The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.332 W Main St.HPC034-00~ 2735-124-41-007 HPC034-00 1~ 4 332 W. Main St. HPC Conceptual L. 1 , -. 62* il P - 5 9 1 1 P C 1 HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS O- ------- --------2----r--J-___-__-_--__---0-_-__---_-7 412 N MIU ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 1 C J 970 925 2556 fax 925 7981 mall@teaguearch.com -gÂ»/0 --------4-4*-4--------n ' -i, 1 i 3 0 0 1 'A. .& 4,4 /244<1*04 3 \ 1 - 1, 1 L Â® 1 I -1 1% - ... .1~ 10 |- 1 042/4 /,2,3-7.9 1 E 1- 11 0 1(0 .1 11.11 ,! 1- 1 0 l E 0 99Â«Â»Â»Â» 8 ' :C:.:34.i~-Â·~~ r.::thl</<ilit%,7.FTÂ©/f/~/~44~7LLp/Â«2 P 12 Consultant Information , >-1 O I E ..tl-''f t-1 l l : tiC -1* 1 '11 1 1 L - it--I 72:. . 3-'.,fÂ»Â«~4>ff/~ h==I L/ /1 9 Â»222 7' F~ - - tf f 1 I fooffl 9 1 4 -/4,4 //A-~1 . '4 r . 01 ' . 4 33 j Ul U j Z 1 existing site plan LU 0 A002 1/8" = 1'-0" C: 0 -U) CD ME S JO 6 - S 14d 50' 49" W f --.---3---13660 ' ocizz . 1 Ul -------------- ---- --__-_______f_-____ 1 j- - line Of side-setback -- ~ 1 gravel~driveway 0 2 I W I off street window well 0 ' *4 0 1 parking space F-- . 1, 0 I - El - - B 4, -1 /1 1 > r - - d --1 -2 VIC 4- ..1/ 1 -1 tord - - --. 1 r. "b IF - M 0 -- -0 -1- ri-- a= e. .5 1 i-4 - ED O \ 0 1 011.6 lili 1 CL 1 -i--1 - - 1 1 21 1 '1 - --- r.---- 3 i1g Â·e 67_ Elietil 11- -- -- 11 1-11 1 11 1 - 11 1 1 11 17 -2-Z= 4 V: f _j o 1 x I concrete walk 1 1 1 1-1 1 3 - -r n rE 4 - t- 4 " 1 1 -1 1 11 'L E~:I concrete walk line ofside setbag!~ 1 . 100.00' 11.15.00 HPC Date Issue concrete driveway existing curb cut third street site plan CT) proposed site plan 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" A002 Mle/vep!9 eleJOUOO leans uleul jee,;s ulew existing driveway existing car port 133wl Slvas concrete sidewalk line of rear setback HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2556 fax 925 7981 mall@teaguearch.com 0 0 0 000 14'-4" , 19'-9" , 14'-61/4" , 5'-9" 0 8061/2" Consultant Information 17'-21/4Â· 14'-10" , 2'- 3/4" 22'-11 1/2Â· 6'-5 1/2" 81-4 1/2' e , 3'-23/4" 3'-23/4" ; 3,-101/4â€¢ , 4'-61/4" 1 1 1 74-\--31\1/0//01 p.7-/..7-.7-/- I-/7.I i.1- \ 1 1. 1 CO light well ,5/00: ',.245f, /' . t. -/~I . ./> h //600>Al....4 â„¢\ -_-1 u LEÂ· r. i ..~ r rrr . a. 1.....1 Ft'.a lu'4â€¢242 L - - --- =- le - 1 1 - 1 - - 1 4~ 1 - .1 - - \ / 12{?J,iiI i~ / - 74Â« U.1 ia o - , closet 614 Em ~ .W gr 1 -#Ms (Il guest bedroom ~ ~ mechanical 005 006 j 9 31 1.1 3. 5 0 51 m 5 /1 media ro, LU@ 8 0 1 2,1 001 Il 55 - i ~ UP < Â·Â·~-Â·tÂ·Â· IL 4 0 1 -Ii--6 - :17....,N , '' -NH ' . . lf[ 1. , 1 k A Â»10 il 7 5 Il I Powder 1 1 3 ath j U 1 003 71 . 01 lilli . 2 I.Fl #Lf (04(5~ Ll-ff t IIS.1 - M dumb f 3 U=n:L 'b walter 4 . 1 1 Ill storage 007 - _ | G~6~~6~aaaa~~G~G~ 4~G~~..~GAa-An-~- ~~ L wine cellar 7- 7 --29- --i---- - 002 7 *F-- -_ 1 - U X / 4474 - L N 1----- I I 2 pki,-ru. 1-,~ ==Â»0=47 L, 6. ---IJ' 1 11 08,1 , 2'-8" .. . 3'-r 0 7'-41/4 . 307= Date Issue 11.15.00 HPC 12.22.00 basement C-Ih basement floor plan floor plan 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" A100 5'-111/2 'N3dSV Slvas HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2556 fax 925 7981 mall@teaguearch.com 0 0 0 000 14'-4" . 19'-9" , 14'-61/4" 0 5,9" . 8'-61/2" Consultant Information 1 1 1 1 0 - i------------------In 1 1 1 1 1 1 ..0 /7 lili 1 149 cover parking light well 1 W - - 1 a~.0.1 - 11 c----i#i- - 1 *1 /----N 5 9//A 1 1 / 1 1% 712 / bath ~ 103 -1 41 + 31- i - ..., ~r====tw/,2476177&4~LYL9AA /IND 31 29 0 -- O 55 0 guest bedroom 7 7 4- 106 293 , guest bedroom Off 52 9 104 3 ....B e ti A , 40 1 0 1 walk-in closet 21 -EEL-Lifl / 102 / /1 1 ~.- -1 3- --2 0 5 0.117777.=1 f W DN Il f up U.la O \ a >- D bath fi eplace , lilli UJ rD , f l 105~ i A , -~,~,-0*:6 -- --~a~- garage p ~ 108 laundry 5.-2230 l J --1-77771~ 7 i ~ r closet chute rU=% 1 dumb 11 5 ---1 02 ET# 1 1 : 4 1 - porch /1 1 1 11 M u-u_- 4 walter IL j 5 777..7. 'j tihiui.l'e//; j~~i uiti~~i mwmmifi -i j ~ii/ii/nipx 100 mudroom 71 F bench 107 closet j~ entry foyer r' Wn'Unitium.:.5Â«xx~Â»ay~ 1- 9 164~ AJ*000/-4 -11 1 1 1 1 1 Date Issue 11.15.00 HPC 12.22.00 first ~"Tj first floor plan floor plan 1/4" = 1'-0" ~Al 10j 1/4" =1'-0" A110 00 El Slvas HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2556 fax 925 7981 mail@teaguearch.com 0 0 0 000 14'-4" . 19'-9" . 14'-61/4" 5'-9" . 8'-61/2 Consultant Information - master bedroom - ~ ~ - - 7 ~-~~j~~I~ 207 lilli 22 VII \1 1 _ bu#et - - +Z WI r--------lf------- /0// I ....././///2/////. /./////0/././ I /////////// .///./. / open - 1 V' dining room living room ~~~ f roof deck to below ~ ~------2~ 01 203 201 4 4 f j 5---lit~HtIll-~W- li i 4 1 I fit 11 ~~ walk-in closet 4 ' 4 208 -0- DN U)~ hallway 1 1- UU 5 206 r---1 []~ fireplace_~~| 1511 p 1 1 : 3 1- y*Tl,#.,1.'.....10'..., . 4 dumb in 0-DJ 111 \q/ //j ///ll//jill/f/jil j/////j ff//// //////il // ///j/ mmMImfl L un-;"-1 / W . f d walter 1-/ 1 a ------_ D U) 1 C 2 1{ 8/7 31 '~ //bray 67 I - 9/ powder - 1 205 1 te: 1 202 - U):1 2 1 Trmrm laundivd roof deck f Cool<TOP 4 1 1 ----- chute f --10 -1 11 / ~ bath --~ 11 209 01 _ 0 -f 9 kitchen u, 1 0 204 lli h Â¢ U) "j'mn771. -.VEN#Nwmmwmwimummnw. 1 1 1 1 Date Issue 11.15.00 HPC 12.22.00 second (<7~) second floor plan floor plan 1/4" = 1'-0" <Al 20j 1/4"=1'-0" A120 00 .In L L-,9 ' .t-,t, ; 13381 0091:I0100' HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2556 fax 925 7981 mall@leaguearch.com 21 300 3 I~ consui.8.i.m..n _199=101__._~ _*- finished floor 2199391_~ -*- finished floor 0 23 south elevation 1,1.- 1/4" = 190" 'Will O -0 ~ 9 85 L d El U p 1 Date Issue 11.15.00 HPC 12.22.00 2 j west elevation exterior elevations A200 ) 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" A200 =1 HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2556 fax 925 7981 mall@leaguearch.com ff Consultant Information I ff U.1 - 4 0 Z U.1 "- Ul U.10 OBSO ( 1 ) north elevation ./'ZO 1/4" = 1'-0" ...2 d ~A210j 9 83 U): 2 ,M U.1 U) EU f 109'-10" finished-tiooF -~- 11.15.00 HPC --- 12.22.00 1 - 100'-0" finished floor exterior elevations ( 2 j east elevation - 1/4" = 100" 0- 1/4" = 1'-0" A210 LAUN 46+ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXISTING ! i i i I ASPHALT SHINGLE ASPHALT SH\NeLE ROOFINg ROOFING 1 1 615 , I Ve. TRIM 1 1 1 i EXISTINS STANDINe SEAM ASPHALT SHINeLE METAL ROOF INS ROOFINe 12 T.O. F.F. @UPPER 2 - t ELEV. 1101-7,1 1 8.0. HEADER ~ ~ 1 ELEV. 107'-4" ~_~~~ HISTORIC DBL. HUNG MINPOR METAL FLUE i 04/ CAP ~11 .-111 HISTORIC BAY MINDOW Â¢ TRIM illee/ %10 - METAL SIDINe - - MESH. VENT Pe. PECK 1% BEYOND ' 41, T.O. F.F. @ LOWER ~ T.O. F.F. @ LOMER 1 - - 7 ELEV. 100'-o" ELEV. 100.0. @1 CD 10 / h ECRESS .NOOM E HORIZ. AD SIPINS / METAL EeRESS TO MATCH EXISTINS LADDER li SUBGRADE SUBGRAPE MALL FOUNDATION BEYOND i \\ 11 1 MALL 0 1 METAL FLASHINS T.O. CONC. 1---1---------_----------3-* - - ELEV. 64'-10" AS BUILT EAST ELEVATION 1/4"=F-O" &... EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEÂ¥ FLUE EXITINS METAL FLASHING BRICK NER PORMER FV 19**f,3 KI EXISTING CHIMNEY 1 "'~I NER DORMER PV STANDING ASPHALT SHINSLE i , i ~ i SEAM METAL 1 1 I ~ NER MINDOR , $4 diW; M ROOFINS ' i 12~ , VERT. Pe. SIDING EÂ»ttl ROOFINS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 METAL SUARDRAIL EXISTING ' 1 11 HISTORIC 1%<.:4=41 1 *"ff/':.1 1 1 ~ 1 DOUBLE HUNS EXITING ASPHALT SHINGLE i 1 1 , VVINDOW 1 4*ji HISTORIC , ~ - B.O. BEAM @ DORMER ROOFING DOUBLE HUNS ' ~ 1 1 1, ' ELEV. 114'-4 9/4" NER DOOR Â¢ EXISTING lf=%1 1 1 1- - 11'lf...341 - WINDOMS ' ' 1.11 EXISTING TRANSOM HORIZ. 743. [44/41 HORIZ. FO SIDING SIDING 10.1 1 1 NEA DORMER FV VERT. PNP. SIDINe ./ PÂ»49 1 T.O. PLATE @ UPPER Iâ€ž T.O. PLATE @ UPPER 19%93*4* -- ME*kil CL-APet~~|~~)~6 | 7 ELEV. ll5'-Il" LINE OF i i ' El-EV. 115'-lili 14*fl HANPRAIL ' le&3.3.*i:1 -TYPICAL FOR ENTIRE 12*43-21 BUILDINe - EXHAUST VENT NEM VERT. -- - 12 Ve. EXISTINS 9--- SIDING ASPHALT SHINGLE 12 ROOFING 3 T.O. F,F. @ UPPER .k T.O. F.F. @ UPPER -- - 1 - - - 4 1 7 ELEV. 110'-7" 0 7 HISTORIC FND. ELEV. 110'-7' EXISTING i ~ f m 0 DETAILING ' T.O. PLATE @ ROOF AD. SIDINS ELEV. IO4'-8 3/8" (EXISTINS) 6 N a. e OPERABLE EXISTING > AINDOW STANDINe BEAM 6 I- 4 METAL ROOF INS & HISTORIC Â»ID. TRIM METAL FLOINER BOX -- - =2 METAL SIPING METAL SUARDRAIL NER MINDOR ~ BEYOND AP. PECKINS EXISTING AD. DECKINS VERT. PNP. SIDINe HISTORIC BAY I IPROGRESS: 12-11-2000 PNOW. BEYOND METAL FLOKER BOX EXISTINe METAL.lr - = CONG. STEP j METAL SIPINe eUARPRAIL GRADE -~ GRADE N ~ T.O. F.F. @ LOWER i T.O. F.F. @LOWER 100'-O" 1 ELEV. 100'-O" l SUBGRADE SUBS- 1 1 ~ I ~__ _~ | ~ - MALL 1 | HORIZ. AD SIDINS , | | | | LISHT PELL -1 TO MATCH EXISTINe EXISTING HORIZ. P==g 1 1 NI' 2- FC SIDING BEYOND ~0;~- _ --- - ~ f MALL BEYOND LISHT FELL | METAL SUARDRAIL | | | || | | issuedate: Rev. ~Date NOTE: NO CHANeES ARE h Construction PROPOSED FOR NORTH ELEV. - LleHTMELL E-4 1 11 11 METAL FLASHING ELEVATIONS ~ ~ ~ EGRESS MINDOW -_- Drawing Title: T.O. CONC. T.O. CONS. File name: BONE-A31.dwg 1 1------ El-EV. 89'-10" Sheet#: ELEV. 81'40" Li---1------------- - L AE BUILT SOUTH ELEVATION / 1 1 AS BUILT MEST ELEVATION ~ ~ A 3 i 1 --94"-27-0" A NOLVAONmd US 3ldS311ID 9 LS k WHB OCIVE!0100 'N3dSV 03AMBSabl E-LHOM PV 013}jaH.L.1.HelbIAdOO SNIC]nloNI 'S.Dely 03AMBSE]H 83H10 -11%1 ONV *Hoinlvls Mvl NOINWOollv NtÂ¥138 11Â¥HS SloELLIHOHV V,IntlkIOSNOO S.LOR.LIHONV IAInUHOSNOO =IO NOISSIF,had Nal.LIEIM HO}kid 3HllnOH.LIM 03ldOO hIO DE]Sn 38 AVVI NOllvr'IhIO~INI SIHI 30 -Lavd ON 9103.LIHOBV WAil.80SN0D 80 A.LHEidOMel 3,Â·LL SI 1Na,InOOD SIH.L NO aaNIVINOO 1NaiNI N91S3O C]NV NOI-LMGOdNIE,Hl -S-LOELLIHOhIV INnilhloSNOO 0002 Â© 919 ope,oloo uedse '199Â£ 1J OS U 00 Fri Jan 05 13:52: 52 2001 F 30" COTTONWOOD SILLESPIE ST. 14" COTTONHOOP FRONT YARD 14" COTTONWOOD 7 SETBACK 3 1-1.83 4--3 38.54 7\l 31.24' \ 16" COTTONWOOP -7 1 / 4 00 1 1 0 / 560" / - *s*i 3<519< L OF EXISTINe LARGER DASHED LINE ~ SIDE YARD SETBACK -4 ~ 1 --~ --- ~~ ,/ W PITCH LOCATION .J ./44 f<- - - -- - - -7 J I 8" COTTONWOOD 1 1 d-1 U [- /1 / L=.1 j h 1 1 TO BE REMOVED - SMALLER DASHED LINE OF ~ 1 1 \-JOHNSON REVISED | ~ , /// PITCH LOCATION r 111 , 0-1 14" COTTONWOOP -1 - / ~1 n I TO BE MOVED - 1 -\Un- -A- 1 17 X I 1 \64 / / n EXISTFI~~NAF22Â¥J n 1 1 1 _1-3 N 1 1 BE DEMOLISHED \ i 1l r-Ti L 1 lim 1 1 111 ~ r [* 1 14" SPRUCE TO . 0 4111-1 li -r-1 1 1 1 [ i -BE MOVED 1 i 0 1/1-31 3 4 EXISTINS SUBSRAPE -9 1 1 1 EXTERIOR STAIRS - 10" ASPEN TO BE DEMOLISHED ~ 1 1 ...:lil&19-L k1-9 I i PREVIOUS HOUSE ~ 0 1 117 ' LOCATION 10" ASPEN -- -- 5.43 L----1 1 Â«13/ / ~ DEMOLISH NON-HISTORIC SIDE YARD L SHED ADDITION PRIOR ' LOT 'A' 1 5-0, ' SETBACK TO MOVINe HISTORIC ~ HOUSE A,/ HISTORIC, LOT - FOUNDATION | 5554 5.F fl/ DRYINELL l9 1 4 lol *1 1 1 1 0 \7 /2 0 loi 11-Oil , - 0 1 .-1 1 1 WÂ·til'9.it' 1 110 r 12" APPLE , 12" COTTONPNOOD -J 12.11' E ,- 71-2 1 1 il ROOF ABOVE ~- MECH. ENTRANCE ''.Mo 1 21*hÂ¥t FOUNDATION 1\\1Â«Jk/ APPLE TREE ROOTS | | TO STEP BACK FOR ~ ~ 1 J ~4~13Â«( - 8'-6 "xle'-0" PARKINS SPACE ~1 /-9- LINE OF FOUNDATION ~ ~ | 3.FNâ€¢â€¢4 0,inÂ®056/ BELOA .ill E.M- t.'i: i*232' I '-O" SIDE YARD ~ ~ ~ / VARIANCE LOT 'B -DOâ€ž Â£ 22 NER LOT 1 Y | %'i%,4 ROOF ABOVE -4 00 6000 5,F, 1 00 I C 1 11 1/1 ROOF ABOVE ~ ~ 1 0 1 01-1 / f 11 1'-O" REAR YARD ~ | ~ - VARIANICE 1 - 7- 2 1.- 1 I I HPC SRANTED 24 L o LÂ»f -~-L- 1 PARKING SPACE PEMOLISH EXISTINe j PROGRESS: 12-11-2000 VARIANCE NON-HISTORIC eARASE 16 100 1 -- 78.50' -- NORTH - A 6 0 SITE PLAN Rev. Date: 1/8 11 = 11-OIl Construction Issuedate: Drawing Title: SITE PLAN File name: BONE-A10.dwg Sheet#: NOI1VAON323 16 3ldS31-liD 9 LS :Lgtif:17$0 %2Sv HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2556 fax 925 7981 1 mall@teaguearch.com 33Z /Â«4134 0 0 4 2 . ...JP 1- Pr~ 274/7// 4//44 /3/95/ /inzix Â« i 7 312*91<2224224Â« 114,rtl~ 4Â«A n lib Je 2 ' -- \CE 1 - _ 14 1 1 CIO A 1 B - - . f. ..1,2. 1 liflf ji fl it 11-1.t \ fi ' 1 ij*'./f j / :tt skÂ£ 1 AA - 1 - 1 - Â· L' 0 1 Â·S CD a ' 12 5 4 C Consultant Information m 1 11 / * 1 1 8 I , :E .:} 1 1 1 /-77.. ,.' ' 920 ' !4 - I 1 t ~Es-r- Wa Ar \ \ 1 ..'l l! ll' 1 4 1 grÂ»Â« 43 9.1... 