ./ 119 --- . ..i 4 'iii ' 1 1 - 1 / 1/\1000 50'Ne - 1 i $ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i . = --ill L 25 755 '14 NEEN ADDI -TION 9>< 1 37-INe BL+36 TO ES MAIN f ... 1 - ;_- WEST ELEVATION ., 1/4":1'-0" ALSTROM/GROUP EXIETI Ne -TO REMA)N KIEN ADDITIONI 312 F A. A. B. C. . I I ~d_ ASPEN, CO 81611 , 970/ 925 1745 TEL - -LA/ - ~Â·t:o-v :-:, 1 970/ 925 4578 FX 6 - . , p - ROOF BEYOND NooD PENCE HOWLING WOLF proiect 0 COUR-7.15.dzE, - ADDITION - ~ date ~ NEN KITGAtE,NI Â»DDITION FRCO~ - 23 FEB 96 drawing no. i r 6Â»~- L.L_~-=40 ' , 1 i A3 1 le, Â· PNe,on SID I h! e 1. , .... 1- 111 . . 1 I -Il- --- 11.1- 1 - I. 66 EAST ELEVATION 4 1/4":1'.0" 1 , . , 4.5*jitj&* .. b J I ..~91 'Jl ' I . 1 , . . ; WT.#+ **:' <* I I , - :92>gh' t . , I U,#,1 444 ..212: 4 * --tÂ» Pe, I i ~Alic 1 %,1 , 4Lf'36 .:fs . /1 EX'67'Ne 84. De, NEIN ADDITION r . i 4.114 , 1 , 1*11 .. 4 lk. .1 k. e A' Â·Â·.r / ALSTROM/GROUP 1 1 /1 1\ . 312 F A. A. B. C. 1 fil .. i..lillilliz i ASPEN, CO 81611 I , 7 .il / i / i ' 1 I /11 970/ 925 1745 TEL dt - 11Â«11 lilli'i f p i./4 970/ 925 4578 F* proiâ€¢C, 1 - HOWLING WOLF \-07 / fÂ«Â»( //9/71 ADDITION l N# *007/ 383,\R//jao7~/ date 1// 28FEB96 i /4/ffÂ« . drawing no. / A5 , / 0 - I ..... I.:a, 1 4 L__j 1 . 4 - ..I./- -I-/0 4 h , ROOF PLAN KI-re14514 ADDITION 1/4":1'-00. - - / $ 4..../ 7-*- EI - :12Â·*tÂ·/. z /. 2 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET CITY OF ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DATE RECEIVED: 3/8/96 CASE # HPC 4-96 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID # 2737-073-29-008 PROJECT NAME: Minor Development Application for the Howling Wolf Project Address: 316 East Hopkins, Aspen, CO APPLICANT: Warren Ryan Address/Phone: 316 E. Hopkins, Aspen, CO 81611,925-5889 REPRESENTATIVE: Sven Alstrom Group Address/Phone: 312 F AABC, Aspen, CO 81611; 925-1745 PLANNING FEE: $115 # APPS RECEIVED 1 # PLATS RECEIVED 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Minor Developmeni 114Â·, leâ€ž Bod, Meeting Date l'ublic I learing ? HPC C]Yes C]No P&Z C]Yes CINO CC C]Yes CINO CC (2nd reading) C]Yes UNO REFERRALS: D City Attorney O Parks Il Zoning El Environmental Health 1 City Engineer C] Housing m Planning Il Other: El Other: DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DATE DUE: CLOSED/FILED DATE: INITIALS: ROUTE TO: .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission .0(12 THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director O FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 316 E. Hopkins Avenue, Howling Wolf- Minor DATE: March 13, 1996 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to expand the kitchen area, excavate a basement at the rear of the site, create an outdoor patio dining area, and alter the front entrance to allow handicapped access. A fence is also proposed at the rear of the property. Fences are a staff sign-off, however any comments which HPC wishes to offer at this time will be taken into account. The drawings show the proposed fence to be 8' high. The maximum height for fences is 6'. The fence must be no more than 42" high in the southeast corner due to open space requirements. The applicant must return to HPC for a public hearing to request waiver of on- site parking. Currently four spaces exist. The spaces labeled as winter season parking do not count as legal parking spaces, therefore the applicant will request a waiver of all four spaces. The trash enclosure are shown does not meet code. The minimum requirement is 20' (parallel to the alley) x 10' x10'. The building is a local landmark and is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Warren Ryan, owner, represented by Sven Alstrom. LOCATION: 316 E. Hopkins Avenue, Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: Commercial Core. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. .. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with the designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a historic landmark .... Response: In 1994, HPC approved the reconstruction and slight expansion of the rear lean-to/ kitchen area. At this time, the applicant would like to extend the kitchen approximately 17' towards the alley. The existing walk in cooler will be replaced in the basement. The new kitchen addition is one story and similar to the existing addition. The ridgeline over the new interior staircase meets the existing north-south ridgeline, creating a 60' long roofline and wall plane. Typically HPC would require a change in some plane, however since the Commercial Core has no setback requirements, the long ridgeline is not perceptible. The new ridge over the kitchen area terminates in the back of the historic east west gable. There should be minimal demolition in this area. The drawings do not show the north elevation of the addition, as it will be obscured by the fence. Staff has requested that this elevation be supplied at the meeting. The historic house has clapboard siding, and the addition which is currently existing has board and batten siding. The proposed new addition should match the existing addition's materials. A patio dining area, to be used seasonally will be created at the rear of the property, including an outdoor bar and trash receptacle and a required exit stair for the basement. (A parking waiver will be required.) The patio will be surrounded by a 6' high fence. The below grade construction will have no visible impact, except for the stairwell, which will be surrounded by wood fence to match the perimeter fence. Currently, handicapped access is along the east side of the building, entering at the rear near the bathrooms. Staff recommends that the access still be taken down the side of the building and through the courtyard in order to avoid removing the front door, which is historic. The historic door is not wide enough for disabled entrance, therefore is proposed to be replaced with a wider door. An elevation of the proposed door will be presented at the meeting. .. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed changes, except for the potential modifications at the entrance, are not visible from the street. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The new addition should be differentiated from the historic house in terms of materials in order to distinguish the old from new areas of the building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The project involves minimal demolition and minimal visual impact to the historic resource. Staff is concerned with the alterations to the front door and porch area. Preserving the proportions of the original fenestration is important to the architectural character of the house. The architect must provide verification that excavation and underpinning will not jeopardize the structural integrity of the historic house. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) .. â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the minor development application for 316 E. Hopkins Avenue with the following conditions: 1. The perimeter fence is to be approved by staff. Reduce height to a maximum of 6', with a maximum of 42" in the southeast corner. 3 A public hearing will be held on April 10, 1996 to request waiver of four parking spaces. 1. Minimize demolition of the historic structure where the new ridgeline intersects with the historic cross gable. 4. Provide a north elevation of the addition. ~) The new addition shall match the existing addition in materials. 