The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.323 W Hallam St.HPC005-02.M,~,ve-fw~,9--I=.I-HPCoTifZj9 - 323 W. Hallam Conceptual HPC and - - Partial Demo \ Bul . +P -9-3 H P .. CASE NUMBER HPC005-02 PARCEL ID # 2735-124-34002 CASE NAME 323 W. Hallam Conceptual HPC and Partial Demo PROJECT ADDRESS 323 W. Hallam PLANNER Amy Guthrie CASE TYPE Conceptual HPC, Partial Demo OWNER/APPLICANT Peter Rispoli abd Donna Dilanni REPRESENTATIVE Same DATE OF FINAL ACTION 4/24/02 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION HPC Reso. #16-2002 ADMIN ACTION Conceptual Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 10/17/02 BY J. Lindt .. . t ' 1 /44.â‚¬ * - . 1.4. 1 4 .... I . I . 4 4 PARCEL ID:]2735-124-34002 DATE RCVD: ~3/7/02 # COPIES:~ CASE NO~HPC005-02 CASE NAME:~323 W. Hallam Conceptual HPC and Partial Demo PLNR:~Amy Guthrie _-J PROJ ADDR:~323 W. Hallam CASE TYP:|Conceptual HPC, Partial Demo . STEPS:~ It OWN/APP:~Peter Rispoliabd Do * ADR]323 W. Hallam St. ~ ' C/S/Z: Aspen/CO/81611 PHN: 544-6947 REplSame ADR:1 C/S/Z: PHN: FEES DUE12405 D FEES RCVD12400 STAT: F REFERRAL4 . 1 - 1 . .1 . BYI DUE: - t REF:1 MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED I. I $ .t 9 1. DATE OF FINAL ACTION 1ZÂ¥/,2Â«2- ~ CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ :. pz: H #49 19 0(,3 '116 -2Â¢GZ- BOA: CLOSED :1 l**Y: 13 - t--LÂ»i DRACÂ· PLAT SUBMITD: | PLAT (BK,PG):1 ADMIN: 6, 61,6â‚¬,pflic 1 4*uoo~fj â€¢ 17 4 - . .... I -Â¥ I ./ + .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT, PARTIAL DEMOLITION AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 323 W. HALLAM STREET, LOTS D AND E, BLOCK 43, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 16, SERIES OF 2002 Parcel ID #: 2735-124-34-002 WHEREAS, the applicants, Peter Rispoli and Donna DiIanni, have requested Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition, and Variances approval for the property located at 323 W. Hallam Street, Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood o f the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The propoped development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all o f the following standards are met: 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: .. a) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and b) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated April 24,2002 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines," and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on April 24, 2002 the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards and the design guidelines, and approved the application with a vote of 6 to 0. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves conceptual development, partial demolition and variances for the property located at 323 W. Hallam Street, Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite of Aspen including a 12 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 3.2 foot west sideyard setback variance for the existing location of the historic house, a 2.25 foot west sideyard setback variance for a small section of the proposed addition, and a 405 square foot FAR bonus. A building repair permit has been issued for the front porch and the work will be monitored by HPC staff. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the Ntt day of April, 2002. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 0-1- 4, MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 323 W. Hallam Street- Conceptual Development, Variances, Partial Demolition- Public Hearing DATE: April 24,2002 SUMMARY: The project involves restoration of a front window on this historic house, alterations to a non-historic addition, and construction of a new addition at the rear of the site. APPLICANT: Peter Rispoli and Donna DiIanni, owners. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-34-002. ADDRESS: 323 W. Hallam Street, Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6 (Medium Density Residential). SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. 1 .. A floor area bonus will only be awarded to projects which in the opinion of the HPC make an "outstanding preservation ejfort." Examples to be considered would include the retention of historic outbuildings or the creation of breezeway or connector elements between the historic resource and new construction. Lots which are larger than 9,000 square feet and properties which receive approval for a "historic landmark lot split" may also be considered for the bonus. Staff Finding: HPC held a worksession on this project on March 14th. The applicant was given direction to restudy the height of the new addition and the connector pieces between it and the historic house. These changes have been made for conceptual review. This project does not involve any changes directly to the historic house except for the restoration of the original double hung windows under the front porch. Currently, a non- historic horizontal leaded glass window is in place. The owner plans to do limited demolition of drywall to locate the original framed openings and install the correct window. This is being proposed as part of the basis for a floor area bonus. This is consistent with the following design guideline: 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. o Reducing an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or increasing it to receive a larger window is inappropriate. o Consider reopening and restoring an original window opening where altered. At the back ofthe historic house is an addition that was built in 1967. The owner plans to demolish a can)ort and otherwise modify this piece somewhat to make it into the connector to the new addition. At the rear of the site is proposed new living space. It is relatively simple in character, uses a low plate height on the second floor, and is no taller than the historic resource. Staff finds that the addition meets the design guidelines in terms of mass, scale, and placement on the lot, the issues that are pertinent to conceptual review. Final review will include some discussion about increasing the distinction between new and old through the selection of materials and details, but overall the project appears to be successful. The guidelines that are relevant to additions like this one are: 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. 2 .. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. o An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. o A 1-story connector is preferred. o The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. o The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. o Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. o Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. o Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. 3 00 .. o If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. o Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. The board should discuss whether they feel it is important for this project to comply with standard 8.3: 8.3 Avoid attaching a garage or carport to the primary structure. o Traditionally, a garage was sited as a separate structure at the rear of the lot; this pattern should be maintained. Any proposal to attach an accessory structure is reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This guideline is primarily aimed at avoiding attaching a historic outbuilding to a primary structure. The board may find that it is beneficial to create new detached garages in order to break up the overall mass of a house. The "Residential Design Standards" require that of all new residences. Staff believes that in this case, connectors have been used to create three distinct volumes in the project already and that the intent of the guideline is met. The project requires the following variances: a 12 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 3.2 foot west sideyard setback variance for the existing location of the historic house, a 2.25 foot west sideyard setback variance for a small section of the proposed addition, and a 405 square foot FAR. bonus. Staff finds that these bonuses are appropriate. Setback variances are helpful in achieving the best site plan for the historic resource. The floor area bonus is justified by the restoration effort being undertaken on the front of the house and the good design, which involves the owner sacrificing height on the upper level for the benefit of the original house. Staff finds that this review standard is met. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood Of the parcel proposed for development, and Staff Finding: There are two historic buildings across the street from this one. All are two story buildings and, due to their size, can accommodate larger additions with less negative impacts than is often the case with the miner' s cottages. Staff finds that this review standard is met. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding: The historic significance of the home, which was built in 1889, will not be affected by this addition. The owner has done a good deal of research into its construction, which is included in the application. Staff finds that this standard is met. 4 .. i The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity Of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: The only work that will directly affect the historic resource is restorative in nature. As discussed above, staff finds that the addition has been sensitively designed and will not detract from the architectural character and integrity of the house. Staff finds that this standard is met. PARTIAL DEMOLITION No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all ofthe following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Staff Finding: The areas proposed to be demolished are recent construction and there are no issues with their demolition. Staff finds that this standard is met. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding: The project is appropriate, as discussed above. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant conceptual approval including a 12 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 3.2 foot west sideyard setback variance for the existing location of the historic house, a 2.25 foot west sideyard setback variance for a small section of the proposed addition, and a 405 square foot FAR. bonus. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution # ~ ~ Series of 2002, granting conceptual approval, partial demolition, and variances for 323 W. Hallam Street, Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado." LD-CD Bvg '37<f>l> ru 9 1 9- 49 lomÂ«.1 ~19 U J 5 .. Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2002 A. Staff memo dated April 24,2002 B. Design Guidelines relevant to this project at the conceptual level C. Application 6 .. Relevant Design Guidelines- Conceptual Review, 323 W. Hallam 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. o Reducing an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or increasing it to receive a larger window is inappropriate. o Consider reopening and restoring an original window opening where altered. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. o Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. o A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. 8.3 Avoid attaching a garage or carport to the primary structure. o Traditionally, a garage was sited as a separate structure at the rear of the lot; this pattern should be maintained. Any proposal to attach an accessory structure is reviewed on a case-by-case basis. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. o In general, a lightwell is prohibited on a wall that faces a street (per the Residential Design Standards). The size of a lightwell should be minimized. A lightwell that is used as a walkout space may be used only in limited situations and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. If a walkout space is feasible, it should be surrounded by a simple fence or rail. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 7 00 .. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. o An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. o A 1-story connector is preferred. o The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. o The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. o Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. o Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. o Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. o If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. o Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. 8 00 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT, PARTIAL DEMOLITION AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 323 W. HALLAM STREET, LOTS D AND E, BLOCK 43, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2002 Parcel ID #: 2735-124-34-002 WHEREAS, the applicants, Peter Rispoli and Donna DiIanni, have requested Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition, and Variances approval for the property located at 323 W. Hallam Street, Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subj ect site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adj acent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood o f the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: .. a) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and b) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated April 24,2002 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines," and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on April 24, 2002 the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards and the design guidelines, and approved the application with a vote of_ to _. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves conceptual development, partial demolition and variances for the property located at 323 W. Hallam Street, Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite of Aspen including a 12 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 3.2 foot west sideyard setback variance for the existing location of the historic house, a 2.25 foot west sideyard setback variance for a small section ofthe proposed addition, and a 405 square foot FAR bonus. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 24th day of April, 2002. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name 3:k3 4. Ela l\Arn StrreÂ·1- AreU&+ia. 2. Project location 99.3 \N, Wa le,vâ€¢ S .U..O, Aspen , CO Lots D and E, BioLK 4.3 (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning R-6 4. Lot size 604 too 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Pe,ter gisÂ·peli a *d Den- O:Lusni - '69.8 4â‚¬94- 1-4.liern C+, Aspe 05 116,4 544 694-7 H, 945 -9*11 C 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number Se:4 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA ~< Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption 7< Demo,1%RErne@B) View Plane Condominiumization DesigRReview Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate lqÂ· ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) I h Story 1- Be,troovns 1- barthd ,;Ills,1*+ 9. Description of development application Acid l,Am- car *arcl~a Mual rBaM starâ€¢q e, kitihen/Fam; Â¥ .1.aa Q,n,f A Ke.11~en b.64-h k clâ€¢4+5- Bls:emen* -Fer $40,4.9., 4.-Be.lroaâ€¢n,5 51-S,Alks an,1 a r IC. roa.1 - 10. Have you completed and attached the following? / Attachment 1- Land use application form 4 Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form , Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachments~ and 5 11111111 .. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Pele r 154,-6 ps 1 ; Address: -313 We st Nall.1 vvi S t, Aspen 00â‚¬]cti Zone district: R-b Lot size: 60'* 100' Existing FAR: 1721 Allowable FAR: 3 9-40 Proposed FAR: 5'645 Existing net leasable (commetcial): n./a Proposed net leasable (commercial): 11/0 Existing % of site coverage: 2 1 14 f ! 4 Do -2â€ž T t, ) Proposed % of site coverage: 6-7 % f 9 , ej, 4 s~fl j Existing % of open space: -7 7 G Proposed % of open space: 6%Di Existing maximum height: Principal blda: 24'Â«' Accesory bldg: w.,., Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 1.4.- D" Accessorv blda: N.Â« Proposed % of demolition: A i Storic- 0 % (Â°'roft Only Existing number of bedrooms: 1 Proposed number of bedrooms: 5 Existing on-site parking spaces: A On-site parking spaces required: 4 Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: rt Front: \3.05 Front: io' Front: )3.05 5 Rear: 33.0, Rear: 5' Rear: 5 Combined Combined , Combined N.+5. Front/rear: 46.05' Front/rear: 30 FronUrear: 10.05 \hi Side: l.R Side: 5' E Side: S. E Side: 26.60' Side: 1,01 Side: I n. Combined Combined Combined Sides: 9.-7.g Sides: 1 5 Sides: \5 Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Exist ing en:rod.2 4.,r At Â£ abt WS'.Anclry - A,dA,4-1 orâ€¢ w Ill e BAL ,7 7 -'. 4 4 0 sc-4 v.:w K - de,mo o-f r, Yi,0. 4 w I (\ 1 sson e -ero,kh.-câ€¢.4 Variations requested: Front, Rear * Eue 9 -r loacks FA R &,Avoc 405 ~ f# (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) .. HPC General Submission Requirement # 3 Disclosure of Ownership rL 1 14.Â»+ZL J PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. P.O. BOX 1417 23286 HIGHWAY 82 SUITE 22 BASALT, CO~17 970-927-4993 1 970-927-4096 FAX JANUARY 13, 2000 PETER RISPOLI AND DONNA DI IANNI 323 WEST HALLAM STREET ASPEN, CO 8161] RE: LOTS D AND E, BLOCK 43, ASPEN PCT14542C3 Pitkin County Title, Inc. is pleased to provide you with the owners policy relative to the above mentioned file. Please review the policy in its entirety. We at Pitkin County Title, Inc. believe in providing you, our customer, with a quality product which will serve your needs. In the event you do find a discrepancy, or if you have any questions or comments regarding your final policy, please contact us and we will gladly handle any request you may have as efficiently and quickly as possible. We have assigned the above number to your records to assure prompt processing of future title orders involving the property. If you sell or obtain a loan on this property within 5 years, ask your broker or agent to contact our office to ensure re-issue rates which may be available to you. Thank you very much for giving Pitkin County Title, Inc. the opportunity to serve you. Sincerely, li*il'; '., 3-' 'C c?-ry txurÂ£,Â·â€žEl RGLynne VanBuren ENCS: COPY OF TAX CERTIFICATE FOR QUESTIONS ON YOUR FINAL TITLE POLICY, PLEASE CONTACT ROILYNNE VANBUREN AT THE ABOVE NUMBER TO PLACE NEW ORDERS FOR A SALE OR RE-FINANCE. PLEASE CONTACT KIM SHULTZ AT THE ABOVE NUMBER. .. HPC General Submission Requirement #1 Applicant Info Peter Rispoli Donna DiIanni 323 West Hallam Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tel. 970-544-6947 Fax. 970-544-6961 HPC General Submission Requirement #2 Location ofDevelopment 323 West Hallam Street Lots D and E, Block 43 Aspen, CO PCT 14542C3 Current Map ~ .\ f 4 % 4 HPC General Submission Requirement t # 4 Vicinity Map \ I L \\\ 4. i Gillespie St 14/8 mugger St ~46'Th Sf 0 . f G .,Hal.. 4 234. ~ f f f W MAIN ST Beeker St E E MAIN ST 0 6 E Ale#, St 0 - , . 0 f: COE g : 8 2 ~ nab GO L.-- E COOPER AV 2 0 t k i f $ : 4 (82) ' COPYRIGHT Â© 1984-1995 ETAK INC, .1 1, 04 Caiu, Crook Rd i IEL, U}tril(1(Ell VUL..11111Â©JIWII I \UMul.&111&110 # 5 Site P~i 'Â« . Hallam Street ...] Â£ U J - ~ ' Old Cottonwood Trees . - , (City of Aspen) '11 ' C -3 1 .) - r 1 , 1 1 ' 11| ati PORCH ! 5-U , 1 1 - 11 1 -' .1- 1 Existing 3 5 3 L 4. House I IJ ' i , N Mature Apple Tree 1 Â»--E i. 1 - - -1 f , L -' , 2 1 >- T i : 1 U 4 11 1 i -* 1 1 Room 1=zE 1-1 2 11!1 ADDITION I Addition 11 1 i it:, Mud 1 Room ' 1 1 11 1 I c====--1 11 1 1 1- C=dll 1 <0 L=- ..,=li 5 iÂ· ri- f GARAGE L <- 1 1 - Alley 1 .. HPC General Submission Requirement # 7 Written Description of Proposed Addition: 1 M story addition with full basement below addition. Basement Rec. room, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, laundry, utility and storage. First Floor Kitchen/Family area, mudroom, 2-car garage. Second Floor 1 bedroom, bath, closets FAR Calculations: Existing House: 1 St Floor 889 24 Floor 833 Total Existing House 1,722 sq. ft. Addition: ist Floor 711 952 2nd Floor Garage (>250) 125 Garage (>500) 9 Basement* 126 Total Addition 1,923 sq. ft. Total Proposed 3,645 sq. ft. Total Allowed 3.240 sq. ft. Bonus FAR required: 405 sq. ft. (* Exposed wall \ Total Wall x Total Floor = Basement Total Sq. Ft.) Description: The proposed additions design is sensitive to the original homes architectural character and scale. Careful consideration was given not to overpower the existing home with an addition. Plate heights have been held to 3 feet on the second floor which will compliment the size, scale and massing of the original home. Gables match the existing homes rooflines and width. Dormers, also appropriately scaled, have been utilized where headroom is required. The footprint of the addition will yield rectangular modules and intersecting gables that are visually compatible. The addition has been located entirely to the rear of the lot to minimize any visual competition with the existing house. A connector has been incorporated into the design and it's size and scale should visually separate the existing home from the addition. .. HPC General Submission Requirement # 8 Additional Materials, Documentation or Reports History of Ownership 323 West Hallam Street Records indicate the following: 05/09/85 H.C. Gilbert to D.E. Frantz 10/07/87 D.E. Frantz to J.B. Wheeler & Co. (Log Cabin on lot E) 05/17/89 Town of Aspen to Edward Gray 03/06/90 Edward Gray to D.M. VanHovenberg 05/-/97 J.B. Wheeler & Co. to Herbert L. McNair 10/09/97 Herbert L MeNair to Sarah L. Lowary 08/28/64 Francis Lawary to