10 7-1 Â»23 -9 .BE.6 - C ''i t - , P fi / 7 . 49 --L 1 existing site plan U.'E o A002 1/8" = 1'-0" 00 1/f U.lia 1- . < S 14d 50' 49" W F------1---------------------------------------I---------- 100 00' 1 fAN< 1 2& 1 U-------- -------- 6---w- -------- k-Â« :1 ..M }> line of side setback i i ..F El r 1 9 ~ gravel~driveway off street window well 1 1 parking space ...2 13 4 I '. 0 ' I,k ..91 A r.-===M LU i ". - -I - I cÂ·:a.â€¢ ...3 1.9:' Â·6:4 94. 11 1- p Va â€¢- 5 - 11.... 1.1.,1 1 . .. 1 - O 0 0 Olui I: , 2 Â·Â»199.. 2 Â· lilli.::.- -0191 O'16 121 ZI. ....:} . --' 1 Le . , 24/Fin : p.~----1. / I z1 E 11/,1 concrete walk ~ I line of side setba* concrete walk ----~~k ~ ~~ ~~5~:2 .,~- 1~ - -lk - 1 N 14d 50' 49" E L-------------------------i-66-6@----------t\11--I-jiff------ -1 Date Issue I I 11.15.00 HPC concrete driveway 12.22.00 . existing curb cut / third street site plan ~1 proposed site plan 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" A002 line of front setb c sidewalk existing car port to be removed main street )lie/Aep!9 818Jolloo HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2566 fax 925 7981 mall@leaguearch.com 1 0 0 : 4 Consultant Information 2109-19" ~ finished floor * 1Â· 4 \ \ 4 1 I. 21.9939:~-*_ finished floor / 1 1 south elevation ~200j 1/4" = 1'-0" -U) B U) Ul CC U) A / /\ 1 42 9 00 00 0 LU mv 0 1 1 NU Date Issue 11.15.00 HPC 12.22.00 exterior /2% west elevation elevations 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" A200 30N3a 13~ IN~VIN.LS~ZE HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2556 fax 925 7981 mall@teaguearch.com LL 0 - Consultant Information f f 1.U - 4 0 Z Ul'- Ill U.10 -0 Cr Gh north elevation .hz O ,â‚¬2 d 9 83 .w â€¢ M U) f 109'-10" finished floor ~ Date Issue 11.15.00 HPC 1-/ - 12.22.00 L - - 100'-0" finished floor exterior elevations <2~ east elevation 1/4"=-EE-- 1/4" = 1'-0" A210 HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2556 fax 925 7981 mall@teaguearch.com 0 0 0 000 Consultant Information 14'-4" 0 19'-9" , 14'-61/4. , 5,9" , 8'-61/2' 17'-21/4" 14'-10" 7.3/4" 22'-111/2 , 6'-51/20 8'-4 1/2" I e 3'-2 3/4' , 3,-2 3/4. 7 31-101/4â€¢ , 4'-6 1/4" 1 1 0 - \#, -------- - 96 I 6------ , ./. 9 lili M light well - --1 #LKIL 1A,7 LU . 8 4 A I I I I I . A I I . Â£ A . a . A . ,â‚¬., ).1~..,4.-r:.1.~Â·.Â·.Â·>.Â·~tt it#MA / \ 34)12*~*4Â«664 Z 1 f ..., r- - - - - - - - - a mw 19/ I -LUO - - 1- - 4 1:Mel//Â»Dz: . //'â‚¬Â·.*Â·~%*pÂ·Â·:Â·~ ~Â· ic-71...5 1.5. 1 4 1 /1 -U)B closet ~ 1 .AE 9 > A l \51 5 1 guest bedroom mechanical 005 3 59 006 Ula O 9, \ 2 f 4 2 media rocnr-- 'h- 001 .., ": 4 6 1- . 1-8. c f 0 .1 / / 5 1/ 1 0 =B m / 31 j up El F f,\~ , ~11"j~ .3 "."4'-er'#21// " ../// ////1 '' 1 2/1 3 1 1 . -=461 / /////////u =*PH j k BU) 31 bath _ * 1 003 ult_] A E 004 f '41 - @1201 :p: ' 1.61 f 4-_1 2 / 4 dumb f 1 5 1 ttwalter k :4"9 1.1 1.1 /----0 . 1 1~31 007 wine cellar d 002 -4------ 5 9.. 11. 1 /211 F h 1. . . ..lIli... . . .. I N I ~.177 7. =Â«> $ I 1 1 , 11'-8" . 2'-8" . 3'-7" , 7'-41/4" , 37 Date Issue 11.15.00 HPC 12.22.00 basement ri-3 basement floor plan floor plan 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" A100 Slvas 00 HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2556 fax 925 7981 mall@teaguearch.com 00 0 000 14'-4" 19-9" 14'-6 1/4. -9 81-6 1/2" Consultant Information 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 cover parking I I light well 6 -I - - 1 4 t===IM-VA?*09 1 1 9 1----1-----1... F--/ m .fo -3 VO 4 1 1 4- 1 1 3] bath 6 0 3 -1414:'Lk/,/*LKY 1 / fl - -hh - 1 - Z ////NmUm / *A U.1 0 5-----------__-__' O guest bedroom f 106 guest bedroom 104 LI 1 ~3-~~-~ 1 --0 B 1 .0 A 1 -- ----- walk-in closet 22 w2 U)~ 8 \ 91 9Â»3244~~22222-2. 1 I ... I K.--......... .... ... /......... I .' U.1=8 UtE] : 4 ' bath - ) 1~_fireplace r ocia ~ (<~ p <~Â«--<zi~ UP ~ CIN ~t 1 \ 13. 1 r r D ,~ oMv q~Mw# 4Mew.wwmn ewwmMMM * ~ garage - 108 laundly -- r 1 ~ I closet . chute ---4-----01 dumb [I t r i (DR 2 1 55 5 m.-1.L rT 21 red //7 ./ , Hum,6.Â·moli i//mmur,<1<#m#i,ip~,~~ M porch 100 mudroom 107 bench closet ~ entry foyer 1- 3 43 . \(Â·'llill/l///ltit//////ll/tui:',lj///////1////////6, - --1.11'llilill 4 21 - 1 1 U I- 1 1 1 1 1 111 Date Issue 11.15.00 HPC 12.22.00 first ~3-~\ first floor plan floor plan ~Alloj 1/4" = 1'-0" A110 .En L L-,9 1331:Il HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2556 fax 925 7981 mall@leaguearch.com 9 0 0 000 14'-4" . 19'-9" . 14'-61/4" . 5'-9" . 8'-61/2" Consultant Information 1 1 1 Ill r - - - 2.4////////////////////////////m-, 1 1 1 1 1 1 \\ master bedroom k 11 1 1 \NL 207 1i & 1 ----- 'IllIl buffet ~ I f ~ open v 4 dining room living roon tobelow~7 9 --------ir----- -- lillil roof deck 203 111 J 201 lA 1 1 f /1 11 11 I. . A walk-in closet 4 4 208 '/7--Ni 11/m/m/mum////5,///1//1//i/, 5///1//74//llitilt//////1//1///lili/filit//Il/llf.'Â· i DN A hallway re . .. UIJ JO 4 206 ; Ill fireplace 11 H 0 1/-~ 1 1 / 1 . . - 9, ------- - ~ES m dumb 03 E--4 [|~] liliI ~ walter I >Â« 414 2 05 "' ' '~ pl~~h i, library 34/:i IIi 111 829 1 1 1 4 11,9 1 202 1 814'. 11 chute. ' 1 roof deck COOKTOP I - bath 209 -. 1 LI 3% kitchen 4.... 1 1 204 toi 0 003 Rf//////////////////////////////////////r/////// /6 L--1. 1 1 1 Date Issue 11.15.00 HPC 12.22.00 second (1-) second floor plan floor plan 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" A120 11 - 133131 V3S HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST ASPEN CO 81611 970 925 2556 FAX 970 925 7981 mail@teaguearch.com 332_ \A/g sT- /\~ AI 1\F CONSULTANT INFORMATION I Z O 2 lS al# . rIL<-7,V<-414- -*-_14d 50' 49" Vy ~~~11\\ 'r- -----7 If) Â·. - -u - _ _ - - -~j - line of side setback 1 concrete driveway A- , ~ off street ~ 3 | light well -P"I .1 , . ./.U,/ l ..' . 1 .12=32 1 1 .1 . . 1. ,, 5'-0 ~ parking space 1 11 ,.Â·. x Â· ' Â·Â· B I G A 1 li 1 61 9 .'.1 Ill. 4 1 'OM. '11 ., Â· _ d -''Â·. 2===4 ..~: ~. Â·i:Â·,c==#0...,.,Â·:... .... ...~.~~ . ~..,, ~~ ~~~ .W Â· ~~~~~~~1 5 2Â» o '91 4 014 \ If Nlq 1 I 71 1 .. 1 I concrete walk ' - I n - 10'-0" ~ 4- - 9.J/#68 4 7: .4//"al i i 1/1 Z 4------ concreTe walk - == =11--2- 2-7-11=0' 1 1- ~,12 Â·4% - -1Â·' . 4.,9/2 k -_-___ .1_______ _line ofsidesetba~ r/-3 <0 % 1 ' Z N 14d 50'49" E ~J 100.00' - uJ .- 0 0- ~ LUCB concrete driveway < <g existing curb cut 1.U m U) third street /31.1- -3 034 DATE ISSUE 15 nov 2000 HPC-1 10 jan 2001 HPC-2 ? ~ PROJECT NO: 0012 f DRAWN BY: HTA site plan 1/8"=1'-0" ~T> site plan ~551/ 1/8" = 1'-0" HPC-1 S 75d 09' 11" E main street MlemepIS melolloo ne of rear setback 00Â¥3010 HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS Existing Conditions Map mail@teaguearch.com 412 N MILL ST ASPEN CO 81611 970 925 2556 FAX 970 925 7981 Lot K and the west 15 feet of Lot L, Block 44 City and Townsite of Aspen Pitkin County, Colorado Telephone & 0 X Television Risers Garage 44 0 99.68 ~DO CONSULTANT INFORMATION 99.64 , Telephone & -99.05 199} Television Risers Alley Â°Ed*8rmavel- 64-Top--Bac--k - r Curb y Â¢Â»7405 dek 4 4 Telephone& 99.63 Televi5ion Risers Found #5 Rebar & / S75'09 1 Plastic Cap L.S. 9184 * 45.00' 8 Trees 4"-6" .1,9 97.77 g9.16 -- -Â¥ / Sewer 1 ~ Window X U.1 Cleanouts? Ed Carport e of Gravel 1 Electric 0 91.64 (0 Flowline 18" CMP Meters 0------- Elev. 98.0 +/- Bush ls' Rear 00 1 Yard 00 00 , 00 / - ---*-- 4 /COM 40 / A 12 6 , , Lt f 01Â·. ''' 4 UJ ., 6-* Legend and Notes: O~49L46 Finish Floor -.j /0 01 / O/ '94) rfd? O 0 00 - A jbo i Elev. 106.6 +/- - -indicates found monument as described. 0/ O O O OL/(90 to / Finish Floor 103.1 - Bearings are based upon a #5 rebar with a plastic cap CUD f/Elev. 101.3 +/- L.S. 9184 found at the northwesterly corner of Lot K and 0 ~~ G 0 (7 ~ s14Â°50'49"W between the two described monumentsÂ· n a #5 rebar with a plastic cap (illegible) found at the Riser , southwesterly comer of said Lot K using a bean'ng of (DE l Multi- Level Concrete l 0 ~ ~ 1 Wood Frame House Pad \ - This map does not represent an improvement survey or <0 I Vertical improvement location certificate. ek Â£459 i.'29 Plpes - This survey does not represent a title search by this ~ -* setback 4>be - surveyor to determine ownership or to discover 98.74 ~ -UJ C / . 68\ 5 2 easements or other encumbrances of record. All information pertaining to ownership, easements or other 41 \ 4 N encumbrances of record has been taken from a title .- 0 0- Concrete E / commitment issued by Pitkin County Title Inc. ~ 1 / 7 00. 7 2.19 1 B 18" Tree Curb & Gutter * , i : dated January 16,1998 as Case No. PCT12302C3. LU 0 # 0 - This property is subject to apparent easements for -1 R <C existing utilities. '1 % *l Top Back *1~ : - This property is zoned Office". Zoning and setback information 7 % 6 1 N of Curb l I k f ~ 14" Tree 7 ~0. ~ i j 5 4 m ~= was obtained from City of Aspen Bu#ding-P/anning-Zoning Dept.. 04 11 4 j 1 06/ * 3 0 1 4.0 , q, , A./ */ ../ 22 / : 4/ 4/ -J J Covered Porch 7 18" Tree \ Budh L / Â»40-iyÂ·gâ€ž / 99 0/401Â»~ 1Â©Tr GRAPHIC SCALE \\ bÂ¥*ibe--/ \13 / ~10 10 0 5 10 20 40 I Il ik" Tree 99.63 Bush ( IN FEET ) 700.SO C * * 0 8, -1 , 1 inch = 1 Ch. ~_ -< 70' Front Yard v .4 01 1 Contour Interval= 1' 100.44 ~ 2 - Surveyor's Certificate: S@tback Line - 8 01 1, JEFFREY ALLEN TUTTLE, being a Registered Land Surveyor in 99.38 100.27 the State of Colorado, do hereby certify that this map of 4 existing conditions was prepared by me and under my 2 ---tel- BURIED TELEPHONE UNE --u- SIGN cn supervision from a survey made by me and under my 45.00, Concrete Sidewalk GV supervision on October 27, 2000 and that both the survey and map Found #5 Rebar & n Found #5 Rebar - g - BURIED GAS LINE ~~ GAS VALVE are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. Plastic Cap (illegible) S - * WATER SHUTOFF X x FENCE LINE Top of Cap Elev. = 100.00 22% im w* 1.-, ROCK WALL 25 POWER POLE JEFFREY ALLEN TUTTLE, L.S.33638 DATE Concrete - tv - CABLE TELEVISION LINE Â¢ LIGHT POLE DATE ISSUE Curb & Gutter Â·95 ~4" Tree 90% of points should be within 1 /2 the contour interval WV + 0 - e - ELECTRICAL LINE 3f WATER VALVE Top Back w - WATER UNE Note: This topography map complies with National Map 15 nov 2000 HPC-1 3* FIRE HYDRANT Accuracy Standards for topographic maps. Where checked of Curb HPC-2 -SS - SANITARY SEWER UNE 10 jan 2001 Main Street 97 0 TELEPHONE RISER 62 and well defined points should be plotted within 1/50" of -ohp-~ OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE O CABLE RISER ~ SEWER MANHOLE their true position. Critical design should be based upon i=-~mm~----3 EXIST. CULVERTS hid STORM DRAIN INLET spot elevations, please contact Tuttle Surveying Services for this spot elevation information. 99 DEaDUOUS TREE 21 ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER --(b ANCHOR BOLT ~~ EVERGREEN TREE X SPOT ELEVATIONS 4- 4 BRUSH LINE PROJECT NO: 0012 DRAWN BY: HTA site survey 332 West Main Street City of Aspen 1"=10' Pitkin County, Co. HPC-2 Â£64\\\ 3 rd Street 133hI1S OCIVEIO1O 3 Vas HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST ASPEN CO 81611 970 925 2556 FAX 970 925 7981 mail@teaguearch.com , CONSULTANT INFORMATION 1- LU LU r 1- co LU *< -1 el / U 1/- EVD - Ap 1 DATE ISSUE I f: .1 1 15 nov 2000 HPC-1 10 jan 2001 HPC 2 PROJECT NO 0012 DRAWN BY: HTA floor plans /'33 basement level floor plan (_2 ) ground level floor plan __ __ /1) main level floor plan 1/4" = 1'-0" *1PC-3j 1/4" = 1'-0" (HPC-3, 1/4" = 1'-0" CHPC-* H PC-3 LE L Â¥f 3ON3DIS3kl SlÂ¥3S Flaii14c-Lifi N 3 d S ZEâ‚¬ i *714.~ki~44-%.~410-1,-W/#Imen'i-~~ /1 1~ t mi Â»~~ f Fil. - .. ./ I.- 5 e ~ 1- - 9% Iâ€¢pollillâ€¢Iâ€¢111~ 0 -/IM ~I &14 e ./ 3 -i ~II -'ll- - - ~ //i.F----1 41 1 e tiNi@/2- . 111,~-1~4 1 1 1---= 1 1 A-JI 1~] / 1 .F -1 1~;3 %1. 1~11 ..1 . kirl'. - 1~I'?43 1~& - . M. 1~1101 e - .-' .0 1---.-I.---IA ........~I I Il %11-li---~IJ - 1 4 Ill 1 4 ..3. 1 1-1 1 4 - /L5~~ji -1 R 1~ te ' 1111~ 1- ~-- -76~--~J ...1 11 - --I- - - limil .i 1 11~11 . .. ..li & lilli. ---1.