The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.323 W Hallam St.HPC19-1900 0 "fÂ«T N tg #2 â‚¬ H 0 Z 7 00 1.-1 1-1 1-1 Z 00 BW tl OlD 1--' t-El 1 M W tri Ul O 2 * R 2--5-2 HISTORIC . I[j[- g MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 323 W. Hallam, Partial Demolition DATE: July 26, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for partial demolition of the historic residence at 323 W. Hallam. The historic house was built in 1888, apparently by D.E. Frantz, who owned a lumberyard in town. Frantz built at least two other houses in the West End, at 131 W. Bleeker and 333 W. Bleeker. The latter house is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The property affected by this application is listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures as a "contributing" structure. APPLICANT: Jim and Anneadare Denkins, represented by Barbara Long. LOCATION: 323 W. Hallam, Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite of Aspen. REVIEW STANDARDS: No approval for partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures shall be permitted unless the partial demolition is approved by HPC because it meets the applicable standards of Section 7-602(C). Please note that Section 7-602(C), as well as the rest of the HPC language in the code, has been recently amended through Ordinance #21, Series of 1995. The redevelopment plan is to be reviewed in order for HPC to make findings as to whether or not the standards are met. 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Response: Staff met with the applicant briefly two times before submission of the application to discuss the proposal. While Staff has no concerns with the new construction to the rear of the property, the alterations to the east wing are more problematic. Attached is the Sanborne map of the property from 1904. The only alterations that appear to have been made to the .. form of the house have occurred at the rear of the structure. A dormer on the west of the main gable appears to have been changed from a gabled dormer to a shed dormer at some point. The applicant wishes to expand the east wing, which includes a first floor kitchen and second floor living space. Their initial thought was to enclose the front porch on the east wing. Staff indicated that this was not appropriate given the City's direction to encourage front porches and the impact that this would have on the character of the historic structure. The applicant also wishes to extend this wing towards the east property line. Staff indicated that this addition should be distinguishable from the historic building, for instance through some change in form, plate height, or ridge height. The applicant's architect revised the plan in a manner which essentially involves demolishing the east wing of the house, reconstructing the wing in a larger dimension but a similar character and reusing the old north wall and porch from the addition. Staff again indicated that this was not the best resolution of their need to add living space from a preservation perspective and would raise discussion at HPC, nevertheless the applicant wishes to come before the Commission for comments. In Staff's opinion, the design must be revised so that the east wing is retained in its existing form (including the porch.) New space could be added to the east and to the rear in a way that is clearly distinguishable from the original construction. There is more than enough room in the east sideyard to extend the building further in that direction. In it's current form, and given the amount of demolition proposed, the project does not meet the review standards. Also included in this project is a proposal to enclose an existing carport (requiring a west side yard setback variance from the Board of Adjustments), and an extension of the master bedroom onto an existing second floor deck. In terms of the "Residential Design Standards, " the project seems to meet all but the "inflection" standard. This standard requires that "If the streetfrontage of an adjacent structure is one story in height for a distance of more than twelve feet on the side facing a proposed building, then the adjacent portion of the proposed building must also be one (1) story in height for a distance of twelve (12) feet." .. The home to the east of this site is entirely one story (it was recently removed from the historic inventory). This implies that if the applicant is going to expand their structure towards the east that this addition may only be one story in height. HPC may consider waiving this requirement if necessary to achieve an appropriate addition to the historic structure. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: The proposal involves total demolition of the east wing of the historic structure. (Please note that the floor level is different between the main gable of the house and the wing. It is possible that the wing was constructed as an addition, but it does appear on the maps of the site by 1896.) The applicant represents that 17.5% of the existing building is to be demolished. Staff finds that the proposed demolition will negatively impact the integrity and historic significance of the structure. B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: The proposed addition is not distinguishable from the original structure in that it has the same plate height, ridge line and wall plane. ALTERNATIVES: HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Partial Demolition application as submitted. 2) Approve the Partial Demolition application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations to be offered). 4) Deny Partial Demolition approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC table the application for partial demolition, directing the applicant to restudy the added space so that the east wing remains clearly identifiable as part of the historic structure. 4 7<7<% Â»i To) (ZA' === ================== 335-3 331-29 328-5 323-21 . 319- 17 ikÂ·Â·g 3//-9 307-5 303-1 235-3 231-29 22 75' Frrl 171| ~2 AL XI 1 d 12 1 *It- 1/ XI/1 4 % 41 Â· c-iÂ» u J,All 4 2 W 72 %2 0 4 ABC.i O E G H / 4 R 87- L 0 n , 1 1, 1 1 e [73' 1 1 1-1-1 L 8 43 / X 1 * 1/ 1/1 ...- -~ % 1 E-= D><S /1 1 0 & 1 El 26 la M Â£ ME_51 OP 1 YII_ k J % i e tr Z 7-7 25 9 9 8 ~ Al ~ _IC 7-1- 7-FIrr _ C 2 '84 %3502 ./ 4 % f l.-13 2 -L ... N 0 '1 ID ~L_Z ~ 22'5' i.zj \N\ /2 * , d, X, 1.-1 G % L/__211 2,0 1 , f 1 334-2 330-28 326-0 322-20 3/8-/6 3/4-/2 3/0-8 305-4 302300 \ 8 ~ j '30-32 230-28 226-2 1 / . - \ 11 / 1. a \A#, 1./ ,\ --- / f 1..\\\ 335-3 331-29 327-5 323-21 319-/7 3/5-/3 31/-9 307-5 3039 - 235-33 231-29 227-2 1 %1 103-4 r. *2 XI 17Â£ .171 '~ \ t rrED L 1-179 2 L /611 4 2=gÂ®W-- , --f.. -~ I 11 1 /1 / _17 0) ~ 4 ( 71 6 1 X -7i'' & /' L.1 L- i i \ A i J / X XI 1 7. --. A ~Ar--P- 8 r.--,C n '-31 E F r u , 1 }12 110 /16 lie 200 202 204 206 208 90 92 214 2/6 22& 0 2 2 802 102 .. HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 323.WH Photo Information: ASP-F-18 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Full Street Address: 323 West Hallam Legal Description: * Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West End Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1-1/2 story Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Modified rectangle / "L" shaped Landscaping or Special Setting Features: N/A Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): N/A For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Cross-gabled; wood shingles Walls: Clapboard with wood shingles and wood scalloped shingles at qable ends Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): Corbelled brick at center Windows: One-over-one double hung wood. horizontal cut glazing at front (east); shed and qable dormers Doors: Cut glass light over wood panel Porches: Front wraps inside "L" at entry, turned posts and brackets square frieze and balusters General Architectural Description: Simple L-gabled cottaqe with large porch with decorative trim. Simple decorative barge board. This structure is a good example of a typical Aspen Victorian Miner's Cottage with front gable trimmed out with horizontal clapboard sidinq with sawtooth fishscales and shingles in the qable. The cross qable is fronted with a gingerbread porch of turned posts and wood-sawn brackets. .. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 323.WH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1888 Actual _ Estimate X Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate _X_ Major Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Remodeling. specifics unknown. 1967-68; windows, date unknown; dormers, date unknown Additions and Date: Rear carport. date unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Â£1 - architectural integrity. o Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. This structure is of historical importance bv illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * Recorded By: * Date: * Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner -- -Of :'' T- 2 0 ---31 41-2Â» -3 \-1 \ 11 ~-C X 11 I A IL- ; 1Â»=n------ < '1 11 1 1 , 1 - 1 ' 0 1 47'26 -1 )nowaa 9 11 1'71 1~Â«EL/_2,01 3318 M < 97-4 r C 0 L - 9 1 . 4----- # 0 ,/ C~ f Â»<173 t~ lit - / 14:*. 1 1 rff-- it- I j \. 1 1 , for - il------il-- 1- -I-------l - tic ---1 -- -- 1 1 . -C 11'.. -6----- il--I i -2 .-0 - C 4 7-1 47 0 0 -V- . I.....#../....-- 0 -=1 1 - C -*- M / . )Â£ ,. f' f ~~~~~- t ~ '(1 1 1 1. Â»Â»01-1 1 1 - M 4 ot 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 43 9 L[ 1 1 hÂ« --1 11 7)< i C i 1-- f 4- L 989Â· 3 - x , 1 Â· Â·:Pe' 9.-Â·k<StÂ¥8NhÂ·ihÂ»Â»<><k,<>04 Â· Â·<CO:~.00,Â»e .44>00<.-CL.