The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.420 W Francis St.HPC34-972735-124-13-005 HPC34-97 -Barry Minor 420 W. Francis 11 -- 8 6 23 tf 2 - S-6 A-, .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 420 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 1997 WHEREAS the applicants. Barry and Ellen Halperin. represented by Colombo International, have requested significant development, partial demolition, and variance approval for the property located at 420 W. Francis Street. Lots N and O, Block 34, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is a designated historic landmark; and WHEREAS all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adj acent parcels when the subject site is in a "H." Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, all applications for partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay district, must meet all of the Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.020(C) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1.Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel; and .. 2.Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: a.Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. b.Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.58.040 must meet one of the following statements in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or c) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints, and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff reports dated November 12, 1997 and December 17,1997, recommended approval with conditions, and WHEREAS, public hearings, which were legally noticed, were held at regular meetings of the Historic Preservation Commission on November 12,1997 and December 17, 1997, at which times the Commission considered and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 7-0 at both meetings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That significant development, partial demolition, and variances for the project located at 420 W. Francis Street. Aspen, Colorado, be approved with the following conditions. 1. The required rear yard setback is reduced to 0 feet for the new garage and Accessory Dwelling unit, which is approved to be a maximum height of 17 feet. 2. It must be determined whether or not the original siding still exists under the shingles. If so, HPC will work with the applicant to determine whether or not that siding can be restored. Otherwise, new clapboard siding may be installed, with approval by staff and monitor. As part of this activity, staff also recommends that the shutters be removed from the house since they would not have been there originally. .. 3. All replacement windows on the historic portion of the house must match the existing windows as closely as possible. Windows identified on the plans as modified by staff in the November 12, 1997 packet, may not be replaced. No window openings on the historic portion of the house may be widened, excepting the window on the east elevation, second floor may be altered as presented to HPC. The applicant should consider the possibility of replacing the multipaned window in the bay on the south elevation with a large double hung, which is more likely what originally existed. Any new window in the bay must be approved by staff and monitor. 4. In regard to the railings proposed on the front deck and porches, no railings may be installed unless an exception for historic structures cannot be granted from the UBC, or unless there is reason to believe that they were there historically. If railings must be installed, they must be wood and should be simple, not turned balusters. 5. Deck boards and stairs may be repaired where necessary and replaced if beyond repair. 6. A variance is granted from Ordinance #30, volume, for the new windows on the ADU. 7. No exterior materials other than those described above may be removed from the building without the consent of HPC. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the day of ,1997. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Chairman ATTEST: Chief Deputy Clerk nol Liv lilki 1 Vall I.trLDLIC v A Â£ lut, Lutvllvlll:,1U1, 1VlliNU 1 Eb OF November 12.1997 ~ Chairperson Suzannah Reid called the meeting to order at 5:05 with Mark Onorowski, Susan Dodington, Roger Moyer, Melanie Roschko, Gilbert Sanchez, Jeffrey Halferty and Mary Hirsch present. Heidi Friedland was excused. DRAFT 920 W. HALLAM - LANDMARK DESIGNATION Hitch Hass, planner presented. The site has three separate structures and the principal structure was built in 1888. One of the structures was moved in 1940 and is currently used as a garage. In order to designate two or more standards have to be met. Staff recommends designation finding standard B, architectural importance; D, neighborhood character and E, community character are met. Gilbert was not seated for this item. MOTION: Roger moved to approve the landmark designation for 920 W. Hallam St. finding that standards B,D and E of section 26.76.020 have been met; second by Mary. All infavor, motion carried 7-0. 420 W. FRANCIS - PUBLIC HEARING Three exhibits - two letters and one affidavit. Gilbert seated at 5:30 p.m. Jeffrey did not vote. Amy Guthrie, planner stated that the applicant is requesting a variance and partial demolition. The house was built in 1886 or 1887. There have been a few additions on the west and north side of the building add some change of materials. Asbestos removal, repairing clapboard and window replacements are proposed. Railings on the front porch are proposed to change into deck surface material. On one o f the out buildings at the back o f the site a window replacement is proposed and Staff has no objection as it is not historic. A construction of a car-port is proposed and requires a variance. 1 2.5.,W $ ASPEN HISTO~~c PRESERVATION COMMI~ION MINUTES OF November 12. 1997 The Parks Department reviewed the car-port due to the impact on the large trees in the same location and recommend against it. Staff recommends restoring the siding or replacing it if it isn't in good condition. Staff also DRAFT recommends that no window openings on the historic house may be widened. The windows on the front most portion of the house should be retained and restored. Staff recommends against railings on the front as they are not an historic feature. A variance from the volume standard on the windows on the ADU is needed. Added to the conditions are penalities if materials from the site are removed. Assistant City Attorney, David Hoefer stated that the affidavit has been presented and HPC has the jurisdiction to proceed. Jim Colombo presented for the applicant. All clapboard that can be salvaged will be restored. The unrestorable clapboard will be replaced with a clapboard that is consistent with what is existing. The single pane double hung windows are to be replaced with the same size insulated windows. The window on the east may not be historic and is proposed to be enlarged to let more light into