Mary E Griffith 11/02/65 Mary E Griffith to Peter Vought 12/14/73 Peter Vought to Tom & Sharon Prior / /95 Tom & Sharon Prior to James Denkins 12/20/99 James Denkins to Peter Rispoli & Donna DiIanni .. HISTORICAL RESEARCH FOR: 323 West Hallam Street Aspen, Colorado Historicallv Significant Owners of Record D.EFranz J.B.Wheeler & Co. D.M. VanHoevenberg The Aspen Directory from the 1880's and 1890's was very helpful in piecing together 323 West Hallam's history. Unfortunately the archives at the Historical Society contain only directories for the years 1885,1889,1892,1893. While the City of Aspen's records of property transactions clearly indicate the owners name during those years it is The Aspen Directory that lists the person name who actually lives in the home. "The Aspen Directory" in 1885 (inaugural edition) listed: "Gilbert, Clf# miner, Hallam, between 2~d &3 rd â€ž It appears that Cliff Gilbert, the miner, built a small log cabin on lot E. Cliff Gilbert sold the cabin to D.E. Franz who is not listed in The Aspen Directory for any of the years available. It is well known that D.E. Franz owned a local sawmill and constructed many houses in the neighborhood. In any case, Franz sold the cabin and the lots (ABDE) 21/4 years later to J.B. Wheeler and Co. Wheeler then sold 114 years later in May 1889 to "Edward Gray." 323 W. Hallam was built in 1889. An Aspen Daily Times newspaper was found inthe recess ofawall dated August 1889. My guess is the home was completed in October 1889 in a very "hot sellers real estate market. Since The Aspen Directory from 1890 is not available it is uncertain whether Edward Gray lived in the house or if he just built the house and sold it 10 months later on March 6, 1890 to D.M. VanHoevenberg. Four years before 323 W. Hallam was built, D.M. VanHoevenberg was working as the "cashier" for J.B. Wheeler & Co., Bankers (see attached ad - Aspen Daily Times: Sept. 12,1885). The Directory lists: r. 232 East Hallam. Also in the 1885 Directory is: VanHovenberg M. Mrs., r. 232 East Hallam. 1 think Mrs. M. VanHoevenberg is D.M..'s .. mother and they shared the house. By 1889 the Directory listed. VanHoevenberg Mrs. M., (M. VanHoevenberg & Co.) "The Corner Drug Store, " Corner of Mill & Hyman. In 1889, as Aspen's growth was in full swing, J.B. Wheeler ran an ad in the Aspen Directory: "J.B. Wheeler & Co., Bankers, Established in 18833 Further stating "The Oldest Bank House in Colorado - D.M. Vanhoevenberg, Cashier, H.T. Tissington - Assistant Cashier and Fred Adams- paying teller. " Obviously things were going well for J.B. Wheeler in those heady days. D.M. VanHoevenberg was also doing rather well since he now had two assistants: H.T. Tissington and Fred Adams. D.M. VanHoevenberg purchased 323 West Hallam St from Edward Gray. In 1892. however, The Aspen Directory listed: Brown C. Leonard. mining engineer, rooms 5 and 6 Brown and Cowenhoven Block, r. 323 West Hallam St. It seems likely that D.M. Vanhoevenberg never occupied the house and it may have been strictly an investment property. The 1892 Directory continues to list D.M.'s residence as 232 East Hallam. By this time he had left J.B. Wheeler and The Aspen Directory lists him as: VanHovenberg D.M., Proprietor, "The Corner Drug Store.," 400 E. Hyman. R. 232 East Hallam. Mrs. M. VanHovenberg was listed simply: VanHovenberg Mrs. M.. r. 232 East Hallam. Upon his departure from the bank, subsequent ads run in the Aspen Daily Times show that H.T. Tissington got the nod to become "Head Cashier" for J.B. Wheeler. As Aspen crashed with the Sherman Act D.M. VanHoevenberg held onto 323 West Hallam Street. C. Leonard Brown lived in the House through at least 1893 or 1894. Again, The Aspen Directory was not published after 1893. Eventually, in 1897 D.M. VanHoevenberg sold the property back to his long-time friend and employer J.B. Wheeler. It's possible, D.M. VanHovenberg may have died in 1897 and upon his death, left his affairs to Jerome Wheeler to take care. Wheeler "Assigned the Deed" to Herbert L. MeNair. H.L. MeNair was listed in the business section of the Directory under "Attorneys." Records show 5 months later Herbert L MeNair (QCD) to Sarah L. Lowary. .. The Lowary family occupied the house for the next 67 years until 1964. I was able to find Sarah L. (Louise) Lowary's daughter Eloise (Lowary) Ilgen who resides in Carbondale. Elloise was born in the house at 323 West Hallam in 1926. Her mother, was also born in the house, in 1897. Ellouise Ilgen was able to provide me with some interesting insights into the house. Most notable and at the same time unfortunate was her recollection of a fire in the house around 1958 or so. The fire started upstairs when an "oil heater" spilled and ignited. The unfortunate aspect of the fire is that all her family photographs were lost. I was hoping she might be able to provide some sort of photo documentation of the house from earlier times and specifically the Street Elevation. . Francis Lowary sold to Mary Griffith is 1964 and she in turn sold to Peter Vought in 1967. According to neighbors and Eloise Ilgen it was Peter Vought that made some of the more significant changes to the house. Vought added the eight-sided "tower," the rear porch roof and the garage around 1968. Vought sold to Tom and Sharon Prior in 1973. The Priors sold to James Denkins in 1995. James Denkins sold 323 West Hallam to Peter Rispoli and Donna DiIanni in December 1999. -,I tr .. 7 Â· 1 r 1 ~. 1 , 11.1- 1,1 111 1 - Â· f' I -1 01'; 11't;, 4 -ac L % ..Â¥14 * ' 11 k . ,-Â· .i -1* 7~.-*~Â·t %'tÂ·1# 1 9â‚¬;~i.Â·- 44 ' 7 1 ' i ~~~4 'A t 4 3,Â»tÂ·. a -, ~6r-: â€ž4*4*,Rum#w0*94#*#m,94*Â£4%*ARR~M#t+r# 4,472# 4 43~,- ~Â·' ; I *i....r '.trÂ·- :6..,.t .. -,= ~'+ * %-*Â¥edâ€ž0Â·4'4,-4:~3-Â·Â· -ni:%4Â·: -ri/,9 9 4 .,# Â·4#' -' '*4 45 â€¢,Â·4Â·44Â·96*Â·...AY*.Ati,r.0.:;f~~*544&4Â£2)* Â·ty#M.WE)*W-'Â° f,SI,-7~ 1<,4;:9~y' r~11,ul*idleanvkh,0IffGl*Mi*(NA?9,M:V .:,: :94,1~,- ~t~*B~ 3?:~2;.t :?%11.,ftâ‚¬>:F~~ 4-~;' ~~~~~~.~A~.I -~Â·.~~ ~.1.1'r.:Ji'.JT. - 11 .7. ' -: . I.,''' **111*84*41.00.s~hare and*eant.â€¢lt 1 ~~~~4%: * pible; to Keep the Best t , Consistin*ofl ** aidgelalinfa#Abt ma~oo~~rl?pi25 Thekq- drlthe Lovvest~FFTZ~- FORT*!-' f,otoer*,ospany -uperaMAR-- . . .-Jt, Uitt, .Ita --reÂ¥*nnes frioth property ' eftbaki#ines oremifficient to insnre: ceS--ThisÂ·is Our Prin- I. â‚¬ tateady p#yment Of diÂ¥idenda on the f QueenÂ«* ffeÂ¢red*oak Among prominentinia. ~ Ciple -and .is -thv 'Â·Pm#rtletrin irhicb>-it le largelyÂ· inÂ· 1 t31#NlfÂ©29 8*g& | FoundaticM of the Success aj, ar A prâ€¢m,larity of_ the - . AI1 GroodS_90 td[-At [ Â·Â·the Little Annie group - E-Biliaeent -*toperty on BiohÂ·"nnd , Corner Drdg Store. ed stock in the cifyi UNDER~ .-Savefal of these properties will be kin#*gu?#phipfeitts of minemi bt-- ~4an Hoevenbarth & 00Â· ~*01&6Met@-Â·m.=u-1-12/<8-par*ut:_ - M the prooeede will also be divided TELEPHeN44-82~--_2 ing-tbie holder* of Continental Di- Dstoek. The company is praotioally i Wheeler Opera House ! - - -- ot debt, but there are liens against 1~7. ka:of the property recently purchased the management-has-decided to sell J. 13. WHEELE*0 - - - Proprietor id#ent preferred stock to pay the liens R J. CUTLER, Â· - - - - Manager eecure'a fand to ' open bhe valuable # 1 ing territory owned und controlled he company, As the stock is sold, -hatof..emt*dollar received will b :'conz[ ING,4.-& ----~ lied to the payment of liens on prop -and-Lha-other balf placed to the .........Mi./. litot tlie development fund 80 that ~ . -.- receipts from mineral and other SALISBURY'S urobs, can be paid to stockholders. d-the - 15th -of-evary _ ___- _ th. For partioulars and full lists of erties and enterprises of the com- f-mnt-thuvrul Mau.ger, 312 )er avenue, Aspen, Colorado. â‚¬J Double Loeomotives. WILL APPEAR ~.WAIT -= 8 Railroad Gazette calls attention to ible locomotive for the Indian Btate Smelting, S October 7,1889 Milling, mrs which is -8 novel departure from utuaâ€¢euplaotice. Tile design ia really I Â·n,knant double header: thht is. it is FOR ---~1MFS,-~~~~~~~~6 - 44 4 I Â· . . 7 -,IL_- . I --.I - I - - 2 1,_ 1 2.-1 ,/./=4--=--*lbr- Et'if 1 - L- L . . 4 - Tz:f,~elz '-Ele,er-=-Il V & . * + - I--T I h .: - , ,, .A '932*ElÂ¥2 -1.46* 1 .1 -1-11...SHN,P W. . 2. 2.-F'll 2.-4 -ap./Wei*uts'*i-425.:irt :*~LM Â«NE .Â»A ?49.9/<VQ..1eâ‚¬..2(,Â«eÂ»- '' 1 IC-- 1 -- m k- ~-r- 1 -9..tr I'*80< F. - 41 , St*CEâ‚¬.#*sea. , . Â·Â· - â€ž ., :eÂ·/60*K~ -7~41 z.* - , ' -1 1 2... 4.. 4..4 -4 '1 : 1 .:.:,d f **:aw./7,614 ) . if, 4.r I qr Â·Â· . 'RÂ·,Rik-.0~. :.i &# r#*th.. . ..Â· ..' ./4////ZL//A///'"1 " -' r - , , 1. 7.Â·. - -6 44 71:'d-zia'~ '2*b-1-4,< ya 41- ...â€ž-- . 1.. It ..It - 1 1.1 1 #1 -0.- U -4 14 . 25450 1-4- :543"Yit?~ Jt-Â·GV'NA;Izi:1... 1.*#J ..Â· / . Â·I - 4-5/1 .... .... $.r ,Â»rtzÂ·:-e 4. L 2 07 - tyÂ·. 'â€¢Er:.'j>; ... ..-1 '1 . I I. . ./I..... A $ I 14â„¢ i ;,~ - 4Â£-=*f,ti>~f--6 2,: I Z - , O-*'-562Â»â€¢.7.6... i...i2- . 3% -6,th>... ...,.4,--r---= .,0 :1..1.*<1.1 1 . .. -ti ./ :,01- ut.~S' I Gl':-;.04+T . I - I Waf//4*f-Â£*M/9<1im/Tlba42#F* r~,ftlÂ·â‚¬2~34:1tff?: 41FU~. f:~4~2JF4t , 1:.-.1 -.1.T~-~ ~*~ z - 1 ' D B ta 0, ~ I. 1Â¥@Â». Lu_.'Wy?jÂ«/idÂ·atÂ» I~ i . , ~**,7;-â€¢EN AT - 16AW* = I. 4 ...4... /* 1....r-/.5 .1"9':~LI/.:i yi~â€ž- -Â· 4. â€¢i ./Â· 7 ' a ...r 1 x 'LI %-fÂ¢ - Â»f th, M. 31'.2/"M' 41**I Am*~ BE.D.~*81*" -- . &0461Â¥11 1%6: 9,1*rod~ed*- 1Â£*majr van . . I . 1 mt.2,Â«42:,~Â»24Ii-,0 801â€¢ A . 16<Witbin thirtk dii>4 4/Ur Irbe -tÂ·Â·4 GINMatfl 4*&*Â¥41*:T, 6 - 14.j tAblic 11,81*66- 2 idlidlt entfy. &*d#160 (04Â£741\ 01 'hirl Nel ' 887.00â€¢11*1Â» IN 1860. i. ausociatiolfijr company of et_ ~ 2.,A.75218 Rample* by mnil er ulrn,m. will reookÂ¥â€¢pre,pt Imigg *9 1*~4Â®npalliti, 91, 094 .ir,1 0*reful .t: tioni '24#Id- *811 â€¢ilÂ¥.r bâ€¢lb.. ~AfÂ·An-*,t#oy of pOR#essron Of i rianed, melted[*n*1 *ad*d oruburifilâ€¢,led. Write .L:. I 4 / .â€¢ Â·101*, 20484 nitjai *lituti'minelj ' for *00***. 4,16 14*wrelic,il,tli#L7)611Â¥*r. Colo. ..74RB"./14//1. 4.-0,6*14:#tintl .Of *UdiHOUtiod~. .' .*2 4' -.1~-rebla@Eldlil/gllit m#jitti*>16*ting. iÂ·dikti.niagi< a i,~ nÂ¥*it#Â£*****Â» er..luto *1**ti-jifibwi~~*per&.M-+-7-4,;~. Â·. 'I~1~ t~~ ~ *trud**,--*44 411 per*{Mug:16&11-ji-4< f iURD.91%38*ntiedi . ir# AAR,edg~ SfeT il- \385 ASPEN PAILy-V\Akes 1 1. ..7 4 +Atit : 1 4, . 1 - 14- 4- , , . r .1 1 .'- ' I - '. 7 . 9 Â» 2 1 A. - 1 -- +2 , 1 . 1% ./6 ..,r': .4. 3%42.1, 71=.:12...1?3fs'.19.ef,f .' J,Tre': *02-,5,1. 41Â§39- .13.5- .40 f =r Â·- Â· ~An -13671 10:r:75-gt .. Â· .4**J~bit.1-~~'~~~'4/'. 63,134:4#0'ek.4.,-'.Â·:il:~AteÂ·'; t:.~~8 1,''I''F51*6 : , - ' 1 <4***14<4*81666 i Â¥6~ Itd 444#i641**Aclaa# .0 . 2- I + r.- . 0.Â·. ,Â·.th.u,u,I:r.. 05: 1 : .Â·~ 9,#4* 7/- 49 . .-.-9- Goods.As Y'" A *â€¢*4' 9 .Neau- r .- ..., '.. 11% ./ I : ./ ' 4243**nhas City. is .. ... , . ~.11{i:jk - I - ' i ' 16"16. 1 *,ettaon. quarters for*ine - 44Â·Â·13 4,42 .