HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.407 E Hyman Ave.HP-1990-2206(. ~ 11 f-1 99 6- 1.1 - 407 E Hyman 2737-182-16-002 4*\ Ax 1-1 2, 5-5- 1 1 H I 1 1 . iI
T . ,/20 -90 12 MAo,1 }t n., eone- A3 ownt,e*8/4 AT 40 9 e-4 0 M.u....1 4,2644-) :16.-ro bb .1-42@4 Hct>ture'¥0 61. 4.w*Mt DUW11& 46:,6;4000'w f '&476 =•ia Son 5~•f?4
0 1 4, 13 0 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Minor Development: Awning - 407 E. Hyman (Hyman Ave. Mall) - Galerie du Bois Date: February 28, 1990 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Minor Development approval for a new awning (60" wide, 30" high, retractable) at the stair entry (ground level) to Galerie du Bois on the Mall. The awning will be burgundy canvas, with white letters, and drop valance. DISCUSSION: The Historic Development Guideline pertaining to awnings states (Page 25 - E. Storefronts, 6): "Consider using awnings or canopies to provide color and depth to the facade. On many storefronts and upper story windows awnings are appropriate. These awnings should match the shape and width of the opening it is covering. They should not obscure important details. The awnings should also be aligned with other awnings on a building. Canopies are appropriate only on the ground level and should match the width of the storefront. Awnings or canopies made of aluminum, fiberglass and other rigid materials are not encouraged. Awnings that do not serve as useful sheltering from sun, rain or show are not encouraged. Response: We find that this proposal meets the Guideline. The awning is a retractable door canopy, designed to fit within the opening, and requires no encroachment license. Further, we find that the Development Review Standards have been met with this proposal. Awnings similar in character do exist on the mall. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC approve the Minor Development application for 407 E. Hyman. memo.hpc.407eh
.. . / 0 III i \ \/\.k - - t /44 + l~3 Go" A 30" = 407 € ti ~/NU\.
Lanvas Products Carpany Galerie duBois 88 25 Road .. Joy Summerfield ;rand Junction, Colorado 407 East Hyman an Dykstra Aspen, Colorado -242-1453 1-925-5525 Retractable Door Canopy ¥ 30" O/~AL-lt«f, L\.12 64,~j~\~* i hinge 8" Valance 16 60* '1 Frame constructed of 5/8" x 1 3/4" x.060 extruded al. tube hinged at wall. Attached to the building with 5/16" steel lag screws ( 6 total ) Fabric to be Burgundy with white trim and 6" letters. Fabric to be acyrlic awning material 9.25 oz.
0 0 + 1.1 . 6 1-0 'i f MC ' ' 9 •u,· 4 50lte p '1 4 36 3 33 \ 11 1 1 / 1 - f 01 4 C'. I . \\00 ~L ' 1 -70'' --1'~- evie. etts -A 4,1'47<f WY 1 le ASP > C v\ 3- - 51„v 1 C. 1 V.·- 1-*i - v 1 i 1 1 1/U t / . <--75 ~ 0 h ~t el V 46\ ///4 4 0\ <~ J A,4 1 8 4890 A \813 BUILD 1 INSPECTOR ~.9PE.NIP'<~
90 £alt.8 Le ././.L 62:Ing a,--.~ci 94Lry- 11-3 - 104·9 * Po 8 e,y_ 100 €16{-1. MINOR HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT Application Package Contents Attached is a Development Application package for submission of your application. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Application Form 2. Description of Minimum Contents of Development Application 3. Description of Specific Contents for Submission of your Application 4. Copy of Review Standards for Your Application 5. Public Hearing Notice Requirements Summary 6. General Summary of Your Application Process Generally, to submit a complete application, you should fill in the application form and attach to it that written and mapped information identified in Attachments 2 and 3. Please note that all applications require responses to the review standards for that particular development type. The standards for your application are listed in Attachment 4. You can determine if your application requires that public notice be given by reviewing Attachment 5. Table 1 of that attachment will tell you whether or not your application requires notice and the form the notice should take. Your responsibilities in this regard are summarized in the cover explanation to the table. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planning Office staff person so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described to you. Please also recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. appcover
