The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.403 S Galena St.HP-1990-211\4 9 1140 -LE v,J 0 -27 / ( r of) 7\\\, J 1 0,5 e. \4 P Iqdo - 2- i ill ha G (Rj Of /,- ~lr) jF~ /2 1-J 44. 4 . 1)4.11 , WilsonlonesÂ® 74CG Filing Supplies File Pocket - Red Rope MADE IN MEXICO 42,17.AG tiff + 1 IAND USE APPLICATION FORM HP-/990 -2 4 ~,4 Project Name GuidoisRedeveloment 1 2, Project Locatian 403 S. Galena, 425 E. Cooper Aspen, Colorado 1 Block 90 Lots E. F. G. H. I (indicate street ackiress, lot & block nomber, legal description where appropriate) CC 15000 S.F. 3) Present Zoning 4) Lot Size 5) Applicant' s Name, Address & Phone # Guido Meyer PO Box 1799 Aspen, Colorado 81612 6) Representative's Name, Addre= & Phone # Bill Poss & Associates 605 E. Main Street Suit #1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303)925-4755 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA X Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual POD ' Minor IIistoric Dev. 1 Stream Margin Final PUD Historic Demolition Mcxnitain View Plane . Subdivision Historic Designation Condaniniumization Text/Map Amendment (NOS Allotment Iat Split/Iat Line (NOS Ehomption Adjustment 8) Description of Existir- Uses (Inmber and type of existing struchlres; approocimate sq. ft.; nmber of bedroams; anY previous approvals granted to the property). See attached letter 9) Description of Develgunent Application See attached letter. 10) IIave you attached the following? A Response to Attachment 2, Minima Sulnission Contents X Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents 1 Response to Attachment 4, aev Standards for Your Application 0/ - - <* --12 , ; 49 . 4*'31 4 .hi ' .9 4, t,. - I.- - Dono*% 'I E, 44 1 , ...... . 4: JI ' 6 1 6 r ' itt. 1 1â€¢ 94 . -. 1 h., , 11.0.4..1.: 11:'1,# 1. .. .J . I 1,1 -14.*IQP' *.Al'~~,-7, 1 '11; '.Â¥ t+M'r~~~~U)11*,fkli 4 / 1 . Ir 1,~ - \~ p . .11 " 1 Â«* 0 , ' .i' 3'b /6/# . 10. f h 6 3. 1, :. .. . .hz t , 1 i 7/ i Vt<*tul"- \41 Â·- 11 111111't 114 $ I '. 'lk, 41 , &41%11*/i&r .. ' 4.'1<11)0 19 ' .r , . W I h.:1 1 1 1.2 . 1 : . .. 1 i -I . .. I - ... #b ./4 .'/,d'' M .L w+ 4. - . - -t ... ./1 4:: 1 - .- -e - Jul . :L i -IÂ·''V Â· b.sÂ·-' 4 4 - ... r :. 4% 4 - . 3.0 1 r 1. t . 1 L 4 : i.... , 1 -d.1 1 .4 1 i. a ' i * ,; i ?di ti ~ki:fillild . a 11,m-tlk ' ' 4. I- Â« 11 . j 13.41 1%1 1 -- r- EES - - 41â€¢,f it] [ lEa... .L 4 / 17,=0 4 , .* - , . ..1 . . %~C 1 - 4 31- ~ - Â» *41 . #. 0 x* . -VIE.Ar'm- .' .5: ~ " 1 -1 . 1 . /iff /( -- *L, * *:,-- ~1 \%4453=,4, -4 -42: t-40=-----~NU,i~~--23"/Â£Wht/#+44 7 *'Ar - - 1. 1 Ve Bdi#/71120:b */h&*2 ~15/zeÂ£5-1- r. I N 1 6 ....I-.0.... k. .-- 21 %99'A I , 1. 7Â»@N402-2 ~Â« i ft*h:Al #c<Ufa , f /Â· 1 Ii'Atti*1 L.h, . ill -' Xah 1 3 11... . i ;A , 1 4; . Â« / NU sTREET TTI t.4..-&., '.. 0.11*. . 3.1,1:.1% ' .. . Ilillit!11 U !11 11: 1 rfunTUTs $ 72\ , . 01./ r. . 1.19. 1, , -66- .0 W. 84.E EMB< brnEET ~ E BLEEKER W U 1 . - mIH TE-1 --moll# '$ <f~.I) 12<4 11 /flÂ· Â·Â·~.9 01:5 4 1 a ,.Se 0.10. WA" igf' C.U.7 HOU- 2 1 , J, . 7 MAIN STREET 11111Tll!1:_1 Mi _-1[[i â€ž!11 . 1.---1..,-L 1 ./. VEâ€¢Va ~ . W. HOPKINS AVENUE k _ _1-_ i E. MÂ¢>PI<*DVI AVENUE , "17 IAL, UU : . ~ 6 I \. 1.1,\.11 Jf..2% C * [L211 Â· PÂ£11110 '"*11 lilliMIAZAWLAR 77'7777777 0IWD-hitiiirlill) I[{wI[ mIEICITIII1 3Em ~02*1*Ili41558332222}3222*3233j 11 1771 !1â€¢Aliffiliiâ€¢ : 1 TOÂ¢tâ„¢ITUX,n JmtnTil ~ ?1 1.1."79 1 %*t ,/7/':0 -1 ''111[1.11_1 ~~~~~~~ /1.11!1-11~1|1|111|1]z . L.~.-- U.6~ * /[F-lEi P*y,6,034.â€žr f \~Â»-- '.04 Mmm n[1111â€¢ .\ 1 Uuu.16 Â· e .1 DVeANT a/ENUE . 2 I |/ 1/10 [[ET[r Â·Â· /=1 ETINI[ 01*11,Â·[mi[[milT]TTITITTI Â· '34/: /5:$ ./ /:4 ./r# Â¥ ~11 .z,- -- mimm 1 rt: * 4: 6# 'r,7 1111IP Tl.rT-Tn ~ i. 44, 4-/1 'LORY . I. 40 -1 0 I. ' + .41 n . .1 .-4:9 -,1 1- 2~3-f,9*elf .- CT+IiÂ·/ . '*. 43 Z Â· ~ : 247)246/ 1 ' . 55<vtf ' 0~2 ~ * ..1 'D 6, ., 4 ./ I I Ul./UlLEX] L.1.2ill 4% \ \ 4% ... ., 2 I i I i . 4 I :\N\.4\ \ .2 :mwld ).-.1 - 1 44/, ...,0 . ' 7, 9 ./ 4 . p . 1,1... 1 ~ h V L ,\2 - Â· ' 13'. .0 . 1. V. I 4 . i ju*pr/ 7 .,.,f-,74 -Â»LI'-\4*Ukâ‚¬&Â»a .. i ' 4 ': 001<~ * ?r,2/1/1// Â· r . . I -1~-0. /.1:7.>5,23 204 1 e . : 1 '. g .& \ P--I -* . 7.- .3.. 4#44 t~?/ I/.14 ki 7U 3. . --42- -4 . '' .S~ '. I ' ,.. I ' . ' : 0,4 ' ' ' -h'y/'15. *~.,EL/- 16*. ~L& -0-.- -1 . 7'..i .:.' -Â·Â·Â·-f-'-Â·toâ€¢/0-'Â· A -1 . . i\.--kjl Y.. - 4- t~~~<01 ~~ L~Â£=- --2--Â·.4... 4.: ,Â· ~>~~'~CL 7-74.62.-.4--4.A<rep . % I N -Tr - --***+ ------ < . k. I, i.,Ir..'~ELE.fizippr/422.23 \ N - \.' ... 8<23-,C.l ~7>-+14.$L'.Â·~Â·7&42>L./..21<4(. r..4 ~9.-21 St . Ir-=LASR>~ 43*Â·A -1 \ 7 L N - N FOU TH ST,REErâ€¢ :$ (6044 GUÂ»d- 3-11-ID A L L 08 Y 6- NU 64Â£- ,~4 #. 1- t, L.1 6 :i 8.*1Â·ST<+461 P'41hld, 1*T-ID : Lit - 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 01 1 k El 2 i U-) 1-- 1-Â© r 2 j ::~ P 1 1 1 1 . Ph . d .--lu-Â«-'.Â«al.- 1 - 4Â¢..4.- I Gc_J ! Â¥4 Â£ 0 1 / P.1 1 1 . 1 -4 L.-T bruIDe=3'5 CONALE,L TOR 15:>USINE-5S 15UILIC>INA 1 4 2 1 t 1% ,i , ! --- 1 1 il L- 1 1 1 '4 \\ ,14 ! MI ~- + 3-21 ) -- -4 < 1:-*PcosE-0 ,Â»LICK,5-1~15 444Â¥:t>q,k-re, > <f I 1<47Â» f %---3/ I.-4 - , 0 1 Â»3'1%-,3129.t - i~--4 |~ I i 1 9 'f ' 2 -1- Â»-PAV'Hal -MATTmy-'49 22-2, CDNE-:K#-31 71-*64 TEK. cooPE AVENUE 19# QUU DO S S 0 7 E PLARI [MI ARÂ© M &, TZ@@Â© AS P EN 9 C @LonzipÂ© lili' 0 5 jo Le 30 ~ and assocÂ·ares K 1 :1, I k 0 F 1 5. 1- Ut t . . 1 3 1 1 E :, 1 13 .oj. - i i 11 ~ " 'I ' 0 1 C ' i I i il i r li 1 â€ž i le e-rh 1 L. 1 1 1 i 4 1 1 1 1 . 1 21 1 4 1 111 1 LIZ:=11 1 1 1 , :1 1 i u/ 1 227.#litisT f L -----1-4. - -- i p 4 1 -4 - -; .-4- =--_~343- , Â£ 1 ; 1. 7 Dll '' 99 rhel wr \UL i. r ' J 1 . 1 -L_ 1-0 1.4 to #'f *- t'Y, M..9 (* r0.w c/ 4 *Es-1-AURAK[-1- . v 96 f \/ls eTI 15441-8 fi)Â·+ 5 VE-6-r I e U LE hÂ» 1 - -- I $ , i h.. : c r 7 -) | UL Â·'t Â·M 4-1 11 RESÂ» 1 W - : 4 ---1. 1= 1 -tz -7 1 , 1 U 2% 1 1 4 - 94 1 -27 1 1/ r'?7' | ' '11 1 . 4 r LL_ + D ' 12= n-ti. 11. . -*- 1 q 11 11 + : 1 1 1 4. P A e n M a N T 1- E V n L T>LAN k n. T A I L L 15 V t- L r LA 14 KES"1-AUK ANIT LEVE.1- PLAN- ' J 1,41 - .I I , 112 - - Dil GUNDÂ©43 ~ARÂ© 06 2. 11Â®Â®@ / ~i,5 ASPEN. C OLORADÂ© 1|| 1 0 5 % 0 10 . ~it--4- Â·a-4 + Â·1 iâ‚¬Â· I m 12>M ./1 f--11 Â£11 1---3.1 P=-9-1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1-#1 - 11 11 , 1 voleM -RO:'oM t~.~ ~~=== POK,1 1=,0,4 2=2==-4 j 12,7 KM leÂ»H --~_-IHEL--27--1' 1(222---- 4---- 41 --* --- ti -- . il ..- ~4 1 4 1 1 042 1 1 1 11 L 1 -c: 1 t' 2 Â»--- 11 1 1 1-1 . L- r---1 ~ _~~_~~~4 - /-4 P=:4 -1 , 1 1 . r L.' ' 1,4 --- -1 1 t=AÂ· 1 1 721-__i__ ________ %===-7 1 6 21:44 292--- 1 2,1-7 Q-br -- kÂ·FARTHE*1- 1 LÂ»_2 1-2*-- --1- - 1 PII-U-+2 I P=71 ///-1 [-7-01 0---- 11 014 1119 j 9 1. U -y=li y -4 9 +-151 - ....... . .4il- - --/-1- . -4- ~ 1 Al'ARTMENT- 2 1 VE.6-T IM.UL,0. \~1' ~~- 4- b n , UZZ=- f i 41 4 4 C\--1 4Â»09 1-4 111 U-==:it ~|| 99 1*&-FAI L KIETAr - â‚¬#TH ,# r .r-1 h h 66-4 rE- -4 1117 1 -9~ --- -fT i -11 1 11 1 1 :1 -6--- =-U-/./.I://ICÂ£; / 51 * fi 0 +6 mi ILTi._ -9 10 4 11 , p d 0-4 - r-+ RE TA I L L--5.Vt k- f,-AN - -- -- --- 4-1 r~ 117 * i 1 4.i ~ LF-.--=z-- ul_ AYAETMEÂ·N-T LEV..5.L -fLAN r=â€ž 2-t ,====t r==-1 r==4 1 1 1 A; ' 0 -11+ L # 1 - f Â·. . â‚¬ ha *--7fK --t- . *f4**s~. t# '01) ; 4 ~ tuff j . 2_132 ' - flip i \ f-I , j i 1 '1 1 It { i k-T- 7-t- 1 711 af i 11 N 22 P ~R---1 9- BASEME-LIT 1 . [ll\\ / . 9, 11/ 1 1 / 1 EASE-MC.A.47 LUE-l- TAAAL Dil BUÂ©0 MIESS M3ILD IlLDU MQ ~AIRÂ©04 Egi@Â®0 111 1 1 BAÂ©O ASPEN 9 COLO 5 1 0 20 50 0 . 4 1 -<PL ' 21 , . . - - - - ----- 11 4 | 1 -- - -NAPP T-Â·12-IM - TYF. P 11 ----- ji~ -1 1 i' 1 11 M 1 lili 1 --5,7-ll 'C- 0 klely[9 -TFJH -TYp.--- 1&0#% -Â»p>(eis ------ ----- ---- Â·-*Tlr-FLAA 46-TT+ 1 w & .2 P 127 - MATE.M AXIST,&469 .- --7 -- - ---p --- 1 0===22*37 -- IICI =-- ~1111 , -- -1 # 0 - ANNIkiq <BET'FAL-TA# A-%13 [1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 k 1-3 71 F 1 111 1 1 [FlÂ« 1 9 11 1 a L- 4 , 1 ,- 11 14-2 7---~ 111 J 4 N // 1 -- 'IZEZZIEZIn --,40Â·cp tp -7- 1 Art-AS<> ------t 'FLAAS-WH E + LA 6 715Â·14 131\ju-â€¢0 rl-*45 TONE Vf NLEE K -FLANTEÂ¥k O 0 0 -r m â‚¬ S 1- B L c VAT loNi - 1 1 Â¢ f p i i H 1 11 1 11 IMel AL- - i 8 f III 1 1 1 .,1 11 ==1 1- 1-1 LJLj-L __ , . i~ 1 1 11 = 4.. klopp TY-IM - 1 Â¥K | 21.-_- -- E-fi442:RY pe:xmâ‚¬~ - =:i- kled'l> 737 MA-Tah --9 72;.-.-=-- .r , ~ g.xis-r-thil:~ -- -= - f t*- 4 1 I ..1 e : 1. IÂ·: i 'Â· 5~. I- ...1 1 '49* 1 1 - 1 - 1 -4- 1 / 6, L L. 6 4, fl-&.6-1--Efi- - - -:F-1-Al.1 6TO,LE- Ell-Ales fLAt41-AF E.--Â· A A L E- N AST. I 12- L E V AT 1 0 KL F I ': C . r ,Â·/32~~kb, 7-Woop Â·rÂ·,4 iMÂ·Â· T YT< 1 \2Â·<4~ J-_- + LA61-6121 -Tr-%1<4 4.17-TA-> - 0 U fuT 1 0// - / 1 . 1 .lili e_~r..21- F:9~979 1 El -=~ -- - - . El_~ --- ___ _ _ __ ~- 1 J L" M U L==IL===JIL:===3 ' I -1 - r f 1 \ --AUA 695 , - 1 I '11 13- 9 2- 2 2 IT - - - - 1 FLPNEE. he>r.'s Ts-KKA 6-cpT.rA ---> -------------- ---Â¥ -.7.= 4.---'Alcot> Tz=> MATCH TZ'ciâ‚¬.1-1144 4 m 1 1-F E -r--11 It i 93- l1640 -- --- 1 11! 1 1 1,1 1 1 1 1 4- M L- A 6 -re Â·Ir 4 1 1 1 - 41 111 14 1 - i ---1 -- 1 | ~| ~ I n.-AASTOLLE 'Fl.41-Tte. t t. .2- 2 -71 ALL E Y EL-EVATION.l 3 f ' 4Â·, .t- 4 Ill QU Il DO S MARC Wl 2. 1990 ASPEN. F===E 0 5 /O lD 31 E it~ >c //L/- 0- 224 3 P. .26 - Bin - rfll(m o_g:Ell -- - _Â»*kivreFit (-Ne') /2=A_ - + 4 -fUMMEPLI ' *P.11 1 1 --Irill -i" - C __=acaetz,cy - INZi~F~L /Â«rtrkE /-~1 El/AB . n n 1-3 _ m- ~11 9 31: f -9 1 /--- - 1 .9 10 11- 'lf== A- 1 UJ,-al -1 i.i ~ r/JE-/ 1 1 . . ..d- . 1 - ---- 808-tt 806*rr-lobt Q ki- 46 g 4 11 6.1 1 :11 4 44+ % a i - 1 I. 1 9 4 - 7-- A . & 60 #Ii 41 f *9 \ .. 0 0, 1 . 7 4./.0 44+MU \ - i/ ,/ '1 30,1 1 - - 0/4.4. . ./.- 42: - 4 -- - 7.yj -- 71 11,1 1,7 'ri,â€ž1 -,A l Il .if, 1.i- '4 li' 'Tr Vl O- --i oillf/,1.. 0, 1 '.1 1.,1/ i., : ,1 . ' jIV'iI74 ti0 7,1 7'611410 '1114 ;'%49,,14444'G# '%'10 * 1l 1'1141 296 11~(,1 uti I'Pell ;'llji ~llIfin 'IUIP/, - il l' 'li< 42 ,4 11* mi ' lFjb j ; 'VALL, i Â£1.'i L.*, fi#*46Â¢ifit Â«f?LfÂ£:rfâ€ž A.L+ illl '11 11'V,#1 1~1/jil<~fA~ .t'i, i,,11 ~,- 3 ,â€¢ ,f 1~ & 11 r./Al LI~ 6,L If 11 c' p rn.,11[ -7 {11 11< /( 1,7 ;,-M i ti iv "FL y .* 10 4(1 }' trilll f Â·1',/>3( 'fl,J 1 M liiiA , ,/ (4! : !,7,14<Zv,4 A . f 1 11 1--3 - 1 J. LL 1 \\ - f â‚¬.Ii 0- 1 1 - [ C. 4 -"Pil '-' 0-GUIDO'O pe DEVELâ‚¬SF AAENT ase-r el,EVAFTÂ»l ,!UL ftÂ»6 4Â» 36'66=0. - _1.'2%451 --_ _HOILD!146 1 14130 / ar,eed JAMa pta LLVAEAa .1489 1 11 , -- - --- 0 - --- .; - .- - - - -I---i---- -- f 1. I. -- . 4/I a b . C 1 . 11 i F: ulh-1â„¢7 *'~LA81061 I --- .. 71614*M7/4& Co,162- r - z .... *ApÂ¥{1301'-_-_lttefr___10 -_-__CAF6 11 *L 1 i , 1 1 0 - 1 , -I .- <~67!Hâ‚¬ 01= 'PUDF FWibLE - Â© u - . - t=kÂ¢ 6 -- - FETAII- * 4 . . 1 - ---clf ~.FF}-Oe 0 -Z tur 1 1 r--- . -1 - _46FWICE N;41217 - . .... . *Fl L- 1 7+26~[P,/L. Â·pe-TAÂ·\U- tzâ‚¬TA1L-- tzeÂ·IA It" f 1/ \13' A 11 i ~~; ,, .- . A- 1 - Le*1.DF- - 1 1 ... GLANTEF-_ + ~ 4 /L Â»24-9 - 1 ! - 1 , * - -0- - ... - -~m ~ 1 --2 - - - ~ - - - .0 - -I--- - --Il- I. ... ---- - --- - 7 1 e I r 2 1. - 4 1 0 1 1 $ ill 1 1 1 - 4 = i r %= Wil:' 4 19* M 7 - 1 l l , 1 2 -. â‚¬-. 9% 9~4 l 1 1 1 I. . 1 V -.- 1 - 1 ./."..... -p-. -.- 0 ir... - - -2,01 cole? peDEVE LOP MENT 4 1 P, Le*L-Â· 8 Q1 HBILL- mee 146 Aâ€¢60622:-0 -1726Â·81 1.- lo! -=103.VA913 -T li It 7 ---, 1 1 1 1-; 1 -1- *-----#*I#. $200Â¥:312- "- 1 1 Er 1 1 I .0 1 - , e -Il..=- I - iÂ· ' /Nfne:I'Me,Â¥r 1 1 1 1 1- .... _pÂ»x>F~ *&- | 3 . 1 1 1 - 213 . i Ir'. .12 . 1 1 L !I Ill) - I . -- - -â€ž -LA - -. 82 2-EleÂ·;ArÂ»12. ~ -- Â· P/FZ42T76â‚¬rrr 1 - 1 -- -1 t 1 pinf iDA - - -k- - - 1 101 -,1 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF 403 S. GALENA AND 425 E. COOPER AVE. - GUIDO MEYER PARCEL - ADDITION TO REAR OF SECOND FLOOR OF GUIDO'S RESTAURANT, TWO STORY CONNECTION BETWEEN STRUCTURES, AND A THIRD FLOOR ADDITION TO THE BUILDING AT 425 E. COOPER. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 23, 1989 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the City Council Chambers, 1st Floor, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by Guido Meyer for conceptual development for the property located at Lots E, F, G, H, and I, Block 90, City and Townsite of Aspen, commonly known as 403 S. Galena St. and 425 E. Cooper Ave. The proposal includes the remodeling and rear second floor addition to the building known as Guido's Restaurant; a two story connector between the restaurant building and the building known as 425 E. Cooper Ave.; and the addition of a third floor to 425 E. Cooper Ave. NO variations are being sought by the applicant from the HPC. The parcel exists within the Commercial Core Historic District. For further information contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/Georgeann Waggaman Vice Chair, Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on August 3, 1989 City of Aspen Account pub.notice.403sg I and associates 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORAD081611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 July 28, 1989 Roxanne Eflin City of Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Guido's Redevelopment Dear Roxanne: The owner's of the above referenced project wish to renovate and expand their property located on the southwest corner of Galena and Cooper Streets. Since this property is located in the commercial core of the historic district, review by the HPC is required. As a first step, we request a public hearing to consider our conceptual development plan. In accordance with section 7.601.F.3.a(4), what follows is a statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure and/or character of the neighborhood. To aid you in evaluating the information, this statement is arranged according to the review standards for development in a histroric overlay district: 1. Compatibility with designated historic structures. The project consists of two buildings. The restaurant which was built around 1953 and the adjacent business building which was built around 1971 and remodeled in the early 1980's. Presently, neither building relates very well to the adjacent historic structures; the Red Onion and the Independence buildings. Both of these structures are brick and sandstone examples of Aspen's mining heritage architecture. 7-1 L-1 The restaurant is a ski chalet style wood and stucco building reminiscent of Aspen's early ski days. Planning staff has indicated this type of architecture is worthy of saving as an example of the resurgence of Aspen. It is our intent to renovate this building retaining as much of the original structure as possible. An addition on the south end of the upper floor has been designed to compliment the dominant features of the buildings, wood trim, low roof pitch, strong horizontal lines and stucco. The major work on the project will be the addition and renovation of the business building. The facads will be changed to relate more to the surrounding historic structures and compliment the restaurant building. 2. Compatibility with neighborhood. The completed project should enhance the neighborhood and be more consistent with its character for the folowing reasons: A. The renovation and restoration of the restaurant. B. The replacement of the business building facade. 3. Protection of cultured values. With the renovation of these two builings,the viability and cultural value of this neighborhood should be enhanced. 5. There are presently no designated historic structures on the property. However, the designation of the restaurant building is a possibility and the remodeled business building is more complimentary to the restaurant. *6 and associates I realize the accompaning drawings are sketchy but at the conceptual level, we are most interested in discussing massing and overall style rather than individual details. I hope this information helps you understand the project. I will bring a rough study model to the meetings. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, /3 Kim Weil Enclosure KW:lati ~ and associates 1,01 ~ and associates 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL (303) 925-4755 1 000 fl UgUSt 2-0, 1 : u i Roxanne Eflin Planning Office City of Aspen 130 S Galena rispen, CO 81611 Re: Guido's Redevelopment Dear Roxanne: This letter is to certify that all property owners within 300' of this above referenced project were notified by first class mail sent on August 8, 1 989. The names and addresses of owners were researched by this office on August 7, 1989. A list of persons contacted is attached with this letter. Sincerely, 2:i-r/wei 1 Enclosure KW:lah ~ and associates 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORAD081611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 August 9, 1989 Roxanne Eflin Preservation Planner Aspen-Pitco Planning Office 130 S Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Roxanne: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that my office will be representing Guido Meyer for his proposed renovation project which will come before the Preservation Committee. To eliminate any perceived conflict of interest, I will step down from any business which Guido has before the committee. Sinc~rely, Bilf Pods WJP:lah 1 871. c' T F "' 0310NL41 FWD TIME EXPD :STERLING INSURANCE 323 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 - J X 605 EAST MAIN STREET RETURN TO SENDER. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Kenneth Sterling Martha Sterling 555 E Durant Ave Aspen, CO 81611 0 ,fÂ©LE-\4 1 i':re, 1 : L'.'.'' 9 6 1 3 !%..i / r. \ fiffOI~**4Â· - i and associates .. 4 -ht 605 EAST MAIN STREET : ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 lic>~ 44 4 . Peter. Hershor ,-Al ,-32 *0864 , r, <1 - ; *i â€¢ 43 4.1. 4383 West unt Ave I . 04%1 ~~~ritj *5390;~ *en ~'4..4, Westmo Re~ 9,7 1 pdj.t/swit~Â·qi,j ~,47/ A Que c, Canada H3Y 1WB / 4, . :j/ e 0,2 1- U 0, 1,.,,1 , 4;/0 14. er...2 ' , 1 ' ' '2 + r..ls z,v. eut., 42>j.7 'I .4.3 ,/i./.* .'Ch > Ove[ ..&4*. *'~ 42Â¢cte j. i 4 - 4 $ I .~.- 1 , Â· Â·~ ' - ~. ~~ ,Â·- ~.a-.- // / 2.- 0 4//4/i/ -7,4...........A...... 1 41:,9 \ .,44, ...- L 605 EAST MAIN STREET if'. 1 0 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 tti .7 â€ž- James Cox 1 niNOWN c/o Acrecapc Limited 040 LC>IU 6Â£2 +AE.eg- ~/ 314 0 Mill Aspen, CO 81611 728-nue R 72 @eforDGE 2- '4-6 ,Â·3- Â·,E .~..,- .-........'........ -- A ' 1.09, 3 ........ \72- L.---// 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Karen Day Hudson PO Box 3234 Aspen, CO 81612 HUD 34 H 11ZC81 08/11/89 HUDSON RETURN TO b~:.reurâ€žK BOX CLOSED 1 - i John Cooper PO Box-511 Bentonville, Ark 72712 3.- i Grenko Properties Ltd Â·PO Box W 555 E Durant Aspen, CO 81611 / 1 Daly Construction, Inc 200 W Bleeker Aspen, CO 81611 Kenneth Sterling Martha Sterling 555 E Durant Ave Aspen, CO 81611 Karl and Madeleine Larson Suite 101 201 N Mill Aspen, CO 81611 6 i Kuyfar and CO. 2609 Spring Grove Terrace Colorado Springs. CO 80901 Christian Christ PO Box 4947 Aspen, CO 81612 i Robert Bean Hilltop Road-Wilson POint Norwalk, Conn. 06854 David Puchy Trustee David Puchy Products, Inc PO Box 382 Eppiny, New South Wales Australia 60045 . Dr. George Hyman 38 East 61st New York, NY 10021 A.J. Gregg Partnership 23511 Chargin Blvd Boachwood, Ohio 44122 1 1 Edwin and Adeline Grosse 34135 Hunters Row Farmington Hills, MI 48331 ..... Rogelio Sada 1 44 Apartado Postal 88 Monterrey Nuevo Leon Mexico 64000 Thomas Garritano Box 41-1144 Chicago, IL 60641 1 Nancy Drake Unit $A 555 E Durant Ave Aspen, CO 81611 David and Leticia Gordon Box NN Aspen, CO 81612 Elanor and Robert Zeff Suite 400 421 Laurel St. : Des Moines, Iowa 50314 ,' David Kirschenbaum Trustee 1015 Euclid Dr Cleveland, Ohio 44115 Michael S Klein c/o Hotel International Inc Suite 1960 100 Shoreline Highway Mill Valley, CA 94941 Peter Hershorn 4383 West Mount Ave Westmount Quebec, Canada H3Y1WB Stuart and Sally Davidson 3415 Volta Place N.W. Washington, D.C. 20007 Gerald and Mary Salton 221 Valley Road Ithaca, NY 14850 1, <4 Raymond and Anita Colony 631 Via De Suenos Green Valleys AZ 85614 Richard Woods ~ i PO Box 14633 j 510 Locust St St Louis, Missouri 63178 1 1 Greg Sherwin c/o Aspen/Snowmass Realty ' Aspen, CO 81611 Joseph Pederson and Dean Bastil 10500 West Silver Spring Dr 3 1 ' 4Â· t. 1 Milwaukee, WI 53225 t Leslie and Marlow Chabay 1532 Pelican Point Dr #141 Sarasota, FL 33581 Eugene and Marlene Shapiro c/o Margon Management 710 Anthony Trail Northbrook, IL 60062 1 , Norton and Virginia Sharpe 10543 Garwood Place Los Angeles, CA 90042 Steven Phillips 5300 Woodland Ave Des Moines, Iowa 50312 - 17â€¢9 't. 2.. 17. 1 . James and Ruby Jane Frazier 1330 W Giaconda Way Tuscon, AZ 85704 Arthur Down and Edith Resnick 12821 Capital Oak Park, Michigan 48237 Robert and Sheeley Katzman Unit 2N 555 E Durant Ave Aspen, CO 81611 Keith Norman and Irvin Maylor DBA Sno Turtle Rural Delivery 9 York, Conn 17402 . 1/ David and Elizabeth Weatherby 555 E Durant Ave Aspen, CO 81611 i 4 j j Hubert and Anne Burgess 6413 Hillcrost Dallas, TX 75205 Andrew and Bonnie Weiner PO Box 1080 Haddonfield, NJ 08033 - Eugene and Marlene Shapiro 710 Anthony Trail Northbrook, ILL 60067 Miles Anderson c/o Don Helmich, Manager 555 E Durant Ave Aspen, CO 81611 Hugh Lee Baker Jr. Nanah Casey Unit 2K 555 E Durant Ave Aspen, CO 81611 - Eugene Witz IS. 5900 Howard St i 1 1 Skokie, IL 60076 Lenard and Barbara Kovaz 1540 N Dearborn Parkway Chicago, IL 60610 1 John Thomas Gussel 555 E Durant Ave Unit 2-D Aspen, CO 81611 Richard W. Owen 4406 University Blvd. Dallas, Tx 75205 E.E. and Dorothy Bickers 555 E Durant Ave Aspen, CO 81611 Fritz and Erika Linder Graf Eberstein Str. 7 f j 7570 Banden-Baden - Ebersteinburg W. Germany 4- - Amelia Kopp & Robert Zupancis PO Box 100 Aspen, CO 81612 James Cox c/o Aerscape Limited 314 S Mill Aspen, CO 81611 Golden Horn Building Ltd. PO Box 4947 Aspen, CO 81612 t Red Onion Investors c/o Charles Israel 418 E Cooper Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 City Manager City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Hadid Aspen Holdings 600 E Cooper Suite 200 Aspen, CO 81611 - 1 1 Camilla Sparklin c/o Lillian Lively PO Box 2213 Aspen, CO 81612 Mountain Chalet Enterprises Inc. 333 E Durant Ave Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen Commercial Condo. William Comcowich Trustee of Robert Barnhart Trust 420 W Main St Aspen, CO 81611 Angeling M. and Roy Griffith : 1 530 Walnut Aspen, CO 81611 Birkwogd Associates PO Box 3421 Aspen, CO 81612 1: Lis G Sorensen PO Box 9381 Aspen, CO 81612 Bruce Carlson PO Box 3587 Aspen, CO 81612 International Lace U.S.A. Ltd. 415 Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen Grove Association 'i , (/0 Menagerie 525 E Cooper Ave Aspen, CO 81611 Stein Eriksen PO BOX 1245 Aspen, CO 81612 j Ajax Mountain Association PO Box 1709 Aspen, CO 81612 Durant Galena Co. PO Box 1709 Aspen, CO 81612 JFG Limited Partnership 114 Mt. Laurel Dr. Aspen, CO 81611 11 + McDonalds Corporation 1 c/o Real Estate Tax Section Â· PO Box 66207 Chicago, ILL 60666 Karen Day Hudson PO Box 3234 Aspen, CO 81612 l Mari Peyton Suite 1 409 E Cooper Ave Aspen, CO 81611 Guido Paul Meyer PO Box 1799 Aspen, CO 81612 j Joel D Tauber Suite 1850 27777 Franklin Road - Southfield, Michigan 48034 . / i j. Aspen-Cooper c/o Wall Mortgage and Finance CO. Suite 110 200 Fillmore St Denver, CO 80206 i John H Cheek Jr 1 PO Box 564 Aspen, CO 81612 Donald Fleisher David Fleisher 401 E Cooper Ave Aspen, CO 81611 l Richard R Woods c/o Unicorn Balloons CO 1313 W Buttermilk Road Aspen, CO 81611 D.J. and D.M. Fleisher 401 East Cooper Ave Aspen, CO 81611 1 . I R.P. Fitzgerald I f j 600 Palmer Dr. . Lake Havasc City, AZ 86403 Kern Tomkins and CO 520 E Cooper Ave Aspen, CO 81611 l Lester Turner 101 Broadway Nashville, TN 37201 1 James and Elaine MeDade PO Box 3099 Aspen, CO 81612 - Lester Morris 100 Sunrise Ave Palm Beach, FL 33480 William Van Orsdel 8th Floor 400 Locust St Des Moines, Iowa 50398 James Nowery Harold Quinn Jr. 100 Travis St Shreveport, Louisiana 71101 Andre Ulyrch PO Box 2202 Aspen, CO 81612 Leonard Weinglass c/o Pep's 525 E Cooper Ave Aspen, CO 81611 Jerald M Barnet PO Box 4357 Aspen, CO 81612 0 1 V. 4 14 7 + 40' p Robert McNeilly Jr. 6th Floor A ''26 1st American National Bank Nashville, TN 37237 Tennessee Three 2700 First American Center Nashville, TN 37238 Donald McCann Trustee 300 National City Bank Building Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Poter R Rogers Carol L Rogers : 1300 South Main Searcy, Arkansas 72143 i Harold Paul Caldwell Jr. Martha B Caldwell c/o Caldwell Campers 5147 Hickory Hollow Parkway Nashville, TN 37013 Jean C Ingham Mt. Resort Trust 730 17th St Suite 730 i ..4 .Â¥ Denver, CO . Dikran Dinglian 160 W 225 St New York, NY 10463 Richard Volk Trustee UTA Suite 3600 5847 San Felipe Houston, TX 77057 1 4 - Heinz and Eliane Wolf Trustees of Wolf Family Trust 1221 Myrtle Ave ; San Diego, CA 92103 W.T. Ray Jr. Speed J.B. 50 Scott Ave Cookville, TN 38501 I $ ..4 Ted Koutsoubos 419 E Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 /- Christine Di Bartolo 104 Magnolia Lane Covington, CA 70433, 1 1 Robert W. Brower Unit C-1 423 E Hyman Aspen, CO 81611 Arcades Associates Ltd. Jerome H Michel c/o Aairescapes Limited 314 S Mill Aspen, CO 81611 1 1 T and E Restaurant Corp PO Box 4069 Aspen, CO 81612 1 ... t. 1 - Stefan Kaelin 557 N Mill Aspen, CO 81611 Rocky Mountain Equity Mortgage Company 418 E Cooper Ave Aspen, CO 81611 John Oakes & Gale Spence 408 E Cooper Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 i Bert Bidwell Investment Corp PO Box 567 Aspen, CO 81612 B and K 308 S Mill Aspen, CO 81611 73mp.... August 23, 1989 TO: Historic Preservation Commission I am strongly opposed to the addition of the proposed third story to the building at 425 E. Cooper for the following reasons: 1. A tall building on the south side of Cooper will create a definite potential hazard during winter months 1 because the addition will severely block sun exposure 4 into the Mall which would contribute to an undesirable condition of ice build-up on the brick surface of the Mall. The composition of snow caused by pedestrian traffic creates a condition that is extremely difficult to maintain during the winter season. 2. All of the current buildings on the south side of the Mall are low in profile, none exceeding two stories, in part due to the Wheeler Opera House View Plane. Whereas this property is not in the view plane, it would be a shame to block the view of Aspen Mountain for all pedestrians in Cooper Mall, among which enjoy sitting in the existing park benches for their enjoyment. 3. I think it is very important to give consideration to the existing scale of all buildings in the block. The proposed third story to the building would be totally out of scale with the existing building in the Mall, none of which exceed two stories. Any redevelopment of this property should honor important existing conditions in this block, which is substantially fully developed. I of course support re-development of the facade of the building which in its present condition, is totally out of character with the commercial buildings in Aspen's commercial core. Sincerely, , Donald J. Fleisher R. R. Woods 314 South Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 David Fleisher 401 E. Cooper Aspen, Colorado 81611 August 23, 1989 Aspen Historic Preservation Committee: Although we are unable to attend the public hearing regarding the Guido Meyer redevelopment, as adjacent property owners we want to place on record our objections to the third floor addition at 425 East Cooper. We feel a third story is completely out of scale with the existing structures on the Cooper Avenue Mall. All other buildings are two stories or lower. This proposed third story is out of character, and would block off more of our ever shrinking view, would further darken the mall, and would over power the surrounding structures, many of which were required to meet guidelines to prevent these very concerns. We would embrace and support a remodeling of the building if it is to scale and compatible with neighboring buildings. Sincerely, 14-11 OUÂ©sfA . R. R. Woods, Owner/~19 E. Cooper f). I David Fleisher, Owner 401 E. Cooper MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Final-Final Development: 425 E. Cooper - "Guido's" parcel, Chalet building, 425 E. Cooper Ave. Date: June 27, 1990 SUMMARY: The "Final" Final plan is presented to the HPC for approval. This deals with the first floor design of the chalet building. HPC PROJECT MONITOR: Charles Cunniffe PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: Staff submitted a complete history of this's projects review in the memo dated June 11, 1990 . The final three (3) items requiring HPC's approval are (as required at the meeting of June 11): 1) Reversal of the window plane with accent of pilasters 2) Wood window trim and frame 3) Submittal of a revised landscape plan DISCUSSION: Staff finds the conditions have been met and are acceptable to the Planning Office. The storefront design appears to the meet the requirements of the HPC. The planting areas have been divided in to three separate areas. A mall landscape- context plan has been submitted per HPC's request. The windows shall be wood. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC Grant Final Development approval for the chalet building at 425 E. Cooper Ave. Any further modifications of a technical nature shall be submitted to the Planning Office for review. memo.hpc.425ec.fd.3 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Final-Final Development: 425 E. Cooper - "Guido's" parcel, Chalet building, 425 E. Cooper Ave. Date: June 27, 1990 SUMMARY: The "Final" Final plan is presented to the HPC for approval. This deals with the first floor design of the chalet building. HPC PROJECT MONITOR: Charles Cunniffe PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: Staff submitted a complete history of this's projects review in the memo dated June 11, 1990 . The final three (3) items requiring HPC's approval are (as required at the meeting of June 11): 1) Reversal of the window plane with accent of pilasters 2) Wood window trim and frame 3) Submittal of a revised landscape plan DISCUSSION: Staff finds the conditions have been met and are acceptable to the Planning Office. The storefront design appears to the meet the requirements of the HPC. The planting areas have been divided in to three separate areas. A mall landscape- context plan has been submitted per HPC's request. The windows shall be wood. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC Grant Final Development approval for the chalet building at 425 E. Cooper Ave. Any further modifications of a technical nature shall be submitted to the Planning Office for review. memo.hpc.425ec.fd.3 -TEL MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Final-Final Development: 425 E. Cooper - "Guido's" parcel, Chalet building, 425 E. Cooper Ave. Date: June 27, 1990 SUMMARY: The "Final" Final plan is presented to the HPC for approval. This deals with the first floor design of the chalet building. HPC PROJECT MONITOR: Charles Cunniffe PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: Staff submitted a complete history of this's projects review in the memo dated June 11, 1990 . The final three (3) items requiring HPC's approval are (as required at the meeting of June 11): 1) Reversal of the window plane with accent of pilasters 2) Wood window trim and frame 3) Submittal of a revised landscape plan DISCUSSION: Staff finds the conditions have been met and are acceptable to the Planning Office. The storefront design appears to the meet the requirements of the HPC. The planting areas have been divided in to three separate areas. A mall landscape- context plan has been submitted per HPC's request. The windows shall be wood. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC Grant Final Development approval for the chalet building at 425 E. Cooper Ave. Any further modifications of a technical nature shall be submitted to the Planning Office for review. memo.hpc.425ec.fd.3 ~ and associates 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 June 19, 1990 Roxanne Eflin Historic Preservation Committee 130 S Galena Aspen, Co 81611 Re: 425 E Cooper Documentation of Revision - Final Submittal Dear Roxanne: Enclosed please find copies of the revisions to the Final Development Submittal for 425 E Cooper. The Committee at their June 13, 1990 Meeting requested the following changes to the facade of 425 E Cooper (Guido's). 1. A reverse of the window plane with accent of pilasters. 2. Wood window trim and frame. 3. Submittal of a revised landscape plan. The plans and elevations submitted address the directions from the Committee and are submitted for the Committee's approval and HPC documentation. If you require full sets of plans for your files, please let me know. Â§incerely, IA i <LAL,A.~*--- V \AWn Â¥9 460 Michdel Baker Enclosure MAB:lah 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORAD081611 TEL: (303) 925-4 755 June 19, 1990 Roxanne Eflin Historic Preservation Committee 130 S Galena Aspen, Co 81611 Re: 425 E Cooper Documentation of Revision - Final Submittal Dear Roxanne: Enclosed please find copies of the revisions to the Final Development Submittal for 425 E Cooper. The Committee at their June 13,1990 Meeting requested the following changes to the facade of 425 E Cooper (Guido's). 1. A reverse of the window plane with accent of pilasters. 2. Wood window trim and frame. 3. Submittal of a revised landscape plan. The plans and elevations submitted address the directions from the Committee and are submitted for the Committee's approval and HPC documentation. If you require full sets of plans for your files, please let me know. Sincerely, Michakel Baker Enclosure MAB:lah i ~ and associatest -/4- MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Final-Final Development: 425 E. Cooper - "Guido's" parcel, Chalet building, 425 E. Cooper Ave. Date: June 27, 1990 SUMMARY: The "Final" Final plan is presented to the HPC for approval. This deals with the first floor design of the chalet building. HPC PROJECT MONITOR: Charles Cunniffe PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: Staff submitted a complete history of this's projects review in the memo dated June 11, 1990 . The final three (3) items requiring HPC's approval are (as required at the meeting of June 11): 1) Reversal of the window plane with accent of pilasters 2) Wood window trim and frame 3) Submittal of a revised landscape plan DISCUSSION: Staff finds the conditions have been met and are acceptable to the Planning Office. The storefront design appears to the meet the requirements of the HPC. The planting areas have been divided in to three separate areas. A mall landscape- context plan has been submitted per HPC's request. The windows shall be wood. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC Grant Final Development approval for the chalet building at 425 E. Cooper Ave. Any further modifications of a technical nature shall be submitted to the Planning Office for review. memo.hpc.425ec.fd.3 - Â«*/ i ijill/1.'llifillillilliff"51,9,1#551,3;Â£31ill:/rf./ .r Â· & 4.#.1. f,T~ 1.2,2-ea,-~ 4 49-4- . 11 41 .$:*POY-Pp1. A.1.,-V'/_.1~~~p Â· , 44* %12 11.1 . 161" 1 11 1 '1 L lit 111;11 *: 1 k . .m + 1 441.i . f fÂ·11 ,. .. 1 E .: - . 1 .15 141 ~Â· 9 r ..,Â·0 i $ 1 :. 1 Ft . -..-=:=I- } 3 I{ Â£ -%~ 43, 1'ME 4 47 1. * V '9 r I A ~.>: Â·-x~.-- 1 Â· .--b-..,1--,--A -, rl,86~6.I i 1 1 90 , 1 ' I ,~///#flt F 1 LA-'-6 64- ' ' ' I L- * 164*< 4 1 1 1 - 2.S:'. ' 00 :, !: i IL . * .- d L. i I . i ; - -/0- a 5.n.I).j... '1 4 - - '..4- F ~~ 4 ~Â« -~ ju. . --*-1-= p I * I 2 .. 4 -- ~2- U . *, . A,J*681, 9, ~-'2 2 . -- Â· Ne.~il Â· - 4.t-'- 4.----1*,QU#IM'ag:,E -- -V P& -I - #. I I r. ...1 1. ... . . : 1'. fi 6" 4 - _ 1 \ i-- 1. a ,Â· 1 1. . :UAL'- 1- .- . -- . -dl. p ... 7~~ .. * __' 6.*-04--zz----~r..:--:Ir- 1- - Â·~-~":-Â· . .. V &. 2. I. / -7 -91--..........-â€ž---- ........... -- - I - -- '. - . .79 4. 4 7,4 4'0 ... L g/~-1 L 3 f I V~Â·J-r . /7~1.4. . 1 'tkILÂ» 21060 Mlitak (3) 0.4'*FF#'0 2,JAP'F 11.9,5/ ..UZ / . liuk.,, * - ~Â©i *~zÂ· ~fit,- ' Â· Â«Jub Inautorpee 6.40-4 0... 75 4 0- '2-09,-Â·e e*Â·u /*TEAE, Â· Afekt#>GLWT'E,P) 94Â° â‚¬ 41 (5.<01,-00 --CAPÂ»UTHEFIUM :22Â»U,CUM f . 0 .1*F~ I[ - - ,Fe,iIAI.40 749* 9-+Cl-j~ Â»47â‚¬ L ,, .i 5,~MF>4-lut, B ID MIFATA ~-1 111' r'I-Â·-Â· ~.--I -V----- ~ ALVIEF FU'LJP B'l-1.12/154 . * r~44I-0 7 E WATEFW H Pdo'go mFWA QUEM 11 1 I ITI: 4 KE,rnil, VE-pli il T-T 7 1 .fl--'.. 6"Ep'.4, 12,Tmmub 1-~*0 L _ ..922_ L-â‚¬1. e,Â·00 f-fÂ·- , -- , .u,i r- - 1 3 11 1-1 . -po ~ ~g,u ~- ' ~-Htl~- ew,FED Elâ‚¬â€¢- 9&4*PX -t- k ji _- . 1 .f. 'ITÂ¥=7 3.,11- 1- 13 r,2+4 E,<ter,ear!*Li | flb. :|.-, .- || 1 1.6 - [4WJ] 9 +111 i / 4 XMR'= 1'1 l 4 ELIBilfu.111 4 19 - - 00-e -0 -3- / J'Â»1/41 T.. ~~ -T ~ . 11 . I . _ T_182 -11 - 1.Â·., ~1. Â· 1 3 ! , Mi,3/Ep#.f' 1.-2 14} 1 92&..4 -FeAUDIPDD 3 9'-e.i- 1 i 21:Â¢ Cr/leÂ© Ct>?OFâ‚¬64 '69*(6,9*mb> 41*Â»eu> y.Â¥vt; raBDUA (,94*.r:%)4 0Â»212 044~4-1.A 6-0â‚¬EF,â‚¬1% 6-$122 /64.5Mt A.JEPEU- t-bri.A VE#44 , UUP 24 FRAT 44 2,4 4 Â· ..0 tk* 5,Â»4Â¥e ' ~ -Â» 911Â»flu'. 6 70Â« 8 2-ma,-1 L-<DC- Ee<ar49 wwle t:0~-----------> 0 .k/0" \-. _ __-_ bAÂ« $ '05,8- f#%1 8,Â«r--4 26 -O-fae 0 .\ 1 ALLEY /4â€¢'Â·05. 44 f 4-0,1 1 STALLS e eic..... M.OPEXTY LINE 1,0 41; 17--11 - -- --1. * ~1 ~ , EXISTINS --MA,4 i I ''* TMANBFOMMa 'OX 1.4, 5*15- 0-A'-ER p--, 6,.Du,M,rÂ». t.tr. 1 r < - PAINTED ASPHAL:T---4 - 5-MIPS *S SPECD 1 ..,n,le -qpc-72,4 -r IL- NAZZL "or {rrr) 1 ' 1/ 1 C._ J li , c 1 L. 1 1 . 1 C Â·'9 - - a BOUAQI FUIUQ*1 &:Â»<te S *46~,4,05(1 6.1966* BitbÂ· 9 DUMFS-ER , ' 1~ T 1 11 J , le /- 4204 i.: . f i 4- -0 - 1 = 1 '-1 4 '44 Â«6 J r - T R.)..C EAfT GLEC-RICALL i I :. 02 1 -tiÂ·1 1 - 1 YepiT, 1.- â‚¬4~. i T I R:al - r- t_ =mar i 1 . . Lk EXIST els r,~r,314 _ _ BELOCATEP -4 1 â‚¬ -1 i . ..11. --O 4 -O + 1 . . -6 , -6 1 9- 1 GALENA 5TfEET 061100~ 6 WMNE#* *6U1.~P~ Â»f\Lm , u. 0- -152 -- % 1 1 I ~ _-j a- O 1 C- 0, -A L 4 Somi =161Â£--4 1 r- 1 1 1 9- th- 4/ 1 14'-04 r [Rk_ 1 T -- L--1 -1I--_ -_-1-1--- ... 1 J- _] FO- Â· - r- --*/rE)' (1Â£8 'ANC)%'AME 00Â·ActÂ·.1.0 -- 4, lkJUG=Zi '6=1 0-1 C-- *At (,4,%2'.-i I 1 '1,212 -1-9 - , 1 ff, 0 0: 2 i I r. . '01 , -1.Q , . 1 .1.3 ..n r- _ 9- r Â· ' S ! 1 -' 1 -1 1 1 1-1 1 , Â°Â·to.~Y LAIE -0. 4 #72- 4 91'â€¢*P N,e,- Â£2- DV 4- C.21 82'-2 22 2 f -; eu,00Â·5 1, ADD,TION BUSINESS < ll-CÂ» RENOV,mON faw eLDG RENOVATION GENERAL NO'ES COOPER. A - W - ~ VERIFY A- P MENSIONS 4 THE r ELD llc>, P 24 - 2 '/2 63 - 6 (?, 49 (9). - (d) Of) .....6.F, --.. 56' Â·)044 i toi. 6 %60 4 51-to#.L Â£2- 10 14'-40 11 . A 4'Â·10 12 27â€¢' 4 4-,0 44â€¢ ' 1 NTS. 'iE..,or â€¢vâ„¢. 1 , .Lic' . 3 4* AL Ch , 1 944-2-1- 20 -- b:* *C -i 1 1 -3 -:!02Ay- 1 W - - .- -1-~ 4 k O 1 1 1 . , i & Â· 4 / ~ 0 'hIBNG.-- 40....C. ; .fy 1 ' - A. 1 *./4 > 1, --- MA ' .4 --- \ 1 -1 . Ap. \ W==rl.- i , ' . -~ D.6~ 1 D-I. 14 â€¢,rn...'WI k- WALL IHZ.1.V , 9 - - 1 9~ fsâ€¢*tÂ· 4â€¢. *R- *O ". CMU 1-41 / 4 e 1 1 . 5-1 PCE-TAIL 5&66 1. WAIT"SR r 44 1 ,~C* LL.LI 1 0 4 1,14 d.0. -; - 1/ 1 ' 1- 1 ~.~4'.BW I 4 /-1 1 1 -441 f 4 4 1â‚¬ . 1 1 - GCN\>/1- - --11,14--. 73- , .1Â·-411~ - k...3 1 41' Pl C 1. \ r %*2Â·re. (i){~ 1/ . ' I l -- r . 1 , 4141 1.1*7'41 A- wâ€¢LL 9411+M 1 [I]l f.: 1/ 1. 1 1, 1 / 10 &3 1 1~ 1 , 0! 1- 1 koi -A 1 0 ., .- 21 --4 r . - -*i-IMI.- ~ - 1 1. .- C *1 40 1Â¥r'*' al: ;Ga -UU 4 . / ef A 1/....7,4 -- rÂ·4~~-4 ...Â». . 1 -41 K,0. 5TAIMWAY . ..1 E f. U 14,7- 1 1 11 07. DITKY 6< @) 9 1 -1-PR KS-\ 11 B. b . c cl- if#-12-, . 1 4 M - L i-/-6 '-( , 4 NCEst-En HALL ti,Â·r trÂ· ~' ~ tâ€¢, n. â€ž + 1 4'-1' 1 41-8,6 Flâ€¢1 ' ' I 1 1 - 4 - 1 1 11111 1 , I -I 1 : E r - U 1 1~ EEMATDZ , RE-rk, L SPACE e- -- ~~ifieteÂ£ 7-'EL~_._ _vll~~n~ 44 4.: 44,â€¢ 11-2. 1..1 "1 +41-f-, 1% e - - ~ 1 94 /2/vt E 9'6 4 /7 . . , / FLIV/7/,K Et!mr DOWâ€¢1 -1 41* 4-1 1 7 . A . .0 31 ~ bul OP Ntal =DF i N m H-= 7 1 , i /31 \ 04*IC. Al-/L- 17 I 4.j 5111Â· i - 560:1 a i / 1- 1 - . B: . l De . 62 - 1096' 1 E '4 429*N . 12.Â« f ' WER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 4.0,121':IA.-:24. Â¥. - , .. VkE (VER. 1 . 01'-4. --- -,L . _ .uâ€ž/R K!~L EL,1941.6'~ ~ 1.4/-0 ~- 1 -OWER.'t!5*C El=.7116,4 * i:,1Â·' G.fy LIG/76 , %1~~~~5Ed' I /35ffit~:2:- t 6 . ,ervâ€¢cr C,fiÂ·,T. ir-L. 42 /5Â£94 1 -:. 1 L42%13*7 U Â»Â»tÂ©kz=:43 1.OOF W./ STANDINe MT.. 9 0 , 1 1 1 1 ....2 -..- *.- SEAM Mair 1 1 L/,1 1 , 4 14 /7- 1 1 1 1 1 L /32 1 01 - 1. , 6/ . It r rÂ·. ~~k:~~kx \DA .'K,li/\1 3--1 1 1 1 -~ Â· - - *- -+- - Jxv laor,wt ' / 4. =C' 1 - 17 11--7 P'724 - 6 - : Hir (* T[ 2--0. 1 1,â‚¬>CK. 900* 4-UC.CO 9 Â· (th Â· ., 0 :114 01---- '11 W Â· 1 4/ WO TRIM r . 1 - 1- 14 1 1, 1 . 1 1 Â· - . I . -- \'ll-/ -,ANDRA - <.E'%.1-AURN'l' FLOCK ..â€¢110.15, . 4 H. ,/ 6.4,9..- 1 1. - EL. 719 9 0 ..2: ~-,1. 'It l . 7 [ 1 ]E~ 'ACE 01â€¢ -wi-P:'46 DER'I 1 - --M"(* OF ...00. 1 - trucco ]Â· 0 "410.$O es'roN,3 -2 -2 -14 M A 7 2 - L. - rÂ·1 ./~ -- BÂ»9-rÂ· //% t> M.â€žA.1,[ 1 1 - 1 1*- 1 ' Stvot r.. - 2---4 % \' ~--2 --- -- -4Â· - 1-4-% a & 1 rE-Al. FLOOâ‚¬ * â€¢ laW-O' EL. 7'Ill G' 6â€¢.4Â£*--ONE t,â€¢4'42 --- - 23'21 0-3Â« 4%2/ Aâ€¢22.-â€¢.C ~ 4- L 7 X. V C.25 VETI â€¢c; (0, 5-â€¢â€¢i:'1 -O 15, t.4-24â‚¬2 5 ,-Â« - Â· EX;57. SLAD 0./-/0 4. 5-4 i.. : 1 ELLE~ 711...11 /Th SOUTH ELEVATION (VEK /Â¥' TO â€¢E 5.-OVED 9 1 42/ \413' ' 80'.SEMEN" cLOOK. ' V + 4 ElÂ·. 7111 0 001 1 -1'Ef< 1, SeE EL. 7140 6.9 4 - /L 1â‚¬efr~.ACE E.61' MI-_ 1.1, 9-INS'NG bEAM / 2- j - 6--5 N AOOF Wi STâ€¢e.DING -ITL. M--L. <00â€¢ I#/.F'â€¢C;0 Â« SEAM :col - (Trn TO ST-â€¢ SLAD ~ E.. 714"' MATCH EX'ST. 11. REP..ACE 5HJT'.Evt AEÂ· BEa D. ./ , 11 ... CTÂ·rp i .yx-A l -Â·~Il U.,1- - ' eVEAL Ar El li - Â»Â«// U 4, Mwwo.w~WooÂ·., r 1, AL -f m -r U *.-ACE WiTWIAÂ®W e 6 XMAY 1 Â·I:.: Ti k- 29- - . - [2 . 11 U %.9 , 21 0 Â® . Er:.1 'nrej ' (Tr, i 1:L; 4 1. WO. TR M! 1, 1 41 4 (El *.: roof k=- 1- I --_ 9-t--tsr \ 4 - NICV PU~INTEM .0, ..0.* -1 .- 4 I I . *. .I+*-I ./ I - EL, 716,0,' -- - - ___ 4 , ? 2 It I 1 I I &.-i./ . 43 . 0 . OIl ~- c wca â€¢-' â€¢ F-----,1 . L ..... / ---- -- GJ= 1 91 Â· <â‚¬ , ! 4, 1 3 -\ i 1 11 DECOâ€¢*:rivm -1/ --901 L 0 , /1 , . C"iÂ·' J. ::Â§ 13] Â· I,4.â€¢-r U I. PrpÂ· 10:49--7 ,if' ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ ri~--1 ~e i rsy-:22 1.4-, mr"Al: F.Ix>1 1->W-WPAi<, -Â·f Â· -Ii- I.-- / r 1 -' ' j. 1 044$ KETAIL 'wON 6 r EL. 71%1.0, - EL. 71*1.4 y NEW M.I.,ER / I NEW M.ANTES , %/06Â·70// .ANO **=714 Adj *#~-- 1,*O#04 *... i i ~ --- ED<169. St.-4* : - i KLEV. 791 9.41 . | 7 1 ' NER'â€¢4 1 1 $ DAÂ·bEME~ FLAol 1 i I I EL 7'Ill.80| 4 12 r 04. 7'!9*~ ..Â·:T 7 L- C 2% NORTH ELEVATION 517 41/ 22'Â· Â·1 74 9:4-01 194 6 16 'i p , i ADDITION EXISTIND t MATCH EXIST Â¢ KEr.AGE MEMLACE EXIMT. MTL. 1109 SHUTT/MS AS MEQ'CDÂ· W~ VTANDING MTL, *EAMI MOOF -- (Tre) , \1 \ â‚¬E,r.ACE EXIRÂ· WINOOW ~ W~ NEW #S WINDOW (TY~ \ UP.RK RID'ID 4 110 0â€¢61 EL. 7111. ul; b L.OWEK nOGE ~ 1 1 49 1 -7 12. 71+8,64' - 1 !1,1, 1 1 4. 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1. r 1 0 IEK. STA N.ESS 1 1 - 15 STL CAEÂ»LE te'~ 0 . H --, 1 1 GUARDRAL - --- - 511 - =r SEE PETA .- C 5-UCCO + &11-1--- y-- <ib - 1 1 11 42\ . I 1 (7> Â· Â· ,- 2, EN ' 03 ~ A,N-/. r , 94 z : LEd -___._EN 1. . f..1 -Â· MEVAURANT FIA>K 1 ..1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 -- -0 - - _ _ Nair'ANTER - - I 7 EL.M,i-11 111 11 11 11 ' 110<â€¢4' Â· - -_ EL. 71*1.11 T - 1 .1 P *T w. 3.Â«-2 -C =E,425 -O BE-rl/â‚¬'N le.-!All - --- 4 grucco lt-I PILA:'Eg. (TÂ·17-) ) F .r ....1 / -4 1 -rex ~ 1 , 0 1 1 -41 2*3 -tf=if'Â·..2 t.: t.7 2279*LlHV.Â· 'F --'M - r ~** IN"D EL. 7'Ill.6' â€¢ Â·00.2 - p,sTâ€¢-'Se rÂ¥A:115- EMfwIC> b#SEMENT FLOOR _ A 4 . 101.1.t _ EL. 79.'.80 /11 EAST ELEVATION fE-_ACE 21< '7 -1-7_. <006 W 9*NO N, --- 55+7 *007 ADDITION , -4 -2 443'* , 0 1 LO."51 â‚¬' Dee i â€¢ 1171- 0Â¥ 7 - â€¢ 118'-0'46 1 EL. 7140. W>' ' Ill 11 1 1 NT ' 1 3 1. 11; / 4, i r 41 1! .1 ,/9N . 1 f I -r /Fr.'/ 2 1 1 1 ..47. * 1 i - â„¢41 -1 1 11 U.,T " 1 â€¢ -r Â®C .E-, 7 -C .LAÂ·u_ -_ -, @ 31 1 41- D' 1 ~A-0-1 Ex ~â€¢61-Â· 9-ucoo WOMENG -ALL <i.TCHEN Â· v Â¤--- - -' ~ ~ , .4 -73 - 1 1 4 -----------7 / KESTAAA\- T.OCR *- - 1Â· EeRSRANT/CONNECTO~ 8 EL. 79,111:, 0 E-"hi' EMV % 1 6 1 7 1 1 1 06'1 ' C,;1'j~,1 <,.11';'LLL ' 2 110 -4 8 ' _ .,ucco m . Â·to I- 'te - F. ~ae"ebEÂ« COL-Dâ‚¬ ty-r u': .... 1 97.6.0 COD< t.Â·CEâ‚¬% V A<CH'T. A# trAL 4/E -5//C. \ 1 2 -74.k 1. 1. 4 21.-----il----- I e. U. â€¢ coâ€¢.4 4/0 L 4 ' G<AVE 2 Â»ACI GOACH 5 - - - - 9 ---- & 1 -----4- CE-A . 'CONNECTOR. ' â‚¬ETA - =..Dâ‚¬ F I â€¢ Â»00 7121 61 -11 100. 0 . * .94* 1 1 4 -2 1 1 .0, . 111$ :,V I 1 ~' ~ -ALL- | 4 1 1 0-11 .O,0 -4. i DI -ON ./.6 Â· 1 lbâ€¢~M..6- ~ ~ Ty I ~acipâ€¢Imiqf M.ook - 6 ; *%% FLOOK 4 4 .- P - . i ~ EL. MIlÂ·60' I Â· :" _ '.0 ro 0~1â„¢ 4 ...79 _1 ----------1--------------- Eth WEST ELEVATION 6Â· 6 ,16Â·2 July 28, 1989 Roxanne Eflin City of Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Guido's Redevelopment Dear Roxanne: Being the owner of the above referenced property, Guido Meyer PO Box 1799 Aspen, CO 81612 I hereby grant permission for a design team headed by Bill Poss & Associates 605 E Main Suite #1 Aspen, CO 81611 (303)925-4755 to act on my behalf for the HPC proceedings. Sinc#Kely,/ 91/dy )47 Gui 4/0 Meyer ATme[Ele,r 1 1 IAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1) Project Name G.0 co 61 9 uo e.6 -:U *~.~ 91%1\ 0 2) Project location 40.3> 9. Ck"A-9,4.) A LDT E. te EAâ€¢oc- go (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning 4) Lot Size 5) Awlicant's Name, Address & Phone # <&0\00 ANTL#te_ ~ (cilci Hu)4 92* eplps eur- / Le f 4-*. 417-3603 . 6) Representative's Name, Arkiregs: & Phone # rka. 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): 07 /1 Conditional Use __ Conceptual SPA Conceptlial Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD l/~imr Historic Dev. 4~19 Stream Margin Final PUD Historic Demolit:Lon Mountain View Plane Subdivision Historic Designation Cor*k=iniumization - Text/Map Amerxhant (203 Allotment Iot Split/Iot Line (PUG E~mption Adjustment 8) Description of Ekisting Uses (rlmber and type of existing structures; approocimate sq. ft.; lunber of bedroams; any previous approvals granted to the C property). Rd spN â‚¬Â»A+- - 9) Description of DeveloEment Application COW Oe,-â‚¬_ 9 Per\ 0 U)\10* ple~wrefl 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attadment 2, Minimm Sukinission Contents Respanse to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents Respanse to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application 1 1 lilli! 1 111111 1 1 I'i 1 1~ . 111 1,11 1 1 \>1 lili 1 i i 3. _1_.p--# - +9 0 + , \ -1@ 1 1 1,1 1 4 2.- V' 1 1,V li i i 1 ]- 1 li i 1 i i i I 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 4. 11 1 6 3 30 11 1,1 1 11 3 4 Â®spx , lili 11 -3 -9 E- 2 0 -2 3 -=22- . . 9 -4 18 0 --3 1 111111 i I Ill F-1--1--t f -Vi -47- C. .11/ r i f - t.-rl. 9 L.3 0 1 4 22 5 .0 32 -- 1 1 1 0 - U U X - 1 1 E- 1 / Uick .>.1, Ii' 1 1 1 1 .P, T - -1--- r. /1 9 4- 1 P "- * --- 3 ----ji-* Vi -c 1 1/ i 4 ;3 9 5 7 1 lili ~Â¢(trl.-M 4 3 Â¢ f ..1 - 1 1 9. 4 4 -7 1 3 t. 4 2 f , 7 F ~ - 2. th- IIi -L--2 u j- -4 4 0 6 4 -1 3 1 -1 -1 4 1 1 11 0 Â»r 23 2 7-1-2 3 9 1 34 Â·J - U 4-fj 36 * f T-3 G _~_-9 -~+t-.t. P 1 1 1 111 1 U m. P 8 u g-9 *'Â£ f 1- 1 93 6 7- 55 ; 4.2 -- 1-L-1-L ..1 1 1 1 1 . 4 _-1.1-1--1 -1--2- /4/ .v' 5 R 1 4 1 J __- ~Il 01 H O 4 , 091--. 0- 9.- - 11 1 1 d to , 4 4 --1 --1- - r- 1 1-_ 1- 1 1 I ..1 4. 1 -Ar - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 11 0 1 1 121 . I 1 2 Â¢ 9, ~ 4 DO 3 -0 1- Â£ -Â»- -1- -r 1 1 1 1 1 (LEÂ· <f) 4 )*-U 041 241 ~, 1, _-_. __ _____-3 ca e 41 -P 3 1 0 1---- --1 4-34 L_-1 1 1 1 1 . irt 1 r 4./.~Fl...0/Â¥".'010.05/./000000..0,0//41 ft.0909â‚¬Xb (064 V iNX-\ t~Lâ‚¬.. / 1 , 1 LAND USE APPLICATION PURM 1) Project Name (luct ts Su,369 -**34j ph"0 2) Project location 4.0-4 5. QM **) A Lpt F ,+ 8<=CÂ¥1 40 (idicate street adkiress, lot & block mmber, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning 4) Lot Size 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Mione # al)\DE> AKE 4 002 , Gilci Wt)4 92- \bps ei-x- / Le / 4-*- 917-36071 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # 7) Type of Application (please dieck all that apply): Conditional Use - Conceptual SPA - Conceptual Historic Dev. i Special Review Final SPA Final IIistoric Dev. 8040 Greenline Coneeptial FIJI) --LZ~Mirnr Hhitgiric Der. ~-LLAL ' 9 1 Stream Margin Final RJD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane - Subdivision Historic Designation Cor*hniniumization - Text/Map Amer*iment (NOS Allotment Iat SpliVInt line (2133 Eboe~ption Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses Â· (number and type of existing structures; approodmate sq. ft.; rtmber of bedroans; any pmvious approvals granted to the property). U.ciffg th*St- 9) Description of Developnent Applicatien Ce\,3 C-9412- Pen o U.3\10* Pl-(Â»JTE-FL I 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Submission Contents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submissian Contents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application 1 / :- -\.\ -21 ca K ' C. 1 \ i. 3# ID\-1 - v-r. lk'j H Vt\-7 ' Cjj 31 n\4-' 1 3-Vil_ 0,7Â·%-2 J <-444/.:er -211.-P:Â¥.yv~ ./,1 . 9 4 Al 1.1 -3-2,-1 1 -9 .j -39) ..2 1 t.c-~ -73<' /,13~j ''-<1j -- -03 ,~. 71 Ely-4 AA LK. L. t 51 -Â¥29121 3 [92.Ut X . 310'*try ./-4. 24 '.1 \ -1,><(u h a., i \4- 1 l .1 C. 4 \ r f \- 2 - //:_1.1 J I34 L -- '7> C 1 vl4 4! a 4.-Â¥77-4 9 -1.-~F,\ \:-1 -7\\-LL \.- 4\ 9,- >\ -1 1-4 35 z.,11 3\4.Vâ‚¬ - 1 - , i --- r ' r.-t> Jul rn \ '2-- In t.\ ,At\,â‚¬tn\-?A 6.1/ L ?}AU_ 4Â» 0 -3 -9 1\, 2*34% D 74\ -47,4 \1 \3 4 h-Â© 0-3 -01<\ r -73-1 LK"\ U -3 319*Â·.A ./A N 'iliA+/j o J<-0.6,3 3,) -341 1 k , - 1 1 -1 pwrAOMAIT Aakee ~ l V 4 1 F Â·Â·: . . 1..: 1-t . 1. . ... ... . .. ... ..... ..... . t. 1 11 .... 1. . . I ... I. .. . 1 - . .. 1 .... 1 12 uume 13 AblerÂ· 1 .1 t Â· .: 0 ~ AaEÂ»9 -7 MALL -41 1 . . 0 ... | .. ,... ........ b ... ... -.. . '... .. . 1 I . :... '.T..... ..... I . .. I #. . 1. â‚¬ 0 : > t / 1 9 b ' AME 1-G PEU:E , r I , M><140Tlkla PE.460* -A J.: i $ 6,\VCMÂ© 1. : 3.60**a:---Â¥,1,/14/ C EXIÂ®Tilde 1+141 1 7 1 - - ... iâ‚¬ . 0 0. - .... .... . . .. f.. . I. ... -4 . 1 I . . 2.14111:*APE 'FT'IMBEIL i , FLANTEM- 18-N-11*H (ITIT) /24'orK> ,, I . . .. - I . ............. ... ,... : ' , 'r' i . . I .. ... 1 0. I. . .U 1 - 1 . 1 . L . + . 1 -- - MAL 1- 1 . 1.-- . 1 - 1 -I I Â· . .1 7. . 2 .... . I 1 ........ L-- 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 0-------0------0------0 FIN.ITER- 1,1 1Â·1 1Â·1 14 19 rl 11 40.1-011 f 4-~0- ~~_J-EE-SHTIÂ»I----~- -- %/Mode rere- \-FRÂ©UT __ -- 9,0 2. Â·el 6,- MOZ1+.1-1 05 4 PWIAOÂ»KIT AaÂ·bee /~ 1 .... ..... . ... 1 . . .. ... . I. I .. $..:... \ . 1 . . I. I e â‚¬obee 12_ Albert \ .. Wee 7 MALL 1 +Ir , . = ... 1. . . 1 . .. . ... : . 1 . .. . .4 ... ... .. 1 . I. ... ..1 :.. - . . '.. 9, . - a. I . ..: ..12- 16kt ' - ..: _19Â· E f . 9 - 1%<lurlkle PELEÂ·E a 4 i i. 1 , ' P'<1~71 4 22.144 . -A :Â£_-5; 6*luefflf) 2: Â·' ; -0Â·;62*TE---0 Rppelt .> ~ - C - EXAT]136 1+14kL - i JI- - . t. .1 . I ... 1.... I. -. ..:... . 1 . .. f.. . .. 1, .... . 1 1 4 1.-LAM )*APE ,&'TIMIEEIL 1 FIANTEIL 18.'442544 (IYM) ' 24'0-YID ~, . . 1 . - ... e. .. I I . - .. 1 - - 1 .. .:8 r .. .. . I. ........ ... . . I . f ... 1.. . ... 1 * .â€¢ 1 . ... 1 . . . -- MALL 1. . 0 1 1 0. ... - . - .7. , .1 . I . 2 .... . . I - ...... ..... -t t-- --- M'. ..--- 1 1 1 : -1 1 1 7LKTEK- - 1,1 H /1 11 1:1 19 11 f 42Â·'-dp" .f . 25' dÂ»UQUL__ -- -.---- - - epfulaH.Ellue -- ~ 1, 1 %104 }P:EW 1-81221.1:F -_ 9/ A Â·el 47.A , C. i '. d - -- - e. MOT IAW 7. I rp r * A>. l: -' [r :,.7 i = 1 1 1 f. - ir{1 '' ' 1 \,1 MINOR HISTORIC DEVE.18PVENT MAY 1 9 Application Package Contents Attached is a Development Application package for submission of your application. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Application Form 2.â€¢ Description of Minimum Contents of Development Application 3. Description of Specific Contents for Submission of your Application 4. Copy of Review Standards for Your Application ? 5. Public Hearing Notice Requirements Summary 6. General Summary of Your Application Process Generally, to submit a complete application, you should fill in the application form and attach to it that written and mapped information identified in Attachments 2 and 3. Please note that all applications require responses to the review standards for that particular development type. The standards for your application are listed in Attachment 4. You can determine if your application requires that public notice 4 be given by reviewing Attachment 5. Table 1 of that attachment i will tell you whether or not your application requires notice and the form the notice should take. Your responsibilities in this regard are summarized in the cover explanation to the table. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planning Office staff person so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described to you. Please also recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review Of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to - ---- - summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. appcover , I ATTACHMENT 2 ,--3 Minimum Submission Contents for All Development Applications All Development Applications shall include, at a minimum, the following information and materials. 1. The applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the . applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the Â· owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1/2"x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. ( p. j An explanation of why the proposed development complies with the substantive development review standards relevant to the Development Application. #U-_ cithy f 4 \.ATTACHMENT 3 1 Specific Submission Conts-:Minor Development to Historic Landmark or in Historic Overlay District A Development Application for a Minor Development Plan shall include the following: 1. A written description Of the proposed development. 2. An accurate representation of all major building materials, such as samples and photographs, to be used for the proposed development. A scale drawing of the proposed development in relation to any existing structure. 4. A statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure (if applicable) and character of the neighborhood. / ATTACHMENT 4 C -- Review Standards:Development in H, Historic Overlay District or Development Involving Historic Landmarks No approval for any development in the H, Historic Overlay District or involving Historic Landmarks shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met. a. The proposed development is compatible in character- with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area, HPC shall find that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements; and b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development; and C. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic struc- tures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. e. Historic District and Historic Landmark Development Guidelines have been adopted by the City Council for use by HPC. Applicants should consult these guidelines in addition to the above standards. Attachment 5 Public Hearing Notice Requirements There are three forms of notice required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations, these being notice by publication in the newspaper, notice by posting of the property and notice by mail to surrounding landowners. You can determine whether your application requires notice, and the type of notice it requires, from Table 1, which is attached to this summary. Following is a summary of the notice requirements, including identifying who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least 15 days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Planning Office Administrative Assistant and we will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be b done 10 days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Planning Office, to fill it in correctly and to bring proof (preferably a photograph) to the hearing that posting took place. 3. Mailing Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development parcel by the applicant. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Planning Office, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearing (in the form of a signed affidavit) that the mailing took place. Standards for notice shall be as follows: a. Any federal agency, state, county or municipal government service district or quasi governmental agency that owns property within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 15 days prior to the hearing. b. All other landowners within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 10 days prior to the hearing, unless notice is given by hand delivery, in which case it must be sent 5 days prior to the hearing. C. Subdivision applications only also require notice by registered mail to all surface owners, mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners of the subject property. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty days prior to the date of public hearing. TABLE 1 p ' SUMMARY OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PROCE[I]RES APPIICATION TYPE RJBLIC IIEARING REUJIRED? BY WHCM FORM OF NOTICE* Conditional Use Y Commission 2,3 Special Review N 8040 Greenline N Stream Margin N Mountain View Plane N Conceptual Historic Development Y HPC 1,2,3 Final Historic Development N Minor Historic Development N Historic Demolition Y HPC 1,2,3 Historic Designation Y HPC, Commis. HPC-1,2,3 & Council Cammis.