Â·/1,#v- $ f Â»C //.Il 1 - 11-1 - . -%*Z . -1 -- I I 1 i - 1 <- ji /- - . 4 11 I 11 ' , . I 11 - I I I 1--1 i i 4, 1 \ 1 1 \ 0 g IS TÂ¥11Â¥H M 6)- f 0 \ j , ----==ZE=ZE===--VW- --,-,----h- 311' C /,1 h /1, - .\ ---V .P*4 - \\ 31 /12 ' ..cL---~ r- N ~ 1 - 1 | Filqi 1< 14 Â· z r-3 H ------------- ./1 r-- 1 11 1 ~ 1 Z Gl z KE O 73HV 9 ---- 2 >4-_U~Â·'ill 16Â»~- 0 0 \-3 1- 1 -- - \ - ~ ONIMMVdi - S /1 . . p 1 , 0 /O 4Â° -- / 47 40---f ~k - 70 -31\\.t 1 h N A h - 1/9 1- 1.1 . r 4 3 2.9: 4/34 - 7444.' . n k... N 1 - , 4 'r / 4- 7: 9.- ' 4. V..1 4. I WML.. I .. , -,-c-- 5-1- V. 1 14 82- -'. -, . - . S I -. i . I 1 .ikE- - 1 1 -2 7, 45 5. r ' -- - -- . *P..9- ,. - +-5 faa --SE:Begg.:.â€¢44114* 21;1 3 T,Ud < I, ' Tk r â€ž m: -4 3, c ..15 3/ il- . 4-'*............ ... 7â€¢ + - - f -~ 44*'31.- -re ATmCHMENI' l I) Project Name DENKINS REMODEL 2) Pmject location 323 W. HALLAM LOT D & E, BLOCK 43, ASPEN, COLORADO (irxiicate street address, lot & block rnImber, legal description where appropriate) 3) Preserrt Zoning R-6 4) Lot Size 6000 SQ.FT. 5) Applicant's Nam, Ariaress & Phone # JIM & ANNEADARE DENKINS P.O. BOX 8740, ASPEN, COLORADO 81612, 544-0838 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # BARBARA LONG & ASSOCIATES 315 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611, 925-6880 7) Type of Application (please dieck all that apply): Corxiitional Use Concentlial SPA Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptal FUD X Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final PUD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivisian Historic Designation Codaniniumization - Text/Map Amerxhart O*33 Allat=nerrt Lot Split/Lot Line (XS Ehoemption Adjlistment 8) Descriptian of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structzures; approximate sq. ft.; number of bedroans; any p[ra,i-CX]S approvals granted. to the property). SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 1833 SQ.FT., 3 - BEDROOMS 9) Description of Devel-q,rErt Application ADDITION TO THE LEFT WING OF THE BUILDING, RELOCTE COVERED PORCH NORTH 4 FEET, CHANGE EXISTING CARPORT TO AN ENCLOSED GARAGE & EXTEND THE MASTER BEDROOM. 10) Have you attac:hed the following? Response to AttadmErt 2, Minimm Sulmissicm Corrtents Response to Attadment 3, Specific Suknissian Ccntents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application BARBARA ~ONG AND A~SOCIATES POSTOFFICE BOX 8603Â·ASPEN, COLORADO 8 1 6 1 2Â·3 0 3-9 2 5-6 880 JULY 19, 1995 ASPEN/PITKIN PLANING AND ZONING 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 RE: DENKINS REMODEL 323 W. HALLAM LOTS D & E, BLOCK 43 ASPEN, COLORADO DEAR SIRS, THIS APPLICATION IS FOR THE REMODEL AND ADDITIONS ON A"NOTABLE STRUCTURE" LOCATED AT 323 W. HALLAM, ASPEN, COLORADO. PRESERVING THE CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING AND NEIGHBORHOOD ARE THE PRINCIPAL CONCERNS WITH A REMODEL OF THIS TYPE. THE EXISTING HOUSE IS A LARGER, TWO-STORY QUEEN ANNE VICTORIAN. WE FEEL THAT THE PROPOSED CHANGES ON THIS HOME ARE MINIMAL PARTICULARLY FROM THE STREETSCAPE. THE MAJORITY OF THE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS ARE KEFr AT THE BACK OF THE HOUSE OR BEHIND THE MAIN EAST-WEST RIDGELINE. THIS WILL HELP TO BLOCK THEM FROM THE STREET VIEW. THE ALTERATIONS ARE NCI MAXIMIZING THE F.A.R. OR THE ALLOWABLE SITE COVERAGE, BUT ARE BEING DONE TO CREATE A HOME THAT WORKS FOR TODAY'S NEEDS. THE REQUIREMENT FOR A LARGER KITCHEN AREA IS THE MAIN SPACE PROBLEM AS THE HOUSE EXISTS TODAY. THE VISUAL CHANGES IN THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE ARE BECAUSE OF THESE SPACE REQUIREMENTS. THE FIRST INTENT WAS TO ADD TO THE KITCHEN BY ENCLOSING THE COVERED PORCH. IN ORDER TO STAY CONFORMING WITH THE TRUE VICTORIAN STYLE THE COVERED PORCH SHOULD STAY AS IS AND BE RELOCATED INI FRONT OF THE KITCHEN ADDITION. UNFORTUNATELY THE KITCHEN ADDITION HAD TO PUSH NORTH AS WELL AS SOUTH. THIS IS BECAUSE OF A SIGNIFICANT ROOF DRAINAGE PROBLEM AROUND THE REAR TOWER. IN ORDER NOT TO ENHANCE THIS PROBLEM ANY FURTHER IT IS ESSENTIAL TO KEEP ANY NEW ADDITIONS AWAY FROM THIS CORNER. THIS CAUSED THE WALL TO MOVE SLIGHTLY NORTH. WE HAVE TRIED TO MINIMIZE IT BY KEEPING IT TO 4-0. THE GrHER CHANGE ON THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE IS A 6-0 ADDITION AND THE CONTINUATION OF THE EXISTING GABLE END TO THE EAST. EXTENSIVE PORCHES ARE COMMON ON THESE HOMES. IN STUDYING ELEVATION OFTIONS IT IS OUR OPINION THAT CONTINUING THE COVERED PORCH AN ADDITIONAL 6-0 TO THE EAST KEEPS THE PROPORTIONS OF THE BUILDING COMPATIBLE. BUILDING DESIGN Â· SPACE PLANNING Â· INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING .. -2- WE WOULD LIKE TO KEEP A CONSISTENCY IN THE DORMER STYLES BY CHANGING THE EXISTING FRONT SHED DORMER TO COMPLEMENT THE EXISTING BATHROOM AND BEDROOM DORMER. THESE TWO DORMERS ARE 1/2 HIPPED DORMERS. THE UPPER LEVEL IS MAINLY CONTAINED WITHIN THE ROOF STRUCTURE. IN ORDER TO MAKE THE LIVING SPACE MORE USABLE THE OTHER TWO DORMERS WERE ADDED. THE REMAINING ALTERATIONS TO THE BUILDING ARE AN ADDITION TO THE MASTER BEDROOM AND THE ENCLOSURE OF THE EXISTING CARPORT TO MAKE IT A GARAGE. THE MASTER BEDROOM ADDITION IS LOCATED AT THE REAR OF THE HOUSE ON THE GARAGE ROOF DECK. THE EXISTING NORTH-SOUTH ROOF LINES AND GABLE ENDS ARE FOLLOWED TO KEEP THE MASTER BEDROOM'S ROOF CONSISTENT. OUR MAIN OBJECTIVE WAS TO CREATE SOLUTIONS WHICH ENHANCED THE EXISTING HOME AND MAINTAINED THE NATURE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SINCERELY, BARBARA W. LONG ,- \y l., $ ru /1 7- 73-F- 1. F. 3-:fs v '\ \ 98 ~INVE~Y~,H~,si:ehk; ES AND STRUCTURES : 51986 UPD E ASPEN, COL O PREPARED 0Â¥ THâ‚¬ .0,~.,r,TAN Pt.AN-,O NE 1-" ~ ..1 4 . 100 \ 0. 4 O 70Â© ..0 4 \\ 1 6 U 1 C-.- 1 f I ' A f 1 1 \95 1 5 . 9-3 - 3 L- - â‚¬ I -'' 2151 ~')'LLIIEITI~ l *Trillr[\ wn /3- \ . f . -87--k.211-2 \ELI ./\ \ 1:Z:LA O, ,. 1 1]11,E.EJ .1111[17;1 22% 1 ,16[[2 ~L2u-."*72, Ltef,Lb \211-u L.L.1.42 - - r -, ~ , 1-Â·- \r-TI Â·, * , (c JE;F- *Tr .Tilli[I; [~Â§~WIF~FUE lii*Flj 111~,4;]I~i 184_~-~*1-~ ... TJET,#Â«Â«- 1 111/ 126'28/ 1 1 MI ,Â·52=41 1-N . / 1\ 9 i j,i REENT :K Hle- uw#Mi IIi'llil;1'?Hilifix@W3-!PLO 1118'1' Ill!11! H 11Â·:6109.# - -- 737* 4/14 3, -- ....-I.....000--J.- - - Mt . 1 -- 7 Ng ~ Illai-T Â®1111141[glillÂ¢ [@~ElTily[%! iNg-31 [R@3% EW[iII :INE!$1* IZIE idttm11 I-- -- i. -- 1 - 11'llÂ® [EFI]t[211] :pl[â‚¬ 0-LI.5 41 'EPF92Nlibl~I I.tlimicn im[[@*IMinli#.26~1-1_-36212- I 1 \\ *-- - - 1 L\~~.1-[all SINE. WIET Ff/]TI Â·i,~41'si l:43-9 [EED Fl-3 '[EEÂ· EWIE; t.[-tul Ill] Bal k 83 -Â·J i il -- pÂ®im]- 1]Ldi -ffEE . im,E] ETIE Ill HI 14 a[[[[Ep E[[[[I-EDE EF~ =LE [1*2l,5,1%mi I - l.9:1&-1]411]3} Â®20; _ r (0311//0 -C~/1/2/3 001/5 BUILDING LOCATIONW LIIUBLE l.aillyUL~fr 11!1.'if - f 951 KEP IFFT 14-3 r~ZL... - -m--m. m-n:-11 Er-%29 X . .2 -Z-7 -33:i> iÂ·rrr-n-J-*Â·Â· . 13 1'114/ - 1. u LUU -:1-1 I r--- -I- I .lip - ri-11' - - -41+ Ulll,L t-EE i-~r-/1 ERE Act-rVt- *-03 -1 '1:41 -ill / : F) i t (1~ I Ii.19 -- f t Efte@ BARBARA ~ONG AND A~SSOCIATES POST OFFICE BOX 8603Â·ASPEN, COLORADO 81612Â·30 3Â·9 2 5Â·6 880 JULY 19, 1995 ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 RE; DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DENKINS REMODEL 323 W. HALLAM ASPEN, COLORADO TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: A LICENSED ENGINEER HAS REVIEWED THE STRUCTURE FOR SOUNDNESS. HE IS PRESENTLY OUT OF TOWN AND HAS NOT YET HAD A CHANCE TO COMPILE HIS REPORT. THIS REPORT WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO YOU AS SOON AS IT IS POSSIBLE. SINCERELY, ld:~ BARBARA W. LONG BUILDING DESIGN Â· SPACE PLANNING Â· INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING BARBARA ~ONG AND A-S SOCIATES POSTOFFICE BOX 8603Â·ASPEN, COLORADO 81 612Â·30 3Â·9 2 5Â·6 880 JULY 19, 1995 ASPEN/PrrKIN PLANNING AND ZONING 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 RE: DENKINS REMODEL 323 W. HALLAM LOTS D & E, BLOCK 43 ASPEN, COLORADO ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY: ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE AND APPRAISED VALUE AS IS: $850,000 APPROXIMATE COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $450,000 TOTAL COST: $1,300,000 SIMILAR HOMES ON THE MARKET: $2,000,000 PLUS (PLEASE NOTE THAT A COPY OF THE APPRAISAL WILL BE SUBMTTTED AS SOON AS IT IS AVAILABLE, BEFORE THE H.P.C. MEETING SCHEDULED) BUILDING DESIGN Â· SPACE PLANNING Â· INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING 7 . 1 SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear._fully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"x17" format. APPLICANT: JIM & ANNEADARE DENKINS P.O. BOX 8740 ADDRESS: 323 W. HALLAM, ASPEN, COLORADO R-6 ZONE DISTRICT: LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 6000 EXISTING FAR: 1832.52 SO.FT. ALLOWABLE FAR: 3240 .. PROPOSED FAR. 2702.94 ------- EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: 21.5% PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: 29.5% w/0 PORCHES, 35% w/ PORCHES EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.)2 ------- EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princical Bldo.: 25 FT. / Accessory Bldg: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: PrinciDal Bldc.: 25 FT. / Accessorv Blda: PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: 17.5% EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: 2 ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 2 SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: 8.5' Front: 10' min. Front: 8.5' Rear: Rear: 70' min. Rear: 70, Side: 1 75' Side: 5' min. Side: 1.75' Combined Front/Rear: Combined Frt/Rr: 30' min. Combined FronURear: 28.5' EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ ENCHROACHMENTS INTO THE WEST SIDEYARD & ENCROACHMENTS: FRONTYARD ARE EXTSTTNG. VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eligible for Landmarks Onlv: character comoatibility findina must be made bv HPCE \ FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commerdal): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined FrtjRr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only) ATTACHMENT 1 1 I) Pmject Name DENKINS REMODEL 2) Project. location 323 W. HALLAM LOT D & E, BLOCK 43, ASPEN, COLORADO (inlicate street address, lot & bloc:k rumber, legal description where appropriate) 3) Preserrt Zoning R-6 4) Iot Size 6000 SQ.FT. 