the bathroom area. Metal railings are proposed and the west window could remain the same size. Regarding the trees the applicant recommends hand dug caissons to minimize any impact on the trees in order to construct the garage. Chairperson Suzannah Reid opened the public hearing. Public comments: Bill Stirling, neighbor relayed to the board that he is opposed to the variance for the garage. The character of the west end is defined by the irrigation ditches, historic character and the blue spruce and cottowood trees. The evergreen trees are 50 years old and 60 feet high and are part ofwhat defines that neighborhood. The other issue is open space within sites. Bill suggested that the guest house be raised that is not historic and build a garage in that location. ASPEN-HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF November 12,1997 ~ 1 1 Colombo relayed that an existing structure exists in Be location of the proposed garage. He also discussed the trees and how the cassions work. Commissioners concerns: 1-' 13-1 j I Snow load onto the neighbors property. Use of existing shed without making it taller and eliminating a variance for the garage. The window replacements will be the same size and double hung except the one on the west elevation which will be enlarged slightly. That particular window is small and not visible. The shutters are not historic. Staff indicated that the bay window was probably a replacement window and typically you would see a double hung window. The applicant stated that he looked into replacing the bay window with a double hung to bring it back to the original but it is difficult to find a window of that size as it is about six feet across. They would entertain two three foot windows across. The board inquired about moving the garage to the other side but the applicant explained that there are several 30 foot trees in that vicinity that would have to be removed. Railing issues. The code requires railings on porches and decks over 30 inches from grade and the front porch on the west elevation shows a railing closing offthe entry porch. The front porch and deck next to it do not have to have a rail by code. The applicant requests a railing around the deck which is not of historic significance. The Board feels that the railing impacts the historic structure. The Board is against variances for the garage. Gilbert requested more clarification on why the garage is not possible on the east side. They had no problems with the window replacements and siding. It was suggested that the railings be wood where needed and none on the front and they should be consistent. Possibly do a hedge in the front as an 3 .. / November 12.1997 alternative to a ra~g. The majority of the Board wl..in favor or tabling r ' partial demolition. MOTION: Roger moved (1) to allow the applicant to proceed with items 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Staffs memo dated Nov. 12, 1997. 2. It must be determined whether or not the original siding still exists under the shingles. If so, HPC will work with the applicant to determine whether or not that siding can be resteored. Otherwise, new clapboard siding may be installed. As part of this activity, staff also recommends that the shutters be removed from the house since they would not have been there originally. 3. All replacement windows on the historic portion of the house must match the existing windows as closely as possible. No window openings on the historic portion of the house may be widened. The pella replacement windows are to be reviewed by Staf and Monitor. The applicant should consider the possibility of replacing the multipaned window in the bay on the south elevation with a large double hung, which is more likely what originally existed. A. Window on the east elevation can be replaced. B. Window on the west elevation which is an existing historic window cannot be changed. 4. In regard to the railings proposed on thefront decks, staffrecommends that no railings be installed unless an exceptionfor historic structures cannot be granted from the UBC, or unless there is reason to believe that they were there historically. Ifrailings must be installed, they must be wood and should be simple, not turned balusters. 5. A variance is granted from Ord. #30, volume, for the new windows on the ADU. The windows on the north of the ADU must be modified to be more in scale with those on the rest of the bulding and the house (narrower.) 6. No exterior materials may be removed from the building without the consent of HPC. With the approval of this application it is understood that windows except for those identified on the attached plans as modified by 4 - nof 1,1, Ill, 1 U t<ll rilibLK V A 1 1UIN COM M ISSION MINUTES OF / November 12.1997 ~ staff may be rep~ed in kind. HPC will work with the applicant to f determine the condition ofthe original clapboards if they exist. Deck boards and stairs may be repaired where necessary arid replaced if beond repair. No other exterior materials may be removed without HPC consent. Also that Sta# and monitor investigate the siding after the shingles are removed and a good solution is determined as to whether the siding can be used or a new siding is installed and what the dimensions are etc. The applicant, sta# and monitor work together regarding a better solution for the bay window on the south side. Roger moved (2) to table the variances, garage addition, demolition and reconstruction until November 24, 1997; Motions 1&2 second by Melanie. All in favor, motion carried. Clarifications: Jim Colombo asked that the HPC reconsider the railing on the deck that is not required and is not historic. He would like to put the railing on the non- historic portion of the deck to give continuity to the deck. The request was denied. Windows that are to be replaced with pella windows are to be reviewed by Staff and monitor. 5 J r.1 1 -r u - I_Â· t..I- Â· I--1 1 -. ..1 1 1-1 -1 1 ASPEN HISTO~CPRESERVATION COMMI~ION MINUTES OE Devember 17. 1997 420 W. FRANCIS -CONCEPTUAL & FINAL - PARTIAL DEMOLITION - PUBLIC HEARING David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney received the affidavit (Exhibit I)of notice and the jurisdictional requirement of the Historic Preservation . 1 Commission and HPC has jurisdiction to proceed. Amy Guthrie relayed that the applicant will retain the existing shed and demolish the rest of the building and in its place will build a two stall garage with an ADU above it. It is a slight expansion but will not damage the trees. P&.Z approved the ADU. Staff recommends approval and the ADU will make a nice contribution to the alley. A rear yard setback variance is requested. Chair-person Suzannah Reid opened the public hearing. No comments from the public. The chair closed the public hearing. Commissioner Comments. MOTION: Roger moved to approve the application for conceptual and final review, partial demolition and Ord. 430 for 420 W. Francis to include a variance on the rear yard setback to five feet which means it is the same as the existing structure as submitted Dec. 17, 1997; second by Jeffrey, All in favor. motion carried unanimously. y " I I '13 '''L-"' . r!1 S.fj'- 1, 19, V * r .I h .