- 1,2,3 Council-4 , Conceptual SPA Y Council . 1,2,3 Final SPA Y Commission 1,2,3 Conceptual PUD ' Y Council 1,2,3 Final PUD Y Commission 1,2,3 Subdivision Y Cammission 1,2,3 Condominiumization N Lot Split Y Oouncil 1,2,3 Iot Line Adjustment N GMQS Allotment Y Commission 1,2,3 GMQS Exemption N (except for see above for lot split lot split) Map Amendments Y Cammission & Commis.-1,2,3 Council Oouncil-4 Text Amendments Y Comnission & Cammis.-1 Council Council-4 * Numbers refer to the following: 1 = Publication in newspaper 2 = Posting of property 3 = Mailing to surrounding landowners 4 = Ordinance adoption procedures Attachment 6 General Summary of One Step HPC Application Process 1. Application Types: The following are the Development Applications which are processed in one step by the HPC: * Minor Development 2. Development Review Procedure Summary. The one step HPC review procedure can be described as follows. Stage One: Attend pre-application conference. The purpose of this one-on-one meeting with staff is to determine the review process into which your development proposal fits and to identify the materials staff will need to review your application. Stage Two: Submit Development Application. Based on your meeting with staff, you should respond to the appropriate portions of the application package and submit the requested number of copies of a complete application, with the appropriate processing fee, to the Planning Office. Stage Three: Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, the application package will be reviewed by a member of the staff. You will be notified in writing of whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not you have submitted what was requested, not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. Stage Four: Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, a date for its review by the HPC will be set. The submission due date is a minimum of 12 days prior to the HPC review date, to allow for staff review and memo preparation. It is the planner's task to review your application with respect to its compliance with the Code and to write a review memo. In the memo, the planner will recommend approval, denial or tabling of the application and recommend appropriate conditions to this action. The memo is normally available at the end of the week before your hearing. You will be called to pick up a copy of the memo when it is ready, or we can mail it to you if you so request. Your project will be presented to the HPC at a regularly scheduled meeting. A copy of the agenda showing where during the meeting your application is scheduled can be obtained when you pick up the staff memo. The typical meeting includes a presentation by staff, a presentation by you or your representative, questions and comments by the review body and the public and an action on the staff recommendation, unless additional information is requested by the review body. Stage Five: Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received final approval of your development application, you may proceed to building permit review. During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It Will also be checked for . compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is issued. For more information on the Building Permit Stage, please visit the Building Department to obtain handouts on their review procedures. 3. Consolidation: Minor Development review may be consolidated with the designation of a historic structure. However, actual consolidation of HPC review with review by the Commission is not possible due to the different review bodies required to approve such applications. However, staff recommends concurrent application review to reduce your overall processing time. Applications which you may submit for concurrent P&Z review include: * Conditional use * Special review * ESA * GMQS exemption for historic landmark or affordable housing If you are submitting any of the above applications along with your one step application, you should also obtain the application package for that type of submission from this office. lstephpcsumm Technical Preservation Services Preservation Assistance Division nterpreting , - National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior the Secretary of the Interior's Washington, D.C. c Standards tor Rehabilitation Number: 82-037 Applicable Standards: 9. Compatible Contemporary Design for New Alterations/Additions (nonconformance) 10. Reversibility of New Alterations/Additions (nonconformance) Subject: EXTERIOR STAIR TOWER ADDITIONS Issue: Creating two separate means of egress from the upper floors of commercial buildings is a fire code requirement that generally must be dealt with in rehabilitating older buildings. Only in a very limited number of cases are variances given for this important life safety feature. In a historic rehabilitation project, this code requirement often makes it necessary to construct a second stair, either within the building or as an exterior addition. When such a new interior or exterior fire stair addition is required to meet code requirements, its construction and detailing must be in conformance with Standards 9 < and 10. These Standards address the important issues of retaining historically significant building material during rehabilitation and designing contemporary new additions that are compatible in scale, color, and material with the historic character 7 of the building. Finally, the new additions should be attached in such a way that future removal will not impair the essential integrity and form of the historic structure. If it is determined that locating the new fire stair within the building would result in the destruction of significant interior fabric, the required stair should be redesigned as an exterior addition, preferably on a secondary facade. NPS certification that an exterior fire stair is necessary to avoid loss of significant interior fabric means that the owner's construction costs are eligible for tax benefits under IRS regulations 26 CFR Parts 1 & 7. If, on the other hand, the owner chooses to construct an exterior fire stair rather than an interior fire stair solely to avoid losing valuable interior rental space, the cost of the new construction may not be included in the overall rehabilitation expenses. Application: A 1909 two-story stone building, formerly a town hall and individually listed in the National Register, was being rehabilitated for use as professional offices . (see illus. 1). The interior had been altered several times and there was little remaining original fabric. The exterior, however, was almost in its original configuration and the owner was taking great care to clean the stone and replicate any deteriorated features. l 82-037 addition resulted in loss of less historic fabric; and the addition was clearly contemporary in design, and of a scale, color, and material appropriate to the historic structure. Accordingly, the overall project was determined to meet the Secretary's Standards. Prepared by: Sharon C. Park, AIA, TPS These bulletins are issued to explain preservation project decisions made by the U.S. Department of the Interior. The resulting determinations, based on the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, are not necessarily applicable beyond the unique facts and circumstances of each particular case. 12 82-037 I . Iiropae-rr- c.-IL,GL-) -- J 29/ nuTer.Â£Â£- Wmmid-'. r--7)/r-7 -cl , UP moor Eur,*12 ( 5. Existing plan of the building. 6. Plan of the building with proposed stair tower shaded in. August 23, 1989 TO: Historic Preservation Commission I am strongly opposed to the addition of the proposed third story to the building at 425 E. Cooper for the following reasons: 1. A tall building on the south side of Cooper will create a definite potential hazard during winter months because the addition will severely block sun exposure into the Mall which would contribute to an undesirable condition of ice build-up on the brick surface of the Mall. The composition of snow caused by pedestrian traffic creates a condition that is extremely difficult to maintain during the winter season. 2. All of the current buildings on the south side of the Mall are low in profile, none exceeding two stories, in part due to the Wheeler Opera House View Plane. Whereas this property is not in the view plane, it would be a shame to block the view of Aspen Mountain for all pedestrians in Cooper Mall, among which enjoy sitting in the existing park benches for their enjoyment. 3. I think it is very important to give consideration to the existing scale of all buildings in the block. The proposed third story to the building would be totally out of scale with the existing building in the Mall, none of which exceed two stories. Any redevelopment of this property should honor important existing conditions in this block, which is substantially fully developed. I of course support re-development of the facade of the building which in its present condition, is totally out of character with the commercial buildings in Aspen's commercial core. Sincerely, , Â»,4, 4Â»,4/ Donald J. Fleisher R. R. Woods 314 South Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 David Fleisher 401 E. Cooper Aspen, Colorado 81611 August 23, 1989 Aspen Historic Preservation Committee: Although we are unable to attend the public hearing regarding the Guido Meyer redevelopment, as adjacent property owners we want to place on record our objections to the third floor addition at 425 East Cooper. We feel a third story is completely out of scale with the existing structures on the Cooper Avenue Mall. All other buildings are two stories or lower. This proposed third story is out of character, and would block off more of our ever shrinking view, would further darken the mall, and would over power the surrounding structures, many of which were required to meet guidelines to prevent these very concerns. We would embrace and support a remodeling of the building if it is to scale and compatible with neighboring buildings. Sincerely, C- <Ctic C R. R. Woods, owner/419 E. Cooper /3 .,1 . David Fleisher, Owner 401 E. Cooper 0/Â« < - ~ and associates t.. 9/ 13 - - VE"~ - 605 EAST MAIN STREET ... . . ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 ' ' Issue: . I . . V . Hft>ZFINALIRE.y]ENÂ»,%010 0 .1 - , . r, Â· Â·~ g.unD Af' - FlkilÂ» MIJA:2191.1.Bl,14, (3) 3,13~ â‚¬'FFB+7 ) 9Â·Â· Â· 9 1 IJ. .PIdAFF MAGO Fl Lit 4 1. 0 < c>24) 4447446, Apt, -1929 (7'rH) ~ ~0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -/ '...........: S-' *%30Â·'cfÂ·tly... 4-87-70 9 4 reb Â¢ 9101 + Â·pÂ»IC ftÂ»H-fEME7 ~ - Â· :4~\7 I - (94*rlkle) :. AerMUL:>LLK,TEP) -49 ib *FLILI.le TFEMI,110011704 6.6"-4 641-. 6.---~t-- 4 CA*1294477*1411 CA:Et U.5411 FBPNK'kilp'lle ---- Â·~1 Â·Â· . ' â€¢1 13/1 1. pu/*Fer'cÂ» Â»01 * - r--4-1 7.4-4 4 -r-'- lilli ....... Itl' i'till ...# -1- - 7.44 6*MI*Â·41-11, 6[DMENATA * fl/*ale 12>Â·88 k.0:teMP *pr Vit-PHâ‚¬b IFFI609>14 4*TSH 2 4, 3-JY:, , o.34f Â·: : 5/0-tf-EP- Fl*let IDLLIEVELL 11 . 011 2 2--11 41-131 4 - - +A FTERrri wA vap/4. Â¢21#46 06Â«- -11* 4-1 ' 1 -4-1 1 - *t_10' r-i , T~Lr~-1 OPEEPINe IPTBH-171,1.0+ .A 1 1 41/1 ff Â· - Â»nui_ \l 1l 1/ . =11- 170~ .1~.7 -U'*->f, - 0!00F'~ 8@â‚¬6 fl*rEM lve 1 1 0. , 4 -r -t- 4 1 i L f 2 1 1 1 1 1 --1--.-1- --- ~415 -_ 13 *044 0,<lern#,5 MAL'. -4- 4- i T ilit; - 41 'll -14 1 , 46 1- 1-1"~ 1 1 Inpkee-r tetch ~1 ; --A- I - 0 Jlk =48,109-5 -0.3.,i# t-t'. nE : - 1 /- I ' 1 1 1 ' I I ' 1 ' 7~-~. 31 1. .. 1 i.. .2 . . . It ..- .. . . . . . . ./ I . .. ~ PÂ»F*47- P Ve ..l I 1-1011 } Â· Â·910~*bE' / 1DrlÂ»12 1PBHOLDIF58, 3,4'-4Â£*Â· Rec ce=fep cok*â‚¬%61( MEN-L(Goucne GlpreAI:rHeluPT dk:gotkitup[ 4,4Â¥* Â»coth >*Of 041*411.1Â·LA tpu~:MEBÂ». Cuier[EF- FLOWEK Pu.lat ELI, 13186CT[#A VE#204, OPEEF'kle *12% 1...LA GuiDo's RESTORATION p. LOT E, F. G, H, 1 BLOCK 90 ASPEN, COLORADO Â»<"nue E,AC* 9.444 - 12222222> -- -+- --i ifty-1---ytifill.,Â·4, .T-,i.FL-14- ]...Aj_1 1 21-T i -i-'_It-I-intzi--El-1---1 I...1.-1. f-1.1 r.,~ 1.1 -1- I. T--2 11L-1.-7.-r-1 ;III- -42..3.-I...-4-2-*2 -- - r + Â·' . /~CE*â‚¬~AA- .. .. 4371, â‚¬51,Â·0 0 - ED<IMITA.10 1+PIF *t-- 1 1 .i. I SCALE, 00 2~ .11011 1 ~ i | ~ PROJECT i 11 1 -- 1 8,<le'nkle Â»FaN Orrf) 11 1 RESTAURANT BleTTAe *4412* BUILDING DESCRIPTION t LANDSCAPE PLAN ~ SHEET NO. L11 0 9, I ; and associates ALLEY 605 EAST MAIN STREET ,Â·.1. t> ASPEN. COLORA[)081611 ~ 9. TEL (30.'3) 92.5-4/55 1Â·,1~ 1 -1 1 0 It 742 - G 61-011 12-" 3-0 1 ' A 1 STALLS 2 8'424. PIKOVERTÂ¥ LINE 160, 44' / 1 . 1 \ .\ C EXISTING f EXIST. FLANTER fb~* W,bALEAQ;12~--9. ) TRANSFOMMPR Â®OX tÂ·) ~f#&8*~I~~l-rS/v ~x3 ~. tâ‚¬ *TENTILIA < pAINTED ASPHALT- 5'MIPS 46 5PEC'D =22 Â· - 9I = 41 AA - ----. Â· k Z 1 WHEEL ' =j 57'Of (TYM) N 12* le-S FÂ»Flo 1 1 i '31 -21 , r Â· iN- 0 1 (73 1 C. 1 EZZ.....2.'.. 1 E- -1 , C- 1 IE- 1 1 -_ Vl N ~ - ~ aiJ *OLLAQD , .4 -0- -QUQ># 80><&03 Â«d-tHe,IDE Mbl.14.+*401-Â». ' ' J 1.21 / ' 1/ e i- - SUM*ER i l '3r- 4 AREA . . '. 1- 1 , ., 4--El 1 -3 . 'D - ' ." it 31#I- 4 -Â¥1 - 1 1: Â· 1. - - 1.-----------------------1 94. -~ . .3 -=t V . . * .---1 1 .. . I <PATIO DECK ,- - i f >,ibl 1 .Â· Â· : i /\ 34 BELOW --4 / W ..1,Â¥Â·. 44 - . .. 1. . .S' 1 RU St- 8,1 1 41 01! I -=22 R~ 1 * R,0 J Â· M./. 7 ---- 1 1 . - Exler, ELECTRICAL 1 i Â· ':; 5 ~ FANEL -0 PE =ke . ..Â·j'Â· ffÂ· .Â·. *-'/0. Â· .. Â·. .''fitj*$~~ 1 -] RELOCATED GANT STRIP 1, k EXIST GAS METEmb . 1 4 1 . . 2- Â·Â·Â·,0 9 'Â·IÂ· i 2.1 9'7~..i- : ~ ~--;Â¥44~-Â·PY 1 ---- , Â· scuppER R.0 - A' >\ LOCATioNÂ¢,M /10 â€¢r Â·. 1 ..$ ...4 : 4 Â· ' -00Â£ i % RELOCATEP 1 '11: . . 4 6.4 12\ Â· -7- - .. 1 -tr -g . 1 Â£01Â·Â· . '.. I 2-4,1 L 322- 11" *al .. Â· -0 1 0 f -, 4-1- tv--2 L - 0. 40' ' .1 ~0-\ -TYR SKY L.,GHT 2./ 4 0 EQU 1 :'M Evt.1- - A .7.7!Â· r..44,Â·--t,?. .... 2,7 U CURB SECTION 4 - GALINA S JETAI L - - 0 t 1 4 4\\4 ,Â»'f. \ / 1 -0 1 4, -RO T RP Â©Re Re' w f- .*:f GU: 00'S V.4 t Â»Â¥ 9.< eLS:,NESS ed!23<NG c i 1 1, .' . i GuiDo's . .. . 5 i ' Â·7 317" '3-0' 8'-34%(' 4-0" '. 6'-9 AC DO' .1 . 9 . 2, ROOF ACCESS O N ~_~ 14/STA+RS Â»6 SMEC'C i - . . . . 9 4,0 . 10 2 4% 1 1 I : ' RESTORATION 4 1 1-- , - 29'- 2. 41 LOT E, F, G, H, 1 BLOCK 90 .. , ~ 1. 1 ASPEN, COLORADO - Â· Â· Â· 4Â·2. #?Â· r. /:: 1 :.,4 - .4.----- - 1 11 , .. PLUE 1 J f. <Â· iu; ..,2,. a - a. -f, 1 . ORR 3 1 1 Ro ORO, Cl - 44 i 24'- oliÂ¢ 90 1 LL_ _ Issue: 1 E---1 r-- - -- 1 N 11 0 . j *'.--!-V ./ I -I....... ... . -I - --I. ..-Fl' , L--1 LJ Lu 1-- - t. . 5.11Â·90 BUILDING PERMrr 1 : . 0,11-90 BEV/1.3â‚¬52 Â· 0 I / 1 - MLANrrEI~ (tEE, LAINPec,ArE ~Lact~-1.1) - L_.7 1 +. 00: R <---- 4,*t> Usenet l / > .t-Â· - ---1- 1 7 . h & 1/1 -14 - / 'Ill , - , '' Â· Â·-$4 ' 1 4 1 1 . 1 - *,LFâ‚¬r=11- . . f=-9 -,moRR f 1 1 1 1 T *- 7 , 1 11 4 -i- + T j ' FROpE<TY LINIE 19,0. +ID' 60.-Â«Rn. 1~ 9*E> Moe. 1 2.754' 4 2' - Â·89 2 - loÂ¥ 1 -4" elizk" 11â‚¬-bil/- 4 1 -, 1-'ll " -i OUIDa'S , ADDITIONI , BUSINESS ~ < BLED. RENOVF-IONI NEW 1 BLDG RENOVATION~ SELECTNG FABRICAnON PROCE-3 - 1ECH,IOUES OF ~ THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRAWIG IS ONLY TO GRAPHICALLY 0 DEPICT THE GBERAL NATME OF T,E MDIE THE CONT,W TEA E RESPONSÂ®LE FOR Colfla-IG 0#ININCIE, AlÂ® CONSTRUCTION THE ARCHITECT -LL NE CLFED OF *rY VIAL,nONS FRON THE DIMEN,ONS AND CONDmONS SHOWN BY THIS DRAWING CO ORE R AVENUE 1 VEKi FY A4_ 10 MENSIONS SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES : 9 IN 76 E v ELO -3 7- . 1 Scale: Â§8' * 1. 08. Al.1 i Â© 144,1 Wl' 11AU Ink,Al pneÂ© 1 fROPERTY L'NE .O L ,Â· Â¥,1 l O.1) < 0.5/ l O.6 ) (EN 41-~V C-j 56'-104" ~ and associates 106 5 Â§&21 8'- 1096'1 42- 10" G' - 1<29' ID'- 216'/ 14'-40 5 , + 1 .r 07 ~0444"re#4949-1 *' TEL. (303) 925-4755 f Â·Â» 1,, 4'-1" . li 246,1 4' 40'~ :4' 41.011 1 ./ 605 EAST MAIN STREET Â·m . 2., 4'' p i . , ------Il --- : UL 14.T. S. 11 CE *11#ler. 411-. Â¢2 ASPEN. COL ORADO81611 ?g'Â· 1 L *Ltoll 3'Â· 4" 1- -8" ~ lamt .2.Â· I 1 L 1 - A. 1 rgi 1*~"ApglE * V f 1 -91â€¢ 1 . , T . .... . 4 '94 1 $ 1 l D.gj " .1 , â€¢ Â·r- \0/ .. / %#MovE *49,1-â€¢6 11 1 -41 -4 14 4-10. 7 -t._. t' -t-k Flt,arbts 0, A.A , 4 4'40 H14HN . .. 0 4 I :4 ~ _ #/ 8- r . - *#l~+I:-Nâ€¢â‚¬Wkt;?Â·62!~~ewâ€¢rÂ·.0,4,- -*NI' '4' . /~3~~~ - p: '-' -** .. 4.-44. 2:Â·: . e:'A. , ,* ..., 02â€¢Â£2~=f:*,2 *,4.-:Â·ekhS*12' Â·, a:â€¢61211,'.,U=4.;~;,1-:14*F~411, ~~ ~j~~ N M.1 ---#4 4,# --- - 41 Me.- ~~__ A EVISTING, ~ 4 dt Trg FILAS-rEA | Â· 1 8- . i // 7 le . 1 D.6 - 1NSUL. 13* MÂ·rl-. 9,LIPS 1 |~_ WALL 5HELVS 1 , ' 1 4 6/4, 51UCCO &0< %16,12 4't . M / 42 r,â€¢FitÂ·5, As gas'p. 2 4 1 2 O 7. 6 f 7- eugf*cE prre FRM CMLI ~ I -0 1 1-2 - 6.6,4.L ".0. ., 1 ---6 5-- - ... A------- - ID 1 ,'f ' 14 AETAIL 97+60 0- r 4 13I] 6=N 13&3 1 *A.0. 1 I Ir- 1 / I. 1 11 11 - / Tor 'PF "0.61- - .... ~ /, l/0/ \ 17 1 T. 21.9,4 2.6 34, j / 4 ex. 790.41 r / 51041-"S) m , fl â‚¬ B .4, lT 1 Cj .... 3 - **3.4,0*141â‚¬C*%~=44*84 Â·4 Â¢J,:. AS/3977 r 0~1.0,W. 9144 - 1 *i'-472,1 MEL. 7126.1* , ur--4 ; 1%3.f- rk-i 4- 1 ..C,Me/:2 p Y.//FLAUTe/ 00 11 35152 ~ /1&,â‚¬3!1Â»#t**SSÂ¢.242~SMii/lgl - * 1 1. , 6-=r- ./ mâ€¢er-r-'r Fir) '* iâ€¢t irr a. - 6,295 9 Â· - STAIRWAY*1 - - ~ B,hat- CA154 Â· W'/ ~ . | u; 1.,r a,â€¢erreleÂ·r MAL 4 SMER 4 I WAL L 'SHE.L.v h '4 -,Â· KNÂ·Ir ur AD. 1 t [~13-1 Â· 11 1 it -t , f '51- i '~g_~; {Â»5901% * + 8 1Â¥1 4 . .s] D G , . U. L - 1 AIR. \ - 0 2. l.6.- t-/1 '1 .1 / 1,10 1 "1 /' % ''. -FLUE 1 4 eN -- ' gs- - -- 1.0 > cr 1 â‚¬ 4 -91 6 g r 1 : 4 1 02 K = ' ME.W, 9465 7- ,-- ,. -01 58" 'PfrE'x' e: 6,4.slip, B'* _v .Dkl g 4-- g -. 7- , 1 t .- -.iFE - 1, A Â· , 11 =1 4 . 4.1 1 1 Loi 4411 2 - 1/ 54-61 -2 93 , 4Â£-r 11-DA K,2. I Â£ i STAI KWAY . 1.1 M A br #E 44' 31_\4/ 4 C - -4 i .51=1=./.1-1...r.7,- i J !! . i -11 1 â€¢ ~ 1.-454Â·p | 2 Â¥.Â»'t ; .~4 1511756'll 4 C ' ~ 1 E~i~ (34" riij j -Orm - 121 Iit~421Ii.lEâ€¢inaiIÂ¥~ t 1 /// 1. A ~ ' 11[32F1-- n. 4/ 8 1 7 4 PLACES 945.17 \ 'HAI- L AED<IT 171Â· /- -1 + Gh Ll 3 - 1 - - Issuee J Alit' | 4'-848 f'71 Bl/? ., 1 . - 1 . -,1 APR le'lo Hro FINAL DEV, = 1 f L 1 6 - Â¢ 11 h 5*11Â·90 BUILDING PEBMIT 1 All Â·Â· - ... 1 Â£? , 6 i 590 REV,#So . ..1 ]-41 ELEX/ATDK 0 r - I. ./ 1 J RETA] L SPACE 40/it 144 44041 4077' 1.JNE OpÂ».K;#4+ C,VEÂ£ 7,~73 .- f 2,1 .7 . . , 1 . 4 1/61 4 . 1. -1 Â¢1 - - I -- - 1/ T EXIST'IN* LINE or ' 74 . , 7- - VT--.-- 7--- , " 1 1' 1 #AL<*>14Â¥ 4 la:Or / 0' ' ..42.L 1-4 7 . I ovEKI-IA*16, Ae#VE- i4 - . / ~VA q ENTAY DUKI *. El E 1_EVATOK M / \. 1 11 1 NoisrwAY 4.02) R"\ - . 1 . Â» +- --4.-I- , C. ... 1 -1 - f - JANÂ· m .1 ! 1 -=. 1 0 --- 4 /3 t \' 1 . 1 . t. -Il.-.... I C . ,1 Â·, i 4 *Cr >t t < U-LINE OF NE.ki 'KPOF 9Â¢\ OVERHANG, A-t- 1 1/ , DEPICT THE GENERAL NATURE OF THE WORK â„¢E CONTRIC w righ --A - THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRAWING IS ONLY TO GRAPHICALLY k~ 9 TOR IS RESIONSRE FOR CONFIR-G DNENSIONS. AND - 1Ct,&=11 1 \27 ,-90 ' , t./ 5111' SELECTING FABRICATION PROCESSES AND TECWNIOUES Of N tr 1- 1 - 10 , .111 1 1[4 1 =. Il , A./P 1. 1.(R Plwr SHOMI BY THIS DRAV~NG 111- - 1 r - - '/' VARIATIONS FROM THE DIMENSIONS AND COIOITIONS r-U CONSTRUCTION THE ARCHETECT SHALL dE NOTIFIED OF ANY 7 -61 1 1? 1. 4 Â· C KEBU!60 EXIDTI KId, 0 / PW'G,51bNE Fl-,â€¢~|lkâ€¢ // 1 1 , FLAN-rERM lot g'.01' go Al, SHOWN ExieTif FLAssro"e M - 2--7101-4- GUIDO'S a' -9 5,6. -- .*'-6,1' U - 10 96" 7~~~ 4~i *-* LOWER IC)'-OIl 1 .2 ./ ft t. - M.0. 11 4zL4 It Â· 16 - 1 30 . LEVEL PLAN . 0-~ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ... 1+ it- 1. f Scale: %10 - 9-0" ~ SO.ALE; 94" :'Lall d 'J 4%71 2 9. . ,-:........ ....Pâ€¢PU C'4%, Â·Â·Â· 44 b~,Mu us, ,, A2.2 .Ak'.01?4'ts .., '1.. 0. 1992_ WILLIAM JOHN POSS VESALL ..6 4 Z >6_~ 12'-It .g,Â»'' /01' , 9' - 1. 1 14 ~ 1-1 91-174 . 2 'EepIR-Â·-*03E~ --+L--1 Â£17946.55' 1 67-UU-0 -1, i \NO. TRIMx 1 N , N N . 1 4 0 F 1-f f '-3 ' LEE-j[---11__ IKETAIL- Fl.43Â©~t i in- --1 4 ti_L t- - & 7111.6' - -1--4 -4- 4.- - --------- LIM'/Ell_MI DeE --4-22.-7-144.*~ .k RESTAURANT_5609Â£- ' -7 EL. 7101.11 i. i 4, * 1 bot WOOD Ck 91 spe=,10. -0 DECORAT INLAY U 2 IKETAL FLOOK --7--EFBEG 1 4 DAe<MENT FLOOK and associates 4 . 0 + I I . . ; / .4, '' / ...... r . .. 0.' . .. . I. . 0 lili.........1 4=1=:"BM/"6 7.1 ... - --:.. 0 . /. D . lill~# 1../.- . .1 -.1= -- 1 .. ... .i. - - . I . - - .4 *. I 4 ~ 0 A. 9, . .. . 4 GuIDo's ... 1 / I. RESTORATION . . . , LOT E, F. G, H, 1 BLOCK 90 ASPEN. COLORADO 11-1~- ~ .1 . 7 1 . - stâ€¢N'I.1--lwll..... - 'll/d....1 . m . ... - .. + 14 - .I 1 -1-===W--2,~2215-'---- ~i.~16Ii . ... . e -..t .lillillillillillillillill-Jililillilill 4 Â¢ I. .. .. .. 1 ... I . . I . I. ... ./r.1....//.- .. . ./1 J.1.--6 - -. . mey,iri~lll 1=/Mi/,s/ir/7/1////// . A A . ... ADOFTION Â· Â· EXISTING ' I :irl- MATCH EXIST Â¢ KEAACE MEIÂ°LACE EX IfT, MTL. FOOF SHUTTERS AS MEQb. W~ eTANDING MTL, fEAM MOOF /117,1 i (T Ye) CE,LACE EXIeT WINDOW â‚¬ NEW WID WINDOW (Tre), ~_ LOWER IKIDGE 1- UPPER RIDGE ==== == == == 1267 711Â«6111 1 1 -1 - 12.8- 0,; N"*(MolÂ¥(/491 EL, 79 +8.66' . 12.7/ 0 91 V . 11 ~ : 605 EAST MAIN STREET .4 1 |1 0. ASPEN. COLORAD081611 611 1 1 - 9', TEL (303) 925-4755 Â·*Â·4 *LK, STAINLESS I 1 6- STL, CADLE Â·90 L - h L GLIABDFAIL --- --. - - .-1 1 .~ 9 - 4 SEE PETAil-* - + \<Tucco 21 -- 4 ~= 1 - <- 0 ~ FLANTâ„¢ -=4 1-10 1 % CY> 121 expwT I , , 0 42) - F= k=-1 f--- Exer: M.ANTEK , 1 U B , M / 34-- 0-I- 1 L-.-~ U- eb RESTAURANT FLOOR .. 1 ============= =====rn--==6==-======r=-=====r=:=2==E~~- 1~ESTAURAN,4 FLAOK 4-.- Â·Â· ,-=------,-----------Â·ry--+12Â« NEW,LANITER T EL,71*i.< - .=======h========E=============*=L LOCATION14 -39------- --- EL,71,1.11 1 1 1 Di - Â·0:/96" S 1 1 0' - 11 4 1 8 1 EX'*TWA GATE TO FENCE TO SEMAIN \ 11 EMAIN ~ . 1 - e" srucco PLEV'Ofk -- \ PILAWEK'S (TYM) -'--- R / 1 - . 11. .. .. . 11- 7 . - <E> , 4 4 - -- ~ 0,/ - 1/1 m I. /-- 1 . 0 IL-/- -2 J1 - -A_ - - / 4- EUL_-- - --1. --- - j RETAIL FLOOR *4 . AX EYA#D EL. 7121.6' 2--- 1 exisTING FLANTE; . Â· 2 V- - 5 1001 -o Il MENe/EP Â» '5Hm/N ----- Â·Â·-Â·-â€ž CASEMENT FLGOR 1 .- 0.------------ T EL.711,.80' .fiE. â€¢ 10'. *'76" ----. Ii--i ------ --- -9-1 --------- -------- - - - - I.-0 -I -.-4 hr,4 -- * --- /-Th EAST ELEVATION i).2 951Â°LACE E-><1';T MITL. ROOF , Â«/ STANOINS MTL. bEAM ROOF - , * EXaTINIG .-- - ...4. .....91 ----.-I , .. ADDITION ; . 4,4. t A :t U L_.2Â» Sioes _ ~_--1 0 LOWER. lei oem. T EL. 7141.(041 0 118-072 -- ---- --Of -1---c 1 ) 1 EL. 7946. 69' .. lit M CH. Ulf NT ~ E - 1 1 = 1271. 01,2 -IHIWI,n77Eli!*~ it , , 7 1 1, 1 U I / 1 1 - - 1 1 Issue: v : 42-21-ZEEVAL-DEL r -- ... 13 ill-:12.122.EIN.ZE=LE 4-08 .- (6- I I 10 ~ lewle*-0 r- . - E.)<57 EX 14TÂ· FLANTEK -- . .r ~I ~ 41- 621 - ,~- / i TO *1 'MEIâ€¢ult-T TO # FLANTEM MATCH EX1 5% +L 01 1 STUCOO -)) ' 7 1 WOMENG H ALL K ITCHEN â€ž.4- 1 It==22 1 3 1*1 REeTAURANT FLOOR ~. RESTALJI~NT/CONNECTO*_ 7 EL. 71'el' 11 ' 1 1 \0 EL,71*1.1' .1 la' - 670' . 110'.,969 STUCCO 7 v \ - / COLOR *r #X 14-r. FENC~ C STUCCO -- - KUP#*PEK 15064< PUN11Â°*-,6 '60 ARCH'T, ' TO ..4 1 SANOBTONE A& 6~ge, -----31, 4>EE eFED. 01 i 4 e. f liÂ« HALL ~ E]Â·[3[30[3 [3[30 0[3[30 â€žAl 01< r ----- -6 1- - %~%2:&~7g~~,~a.C THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRIWIO IS ONLY TO GRAPIIICA~lY pÂ»veK4 ' 400.0 4,LAE>----- -1 .. ~ Â· CONSâ„¢UCT,011 THE AJICHI,ECT MIU VE NOTIB OF ANY SELECTIO FABICATION PROCEMES AlÂ® TED-01*8 OF 1 VARIATIJNS FROM THE EMIENINONS AIC CO,OTÂ©,0 4 SHOWN BY THIS DRAW.G. ' /400Â©NO. 61.,0 - 2 01Â«IDE 0 le;AC.K FOACH - - ,# 44 .32't.-172.. .0 .11*~.Â·_,,. - i 1 1 1 RETAIL FLooli , - - -- -= 3 ' p==EIZ--N -- _SNEkikeÂ»EcTOR. 4 T FLÂ· 7151.0' u - .01 '. a , 5%Â« | EL. 712.1, G' 1: 1 1 1 m 1 001-011 9 100, - 0 '- ' '09Â· ' ...+ * :4 I , ., .1***~t~' 19* 4 * $ 4/4 Â· 4''l. 1 * ' Â·Ari#.0 . 9 ; | 4~ |EAST & WEST| .4, 1 ..4,5 I g . .44 1 4, 11.1.Â·.5.~9 4,Â¥ 1 HALL EXTERIOR - 'ELEVATIONf | 4- --711--#r-r-- W â€¢fr. pp. - 1 1 - 5 -11 Blel= IN#UL. 1 1 4Â· i r-.-~4*- -1-Â·- b" WON. WALL- % 1 I - 44 HNO, 41,- 4 < ~ ---- - feACKFil.6-' ~ Scale: 74~ =1'-0" *% 0 - / 4-- 1 ~SEMENT FLOOK . 1 4% . ;4 . 19 .De . *SEMEN" FLOOR. ~ v 4-4' '*- -1..â€¢: .'.2.-'MÂ«... I.&:' .g'. ~'' ~~Â·' ~'~i H .... . 918,~ Â· Â·. .......~ - jÂ» --- - +00 FUN. og,4*N 4 . EC. 7111.801 +' 1 . . _ _ 1 ' 10 - 2 6/6 L__----------- ---14 . ' -*.. - - - - - - ,-7-- ..44 4--------------9----------- + 90'-2 9 -4..1. [*53-1 123 WEST ELEVATION , 1 Â·tri: 41 Â£ Â©1419 WILLIAM JOHN POSS J 5 3 11"-101 ID'.4 *11 OK.~+14 0*AMMJ 34 - 4 A L L E Y 3-14-10 O -- --+~----- -- 0 I J 1,1 ' 1 #Â£ I ST INA Plk[ING:, 1*rts I '7 1 u.1 1 1 1 \ i 1 f- 1- -- l.0 1 1 1 1 4 . .- ' 0 , 1 9. L-t -- . 1 1 -11 1 C=rul DO' 5 coNVECTOK t>USINESS tUILDINK=1 1 1 i /2 Z ' 0 - . .Â»4.1 1 4 --I , 1 li l 1- 0 -3 7 -23 7 1 (17 ...4 I ) 1 1/ 3, ./ --4-4 -=. 1,\. < - < e.*Fe>en- c=,NOF,5-1-# A,~4â€¢rge.eÂ·re, > 11 4 1 )* T 6 1 +-152'Nut en-+443+2 Â«4 .~ .......5- I 1404 j 1 11.r- 1 9 0 L A & .a 2.'-0' 66:'NCK#-ttl 'FLANTEÂ®- #T. rf @k.94._ 4_'ACCjd ( 1 ... / --1,14 f A - -. L , 4. C o R A v -L E i N U E 0 Â¢ 2<1-9-9- - L 9uvrnÂ»Â·a.,11~ 3'w . 1 OL,l.,e/+Lt bLAL. 16&0{Â»,9 Â°09 66:r eke A./Futid :O,z-c-u Â«â€ža-- 1ceÂ« u r 41&*ck Vtvy-5 *d-- CLOn- J.Su. \ SHN, &~~Â£ 9~807Â£ PLAE MIAR G IM R. 1@@@ 1 1 1 1 1 O 5 10 50 4. L- 1 C t...L A .53-37E' 4 A.7 5 0 0. t, . - , =- r-r, J , I .4 1 . - 1 01-2 Tr_ _ -_ '* " 4 1 1//1 F el-Â» i t_ Â·il'* I ' St. 1 *At -1 - i p, IT- - . -- i 1 14 i . 1 t. Â· 1 1 1 -! - -- - - -t + -~FÂ» ------ lf-t-F-- - . - I. . r . 4 1 $41% 4 , LF- 11 2 r .71 1 ... 1 -, 1 '14*..4 4*'. 4 4 1 1 i 1 4 114 <i rt' f ..0 .. 1 .*4 4 6 4 1 - 1-clt>AT . - -. = - . . . f 1 . .. 11 10 '. V. . . . 1~ 4= ./ ' iri -L \41 V &41-1 e U L E. . -4 .F'.. '. \/15 STI BU LE - f .f *54 -rAURANT '? 1.9 â‚¬4 , 1 ' . 1741 1 1 + C / * F k E TA 1 6 4- Lf L :- 4 li . 6 1 -7 i /4 #..4 4, 1 11 -=1 14 lot 4 1 1 1 # 7. 1 , '-I-. Ill 1 46. 7 1. i 1 F. 1 1 1-1- 1 1 4-r--1 V Â¢ 1 4 11 11 4. 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 ./ #AsÂ·~MaNT 1-EVE.L T LAN K #TAll Le V L L r LA 14 KE51-AUKAUT L S v n. 1- FLA KI INARÂ©#0 2.1Â®Â®@ 2 UBDÂ© 3 ASPEN. COLORAP@ T ' 1 - 0 '1. 'A -- 0 -- 1-314 t----4 - - '1,1, I - DF 1-7134= j '1 1 voleM NOOM - p- DO K H lope M p.j--L- 4 , POEM Rbc> 11 3 4. ' 32 '_ fj - .Li<+ ir -- -2-2- 1 7-1.----1-- ..lt 7.--7..... 1_=zin- iâ‚¬- 1 11 =6 1 11 - riF--- 3== = (1-- tÂ« ~~ 1 - L r-1 --4 1--t f===4 k====1 '1 1 1 1 \ L.3 1 1 11 2-7 r-- =In-_ -- -- =~4 7 ---- 3%3 347_ 41.04~ ----- 23310= AVAR-r-HE)43- 1 , P kl Ut. --1- 6--rt=- i AÂ·PARTMENT- 2 1 7 1 n, < * 1<7*T -- 44 11-1 tee=.0* 4-1 P - --1 8 EZE==i E- 1KtÂ·-rAt l_ KATAIL- sm#- 13 14- 3 74 \ ---- 1-4/ T AÂ¥*F~MEN-T- S \ h 2 ------1 \1 --]346 MT --3 !2322 FET 24= I - --ir 1 It- " E -/71==1 113- 21 /11 up. 222 ~: %'i - /3 Fl fl Pl 14------9 t=- =4 14 -i=- =1 F -3-1- 'K E -TA I L L.AV E 1.- f LA N 1 ' 4 ' ty----I-11 A'FARTMEÂ·N-r Leve.L TLAN 1-==-t .-, A-1 $==4 f===J P==4 i===4 f====1- 1 . 1 11 , L L._r 1 _ I 3 le . . , . .Â·'# - 'g. -4.* . , . - 1 1 1 1 1232-7 1 lie t-/ 1 UY il -ful 4-1 .. 9 BASEMEUT 1 1 \Â«/ .Rit- -1=L bAS E. MC. KIT LCA/24- 1'1.-Aid. D# BUS Il INTIES365 21:J Il LD U ZE* INA*Â© IM 24 1@90 ASPEN 9 COILÂ©NAÂ©0 1 1 1 1 1 f 0 5 '0 20 60 . 8.4/"brak-1 6 2 42\ A f A?. 9 \4 \4 1 dr P Of PY ) 7 1%,A <9,4 2-/ 1 Ck ktfwitty 14%*NA --s 1 / -------- -----TE-BlEA WolT,4...40 (4604~-,Ategi-'~) 1 1 \,70.1 ' 451>,}e i 9 ... #--* Â·- 1 -1 l'l ' -#%9 -1-9.IM- TYF' \ 11 1 1 4614-- -- - 1 ~ - ' ~ ' , ' 3Â¥a.014-24â€¢44 0.6,cf) 40661.-11- - :1 01 1 111 1 woou l'FIH -1'Â¥F,- 1 49 1 --1 1. '1 1 --- - -*TIAL,O <C - 9 1 1 1 11 1 J 1 1 1 1 n.-lar/: 180*Cs- wood- 1*4 r*li@M~Â«1 51 --2* 4.- --ANKI'k,q (122!:trlcALTA101-i=-tkill.4-~ 143:rp -127 A-- ca,\ 0.64 6 MATZ.H #*IST-'461 _ r i .1 - 1 - . il[FIT r.-1 ~ - ./ 1 11 lr' 11 1 19=77 1 1 ! 14 [In ae / i' 4. 1 1 ' 644.11 ~ ' Â¢5. 1 11 il ' 21 1 ELEflEzzr-3 . 7 - -Metp ~0310'F:dp 75 J ' 0 rt 1 -0-7 4 1 11 '1 1 ; 1 1% .1 1 e - -- - 1 ig 1 1 1%1 1 1 13 \41 w ---71 _i --- 1 I --- -1- [2232___1 11 Ul L.-1 'Fl.46.wHEL theIE!Â£ Â·5TU.64-2 -+ 1.'* FLANTEK- -3* 42144Â«f) ' 4 47 k Pott /* 51 153 ~0 04)42 01'15-1â‚¬ ST. 1 1- C VATION[ 9- 23 / V W k .*P 1- .\ 9 A 29>3 P/-6 40 p v' y ir,rs/grAS#r. fiLLT#lf,ki 30 - 57 - 9 Y<17 109 - - 3Â¥- / 3\ 'I 1 6 .4 11 11 r Â·i 11 -E 114 Ii''j *11111 - 2__=1-__.L_==L=L=_ 4 1 ,1 2 1, lit 111 11 1 ~L-- -- e. \ADL>u, TKIM - 1[Y-K- IN 116 5,1.-A 46 ---- /Llk-- - -- l~' 1 k'41*ASTEK..A 4 -1, 1 11 111 1| Â· tÂ£..UL ir 1 - 7.- 1 -- 47-Ptz:>IqEI Â·FEÂ¢**15:, * ,#062-12 732 rlb-1-6-H---9 ZE-*1 5-1-1 h:21 r-J=m=-I. ==I.Â·.-:ts -r-Â·r=r=* a -=g-/.-:a== n -e~z==j 't 11 ' A-4 * *â‚¬ ~1 L . 1 -t't 11- i J 1 ----i=- , F#//--4--rL-nl 4 - '~ -9--Â·.49â€¢~-'~ 1* -- r - - -- -11 Ct j . , Â·A' . Â©4 Â» r -7. C 1 1 11 Â¥ 11 i . 4*t i R NA, 1 ~ ~Â· ' ~ 11 ' h L,1 4 , .6=411- 1 1 1 ! 