*07FÂ·Â·0Â·~,492'Â·'- )-* ' : -. - ~,' AdheerisÂ¥,dll: knowh merdhant 7,4 ' -3-t/.1 . -7--,41:4 Li#known -minlilge ~ruirs# FihhinÂ¢ Tackle, Toj-::- I , 1. .... 4-1- ..1171Â¥.-4.==, :2 144189 $*aot T.eadvf# )0*Jiheeity.. '- let -AHicles, is at the 444 {hrleah has *tome to Ashcroft to 1 ilil,qift Fork#RhiD-61aim, Ge Juditibs. Corner Drug Store . .'. .:...7- =27 .t.a*....=*~ I , . Â· t Â·2 + O E. Meyers, of- Garland, Kanias. arT ./.I~...a-/'.5- 1--I......h/-2/*Mpt/L.. - ived ,#the city Friday morning. _ t r6 e -Oldâ€¢ The 86115 Brothers' cirens and menag- rie will sbow in Aspen on the 29th. - Heavy Dry Goods Failure. --- 1 J~JÂ£ Norman J. White, a prominent citizen PHILADELPHIA, July 25.--Surprise was f Bonanza, Colorad~, 18 in the city. occasioned in business circles tbis morn- . Ung by the announcement that the firm - Furniture am W. A. Green le putting up a neat three of Lewis Bros. & C o.,wholesale dry goode ... Â®m cottage on East Hopkins avenue. dealers, Chestnut street, above 86â‚¬ond, Carly a Fill fla.41 0, UnrgAn iR huildine a line real- had made anassignment. While tbe ex- ence on Mill street on the bluff just be- aSt amount oau'L ad yel Le adogrtainod, 441.-0 A+B : it is tbought the liabilities will sum zip Rd the_gew Hptel Jerope. nearip.to= millions. The firm is one of - T. J.-Zollars. Mrs. S. W. Zollarn, F. N. thelargestin its line of business in the . ~ .~ ;rady and W. 0. Morrison, of Den rer, bitv, and perhaps in the country. It has . ~ m_mg#!teredatibe-Â£18221on.__ ho&ses in many large clties of the United 1 T]*lertaker and Mrs. W. B, Rootleft_.90 yeater day,9 -Flatal,noMl,W-Nuwark, 014;w,go, Ral [idland tram for Den ver, where she Will -*imere-and Boston.._Tke members of the firm resident in thia city are Gearge W. Imain about ten days visiting friends. Wharion, Joseph W. Lewis and Henry Judge R G. Withere returned yeeter -, Lewis. WhartoA, when seen this mora- ay from Frying Pan, where be had gone ing, promptly admitted the authenticity Ad~Er 1#obm#~a'81#~ska-#:~54~= Grtupr,206;'t;iC'lt~1~nadinauy#~-- Â· Th..6 1,66 firet day of tho grand gurn- 6 Culsignmont. Corneliâ€žm W 13liâ€¢â€¢1 of the er.Inge-mnatin st. Atbletic Park. Firet 1 New York ilrm ot Biiss. Fabui u & Câ€ž.,1.e oe will be called-- ---promplry -- it letated.-was the assignee, p "I am ouable," contÂ·inned Wharton, 80 p. m- "to place the amount of our liabilities. The Midiay,d train arrived at 2:15 this * However, I feel confident that they will amingr--Tberewerâ€¢ only s few- passeD. i nut be much -in---exeess- ef aseete; ..Of-_ ;rs on board. The road is not yet en- course it'B impossible to determine these Â·elY repaired. things until an examination of the books . - ' has been made. We are now going over The family of Mr. M. O. Sherman has 1111 our books and will Drobably kuow more st takeo possese}on of the newly built I d.,finitely how and where we staud." - ttage on East Hopkins avenue, owned "If we could have had only two idr Mrs.~Gillespie, I three days more I am sure we would rheÂ·first case in the police court for ' have been able to tide over tbe dificult. ree davs was the trial of Jim MeCou rt i 188, but the blow fell just nt the worst 1.4.-- A-.,nl. n. 117.8...An,â€¢ Â¤o n.Â·no ' time and anr nnlv course was to make . r.,â€¢â€¢ r.i ... 03-0 Ly 9- 4 Â£ 8 sci ASPEN PA,l LY 1--1~g-9 re .. West Hallam Street Old Cottonwood Trees (City of Aspen) E. 1 Existing ~ House 0 4 i K Mature Apple Tree * Illy Z 11 Room 1 1 I 1 \\21 - - 1 ADDITION Addition 7-- ! 1.H lic ' Mud Room i GARAGE ' - 1 Alley - FIRST FLOOR PLAN r. .. 15'1 Â· A I peters I Bedroom ,- i i L ~STORAGE ~ 0 V. CLOSET Max's - CLOSET I 4 Bedroom Study NOOK~ BATH -1 9 2, CLOSET X - kf'Â» HALL CONNECTOR r, T H rN DRESSING - - ~-OPEN BELOW ' BATH OPEN BELOW BEDROOM ~ 1 " 1 1, ~ 1 --U,---~-LLP-~1 18 < - DECK 11 274 2ND FLOOR PLAN 12'7 .. 11 LE BEDROOM 1 U-T~ FAMILY ~LL 1 J Hi J EEI C] | IZI BEDROOM u.,Ul-Â·Â¥ , e) 1 BATH --L--~ .-0-l - _Il-= 1 LAUNDRY L '"/LL 1 STORAGE BASEMENT LEVEL 4 ~. 1 Lk= - irt Ad . 84*7 . I. 004#*#T .AP "I t.t fle f.f:- p*.4.1 4, I . 1 1 4*194 2- .Il" 0. . ... - - , I 11 ..1.--iu, â‚¬ I difitf*flk' il , M , 0 ~.144,1-1 , 41#% it; 3.Â·~**:f': 1. ft 1, 7-/21//1.4//9/'Iâ€¢ . 8 61*flk'tz,(Ii f.:4,4: ~ 4.f: 3 3.NttÂ·*?1:4:t;f,~3~Â·f"jÂ·~?%;Â·Lf ,~.6.~3', 4-7242+ 4..'~''' 3.1 91.,3-t#*Â· .. '0 24Â»Â·1404Â·-Â·-gâ€¢Â·. *, . 4 -Il.:I-.-I I. -/P ..m.' â€¢r t '121' ' - ~ . 1 --- 4 Â·Â·Â·11*"4. dljfars;*,%,6 4=*.Â»s--7--.--~ . . -.,u ?. 61-:,931%,f~~[1'.3 ~ i f i~f,~.4,4,~yp.6<3>Â¥Â·Qi;?f ' 1(di &94:6 w'itk~*,#~~, ~1~~i~*PY.~45',MtÂ¢~(:f~~Â·-~tj]1 + - 41,4.. :~t. 1,2,2Jâ‚¬R.iÂ«C{51.taIy'.f~I~~f.r *%*'ITAM,4 , 4:4 -Â·Â·.Al.. 1 .. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 3-8 [4/ f 90 )6 4 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 41 1-l-\ I An_ , 200- 1 1 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 111_ I, 011 v ;Li f s L i li rf r (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 4 Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the priblication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained fromyte Community Development Department, which was made o f suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not Â» less than one inch in height. Sid notice was posted at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses o f property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text o f this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other stifficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 2011Â«01 >4natur i AL Thegoregoj~ '-Affidavit of 1~0oti~,wyas ackqowledged before , thistÂ·Il-Way 1-,3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 323 W HALLAM MAJOR DEVELOPMENT RE- VIEW (CONCEPTUAL) AND VARIANCES , WITNESS MY HAND AND OFF-ICIAL SEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on We.'nesday, April 24,2002 at a t- meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen i Historic Preservation Commission, City Council ~ 4 r 2 / DIE>22~ ; Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Gatena St., Aspen, to My commission expires: 5 consider an application submitted by Peter Ris- -,<2>.>-c-k.1& '2 poli and Donna Dilanni requesting Major Develop- ment Review (Conceptual) for the property locat- ed at 323 W Hallam St. The property is legally 5 -,02*-1 /49,3.0.9.94* described as Lots D and E, Block 43, City and 7 Townsite of Aspen. The project requires the fol- Notary Public y ~Â·.. C ~ lowing variances: a 12 foot combined front and "f ,:Â»R .O j rear yard setback variance, a 3.2 foot west side- f yard setback variance for the existing location of the historic house, a 2.25 foot west sideyard set- fl i vl~ ;i back variance for a . mal[ section of the proposed 10\ Â·Â· , addition. and a 405 square foot FAR bonus. f For further information. contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development De- partment, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 92{1- COLOR,v 5096, amyg@ci.aspe..co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission ATTACHMENTS: Published in The Aspen Times on April 6, 2002. (8585) COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED B Y MAIL HPC Design Guidelines Building Additions Project: 323 West Hallam St. The following pages are meant to list and reply to applicable HPC Guidelines when constructing an addition. .. 1.) Minimize negative effects to the buildingfabric. The connection is made where the current utility room and hall is located. The garage/carport with deck above will be removed. There is little, if any, removable building fabric involved. 2.) The addition should not affect the perceived character of the building. Loss of character can be avoided by locating the addition to the rear. The addition has been placed behind and to the rear of the existing home. 3.) The overall design of the addition must be in keeping with the design character of the historic structure as well. 4.) Guideline 10.6: Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. The overall design character of the addition, as proposed, is meant to compliment the original home by maintaining the same roof pitch (14/12), 2nd floor plate heights (3 feet) as well as the 18' width gables which should be visually compatible with the original homes size, scale and massing. The home sits on its original "foundation" which of course means it also sits low to the ground. It will be necessary to step up about 15" into the addition since the property slopes up several feet from front to back. You'll see this elevation change in the elevation drawings. The final rise will be determined upon completion of a topo survey. The rakes on the original home include rosettes and other details and the gables contain scalloped cedar shakes painted in contrasting colors. The addition will not attempt to imitate this level of detail. The addition is designed to "shadow" the original homes shape and to be complimentary without demanding the visual spotlight. 5.) At the same time an addition should be distinguishable from the historic portion, such that the evolution of the building can be understood. This may be accomplished in a subtle way, with a jog in the wall planes or by using a trimboard to define the connection. Keeping the size of the addition small, in relation to the main structure, also will help minimize its impacts. u an addition must be larger, it should be set apartfrom the historic building and connected with a smaller linking element. This will help maintain the perceived scale and proportion of the historic portion. The addition has been placed as far to the rear of the lot as possible. The connector is up to 15 M feet long on the west side and its roof height is substantially lower. The exterior siding will be a combination of beveled (clapboard) siding and cedar shakes separated by a trim board. The size. scale, volume and length of the linking element should give the original home enough "breathing room." Skylights placed near the ridge of the connector are also intended to lower the visual reference. 6.) Consider the effect additions have on the character of the neighborhood as seen from the street. Locating the addition to the rear could be a better solution in such a case. The character of the neighborhood should be minimally impacted visually since the addition has been located to the rear of the property as much as possible. .. 7.) When designing an addition to a building the maximumiloor area is not guaranteed g it cannot be appropriately accommodated on the site. In some cases, smaller additions may be necessary. The existing home is located 21 inches from the west boundary. The carport/garage will be removed and the addition will be set back the required 5 feet, thus lessoning the existing encroachment. The combined front setback (13.55 feet) and rear setback (5 feet) is 18.05 feet (R-6 zones require a combined 30 feet.) The design proposes to vary from this requirement in order to comply with HPC Guidelines (10.8) suggestion to -provide a minimum of 10 feet for a linking element (15.5 feet is planned)." The additions side yard set backs will comply with R-6 zoning. The removal of the encroaching carport/garage (20 feet in length) will improve the current encroachment on the west boundary considerably. The site should easily accommodate the design and placement of the proposed addition. 