Â· 4 .. ' I . 4, 69 ./ 4 if 1 , . .r J 1 .. SABBLOAE) 11'JEJE,f PARCEL ID:|2735-124-13-005 DATE RCVD: |10/07/97 #COPIES:~--J CASE NO~HPC34-97 -j + CASE NAME:~Barry Minor i PLNR:~Amy Amidon 1 ' 1 lili 1 . ..... PROJ ADDR:|420 W Francis ~ CASE TYP:~ Minor STEPS :1-3 *- I OWN/APP: Halperin, Barry ADR : C/S/z:" C PHN: REP:~Colombo International ADR~520 E. Cooper C/S/Z:IAspen, CO 81611 PHN~ 925-7806 11 FEES DUE:| 120 FEES RCVD<120 STAT: r-1 REFERRALSI I REF~ B~ DUEI I MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 1 -7 1 DATE OF FINAL ACTION~ BOCC\CC:1 1 REMARKS| PZ; BOA: CLOSED: ___j BY: ~ HRG OFF: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK.PG):| ADMIN1 .. 0 N 83 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission .r CU FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 420 W. Francis Street, Minor review, partial demolition, and request for setback variances, Public Hearing DATE: November 12, 1997 SUMMARY: This house was built in 1886-1887 and is a designated landmark. It has had a series of small additions made to it, and some changes to exterior materials. The applicant proposes to replace the exterior materials on the house and to remove a storage area on the outbuilding and replace it with a carport. The location proposed for the carport requires setback variances on the rear and west sideyards. APPLICANT: Barry and Ellen Halperin, represented by Jim Colombo. LOCATION: 420 W. Francis Street, Lots N and O, Block 34, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: R-6 Significant Development PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development involving historic landmarks, or within an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than 1 Exhibit A .. would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2); Response: The applicant proposes to remove the asphalt or asbestos shingle siding from the house and replace it with clapboards. Staff finds that returning to clapboard siding is appropriate. It must be determined whether or not the original clapboards still exist under the shingles. If so, HPC will work with the applicant to determine whether or not it can be restored. Otherwise, new clapboard siding may be installed. As part of this activity, staff also recommends that the shutters be removed from the house since they would not have been there originally. In terms of window replacement, staff finds that windows that are readily visible from the street must be retained, but the remainder of the windows may be replaced. All replacement windows on the historic portion of the house must be double hung and match the existing windows as closely as possible. No window openings on the historic portion of the house may be widened. Windows that must be retained have been indicated on the building elevations which have been modified by staff. The applicant should consider the possibility of replacing the multipaned window in the bay on the south elevation with a large double hung, which is more likely what originally existed. In regard to the railings proposed on the front decks, staff recommends that no railings be installed unless an exception for historic structures cannot be granted from the UBC, or unless there is reason to believe that they were there historically. If railings must be , installed, they must be wood and should be simple, not turned balusters. On the ADU, staff has no concerns with the window and door changes proposed since this is not a historic structure. A variance from Ordinance #30 is required for the windows in the west end of the building. This is discussed below. The request for a carport on the east side of the building was referred to the Parks Department. They recommend that the carport be located on the west side of the ADU because of the very large tree on the east. Staff defers to the Parks Department on this issue and recommends that the carport be relocated. This will still require the removal of trees, since conifers have been planted across the rear of the property, however the trees are fairly new (planted within the last two decades) and should be allowed to be removed or relocated. The new windows proposed on the north of the ADU must be modified to be more in scale with those on the rest ofthe building and the house (narrower.) 2 .. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposal involves modest changes to the building and some restoration, which will contribute to the character of the West End. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal has no impact on the historic significance ofthe property. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereoÂ£ Response: The proposal involves changes which will enhance the architectural character of the property. PARTIAL DEMOLITION Section 26.72.020, Demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation, or temporary relocation. No partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, shall be permitted unless the partial demolition is approved by the HPC because it meets the applicable standards of Section 26.72.020(C). For the purposes of this section, "partial demolition" shall mean the razing of a portion of any structure on an inventoried parcel or the total razing of any structure on an inventoried parcel which does not contribute to the historic significance of that parcel. 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Response: The applicant proposes to remove a small addition to a non-historic structure. Staff has no concerns with this. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: There will be no impacts to the historic significance ofthe property. 3 .. B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: The new carport, which cannot be constructed in the exact location proposed, will have no impact on the architectural character or integrity of the property. Ordinance #30 The proposal is in conflict with one area of Ordinance #30; the volume standard. 1. Standard: "All areas with an exterior expression of a plate height greater than ten (10) feet, shall be counted as two (2) squarefeetfor each one (1) squarefoot offloor area. Exterior expression shall be defined asfacade penetrations between nine (9) and twelve (12) feet above the level of thefinished floor. . ." Response: The proposed modifications for the ADU include small windows in the west gable end which fall into the "no window zone," between 9-12 feet above the finished floor. This is a one story building and staff finds there will be no impact to the scale of the building as a result of these windows. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. Recommendation: Staff recommends HPC table the carport review and approve the remainder of the application with the following conditions: 4 .. 