11 ALAÂ·16 - YLA*-1'-ER- . - -FL A 6 672,3 E -61 l-466 0 r LAK|-FC-le AR 4 A LELI<!A ST, :E L EVAT I o KL 42/3 /' //2-hbo~ +-- Â· + LA 61- Ele. 07--- woop 1-1, 111- 1- Vt< 4 ty* E-1-Â«af-- h:52~4~0~7A 1 lilli --2-*% / -1 C / 1 i , . 111 -ft-%1<-4 4-31-TA --> --- ~~ 111 P===L==JL__- _ r~3 -lrl[ 1 11 ID 411, 1 1 .1 4 - -- / -- 1 \- / I lili 11 U - Fl b A.66 ' 1 1-=JL~-=1 i 1 L==t==1=- fi | -..==U F LONER *be>(Ce, L Tey.KA ,=TrA-4. -- 1. 11 Ld -UZE-ZIU~*UNI 4--1420 t> TD KIA-TCH UNCIST.114,4 -11.22--LI-=22-- -- - T 7---.2. -1[3 -*. 4 1Â» 1. - Mr=97'Or Â· iii 11 lit 4 i I r L- A 5 1-8 e I N ".l: B' L i ST-L164-0 - -- ---- - || ~L- ~T- .1, 1 :h P 11. 1 4 --11===:it_ /- 7 1_Al.El STD kLE- 11.-/4rrEA 11 1 - ~21 : 1 /2 - -1 411 A L L E Y El-E v A T 10 &1 4 5: 1, i,, ".1 Â¥44 11,1 ., <5 1 -013 1 MARC91 2.1990 ~ ". eUO K>(7 3 0 15 30 AS [PENg COLORADO ~ 1 1 1 1-------I-- 4 i ~9 . 1 4./46... hWhiAL ~ and associates 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN,COLORAD081611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 May 9, 1990 Historic Preservation Committee c/o Ms. Roxanne Eflin 130 South Galena Suite #300 Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Roxanne &for Field Monitor: Pursuant to our field observation of the parcel located at 425 E Cooper with you and our structural engineer for the Guido's Renovation Project, we pointed out to you various structural flaws and inadequacies in the existing second story wall framing. These problems, we believe, are so numerous in nature and/or compromise sound structural integrity that we believe that the exterior walls of the second story should be rebuilt to match the existing wall layout lines excluding the addition as proposed on this project. The exterior materials shall be as existing or as per Final Submittal. Please find attached a confirming letter of record to our office from our structural engineer's office, Theodore Guy & Associates of Basalt (dated May 8, 1990). Also attached are some photographs of some of the interior viewed problems as we field observed. It should also be addressed that we have a major structural problem with the existing guardrails around the second story perimeter. This problem has been addressed in our final construction documents that will be submitted to the Building Department. ~T~an k 2, Enclosure MAB:lah THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS May 8, 1990 William Poss & Associates 605 E. Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Guido's Remodel Dear Bill: During current demolition at the Guido's Swiss Inn Building, structural performance concerns were uncovered. The primary concern is for the structural adequacy of the second floor stud walls. The original construction was of substandard quality and failed to adequately connect the top of the second floor stud walls to the primary structure. Prior to demolition, the walls have moved outward causing a 1" gap between the top of the side walls and the end walls. Temporary X-bracing and metal clips have been installed to stabilize the structure while demolition continues. In addition, all header, door and exterior walkway framing is inadequate and will need to be replaced. Since all of the exterior plaster and trim finishes will be replaced, it is our opinion that the second floor stud walls should be replaced to preserve the structural integrity of the building, and insure public safety. Please contact our office if we can be of further assistance in this matter. Sincerely, THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC 326633- KN- Dale D. Kaup, PE Project Engineer Reviewed By: ~ Le \ 4 Ov1(LK Stephen K. Peightal, PE Vice President DK/lw 90536 Ll 23280 8 STATE HIWAY 82 P.O. BOX 1640 BASALT COLORADO 81621 [303] 927-3167 /1 - MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Final Development: 425 E. Cooper - "Guido's" parcel Date: April 25, 1990 SUMMARY: The HPC is being asked to grant Final Development approval for the Guido's parcel, including the chalet structure and the adjacent two story commercial building. HPC PROJECT MONITOR: To be assigned at this meeting PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: On August 23, 1989, the HPC reviewed and tabled action for a Conceptual Development proposal involving a third floor addition to the detached commercial building on the Guido's parcel (to the west of the chalet building). The plans included a new facade on the commercial building and a bridge connector between the two structures. The Committee found the general application was not compatible with the chalet building or the historic district. On September 13, 1989, the applicant returned to the HPC with a revised proposal, which received Conceptual approval with the following (condensed) conditions to be met at Final: 1. Chalet building preservation be precisely defined 2. Exact building materials represented at Final 3. Bridge connector restudied for reduction purposes 4. Landscape plan submitted 5. Commercial storefront plans be submitted in detail 6. Restudy of bridge connector; hide mechanicals there 7. Roof top plan be submitted 8. Existing conditions be provided either in elevation or photographs 9. East elevation of commercial building to be submitted Due to the number of fenestration design changes made to the plans since Conceptual approval, the applicant wishes to receive HPC's approval for the amendments prior to continuing work on the Final Development plans. On March 14, 1990, the applicant met again with the HPC to obtain approval for an amended conceptual development application, which the HPC approved with the following conditions: 1) Corner entrance (of chalet building) be restudied, with the suggestion that a gesture of the solid aspect of the building be retained in some manner at that corner. 2) The second revision to the fenestration of the commercial building as presented (at the March 14 meeting) be incorporated into the final plan 3) The fenestration on the ground level storefront (of the chalet building) be restudied to ensure compatibility (with the character of the building) 4) The HPC supports staff's preparation of a referral letter to the zoning department to retain the non- conforming Guido family crest sign 5) Landscape elements are to be restudied and all remaining conditions of conceptual (granted on September 13, 1989) shall be met at Final. STAFF'S RESPONSE: We find that all of the above conditions have been met with the exception of Conditions #1 and #3 - entrance and storefront level fenestration design on chalet building. Staff is recommending further study in these areas to make more compatible with the second floor. We find that the solutions chosen, in the form of large square windows and large expanse of corner entry transparency, are not in keeping with the mountain chalet style. This style generally has smaller, horizontal openings and a larger percentage of solid to void. The difficulty has been in adaptively designing this first floor to accommodate retail, when it never has in the past. Possibly with the use of more wood tudor-like trim (similar to the upper floor), the two floors may tie together in a more harmonious manner, and the chalet style will be more apparent at storefront level. Staff questions whether simple divided glazing would help in breaking up the window mass, and tie the first and second floor windows together more compatibly. The chalet building's corner entrance poses an interesting design challenge. Glass doors are proposed, which we find appropriate, however, the side lights and transoms may be inappropriate in a building with such symmetry and substantial proportions of plaster walls. Possibly less glazing and more stucco (plaster) would be a better design solution, and we recommend that the HPC take this into consideration. It should be noted that the diagonal, recessed corner entrance as proposed on March 14, 1990 has been redesigned. The entrance is now on the same plane as the north and e'ast walls, which sta f f finds to be a significant improvement. 2 .. The "Mountain Chalet" style is noted for its tudor influence (rectangular timber/stucco materials), low pitched roofs with wide overhangs, horizontal features (balconies, fenestration) carved verge boards, and cutout balcony and shutter detail. We feel that the amount and design of glazing incorporated here is not appropriate to this structure, and significantly changes the chalet character of this building. PLEASE REFER TO THE APPLICANT'S LETTER (ATTACHED) FOR DISCUSSION ON "CONTINENTAL SWISS" DESIGN IN RELATION TO STOREFRONT LEVELS. COMMERCIAL BUILDING: Staff finds that Final Development proposal for the commercial building and elevator connector appropriate and compatible with the district. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Grant approval for Final Development as proposed 2. Grant approval for Final Development to the commercial building as proposed, and require restudy on the storefront fenestration and corner entrance as discussed by staff. 3. Table action, recommending further study be completed on the chalet building for compatibility purposes. 4. Deny approval for the amended proposal, finding the conditions of conceptual have not been met. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant approval for Final Development to the commercial building as proposed, and require restudy on the storefront fenestration and corner entrance as discussed by staff. Approval is subject to HPC's approval of materials to be presented by the applicant at this meeting. memo.hpc.425ec.fd 3 - pil-=f 2- f MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Final Development: 425 E. Cooper - "Guido's" parcel Date: April 25, 1990 SUMMARY: The HPC is being asked to grant Final Development approval for the Guido's parcel, including the chalet structure , and the adjacent two story commercial building. HPC PROJECT MONITOR: To be assigned at this meeting PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: On August 23, 1989, the HPC reviewed and tabled action for a Conceptual Development proposal involving a third floor addition to the detached commercial building on the Guido's parcel (to the west of the chalet building). The plans included a new facade on the commercial building and a bridge connector between the two structures. The Committee found the general application was not compatible with the chalet building or the historic district. On September 13, 1989, the applicant returned to the HPC with a revised proposal, which received Conceptual approval with the following (condensed) conditions to be met at Final: 1. Chalet building preservation be precisely defined 2. Exact building materials represented at Final 3. Bridge connector restudied for reduction purposes 4. Landscape plan submitted ~ 5. Commercial storefront plans be submitted in detail 6. Restudy of bridge connector; hide mechanicals there 7. Roof top plan be submitted 8. Existing conditions be provided either in elevation or photographs 9. East elevation of commercial building to be submitted Due to the number of fenestration design changes made to the plans since Conceptual approval, the applicant wishes to receive HPC's approval for the amendments prior to continuing work on the Final Development plans. On March 14, 1990, the applicant met again with the HPC to obtain approval for an amended conceptual development application, which the HPC approved with the following conditions: 1) Corner entrance (of chalet building) be restudied, with the suggestion that a gesture of the solid aspect of the building be retained in some manner at that corner. 2) The second revision .to the fenestration of the commercial building as presented (at the March 14 meeting) be incorporated into the final plan 3) The fenestration on the ground level storefront (of the chalet building) be restudied to ensure compatibility (with the character of the building) 4) The HPC supports staff's preparation of a referral letter to the zoning department to retain the non- conforming Guido family crest sign 5) Landscape elements are to be restudied and all remaining conditions of conceptual (granted on September 13, 1989) shall be met at Final. STAFF'S RESPONSE: We find that all of the above conditions have been met with the exception of Conditions #1 and #3 - entrance and storefront level fenestration design on chalet building. Staff is recommending further study in these areas to make more compatible with the second floor. We find that the solutions chosen, in the form of large square windows and large expanse of corner entry transparency, are not in keeping with the mountain chalet style. This style generally has smaller, horizontal openings and a larger percentage of solid to void. The difficulty has been in adaptively designing this first floor to accommodate retail, when it never has in the past. Possibly with the use of more wood tudor-like trim (similar to the upper floor), the two floors may tie together in a more harmonious manner, and the chalet style will be more apparent at storefront level. Staff questions whether simple divided glazing would help in breaking up the window mass, and tie the first and second floor windows together more compatibly. The chalet building's corner entrance poses an interesting design challenge. Glass doors are proposed, which we find appropriate, however, the side lights and transoms may be inappropriate in a building with such symmetry and substantial proportions of plaster walls. Possibly less glazing and more stucco (plaster) would be a better design solution, and we recommend that the HPC take this into consideration. It should be noted that the diagonal, recessed corner entrance as proposed on March 14, 1990 has been redesigned. The entrance is now on the same plane as the north and east walls, which staff finds to be a significant improvement. 2 The "Mountain Chalet" style is noted for its tudor influence (rectangular timber/stucco materials), low pitched roofs with wide overhangs, horizontal features (balconies, fenestration) carved verge boards, and cutout balcony and shutter detail. We feel that the amount and design of glazing incorporated here is not appropriate to this structure, and significantly changes the chalet character of this building. PLEASE REFER TO THE APPLICANT' S LETTER (ATTACHED) FOR DISCUSSION ON "CONTINENTAL SWISS" DESIGN IN RELATION TO STOREFRONT LEVELS. COMMERCIAL BUILDING: Staff finds that Final Development proposal for the commercial building and elevator connector appropriate and compatible with the district. ALTERNATIVES: 1.. Grant approval for Final Development as proposed 2. Grant approval for Final Development to the commercial building as proposed, and require restudy on the storefront fenestration and corner entrance as discussed by staff. 3. Table action, recommending further study be completed on the chalet building for compatibility purposes. 4. Deny approval for the amended proposal, finding the conditions of conceptual have not been met. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant approval for Final Development to the commercial building as proposed, and require restudy on the storefront fenestration and corner entrance as discussed by staff. Approval is subject to HPC's approval of materials to be presented by the applicant at this meeting. memo.hpc.425ec.fd 3 ; and associates 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 FINAL DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL APRIL 13.1990 TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE OF ASPEN FROM: BILL POSS & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING, P.C. MICHAEL A. BAKER, P.A. RE: 425 EAST COOPER AVENUE, ASPEN, COLORADO "GUIDO'S" - PARCEL AS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED Forward In an attempt to satisfy the remaining conditions as set forth by "HPC" on March 14, 1990, we believe we have met and have addressed these concerns in this Final Development Submittal. Our primary concern is that our design solution for the commercial building not compete with the chalet tudor styled building which is also being renovated under this HPC Submittal. Because of the relative location of each of the buildings to one another and additionally to the Cooper Avenue Mall and the proximity to Galena and Cooper Avenue intersection we feel that primary significance should be given to the "chalet" structure. We feel that this was accomplished with a softened facade for the commercial building while accentuating the chalet styling of the primary structure. We studied the present "chalet style" of the primary focus building and found that the use of any rectangulartimber patterns are virtually non-existent on the lower story of this building but especially detailed on the second story. This is consistent with Continental Swiss design features historically influenced. These features include stucco and/or plaster, stained wood (not necessarily painted or dark stained). Our solution, we believe through this renovation uses these features to accomplish a harmonious balance with history. Since the commercial building has previously met the issues and conditions of the HPC Board, we will not focus on this structure in this narrative of submittal, but will address the unresolved issues still before the HPC Board and this project as they concern the "chalef' building. 141 ~ and associates Sheet Al.1 -- Shows the relationship of the existing structures and the stair and handicap accessible elevator. Sheet A2.1 -- Shows the revised fenestration puncture locations and entry way recesses that were an issue for our H.P.C. final submittal. Sheet A3.1; States the use of materials and the relationship of Sheet A3.2; same with each elevation. Sheet A3.3; Sheet A3.4 Please review the above and herein attached drawings that we sincerely believe have addressed the remaining issues that the H.P.C. Board asked for our restudy and resubmittal. Should the H.P.C. Board require any additional information or comments prior to our scheduled agenda meeting on April 25, 1990, please feel free to inquire from this office. William 136* & Associates Architects v Micheet*-Â·Baker, PA WI ~ and associates 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN,COLORAD081611 TEL (303) 925-4755 April 13, 1990 Historic Preservation Committee c/o Roxanne Eflin 130 S Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Guido's - Final Development Submittal Dear Roxanne: Please find enclosed our Final Development narrative and drawings with regard to this Final Development Submission. The drawings included are three (3) sets of each as listed below: Sheet Al.1 Site & Roof Plan A2.1 Lower Level Floor Plan @ Chalet A3.1 Building Elevations (N&S) @ Chalet A3.2 Building Elevations (E&W) @ Chalet A3.3 Building Elevations (N&S) @ Commercial Building A3.4 Building Elevations (E&W) @ Commercial Building It is my understanding that this submittal is to be scheduled for the April 25th H.P.C. Agenda for Board Review. If anything else should be needed or required for this meeting, please do not hesitate in contacting me. li~ards, A -7 _akk Enclosure MJB:lah 1/ 18*~,#AL-6-Twf - r i e- /-1 .. 117 -Nzi#Eli.. 1+ 1. 3.XMA \. 1114<r. W f 412 '. 6-2,â‚¬, r L. ,-1/- % <cc-- . 3, 12, 40* *41 2 24,4 r p - 7 Nfl , 11 44 11#' f?'. - 4 :4 9 14, . 6 . , Er i V , i~Vy-j 1 ./ P ? d U JIEill'Â· ...1 , i.. .1 -Ibi.' ,-1 1'~ '4# i:iii.tilii: 2. 1 ..1 i : .likt* U'.1 4. -0'. -f Fi /4/4, Ii- i,3 ... - Lic *A ' t .1 4/EY'll I.-///~~&pv~7~4~4~~~~~/ 3,1Â¤ i{-1 f. lil % :Aff-1 it i fil t :1~1..)'~Â· 2 Â· t Nh I /1 0, _r- ..11 1 I . , Â·p,Jiwit f j. 4 ; . .'i .0 : 1 4 1:14 ' I Z '5 ;..: 1,1.1/ 1 . ....hir.,1 f./.: ' ..1- - 1 ; til p I. lit F , ' ' 1 1 1 :101.i ;, / 1 t.1 WS: i: .. .1 ,/i//// I '. IND: 1 1 - c. 4.4 0 4 Vil; U.-1 t.. - 2 M~0 %.*~'' - 1.. .00 . .. 4 . 'i. 1, 6, / :1 . . Vt# - ~1 ~ 14 - LI~: -a * 1 : .ty - - -bil"NIJ *bljfl. 1 1--_* -- -- . ./.11 1 - 11 lili . 1 1 lip 11 111 IIi - .....1 , \. 1 . 1 N . 11 . 11.- . " d â‚¬r.: 1 I .. . t 1 Fi-TAOT----7 -. do -- =Chi - l,- - -tr ---- -- 7*,6 ~ . r /1. It - =. a- -L/U,LZ, - 4/A/,har,#~I - -- U~_77-7-' .w:'+ -2------1UE=Zii Mit' -.. - ./":3:1:*2...- ----4 -1 3 ---4. *4.Z --C ----- 0 - LI-ri--- .- h ' - .emr ---- --,2,â€ž..274- ). - --- . 9'L. A -39-/ c le'-23/2 (vz.8.IFY') (. A.1/ 9-Â»NDI Ne SEAM L./ / [187-AL fU=F- 26 SPEC'ZI . / 1 TYÂ© 1 )-- N-K 9 \Cz:ZE N h ---- REr-LACE EXAT. MTL. / N l~OOF */ STANDI Ne MIT El 1 .1 1: BEAM ROOF i 11 441 Ne---g XZX, 3// // :--1 O 1 ~ - , b 4 . -4 - 1 1 1 1!\ - 0lf!.1-1 1 1, 1 H , I 1 1 1 i 1- i '1 NEW 1 ,+ ; i h m LI 6-FUL-60 - - 2 ~! .1 - _ > l 111~ h 4 1- //1 i i 1 - - Pul \ 1 i! 4. i. 11- ..11. ~ A 11 7 '1 15 1 -I . 11 ; ru 1, 1 -1 TKI M . 1 -- --: . 4 <bTL. (il.bâ€¢Â·gc g,.4Â°l- - NE'/ fl-*ATEC.9 I 11...0 11 & 7, c Z . FJ rn 02[COKAT'vE ,)0 .. - ------f ' Â¢------ -Â·- f:.ALE OF elli L.01 $â€¢.16 6-AY ('YrÂ·) i i Li\\\ -4 - 1 1 . r ------- =â‚¬2 <7 7..11 Wn:DW i- 7 LI aDO 5Ll;*%3'UND REMXED 1 I -- I! 1 7%':M # 1 4 i lip * It, 1 . L NO. TRIM --> iÂ· 1 - --- EXIâ‚¬f[ GATE -Ir lee'VAIN ~ -Illi%]E a[-i--j U.- I r.1 R.-1 li-/ 2 2 ---1 l i -/ . k $ I. li . . i T- E>415-7. C,LAN-E.k ~ 70 #E 1.LEMOVED J .Ii- -1- - -- - . 8 . '1 1 1 L -- - 20\0. 6-OCK =EACE AEOUND -ITY BERViCE MEFE!76 , ( ev OTHERS) -O 68 0-A EkED + -V w- 5-AD Â©ANTED AS 9'EC'k f " t- --- - - 1 .. 3. ELEV 79Â·12.91' --0 lbE: 1<.EiOVES 1 /L SOUTH ELEVATION ~ 43.1) 1 w ~ 43.1// 1 1.- .ZE ./1 - /4 j -13--5 I |~EFLACE EXI'L MTL. STAN,SING BEAM' FOOF Wl STAXIDING VEL. Vt-0, *,90, A& 4,F;GO \\,A,7 2 (Tre) 4 BEAM goof - Ip\.4~~ , ~ 1 L MATCH EXIST 6 REPLACE thUTTERS At BER 0. 21 1 (Trf) 1 - - 3-*:2-4< - I .-3 & 1 i i TEÂ·/EAL JOINT ,REPLACE E>(147. WINDOW 1 1 0,/ NEW vv[:>. WINDOW .1 J 11 1 1 1 1% r 1 , . --:-4 , I 1 - 9 r-1 L -S 40 li , ---I ' (791 , 1 -=2, . 1 -,-r- ; ' 0/INDOW A 1 1 .-' --4- Ill~i-qi-- - - - bUSIN/45 1 WE). Tel 11 3 11 1. - 1 heâ€¢4 9"UÂ»*-1*,5 e:> fA,U W --- 1 0 .. 0 C f / 0 .. 1 -4 i 1 4 AWNING ' , 1 1 /.1 1 /6 1 r-n , , f 1 \ i , , 0 , C 11 . R. . 1 , / . + 4\ \ i \ /10 F. r r - 7 r 1/ !1 1 - \ /, NEW rl-ANTE, ' . ~ SANOSTONE NEW FLANTER 1 Â»AND 50+IC>STON|E â‚¬,AND -- - EXIST. SLAI2> WELEV, 71 1 6.4 1 ~ 6- 1 6,512'Ff) 1 1, -1 - - - -- 1.- L Il r , , -- - - I - /2 j NORTH ELEVATION 3 Al 4 4 4 / - 2~ i.1 16 4 21 i 1-1 \W ./ /0 1 1 4 -- MATCH EX ! ST Â¢ REMLACE IKEFLACE EXIOT. MITL. FOOF 1 1 SAUTTERS AS 5Ed[). \A# 6TANDING MTL, eEAM MOOF ! â‚¬EPLACE EXIâ‚¬,T WINDOW X ' Wl INEW WE). WINDOW (Treh ' - 1 1 . 1 1 1\ 1 4 1 \11 . 1 1 1 i i 1 ' 9 i 1 1 \ 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 , i I 1\ 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 j 1 / f 4 1 \ 1 1 i *110 4 . 1 1 1~ 11 1 - ; -6~ - 2 | 3. , 1 11 1 11 , 111. i .r 1 r. =/, lk==1 1 4.U :r-- -,r - -7- , L=â€ž 1 lilli 4 l 1 4.-I -' .-2.-- = r â€¢ s.,T i ir . i I . 1 9 i 0 u INTE, -8 11 0 Hit 1 1 0 3 1 1 ! ~4 4 -4 # F==. -- Ex 5 -==Z= Fl-Al 1-3 1 ..= i r---. 1 L - 1 â€ž-- P ' 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 - - .----- 4--. - - -- ------- -- u_-- NEW JLANTER - -12-===7-1 LOCKFIONS --- --- - --- 11 - GATE To v-- 7- - 72 0 [3<- -6 MITL. 0 0 0 2 53 OECDRATIVE CEMAIN i N LAY (Trf) . ., 1 - . 1 1 ~. 6. <3 1 1 1 ! LT-UCCO - -- gl.AN-E . 1 9 1 1 ..9 11 11 / 1 11 1,6/ 1 0 'i i -- - - ----------4 -El O 1 1 Â·l m - 4 1. - --- -M -*. -- 1- 1 - i 17-- - ...,14 ..... - ---- --4 FLANTES / FLANTER 1-2.-*t - r - - 4 - -- I --il----- /11 EAST ELEVATION gelÂ°LACE Exiâ‚¬T MTL. ROOF- 14 k .... 74 2 â‚¬ I _i.... ./.4 ..c. -t *4 Ul. 14 r > Â¢ 1 11 1 1 11 : 1 1 1 ' . , 11 I i 11; Â·,1 1''lilli ,1 1 1 0 1 ! i . 4 i : : It â€ž 1 : ' 1 i h 1 1 1 1 1 IM~CH, EOUIrMIENT j 1 .1 1 1 1 9 ML 4 1 1 1- 1 i --- 1 0 1 . 1 1 P 1 i 1 1 1 1. 11 r \ A 1 -- s~UCC,0 -~ WOMENS HALL KITCHEN; f.- 4TURGO--1 4-1 4 . vt 1 1 11 , 6 .- 1=7-1--3-12=-2 ==r--n.--- ----.}Evefbtlrl- 1--1--- I-----M- ---101- M -----1 - 1 W??113~ ;222)VZZ#566-?EM5LLSdIC) A.: r-1 re - 29 - 3 .- STUCCO 7 - I. / COLOR .r < 5,<14-r. FEN ST UCCO --- .- . - EXIST.GRADE V ARCH'T. 70 MEMIKI, SANDSTONE 46.E efe. IDANIO - ----- - - - 4 \ 1 - \ i HALL - i ~ ELI El 2 -1 El Lf' ' PAN/ZAW Il ' \ + CONGÂ· 6LA= - -- 1 17%% 90 muMYERS Al, SFEC. 1, - '4Â· CONG. EL-,â€¢â€¢t - - - - - - -- 3 f --- P. - -- ---- - - - - 1 47-- 4-9-2 .4.1, '226.. ' 4 1 4 ,71 1 '44 7 . 1 90 .l 'All, 1 1 t X . 1 HALL l I ,a 1 .. 4+ ./ 11 4 1 Grr, p IK- 11 12-,(bia INGUL, | y - lf; - & " WON. WALL /4 601â€¢16. 4.b,â€¢,0 4 (L - leâ€¢ACKFILL I P -44 , 1 441 4 31 r .4 i fig. 4 1 ' i. A -- [28"IN 4 4 fot=Â·1Â»0 - - _ 3'~ __-â‚¬9227*al.'...tiff< 4 .*s.<SgimertÂ¢704$'-- -- - - - - -I.- ~/4*~/4*i /t WEST ELEVATION CA Dj 4 . r 1. 1 9 - 4- .1 $ ~Tn,--/ 1- ...I ~ -1. .... OUKFACE MTD. CEMOVE E)<167 WINDOW. LOCATE /CONCEALEP NEW WINDOW orEN IN K 7/2. "'=Â£DIA Li eHT PAT C H E X I LT, O V E N 1 N G S . ~ T YM ) 48-11202 (TYM) SE-,1 pt.TAIL- --Q~ / W/ METAL LAF 1 1 0 4 , _1 11==11 .6==4 1, I r --1 1 6 il L' 1 , 1 -1 11 ! - 1 /-0 E-6 1 / \ 57-ucoo ~ ~ \ L.// | i / ~ ' â€¢42TUL.t~2 -. 9! i 3 .\/ i ) STUra, + 3 L/ 1 It i , D 1 - 1 1 COLOK i. 4 1- - lbÂ¥ -1- US. F.OWEN AlÂ«-A l TE= T - i I , expx h. CT.YA C T 3' r. D 1 0,42. 7%!MI i ' 1 -,1,1 ..1 1-- #.- ---- --- -- -1 4 r--'--1 1 1 ' i 6 . L -3 L. . - L. i 1 UL- , C U. 1 1 6Tucce -RELLIE,P x Â· eApuSIM 40, AWNI %6 rn _ 144 ' -4--- {2] 1. AWN'43 T- + AWN I NG -. 3 4 12--H V LIELIEZZLEL---EEZIiLLECI- . 4 / i. 11 1 1 , li 1 1 1 li IIi t , .4 It it 1 , / 1 ; 11 /--h Â«STUU.0 --. 6 MTL. I Ii'jo . , /, 1//n > / PECONâ€¢mvE . 4- < ~ 11 -7/ 1 + - 1-1 i 13 GrIL IE 1 L. 1 , -~ / i t. 1 2__- 1 - 6.-- r 1Â· 1 . in 1 n [16-_2-rm-n----1--1 j)1 ..... -- rt BAN'22 - Â£*ANDSTONIE. e#No - SAN[77Â©NE *ANG Â·,6 & -6 . 1 . MEÂ£+1- CHIMNEY Â¢- CAF A~ FER MEDI-1.'b~E. . 61<f 1-16HT tls 0 *EXO NIO Â« 2* G \\ U A.2. , / I /. - 1Â£- --, - 4:76660 i 4 1 _ REVEAL- , , 1 , 1 1 1 1- .- ---- -Â¢ il 111 7.--7 - 1 1 - NEW *12 ' , NEW WD. . NEW WO. - ' Q NEW wo. 2 NEW wto. -/ , 0 11 1110 1,1 - WINDOW ~ i~ WINDOW'b 1 Â© k - WIN DOW WINDOW U IL WINDOW i < ' t| L - 1 - 1 7- _ _-- _ , * 11 Â· 1 1 ' i_ 1 . ST U COO - 35-- EX I 'br. c=Â«mr 6,â‚¬ADE \ 4/ METERS 75 4 Ic< 5A\0670>45 eAND, BE RELOCATEP -- a -1----- -- - L / -- - ---- . 1 /7 FAST Fl FVATION /6KYLIGHT 1 1 i DE<ONP I | CONICEAL.510 L1 6 kIT / . SOURCE (TY'.) '1.- 3 1 ~hhoe 4 1 --la i ---Ca~ Â£ MECH. EQUIPMENT I / - 1,41 9 ---i 0.-8 i -dk REMOVE EXIer. WINDOWS. LOCATE \ KIEW WINDOW OfING. FATCH EX ler OfN'6. (TN'19) , 2 = t. - h. P hi_ O K ' 77 6-1 *-Al HALL WOMENS COOM - 1 1 1 1 . - m . 1 *24%33/73 .ff,1 -27,1 ff Â£ 7)9.41 I- WN _ Zf | ~) FLMEJd- *7 1- i 11-).u ,-,U. C (23 1 h 1 CANVAS % :i o AWNI ING (TrF!) li~ STUCCO - STucco - COLOR HALL 11, 1 1 !! mY AMCH'T, 4, ED-1 1 1 - 0%4; r.vil ti 1 1 j .k UTILITIES RELOCATED 4 1 7 L 1 11 , I TO TH 16 AREA-- 5 0 ' / 1 ~ 1- / i SANE)STONE AAND , 0 . 1 / 1 -~ L__ 4 , 4 - 497' *,.F-. -664 .4 44-Â·4=14-r,2rtfu--'t_"tâ€¢' - Â·Â·â€¢. 4 - > ' -1 i AW.Â§* ~l -Ill----------- Ill- - - Ill ./.-- -------- 3 0 . 24 JAA All**th>2-3.> AffhAA/,KARLA#vhd~h>r>.~Â·-3.> 1. flb*j#1-444Â·12Â·.2 >T,>â€¢1144Â· Â·,eâ€¢ .*rÂ»-1 1 A ..9. L . Â·tÂ·Â·. , 1 /â‚¬*,P//90// . 12' -6 E : 4 %.... ':K I /1 - 1 64* Ibc â‚¬-8 CS, C NSUu.. 1-1 ALL 1 1 - 8 FC>N. WALL f C Â£ -- D~~KFILL 1 . 1 4 11 & 62Â·40. 9,1-/Nb g... : t 4 .: e V - ..- .. - .....1........ . - ..,~ -,- . ~ Ila 1. 1. 4 - .-- I 4k I ..) I .â€¢#/<p.Ul ,. 2>.ly 9-,I r.â€¢M..... I - 'Â·21 ./ .7.-'~ 1'' L 4r'!" ~4.444-~49% 2 _ 00/ Eho.<4' -cnu-2-17 73Â· 7'Â·07 4***e ---- -e - - rth_ WEST ELEVATION 94 i.. - *. A . Â£ 2 i :u ./ -- i.- c. W ,k ~ - - t.,O ST 1 Ne' 0 BURFACE- KITP EXOVE EX:â‚¬C WADOW _OCATE . ColNDEALED F-~--Â· ' NEW WINDOW OfEN I N.166. LIDHT 11-+T SOURCE (TYM) 4--.- / PATCA EXIST OFENINGS 112 / C - SKYLIL,HET / 13Ens>hip 1 1 11 - p--i f O El m --L- ----- 1 ---- --- 0-- - 1-5Tuao COLOR. 737* 1 - --p - . - 1 , . A<4 ITECT- Â£27 \ 1 .7'--L ' ~ii .2Â«C~ / \ /,I\-1 ' *12---,4~1,27 - -~ ----- c.r~Â·rph - 1 --0-1; ~c> : 4 Â·s--2-- 3.,r- -i - I , 1 --- 1 / 1. IT...\ 7!1-.-"tiÂ©7 -7 I -- 1- - h. - ---4--- - A ~- 1 r -~ 7 1 r L.---- J ; i- _. _i i, i<t \2 MIN \/ 4 ' 9441 'E 2.0 #1 4 0 'j to 3 430(3-- \ , /''Ell \ -- /.11 1 1 1 1 1 1 $ \ /1 1\ 1 1 /11\/1 / / : i i v. ' iv i Â£ ~3-- 9-LooÂ© 1 11 c TW E ) AUARIP TRAIL WIP. 1-KIM (MTI-. Â£4-ho) / U LANDGEDNE '42 ISAND - 568- PETAIL -Â·(~ l -11 1 ' 1 0 0 -4 1 , 1 WOOD PICAME L_ 2 -1 11 1 VINYL 6-LAP DOL. VELO)KATIVE Huk'(1 14'KIDDI.4 */ 21. 1' ZNLAY (OfF) 4 M ZED -rk,EKMAL 6.- - 4 EGRESS 1 EGRESS TEMFERED; 61.>â€¢55 EaRESS 1,! WINDOW [1 > 1 ~ WINDOW ~ L> ' 1 . c rre. ) WiNDOW ----- > ' i M.~= T : ~ _--1 7 1 1 - --t .