6. Provide a section of the courtyard, showing the bar and staircase area. 7. Maintain handicapped access along the east side of the building, entering at the rear to avoid changes to the front of the house. Provide an elevation of the new door at the meeting to illustrate the alternative. The handicapped entry must meet all ADA requirements. 8. Verify that excavation and construction of the new foundation wall will not jeopardize the structural integrity of the historic house. 9. Revise the trash enclosure to meet zoning regulations. RECOMMENDED MOTION: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: - . . ImmlaSE APECICO:ECH Ell b=ject Nana k-K) 00(--/h~R (204~F: Â· ~ .. A P=je: I,xmticn 3/41 E H-E)F;'M.lkl S LOT O JiLF- 30 Â· (irâ€¢icate street address, lot & block I=ber,.legal des=iption where aggrcgciate) ) kesent hing 60 4) If Size 3000 69.1=7-. ) Applic=It's Nane, Address & 9=8 $ File E F+OF*IMS /MCI 60.4"2"1Â· RY'AM PR ESTEUT 9 25 5 631 D Represertatirie' s N-, Mdress & Ebcoe # 45VEN AL S-rBÂ©N'\ ALS-I-Btra â‚¬9)OF:' SIS F AAh<IL 125 19"MD ~ 9 Type of Agplicaticn (please check all that agply): arditicnal Use C=Ymptual - Ccnce=tzzl Histacic Dev. - Special Review _ - Firal SEA - Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline - Ckxx=eptual POD -E~inor Hist=ic Dev. ~ Stream Margin Final ED - Histaric Danolition btxmtain View Plane . Subdivisian - Historic Designaticn Carxjaninilmlization Tect/Map AmendxneIit (ZCS Allatmerit ... Iat Split/Iat line ~ QCS ]Damptirn Adjustment D Descipticn of Existirg Uses (rx=ber and type of .-,4.-4-4-- --4.--,--*-----,-0 approximate sq. ft.; runber of bedrocns; any previa= approvals granted to ttke p=perty) - RE:b-FAORANT / 5,Â©F=;F:EEH-<3(>66- / 874~ .. 9) Descripticn of Devele!=It Application k 176,+-PEN ,AIX) 1710 41 EASEMENT .STER Â·AdiE_Â· OlrT-IDCOI~ E)1 14 10#6 PA-11 0 ~ SEA SOMAL_ 01-E~~. LO) Have you attached the following? Respcnse to AttachmerÂ£ 2, Mininx= Sibmission Oactents Â· z Respcnse to Attattment 3, Specific Subnission Contents Response to AttatiIXEnt 4, Review Star2ards for Your Applicaticn From : ALSTROMGROUP PHONE No. : 3039254578 ~ Mar.07 1996 3:56PM P01 ALSTROMGROUP 312 H ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER ASPEN, COLORADO @1611 970 925 1745 7 February, 1996 21 February, mvision 5 March, revision Warren Ryan RYANCO 925 5889 715 West Main Aspen, Colorado 81611 HOWLING WOLF 316 East Hopkfna ZONING AND FAA SUMMARY ZONE DISTRICT COMMERCIAL CORE MINIMUM LOT SIZE 3000 oquare foat MINIMUM LOT WIDTH no requirement MINIMUM FRONT YARD no vequlromgnt MINIMUM SIDE YARD no requirement MINIMUM REAR YARD no requirement except trash utility Bervice area *hall be required MAXIMUM HEIGHT 40 feet MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS ON THE LOT no requirement between p:incipal and accessory buildings PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE 25% may be reduced by special review FAR all other uses than detached residential dwellings 1.5:1 ratio 2:1 by special review Allowable FAR = 4500 square feet (1.5:1) Existing FAR 1229.60 square leet Existing FAR to remain 1056.60 square feet Ground Level Addition proposed 444.00 square feet {kitchen/stair no. 1 /corndoO basement level not included since entirely below grade exterior (open stalr no. 2) 147.25 sq. fl not included NEW FAR TOTAL = 1500.80 squre feet PARKING two spaces per 1000 square feet nÂ« leaseable note: in a telephone conference with Amy Amidon on March 6 we are required to have a public hearing regarding parking for the p,vieet on April 13. following the prior HPC approval on March 13. since we are reducing the number of patking spaces from the current use we need to have a public hearing to request a waiver of the purking requirements on site. Post-Itâ„¢brand fax tra~mittal memo 7671 #olpâ€¢geâ€¢ â€¢ end of memo 1 2/r %7 hom 06. , .- # e .... 0-0. ----*.../.- Z, 648,7 Phone * f F.x R 11 .. ALSTROMGROUP 312 F ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 5 March, 1996 Amy Amidon HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF ASPEN 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR THE HOWLING WOLF 316 EAST HOPKINS ASPEN, COLORADO PROJECT DESCRIPTION the attached drawings illustrate our current proposal for the property. we would like to begin construction as soon as the lifts close for the season. The kitchen addition shown is the primary reason for the current proposal we are also adding much needed basement storage, an outdoor (seasonal use) dining area, and improving the front porch and handicapped entrance at the front of the building. Since we believe that the above improvements are for the most part not discernible to the passerby, and since many of the above improvements will be screened by a wood fence (which will be approved by staff) this project is a minimal addition to the property as seen by the casual observer and does not detract or really change the character of the property or neighborhood. We believe these are very minor detaids which will benefit the community at large and that they do not adversely affect the existing structure, neighborhood, or community. In fact since we are providing a better foundation at the rear wall of the existing house we are preserving its status and current use. ALSTROMGROUP Ash zi>\I 312 F ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER 1N3WdO13A30 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 A.LIMr.--,In 970 925 1745 %61 9 8 933 Â« 1413 33' 26 February, 1996 via fax / 920 5580 Dave Tolen ASPEN / PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY Court House Annex 530 East Main Aspen, Colorado 81611 HOWLING WOLF 316 East Hopkins Dear Dave, Attached are copies of the HPC vested rights approval for this property. Item 5. regardina the original shed structure on the site the file shows a credit for 397 square feet of net leaseable area. Also attached are copies of the 1993 building permit and 1992 HPC application with previous owner names of the property. We are proceeding with our applications and submittal based upon this recorded exemption of 397 sq. ft. Please notify this office prior to March 1 if you have not found this information in your files and we will supply a more complete copy of Mr. Krabacher's file for your use. Thanks for the meeting with Paul. Please contact us if you have any further questions. Sincerely, Sven Erik Alstrom AIA cc: NNarren Ryan /01/Pu RYANCO ING>lit, Steve / Paul HOWLING WOLF Joe Krabacher KRABACHER, HILL, & EDWARDS P.C. i 1 - f ' PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 316 E. Hopkins, Vested Rights Resolution NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, November 25, 1992, at a meeting to begin at 2:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the Second Floor Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by Margaret Johnson requesting vested rights approval for the previously HPC approved site specific development/demolition plan for the parcel located at Lot 0, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen, also referred to as 316 E. Hopkins St. Demolition plans were approved by the HPC on November 27, 1991 for the outbuilding only. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. (303) 920-.5090. s/William J. Poss. Chairman Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on November 6, 1992 rCity of Aspen account pub.notice.316eh.vr . LAND USE APPLICATION FOR VESTING OF PROPERTY RIGHTS The Applicant, 316 E. Hopkins, Inc., a Colorado corporation, requests vesting of a property right pursuant to the demolition plan approved by the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee ("HPC") on November 27, 1991. Purpose of Vesting. The Applicant wants to vest its property right in the demolition plan to insure that the 397 square foot net leasable area represented by the outbuilding at 316 East Hopkins (the "Shed") may be added back to the existing historic cottage located on the property (the "Cottage" ) during the vesting period without competing for an allotment of commercial GMP square footage for not more than 397 square feet. The applicant recognizes the applicant will be required to comply with applicable HPC design review requirements to add the net leasable square footage represented by the Shed back onto the Cottage. Submission Contents. The Applicant submits the following submission contents: 1. Applicant. The Applicant is 316 E. Hopkins, Inc., a Colorado corporation. The Applicant r is represented by B. Joseph Krabacher, V Krabacher, Hill & Edwards, P.C., 201 North Mill Street, Suite 201, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-6300. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a letter stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. Address. The street address is 316 East Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado, and the legal address is Lot O, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. 3. Ownership. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a title insurance policy disclosing ownership of the parcel and all recorded instruments affecting the parcel. 4. Survev: Attached as Exhibit 3 is a survey map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 4 5. Shed Plan. Enclosed as Exhibit 4 is the Shed floor and elevation existing conditions drawings. The drawings contain a certification that the net leasable square footage of the Shed is 397 square feet. 6. Minutes of Approval. Attached as Exhibit 5 is a copy of the minutes of the HPC meeting of November 27, 1991, wherein the HPC granted / .. // minor development approval for the demolition of the Shed. Resolution Granting Vesting Approval. The Applicant requests that the HPC approve a resolution granting vested property rights to 316 East Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado, vesting the rights granted in the Minor Development Approval granted by the HPC on November 27, 1991. Dated: October , 1992 KRABACHER, HILL & EDWARDS, P.C. By: B. Joseph Krabacher 201 North Mill Street, Suite 201 Aspen, Colorado 81611 303-925-6300 ryan\docs\land.use CO L> -2- / 1 ..I General BUILDING PERMIT APPLICA/ ' 1 ' . 181611 ASPENIâ€¢ITKIN REGIONAL BUILDING DE.-ARTMENT Construction . .320-0440 Permit PITKIN COUNTY D CITY OF ASPEN M Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. No. JOB ADDRESS 316 E. Hopkins 1. LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK ~ TRACT OR SUBDIVISION C J SEE ATTACHED SHEET) 2:Esc. 0 80 City and Townsite of Aspen OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE 3316 E. Hopkins L.P. 715 W. Main, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-5889 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS PHONE UCENSE NO. 4 Stutzman Gerbaz Inc. Box 670 Aspen, Colorado 81612 (303) 923-2734 \60\ ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO, 5. No Me- 4 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. e 6. ht o.~e CLASS OF WORK: SOUAAE FOOTAGE ZONING FEE CENSUS CODE 7 O NEw O ADDITION O ALTERATION m REPAIR,Demolition 8. 397 USE OF BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE 3% USE TAX DER ~~ ~ Commercial Rental VALUATION OFWORK 2,500.00 Type of Construct,on Occupancy Group Lot Area 10. $ Size of Building No. of Stones Occ. Load 11. RemarksDemolition of out building only (Total Square Ft.) representing 397 net leaseable square feet. HPC granted approval on November 27, 1991 NO. OF BEDROOMS Use Zone Fire Sprinklers Required: EXISTING ADDED C]Yes o NO and r rights were vested on November 25, 1992 -fer 4â‚¬YAO Â£ 11740 0 No. of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES. Covered Uncovered SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATE ZON:NG H.RC. Fixture Count: . PARK DEDICATION HEALTH DEPARTMENT Fl REPLACE PRESUBMITTAL APPLOTION ACCEPTED PLANS DECKED APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE FIRE MARSHAL F W m SPRINKLER OATF nATV DATE - rv Tâ€¢ WATER TAP NOTICE OTHER SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. SELECTION OF METHOD FOR PAYMENT OF USE TAX THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IFWORK OR CONSTRUCTION I MONTHLY USE OF QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120/180 DAYS, OR IF CON- STRUCTION OR WORKIS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONEDFORA PERIOD O DEPOSIT METHOD: 3% OF 25% OF PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOW U OF 120/180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. AT ISSUANCE. FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL MATERIALS t HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND COST MUST BE FILED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WORK. GENERAL CONTRACTORS CHOOSING THIS METHOD WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT MUST REPORT AND REMIT TAX FOR ALL SUBCONTRACTORS PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF THAT DO NOT OBTAIN THEIR OWN PERMIT. ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PER- FORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. O EXEMPT. STATE & PITKIN COUNTY RESALE NO. EXEMPT ORGANIZATION Se,hAE Of CONIRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT <OATEI THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED. WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE 0-=52 -- SIGNATUAt,PKe'~.715.Er BUILDER) (DATE) Scoâ‚¬j Qrpebpr as PLL..31.1*UL Zoning Validation Plan Check Validation Permit Validation 3% Use Tax Deposit Validation WHITE-FILE COPY GREEN-FINANCE DEPT PINK-BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ir:1 1 n~-ACC weene --- ....---- -- =ye-1-EeÂ¢.NmIErb4,e'*~Â·.1-h. Â·-Â·.1/'gfitfvtÂ·.72%~ iri.:-5 .;T-- . - ./.A g a--- . .~ " - --- I I i;:AFÂ·<..~:-Â·::::::*:; .:--- â€¢ 41 -s.~,622037:,Juyif-'.4:,i.~/~~ a 4 .:. 1) - .Fixdectfz:I~':79 316 2~~r'.f~plET,'---.EI.'-------.---'-- - . I . 4.:i.Â· -Â·Â· ., ~'1 t~tpae:~9~â€¢AtÂ·*Â·,4Â»e..Â· -, . 65&4*.Rdawalf.4*3#K-9::'?'Â·-wÂ«p'â‚¬ r. . 2) 'f? ItojicÂ£'im;ti20 - a 316 -East HopkiG;' Lot b, Block 80 1.-?94,i@*K*~#*U44A(s,' it.vv ,City and Townsite of Aspen 'r, 9 2....6-* . 104â‚¬*95* (indicate st:reeâ‚¬-address, lot & block I=ber, legal ' ----z .. aemu.,2,uon Miere apprcgiate) ; ' ~,iPresent Zoning CC 4) Iat Size UQQQ-16-LL. 14;~li~~41:'s Name, Address & phone * Margaret Johnson c/o Brooke Peterson *315 East Hyman Ave., Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re~esentative's Name, Address & ]phone * B. Joseph Krabacher. Krabacher, Hill & Edwards P.C., 201 North Mill Street, Suite 201, Aspen, Colorado 81611, (303) 925-6300. 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): - Conditional Use Conceptual SPA - Conoeptual u ---- Special Juvie.r - Final SPA - Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline - Conceptual POD --1_ Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin - Einal ED - Niftoric DenÂ·olifirn Mocintain View Plane - Subdivisicn - Historic Designatirn ..... uxuamlnllmuzat:lon - '1'ect/Map Amendment .