1. The request for a setback variance on the west sideyard is denied based on the Parks Departments comments. A rear yard setback variance may be appropriate for the new garage. The applicant must provide a revised plan. This portion of the application is tabled to November 26, 1997. 2. It must be determined whether or not the original siding still exists under the shingles. If so, HPC will work with the applicant to determine whether or not that siding can be restored. Otherwise, new clapboard-sidifg may be installed. As part of this activity, staff also recommends that tE-,3550 be removed from the house since they would not have been there originally. 3. All replacement windows on the historic portion of the house must match the existing windows as closely as possible. No window openings on the historic portion of the house may be widened. Windows that must be retained have been indicated on the building elevations which have been modified by staff. The 4 applicant should consider the possibility of replacing the multipaned window in the 13 bay on the south elevation with a large double hung, which is more likely what originally existed. 4. In regard to the railings proposed on the front decks, staff recommends that no railings be installed unless an exception for historic structures cannot be granted from the UBC, or unless there is reason to believe that they were there historically. If railings must be installed, they must be wood and should be simple, not turned balusters. 5. A variance is granted from Ordinance #30, volume, for the new windows on the ADU. The windows on the north of the ADU must be modified to be more in scale with those on the rest of the building and the house (narrower.) 6. No exterior materials may be removed from the building without the consent of HPC. With the approval of this application it is understood that windows except for those identified on the attached plans as modified by staff may be replaced in kind. HPC will work with the applicant to determine the condition of the original clapboards if they exist. Deck boards and stairs may be repaired where necessary and replaced if beyond repair. No other exterior materials may be removed without HPC consent. u 00-1 Exhibits: A. Staffs memo dated November 12, 1997 B. Application C. Map ofproperty in 1904. D. Photo ofproperty from alley, circa 1970. E. Site plan and elevations modified by staff. F. Parks Department referral comments. 5 ~ ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. project name +KLFEINH FNal patwe- 2. Project location 47 b , f #H,014 4-T,2081- petâ‚¬*, 0,1..â€¢94'90 (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning F'& 4. Lot size 4â‚¬GO <29 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number "AST + AlÂ» HAI- pe-~ 3170- 944- - I 715 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number =as> L--,52Â¥027 IKITE,+1â‚¬14,1-, 1146 49 #. 4~ FE, 4-1.11-lb 44Â·we Â» FEr' , 4,1-1,2 "tod, 15 19 - 7Â£586 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD X Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) 4116.&ING,[-60 F*4Vll 1-Jr 4-6 1.146 2127 41~ 1-TA 9 0%16+ ME-9 %60144. 04% A. P.U. +16 64486 2~9 EP WI114 ONS, 15EP B.44, 9. Description of development application 1-lÂ·FAFACM- @Â¥ 14-EW Igthick,1,1 6 14'mi @104* WINO#*4 -846 *WIE- 411 18, <21Â»B ,â€¢+112 %004. I re'vud @t 14-1~ W 64 FlÂ·Â·IA.:r â‚¬141H,4 US g i pt ter WI-0-1 61 *fle-Â· 1,4/OG &#P â‚¬:*t~. FIE-p "CE "1,9 1*Ar, 4Â£12 4 4141 _12*,M _1,111'Ph 44 51,4 Le, AN**5 -v 10. Have you completed and attached the following? 1- Attachment 1- Land use application form /'Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 4 Response to Attachment 3 / Response to Attachment 4 Exhibit B ATTACHMENT 2 ~ DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: *pr 4- GLLEN NAL FEF-14 Address: 4 2.9 H, FAAM=71 41 4-rfee-r Zone district: 11: --60 Lot size: 66>00 49 Existing FAR: .2 4 E-1 4Â¥ Allowable FAR: 104â€¢ 40 Proposed FAR: *541 <p Existing net leasable (commercial): Whe- Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: 4 0 44 Proposed % of site coverage: 40 54 Existing % of open space: 96 0/0 Proposed % of open space: 4 655 Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: 1 G' Accesorv blda: 11*'4:~| Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 2. 6' Accessory bldg: 1 sub 11 Proposed % of demolition: 4,1 h Existing number of bedrooms: Proposed number of bedrooms: 4 Existing on-site parking spaces: H/Ha- On-site parking spaces required: 2. Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: I Front: 10,5 1 Front: 1# Front: 10. E Rear: - Rear: 1 0 Rear: - Combined Combined Combined i 1 Front/rear: 16 9 Front/rear. 84 Front/rear: 1 0, 4 Side: -- Side: G Side: -- Side: 01,01 Side: ce Side: 9,6 Combined i Combined - ' Combined - 1 Sides: dll 6 1 Sides: 19 Sides: 4.9 Existing nonconform ities or encroachments: 06*:F- AO U 66 04 814;f*â‚¬1Â·tivIANT + -41 IN#4-r Â·GR 06Â»*C:2 EPI#P-a+MEN-r, Variations requested: DeN-rl Nl-lA-fl 01 OF *<140Â¢401 (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) 1 . 1 1 - 2 \ 1 \ 0Â© \ , --- V C = 9 1 -90\ -- - ----1 /1 6> --)\~ - - --- ~ 0 0Â« r E - .-_ i N,947.4 A- *t- 19 t\ -1- 6 . 29 0.. -t~-L~ ~-\360 '4\ Â°\=fpx ---v 1 1 -\ # R d.. C'. ..94 4 9 , 42\ 6 \ 04441 ~Mounlain-Â¥#ew Or ' k wle-~ - -_-/fne R d --t, 4 f i f,f.t- -%. Ntt 4243 -- ,Â« 4\ \C, At- --- - Â£4 + '49 .7Â¥32.54= - ..---- \ 1- A *\\9 Â«/-//AJ-/, AszrÂ£0 5 -I= 0 0 01 -6 1.0 --//U- ,a 11:4' .'C' \Fn-~funny Cr ~ .~ Si e rr~~el \4 ,>*22\\.. . O,11.A, ,~/7 , N I-- * 3 6 01-Â« L-\ 4 41 81}BU~,0, ' )#< 1 $ A dÂ«4, \1- ; /5& AS[)en Â»46 R Â« L_---46Â£. \ Ins!,lule \4'* #Â· lib V S H.inter v , 3; 1% ) 0 S d / 1 1.. 4 *1 7 5 40..9 \ ./ 7% /0 1,tls< Tent Wood Duck in Di 1 0. ... t' 4 4 Gliles ie St : i Goll Course 14\ v. .-i '-1 ,/4-- F--7\' Pe r' CT r) ,\0, 1 '74? 3.-IL '74, t 10 1/ ye --9 i -1 - S.U ~ : , 21 0 â‚¬ 1--el , 4 3, 0 - vine St 24 4, 0 ,1 46~ \ scls ~ -4 t 6/ '4 1 , 1 P Sb ....\ ' f 1 i - Race t Maroon C reek Ad 3 - 1 . 3: : = 9 f *(ms, ls> C dio 5 --,9 4 st 468 , S ow, A. park C/, Sawmill . 4 ad fanct ..1 ' ' 6.0 \1\ % U 7 a,4 St 4 pk '*0% \ b Â·t . 0 f i g /Â°â€¢ 1 0 1- 4 : e 4 1. 4 & C bn j 20 4 4 4 44 /54*8 ,% - 9 , UL C t~ oq~v. ~-~< b i C HOS,1 1% ~ 1 ..Â£; f' 1 R,n '-44 4!I Z / s.u .. C Z 0 06 + /0 1.1 :1 I /\ 10 ~ " -ose-fail .:4~i / \3, 1 L O. C (4$ 3 4 6 : ce f (, -27, 4 H 99~el\j .re' 1 0144. 0 0, 2 0 4 '.,~ ) , 4. / ~ / G/~4' 4:' 4 .$% j# s, r Ck' Mall C k 1 5 7\ a ' tarkspu, In 4. p k Â¢ b itâ€¢ )562 .(A G/, rt na 4 (: C â‚¬ Summ# St . r Â¢+ '604,0 PROJECT SITE -- *; #- Al n Grove 8 Tr 4 Wâ€¢â€¢hlk. #'4 Ute M ) (72,Y 9 '. 0.- 4, .... 1 6 -1, 41 4. , ' '%44; . 9," ..11 r 9 9: 3 ; 82 i ~, VICINITY MAP 1 k\\ O, 24.