- - .., F -- -7 -%- /il SOUTH ELEVATION 76: 40 4 ..j Â£ 0< MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Final Development: 425 E. Cooper - "Guido's" parcel Date: June ]3, 1990 SUMMARY: The HPC is being asked to grant Final Development approval for the structure referred to as the Chalet building. HPC PROJECT MONITOR: Charles Cunniffe PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: Staff has summarized the actions taken in previous meetings since August. 1989 on this parcel for HPC's reference: On August 23, 1989, the HPC reviewed and tabled action for a Conceptual Development proposal involving a third floor addition to the detached commercial building on the Guido's parcel (to the west of the chalet building). The plans included a new facade on the commercial building and a bridge connector between the two structures. The Committee found the general application was not compatible with the chalet building or the historic district. On September 13, 1989, the applicant returned to the HPC with a revised proposal, which received Conceptual approval with the following (condensed) conditions to be met at Final: 1. Chalet building preservation be precisely defined 2. Exact building materials represented at Final 3. Bridge connector restudied for reduction purposes 4. Landscape plan submitted 5. Commercial storefront plans be submitted in detail 6. Restudy of bridge connector; hide mechanicals there 7. Roof top plan be submitted 8. Existing conditions be provided either in elevation or photographs 9. East elevation of commercial building to be submitted Due to the number of fenestration design changes made to the plans since Conceptual approval, the applicant wishes to receive HPC's approval for the amendments prior to continuing work on the Final Development plans. On March 14, 1990, the applicant met again with the HPC to obtain approval for an amended conceptual development application, which the HPC approved with the following conditions: 1) Corner entrance (of chalet building) be restudied, with the suggestion that a gesture of the solid aspect of the building be retained in some manner at that corner. 2) The second revision to the fenestration of the commercial building as presented (at the March 14 meeting) be incorporated into the final plan 3) The fenestration on the ground level storefront (of the chalet building) be restudied to ensure compatibility (with the character of the building) 4) The HPC supports staff's preparation of a referral letter to the zoning department to retain the non- conforming Guido family crest sign 5) Landscape elements are to be restudied and all remaining conditions of conceptual (granted on September 13, 1989) shall be met at Final. On April 25, 1990, the HPC granted Final Development approval for the commercial structure and tabled Final on the Chalet structure with the following conditions: 1) Restudy of storefront fenestration and corner entrance, with the possible use of additional wood trim around doors and windows 2) Color rendering and architectural details be submitted 3) Detailed landscape plan be submitted 4) Restudy the base treatment of the Chalet building 5) Staff shall prepare a letter of support to the Zoning Officer for the Guido crest sign relocation on the structure On May 9, 1990, the applicant appeared before the HPC, and requested to be added to the agenda to discuss the demolition of the 2nd floor of the chalet building. Following investigation, the contractor discovered major construction inadequacies of the (late '50's) 2nd floor, requiring substantial demolition. The HPC stated that the applicant shall submit exact demolition and reconstruction details in the revised Final; they also required that the demolition be sequenced. STAFF'S RESPONSE: The following has been submitted for HPC's review: 1) The sandstone base around the perimeter of the building has been reduced in height, as HPC required. 2) The applicant restudied the first floor fenestration and wood trim option, and has produced no changes. Staff is still not in support of this storefront and entrance design, finding it to be incompatible with the 2 Swiss half-timbering style of the building. As previously stated in at least two review memos, the square windows and entrance door and sidelights appear out of character. No wood trim has been incorporated around the windows and doors to carry out the Swiss half-timbering style as the HPC recommended. The "Mountain Chalet" style is noted for its tudor influence (rectangular timber/stucco materials), low pitched roofs with wide overhangs, horizontal features 0(balconies, fenestration) carved verge boards, and cutout balcony and shutter detail. We feel that the applicant has not incorporated the HPC's recommendations for a restudy, and can therefore not recommend approval of the first floor design. We feel that the proposed first floor design significantly changes the chalet character of this building. 3) The landscaping treatment in front of the building has been amended, clipping the corners in an angle to allow better pedestrian flow from the mall to the building. This appears to be a better design solution, and should reduce the screening of the storefront. 4) The applicant delivered a letter to staff on Friday, June 8, stating that the 2nd floor demolition can not be done in a partial manner. They intend to remove the entire floor, roof and all, and reconstruct immediately. The barricade that is currently up will screen most of the 2nd floor from public view. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Grant approval for Final Development including the demolition and reconstruction of the second floor as proposed. 2. Grant approval for Final Development including the demolition and reconstruction of the second floor, requiring another restudy on the storefront fenestration and corner entrance, with specific direction to the applicant. The Project Monitor and staff may serve as the final signoff. 3. Table action, recommending further study be completed on the chalet building for compatibility purposes. 4. Deny approval for the amended proposal, finding the conditions of conceptual have not been met. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC Grant approval for Final Development including the demolition and reconstruction of the second floor, requiring another restudy on 3 the storefront fenestration and corner entrance, with specific direction to the applicant. The Project Monitor and staff may serve as the final signoff. memo.hpc.425ec.fd.2 4 4=*- 64 -r~ ' ' ~Â·' C r. c '-:- *960Â¢ 4.199032 r., . . .., 01Â¥7,47'5.4 0*11,71(114UL efMI1*4 319W oerIH 441-U Â«1*4714*Â¥'1=1-42.lellf a\Arne t~*21 4,44 494~4-4 rier],1 el,14 altÂ·114 *00*16,1,2 mt-14'e .1114-B'Z eagelke- errlrlk# 10*4 404 -24*21 411 Ur'214! 41Â·19180 - - 213*2 *IW >/1 43 ~Â· c Z,|. 4 '~,1 Â·+f'1*|1'7 HrIHBHL194â‚¬#-100 VIi.*IA .9/111L1*U-,9 4514 /,4 24011Â·42# 404#7 . . . QkÂ»102Â«41 . --- â€¢'iâ€¢ Â· ,. 1 ;:Fl'ii: t 4- . / 'Â· 4 * Â· - Â· 'Â·4</r-,9-114rlri41 pl*711-1.4 2 ,I 2 .+L~~-1_f '_ Â· Â· - Â·; ==. Â»rÂ·Â· afÂ· v~:.5 Â·~ ,~>63_1/zz:;~6yWHExc, 1 ...A ' 84 --2L .4.2* 1 I \'ll-1 --- . mt;IDc~Jqsnlil-RfD ..,Â·rm Â·: /r.-64- i \>L--tili htitr I . __/ ,- *4444*tlail . ': 1.. 1 / c--pm ... , 6 2. 1/*rÂ« Â·it L -... 1 . .1 4 . . .1 . M h.g - --- -- 4.Unl : . I .Â·Â·/ '*V/v ,+j~~~~5~~4.1 .r. - /4 1- 111'il.11 rl71117171-4/ ~110Mfl,14 71,21.Id--/'r .-/ ~ 2. Â·l,Â·12*47 tiailâ‚¬10Â·d~ /212+14-ftÂ·/ ' ,140#42.Wr' 40 4 41*114ld + el |aM[|41 +10111 B l.4.11'111 1.4. lili t . . - 3-1.-74716-I + 1-. . .. Â· .9 ,T F 1 - r l'-1,1 V "Â· ..,Â· h Â·a - r. jirTIU CCU. .t' 4 /,ime*DDS-41- C,-,AJ. 1 . . ..1, 1 Â·b.<th -.. . AJ 1 0. < , . 0----11 Â· v . 4 . 1 .t -5-a-- 2>c . 1 ~41114 0211,| *WHO 0~4419 ~eÂ·z 4 414[IM oerli ellrild . . - . 1 , 1 . C~ '. f~f:433,%43%40Â·fs-G#&351 .26 , -7 F. ': 1 . 3.13 1.10. .' ' #jit#44~f*~tktflity f :~:i j~ f.)3%134:%6..*!...<'Â·09â€¢{'. ~ . Â·Â·- Â·Â·)Â·E,fi).N :44'r*Â·<fÂ·t:,A,4,14:7,9 Â· :.Â·7'3*,4 Â»p~,*,tpÂ·3 "s~Â·1D~f@5Â·~rÂ· 1 {i.i *-Vi:i,KiAÂ©*44** 40Â· 14*ig .1 1 .'. . 1 -1 Â·Â·Â·t.Â·1-:~IÂ¥7:'-Af.**15.41: rl*v:I Â·:.4, RÂ·~i,)'1+24Â·R,4 / A,3' --.c 4---1 t. and associatest '* ... mbr'*. May 17, 1990 Historic Preservation Committee c/o Ms. Roxanne Eflin 130 South Galena Suite #300 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Final Guido's Submittal - 425 E. Cooper Dear Roxanne: This narrative letter is pursuant to our previously submitted letter of May 16 regarding final development of drawings etc. for the May 23, 1990 HPC agenda. In review of the April 25th application before HPC, we find the below listed considerations were still at issue with the board: 1. That the 9/13/89 conceptual review were met and complied with the 4/14/90 review excepting that HPC reccommended approval of business building as submitted, but that entry fenestration of the chalet building and materials usage should be items to reconsider. 2. Signage and graphic, should be renovated to match existing. 3. Sandstone base band should be lowered in height to match that of 1" thick wood (painted) base banding. 4. Reconsider corner entrance with possible dark painted wood trim around doors and windows. 5. Landscaping plans and color drawings showing materials. This motion was voted and carried unanimously. In compliance to this motion, we feel that we have complied with the hereabove concerns with our attached drawings covered in our May 16th letter and further address the items as follows: 1. We have restudied the fenestration issue and feel that the openings which represent about 3 5% of the wall mass keep the horizontal elements of the chalet building intact and allow the subtle vertical nature of the building to relate to the traditional elements of the neighborhood. r As previously addressed in our 4/14/90 review submittal before the board, we feel that the design is totally in keeping with "Swiss Continental Design" by allowing the residential elements to relate to the "home over the business" feel that is very common in Swiss architecture. That distinct yet subtle division of "home over business feel" has been continued with our study of this design question. The proposed design for the retail space at the lower level is in keeping with that theme and the second level restaurant exterior design is in keeping with the residential feel above the shop. 2. This item of nonconforming signage received unanimous support by the board. HPC agreed to provide a referral letter to planning and zoning for approval as historic and requiring repair, renovation, and or replacement. 3. Our drawings of building elevations affected show that we have lowered the base height of this building element and its relationship from previously submitted drawings. 4. We feel that dark stained wood around the openings is inappropriate and would negatively detract from the horizontal nature of the chalet building and emphasize the ratio of glazing to stucco as being greater than the present ratio. 5. Landscaping plans are provided in this package and a magic marker overlay will be provided at the scheduled agenda meeting on May 23, 1990. GEAk You,/7 Michael A Baker, P.A. MAB:plb 19.-: and associates fl JUN 08 '90 13:48 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PC A P.2 THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENOINEERS June 8, 1990 Mike Baker William Poss & Associates 605 E. Main Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Guido's Restoration Dear Mike. During a Field Observation on Thursday, June 7, 1990 at 4:30 p.m., I observed that the southern portion of the first floor framing of the Guido's Swiss Inn building was removed. This framing was removed to aid with foundation demolition in the basement. The loss of the first floor compromised the overall structural capacity of the structure. We feel that the best option is to immediately remove the roof and upper floor framing to insure public safety as well as the safety Of the construction crew. Please contact our office if we can be of funher assimance in this matter. Sincerely, Â«D-,_ Ip. 24' Date D. Kaup, P.E. Project Engineer THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC DDI</pnp 90536 L2 9 et' 3 1273Â¢4t4304 , 3Â· ; Â· - ' .3~JtM. ~Â·~EjPS'~Â·1~~ Â· A.... ' .. . 4 - ~11=2--121-0~49,irA,amniJJ/46~~fi~~~~w64#~iefifW~~87 Â«*4Â«.. 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 TEL (303) 925+4755 June 8, 1990 Historic Preservation Committee c/o Ms. Roxanne Eflin 130 S Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Roxanne: This letter is to inform you that after careful review of the structure in Guido's (428 E Cooper St), we feel that we can not safely brace a partial roof/wall assembly for wind loads and request a release waiver from our amended approval to reflect this concern. However, we are requesting to be allowed approval to remove this roof/wall assembly in accordance to standard construction techniques and replace with new assemblies to original dimensions, elevations, etc., as per approved plans. ~gards /6><-- Michael A.iker Enclosure MAB:lah 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 May 16, 1990 Historic Preservation Committee c/o Ms. Roxanne Eflin 130 S Galena Suite #300 Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Final Guido's Submittal Dear Roxanne: Pursuant to our last meeting before the Board please find enclosed the following: 1. A letter from our structural engineer Theodore Guy & Associates outlining the proposed demolition/construction sequencing plan as reviewed by the owner/contractor for this project Mr. Guido Meyer, Jr. This plan addresses the construction concerns of the Board for this project. Also find attached drawings numbered Al .1, Ll .1, A2.1, A2.2, A3.1, A3.2, A3.3, A3.4 and a cover sheet reflecting the changes we made pursuant to our last conditional approval before the Board on April 23,1990. Materials and associated data will be presented to the Board for approval at our next scheduled agenda before the Board on May 23,1990. Enclosure MAB:lah MAY 16 '90 13:06 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PC A P.2 i 4 THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES aC ARCHITeCTS AND STRUCTURAL INOIN~EAS I May 16, 1990 William Poss & Associates 605 E. Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 Ae: Guido's Restoration Dear Bill: Below is our proposed demolition sequence for the roof framing and upper level stud walls at the Guido's Swiss Inn Building. This sequence may be adjusted for field conditions that are encountered f and for bracing and public safely concerns. 1. Remove 50% 2 of existing roof framing. 2. Remove same amount of existing third floor framing. 3. Remove perimeter upper level walls at area of removed roof and floor framing. 4. Interior floor framing ar the upper and lower floor can be removed .as required to begin construction of the replacement structure at the lower and upper levets. 5. Construct upper level walls and roof framing at the initial demolition area. 6. Repeat above demolition procedure for remainder of roof framing and upper level walls. 7. Complete construction of upper level walls and roof framing. Please contact our office if we can be of further assistance in this matter. ' If Sincerely, . * Dale D. Kaup, P.E. Project Engineer THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC r, -7,1 .k DDI</pnp APÂ·~44*.Â·/yÂ· 90536 Ll *.4 3% 3%4,4 ~bEN 22280 8 STATE H,WAY 82 P.0 GOX 1 640 BASALT. COLOAA,0081821 {303) 827-3187 D#l Pe ALLEY oa,Â»8 4Â¥*t .~ f â€¢Nf ... ... 7d-G ---- ------------t::t 1 STALLS e 0-2- 01 7.OFERT'r LINE 14 07 ...... I rÂ·I I ~ -~NIFOR.I. MOI i \ P. A.-El - .g. 96 --* 1 J -6 â€¢for"fro L 1 .- ' ' ' C._2_- i C IC , i , 6 r V - 8 OUAâ€¢o .1 b 41 4 1 - 3,__2 -2 , ~"R Y 4 -'i 11: . 1 , 7-11-4 f b , N 47,0 DECK 1 61 1-OW 1 1 1 1 L ~ d ' ~Le-" -4'2.0.t 1 - 11-1 - v.=11Â°Ma ~ .1 .. p ::.24.6.â€ž. 1 - J ......... _ -- -- -- Wl-- CANT STRIP I SCUPPEA RO , . ..f %'ELIA' p I + -A ONÂ» Me~0-P I 1 N 11- 31'Â·11' :11 13 7 L .===* o I '0 ./ 2 F i ,Â«-,r 51.Ii- e 11 -*ECIANICAL | i Elli*.,4 .. 2-I-xy:%.12....1 ID SALENA 51-fEET 511 ' 12. El - --Â¢ . 12" CIP U ' 1 L.- -- - , FL DO'S h.- - - L -r SUSÂ·NESS e 4-, 0 ->9 I - 1 I ' r-_- --- .w , . .40â€¢ â€¢aciss k GUIDos 1 ' rl 9 ' 5 0./5-A RS ASSâ€¢ECC * 1 RESTORATION 1 â€¢ 1 '07 f. I. 1 5~ 111 ibe'liC. â€¢Ir'C 1 />-1 :1 1 '1 - 7 -a ~ ~ 1 1 1 -------1 -~ - -â€ž/7-1 I.U. b 1 11 1,-1.0 'PrR .0 KO 1.-U- -- 9/t 1 1 1 11 .4 -Ch 5 1,Â·liD ./I'll...... ' I r-- 1 r---i----1 /--7 L_.1 1 4 . , 1 I ... .. , 1 e. Or,A. SE, . , , . , ANOÂ¥.ArE 7'_AN ~ ' YHT 40,4 1 4 1 J .2 4 RE? .2 - ' i i l.-4,Â·r .NE i.0. 0, L 51-51' - 81'.21' ,% 421.3,01 i-d.9 1-/ C . t , CADOCTS L ADDITION 2 3USNESS - 3LCO -NC~MON , NE.W 1 6LCÂ» RaNC~Â¥ION . SE----St . 0- ' GENERAL NOTES $ COOPER AVENUE , 1 VEK,/Y ALL PIMENSIONS 1/ THE ' ELD SITE PLAN All 3.2'08 p. P':,at E- ,OÂ·.00 -U-: ...~30/bo 0! Â«4**Â¥.1/ I ./ associates WIA V.1/ .MI, f#.*'I"I" na ec- 4 rÂ®f.Â£1 poeâ€¢e~â€¢2* 2 -*2Â» ~ lkÂ·re;F:C -1 1:21 1*P'M,140 4â‚¬ 4 *_ ~te Â» 4.kt'!* 01 F Ul#, 46%,>SE-7% "e"" "'Â» 0 EMA -/ //I-- -48/'%- 1 , A#14444 .*310 -12,9 ..14Â£10 ... e0~b42 02**4b W/Ptu 0%11.*** , Jbo. 22 . :.... le ..Pe: I. ..x.eiÂ»- e.~A,re-=Â· AÂ»- 5 , 1 '4:'*Tb /Â£,7;0,4 e~Vel 4 4|b' 42'hiP kle , ~ L 8 I , , t*-4â€¢â€¢-Â·r--+I/JM 5,Â¥6,â€¢al'/ 1.1 12':,4.~, 1.".. 1.4:..4f~[ -2. .-.-' 1 ~---- OUÂ·* Â¢**OÂ·Â· 0.46â‚¬ j. ' Â·'i .p,r'Â·>.HEr!9441. Lf LtfLUÂ»*' t ---A 1 0 . 0--t 'Ill Â·pl ' r.*tH,-M i ....Se** T GuiDo's rm> 9.--/.- 0Â·0Â¢~,-PÂ·VO~ ca~., Â»UA 92%, <,0.CÂ»:go co-% RESTORATION M.â‚¬0.7 "f- 1Â¥r" -- 5Â»5&60 lyÂ» 1-* #teâ‚¬P h h//.IlifU ASIN CIOR.00 W. EFIM' hOCK 40 eot c ' 19â€¢lw.>73 " 44 3,6Â»'944./. 2,~'E;*77â€¢ PUSH 1/4/ +IM. + 4'641,f/4 1,4./.3'BAâ€¢ A-/B' lue... . t./rES-/,0.11 57-#F Â·fllal l/: 9*J* INAIFYI, 64-4'*â€¢L *iÂ»-X' WebA 1.-- 3 . 1,-0 .0 ./.- - Avised LANDSCAPE PLAN 80.1.1 Ll.1 0222-/U'AMÂ»â€¢,03. , 7 e "f~ r 0. 4 (9) Ca,4 - rip) 4./. 1 66104% - Ill. G' 1 I.,W 1.-: V 4 Â·40 .- 1 . 6- 26, 005 EAU -;N Smi AS./COLO~.08,1 Â£ 1 1 00." g.,5.4 =AL 5 1 r----44 i 4% ~37 1 1 ( De, . . -4. LA WINUL,Â£21â‚¬Â· millâ‚¬.C 18 - 0 PKI 1 COOLIK - OAKE~Â¥ I ...... .TOW.C. 1 Imti (z) /1 IiI 0: ~ 7 -- 2 1.-7 1 0.0 o N I ........ 1 4% 11 0 / f Â© T' 1 1.LAUN. 7 1 1 1 67 L.-4 J Â® 1-1 =t; p i Â·: Â£10 '.... ..Â£. h 13 '-4/3--33Â¤,Appr-76-bo I'-i efib -f I y ... . ' 9 1 Ili 1 4 I AL- - ' .....// 1 9. -> v .... i . 1 , 1-4 /00 .2,=31--4 A - -Mu. C...9.- I . â‚¬ . #F f . 1 - - 1 . 4 -/14 - E 1 1, I /71- .rUP, . . . ..1- I.44 I 3 --7 8 i I r' 4Â¥ --1 -11 p , o >-- 1:411 r 1117 3 1 1 1 1 5// I I.,T . i .. Â· ' e YZELE' 3 1 \1 1 //Â£25191!01 -: f.. 1,2 '. *11 . sâ€¢ 1-1/.2.//eLL . lei Guino's I~ e~--a , 4.4 ...4 4.4 .[9] cycÂ¥'40*10 ~ / 2\ '> i ' RESTORATI 1 - ,, 1 1 1.!ful- -51.:74 r [t-plol ~ ~- Ill ler E f . H j KI ASPEN CO,LORACO lÂ· I.* I pr'. (I.V..) , I tY/Â¢ I i #6 8.*M: /--1 ~ 1â€ž \ ... ... i ...... Ir *.1 9-4---- A-:---- 4- : ..m Â©1 1 ......,I.,1,Â¥1* 1 1 . - . M le'le. ..... -- 4 ez~Mi S-/Mawill,< - .... i' -, 1 012 1,1.4, . 0- 3. -2 :0.. \-' * - PrLâ€¢. . -1 ll r-"'CML,~4,Â¤4412,-,7 -7-9-- 1 ill- 1 1 r . 0, o. IN $ 4,) r \ I i|! &-IT'll lu. /1,2. w ...â€¢ ala .. trrn * .EvÂ· 71,1.8,9~ CnÂ¥) 1 -11 ra j -9,1 ' -. KCITAIL ST/*AUL ; ~ 1 11 . 1.u.--ro. 1 1 - 1 --{-12}MECT. -1 1 1 1 11 0 89] F 6-1 49 4 -- --4/31 \IA- - + 219 /1 1 . ' 45ughaEais ~'...4~... */ Fc- .CT.I. ./.27,-210/ Â·22.r212----- 41'40 v-,/ 1 - GUIDO'S BASEMEN1 LEVEL PU At ...â„¢U.I.... 4 Sr,66. c, r Fl ~, BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ', 21 ' .....; Â¥4'â€¢1'.00 SC.1.1 94' â€¢ 1'-0" 42.1 O-211_WiLIN/0- 10'.11 . ' -0. 4-: - * , Wl 6.4 e i 0..1 @ .@ 9 V 1 56'.17&*â€¢ .?Id J.....5 L L G.Â· : G'.8. D 14'- G 1.'Â· Ilk. I b . . /Â·U zir 4'Â·1' , 14-46' : 4-0. * 1 â€¢SI I# ... 9/ [.t]ON,61, 9, b I I v . 1 3,Â· zE-~d Â· " ' ./, 4'It'.4 1 --TAÂ· 4 - I " , ------ ----- ------- --- 1 ---- -- Imi~ /1-4 2.-- I ': n '?, . 1 . FT- 1 - ..10 1 - -~ r <0.9 Â® LI ./ . .1 1/. 1 1 F ... - - lili* ... ./ I 1 /4 (2) 1 1 ... I 4 i i 1. L - (o.4 P -WALL 4.Wl I , F 1 1 I . 8 KET,416 98/Z I.| te!IMÂ» [ -4 QU / riIJ *,e-/Â·r i .bil. ~ , lÂ·D J 2 --- 1.12 '31 11 ..1 7\ FF- ---r 1 1 ' ~ 57=m221- m u. . 1,C L b VE:Wid 2- -4- 1--~ 1 1 Ta.17. 1 PlÂ»/i X f - 4 1 A. ELL.583,?4 1 1 -2-ff-j- ~ 1 - > 6 1/21 - 0 1 L ~ 4 ,> '0 1 -.c_.g | 1 +TH-Ii -1. A. I e F N - . 1 - I -0 - 1 4 - r 1 1 11 : 2 P.Fi, $-Al.WAY i 1.2 -1 - \ 1 .U i. + 7 Â» 4 1.i .:1-4.~.1'Z,-,dÂ£.1.'. .'t GuiooÂ·s f Â«13~, 1 1. 1 4 -,2 < 1 'riz-PE 03'*9- - 4 1 ' A. | -&5â‚¬6 ~,Â·r J , --- 1.-ue: 4'-10 . Â· - tr I. :Â·I'l 'El r ' .... Irm i d Q zaf 1 ' - 5. 01(3 3.1165.16 4.-- : - 4 2- 1 '4 la ~ -4 - -- CE el 4-1 40 0.15 -le"c"A'Â£-.L_1~___////// RETAIL 5'.422 - 4 i , I , 1 1, b I ENTRY 6\ 737 54 1 . L.VA-â€ž~ C tr CZ] , e .1* t>A/1 . -$,CI --11 1 1\ 40 -- 0-- I i -- 1 1 1-- &79<7 '/ ~ 11\ m /64-- C ..11 r , ~ 1 L. Â® - -41 4- 3 .<L_ 11 ' \ 'vig/All N..VÂ·I-- ,..1 | il. i .~4 ~ 6 1 ' ''G> 11 1 I 1 - i GUIDO'S 7.-, rp j. - :.11 -4.-- LOWER , 8.01 1 1.1,4 , ts' ... 'rp y:v",f' i'Â·u' 'ff'-9P f-- 11.4 1 r. I 'dÂ· I â€¢00 LEVEL PLAN 0. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 90*.6:94..1'-60 Scale, 74'- 1'-0' ~ A2.2 .-05LWIL... JOIN Pols Wl (.11 (.4, (20 2 (-1 1 0 , V .7. 56'Â·1046' ..Li ' 1 ' 6./ . -/ Il'-6 14-lk '04. ' ' * 0~Nt**twl-Â¢-t ./ ./< e. < .4,2 I 4 'Â· Inkâ€¢ ./ Â·' 0. I r '.0 1* 9,1* -'i I. Wil m. ' ...4 1 .9- '.1...~011.1, 6 8/.ili ftÂ»I .ICJ. I . I==tr-C-Z=-2--F----a %2 C U. ' Ip / .~ 9 -1 ---7--t .,1 41 2 1 01 -- 46 111 1 11 11 , 1 I . 0 + DALCONY 4 W... M=. 8 0. *#0Â». 3 # 0 -1 #9 11 2 3 9 - 4 '.-In 14 1 1 DININA / 5-10 . .6. ' P.6 6 4.0 . el e 8,7 .Â·..W /7, .10 4 2 1,/ leÂ·-114,Â· 44.1.0.- 1- 1 31 1-1-- 7- . 11 rt- 1-_ Â¤ 4 , 61 b= N . 1 1 /*46:94 9'4' iLENIr -' 5Â¥./.</ ITI ... Â·:Ft@44 L I 1-1 Â£ + 12 1 -I n ./.i I lure. h' | f ' ............... ' ' 6,/'I).0 1 1 .i- 11 ' . r 1 12 4 1 221 ,Â£ D., 1 1,1 ./ 1 ./ r -- U- 5 :% 1: 1 .1, 1 X b KITCHE,4 4 1 :171 , 19 1 1 it t .U .. 7 F - l . ' 4, . 1 .1 ..i./. - ..... I e -- 3 I .1 11 1 Ir 19 1 1. 1 1 X I --1.,3 .1 ,C~T (i) RESTOF?ATION Dll! GUIDOS rin â€¢1 4 I -~~-9/ /: f ~, =1,51,2â€¢14 4 AS~EN COLOA,~00 3 'Or f . / I ,./.Cl . 1 -gi - 7, 4 â€¢6225 '41 Y G I .le . . / COM.001 1 [Ii] , 1 le; 11 4 Il- .0 4 1~-ue 91 <#91'Â» (1 4 -1216 6,6" 3 , 40 3/ -3 -4.- - 1.~ ,C-bri.L 1... .1 , 2 ..3 -Ill ........ k- i --Â·Â·-- 'i~_~ --123- 1.. 1 I _MME- .9 41.-EMEL-1.1 A I 1-3,1 t<1 2 1,1 ' b 1 1 91%199 " m 8-royGE: Â» 4 Â§11 1 . ' eLI.-/.... OIl 4 4 , . 1/@27 .'6"Sir'(NY G . 3 ./ \1 - t _ V ~. i , ta.A lili ," 11 OFFICE- -- 1 ('A . -j t; 1--+1 L it dll CUD--1 1 aÂ»-1 --4.4 I . - . #***{t -- -74 -Fl ~ ~~ ~ 1 -4 69 1 63 leeve --an- 1 ~ GUIDO'S liz 1 : 1 k UPPER LEVEL 'trk .... . e. .'12' i .... ' 8'Â·CPI :Â·I' - 1 1 .' .k-- 41- 4, PLAN O EK=-4.LI: hi'.I'-~' ~â‚¬3*1 4 .4.~d UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A2.3 ...'OW....DINPOSS â€¢ O 5/4 I 4'-IIJtz' ~ 4Â·Â·iii .; 9<M . 6â€¢,00 Wl 0-24'"4-1 2 * EL 7'141 6/' 4 . 1*0~4*_ / and assoctates 7....,COE I -0....100/ r=.71.8 1.44' 1,1-'Ul/5. NAM#40-1.t . IT...'JI, 4/1, % 1-1 NQÂ« --0 ./ ./. * 14%, # /'Rff' - ~141.-u -1 1.1? - 8, 4-7'11 X.I . -1 Arf-re,Â·Mir Â«~M.ACE E~ 4- M-L 31/M /03' /00â€¢w 2-A,4Â»â€¢e ./6 1 -O 5 ~* 11 -1 3,0 , 1-7- 1 7 -- | ~~3 ~- - --'1 ' ~ ~~ . 19Â» 1! .... : f IS. 1 . :.'K'~M D~ . LW 1 - 1 11 11 .-W.'.. 4 I â€¢ lit~ 1 l (0 .31 ~ /'*~ 2, 11 .1 'i -- .1.0 -~4 - /1 --1 --- .-00. . 0.4 e ):.4*: * E-/ M 1 1 I i l./. ..... *.... _:21_.-_. T } 64..4 ': i 1 , ---Â«OR , NOW Eliâ€¢:r .......1Â» 41 : I ....9.0 ....2 E- ......<4'.7,< 2 -I le/- 4 :-4-00 ..... ..le. - ./ - 1 22~- .... -./ Me Â·~2 1 -I<.m# .O M/7-. gW|- V / 1 -O ./ I.jIVE' /31 SOUTH ELEVATION __ -_ _ - w 1 L X3\ ...E-El- /-04:I 1 1 1 .... A. -/El â‚¬ 21= . I -G-1 4 I S- 7..%' '4 tr./01.I ..AM RESTORATION :222%1CaL %/ .$. ea. /4 ...â€¢/0 \AN GuiDo's SEA. Inol // :. I. 7. . LOT E. F G. w I BLOCK - I I .04, O-1 1 - -- Â· Â· .spr. coio..co MA-_- r' 9- I QE~..LE E] r. W 1 0 2 ./.' | I.,EA-'... 1 1.... _ '4<_AZE f*14' W.NXW I.wwow|Nooll ~ ~--- - --i . 1 1 % ..... PCâ‚¬M'-'r J -1 - I .+ ./. ' â‚¬..' 1/ 1. 111 .-: ) ....... ..~6 1 1 , 1_11 L.1--1 Â»-= - .-----=... -P- -=l . a - -~ 2 Â· 4 5- 71' U'Ill ~ 1 1 0 & -- 11 1 . 2- 01 1 -1 ' Cl i 1 1 0 1 r I 1 l.; eli 1 11.r' : 1 il cz --I--0.- .. r \. . 1 0 2,1 lt_-~. 3 __0 - = ---* r. F=Â·FÂ«-~--1 -- -----1 1 / 1 1 + I - 11-A- r.001 *- 1/1=UrÂ¥Â·--Â·~~ GUIDO'S - L -11- 61 I -- - 4 5. 7.2 : g F-le. 1 NEW -j:â€ž 1 ......... .e.-0... NORTH & SOUTH N-- -- t.hwo~0â€¢4/ ... EXTERIOR EX ST B.AD ELE, 7# *49 ~ + ELEVATIONS 1 lt.... 1 4 ~| .___ . 0.6-NI FI. $ D*91: 1 -- A3.1 /21 NORTH ELEVATION ./ 4 22 :1 I f. 99 . 1 ADOI-ON Dil ! -Ati Exier Â¢ REFACE UpLACE Exler. 99&. /00/ ........5 1Â¢0'0. 94 051Â»241/6 IrL. t..01 Moop ... - 1 #,6 / f./.ACE 'Ile. bviNG'W 1 WI NEW l,YO WIOW -), ~ 1 ,-OvvE' lioe/ Ul/K ZOOE i / and assocales - 118.- 0/8 1,::i ' Y $ 925 47. m5 fâ€¢5~ W'~ SrAE. Â· Â·lf 09 11 F I I â€¢SPE' C.00/0/816" 0LK V...56 3-*â€¢all- 5 S-- Câ€¢./..'0: r=' L :.6 1, 7 7-c 4 6.1 1 1 Â· t 4 1:,1 2 '14 , 11\ 1,1 47 Â· ~:--Li 0 i4|-.1 ,~i[ 0 1 ::, FÂ· 1 <D> 1 -]i :i l .Â« -C- 7-*. E. S , 1 '1 1 1 L- 9,6-A-.AN- ..004 ' NEW-_I.-7. . . L.=-f , ~te"AW~Ae' -6.52,~ */1,6 4; 4 Â£$71,1. EL.71' 1 r U| 1 - 1.-2 = -7 CK 4214 ..7.. 1- . 1----7 /J=\ 8 + 4U e 't .c} i , Â· r I I X. 1 Z â€¢m_AN~M 1-- 11 1. 1 1 4 , 'V ~412~737~6~3-(-315-f~3 -.34'ti.*49%~~~-~~-.--4767 3 W =iÂ»'==1 fri - too< EL+ 7,2 ' e_AN-El eâ€¢*SEÂ·'EN' .Â»3/ . 11 EL.71Â·Â·U 1 I .....: /Th EAST ELEVATION - IE--/C~ 2.:('7 V-_ â‚¬,XPF W VAV .4 - BEAM /%5 EX /1" i ' I ...1-10. - - - -Ia c=L-4 Guioo's Bici , ~ ~ It 1 7-- 1 1 1 4 A. 71*164'li ~Il ~ ---- i * I Â·18Â·/le RESTORATION 1 EL 7190.49 1 iti li rMÂ· TUIMrN. 1 1 - '271. 010! lOT f. F. G. H ' /10/% If ~~ AS./ mORADO $ 1.... 1 1 1 1 /6.- -I' - - I n â€¢0 e. & /6 -Elv .,01 ~~1 & el â€¢./. -- -e . 0 11 ,. ... 1! 4-=60 WOMEN' .ALL .1-C"EN 1 ... I5974-Ifiâ€¢:-IMAECTO~ Qt-A_RAN- COCI *11111Jil-Â£1-L 11' 0 " i'' *'|"" li"ivilt 5-71,1.1 /1:01.,W t lue,ell COL.C. ./ t.f-.- Cel< e'l~ME'26 v ARCIT .. ..-I . \ 1 9-ucc~ '46 4..C .6.1 ,0. 7 --/ , .7 .3-'[-i v .]CJ [J; 3 12.; 1--El- r.-AEK~- g 1-HAU_ ~3-7=:64--A - ' GIllis e~~C,< ./.Cl Eg,71- ..A_ ../. . ye'47 EXTERIOR 4 --/9--2-1-4---:--------,---~-~ -- ~/faRN"* - .En-gÂ»EC-".-5 r -1.- --- - 1 I E- 71/ 6 1 L mil M . 1 .t' h 4 6/*~ , 1 GUIDO'S 1.... I 444 4 I. 340 1 EAST & WEST I.Â·r "c I 4, I - 1.7 I 1 Y ELEVATIONS , 1 :1 1 4 -& 1 1 e.14*f-VI'lf 1 1 - ------4 A 4 %- plil . Old.,9 A3.2 /4//45,/ /00l -- --- --4 E- 7111 &5' -9 6.7Â·111007. _____ ~__2.,.kiwi -__c -mj,Ilt#4* 1 L__ 23 WEST ELEVATION I _.21 ./.1,1 JOâ€¢N PC)SS O% . A Wl \UP. 17 c Apprn:0,1 ~ E-EyTÂ»1 - ) . 'Bl/VE â‚¬~I< W'/0.....All 7 3;13 k -CX>. -w /6-~A.= ~70+Ver OteN,Nee (rÂ·rp) %00 râ„¢r.3 -a ptÂ·câ€¢,~ 0 /67WUr-Dr - 1 O IrÂ«-LEE- CI - -----1 Lj- ----- ----- L.1-:- -- ---1 -9 - Ll-- ~ ~ ~__ -0 le â€¢Ill* ./ â€¢04.- + â€¢Â»*66,â€¢.Â¢2.*t fe EAS' MAIN STREET ASPf. 20Â£Ogâ€¢DOâ€¢,6~' ..F 'k Â·~ 1 F-1 â€ž, #I..j .-ss 4 Cl] 23 1.1 1 11 : + 11 -â€¢-4 e i ! *J .1 ;-1 ,- T. 21 ej--m. 1~ .12 , 1 1 , , Lf- 771 â‚¬â€žrj 1- 1 1- _.r-1. ,. 4 1 ki=:4 3-Â» ~ - -_- _=ME.=EYE-/--_ 4 7 ...: - "U"e K..It. . L.71:bl J <- * -- / 11 '2 1 i.>=2242'1~ -, -- ---a : i G>/-----7\' "r===T -11 Ir,li ,â€¢ 71 1 1- G I r, g~ 4: , 10 1 3 -, i v"u 1,1. 1 4 d I J 12 1 !1 - Aff'i' 4 il_.-_ ..ItÂ· ...0 1 P i 1 I'L+- 31 11 "--~4.9- i L 1911Â· lip 1- ..U Â·11,1/ K ...... 4./1.........0 -IM:Veâ€¢Aâ€¢. M..7-I -N 2 V-*F\~ ~VE_ E- 7'Â· . 1 ..1 [] r. /Th NORTH ELEVAHON Â£2#11'TI!91 AOPITâ€¢el,1 1 > IC..... ./p le# l n. Ii./. ./AN.1/4 e-Jvm Ixt- W %COW _OCAT ::' I ./0. OF./1./6 ~,0-T leAM 'trA.K ---,KI/â€¢.er -A-2- 4 OT >.... â‚¬KO-RCE (1~) 9,"..r 8.r).D W.LP Ll. RESTORATION 42 - 1 6--- if n- ri 1 1 ,=Â·-11- -1 l.1 . T.....5 LOT E.'ll ;LOC* v CL. 1.AP Â£>i.; ~ ASPEN CO'Of?400 t â€¢ 111.3/ .fU,-~ i Fm'=-~ -=N r--31 5-8%~ '1/*-al' 11Â»41,7.â‚¬11 . 1.-0.1 I I . v I r V ... , /.\ :11 -*-lr Â· ll 1 ' t -3 -/ rÂ·...~ Â·-/V 3 /1 5 ./2 15,u,-5/6 1/. 1, 61': ->~ 1<5 1 91 , ti/''f ' 9.mer -~ ./.04. I EL L I --'.. w,2. -TKIM Â£â€¢1. uâ€¢Â·â€¢4 4,Â·:.0*TIV I'l -ul ./. PET.16 43 ----l L 4 -*./gv,I le.Clit; 1 L.79/.11 1 Â· 10.-/ U [1 --0.. COOK - cox d 10- f r .1 Div-5-Ee AFEA [- <P).. 2 04 11 'EM ; ' 01 1 1 'r -/1 I leâ‚¬ESS | ( 11 1=1 'T ) -<64 ~l il . EÂ» Vt ' Â· . 11Â·' 9 1. ~~ 1 WINOOW - 11. , 1 6-A . â€ž1 6 /2/' I ' ...DOW + > , 2*ME=EA- . 1 L" '~ lk-- .1, 1/- I.Â· -0.VE' t-Eli- Â· - 2.-7~/I=/,I..#IJ-/I - '447,5 + R:~:4==ni:~Ii . a 1 ---------------a 45. 4 BUSINESS ~ 7-- - BLDG. NORTH & SOUTH MEMENT #06 A -, EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS .,6, 1, - t.,111 DI 6.-1-1 ,.1 -/ i V.sy /ih SOUTH ELEVATION A 3.3 713, ~iM i I. . li'i 1Â·' Ah --T bj' i â€¢a~NO. 1 Cah,g,6,0- 1.1*wr , -- -1 ....)