8.) Existing Additions: Preserve an older addition that has achieved historic significance in its own right. An eight-sided "tower" was added on to the home in 1968. I believe the overall proportions of the tower aren't quite right for the existing home. It's a little wide, a little short and a little out of scale with the existing house. In any case, the planned addition will not effect the former addition. A rear porch was also added in 1968. It too is poorly proportioned. It also attempts to mimic the original front porch with tacky looking "Victorian" trim. I would like to remove the rear porch entirely. 9.) New Additions: Design a new addition such that ones ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. The linking element should provide the visual separation necessary to differentiate old from new. Jogs in the connector and a change in paint colors for siding and trim should further enhance ones ability to interpret the historic character of the original home. 10.) A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. The design philosophy was to create and "architectural shadow" of the existing home. With this approach in mind visual consistencies are created and the historic character is preserved. 11.) An addition that seeks to imply an earlierperiod otherthan that of the primary building is inappropriate. The design does not attempt to imitate or imply an earlier period of architecture. It is hoped that the proposed addition will be viewed as "historical" at some point in 323 W. Hallam's history. 12.) An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. Again, the design philosophy was to create and "architectural shadow" of the existing home. .. 13.) An addition that covers historically signijicant features is inappropriate. No historically significant features will be covered. 14.) Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. The small (5' wide) wrap-around deck planned for the rear is in keeping with the philosophy that an addition should be a "product of its own time." In 1889 no one cared about the views ofAjax Mountain. In fact, it was an industrial looking view. Today, of course, watching skiers come down Ruthie's Run on a sunny afternoon can and should influence the additions design. I'm suggesting that while HPC Guideline (10.9) states, "flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions," consideration should be given to the guideline that states "additions design be a product of its own time" as well (HPC Guideline - 10.4). 15.) An addition should be made distinguishable fromthe historic building while also remaining visually compatible with these earlierfeatures. Again, the design philosophy was to create and "architectural shadow" of the existing home. 16.) A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. The location of the addition, changes in color and materials used and the inclusion of the connector element will make it easily understood what is old and what is new. 17.) Preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street. No changes will occur that will affect alignments on the street. 18.) Some roojlines and porch eaves on historic buildings in the area may align at approximately the same height. An addition should not be placed in a location where these relationships would be altered or obscured. Visual relationships will not be altered or obscured. 19.) An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. The addition design proposes similar plate heights (3' on 2nd floor - 1/2 story) gable widths (18 feet) and roof pitch (14/12). This will match the existing homes proportions closely. Again, the property slopes up to the rear and you'll notice that the addition will step up accordingly (15" +/-) as shown on the elevation drawing. 20.) U it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from signijicantfacades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. A connecting element has been included in the design and has been set back as much as possible. .. 21.) A 1-story connector is preferred. A one-story connector has been included. 22.) The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. The connector is 15'-6" in length on the west side. 23.) The connector should be proportional to the primary building. The proportions are appropriately sized. 24.) 10.8 Place an addition to the rear of a building or setit back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. Again, the addition has been placed to the rear. 25.) Locating an addition at the front is inappropriate. The location is not in the front. 26.) Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement, which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. Floor area has been located under the building in the proposed design. 27.) Setback an addition fromprimary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10Jeet on primary structures is recommended. The design is in compliance with this guideline. 28.) 10.8 Roofforms should be similar to those of the historic building. Roof forms have been designed to be similar to the existing home. 29.) Gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. The roof plan has intersecting gables and dormers have been sized (12' width) to be subordinate in size to the main gables. 30.) 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. No historically important architectural features will be destroyed or obscured. 31.) Loss or alteration ofarchitectural details, cornices and eave lines should be avoided. No loss or alteration of architectural details will occur. 00 32.) 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. The materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. Painted beveled wood siding and cedar shake gables are planned. The original house has scalloped cedar shakes in the gables. This detail will not be included the additions gable. The rosettes and other details in the gable's rakes, as mentioned earlier. will also not be repeated in the addition as well. This will yield a subordinate relationship to the original materials. .. Additional Preservation Efforts Project: 323 West Hallam St. There are a number of projects aimed at preservation to be undertaken during the construction of the proposed addition. Front Porch The front porch has some structural issues that I would like to address. The inside corner around the horizontal header appears to be rotten inside allowing the entire porch in that area to sag miserably. I propose exploratory surgery: remove the roofing and sheathing and repair or replace as necessary. Roof The entire roo f needs to be replaced. There are no leaks in the house however; the roof was installed with inadequate over hang near the fascia boards and "lips" onto the trim and soffits in some areas. In addition, the roofwas installed on a black composite material available in the late 1950's. You can easily break this material with your bare hands. For a short time it was used for sheathing walls. It came in 4x8' sheets which was a lot quicker than nailing 1"x6" sheathing boards. I believe the Lowary's (owners in the 1897 to 1964) installed the -new" material to repair a 1958 fire (see History of 323 Hallam attached). This composite material is not and was not at the time of installation, suitable for a roof. We would like to remove the sheathing and roofing material and install machine-cut cedar shakes (the original roofing material installed in 1889). This would be a considerable undertaking but I feel that the roof is a prominent visual element as viewed from the street. Consideration for this restoration effort from the HPC would go a long way when reviewing my request for additional FAR. Front Wall Restoration The horizontal kitchen window on the front elevation was installed in the late 1960's or early 1970's. It was installed in order to accommodate a kitchen counter. I would like to restore the front facade. I looked through all the available photo archives at the Aspen Historical Society and books on Aspen and found no record. I asked by neighbors across the street (Gretl and Tony Uhl). Tony's recollection: "there were two windows separated by wall." Removal of the horizontal window will have a big impact as viewed from the street. I suggest more exploratory surgery: remove the interior dry wall and look for headers, liners and other clues that would reveal its original configuration. .. ASPENNITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Fe.+P.r Rispli A,nri DonncA O I]Lann, (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for 3 & 3 W. Hallarn Qtrpet - A*1, t', an (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may acct-lIe following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ 251-09 55- which is for I 2- hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: 4-- 16 71 Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director Date: 31 lio/t Mailing Address: -3 13 \Al- Ha\6%, 91. A'Pah , CD 31611 g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01 .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name 30.3 'Al. Elcil\Q.n Street AJetâ€¢*+Zab 2. Project location 9 13 \N. Walle M S -Ex-Int, Aspen, CO Lots D and E, BIDLK 4.3 (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) t 3. Present zoning R-6 4. Lot size 604 IOO 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Peter gisvel; a Ad DÂ® nn. O; Ianni - 1651.8 ktm+ Ma &6'n C+, As pe'm 05 116/1 544 6947 H. 9 49 -9*1.1 C 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 9214 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA ~< Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption >< Derno<-aih~iD~e View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliVLot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate lqÂ· ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) 1 /6. Story 1 - Bejrnovns 1- barths ,;111 scf f-t 9. Description of development applicatio~Add l,Am- car rn-traam, Clar/ge, k#+Chen/ranâ€¢i Â¥ avaa, 1. -An.M -Purs; b~th, cloge+5. 21.reman* -Fer s-be.Las., 1-8,â€¢lroarn,5 2-Glm,Wis an.1 4 r 12. robw, - 10. Have you completed and attached the following? / Attachment 1- Land use application form 4 Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form , Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachments~and 5 11111111 .. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Pete rÂ· 1:44 9,01, Address: -313 West Mallinn St, Asfen 00 â‚¬]cli Zone district: R-b Lot size: 601% 1 00 Existing FAR: 1 -721 Allowable FAR: 3 140 Proposed FAR: 3'6 45 Existing net leasable (commetcial): n./0 Proposed net leasable (commercial): ./Al Existing % of site coverage: 2 1 54 f i L.~ An U..4 -/ 1 I . 1 Proposed % of site coverage: 37 51 f 4 41,4 t, ~ f + 1 Existing % of open space: 1-7*I g Proposed % of open space: 63'1 Existing maximum height: Principal blda: 24Â».f Accesorv bldg: w ~, Proposed max. height: Princigal bldg: 14'-D" Accessory blda: N.K Proposed % of demolition: Mis#oric-0% CO"OV'~Ov,19 Existing number of bedrooms: 1 Proposed number of bedrooms: 5 Existing on-site parking spaces: 1 On-site parking spaces required: a Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: 14 Front: \3.05 Front: io' Front: 13.05 s Rear: 33.0& Rear: 9' Rear: s. Combined Combined Combined N.+5. Front/rear:.*h.gy' Front/rear: 30 ' Front/rear: 10Â·05 \N Side: 1.2 Side: 5' E Side: E Side: 26.Do' Side: 1,01 Side: I n. Combined Combined Combined Sides: 9.-7,8 Sides: 1 5 Sides: 6 Existing nonconformities orencroachments: Existtng en:.foarr,Wrn-1- 2(13+ baw"Mry - AdA,tior, W ill ean< 12, Â·, 4 14' scÂ·46.,~cl< -4(.mo o~f rotrp'0. 4 w ,(\ 1 sson e ne re L kh#,-C â€¢#4 Variations requested: Front, Reor 4 9(1, : -r Loce hes FA R 2.onÂ·,c Hos ( 44Â· (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) .. HPC General Submission Requirement #1 Applicant Info Peter Rispoli Donna DiIanni 323 West Hallam Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tel. 970-544-6947 Fax. 970-544-6961 HPC General Submission Requirement #2 Location of Development 323 West Hallam Street Lots D and E, Block 43 Aspen, CO PCT 14542C3 .. HPC General Submission Requirement # 3 Disclosure of Ownership rL 1 1414ZLJ PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. P.O. BOX 1417 23286 HIGHWAY 82 SUITE 22 BASALT, CO~17 970-927-4993 1 970-927-4096 FAX JANUARY 13, 2000 PETER RISPOLI AND DONNA DI IANNI 323 WEST HALLAM STREET ASPEN, CO 8161] RE: LOTS D AND E, BLOCK 43, ASPEN PCT14542C3 Pitkin County Title, Inc. is pleased to provide you with the owners policy relative to the above mentioned file. Please review the policy in its entirety. We at Pitkin County Title, Inc. believe in providing you, our customer, with a quality product which will serve your needs. in the event you do find a discrepancy, or if you have any questions or comments regarding your final policy, please contact us and we will gladly handle any request you may have as efficiently and quickly as possible. We have assigned the above number to your records to assure prompt processing of future title orders involving the property. I f you sell or obtain a loan on this property within 5 years, ask your broker or agent to contact our office to ensure re-issue rates which may be available to you. Thank you very much for giving Pitkin County Title, Inc. the opportunity to serve you. Sincerely, i i U' 1 1 â€¢dÂ»rynÂ£' 'l '277 5Â£Viti-4 IMILynne VanBuren ENCS: COPY OF TAX CERTIFICATE FOR QUESTIONS ON YOUR FINAL TITLE POLICY, PLEASE CONTACT ROILYNNE VANBUREN AT THE ABOVE NUMBEN TO PLACE NEW ORDERS FOR A SALE OR RE-FINANCE. PLEASE CONTACT KIM SHULTZ AT THE ABOVE NUMBER. Current Map ~ % 440, % E 4. 00 HPC General Submission Requirement r # 4 Vicinity Map _ Gillespie St Nom, St W Smuggler St W Francis St U.,4. 26- f 2- W MAIN ST E Bleeker St 100 < 9 E MAIN ST 05 EMain Sl King St - . f f 0 nk E 0 ur G 0 W Dean St (It B PER.1, 0 (82) COPYRIGHT Â©198+1995 ETAK INC 16 Meadows Rd S 6/3 Castle Creek Rd nru Uelleldl OUUItlibbIUII r\CL~UltCHICIll #5 Sit/lan Hallam Street Old Cottonwood Trees _ (City of Aspen) / 11------------ PORCH 1 Existing i House 1 r Mature Apple Tree 1 ' 1 L.,------- - 6 - 1, B U~Irty Room ---- ADDITION Addition Mud p ~ Room i ----- GARAGE Alley 0,0 .. HPC General Submission Requirement # 7 Written Description of Proposed Addition: 1 92 story addition with full basement below addition. Basement Rec. room, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, laundry, utility and storage. First Floor Kitchen/Family area, mudroom, 2-car garage. Second Floor 1 bedroom, bath, closets FAR Calculations: Existing House: 1 st Floor 889 2nd Floor 833 Total Existing House 1,722 sq. ft. Addition: ts< Floor 711 952 2,id Floor Garage (>250) 125 Garage (>500) 9 Basement* 126 Total Addition 1,923 sq. ft. Total Proposed 3,645 sq. ft. Total Allowed 3,240 sq. ft. Bonus FAR required: 405 sq. ft. (* Exposed wall \ Total Wall x Total Floor = Basement Total Sq. Ft.) Description: The proposed additions design is sensitive to the original homes architectural character and scale. Careful consideration was given not to overpower the existing home with an addition. Plate heights have been held to 3 feet on the second floor which will compliment the size, scale and massing of the original home. Gables match the existing homes rooflines and width. Dormers, also appropriately scaled, have been utilized where headroom is required. The footprint of the addition will yield rectangular modules and intersecting gables that are visually compatible. The addition has been located entirely to the rear of the lot to minimize any visual competition with the existing house. A connector has been incorporated into the design and it's size and scale should visually separate the existing home from the addition. .. HPC General Submission Requirement # 8 Additional Materials, Documentation or Reports History of Ownership 323 West Hallam Street Records indicate the following: 05/09/85 H.C. Gilbert to D.E. Frantz 10/07/87 D.E. Frantz to J.B. Wheeler & Co. (Log Cabin on lot E) 05/17/89 Town of Aspen to Edward Gray 03/06/90 Edward Gray to D.M. VanHovenberg 05/-/97 J.B. Wheeler & Co. to Herbert L. MeNair 10/09/97 Herbert L MeNair to Sarah L. Lowary 08/28/64 Francis Lawary to Mary E Griffith 11/02/65 Mary E Griffith to Peter Vought 12/14/73 Peter Vought to Tom & Sharon Prior / /95 Tom & Sharon Prior to James Denkins 12/20/99 James Denkins to Peter Rispoli & Donna Dilanni .. HISTORICAL RESEARCH FOR: 323 West Hallam Street Aspen, Colorado Historically Significant Owners of Record D.E Franz J.B.Wheeler & Co. D.M. VanHoevenberg The Aspen Directory from the 1880's and 1890's was very helpful in piecing together 323 West Hallam's history. Unfortunately the archives at the Historical Society contain only directories for the years 1885,1889,1892,1893. While the City of Aspen's records of property transactions clearly indicate the owners name during those years it is The Aspen Directory that lists the person name who actually lives in the home. "The Aspen Directog" in 1885 (inaugural edition) listed: "Gilbert, Cliff miner, Hallam, between 2~d &3 rd â€ž It appears that Cliff Gilbert, the miner, built a small log cabin on lot E. Cliff Gilbert sold the cabin to D.E. Franz who is not listed in The Aspen Directory for any of the years available. It is well known that D.E. Franz owned a local sawmill and constructed many houses in the neighborhood. In any case, Franz sold the cabin and the lots (ABDE) 2 16 years later to J.B. Wheeler and Co. Wheeler then sold 1 M yearS later in May 1889 to "Edward Gray." 323 W. Hallam was built in 1889. An Aspen Daily Times newspaper was found in the recess of a wall dated August 1889. My guess is the home was completed in October 1889 in a very "hot" sellers real estate market. Since The Aspen Directory from 1890 is not available it is uncertain whether Edward Gray lived in the house or if he just built the house and sold it 10 months later on March 6, 1890 to D.M. VanHoevenberg. Four years before 323 W. Hallam was built, D.M. VanHoevenberg was working as the "cashier" for J.B. Wheeler & Co.. Bankers (see attached ad - Aspen Daily Times. Sept. 12,1885). The Directory lists: r. 232 East Hallam. Also in the 1885 Directory is-. VanHovenberg M. Mrs.. r. 232 East Hallam. 1 think Mrs. M. VanHoevenberg is D.M..'s .. mother and they shared the house. By 1889 the Directory listed: VanHoevenberg Mrs. M.. (M. VanHoevenberg & Co.) "The Corner Drug Store, " Corner of Mill & Hyman. In 1889, as Aspen's growth was in full swing, J.B. Wheeler ran an ad in the Aspen Directory: "1 B. Wheeler & Co., Bankers. Established in 1883." Further stating " The Oldest Bank House in Colorado - D.M. Vanhoevenberg. Cashier. HI Tissington - Assistant Cashier and Fred Adams- paying teller." Obviously things were going well for J.B. Wheeler in those heady days. D.M. VanHoevenberg was also doing rather well since he now had two assistants: H.T. Tissington and Fred Adams. D.M. VanHoevenberg purchased 323 West Hallam St from Edward Gray. 1n 1892, however, The Aspen Directory listed: Brown C. Leonard. mining engineer, rooms 5 and 6 Brown and Cowenhoven Block. r. 323 West Hallam St. h seems likely that D.M. Vanhoevenberg never occupied the house and it may have been strictly an investment property. The 1892 Directory continues to list D.M.'s residence as 232 East Hallam. By this time he had left J.B. Wheeler and The Aspen Directory lists him as: VanHovenberg D.M., Proprietor. "The Corner Drug Storeâ€ž" 400 E. Hyman. R. 232 East Hallam. Mrs. M. VanHovenberg was listed simply: VanHovenberg Mrs. M., r. 232 East Hallam. Upon his departure from the bank, subsequent ads run in the Aspen Daily Tinies show that H.T. Tissington got the nod to become "Head Cashier" for J.B. Wheeler. As Aspen crashed with the Sherman Act D.M. VanHoevenberg held onto 323 West Hallam Street. C. Leonard Brown lived in the House through at least 1893 or 1894. Again, The Aspen Directory was not published after 1893. Eventually, in 1897 D.M. VanHoevenberg sold the property back to his long-time friend and employer J.B. Wheeler. It' s possible, D.M. VanHovenberg may have died in 1897 and upon his death, left his affairs to Jerome Wheeler to take care. Wheeler "Assigned the Deed" to Herbert L. MeNair. H.L. MeNair was listed in the business section of the Directory under '~Attomeys.' Records show 5 months later Herbert L MeNair (QCD) to Sarah L. Lowary. .. The Lowary family occupied the house for the next 67 years until 1964. I was able to find Sarah L. (Louise) Lowary's daughter Eloise (Lowary) Ilgen who resides in Carbondale. Elloise was born in the house at 323 West Hallam in 1926. Her mother, was also born in the house, in 1897. Ellouise Ilgen was able to provide me with some interesting insights into the house. Most notable and at the same time unfortunate was her recollection of a fire in the house around 1958 or so. The fire started upstairs when an -oil heater" spilled and ignited. The unfortunate aspect of the fire is that all her family photographs were lost. I was hoping she might be able to provide some sort of photo documentation of the house from earlier times and specifically the Street Elevation. . Francis Lowary sold to Mary Griffith is 1964 and she in turn sold to Peter Vought in 1967. According to neighbors and Eloise Ilgen it was Peter Vought that made some of the more significant changes to the house. Vought added the eight-sided 'lower," the rear porch roof and the garage around 1968. Vought sold to Tom and Sharon Prior in 1973. The Priors sold to James Denkins in 1995. James Denkins sold 323 West Hallam to Peter Rispoli and Donna DiIanni in December 1999. 