The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.411 E Hyman Ave.HPC056-012737-182-16-005 - HPC056-01 ~ 411 E. Hyman Minor HPC \ 6 -4 Â«0 H 4 7 .. CASE NUMBER HPC056-01 PARCEL ID # 2737-182-16005 CASE NAME 411 E. Hyman Ave. Minor HPC PROJECT ADDRESS 411 E. Hyman Ave. PLANNER Amy Guthrie CASE TYPE Minor HPC OWNER/APPLICANT Frank Chiavone REPRESENTATIVE Jeffrey Halferty DATE OF FINAL ACTION 10/10/01 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION HPC Reso. #49-2001 ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 11/9/01 BY J. Lindt .. . , PARCEL ID:|2737-182-16005 DATE RCVD: |10/2/01 # COPIES:| CASE NO HPC056-01 j CASE NAME:1411 E. Hyman Ave. Minor HPC 3/ PLNR:[Amy Guthrie ~PROJ ADDR:~411 E. Hyman Ave. ~ CASE TYP:|Minor~'PC ITSTEPS~ ~ ., OWN/APP:~ Frank Chiavone _ ADR C/S/Z: 1 I PHN:| r 'p REP:~Jeffrey Halferty ADR: 215 S. Monarch St., st C/S/Z:~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN~920-4535 a ' * FEES DUE:|500 D k FEES RCVD:~500 * STAT: F~ REFERRALS~ --. M--1 ril ; BY| -â€ž DUE: MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED '~ c ' Â· .,tat - '41 .4 DATE OF FINAL ACTION'.~ I Oll/PA \ Â· CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS| pz: 1113( ke<r) . 09-.zoot 7/kÂ·-4. h..N.4/&, 1, , BOA: (CLOSED:| Il~C(/0/. BY:~31 Lq(,401.-1 DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: | ' PLAT (BK,PG):| i ADMIN:| /41Â£06, o Vâ‚¬ cA i 7 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 411 E HYMAN, THE WEST 16' OF LOT C, BLOCK 89, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO Aol RESOLUTION NO. Il, SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Pretzel Maker / TCBY, represented by Jeffrey Halferty Design, has requested minor development approval for the property located at 411 E. Hyman, the west 16' of Lot C, Block 89, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is located in the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity o f a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Christina Amato, in her staff report dated October 10, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting of October 10, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application by a vote of to NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: .. That minor development for 411 E. HYMAN, the west 16' of Lot~~Block 89, City and Townsite of Aspen, be approved as proposed. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of October, 2001. Approved as to Form: nU David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Anne Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director THRU: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Christina Amato, Historic Preservation Intern RE: 411 E. Hyman- Minor Review, Public Hearing DATE: October 10,2001 SUMMARY: This non-historic structure is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. The applicant requests HPC approval to enlarge the storefront by adding hopper windows to the bottom of the existing window, to replace the glass in the existing window and replace the door entry and awning with newer materials of the same design. APPLICANT: Pretzel Maker / TCBY tenants; represented by, Jeffrey Halferty Design. LOCATION: 411 E. Hyman, the west 16' of Lot C, Block 89, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: The property is zoned "CC, Commercial Core," with a historic district overlay. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after 1 .. making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The existing building will remain essentially unchanged. The existing window, door and awning will be replaced with similar materials with no design change. The window space will be enlarged to accommodate hopper windows below the fixed window, for the purpose of ventilation. Although not an exact interpretation of the 19th century storefront, the additional windows will create a large storefront window, which is typical of the historic Victorian commercial buildings of the district, and is therefore recommended for approval. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed changes are consistent with the character of the neighborhood, and would only enhance it. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the significance of any designated structure. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal will not impact the architectural integrity of any designated structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. 2 .. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the minor development application for 411 E. Hyman as proposed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Resolution # , Series of 2001, finding that the review standards and the design guidelines have been met." Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of2001 A. Staff memo dated October 10,2001. B. Application. 3 .. jeffrey halferty design 215 S Monarch St. suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-4535 (970) 925-6035 Fax Memo DATE: 10/1/01 TO: Community Development Department Historic Preservation Commission Attn: Amy Guthrie FROM- Jeffrey 5.0. RE: Pretzel Maker / TCBY 411 E. Hyman HPC Minor Development review Aspen Amy, We have been working with Frank Chiavone to help with the design and development for his retail conversion at 411 E. Hyman. We are requesting permission to enlarge the storefront glass on the North wall. The suggestions from the H.P.C.'s work session deemed helpful and informative. 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design scale, site plan massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and will be subordinate to the main massing of the structure. 2. The proposed development is consistent and reflects the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development and will be a welcomed element to the commercial core. 3. The proposed development enhances and does not detract from the historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and will be compatible to the existing to the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development enhances and does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure of part thereof. .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name PR-elie 1 h/\ a Kâ‚¬rl 2. Project location 1-11\ E <Au,v/noir-1 3 4 0(Ywn-ir<2 r â‚¬0 I (3014-c._ (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning GL 4. Lot size 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number F ltd.1 vl k 6. Representative's nam . ddress, and phone number 32/fral *fly 927 %4-5 Â®re 7. Type of application (check dll that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., numberof bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) PE.,49'9 U 9. Descriptipn,of development application -127 'I?r/) ~874â‚¬~ 4 ne * 5-0 x 5-\2 44 1 61 Â¢0\,4 . Dre dRK\4\0 u \Jet-/ d r .ex ucs,n r,1 re '10Â» 1 Â« 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4 .. . . J, 1 ' . I I I I ' i I ; , 1 1 .~,1 : 11 111 11;11 11 i ' 11'I 2 11 1 1 1 1.11 , i 1 ' 1 11 - ' t i 1 1 1 1 1 11 'f 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 . i ! 1 - - 11 11 1,11:111,11 11I )1 11 1 1 i ; 1 11 1 ; '1- - 11 I lili'i 1 !1 li 1 I 1 1 Ill /! 1 ' I â€¢ ' !1i1I1111 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 11111111111 . .IiI 1:!>111:I'll Ill M i 1 1 1 ! 1 ' 1 : 1 I I 1 1 ' 1 1 Â£ 1 *]11,11 lilli 1 2z PNE'YANIE ZI 1- 1 3 1'1'1'1'1'1'l;I'1'1 1'l'1i 1 ' { 1 i11 t 11! ' '1 '1' 11 ' '' 1' 1( '* !1II1It1{II1Ii iIII1IIIIItII1 lit/IIIIIIIIIi Illiltill/lill I lf/11' ~NORTH ELEVATION 411 E. HÂ¥MAN. EXISTING 1/4,1 = 11-O" 041]Â·00-11*3 1-100-0-0[EL -=~ 1 %*--1 C L-/It 2 1 J 2 fi 1-1 1 4 33-222222231 4223232222 25+Xk T 161 L C J N 14 * --1 BLOCK 89 __-r-~i 1/4 - SCALE : 1" = 50' 100 FM---I)-ILL,1............LJ==/ELL&/L1L CONTOUR I N TERVAZ 2 FEET- hi Fp f A f.... - / -Ii-*.-Il- SITE PLAN MAP 411 EAST HYMAN Scale: 1" = 50'- 0" P38 'Â·6 :t 58#5 04, -44 fl-] .33HS 01 1101Â¥W 3003 .. 1 i ; 1:.1 1 35%201%95 ARNINS EXISTING NEK POOR - ~-PF>%2'MREf 8'-10" - . \-_.......I......--Ii/'-S pses?nneR ORS 1,11'11.1 :1 1 1,111'11!1111 . '1'1'1'111 I 1','111:,'1,/'11'' 11:11111 lili PRETZEL C-) NORTH ELEVATION 41 I E. HYMAN. PROPOSED 1/.4,1 = 1,411 FACTORY . 