* L -- - Ul "95 1 13 U J landassociates ~MOVE EXI-r. WINOO-, LOC,- , â€¢'~- SLA- 1 h,WWINDOW o,NU.M) 2*14, erâ€¢ 6. ('Tim I N*kebrk.W.f-*t - â€¢ 111Â·I'le' , -' /&71 ~~~ J ~I j~~+ ~4 ~ ~fe~(T AN;' N '1' *"M0/ 3!Ic/ei taklÂ» Eee* * |Lf 1| I#=%# 2121_3 0 -X CO#ECTORL...1 .m# 1 A.4:17'/214'riWIA"WR 1 1 1* il â€¢ 1.. i.,Il,71':,Â·. Â· Â· L'MER LEVEL -'7-El LE'll EL 711>t " . 1.1- C - NEW CANVAI IL. 71ll 11 i| 0 AWN,Ne (Â·rm 1 . 1011' El f _6â€ž4EY .- -- . CooleR etk=k 6-D.... D.NO . CON,EC-CR EL/TLL.je.i 1 1 1 1 0 9- 9 20421 ELÂ»yv,7 77/ - - - - 44 1- . | + 11 i 74. " D -../tpdl 1 . 1 - ' 4,4- 4.. . 10'.1.17. E. 7119 6 1 10 - 2/1 - ~ ' 1 1~ -:=p i 3. Â· 2%1% 4 - *~ WEST ELEVATION I 1 [ -4 213 -- 9 41â€¢.fu.,6,4, 'NO ...U. C./0 *41' ~ ~ UYke-= --- --- -- Guioo's 1 AESTORATION eu,u, . . Â«ucco REVIAL LOT E. F G M I ROCK 90 ASPEN COLORADO r=91 1[4.- A =Cl- 1, e a 7.%â‚¬:7 FJ.fi 490 -m=1 JER)~, ==. 1--Ul en L J I ./.0 --5 cll, L. LÂ«Ill â€¢ '1 a n 95 e.:.2.9 -5.-i - ~NVAS - - -I i- - - - - 1.~IF- 6-.6 AWNINI ' :Â·76 %.0,40 % - '-ruc=5 -1 h +ADE . 1 MEÂ·rels ./ /'ni~ \A . 5,Â«36Â·ro~ BAND Mux,Â·rep - - LJ/lill L 'I â€¢ 11-6 ;Ir---:,;I- ' .......4, 1 I ~- EL. Mâ€¢I,Â·2' * 1 + BUSINESS i i BUILDING 1 1 Â£-AP- 4 EAST& WEST I ./ 1 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 6-1-/;~= 1* , 21 EAST ELEVAnON A3.4 0 1-|I WI..#.POSS I . J ~ and associates 1 ../ . ..+ 605 EAST MAIN STREET -6. Â·'Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 /Â·* 4- J-1 l (303),925Â·4Â·755 20, *6 Â· -1 -yÂ·49- .. 1 1 .. 3. , . *15 4 Rookiet Â» Plk[ Ut? 111-100 M 061* D 2.9 4fpe.42 . , 504*FF Ptl-00 pl NE ' ' 1 . lillil I - MPFULNe 1*MLIWIDEÂ® 3.GIL#" 0â€¢L- li'll I.l IJ 1 . M. ..... . 7*t.. : I . 1 1. . a. 1 4. 2 +-FI~~~ ')1 Â£219+1kb Â»+FEN ..\ 1- 1. . . . Ii. 1 .. PkIAM MLI# FIKIE~ I . 1 1 t . A *' - .... plkille MIÂ»0 MI.1.011* 1 -4' .78+P -4-la.-lu.r 1 .. .L. 4 .i... F -'. c. Â£5el-19+4010+ 91/OFIEÂ»:1Â»Â· lj.Ill ill I - Â· Â·Â· lilli . ,>4'.' 1- 1 Ph s h _14 1111 1 1 U. li , - CALAWTPF PLOINEP #wile 3Â¢1-1, \:7 . - * IMP<*14:INEMUM 80Â¢01 kleuP[ " 9,+*Â¥ eriperh Â»*r + 1,41*0 1-0 * 4#Reao *r 1011 4184+ *dublkle ~;%PriÂ·i 1 1 1 lili 1 PU-|Pr[412:0, Ppe,dÂ¢kÂ» eÂ«EFI. I.'. 111]11.Jll . .91@'I , ..C /---,164' 4,1.INDINIe U. .It.:= .1 11/ r : 1. /-1 I i I 11Â».--4=xhA , I - 1. 1 Y I '"-10;'A,v -*1~1- ~*\~ \ 1 , 1 f. / ,/6 :114 - + [i~~ ] \ 0 3. ' 904,4/ \ (fUHAI Kle *Hip Z I. niA 1 El Â·, V,IiÂ· 9 1 1 1 HAWn -* .6Mt \ A . (1 1 I I I [1 \I 2-Â·u - *Nt'J \1 1, 11 . ...2EEÂ·.6.1 4 60 :I \J r' 1 1 lilli 001Â£>H NUUVIUU-/ - . Â·- - -2..Â·=.h. r.3Â· A e-L , . 91 rhly i /6 i 1 \\. l'l'I'1 11 11 11 lilli.411,1 ... /,till.[ 11~.1 .\. V' . l. X -21./i,r--tl ,1.1., 1\, -- . - I v v. V U 1 1:11 GuiDo's .... . . Ill... **815*fille . .. .... _ _ + RESTORATION eper,14*EP %+442 43/ 4,t:z 7018Â©-E[LeÂ· \4*-RIA :>He-1444-[HEHOH /4241 Nauct 6,Â« COMÂ¥* 040251\XI LOT E, E G, H, 1 BLOCK 90 ASPEN. COLORADO Â¤0/1*eED 9/01' F'* FEÂ®â‚¬12 - 'Emp'40 F,Â¢11,1-4 04* 4\AREN **dr **De< 1/2 ptip reae[-8- 1MluÂ» ?MP[LI:01P* 2,6'-4~*. ~ Â»MIKA#UWA >10#E,#:b f 191* 111.W r[LIG Ue 3-4*FRAD RUN,+46. Â»FE}4Â· bhuMP 01,1*MP MLA10* 01,1.1*0EUÂ·- m.44, Ht.10 FINE 9Â¢0414 â„¢Â·Ill.Ild)12* 6.4'-4064* Issue: HAÂ¥ 11'10 t>41LOILIGi fÂ»lIT *14440 PO,94 LANDSCAPE PLAN ScAL_s : 9'4"=1'-Â·01' THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRAING IS OILY TO GRAPHICAUY ~ %=46#,Mi-=a=X SELECTIB FABNCATION PROCESSES AlÂ® TECI~OLES of CONSTRUCT** THE ARCHITECT SHAU BE NOTFIED OF *rr VARIAnOIS FROW â„¢E DIME)1~0,8 Alâ‚¬ COMIT,ONE , SHOWN BY THIS DRAWING .. LANDSCAPE .. PLAN ...9 7%1 Scale: 344 =lloIl LI.1 Eife.~. t Â© WILLIAM JOHN POSS t 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 May 16,1990 Historic Preservation Committee c/o Ms. Roxanne Elin 130 S Galena Suite #300 Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Final Guido's Submittal Dear Roxanne: Pursuant to our last meeting before the Board please find enclosed the following: 1. A letter from our structural engineer Theodore Guy & Associates outlining the proposed demolition/construction sequencing plan as reviewed by the owner/contractor for this project Mr. Guido Meyer, Jr. This plan addresses the construction concerns of the Board for this project. Also find attached drawings numbered Al.1, Ll.1, A2.1, A2.2, A3.1, A3.2, A3.3, A3.4 and a cover sheet reflecting the changes we made pursuant to our last conditional approval before the Board on April 23,1990. Materials and associated data will be presented to the Board for approval at our next scheduled agenda before the Board on May 23,1990. ~ Tha k you, '191ich2&NLBaSE> Enclosure MAB:lah MAY 16 '90 13:06 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PC A P.2 i THEODOAC K GUY ASSOCIATES *C ARCHHEC-re AND STRUCTURAL INGINIERS ' May 16, 1990 William Poss & Associates 605 E. Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Guido's Restoration Dear Bill: Below is our proposed demolition sequence for the roof framing and upper level stud walls al the Guido's Swiss Inn Building. This sequence may be adjusted for field conditions that are encountered 4 and for bracing and public safely concerns. 1. Remove 50% i of existing roof framing. 2, Remove same amount of existing third floor framing. 3. Remove perimeter upper level walls at area of removed roof and floor framing. 4. Interior floor framing ar the upper and lower floor can be removed .as required to begin construction of the replacement structure at the lower and upper levels. 5. Construct upper level walls and roof framing at the inmal demolition area. 6. Repeat above demolition procedure for remainder of roof framing and upper level walts. 7. Complete construction of upper level walls and roof framing. Please contact our office if we can be of further assistance in this matter. , ./Â·Â·1 441 k'Ta *7 Sincerely, A kÂ·Â·26,3 Il_ 13. L.-~D r Dale D. Kaup, P.E. 4 Project Engineer THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC DDK/pnp 901 90536 Ll k..3 '19 '2 23280 5 EATE MPWAY 82 PO. BOK 1640 BASALT. COLORADO 81 821 t303] 827-31 87 .* Mapw E i and associates#31 May 17, 1990 Historic Preservation Committee c/o Ms. Roxanne Eflin 130 South Galena Suite #300 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Final Guido's Submittal - 425 E. Cooper Dear Roxanne: This narrative letter is pursuant to our previously submitted letter of May 16 regarding final development of drawings etc. for the May 23, 1990 HPC agenda. In review of the April 25th application before HPC, we find the below listed considerations were still at issue with the board: 1. That the 9/13/89 conceptual review were met and complied with the 4/14/90 review excepting that HPC reccommended approval of business building as submitted, but that entry fenestration of the chalet building and materials usage should be items to reconsider. 2. Signage and graphic should be renovated to match existing. 3. Sandstone base band should be lowered in height to match that of 1" thick wood (painted) base banding. 4. Reconsider corner entrance with possible dark painted wood trim around doors and windows. 5. Landscaping plans and color drawings showing materials. This motion was voted and carried unanimously. In compliance to this motion, we feel that we have complied with the hereabove concerns with our attached drawings covered in our May 16th letter and further address the items as follows: 1. We have restudied the fenestration issue and feel that the openings which represent about 35% of the wall mass keep the horizontal elements of the chalet building intact and allow the subtle vertical nature of the building to relate to the traditional elements of the neighborhood. I #1' 1- As previously addressed in our 4/14/90 review submittal before the board, we feel that the design is totally in keeping with "Swiss Continental Design" by allowing the residential elements to relate to the "home over the business" feel that is very common in Swiss architecture. That distinct yet subtle division of "home over business feel" has been continued with our study of this design question. The proposed design for the retail space at the lower level is in keeping with that theme and the second level ,restaurant exterior design is in keeping with the residential feel above the shop. 2. This item of nonconforming signage received unanimous support by the board. HPC agreed to provide a referral letter to planning and zoning for approval as historic and requiring repair, renovation, and or replacement. 3. Our drawings of building elevations affected show that we have lowered the base height of this building element and its relationship from previously submitted drawings. 4. We feel that dark stained wood around the openings is inappropriate and would negatively detract from the horizontal nature of the chalet building and emphasize the ratio of glazing to stucco as being greater than the present ratio. 5. Landscaping plans are provided in this package and a magic marker overlay will be provided at the scheduled agenda meeting on May 23, 1990. You,=47 /Michael A Baker, P.A. MAB:plb MEMORANDIIM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Final Development: 425 E. Cooper - "Guido's" parcel Date: June 1~, 1990 SUMMARY: The HPC is being asked to grant Final Development approval for the structure referred to as the Chalet building. HPC PROJECT MONITOR: Charles Cunniffe PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: Staff has summarized the actions taken in previous meetings since August. 1989 on this parcel for HPC's reference: On August 23, 1989, the HPC reviewed and tabled action for a Conceptual Development proposal involving a third floor addition to the detached commercial building on the Guido's parcel (to the west of the chalet building). The plans included a new facade on the commercial building and a bridge connector between the two structures. The Committee found the general application was not compatible with the chalet building or the historic district. On September 13, 1989, the applicant returned to the HPC with a revised proposal, which received Conceptual approval with the following (condensed) conditions to be met at Final: 1. Chalet building preservation be precisely defined 2. Exact building materials represented at Final 3. Bridge connector restudied for reduction purposes 4. Landscape plan submitted 5. Commercial storefront plans be submitted in detail 6. Restudy of bridge connector; hide mechanicals there 7. Roof top plan be submitted 8. Existing conditions be provided either in elevation or photographs 9. East elevation of commercial building to be submitted Due to the number of fenestration design changes made to the plans since Conceptual approval, the applicant wishes to receive HPC's approval for the amendments prior to continuing work on the Final Development plans. On March 14, 1990, the applicant met again with the HPC to obtain approval for an amended conceptual development application, which the HPC approved with the following conditions: 1) Corner entrance (of chalet building) be restudied, with the suggestion that a gesture of the solid aspect of the building be retained in some manner at that corner. 2) The second revision to the fenestration of the commercial building as presented (at the March 14 Â· meeting) be incorporated into the final plan 3) The fenestration on the ground level storefront (of the chalet building) be restudied to ensure compatibility (with the character of the building) 4) The HPC supports staff's preparation of a referral letter to the zoning department to retain the non- conforming Guido family crest sign 5) Landscape elements are to be restudied and all remaining conditions of conceptual (granted on September 13, 1989) shall be met at Final. On April 25, 1990, the HPC granted Final Development approval for the commercial structure and tabled Final on the Chalet structure with the following conditions: 1) Restudy of storefront fenestration and corner entrance, with the possible use of additional wood trim around doors and windows 2) Color rendering and architectural details be submitted 3) Detailed landscape plan be submitted 4) Restudy the base treatment of the Chalet building 5) Staff shall prepare a letter of support to the Zoning Officer for the Guido crest sign relocation on the structure On May 9, 1990, the applicant appeared before the HPC, and requested to be added to the agenda to discuss the demolition of the 2nd floor of the chalet building. Following investigation, the contractor discovered major construction inadequacies of the (late '50's) 2nd floor, requiring substantial demolition. The HPC stated that the applicant shall submit exact demolition and reconstruction details in the revised Final; they also required that the demolition be sequenced. STAFF'S RESPONSE: The following has been submitted for HPC's review: 1) The sandstone base around the perimeter of the building has been reduced in height, as HPC required. 2) The applicant restudied the first floor fenestration and wood trim option, and has produced no changes. Staff is still not in support of this storefront and entrance design, finding it to be incompatible with the 2 , I . Swiss half-timbering style of the building. As previously stated in at least two review memos, the square windows and entrance door and sidelights appear out of character. No wood trim has been incorporated around the windows and doors to carry out the Swiss half-timbering style as the HPC recommended. The "Mountain Chalet" style is noted for its tudor influence (rectangular timber/stucco materials), low pitched roofs with wide overhangs, horizontal features 0(balconies, fenestration) carved verge boards, and cutout balcony and shutter detail. We feel that the applicant has not incorporated the HPC's recommendations for a restudy, and can therefore not recommend approval of the first floor design. We feel that the proposed first floor design significantly changes the chalet character of this building. 3) The landscaping treatment in front of the building has been amended, clipping the corners in an angle to allow better pedestrian flow from the mall to the building. This appears to be a better design solution, and should reduce the screening of the storefront. 4) The applicant delivered a letter to staff on Friday, June 8, stating that the 2nd floor demolition can not be done in a partial manner. They intend to remove the entire floor, roof and all, and reconstruct immediately. The barricade that is currently up will screen most of the 2nd floor from public view. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Grant approval for Final Development including the demolition and reconstruction of the second floor as proposed. 2. Grant approval for Final Development including the demolition and reconstruction of the second floor, requiring another restudy on the storefront fenestration and corner entrance, with specific direction to the applicant. The Project Monitor and staff may serve as the final signoff. 3. Table action, recommending further study be completed on the chalet building for compatibility purposes. 4. Deny approval for the amended proposal, finding the conditions of conceptual have not been met. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC Grant approval for Final Development including the demolition and reconstruction of the second floor, requiring another restudy on 3 - the storefront fenestration and corner entrance, with specific direction to the applicant. The Project Monitor and staff may serve as the final signoff. memo.hpc.425ec.fd.2 4 -1 1-'I 1 LIC' po 15Â· al= i Mt-UUUML K GUY HEBSOC PC A P.3 THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTS ANC ITRUCTURAL iNC@INEEAS June 8,1990 Mike Baker William Poss & Associates 605 E. Main Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Guido's Restoration Demolition Sequence Dear Mike: During a Field Observation on Thursday, June 7, 1990 at 4:30 p.m., I observed that the southern portion of the first floor framing of the Guido's Swiss Inn building had been removed. The contractor was instructed to adequately brace the top of the basement wall in the areas where the first floor diaphragm had been removed. In addition, we feel that the overall structural capacity of the structure has been compromised and we feel that the best option iS to immediately remove the roof and second floor framing. Furthermore, we would ask that any additional changes to the proposed demolition sequence be pre- approved in a meeting between the contractor and our offices. Sincerely, V- U. Le-fI~b Dale D. Kaup, P.E. Project Engineer DOK/pnp 90536 L3 /f ,Â«Il .A 44* 2Â¥*; '47 4 23280 B STATE HrwAY ae P.O. BOX 1 840 BASACL COLORADO 81 621 8051 927-31 87 u N 41/*me ...'.7Â¥29 19# ; and associates 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL (303) 925-4755 May 16, 1990 Historic Preservation Committee c/o Ms. Roxanne Eflin 130 S Galena Suite #300 Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Final Guido's Submittal Dear Roxanne: Pursuant to our last meeting before the Board please find enclosed the following: 1. A letter from our structural engineer Theodore Guy & Associates outlining the proposed demolition/construction sequencing plan as reviewed by the owner/contractor for this project Mr. Guido Meyer, Jr. This plan addresses the construction concerns of the Board for this project. Also find attached drawings numbered Al.1, Ll .1, A2.1, A2.2, A3.1, A3.2, A3.3, A3.4 and a cover sheet reflecting the changes we made pursuant to our last conditional approval before the Board on April 23,1990. Materials and associated data will be presented to the Board for approval at our next scheduled agenda before the Board on May 23,1990. P Enclosure MAB:lah MAY 16 '90 13:06 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PC A P.2 * i THEÂ¢000.C K GUY ASSOCIATES 0C ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL INOINIERS ~ May 16, 1990 William Poss & Associates 605 E. Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 Ae: Guido's Restoration Dear Billi Below is our proposed demolition sequence for the roof framing and upper level stud walls at the Guido's Swiss Inn Building. This sequence may be adjusted for field conditions that are encountered i and for bfacing and public safely concerns. 1. Remove 50% i of existing roof framing. 2. Remove same amount of existing third floor framing. 3. Remove perimeter upper level walls at area of removed roof and floor framing. 4. Interior floor framing ar the upper and lower floor can be removed as required to begin construction of the replacement structure at the lower and upper levels. 5. Construct upper level walls and roof framing at the inilial demolition area. 6. Repeat above demolition procedure for remainder ot roof framing and upper level walls. 7. Complete construction of upper level walls and root framing. Please contact our office if we can be of further assistance in this matter. fly< V. Â·Di~f' 3># Sincerely, 21.m' 3' 9-h 61 Dale D. Kaup, P.E. Project Engineer , 4-4 THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC DDK/pnp 90536 Ll fea 4 47, 1 ~ 7-7;2Â¥At~t> 2,2.g egrATE HIWAY 82 P.O. GOX 1640 BASALT. COLOAAÂ©081821 [3031 827-31 67 ..Â·UÂ£43Â·~Â·1Â£i*3*I43)~47&~'9~4)#Cew:3EfyÂ©*=9999Â· â„¢eâ‚¬u'Â·7-~Â·rÂ·~,Â·Â·Â·,y-Â»Â·=~Â· Â· .t fvÂ·-.Â·.pÂ»,-< ,-6#*i.N41 bil ~ and associates 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL* (303) 925-4755 4-< 1/ 1 0 91>< AM 4 E - U 7496 Loe \29 Vt\C MO-7--- 1O3OU l 4 27 RTÂ·\E T-l U l 46 KEQU \RED 84 .04 023 E 5(46 KALTALS C (owal 82 1 -969 8 *U-N IMUN DATED DEMOU--(-10 43 f<A O (bASTRUG-leju 9*ja-mal 04 Glklods . 1 W ILL Be . 0(47 09 Fi-\u-- OFFICE 01 RoA,O AY <30 1 -[1\04@U~ I EOULD F921'4 6 785 0\112 Id)W - U\CiÂ·\Â«L_ i, * - , 4 .,+ p., 1144 , 1 F.F~f ( r Â·, 4. , *, 027 Y ~TE\ANKS. ,Â»AMMU- /2:7 ; and associates May 17, 1990 Historic Preservation Committee c/o Ms. Roxanne Eflin 130 South Galena Suite #300 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Final Guido's Submittal - 425 E. Cooper Dear Roxanne: This narrative letter is pursuant to our previously submitted letter of May 16 regarding final development of drawings etc. for the May 23, 1990 HPC agenda. In review of the April 25th application before HPC, we find the below listed considerations were still at issue with the board: 1. That the 9/13/89 conceptual review were met and complied with the 4/14/90 review excepting that HPC reccommended approval of business building as submitted, but that entry fenestration of the chalet building and materials usage should be items to reconsider. 2. Signage and graphic should be renovated to match existing. 3. Sandstone base band should be lowered in height to match that of 1" thick wood (painted) base banding. 4. Reconsider corner entrance with possible dark painted wood trim around doors and windows. 5. Landscaping plans and color drawings showing materials. This motion was voted and carried unanimously. In compliance to this motion, we feel that we have complied with the hereabove concerns with our attached drawings covered in our May 16th letter and further address the items as follows: 1. We have restudied the fenestration issue and feel that the openings which represent about 3 5% of the wall mass keep the horizontal elements of the chalet building intact and allow the subtle vertical nature of the building to relate to the traditional elements of the neighborhood. Wt ~ and associates As previously addressed in our 4/14/90 review submittal before the board, we feel that the design is totally in keeping with "Swiss Continental Design" by allowing the residential elements to relate to the "home over the business" feel that is very common in Swiss architecture. That distinct yet subtle division of "home over business feel" has been continued with our study of this design question. The proposed design for the retail space at the lower level is in keeping with that theme and the second level restaurant exterior design is in keeping with the residential feel above the shop. 2. This item of nonconforming signage received unanimous support by the board. HPC agreed to provide a referral letter to planning and zoning for approval as historic and requiring repair, renovation, and or replacement. 3. Our drawings of building elevations affected show that we have lowered the base height of this building element and its relationship from previously submitted drawings. 4. We feel that dark stained wood around the openings is inappropriate and would negatively detract from the horizontal nature of the chalet building and emphasize the ratio of glazing to stucco as being greater than the present ratio. 5. Landscaping plans are provided in this package and a magic marker overlay will be provided at the scheduled agenda meeting on May 23, 1990. EAk You./7 - 7 Michael A Baker, P.A. MAB:plb D# ~ and associates 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL (303) 925-4755 June 8, 1990 Historic Preservation Committee c/o Ms. Roxanne Eflin 130 S Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Roxanne: This letter is to inform you that after careful review of the structure in Guido's (428 E Cooper St), we feel that we can not safely brace a partial roof/wall assembly for wind loads and request a release waiver from our amended approval to reflect this concern. However, we are requesting to be allowed approval to remove this roof/wall assembly in accordance to standard construction techniques and replace with new assemblies to original dimensions, elevations, etc., as per approved plans. Enclosure MAB:lah -A:.- A 2Â·L 'Â·A 11,1 %40 :.1 - t..4 , ; and associates , Â»*kabts.*.* H. k 605 EASTÂ· MAIN STREET -44 j~- ASPEN. COLOAA[)081611 11 -13:, .. tt -t 5-_ 1 14..' 1 46,;2 1 . r.,1. k . '14.Â·t-$ 4.9-1. . t.â‚¬ .0 - - 4 1 . I Â·Â·Â· Â· Â·Â· 01* HOL'Â·Wit'I Al)' - Plk[Ide ML.100 FIL[*1-10 5 2Â·5~ ef~NO ..<- /2 . 42 504*FF Mate PIVE / 1 -1-44446 - *AILI-le 17*MI.I.I.Â»60 3.4 -4 AL- 11 . #Juuti J 9 - - -t-_47 . Â·7 41,0+14* Ple,14 .r '1.LAb MUBID MI,led* 13*-4'Â«PE+P 1. 2.--1 44#11 - I -wz=Efi~hâ€¢~ / .. .. .i \ --#RttiNf /. - I . PUff MLIW YINE- 1 1 L ] L I I . * ./ 1 -1 TT -1- -1-. I ! i j-9hA,flt lâ€¢, 5*91Â»Â·401+ ho FIEÂ»TA . , F 1 Al,1*rEP. PLOINEF *,142 MA, \ . . . . 5.Hpfi*IdNEHUM LADINBUM 'ty*j 1,9. 24+FF 0-081> Â»er- J f:.myr-*'EÂ·- 4. 0Â· s:Â·>:-Â· fc '1 I i~i'Bi)*Ail ... .... .. 4 â‚¬ - -*- 79*Â»0 -to * UP<Em) Pr 10 " 410 8 * dk,LD 1 00 lili 1 1 , Â£4 J,~ Â· â€¢' I , Â· â€¢ Pul-'DMAID ippld.rk:,4 ete!,EH- -. .4-1-1- .---7 A â€ž409-r~+-40.r ' 71+ _LK-~ 1.--C /- 4014' HOUNDINg . 4 -2 c;6 \52* A f y.. . . /.J 124&24*B<\ I - .1 - .... *-1 -1 . . . .929/T . - i (ful#146 Â¢Â«D - -71 n Â«a 11Â®Keler#01+ vii 9 1 1 1 N.*,n * A,A 1> /1 r il I 11 1 11 ~kil ' h- ..A/TE:I .....- , I. ./ Al Â· /1 I I i 1 1-1-1 1.-r-r'Ir *111/1/Z . 1 7/ 2. I 1*44Â·-WW*T'12 AN 1 1 VÂ·mul W ~ 1\N - 0 \111 N-Â«30' f-Â»\ ? Â· 0'}1124 1+LIUMIUD --,/>7' I I '. -/ *, f>-6 r...9 â€¢ . . 2.- , <(~ 1 1 IN - 111 rt-PA- . ...' rir r ,-61 1 1 ../L' I i . 239 9 - VZ 'V 1 : 7<1 1 11 1 111 .'.1 . -r Guloo's . 1 . *4 ZekbÂ©0 ..: I Â· .. ,. ..L . â€¢Mtâ€¢ + RESTORATION .. y.2 - )9% w,trk 46Â»â‚¬1 9 64% Praw-m.Â» \*416 09<*96#416*,a tao\4*82 6*8<60\.0Â¥82 6040:01 w LOT E, F, G, H, 1 BLOCK 90 4Â¥ #/Fz:,at, 1/0' Fi* FBIDE:LE - cEBPIA, Fte@'1-11,1-4 94* 4+Alf *Aer *DeD ICE' 44/YEW.F139/%.El ASPEN. COLORADO *FLLL& 1PMP[lko Pe) 1,6-4'44. CATBNUI-A >l.#ME*2 Â¢ INIÂ» Mow Y[OB Ne Â®-44::*264 *,4? 94 ,Â· 2610#44 *404 t>WIMP 0412* 01410* 01-UB#14- D'+AP Hl.10 FINE *121,41* 7*MUL"PM *Â·t#'-1'CAL. Issue: 9*- 82 lihIâ€¢#ki~ *Mabk MATII'lo t>LIli-0149 faRMIT \ ?Girt irÂ·.1~ 3 LANDSCAPE PLAN 1.A SCALS ; 94" = 1'-01' . 44/1 eli 9 fe.fe- I I vARIAno,4 PROI THE 01&480016 Am COâ€¢OmONE DEPICT 111Â£ GE*ERAL NATM* 1 TE WOMC THE COIa,lAC - TOR S .PONS.LE FOR COIFI- 0 D.Â®aole NÂ® THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRAWNG S ONLY TO GRAPHICAILY *46? SELECTIO FASIVCAT*]N PACCESIS AE TEDOICIES OF , SHOWN BY THIS DRAING /7- 5' '49 LANDSCAPE r#-1 1Â· 4 ... 1 CON51RUCTIO,1 THE ARCHÂ«TECT NI,u dE NOTFED OF ANÂ¥ ke - . -VAL :p..--S %70Â· 42%2. :.-4 PLAN Scale: ,!0@ 11 0 1 '-,9 11 LI.1 I WILLIAM JOHN POSS Dil ; and associates k.,AibraadÂ».+ Â¥L 605 EAST MAIN STREET ".Â·Â·33~l -d~32 *; ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 109 , (303) 92,5 4755 t~ . 1 1 *15 k. Ploukt,121 4 .Â· - Plkil,le MUgO MI.tedÂ® 3 2.6 Eft&41 PAPÂ®F Mate PI KIA / \. --11 1-1-1 i h i 1 1 11 1 I i Aillul . ' *Fljl,4e -Â»MUMIDEB D,g'Â·-4' Al- . Â· 1 -W RLAH 45 /*Ft Al F ST r . It Â· . .j . 4. -4-4* lie 1 1/ r I . -1_n--_a4-2 , 1 1. ' 1 1. Fl Nue 91 1,120 M(.100* 7-4' Â«Fifi .1 .- I . .6 ... .. .ls I .. --T|~1I,~I-~1-~1-Lili . --1-4 ' 1 Â· Â· a,UÂ«[EP- FLOUEP *LLE PAM, 1 1 .1_ 1__4hirl . . A PkiA~F HI* 71#4 '.1*4.-41-1,1+ et,OHIÂ»:IA -. - 5'Hpfi*tNEHUM 6001#BUM " 84*4Â¥ 0*Â«9'Â· PAel' + 7,41*0 1-0 * 4#REPED *r 51* itiMA '1211klible /1 1 Ili*til.'~gi: e -2/.I ' ' T ' 1-11 *%87 Pul-torte' Ipf'20Â¢kÂ» eÂ«84 I lili 111111.11 1 114-J) 0 -J~ U~ fai A -~~~~ ~-~ // 7~,~ .. r. / 4 .r {'.N@#*77~- 061 X I ./ 1 1 1/ .-0 , C ,-Ft,4 HOUND'#4 LA\\ / I 0(40 1 -14 42 AUTÂ¥-rÂ»:~ \ . I / . 9 11Â®4 *r"44- 0 \/4 9 I Il -\ COMMINg #/He . ..Â£14Â£. r.~r' LT4v 1 1 11!11.1 -F- L .rrl ' I j 1 1 1 *HPH 190#01#67 -767~' 'C ' Â«-iL .'4>Â». 1.4.:. -v-vbv'JU<d~| ~ 19, 11 3/11 1 1~~ 1--r-1--7 1 !11 ... 1 1 1 1 1.:Ill - 11â€¢ .. . Â·Â· Â· ..1: ., -r /4..3345'115 . i I -LI ... Gu:Do's - .. * + RESTORATION 6*75) 1214-r[LI,Â» V*#44 . GM 00,0 *rÂ»â‚¬1\04 LOT E, F, G, H, 1 BLOCK 90 P,vatg 1/1" Fl*FEMN,8 - ~5610 114471 464 94*#F 41+07:~ DE*-7 34Â£46* 1/2' ed#,PMMNAL ASPEN, COLORADO *FLIU* 7#MLIWIP* 2.#441,0 Â»11IKNUI-A >L~ME#:b f IN#8 1'[I,W R[0Â£10 4-440~ RbiA+Ng Â»FE# 6>Â®IMP &1,1*frk 014Â·120- 0111**14- ~ Â£)14+F HUW FINE 70944 7NlUlÂ·,6'IE:Z* 6.~'-4066~Â· Issue: dil,144,1,0 *p64 MAT 11'10 2,411-[2461< FÂ»liT 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 5 CIA LE, : 94" = 1 '-c:91 DEPICT THE GENERAL Full,RE OF TIE WORK THE CarTRAC RE PURPOSE OF THIS DRAWIG 6 ONLY TO GRAPHICAILY ~ TOR S *SPONSEE FOR COIillile DIENSDE All SELECTNG FAB,UCATIN PROCESSES NO TEÂ¢10101*SOF CONSTRUCTIOIL AE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTFED OF ANY vARAMOÂ»E FROI THE DNEFOKÂ»e *0 KÂ»Or[Â»E Â· SHOWN SY THIS DRAING LANDSCAPE PLAN Scale: ,!4, '1 .~1-,pit LI.1 A WILLIAM JOHN POSS - ... MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer Re: Minor Development: Guido's Chalet building, exterior wall murals Date: _3-gg-embef-1-87-19-90-flc i het>dc Li.clu~- oqu'l-Â«. < /4 44* c.2~<ti~ / f i.a ,Â·-f- tie(; . 