-mewa laurel of â„¢tn Lourel â€¢ COLOMDO INTERNATIONAL, INC. 520 E. COOPER ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL: 970 925-7806 FAX: 970 925-3972 Proiect Information Halperin Residence 420 West Francis Aspen, CO 81611 Proiect Description On the main house we propose to upgrade the existing windows with pella double graded windows of the same size, color and style. In the bathroom and bath on the upper floor we are considering changing the window width from 2'0" to 3'0". These windows are hidden from the street scape and therefore would not be noticeable. Also on the main house, we are proposing to take off the existing asphalt shingle siding and replace it with 6" horizontal painted clapboard similar to what is on the ADU. This would be typical of this time period and neighborhood. On the ADU building we are proposing to replace the existing tool shed and ski room and replace it with a one car garage. In order to make this 50's style building more compatible with the main house and neighborhood, we; are proposing to make several facade changes to more appropriate doors and windows. L ;1 --------------- ALLEY BLOCK 34 EDGE OF GRAVEL 12*71.- 1-. ' 4 /Ques-r 4 1 8% / Housa 21 1 1 1 -- 0-2/ -- 4 t 8. \,\ 1 14 N Ny/-16 1 f liTU: lei. ; MAIN u HoUSE in . / / 4, P wkMr44--7,; ''~-4 tri â€¢, P / TO i 2 1. 6 ; arkk AL 2 i f ht- 4/,5 1 1 l'W ~~~ .IdET lm,Â£ ty SITE #I Maill 17 ADDRESS - 420 W. FRANCIS STREEr -TE 01 ASPEN, COLORADO on/Ill. 81611 -MON I = 0-GE LEGAL DESCRIPTION A lOTS N &O, BLOCK 34 CITY AND TOWN SITE OF ASPEN MTKIN COUNTY. COLORADO g WEST FRANCIS STREET - co,aeirs SrrE PLAN 4/& 2--67*1 S1 ~IONVUISJI}I NIHJI.IIVH ~ 901 OWNOUOD i N14Â°5049'E 100.00' S14'5049"W . NE2 e,0 esli 2,6" 8L3. 8'-9" 6'-11' 14.-4. 5'-1' 5'-110 im 9 4- I 4 #m ~- 1 4 i -1 4 1 -'..6..1,1 : k -~ f Int,-1 m I ~ i r-i f 01 4 --9 1-7 3 %_-3 -- / Ll- 41=th -I & 0 Â£ %41 t.......1..... z :C 7-7:1 9 C, 4 /1 e 4 rÂ«ft g , :.. : i: P â‚¬ i: M g m 6 : Ng r 4 C . 9 UJ r % 44..9 1 7 r 08 i~' -- - -7--t il: ---- I 11 JIi .. i-L 1 / 1 . N o ; *dirr--rl j L-7.11 - -7 Z N 8- 10*LLIU:i 94 4--- Â· 1 2'-6* 13'-8" 28' 8' 50110 50'-9â€ž 21 4. 11 ty-,I:-6 Ir:,c<flM- ~'FlAMAN> 8 1 ~ i-1 81 15 11. - i Wi *IIAA:04 HALPERIN RESIDENCE 420 W.FRANCIS STREET ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 >1030 HOMOd (NOILITIO}BC[ P ONILSIXH) DINING HOBOd L , , . LAVI. Â§1 1159Â£* mme 2:g 32 am .i *mimerr".1.'/A'VM E + V 11 . 4 k m - M 0 ZE]ZE Li:im=~, 6-â€¢amâ€¢,~â€¢em:~~ fi 41 (-O L CLOSE OFF 4 Â§ 4-LL --2 ag Z 11 2 0 52 .it-ii-:En. .....,- .7 i ii IE_ 0. el 415 ./C /7--E N w, </3 1 ,ii . 13,-8. 16'-5" 12'-3" 42'-4" 1 it . S P r .1 ma 0 HALPERIN RESIDENCE 11 1 1 El mCOLOMBO Â¥ 21 420 W.FRANCIS STREET 09 fij 11 .1.1 ' tr 81611 ASPEN,COLORADO I I."I'.'I'.'I *'I.".. I. lkIOLIHowaa Gy DNLLSIYEDNVEId 21007:I THAHTI Maddn IEr Tlf GEMOVE WINOOWS ANO REPLACE TO MATCH IErl,~ /~ 8(ISTING STYLE SIZE & COLOR 30'Jer i -4 1 - 10'-412 20'-41/2* f - 1 1 IÂ· A-A'...... â€¢ I - C i 05 9 REMOVE WALLS - i ~ STUDY laTCHEN ~ 6 1 TOOL Y M ~I SHED g Â©]ww i 1 3 SKI 2.-~-- *M'. 1 I ::1 9 S ROOM i 1 2 'S 8 t DARKROOM.Â·-tr EP E I 1 k 1 CL ABOVE WALLS E 1 000FI i 61 i ': UVINGROOM e : -Ip ! 1 1 1 411 TO 10,1 111'/ WTE 1 It . 5'-e 5'-00 21.1 1/0 ,/~6'â‚¬ 2~-11/2~ 9'-e Â¢22 f f :Â· REMOVE WDOOWS AND EEPLACE W/ FFENCH PATIO DOOM TO MATCH EXISTING STYLE & COLOR 12FLOOR PLAN ADU FLOOR PLAN(EUSTING&DEMOLMION)~~ ~ Joe Pâ€¢-EM 1715-07'R Self:1/10 .-. 09-1647 pe/1////118:,cpO 3../ DATE A3 OÂ£11/\tO31OO % 1 9 4%*I<a<e 1 1 1. ~ ~CK FOR .4.*AL*nON ON EASTS'E \ . ~ Clfal<WA"KiliTOADUÂ®EFTH) Â® purt.:rApiON#19'Ii#TEC~UT \ ~ ",2,0.-ULATID"'10-LLCAVITES \ O -OKEDErecrÂ¤1â€ž5reA \ ~ leâ€¢rec.SCUFms,51- 117 \ .-r 1Â§â€¢7~ 4,2, . 32Â» 57 1 - NEW SURFACEON STEPS x/-- AS REQUIRED U 11- lul 1 \ S~ 0-4 -1 Â£ -1 DECK A.21 66 -0, I ' - r---- - COUNTERS & ROORING Â¤ 5 LAUNDRYMUD *,-â€ž,el KrrCHEN H]3------~ -7F..i.l IP-- 1- 1 1 -=]=Le-1 1 -Trl 6--I *30- TRASH | I= i'00 1 4..1 - 1 pC REPLACE ALL EXTERIOR W~DOWS TOMATCH - 1 - EXIS11NG IN STYLE. SIZE _ ~~4 -----1, \ & COLOR - RE LIVING I liu m 11412 6 12 7%81 L.-~J>~ iu~nt a 1 Itt_ NEW RADIANT HEATING BaOW Â· A.OVE 201,57),G KITaet CAB,Ety 11 0-2 ~T\\\\IÂ® 11Â«F J 1 1 NEW WOOD FLOOR - . 7 j ~ 4%Â£ cLA HEATING UNIT ~/ Re,OVEDOSTNG /1 1 4.1 '111 c=.01 k=El - - 10 IEN SURFACE ON DECKS AS REQUIRED . - NEW METAL RALING @ DECK DECK - C , PARLOR le Â· te, METAL RAU,G AT CECK -~L- DECK Â®~ 197--Ilt f~/ AND R.OWER BED(TYPICAL) NEW MAIN FLR m.zr Trru SPRJNKLING SYSTEM FOR LAWN 2 I JOB Nul-ER 11 1 11 1715478 2- DATE 09-1547 0...4. SEEPS 8 't F.V.0.1 F.,0,0 341 81 518â€¢ AV 74' < ~. 4'-5â€¢ 49 Na. 0-06 DITE 8Â¥ . 1 C FOSTS J .-, d . -i ,=,6.TAL FENCE RS'LACE ALL EXTERIOR sr-w - Wâ€¢DOWS TO MATCH EXIST.le ;E 4 cc-/er, PEW R.AGSTONE WALIMAY -" /1/Iria,m k- - NEW ENTRYGATE O STREET FBONTAGE E-1-=*-0- - 1- MAIN.ELQQR PLAN(NEW CONSTRUCTION) * SCALE:1/4.- A4 -EDGE OF CURB t' 133!HlS SIONVEM 024 1 191-8 00Â¥80100'N3dSV ./1,9 .It,9 }12-1NlaIS)Ill NIH)Id'IVH ~ OUIA10700 i i.- .... 1 18â€¢.f 47 _ 8Er r--e--1-rn-0-33 1 14 -: 1 - MAST*R I , BER~OM 1 - N + kI NEW VAUCED CEING I 4 1 -4\ 9 . 1 8-8-11.1 Â·zi 'r~ll F. d ,WALK-IN , (%4 L Â« CLOSET USE eaSTING TUB 1 f,DIA es.Opi --1 - i-r m z 4 -7/ - "Er .i i Al/4 1 , 7* i L 2.-Ir ,/ H._T 110Â»44--1 TO 1 - /1 - ~ 31 7.v. 1 i BEDMOOM I 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 -m TITLE NEW UPPER FLR =ER L=Â«E --4 1715-07Ft DATE Â»15-07 Fevaoll P'%0/0 1,0. aÂ·-IC DATE IY UPPERFLOOR PLAN(NEW CONSTRUCTION) %& SCALE.1/4.- 1'-(r - 00//Bl' L . iâ€¢â€¢Ernoi' ~i I - ii.:.:. 133819 SIC)NVW=! M 024 1-191.9 00*0100 N3dSV 64 1/2' Ily\/t .weâ€¢, _~w: Id- - mt 01'e 512)NflaISHII NI}13IdlVH ~ E OE!,1/\[O70O i . 1 21 ll' f.4..k '~ 0~ L 00 *e 12'113/* 2'Â·0' 41/7 . ZQ O' 1 1% r 4 6 Â®* 4 4 A Â®142~ 01 896 - sicÂ¢e 1 M Y 4 W + I 6/2, 184" 234' . L. .9. 8, 01 m COLOMBO HALPERIN RESII)ENCE 420 W.FRANCIS STREET ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 BUNIAn ioowaae < @01 ALL==mix-TO-EUCED .â„¢Pal,4,4000Â¥.CONSOFTHES.i -1 m 0 0 Cti LU Â© = 90- 4 226 1 - L - 24 e =1 4% - =1 2.1: 4 04 . . W 1â‚¬~OVE B~IDIG ASPHALT ~'~~FIROUGtIOLJT ~ SIDING.REPLACE wig _ . f REDWOOD -- REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT : .--- , 4 El - b- 4 + * - ~ 00 SIOING.REPLACE WITH \ T REDWOOD Ct.APBOARO ' . - - 1 - 1 El,aeasâ„¢asm, _ I. SURB'DESAW,REDLINED Fet.NCE EXISIVIB STEP SUMFICEWS Fâ‚¬O<MAED Emâ„¢G SFINS*,GRN* NORTH ELEVATION ' ~ NEW wl,OOWS TO Â·: ./ I - A -i r-47 e A -Zr__--1 MATCH EXISTING THROUGHOUT 3 RISMOVES<ISTINGASPHALT SE)ING,REPLACE WITH - f REDWOOD CLAPBOARD 0,er,m' ELEVATIONS-N&S 1- -- le 1715417R 9*1 08/12/97 i Reâ€¢OVE EXISTING ASPHALT ... -/-. -/----. :I : Z ne-a. *Ofe SIDING,REPUCE WITH -- 2 0 -- -~~\A -7.00 FetACE WOOD DECIONG AS REQUIâ€¢ED 11 0 7 0 n,:Cli -7--0:209rl - ReRNISH EXEnNG DOORS - EXIST,O &ANISH GRADE REANISH EXISTING DOORS REMACE SOSTIÂ«3 STEP SUAFACESAS *OUN*D .. SOUTH ELEVATION - - 92.1 4 1 0 -e-New--TOE-ACED 1 . 0 WTH PEU.A WOOD MI*Dows oFTIESAAE NZE STIUE & COLOR i. 4. 00 g j - *00 = 222 ~~L__ , %& = 9< NEW Wâ€¢OOWS TO 1 - - ..1 MATCH EDOSING T}â€¢,OUGHO~ir -0 I lir ''".lit : : 0 .... - ..:i:::. 1 - -4.-elÂ¥- - , R -9- 2 ff h --/3 =pau IIAP-* IB=z-_ - Al ~ a -- -- - ----*Mi=J~Mle 'IN~- - -- 4.