The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.331 W Main St.HPC8-97HPC8-97 -Herron Unit #3 Minor HPC Review 333 W. Main Street Unit 3 \ A K AP- 9 7 P .. RESOLUTION NO. w- , SERIES OF 1997 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 333 W. MAIN STREET, UNIT 3, ASPEN, COLORADO WHEREAS the applicant, Diane Rosenthal, represented by Chris Shipp, has requested minor development approval for the property located at 333 W. Main Street, Unit 3, to alter windows and doors on the south and east sides of the unit. The property is a designated historic landmark and is located within the Main Street Historic District, and WHEREAS all development in an ~'H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof, and ~ WHEREAS, Amy Amidon, in her staff report dated March 26, 1997, recommended approval with the condition that the new- windows on the south be more vertical in nature, and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on March 26, 1997, the Commission considered and approved the application without conditions by a vote of 7-0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: .. That minor development approval for the project located at 333 W. Main Street, Unit 3, Aspen, Colorado, be approved without conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the day of ,1997. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Chairman ATTEST: Chief Deputy Clerk ASPEN HISTO~~ PRESERVATION COMMI~ ON MAR. 26. 1997 Chairman Jake Vickery called the meeting to order at 5:05 with Suzannah Reid, Mark Onorofski, Melanie Roschko, Susan Dodington, Mary Hirsch, Roger Moyer and Gilbert Sanchez present. Jeffrey Halferty was excused. 333 W. MAIN STREET - MINOR NOTE: 333 W. Main has five exhibits. Amy stated that this the Herron Condominiums on Main Street and the proposal is to make window and door changes on a condominium unit, #3. On the alley side they would like to change a slider window to two larger fixed windows and on the east side of the building they want to switch the location of a door and window and make the window larger. Staff s only concern on the alley side is that possibly a more vertical proportion be suggested. Chris Shipp presented the proposal for the applicant. The views from the back of the building are good up toward Shadow Mountain and the lower views are just toward the alley. The proposal is for two trapezoidal windows and the reason they are not taller is to obscure the view of the alley. The existing outside pulley system will be taken out. Moving the door will allow a gas log fireplace in its place. Chris also stated that he did a photo of what Staff is recommending (four windows) but his intent is to obscure the alley with minimal glass. Committee member comments. Suzannah stated the trapezoidal windows goes with the building. Gilbert stated that horizontal windows relates to the existing horizontal popup area. Roger stated that he had no problem with the proposal as drawn. Susan said double hung windows look better from Third St. and tie everything together. 