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # JIM & ANNEADARE DENKINS P.O. BOX 8740, ASPEN, COLORADO 81612, 544-0838 6) Representative' s Name, Arlfireng & Phone # BARBARA LONG & ASSOCIATES 315 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611, 925-6880 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptllal SPA Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD X Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final POD Historic Demolition leuntain View Plane Subdivision Historic Designation Corxianiniumization Taxt/Map Amrxhant (24$ Allotment Lot Split/Lot Line (NOS Eb=ption AdjustmerIt 8) Description of Existing Uses (Illmber and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft.; number of bedroams; any previous approvals granted to the property). SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 1833 SQ.FT., 3 - BEDROOMS 9) Description of Develognent Application ADDITION TO THE LEFT WING OF THE BUILDING, RELOCTE COVERED PORCH NORTH 4 FEET, CHANGE EXISTING CARPORT TO AN ENCLOSED GARAGE & EXTEND THE MASTER BEDROOM. 10) Have you attached the following? Respense to Attadment 2, Mininum Sulnission Contents Response to Attadlment 3, Specific Suhnission Centents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application 1 SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of ClgaL{ully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"x17" format. APPLICANT: JIM & ANNEADARE DENKINS P.O. BOX 8740 ADDRESS: 323 W. HALLAM, ASPEN, COLORADO R-6 ZONE DISTRICT: LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 6000 EXISTING FAR: 1832.52 SO.FT. ALLOWABLE FAR: 3240 .. PROPOSED FAR: 2702.94 ------- EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: 21.5% PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: 29.5% w/0 PORCHES, 35% w/ PORCHES EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): -------- EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princioal Bldg.: 25 FT. / Accessory Bldo: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: PrinciDal Bldg.: 25 FT. / Accessory Bldo: PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: 17.5% EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 3 EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: 2 ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 2 SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: 8.5' Front: 10' min. Front: 8.5' Rear: Rear: 20' min. Rear: 70' Side: 1.751 Side: --2_min. Side: 1.75' Combined Front/Rear: Combined Frt/Rr: 30' min. Combined Front/Rear: 28.5' EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ ENCHROACHMENTS INTO THE WEST SIDEYARD & ENCROACHMENTS: FRONTYARD ARE EXTSTTNG. VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eliaible for Landmarks Onlv: character comoatibility finding must be made bv HPC j FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commercial): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined Frt-/Rr: Site Coverage (Collage Infill Only): ' U LRVT f.~ ~:~~ ~ lill DEAN N. BOSWORTH, PE 4 ..:~ ...illip!1&': :14 .:01. 'F.1 2 X ' CE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER . :7 7 P.:11!11 746 SOUTH FIRST STREET y Â·w. 11:;. 341' MONTROSE, COLORADO 81401 *4,8 4< 48[r' '1Â¢?!,F{;1111 (970) 249-3315 .~+9.>.I li.: 1 %: "i i 1:,5:l~i?4:11 i July 26,1995 â‚¬314. Aspen Community Development Office 4 Â·41 Attn. Amy Amidon ...tati': 130 S. Galena .i Aspen, CO 81611 it -2 tz.:1 .4.1 I. FAX (970) 920-5439 7/26/95 34: 1 W. 11, F F E RE: Denken Residence historic structure evaluation for remodel 1, 1 19.1 323 West Hallam, Aspen, CO /Â·rl:Â· * :~I ij Dear Ms. Amidon: .1: ~ M D Q Please refer to the structural evaluation addressed to Barbara Long dated 7/26/95. 14 .au .lau It is my professional opinion that the existing historic structure may be modified as shown on the r plans dated 7/17/95 without compromising the unmodified portions of the structure using current 54 1 W.41 : and typical construction methods. ; 4'k ' 4,"ummi#"axop 4 Sincerely, , Â©te.=f':2*7,77 '-- it 2/%.07 75*0120 :4 0-: 2 - ~Â£77 4%32Â£~.ds/,TELI- 00 t E 1 -I Dean N. Bosworth, PE *Â£~i 25320 Q: M 0,1 5 - ME Colorado Registration 26320 * Vox).1 23 Â·4 4 311 %2:Â·5)~ p# n.4 62 " Â·BE '44'4:2/m:mDP. RE fk iii . 3 .0 1 Le-2-2Â» , 9 .* 11!'. 9\ i ,T ~ JUL 2 6 1995 ~ 4 4 C ' f..t.4.97 f 10 y EVELOPMENT ~ '' 1 " 11 1'.Â» DEAN N. BOSWORTH, PE I. ... 0 1,111 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 746 SOUTH FIRST STREET ~ MONTROSE, COLORADO 81401 ~li (970) 249-3315 July 26,1995 Barbara Long Barbara Long and Associates 315 E. Hyman Ave. 4 Aspen, CO 81611 r RE: Denkens Residence Structural Evaluation 323 W. Hallam, Aspen. CO '~' :ilÂ·: ' *. EVALUATION A preliminary visual structural engineering evaluation was performed on the above referenced t structure June 13, 1995. ' Q ' The structure is ttstick-framed" with wood sheathing and siding. The structure was built â€ž around 1890. Extensive remodel, including new foundation, was done approximately 20 years tii, ago. 1,111 4 Visual inspection showed no significant structural distress in any areas of the super-structure. The sizes of floor joists and wall studs was not verified. Typically, structures built at this time ' will not meet current structural codes. The East gable floor is lower than the west gable by approximately 18 inches. It is possible that the East gable structure was added at a later date. '14'11 39 The foundation appears to be a slab on grade. The s]ab appears to be the floor of the West gable. Â·41 Kl~ ''~~ The East gable floor system appears to be a stick frame, probably original, construction bearing 41* on the new slab. No significant distortions or settlements were observed. 1:4:1 .iii' 1-2 - Foundation distress was observed at the historic front porch. 42 r - .â€¢tÂ· 91'4 9",f&Â¢a-:93Â·492Â»---4Â·,pjtlaÂ· :-?d.Â·i-,----;f-~-- _ 0 0 4 4 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are based on a preliminary remodel plan dated July 17,1995 by 21 Barbara Long and Associates. These recommendations should be used only for a basis for i i structural design. All new construction shall be designed to current codes by a registered Il engineer. Any existing construction which is modified should be verified during construction, sid AM I1' , 1. Modifications to the existing West gable structure should be kept to a minimum as shown ~ on the plans. Removal of the interior wall between the living room and the entry will require placement of a beam at that wall or the addition of new second floorjoists. This shall be verified 1 ]12 during construction. 2. The new garage/bedroom addition to the south should be entirely new construction. The existing carport structure is inadequate to carry new structural loads. This addition should be 43Â® totally self supporting to foundation and should not apply additional loads to the historic West gable structure. 3. The current plans for modification to the East gable wing indicate that the best engineering f, M solution is to demolish the existing structure and rebuild a new structure as shown on the plan. 1,6 This construction may be accomplished, with proper care, without significantly compromising the existing West wing gable structure. Architectural features such as trim and siding could be salvaged as required. 4. The front porch should be resupported on a new foundation. Ifmoved to a new location 1. 11 :L.:?Ir t'~111 the porch superstructure should be braced and fully supported according to good construction 4 4,41L L practice. p .1 1!11. 1 SUMMARY @311 1,9 1 Â·fill :1 :~ 1 30%'. These recommendations should be used only as a general guideline for architectural and structural design. Engineer shall be notified regularly as construction proceeds. Proper ' t coordination and communication with all members of the construction team is essential. : ' Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. ..;Ir::0... L 1 1 ftÂ·;:?