\ I. REFINISH eaSTIO DOORS 1Â·- - --t~D=a - a. 2- 11 1 901.'catos"/48 5,9 SU-Ace.S RED,//80 lelACE EÂ»ST,48 STEP SURFACESAS REQUIE) SOSâ„¢B *FINIM GRADE REMOVE EXATING ASPHALT EAST ELEVATION SDING,REPLACE WITH Re)WOOD CLAPBOARD e - -- -I ....#/ . NEW WN)OWS TO MATCH eaSTING nROUGHOUr - r .&2*1 --- - -Â·-- Ima =- ELEVATIONS-aw - -__ 17154/R 08/12/97 DATE .. . t'=.3-IrJ-lr7~7-112~.- " ... i gl- Ill r : Â· *'a)/"1914Â¥~CXORS -- --r:-7.- -hri.4*0 - 803; O-02 OaTE *f. IEW METAL HA,ORAIL- SEE DETAL - - Nan STEPS DO-4 p.1 MAN-0- REMOVE EXISTNG ASPHALT SEE DETAL REF-SH EXISTING DOORS WTTH eaSTING 4-â€¢SH GRADE IEW OfECK SUF~ACE W REDWOOD CLAPBOARD FeLACE WOOD DEC-G AS HgOINRE) WEST ELEVATION - : --- - A8 ,. 1331319 ..'W , , 1 1 1 TUF' . TIT- 11 11 1 1 lilli p 1 .'. 11 1 -441 !" It 1 4 , 1% It 1 111 . 6 il I , FE?.- 3, i i-1 9 2 11: 1141Â¥r,+mut . m , 0 1 4 +44 1 1 1. 1, I . A 1-111111 P -CF-1- 4~ 11.1 1- T 11 111. 111 11 .. i LAL=.11 18 47 .1 3 I 1.-,1 11 1 1 1 ly d. 1! 02 . 0 .1 2 1 . 111,1 - I lili 1- 11 ErÂ® I-t-: i 1 1 411111 11 li f.1 11' ' IiI. 1. ... f Â· 1 :li: 1.; till.11 0 24466=04/ 1 112 Shil~2 ~ 4Z -O 452 ' / I ''' libki~t~ - '0* ~ ; itt.; /'11 101 Aill . 1 1 0 . /til l :,1 : 1/ 1 L 7-Â£71-1 . i12 1 # 10 ' mm.Â·.Â·*Â·4 : InÂ·.irlf:91\1 11: Iiii / 1 1.1 ~1111, ...... tv HALPERIN RESIDENCE 17 ~ COLOMBO 1-,5 1.- C ,Â»I [17,1 '/1 1.' 1 ' "l,~! 1.'Â·I ; 1 1 420 W.FRANCIS STREET ASPEN,COLORADO -I l.'. ILLLIÂ·i' M 81611 . 11 ... A 11 11 1 1 1 ,- 4: 11 -- -,t: NOLLVAHEE J I.,7 i . 1 D - e xi STINg 1 l - BM/l-0/N.6 4. ' -(2/2-opâ€¢*ep 61,~,7-4 or _3~-1.41 . 4 - P,le W.E- .F \ I V t 6,1411", cod,Pe".9 1. 4 1Â»-ees -. , 1 I I /1 - 1 , li -- 1 4 4 1 1 1 - P ... FE,FY- 61*.r. 0 A L f Co "t I ./ , . j 6*t,F 9#52 0 . /1 4 4 14"D/A . - 0 0/Al: li' DI k. i*It W/r: i #A 6-te-~-410 -- t-if-$ /,7 e-/V 46- _ ~------- 21 + 0 41 BM#&O #'46, 11Â¥IFPâ€¢ vtaFFVUENT~ ~CM iliâ€ž i 5 e. 1. .: 1 #i" rtteÂ¢:..: 3. t~V â€¢ .. Memorandum ' - THE CITY OF ASPEN TO: Amy Guthrie, Community Development FROM: Kevin Dunnett, Park' s Department THRU: Jeff Woods, Rebecca Schickling 408/40 NOV , RE': Barry and Ellen Halperin Application, 420 West Frahcis 00 44044;, p'2'997 UAh . 'VA, DATE: 5 November 1997 VELOPMENT I visited the site this morning and prepared the attached drawing showing the conflict between the proposed ADU garage/car port structure and the existing coniferous trees to the west. It is evident that construction work shown onÂ· the proposed plans is within the trees drip-line zones and will have serious impacts on the existing root systems. It is the Park's Department's recommendation to deny the application for the ADU building portion of the application. The applicant may wish to pursue an option with the garage/car port to the east of the , - existing ADU building; however a tree permit and mitigation plan may need to be incorporated as there are several existing trees to the east of the existing structure. Please call with any questions. 2 I - ..' Exhibit F 130 Souâ„¢ GALENA STREET Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1975 PHONE 970.920.5000 - FAx 970.920.5197 , Pnnted on Recycled Paper a 0 0 2 LU eda ----- RQE =Z = Li-LU - 41 % 0 - 0. 0< ALLEY BLOCK 34 = -- -R ge 4 A -- - / 1. e, i - -0-- 4.5 /0*. -' - -t > f \*t \w \ 1 .id? ft \ 0 N 6 2 1. 43- 84 -- 4 %1En Â° i 4 P t#k 0 k 16 N . E- f 1 1 -r-* 11! 74 jf' : 1 -. 1 -5-t-- -% 14! i N 75'09' 49 2- *06-A/\\ lk' t ' , -1, A LAIAAf Â»-h Gex 60.00' . f 31â‚¬Er Trn.E SITE PIAN a ....S â€¢ O V {7 ADDRESS 171547R 420 W. FRANCIS STREET DATE *15-07 ASPEN. COLORADO DRI-. 81611 EDGE OF PAVEMENT PEâ€¢moN fecift le CD-GE DATE gY LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS NAO.BLOCK 34 #87. Pa~INC/8 878587 - CITY AND TOWN SITE OF ASPEN PrrKIN COUNTY. COLORADO ZE E CO-/BITS - SITE PLAN ~4 3-inne- SCALE:'1'-10'.e '23/ Exhibit E 2%1(JU.11-11. :-1 - 100.00' 4942 '00.d01 51(1Isal}I N V k Vift 0 El,NO"100 i r.-1 U Z -Hâ€¢eAA WOOD-mou~OFTHESA- SCZE SrU & COLOR I 201 9 E =1 229 - -1 292 -- &1 ir 1 /42* - Il *03 @01 2< -- - 41 - - NENWIOOWSTO 44 MATCH EXISING ~ <1 *Ern,E: - "*t'B' A U :ip #, -- MigE-1*MF*-4-- - ' --1---r --1~m'll J IR-IM lt==lk----- M 17 0.41 972 3-2.1:#= --rm=imr------------- .. FIEMACE IDOSâ„¢asTS' SLEÂ¥*TESAS 19_':W SUFFACI~AS REQUIF~D ;SH GRADE Re,OVE eaSTtNG ASPHALT EAST ELEVATION SIDING.REPLACE WTTH . 6* REDWOOD CLAPBOARD ... 41//1/ZTE# -----1- - - -NEW WÂ»OOWS TO - MATCH EXISTING T~,OUGHOUT : 2. it-t-/2-3, - \ H - I --. s,â‚¬ETTITLE ELEVATIONSâ‚¬AW aâ€¢,a - - 1715-07'R 1 OATE08/12/97 I. - A I P-Â¢8Â¥ . - 1 * : 0-ae [AN s mr: IEVMETALHA,ORAL- _ _ - '' 9EE DETAL - -LOINECK---~ -- - - ----- -------~ * -- - - i - 1-- - NEW DOWN NEW RAE,W SEEDETAL SDING.REPLACE WITH &)STÂ»48 -SH GRADE Iâ‚¬W OEK SUIVW:E -- ReMNISH eaSTING DOORS C REDWOOD CLAPBOARD FetACE WOOD DIECKNIGAS $<FiC~W â€¢ 1 *Lairte WEST ELEVATION ~ /0 -4 E i SCME-3*'-----19- L. Â· ~AS Â· 1 S .. ALLEDOill# VI~OVISTOIE-LACED -TH,ELLAÂ¥Â«300-Â®0.SOFTWilit -1 m sÂ¢E& smE & COLOR 001 11!8 #al @m 241 229â€ž k.1 206 - 1 =1 RE 8/11 5Â« t 3 -1 , -1 Fle,OVE easT,0 ASPHALT NEW WFOOWS TO p* # mi<VE</imm - MATCHan"CANIO,DZ 'el â€¢mEDWOODCLAPBONâ€¢D . ~ ~~ -1 - Wr~ 0--4-liaWEA"bin/1/12/---Illl--Ill--Il---I.-I--I --- . REMOVE e<ISTIO ASPHALI SIDING.REPLACE WITH -- \ r REDWOOD (1APBOAAO r - 1 ! Ret.â€¢CE EmTING STEP _ a. SURFACES.AS REQUIRW S.WACES*SABOUnED - - VISTING AFNISH GRADE NORTH ELEVATION , imm:==========ry 1 . - NEW WmE)OAS TO MTCH EXEnNG T-OUG,Our .... . 0 - : REMOVE eaSTiNG ASPHACr SOING.REFUCE WITH 6- REDWOOD a,PBOARD Ier,nu ELEVATIONS-N&S kÂ· 1- .0 ...0. ~ insâ€žam - 0*m (Â»'12/97 ---... REMOVE EXIS,1NG ASPHALT - . S~ReUCE WrrH . \\ - -- A...0.Fle:OFQ r REDWOOD CLAPBOARO . CÂ»*-DE $14% * -0 - \ _-9.00 J. 1 - ...44 '-6â€¢Â£E WOW DEOQI# AS REi1,~e _ -- REF,Â«SHEXISTING DOORS ./. 1 1 .4 .: m - , ho\AS eaSTNG *FINISH GRADE REFINISH ED<STING ObORS - F~EMACE EXISIVIG STEP - SUAFACESAS REQUIRe . **ili!& -- r - i .-I &. L . Â·Â· .V&&.Ai* , :2Â·~2'ff'--Wi~:12;LED.:221:,4...... -./*pl . /A --4 ituth F ys: ../ Â·. .60177 ,Â·~1*jit. 2 0~<* 1 9-4,1.41 ., -47*204'43..,te#--- :56 " ..3&*M - . >4 Â£ 1 1 2 fril-iffjr-Â·iÂ»:ee~ , '- '' I- ill/*Ili..'Ul; - -I- * ~ z-14-1 Ail Lim ~ . ' '1 ..IFF -#4 - ....... .. J!41* 3. .2 29#8~3703/16#l/D '0581#LL-- ..4.- ......:. _# .-2.-1 . -11 / : , . 0 1 il # 1 1 /. 111 0 [EN*%419 F I || Ell '0 H 1 0 404 409 4/1 11 50/ 3/2 '0 0 4;11 . 11 -5 4,*0 ST. N.4TH N -*12======Â»= ========== =========== ==== = ==-11= = ; =========== 84 311 0.#, 411 610 4/2 400 1 4/0 4/2 . 500 I ; -:1 11 1 s/ W*4 11\ 01111-12' K ~ 041 14 11 / ! 1/ ' 1 AX Ill 1 4 11 V I Tr - 4 11 9- 1 1, ---Ar M -UT ' A -/ 1.1 11 * L-r-1 0 4 li:; - 11 1 4 8 a 25 11 21 0- Fi 11 11 - 11 H 11 Ill-Ii- MC IC C 11 - 11 4 || N D u'- 0 4 70 E-J D A '14 ~ 8 0 Â£ 127 r73 \--0.-1 5 1 01-01 11 / 1 0 K E. |i I DF 3~--~ " 2 3 11 2 9Â§4-,~ 11 i ti Lalt * I ,I Â°F ll 11 - 0% - S U 0 7 64 4.44 1 :4 11 ,/<5= -71 12 ' - -& 11 + [4" 4 3.3, . 7-7 - 6 11 4- 6. 