4 1 N 4 k 2-r & 0 IN I . . di#*4**1**%*lt,*raâ€¢:i .. jeffrey halferty design 215 S Monarch St. suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-4535 (970) 925-6035 Fax Memo DATE: 10/1/01 TO: Community Development Department Historic Preservation Commission Attn: Amy Guthrie FROM: Jeffrey RE: Pretzel Maker / TCBY 411 E. Hyman HPC Minor Development review Aspen Amy, We have been working with Frank Chiavone to help with the design and development for his retail conversion at 411 E. Hyman. We are requesting permission to enlarge the storefront glass on the North wall. The suggestions from the H.P.C.'s work session deemed helpful and informative. 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design scale, site plan massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and will be subordinate to the main massing of the structure. 2. The proposed development is consistent and reflects the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development and will be a welcomed element to the commercial core. 3. The proposed development enhances and does not detract from the historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parceIs; and will be compatible to the existing to the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development enhances and does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure of part thereof. .. ' ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name Reflze I Ma Kâ‚¬ 4 2. Project location 1-11\ 11 \4 ut vviol n , COrY\01-cR c Icl 1 COR -e_ (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning C_L 4. Lot size 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 0201 n k. 6. Representativds name, address, and phone number Â¥229 - 4-9 Â®5 7. Type of application (check a|11 that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline - Conceptual PUD - Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) 220Â«K I u 9. Descriptipn,of development application -127 ~ r-/7 ~874â‚¬/ k nu * 519 % tif' pl i A 0 014 . 40 ~Rh A.8 0 e-/ VÂ·:722 ar Â£,x te'nat,~ ret, i Â« 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4 .. f .-1 ' 1 ''11,1 ' 111'111111;111 111'11111 - 1 I11)11:111L1 2.1 !.1 ; : i i !1 2 1111 11,11,1 11 1 1 1 1 - 11 1 1 1,1.1 11 i i . 1 -:111:111,; ; 1 lilli - ''11,1 . 9,~'11 $ 1 11 - I :ill.tli,1111; $ 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 112 3 14 1 m~:i ~ 2 + 5 ' 1 ' - 1 1 I Â¢ 1 11 - 1% 1 I 11 ' 1 ' i 1 I I $1 1, ' 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 i & '1- , 216:1!il'lillil 1,1,1 ' 1, 1 1 1 i 1 --'. : i -i -1 '7 --1 ' 1-7- -i i i ~ 3 ~- PNEE"ANE -3 3 3 ./ i 3 3 zi i,Â£:, i':.:,! *,i , 1,;Eâ‚¬ ' . $ 1 ' 1:111 1 111/1'111'11 rbi /1t1 til,lil,;''t';'1'1' 1 1 Im 1,~1/1/Ii'~11,11'111'/i Ii/11 flttlt,111'Ii: IP \ 11 ,/1,11 1!i 1tÂ¢I1 1 1/,1 . <-)NORTH ELEVATION 411 E. HYMAN. EXISTING 1/411 = 11-011 tin-ottou-th--- 15 .. 1 ?1 7 .. 11 . I, $ 1 . 1 .1 - I ! ' I.~ . ~ '1 - ' :' ''1 ~3' 4;~ i:t~ ~ .,it '~1, 2 ':.~1~1!, 1, TI . Ub /-25%211**s ARNING 2--~ EXISTING - NEA DOOR / - I~ -MFA#'Ee 8'-10" r 1 li) 4=14 / - -\...../.../2 ....... I.i...I/--06'& TIVABR10241 Ope ..- 1'1'1'1 1,1 1';'1 1 1 ! 111.:'1111 ''"1; ' ' r ':T ....22 11- PRETZEL /-1 NORTH ELEVATION 411 E. HÂ¥MAN. FACTORY PROPOSED 1/4,1 = 11-OIl 76%2*. ' . â‚¬, lt+Ul)11{11-ft -MO --*-TI - 0 ,\ <JOILL--- GED ~ ~T 16 L ~ 8 C ~0- 4 -1 BLOCK 89 71/ 1\ 9\ 41 4 SCALE : 1" = 50' 100 CONIOUR INTERVAL 2 FEET- - {7 1 . 1 rZE-27-77 1 , n/ / SITE PLAN MAP 411 EAST HYMAN Scale: 1" = 50'- 0" P38 _ - 1 ... ' 51-1 .33HS 01 H)1Â¥W 3003 .. ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of Citv of Aspen Development Andication Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. , 1 APPLICANT has subrhitted to CITY an ap lication for \ 3.44-AutÂ»82 (Ltrb-tuouk Â£\A -11 4 1 2,1-4 Arl (hereinafter, THE PRdJECT). ~ 2. APPLICANT z~derstands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staffto complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of$ which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: Julie Ann Woods 1 8,1 Community Development Director Date: Mailing Address: 4-1 1 -E, 41*An g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01