1.11 1 S - 1?Â£ 41* Â£1144+1*-1 ' + .6-Â·' 1. '1 ~1 2~_ 1 41 1 1-e , 1 1 ; .... 6 11,4 # -I 1 Â·-t 1-1 1 -2 ... 1 1 1 F 1,1 - 1 --1 11 -&%4/.**1*, .Z ~ * 0, r. .. L. 1 41 :4 =fit e.p:Â·Â·'q.0 f, f...~:42' 4.:1:E L%'2 - -0 2-: 74*' I'-2.22 'E..1â‚¬ 4-4,304+4,~ ~'94 Â£*" ''.4-N r J.Â·j m.:Â·:.â€ž:I..: .3- 69 - - Â·Â·Â·Â· 91*,.~ 4 :.1.t#**si'21'?j*Vig- * -U, 4 I :f I *IdaÂ·:~:ti~~~M~2~*r:'B ~~:~2FL11Ir~iliU:Wrcr : : I A ~~~ r~rt-96a{-:7ft*tÂ« t~ .â€ž....~ 111â€ž fi"' Â· . : /' 3 ':+Ill.~6 :Â·:.: tÂ»% i. .. -/:' -'. 1-~ ~ 0,,2Â·i~?dil.2 *u444*4.46 144<At,s IGoed BUn/* Eptih, .,-.- .. . 2 - :dal.:;..: + , Â·.L:..2- lk, Dmm,gâ€¢-.../0/2/r The' :,took. i.if . . Â· ' ' -6 . 'i~ /,4- Â·'47:4 -*472[ r #0*01~18~1*'W -k)di,iÂ£RyÂ· ~021 Â· .,#. - ...:- --.4* Min-t.e.mem**Ait* moothly.fÂ»-obm. Cl#Ill to Keep the Best 46=f ust. 14*411.6 TwO.W.L~* :-B:mutrolamore *t0d ~ 0,jig~talm#Â»'the 1*81*tog!#,8142: 1.Thetn- 94#the Lowest *-FFir. rÂ·otner-dompany; open*ng An 1 1 .~ -~ FOMIER latt -ItaL.*eventleâ€¢ from propertyl ;61:Â·1han=iii,en'are nufficient to insore, ces-*This is Our Prin- 544*dy D#yment of dividends on the I Â¢60â€¢**tock. Among prominent minÂ· J ciple and .is -the ... >MOD*Ixes-id irhich-it le largelyÂ· in. 1 , wueensÂ¥ $:1:rd:11:fldt'21, 82%:?01Foundatio* of the Success [ -p . Â©am. 12~, 1*g~~r tZA:51--and--Popularity of the _1_____All Â«9*#s soljd #~_ I <the Little Annie group i kedjaeent --0*operty on Bichmand L 3 Corner Drug Store. ed stock in ihe 419' .-8Bveyal of thea properties ivillbe %1CSZ:~%221~U~;i~~#ZL ' ]09.n Hoevenbarth & co. UNDERO M the prooeede will also be divided f ,Â¥U=L-1.tiliIA lkY u' O. 1 Ill.,ILTUHn~-9---0*r--------- ing-ti}e holders of Oontinental Di- I 3 stock. 'The company is practically Wheeler Opera liouse !: or debt, but there are itens against ~ *.of the property receptly purchased . the management-has"decided to sell J. B. WHEELER, - - - Proprietor iment preferred stock to pay the liens ' 880*Ima fund to-open Bhe valuable R J. CUTLER, _ - - - Manager ing territory owned und controlled hecampany, As the stock is sold, u- <9'~~710 ind th, other ball placed to the ht of the development fund so that :. -------------1.-- -i------- - receipts from mineral and other SALISBURY'S urus, can be paid to stockholders. ~-113'/R'Mjll"-~ aid=the-11*hof avery _~_ th. For partioulars and full lists of erties and enterpriges of the com- â€ž411)~0[1-8 -- 4 apply to B. CLARK Â·WHEELR, PresÂ· 1 1- ~ 5 and Ganersr-Minagerr-819 -Bast--+1-V"- mr avenue, Aspen, Colorado. WILL APPEAR ~.WRAT I Double Loeomotives. te Railroad Gazett@ calls attention to ibie locomotive for the Indian state rays which 18 -8 novel departure from October 7,1889 -Milling, Smelting, S i m*nant fintihle header: thht is. it ia I FOR 1--leystS]i*:ti~--Bell .: 1 r Ir hÂ· 6.. j'r./ :$' E , s : ./ ' .' -39 :, 3.352%,iÂ«t'k.VT*%4922#3%6 . 5 4./ /4 ' ART#i=t. 1 -9 t.,.L i J.,U<â‚¬?E;..16( - Â·. O '. Â·4; ... A',4, t#,1-7fÂ· i k:tÂ·;F:-j 43-fyi - 7 .,4,;Ulr=*2 4 - f Â· ... e. *Wj.4 Â· .- Â· 14*â€¢A.-; , / 3 '- truc: .ft - . + I . /Â·~ t. 2/ # 2444*R'*1*0 4 -ft - â€¢s,f -DI~Miyy~ $ 9 'f. I .*9* Â·c' Â· - - - '. 11 - Â· 1 â€¢IliTIÂ»// tA.rac et I I C. J' *- 4.+ - /-.:-' .3 ./ I ~~P~ ". '~t i.'5@6. -nÂ» 1: I 1 3 .9 27 4 0+ ,Â·, ~>t -'/Er. - :.6./ ,- . - 00- . - Â· 1 2.2*tt'J-*!6 @ Â·.. ~â€ž4.''-..4Â· ,... '-1-- 1 7Â·44.&/, Â¢ 0 . ,Â· .., -J *â„¢9(~Â·'12-.-Â·dtÂ¢~~~r~.*.~~4. --T-lirp#*FiÂ· t I J-1 ... 2.l~- I -1 ' . I . e ,. - cÂ·~-44-' ~~2~YAM*t,1uio:- d.fillÂ·:Af i~.49~940.*.-F 41:I*02,~---O- r: 3 --#~0t-. ~ ~ :. . , . I 23Â¢~tod***ditte: 0 , -- ---- .' I -, 1, I. 4 -Em, 21Â¥Â·Â¥123//7/-- - .-:' 6~@1 - 4 3 y. 4*fi#**14- 0- Â· Â· 1 1 , T= U 1 I ". 2.~Mil'ki. I .. 4 Â· COLORAN - I - .- - Wlny-2 . VT #... 4 1 1 .. ~15â€ž4.,r-.5â€¢ir:9994:REPV#04$. 0*- ...., 9â€ž90 /44**4**lp*:6~Â£*ablie -- i 801â€¢:A *4-*ithin.1 ~irty diiy. *tteril#e AM Gl~*029&1Â£ 4*&**ate:r. . Diblic lâ€¢dnes of *1141 entry. I. .6 0,4*itida to*Â£441 of , #aid act * ~TABLIâ€¢11* IN 1466. . C'it# i. aosociatth*or company of . in** 4 *}*COU#allt* 0, 911â€¢, j ~,~~;0;* t,e:Yi",9Â¤129:Y#:;rlr: ~ p.b: : :. ~-t~*6Â£;JUMEN/ 1 ym 00090*tioy or Pesâ€¢egaihn Of; r*11Â»611. melted am"amlm**orpâ€¢wh.ed. Write '104 b#54 *tust Withid i,tinety for tâ€¢râ€¢â€¢t. 44614â€¢wrette**trwt. ' 1.- Â£ I .......;.13 .9---- 4.-pat'AllÂ¢*tion .O/ 11(441*(il/*<4~â€¢ I / *.. he#/4,2frid'â‚¬*, *dikt**Kin.;' Â· i. 7 Ii'Â® â‚¬ e FT /2 \ 98 5 ASPEN PAIL-9-r-\Akes t.f A 8- 4., ' . ' .. I. .L ' y. 8.. t * i I - 4 %6.#.. t~'Pq'Pfu :.-=--9.:-2.LÂ·'t'Uff'Â·132Â·~424473.*trfipÂ·' i.y -- "- -.:-'yA, 1.1 ~ - -10=A -6 i ..1.-' ~~'Â·'~ ' ~'~.<047~,-Â·213.~32 " ~- '- --. - -9-t-1, ~~ ~|~~ ;~~ ~64. ..ll>,3,1. fk.:; t -. It 4 - -- 1 - ..: Â·Â· M vul 161*Sitt f *'or Itd Â·,articular i:lass* 1*'. '. , 609441 -AsÂ»en'â€¢Â·Bead- 09. *a'W .-. or gen,as City, is . . ..4 L.-41- den. quarters foryine : 7- I ./ 2 ' .*bal*,**611:kndwi~ merdhant. -**44.ell.known minnia.ilpruirs. FishinÂ¢Tackle, Tojk- . *CeriaaileÂ¥3EAE]>Bj,6 . r ti~--1-- ,*01 10*411,4; lamit,Scity. 4 let --Afficles, is at the -r~/Ii//1/ (De Oarleah has gone to Asheroft to -J 1./1.'r Forke-n),1.maim, the Judkth. Corner Drilg Store. .- . Â¢ h, -7 4, 4468# ... C E Meyers, of- Garland, Kansas, arr: _g-;- ' . -1:-- - - ived in;the city Friday morning. 4 22*4 - . ..... 1 91,8 8616 Brothers' circus and menag- 2 -The -01 rie will gbow in Aspen on the 29th. Efeavy Dry Goods Failll Norman J. White, a prominent citizen PHILADELPHIA, July 25.- Surprise was , f Bonanza, Colorad*, 18 in the city. occasioned in business circles tbis mom- . -ing by the announcement that the finn - Furniture an{ W. A. Green le "patting up a neat three of Lewis Bros. & i o.,wholesale dry goods Â®m cottage on East Hopkins avenue. dealers, Chestnut street, above SE.ond, Cari y 4 Ful _0001 n Mnrgon iâ€¢ huilding a ilne resi. had made anassignment, While the ex- enee on Mill street on the bluff inst be- &6x amount uall'L 4-yet 1,0 1866,6#ine4:----------1.-411:a:em__atil 1 and the gew Hplel Jerome. it is thought the liabilities will sum tip .Â® iJV13Â£~lICU~~ nearlylout.milliens. The firm is one of T. J/Zollars. Mrs. S. W. Zollarâ€¢, F. N. the largestin its line of business inthe ;rady and W. O. Morrison, of Denrer, 'city, and perhaps in the country. It has 91Eg*0red-attbeClamiidon. houses in many large cities of the United , Mm F. B, Root le ft 01 yeater ciaj;V -HEiites,-notabiy-Ner-1-erk, 012-e- Ral --1- --ILI]*lellaker_.and-_ [idland train for Den ver where she- Will -'imere-and Boatoni T.hemembers of the firm remdent in thia city are -[363rge W. imain about ten days visiting friends Whâ€¢rtnn, Joseph W. Lewis and Henry Judge R. G. Withers returned yeeter .j Lewis. WhartoA, when seen this mora- ay fromFrying Pan, where be had gone ing, promptly admiged the authenticity . ~- &&507@â€¢;46'EF*$-rh,Â·W'RuiS'thGth,61,219.'crakA= or %*B"Gimirtliatlrid:ih dit.nod...ala.16:lar- ' - Thin;.-tbe-Aret-day-ef--the--er8=-â€¢,im. aasignmont. rhrn91;,in W Rlim, of the eunce -movt#1!g_*; Athletic Pack. First I New York hrm ot Bliss, Faborn & Cu.,Le oe will be called -prompITy - at tdated..was the assignee. 80 p. m. i "I am uuable," contÂ·inued Wharton, "to place the amount of our liabilities. The Midland train arrived at 2:15 this i However, I feel confident that they will arning:---Tbere werâ€¢ 00}y s few- passen. i not-be mucti -in--1,xeess- of aseets; .Of - ,rs on board. The road is not yet en- course it's impossible to determine these Â·elY repaired. i things until an examination of the books - i has been made. We are now going over The family of Mr. M. O. Sherman has 1 our books and will Drobably kuow more st taken possession of the newly built ~ d linitely how and where we staud." ttage on East Hopking avenue, owned i ,.If we could have had (}Dly two retÂ· Mrs.~Gillespie. i three days more I am sure we would rheÂ·jirst case in the police court for have been able to tide over tbe diflicult- ree dave was the trial of Jim McCou rt i 184 brit the blow fell just nt the worst L.:-- A.,..1. n. TIT.,1...An,Â· Worrom ' time and onr nnlv course was to make ...... ry ... TO 1-1 9-6 Â£ 869 A.spEN PA-l LY -1-11469 .. West Hallam Street Old Cottonwood Trees (City of Aspen) 11 1 11 7 PORCH 1 Existing ! 1 House j 0 1 ' 4 Mature Apple Tree L 4 f J 02 ADDITION Addition 1 11 i Mud , Room 14 4 1 - 1 /9 : GARAGE Alley FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 . 0 Peters Bedroom 29~ 11 1-1- L 1 E CLOSET Max's - ILLOSET i Bedroom NOOK I Study mÂ·1 - m / m 12 m - BATH 3Â·6 1 2 4 , ~ CLOSET 4 HALL CONNECTOR 1 1 IrN 1 DRESSING 4 IT- 9 1 1 . - | L OPEN BELOW 11 1 r OPEN BELOW ~ BATH 1 ~ .l BEDROOM - 1 I " 1 13/ 4 5 : 1 18 - DECK = 'ZZI 2ND FLOOR PLAN .. 1 C 1 4.- I I I 1 FAMILY MIL - [-----1 -1 0 11 1 0EOROOM UTEUTY t. F| BAn' -- Al ' - ati LAUNORY L STORACGE BASEMENT LEVEL 4 .. 1' 1 -- 4 //// ):61, " t. 49 :Iii ' A ?3 fE 4Â¢Â¢21 %2, I.,.~1) 29 0.1 \ Â·4' ' *44 4 ~.1 3.* â‚¬.: M.>* I. 1Â¥; 71 2 ~~ 3 ' a . -MI. Â·'' p J /9 3: -: .424:' , ~ .Â· 1: miâ‚¬.Â·' , % 4~ '<flifi , :, ~ 7'2 >kpÂ· *94+r .4 Â· I .*f*) 1â€¢ . 2 ....Ale %11 ..1 1. W.. i rN : 41 ... J)Â· . 19/,44 + 4 Â· ~ . i 49:....~%. .p4{2 Â· h ~Â·432{Â·91#414**y~.4ij~{tlf 4 ..: ,:6.- i~ 4 tafÂ°LF t.-jj 4 +tisi;,1 ~Jig?~T . r 4#'DIC<f *v-e. 9-t<,F .1 ..5.-Â·. p 9- .':t .* .' A % t- fir#/2-1-:.92,~0*51<Â·~>t: Â· .j-114'j<~i.t .i 4 N f . I , UPC (DEME-BAL S UBMISS 4 0%4 12.a-CPU\{2.9 #v\G-NT 44 6 SITE s 01:N ay 1 -1 i , U A L LAM Â© T 2 E 6 760001 /111 ts MOO ' TUN[7 12E*NE. 1 ALUM. CAP FOUNO KEaAR- * Al-l.,WI. CAF L NO NU./%3 ..,587 L. 1 . -- - - - r 'f641/EL ..1 . \/, LID NUM/teER- ' .r \A 1 1 Â«//3 . 1 h -81 1 _[FiEl. 4 WED"ENCe / . al. , 4*1-7-1.-22__--41 4 '4 - 1 1 - -/ 1 1 OULDNS CORNIEK -0)21Â©merf 1.80 -- - - -= -~ L--- =311 4% 1 19833392./ I- lizi . 1 I>t: / ////a *Â·i6~442iI--91 91/// / ~ Id ROOF OVEEHP+16 f f~ ,-rNC) forit< *10(39 j / fy 1 . \.6 ?[DC* 0*01*ta- - 1 / 99>'*'18= -HOU-5~-~ ~ /'/ p' -4 1 #EffigaeferGEE#399*8Efate/~frfE[-1 -6- / 8 8 7.G i l' i -~$4% BUILDIkle CaWER 10 FlÂ©PERIY 1.15' - - --f~/ ill.3 /4~Or- -1-1 7447 11 / 2 0.6 ' 1~24 0/54-14,6 ~ 3 Â»t/ t f f ,/ 1 r , F x CAR. FORI. ~Lol-5 0 0 E \0 i 7212 WED-- L LOOK 43 J 4 1 lili It O 5 0 20 30 40 50 0 Â®CALE : 14= 0 1 '11 , ,..:Â»9.17.2241 ' 64 -f- ~. ~ f ~ e.de OF Â©54121#65 : FE)UNC) 611Â¥ MONUMENTE> NE COR..BLIC 45 ID he/COK El-14 60 675-09' 11" E .. WOOP FENEE- --g ~ Â· ; IC.K. -116 CURE ..1 C -8 . g..firng CLe 2.-- _a'.. ' 0 OUIEVe-(012'6 CERII}=EAre 9 14 4 11 1, JAME, Fi Ree,ER, Magee>Â¥ C.ERTIPÂ·r' -rwle ON , Â·-' 0. r....,- r % Â§ ~.ar A. LOT E JUKE 19 -te , 1974 A el..)fLVEÂ¥ '0,06 NAACE UNFEC M-r' - bUPERVI'bION OF~LOTd Off, BLEZE. 43, Â»aPER, 5 SMI ; COLORAW. TUE -ND â‚¬STOKÂ¥ WOOD FltAME MOL)512 y,06 Â¢ reuND -10 et LDE~TED Bolleel:f WITHIN THE ea-)N[*,er Â©ET: REBAE < CAP 1 1 :1 '4 DML#9 0,0Al- uAA, câ€ž, ~ U N 85 OF -1-ME AeOVE CaC;2}!810 PleOPE# Ad> 61-ICWN ~ HrgEON.THE LOOXID4 ANP DtMENSIONe> OFALL- 4 . L. t. Â°IleÂ·+ 0Â·95)--1 1 - :. 0 / - r 64 + iDUIL.12)1435, IMFgOVEMENID, 25Â©EMENMD., R]ek-115- OF- . . 1 - r" | NOY 1,4 124!PENCE OK KNOWN -Â© ME- AND ENCIâ‚¬yol- MEKIT;5 Of OK ON TWee 1912EMIâ€¢529, ARE= Xa.)1*mic *WOWN. OVERWEAD UMUTIM, f FE)WER, TELE. f TÂ©) T pouND >UJM. CAP (NO NUMbEÂ© *WEE FOLE ---' liET REeA,2- 4 A~Â¥5716 CAP 915*LE. Wtlhe-95 CORNER- Â£ 1, t , C - JAME; F. 12EEâ‚¬K L.6. 9164 . .- L.1 ' JOLX 2. , 8-14 .A li A L LE Y 620 0 K 4 3 SURVEYOR' 5 CERTI FICATE: /7 I HEREBY CERTIFY 11*T ON JANUARY' 22, !995, A , --=Â¥t '.'.- Â¥ISUAL INBFECTION WAS PERFORHED UNDER Hr .1.-ji,1 ' SUPERVIDION CF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED FREFERTV NO CHANGES WERE FOUND. 4 i ALFINE SURVEYS, INC. DÂ¥: JAMIE F RESER /7 ./ i ...... i, IEPTE - L.5. 9184- 1â‚¬Te: FITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. aDHHITHENT Kb, rOT- ... 941504 WAS UE>ED IN THE FREGRATION CF *04 THIS SURVEr. r.'' date: JUNE 1918 / 1974. TITLE: JOB NO.: 15-3-/ 5, DRAFTED date: JOL-f 1#, 1474 61 IMPROVEMENT OUR>/EÂ¥ CLIENT t HYLizlit / TRI-CO Management, Inc. SURVEYED - -f j ",LU L.OTE> O 45 SHEET 147 1 47- i NOUCE According fo Col'iradu law you rnust conmence Ally legal ncttur, t,Aeâ‚¬ Box 1730 4 REVISIONS date 1 27Â· 15 UPDATE ., \ I i i upen,n, defect tnt?Ils,ur,eyâ€¢,th,n 3 year;,fler youlstdiscover suchee'cÂ·l. , In no evenl may any @cbon b,ted upon any deled in Ull,Imve, be comm:nced Aspen, Colorado 81611 BLOCK 43 .1. ATEN , COL-ORAIX) - -- mon th,n Mn years holl ie dâ€¢t, d ID,c~80Â£1*1 *=Ill# . ..CA %2* . . * 2uu<. 2- 4 1.-w~.,~~..217,_U.k~-'(wAr* 303Â·925Â·2688 -~ 0 D - _ t.Â· JUL_-11 f.-7441 28'- 80 'e i '12>.-Ott ' S I I .4 .... i 292'.1'.3 2.1{00*6.INWRE,401*211.til'-.943.46.93#06,1-:2Â· 9 64 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.11.-,2 11!,1,1 .1 1.1 - 94 1 ) -2 -1 0 ! ' 18. 21% i . . d :41 1 i: 19 1 2.- Ililli .. 27 I : / i 1 1 1 11 11; f 15'10.1 -'.1 iÂ·46.0 142 *3.13,0 11 '.C 93 14 11:< 1 9 - 6 613 Ron M 4/ ~44. - 12,90-9)0'.A . 6,â‚¬ - 1 M V . --1 -,r Â° t ./ I I i 2.-J Til:,1 . ,C . -fi. c L .Og E 7- 0 9 21-09 NE.-T. :%,- ... 1 / 1\. r. \ 04.-.42%.44 2 \ 4 : S' 1 \ . - _ 1 --â„¢I - 2 -BATH : Â® ) 4.Â· 1 0 15'- 6. 10 1 6 Â·15: .A: 'el OJ _fo '1 r Ste:<~6.224. >*2348*:0.:TE.32 *ra-742WfGNEWÂ«:21.,4.,95.433$*!F* Â· 9,â‚¬.- . 1 . i ...7 t.: 16' . ark i ' 91 e. === $ .. . 1 I '. 9. .f . /4 . 1 /1,7 -â€ž=Er 59 4.--r.JoyzÂ·2 11 + '-' .te 75trz>12:/5+66* -1260, 12 OOM A. 41* 9 7 â‚¬ m *t C *XZ : 9.. -6 - 4-Â· 0,1 1 12 1 4 - 1 -14 l CZE . N. 1-7 .-1 t ,-Â· - lt! 34' 1 -42'j I. 6 - j . .4 -4- .1 1 0 i; itVi'fÂ·491'1320':4,-1-9;.'r.:12,-:.9 +Pfc 96tÂ«*:'S#:<.M~~:25139fÂ·26â‚¬T'ilt'fO#:1 :,Fi1579% 1.4(2~b->9$ 1tfÂ¢'17<,3,12'32*t :*~'-'*Â·1<Â£'*St:3 . 11 14,- 611 p r le'-O' 155'-Of' e-Â· . ' 37 4- 6 11 F77--Fgh-GE MENT - LEVEL - 1 P Rispele~-/-.~ -1- 1513.I W,i WAll.>4M gr. *SPEN, ..COLI-gtbil.- _ - 1 -0 14 - r. 1 .6* ~JU'N,.mt:,2, Cy tp. +9,~ 4#5f r:Z,i:,4. :8?09\'~08Â·1,4.~4.~~:<:.?19-,127; 1.L 9.4 6.41'ip: â€ž0~-, 547 > illy *61*%9 + 28'. 0" E 63 - , 1 1 1 1 1 4 11 1 -1 -1- 11 1 ' 1 . 1, 112:I r-T--c : 4-111.11 -LI -1 --- n. 1 4 2 1.1.1. . 1 11 / m 1. 1 1 -1 J x. 2 7 0 i 1... i . / 1 /1 41< 1 1 ' :/ 9 0 . 49 11.1 - E 0 1 , , Al t . 4-t - - 0 1.A h - 0 k â‚¬, .KITCHEN_.22 . 1 . V 4 121? I 4 le at I Â¢ . - I L.1 , u Â· 5 i l'J , 8 1 4 17,1 2 4:H- / . 0 1 - / I / j In 0 , I '2,1 . 8 'f 0 , ... 1- 1- r.-11- 9/2/1/7./. ,='rÂ·-"i'r;~;'- '3,~11 1-'11 !-1-4 =2--11-1' r Â·6:49*L . 112 11,1- 1 ~ ar. 1 (C -4.- 0 4 -0 f 4 1,1 - 1 !Â·t 34.7 \ 1 Â¥\ - . r.- - - -- -- -6 . ' I U U 11-w' WA :. a (/15, C # â€¢ L ~ lEi 'a 00 Â£/ a 43 6.4 4 X ~ ,- . 1 Di . IT.. 9, -HUE? RM. 61Â· 1 10 .... 6. -- 4 057- U 1-[--------T I 1 3- IM=*9-k-*m-*AN*=~*m=m. 1 ' 71 1 lIlli - 1 tamil .......2 4 .5 ke 1.- -- - . 11Â¢723.-- 2211.=4 - -- U=-2 ' --=WALLi ---72 ~ -2:*FZ.Ad,C_. -_ ' '4 1 1 . : 11 0 1 i r --.... . L . i p.v,1...1.-1 *'WI.hvf.?t006%2~R~AN~~7Â·4??453N,76). 1 44*41':1 . 0 1,9.... U.N...4.1.4'.':.1 . 11 --T 7 2 11 /9 Â¢ , ' 0 I 14 4 I. 4 4 -.9 2 0 1 /1 M - . 4 ..S-*.-â€ž.1- i , 1. 1 } . -1 -1.4 1 1 '. .... 21 Ct>JE.Fil ,- 4 1 it 1 6 .. -01 -- 1 t i 9 2 . -7 3 1 I ' V .5 1 . . 1 1 1 1 4 - -- F I 1, . ... P 1 1 . . 1 14 114 4 f #7*Fer#113Â·.'~TiO&,1 ', '' ;1 ... .. ~~ tt, Â·.â€¢'ii,, L -,I' I :5. .ga,pj,V3.'. *44% .' 1---7.--'-" -r., .-- ..1 3 , -3 Â·ey,griN, * 12 "' '. I. 1 1, * 6.-9 UTILITY '2,~t. 1 , 1 1 1 K 3 - ' 0 3 . 4 0- Ul -63 , 1-0.1- U I N Z 6 '-(44 -n LOT LINE f . . . 231 - i' 14'- 0. . , f \ e /9 -6, 50.4 6 1. 9 19.40' 27>0" 5 1 - d. r 201ST.1 Nt(3.. . -~CONNECT~'orâ‚¬. -ADDITION , F - R 56-1- FLOO â‚¬ * 11 Z * Â¥2. R\QPOL1 ' -'72.11 - -9,A +4Al-LAM S-r, 0 24$1:>EN-,__CO Â£*69 %j Â·4 + 1/11 0 -54-4*141: iyq ..0 42-0 . 19-101 7014** 43*0*~32 ,,0-,Lt /0-,23 ice.:...1.~/.*.~.~ . 1.1 - 103 L O" 1 t - 14'-0 . PROPERTV 63' -nt' LING 8 - 0 .l 0 , 0 f ---Il- 0 1 11 $ + I. i \ 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 ' fil Â»1 1 /49 1 , 01 * 1 .t 0/ :5* Â·~ * I 6 -' C l 11 i 4 m gh--1, 1 h ;k.*f,Â»it-:....41'.9......: .1 --- ' W 8 ~ p 4 1 W 1540, 1 t-Â· 1 4 - 4 g /9.-di ' - 1 NX . 4 U | m 1 - n F 1 2 4 1 1 - 1 9 4 e 1 . ..- r il th <1 1 h .4 - -- :JrÂ· _~_~ ~~~ ~~ ~il 1 11't ~ 1 ~4.' S 1 1- \Nt . .2*k 1 Â» 14 VIA ... , B -W X / 14 M .1 91 1 . .> i - 1 1 1 1 " - d .1, .... 1 -11.75â€ž: .. 1 ..1 : 1 0 - 74 111 4 I t).4 4 1 11. Ittl / ... p ...,1. .1 .: 11Â£'.1.. ..1,1 --1 U luÂ«ita.Â·;yÂ·rz "et--~,A"AL#.4777-;331-~ 5 ir: L---/ -i '-i' 1, - *#wi~ - 3 *41#%Â£.Mi@*'4(#.3/t::919*2: 0 ~ 7-Tu=7E-----T---1---~EmÂ·-'I--1-T-TZ i, n r fe i ' 1 / * Â· 1 9 -4.6:-:Â·C; . '1 - -c~.". ri... - â‚¬ ba "'.*,' Ii", '-' -'" ./ -'tz:E'- '3400*%923:tE~,P;62,;Â·.~1 AS,r .,.e. S e Â· 9 - * 1 1 - - - - WALl-- -- - -- 3 - --- 22id>*26,0.A-2 -- - 1% C4 1 j c bo 26' i O OC N 37:77. / E Â¢ 11 v Â·Â· .0 j -6/A/Ecm>QL 4 1 13 E 'il :''~ - ' i \ $ I . 1 1 I .. I 21 i 91 . 1 / 1 1 -1 1 1 | 11 1 -I / 1 % N /9. 1 \ j \ id. ' 1,i' \ . f ~-' ' :. ~lf 1, , ' " 3 0%2*It#**ruwwl wmti-Â·1,=Widlaltu:491$Â·â€¢Â·uâ€¢â€¢,4~Â·â€¢-Â·/'t~ipl**;!6%922,WTAJG,iMI.#Ct*M*tÂ¥/P/Â·"97 * ibu j | t , 1 :f: I0 1 t. i ~ 006994Â·Â·V;ndA .UU 4,4Â£Â·4 4 Â·- 4 fe'. - -Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â· . .Â·Â·Â·r N.... . ... ...â€ž~Â·. ~ ,~ .. i ~4Â¢â€ž,..Me'.râ„¢-'Â·Â· â€žÂ·mar~.91=Zi.*5%84eb 25+rÂ·*ta~M6 -4 - YÂ·~~~~~~~~~1*qÂ·-â€¢ -Â·p rÂ· Â·I,-"I'kÂ· â€¢Â· J...1 ~ L. 1 . 6. M , 31 401 r - 5 lit Â·.1 i--1- 6/ ~ 1 1 - 4 2>8'37~--41 1 1 13 122 + 6' J.A ,. 91'*. ' .Â· 15 '-8 14 00" ' 4 5,1/ of 5Lg t 4 2 C Q -- 1 1 i 1 4 w 2 3 t E-jp; 1990&001-- - 0.-_ - -/ 3 9357 - 41 , HAULAWI ST-. AFF'EN, 68 2/ (ott_ (Gzlituk-L '43 = t= C),1 4 - Â·14Â·Al,-GAK/1Â· 4172eET- 1,-REPASM#*s,Al:.29~Â·. F'120-lpl= 1< i V 1. 41 4 ' fte - . 4 11. \ ./ \I 1 r 4 4 . 3 /1 N 4. , \ - -41 - \ 1 1 / - . . . / r 1 A i /1 , / \1 / - 1 / . If Y ' /-1. I / 1 I \. 1 1 Z 4 . . ...i 740,5 AtIVE --2 Roof PLAN_ i 232(191200 -EJUHAUjl-N\IST, 3-96â‚¬P=Ny-003.732Â»177- - 1/ f ,1.11 jacAL,5 1--'/4 *1-0 % 't e 4.7- 21 Â£ d. . 4,0 - ir i> 4 1 314,5 0918 (2.-> Â· + ivaasY _ -6,S V'."714/-Â¥ *m 9~â‚¬2 /14:*S,21 4- ..1 i $ ---- . I .- .- i,Â·.. U., 41:':1- .0135.944)kh-_ t 09 -,0+1 ---1 10-93 . - -cy--i B f , - .75 7,5 .9 -1 -3 1 1 il 1 1 - , 1 -/ , ..I 10 0- I . j i - ; y on .i! + A - 1 il - lI -Ir--1- LFUm ~: ITS33 &- 5 J -I;- LL;IÂ· -- . I .& . - 8 1, . . 11 -Â¥-1 t i i :. - j 1| 11 f.3 ..4.:r i:< r-'Â·Â·Â· ..r) , ,-7 8 i 1 5 1: 1 1 t....A 1 1 i 2 . - Â·-4 g tz: i.J 4 'C'. L.LfI.j U._f~_J <1 i I . . 9 il 1 0. .. 4 - - F-KI.<26_5. .- 1 f..f?je . i - -~--------- -- 4 , - r- j/ 7 - - -l C 61 1 E u.2 L ki- 44 =4=1-41 -- 4 H i 1 . PLA:-02 F.rr. - * .1. I --- . .1 - . C. + dE, 1 -/6-. - - 4 0 -I- - * Il-- 1 1 1 . I tr, - _ . E L. CIDI 9 1.- 7/Â· - ; I -- , 1 1 1 . 3.Â·U .... 1 .1 C ,-I -1 _. , 0 ~ ~~ ~~ ~1- - It.7 11 1 -lili 7;el, -~ ~ i . 1 1. 2 1 i! N ... -....Aul:iL-12.EVArtoN - - - - 1.---/---+~ -a~ MÂ·m -E N* 341 t-7 H ' Â· Â· 97* li 1 t an-i i ( a' < ) r -#9 â„¢-Â· u , :~54* *\\% :'1116/11%61% i \ 1 9/0.36 -- 1 ille-r.b -c //,Â·- .,.7*W~~j~$*p'~!115ICIE /~*ta\XElli ' el/,EL,11 fitift' ;97Â·- ...ft, - -L- 4.62#811 - FL. rt)7*ST Â· i:.41-Ihit. 70.t-2:344.-9- i.-9-nt- /12-it'-- = I h....11 1 81 '-t/-- e. 1 -.7 2 // :, f .1 -1 4 11 Â·f l Ir 1 7 f, E-001'.I NG i el G'Â·r'-th -1* -0 1 4 - -EX! STING .- - ---+ - --- ..CaNNO:TUR. .AP*110-loN - ~~ - 6 u . - - ---- # -- 33, 1--0 .' 4 1 00'-O 8 1 37-7.-0,# ~ SE-ISACK.-_ l,1 88'spot- 1 -232-3 41. 4-IALA*19'91- -*2PE'11,_cO-21 61 1-4- WEâ‚¬-F _ELEVAT[ ON SWALE : &4"Q I'-01' .. 4 ~ 11 1 \ I. It 1 1 -.t -W. I-/ 1-ill 1 1 --il / I 'L.- 1 1 1 1 \Ut-7.- - -4 1' ... .- -1.1 1 1 ' -~ - - . E 1 1 1 11 4 1.------- ! 1 03 - i P il ' 1 $*- 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1122 2=42.rot 1 , 4 - il .1 1 f 1 1 ! - 1 1 IiI 4 . t , 0- I p r- -- 1 j 1 1 1 , 1 1 ' 1 : - 1 i --- i ! ; 0 - -1 1 . 1 3-1... - #-i *.-4H 1 1 1 2 4 [ - i 0-_ _ . 1 - 1 11825-61: - - 993JIWEWAULAM en 16294, Co -2t 6 tt- Lt nt,-- _S2DALE 1---J/*6"2/ Lot' _ ,--4...~... .........'.1.~......V----...n------...'.-,~.,-7.â„¢..,â„¢-M~-.'.-.-V.'.,~,9~~4.~.W.......--,-t.--~-~,-4 : ___.21_ .CIRC)$6~.SeCT\QU _ :CQBNECZEO,Â¢ -- 600-E H ELIEVATI-TON f â‚¬ :r FRe>Prc2Â¥Y UNF--Â·- 021 4 f. 4.%4* 1 + 0 .9 I U - 0 . f i , ... 1 Â·i , \ IL-\ 1 1 '20 1 h ,; 3 1~-1,2 1 111 r - ; aky r : Â· 5 41. 1 1 j... l 1 liu -1-1- EL. I . It'; I. f 2 te/1 Iii L 4 r . 1 .,-' 1 '.1,1 t , ; i .-....-- e.4 . / -I. 1111 1 1 1 1. 1=.7-,7.-27-.- 1 -,-1- 1.11-1 1.1,112 + i,1 ' iet.. ' , -I.*' F$*I -~ .2 L '.-.---.- ----. ,\ 4. If / \3 .. 9/ i ... g. --, Â©4 - ..4 l' i 1.141 111 LJ -r.3 1 Â· , A-FfÂ·-- - - 44- 1: r i .0 1 - 1 ' ' . f--1 41 , 1 1 71 - . 1 . 1. '.-All/=. ' 5-*-- :-:=Â·4 % @. 1 lt- 7 i- ---Â·A- -- 1 1 L 1 1 7--7 1\JOVA.1-1-1 i ELEVA77ON F. F? is rÂ°K 313_ W. HALLAM 91. AG PEN, CO- 21,6 11 94 "s l'. alÂ· 91 0. . rn - ix-P 1.7 e 1 \ /3 -344 /9,41 : n 11 9 .12/4/. U 'Flt :et-*%1- - 1 4/2-3- lm.'... 91$ 4 \ 4.01.f--~ X / 50 '' i 1 1 ...~ - 4 FLA-CE -1. . 4 .7 . - - =1 Â· -Â·Â· T-1- 'Â· 'T ~~ ii ' N V 1. 0 1 /4* FL r Lili , -nÂ·Â·Â·Â·-Â·~ j -,9 1 i. , '---1 It-1 -0 .. U ., L td- .....i.... It 11 11 : i Ii iÂ·---,11 1 1 '--; F l- 3-0 1 <337Â· ~ -- - -- - -- r. . 1 -. 0 - 1 1 1 1 11 - . 1-1.--1-1 1 : ;~ =9 L \ I & i 1 j i U 4 . I.7-WI , - EL . 5019 T 9<94\9(1 4 Â·Â· 1(413-1169\34*b, '=r M>We~\9**t\1//3 .LAVN =:.7 ./Â»42 1%- h 9 e EL,.BillivIEN-f 1 11 1 1 303.01 _HALLAM 61. -,6 99+1, CO. - 1 1 8._o. Vt D. i 16' - C>" , 41-00 1 P. Wt\â‚¬POLÂ·C 53Â£) ~ --- ~ - -~ i' 1 1 / 1/4' 1 1 -0 0 ' ~-OUTH_ El-EVA-'T-1-ON , 5 01 4 i -23QBERUYÂ·. Â·Â·Â·1Â·13>11. - ---Â·-- L--