0 U G. 1 11 'A R 1 - 0% 9 91/-\-/ 127 fs,rÂ·Â·Â·Â·lir 1- R 14\ r71 ; 2! H. 1 1 i 'l # . NI :71 In 11 || el Ul u 11 1 1, --04 - 11 0- /1/ 1 \0 LE---1 1.-1 41 1* S '*71 /Â· Â· + ri-7 /Â· ~ r 20' - 73! E 20' PA 7.5'll 1,, 1- 40/ % 501 10 li 0 11 0 0 ST. ~ 381 4 N. 3RD 0 ull h 11 0 11 Ill 1 1 1 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission AC FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation ofticer L,7 RE: 420 W. Francis Street- Conceptual & Final, partial demolition, Ordinance #30, Public Hearing DATE: December 17, 1997 SUMMARY: The property is a designated landmark, and contains a historic house and an outbuilding/accessory unit which is not considered historically significant. The applicant originally proposed minor changes to the living unit and the addition of a garage stall on the west side of the outbuilding. It appeared through the review process that the proposal was likely to have some negative impacts on large trees which surround the area. As a result, the project has been redesigned. The applicant now proposes to demolish the existing outbuilding, except for a storage shed, and to build a new two car garage with an accessory dwelling unit above. Staff recommends approval as proposed. Please note that Conceptual and Final review have been combined into one meeting for this case since HPC has reviewed the design in a worksession and because of the quality of the proposal. APPLICANT: Barry and Ellen Halprin. LOCATION: 420 W. Francis Street. ZONING: R-6 Significant Development PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development involving historic landmarks, or within an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1 .. CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: 214 E. Bleeker Street (Greenwood), expires February 12, 1998 520 Walnut (Greenwood), expires March 22,1998 414 N. First Street (Ernemann), expires March 26,1998 834 W. Hallam (Poppie's), expires April 26,1998 514 N. Third Street (Ringsby), expires 123 W. Francis, Lot B (Vickery), expires May 24,1998 .. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The new building retains essentially the same footprint as the existing structure. Impacts to the surrounding trees have been avoided. The proposed building is architecturally compatible with the existing house and uses identical materials. Staff finds that it is very well designed and will contribute to the character of the alley. The applicant is to be commended for redesigning the project to avoid impacts to the trees and for voluntarily providing an accessory dwelling unit. In terms of dimensional requirements, the applicant proposes to retain a non-conforming shed on the west side of the garage. This non-conformity may be maintained as long as it is not increased. A variance is needed on the rear yard setback. Although the existing structure sits on the rear lot line, it is being demolished and a variance must be granted to replace the building in the same location. Staffis in favor ofthis variance. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: "Cottage-Infill" housing is typical of the West End and encouraged. Also, the applicant is providing on-site parking spaces which have not been present before. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal does not impact the historic significance of the parcel. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. 2 .. Response: The garage is detached from the historic house and is architecturally compatible with it, therefore the integrity of that structure is not diminished. PARTIAL DEMOLITION Section 26.72.020, Demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation, or temporary relocation. No partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, shall be permitted unless the partial demolition is approved by the HPC because it meets the applicable standards of Section 26.72.020(C). For the purposes of this section, "partial demolition" shall mean the razing of a portion of any structure on an inventoried parcel or the total razing of any structure on an inventoried parcel which does not contribute to the historic significance of that parcel. NOTE:Demolition of an outbuilding is reviewed as a partial demolition. 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance ofthe parcel. Response: The applicant proposes to demolish an outbuilding which is not considered historically significant. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: The outbuilding is not historic. B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: The structure which replaces the outbuilding is architecturally compatible with the house. Ordinance #30 Staff finds that Ordinance #30 has been met by the proposal. 3 .. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: 1) Approve the Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. Recommendation and Recommended Motion: "I move to approve the application for Conceptual and Final Review, Partial Demolition, and Ordinante #30 for 420 W. Francis Street as submitted on December 17,1997." 4 91OLOMID ' INTERNATIONAL, INC. 520 E. COOPER ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL: 970 925-7806 FAX: 970 925-3972 420 West Francis Aspen Historical Preservation Commission Conceptual HPC Final HPC Applicant Barry Halprin 420 West Francis Aspen, Colorado presented to: CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASPEN HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMISSION 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 0 COLOMBM INTERNATIONAL, INC. 520 E. COOPER ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL: 970 925-7806 FAX: 970 925-3972 Project Information Halperin Accessory Dwelling Unit 420 West Francis Aspen, Colorado Project Description Regarding the Halprin Accessory Dwelling Unit, we are proposing to retain the existing Shed to the West. This will not impact the existing trees on the neighbors property to the West. We will convert the existing Residentual Unit to a Garage. In order to provide adequate interior space we will need to expand the East wall 2'-6". The existing 5'-0" x 12'-0" Bay Window on the South side is going to be remodeled into the new Entry/ Stair. These functions require a space 6'-6" x 14'-0" as shown on the Plan. The slight expansion required moves the South wall 1'-6" further into the Halperin lawn. We are adding a 500 SF Upper Level A. D. U. Unit. The maximum height of the proposed addition will be 17'-0" at the Roof 1 /3 point. The existing mature trees in the East yard will not be impacted. 