1 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MARÂ£2-L1291 .. Chris said he thought about double hung windows but it opens up the view on the alley. Mark stated either way is fine. MOTION: Roger moved to approve the minor development application for 333 W. Main Unit #as proposed; second by Mary. All in favor, motion carried 7-0. Gilbert did not vote. 403 S. GALENA - MINOR DEVELOPMENT Gilbert stepped down. Charles Cunniffe presented for the applicant. NOTE: 403 S. Galena has six exhibits. Amy stated not long along HPC looked at a remodel for the store front windows and the proposal now is to add bay windows on two locations on the north elevations. Charles stated that this proposal is for an image center for River Valley Ranch Aspen. He stated that you cannot see in the windows due to the light. The glare from the flat glass acts like a mirror. If you walk by a curved piece of glass due to the refraction of the light you get a clearer view inside. The proposal is a bay window with flat glass sides and a piece of curved glass on front. An all curved window might be too contemporary. The top o f the window goes up against the bottom o f the deck overhang so the deck forms the roof o f the window. Suzannah asked if the windows would be metal? Charles stated clad window to match the existing. Mark asked for clarifications of how the window will be hung with the square ends and rounded window? 2 .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET CITY OF ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DATE RECEIVED: 3/20/97 CASE # HPC 8-97 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID # 2735-124-52- PROJECT NAME: Herron Apartment/Unit#3 Minor HPC Review Project Address: 333 West Main ST, Aspen APPLICANT: Diane Rosenthal Address/Phone: 59 Squire Lane, New Canaan, Conn. 06840 OWNER: same Address/Phone: REPRESENTATIVE: Christopher Shipp Address/Phone: P.O. Box 1060, Basalt, CO. 81621 927-9274 RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Applicant Other Name/Address: PLANNING FEE: $120 # APPS RECEIVED 1 FEE RECEIVED: $120 # PLATS RECEIVED GIS DISK RECEIVED: TYPE OF APPLICATION:Exemption Itiview Body Meeting Date l'ublie Hearing ? HPC C] Yes CINo P&Z [3 Yes UNo CC C]Yes UNO CC (2nd reading) C]Yes C]No REFERRALS: m City Attorney E Zoning U Environmental Health El City Engineer Â¤ Housing El Parks El Planning Il Other: Il Other: DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DATE DUE: CLOSED/FILED DATE: INITIALS: ROUTE TO: 0 I Q- 0 --I;-I MEMORANDUM .me"#WTER<"~immig"NI TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Direktor j Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Director { Yl All, FROM: 1 Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer ~- RE: 333 W. Main Street, Unit 3- Minor DATE: March 26,1997 SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to add new windows and relocate a door on Unit 3 of the Herron Condominiums, 333 W. Main Street. The building is a designated historic landmark. APPLICANT: Diane Rosenthal, represented by Chris Shipp. LOCATION: 333 W. Main Street PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with the designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a historic landmark.... Response: The applicant requests HPC approval to add two new windows on the south side of the unit, and on the east side to switch a door to a window and window to a door. The affected area of the building is fairly recent construction, so no historic materials will be affected, and the changes will not be easily visible from the street. Staff does recommend that the new windows on the south be more vertical in nature to be more compatible with the historic building, although double hung windows are not required. .. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposal will not impact the character of the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal does not affect the historic significance of the structure. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal does not affect the architectural character or integrity of the structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the minor development application and that the new windows on the south be more vertical in nature. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the minor development application for 333 W. Main Street, Unit 3, with the condition that the new windows on the south be more vertical in nature." . M. .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name PIAAE -ROSEUr/+AL AF5427-hEUT- 2. Project location HEKRoO APAer-MGO-1-3 - 01) ir * 3 333 33: AAIN â‚¬77. Ag-Pro, CO 8 16 L I (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 4. Lot size 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number :DIAUE- 20&,EArt-MAL 59 SfulaE LAUE , 1)El) CAA*No 1 COUDÂ· 04%40 TELE 20 3 / 964 - ///3 7AX : 20 3 / 172 - 5937 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 6/110.s--m'P# EK_ 5#/PP 1>.6.-Bm< [060 1 -EASAL:t- 1 L.O 81G:LI . -TELEÂ· 970/44.7-Â¥.274 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD -KE Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment Â· i 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals grantedÂ·to the property) APARN--AED-f- Bodt>,Al 9. Description of development application Mwoe_ PEUâ‚¬lop KEMT 1246 -TNE- PURFOSE- DE ARP/,02 -7-lu 0 \U Ulpo \05 -70 -TRE SouTÂ» CALLEY Z>IDE) AUP *E-Com-iqi ELA)61 -THE EX(5-77Â£)6~ -II]CoR' A-00 \U/U*0 70 -7#E- EAST- Chs Sko\Uu 10. Have you completed and attached the following? 4- Attachment 1- Land use application form A)-4. Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 4 Response to Attachment 3 4 Response to Attachment 4 11111111 1CrtÂ¥Â«4 -f Aspen Â«22Â« Aspen Moun al n cf /4 5 --M- - It / IkIER.eou -A,FAKOTEÂ©ts 1 Â£ 4. 333 1\IEST .MAIU- -9 --fiff--- ;61 - , M--A- 1 2\- - M 7- y r-' IbrAULI<- 1-/'--- -2,-D~!LU.crzp%%- I *-t j--1-9Â·-P+- j. / lilill'll/ -1 '''' ,-4 -"-1-1-4-/ - * o nd p 4444Â·/ A~\ Â· j H . - 14-1"7= \911\ lit"'ili- i COONI AVE f COON; AÂ¥'\ 07\ 1 - ~-14.f-N-3// 1 1 L--1 T -_ F-Â«4-41 . ly \\\ . /.14 9 0 1 , 162(l *22 9Â«X 21 1 -31499%43\ / ill f -Syn(% ILE. - ~044349:48. gzinot ~rÂ«Â°- ~~ - ~ La ~ E7777 8 / / / /-UTR 1 1 6-1~ \11\-41\ \ E---r WA-,Tbir-Art Â¥Â«mINE-Wh -Â»--V ---\ 2Â«21\ -\ 4, ...1 1$415\4~ 3 ~ 1 WA' 51 1- = -5- = .. ~.-1. -F.."*7+ , t I *,1 # i, 1 ~..A .4.-0 -? -6 04= 47 4.\\\\\. 4 \\ Ii-d\V' FT i{\\ \ \37Â«1~~, , 1- 1- Al \\1\ to\11,0 14\222 1 /93=f-J r \ 9 6913 \=,_44, 1 r \ O d NO \--7 j ..4 C.Ar=$91 \ 94441 - r 4- -04Â»491 4,1 \ - -- \41====3 ci~ ~ ~I--ULLIWN AVE:-~~e Â« 43 1 inch =550 Jeet ~ Â»11 4 a 440301 ' -.'Mt'}8{18??M ".,Â·~ .~.:.~~ ' Â·'~':~: ~!4~112**4 Nifi, r ' 3039279722 C. SHIPP & ASSOC. 