4.2/42,1 6 Attached are copies of the two murals proposed for the north elevation (facade) of the Guido's Chalet building. (A full color rendering will be presented at this meeting). Staff met with Charles Cunniffe, project monitor, and discussed in-house approval of the murals. Both Charles and staff agreed that due to the highly visible nature of the murals, that full Committee review is appropriate. Bavarian/Swiss style buildings in Europe are generally laden with painted murals, and the Guido's building pre-renovation had some decorative signage in the form of a family crest. Although the proposed designs are new, they depict the historic development of Aspen (miner and skier), and therefore tell a story. Signage (which the Zoning Officer is considering this to be) is considered Minor Development, requiring HPC approval. Staff is not making a recommendation in this proposal, and is leaving the decision up to the HPC on this matter. "Art" review is highly subjective, and staff cautions the committee to utilize the preservation standards in considering character compatibility in relation to this structure and the historic district as the basis for your decision. memo.guido.murals i -1 ;!i)''F l!i lilli 1 1 1 1 ' i j , I !--3 - 1--1--- -7 11 1 1 1 , S h tb t~ o r N t:~ 3 , -- - -- a M _~_~ 6 F F *4& ~:\~~ r~ _4 _ L .1- (247, -_* Af j -f 4 1 1, 1 4 -t ) 1--- Â¥ _ _* , - i 4-4 1 % . 7 R- R 1 -4 --1- 1 -1 -11 0 - --4--d h 5 2 rEE - %9' 8 0 "4 67 - 2-6 74 ---4-- Su -e_ - 11- 01 - , - 1 1> 0 -1- \ -- -1- - 2~&Â·- 1-4 _u___3 ~ 9 9 7 1 ... ' U k '_Li /43 - T- 4 1 + e:' Al . & , l; K O _L " h...,, 9 4 4 --<1' 4% -34- 60 E t fi j i 1\ 1/4 :4 | 1, UA \ L f - --1- . 1 1 , i j R 3- %1 i k ?23 34 ~ -4 -- 4 -- L ~J 1 * 1 1 , fl - 0 1 k.. - -1---- - 4 ip,- 1 -- 1 8 4- 1~ 9 - -4- r A. -41 444+90 1 - 4 N - f 4 2 J il 4 4 1, # m It- +JI-- 4 / 4 0% -4 Z-= 7 -2- i - t#\% 1 1,1 1 1 1Â»3 & 1 9 4 1 A- 1 il Ii! iA . 1 1 1 ' fl --- lia 1 1 1 i 11 jj . I j j; 1 1 1 1 1 1 j j i + C ; 1, illii lijili,ir; 111 1 jj 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lit 11 11,1 1 1 .il 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 4 11 I 11 1 1 11 1 IIi 1 1:i j - --- -- --- 1 - -- It 1 - -1 - 1 1 ---1 1__ 1 1_1 1 1 i ir i , 11 11} -1------ -- .r -- -- -4- - 1 I i 1 1 -13 --4 1111 lili Ii I 54\31112-1 1-\~ #n -,pi Y *Â¥319 3, -80-1 00 S brA)â‚¬44114 -WÂ» 1.-1 21, BJAN Tad D r*\al,rfj -5-1, Airra CAC) favv*%133(1LS (1\Â»#M 55 33003 (11- 5 91*\07'N 1Â£111 1 1 1 1 1 1 --4 - -- t- - , -- F f - --- -- - -t 9/9-1 3,44 -11 1 -1-L-t~ 1 -/11' - T 11 / ----------- I K 9 -f , 4 --- ---- -- _ 2 il_~ 1 7/1-92 // 1 1- 1 I I Pi : 1 1 ; 1 I I ' i -4--4---- --~ I F 4 -- i- 1 ----- - i --- 4 . i 1 1 9 . 3 1 TRANSMISSION REPORT :ASPEN'PITK IN ADMIN. i NOV 15 '90 14:52 ) 3 X >< DATE START REMOTE TERMINAL MODE TIME RESULTS TOTAL DEPT. X TIME IDENTIFICATION PAGES CODE x NOV 15 14:50 BILL POSS & ASSOC. G3EST 02'24' OK 03 0012 X X X A X. I >i X . - 4 .le --4-" Er Â¥. CITÂ¥401*kSPEN 130 IMIFFWI&fjlligiqIy~"- - 011 - ;treet asp ~1611 Â£ r-7 Â·, r r" - " p. . -4411 tA. 303-920-5199 City Administration 303-920-5090 Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office DATE: 1 (- l N-10 TO: t' l b AL- - HA-, FAX# ( 9-3 1 920 0 - 10 67 lio FROM: 43"14. g f DEPT: f&/vi i /15- l) FAX# (303) 920-5197 # OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET MESSAGE: See attached Ckli-k_ ejti wei- 4 bok lat- 94-44 - cit kul- ker*(40 -fj ilckÂ£61 7/c.4- ujtfi ?<;4 A 1 tfL. Cvt cuid .Mao /1*0.- i}f ~aa.- 405Â£74 , Please contact 40 jikE - 795<1 070 if you do not receive the total number of pages indicated above. - \ 4.11 Â¥+ 1 ~ 5 92/ 9.. .411 1,; 37 . F. p.414Â·49 1/- 4. f - * V :. 1 V 4 V.lk ,- 9 , ... ..4 ' I. 9 Â· e 4. N t 1. 1 . - t - 1 2 0 9 â€¢ Â· 1 'rp 4 . 0, f 4 1 , . i ~dic: , .1 4. , 1 4> 1, 1 I. . 1341 4 ' *- . 4% - I ~ . '4.Â· . I t. ..3 4 4.. .1 Â¥ . A ' 9 6 I 4, " ,, 4. e. lie X 4, , r 1 01 ** 13 1.3 ' .f qb- JY A k * ' 4 &*U ./ a 4/*W,.0 1 6.1, t, A 'M 4, * /*.I' t t '11111,1.1 D Ill , Â·A, 1 , .' 1'0 4 1.., , i'-~('., :64.~, ' .' 1 h 5 a 1 - i 6 1 , - b. .: f -r-.. r- - ,62/ . *ir?4*84 jj~j..~ ~~. ti -.k:..Â·:*: ii., ..;,** , skÂ·.ik !lA. Â· 117... ... S -- b I Vh qâ€¢ Â»:.. 1 D~44.7 14, ?. I 1%11#*:, ..Â·y' 7 1, 4 4 4 + p ki,-1,... 4.1 & ..1 0 .... 1./WA J,4.trr 1.% , ,Â· :,Â· u. :k Â·â€¢42' ,12. 9 j .,1. '.9 #A#T- M 4.- , '14 11 -- 11.- 4 '. ,-Al â€¢'09 9 849. . 4 .. 4 . 1 9 4 \ V 4,/ 1- J ..;â€¢. 1 ~ ~~' 4.. 0 gj//1:6- 4 1. jw?*,~ 4.A , -. 1,1- K *Eur.9/ C 1/2 Â·,2 ./ . .... 1 4 Â¥ . ... . .f ..f N - I 3 . .21 r. 2 I , 14 4 4 Â· f' 'f , b '* â€¢.e :, I.:..,i:> .1 . 4/ Â· Â· 'A Â». 1 ..7, 11 , t. . 4/ 1/ ..... ... hi! 4 . 1 . ...6..... Â»ZÂ»- ful< 0,1 , 11 .... ,ae. , ./ro '. - 1 .4 t .,~~ , 9 4 44, 'W- 1 .. 1,Â¥P , I U 95f i f D i. ; and associates *Abolte.lit"*Mt 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 TEL (303) 925-4755 1 -- - - VE #:0-'P 1 0 4 4 ..4, *m - 6.Z- , 0.- 4.2. t- r A / .... *-~37 ke ?14 *16 J iÂ»* - 23.L >6, 04' *pr = 04 - X 4 4=- +4 77 9 - 7 :J . 1 114, it , 1 0 11--1 b i. i 7 4 4 , 09 -1-,0 i i litt j tre/6 111 4 ,# i :. . F .1' ' : . -, , 1 'tjiti 11 'i :1: t. . 1 11 04Â·711 1 Il - i Al 11;/il ' 0, , -1,1- i'21:1 4 1*1 .- -., 4 , ',1. 1' R'. 1 1 -1.4,~li,~ IL# . - f * .\ i 1. / i 0 0 11 'li . ~~ -1 9 . - 4 -1 1 -* R - Guino's . 1 RESTORATION j . LOT E, F, G, H, 1 BLOCK 90 ASPEN, COLORADO EZ=- - . P. N Issue: . 251 - - F 4/15/90 HFCÂ· Fiwl, DEV. U ./4 - - I b ... , - - 1 , . - -4 ... 3 - . f --/ - -C-/ - - /1.,/A/*bul/9/80&/Airie:Z,4'i. ---*L-*ELr~~'~'i~~4L $,4#~4.- ... ~ r - 1 01 FÂ« THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRAWING IS ONLY TO GRAPHICAELY DEPICT THE GENERAL NATURE OF TlE Kful THE CONT.qAC TOI, IS RESPONSIBLE FOA CO,flilll DIENSIO,U. All SELECTNG F.â€¢BRICATION PROCESSES AM) TEC-QUES Of 41 Â» 3 t_29 %07 55 CONSTRUCTION. THE ARCHITECT SIALL BE NOTFED OF ANY VARIATIONS FROM THE DIMENSIONS A,O CO~mONS SHOWN BY THIS DRAWING 1- - - COVEEP 9'TdwccÂ» NOT FOR CCNSTRU Scale: Â© WILLIAM JOHN POSS f ABBREVIATIONS GENERAL CONDITIONS DRAWING INDEX C. 'MBOLS USED AS ABBREVIATIONS: BUR built up rooling DIAM diameter tolerance CONSTRUCTION", LATEST EDITION, ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THESE A. THE AIA DOCUMENT A201 "GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT FOR PLAM plastic laminat, RBL rubble stone TOL L angle BBD bu!!etin boar DIM dimension ~ n plate SFGL gafety glass T&6 tongue and groove CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, EXCEPT AS AMENDED HEREIN. COPIES ARE ON AC).1 REFERENCE ~~| centerline CAB cabinet DPR disperser schedule FILE AND ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT THE OFFICE OF THE Cl.1 SURVEY PG plate 01.65 SCH TSI. top 01 slab ~ C chan'nel CAD . cadmium DIV division MVD pl, Nood SCN screer 1ST 4) ) of .tee! Al.1 d penny CPT carpet (ed; DR door ARCHITECT. SITE PLAN 1. perpâ‚¬ndicular CSMT ca.en .nt OA doubleactint, ~ PT point SNT spalant 11% t' 10 of wall . PVC polyvinyl chloride STG seating TB c,,Â·e bar Ll.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN PL plate Cl cast iron )H double hung A percelain enamel SEC section B. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS CONSIST OF THE AGREEMENT, THE GENERAL A2.1 GUIDO'S BASEMENT PLAN round CIPC :ast in-place, concreto DTA dovetail ancho 1R Ka Ni/,1 Plc pest-tensioned conrretr S.K service sink T treaa CST Cast Mone DTS dmetai! a -40 :e,Â· : P(IF pounds per cubic foot SHTH sheathing Tvp typicar NOTES, THE SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE DRAWINGS, WHICH ARE A2.2 GUIDO'S LOWER LEVEL PLAN CB catch basin DS downspout i PFL pounds per lineal foot SHT sheet UC undercut BUSINESS BUILDING BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN *6: ' COOPERATIVE AND CONTINUOUS. WORK INDICATED OR REASONABLY A2.3 GUIDO'S UPPER LEVEL PLAN .. ABBREVIATIONS: CK cat k (Â·ng) D drain 4 calk (ing) pounds per square inch SH ~ and associates ' , PSF pounds per square foot SG sheet glass UNF unfinished ABV ab,ne CLG ce ilinf DRB d,Â·ainboard : PSI shelf, shelving UR urin,1 FULLYCOVEREDINALL. ANYDISCREPANCYBETWEENTHEDIFFERENTPARTS A2.5 BUSINESS BUILDING LOWER LEVEL PLAN IMPLIED IN ANY ONE OF THE DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUPPLIED AS THOUGH A2A Afl aboke finished flooi CH1 ceilihg he,gh, Df d,Â·ain tile SHO shore Cd), (ing) A2.6 ASC above suspended ceiling CEM cement DWR drawer PEB piefabricate (d) SIM similar VB vapor barrier ,CC preca.t concrete VI v.joint (edi SHOULD BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. BUSINESS BUILDING UPPER LEVEL PLAN ACC access PCPL cement piaster [pertland) DWG drawing + PFN piefinished SKL skylight VAR A3.1 GUIDO'S NORTH & SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ACFL acce55 floor CM centimeter(s) DF drinking foÂ·.Intain Â·olid core BUSINESS BUILDING EAST & WEST EXTERIOR TEL PRF preformed St bleeve VNR veneer C. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND A3.2 GUIDO'S EAST & WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -* WLÂ¢-1/ AP access panel CER ceramic DW dumbwaiter PSC .,res:ressed concrete SC VRM vermiculite ORDINANCES, AND SHALL BE PERFORMED TC THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF BUSINESS BUILDING NORTH & SOUTH EXTERIOR AC acoustical CT ceramic tile EF each tace PL property jine SP ' m.ndoroof VERT A3.3 605 EAST MAIN STREET ACPL acoustical plaster CMT ceramic mosaÂ·, trile) E east vertical ACT QT quarry tile S -outh VG vertical grain acoustical tile CHBD chalkboard ELEC cla.tic (al) RBT r; bbet, rebate 5-PC fpacer . N vinvl ELEVATIONS CRAFTSMANSHIP BY JO[ IRNEYMEN Or THE APPROPRIATE TRADES. ELEVATIONS ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ACR acrylic plastic CHAM chamfer EP electrical panelboard RAD radius 5PK speaker VA, ,invl asbestos tile D. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE INTENDED TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS ~4 (303) 925-4755 ADD addendum CR chromium (plated) EW'C electric water cooler | RL SPL ,Â·inv! base EQUIPMENTAND SERVICES REQUIRED TO COMPLETE ALLWORK DESCRIBED A4.1 WALL SECTIONS ADH adhesive CIR ciiÂ·de IL elevation Special VB rail (ing) W vinyl fabric ADI adj,icent CIRC circurnferince Lk\ elevalor terence ' ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT ANY CONDITIONS WHICH WILL NOT PERMIT A4.3 WALL SECTIONS Issue: i RKE rainwater conductor SPEC specii,cation (51 HEREIN. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO BRING TO THE A4.2 WALL SECTIONS ADIT adjiistable CIR clear carlee) 411 R emerg.,ncy RfL reflect Cecil, (Ive), (gr} SST ;i, i,iless 6 ee WSCT wainscot REF SQ square VT vinvitile AGG aggregate CLS clocure ~( enclose Cure) REFR refriger,itor STD s: inrl:rd WTW wall to wall Aje air condit:oring COL column Q CONSTRUCTION ACCORDING TO THE INTENTIONS OF THESE DOCUMENTS. Sl.1 GUIDO'S FOUNDATION PLAN equal REG register . STA sla'lon WH wall hung ALT alternate COMB -ombinatior EQ.' reinforce (d), (ing) ST WC ,:ater closet equipment RE D,al IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE DETAILS AND/OR S2.1 GUIDO'S LOWER LEVEL FRAMING PLAN 5.4.10 gpU]LÂ¤INI3 FENM IT Al aluminum COMPT compaitment C escalator ' Â·taterorooling ANC RCP reinforced concrete pipe STO ;torage WP DIRECTIONS REGARDING INTENT WHERE IT IS ALTERED BY EXISTING S2.2 GUIDO'S UPPER LEVEL FRAMING PLAN anchor, anchorage COMPO compo,ition U omposite) .ST estimate REt . remove SD ;torm drain WR water repelier,1 CONDITIONS OR WHERE NEGLECTED IN THE DOCUMENTS. S2.3 GUIDO'S ROOF FRAMING PLAN AB anchor bolt COMP compress (ed), (ion), (itle) XCA excavate REf resilien STR structural WS v,Â·ater!,top S3.1 BUSINESS BUILDING FOUNDATION PLAN ANOD anodized CONC câ€žncrete :XFI exhaust RET return SCT structuril clav tile WWF mlded wire tab, ic E. ANY MATERIALS PROPOSED FOR SUBSTITUTION OF THOSE SPECIFIED OR S4.1 BUSINESS BUILDING CORNER LEVEL FRAMING PLAN AP: approximate CMU concrete masonry unit EXG existing RA return .ir SUS suspended W $,est ARCH architect (ural) CX connection EXMP ?.panded metal pl t RVS reverip (side) SYM symmetry (ical: WHB *thed huniper CALLED OUT BY TRADE NAME IN THESE DOCUMENTS SHALLBE PRESENTED S4.2 BUSINESS BUILDING UPPER LEVEL FRAMING PLAN AD area drain CONST constructior ER expamion bolt REV revistop 1.1, re,ised SYN svnthetic W u ic. 111. w'ItÂ· TOTHEARCHITECTFORREVIEW. THECONTRACTORSHALLSUBMITSAMPLES S4.3 BUSINESS BUILDING ROOF FRAMING PLAN ASB asbestos CONT continuous 91 0 crtinii, EXP expo>tÂ·d RH right hind SYS system WIN .in.lou WHEN REQUIRED BY THE ARCHITECT, AND ALL SUCH SAMPLES SHALL BE ASPH asphalt CONTR cor,1 ra, 1 (or' EXT e,le,Itir ROW right oi wan TKBD tackboard WG wired riass REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT BEFORE THE WORK IS PERFORMED. WORK 1 AT asphalt tile CLL contrait limit line EXS e>tra strong R riser TKS tackstrip WM Â·.%;re me,h AUTO automatic UT control joint FB face brick RVT rivet TEL telephone WO 1, ithout MUSTCONFORMTOTHEREVIEWED SAMPLES. ANYWORKWHICHDOES NOT ZONING DATA 1 BP back plaster (ed) CPR copper FOC tace ot concrete RD root drain TV te;evision WD BSMT bacement CG corner guard FOF lace * finish RFH roof hatch TC terra Cotta WE Hood ba,e CONFORMS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL no{M ~ BRG bedring CORk corrugated FOM face w maw>r ry RFG tooling TZ terrazzo V. P 1 workirly poir SUBMIT REQUESTS AND SAMPLES FOR REVIEW THROUGH THE GENERAL CONFORM SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH WORK WHICH ' BPL bedring plate CTR counter FOS &ace m studi R 41 rric,ni THk thick (ness) V-1 wrot ch; 1.n BJT bed ioint CFL counterflashing FF tactory finish RO rough (,pening THR thre> hold CONTRACTOR WHEN WORK IS LET THROUGH HIM OR HER. REQUIRED BM bench mark CS counters ink FAS faskin, fasteror RE rubber base TPTN toilet partition VERIFICATIONS AND SUBMITTALS TO BE MADE IN ADEQUATE TIME AS NOT TO TOTAL SQ. BEL belo., CTSK countersunk screâ€ž FN feng RBT rubber ble TPD toild Daper dispenser DELAY WORK IN PROGRESS. GUIDO'S FOOTAGE BET between CRS Course (5) FBD fiberl,jard BVI beveled Cwr, rross grain FGL fibergi,1.3 Bil bituminous LFT cubic foot FIN (inish fed) F. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT FOR HIS OR HER BUSINESS BUILDING BLE_ block CÂ¥D cubic vard FFE finished llc,or elewatic:n REVIEW WHERE CALLED FOR ANYWHERE IN THESE DOCUMENTS. REVIEW BLKG blocking DPR daniper FFL finished floor line SHALL BE MADE BY THE ARCHITECT BEFORE WORK IS BEGUN, AND WORK Ground Level ' BD board DP dampproofing FA fire alarm BS both sides DL dead load FBRK fire brick SHALL CONFORM TO THE REVIEWED SHOP DRAWINGS, SUBJECT TO Commercial/Retail 4,782 BLA both ways DEM demolish, demolition FE fire extinguisher REPLACEMENT AS REQUIRED FOR SAMPLES IN PAR. E, ABOVE. Dormitory Rooms BOT bottom DMT demountable FEC fire extinguisher cabinet Circulation, Mech., & Storage BRK brick DEP depressed FHS fire hu~e station BRZ bronze DTL detail FPL fireplace BLD(. bui ding JIAG d,agonal FP fireproot Subtotal: G. THE BUILDING INSPECTOR SHALL BE NOTIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN THERE IS A NEED OF INSPECTION AS REQUIEED BY THE UNIFORM BUILDING Second Level ' FRC fire-resistant coating HC hollow cote MMB membrane CODE OR ANY LOCAL CODE OR ORDINANCE. Residential FRT fire-retardant HM hollow meta! MET metal FLG flashing HI hook (s) MFD metal floor decking 1 H. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY AND CARE OF L 14-BR Unit 2 2-BR Units FHMS flathead machine screw HOR horizontal MTFR metal furring ' FHWS flathead wood screw HB hose bibb MRD metal roof decking FEDERAL AND STATE O.S.H.A. REGULATIONS, AND FOR THE PROTECTION OF Subtotal: 5,927 ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH Circulation ..21 , 1 FLX flexible HWH hot water heater MTHR metal threshold ~ FLR floor (ing) INCIN incinerator M meter (s) ALL WORK UNTIL IT IS DELIVERED COMPLETED TO THE OWNER. FLCO floor cleanout INCL include Cd), (ing) MM millimeter W FD floor drain ID inside diameter AlWK millwork - 1. ALL DIMENSIONS NOTED TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. TOTAL FOR BUILDING: 12,193 FPL floor plate INS insulate Cd), Mon: MIN minimum DIMENSIONS NOTED WITH "N.T.S." DENOTES NOT TO SCALE. RESTAURANT BUILDING (Including Connection) FLUR fluorescent INSC insulating concrete , 4.... mirror FIT flush joint INSF insulating fill MISC miscillaneous FTC footing INT interior MOD modular J. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND COORDINATE ALL OPENINGS THROUGH Ground Level FRG forged ILK interlock MLD molding, moulding FLOORS, CEIL INGS AND WALLS WITH ALL ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, Commercial/Retail 2,009 FND foundation INTM intermediate MR rrop receptor MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. Circulation 571 FR frame (rl), (ing; INV invert MT niount (eal, (ing) Subtotal: 2,580 FRA fresh air IPS iron pipe size MOV movable FS full size K janitor's closet MULL mullion FBO furnished b, others IT joint Vt nailable COORDINATION AND RESOLUTION DURING THE BIDDiNG PROCESS. Second . vel K. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY OF ITEMS flEQUIRING ' FUR furred (ing) IF joint filler NAT natural FUT future 1 joist NI nicke, Commercial/Restaurant 2,316 GA gage, gauge KCPL Keene's cenient piaster NR noise reduction GV galvanized KPL kickplate NRC noise reduction coetficient Circulation 412 Gl gaivanizea i,Â·on KIT kitchen NOV nominal Subtotal: 2,728 GP galvan'ted pipe KO kr.ockout NM nonnietaNic TOTAL FOR BUILDING: 5,308 GSS galvanized steel sheet LBL label N north ~ GKT gasket (ed) LA8 laboratory NIC not in contract GLASS AREA GC general contract (or) LAD ladder NT:, not to 5. die TOTAL: 17,501 GL glass, glazing LB lag bolt OB; obsctÂ·,e GLB glass block LAM laminate (d) Or on center (s) Restaurant Building 682.7 s.f. GLF glas~ fiber ' LAV lavatory OP opaque RESTORATION GCMU glazed concrete masonry units LH left hand OFG opening GST glazed structural tile L length Ol open-web joist Business Building 791.2 s.f. Guloo's GB grab bar LT light opp opposite GD grade, grading LC light contr:)1 OPH opposite hand GRN granite LP lightproof OPS opposlte surface LOT E, F, G, H, 1 BLOCK 90 ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 22,500 GVL gldveÂ·t LW lightweighi OD outside diameter ASPEN, COLORADO GF growna ta LV,C lightweight conc rete OHMS ovalhead machine screw GT grout LMS liniestonie OHWS ovalhead wood screit GPDW Evpfum dry wall LTL OA merall linle! GPL gvp.uni lath Lt live load OH overhe,id G Ppi gvmum pia.ter LVR 1(,2,1 C r PNT paint {url) GPT gvp,urn tile Ipl low point . PNL panel HH handlic,le MB m,ichine 1,01* PB panic bar PROJECT DIRECTORY HBD hard Avard MI mallt~able il,;Ii PT[) paper lov. el citÂ·,penc, 1 HDW hardw.ir (' MH mar ~1()~f. PTR paper t mrâ‚¬.1 recepto HWD har[Iwi){,(1 MFR m.]nuta{ 1, irc (or) PAR parallel . 'IT head Ic):rit MRB nAM Pk Parking HDR header MAS ri.]vm, PIN) pATtI( 1,â€¢ 4 ...,0 ' HTG heating MO ni,honrY lic ning Prk' p,]rtition HVAC hea! in*'ve ntt latin* MT l malerml (Â·) p\ pave (41, (Ing) ' air conditioninâ€ž .4AX mavinium PVM T BncÂ·merit ARCHrrECTS: BILL POSS & ASSOCIATES HD heavy duty P[Ri pxÂ·doT.MÂ· (d) ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 MECh ....11'lili{ C A PE D IMÂ·(iâ‚¬Â·41.11 HT height MC med,<ine calmiet 605 EASTMAN STREET HX hex,Son.11 MED nied,um PE RI litÂ·rifllâ‚¬Â·!(,r HES high rarly-strenpth c ement MBR MÂ·mixÂ·r Pl.A5 iiI' 'tÂ¢Â·r (303)925-4755 LANDSCAPE ARCHKECTS: GREG MOZIAN 117 SOUTH SPRING STREET ASPEN, C-LORADO 8161, (303)925 -,963 PROJECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS: THEODORE GUY & ASSOCIATES 351STAIF HIGHWAY 82 GUIDO'S P.O. BOX 1640 BASALT, COL.OPAL,O 91621 (303)327-3167 DESCRIPTION 'vol> GENERAbgo REFERENCE' NOT FOR C~, SHEETNO AO.1 m *18 9 t b-lift-imt- I,k : 605 EAS} MAIN STRE 11 ~ ASPEN COLORADO81611 1 TEL (303) 925 4 /5.5 29 -t[Ila LpEr 14 E'<mE!7 . ' 204*74157b MNI> -1 - IOFÂ· 71*, Â· ' . 1 -1/%4 019'IN IN fIA-r[* WALL 1-- Â·f~,' ,>-ozo f'ArrEP le" Ht,H 71Â», 9UG0 110600 (9) 2.,52 Â«PEAP . 1 0.-fÂ« MUÂ® :PINE ' / .1- - - -9 k ' - 111-11.041],tUC'*It *0410 -PMOU>\Â»2 6,4-4 CM-Â· V 3 V .f me f r ~ -7-437 1 1 --E 64440 -W /m Ill l 4 * 1 , 4 Fude 10% MI-DIÂ» 4-4'6**2 1 1 i la 1 1 1~17171 p'Â»ff rruw el kIt C liliall Ili' 1 CAH+141,11,A Ca#HEÂ«P, --13â‚¬7~r.Â·v 41 \ 01/1/ReeÂ», CAAJ4** Pi,OUBM- L.1,14-titm P B UA-re~ap *r . - 6 , / Gat,-rb iFF[6,104 eÂ«al. 1 P"PHA HOOKI,0 4[0 *' 1 -'' c,#01Â»Al~keril,Ir[ 0Â» 4[BUM A. 5% -,46 1 . - . \11 11 1 1 1 . 2 1 1 11 1(1 -r- I. 4 ,. 14 -+ 2 - Â· 01Â»FF Â®*CM> Â»er '- ,4 1' n M 11 21 11 11 11 ''1" 11 !1 11 1I 11 11 ,/3 W ~jU,~ 1 * 4,/JMEY-. y"' * A,JO 1 6, -- .. -1-1-r-Ll'' ~-12.~ /J 11 -O UF91'*12,0 ALL:rr'kle' 4 45*7 H,t,U*EfÂ·- 12> Flouk-t7 -8 - lilli - / 19 . =d , 0 4 1 Zilt-3 )' 1 , < ' , , = "41-*p w*- j 'k== /040 + &%1 0440 + 1,0. ~ k. b 4 - 1 11 71\11 ! 1~ 31 11 .1.~-inrii-Tior'Ff?li 7 iI i'-8 1 1.19 i ii ii Kii~ , ' 7 -11- 11 1-6-~ii 1, h 11 i -p.~~ 1 T- 1 4 -I..-- -- 1 --it 1 1 1 '1 - 14Â»J . 01't'0*Pl,lkilkÂ·la, --- MAL PREAM 1*4/ 52*le 111 r +1 KT417-14-411 , - - 1 - M J Â· Â· Â·1Â· Â· , ~~Â· PIT#art-. 1 ... GuiDes RESTORATION (Â« 60\#>fE[70-4.eze â‚¬ 0909 13'TWFul-+ VE?kIA 6,9 Ouoe>co=NEUV LOT E, F. G, H. 1 BLOCK 90 eKF:*b &6' 4/af- fEIDPLE OFEEflkle Â«BAO'44 90Â«r *Th 94:"' :*teED 72 *eaÂ¥--*DLE ASPEN, COLORADO Â¢8.1467 -7Ekllkelt:ba z.tplÂ·~'g>~ 5,â€¢RÂ»11,164 21.Â£>1/1047â€¢ flkÂ·[de MLI//7 516.591%/. 91 -1' â‚¬7feÂ¢7 1 aoeÂ¥\He MEU 00\07 PWE,teW, 31.10Â»-[E#- P,6>WEÂ·* . 94Â¢F #490 FNE I 1' 'fl tfUU.le -PER'1412210'%:7, 27,0-4 4AL. -- Issue: 02446 Poes4 5Â·i I.90 BUILDING PafiMI IT 4-, THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRAWNG IS ONLY TO GRAPHICALLY - SELECT~O FABFCATON PROCEÂ»MS All TED-CIES OF CONSTRUCTOL THE ARCHITECT MIL.1 dE NOTIED oF ANY VARUTIONS FACI THE DIMENIONS AID CONDmole SIOWN BY THIS DRAWNG 1 - t. 4 j. . L LANDSCAPE PLAN ,"A. , 3 -44090 i NOT FORL.. C j 4 - Scale: \ 1990 , - Ll.1 , 1 4 - r . - ~ Â©1990 WILLIAM JOHN POSS | h t k I Dil . D 0.1 ( O.4 ) < O.9 l O.8 ) ( 1.0 ) (if) 0 v 6231- 123/87 Â· Ill 2 1 t.'-e G'- 8" 14'-G"- 16'-242' :24" ~ and associates 2 .p--. ---*f- , 'DEE Â«RUCT. PUT,5. 1 DEE .Tgler 944 5 al 'fil 1 1 d- \2,2 1- â€¢t 2 \ : ~MATÂ£-A ~ ~ 0 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 At MATEN 605 EAST MAIN STREET \ TEL (303) 925-4755 1 EXISTIKIV Eh<I5Ti46t t D.g ~ Li- 1 i 1 4 1 - 1 - fl - T 49 , \r, 4 1 -94 - 42 F 1 H . 3 1 55 WINE/LIQUOK PKDOUCC M 91Â©r COOLEK DAKBer ... 1 60,>LEK 1 *ragAUE 45 f E--3 .lan f [Er' m ~ I (OIl - = 1 / - 4 13 0 5.0. In 3 1 - 62 0 9-1 Git l.'-9 35Â£ ' 31 -0,1 1 314*11 ii'- 94" f /1 1 - i /2-1 ~ 1 1 EMPLOTEE 555-1 190" F 1 + B \ t 4 1 ...r = / f 3 1 n 1 7,1 f Â© f Â© 1. Re , 4 /32\\ 1 1 j ~Â«LAUN. 41/ 6-6Â£.ir 0, 1 I tifp rnE~ of A Â·Â»STIN~ SUK @) 1-_~ ig/, D f .1 <4) 1 29. /56\ 11 11 j EÂ¥*rEEK PAC DE MEMDVEO 4 E>ONATE x /ttp... - ' 1 r 4, 4 , 9-94 C --Vh) COKRIPOK tj FoR KIEW 4â€¢ 4%(, el...e % 21 + - . AS 9520. ELEV.,1-1 -1 {ch 0 Bill. 1 1 f & 1 /> ff /~ 010. 2, 79I2061'(91'-Â·r/Â® .7- \ 5 3 + ----- - \ 1 1 , Â· .4 L ~ ~ EÂ·WIERGE>)44:LY LT., 1 , , ' /Ulrdâ€¢56~93 9 . ge l *: - ,/Th -3- t.4/ BArres:r ,~~~,/ 1 ~ 2 1.41/ ...rref,tr VAG 1 < HEA<TE.K. ~ .2 -f r \LI : i A .3,1 11 1 bil- ;1 kIEW cekle. .5-FAIKWAL_L %~5~ 1 FliEE ZEN COOLE:KL F , 1 ~ /=1 51,8 4 9 SEE. STKUCTUFAL DWL,S <CA- , .17 . 0 1 3--7--> ~< * ~76Â£R - . Cal -1 /9 Â·t ~-- MECHÂ·. CHASE- 1 i '-71 J -4 1 - . 4/ 1 AIDTE-'. ll) / 1- %,- .4.2 A IE 4 9 Az %\ 1 b . ALL WALLS ARDUND --3 ~ ~ ~_.~_ _ ~ Ae,OV# 4- -5- Ii:4 f----1519Â·PlP<KM'i52 -Â» _ 1' 14-'22' .IL.45/I ) -- 1- 439 1 E 1 16. O-6. 14/ Â·le- 190 -1 f \~+12-CH. f / 0 1 1 1 i 1â€¢ 1 G . & TZ' 15â€¢E KE.Mo'VES, As I - ---1 J i?, ExI ST INER HALortter IdALL * ~7 ~1 9 ' t5AT-T- INSUL. CTÂ¥FC) -6 1 u, 1 f... 1 .... . - i , PEâ‚¬ ST'kULTÂ· -PkILM 4.-f~ - - 22- - 1- J -- -- - -- I - --- --- -- - 0 1 5102.\131 - 2 7--Rly>_Lix _ ___. 7 :. 2.. :.-7- 7* - - r=-1- 1 5, / 40 / 4.1 - ~~- sTAIRWAY+3 1 V 467 / 1 Â·Â· ' . b 9'-9 ! AM 0 5'-519 ' 3% 01 \2=,1 /sl-WIRWAf *I, 9 ~ 60*Z DOFE '. - Gu,Do,s - / 1--/ raill fEEl .1&1412686|Cr . l-16â€¢1+r 4-I<*r .C~ \drzo 1-- -imm5 6_~ RESTORATION 41 1 - 1 - f. 0 1 1 Â£--22 LOT E, F, G, H, 1 BLOCK 90 01 X ~~ZZ~~IEr)&MIE*ililli~ UEXIS-rthilq MA6OKiler 4 5 ASPEN, COLORADO / 1 NALL. FT-al. (FURIKED) 1. AG.3 116 i / SHALL BE- REMOVED 40 4 * PER 61-KULTUMAL Â«-- -~Â©'5*E~ 1 1 SAW eU-r 4 ASHOVE, 3 LT Â·1544Â£6. * Â¤ _14- 1-513-1 Â© H <9 -RE-PAIK EÂ¥15:rILIA & --SWE J Â£ m 7 M oÂ»PICE 9--- MASONâ‚¬F WAL.LS 1 -1 5 9,.. 11 1 , 1 I M 1 131Â·41' 121 -r--~#f~~~&1-~- 2 Issue: 1- - 10 4, 0.90 .iFC FINAL De 11* .3/."./1/ CAL, 17 62-E- ENLA*CUED' Pir'10 $6"-9-z -0 -0 > ' ' 2'-04/tu,-Jil_*fi-- 1 - - -~ fLAN5 FOK prls, ' 1 (4, l-54. - 5.11Â·90 BUILDING PERMIT 1 11 - 9, . 1/-1 , IN - 1 dj 11 < b 1 & Ll*-w ~ i - 7 1 * ~ ELEVAJDR 211 + -21' 1 A O / 1 1%* . - 1 74. 0 1 S.O LE , ~ 143 Â¥ 4. /6 9 - i ~ EXCAVATE * FEMOVE E A% 1 /4 / 4-HE.~ aNG. 1 6 1 T.1 7 - A IB' 4 - 4 - Ve,1/ / 15(ISTINÂ»t le,ASE-MEN-T. CoNG. 1 -~ FUt/LI. 4 kIALL- 1 ~ 1 1 9 - / 51.*15 4 *EFLAGE- AS 'PEA _ b<-- / AS l'Ek ST*LICT, 14+.J . / \ 1 ' 4 r* D.445. C-Tre. 9-~ 0 EL-EVATLPIC 1Ilt'fie<297 69 L 92?62 Lup 1' - ' | 1-10*STWAY . p.. 0. CÂ·rr-F.3 *- E.LEV. 1911,80' (TrF); 4 // 1 Â·-4 1/,/" f | ~ | / ELEVAT~ | G 10'-268) f 1 A U RETAIL 51-DIKAGE 4.6 9, - 1 1 -33Â© 1. : 4 - -- -7 - 4 . P -N . 24 / 1 1 j 4 1 - /00/~\ <331 1 - \ 7 , K, I. 3 . / 5 1 42>v \ // - _ 4- TME PURPOSE OF â„¢ls DRAWING IS ONLY TO GRAPHICALLY , 4 'Â· Cttiv ge# ENt.Alic.ED TOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING DIMENSIONS. AND DEPICT THE GENERAL NATURE OF THE WORK â„¢E CONTRACÂ· '2 SELECTING FABRICATION PROCESSES AND TECHNIQUES OF ~ PLAN FOR --DETAIL-S CONSTRUCTION. THE ARCHITECT SHALL dE NOTIFIED OF ANY SHOWN BY â„¢IS DRAWING , VARIATIONS FRON THE DIMENSIONS AND COI[}ITIONS .4 42'- 411 v ETIFY t 1 - GUIDO'S ~ NOTE: EXT ENDU. WALL BASEMENT' Ex I ST I Ha 5.+ALL- -11Â©E. UUPEk f t-- FIAIKIED, ANoic>KED 4 coNSTKUCTED AS PER STRUCT PUGS 4 SPEDS , ( CT,-p..1 9 - 1 . i Â·V f j C /33 BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~ ,*1,14.E: !/411 =11-oil Scale: 1,4" = 1'-0'1 ' C (41<foscflt##1\09 0 A2.1 Al I ilr Â· .... r. Â© 11Â¥ WILLIAM JOHN POSS < f h Co.13 (0.4) 0.5 016 0.8 1.0 - - â‚¬ a- '~ i ,-; 3Â·L-4 ' .. .. : 'Ill tri 3 A i 9-21- 1 ?Q le 1 11 @ 0 6 't -1 -1 0 I'-436 6 : r - l /1 1 1 1 \ .-0 - / L - 1 4 =94 1 â‚¬ r J =Nt li 9 00/ 0 1 , L'Â· - /O 1 -_7 1 43 9 1 , / F-' 0 43> ~ ~ 11-_1 [ 1 GUIDO'S - 9.11 4 -14,tr ' - h 6- 10 3611 19 4" 1.-/k* LOWERJ>Â® Cto" r 8'-0' , f , 7 12!-toi' '' I .- . 42'- 44 id - 1 32 - _ 2 LEVEL PLAN 1 Â£. , ' 4 4 7 j NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0-hr LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN :.- 1 fÂ¥ ~,~ SO,~Â·LE: 94" :1'-â‚¬91' , i Scale: 94'~ - 1'- 00 1 - t t Â».1., 4 1. A2.2 *1 , ' 1 Â© 1990 WILLIAM JOHN POSS - .0.;akia 59'-4*' - _- 2- 5%" -- 1 . , and associates A .11'' 1 1 .. . I , .. I . I I ' 4./. - 'll ' I ' I.L' J~i _ I I Mi- r 11 A# 0 .Â· k , .. .- . a 2,1. 1 ' I .. Â£ t - . I ?th . - 4*i - - - 1 - A- ~"7-14 - 4 1. .. I . 4 r 'I :i it 7, I . 11. . .. 1 C . i â€¢.Ah Â· 4 V . Â¢1 9 0 I. F . 60 I.â€¢ 2-t_ *U I I . 3..Cm 1 I &41 - , - -04.' 0 . 4 1 GuiDos 1 RESTORATION J f Plt 444 74.420 1 -0 LOT E, F, G, H, 1 BLOCK 90 .. ASPEN, COLORADO Ae a. '' . 0 ..... . 0 rk '44 4 . iÂ·i, ilr . 0 . - . 6. - I i 4 27~TI. -;2~*ek *I'!~:E3hA'I . i Â·~ N,t . \6 .. M.ZAR.hi ' , ..... .... 1 , 1Â·28'* . , Itt... I:. . 63. .1.,1 .21 1 1 I- 4 0 '11.- Dil - r <7 A.13 lo.4 ) lo.4 6.4 , < 1.0 J - , - 5222\03/2 Â¢ +0 -~nj r 2 . ~_ ~ and associates 14'-3 CD'-8" Co' - 8" 14'-6 " - c 'G'- 2 161 b 11, f 31 111 4 '- 11 Fit' 914 24 1 04" 04 + U El +40 I . i - ' r 11 11 g O, , 3~-84" )0~ 710 1044 7100 JO). 3'- 2,%" 3- \ 605 EAST MAIN STREET\ 2 ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 .it 11,0, R. D. R.0. R.0, ~- BUILPIMA Â¢ i TEL (303) 925-4755 _ ~ lt=P KI t>Ore- E 1 1 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 11 Ill . 4 I I 1 1 11 1 1 tl 14 1 4 + '1- d 6 6.9 ) - i 3, 1 1 ----------- 2>ALCONY 1 __ ri Â·Â· 4 /2 __3*.2---r-4--0- aUL 4 WALL TELOld (a> V T in_ *OVE 1 1-r--- AD 5PEc'o_ -4 A#Â©11{32,* _~1 Â© Al Â© 16 1 1 (1) Plo f A A Â· V Afl U - N 4 4 3 1 2 -4 1 9 ! 4 1 1 PININA i @ 3% I r. _ 1 , 03'-10" . 4-8 4[ d t E-, 11 6'-ID*" 2,117'' 490 4iz" le; - 9 142 4- 218* - 1 ~ Â·NsovE- ' 63 1 RUM Â£>VEKHA+IL1 , 60 . 4.- . ~- .. -- 1 3%41442'-64 -111Â»" < 9 0 10 -1 -M Â· Â·~ ~ Ill r----------- .11 . 11. 1 . 1 - -.~ -4- - 0 :i 0 19 1 mui 1 J 1--1 1/ 1.. 6-......&&;...- 11!d-- 1 re -I=mF/immmIT=im./MMIRI 9 5* ; 2'-2,0 L I'-30 Ar BArregY FAC ! - Il f â‚¬12" .STAL.*.ae.FC MTL 59' STUDS 0 :U'0.0. 14/ 9 4 - 1. 1 1 - $ A SOUklP le,;775 55Â·TWEEN - 4 1,1 1 V - 4 - CAS A J ER Â® Ii I. - 9 ' twy-1 6 Â·Â· 14 f-/' 1 1 W. 1 + 1 --#. A F -1 10 * 9 KITCHEN - r 1% 0/1 1 CgiJ - W "*, =r<:r- 1.