--.11-//1- li . 1 11 -~ l r.al M . I - 1- . - Ill'. 0 ~ . HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST ASPEN CO 81611 970 925 2556 FAX 970 925 7981 mail@teaguearch.com CONSULTANT INFORMATION 109'-10" - finishedfloor --~ \ 100'-0" ' finished floor 4 /'Thsouth elevation Z 1- 2 UJ LU 0 -1 R <C LU m 125'-2 3/4" to.ruge- < 1 '7 1 119'-9" / 11&*i~ 1 1 11 t.o. plate 117'-7" t.o. plate F U L 00 00 00 109'-10" finished floor - DATE ISSUE - 00 + m v U 4 - 10 jan 2001 HPC-2 15 nov 2000 HPC-1 F 1 - finished floor -- PROJECT NO: 0012 DRAWN BY: HTA exterior ~2~ west elevation elevations 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" HPC-4 LL 90 0 00 3ON3DIS3kl 133hI1S oavaoloo HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST ASPEN CO 81611 970 925 2556 FAX 970 925 7981 mail@teaguearch.com 125'-2 3/4" ~ t.o. ridge 7 117'-7" CONSULTANT INFORMATION t.o. plate 0 109'-10" ~- ---------i--------1-- -- finished floor 1 - 100'-0. Z:.J/- finished floor 1 /~21 north elevation ~3 E ./1 (0 0- Ill 0 1 J R< 1.U m 547 + 00 117'-7" 2,0 -- 1 -- 109'-10" - -- -- --- ---fashedfoor --~- DATE ISSUE 15 nov 2000 HPC-1 10 jan 2001 HPC-2 1 m EE - - LE : ~ finished floor ~- PROJECT NO: 0012 DRAWN BY: HTA exterior /2) east elevation elevations 1/4"=1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" HPC-5 30N30 133hI1S 00Â¥30103 0 . PAFEEL-i6: ~27351124-41007 1 DATE RCVD: |11(29/00 # COPIESTI CASE NO~HPC034-00 CASE NAME:~332 W. Main St. Conceptual Review PLNR:1 PROJ ADDR:|332 W. Main St. CASE TYP:|HPC Conceptual- STEPS:~ OWN/APP: John Seals _ ADR<4410 Medical Drive, st : C/S/Z: ~San Antonio/TX/782 PHN:|(210)615-2222 REP:|Harry Teague Architects ADR:~~2 N. Mill St ' C/S/Z:~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN~925-2556 FEES DUE]2310 D ~ FEES RCVD12310 STAT: ~ REFERRALS~ REFi BYI DUE: MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED ~~ DATE OF FINAL ACTION:~ CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ PZ: BOA: CLOSED: ~ BY:~ DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: | PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN: 401 *67 . MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission ,~C THRU: Joyce Ohlson. Community Development Deputy Director ,k. FROM: Fred Jarman. Planner ~Â· -' RE: 332 West Main Street -Conceptual Review / PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 101 2001 TYPE OF REVIEW: Conceptual Review PROPERTY LOCATION: 332 West Main St. r. ./ ....... i . --:. 1. ZONING: Office Zone District with Main 1 - 1 - Street Historic Overlay -,1.1 'r . t. ''e Â· REQUEST: 1) Partial Demolition 2) New Addition 3) 500 FAR Bonus 1 Â·,4'6,~ 4) Variances 1111;,2...1: tinlit!111,!1 1 I STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant. John and Carolyn Seals. represented by Harry Teague Architects. is 332 West Main Street. Specific land use requests include a 1) partial demolition of front requesting Conceptual Review for the renovation and addition to a residence located at porch and second addition in the rear. 2) construction of a new addition in the rear. 3) 500 square foot FAR bonus. and 4) setback variances for a property located on Lot K and west half of Lot L, Block 44, City and Townsite of Aspen. ST.AFF COMMENTS The subject property contains a two story structure. built in 1888, and is currently listed as a Historic Landmark on the City's Inventory of Historical Sites and Structures. It is situated on a 4,500 square foot lot in the Office Zone District and within the Main Street Historic Overlay District. The structure was originally built as a single-family structure and is approximately 3,261 square feet in size. It is currently used as an office with five separate office rooms. three smaller work rooms. and a single story residence in the rear of the structure. The HPC conducted a site visit to the property and reviewed the application in a worksession. Over the course of time. two additions have been made to the original house. The first addition occurred shortly after the house was built and is consistent with the original house as it maintains a consistent roof slope line with the original part of the house. The .. W NO / .r . 7 ~/second addition is not as compatible with the original house in architectural character; U V # specifically the newer addition is a rather distinct departure from the original house in its massing, detailing, and proportions and does not significantly contribute to the original houses historic fabric. The applicants wish to demolish the second. most recent addition that extends off the rear of the house and construct a new addition to include a two-story hallway connector to a garage with bedroom above. In addition. the applicants wish to demolish /dismantle the existing front porch because of structural deterioration due to normal exposure to the elements and then reconstruct the porch in its exact location and proportions. Further. to the extent possible. portions of the porch will be saved and placed back in their original locations. Once the second addition is demolished and the front porch is demoiished /dismantled. the applicants wish to lift the remainder o f the original house in order to excavate to accommodate a full basement. The house will then be lowered back to its original foot print. The applicants are also asking for the following variances and requests: Dimensional i u ,> Required x F Proposed , ~ Variance *equinments -J i) :9 ~6 : t.s~10Â·fÂ«"<1 >~7 -9. :~"Â·;:Â·' ~'~:"f *jÂ·4411ested Rear Yard Setback 15' 5' 10' Side Yard Setback 6'8" Maintain Existing Maintain Existing Garage Access off Alley Maintain Existing Maintain Existing 4 Driveway Use of ROW Maintain Existing Maintain Existing, Paved Preferred Maintain Existing Maintain Existing I This proposal intends to maintain the existing house in its exact location / footprint with the exception of the new addition located in the rear o f the house towards the rear of the lot. Further, the new addition will not severely increase the rear footprint from its current configuration. Staff finds that the requested variances are appropriate in this case as to maintain the current fagade line of the front of the house with the other similar houses on Main Street. Staff is concerned with the request to maintain the existing access to the garage from 3rd Street. Currently, the existing carport is accessed off 3rd Street; however. the rear of this J 1 ~~0~ lor is also accessible via an alley. In general, the Land Use Code encourages access. g F # when possible, from an alley so that streets do not become auto dominated and detract v from the value of house facades and the pedestrian experience. In addition. the City provides incentives towards this end in the form of additional FAR for garages that maintain alley access. While not required. Staff would like to encourage the applicant to reconfigure their design to incorporate alley access for both car spaces. The applicant proposes to partially demolish and dismantle the existing covered front porch. Staff would like to commend the applicant for attempting to preserve. i f at all possible, the original portions of the porch while restoring it to its original form as 4/ 2 -ux-,7.45 currently depicted. It will be important to take great care in the dismantling of the porch and careful labeling of its parts so that successful reconstruction and reassembly may occur. This memorandum outlines several guidelines that discuss important elements for this porch rehabilitation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the HPC approve the requests for 1) partial demolition of front porch and second addition in the rear, 2) construction of a new addition in the rear, 3) 500 square foot FAR bonus. and 4) setback variances for a property located on Lot K and west half of Lot L. Block 44. City and Townsite of Aspen. with the following conditions: 1. The schematic design shown on the site plan presented to HPC is in no way approved or endorsed by the HPC. Any further development for the historic structure shall be subject to further review as required by Section 26.415 of the Aspen Land Use Code; 2. That the HPC herein and pursuant to this Resolution. grants the applicant approval for a five (5) foot rear yard setback variance and to maintain the 6 foot 8 inch side yard setback: 3. That the Historic Preservation Commission grants approval to the applicants for a 500 square foot FAR bonus; 4. That the applicant shall submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation: 5. That the applicant shall submit a preservation plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating how the existing materials, which are to be retained. will be restored. The requirement is to retain/repair all original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage; 6. That no elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist outside of approval granted by the HPC and no existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor; 7. That the HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures; 8. That there shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor; 3 .. 9. That the preservation plan described above, as well as the conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction: 10. That the applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC Resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit; 11. That the General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit: 12. That all representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shail be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. unless otherwise amended by other conditions: 13. That the applicant agrees that any restoration has to comply to the UCBC 1997 version; 14. That the applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during demolition. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction as a requirement of the City of Aspen Streets Department: 15. That the applicant agrees that prior to issuance o f a Certificate o f Occupancy, the applicant shall sign a sidewalk. curb and gutter construction agreement (if applicable) and pay the applicable recording fees; RECOMMENDED MoTION "I move to approve Resolution No, , Series 2001, approving the requests for 1) partial demolition of front porch and second addition in the rear. 2) construction of a new addition in the rear, 3) 500 square foot FAR bonus, and 4) setback variances for a property located on Lot K and west half of Lot L. Block 44, City and Townsite of Aspen. .. with the conditions stated herein. REVIEW CRITERIA AND STAFF FINDINGS EXHIBIT A - PARTIAL DEMOLITION EXHIBIT B - PORCH REPLACEMENT & REPAIR EXHIBIT C - BUILDING ADDITIONS EXHIBIT D - DESIGN IN THE MAIN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT EXHIBIT E - FOUNDATIONS EXHIBIT F - RESOLUTION No. 3, SERIES OF 2001 4 e . EXHIBIT A PARTIAL DEMOLITION No partial demolition of any structure included on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen shall be permitted unless the partial demolition is approved by the Historic Preservation Commission in accordance with the standards set forth in this Chapter. The applicant shall be required to address the following Standards for review of partial demolition. No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all o f the following standards are met: a) The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure. or tile structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel, and Staff Finding The applicant is requesting the ability to conduct a partial demolition o f two sections of the house including the front porch and a more recent addition on the rear o f the house. The addition proposed for demolition located at the rear of the house does not significantly contribute to the historic fabric o f the house and its demolition would not detract from the its current historical contribution. It is an addition that has been constructed to an earlier addition and is not connected to the original house. The front porch is a significant element contributing to the houses historic nature. Because of the naturally occurring damage due to the elements. the applicant wishes to demolish the porch and reconstruct it in is current historic form. In doing so. the applicant intends to preserve portions of the porch that are worth preservation. Staff finds that this is commendable and recommends the applicants take great care to preserve as much o f the original porch as possible. Staff finds this criterion to be met. b) The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and Staff Finding The applicant intends to demolish an addition to the house which is not part of the original house. This demolition will not impact the historic significance of the house. Because of the naturally occurring damage due to the elements. the applicant wishes to demolish the front covered porch and reconstruct it in is current historic form. In doing so, the applicant intends to preserve portions of the porch that are worth preservation. Staff finds that this is commendable and recommends the applicants take great care to preserve as much of the original porch as possible. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5 .. (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding The applicant intends to construct a new addition at the rear of the house. This new addition will not impact the architectural character or integrity of the structure. It will be identifiable as a new addition rather than a continuation of the original house in its architectural style. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 6 .. EXHIBIT B PORCH REPLACEMENT & REPAIR Historically, porches were popular features in residential design. A porch protects an entrance from snow and provides shade in the summer. It also provides a sense of scale and aesthetic quality to the facade of a building. A porch catches breezes in the warmer months, while providing a space for residents to sit and congregate. Finally, a porch often connects a house to its context by orienting the entrance to the street. Because of their historical importance and prominence as character-defining features. porches should receive sensitive treatment during exterior rehabilitation and restoration work. In the case of 332 West Main Street. the porch has suffered over the years due to constant exposure to sun. snow and rain. Furthermore. there is considerable paint peeling and in some areas the porch itself may experience sagging and deterioration of wood structure. As a result of these issues, the applicant wishes to partially demolish the porch and reconstruct it in its current historic form. In doing so. they intend to preserve as much of the original porch as possible so that the historic fabric is maintained. The Historic Preservation Guidelines indicate that after discovering structural or cosmetic problems with a porch. the applicant should formulate a strategy for its treatment. The most sensitive strategy is to repair the porch. This treatment is preferred. rather than replacing it altogether. This approach is preferred because the original materials contribute to the historic character of the porch. Even when replaced with an exact duplicate. a portion of the historic building fabric is lost: therefore. such treatment should be avoided when feasible. The guidelines also indicate that replacing an entire porch is discouraged. it may be necessary in some cases. When a porch is to be replaced, the first step is to research the history of the house to determine the appearance and materials of the original porch. In doing so. one should search for: 1) documentation o f the original porch in the form of historic photographs. sketches and/or house plans: 2) physical evidence ofthe original porch. including "ghost lines" on walls that indicate the outline of the porch and/or holes on the exterior wall that indicate where the porch may have been attached to the front facade; and. 3) examples of other houses of the same period and style that may provide clues about the design and location of the original porch. The most important aspects of the project involve the location, scale, and materials of the replacement porch. It is not necessary to replicate the details of the porch on most buildings: however, it is important that new details be compatible with the design o f the porch and the style ofthe house. The following are specific guidelines outlined ill Chapter 5 of Aspen's Historic Preservation Guidelines. 7 .. 5.1 Preserve an original porch. The applicant intends to replace deteriorated portions of the porch where appropriate and demolish portions that are beyond repair. The size of the porch will remain exactly as it currently exists. Staff finds this guideline to be met. 5.3 Avoid enclosing a historic front porch. The applicant does not intend to close the porch. Staff finds this guideline to be met. 5.4 The use of a porch on a residential building in a single-family context is strongly encouraged. The applicant intends to maintain this structure as a residential use and the front porch Will serve as access to the primary entrance to the residence. Staff finds this guideline to be met. 8 .. EXHIBIT C BUILDING ADDITIONS Many historic buildings in Aspen experienced additions over time as the need for more space occurred. In some cases. owners added a wing onto a primary structure for use as a new bedroom, or to expand a kitchen. Typically. additions were subordinate in scale and character to the main building. It is important. however. that a new addition be designed so that it preserves the historic character of the original structure and do not detract from the character of the building or obscure significant features There are a few basic principles for new additions that are prescribed by Aspen's Historic Preservation Guidelines. In general they include minimizing negative effects that may occur to the historic building fabric. the addition should not affect the perceived character of the building. and keep the size of the addition small in relation to the main structure. Specifically, the guidelines indicate: 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. Staff finds that the proposed new addition does not reflect the exact character of the historic house but is not too inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building. Further. the addition does not attempt to portray an earlier period than that of the primary building or imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. The proposed addition is made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. In addition. the addition maintains changes in setbacks. materials. and architectural style from the historic building. that help define a change from old to new construction. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. Clearly. the most visible side of this house are the South (Main Street facing) and west (Third Street facing) elevations. The proposed addition will be located in the rear of the historic resource. Staff maintains that the addition does not interfere with the Main Street facade allowing the original proportions and character to remain prominent. However. the addition will be seen mostly from Third Street. This addition will take the place of an older addition that is proposed to be demolished. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Staff finds that the rooG proposed are appropriate in their gable configuration similar to the gable forms on the original house. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 9 .. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. The proposed addition is currently attached to an even older addition and not directly attached to the original house. This new proposed addition does not result in the loss or severe alteration o f architectural details, cornices and eavelines. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. The applicant will use new materials similar to the original materials. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. Staff finds that the rooftop gable forms are slightly subordinate in scale and not highly visible from Main Street so that it does not detract from the historic nature of the house. However, it will be largely seen from Third Street but is still a smaller form that the original house which is appropriate according to the guidelines. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10 6 .. EXHIBIT D DESIGN IN THE MAIN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT Development in what is now called the Main Street Historic District began with housing built during the early mining era in Aspen. Soon a few small, commercial businesses sprang up on corners in the neighborhood. The early streetscape in this area was dominated by trees, typical of a residential area. Starting in the 1940s. development of lodging occurred, either as stand-alone hotels and motels or as bed and breakfasts. While some of these more recent buildings may also be of significance. they do not establish the historic context for Main Street. The primary period of significance for Main Street is the mining era in Aspen. The primary goal is to preserve this character while accommodating compatible changes. In addition, individual buildings from later periods may also be of historic significance and should be preserved. The Historic Preservation Guidelines discuss the following elements that should be respected with any new development in this district: Building Width. Building & Roof Form, Materials. Architectural Details. and Windows & Doors. Specific guidelines include: 12.1 Respect historic settlement patterns. The applicants propose to maintain the original structure in iIs exact historic footprint as it is currently located. This is so that it remains situated in a way similar to historic buildings in the area. This includes consideration of building setbacks. entry orientation and open space. Staff finds this guideline to be met. 12.2 Preserve the historic district's street plan. The applicants intend to preserve the three distinct street grids intersect in the neighborhood (Main Street, side streets and alleys). Staff finds this guideline to be met. 12.3 Where one exists, maintain the traditional character of an alley. There is an alley directly adjacent to the rear of the property that services residences between Second and Third Streets. Staff highly encourages the applicant to take advantage of the alley for vehicular access to the garage located at the rear of the lot and as a new part of the addition. Staff finds this proposed addition complies with this guideline; however, it deviates from the intent the alleys serve to provide. 12.8 Provide a front yard that is similar in depth to its neighbors. The applicants intend to maintain a consistent front fagade line similar to their neighbors. Staff finds this guideline to be met. 11 0 . EXHIBIT E FOUNDATIONS The applicant wishes to lift the original structure in order to construct a basement then lowering th structure to its original location. This certainly involves the foundation of the house. The Historic Preservation Guidelines contain language referring to foundations of historic structures. The guidelines specifically indicate: 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. This particular request for lifting the original structure then setting it back down on a newly finished basement is of an individual structure in a historic district. The applicant intends to maintain the historic structure with the exception of placing an addition in the rear. In doing so. this relocated building shall be carefully rehabilitated to retain original architectural details and materials. In addition. the applicant. as a condition of approval. shall provide a plan to secure the structure and provide a new foundation. utilities. and to restore the house. Staff finds that the proposed relocation meets this guideline. 