-. QCS Allotment Iot Split/Iot Line GDOS EÂ¤mption Â· Adjushoent XXX Exemption for Demolitioh under Description of rbdsting Uses (number and type of existingÂ· structures; Ordinan approocimate sq. ft.; nmber of bedroans; any previous approvals granted to the No. 9 property) . .Â· - Series 990 .. 1991. historic cottage of ~90 sq. ft. and non-historic out building of lon sCI. ft., r.,4,-h mArlit-innpl flr,nr m,-pm of 113 sq. ft. within enclosdd porch." 9 ) Descriptirn of Develgment Applination Exemption from Demolition Standards under Ordinance No. 9 Series of 1991 for non-hiktoric out building 10) Have you attached the following? x Response to Attadment 2, Minim= Slinission Contents x Response to Attachment 3. Specific ahnission Contents x Response to Attadment 4, Review Standards for Your Application 0 3.lilli .. RYANCO, INC. 119 WENT MAIN STREET, 5UnE 203 AaPEN, COLORADO 81611 WARREN F. RYAN TELEPHONE 910Â·915.5889 PAISIDENr PACS[&{[LE 910-925.2408 5USAN BRUCKER CONURDLLE SHERRY RYAN PROFE,TY M.MAGEn Marchll, 1996 Ms. Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Community Development Department Aspen/Pitkin County Via Facsimile (970-920-5439) and 130 South Galena US. Mail Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: 316 E, Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado Dear Amy: Please accept this letter as authorization from 310 E. Hopkins, Inc., the General Partner of 316 E, Hopkins Ltd. that the 41.fGngroup (Sven Alstrom) is our representative in the approval pr~*931&r the above referenced site. If you have guestions regpiding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. f 9.-2.4 v Warren F . Ry an cc: Sven Erik Alstrom, via facsimile 2'd BIS'ON ODNWAN WdES: V 966I- II-MUW From : ALSTROMGROUP PHONE No. : 3039254578 ~ Mar. 11 1996 6:57PM ALSTROMGROUP 312 F ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER A5PEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 11 March, 1996 Amy Amldon 970 920 5090 planning HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER 970 920 5006 private COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 970 920 5439 fax CITY OF ASPEN 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 ' PROPERTY OWNER OF RECORD HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HOWLING WOLF / 31 e EAST HOPKINS Dear Amy, Further documentation on this project should reflect the legal business name ot the Owner 01 the properly- I incorrectly listed the properly owner on the application form. The property owner of record is: 316 EAST HOPKINS, LTD. The general partnership ig: 31 8 East HOPKINS, Inc. Warren Ryan is a member of the general partnership with signature powers for Bat group. Please revise your permanent record accordingly as well as my previously submitted materials A Sincerely. Jll-# Sven Erik At Immliillfj/'ll'll././. From : ALSTROMGROUP PHONE No. : 3039254578 AIIA Mar. 12 1996 4:56PM Pel AUTROMGROUP 312 F ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 12 March, 1996 Amy AnÂ®ion 070 920 5090 planning HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER 970 920 5096 private COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 070 920 5439 lax CITY OF ASPEN 130 S. Galena Aepen, Colon*la 81 811 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HaWLING WOLF / 310 EAST HOPKINS Dear Amy, Attached 15 a letter from St*ve Peightel the Prolect Engineer for HOWLINA WOLF. Steve and I inspected tile Crawl *paces of the existing building in late February. We intend to reinforce the rear joist bearing /framing and install a new foundation wall at the line of the existing historic structure. We will not adversely affect the existing residence but will essentially be providing a new rear foundation wall which should grant glÂ»ater tongeÂ¥]ty to the exigting structum. Sincerely, a?ng*44. Sven Erik Alstrom AIA From : ALSTROMGROUP PHONE No. : 303'3254578 ~ Mar. 12 1936 4:56PM 03/12,/1996 1 2: 04 97092748-I3 THEODORE K GUY @GHTAL GUY ENGINEE~ CONSULTING SmUCTURAL ENGINEERS Minch 12, 1996 VIA FACSIMILE Sven Alitonn THE ALSTROM GROUP 312 F AABC Aspen, Colorâ€¢do 81611 RE: Ho,ing Wolf Addition Dear Sven: Ah latter In to verify our Involvement WIth the gbove referenced project. Pdghtal Guy Engineers ham been retained by the Owner to provide profe=lonal englneâ€¢ring senlces for thhi project. We wn, perform atructural design and provide con,truction documents to be coordinated with your archltecturat deÂ¢uments. Peightal Guy Engineers hm extensive structutal experience with Aspen projects of historical Itnportlnce. Projects include major structures such as St. Mary's Church addition, Aspen City Hall'* restorltlon, the Pltkin County Cout,house revisions; as well as smaller structural projects Involving numerous Viatorian houses. Our demon work 11 apt,road,ed with the understanding of the Impoltence of congtruction Interaction with the existing structure. Please cal with Iny questions. 1 sincerely, -.â€ž. Stiphen K. Petghti P.E. PEIGHTAL GUY ENGINEERS SKP/IM 96517 L2 23086 61*TE HIGHWAY &2 P.O. DOM 1840 AASALT, COLOMADO 81*24 (5170} 027-96,0 m .. ALSTROMGROUP 312 F ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 5 March, 1996 Amy Amidon HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF ASPEN 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR THE HOWLING WOLF 316 EAST HOPKINS ASPEN, COLORADO Dear Amy, Enclosed are current plan drawings for the Howling Wolf addition and remodel. Also enclosed is a check for the application amount and an HPC Minor Development Applicaiton. Thanks for the pre-application meeting. Please advise me on scheduling we are in a rush to submit permit drawings for the project in order to begin construction when the ski season ends. We have eliminated a proposed dumbwaiter and prep area due to cost restrictions. The basement areas will now be employee toilet and locker, walk in storage and liquor and dry storage only. Please contact me directly for further information that you may require. S .. ALSTROMGROUP 312 F ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 5 March, 1996 Amy Amidon HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF ASPEN 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR THE HOWLING WOLF 316 EAST HOPKINS ASPEN, COLORADO PROJECT DESCRIPTION the attached drawings illustrate our current proposal for the property. we would like to begin construction as soon as the lifts close for the season. The kitchen addition shown is the primary reason for the current proposal we are also adding much needed basement storage, an outdoor (seasonal use) dining area, and improving the front porch and handicapped entrance at the front of the building. Since we believe that the above improvements are for the most part not discernible to the passerby, and since many of the above improvements will be screened by a wood fence (which will be approved by staff) this project is a minimal addition to the property as seen by the casual observer and does not detract or really change the character of the property or neighborhood. We believe these are very minor detai,As which will benefit the community at large and that they do not adversely affect the existing structure, neighborhood, or community. In fact since we are providing a better foundation at the rear wall of the existing house we are preserving its status and current use. . 