1 ~ IAND USE APPIianON FORT ~ 1) Pmject Nam 62 tV li ~ A i3od 2) Project location 401 6 AST By -A,4 (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning 4) Iot Size 5) 4plicar£'s Name, Address & Phone # CIAR UA,5 /2)vcc~cl-c Co•-pat~ 9 5 99 15- 20.2 6.-ucil - 1 u 4,10,1.66 ¢ 110-1 2 19 2 - I <t-53 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # .3.-0 - Dy Ids t\f C.. 5 4»-1 4 s /4 6 ove 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use - Conceptual SPA Concental Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual RJD A ~inor Historic Dev. Stream Margin · Final PUD Historic Demolition Mountain yiew Plane Subdivision Historic Designation O0xxlanDliumization - glbxt/Map Anaxinient QUS Allotment Iot Split/Lot line - (NOS Doeuptian Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (rtimber and type of eocisting structures; approodmate sq. ft.; number of bedrocms; any previous approvals granted to the property). CO¥,1 -eic#,Ll 1\,0 ·~014~5 D o ov C A 9 0 1> 7 67* tv-•. ct- liej Aft Ve Y<p- -3 le, 6 0 0 te i le A.j 3 0 1' ~k ~ 9 L 9) Description of Developnent 4plication 10) Have you attached the following? Respanse to Attachment 2, Minimum Submissian Contents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application
.. ATTACHMENT 2 Minimum Submission Contents for All Development Applications All Development Applications shall include, at a minimum, the following information and materials. 1. The applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. 3./' A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners / of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, £-, liens, easements, contracts and agreements ) affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the ~_~~0 owner' s right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinify map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 5./*~ A written description of the proposal and an ~ explanation in written, graphic or model form of f how the propoted development complies with the ) review standards relevant to the Development C Application. L attach2.applications
.. ATTACHMENT 3 Specific Submission Contents: Minor Development to Historic Landmark or in Historic Overlay District A Development Application for a Minor Development Plan shall include the following: 1. A written description of the proposed development. 2. An accurate representation of all major building materials, such as samples and photographs, to be used for the proposed development. 3. A scale drawing of the proposed development in relation to any existing structure. 4. A statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure (if applicable) and character of the neighborhood.
.. ATTACHMENT 4 Review Standards: Development in H, Historic Overlay District or Development Involving Historic Landmarks No approval for any development in the H, Historic overlay District or involving Historic Landmarks shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met. a. The proposed development is compatible in character- with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area, HPC shall find that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements; and b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development; and C. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic struc- tures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. e. Historic District and Historic Landmark Development Guidelines have been adopted by the City Council for use by HPC. Applicants should consult these guidelines in addition to the above standards.