9.4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. As proposed. the house will face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback as its current location. Staff finds that the proposed relocation meets this guideline. 9.5 A new foundation should appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. The applicant intends to reposition the house onto a new basement similar to the basement. Staff finds that the proposed relocation meets this guideline. 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. The elevation heights will not be drastically changed as a result of the newly relocated house on to its new foundation thereby maintaining its current historic significance. Staff finds that the proposed relocation meets this guideline. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. The applicant proposes one light well in order to provide light and ventilation to the subgrade basement. The lightwell is not on the front fagade of the house (per the Residential Design Standards). Staff finds that the proposal meets this guideline. 12 .. EXHIBIT F RESOLUTFON NO. 3, 2/6/ SERIES OF 2001 < ~~ RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PR~SERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING A 1) PAcWFI-ArIEMOLITION-OF FRONT PORCH AND SECOND ADDITION IN THE REAR, 2) CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW ADDITION IN THE REAR, 3) 500 SQUARE FOOT FAR BONUS, AND 4) SETBACK VARIANCES FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED ON LOT K AND WEST HALF OF LOT L. BLOCK 44, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel ID: 2735-124-41-007 WHEREAS, the applicant. John and Carolyn Seals. represented by Harry Teague Architects. is requesting Conceptual Review for the renovation and addition to k ~ e. 3)Â·fzw~r--2 residence located at 332 West Main Street. Specific land use requests include a 1) -partiat- 6~~A- demolition of front porch and second additiqn in the rear. 2) construction of a new addition in the rear, 3) 500 square foot FAR bonus. and 4) setback variances for a property located on Lot K and west half of Lot L. Block 44. City and Townsite of Aspen. WHEREAS, the property is currently listed as a Historic Landmark on the C ity of Aspen' s Inventory of Historical Sites and Structures: and WHEREAS, in a staff report dated January 108,2001.the Community Development Department determined the application for a 1) partial demolition of front porch and second addition in the rear. 2) construction of a new addition in the rear. 3) 500 square foot FAR bonus, and 4) setback variances for a property located on Lot K and west half of Lot L, Block 44, City and Townsite o f Aspen met the applicable review standards, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at a public heanng, which was legally noticed and held at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on January 10th 2001.at which time the HPC considered and found the application to meet the review standards. and approved the 1) partial demolition of front porch and second addition in the rear, 2) construction of a new addition in the rear, 3) 500 square foot FAR bonus. and 4) setback variances for a property located on Lot K and west half of Lot L. Block 44. City and Townsite of Aspen with conditions by a vote of < to / CE-6 -b. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission approve the requests for 1) partial demolition of front porch and second addition in the rear, 2) construction of a new addition in the rear. 3) 500 square foot FAR bonus. and 4) setback variances for a property located on Lot K and west half of Lot L, Block 44. City and Townsite of Aspen. with the following conditions: 13 .. J 1. The schematic design shown on the site plan presented to HPC is in no way approved or endorsed by the HPC. Any further development for the historic structure shall be subject to further review as required by Section 26.415 of the Aspen Land Use Code: 2. That the HPC herein and pursuant to this Resolution, grants the applicant approval for a five (5) foot rear yard setback variance and to maintain the 6 foot 8 inch side yard setback: 3. That the Historic Preservation Commission grants approval to the applicants for a 500 square foot FAR bonus: 4. That the applicant shall submit a demolition plan. as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part o f the renovation; 5. That the applicant shall submit a preservation plan. as part of the building permit plan set. indicating how the existing materials, which are to be retained. will be restored. The requirement is to retainfrepair all original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage: 6. That no elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist outside of approval granted by the HPC and no existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor: 7. That the HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures; 8. That there shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor; 9. That the preservation plan described above, as well as the conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction; 10. That the applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC Resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit; 14 .. 11. That the General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit; 12. That all representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions; 13. That the applicant agrees that any restoration has to comply to the UCBC 1997 version: 14. That the applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during demolition. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction as a requirement of the City of Aspen Streets Department; and 15. That the applicant agrees that prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. the applicant shall sign a sidewalk. curb and gutter construction agreement ( i f applicable) and pay the applicable recording fees: and 16. That the applicant will provide the Community Development Department and HPC with an agreement regarding actions taken to mitigate for any potential impacts to tress on the site as a result of this land use request with the City of Aspen Parks Department prior to Final Review before HPC. /7-; Ar/11'g >463 U~ 6 1 40+ 4 - 44 i 7. U C...8 6 Co 'FLA#& + "$ APPROVED BY THE COM~ISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of January, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair di i'' 1 //If. -lf ~ifft 4 15 ftÂ·Â©,40,~~ .. A ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Deputy City Clerk C:\My Documents\Current Cases\HPC\332 West Main Street Conceptual932 West Main Conceptual Memo.doc 16 1 0 0 64&4 4 1 1 I 332 West Main Street APPLICATION FOR H.P.C. CONCEPTUAL REVIEW 1 1 CONTENTS: Attachment One: Land Use Application Form Attachment Two: Dimensional Requirements Form Attachment Three: -Letter of Authorization -Title Certificate -Vicinity Map Attachment Four: -Written Description -Existing Conditions Map -Evolution of Elevations -Street Scenes (Context) -Site Plan Comparative -Proposed Roof Plan -Floor Plans -Building Elevations -Restoration Intentions -Garage Precedents 1 1 1 1 1 . . I,1 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Projed narne â‚¬3> 641Â» '2:641/ DEA 10â‚¬5 13Â£5MO/\6:7, 2/ 4(Â©/7-2.A~ 2. Project location -532- M A/4 :br. 3 607- /< *wo pt/grÂ«- #Det,fi of 1.-01- L : 8Â»LÂ·ack 44. Pret'- (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 1 3. Present zoning 4. Lot size 4-500 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 4, R. Sexic , H. t2 4+lo Meel,-6.1\ hrive â‚¬pu~[fe too. 9.Â»a A.+oi;o, 7-X' 962-27 1 41 103 4,5 - Z.Z,2 2. . I 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number t[*try $ C Xek C txrÂ£11+*As 417/ A. *1[1 A- r * 990 J.hg~--) 2. 9,56 7. Type of application (check all that apply): - Conditional Use - Conceptual SPA -X_ Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC -.- I - Stream Margin -. Final PUD - Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo 1 - View Plane - Condominiumization- Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 1 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) Or,5 4.7 4. ...te 4 /938 + O #L,~44'#A G c 41#47<0,4 9 t. 4611 or. /1,~'~fwil"A'~26., 1>26 I .4. ft. 1% .1 1 - lu 5 4â‚¬22 Yao.ed .4- 3 4.u.Â«*ec- 2 '/1 6-L U. 1 E 1 4 2 d wit a 40,4- A.MA + 1 40Â¤ r,Qi.4.1,>* A fuor 9. Description of development application 1 10. Have you completed and attached the following? - Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 6 Response to Attachment 3 Ij - Response to Attachments 4 and 5 1 1 . . ATTACHMENT 2 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: 6 23Wl/47. c j *â€¢l~ k 0/)Â·24 2-VA Address: 4440 2â‚¬6.M- DRWEE 4911Â¥ 480 54 WTD.floTX 9% 2.1-7 Zone district: Lot size: 45.00 4 Existing FAR: 3 zÂ» ~ 4~ 44. n Allowable FAR: 26 2-6 -1 . t tÂ· Proposed FAR: 20-94 9. ft Existing net leasable (commercial)! 17Â·71 Proposed net leasable (commercial): 22/1, ) Existing % of site coverage: (i sal. + +500 j Proposed % of site coverage: 3,8 1 71909 + 45<2A Existing % of open space: 60 -2 71 Proposed % of open space: Gz 7, Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: 24' Accesory bldg: 13' , Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 1.4-' Accessory bldg: 0 3-3 Proposed % of demolition: I+.9 % (460 + 3 2-61% Existing number of bedrooms: 1 Proposed number of bedrooms: + Existing on-site parking spaces: 2 On-site parking spaces required: 2 Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: , Front: 2 3 ~ 6 4 Front: 1 0' Front: 28' 4" Rear: 1' Rear: 15, Rear: 5 ~ 6- Combined / Combined , Combined v Fronurear: 2 6.6 Fronurear: 25 FronUrear: 26'6 Side: C' Side: 05 ' Side: 5 ' Side: 4' Side: - 5, Side. b.d wilÂ·k allow K.. ce. M Combined / Combined , Combined , Sides: 9 Sides: 1 3.5 0 Sides: 0 3 &Â»trow 4-v re..diâ€¢ Existing nonconformities or encroachments:_ 956 *Tl-#co#,11 E-K,- 214 1 Variations requested: 65*- A:7Â¥4-ectt/#fE71/7- LA 1 (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft, site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone J districts) 1 1 HARRYTEAGUEARCHITECTS 412 north mill aspen co 81611 t 970 925 2556 f 970 925 7981 mail@teaguearch.com ZA Standard/Guideline Nonconforming proposed issue Variance/Exemption requested 15' rear setback required under office In response to the established street front 10' rear setback variance. zoning designation. 26.710.180 D.6 pattern, the 5' rear setback required under R-6 zoning is used in the proposal. Sideyard setback of 6' 8" (2/3 the distance An approximate 2' 4" existing Retention of historic setback at west wall of the front yard setback of 10'). encroachment remains in order to projection. 26.575.040 C and 26.710.040 D.5 preserve location of original house. Garages shall be accessed from an alley if Proposed garage is accessed from 3rd Allowance to maintain historic orientation one exists. 26.410.040 C.1 street. of 3rd street garage access. Engineering department prefers public Proposed driveway crosses R.O.W. Endorsement to continue using historic right of way to remain clear for pedestrian portion of the public right as driveway use. access. Engineering department prefers that In keeping with the neighborhood Permission to maintain historic use of driveways be paved. character, driveway may not necessarily gravel or other traditional material as be paved. driveway surface. If dwelling can be accessed from an alley, By orienting the garage toward 3rd street, 500 square foot F.A. R. bonus garages shall be excluded from floor area we forego the opportunity to subtract 278 calculations up to 250 square feet only if it sq.ft. of the garage from the F.A. R. ill is located on said alley. 26.575.020 A.3 calculation. 