* f. . gf8'Ty:;3,4, Sincerely, :ilii*'42" .......4 6 , 14607) 190,061~e~/ i~**>OLAs *3:i,*Â»~-/ :iÂ·:%9' ' Dean N. Bosworth, PE .1 2,3 5 4,7.. g 2% Colorado Registration 26320 Mp. 03-0 9 3 iqqs< 91. A :MA 1 ''' *IL BARBARA ~ONG AND Af SOCIATES POST OFFICE BOX 8603Â·ASPEN, COLORADO 81612Â·30 3Â·9 2 5Â·6 880 JULY 19, 1995 ASPEN/PITKIN PLANING AND ZONING 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 RE: DENKINS REMODEL 323 W. HALLAM LOTS D & E, BLOCK 43 ASPEN, COLORADO DEAR SIRS, THIS APPLICATION IS FOR THE REMODEL AND ADDITIONS ON A"NOTABLE STRUCTURE" LOCATED AT 323 W. HALLAM, ASPEN, COLORADO. PRESERVING THE CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING AND NEIGHBORHOOD ARE THE PRINCIPAL CONCERNS WITH A REMODEL OF THIS TYPE. THE EXISTING HOUSE IS A LARGER, TWO-STORY QUEEN ANNE VICTORIAN. WE FEEL THAT THE PROPOSED CHANGES ON THIS HOME ARE MINIMAL PARTICULARLY FROM THE STREETSCAPE. THE MAJORITY OF THE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS ARE KEPT AT THE BACK OF THE HOUSE OR BEHIND THE MAIN EAST-WEST RIDGELINE. THIS WILL HELP TO BLOCK THEM FROM THE STREET VIEW. THE ALTERATIONS ARE NOT MAXIMIZING THE F.A.R. OR THE ALLOWABLE SITE COVERAGE, BUT ARE BEING DONE TO CREATE A HOME THAT WORKS FOR TODAY' S NEEDS. THE REQUIREMENT FOR A LARGER KITCHEN AREA IS THE MAIN SPACE PROBLEM AS THE HOUSE EXISTS TODAY. THE VISUAL CHANGES IN THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE ARE BECAUSE OF THESE SPACE REQUIREMENTS. THE FIRST INTENT WAS TO ADD TO THE KrrCHEN BY ENCLOSING THE COVERED PORCH. IN ORDER TO STAY CONFORMING WITH THE TRUE VICTORIAN STYLE THE COVERED PORCH SHOULD STAY AS IS AND BE RELOCATED IN FRONT OF THE KITCHEN ADDITION. UNFORTUNATELY THE KITCHEN ADDITION HAD TO PUSH NORTH AS WELL AS SOUTH. THIS IS BECAUSE OF A SIGNIFICANT ROOF DRAINAGE PROBLEM AROUND THE REAR TOWER, IN ORDER NOT TO ENHANCE THIS PROBLEM ANY FURTHER IT IS ESSENTIAL TO KEEP ANY NEW ADDITIONS AWAY FROM THIS CORNER. THIS CAUSED THE WALL TO MOVE SLIGHTLY NORTH. WE HAVE TRIED TO MINIMIZE IT BY KEEPING IT TO 4-0. THE OTHER CHANGE ON THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE IS A 6-0 ADDITION AND THE CONTINUATION OF THE EXISTING GABLE END TO THE EAST. EXTENSIVE PORCHES ARE COMMON ON THESE HOMES. IN STUDYING ELEVATION OPTIONS IT IS OUR OPINION THAT CONTINUING THE COVERED PORCH AN ADDITIONAL 6-0 TO THE EAST KEEPS THE PROPORTIONS OF THE BUILDING COMPATIBLE. BUILDING DESIGN Â· SPACE PLANNING Â· INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING .. -2- WE WOULD LIKE TO KEEP A CONSISTENCY IN THE DORMER STYLES BY CHANGING THE EXISTING FRONT SHED DORMER TO COMPLEMENT THE EXISTING BATHROOM AND BEDROOM DORMER. THESE TWO DORMERS ARE 1/2 HIPPED DORMERS. THE UPPER LEVEL IS MAINLY CONTAINED WITHIN THE ROOF STRUCTURE. IN ORDER TO MAKE THE LIVING SPACE MORE USABLE THE OTHER TWO DORMERS WERE ADDED. THE REMAINING ALTERATIONS TO THE BUILDING ARE AN ADDITION TO THE MASTER BEDROOM AND THE ENCLOSURE OF THE EXISTING CARPORT TO MAKE IT A GARAGE. THE MASTER BEDROOM ADDITION IS LOCATED AT THE REAR OF THE HOUSE ON THE GARAGE ROOF DECK. THE EXISTING NORTH-SOUTH ROOF LINES AND GABLE ENDS ARE FOLLOWED TO KEEP THE MASTER BEDROOM'S ROOF CONSISTENT. OUR MAIN OBJECTIVE WAS TO CREATE SOLUTIONS WHICH ENHANCED THE EXISTING HOME AND MAINTAINED THE NATURE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SINCERELY, BARBARA W. LONG N /- \ p. . E. \-55/ . ) 1. 1. 1 I \ 98 INVEATONY 16Â£ 11 IC ES AND STRUCTURES : ' \ )1986 UPD E 1 -/ 1 .-1 -â€¢EPA~ED IYTHCA~~~~~L~A-4-GOFICEI-~T P 1 / . 1-) ' . . I . *00 . . -==1 1 1 /b 0 2% 400 //-1 - V - V (1 . 9 \ 951/ , , '' 6. tig c Â·==312, ' 0 l.l. . 9-1 1 r oo ... *.. --- .. //9.11 .---- r. .. /1 11 1 I - V -nr~ \C Â·Â·t--=.:,_I U.19-7, URUL ... . , .\. --- : 'tu-1 - - 044 [[I; 41 ~ 1 [11141 1,1] T14*7154--*Il lil: *tk,-t<k<L~:t, \: P.14. 61.A 01 58\ .\ --- V." IÂ·Il Â£ u !12-<WIL .3!11421 EE EE]k 'jtlkklill 1-111016 .Â·1! [IFEEE, Er)Ik.le'i my .,J [Ii-2-111..1!. Ill Il!' 32-!In 0?Wl~1Â¥~1 1fTWT- 4 11J EQirl-F [Â¤El i W.W].18 'Ttm-râ‚¬J . , 1#i [}EF-IP:11:IN~ =Dil '11'1111:i.lilili 2L,#2142=~~'gr.-2 1118 1-11 mii*1 11 121â‚¬1Â§~\ 1 -- -- 1- -Â·-/.â€¢ 1/ -1 \ Nil -* 11/-1 [[~WTE]:111141;Il# 5Â©1. d*+914pd [NÂ© Ei[[iII f~ ithilj lÂ»- 1- \ -0194 1T / 1~KIÂ®1.[FE [*[[1 lili~ilq~LLUU f [1111.[lill. [Alilil :luil[LLI. ' Â°6 . 1~ 11;1Â·,1 IU]]11& Â®I[l -- -1,-[Il]I[BUEUHI, miff[B i E-2-3 1 EWHIÂ· [FE!] GIWID] [[%[[[I :Qi[I[R, [[19[Il [[lf f F*,*[@ *[ 1]9Â·~[WI[1] GIW~ "aE[?III: . -0 -4 [1111-Fillfflll-Fiftil E AlNÂ·III. m-TTfl i RT[TUT~I 1 ELLI .LiÂ£~ 1 Li*LL! 17 - u.ueu .L i - *11-Lt BUILDING LOCATION W [213- rl/ffgliK FHEEL- f [[iffiffl EliE]] miTI Â»2Â£3 Â»-U[8 41[1] ulgl-14 _1114 32 -0- 1 IL CE u i [fiyl] 3 L_L.~3 LE T ULalli L----, -=0= 333- 1 - Al nhi-. 1*94 i ;zÂ· r i.'Â·- 111,19 - BARBARA ~ONG AND A~SOCIATES POST OFFICE BOX 8603Â·ASPEN, COLORADO 81612Â·30 3Â·9 2 5Â·6 880 JULY 19, 1995 ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 RE, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DENKINS REMODEL 323 W. HALLAM ASPEN, COLORADO TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: A LICENSED ENGINEER HAS REVIEWED THE STRUCTURE FOR SOUNDNESS. HE IS PRESENTLY OUT OF TOWN AND HAS NOT YET HAD A CHANCE TO COMPILE HIS REPORT. THIS REPORT WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO YOU AS SOON AS IT IS POSSIBLE. SINCERELY, BARBARA W. LONG BUILDING DESIGN Â· SPACE PLANNING Â· INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING BARBARA ~ONG AND ASSOCIATES POSTOFFICE BOX 8603Â·ASPEN, COLORADO 81612Â·30 3Â·9 2 5Â·6 880 JULY 19, 1995 ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING AND ZONING 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 RE: DENKINS REMODEL 323 W. HALLAM LOTS D & E, BLOCK 43 ASPEN, COLORADO ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY: ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE AND APPRAISED VALUE AS IS: $850,000 APPROXIMATE COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $450,000 TOTAL COST: $1,300,000 SIMILAR HOMES ON THE MARKET: $2,000,000 PLUS (PLEASE NOTE THAT A COPY OF THE APPRAISAL WILL BE SUBMITTED AS SOON AS IT IS AVAILABLE, BEFORE THE H.P.C. MEETING SCHEDULED) BUILDING DESIGN Â· SPACE PLANNING Â· INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING L Ad'40,4--1 141/911Â» -- .-- n 1 f -) 4- 1 C I = --lill-I th 0/ /h . / 4 4 1_---1-~ARKING ---- 1 - - -- 1 1 P/--7- --- 9 1 -0 -- - _3 ------ /1 L.-11 AREA 0 r 1 :---- - 1 Il z ,/r-1 9 8 1 1---- 1 X -------41----) 1 1 <TI - . If - -0 r ------- 4 A V 4-, 1 -- 4 I - 111/ i f It / 1 . 1 -, 1 1 /7 j:: 1 1 ----=Z=Â».-e--_-A------.----- 1 h Â· - 11 H - t \ _131 - Â»1- 4 0 0 4 40 W HALLAM ST Â© 0 '' it " .1 11 1-1 A 1/ 1 - h t 1 1 1 1 1 '' E r - -h If 1 r--n 1 P---~I 3Â« h ~'1 1 1 1\1 - /Y - W KX>â€¢Â»MxÂ»Â«k. &975Â·6 044Â·'- I ' 17 L &181 \ /R 1 N NALLA % V i V - i -- pfi- Â£12 :M .- 1 1 21 1 -3 1 1 1 ; I 1\ ' 11 t vII 1 l\- 1 * t \1 \1\ ------ ---4---4-1% -j-U=n 1 -1 1 ------ 11-1 ~ Lfflk ---------- 1 1 , 11 1 , 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 IN-\ -= 1 1 1 I, 1 t 1 /1 \\ 1 1 H M M 1 . /1 I /1 11 , 11 - 211--- ' F ~0 3 32 S Wt-1.~wu.Â£1â€¢rl 0 w BLEEK-Ef~~ST -~EJV-145.REMODE,L \~ - 60~ - 0'* Â»n/-71 ~ 1 L â€ž- 1-3 ' 11 \ r 1 7 N 3RD ST Y' r 14) BARBARA ~ONG AND A~ SOCIATES POST OFFICE BOX 8603Â·ASPEN, COLORADO 81612Â·30 3Â·9 2 5Â·6 880 JULY 19, 1995 ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I, JIM DENKINS, CONSENT THAT BARBARA LONG REPRESENTS ME IN THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR THE REMODEL OF OUR HOME. IT IS LOCATED AT 323 W. HALLAM, ASPEN, COLORADO. ~Â·-SERELY , ~ / 5.Pl DENKINS BUILDING DESIGN Â· SPACEPLANNINGÂ· INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING ~ CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET ~ City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 7/20/95 CASE NUMBER: HPC19-95 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2735-124-34-002 PROJECT NAME: Denkins Minor Historic Development Project Address: 323 W. Hallam Lot D & E, Block 43 APPLICANT: Jim and Anneadare Denkins Applicant Address: P. 0. Box 8740 Aspen, CO 81612 544-0838 REPRESENTATIVE: Barbara Long & Assoc. Representative Address/Phone: 315 E. Hyman Aspen, CO 81611 925-6880 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: = = == = = = == =t 335-3 331-29 321>-5 323-21 ,3)9-17 3/5.10 3//-9 307-5 303-1 235-3 231-29 22 r- 71 4 4 -27--~ x prTIA -;7-691 11 1/ XIA IA -n x 01 0 /5 -27 2 Al-11 *IL p L -1.-2,1. \7 4 A 2 j , -f ....... 1 --1 te 8 Â»O E G N,# R 8~L 71 F~-d FII 1, 1 1 1 -=Ii 8 43 1/X/x 11- Lt' -~Â« 1 E-Z~ 0 M Z /,9 1_91 0 4 1 2< 1 4 3 4 N /'f Z N TTI 2 0 i 7-7 L k 64 MH A 4 1 532 - SD 5 2 8, 4 2 i ii & ~ <K *: h -7-, 44% %9 4 1.2 % 1/ x -3 2 / u.' , 2.-, 2 ~2 ./[Et / x L.-1 Of U_-21 1 334-2 330-28 326-0 822-20 3/8-/6 3/4-/2 3/0-8 30&-4 802300 1, 1Â§~ ,\ 1 034-32 230-22~26-6 all ----~ I--M6----- 1----- I---i- -- - - - - IM-i - - - --. Â· 11 Â· ' 335-3 331-29 327-5 323-21 319-/7 3/5-/3 31/-9 307-5 303-j i 2*33 23/-29 227-2. 9 6 \ 0Â¥-1 f X B= t <_w L Â· -f 1 - 1, i 1 1 4 - 4 / 17 1 6 00 71., -13 . - E U 1- 93 1 IMI 9 4, / x 1.11 Ld_ _ 1 - F G 6% 1 [2; - ~ " rr 71 a rz--91 C D 112 110 06 lIE 200 202 204 206 208 2/0 812 214 2/6 2/8 75' 75 202 902 . tOg 202 002 .. HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 323.WH Photo Information: ASP-F-18 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Full Street Address: 323 West Hallam Legal Description: * Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West End Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian Cottage Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1-1/2 story Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Modified rectangle / "L" shaped Landscaping or Special Setting Features: N/A Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): N/A For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Cross-qabled; wood shingles Walls: Clapboard with wood shingles and wood scalloped shingles at qable ends Foundation / Basement: Unknown Chimney(s): Corbelled brick at center Windows: One-over-one double hung wood, horizontal cut qlazing at front (east); shed and qable dormers Doors: Cut glass light over wood panel Porches: Front wraps inside "L" at entry. turned posts and brackets square frieze and balusters General Architectural Description: Simple L-gabled cottage with large porch with decorative trim. Simple decorative barge board. This structure is a good example of a typical Aspen Victorian Miner's Cottage with front gable trimmed out with horizontal clapboard siding with sawtooth fishscales and shinqles in the qable. The cross qable is fronted with a gingerbread porch of turned posts and wood-sawn brackets. .. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 323.WH FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1888 Actual _ Estimate X Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate X Major Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Remodeling, specifics unknown, 1967-68; windows, date unknown; dormers, date unknown Additions and Date: Rear carport, date unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A__ B C D E Map Key Local Rating and Landmark Designation j-~ Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Il - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. This structure is of historical importance bv illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: * (Y or N) Justify: * Recorded By: * Date: * Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner 9 N â‚¬ I set,,1 - .,-4-29-/ . ...<a *I Ir'~T '44" iaL 1 47,1 4 27 kir-7 7 r....... - -/1. . Al* . ~M. .. 1 -, -- i. ./* 4/:~.-/411'ap/.p , . 1. ----/'Iallf . .w it - .Bil=:E.4. 0/.Ir.. I -- 4. - y ' 4* 1 1 -1 - I .. 0 .../.-..= - I , '&41 1%*h /17- - 2,8.:gr, 3#y.*5 0.-, # Q . 46- _ _ / 4.- i . ./ ...= - 11,- Â· -2 -r- - ..1 ... Â·heÂ·,2 . .*'f' t>'%271Â·" ' - I ...5, 1.-1, . (Ll JUL 20 '95 09:37AM PITKIN COUNTY TITLE P.2 .. CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP Pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the State of Colorado hereby certifies that JAMES D. DENKINS TRUSTEE U/T/A DATED 12-31-84, is the owner in fee simple of the following described property: LOTS D AND E, BLOCK 43, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, Subject to encumbrances, easements and rights of way of record. This certificate is not to be construed to be a guarantee of title and is furnished for informational purposes only, PITKIN COUNTY,TkTLE, INC. BY: lkDW.UUPY'V-3 alithor'~bf d ~ignature CERTIFIED To~AILk 1, 1995 @ 8:00 A.M. APPRAISAL OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 323 WEST HALLAM ASPEN, CO 81611 1 1 \-- -L/'* A il.-i IJ i as of -1< E-vks DE L_ JANUARY 6,1995 for UTE CITY MORTGAGE Basalt Center Circle, Suite 200 Box 845 Basalt, CO 81621 BORROWERS Cry by ELK MOUNTAIN APPRAISALS, INC. /EF Z , 45 VIllage Square Snowmass Village, CO 81615 F ?31. Â», 4 -' ts 4 4 0)64,1 M - . 11'.ecuENT 44 0. 432'fr.,11 %667 LE-LI I I .. Snowmass Village, CO 81615 (303) 923-6474 January 18,1995 Ute City Mortgage Basalt Center Circle, Suite 200 Box 845 Basalt, CO 81621 RE: Property - 323 West Hallam Aspen, CO 81611 Client - Denkins Dear Sir: In accordance with your request, I have personally inspected and prepared an appraisal report of the real property located at: 323 West Hallam, Aspen, CO The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the properly described in the body of this appraisal report. (Summary report) Enclosed, please find the appraisal report which describes certain data gathered during the investigation of the property. The methods of approach and reasoning in the valuation of the various physical and economic factors of the subject properly are contained in this report. An inspection of the properly and a study of pertinent factors, including valuation trends and an analysis of neighborhood data, led the appraiser to the conclusion that the market value, as of January 6,1995, is : $850000 The opinion of value expressed in this report is contingent upon the Limiting Conditions attached to this report. It has been a pleasure to assist you; if I may be of further service to you in the future, please let me know. Respectfully submitted, Elk Mountain Appraisals, Inc. 94/9 0 V Mary Griffin Elk Mounlain Appraisals, Inc. (303) 923-6474 ~-Ill.-I--Il....I-,Im t . .. ~iÂ¥Â·~ Assessors rarcei iw. Z / JJ - 1.49 - J-:t v v- . 0,- F# 1 Borrower Denkins Current Owner Prior . Occupant Ix I Owner 1 1 Tenant 1 I vacanr i RN Property rights appralsed I x I Fee Simple | | Leasehold | project Type I 1 puD | | Condominlum (HUDNA only) HOA$ /Mo. 1.tÂ·:il Neighborhood/Prolect Name West End Map Reference no SMSA Census Tract No tract 3%{: Sale Price $ 850.000 Date of Sale 12/29/94 Loan charges/concessions to be paid by seller $ none 2% Lender/Client Ute City Mortgage Address Box 845. Basalt. CO 81621 3% Appralser Elk Mountain Appraisals, In Address Box 6520,Snowmass Village,CO 81615 4% Location x Urban Suburban Rural Predominant 811%10 family housltfjE Present land usa % Land use change 2% Built up x Over 75% 25-75% Under 25% occupancy $ (000) (yrs) One Family 85 El Not LIkely El Likely - :*:- Growth Rate Rapid x: Stable slow ..2L Owner 85 % 600'slow new 2-4 family 5 ~ In process :44 Property values x Increasing Stable Declining JLTenant 15 %,3990 'HIgh 190+ Multi-family 5 To: 4 Demand/supply - Shortage =i=Inbalance __ Oversupply _x_Vacant (0-5%) %2%4Predomlnant kE:Â§4 Commercial O :Â·1.: Marketing time Under 3 mos. x 3-6 mos. Over 6 mos. Vacant Cover 596) 1200 variesvacant 5 E: Note: Race and the racial composition of the neighborhood are not considered reliable appraisal factors. .#. Neighborhood boundaries and characteristics: The boundaries for this area would be what is considered Aspen Â¥ West End-from Mill Street (eastern) west to Castle Creek (western) . 4.> Factors that affect the marketabllity of the properties In the neighborhood (proximity to employment and amenities, employment stability, appeal to market, etc): Hi * The subject is in a relatively coherent area that is just west of downtown Aspen and is close *4 to skiing and shopping as well as restaurants and most of the employment. This area consists ~ of older housing (Victorians and newer homes -that have been recently constructed or total 0% remodels) . This area is considered the most stable in values and demand due to the historical & significance-original housing from mining days. 1: Market conditions In the subject neighborhood (Including support for the above conclusions related to the trend 01 property values, demand/supply, and marketing time -- such as data on competitive properties for sale In the neighborhood, description of the prevalence of sales and financing concessions, etc.): t@. Sales in this area have been increasing due to the high demand for reasons mentioned above.In a this type of market. sellers concessions are not necessary and are very unusual. This area has BÂ· been in high demand for the Dast several years due to the unique nature of the West End. Â·*I Project Information for PUDs (11 applicable) - Is the developer/builder In control of the Home Owners' Association (HOA)? L_IYes IiI No #Â§ Approximate total number of units In the subject project n/a . Approximate total number of units for sale In the subject project n/a 1 Describe commonelements and recreational facilities: subiect is not in a PUD-is in original townsite of AsDen 4% Dimensions Rectangular Topography Level to gentle slope wtearea 6,000 sf per assessors Corner Lot El Yes ~ No Size Typical for neighborhood 2 Specific zoning classification and description R-6.residential Shape Rectangular 4 Zoning compliance ~ Legal ~ Legal nonconforming (Grandiathered use) ~ Illegal L] No zoning Drainage Adequate E Highest & best use as Improved: [7] Present use E-7 Other use (explain) View Excellent-Aspen Mtn 1 Utilities Public Other Offsite Improvements Type Publc Private Landscaping Good-gardens .aspen etc * Electricity x Street Asphalt x Driveway Surface Gravel it Gas x Curb/Gutter Concrete x Apparent easements See survey A-Â¥ - FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area ~ Yes r-1 No E Wator x Sidewalk None/typical LAI Sanitary sewer x Street lights Corner 1 - FEMA Zone X Map Date 06/04/87 i:Â· Storm sewer x Alley gravel x FEMA Map no. 08097C0203 C 3 Comments (apparent adverse easements, encroachments, special assessments, slide areas, Illegal or legal nonconformIng zoning, use, etc.): Excellent E site with good views. site is well landscaped with pines. shrubs. rose garden. perennials and 2 wood fence with brick columns, iuniper lined stone walkway. ..~:. GENERAL DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION FOUNDATION BASEMENT INSULATION F No. of Units 1 Foundation Concrete Slab yes Area Sq. Ft None Roof Unk =1 K No. of Stories 2 Exterlor Walls wood lap Crawl Space No % Finished ------- :eiling :~: Type (Det./Att.) Detached Roof Surface Asphalt Shngl Basement None Ceiling ______._-- Walls Unkn x E: Design (Style) Victorian Gutters&Dwnspts. None Sump Pump None Walls - - --------- Floor $:.: 0 Existing/Proposed Existing Window Type Wd/dbl hung Dampness Not evident Floor ----------- None f:?I Age (Yrs.) 107 Storm/Screens single pane Settlement typ for age Outside Entry Not Unknown Â¤:x ~:' Effective Age (Yrs.) 30 Manufactured House no Intestation Not evident applicable Adequacy avg x Ag ROOMS Foyer LIving Dining Kitchen Den Family Rm. Rec. Rm. Bedrooms # Baths Laundry Other Area Sq. Ft. 44 Basement None *I Lovell 1 1 1 1 .5 mech stg 786 4% Level 2 3 2.25 786 PE i Finished area above grade contains: 6 Rooms; 3 Bedroom(s); 2F2P Bath(s); 1 , 572 Square Feet of Gross Living Area 9Â£:~ SURFACES Materials/Condition HEATING KITCHEN EQUIP. ATTIC AMENITIES CAR STORAGE: .-- -Ii- :N:j Floors CarDet Type HWBB Refrigerator 1 None Flreplace(s) # WS * x None El =EE:E j#.1 Walls Drywall over Dlastr Fuel Gas Range/Oven x Stairs Patlo wood x Garage # of cars - * Trim/Finish Victorian Disposal x Drop Stalr Deck wood/stn x Attached condition Average === ==== Â§%Â§ Bath Floor Carpet COOLING Dishwasher x Scuttle 1 Porch stone =21= Detached p Bath Wainscot marble Central None Fan/Hood _x. Floor Fence wood/brk x Built-In : Doors Six panel Other ----- Microwave Heated Pool none O Carport 1 ..v.