0 69 5/740 1- IAND USE APPIICA=CN FORM u he=ject Name H/LINE; (k)Dll= . ~ 2) project Iocatic,1 3/47 2 PtOF'klus LOT O X BLK. AO Â· (irdicate street ~ress, lot & block Iâ€¢mber, legal description Miere apprcgiate) 3) Present Zoning (O 4) Iot Size 3000 69. PT, 5) Applicarztgs Nane, Address & R=te # 75 /(2 E F-t'D PKI klS /kjC, W,4Â¥2$2EN Â· RYAN PR ESIDENT 9 25 5 631 6) Represerttative's Name, Address & Ehone # 45VEN AL S:71=kÂ©AA ALSTRCFY\ EEÂ©01Â¤ 512 P AAhcL 12.5 IÂ»40 7) Type of Applintion (please check all that apply): - Conditional Use Conceptual SPA LL conoâ€ž,al Histacic Dev. - Special Bader _ Final SPA - Final HistairiC Dev. 8040 Greenl ine ~ Conceptual POD niscoric Dev. - Stzeam Margin - Final POD - - Historic Demolition - Morintain View Plane _ Subdivision -I.--I- Historic Designatian - 00~xianinil=ization Text/Map Amendmat - GW Allotmerxt Int SpliVInt Line - GMOS E~ption Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (rnaher and type of existingÂ· structures; approoamate sq. ft.; number of bedroans; any pmvious approvals granted to the property) - RES-i-Al)Â»MT &/ Ck)~Ent=EERfl)59-_ / Btrk - 9) Description of Development Application kITO,Â·H-EN ,AIDD/TI ON EASE M EM-T .STORÂ·Ad,E Â·. OUTDGDS DIKI/)%16 PA-BO f SEASMAL_ 012~. 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attachment 2. Minint= Submission Contents Response to Attadment 3, Specific Suhnission Contents Response to Attachment 4, Review Starxlards for Your Application . 1 t=. . .W ISSUED BY ~ ~ Commonweafth. 'M)LICY NUMBER Land Title Insurance Company 128-034934 OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; 3. Unmarketability of the title; 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers, the Policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Attest: - By /~'.,~ h 3U ce-h ~ becretary President EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation Oncluding but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. L '' NM 1 American Land Title Association Owner's Policy (10-21-87) Valid Only If Schedule A, B and Cover Are Attached Face Page Form 1141-2 ORIGINAL The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this tz}kh day of December , | rru~lillullv,Fal ill ' 0 â€¢td Title Insurance Com~ SCHEDULE A-OWNER'S POLICY / CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER ~ PCT-5689 12/5/91 @ 2:01 P.M. $ 350.000.00 128-034984 1. NAME OF INSURED: 316 E. HOPKINS, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN: 316 E. HOPKINS. INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 0. BLOCK 80, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN. STATE OF COLORADO. Cdri<2rim #FU,90 QO PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. (punters i'gr~d Authorized Agent ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-1766 THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER ON THE COVER SHEET. ~ - - The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this t=,4-41 day of December 2- .ACommonwealth~ 1_ 1 Land Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLICY NUMBER PCT-5689 12/5/91 @ 2:01 P.M. 128-034984 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements. or claims of easements. not shown bv the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments. and anv facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien. or right to a lien, for services. labor. or material heretofore or hereto- after furnished. imposed bv law and not shown by the public records, created, suffered. assumed or caused bv the insured. agents or contractors of the insured. 5. Unpatented mining claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authoriz- ing the issuance thereof: water rights. claims or title to water. 6. Taxes for the year 1991 not vet due or Davable. 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in the Deeds form the Citv of Aspen recorded in Book 23 at Page 132 and in Book 59 at Page 252. as follows: That. no title shall be hereby acquired to anv mine of gold. silver. cinnabar or copper or to anv valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws. 8. Encroachment as shown on Survey prepared bv Schmuseser Gordon MeYer. Inc., as Job No. 91144. Dated October 10. 1991. EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1. 2&3 ARE HEREBY OMITTED. t 1 CONDITIONS AND STIPI~IONS (Continued) . DETERMINATION, EXTENT OF LIABILITY AND COINSURANCE. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations. the loss or damage sustained or incurred by the insured claimant who has suffered loss damage shall be payable within 30 days thereafter. or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy and only to 13. SUBROGAHON UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT. . the extent herein described. (a) The Company's Right of Subrogation. (a) The liability of the Company under this policy shall not exceed the least of: Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by (i) the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A; or, any act of the insured claimant. (ii) the difference between the value of the insured estate or interest as The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and insured and the value of the insured estate or interest subject to the defect, remedies which the insured claimant would have had against any person or Iien or encumbrance insured against by this policy. property in respect to the claim had this policy not been issued, If (b) In the event the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A at the requested by the Company, the insured claimant shall transfer to the Date of Policy is less than 80 percent of the value of the insured estate or Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary interest or the full consideration paid for the land, whichever is less, or if in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The insured claimant shall subsequent to the Date of Policy an improvement is erected on the land permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the which increases the value of the insured estate or interest by at least 20 insured claimant and to use the name of the insured claimant in any percent over the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, then this transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. Policy is subject to the following: If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the (i) where no subsequent improvement has been made, as to any partial insured claimant, the Company shall be subrogated to these rights and loss, the Company shall only pay the loss pro rata in the proportion that remedies in the proportion which the Company's payment bears to the the amount of insurance at Date of Policy bears to the total value of the whole amount of the loss. insured estate or interest at Date of Policy; or If loss should result from any act of the insured claimant. as stated (ii) where a subsequent improvement has been made, as to any partial above, that act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that event, loss, the Company shall only pay the loss pro rata in the proportion that shall be required to pay only that part of any losses insured against by this 120 percent of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A bears to the policy which shall exceed the amount. if any, lost to the Company by sum of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A and the amount reason of the impairment by the insured claimant of the Company's right expended for the improvement. of subrogation. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to costs, attorneys' fees (b) The Company's Rights Against Non-insured Obligors. and expenses for which the Company is liable under this policy, and shall The Company's nght of subrogation against non-insured obligors shall only apply to that portion of any loss which exceeds, in the aggregate, 10 exist and shall include, without limitation, the rights of the insured to percent of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A. indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance or bonds, (c) The Company will pay only those costs, attorneys' fees and expenses notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained in those instruments incurred in accordance with Section 4 of these Conditions and Stipulations. which provide for subrogation rights by reason of this policy. 8. APPORnONMENT. 14. ARBITRAnON If the land described in Schedule A consists of two or more parcels Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the insured which are not used as a single site, and a loss is established affecting one or may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules more of the parcels but not all, the loss shall be computed and settled on a of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may include, pro rata basis as if the amount of insurance under this policy was divided but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and pro rata as to the value on Date of Policy of each separate parcel to the the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the whole, exclusive of any improvements made subsequent to Date of Policy, Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy unless a liability or value has otherwise been agreed upon as to each parcel provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of by the Company and the insured at the time of the issuance of this policy Insurance is $1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the and shown by an express statement or by an endorsement attached to this Company or the insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of policy. Insurance is in excess of $1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. by both the Company and the insured. Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules in effect on the date the demand for arbitration is (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, made or, at the option of the insured, the Rules in effect at Date of Policy lien or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees land, or cures the claim of unmarketability of title. all as insured, in a only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permit a court to reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the aw ard attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having -. obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or dannage caused thereby. jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title as insured. 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the insured in settling any claim or suit (a) This policy together with atl endorsements, if any, attached hereto without the prior written consent of the Company. by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the insured and 0 the Company. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION be construed as a whole. OF LIABILITY. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, All payments under this policy, except payments rnade for costs, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest attorneys' fees and expenses, shall reduce the amount of the insurance pro covered hereby or by any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to tanto. this policy. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this policy can be made 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE. except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the lf the insured acquires title to the estate or interest in satisfaction of the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage, or any part thereof, it is express- validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. ly understood that the amount of insurance under this policy shall be reduced by any amount the Company may pay under any policy insuring a mortgage to 16. SEVERABILITY. which exception is taken in Schedule B Or tO which the insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which is hereafter executed by an insured and In the event any provision of the policy is held invalid or unenforceable which is a charge or lien on the estate or interest described or referred to in under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include that provi- Schedule A, and the arnount so paid shall be deemed a payment under this sion and all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. policy. 17. NOTICES, WHERE SENT. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in (a) No payment shall be made without producing this policy for dndorsement writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of o f the payment unless the policy has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof this policy and shall be addressed to Commonwealth Land Title Insurance of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. Company, Eight Penn Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2198. NM 1 American Land Title Association Owner's Policy (10-21-87) Cover Page .. ALSTROMGROUP 312 F ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 5 March, 1996 Amy Amidon 970 920 5090 planning HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER 970 920 5096 private COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 970 920 5439 fax CITY OF ASPEN 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HOWLING WOLF / 316 EAST HOPKINS Dear Amy, We have ordered a new (updated) survey for this property to be included with our building permit submittal. We have not yet received this and have included the current record survey with our application. Warren will also forward a letter of authorization for Alstrom Group as his architectural representative. Sincerely, OV/rh Sven Erik Alstrom AIA . . 316 East Hopkins Avenue Lot 0, Blk. 80, City of Aspen Pitkin County, Colorado -+L ' *091%, ~ .17. 1 j 4 JO.,6.- Â· Found Rebar & 1 Slog ellow_flastic Cap 1.5Â· , Shed < COVâ€¢ / Porch Lot N Lot 0 Lot P 3,016 sq. ft. 0.069 Acs.+/ P - 1 Story Wood J 2 Frome House N O.J . 4 . U . ...... Â»r Scrib Brfck Walk h Conc, -â„¢**t .t. ound Rebar & *r 52 -1-2 Yefli.Plastic Cop 0 Concrete Eost Hopkins Avenue Legend and Notes: - 8 indicates found monument as described. - Â® jhdkates set monument rebar and cap LS. 15710. - A Indicates control polht - Survey Orientation based on found monuments as shown. - Easements shown are Own Title Commitment Case No. PCT-5689 CJ Issued 8-27-91 by GRAPHIC SCALE PRIdn County Title. Inc. 0 10 20 40 9 . .I l Surveyofs Certificate: 4 Kenneth R. Wilson, being o Registered Land Surveyor h the State of Colorado. do hereby certify that thfs improvement survey was made under my supervision and is true end correct to the best of my belle, and knowledge. 1 furlher certfj> that the ~40:43'L 0 improvements on the above descnbed pored on the date, except ut/Kly connections cre entirely within the boundarfes of the parc,4 except as shown. thal there cre no encrocchments upon g 4< LS 15710 ]*1 the described premises by *nprovements on any adJoining premises oxcept as hdkal,d. and fhat there fs no apparent evidence or sign of any easement cross*,g or burdening any par! of *cid 9% SURVO~*~~ parcel. except ca noted. 