1 . . HARRYTEAGUEARCHITECTS 412 north mill aspen co 81611 t 970 925 2556 f 970 925 7981 mail@teaguearch.com 332 West Main Conceptual Review Application Attachment 4 Written Description of Proposal This proposal is for a renovation and addition to the residence at 332 West Main, Aspen, Colorado. The existing structure, built in 1888 as a single-family residence, then undergoing two subsequent additions, has come to be primarily used as office space today. Including an attached dwelling with separate entrance, the floor area of the existing building is 3,261 square feet, as stated in the HPC records. The original structure was two full stories, plus a small basement ~nd-an--aijic--soaa.The new residence is to consist of 4 bedrooms and ~ F.411.gL2&84 squam.~1.Ihis number includes the total area of the garage, on ac&unt of the fact that it is accessed from the street rather than from the alley and therefore does not qualify for the F.A.R. reduction. The first addition, done shortly after the original house, is not insensitive to the original house in that it follows the old slope of the roof at the rear. The second more recent addition diverges from the architectural character of the original in terms of scale, massing, detailing, and proportions. Accordingly, the owner proposes to demolish the latter addition, conserving and renovating, and then adding to the historic building. After demolition of the addition and porch, the portion to remain is to be lifted sufficiently to excavate for and build a basement beneath, then lowered to its original position. The porch will have been carefully measured, documented, and, to the degree feasible, portions of it preserved. It will then be reconstructed as it was originally. The primary mass of the addition is to be a two-story volume with garage at ground level and bedroom/bathroom above. The rest of the addition consists of bedroom, entry area, and mudroom at ground level with a narrow linking element above, flanked on either side by roof decks. This response serves to clarify and enhance the identity of the original design by providing a simple extension of the street level fagade while allowing the original roof form to read clearly in the forefront. The remodel will restore the integrity of the original Shingle Style residence. In addition to returning it to its original function, the proposed design responds sensitively to the original form's scale and proportions, and respects traditional patterns such as that of carriage houses addressing the street. The intention is to create a balance of continuity and distinction such that the span of time between the old and the new is not necessarily obvious, but becomes apparent with more careful consideration. For example, the detailing of the addition does not attempt to recreate that of the historic building, but rather to complement it. There is to be a similarity in use of materials between the old 1 . . and the new, with minimal, contemporary details that offer an expression of individual identities of each era. The intention is to provide a contemporary and harmonious addition to a unique and valuable historic resource in our community. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . . HARRYTEAGUEARCHITECTS 412 north mill aspen co 81611 t 970 925 2556 f 970 925 7981 mall@teaguearch.com 513 W. Smuggler Conceptual Review Application Responses to Attachment 4 - 44 weril*KI IPeECE#;t-to,Â·.~ Additional material to be presented at review: - site model - computer simulation of streetscape HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS Off 49 4/::mqi'.3122,9-*griplil f \\-------0 0/1 8 -rj- /1~-----Â»1~7 ii,11-Ll ST ASPEN. Co~16. --9 FÂ»-- x& 266%41 1-%41 t,4Â¤23~ r**=3j *4 *~ - --2- / r.--- ..., t..1.1:4 04'Riag - ~ 14---:* ~*tf k *ffÂ»-7--4Â« 49%*f/*Â»:g//~ ,~-~ Lt---\ - consult- .o,rn.on 0 r\-.\,X\\.-0 n :.m: e ju 044-- 4-7" -+4(34 1) o r / u.| 03!6 0,0, i.-9 mi .-j fi~ ~~--3--3 0 ...3. 1111=9" i -29 t. 1 , f / 9--- : l i K29" 1* 5- El / 9 / ------- 27*AN~1 ~Â» f4~ ~* YbiTJAr ~ b/-TFâ‚¬ 1 â€¢- m~....et . .f {MF 4 --- ZÂ»422# 1 .... I d 23* min . '1 +422* --~LAPT#~4*21 k zi Off r--2Â»\ <141 5.-- 1 t'.- 7-Â»ZI- 1 1-40->~1 1 1 = 11.15.00 HPI -Â« fÂ¥#*g f //2Â«f e 0.. 1.- 42<27,19; / 6,/k~ 49#if~l ./.Nurn-: 0012 *vn./ JAL vicinity map / (22Â»f 4----OfÂ»f , = ir . 1 0. HPC-1 00980100'NadSV ... HARRY TEAGUE Existing Conditions Map ARCHITECTS Lot K and the west 15 feet of Lot L, Block 44 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 01611 970 926 2568 f= 925 7981 r,-110 t~gu-,ch.com : City and Townsite of Aspen Pitkin County, Colorado / -7 rÂ·'Â· ~'vi 4 0 , ~ 1-11 11.:5% ,A ,al-- .1.-V I g . -1 / f - -~-----K. 'Â· ~ .2.6-lip---zzj Consultant Information e - - , I '4 2 J -Im ...'ff Lf. i 1 94 63 D., z, Ff *79 1 0. 2 h. B T -aâ€¢ 4-6 . 197.77 \SP, 00 / C.74.....2 ,/ 1':c.../--1- * . _<-43 7 ~ - --W----_I -. dj.5 - - 1- rbi r....." S.'I:':Â·C --- 1 I. ' ' I Â·3/ 7,- -4. p' ..0. 0 1 ..........4 91 f I / R, 0,-~ 1/ . 4/8 ,> f.'ptl 11 i *IA ' VE':Â·Â·LiE: i I -1 P,as ' Â· '2 .Nal' Â· ./ I>:48 - 0 9874 ODES â‚¬6 â€¢ t.Â·'.-#I--- eÂ©11@~ LU#8 1-4 1$#. 00 9.7 / C 0054 i : 0' Q Za U ......... A 4, 8 4 & 9 i ., â€ž .. - . . 4 < i dll / / GFU,F'HE. SCALE 0 9 , 1 i 41, :l 1 4, :1 'C~'.: 1<I ! Contour Interval= 1 ...4.. :. 1 .1 %.8/ 99./S ; t>, , if , 2 I j '------.7 2 0,~ 1 /2 ..9/06Â»4424 $/ /6 R[UNIN ; 4 :19. X - " I - k* /8//FiEYALLEN 76;7312 L S 63338 n.47.6 A Date Issue 11.15.00 HPC 77Â© Street Drawn By: HTA r.6% Project Number: 0012 332 West Main Street site survey City of Aspen Pitkin County, Co. 1 ==10 HPC-10 30Naa SlvES oav / F f 1 . . . . HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N Mil ST. ASPEN CO *1611 1 1.* 925 7981 m,11/t,aguearch.com -:.4 LLI .... U2 - I Consultant Information 1 - 4-1 MI . .Mill ' ~0 -10|~ Â®:4 * t=14' /4 PfÂ¥Â¥Â¥fÂ£Â¥4Â»23 '00*K= 9 30%1 == r----9.**,r Â·-Â·Â·+ ....1 \==f."- ===E771--T...in--mrTIM"nnprTHannats/YRF |~ Â® 1-& iÂ»-U' i ZE- -41 r f- Â·Â·-1 I -- P i';14 - ut _1 &1 - r 4-.: ./ '- i + # i r' bil,-T==M.'.1-7- 2.1 1~ ~1231-r'-â€žâ€ž r :.1. ==j 1 --4--11 -L 12=====*==f====1 _....1 -1- - t.im Â·ft.Â·,-*p..~ 1 111111111111111111Illir:: - U.1 m original west elevation - 1888 west elevation with early addition to be restored r 'Xa lu O 0 Z f U) ,Â£]IIIIImzsll..IEI:II] 1 64//1 E---7(2~ KN Lig.......;*~U*UUUmmII~i I WSÂ·*Urrrn~Vuvruj*W~~~~~"~ - Â· rTTT-T ' s. i, 0, ,2FfRE- .--r 'Ill....... I 4,22?':irt --- milimEN' Â·IL==1~ 3Â¥mm~19 3 El 11 4 -EFiliMML#INIMM,#im-,11-1-1 -- r. .. f =1-11 ...1.02-Â£ Date Issue 11.15.00 HPC existing west elevation with later addition to be demolished - 2000 west elevation with proposed addition - 2000 - 1 - Project Number: 0012 Drawn By: HTA evolution historical 1/8' = 1'-0" HpC-2 i= ~~~I + BON SlvES IVIN 1SSIM EEC 1 . . . . HARRY 1 .2 4441 \ Vjil 1 '14::2 243 , TEAGUE 1 ARCHITECTS 4: I e , b 4 ,&.W~ 21: * ~ 'Lio -sâ€ž f= 925 7981 I If {2 44 . I. f 1.'7% .-- 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81811 ..1 Ly '. . 0::1 7 .. / lk. - 1-110Â¢-gu,arch.com 1 . * .4 Hy..4147 ....1 Nt . . - , Al 4,%Â· .44 74 1 4 4 5 2 +Yrt. -0 0 4 ,... .. 4 . 1,1 1 44Â» 1 1 , ; +T r 1 .0 1,2 . Ai . . 1 4 -- H,/4-4/ =9-tia li=' r=,ir7 .. 4 0 . . 4. I + .* 1 1 : 2..... Consultant Information .. . . 1 .... :' 1. 62 -=*216-,6-: 6-4~.t..3-~ 3825 . . 3rd street elevation looking east I - i ~ 11 F..4 11: '11. 1 -- - â‚¬ --IINbYLqL 47' 4 1 1 11 1 r 9 - 2-ah 1 1 49 1 2 . fct 1 1 ./ . b,44 F i -56- 1 la lit . .. , 1 4 1. 4 1 hiâ‚¬- , - 1 -r , h . 5 1 1 10'HAR, .1 Â·61 UU' . i ~ Â·Â· 0 '' 0 1 7. e. 1 0 11 kil , t -'t' _ 0 Wl c Ci.. 9--' - -WI , -0 ' L ... -~r U)=9 q LU'o .tiei: e bt =0 , ~1|' 4'ULLL~LLI 11 - - D 25 , -i- 2 ~ /41-1 ~4-44~4 4.-*, U)* 2 2 1 + - ry -+1 313=6 1 - ~ _ 4-~ 4 * ~'T-4 -3-'~ 1 -*2- - -bri-- ti- JM 3rd street elevationlooking west < LU (D 7| t /5- * 1, Â· . I i. , j -- '. - ...f - . 4*. 1 1 1 4 ~*.11 1 , 1 % A 1 I Â· 1, 13*14; A , I 11. , & F & 11. '11. , 1 1 -P :13 + , 1, '11,1 4 mill 0,1. ~ 5 . .. I . *BJP. ... 1 y..1. ~ 11:1.14 .1114,411?.: 1 ...021= 1 =RG.:%~4. M . 4 . .- 1/. I 11/' 94 4 . .4 1 ..4*14 . + 1, 1 i ..2 . 52 ' D . >.. r. Date Issue 11.15.00 HPC .. -- ..e - 1 ' I . : I ..4 .... 1. ..6. . . 4 â‚¬ 4.. 4 . . I. . 2-2 + 1 1 . :9 + i. . . I 1*tt":â€¢'1 I'tim'- -1~~ '~ 1 F -1 0 1- 1 - -- 111,1 , ,Â¢. 1 -- ..4 ..-- 1 - - Project Number: 0012 Drawn By: HTA -- i - - I.:.fl* **/I'll//'..Ill- *./.:- I _ -- - street scenes -- . 1 MÂ«â€¢maâ€¢-*i~442~":"--- ..~.. _ .....2.-di_Ulti.=2~ ----- --4-----I- -- lotto scale main street elevation looking south H PC-3 30N3a 1331=Il 51,liFF .,F7 If T 1 1 . . . . HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 NMILL ST. ASPEN. CO 81611 970 925 2556 fe 925 7981 alley all~ mall/t-gu-rch.corn 1 0 1 1 1 43 Property ine . 1 1 1 : i line of rear setback (5) 1 - ex;Ming dmmy ~ existing car port E--1 Consultant Information to be removed ~: ' i new concrete driveway ppopesed:wo , 0 *; ' .stor,addmen li 1 N ,--M r sginng wood"med i I 1, addlbongtoÂ·be rent,ved ' ' | - - 1 3 , . I 1 1 1 : 1 1 i | 58233(72KP'Gme,8.272:8 1 1 1 1 ..#.I :.*,I*# *:#.,) 1 1 1 1 3Â©RATBNE:'QÂ©h?*.:'eeetik 9% 1 112,0# S # 0- -664 -c. +V -,~~~10 1 1 i ' 67*j;3*9432*443* I /-:.mh I Â® 1 1 1 1 1 J 5 Â» 1> -6 -I> 1'- C- Vâ€¢ :16 e. * > 1*- 1 1 't"; S si ......'...,. ,â€¢E â‚¬ **<- # ,> 6â€¢ e VÂ«eve# . >â‚¬9 f::= ..Â·I j>I Â·>23 : 2. Ma................c A-DI-:HN?i-7.-3 Â·v, Â·,> Â·0- ./ -C-bldkj,~t,DoÂ·@le,7 -,> I. Â·,> ,> tr.t..t..1....t..y i M.3=#2:.tj:,IZ:.Ej~ i 2 40:<Â·Â·:Â·.t:ty 9 MVVibltM.N.4.,RZO~ Â» .6 ... 'C- 'C- L. L- i. b. C. = L. 1. â‚¬~ < i FLI.4L..Ft'ILL-LILL# 4294'44 1 1~.t~~1,1:;P' , 1 \10 -6 1- * 0- -2- 0 6 /- O 0 1- * .12 1 1 1- < p,x Â·*x Â·Â·,x Â·Â·,i: 'q~*ial r#6 1 1 OR IIWB 3 #i,$,#i.-###&% 5 OK ~ * 1~ ~ v * 1- ~1 * 6 1, ~ I Bi&*Â©20&'BleÂ©8% 1, 4 :. WES 1 'giiÂ©0i 1 1-1 Ul %8 0/ -0 41Â· 0. 4.- 2- I. C- 13Â· -11 1' â‚¬1Â· C 1 1 1 1 E 1 SysÂ©64*im*d.~Es...4.....4, dfij: iC::.N ; DCmE 1 ' 4402! iwe:/1.:..7 existing porch '0 'atit:<:>.1 1 j.~?ii?t?i%?i%(= rl- 11Â£-ak=kÂ» ), *chy>afâ€¢.' 222 â€¢,~ â€¢,1~1 i - BU) ~ ~ existing porch 2*2 Z..:...'*:::%.A , 1 '- 1 E < % - - 11 i : / e \ \ AM**25 :.A -1, 1 --4 V' 1 4 409 i:>26*2/91 (11 it:ttxt:.1 1 1 0\ fÂ»kÂ»Jj i ,-1 '.............. 1 *907 i 1 1 43?35% 1 5 ; line offrontsetback(101 1 1 4.}Ii{~#.9 1 1 1 line of front setback (10) ~ 1 1 1 -. I I . 1 1 1 1 van:x::MÂ¢*tr - -t- f-- --- ---------- --~ 2-i ................:ti........:3Â·........f \ 4 1):i:Â·Ii>Ii).i>~'. :i):i:Â·:i:Â· i):i):i:Â·i . concrete sidewalk :Â·.): "Â·:Â·:i.:Â·.:Â·: ..... 1 44***MBM# concrete sidewalk - 1 f 1 1//<tit.K.K.K..:K...:-:..:.1 \ 1 9.: i<: R: R: RG.C<: R:. <: R: i:l:.31 4,: Â·::.:-i~ 24%4% 42 ..t Â·.t Â·.t Â·.t Â·.%3 Date Issue .%33%%*B -. Â·- Â· Â·r- â€¢.LSVÂ·Â·- 11.15.00 HPC %f:: ij:ij: i.i: i:~'i:~ i:~i:~ iiV v::Â·.E:Â·29 main street main street U-, .: ..9....:.r-- 0 el' k<r, I.Z 1 ProjectNU~: 0012 existing site plan proposed site plan Drawn By: JAL site plan comparative 1/8 - 1'-0- HpC-4 third street line of side setback (5') 30N 1V3S 1 . . . . Â· Â·Â·'22> HARRY . .1 1 ;i: i i ~ 1 TEAGUE J / 1 ...r- 1 Â·Â·di: 4-EE-1 : i 1 6.:?i....:2 -:?i -2 .......b ARCHITECTS S~~~ 2-:1 :, .,~, D. 1, iij:.; , 1 412 NMILL ST. ASPEN, CO elill 1 Â»D.:.f: ft:y:.9.. j.Â·::-i >i:>:i:Â· iwi:Â·:> i>~i)~i>Ii:4 ~ 4 970 925 2556 f= 926 7901 ' mallet-gullarch.com 1 1 (i?Ii>Ii>I%?i~:MF~:? RFRH 4 4........ 1 ... , , 1- :Fiiii . ~ 4 :Ii.Kiumak,LA-: 44022- 9-(22 22 *fÂ«-:59 , 1 -.'- 1 :.:97...4:t<:1'I:.20' 9 1 , lEi .. 11 I. + 11,7 r....: F 4 1 ':.:t:.'.''F-Vwp .... ipt>:t: /52 44::: 1 AE: r:,.: t:520% .U64:.>Ir Consultant Internation :P:Â·': 2.. L,t,v:':iP~.' #147Â£':76262QÂ·: I'<,p<Â·, , t.t Â· 1 -------------------------= â‚¬47}11\<a - --I;j*Filt#*-4 alley property line 1 ine of 1 .elback :,2: .. . 1:-~M-::IN:.:=rRU: ~ ; I Â·ji~(i~(i~: f Â· -: O ADDITION .**: .i Â·Â· O HISTORIC '~j<~i?i i; r- 4 0 -- -- r.------ , I : 1 . 1 0 1 1 . I . .. 