Â· = Condition ------ Washer/Dryer p Finished Driveway 1 Â·El Additional features (special energy efficient Items, etc.): *woodstove is not included with sale. Partially remodeled and 4 updated Victorian-see addenda for details. ~di, Condition of the Improvements, depreciation (physical, functional, and external), repairs needed, quality of construction, etc.: The condit ion is in 45 good to average condition. normal wear and tear.auality of construction is good to average. No ~: functional or external obsolescence noted. The subject iS typical of Victorian homes in this * area. 7: Adverse environmental conditions (such as, but not limited to, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc.) present In the Improvements, on the site, or in the 2Â§ Immediate vicinity of the subject property.: The appraiser is not qualified in the field of environmental hazards 0: and the appraisal is not an environmental assessment of the property. Freddie Mac Form 70 6-93 12 CH. PAGE 1 OF 2 Fannie Mae Form 1004B 6-93 Elk Mountain Appraisals, Inc. (303) 923-6474 . .. r*:14 Dwel#ng 1. 5Â·/2 bq. rl wiÂ·Â·111.L~7..1[1! -v .6.9/Jv- 4 - 1*1 l.:.SM Sq. Ft @ $ I were based-oh-local tbntractors estimates r 1.21::1 | with land sales based on land sales in *: Garage/Carport 390 Sq. Ft@$ 20.00 - 7.800 the west aspen area and from market :fl Total Estimated Cost New + .$ 204.300 abstraction. -see addenda for "tear down" D Less 30.0 Physical Functional External sales in the same neighborhood. #: Deproolation 61.294 0 0 -S 61.290 Depreclated Value of Improvemelts .$ 143.010 ----'' 'As-Is' Value of Slte Improvements =$ 10.000 2 INDICATED VALUE BYCOSTAPPROACH (903 000) =$ 903.010 Remaining Economic Life: 20 Remaining Physical Life: 70 ITEM | SUBJECT COMPARABLE NO. 1 COMPARABLE NO. 2 COMPARABLE NO.3 323 West Hallam 212 W. Hopkins 525 West Hallam 614 W. North Street % Address West End *: Proximity to Subject 3 blocks west 6 blocks NW 2 Sales Price $ 850.000 E |$ 850,000 |$ 730.000 W%40*Â»2:l: 695.000 >95 Price/Gross LIv. Area $ 540.71 1$ 321.97 1|75.00 $ 449.23 Ill ~>5*.79(34%7.&$ 342.36 [0~75.11 9 Data and/or Inspection MLS/deed/inspection MLS/deed/Realtor MLS/deed/inspection >% Ve rlflcatlon Sou rces Assessors Assessors Assessors Assessors 1 VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION + 1-) S Adjustment DESCRIPTION + (-) $ Adiustment DESCRIPTION + (-) $ Adjustment Sales or FInancing Cash Owner fin Owner fin â‚¬ Concessions 3 Date of Sale/Tlme 12/29/94 ,, Closed:8/94 Closed:11/94 Closed:9/94 3?' Location West End WE/inferior +200.000 West End West End Leasehold/Fee Simple Fee Simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple .:.~~~} Site 6.000 sf 6.000 sf 7.500 sf -100.000 4.050 sf +200.000 0 View Excellent-As Exclnt Exclnt Good +75.000 * Design and Appeal Victorian Victorian Cottage Cottage Quality ot Construction Average Average Below avg +32.500 Average Age A107/Â£30 A94/E15 -127.500 A115/E50 +146.000 A95/E15 -104.250 Condition Average Good -15.000 Fair +50.000 Average t 1 Above Grade Total 8dms Baths Total 8dms Baths Total Bdms Baths Total Bdms Baths , 3: Room Count 6 13 22F22 724 13.5 -7,000 4!151 +7,500 7 ~4 f3 -2,000 }E Gross LIving Area 1.572 Sq. Ft. 2.640 Sq. Ft. -80.100 1.625 Sq. Ft. -4.000 2.030 Sq. Ft. -34.400 CP...: None None None *:t Basement & Finished None *Â§ Rooms Below Grade 4 None None None None * Functional Utility Single Famly Single Famly Single Famly Single Famly Â·:H.Â·i Heating/cooling HW/gas FA/gas HW/gas BB/elect +5.000 #2: Energy EMIclent Items Average Average Average Average *: Garage/Carport Carport 1 Garage-2 -10.000 None +5.000 None +5.000 :12/ Mt Porch, Patlo, Deck Decks/patio Decks Patio Decks/patio ~5 Flreplaces, etc. WS Fpl-1 Fpl-2 -3.000 Fpl-1 4.3 44 Fence, Pool, etc. fence Fence Fence Fence Unfurnished Unfurnished Unfurnished Net Ad j. (total) 39.600.,Gl,+â€ž,.Fl- $ 134 0 000 |~~. + F-1- $ 144.350 * Adjusted Sales Price Groge51.7% Gro#$47.7561 Grol:061.2~ 43:~ of Comparable :Net 4.7% $ 810.400.Net 18.4Â°2$ 864.000 Net.. 20...81(I $ 839.350 u Comments on Sales Comparison (Including the subject property's compatibility to the neighborhood, etc.):The above sales were the best 4 available -houses in the subject area vary greatly from one sale to another and therefore the ijj adjustment are relatively high. The above are the most recent sales in the neighborhood-to go A outside of the neighborhood would not only show higher adjustments but also would not be the P best comparable sales for the subject. ITEM SUBJECT COMPARABLE NO. 1 COMPARABLE NO. 2 COMPARABLE NO.3 %31 Date, Price and Data No sales No prior sales No prior sales No prior sales 43: Source for prior sales in the past activity in activity in activity in j within year ofappraisal 12 months past 12 months vast 12 months past 12 months %>; Analysis of any current agreement of sale, option, or listing of ths subject property and analysis of any prior sales of subject and comparables within one year of the date of appraisal: dThe subject is listed for sale for $895,000 unfurnished. The comps are not currently listed 3~ for sale. Ei? INDICATED VALUE BY SALES COMPAHISON APPROACH .. $ 850.000 2 INDICATED VALUE BY INCOME APPROACH (If Applicable) Estimated Market Rent $ n/a /Mo. x Gross Rent Multlpller n/a = $ n/a Ej This appraisal Is made I_..LI 'as Is' L_| subject to the repairs, alterations, Inspections or conditions listed below 1_1 subject to completion per plans and specifications. g Conditions of Appraisal: Subject to attached Certification and Limiting Conditions. * Final Reconcillation: All of the weight was placed on the Sales Comparison Approach and the Income i# ADproach was not used because property in this area is not typically purchased for income. iD.0 Ri. The purpose ot this appraisal Is to estimate the market value of the real property that Is the subject of this report, based on the above conditions and the certification, contingent 1.3 and limiting conditions, and market value definition that are stated In the attached Freddie Mac Form 439/Fannle Mae Form 10048 (Revised 6/93 )Â· ~ 1 (WE) ESTIMATE THE MARKET VALUE, AS DE~NED, OF THE REAL PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT, AS OF January 6. 1995 I: (WHICH IS THE D~i~OFANSFECTION A~/~HE EF~~~E DATE OF THIS REPORT) TO BE $ 850.000 ~ APPRAISER: f/1/\ SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (ONLY IF REQUIRED): :t Signature v u \UN ka, Â» Signature ~ Did U DId Not 35% Name Marv Griffin U /1 ' V 7~ Name Inspect Property * Date Report Signed 01/16/95 ~ ~ (-) Date Report Signed 0 State Certification#00001801 State co State Ce rtlflcatlon # State 33 Or State License # State Or State License # State Freddie Mac Form 70 6-93 12 CH. PAGE 2 OF 2 Fannie Mae Form 10048 6-93 Elk Mountain Appraisals, Inc. (303) 923-6474 Z* 1 . .. ~ Property Address 323 West Hallam ~ Clty Aspen County Pitkin State CO ZIp Code 81611 I Lender Ute City Mortgage ~ ITEM ~ SUBJECT COMPARABLE NO. 4 COMPARABLE NO. 5 COMPARABLE NO. 6 323 West Hallam ~601 W. Francis ~433 W. Gillespie Address West End Proximity to Subject ~84*#48<:'*Ick"**"'.*~044 3.5 blocks NW 7 blocks NW 810,000 .96**410:/:.M $ Sales Price $ 850.000 :31$ 750,000 .:ii.j~f~~Â·~Â·~.i~:~:~:~~i~~~i~i~~~~~ ~Â·~~iii~~: ~~ii~:~:. 1$ g [jr'.6 L""~,:.:mE*, Price/Gross LIv. Area $ 540.71 01$ 332.45 1 Ef~,25*3259$ 345.27 [ZIL~#404 Data and/or Inspection MLS/deed/inspection MLS/deed/inspection ~ Verification Sources Assessors Assessors Assessors VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION + M $ Adiustment DESCRIPTION + (-) $ Adjustment DESCRIPTION + (-) $ Adjustment Sales or Financing Owner fin ~ Conventional I Concessions , i Date of Sale/Time 12/29/94 Closed:10/94Â£ Closed:10/94 1 Location West End West End i West End Leasehold/Fee Simple Fee Simple Fee s imple I Fee simple ! SIte 6.000 sf 4,500 sf , +200,000 5,000 sf +150,000 View Excellent-As Excelnt I Excellent Design and Appeal Victorian Contemp Contemp Quality of Construction Average Average Average Age A107/E30 A48/E25 3 -37,500 A31/E25 -40,500 Condition Average Average i Average Above Grade Total Bdms Baths Total Bdms Baths ~ Total Bo ms Baths Total Bdms Baths ~ Room Count 6 3 2F 2P 7,3 ;2~~1 +7,000 7 i 4 ~3 -2.000 i Gross Living Area 1,572 Sq. Ft. 2,256 Sq. Ft. 1 -51,300 2,346 Sq. Ft. -58,100 Sq. Ft. Basement & FInished None partial-unf None Rooms Below Grade None None Functional Utility Single Famly Single Famlyl Single Famly i Heatlng/Cooling HW/gas HW/gas FA/gas Energy Etflclent Items Average Average 1 Average Garage/Carport Carport 1 None +5.000 Garage-1 -7,500 Porch, Patio, Deck Decks/patio Patio Patio/deck W Flreplaces, etc. WS Fpl-1 Fpl-1 Fence, Pool, etc. fence Fence I Fence part furn I -2,000 Unfurnished Net Ad]. (total) 171 + E-1- $ 121,200 |11 + n. $ 41,900 -7 + E-1- s Adjusted Sales Price -Gross40.4% Gross31.9< Gross -Net 16.2% 871,200 Net 5.2% 851,900 Net . 