4 0-â€¢w.. A A 2.bpk)3 /0 04Â·91 OF cO\.0,- Kenneth R. Wfloon L.& 15710 JOB # 91144 Flle krcfmp #64 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. SURVEYORS ENGWEIRS , 1001 GRAND AVE., SUITE 2-E .J GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO. 81601 GM (303) 945-1004 SCINUESER GORDON MEYER 50*49* W ~ 100.00' LkÂ»* S 74 ~ ~ ~, Peter Rizzuto and Tuvia-Stein I 4 ...Ul ' 114 U I 1 1 Net?1 whose address is 316 E. Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 81611 i CE \1~ ' 4 -41 * County of Pitkin " : 0Â£1 Uy' 1 54 -0 I Colorado 1~ 4 4 eli and State of , for the consideration 1031 1 ofTen ($10.00) dollars, ti and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid, hereby selks) and convey(s) to 4- 316 E. Hopkins, Inc., a Colorado corporation I lu f ~-whose legal address is 715 W. Main Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 1[ . It ~ 4 County of Pitkin , and State of Colorado , ~~ N UJ the following real property in the County of Pitkin 944 6.1 0 f' and State of Colorado, to wit: I 11 ~ Lot 0, Block 80 b City and Townsite of Aspen 2 1 11 il 4 q 11 11 316 E. Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 81611 also known as street and number J with all its appurtenances and warrant(s) the title against all persons claiming under (me) (us). r Signed and delivered this 54Â·k day of December , 19 91 Peter Rizzuto Tuvia Sibin , & 1 V Â¥00' i . =2, 1 0 ''4*1/ 1~ - :V I /'~ STATE OF COLORADO, I SS. County of PITKIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before nic this E>141 day of December , '9 91 .by Peter Rizzuto and Tuvia Stein ..14' ''. $,â‚¬010, â€¢o . 0 1 My commission expires , 19 . Witness my haiktan f o:Â· 22ik~ sda~; : ~~ ~e...46Â·v16 r: f 1 , Joy S. Higens/Notary Public My Commission expires 4/22/94 -â‚¬14 *â€¢..0-..... 2 92,/H . s Ag 1 601 East Hopkins Aspen. Colorado 81611 nver, insert "City and." 14â€žtaryÂ· Public ~ f 11 86. St'ECIAL WAHRANTY DEE!) (Sluirl Form) Bradford Publishing. 5~{25 W. 6th Ave.. Lakew'ood. CO 803 14 - (303) 23.1-69(xI 2-88 61 7 It I- L ' --1-0 U--1 tOM HRETT EP N~= ASPEN HISTORTC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 13.1996 316 E. HOPKINS - HOWLING WOLF Alstrom stepped down. Amidon stated that the proposal is to the expand the kitchen area toward the alley and excavate a basement and create an outdoor patio and to alter the front entrance to allow handicapped access. There is a fence proposed for the rear of the property eight feet high but zoning allows only 6 feet maximum and 42" high as you look at it down the side of the building due to open space requirements. You need to be able to look into the patio area. The applicant will return to HPC for a waiver of parking. The trash enclosure does not meet the code requirements. Amidon stated that the new addition has two parallel ridge lines one of which meets the existing ridge and one that intersects an existing ridge and a condition has been recommended that they minimumize demolition where the two intersect. The North L has been provided. A clarification that the new addition shall match the existing addition materials, that means board and batten siding. A section drawing of the court yard has been provided. Staff has recommended that they maintain the handicapped access that is along the side of the building. The applicant proposes to bring the access to the front o f the building and that requires a concrete ramp and probably replacing an existing porch deck to bring it up to meet the door thresh hold. Most importantly it means that the 2 1/2 ft. wide historic door would need replaced with a three foot wide door. Warren Ryan, President of the Corporation that owns the building stated that the door is a fire hazard and that is why it should be three feet. As far as retaining the side area as handicapped a wheel chair will not fit because the adjoining property owner has a curve that is two feet deep. He is recommending that the access be in the front. Paul Levine, owner: As the door exists today handicapped people enter ithrough the front door and we never had anyone come through the back. j The alley area for handicapped is narrower than the front door. Madsen asked if the handicapped area in back was the designated area. 2 ASPEN HISTO1MC PRESERVATION COMMISmON MAR. 13. 1996 Amidon stated it was represented on their previous building permit as their handicapped entrance and the Bldg. Dept. did accept it. No one is arguing that it is physically difficult. Madsen asked what the law read. Amidon stated that everyone should enter from the front but there are exceptions for historical places. Levine stated that the fence has been lowered but it might be more attractive i f the fence is highter. Amidon stated that the six foot maximum deals with the falling of the fence and will it hit the house next door. A variance would have to be presented to the Board of Adjustment. Moyer stated that the front door is historic and the Board would like to retain that. The Board might ask the Building Dept. to retain the front door as handicap accessibility. Amidon stated the front door might be retained but add wood to it so the character is not destroyed. Moyer stated that three inches would be needed on either side and that might be possible without destroying the character of the door and would solve the landlord's safety problem. CLARIFICATIONS Vickery stated that he was unclear on the roof drawings. Levine stated that the roof is changing over the kitchen to utilize the space. Alstrom stated that the angled roof is partly the new kitchen addition and partly re-roofing the old roof and it slopes from the gabled roof to the east property line. 3 ASPEN HISTOP<vt PRESERVATION COMMI~ON MAR. 13. 1996 Dodington stated she would rather see the door stay as close to the original as possible if it has to be changed at all. Moyer stated that he would approve the proposal but would encourage a rear formal ADU access and leave the front alone. He would encourage a letter regarding the raising o f the fence to 8 feet. MOTION: Moyer moved that HPC approve the minor development application for 316 E. Hopkins with the following conditions: 1. Public Hearing with regards to waiving four parking spaces. 2. Minimize demolition of the historic structure where the new ridgeline intersects with the historic cross gable. 3. The new addition shall match the existing addition in materials. 4. Provide a section of the courtyard, showing the bar and staircase area. 5. Letter allowing the fence to be eight feet high with a break in the south east corner which might be a gate etc. or cast iron to comply with the legalities of serving alcohol. 