1 0 Â· + :g . - m.. (~1< A.. M C 1 1 -- . I 1 1 0 1 1:'I, ,:977 Â· Â·'' i:i:; 2 - 1 -1 1/ 1 -- iii:. ..:ifil 'N L.'.T . 8/t :â€¢ I ..-' .0: 1 - .:f:X / 4 .- 1 : 1 . ,#39 :1 1 , A :1 --*- - -- ;1 :MWN /0 7 : c ' . Â® 1 1- t U} 1 1 - .6 F aRTH : )l Â·$ 4 0 ~~Â»:4 0> 1 1 1 \. 7 1 4.::.9..t...... iii ' Â£ -i 4/ 2:lt:....:...2.7 i,;1 i; 1 <M/:E::17\ \ 4/ .4Eli':~<-r 1 . , ' eE@ 1 1 Issue 11.15.00 HPC 1 1 't 1 line of front setback | 4442 .....:.T: M.........L- Prolect Number: 0012 Â· Â· Drawn By: JAL 905 ............. 9:0::4)4}ifii):Â» ~ ...1 proposed 6.:::iÂ·:li.l:Â·.....:lk: :li-:lis.:.1 roof plan lf..............10 1/r = 100' main street --3-:.-:14:..411/ HPC-5 6 Urr*if 1. G.3 \4yu v 30N3aIS3 1V 133bllS NIVIN 1SBAA~ third street t?HvaÂ»&Â·A*aÂ»MaÂ¥.%Â»wal HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 NMILLST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2556 f= 925 7981 mal. guearch.com alley j gravel driveway S 75d 09' 11" E 45.00' i line of rear setback : ---Fir---Â·n--g~ ./*Â£ A*;ALL, Consultant Information JI ~undly p E373' ~ ~ fÂ·Â·Â·Â·iÂ·Â· ~~ ~ chute I 11 4 2/ 0 1 ...â„¢ off street J master I r. concrete driveway galle - ki- Lad parking space 1 lilli walkway ~h 8.-i laundly ,--Â· i 1-h | above + f bedroom 9 W E L A--2 1 "'htwell \ 1 chlute 1 Prl--,-1 - r.7 r. ' closet M 1 -21 t L a L. 13 77*om deck # deck 1 7, guest bedroom -----0-Jr - - ---- - ---- ADDITION E 'â€¢ .8 i '1 1 bath i: i Â·r HISTORIC Awder I 1 11 L gn /1-- 1 E; { 1 -,M 1 IL ] 11 ~2. 0 -9- guest d. WIF ~ F. 1 bedroom dwt, 1Â»1:.2.-2 p I .441 4'16- lit ,~3 7 . r 1 r- ---_;~[tjz>~Â©,Ji~.1 -Â· 4*brf -* Ul 1 4 Â· : 3 11,1,1 ClÂ»L,al -1~1 . 3 Lr-: \ I lili 1 8 [ft -_r-1% EL I u 0 1.v E.... F MM-r E i Th - 2 9 2 / hr Â§ 1 :LI closet bath ~ ' - / i i kitchon c.7 '. _ dir,Ing room '~ 1 5 -t L W Â° 49 - 0 4 . an-1 -=1@ z.- 1.1.1 Â§ E '0 9 ...93 0 U} L.1 15 DC & EU) i J 91:&-roorn / - - 6, hing room L. /\ > 0- 11> 03, fl'.5 / 1 04\ /if i Ile existing front porch y l J /1 2 46 - Â»=/ U.1 1 f ./r M (0 :S line of front setback *5-1 I 1 1 N 75d 09' 11" W 45.00 / , concrete sidewalk 1/6 - ' Date Issue 15 november 00 HPC [ - 3 main street ~ lower level plan rih ground level plan Cih upper level plan Pioject Number: 0012 HPC-6 4-'pc-9/ tzy Drawn By: JAL ///1- 1 floor plans / 1,1 1 HPC-6 1/8. = 1 '-0. eâ€¢4104.Veuuoo N 14d 50' 49" E 133B1S NIVV\I 1S3 --- 1 . .. 3%43 i V HARRY TEAGUE 1 \1 0/ ARCHITECTS 412 NMILL ST. ASPEN. CO 81611 9709252Sse ta. 925 7$81 1 -gh,= 1 - 1 11==L.==-1=k Consultant Information / i j ~-----8/ 8 11 ' 5 - 1 109-10Â· "9 9 I Cul-6 Ii'.d floor + f.shed f. E r / 1 Jir:= / \ -236*Â·+ 100'-0Â· east elevation north elevation m= 1 ~ % %% % ...%. 1 lk[ f :- b -2-11_1 F======= E==22==2275Â¢~ P,-; ti,i, ilii', i, i,i, r./ 1 1 - - miagmm= 9.1-6-Jifi-.4:,Ii>%431>fÂ¢42. 4.A 1 :r 3-3 1 1 TI - --- 7/6Â·-:Â·r-Â·F -- - ) - <17 .... Mir - - Issue 15 november 00 HPC 1 ~vation west-*Mation - Pr~ Numbu: M12 Drawn By: JAL exterior elevations 1/e = 1/0- 1 H PC-7 30N3a Yislvas dMWWOO'NadSV 4- 1""'* "I HARRY .... . TEAGUE T .h + ARCHITECTS -:t =.C, 4 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 925 2556 fix 926 7281 ''~~.~ ~A - SHINGLE SIDING TO BE REPAINTED/ 1 + mal. t,agu-rch.com \~ - REPLACED WHERE NECESSARY. .. . tE 9 4 k . I ./ . ' / t.11 . - 1 t Consultant Information PA. 114- I - - BRICK CHIMNEY TO BE RESTORED - y . AND PRESERVED ABOVE ROOF; * - JOINTS TO BE REPOINTED. 1 N =Â»=73~-a . - W. :-- - - 1 0 DETERIORATED EAVE AND . + I 34 wn:~41-41 0:9 ROOF CONDITIONS .- -/4 .4 F.... .. TO BE REMEDIED. . I -- 4- A .r -- 2- Â®= 1 1 411 1 1 1 .71% 1- 1 1. a...11.1,~ 1 ~ Â»:Â·f.XL*4~ :?C'~E~k: t: Â®-f'. i f' h *1 11 7 4.0.. I . '' 'i,6.mill"hZ.'P*7.lime- / ...I. â€¢ ~1 '1,1 0 i :|ti:Â· ' 1 hz.vt-Â£0/3............ki#imen//gi/ EXISTING CONDITION --VIEW FROM MAIN STREET ---- ORIGINAL EXPRESSION OF STRUCTURE ~ TO BE REPLICATED; GLASS INFILL TO I FOLLOW ORIGINAL FRAMING SCHEME It PORCH TO BE DEMOLISHED ~ O - AND RECONSTRUCTED. CD+W ~> 3 -----Ill-/a......MI/&lilli 14 ./.7 .. . I Â«. 1 , ... I & 1Â£-All// 2. - 4.. 1... 1-/ l.,NE I -It-W#- UTILITIES TO BE RESITUATED I ' NEAR NEW MECHANICAU -iIIHIil/I~ aa \ Â· Â· ELECTRICAL ROOM. .i,1 P 10 /,14 Z/"Al.'i'23 U / BRACKETS TO BE RETAINED. ,il \ i lilijjmlillllllililll 1 4 4..9-,21 FENCING TO BE RESTOREDOR REMOVED--~\1-ir~ Date 1/lue 11/15/00 HPC 7-3 -â€¢ gr-/ - I Â·Â· ~ --0 i f 9.2%.=I.. .. 4 + I . .7- I ./-.f.. E Project Number: 0012 -'229841:71 lii||11|Ililk: 1 Di ..:& f' . :1044... .~:.21:JT:...rc: .*-'... Drawn By: HTA * 4 ~'*-~ DURABLE STEPS TO MORE APPROPRIATE AND BASE TRIM TO BE RESTORED. '~. 1==Vt/mIlllII--- I REPLACE EXISTING PAINTED HISTORIC CONDITION --VIEW FROM MAIN STREET --,"I'l"/////i'*-44Â£. ~ WOOD STAIR. 4-,mi: . Restoration $ . No scale r. -1 *. I 4 21.641 1 HPC-8 30N30IS31:1 VES 13381S NIVIN 1SSIM 00Â¥EI0100 'Nad 1 . . . . HARRY TEAGUE + I 171 11)~411'g.9,1 :'.1:114..'.A':Dia~ . + .; 1 4...Al-1.57"Im.... 1 /1../1/' i ' Iii -fL, me:.. 1 41 11 4%*|| |1| + ARCHITECTS 0,1, '14.1' ..2'. â€¢ 412 N MIU ST. ASPEN CO 01611 *T :64:5&1*44'L/*lailk#J ZilbALivid'' 2 : 2 . 4 - $ e ... , A il/*el . lA . 111 y - Mk'Gl 4 . 970 926 2556 f= 925 78/1 r 4 1 Fn,11*,ch com . 41*. - I + 1 + "+ 4 4 +6 ..1. -Â· 12%.3-.A 1 ..12Â£.iylliIAm .NI,illill/~-7~ ..3GZ/~rA,jil .. ; 1 1, a .....01.~ r Ali.. /- -4 /81/E//9//// 0///Ult Wri ~6; /~La,m///~M Â» -- 2- .14,1 4 i I .A -94* * Consunant I~ormation r~ .,!~11.....0 -.11.1Â» - :4 -111111.11.1.- 4th&Francis 4th&Francis 2nd street 201 north 1 st street ..... 1 5.â‚¬: 25 1 + '_.0,1*-..~ilir~lill#I . 1 : I< .4 , I. ~Ir#liw~-Ihi- . 0 0.:.j./, 4 . : 4421"1"'lliall'Mill/"Iin"Imiplill'll'll'llillit' 4 1- 7 4-,2.1 .dIMBI)lir~ 41 1: '.Ii , 4, 1 4,- , 0 '4, t . ~2 --*~ -' 4 2 814.1 - . i 1 0 99 1 - ./ - U)zE r *s' 2 1 Ill 1- ' 4. 1 9 ip::tr#64,4#1$ ~7 .1...7 elilli-~.- . Jo - .'I'. 1 ... 4 .2. a, 6- -1 1 1.1.1 4 0 . /-4 -Â·-Â·.A:Fia,Li#-4 ./limp'.1.~ 2.9 - 1. 60,1. - Oc E f 89'' 11(jaunmli,Il*,Im&* a #; -1 U. 9. I. 0 1 -7-li/7-:.1%*14 1 11 =.... i 1,41\; 4 t :G, .r (01 0 4 . -100 .. yel-- 4 4% Â» West elevation of existing condition with adjacent carriage house view down 3rd street with proposed addition U) 1 1 24,/1.4 + C, 40. 0 .... . .1 t, 7 + .1.4 ........0. . f ....1-'--...r.---9 ....... 1 41/ .3.~24--717. : af. ..9 -Jur~r~z--34 -. t , 3el'Net~*1.-1 i - - 1 ty.ik fl.J),/.Â·.6 . .: 1 -'-r'-7--All 1 - * All//RM///// .- 1.- ........1 / 4 Â·. 1 + if~Y / y Â· .4- - 4 1 ?*4 j.,11.-- , a.~GU+. '.,~ ~ 01Â·. - . 2,0. 2 1% Date Issue = Â«. tty. -vt/.9~fl':-I 11.15.00 HPC k, I X ++ ~qurup I L-3% =I- - i A I ' m . ..6 r 11 . - '. + 111 -,~ , Project Number. 0012 ..4 ' Drawn By: HTA garage 1 precedents 1/8 = 1'-0 200 north 3rd street 604 west main street 202 north 1 st street 333 west bleeker street HPC-9 30N3G 13381S I I i.'* .... HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970 025 2556 1= 925 7981 m~11/t,agu,-c~com alley S 755d 09' 11" E E 45.00' ~ I. line of rear setback ----- Ir uliÂ·'21,7 r--r r -]147 T i 17 -9-1 Consultant Information 1 9.'.9. - < n mech... : ' ' :Il ga- 01 , ~1025. I los .01 11 & 1 1 1 Â»Â·id jÂ·Â·*Â·-1 1Â· 2 1 1/ :-- U 21Â·-~ ' I -9 1 200 .i I ~28 closet -.closetÂ¢;.t] \ \ roof deck I i roofdeck 8-4 -mÂ«-m hz..1 ' 11 k'Â·~LJ- 1 Â· 11 q 7/ : -41 Â·Â· ADDITION r.- HISTORIC i I It -Â·-Â· t - l- 1611=-: 11-41 fl~ i ~ 11 , f.'-I.-d.. 1 < f./.W lf--Â» i Z LEI- :& :Sc~11â€¢r . 001 5 09 F : 101 . 9 . L= 10 iÂ» F. Â¤ f=i Fi,==IF=9 1 0 4 - I 1 Z Walk~n cIOBet 2 . 7 7.r . 165 .On 4 'hina 'Ocm kn 'F 0 Q & D. - KI--)~.-- -/ , 0 204 H I & ./ â€¢war Z -1 : -,1 /1 I rl==1==11 Â«t - 1 L____._ 1) 3/ h671-: 1 -0 L f==P: 0 0 * 0 11 g;~~t -diom / li~rar H 6.x,In ~ bc:33:0 ..1 nual /U 1 . n 0,, + /2 Ill Â¥ 1 11 M- 7\ /7 1 , fL- 2 1 i l J 4 line of front setback 1 1 8: i 0/ 9 92( ~5// N 75d 09' 11" W 45.00 - . 0 - 13 concrete sidewalk 14 . 2 ' M . \ j.j -\410 H,~:f Date 18â€¢ue 15 november 00 HPC-1 10 january 01 HPC-2 main street ~3~ lower level plan /'~~h ground level plan C~ upper level plan Project Number. 0012 <HPC-6.3/ (HPC-6.2~ (HPC-6.2J Drawn By: JAL floor plans 1 1 1/8- = 1'-0 43/F HPC-6.2 BONBDISBEI Slv3S 133EI1S NIVV\l 1SaM ZEE ~b'- ~ ~ ~ ~ HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 NMIUST. ASPEN. CO 81 611 970 925 2556 f= 925 79/1 maill t,agu-rch.corn Consultant Information 0oK:22=I==71Â·914=.'UPWIUUUUNUD~ m ' 1 -TICEIgifiCENEEN~ 109'-101. finished floor a. (1 1-- . I. I -* =----ilizilf-"M""100=WiNI -h -~~-7#=====#./596/....71.BEHI - louÂ·-0 100'-0- 4 #n,ifiEYE,+ finished 00@ Â· j l [tz=ZE=Zzlt=ZE=tz=========ZZ==Z-------------4-2-----ZE:=ZEZZZ:ZE==5==zz:zzz=zzz=zzz=zz=:5 Ezz=======zz==zz==z=z==zz====N east elevation north elevation 0 \ 0 Cr 9 0 8 Z U) n 4 / 1 11 14 1 \~***2@9,@A 01 =r[*=I==CO=CO==Ik 5 1 WIRT:- :. x 1 \\ r-4 - tit ~?' ~'"' ' ~Â«=gi- ~,~ flY TA O=9Â·UJ 114-< ~AT E 7 -M=."EM'.~ 109'Â·10" 4 ~101-10- Wn/,ahmâ€ž-------~EEEE//&//E////~&55&&55&7&//=4////dC11517111113111*717121717~- .T=.77.....7--9=rr=Â¥r -- 4. d , -- timle Fmt,ty ==mr,v -L - L=-=1=1Â·, t= -1 -f : - C=~~,=.r.---Â·r 100'-0" . . 100Â·_0" - - - -- I ..4 *fiA,she37!oor Iitj--Ill--/,f/l~imic//Bil/)/EEiliiafffLillilli~' 11 1 1 1 1 11 11;1 1: 1 Date Issue d,EL=zz=zzz==zz=z=zz=zz=z~zzz=~czzz:zz~ - dz=zzz=z=zzz==tz==1=zzz/zz=zzz-zzz,zzz=zz==dz==4=zz-----1--==4=zz=z==zz=zzz=zoz-z=z~ 15 november 00 HPC-1 10 lanuray 01 HPC-2 iouthelevation mit.]milgr- * ~ - SLI//40 - 4 lji& C~h ~ Project Number: 0012 Drawn By: JAL , P kif~ - exterior / elevations P 19 HPC-7.2 BONBDI Slvas 133ELLS NIVIN 1SBAA ZEE - HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 N MILL ST. ASPEN, CO 81811 970 925 2556 fix 925 7911 Inmlt/t~gu-,ch.com 1 Consuttant Information ,======9 -r-Â·r-,7-Â·-Tr-7--7mrmÂ·mrmnmrmfn,TTImTTrrTrnmnF==-=4==i===*=-4.-il././.Ill. 1-1 109'-10- .14'94-57Â¥4#i~*mmm~__ _~~~~:1Â·;u ~EU5~+Â·- --~ finished floor - 00- -- 00 ".......-",.,4, lou-0- 4. 4- El,~ il-~,-T :, 11 1 1 | dz=zz===~====~=================zz:zzz==z:=6:2:zzz:zz:zz:zz:zz=zzl:zzz:z=zz:zzz:zzz:zz:b tzzzzzzzzzz==zzz=zzz==zzz=zzz5 112: 4 r- east elevation north elevation 0 r IL ODES LL1Â§8 af' -91111]111111111. OC Z. 4,2* tÂ·'Â¥ CD (4 2 IN RA 1.f.J-1-Â·=.* rful = i h ~m- 91 JVW,ms.5 9 1111111 U.1 4 -4 * - 0 4 + W D ' 7-Â·Â·Â· * 11 1 / }IW , W 11.-t! - + /711 ' E ,;,II:-r. Â¥4+7-Â·Â¥lf 21 109 10 201 ~. ~109'-10" \ 233) I I -Y. 241iriliii-fi;37+ 40>1 aii*--fi66F--- ~jib~ B I 3 -- I "u-i-- - '==]*R ,.Â·i ] fii.44131 E--~il _ 100 0" 100'-0 -- 1 -W..........,- f 'i[ -L_]4 -. - flushed holr + ~ 4 - =---- - * - ~ finished floor C upper floor plan ' ' ~ L__-1 1----r -------~--1----1-------l 26=zz=zzz=zz=zizzz=tz=zzz=zz==z=zzz=zzz-zuzzizzz~Ezzz=zzz=bzz=zhzzizzz=z-zz=z:zzzzrzod - Date 1/lue 15 november 00 HPC-1 10 lanuray 01 HPC-2 south elevation west elevation Prolect Number: 0012 option 1 \ 2 -8 C 01 HPC-12 30N30 13381 1SBAA JAN 15 '01 01:13PM HARRY TEAGUE P.1 .. HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS John and Carolyn Seals TO: Texas Neurosciences Institute 4410 Medical Drive, Suite 400 San Antonio, Texas 78229 Phone: 210.615.2255 DATE: January 12, 2001 FROMÂ· David Keleher RE: 332 West Main Street project update CC: Brian Unekis, Brant Lahnert, Fred Jarman Dear Dr. and Mrs Seals, Happy New Year to you. I have returned from a fabulous vacation down under, and I gather that your visit here was a good one. It sounds like the meetings went , exceptionally well, informative with respect to both the design direction and the various potential contractors. The proposal for your house received preliminary approval from the HPC last week, and I am pleased with recent developments in the design. Some new developments have arisen in our office, however. which will affect my involvement in the design of your house. In reorganizing our staff, it has been determined that in the near future, I will need to begin working on another project, and so while I may continue to be involved in your project to some extent, I will no longer act as proiect manager, That role will be filled by Jason ]ePoint, who has been very greatly involved in the project since joining HI*, and has a thorough understanding of the design of the house. It has been a pleasure working with you, and I look forward to the possibility of seeing l you here in the future, Please feel free to call if you have any questions, Best Regards, 44 + D David Keleher 412 N. MILL STREET ASPEN.CO 81611Â·1508 TEL (970) 925-2556 FAX (970) 925-7981 emad hta@rof,net / NOV 29 '00 12:46PM HARRY TEAGUE -4 ~ED 4 1 .r . ASPEN/PITIC[N COMMUNTrY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement fbr Pavment of Claof Aspen Development Amplication Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinand CITY) anci â‚¬2, > Ftel., ...1 /0,4 J Â¢2 0 ~Sâ‚¬4â€¢Â·0., (hereinaner APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: --I'l 1. APPLICANT has submirced co CITY an application for 4,-+9 10Â¢Â»1 0 1%~JÂ¢-21 .,.0- W. A.ld A-1,4- (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees thit City of Aspen Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 1999) establishes a fee mucmre for Land Use applications and the payment of ail processing fees is a condicion precedent to a determination of applicarion completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of die size, narure or scope of the proposed project it is not possible at this time co ascertain the Rill exteric of the Costs involved In processing die applicacion. APPLICANT and CITY Atrcher agree thar it is in the interest of the pardes char APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter pirmir additional costs to be billed co APPLICANT on a monthly basis. : DPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make addirional paymems upon norification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefired through the greater certainry of recovering its &111 costs to process APPLICANT'S applicarion. 4. CrrY and APPLICANT 8/'her agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present guffident informarton m the Planning Commission andlor City Council to enable the Planning ( ' Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for projeci consideration. unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its righz co collect 8111 fees prior ro a determination of applicadon complereness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposir in the amount ofS_22110- which is for &02.-' . hours of Community Developmen: graff time. and if acrual recorded costs exceed the initial deposiÂ£ APPLICANT shall pay additional mon:hly billings co CITY co reimburse Ihe CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT furcher,grees that failure ro pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no cue will building permits be issued unril all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT //Julie Ann Woods 1~ Community Development Director Date: -IL \1. 00 Mailing Address: 432- 14 44,w *â€¢~ CdP Â§ /611 g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 12/27/99 .. John R. Seals, M.D. BOARD CERTIFIED IN ADULT AND CHILD NEUROLOGY TEXAS NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE 4410 MEDICAL DR., SUITE 400 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78229 210-615-2255 November 21, 2000 RE: Property located at 332 West Main St. Aspen, CO 81611 John R. Seals, M.D. and Carolyn Seals, owners, give permission to Harry Teague Architects, 412 N. Mill St. phone # 925-2556, to act as authorized representatives on our behalf through the approval process with the Historic Preservation Commission. 249/10Â© 11-21-00- n R. Seals, M.D. Carolyn Sea s Date NOV. 27.2000 12:32PM PIiIN COUNTY TITLE NO. 1741 P. 1 . PITKIN COUNTY T=TLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, TERI) FLOOR ASPEN, CO 8 1611 (970)925-1766 - FAX (970)925-6527 RECEIVED 1 NOV 2 7 2000 DATE: 11/27/00 BY HTA TO: HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS ' ATTENTION: DAVID KELLEHER FROM: PRISCILLA PROHL 1 RE: SEALS q SHEET 1 OF 6 INCLUDING COVER SHEET SHOULD YOU NOT RECEIVE ALL THE COPIES LISTED ABOVE, PLEASE CALL US AT THE NUMBER LISTED ABOVE. MESSAGE 1 NOV. 27. 2000 12:32PM ELIKIN COUNTY TITLE - 1 NO. 1741 P. 2 .. PITKIN COUNTY VITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS. TRIRD FLOOR * ASPEN, CO 01611 (970)925-1766 - FAX (970)925-6527 INVOICE TO: ORDERNO:1607 HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS DAVID KELLEHER 412 N. MILL STREET ASPEN COLORADO 81611 DATE: 11/27/00 UNDERWRITER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION:LOT K&W 15 ' OF LOT L, BLOCK 44, ASPEN CHARGES OWNER'S POLICY $ S MORTGAGE POLICY $ $ ENDORSEMENTS $ i $ MORTGAGE GUARANTEE S : FORECLOSURE CERTIFICATE S TAX CERTIFICATE $10.00 EACH X $: CLOSING FEE S RECORDING FEES $ 0 & E'S $ CANCELLATION FEES $ 1 TITLE COMMITMENT UPDATE FOR SURVEY $150.00 POSTAGE S SUB TOTAL $150-00 PREVIOUS BALANCE +$ 1 LESS CREDITS -- S TOTAL DUE $150.00 NOV. 27. 2000 12:32PM P~IN COUNTY TITLE . NO. 1741 2.3 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: October 30,2000 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT15703 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owners Policy-Form 1992 Amount@ 0.00 ' premiums o.od Proposed insured: Rate: (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 0.00 PremiumS 0.00 Proposed Insured: Rate- i Tax Certificatet $10.00 3. Title to the MEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective daje hereof vested in: JOHN R. SEALS and CAROLYN SEALS 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PiTKIN Stateof COLORADO and is described as follows: LOT K AND THE WEST 15 FEET OF LOT L, BLOCK 44, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. ' , PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 r,01 E. HOPKINS TÂ¢lis Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 uÂ¢less the Insuring 970-925- 1766 Provisions and Schedules 970-925Â·6527 FAX Aland B are attached. AUTIÂ·lORIZED AGENT NOV. 27. 2000 12:33PM P~IN COUNTY TITLE NO. 1741 P 4 SCHEDULE B - SECT iON 1 REQUIREMEN 1 1 -3 The following ate the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full donsideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: ' 1 1 NOV. 27. 2000 12:33PM ULKIN COUNTY TITLE NO. 1741 P. 5 SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEFI-IONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the tame are disposeo of to the satisfaction of the Company 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the Dublic records. 2. Easemends, or daims of easements, not shown by the pubit records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and u-,Mich are not shown by the public recorcs. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material he: atofore or hereafter fllrnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. : 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, fitst appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposek[ for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. : 7. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from :he City of Aspen rechrded in Book 59 at Page 541 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws", 8. Terms; conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in OrdinanÂ¢e No. 60, Series of 1976 recorded December 9, 1976 in Book 321 at Page 51. 9. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Ordinance No, 3, Series of 1977 recorded March 15, 1977 in Book 325 at Page 942. 10. Terms. conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Agreement recorded January 16, 1998 as Reception No. 412626 and at Reception No. 412630. 11. Deed of Trllst from : JOHN R. SEALS and CAROLYN SEALS To the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin For the usq of : NORWEST MORTGAGE, INC. Original Amount $ 715,000.00 i Dated / : November 16, 1998 Recorded : November 19,1998 , Reception No. : 424639 The beneficial interest of the above Deed of Trust was assigned to FIRST UNIO'N NATIONAL BANK by instrument recorded November 8, 1999 as Reception No. 437493. 1 11 1 NOV. 27.2000 12:33PM ULK IN COUNTY TITLE NO. 1741 P. 6 . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DISCLOSULES The Owner's Policy to be issued, if any shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Water righis, claims or title to water- (NOTE: THIS EXCEPT ON WILL APPEAR QN THE OWNER'S AND MORTGAGE POLICY TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER) Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-2; NOTE: Each title entity shall notify in writing every prospective nsured in an owners Ititle insurance policy Tora single family residence (including a condominim or tow,'mouse unit) (i) of that titld entjty's general requirements for the deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to, unfiled mechanics or materialmens liens, except when said coverage or insurance is extended to the ihsured under the terms of the policy. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnify rig the Company against unfiled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons indicated in the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. Upon receipt of these items and any others requirements to be specified by the Compahy upon request, Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the Owner's policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requirement upon amy title insurer to provide mechanics or materialmens lien coverage. , NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners or loan closing under circumstances wpere it is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said transaction, the Company wiH be deemed to have provided "Gap Coverage". 1 Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122): (a) The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District; (b) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained form fhe County treasurer of the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (c) Information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk,and Recorder, or the CountylAssessor 1 NOTE: A tax Certificate will be ordered from the County Treasurer by the Company~ and the costs thereof charged to the proposed insured unless written instruction to the contral are received by the company prior to the issuance of the Title Policy anticipated by this Commitment. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-S,action 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT15703 A and B are attached, tri l HARRY TEAGUE ARCHIT~f S 412 north mill aspen co 81611 t 970 925 2556 f 970 925 7981 mail@teaguearch.com 6'ckgr@-66<)ve=-rel . C o pn- MEMORANDUM To: Â·Ef#*Harpy, Fred Jarman, Geah-Oate From: David Keleher Date: November 16, 2000 Regarding: Seals Residence - Necessary allowances to move ahead with scheme as proposed at HPC Work session of November 15 1. In order to orient the garage with access from 3rd street, we need the following: a. allowance to build to within the 5' rear setback line of R-6 zoning b. to be granted an FAR bonus to make up for the loss of garage bonus we would otherwise be allowed by orienting garage toward alley. 2. Variance from the board of Adjustment standards to allow the garage to remain at the location as presented at the worksession. In this location, the west wall lies on the setback line rather than receding ten feet from the front fagade as recommended in the design standards. 3. Variance on rear setback required under office zoning designation. 4. If we choose to keep the concrete pad, and if it encroaches on the public ROW, we must apply for an encroachment licence. If we remove it, we simply need permission for a "use by right" for the right to continue to use the zone as a driveway. 5. HPC approval for removing and rebuilding porch. 6. HPC approval for maintaining historic setback variance of approximately 2' 4" at west wall protrusion of original structure. V., 3-6 9 0 .a 3.t,y n 42 01 4, j , f' 4 f i 14 4 Â«11) ' -,2Â¥â€¢Pâ€¢W+4Â»â€¢a:C 91 -- t 2.. .,1,