--Ir--MECH. CHASE 10 i -4 1//1 a F ' , H *-t- 4- FLUE - . Â§ 1 It Il//~Al= 4 - PÂ· A' g ID - . DowN ..4 Se '1 11 v // 1 - 9 ii STAIRM/AY.4 %4~LI-17 1, i r STAIRAAÂ¥*3. /' -- 1 UPAT . % 1 CH,61< 3117 -T 11?1 01/â€¢Iâ€¢lh~ I , 1 G.he" - 1 ~ Fir-1 ~ .- 1 1 }3= ' 0~ EAL 21â€¢,leâ€¢Ge:def Dr. 9 BATTERT FAC --1~Tiillem::G,EKILY 1.-6 -ill-li~:-I:]Iâ€¢Ill:-:Il- 1 Low FÂ»:rl-noki IF -0 1 / 4 .Arre,% FAL -Â·meHm]:Alâ€¢Iâ€¢illllll ~- HALL.kÂ« 34(* / ~ 0 4 0 @ r---1 / CORRIDOR - - 1 2 1 - - / N j J 3 %2 4.Or . 0 1 5 -9 =04 ( 31â‚¬ ' Issue: 1 1 --+ + '.--.-- ' -t---11~ (1) ~~ (Y) 1,-- 1 6 5 3/4,1 Â¥4 / a 181 -7 1 69- 1 1 - 1 546-7 4'-O" 94~~~) 7'- 6.11 - L ~L./ 01-10Â¥611\--Il :,1 25'-8" mEEr 41 4 2- 90 H EC. 60ktER .DEV. woMIE# 8-1 1 71 1_l z'-", 2,-G' CriÂ« -[*] 4. C 1- 1-b CEI[ ~ MEN 51-4,1 . 07 - 5.11Â·90 BUILDING PERMIT A 6 , 4 D I h.11 N.1 (3 -41 4 If/ 6 1 - Ul--1 M eL=VATQ< 2-- 10/ C f:28 g ' r V.... .440â€¢~ '- pr u~. . 1|,+P 1,0~,4,1. 'r!:Fi Mil -- ~ STORAGE 4 ' J L 0 . m N m to El-E.VATO~ 4 1 N ~ HO 1 5-TwAY 7 1 8 1- .- 0 0 - 1 8 k â‚¬5fs-FULIEK MIl 359 \ 0 01 /4 1 . ST-ut:75 S IG'DÂ·C. 14 ~ L i.14; 2-2 (*Crk f K _iÂ» - - 0 56>UUP DAITS SET. 4 + I TYF: 4 - 1---, , 0 -ISEE) - f 4- ~ Rtips ~ ~ ~ 2- OFFICE- -T - 0 1 zoof- ovegRANA - L. - . 5 25 CUL - i heervE- , IN F 4 ~41- THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRAWING IS ONLY TO GRAPHICALLY - ~~ DEPICT THE GENERAL NATURE OF THE WORK THE CONTAAC 1 7~ TOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING DIENSIONS. AND ..7./.166"Il/V*LB ~ Â·~ Uk.â€¢1LJ~~~ I SELECTING FABRICATION PROCESSES AND TECHNIQUES OF . CONSTRUCTION â„¢E ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY 6...1 Ll ,â€¢ .2, . ' â€¢ VARIATIONS FROM THE DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS , 0 <3 1 Â® i * ~.3 ~ SHOWN BY THIS DRAWING &)AÂ©OVE . 15*6*NY ' GUIDO'S , Z. 24 e'- O. ED;-0. S'-00 1 Zf 1/h UPPER LEVEL .. I . I 1â‚¬00. ..0. I 4,01 1 PL~ , 40 41.L 4~ - ' 1 - . f 0 1 e 1- - 9 CCNSTRUCTION UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~ 0 - ... r scA La 1 24*' - 1 ~-6~ Scale: 24 :16 11-011 - r 2 .. A2.3 i ' - X-X Â© 1990 WILLIAM JOHN POSS 1 1 i'~ UP=Ef KIDGE__ EL,7141.66 --â€ž = 1Â·*6 -Ob~ =ar.mif~IINI~IC*- - -' LOWER RIOGE EL.710.6,4 .127~-096im--- rÂ« / \ -- -1 -- --------4- 0Â«14&11'fe' w.?10,â€¢ti.t- 1 5-1-ANDI Kle SEAM ~ A-3,11 Mal*L_ 8Ct=F ~6 SPECÂ·'0 -IGI-IT& ~ 1Â« (-TYF') - 1 -O STR. 5LA ~ ~ 605 EAST MA/N STREET 11 1 1 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 f El_7146.55' TEL (303) 9254755 â‚¬Et-LACE =>Gâ‚¬. MT , 4.91 - Â· 1 1 Â«5~ iÂ· i --~ ~Â·-~-rÂ«-~~~ ~ - I<00, w/ s-LOING MTI-, BEAM 50(OF / I 01 0 1 <F> <<, I J t ' "r -4 '--7'- Â¥r 11\ 1 NEW Ixt /2 / , E- 900% lili 15005.\\ g \411,111 \.. 2,# 1 1 : wo. TRIM - 1 67-36-6-0 --1 , dih 394 + 1 , M - r ' WO. TRIM *t -- - -- \â‚¬TL, Â«ANDRAIL -eSTAURANT FLOOR ; 110'Â· 6191 ~ g,ew rwlÂ·rABS ~' EL. 71171.11 1 3'57_ 1 0 -------- , FACE Or pull-PINS El _ PE.COSAGIVE 1.4,_Ar ---1 L] ./7.t (TYM Â· '' Â· FACE OF WINPOW - 1 1, . SUBROUND @EXOND "7.-7.T i c- 05-TU=c --3 - e 1 /< TAM Li 1 17-1-1 1 (f"IT, --- 40. TRIM- - ' ~ - Exler; <34-TE -182 FelvIA'14 A 1 11 1 L-1.-1 '. ri*Â·~ .% 5 EXST. ~Â°LANTER _ ele.AIDE 1 - g ETAIL- FLOOR 1 = 100'-O" 1 RETA& FL-00% i i -T~20)11.1.(2 - 3----34 I 1 EL. 7921,61 SANDSTONE PANID . ---4 I - CONIC Â®LOCK MENCE AROUND 3-1 LITY SERVICE METERS | , ~ (1*YOTHERS) -O 69 logASTâ€¢RED + = ~Al NITBO AS rEGIC'' /4---- EXIST. SLAD h ELEV MI"11 -Al .1 1 (VIR DY) r ril SOUTH ELEVATION - __~1_1__ TO 48 FEMOVED ~ 9 C Ch ' Â»* 6/' 3.1-- 1 pASEMENT FLOOK - 4/ift- --- 4 . f EL, 71 11,00 f ---L 2 01'MEK Â·g' 12&_____--,~~ ' EL, 71 41. 64 - 2- LIGHTS :LITZ.1/â€¢Iâ€¢~41/'ll ' 1â‚¬61Â°LACE E>Â«I MTL. STANIOING BEAM ~OOF WISTANDING MITL. MITL, REÂ»l= Ae Â«SEÂ©, At,1. I:74=1101:AVILIJAYI -1 H ---al......4,~- T.O. ER. SLAB- 06- SEAM FOOF - -- 7 EL 7146Â·551 -p Im.II-III:â„¢â€¢II-IN MATo-! EXIST. d. REPLACE U L SHUTTERS Ae 'REa' 0, â€žâ€ž 4 -1 0 (TYP) , 3 21 i KEVEAL JOINT \ . 1 Issue: â‚¬ LACE EXIAI WIN W / i tzilleÂ®E_ENAL-RE_ W NEW WD. WINOO - 5,1 1,90 M.*21 FERMI -rl 1 1 \ / m \9 IMP, Ir-----~1 NEBI Â·Â· ~ 2 0 I 1 0, 47.. " tu U. 0 V [I 11=1 3.05 + 4 2-3 - i 9 1 03 M 11*-41 (TYR) i (TY,) . 1 P...4 11 11 11+11 7 / 1 -U 11 11 11 11=1 WINDOW,N ' I 2-3 16'US,Ne*6 bor/G. - = ---DI~~12~ZEZIIZEZZI~~'~ r- ==M WP. TRIM ' *Al / i-d-a-i------ 2 1 New Pl,+4Â·TEZe AO '910Â»/ hi - - --- - ah RESTAURANIT FLOOK .4----~ 1-- 7 EL, 711&I.9' - O 0 0 0 1 1 AWNING =&4 0 1 1 -1 ! Â· 6 0 - 574=62-M~% 0 . SELECTNG FABACATkoN PPOCEMES AND TECIICES OF -~ EL 5 - / VAP,Anon mON â„¢E DNe,m~ A,0 CoM,mOle t. CONSTRUCTOL THE ARCHITECT SNU 08 NOTFID OF *rY TME PURPOSE OF THIS DRAWIE IS OILY TO GRAPHICAUY -1/ SHOWN BY THIS DRAWNG - /El ' O - \ 1 \ , 1 RETAIL FLOOR 11 _.*_ElhE_ fheen_- - r r 527146'- -7- Â£ 712 0' i . GUIDO'S i / I. I 1, GRADE iN FOREeleOUNP NORTH &Â« t. NEW 1Â°LANTER / NEW rLANTES 'SANDSTON!~ 1 Â»AND 56*>STOKIE DAN= l ~ SOUTHr :490 -1#3 - 1 r---EXIST. SLA* 1 1 EXTERIQF*/~ | ELEV. 710.el~ | | &-1 1 1 ELEVA#IONS ---- 1 1 171 Scale: *Gilloil -9 7-J.. E j | | *A5EMENT FL. 1 i DASEMENT FLOOF< 11 2 EL. 7911.00' 9 -Â¥1-7111.83-:-_-- ~---------2+~-N-ER-TH ELEVATiON -- - --- - - -- --~----1-------- -1 , 4.1 \1 - ~ Â©_[130 WILLIAM JOHN POSS * in'.1 22'-11112 ADIDITION EXISTING t 1 1 MATCH EXIST Â¢ KErLACE MEFLACE EX 1 97. MTL. TiooF SHUTTERS AB BEa'ID. Wl *TANDING MTL. 6EAM FOOF /1151 (TÂ¥f) 1 4 â‚¬EFLACE EXIeT WINDOW 1 1 74 NEW WD WINIDOW (Trif) ~ UPPER RIDGE -' ... .1.-1!01"'ll 1 a, LOWEK RIDGE \ i - U. 7141,Â«1 - wd#eÂ®re.0.Lpia,w,int '111 1 \ 1 = 128- 0681 - 9/- EL, 79 48, (.9 i - ' I 1 I 1 1 11 1 1 - 605 EAST MAIN STREET 1 . 1 ASPEN, COLORADO81611 \ TEL (303) 925-4755 ~ 1 11 1 - I. \ O- --Â» t- STL, CAbLE Â¥0 1 - 1 SEE. PETAI L.- ~ _4-9.- > 4 r 1 ExieT I ~i| <9 -'* i' MUANTEK -Â»t- - t.3 --. 4 U -==- -4 11.11 Ed - ~ G / FLANITEK ' m EXIST. 0 - i I -- 41 KESTAURANT- FLOOR . --- ----= - ----- - - -- -- ---. REST-AURANT FLOOR -- --- .--1---- ---7-7-- -2--1--\\ NIEWr LANTER ---- ~-~ 7 EL.liÂ·,1.11 . 110 --7 e -- LOCATIONS ------ 1 EL, 74-41' 9 1 - 6 11 s 110 -%% El -- -- Of -3~AX-rivi 3 0 1 Exi#T vvt=2 GATE To 1-1 1 FENCE TO IKEÂ·1151 N \ KEMAIN ' N LAY (TYF) . f i -_ 47-UCCO - S L==L Â«-==3- / 11111 / 0 4 1 1 44 / O -El EL \ Il - - 7%67. - \ -- / -1 1 \ f ETAIL FLOOIL - -- 4 - . _.6.- -r --~----- EL. 712!61 1 ; 1 = 1 00-011 - FLANTER rLANT-/i~. , -I 7 + r SASEMENT FLM* ~ EL. 71'1.86)' - -npr-- - L_ ___ _________________________________________________.'___J .10.1-ND~~ /11 EAST ELEVATION ' 42 RErÂ°LACE EXICT. MTL, ROOF WJ 51-ANIPINe MTL. SEAM ROO:' -_-- EX I %TING ADD T ON __1_ ~ 2 UPPEK KIDGE 111 ~ | LOWER K ! Dee 7 EL. 7141 . 9'>'i - '5 118'- 04/6 '1 1 EL, 7948, 692 EFLI 1 I â€¢Iâ€¢*2-- ----Â·- M C.H. UY eNT Ii[â€¢Ii=-~Ic-:--=ICâ€¢Ill:-Ii- 1 1 12. U 1 1 Issue: .1 423-2-KE-ESAL-EEL V *= 1 9- ----- -j 5*lo~*Ull-912--METME 4 -011 1 -- U4T 4-r-3 h 6% 47 rLANTEK - 1- 11 / FLANTE'. To IM MEIâ€¢ull-T To MATCH EX 1 51-Â· 4.01 - eT UCOO H A1.L KITCHEN -32!ENR _ -- - --- - I 0 RESTAURAN#CONNECTO~ ~ KEeTAURANIT FLOOR ; EL. 71*1.11 1 - 110' 0 , Y0 ! ' . 110- 632 u , sTucco 7 - Sule,le,mic f COLOR *f e>(147, FENCi <x 6-TUCCO-.,~ . 10Â©61< puN/14'Ele ARCHIT, TO BEAAIN SANDSTONE A& fp~%~ - LEE. 59/C. Â·~8 + 9 S HALL â„¢EMRPOSE OF THÂ£ DRAWMEOILY 10(~IAMIOLY 13,1~10|< ----- -- COWSÂ·muclat THE ARCH,TECT ,â€¢11 2 NOnFED OF All F'Ave~,1 SELECTINQ FABRCATION PAOCES- AK TEDOICIM OF DEPICT THE GE,ERAL NATURE OF nE WOF,( THE CONTAAO TOR S FESPINSBLE FOR C(*fl/0 DIE,451014 A~g) *~ CONO '6Â»L..AEâ€¢ - --~ VAF~nONS FROM THE DIMENSIONS AND 00,Â®m018 1 SHOWN BY THIS DRAWIO I i.f *Ii- .,... 4 i 4 GRADE e *ACK 'Fol~CH -- -li-- ; 4 /24- CONSÂ·. eL,Nb _ _ _ I I - Â· '454 1 05&69- - W k ~ RETAIL FLOON. Â· -- -p_.--Izzl~*~_------ CETAIL/CONNECTOR .4 - : 424 0 1 I m 1 00'-O|| - * EL. 7111.6' ~ EL. 712Â·61 11 44 et' -- a 442-4 "'/ 1 4..... - . III, -99 . .....+.........* . C 1 CUD' -O 1 Â· .,i ./,523/ . 1EAST& WESil 'EXTER'OR 990 1 49<4 7 - *D Â· Â·1>Â·I. 1 Â·* 4 + L ot, 1 I 1 HALL 4 ./ . - IELEVA-fIONS~1 1 Â· E 1 1 .1 - 5-11 51010 IN#UL, | b" FION. WALL | Scale : >4" = 1 '- 0,i 4%. 4. 43- /~~~ ~-~ 4 1 - M CONA 4l,Alb ; < --- -AA"PILL- 1 BASEMENT FLOOR | --- - -- 4 - *AGEMEN.f FLOOR.~ 11 - . 4/4 - O F'UN. 08AIN 4 El-' 7111.801 1 .. :6 I. 6.-0..- 34 ... . -----Ii------------- - 101.2,9 ~ A3.2 ~ Â© 1410 WILLIAM JOHN POSS 10'-69' APP TION| 54<151-14 . 01. -E'j \City ~ f NEW WINDOW 01Â°ENINee LIGHT /*/2, "cmÂ£LIA OLLAFACE MTD. REMOVE E)<leT WINDOW, LOCATE *NCEALE.9 - 21- 3 9876+ Exter, OPEN I hee. (TYM) eaulâ‚¬CE (TYr) Set PE-TAIL- -~ W/ METAL CAF Ballâ€¢mazwm,=~ . . TO. SLAB 1 1 ..K - ---- -- EL,7940*01 ,AÂ®*B"Itaâ€¢11nt dll'Â·316â€¢ E==111 \ ' 605 EAST MAIN STREET .1 U U 11---3 ' ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 ~ - i~TEMLE-1% 1 55#stifri,frzz- 11%2911{! (TYr.D 11 9 11 7 - 11 -6 1 592 -1 1111 */ 1 4 m 4~ 1 Rfl M-ti> t|| r-- sTLEÂ£~1 F~ 1 013 -__- -- 03 ' TEL (303) 925-4755 1 V err VII-;1 1 - tqLAZE-P THERMAL Alwl[ TECT i ~ - WIP. FLOWEK .OX-- (TY'V.) 14 f 10 I- Agjil Lwd MA TKIM 1 .- 1131 I 1----1 1 4-4 [2~IJJJ-1 , Uf-EIK LEVEL -- AWNING -1 OAN129*12>Ne A,ZH AWNING --~. -Â· 6-rucco -RE-LIE'P - AWNIND-1 â‚¬,AN,LeDNE ANCH E AWN ING ~ 01 1, 5 El z El -0 0 -- EL.713I.I~ '109'-â‚¬,11 1 1 - -- -0 0// 11 + 2 //1 ill\\ 601 1 4 H 0/ 1 1 9 0 // 41 ' / 11 ihi \ 11 0 1 91 1 1 1 11 / i 11 2-2 i il 1 c i ~c 6_ < -cce ts'Unâ‚¬ ~ ~~* z *~< E-~~ ~fiz F - 1 J q- i CANÂ©STDNE *Nlp - , m I~'~ ~LL l[L U - lilli 1111 /1 11 1 1 J] IL====~ __ Lul 4/] 1 NLAfv I ~1 ./1 a i 11 ' m (Tle) /0 7 GRADE,N ./1 - 1 \ DACKGROUND - ) -3.'It-.- 61< ----our--~j , A 3Â·i; 7 JIni~~~f~fÂ© r 1 'f./t*l[~~ ~~12j, LOWEN-LEXE.__*- . t . El-'714,2,' L kl pol-2 E I Okf~LATE \ 1 111-14 \ IN- 1 \ . 1 -- -- SAINPUTONE *AND L.........1------------ L-~ LANIDS-TONIE BAND-~ -- SANOSTONE 12*4C) - - ----Â·-- 1 1 | *ASEMENT LEVEL 1 I. . T 7911.e' = 90'- Z'/0" - /Th NORTH ELEVATION ~_- etwisT_1Â»__*hEELI-Ek_~ 0-Â« 5UKFACE- MITe tty" REMOVE EXIOT. WINDOW. LOCATE , COINDEALED F LOW 12'OAE- STANOINIC, /NEW WINDOW of ENINGSÂ· .Â· LIO HT 1 ~/ JATCH EXiST OFENINGS ~ SoLIFADE (TYF) SE.AM MILIALI- 16 -51Â«1-16*+T- ttop AS 5Â¥ EC u I & ToF op PARAPET - 61<7 f BEYOND BEN-D,49 21 â€¢1/01/â€¢Iâ€¢~2~ -7-6272'-2 8" ~ m - V - \ / 1 1 12Â£221Â£0-/f.120 -- 01---7--- -TOV OF T. O. 51-At> LZee-lee . -.1 I - - - Efflfflf//ad/M-= ' ThÂ·213#40 - EL. -1142.56* STULLO / = 111'-5'6' (OLOR -37 ,/M ......... 44. op 1<EvCAL r 41Tec.-r __ rp*@~iip~*@~*1 [ii~ - ._______ 4 - 7 â‚¬ T.Â¥12,3 - E -1 -I -+ M Ir.--Ki.Ir> -=<111 F -~1 Â· | 1[[2- --~ ;lll[22- \41 1 /~-3-4 414-1 ~f---- -U f---7.U - 11Â£- L--2- 11-31 7 Issue: 1 1 e v L-- . L___1 IF \lilli' \'111 ' 111-32.-1~trâ‚¬ftÂ«_REY_ r 1 / \ /\ |' , 1 '|'|' ' \ !11| | 11~77~ 1 1.11 /\ /,T 4 , /4~-F> h .Â®Â®.4 A .f<Â® dll k , .46> . lili,/ \:111 / \]111 1/ \ / - : 1 -kICUP F'KAMIEÂ· 0.- 51-1.99- ~BUILDING PENE- / i 1,4 / 44 CLAID .DBL 1 \V/ 'rIVOT EY BA CoN.1' r ~ 'FAL LA 01< BEYOND C- LS-ructo -\ UMUATIP leÂ·I L Wr:2, -Tk IM (MTL. L.1.AD) - ___..____~3 [~ZIZE~~2~ZIEZZI~ + EQUAL 4 uFFEK Le/EL /// Cr-nt) 1/ eANID*TDNS CAF PAND - 95& PETAIL -~ UrlÂ°EN j-EVE L. 2 F EL. 1131, 1' 1 , ASCESSED = 1Â£)9'- 6' 7 1000A ~ 3/4 HOUR POOK Ifm==en L 1 ,-1 11=-1 , 11 111 4>--1 1[ e 1 \ 0 -7 - . a 3 UMIÂ°STER EA \ Vy d.\ EÂ®RESS EGRESS --t=]11 b==4] 1 11 L--2]1 11 -- - - -111 -1LIL] E N El L. - Eeâ‚¬ESS EGRESS 21- Wi NDOW-- --JU WINDOW lor- WINDOW-Â·-~-3 11 wINDOW ~ 1 1 AL|111 STAI R RAMF - - r--=-21 1 1 265 cllÂ»*114 2 -241 - __L- I - Q LOWAK LEKEL ----9 - -1 --- LOWER LEVEL 7 24-0 -192.1.1' THE pURPOSE OF THIS DRAWNG IS ONLY TO GRAPHICA'.LY DEPICT THE GENERAL- NATURE OF THE WOAL TME CONTAAC . 99'Â·194" EL 712 1 22 i Ton 6 RESPONSEE FOR CO--0 0~ENSDa AlÂ® SELECTING FABRIATÂ©N PROCESSES ME) TED-QUES OF Â· 91'-1 14 CONSTRUCTIOIL â„¢E ARCHITECT DILL BE NOTIFED OF ANY VAIIAIONS FROM THE DIMENSIONS Al[) CONDITIONS SHOWN BY â„¢IS DRAWNG 4 - A BUSNESS 1 1 + IBLOG. NORTH 1 1 1& .SOUTU S 6, 155MT, LEVEL. | 7-Emii.0 r 1 4 1 ~,7111'A' ------4- 1EXTERIOfti,o~ : 90% 21*4 . 10' - 23* 'ELEYA-ri6NS 1 Scale:#4Â·64' r-21 6.-Ii./-4 2 SOUTH ELEVATION LAÂ«] V 497 --- 11+39+ -lip -- -Ii... -Ii /ek<YLIGHT .A~. ~ '-â‚¬Â·-rONg CONDEALEW LIGHT - 4 SOURCE (TYP) / 2 11- r -- - - 7 -74 - |MECH. EQUIFFIENT ~ I VtliTÂ¥,n=ilâ„¢mal- 1 1 4 To. LA# .1 sEMOVE EXIer, WINDOWS, 2-00,7-5 --- - - ;*~**,~& #d'W~~ NEWWINDOWOFIN'G. PATCH EXIÂ« orN'6. cre) ~- L, 7116. 67-7 ,~ 605 EAST MAIN STREET f - ~ASPEN COLORADO81611 KITCHEN MALL Â© ~ (303) 925-,4755 ] 0- 1 - r ~ UFfER. CONNECTOR El- 7131,1~ 0 11Â©Ltril - 1 1 uâ€žEIK LEVEL 1, - 11 T u FFER. LEVEL EL 7131.1' m AWNINS (7Â¥n j --9\3, . 1O1LGI' INEW CANVAS -E.71*Â«----7- â‚¬ELOCATE UTILITY Â« METERS TO -THIS STAIRe 4 AREA --- i-I 1 ! GRan-Zi , ALLEY PE.YOND ~ i STUCCO 1 -~ AVENUE MALL <3 MALL - -1 - 1 \\1 FLANTER. /fia 41 ; CE,/ /11 GRADE 141 /1 - 1 / SANDSTONE BANIO / 0 . 1 ,6 - CONNECTOR_EL. 71ZI, 61 v 1004>" ....1.- ... . .. BANDSTONE Â»ANIO 6 1 0 2-'4~~CON *LAD / 1. . k. 412 ' .5% , 1 :. ' -2- -i -1-** : 7- ~1 ~ .., - - -5 1.-2-~ -Â· - Â©933] [433<J . LOWER LEVEL . 1 L El-, 071'24,+61~ - 12 -2-9*944* 4-3 -_ ----__ - || ./ - - -:-'-I' -:-I -' t ~ LOWERIEVE 16. 712I,2' =11171/Â¢ 1 \'* ... 1 84 ~ 1â€ž #i.i- 4 ':1 4 â‚¬..fiall'*,a:1~e&=*a~Â·2 - EL, 712Â·I 21 'E ... -- 9 Ar.... ..... .4 -- -- 1 . .-2 903 = 11 1 74" 'I v 40Â·+ 1: '' 9. *Â·'--,#~ ...â€ž 94* 1 7. '.. . '1...r +1% 1 9.4 1, & 3, \ 1 -1.-2--1,-~ f.11 eye le,p, e. *P HALL --Â·_ Â· --- - ~ FION. WAL-1. ~ ~ 11 l 41; 1 #t / 1-f I f , E Mâ‚¬LND. SL/45, ~ / .: 2 CONNECTOS le>AeEMENT 1 4 4 7 Â°i - 13.':44 -- -- 1.- eASEMENT i , EL, 7111,81 -1- 91 - 278" r-1 Eli-, 7111.8 : 10'- Â©e" /11 WEST ELEVATION MEÂ»1. CHIMINEY â‚¬ 6AF AÂ¢61=PER. MECH.â‚¬6134#; LF -9 61Â«613+T UP. FAeDIA CLAO V* Â»ErGND N AS 5,34' 10 (TYF.) 2-4 GA. IMTL Â¢ FAINTED - Ifl 01/â€¢Iâ€¢jh~ 37miz.,FEVit.7,1 473660 ' REVEAL- i ., Â«UCED REVEAL --- 7====:il _|~~ NEW W12. Iii-~ 7322- 11131 -- NEW WID, r FTS-' l NEW Wto, WINDOWS ~' WINDOW e .lili 4/' WI NDOW 1 Â»ANDSTONE Issue: 11IL _..IlrL--_--31 -L[fl / HANDRAIL =a 41* 90 ~H'Fr KINAL 13â‚¬V. / CAP t. -4~ 5 Il Â·10 1 #UILPING rEBM IT JL~1211[1 ~LL====Jit 111 1 -DIZIEZEZZI-Z- _1- CANIVAG ~~_~~_~ _~ _ _ ___ ~~_____~__ ~ ~ _ ~ ______- AWNING ~ UME~ LEVEL j IDEMOND - # El-. 7931.11 101 Lall -11 A -- <TUCCO ~ eRADE ~ EX IST; 0 METERÂ·S -TD Â© SANDSTONE *AND ~ *E REL-OCATEP \1 - LOWEA LEVEL --.-Ill-*---- . :1 , 7.2- - 'EL.79)LZ - THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRA-0 6 OftÂ¥ TO GAAMIEN.LY 1 1 1 = 19 -74, DEACT TIE GE,ERAL NATUIE P TE WORC DE CONT.IAC 5&7*25=7=-i, ColeTRUCTIOIL THE ARCHaECT -LL RE NOTFIED OF ANY Â¥AFIATIONS FROM THE DNENS,0,11 AM) CO~){110,8 L____ 4 ___ 3 ' 9 BUSINESS 6- BUILAINGâ‚¬_-. | SASE-MEMr LEVEL i EAST& WEST 1-= 9 EL.lai 1.9 f Â·10 - 1'/60 EXTERIQRÂ« ELEVATIONS rl Scale: 4 &16" /t EAST ELEVATION 3*7 13, MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: 425 E. Cooper - "Guido's" parcel - Amendment to Conceptual Development approval Date: March 14, 1990 SUMMARY: The HPC is being asked to review and approve amendments to the previously approved Conceptual Development plan for the Guido' s parcel, including the chalet structure and the adj acent two story commercial building. The changes are primarily found in window and door openings and placement, and are significant in number. HPC PROJECT MONITOR: To be assigned at this meeting PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: On August 23, 1989, the HPC reviewed and tabled action for a Conceptual Development proposal involving a third floor addition to the detached commercial building on the Guido's parcel (to the west of the chalet building). The plans included a new facade on the commercial building and a bridge connector between the two structures. The Committee found the general application was not compatible with the chalet building or the historic district. On September 13, 1989, the applicant returned to the HPC with a revised proposal, which received Conceptual approval with the following (condensed) conditions to be met at Final: 1. Chalet building preservation be precisely defined 2. Exact building materials represented at Final 3. Bridge connector restudied for reduction purposes 4. Landscape plan submitted 5. Commercial storefront plans be submitted in detail 6. Restudy of bridge connector; hide mechanicals there 7. Roof top plan be submitted 8. Existing conditions be provided either in elevation or photographs 9. East elevation of commercial building to be submitted Due to the number of fenestration design changes made to the plans since Conceptual approval, the applicant wishes to receive HPC's approval for the amendments prior to continuing work on the Final Development plans. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: Staff has included a copy of the approved conceptual elevations presented on September 13, for comparison purposes. Please carefully compare the changes proposed for compatibility purposes. The fenestration patterns have changed significantly, on both the commercial and chalet buildings. North Elevation: o Commercial Storefront level changes: Retail entrance doors, central door, arched detail over doors, awnings o Commercial second floor changes: 3-2-3 window pattern, narrow double hung windows, awnings eliminated, cornice lighting fixture included o Chalet building changes: The fenestration has changed substantially, beginning with the first floor "picture windows" (unbroken panes, rustic metal trim). The second floor windows are moved to the ends. East Elevation: o The changes in window openings and door placement has changed the character of this elevation substantially, in staff's opinion. The HPC should consider these changes carefully. and compare these to the Conceptual plans. South Elevation: o Again, a number of window changes have occurred on the second floor of the commercial building, and the first floor of the chalet building. The windows in the second floor addition to the chalet building are now presented as larger (five across as opposed to six). The HPC should consider whether this change is compatible with the established tudor grid on the north elevation. Staff response: Please refer to Section V. "Commercial Buildings - New Construction (beginning on page 35) of the Guidelines in reviewing these changes. We find that the proposed changes to the commercial building are not out of line with the Guidelines and Development Review Standards. The basic proportions are repeated, and modern materials (stucco and terra cotta) have been utilized. Our primary concern is that the commercial building not compete with the adiacent chalet building. It should be subordinate in nature without being uninteresting. We feel the design generally accomplishes this goal. On the other hand, we are very concerned about the 2 significant changes in fenestration on the chalet building, and the subsequent reduction in exterior plaster wall surface. We recommend that the HPC study those elements that give the "Mountain Chalet" style its character, and then compare the proposed changes to that. The "Mountain Chalet" style is noted for its tudor influence (rectangular timber/stucco materials), low pitched roofs with wide overhangs, horizontal features (balconies, fenestration) carved verge boards, and cutout balcony and shutter detail. We feel that the amount and design of glazing incorporated here is not appropriate to this structure, and significantly changes the chalet character of this building. While the need for transparency at the storefront level is understandable, (converting from inn to restaurant to retail), a restudy appears necessary to balance need with traditional architectural integrity. Landscaping: The landscape plan indicates a 2' high (raised) detached concrete planter in the area between the edge of the mall and facade of the chalet building. The CCLC is discouraging the use of raised planters in the mall. We find the combination of the concrete material and physical interruption between the mall and the storefront level should be restudied. The HPC discussed the continuation of mall bricks through this plaza area, however, the applicant is indicating an aggregate concrete surface. The Planning Office is in support of pedestrian amenities in this area (benches, etc), however, we feel this conceptual landscape plan does not necessary meet the goals of the HPC as last discussed on September 13. We are recommending further study here, to achieve the goal of providing a dynamic pedestrian/plaza experience. Remaining conditions of Conceptual Development approval: These have not been met with this amended proposal, however, they are Still required for Final Development review. Additional conditions, should any be approved at this meeting, will be required to be met at Final. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Grant approval for the amendments as proposed 2. Grant approval for the amendments to the commercial building as proposed, and require restudy on the chalet building, as discussed by staff, and/or with additional specifics. 3. Table action, recommending further amendments to the proposal for compatibility purposes. 4. Deny approval for the amended proposal, finding the original plans more compatible. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant approval for the amendments proposed to the commercial 3 building, as submitted. We recommend that the changes proposed to the chalet building not be approved, for the reasons stated above, and recommend that the applicant restudy the fenestration issues for compatibility. We also recommend the landscape elements be restudied. All conditions of conceptual approval are to be met at Final Development review. memo.hpc.425ec.cd.2 4 bil ; and associates MAR 51990 605 EAST MAIN STREET - ASPEN,COLORAD081611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 March 2, 1990 Roxanne Eflin Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 S Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Guido's Redevelopment Dear Roxanne: Enclosed please find a current set of drawings for the above referenced project. We would like to be included on the HPC agenda for March 14. At that time we want to have the committee review these drawings and make comments about their compatibility with the commercial core. The restaurant building upper level will retain the plaster and trim board motif. The mall level will be converted to a retail use containing 2-3 shops. Entry will be accomplished by glass doors. Display windows will be made of rustic metal frames and will be recessed into plaster pilasters. The business building will consist of a stucco exterior with a stone base. Detailing will be comprised of wood, possibly terra cotta, and canvas awnings. Storefronts and doors will be wood and glass. The connection has been designed to have as low a visual impact as possible. The materials are stucco with a stone base. The site plan shows a plaza development to the north of the restaurant building. The existing dining on the south side will remain. Trash and service functions will be located on the south side of the connection. Handicap access will be on the north side of the connection. S,incerely, A 46 %27) Kim Weil Enclosure KSW:lah 157Â».1 727-71 ----- -------. An example o: Romanesque R, *r ir l:34 6 1 +1 1 4! 1101Â£16 ir~/ 11 *Up# /1 'li: ; i, -/Ir-'VE 22##Qi ; ~*2-,I;i~li~ Mmt..MEE#Eligjl# 1 + . 1 *14.-7 1 1 -1 =-7.'.'I 11 -r. 1.- + I ., 411 1+ -1 + An example of Italinate St *Ell.WL.44.u tut'Mlik,1, ' ~~~ | |lul 1 ..tullJ11144-14Ill~WWWmil.LU~~ If'~'~'t~'4ldfl I /1 JJ,+Lw*L. %4~61ul.1114~ i..950./ , , ble ~L 8 \,Cl R - - .-+ lt,m~ --11 32 - C 12 ,/1 0 0 B rj ,Â» Ttl--- -6===M.g 1--1 11 1 2 =E= 1 L LE' 1 IM 01 7 1- -, .- IIi -1 L Â· lim i lilli 6 11 1 11- lip= An example of Mountain Chalet Style. 4 . .3 4 243 ~1Â·tpito': 4 Â£ 4 .e m.1 n -11 -11 .Ll 14 1 4 11 11 PLA':,1'5Â·% . L.m NA ---1 . #009 775â€¢MÂ· TÂ¥/ dw -LT==i~~- 14*79 ~~ 1 2.12 El 2 2 .TI,-,O , Apt,4 woop TAH -1Â¥r, *5 .11\ 10'4~ 36.6-JIi/-- a-WÂ°~ 'p.e, -nFU-- AN/lk.. C.er.:.Â·-T....6 rm# coÂ·rrb ~h\~ :1:2 mii;*3 W.''I f. -/,3] 1~-4 0 -----_ I. r j / -- Â· L 11. Al - U -. - râ€¢W *41 ty. * -r' '1 ~~45?7~ :.1 -4- - 1 .11 1- ., .070%,Pa 0*1/6 ,1- j MUU-0 Â·I.Â· 11/CT.r'UE. v~4UK. Â·nAUTE'Q cooree s 1-. B. L. C.VATIOW -1 , ME.Thi- all A ., 6 ~i'm~PA- i i-....,â„¢r....1......' el'- 1.- ' 11- 29 I.1-W w Tk:+ 1-rr r# .42,05--71#.b.' 1,9 -.T'*br Â· Â·~C,~ ~ '/ NOO-9 9 MITCH-t- H j .1,' 4/4 -167-1 Ia, ' -T-,fA~ 1.4,1 U.â€žÂ®Aai.:afâ€¢r L.LAâ€¢1-1 fÂ»66,-râ„¢.*-l L__.~644-61-â€¢yNA- .6,16....65 - fuâ€¢)2'1â€¢4. 4~1-eNA sT BLEVATI ON- - f LA61-61< f Â£,M- Â·rÂ¥M ...0--/:ES,2,1*1'(Flul#ES,M# ./- 1 <2 -r-* u,TTA-' ' it It //1 111/Waa,~E/191- ;%&*sp- U U' Ll ~TlrTV-1-r- -- -1 -2 1 1 45*Ch:4=3Â«X - ~Â·Â·Â·Â·2'a'*'/g4~1Â·<.-/21*4 â€¢t / / - '~.'/.09-'- ' 111 A .,4-FLODEK -,AS 13- - 0- 0- Ir C &2.- 7 - - U.El,-14â€¢201. W fIATIH ml[15â€¢T'N,611 1 4 *ft,tvÂ·'1/flfflr> P,UT~ , , ~.â€ž~:0 .Â· Â· STUU-O / 08 Url H n FL-44.Toklt. Â·FU4,1'tt 1 1 ,.[ A-==6 23321 ALLEY ELEVATION 0-Â«NAâ€¢4 CO flitic W.1 G U 0 DO' S MARC 01 2.1990 1 1 A SPEN. COLORADO r--1--40 'Ar- 4 0-,4- 2 :.4 C Aa - ".4 . W # 1 e., 'Cy t-, 14.4. 3, . ' --------- -- ---1-Â»-- 71990 ALLEY Ul : Cal.Â·TINA PIâ€¢lfht6, -FATIO LU 11 1 1-1 1- - 1 -1 In 9 - 1 1- 6fUIDO' 5 CONUEL TOK Â·OUSINE-55 OUILPINA Z i /P 21,3 1 a 4-1 4* pl Im <r-mi) - Illig -- - â‚¬----4--t/Po.1/ 0/btgÂ·-Te ALVI*,Cetâ€¢.1-Z -1--Â·-4 1 , . l~ *2 4 ~ ~ ~ zr=~_ ~ ~ f *-15~ut 1 U, 4-,FAV'He, -MATTC,fOis -1'-6 coNDKA-TeÂ· TLAW TBE- coopER AVENUE CbM"AWL' Dill EU[IDÂ©'S SITE PLARI Â®ARGE 8. geÂ®@ f 1 ASP'E[M, COLORADO '--4 1. 'o ./d'ultÂ»Â£*I-k- 0 1- 11 -717 .- 10=.9 - 1 li I Wker-1 Woorâ€¢1 DOKâ€¢1 050-1 !41-HJ U==== - 1. 1 L 11.- ......- ... Â·-- -Â·- .--Â·~ p. R.M It,Â»rt .ti #--: , - Â·1 . 111 1! r-1 V 'rofie L!=6 '11 - 3 L 4 2 F Â«Lar 1 6. 07Â» 1 VT-MENT- 1 -,pu L,/ 0 1 .unES- =,=1 F--> 41 -#I- 1 - - 14 11 C 1 ./ ur 1*I -------1! 0-17==932-9 VEâ€¢bT MUL-' : 2~\' ~ 1 A/11 ilf 2 ~~~~ ~ 11 t veÂ»v 4-91% 4 L- E- PLTAI L- . Ar:TAIL %1-*Thlk 1 211 .- -01 1 5114-0, Ii=r 11 -.-* 1 4- 2 0 441 CEÂ· TAI L L.E.vt.4 fhAN LIZE-32- Al'AKTMCIT Live-L- TLAN "-It ---t .-+ -7 riA "- .-4 r=" . , 1 1 11 1 : t--7 ; 1 Et.tut=- 1 Eli EJE ' L.--1 7 11_- . 11 4 ~1=L- 846/ME-U-T */11 2 1 1 ,/ 1111 [EL lEt t,AÂ·SE.MmuT LUE-L 1>LAN[ 7 BUS [1 NIES S [SELD ULÂ©UNIQ WARCH 291Â®90 r-L._1 1 1 ASPEN g C OIl=OR AÂ©O 5 10 10 50 -1 1. Il i.' .. .11 , LÂ» i 1 Ret-/44 1 4 1 - 1 11 9 ~ n 1-71 201[23 72. It:z2 ---. E--r- + -' 1 - 4- . 11 ./ 2 - / A - M=k- A'l LP 7-it ~- 11 0.1 1 :N : 1 4 ; + r '11 1_ U V#STIBULE Â·KEÂ·,1-AughNT VE<,1- 1 e U L E. 1 K E-rb I l- 1 133 1 3 m AÂ«C-M eNT LE.VCL I'LAN K e T A i L L S V L L r LA N CE 5~-AU XLA UT LEVCL PLAU Wl 8 U 0 DO S , MARÂ© 06 2. 19Â®@ "* ASPEN. COLORADO 1 1 1 o r---3 20 9, /*lb./.0-7_ SEP- I 442% aM %13- F 1/41 N CK AS .-- -#4--- WE), TR'vi i'-- 72RfRA COTTA ,- -- PVD. TRI Â»f 63-11660 h MTL. %007 - t , ,i / d .8 i E --a 1/Â«42--/h, )-4 -11 j 1/4 ir 11 4 - 1 1 1 /-t- Â»f . :111 . P 1 41--- - 4 1 i .1 1 r= 1 -le>:I' , 1 - ! 1 1 -2 3 . 1 '4 , Â·il ;1 I 1111 11- 1 # 11 1 121 i i.....1 11 lili 11 1 11 . 11 . 1 IN 1 . 11 Â· 1 W 11 1 I !,It- i p i// .1 11 111 1 1 11 1 1 Â· 11 ''0. 1 ~Il l. L -41 1 ==.-4, -; -3 4--1 WA/*v 4 . il , 1-1 , 1~,vwwvy~,~ i , L_ _- ' ./. 1 1 Â»tif> , .1 1-04, ' . 1 . ' 4UU ARI'lk,!Â·f;i~- t.':lj:jjito74 ;'126- e 9,26441% PNY 2 1 1 4 7 **myaÂ·*- 4~13*2* .- 1 -1 : 11 / 1 1 [59Â»11*Â· , , 1 1 ' 1 1 62.-65'fÂ£99/ I , - 1%13*?tr:.6. - 1 L_-4 1 111 i i/inyyH# - . - /,9,/,0mz. t; 1.1,W yv,w p. *D v, v .V 1 1 I lili 1,â€ž 1 , 1 1 6. Z CO b 0 0 Z OllVA313 H.LE!O 69 logg l 71/\FP 1N3IAIdO13A3G3EI ~ 0-01=1 .2 -1.UNG 1 NOI1VA313 HlnOS .).I N 1 0 1N3Wd013A30313 S,Oalne / ;11 e U.ili~LI 41 411 L. 411 J f.f i,!llit. 4. 4'SE=== 1 111- â‚¬50 , Ni /9 if / G 4 1 44 1 - /7 '61 94<L_ t :' . Â·e., 9 4/ 1 , It , 9 ! 09 94 1 35 -,2 + Â»== ~ It-1 !11 , 11- Ptl? - 94.2,3 0,9 - .//1 Â·11' i li r,7.17. \#Mt,/ : ' ' ' i. 1 42. '-1*.Â£ix,~Â·_710*4Â».~1,0.,i ' - 994 2/,1-1 /// A.\ ..1 . - 1 h 1 11 1 - %'.1 4/ ff 122.UL==- 11 I h 4/2 ,/ 944 '' 9,2,4 4< 1 " 4 ~ . %/1/'edlt. @ #.1 4 4 44 .1.. 1,111 1 4.- 993 11411/11 â‚¬ , 1 '. -difill'U, 1 1 ii, 1 111 1, II 1.1111:1 ' LOP# 2 b.1 ~~I.~ \*ah 9 9,9 344.9 I '' ijlaill: fÂ» -7 11Â·, f :1111 2 >*:41-22 l -1 4.1 0 t ; j 't 0 0 -- B V ff l -7 . 1 11 : -- r, 2 â‚¬26- 9Â·-1 . - . . t , *CANÂ¢7%â„¢ /-1 >IDÂ· 1-Il- 81 607-17Â« STUCco-' 1 _L-L- - i ~-1-i - J f------- - - 1 .1-:1 1' r: 1 -i l ! liFt /<. 1 1 cs 1 . - 1 h J -8 E ~11 91 ') IL .74. i I 11 21 . r 1 1, 1 1 01 [B 01 Ul C C 6 F M 6% Q G\Ul 4-9 -2 3 6 p 1- gl GUIDO'S REDEVELOPMENT Ult EAST ELEVATION 1 SepT 81 0.)6.01 1 + \UÂ·u '432 WahA<,-8 N\-EDÂ· MÂ¢OF Jf,Zodjirl 4 i li I - -- --1 71216e'~Ic[ 2-- ---7