6. Letter encouraging the ADA access at the rear and maintaining the historic integrity of the front knowing that the wheelchair people can get in and out. Second by Dodington. DISCUSSION Madsen stated that she felt the motion should include the preference of adapting the front door to make it wheel chair accessible and code approved rather than sending a letter. She wants the possibility of adapting the front left open in the motion. Moyer stated that the front just isn't the door, a ramp would have to be construted and the porch changed. Vickery stated that the side ADA entrance would not meet the ADA requirement. He suggested that the applicant persue options with the Bldg. Dept. which might allow them to accept access through the front. The second amendment would be that Staff and monitor be authorized to make 4 .. ALSTROMGROUP 312 F ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 13 March, 1996 Amy Amidon 970 920 5090 planning HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER 970 920 5096 private COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 970 920 5439 fax CITY OF ASPEN 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 MEMO for TODAY'S MEETING HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HOWLING WOLF / 316 EAST HOPKINS Dear Amy, We have provided the following clarifications in response to your staff memo for this meeting. 1. A letter from our structural engineer confirming his qualifications on Historic Projects. After a site inspection of the crawl spaces with the Engineer we intend to provide a new foundation wall for the rear of the existing building thus increasing its longevity. 2. One set of revised BUILDING ELEVATIONS and one revised FIRST FLOOR PLAN (colored areas indicate new work). Kitchen and Stair No. 1 addition in green border a.) We have shown a fence height revised to six feet. b.) We have shown a series of PATIO / COURTYARD ELEVATIONS on A6. c.) We have moved Stair No. 2 to provide a larger trash area. this has necessitated moving the outdoor bar area THEREFORE we recommend that HANDICAPPED ACCESS occur at the front door which requires revision of the existing entrance. which we believe is not completely original. d.) We have shown board and batten siding for the entire addition with the existing building siding to remain. 3. Supplemental Drawings SD1 and SD2 show the existing front door and a proposed 3 feet wide by six feet eight inch high new entry door. We propose to revise the non-original transom and sidelight to a more compatible proportion and detailing which is more similar to the original construction. Total slope of the front sidewalks are less than four inches therefore ramping or sloping of the front porch and sidewalks are in conformance with ADA requirements on slope. luu- b Sincerelv. ~ ..2-- il ] Al n 6070090*l. Sven Erik Alstrom AIA -T- C]g z 'PINCIvl'~C +~MLINSI/42+12=In S 06, ag4hi 3 1 01[10hg - SNible,lot--1 'g mig / M 06Â£91V =r-10 N @1\11'1[<40Â«- 30 Ou Â»41 1\~ GN il.9192 -- t 1 0 jigi g . - $ i 0 - ?- 17<2 /1 , J Â· 11= 300 cl le +19 - 1- --- C,2 X ltd- --- ~.- 1,61 09N44Â£.L - 10 1 ---_ i 02>41=; -- I . N I '+NEW L 71 +40 N i CleNE+*~NG GN I 1120 t..43WOOL NW (11 20 GIN ILQI X2 - 1 + _ 3~ <- --7~p|WED et- -TRANSOMI 7 \ I -- 2 r. t--1 5 1~ -- 11 1 . : 1 . -Fl'>â‚¬D e\- eu 1 CD r X ', I.J--4 0 U , / C 7 1% 51-011 / a 4 .. ---NE hi ENTRY- 2-1 '1-, 11- CD n f 1-101/\1 L.00 11\E laloj- M ~A LSTRO Ml . 31* *A HOPKINS - PROUP 120 MAR le 1-Supal.,EMENTAL DRANI Nia , 5D- 2 Ij9 -ie ' ALSTROMGROU~ 312 F ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 13 March, 1996 Amy Amidon 970 920 5090 planning HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER 970 920 5096 private COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 970 920 5439 fax CITY OF ASPEN 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 MEMO for TODAY'S MEETING HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HOWLING WOLF / 316 EAST HOPKINS Dear Amy, We have provided the following clarifications in response to your staff memo for this meeting. 1. A letter from our structural engineer confirming his qualifications on Historic Projects. After a site inspection of the crawl spaces with the Engineer we intend to provide a new foundation wall for the rear of the existing building thus increasing its longevity. 2. One set of revised BUILDING ELEVATIONS and one revised FIRST FLOOR PLAN (colored areas indicate new work). Kitchen and Stair No. 1 addition in green border a.) We have shown a fence height revised to six feet. b.) We have shown a series of PATIO / COURTYARD ELEVATIONS on A6. c.) We have moved Stair No. 2 to provide a larger trash area. this has necessitated moving the outdoor bar area THEREFORE we recommend that HANDICAPPED ACCESS occur at the front door which requires revision of the existing entrance. which we believe is not completely original. d.) We have shown board and batten siding for the entire addition with the existing building siding to remain. 3. Supplemental Drawings SD1 and SD2 show the existing front door and a proposed 3 feet wide by six feet eight inch high new entry door. We propose to revise the non-original transom and sidelight to a more compatible proportion and detailing which is more similar to the original construction. Total slope of the front sidewalks are less than four inches therefore ramping or sloping of the front porch and sidewalks are in conformance with ADA requirements on slope. Sincerely A 0636, â„¢--,4 Sven Erik Alstrom AIA 03/12/1996 12:04 970927~ THEODORE K GUY,IiSOC PAGE 02 ./. PEIGHTAL GUY ENGINEERS CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS March 12,1996 VIA FACSIMILE Sven Alstorm THE ALSTROM GROUP 312 F AABC Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Howling Wolf Addition Dear Sven: This letter is to verify our involvement with the above referenced project. Peightal Guy Engineers has been retained by the Owner to provide professional engineering services for this project. We will perform structural design and provide construction documents to be coordinated with your architectural documents. Peightal Guy Engineers has extensive structural experience with Aspen projects of historical importance. Projects include major structures such as St. Mary's Church addition, Aspen City Hall's restoration, the Pitkin County Courthouse revisions; as well as smaller structural projects involving numerous Victorian houses. Our design work is approached vhth the understanding of the importance of construction interaction with the existing structure. Please call with any questions. .r ~ Sincerely, -11*1 lit,A Stephen K. Peightai P.E. PEIGHTAL GUY ENGINEERS SKP/Ils 96517 L2 23280 STATE HIGHWAY 82 RO. BOX 1 040 BASALT COLORADO 81821 (970) 927-8510 31* EAS* 1-te*j MS, CrD * 1-1-060(-l Ne (,COLP- i . 1 1 rnA?=z- 90 1 - ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: .5 147 EAST PrOPMUNS / LTD Â· Address: 2% C 0 EAST' IRY 'Fl<. 4 9 Zone district: CÂ©mmERCIAL=. CORE Lot size: 7~000 Existing FAR: 221Â· 690 Allowable FAR: 45Â©0.00 Proposed FAR: 1 5 00Â· 420 Existing net leasable (commercial): _122Â°1 0 600 Proposed net leasable (commercial): 1 SOO . 40 Existing % of site coverage: 41Â°/0 Proposed % of site coverage: e 6,4 Existing % of open space: 12-.6% Proposed % of open space: /2.6% N/) ct-1*16â‚¬,E Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: /2, FT Accesorv bldg: A A Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 12) PT Accessory bldg: 1\174 Proposed % of demolition: O% OF +US-TOR.1 C DO yo SF AIX)' TleN 5 1 Existing number of bedrooms: NA Proposed number of bedrooms: 94 Existing on-site parking spaces: 217- On-site parking spaces required: Setbacks Existing: 1 11 Minimum required: Proposed: Front: 10 -O Front: O Front: 2 Rear: 4,0 i - e V Rear: 0 Rear: Combined Combined Combined Front/rear: DO LO, FronUrear: O FronUrear: Side: 0-1-6" N Side: O Side: Side: Side: O Side: Combined , 1, Combined Combined Sides: 12. '-O Sides: ~ Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Variations requested: (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts)