The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.330 E Main St.HP-1991-15..../. f 330 G Au., 64Â· 1>e' AP- tqql-I-5 330)~ Main 2737-073-21-001 -. 26% -1-1 2- 9 3 H 1 AA 1 I X .. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer Re: Minor Development: 330 E. Main, Hotel Jerome, Totem Pole in plaza Date: June 12, 1991 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Minor Development approval for a 20' carved wooden totem pole on a 3' base with 10' wing span at top, to be installed in the courtyard area of the Hotel Jerome. APPLICANT: Marketing Corp. of America (Hotel Jerome), represented by artist John Doyle ZONING: CC, "H" Historic Overlay District OTHER BOARD ACTION REQUIRED: The Hotel Jerome's development, including all landscaping and courtyard features, was scrutinized and approved under a PUD agreement a few years ago, which did not include the proposed structure (totem pole). All changes to a PUD are required to be approved by either the Planning Director (as "Insubstantial") or through the P&Z, depending upon the scope of change and other criteria. Planning staff has not determined the PUD amendment process for this proposal at this time. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The Development Review standards are found in Section 7-601 of the Land Use Code. Staff reminds the HPC to - review this proposal only within the context of the development review standards, and make your findings accordingly. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay district or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark... Response: The proposed totem pole is considered, by zoning regulations, to be a "structure", thereby requiring a building permit. We also understand it is not temporary (as in a seasonal art display), and is designed to be a permanent addition to the Jerome's courtyard. In addition, due to its large size (23' high with a 10' wing span at the top), and no cultural association with Aspen's heritage or the hotel, we find its review by the HPC to be appropriate. Usually "art" has not been reviewed by the HPC, however, this particular application within the Commercial Core Historic District warrants HPC's consideration, due to the reasons previously stated. 0 0 The Planning Office has no doubt that the structure itself will be of high quality design. The artist explains that the totem's animals are "Aspen specific". We feel that installed within an historically-related setting, this structure could enhance the landscape. However, when considering Aspen's native american history (nomadic Mountain Utes) and cultural Victorian heritage, staff has a difficult time finding that this proposal meets Development Review Standard A, B and C. On the other hand, our community's character is uniquely eclectic. Our post-war history is ethnically and architecturally diverse, a result of "borrowed culture". Perhaps the introduction of a north- west Indian art form within the courtyard of the Jerome carries the feeling of cultural diversity forward by making a strong statement. The HPC should carefully consider these issues, and weigh historic compatibility against the introduction of a new element deeply rooted in northwest native American culture - particularly if it is to be located within the heavily used courtyard setting of the National Register Hotel Jerome. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: This proposal is entirely unique, and could therefore be found to be inconsistent with the character of the neighborhood. However, a variety of art forms (metal sculptures, life-size bronzes, etc.) are found throughout the district, many of which do not speak to Aspen's history. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structure located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: This "cultural value" review standard is perhaps the most important to consider, when determining the appropriateness of this structure within the Jerome's courtyard. We feel that the totem pole does not necessary detract from the Jerome's cultural value, however, we do not find that its value is enhanced by the proposed structure. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The installation is proposed to be well to north of the sidewalk edge, (approximately 120 feet), (refer to the attached diagram), and therefore it will be less visible and its direct association with the Jerome's facade lessened. The 3' base will be constructed of concrete, surrounded by a "brick colored lichen 2 - 0 0 rock". Staff is unclear about the design details of the base, and recommends that the HPC require clarification of both material and design at this meeting. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider the following alternatives: 1. Approve the Minor Development application as submitted 2. Approve the Minor Development application with specific conditions to be met by the applicant prior to the issuance of a building permit. The applicant shall clarify materials and design of the base at this meeting and on the plans. Approval could be time-limited (3, 6, 12 months), with a sunset provision included, requiring public "survey" information when reviewing a request to extend. The location could be altered, in order to insure that the architectural and traditional lawn setting integrity remain the focal point of the parcel. 3. Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations should be offered). 4. Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the development review standards. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC carefully consider the applicable character, architectural, cultural and historic association issues discussed by staff in this memo, and take action accordingly. Staff defers to the HPC for approval or denial. Additional comments: memo.hpc.320em.md 3 I i. rp Â© [ff [1 F\/7 [EF i.43 1 4 14 ' \\ ~ MAY 2 0 1991 SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT 4 U i r- Development Application for Exemption from RPC--f*hew (Please attach supplemental information, i.e. sketches, samples, catalogue details or any information which may be of assistance in approving the development activity. Please provide a detailed description of the proposed activity.) | -Applicant's name: _304-24 M. bo-4 6-a e,Address and day phone: .FcÂ« If 2- 1.3 A S.PE#i 92-<3- 6-12-4.,2-1 c-Property owner : /U,xr )Lt:-Â·t 1-.- Curp> , r.f- Aw/4 Le-.4- - Nott i _jei-eÂ·--2.- c Is applicant authorized t~represent owner in this application? *55 -Address of property: 33,> EA<E ,vuA iA - A <17>E,4 x- Name of property, if applicable: HoT-EL- -yERizz C.Â»A~ a Is this an Individually Designated Landmark? 4--44, Located within the Commercial Core Historic Othrlay District2 1-64- Located within the Main Street Historic Overlay District? M) u Does the proposed development Aheet~ the standarpls snepified in Paragraph #2 in Attachment #4? A - ,-#L rot r>.1.~01:tz*'~cti Explain in detail the proposed development: A 23 moo C H- t El.F+ 19~7-2 C>â‚¬ 1-CA a ' 2-0 Â¥10 OT- 'r;4-L--4.-- 7-Â»7--aÂ« PDAE >-3 ETÂ» 04 Irc) 9-05-I 00 k +16-1 -:6.PAN, , l,-3 / L L- .E3tF 5,2 acriEk> 061 A -4 For,>T- cLE<vtâ‚¬1311- p EED E_-9-TA L COE-ltd--1-1. 73 E -,60;1;DO J /*,63 EY 4 8%2 ic_-M COL_.Dz SID 1- ic H Er-1 25=<' k- . TAL 5 POL- E -3 1 1--L- /1527 Â£52-'acT-Eb 261 1-H E 12 EA 52. 17-ta < 123120Â»AE 600,;.2.1-bl,(-22) F-.46 i /4 el /Li-,4- 1 /4 -34>TUEET- BETL-JEEN THE j PCPOL- A ee.4 AND 7-rte co-0 2-T f 34833 17.35 E- Llf - AT'03,20-,4 re=- N.rie-ret- Elf ~, A 1 A â‚¬T - i A Mo VY-E-51 O 1- 7- +1-ZE .Pe ul-hz Z- 6 =>am- .[3>2 Ath/aA.,M. Thank you. Planning staff will notify you if further information is requested. (14 ';264 120) exempt.app ,. .. A-1 0-1.-E L 0 252 0 Â»Ug. l 1 0 DECK k Â®TEAA.- POLE H 07-EL W tj C o l-) Â£T 1~A RT) C.2 AL D-,LA- e \A R - 'SNUEL ==:0 Â£21 51Â£1Ck>CA) k f MA 1 Al 5-r-REET f . MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Gary Lyman CC Frank Palcic CC Roxanne Eflin From: Roxanne Eflin Postmark: May 25,90 4:05 PM Subject: Jerome Terrace Message: WE FINALLY HAVE IT, AND SIGNIFICANT CHANGES HAVE TAKEN PLACE WHICH ~HE HPC SUB-COMMITTEE (OR "TERRACE SWAT TEAM") HAVE APPROVED. Since I am out of town all next week, please consider this CEO my signature on the building permit. I have routed you a copy of the revised plan and the detail of the planting box! Thanks for hanging in there. We may have saved a few redwoods! It is CERTAINLY a more compatible design within a historic context. ------- 4. .-21 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Minor Development - Hotel Jerome terrace treatment Date: May 23, 1990 PROJECT SUMMARY: The Hotel Jerome is currently installing 1,951 sq. ft. of redwood decking where the lawn area used to be (west side yard). Work has been stopped in order for HPC to review and approve the development proposal under the Minor Development provisions of the Land Use Regulations. DISCUSSION: The perimeter garden areas are being preserved, in fact enhanced with additional plantings, to provide a natural buffer zone around the deck area. The deck is flush with ' the ground (not raised). The applicant has stated their need for decking is due to the maintenance problems the lawn area has caused them in drainage, maintenance, etc. PUBLIC COMMENT: The Jerome's adjacent neighbor has discussed his displeasure Of this development with staff, stating incompatibility and increased heat in the summer as two principal issues. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider alternatives to such a large expanse of redwood filling in the natural terrace area of the Jerome's west garden. Certainly redwood is a contemporary material, which (in staff's opinion) competes directly with the historic character of the Jerome. We are recommending a significantly reduced portion of redwood be used, if at all, with more lawn area exposed. A brick border in conjunction with the decking may be another alternative worth examining; a variety of textures to soften the contemporary impact is more compatible, in our opinion. USE OF OPEN SPACE: Staff has notified the Jerome's management that any increase in the use of open space, as previously defined in the PUD agreement of 1986, is required to be approved through the Planning and Zoning Commission. We understand they intend to increase seating and the commercial use of the terrace area. This is not an HPC issue, per se, however, has a direct effect on the need for expanded hard terrace surface. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC deny Minor Development approval for the Hotel Jerome's terrace development as submitted, and recommend that they restudy the proposal to incorporate a much higher percentage of vegetated, natural area, i.e. lawn. memo.hpc.jerome.terrace I t .. GIBSON & RENO Â· AFICHITECTS I!71990 i May 16, 1990 Ms. Roxanne Eflin Historic Preservation Commission 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 8161] RE: PROPOSED NEW EXTERIOR TERRACE SURFACE HOTEL JEROME Dear Roxanne: The Hotel Jerome proposes to change the surface material of their Main Street courtyard from grass to redwood decking. Grass has proven difficult to sustain in good condition with the frequent outdoor gatherings which occur in this area. A 2x6 redwood decking surface is proposed, which would be installed "flush" with the existing grass and sidewalk surfaces, and would match the nearby existing redwood decks. All existing ground covers flowers, shrub and tree planting areas which presently exist would be allowed to remain and only the Kentucky Bluegrass areas would be replaced with Redwood Decking. (See attached drawing). As part of this project, a row of juniper shrubs would be added just behind the iron fence parallel to the City sidewalk. We hope to have this improvement ready for our summer season. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Y o ur s t rlu -1/8<~ -- r - 'David F. Gibson, AIA CC: W. Triebnig M. Feller N. MeGrath 418 E. COOPER AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ 303/925 5968 1.#LI'E'511&/1,1 t #MAIN'0 STREET City of Aspen sidewalk (existing fence). --~ -- -~--~-- .. Shrubs 0.- 4 4 ' %. : .0 ... ..... .. D (existing Crab ~ ,, .. <. .. Â·. t. A 414 'Â· ", .9 0 .0 0 0 0 -1. I .. t . .0 I. ......... / 1 7 . . . D . . 2: 2... 0 0. , . ..~.JV, . Apples) ... t .. . 0 ... . ... . a . : .. 0 ...... I ...... (existing # 1. .. ., ..,6. 4 .: 1 ......6.. ... 0 .. ... flower bed) f ' - .. .... (existing Aspens) -- ~ .. .. ---../ N.e-w___Re_dy 9_9_d_-t - 4 . . I+- 13' X 20' - .4 .. - New-Redwood .t Decking -- 27' x 68' - - -- - '* . . . .. 0 4 1 . . D . . . . ... .. ...4. 1: 0 I ... ... . .r (existing -- . . sidewalk) (existing spru - f~I=-2233_ '2 .... ---- -- i. , (existing deck. -11**dat= ..> ..1 I Â¢existing Mugo Eum=appie 4Â· Pines) .... . (existing pool ----- . I .. ..4, 4 Â¥ 0. . r \ 0 ..... 0 .... glly*WAW - NORTH Scale 1/8" = 1' PROJECT TITLE: SCALE /, W , DATE HOTEL JEROME ye) .=la ./6 .fo OWN BY' DRAWING NO. ~ GIBSON & RENO Â· ARCHITECTS 418 E. COOPER AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN. COLORADO elam 1-1-. Ur ...1 , 1, Main Street , 1 0. -__11 \ C> f.\ r / 4\ h City of Aspen sidewalk u,\\ 0 3-(Af \. 1 - ) /1 L.< \ , 1 / exiatIng fence Ly . - -0 -Ill--1.- -li~--~ - - ai,E):a,wa-â€ž,rf,.*,- - =D - ~-3 - - I../.-I...//.I:I."- . 4 .. 0 .. ./ 9.... ... 0 New Juniper 4//rube , .,... . 11; 90(\.. ~,Rplf ,. Â· . C. 11~ ./ ... 4 . ,\ 0 - . . 0.4 .O 0 existing Crab 1 ' ... I . 4% 0. . mt . Apples ' ' . . . . 1/ .. ./. .. ....0 â€¢t .. 0. I. I. .. 0 0 . . .. 9. '44 / -- exiating flower I . e . e K. . ~49 bed 1131\ 0*4173... . Iyew Aspene __- coR:88-mi3~MCI [3~C].Ej~[_1 Â· ~Â· J ~ ~i~ ~ ~ --- fi l n.r--1*1:905Â· existing Aspene -- ---- 10'OCIO:02(0.0.00Â¤3[lm ,; , 6 Newâ€ž 1 '-6"x 1 '-6" , E~posed Aggregate - -_~ ___ _-- :[30,El_0]000(100Â·Of] UE]:0.Â·2 ~ ~~~~' : . *1--1 :. Â·[Jin ;Ilt)Â·~If] *: Pads with Grass --- , ------- ..:7. f .0: 30 Infill . p . ------- -- -- 1 * - --- -.- FA/M- Of](, 0 New Planters -----= ' â€¢ 0 1 ... 4 /9\11 New Redwood '4*39 -a â€¢ f Decking Ell 1 New Benches -- -- ------ y . 01 .- . t 022222 -7-- - - -- -Â· -I ---14Â»:44 + 11 /46'rilt . 4 9 --- ---- -- -- ~_- -d"il . $ 0 -- - - - -I -- : 1 .. .. .. . 1 1 + I 7 / existing sidewalk --------- - - - -- 'xi> - Lifilli:f)) .: ~ -P------------.----/t~ -- .is 1 ------ - existing Spruce - ---- -- - - 0 :- /,1.e r 1 1.: . 6 C -2 -1-~ d ,rri, exieting deck ___ _.- . __ . 0 -- - Pl !1 1.2 existing Mugo -+ it; 1 Fines -- - --- â€¢ .t .1 9-0 - / ---- - .k --2 trirt 21 existing pool 1 M - I --- 1 U. .4 Fa. - .. . ..'. 0 .. 0 . .. . f.'t 4 0 -. . I . I .0 1 1 0 . 9 0 .. 6 14 A . . , . 1 1â‚¬ 4 0 . 1 . Â» 3..4.4 ' . 0. . .. . .. 4 - r ---- .. I .-I -. ... 1 --.. . 17 4 t. I . NORTH --- 1 1 2 --2-- 3-7 --1. I - Scale 1/8"= 1 '-0" PMOJECT TITLE, -lilll. ---Ill-----*Il--I*-+.i--I--- SCALE DATE; HOTEL JEROME Â£ Â£6" 26_ 1 4 5 24 70 OWN IY DRAWI ~41 M. JA:7 er-116.- +--1 't= GIBSON El RENO â€¢ ARCHITECTS I â€¢,e â€¢ 9% 4,Â·4 4 @ D 044 A y. 6 #*1> '"E--1, 1 B.6 b 4 15. 4 D D 6 -6. liwo 04*~0 f y TYPICAL PLANTER BOX ELEVATION DATEÂ· PAOJECT TITLE SCALE 1/,261'-011 D. 26Â·90 1-loT EL LEÂ»MIE 17*.4 -L.JECTI EARANG NO. L -â€¢- GIBSON & RENO Â· ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO. 418 E COOPER AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN- COLORADO 816Â·M .Spe=r' Â·â€¢ 29+ - 130 S. Galena BUILDING PERMIT APPLICA-~1 General 1 Aspen, CO 81611 ASPEN*PITKIN REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT Permit ~ Construction 303/920-5440 PITKIN COUNTY E CITY OF ASPEN E] Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. No. JOB ADDRESS ~ 1.5 50 9 K) Ck\M LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR SUBDIVISION ( [3 SEE ATTACHED SHEET) DESC, 2. MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE 3.761â‚¬L -Ree-O rvt Ltd- 530Â·g-/rojk 9 20 -/ CuD 4 co~Tga E 60 2,4 h c., , 1 4 eas Ltd . 963 - 007 v MAIL ADDR#SS PWONE LICENSE NO. ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAILADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. 5. ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. 6. CLASS OF WORK: CENSUS CODE TOTAL FEE 7 Â»NEW U ADDITION C] ALTERATION E REPAIR 0 MOVE U WRECK USE OF BU DING PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE 3% USE TAX DER 8. dec- K -504 CeÂ· VALUATION OFWORK Type of Construction Occupancy Group Lot Area 9.$ Size of Building No. of Stories Occ. Load 10. Remarks (Total Square Ft.) ~ ~~~~,1 13 Id, D-*( 7 , I. h,1 U T~_i j /__n, 26-3721,2.1, -7- 22Â£7 b EXISTING ADDED E Yes 3 No NO. OF BEDROOMS Use Zone Fire Sprinklers Required: 359â‚¬& UOT ] u F 4 066 uiklkâ‚¬I No. of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: Covered Uncovered SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATE 1. 7 ZONING #.R L. 7 -9,9.# C.~0.90- , 12"40.-4 H.P.C 11. Fixture Count: PARK DEDICATION HEALTH DEPARTMENT FIREPLACE PRESUBMITTAL APPLICATION .ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE FIRE MARSHAL BY BY BY BY SPRINKLER DATE.- DATE DATE DATE WATER TAP NOTICE OTHER SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. SELECTION OF METHOD FOR PAYMENT OF USE TAX THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IFWORKOR CONSTRUCTION E MONTHLY USE OF QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CON- STRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD U DEPOSIT METHOD: 3% OF 25% OF PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOW OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. AT ISSUANCE. FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL MATERIALS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AN0 COST MUST BE FILED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WORK. GENERAL CONTRACTORS CHOOSING THIS METHOD WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT MUST REPORT AND REMIT TAX FOR ALL SUBCONTRACTORS PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITÂ¥.IQ.VIOIJIE-QU..CANCEL THiE PROVISIONS OF THAT DO NOT OBTAIN THEIR OWN PERMIT. --ANY OTHER STATE 0R LOCAL LAW R'5GULATING1ONSTRUC~TION OR TH~ PER- FORMANCE OF CONbTRUCTION. , /~r' U EXEMPT: STATE & PITKIN COUNTY RESALE NO. %/ ut ' On 14 \.3 culs~shs r-10 EXEMPT ORGANIZATION SIGÂ¢IATURE OF CONTRAC~R~R AUMWORZED AGENT ; ' / (DATE) I ' THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED. WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE 4.-3 SIGNATURE OF OWNER (IF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) Plan Check Validation Permit Validation 3% Use Tax Deposit Validation WHITE-FILE COPY GREEN-FINANCE DEPT PINK-BUILDING DEPARTMENT YELLOW-ASSESSOR GOLD-CUSTOMER 1 130 S. Galena BUILDING PERMIT APPLICAP* General Aspen, CO 81611 Construction ASPEN*PITKIN REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT Permit 303/920-5440 PITKIN COUNTY U CITY OF ASPEN E] Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. No. JOB ADDRESS 1. 3 -6 0 9 %1(1\ M LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR SUBDIVISION ( O SEE ATTACHED SHEET) DESC. 2. MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE J-MeL Tee-ome U\-4. 530Â·P--fro,X~ 9 20 -1030 CONTRAÂ¢9rOR MAIL ADDR#SS ,--. PHONE LICENSE NO. 4. DRa E-60 2,4 bui Ideas bEd. 963 - 007 9 ' ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAILADDRESS PHONE LibENSE NO. 5. ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO, 6. CLASS OF WORK: CENSUS CODE TOTAL FEE ** 7.301Ew E ADDITION E ALTERATION C] REPAIR 0 MOVE O WRECK rÂ· USE OF BUIL DING PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE 3% USE TAX DER 8. dec K -Spk eÂ· VALUATION OF WORK Type of Construction Occupancy Group Lot Area i 9Â·$ Size of Buildina No. of Stories Occ. Load 10. Remarks (Total Square A.) , U b 44 , ilm,-92 -412 M,7 72â‚¬06 4 NO. OF BEDROOMS Use Zone Fire Sprinklers Required: EXISTING ADDED [ ] Yes UNo U 41923 tjdE 'U T -12-'91*0 1 Jo 6+0 No. of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: rj Covered Uncovered SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATE 2-0 s.-17 - w, 11 1. wi H. f>Â·C- 4. (,r.j, N, P Â£ 7 - ,)-4 - ZONING 1 (/ H.PC. 1 11. Fixture Count: PARK DEDICATION Â·~ HEALTH DEPARTMENT FIREPLACE PRESUBMITTAL APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE FIRE MARSHAL A BY BY BY BY SPRINKLER DATE - DATE - OATF DATE WATER TAP - NOTICE OTHER SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. SELECTION OF METHOD FOR PAYMENT OF USE TAX 1.Â· THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULLAND VOID IFWORKOR CONSTRUCTION E] MONTHLY USE OF QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. i AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CON- STRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDEDOR ABANDONED FORA PERIOD E DEPOSIT METHOD: 3% OF 25% OF PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOW OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. AT ISSUANCE. FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL MATERIALS # 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND COST MUST BE FILED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF ' KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WORK. GENERAL CONTRACTORS CHOOSING THIS METHOD â‚¬ WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OFA PERMIT DOES NOT MUST REPORT AND REMIT TAX FOR ALL SUBCONTRACTORS ~ PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORI-1Â¥Â·-IQ*VIOLATE{18 CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF THAT DO NOT OBTAIN THEIR OWN PERMIT. 1. --ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW R'5GULATING~ONSTRU~TION OR THE~ PER- g FORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. /~,n [3 EXEMPT: STATE & PITKIN COUNTY RESALE NO. t \ 3014\ on 'C D 01(97>311;po WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE EXEMPT ORGANIZATION ' SIGAIATURE OF CONTRACIRe,OR AUTHORIZED AGENT ' THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED. SIGNATURE OF OWNER (IF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE} Plan Check Validation Permit Validation 3% Use Tax Deposit Validation J Rty.Â· ' Â· .KE fo Â·Â· WHITE-FILE COPY GREEN-FINANCE DEPT PINK-BUILDING DEPARTMENT YELLOW-ASSESSOR GOLD--CUSTOMER 2,2,A. .9-,â€žFJ -"t :1 130 S. Galena BUILDING PERMIT APPLICA~I General 1 Construction Aspen, CO 81611 ASPEN*PITKIN REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT Permit 303/920-5440 PITKIN COUNTY E] CITY OF ASPEN U Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. No. JOB ADDRESS f 1. 23 6 0 9 Nh (1 1 6.-4 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR SUBDIVISION ( E] SEE ATTACHED SHEET) DESC. 2. st ZIP OWNER MAILADDRESS - PHONE k 4 0 7 A 3. ~342 L -762 ome l.td . 330 2/rrmw 7 4-L' - i ---lib CONTRe / MAIL i-, PHONE LICENSE NO. 10Rt:/is 0 6-fc/ Lik 5 - Â«9 9 1326 %60 2,4 bui i L ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LibENSE NO. ENGINEER MAILADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. 1 6. CLASS OF WORK: CENSUS CODE TOTAL FEE 7.;ter,EW El ADDITION m ALTERATION El REPAIR Ll MOVE D WRECK USE OF BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE 3% USE TAX DEP 8 dec K 50*c e. VALUATION OFWORK 4. Type of Construction Occupancy Group Lot Area 9.$ Size of Building No. of Stories Occ. Load 10. Remarks (Total Square Ft.) 0 0%.3112 32,Â·2 0,1,-7- 22(26 NO. OF BEDROOMS Use Zone Fire Sprinklers Required: EXISTING ADDED [ -1 Yes U No - hu>El LjoT ) U T-,2 1 +4(L -1 61/0 tl,+7 No of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: -- Covered Uncovered , Â¥.. U.Al 4 . , SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATE 1 ZONING //Re 9- 1''I < C ./ , 2.4, H.P.C. 11. Fixture Count: PARK DEDICATION HEALTH DEPARTMENT FIREPLACE PRESUBMITTAL APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE , FIRE MARSHAL BY BY BY BY SPRINKLER DATF DATE DATE DATE --- WATER TAP 4. NOTICE OTHER F SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. SELECTION OF METHOD FOR PAYMENT OF USE TAX fÂ· THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IFWORKOR CONSTRUCTION m MONTHLY USE OF QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CON- STRUCTION ORWORKISSUSPENDEDORABANDONEDFORAPERIOD U DEPOSIT METHOD: 3% OF 25% OF PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOW OF 120 DAYS AT ANYTIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. AT ISSUANCE. FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL MATERIALS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND COST MUST BE FILED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF 4 KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECL ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WORK. GENERAL CONTRACTORS CHOOSING THIS METHOD h WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT MUST REPORT AND REMIT TAX FOR ALL SUBCONTRACTORS PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITTLQ-VIOLATE.QR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF THAT DO NOT OBTAIN THEIR OWN PERMII ---ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW 615GULATING9ONSTRUgTION OR THE PER- FORMANCE OF CON@TRUCTION. /L m EXEMPT: STATE & PITKIN COUNTY RESALE NO. ,)(IU i \ o sic 0 61-1 L 93> 4*Â© , EXEMPT ORGANIZATION SIGNATURE OF CONTRACWqR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED. WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE 3 SIGNATURE OF OWNER (IF OV,NER BUILDER) (DATE) Plan Check Validation Permit Validation 3% Use Tax Deposit Validation 46 4â€¢i~= 1 WHITE-FILE COPY GREEN-FINANCE DEPI PINK-BUILDING DEPARTMENT YELLOW-Â·ASSESSOR GOLD-CUSTOMER . ./. A It 6.: 4 . 1 r 130 S. Galena BUILDING PERMIT APPLICA~ General 1 Construction Aspen, CO 81611 ASPEN*PITKIN REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT Permit 303/920-5440 PITKIN COUNTY [3 CITY OF ASPEN E] Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. No. ' JOB ADDRESS 1. 3 42 0 5 3-h'J).\ R l LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR SUBDIVISION ( C] SEE ATTACHED SHEET) DESC. 2. OWNER -7- MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE 6 2 unie L.tcj. 330 6-0 -P-4 i /1.7 CONTRA~OR $ MAIL AnDR~SS .- 7ONE LICENSE NO. 4. [3)201% 601264 OU, d Â¢/4 Ltd , 9470 - /,1/)7 0 ' ARCHITECTOR DESIGNER MAILADDRESS PHONE LibENSE NO. 5. ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. 6. CLASS OF WORK: CENSUS CODE TOTAL FEE 7, ENEw El ADDITION El ALTERATION E REPAIR C] MOVE U WRECK â€¢ USE OF BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE 3% USE TAX DER 8. 1-/Li. 3 1 ---- .T ...4 or E 301 ce VALUATION OF WORK 1 Type of Construction Occupancy Group Lot Area 9.$ Size of Building No. of Stones Occ. Load 10. Remarks - (Tbtal Square Ft.) 4/0 11, IL Di,~/Ki -2, 67,+â€ž 7 K. 262 ~) NO. OF BEDROOMS Use Zone Fire Sprinklers Required: Â· EXISTING ADDED 1 1 Yes UNo Dz Â· 6- C Â£/u 1 1, r, 2, VAL f , '.) / u, LÂ¥ ' 4 No, of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: Covered Uncovered SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATE , -7 ' ZONING ' , lib, 5 , H.P.C. 11. Fixture Count: PARK DEDICATION HEALTH DEPARTMENT FIREPLACE PRESUBMITTAL APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE FIRE MARSHAL BY BY BY BY SPRINKLER DATF DATE DATE DATF . WATER TAP NOTICE OTHER SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, ' HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. SELECTION OF METHOD FOR PAYMENT OF USE TAX THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORKOR CONSTRUCTION Â£ MONTHLY USE OF QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CON- STRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDEDOR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD 2 DEPOSIT METHOD: 3% OF 25% OF PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOW OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. AT ISSUANCE. FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL MATERIALS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND COST MUST BE FILED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF r. KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WORK. GENERAL CONTRACTORS CHOOSING THIS METHOD WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOI THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT MUST REPORT AND REMIT TAX FOR ALL SUBCONTRACTORS ./ PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TQ VIOLATE 08 CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF THAT DO NOT OBTAIN THEIR OWN PERMII 1 -- ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW ~GULATING'gONSTRUCTION OR THE PER- FOAMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. 4 m EXEMPT: STATE & PITKIN COUNTY RESALE NO. , 2/-L<t \ 4 -, 1 (. \3 01 i (g-~ S~)5 f--10 EXEMPT ORGANIZATION SIGNATURE OF CONTRAC~R'OR AUTHORIZED AGENT ' THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED. f (DATE) ~ â‚¬ WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE b / 2 SIGNATURE OF OWNER (IF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) Plan Check Validation Permit Validation 3% Use Tax Deposit Validation WHITE-FILE COPY GREEN-FINANCE DEPT PINK-BUILDING DEPARTMENT YELLOW-ASSESSOR GOLD-CUSTOMER 1/ V 4 1 4.4.00.0 -) r. .. i. t i . 16..f . C rl . Ker i, U.': C g (22 0 U.,1 ~ i f ..4. 1 1 134 3= 4 -Â· Â·!i. Â·r b "* .1-I , , 1-1 -M" WOODEN BENCHESr=634~1~ '*lg ;, - ---Â·--1 j -1- =Il /; - ---Ill --1---.-- I.Li--/. I .:If , - er'<"I:-42"Ara--.-1--"-,1 -- - r . 0. ..7=-1 1 11 , W. U. - 1 . -~Â·~= ~~ Tip ' ~~ ...Lri - ' 17 $ - .2' 'â€¢0 / I . . 064 UP . t Â·u - , rÂ·â€¢ 1 - 1-...tMI. -- lt: lA - 18 -, t, - '... -- . - _ .r- . 4..,: ..w ..+ Â· , -1917mV-7,4770 -17'0'tr 1.3 904 -- - -- - 1 . 1 A p Â· ... . ./f./' 3 !t 'f Â·:L â€ž. L .--2 , - . ' 15> =_sti=u:~-711~ j; 1.i .Â·'%8":UW...4-41~Â·UisuÂ·,A.Sr:- 4 -- A 1 ~ 1 - :. 1 :7-. .17.* 1 L.''F . .: . . , i . 1 r. , . . :r. + . .. ... 1 - . . 1/ . â‚¬ 1 -'imm 1 -' . - I.- . ---C F ~Â· Â· -- I 1 1. ~ -ful,31Â»jf994*Jag Ir-5.7(~.36--''ft- 1 .... /1/ 11 6,0/ . law'. DZ-MUK%. 2,111 Â· -- -- - 1 - - - 1:40.: T-Â· 27- w 41-rf. 4 . 4:ir:i- Â·~ ip< ..- . A, 1 - 1 LA - BAA)2=12 - 1 -a Â·-r -*.. Â¥ 71 k A- --- , .. 4.11 - "0 L L:. .- -1. .. . 1 -- r- - k -7.-- I aCHIENEWaaDEREA<IECBDXEr 47Â· Ici . I_ b'kâ€ž , 140-1- 1 k * l ~941"Aif"Tr-ij.*f,: 5 k /1 A- - i 322#f<1. -E~)Â·/ --4 ..i.3..... d, -1 L V ., V . 0. a. W T 4 I 1/17 r Â· Â» Â· -, 1- . -Il...,9- ...1 ...1 2 .:. I /04- -- - - 11,26 -1:1 1%, - 04 x \3 '- 0 ~ D - 4 It. I ,, I. . & 1 L' 8 11. . v 0 - - q 2,0 - ' 139% 1600-A ! 9 1 - - , 2- EXISTINE DECK 001Â« 41Â« . t HOIELL--J EROME LUEET COURTYARD _ Ils) Ag . f-1 - fldl,oto oc clce_klj#1 - 7461'-0- Â· - JASPEN-CONSTEUCTORS-1-EQ- BOX 1460 _ASPEN Colo 2 -DRAWN- BY:- REq - COULTER - 3/16/TO - 1- . kil# 9.4/ r-15-9 0 0,4 1 3Â£.- 1 Â·1Â¥ fÂ·- 3 3Â»0 6.41.1 72.2 Lrk,Â£1.4 6-/u a p-,--1 U; ASPEN*PITKIN ~ REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT k Â£ CORRECTION NOTICE ~ Â® STOP WORK ORDE,B Job Located at ilk c 14 -4 I ./ -33 2 E-Â·Fl . 'll f I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and ~ have found the following violations of City, County and/or Colorado State laws governing same: F Ut{C â„¢j. 301 - ~er-42~ ~17'~ 3 6 1 - A.404.- L.j - PR-, 214 309 2,Â», 7 + Zlet fA, PiJ 305- L Z" 1 f .AL f 'c 4,_~h:Zir, Resnond By 2 4 Â£ ri. Sf/6~'D Photos Taken: Yes El No g ; Please Contact 6-1 4- Youare herebynotifiedthat nomore workmay bedone uponthe ~ premises until the above violations are corrected. If you do not : communicate with thisoffice bythe above date, this matter will be [ referred tothe appropriate authorities for enforcement. Failure to ~ correct the violations may subject you to a civil suit for an injunc- tion, or a fine, or both; or to misdemeanor criminal prosecution,1 which upon conviction may carry a sentence of fine or imprison- 1 ment, or both. \ 4 CLA A Pl Inspector for Building Department 4 Building Department Phone 925-2020 Time of Day 2 :06/ 24. Aspen, Colorado 81611 b 1 ~ DO NOT REMOVE THIS TAG ~ Detach and bring this portion to the Building Department LUâ‚¬ 1 0 e-4 - 3 34 6, r/LL Location Date '77--7-,Ill ~ 3 â€¢Si.ht i' ~ :71.1 uy/ji....f t.. 0 1 .*.---Ill=.i.- --. . -. _4 1 1/ 11 k ri 1-4 1 1 3 0 664 9 1 b --- 1 O 6 0 Â«cd SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT 4 Development Application for Exemption from HPC review (Please attach supplemental information, i.e. sketches, samples, catalogue details or any information which may be of assistance in approving the development activity. Please provide a detailed description of the proposed activity.) | Applicant's name: Address and day phone: -3.30 E. 94*. f n -3 260 -_/000 Property owner: , -10+ e, 1 1 6.roy,Â·1 6- U . tners Ltd Is applicant authorized to represent owner in this application?.26 Address of property: 3-2>0 (EL- 84Â£~ .., /b~e,1 Name of property, if applicable: 4Â·'c /' Â· ~ C , - <ryÂ¥7 C- Is this an Individually Designated Landmark? yes Located within the Commercial Core Historic Ovdrlay District? 4-2Â£3~ Located within the Main Street Historic Overlay District? U Does the proposed development meet the standards specified in Paragraph #2 in Attachment #4? Explain in detail the proposed development: 1/00 (OU-2 4-brnUL CLIA f, A A V 19<-.06-LÂ«la (73 inA /1/1-0.0-7 --13i/1 -7~~4 4,4 k...~a.Â· O 0 1/4 7 31Â»Â« -,-. 39 4,01-741 6-1 0.0--a.n ju--00~1~--or>R) cjk..ec.4- ._..ktv<:f- . J h 0Â·07.Zâ‚¬f Ex../ *2.< .4. 5 -d 7 ... . . -4 , .ir . - --1-x'J , tflu c- 4 7 fi.,. _j. L '4220 L- 1 -}Â£ ? 90-40Â© Â«40 Umun a Kn,a.or< unc.e ALA pUrvuÂ£,2: (ARAA .c) ''L-,6 ----â‚¬2i-, T-Jf- Jub 141 .Â·p:â‚¬A-&09 J '/ J 6t.Â«urQ l,on.AIa&- ' t._a u'l-u-- -*11 s A A 2..a .76:t .Â£664,Â·, r .'7144 %71 _75~11- 1 ...4.45 631 .1.66Â») I c ~ i ~ ~&~Â«.CIâ‚¬ C) r y-,3 013-40--rj? f.<r-646' 73>cat-lf) 41.-~,f-:5-6â€ž 0/ r?#-tor., , OunD> Abc.,,u .....tl~~,,1 AP.uqlÂ·und .ofiU ; 4914/y-147LY.4 f*Â·1 4 c.fan. 609 1.1.Â· jF~ ) h.Â· O /1, A / 6.G, : 14 i R.,cit:e~.- I 1 . 1(f / AD r t rv : z , i .g . Â·Â·Jt-- Ag> A 4.2,Â« rrv~ -ttift- f.~Â·~~9*~-~ iT,r;UUOt-\ .-2 r, 2/v\ luuiqa --j-lu ,2~e 61/1'1/ 4 22< 14. . 404,< . r O-Or-70 . Thank you. Planning staff will notify you if further information is requested. exempt.app . (16,4 6 f ft clau (( col - - 4 4!BLE Â« 0 414.-2 -4,.4-- fj -J . 3 fi-t' f Â»i't t, < O *â‚¬v, 140 - 40 . r' tj ~ <i-146~ 4(! Otal< 40, EC) 3- Icly .. f- 0 I r O -1 8021< J 2-4) C.(IEJAâ€ž 1- ro H &2 W 3-7 0 m k OZ 0 Z =rn 0 010 00 m A MENDED AND RESTATED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP MENT AEREE 2NT HOTEL JEROME - RENOVATION AND ADDITION THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 32_z-~ day of , 1986, by and between THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, a municipal cor poration and home rule city ( here- inafter referred to as "City"), and HOTEL JEROME LIM ITED PARTNER- SHIP and MARKETING CORPORATION OF AMER ICA (hereinafter collec- tively referred to as "Owner"), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner owns that real property and the building situ- ated thereon, commonly kno wn as the "Hotel Jerome", more particu- larly described as follows: Lo ts A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, O, P, Q, R, S and the East 2 0 feet of Int N, Block 7 9, together with the East 170 feet of the vacated alley in said Block 79, City and Tbwnsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado ; WHEREAS, Owner's predecessor in title, John F. Gilmore sub- mitted to the City for approv al, execution and record ing a final Planned Unit Developnent (PUD) plat pertaining to the developnent of that project known asÂ·the "Hotel Jerome - Renov ation and Add i- tion" (hereinafter referred to as the "Initial Proj ect"); and WHEREAS, Owner' s pred ecessor in title entered into a Planned Unit Development Agreement with the City for said Initial Proj ect , entitled "Planned Unit Development Agreement - Hotel Jerome - SEP 15 PITKI 28id83 0 0 t ; 4.Â·_, r.ilk LJL' 7. Miscellaneous I ssues. Owner agrees to the following itens as a condition of this agreement and the approvals contained herein: a) Owner shall remove overhead wires in the middle of the garden prior to the issuance of a building perm it for Pha se II for safety reasons. b) Owner, at Owner' s sole cost and expense, shall repair the underground electric line serv icing the street lights on Mill Street which was sev ered during construction of Phase I. Such repairs shall meet appl icable City specifications. c) A transformer and em erg enc y generator are located on the western edge of the garden. Owner i s ex pl or i ng m ov i ng these to a new location on the site. Should this prove to be impr actical, Owner shall work with neighbors to lessen sound transmissions from the generator. d) Owner shall prov ide guest transportation and air- port pickup and delivery. Any vehicle owned, possessed or oper- ated for such pur poses by Cwner, shall be stored in the und er- ground garage. e) Owner has received cond itional use approv al from the Planning and Zoning Commission for the expansion of the hotel in the Ce zone district, special rev iew approv al to vary the trash and utility access area, and special review approval to utilize the garden area for forty-four (44 ) outdoor dining seats associ- ated with the restaurants in the Proj ect. Such o utdoor d in ing seats shall not diminish allowable indoor seating. 11 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Minor Development - Hotel Jerome terrace treatment Date: May 23, 1990 PROJECT SUMMARY: The Hotel Jerome is currently installing 1,951 sq. ft. of redwood decking where the lawn area used to be (west side yard). Work has been stopped in order for HPC to review and approve the development proposal under the Minor Development provisions of the Land Use Regulations. DISCUSSION: The perimeter garden areas are being preserved, in fact enhanced with additional plantings, to provide a natural buffer zone around the deck area. The deck is flush with the ground (not raised). The applicant has stated their need for decking is due to the maintenance problems the lawn area has caused them in drainage, maintenance, etc. PUBLIC COMMENT: The Jerome's adjacent neighbor has discussed his displeasure of this development with staff, stating incompatibility and increased heat in the summer as two principal issues. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider alternatives to such a large expanse of redwood filling in the natural terrace area of the Jerome's west garden. Certainly redwood is a contemporary material, which (in staff's opinion) competes directly with the historic character of the Jerome. We are recommending a significantly reduced portion of redwood be used, if at all, with more lawn area exposed. A brick border in conjunction with the decking may be another alternative worth examining; a variety of textures to soften the contemporary impact is more compatible, in our opinion. USE OF OPEN SPACE: Staff has notified the Jerome's management that any increase in the use of open space, as previously defined in the PUD agreement of 1986, is required to be approved through the Planning and Zoning Commission. We understand they intend to increase seating and the commercial use of the terrace area. This is not an HPC issue, per se, however, has a direct effect on the need for expanded hard terrace surface. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC deny Minor Development approval for the Hotel Jerome's terrace development as submitted, and recommend that they restudy the proposal to incorporate a much higher percentage of vegetated, natural area, i.e. lawn. memo.hpc.jerome.terrace