629 P02 MAR 11 '97 23:57 Applicant: Diane & Joel Rosenthal 59 Squire Lane New Canaan, Conn. 06840 Home: 203 / 966-1113 FAX 203 / 972-5937 Office: 212/944-4455 FAX 212/730-7730 March 12.1997 Project Name: Herroll.Apartments - Third Floor Apartment - Unit #3 Project Location: 333 ~~lain Street, Aspen, CO 81611 To the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission: 1, Diane & Joel Rosenthal. hereby authorize: Christopher Shipp P.O.Box 1060 805 PiTion Drive #8 Basalt, Colo. 81621-1060 970/927-9274 FAX 927-9722 to act on our behalf for the purpose of submitting a "Minor Development Review" application to the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission. Signed: Date: 17\ A ,(L..2 2-31 al 7 Diane Rosenthal 3/I*/97 Signed: ce- Date: / / / 1 V Joel Rosenthal . ATTACHMENT 4 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW All applications for minor development review must include the following information: 1. If determined appropriate by the Community Development Director, a site /.6 1 plan or survey showing property boundaries and predominant existing site < characteristics. \/1/. 2. An accurate representation of all major building materials. such as samples and photographs, to be used for the proposed development. 3. A scale drawing of the proposed development in relation to any existing structure. 4. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. including a statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure (if applicable) and character of the neighborhood. URE UEIU O\VUEâ‚¬ i 33/AUE 1206&:U-TUAL , \UISNES -10 APD -1100 0/An:>01/5 -1-6 -THE -KEARL CAUFF 6/DE) 64~ mle -THIRD Â¥1.DOR_ AFAÂ·efllaul-; 1122 EXi sÂ·nt.)6Â¢ 30012 AUD \0(AlI>OB DU -~ME E-As-Lit S /DE- WILL BE SU [1--CHED So -TWAT- 11Â·lE- -3>0012 \VILL BE =0 -FUE 1-2,6477 06 640 Uk) m UNE 710012- TAO, -1-NE Tlut) DEU \U1L.Do\VS 01) -TME- All.24' 5 IPE CEou-IM 50Â© WI LL UaT -BE \86 (BLE ;F12O,A MA K St ADP \uill_ BE Ok) 1-9 -PAR-YALLE Vis<BLe WHEA.) DDE" IS -TRAVELL/A-)# i.)091-N Do )AD st -7-RE oj~Â©129 -TE) -THE 23002_ Aut> U ( 01)041 0/0 -TRE N-?U 5-1-/*oq- strn k \Ui LL--32- PRI MATZILY *DDEAJ B f UNE EX le[-1 u< -EAILIk) 9-. S\U (Tr. MEP loCATI 00 5 /9-\NA \-- 1AsI~1 P. ( W. DiE\U \UIUI>OUS 9-00 4 :00 00 frr' 1/87.120: 1 1 flip' A- 1 1 - . , 110032: ELAM *6 9 =AI:E: '*4 - lic>" C.sut'P 2.|26~97 6 a figbh . ,1 44 2/11:1/4.1 I . e 4~~ -0= f. 1 - .*& i., 8/44..m ft 4/ .. ./ - AB. > .4 -- d -# 4 I . ' .. t"t.~~42,4.5.,4 40,1. *41/ #4 -. 44.44 1Fhe' 4% il.*90"#flWMEL:Ti , t 1.44 ~.,44?*IF} 2 . 14*. ...0 1 - m . ..2.2 -1 .--: / '- t ./ 7 \ p- 41,1.r W=--:90.p' -,*-AMLIn Â¥4 / 1/ 11111- I ... -3 .10 r X4*.-*-1 i **W y . - 1 3 1 4 4 . - 'mâ€ž...a *4JlÂ·b.Â· *Mi .-1 Â£ 65 494 + ly..84 I 2- - 0*â€¢24, '. 9.- - -4,%01,2-N.er 4 7%.,â‚¬4, 14f , ' 421, r 43/1~.....m- - + "hyl ...1,â€ž//1 . .., \\ ' U â‚¬bl.-/#,1-V *47'.4. *in 4..1 41'r--I Â¥' / 0 7 Â£ -2,4414 ... 1.1 *'. 11.0..7 . I 7.,I.K. ..9--".I...m W Â§%..4 . : *Â©41-*44Ek Â·: 1//i~*.9 . I 'V + 4, 1 .1.P .1 7 1/ .0 . N .0 + 2/lill'll'll'll'lliligigib:tw 4. 1 tril , > . - - C.2 1 - 4 4, , 4 Ji/i T' -lai -- ' : .Clicy 'ir 1 1/1 1 I v-1 .t .lk i. h7%9: n 4 . 1.. AILI -- . ,Â« 1 f 'A 1 .... -'-2.'- + .' . 446. 9:=4 , r. /Tfir: 7Â·..,.i , 444 /,62 . 2.3 4 1,41)&.1 7/- / K 4=,krffÂ¢ftâ€¢.re.,2.4 .- Â·Vt-"4.13 i r rer rÂ· cfr-trf : f r A., * . , , - <~ ret,rer,rerÂ¢,i,0~4?~* . .,4, 4. h 1/Â£/r,rr,rr,/rrr,tr/111# 'wÂ· r 2) 1 f ./ , "li : 2&6./*sil:Â· Â· 4.% K . , 4 - M. 1. i 3 441 4â€¢ A 7/#, rÂ·4 ''. % J / :Â·(43* Â»2. I ' 0Â·.2. 1 i .:* Â· p r 1 1.. V ' 3 11 . #1,0- r * t. // I I. Â¥ 4,4 a L. 32,;1- ~,#*/ 1.0 *-~aÂ»i'I.7, .h,r '4 - . ./ fr,rf re, . 1.c Â¥ 64' 6 4 h '<Â· % .. I ;tr".4.~~- z I I $ i , 1$ ;'. # r#,1~~Â· . Al ' 4.* r'* 4\% t , . r N .4 ' , //,5./'.:'/ 1 "' ./ I * ' ./414*