4 Date, Price and Data No sales No prior sales No prior sales Source for prior sales in the past activity in activity in within year of appraisal 12 months past 12 months past 12 months Elk Mountain Appraisals, Inc. (303) 923-6474 .. < Borrower/Client Denkins Property Address 323 West Hallam County Pitkin State CO Zip Code 81611 City Aspen Lender Ute City Mortgage This addendum is for use with all appraisal reports to comply with current appraisal standards and requirements of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Office of the Comptrollerof the Currency (OCC), the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC), the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), and the Federal Reserve. Instructions: Check only those sections which apply to the sublect properly being appralsed. E APPRAISAL PURPOSE AND FUNCTION The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the subject property as defined within this report. The function of this appraisal is to assist the lender in collateral valuation and/or portfolio management. EXTENT OF APPRAISAL PROCEDURE The data contained in the attached appraisal report has been compiled by the appraiser from the following sources: Inspection and research of the subject property to identify dimensions, nature of construction, physical condition, and any other physical, functional or external factors; Research of municipal offices and registry of deeds to identify assessments, transfer activity, site parameters, and other pertinent factors; Contact with appropriate real estate brokers, developers, managers, appraisers, and other knowledgeable sources to identify relevant market data such as comparable sales, comparable rents, vacancy rents, depreciation rates, operating costs, development costs, and any trends that may influence such as economic or demographic trends. ~ The estimated reproduction cost is based upon the appraiser's knowledge of the local market, surveys of local developers and contractors, and [Â© All forms of deprecation (physical, functional, and external) are specifically addressed in the attached report or other addenda. Physical depreciation is based on the estimated effective age of the subject property. ~ The site value estimate is based on analysis of site sales, and abstraction of site values from sales of improved properties. E For income producing properties, actual rents, expenses and vacancies have been reported and analyzed for subject and comparable income producing properties. Potential rents, expenses, and vacancies have been projected based on market data derived from prior and current market surveys. ~ The subject is a single family residence located in predominantly owner-occupied area. The lack of rental data and the lack of sales of rented dwellings make meaningful rental and gross rent multiplier conclusions impossible, therefore the income approach was not applied. [*] All sources and data utilized are considered accurate and reliable. Unreliable data has been disregarded. All sources have been noted where appropriate, and all data has been confirmed whenever possible. 43 SUBJECT PROPERTY SALES HISTORY -3- The subject property has not transferred during the last twelve months. - The subject property has transferred during the last twelve months. Any transfer activity which has occured during the past twelve months is listed below and is addressed in the attached appraisal report: Date Sales Price Document # / Book and Page Seller Buyer 1 1 1 1 Source: E FEMA FLOOD HAZARD DATA Zone Map/Parcel Date Name of Community X 08097C0203 C 06/04/87 Pitkin County The subject property Is locatedin a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area. The subject property Is not located in a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area. The subject property's community does participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. The subject property's community does not participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. The subject property's community Is covered by a Regular Program. The subject property's community Is covered by an Emergency Program. Â®Â® IX' Bwix' I 1 .. ~ "~ The *uwdet~roperty is currenrly Tor sate.,urn,-Â«. -Â·- - - Â·Â·Â· Â· . The suwect property Is not currently under contract for sale. ~ The subject property Is currently under contract for sale as described: Contract Date Offer Date Contract Price Seller Buyer 12/29/94 12/28/94 $ 850.000 Prior Denkins x The sales contract and/or escrow instructions were reviewed. x The contract indicated that personal property was not Included in the sale The contract indicated that the following personal property was Included in the sale: The personal property estimated contributory value is $ __ Personal property was considered in the final estimate of market value and has been addressed in the attached report. x Financing concessions were not Indicated in the contract. The following financing concessions were indicated in the contract: Source: x Offering and/or contract information was considered in the final estimate of market value. Offering and/or contract information was not considered in the final estimate of market value. Offering and/or contract information was not available to the appraiser. (For additional information, see attached narrative addenda) [F] MARKET OVERVIEW A reasonable marketing period of 4-6 months has been projected based on MLS statistics for similar property in the subject area E ADDITIONAL CERTIFICATION This appraisal conforms to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation, except that the Departure Provision does not apply. Their compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurence of subsequent event. This appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan. E ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLAIMER The value estimated is based on the assumption that the property is not negatively affected by the existence of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions unless otherwise stated in this report. The appraiser is not an expert in the identification of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions. The appraiser's routine inspection and inquiries about the subject property did not develop any information that indicated any apparent significant hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions which would affect the property negatively unless otherwise stated in this report. It is possible that tests and inspections made by a qualified hazardous substance and environmental expert would reveal the existance of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions on or around the property that would negatively affect its value. E] ADDITIONAL COMMENTS [Â© APPRAISER'S~IGI~TURE~ LICENSE/CERTIFICATION Appraiser's Signature Effective Date 01/06/95 Date Prepared 01/16/95 Appraiser's Name (print) Mary Grlff#4 V \/ /1 Phone # (303) 923-6474 State CO U License Â® Cwtification # Â¥ WooO18O1 Tax ID# 84-1258868 El CO-SIGNING APPRAISER'S SIGNATURE & LICENSE/CERTIFICATION j The co-signing appraiser has Inspected the property, both inside and out, and has made an exterior inspection of all comparable sales listed in the report. The report was completed by the appraiser under direct supervision of the co-signing appraiser. The co- signing appraiser accepts responsibility for the report including the value conclusions and the limiting conditions, and conforms that the certifications apply fully to the co-signing appraiser. 8 The co-signing appraiser has not Inspected the Interior of the subject property. The co-signing appraiser has not Inspected the exterlorof the subject property and all comparable sales listed in this report. [E The report was completed by the appraiser under direct supervision of the co-signing appraiser. The co-signing appraiser accepts responsibility this report including the value conclusions and the limiting conditions, and conforms that the certifications, with the exception of physical inspection apply fully to the co-signing appraiser. Co-Signing Appraiser's Signature Effective Date Date Prepared Co-Signing Appraiser's Name (print) Phone # State U License U Certification # Tax ID# 7 0 ATmCHMENT 1 IAND USE APPLICATION FOIN I) Project Name -RENKINS REMODEL 2) Project IDcation 323 W. HALLAM LOT D & E, BLOCK 43, ASPEN, COLORADO (inlicate street ackiress, lot & block rnImber, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning R-6 4) Lot Size 6000 SQ.FT. 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # JIM & ANNEADARE DENKINS P.O. BOX 8740, ASPEN, COLORADO 81612, 544-0838 6) Representative' s Name, Address & Phone # BARBARA LONG & ASSOCIATES 315 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611, 925-6880 7) Type of Application (please d]eck all that apply): axxlitional use Ccnceptlial SPA Conceutlial Historic Dev. . Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual RJD X Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin - Final RJD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivisicn Historic Designation Corxiaminimization - Tect/Map Amerxhant (MOS AllotmEnt Lat Split/Lat Line (NOS Exemption AdjustnErt 8) Descripticn of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft.; amber of bedrocIDS; any wevious approvals granted to the property). SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 1833 SQ.FT., 3 - BEDROOMS 9) Description of Develc,nerrt Application ADDITION TO THE LEFT WING OF THE BUILDING, RELOCTE COVERED PORCH NORTH 4 FEET, CHANGE EXISTING CARPORT TO AN ENCLOSED GARAGE & EXTEND THE MASTER BEDROOM. 10) Have you attached the following? Respense to Attachment 2, Minim= Suhnissian Contents Response to Attadimerrt 3, Specific Suhnissian Ccnterrts Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application l --3 4 3 0 r .a 0 9 <4Â·91 k Â£ , ~ L . tr ELI . 0 1=t 14 - V \..4 4. F'Of. tu B ____ +1 + \ R J \ \\, ~ 40\1 4 El <94 e - -- 1 F-- - 11 4.-I=.,~.4 21... :. . 1 11 14 110 11 uÂ«f'-Dpk-- 11 11 1 1 . 7 \ I 1 11 , 11 1 4, 1 - -I 41 0 4 1 , ... - 1 | * \ 14 / 1 11 . 11 k. U.-- -2.. . '. I . 1 ' * 11 LIJÂ« ~ 11 1 CI 76. 'Â¥f. 4.1115. 4 I :\.X Li- --- '-- Fld@~ 1 - -T\\F .Zir-- 453/ 1 . \46. .\01\ , r-- 10 0 1 23 lh\N I . --2 ti frups:za~/ J=r J. p. -2 - i.Â·1.p#,6.1- _ .XÂ«4 / 11 . 1 - \X\\ 4 8 'j -i/././..2 5.