.. Attachment 5 Public Hearing Notice Requirements Thete are three forms of notice required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations, these being notice by publication in the newspaper, notic4 by posting of the property and notice by mail to surroueding landowners. You can determine whether your applica*ion requires notice, and the type of notice it requires, from Ta e 1, which is attached to this summary. Following is a summary of the notice requirements, including identifyin who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publica ion Publication o notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least 15 days prior to the hearing. The 1 al notice will be written by the Planning Office Administrative A sistant and we will place the notice in the paper within the propriate deadline. 2. posting Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done 10 days prior t the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtai a copy of the sign from the Planning Office, to fill it in cor ectly and to bring proof (preferably a photograph) to the hearing hat posting took place. 3. Mailing Mailing of notice is to be mad to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject develop nt parcel by the applicant. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Planning Office, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to t e hearing (in the form of a signed affidavit) that the mailing t k place. Standards for notice shall be as follo : a. Any federal agency, state county or municipal government service district or qua i governmental agency that owns property within 300 feet o the subject property must be mailed notice 15 days prior to he hearing. b. All other landowners within 300 f et of the subject property must be mailed notice 10 days pri r to the hearing, unless notice is given by hand delivery, 'n which case it must be sent 5 days prior to the hearing. C. Subdivision applications only also requ're notice by registered mail to all surface owners, miner owners and lessees of mineral owners of the subject propert . The names and addresses of property owners shall be th e on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appearedl no more than sixty days prior to the date of public hearing. m
TABLE 1 a]BiM~ OF PUBLIC HEARING NOrICE I,20(ECURES APPLICATION TYPE IUBLIC HEARING REW]RED? BY WHEM FORM OF NOTICE* Conditional Use Y Commission 2,3 Spec Review N 8040 Gr ine N Stream ' N Mountain Vie Plane N Conceptual Hist ic Development Y HPC 1,2,3 Final Historic Dev opment N Minor Historic Develo t N Historic Demolition Y HPC 1,2,3 Historic Designation Y HPC, Commis. HPC-1,2,3 & Council Commis.- 1,2,3 Council-4 , Conceptual SPA Council 1,2,3 Final SPA Y Commission 1,2,3 Conceptual PUD '· Y Council 1,2,3 Final RJD Y Cammission . 1,2,3 Subdivision Y Commission 1,2,3 Condaminiumization N Lot Split Y uncil 1,2,3 Lot line Adjustment N GMQS Allotment Y ' ion 1,2,3 GMQS Exemption N (except for see abov for lot split lot split) Map Amendments Y Commission & Commis.-1,2,3 Council Council-4 Text Amendments Y Commission & Commis.-1 Council Council-4 * Numbers refer to the following: 1 = Publication in newspaper 2 = Posting of property 3 = Mailing to surrounding landa,ners 4 = Ordinance adoption procedures
.. Attachment 6 General Summary of One Step HPC Application Process 1. Application Types: The following are the Development Applications which are processed in one step by the HPC: * Minor Development 2. Development Review Procedure Summary. The one step HPC review procedure can be described as follows. Stage One: Attend pre-application conference. The purpose of this one-on-one meeting with staff is to determine the review process into which your development proposal fits and to identify the materials staff will need to review your application. Stage Two: Submit Development Application. Based on your meeting with staff, you should respond to the appropriate portions of the application package and submit the requested number of copies of a complete application, with the appropriate processing fee, to the Planning Office. Stage Three: Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, the application package will be reviewed by a member of the staff. You will be notified in writing of whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not you have submitted what was requested, not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. Stage Four: Review of Development Application. Once your · application is determined to be complete, a date for its review by the HPC will be set. The submission due date is a minimum of 12 days prior to the HPC review date, to allow for staff review and memo preparation. It is the planner's task to review your application with respect to its compliance with the Code and to write a review memo. In the memo, the planner will recommend approval, denial or tabling of the application and recommend appropriate conditions to this action. The memo is normally available at the end of the week before your hearing. You will be called to pick up a copy of the memo when it is ready, or we can mail it to you if you so request. Your project will be presented to the HPC at a regularly scheduled meeting. A copy of the agenda showing where during the meeting your application is scheduled can be obtained when you pick up the staff memo.
.. The typical meeting includes a presentation by staff, a presentation by you or your representative, questions and comments by the review body and the public and an action on the staff recommendation, unless additional information is requested by the review body. Stage Five: Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received final approval of your development application, you may proceed to building permit review. During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It Will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is issued. For more information on the Building Permit Stage, please visit the Building Department to obtain handouts on their review procedures. 3. Consolidation: Minor Development review may be consolidated with the designation of a historic structure. However, actual consolidation of HPC review with review by the Commission is not possible due to the different review bodies required to approve such applications. However, staff recommends concurrent application review to reduce your overall processing time. Applications which you may submit for concurrent P&Z review include: * Conditional use * Special review * ESA * GMQS exemption for historic landmark or affordable housing If you are submitting any of the above applications along with your one step application, you should also obtain the application package for that type of submission from this office. lstephpcsumm
2\<I-6 FIGURE 111.~ -. 98 1 ENTONY 1612 1*NDAIC " ES AND STRUCTURES :' LEGEND -0- 1 1 1 -/11 E~eglignal designated. not yet designated O ~1986 UPD E ASPEN. COL Excellent Structures designated • not yet deskylated a ---12 -- . PREPA~ED BY THE As*YBM™/ PLA--O ACE ... Hglatli-210!gly[22 - designated I 0 100 .00 not yet designated o 0\1 , . .1-1--1 1 Cor,tii]utin Struct,ga G \ O 200 400 EXISTNG HSTORIC DISTRICTS .A 1. man street 2. con•nercial core g' %1 3.west bleeker/hallam street O 1 4.hanam lake . , // 5.community church 6.lift 1 - I / . Cul,=92 D-- ~-2:z yn I , V - :* t. 4 -2- 2 . . -111 1 ;, m --I --\ pairtr--67==--Ll:i» \ill-'3 0 0.' '96 \ ~' .=In \\ i 2*11 Eti.A o 7~777-7 9-3,%1062A 2%P':ZA&\ 1 \101:A11.ltw 1 ' lilli .~ / ' t| |Lub liYJ...1.J_» N,•7 ,- 0 ~~plnl:, T.~~Il .11[[E EiI® 1.* ..1 Uid 1 1 1-1 , . #BJ ~-_frn:Ti,r-- .iilij®t ®i®] 111f!}Ek [2~511-1 ER®1.i--3 -- -:---Nter [ H. 2 . .i.~ i ~ i i i u . d. ~ . - v v 0, f /73 411 I i 'll [Tinnw [~WIIB \ RIWETI - I 1 \\ N , -A / c WITE IE-!21.11;,3-Wy RIWITI] ClTIOl~Y:[[[*~ Sit,i=~ 4~#4~*t-)Iltlm--uiijijl_124--- . 1 h r - I r: 1 T r • rm Tia i ~ ~ * It---32 *j 2-El- ilw.IC [[Ill[Ill: mum [NIMAIi]DIE <uEu,3] * BIWil] i 0 . ~~ 1 HI 1 1 111 Ullitu . u.1.Luuu ,[I~]11% tut.1 Ill 61p. 1111%1~u. 4 lg§iII*6[1®31.BIE' . ;> /~4 21 ·- rrmTTTr '[@21:mjEI!:Ilmi}Il] tiwlmi [E#8#, UUEI[Wkilll!11@Bil 1 9 -I h,c o L / - -5-- '*L [iIWIib MIUff! W mulillf ull®uiu IliWIKI [[[WE OmI]] :NIfFt mwlm [[100 - E;438 [Evqj~ I~*~ ruE,I @2]1] 0~ mila, - 111'11'111.ul!111111 1. r=-1 , -immlm i [EQI[3' [I@Im i E.iE i EWRB· MER[I [ED r [11]31 -EE. [Imlm] EmE [®11@ Ell@, mimin EM EW®. [[Nt® 1 *11] mvirm ]*Ii %&1%'m - E j *1111. mil: 5 -*4111%= L[lill!111 - ul.urul];11[ilU.LU 0.4,1- mamaimwrO i - Willilill - 3 - 46Ili[11] liliED 1 4 --tti JAL im##i.i ~__ __ - -i21] -rITW]ID mwa 41*El;191 C - Uk. / . 957 I , 0 - Vt=/Ch Li \1 . 1- ' tiah i E-2 112- -1 • 1 ¥ . - UE. - . · 7567 2 E-1 - 1 CUE . ..... 31 Ail¥- E-11 1.1 0 1 29 \ 1 -- f P (, -0-- · . -vib 111-19 13~=r L