#Effify OJATV - 1 . - $* 11' M----r' , i . I j i. - - 1 - 1-1 3 1 1 . U 1 ': 4- I r'.1.1 Q -- -*-$,0.1*/ / r .#meT: r , t \ 1 \ I , it n ./ \ 1 -1 Â·j / ~j -r f Â¢ I . 1 4- 0. 3 7 -I Â· 4 4 El r \- --/Awplimr"6 , t.6 .9,0%4.f - - F>Yl'WF - ' -- ---1 5.Â«1- --Lla Â· - -----r _in -r'l jup.,0 ' t i ___ I -1 t :'.-; ---U----- --9-- -rt - _ 6 -1 ELE#*U â€ž 1 14 1 1, 1 . b 1 1- { 3- US- k 1 4-- 1 r - 21 *6002 -ro ,&'94 N /* - 1~ t v -1- * 11 1,1/w,04/vid:Jq â€¢ , 5. -1 11 / t/ %6~ 64 Â· 1 11 1 ' r 1 1 | 1 , ..1 J -11 1, 1 1\ . 1\. . 1 1 1 L - + â€ž---- , 7 I ; 4 i 0 1 -LI 1 /.1. 93-911 -- L 1 / 1 5- T 116.2. 1 1 - 11/ - \11. / . / 4 :i - 1 1 - 1 Ii- - 1 r-/ +* ' 1 ;, IL-Z.- --1 11 1 L-f - --1.1- 3- = 349~: * Fr 1- ' 1 + ..0.0. 4.-9,41. * L i: 1- ' 0 4 - 1 142.1 1 ~ ,/ 1 107 -4- f -- 11 '.1 Â· ,/ **'M '...#1'... .. ~*AÂ·'./.0 ~-vyÂ£*Â·.p :21 - i 1-- -36-4 2<22; I "~~*i'.t '1 i: 4 8* *f U ' 571 . t*-'Dedpo P'~ . ; _ 7. 1 1 1 L - 1 . L. Ivid~ ~ Tf ..r -0 L /1 - < N l' i 11 ~ h 11 1 1 -1.1 1 Jd LY 191'116 . tia .r . 1.0!J ur 11 1 Ille A-- 17 r- - - - 4 J.wâ€¢ To 16 -avEP L ' U tr Of i 6,0 - --lf (,ppr'â€¢J) M -flee[ btrIRL, rboâ€ž r,0-J :iÂ®*04= w,u rue= r~J -9. 1/0 \I \ 1* 1 Â·1 Ual F I F r. - - 910.4 -4 -FY/b:,MAJ, 4,9.00 L .Â·iker*47~4-.1/1.t~ .Ail .tfl. . :.7 Â· 1 . . r'.'. .. I ..9 ...422%,lf ~r . 61. r %.f *,4 g 9 /* B.Â·Â·Â·. A.Â·â€¢ C .0 x. t 4'-4 . ,.1:i#â‚¬ 1 fae*4 p . 4#//1 â€¢Â·idd ' .' 4 '9 - r 4 . '. 4 ~ , 41;* : 1-8414/i,41: , 9.1 2 - 2.9 41 141112[- 1 *LI.I 'il l,nr u . 4.- \ . - r.w, / , I. .993.1 -1-a it-#59 .. t 11*i L- .t h . . ...1 WAE Â·Â·â€¢ .8 ? .: 5-49 411 1 , A 1 -?Itic. ' . ... 9/ 1 / / ...6 . ,.41 : . 1 9 Pr -1- - -----Il - '. 1 P -Ar- Â· - --1 /1 6----- L- fty.:r 4 '. 0 , 11.Â· Â· . 4 -1 \-I- -4/ -r- . 9- r , 1 1 : 1 ni-4- L . 1 -â€ž112 1 : 1 1 - 31 k I 1 1 7/ I - >1 1 - -4 -2- F ' 1-Â· T 1 Ft F 1 1 1 1 4 --- 1\/ / - i , . / 1 i 1 1.--- ---7 . .. J f Â£ \ 12 . 1 -, Â·P Â· ..4 , {,1 ./ 9, / MI 2,1,24.-,44'-04**4'. 2 044*7\007 . .4. k.t" Â·44 ''*+i f t -. 1 14 l'H 'l 11 11 1%9% 1 \\ - 2---R I 01 3 0,- P I t--Â·# --Ij 3 -7 4 0 N_ -r _ 10 At t. d- 4 1 11 8 -1 -.224...1/ + M 1 . i 1 Rj i l) S E=r=* Â· 1-1 '111 11 111 11 4 i 1 L_13 D '11 9 3 h O - Yu, 1 11. 1 1 *312 , 1 6 6 -& e i F * f.th 'JOL 1Â¢ Â£ Ill'D 3 ~ rÂ·:aw ' 94 l!11.- h 49.-- I,ki fe L . A - --- 1. . 11-.11 1~"11.11, 1-1 i i I â€¢ 2 1 li 1 - O 1 Jilli . b. 1 li./.Ma..li/. it_. l . /:Illillillillilluujilillillillillillili~ --- - ~.~~ I , I . .. .. 0 , ... : 'AA 11=11=11. p.1.1.111.11 ... f -iliwili 1~~F= .~. r--7- 1 '11 1.1 lilli ... 1.11=1111.IC-1 1 ~ /1.lill' 1.1*1. .LI.1. 1 ... ... Illillilill Illillilillilill Illilillillillilillillill 0 - I 4 . 0 '18 4,Â· ' ' '1Â· 14 L doffs + 0.1-6(JLÂ»Â·rioje . 1 111 %1 4 611 -0.0,-31 1 1,656 '.1/Lt. ki:Ke,& 161.[* 354,1/F**4,0 0~.bolll t 47'TE ,$*VE.â‚¬,leÂ»F; e.,8.Bfo r~eLC,yaw'. '111,1211~ . 4 ill u *,4164Â¥t, 44#vmjeet:P pt,041 66' 02; 1 *Â· *52 Â¢ 1 pi,towlhba r P Â¢ S $ " A ~ 1 I .+ 1 .t ,tÂ· â€¢-lh' 1 . 1 - lif L,/0 6*4 * I-1 2,10 , 1 2 ik,r , .1,10 1 41/ 010 lA/L- 1-,/6, 0 1 124. 1 60 ? , l: 11 *Â» P "P u .1 o.eto f (6Â·0 17# 0.00 4 4'ew,1/ OVE'â‚¬, . b 0'r .i i It 61 '90 . .., M A L L A M Â© T E E E 3 41,49, 1 11 - It *IA,Ok,bl51Â£/ 5;'Eâ‚¬,W4.~*10.~*Â» FÂ·â‚¬2:,Â·:le'f'> 0, e,g,~o s ~560 Â¢1' 000 C FS Â£>D 6 -' 2. #2 470 i 1 1 ' h. 1 . ..14 E,xe< 26*; L>k,26:Â·E> f * es'ticÂ»Ric,911 ..,, .. 1 1 72 222---21 , - 1 */2,/Oprog'.2 : 40: te'Vt'AMI 0 4 3 04 4,Â¢4 6 76003'lin m. MOO' . 2 1 '' 4% .. c GOUNO REE#A i 4.UNT. c,62 FouNO TEEE*2. i ALLWI. CAP i LWO ALMIBER) 'p.&4al' - 11 ~ ~ ~NO NUMPER- ' 4 " 1 /ki 1. ~. - , e)/1 ,%000 FENCES -> 1 ./.1 -11 ~533=.lf= -41 I . 1 1 1 -- 1 r-- 1 BUILDING CORNEK -0 PROmCff ]80 -' - -- .J l.. 9, 6%/1/Mi'+ CullffÂ©4~i Â· - r. 14,8 77Â» Â· 1 6 lilli eref 't J 1 40 ., . 1 1 1 1 i 'ffi i ' // / 1-wo eyÂ©,r yar) /3/ -04*: I LO' mof OVE12}*Â·16 - - ~/ FRAMS. HOLOE 0.,/ 0 ~ill ,, s Â«,&~<T,~/S~I-~4 2 i1 1 BUILD[kle a]RNER 10 AEPetrY 1.76' c .-3.. 1.- +,r r 3 . -4- -8 - 61 fe,ki E.)441 del - 3 - 4042**SM#&, dz!1434 1 al/2.teÂ¢'â‚¬1 ~ r -h '1 O **AKY*F.*%*Ar l" . 0 F i , *+02 *&8&9%1*40TD 0 4 E Â· ~j i Ta>l_ eÂ®-leD ~ ._~t~{~*51-100 K 43 01# 6 ASE*R%63$86*& >429% 1 ~744'f . - 1 1 1 ; ..01 â‚¬,CALE : 1'~ = 101 --tixeh 6 PKÂ¥ aiL- 4180'4 -f-/ Elir *,0 6561,5 OF 27 'Phil . ~t Â·â€¢ 1 OE,h{~1 ~ NE COP v ' iÂ»#04$64*1641 61' r./.e'W I ' I : -11 10,1 'FÂ» 4 41* 9 : r th.7 Â· C Ile.leÂ¢'y) WaMP FENCEL ---g 2, Â·' -~ , K 5 1 4. 12 4 .,2 'b Â«*7Â·# ti.14 5. Outa # I I I.'I# V C 111Â·. 4,11 4 -14 j?) ..1 '. .1-9.,1, 1 , Lf,r D ./ I JUqE- IE) LOT E 1 ,... *UPERVY. - FEDUND -lu 11 :..: 5.. 4.,V 4/ALUM. CAP HrEEON. 11-Â·rE LOC.63 1.-4 N . UNet, OF: - 2.11 r '2 . 4.:(44 .:1 LET: REBAR + CAP \ 11 1 L 5 ll84 0-99--l.1 .*0'1 Â·f BULPINBEW IMPROVEhAEND, 1 ~ N 9- 4 + 0/*1' IN IMPENCE 012. MAY)WN TO N . t, Â·,,....2.f. ,#.Â·- 2:t . 4 /1 1- 2 2 N 79>09)' 11"W 4000' .... MENTS Â©f OK ON 11426,3 PREMI'555 AK:- . . AL. . 41= OVERWEAD U-TILITIES *mWMK,Tm-E. ; T'V)~ FOUND AUM. CAP (NO NUMEEÂ© D $ C *WER: FOLE -' ter REeÂ»2- 4 PueFrt CAP , , I FDttf2>l_t5Â· Wtlhlr55 mENER- -- . 1,0 // I 6. . t . .1 ./ JAME'b M RESEK L.6. 9164 ' . '1 f JUL-C Z , 1974 - - 3-2.1*1 .1;ZtH ALL EY BLOCIC 43 SURVEYOR'& CERTIFICATE : -'~~..~40;11,4 1 HEREDÂ¥ CERTIFY 114AT ON JANUARY S, 1995, A I . I Â· A ..1,V ,r ' 't ' Â·-1L % .1. I. .. ! I. 4....1 .40 Â¥15UAL INeFECTION VAB PERFORMED UNDER HY #I , , NO CHANGES WERE ROUND. r'''cht:,Â· t. W.,1.. ..4.J 4 .0 -44' 41;.4 LUPERVIDION CF THE ABOVE De<CRIBED PR:3:'EETY[ 4 1/ , f. .>npr, #44 42. .,4,~ 1 ~-1 1 1 .,Â·:,Â·Â·r o Lau ! N 1~ ' Alr'INE SURVE'<5, INC. Dr: JAHee r RESER I OATEÂ· L. 5.9 04 . 14- 4 73 9 . 1Â©TEÂ·. FITKIN G)UNTY TITLE, INC. aÂ»!HITHENT hb. ET- ' , 4 - , 1 1....,3 '.,4-,744., THIS SURVEY; Â«7.-4.r :G#- 9415C4 WAÂ© Uâ‚¬â‚¬D IN -THE FREMARATZN OF , p' .t._ itt - t. , , 14Â¥j ...: ip,; 4 'r, A:14. 11 .... AL â€¢ JOB NO.0 15-3 7224.1 A TRI- CO Management, Inc. SURVEYED date: JUNE 19 -8 / Iâ‚¬rM. TITLE: DRAFTED date 1 JUD( 1 11 / 1 914 61 IMPROVEMEN-F OURVEC , CLIENT: j4Hyl-ellÂ¢;:FAA; b NOTICE According to Cclondu law you mustcommenc,mly *gal acbon b.sed Box 1730 Â· 4 REVISIONS date. 1,27Â· 15 UP[7(rE L~ 0 4 e . b rf?* 2.~42*.ika fi uponâ€¢mdefoctin thusturvoywithin3 yeanaftorm-dhcoversuchdetâ€¢ct Â· ' SHET N&~F'~1~I i,'it*42 Aspen, Colorado 81611 BLOCK 43 1 Inâ€¢00entmoyâ€¢ny â€¢clonb,Â»d tmon En,delialollorm becomm-d . ,. , ATEN / CologARD : er Â·,%,0,1,(f.i C .~11 , J %.. 1 '. 303.925 2688 , 4 C ~.'t-,I// u /4.',/ 1 ; 4:q f ' 'Lfal. 11 ~rt~* r..iÂ· ' I. 1 . -*4Â· . L.K L i.hu :,2 7 1 ~.;' $ .~j//-9/( r . . lid itliili 1 . I I 1 i A L L A %1 0 T E E 6 76'09' (11 E 0.00' i c fOUNO REeAR- 1 ALUM. CAP FOUNO KEEAR- t All11. CAF 'i C NO N.UMBEr) *RAVIL 3 h{ KID NUMBER- ' ir:Â«1Np -1 I -7 4 W 1 / -1 1 . 2 - _rÂ¥El Â· 'w =- I -51 1 ~ 1/ -- - - - ---- ----- - 1 , --- - ...... -- ......â€ž-UE-- -- -= 1 20!LPING CORNER. -0 PRPPEET 1.80 -- - - - 1 1 4 // //6 /4 22.-1-9-L-- , 4 . 24 Â«/Â» Ef-7-- - --~Â« Ll 1,0' ROOF CVE~HAN& 2 , 9//4+10 010270' RED[) ~ ~ 1. 0' moF OVEKHAHe - -ERAM-HOU'bE 44 4 31 - z8 a / // V / / / 41 coht. 80 3 WILD:kle amER 70 FlÂ©PERIY I.75' - - t il 9 -= 3,1/bgo feÂ« ~ ~ ' ~ ~%#44 + . 17 1 1 \0 \ F \ CAR.. foR:T- <WTS [) 4 E 12Â»L *WEDÂ· . , ~BLOOK 43 Â· , 1 - Â·t 'lillit .,1 0 5 10 m 30 AD 50 e,CALEE : 1" - \<~> I . OWED . -f-/ Â· . A-2.11.:.--Â·..1 66615 OF BEAKIK.185 5 ROUNC) CITY' MONUMEhITE> NEC02..BLIC 43 TD 1*V COK BLI< 50 5715,09' M"E 2% f . 3 WDOP FENCE- -~ 4. 9 - ..5 12..1.. lie CURft 1: .1 7 64 g.fUTIE COK{5 -1 - -- 4 - OUR.VE~(012'6 CERICH=ICATE " 1, JAN/125 M REE,ER, HEREBY C.EFCIFÂ¥ 11Â·-*r ON , bUFFRVIOION OF LaTe 0 1 F, e>Looki 43, AbeDÂ·J , 1.9.. LOT D~ LOT E JUAE 19-[B , 19-14, A 601234pf '6Â»6 MADE UNPEEK Mi LMI, --4- 1 FÂ©UND -10 13â‚¬ l-CUTED egleel=r WITHIN TNE EaÂ»1[*A'- (01-ORACD. TUE TUD <STOFf WOOD FIKAME HOUSe 'AÂ»,5 er-T : REPAR 1 CAP 9 d 3 911,=St 0,~ALUM. *42 ~ UN:35 OF THE Â»aDVE PeCAJEEP P!2OPE# Ab 6140*N | WrEKEON. IME I~Â»:10Â·4 AtÂ·4[2 AMENe,IONe> OFALL 3 A}ILD]rÂ·,35, IWIFFOAEMENTD, EAbBMEArl5: laeR-15- OF- L. 5 Â°1184Â· (11Â»2~2-â€¢tiu . 0 1, 4 1, 1 . .. R 0â€¢*1' IHI EVTPENCE. OK KNOWN -O ME- ANIP BJC,10504- k-f Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·- Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· N 75Â°09'Itnw WOM)' Â· Â· .Â· , MENT,515'f OK ON TWESE PREMI'5!99 ARE Â»<LL)1Â©â‚¬reef . Â©WOWN. OVERWEAD UALITIE,5 *FOWEL,TELE. 44ND ALUM. CAP (NO NUMBEIÂ© *WEE FDLE -' ser REe:AR- 4 AA>TIC CAP _ ~ Ft?yJ[/385 WIn-Â·255 mEKER _ _ JAMA M REDEK L.6. 984 ....4 / JOU< 1, 814 . A A L LEN' BLOCK_ 4 5 SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE : 1 HEREE>Â¥ CERTIFY THAT Chi JANUArr 26,1995, A . Â¥. VISUAL INSPECTION WAS FERRDRHED UNDER H'r 44, f SUPERVIDION CF THE ABOVE DeÂ©CRIBED FR)Hter< 4 NO CHANGES WERE FULND 1. Si l / ALFINE ZURVErS, INC. Dr JAMIE F KESER 13Â¥TE Â· L 0. 1154 loreÂ· FITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. a)HHITHENT Kb. rOT- 4 9415Â« WAÂ© USED IN THE FREPARATION CF '.1 ., fA THIS SURVEY ., ... - - i~ 4, / TITLE: JOB NO.: 19-3 ..7 SURVEYED date: JUNE 19 3/ 1974 IMPROVEMENT Â©L)12>~C CUENT: HYLE<t' '1'.1. TRI-CO Management, Inc. DRAFTED date: 301.4 1 0-r 1434 61 2 Box 1730 w Â· NOTICE Accord,neueoloradu law,oumustenmencennylegal,ctur ..pirÂ¢ REVISIONS date 1.27 15 UPDACE LLITE, O {e SHEET AK:L: 1 00*' 4 #P upon *n, defect m this Eurvey within 3 yars aft01 youl discover sut:h deÂ·a Y Innoevent may any@fan baed uponiny dehdinls,rve, becomirenced Aspen, Colorado 81611 BLOCK 43 ADPER , COLLKAED mom th,n In yeam hom me dit, 0 thecIriME:*19 *-11=00, *-5 7 - rt- Â· 303Â·925Â·2688 x.~Ag 'â€¢ .. ... -.r- Â· '-3. 7 1473. 3 3 2 wÂ· 6 RtcÂ«