'COLOMBO ' INTERNATIONAL, INC. 520 E. COOPER ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL: 970 925-7806 FAX: 970 925-3972 HALPERIN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT 420 WEST FRANCIS ASPEN, COLORADO NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT This proposed Remodel of the Halperin Accessory Building promotes the charactor of the West End Alleys. The existing acessory building is one of twelve present in this blocks alley. The A.A.C.P. encourages this type of development. Off street Parking accessed off the alleys is noted with the high emphasis and voluntary Accessory Dwelling Units add to the Cities rental inventory. This Project provides two off street Parking spaces that are currently unavailable. Specifically this Project responds to concern regarding the existing mature tree on the West neighbors property. There are also existing mature trees on this property to the East. This Project impacts none of these trees. In detail, the Project incorporates the existing shed into the proposed building. The existing Accessory Building is remodeled by converting the existing Rental Unit into a Garage and adding an Upper Level Accessory Dwelling Unit. The Design is accomplished using a cross gable 8/12 pitched roof with shingles to match those of the existing Main House on the Property. The maximum height of this addition will be 17'-0" at the roof 1/3 point. The exterior wall finish is proposed to be 6" horizontal redwood clapboard to match the Main House. The Windows will be wood double hung units to match the Main House. Overall, this Project adds several important elements to the neighborhood while imposing minimal impact at the alley. .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPUCATION FORM 1. Project name *1/PER IN fÂ«ICEHoe Z Project location 4-10 W . FMIN/1 5 4-r' - - AS f PH , dfuL':,AAOO - (indicate street address, lot and biock numberor metes ana bounds description) 12.-4 4. Lot size 6000 5* 3. Present zoning 5. Applicanfs name, address and phone number I*f#< 4, 61,10,8# 14Â® PEPIN 910- *44 - 1718 6. Representative:s name. address. and phine number 49|.e:, 1Vred' INCERÂ©441Â»1*4, 1140 9,00 62 '06'ff* '*w 1-rE *66 A#FFH , 444,+40 +16'11 7. Tyde of applicaticn (check ail that apoly): Conditicnal Use _ Conceptual SPA 1 Car,cectual HPC Soecial Review Final SPA . X Finai HPC 8040 Greeniine Concectual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Finai PLID Re,ccation HPC Subcivisicn Tex#Mao Amend. Hiscric Lancmarx GMCS allotment GMCS exempricn DemciPartial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lct Sclit/Lot Line Acceai Committee _ Aajusiment , 8. Description of existing uses (number and type cf existing structures. acoroximate sa. 1. number cf bedrcoms. any previcus acorovals grantee zo the property) arro f'46 -0+IP Te#' t*M-[10,1, U 4444 0 9. Description of development application 4194 19/Pi NÂ·g, 8% leT'Pla WHIf ApH>/EF[@,2 10 #All,RE-0 Â»to Ull:Ef- 1-ey#1- 0011.:r F* W* 04 04 A, P, U . 10. Have ycu completed and attached the following? 4- Attachment 1 - Land use application form 4-- Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form . 4 Response to Attachment 3 4- Response to Attachments 4 and 5 lllllll.t .. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Apolicarr F*KAÂ« 4 61,1Â»1 1+1,1101 H Address: #20 KI. FF,41 019 Â«R Zcne district R-69 Lot size: 10 600 " Ecisting FAR: -24 67 Â« Allowable FAR: 61 + O 4, Prcocsed FAR: 8#6,8 if Existing net leasable (commercial): NA Proposed net leasable (commerciaft: NA Existing % of site coverage: 45+0 Prcocsec! 1,6 cf site ccverage: 4 0 +3 f Existing % of open space: . 960,4 Praccsed 15 of open scace: 27+70 Existing maximum heign[ ,Pr:nc:cal ticc: *4' Accescri clac: 19 " b Prccc:sed max. height: PEr:cical tidc: 0 5' Accesscr, bidc: 171 P==sec 3% ar c:emcilticn: . '91 OF AGOEâ€¢994%7' 0424, Existing number of bedrccms: ON& P'-=ccsed number cf tedrccrns: 416 Existing cr:-site car<ing spaces: N#NE, C n-site parking spaces recuired: 1-4 0 Sertacks Ex:sing: , Minimum recuired: Prcccsed: i Frcrt: 16Â· 4 10 Pcm: 16Â· G 2 rant: Rear: - Rear: 12 Rear ' Ccmcinec I Carr:tired Camtined Frccurear: 161 6 FrcrTUrear: 30 Frcnurear:16-5 Sice: -' Sice: 6 Sice: , Side: 9.60 Sice: 9 S ice: 4. G' Combine Cam timed Combined Sices: 1.6 ~ -- S ides: 1 4 Sides: 1 .e' Existing nanccrrformities cr encicachments: +Pt-| 1â‚¬~rg .1~: 41Â£*77â€¢20 ENNIâ‚¬0,5.14 M EN-rd Variaticns requested:_ ADI'l TiN LI#fl,H * 2-0# pet!410,1 13 -_ FEP'% 4Â¢[*L- - (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbads, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.fl. site coverage variance up to 5%. height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) t.: 016 - -- â‚¬---- _ ,/1 \ 9 . -... 174.,41'-~ 1/\ 9 k,/ U \ 44.â‚¬?94%-$ b Â·n k J . 12 / f//tof- 40, t 41 )4 -- 3- re f s.ci </4,4 '4Â»-- 3>r~ th-ix <o L/, '4*~1' \24 \..%-- d %9, . ----l ---- ..ountâ€¢In-new Of' . O 4\ . snowfunny C, Â»N Ce. c (.,7 AN . \34't 9*1.8 41 ..04.\ * L-- 50'0 - \ \6 1 3 d tip ~ institute \<,6 /3 Aspen --- 1/ \ F \1. 4=ly,4, O .14 1 44 q k-m -- -Â¢ 3\ \ ' ~ct. (3.- Fouq J 1. 10 1\ li . /3 3 FO 4% U ( C li Wood Duck tr,~~40 1 ' MUSIC , Tent Glies le St . t \ h D--Â·Â·Â·y-/ pe rl Ct C) Â· ' 1 0. . Goll Course 1 --2, ' Â·~06-*-Â·1 - 74 , 12 . /0- 1 2 ~4 -fL 0/ 2, Smu 'es, Wine SI ~4 4 P 6 -4 h / 1 -1 el3, 0 - . 0 d / 4 4 t.0 3 Race il g, 1 0 9 4 . M H flam St . .3654, pe.4 6- ' 8/ 4 06 0,,f A v on C.trek Ad >. . 4 0 4 pk .,b \ rancl 4,04 24 a ' t. - 'Nt? fl /i'\1\4(~ a/n St . - ny' - 5 ,4.- qs, 4,6 4 4 *c" /'~ ~ L__1 ( I.* 4 pk 82 0 8 '&60 '09 .'56 Â·5 4 , 996-- \ Mde 1 5 4 1. ~ ~4.)~~'Grt>*40 4 C ) ../Â« 3 .0 . 8 4 'do./ \ 19 , 4 05 2 82 2 65 6 . ere' /4.4344 0 0, Juâ€¢ st j 1~~ Man , 3 n. 1 KE? 2 -00 .09 -+R, n St b er' 0,0-,idi:ZE. G/1 4 n. 18 : r e f .6 . PROJECT SITE Suinmn St .*1* ; 444*P 4ff' A. n Grovâ€¢ t? Â· A IPS M 4 Weitvlew 2 0 1. A.6.Ad - 0. . r - 0,1 .1 AC- n < 02 '47 \=X -,â€¢el NITY MAP 0 . 7 'S *bruds - ' ~ twin R,Gge-6, ;32 - *EMB'-000 or i . Â·Â·Â·,Â· ~-~Â·t. L*ure' -1 49\Be 1 1- .u.* w,.I, 4* rip= ~-=1 % 5 -Â»--1 1 0811 YAE *i(1 1 r---7#5;E, *. 11 -- It ---M + i 2 -1><4 MI - *l 1- .1 . 11 4/ xI L - -. 0 1---1 8 -- 444 i. Co eE ... - t Cil R r- + A â€¢ ,A 1- f 4 - 21 - Rt * t --4 ,Â£1 1 1 1 1 4 40 *Ey 0Zt 219 00* ,Â· SL 4 4 .m- â‚¬11 -- --= 14 --* IZ li 19 =I ==a -- tmt= -4--2=//ell5e~--12'#t-I . 11 0 - 93Â°~~Â·~ -l~ \lot 11 - X Se> 14 C e G/Â» 1 /1 1 1 10. ... 1- 1/. I. it *MA~l,-0 A.9 A .11 %~-1 Fl .2-- O ln! 9 4 : ZR s U 0 44- #. 90. ir .. Z 1 I 1 2~-~>~_ IrE-131 - Â» 1 IN art - Crl c N 1, 0 X . /- . 1 I r *i 1 1 33/ \4\././. It . 4 04- %1 % 6 AT Fi-r .=-,: 0 - 1 04 fl -1-2, ~ 1 --' .r 0. MA 1 2.ltl;! N --- It : 03 t 1 ... 1 - 1 1 1 1 - -_.% --, SL DEV 047 I 11* ZOD 'd,d.,1, %"* Exhibit C 95*_. (E) - N * 3- > - 4 e 1 0 1 ' i w 1 * | * 1 . r < | 3 L 01 M L 1 *19 .., .. .. I. .:=,9, 242 A. 94.1,46>- 4 , - -:VIA> M))14;FJ~ , 2Â£ 212 LL__EA , P\'.. k# I /5. . 25Â· ;- . .... .. 0 . ... . ABBREVATIONS MATERIALS SYMBOLS LEGEND S~T INDEX '~vE RNISIED FLOOR A.F.F. ACOUST,CAL CEn-NG TU-E AC.T . -*cnoN .... Â·....ES ADAISTABLE ADJ ALTEBILAVE ALT WOOD ANCHOR BOLT U ARCI/TECTWRAL ARCH EARTH MASONRY BULD~18 /71 2-1 NEE- semON - I .Ill ,;f/3,2 . BEAM MA BEAA-0 8,441 .<t, C r/, .'.... ' 8LOCI0Na al.1((3 sorrow 8â„¢ STUD WALL- BOTTOM OF FOOTING B.F. 99/NNG GLDQ. UNDISTUFBED CONC. BLOCK 3; z :E-ING 41 $ _E.E. EXÂ· UN ~ UJ m OWME, a.O. 15 'BESSED .Â·PPER LE /EL 26,R 11.-N .C WALL. 13 EGENÂ·6 103 ;LJOR ZON CABNET CA CER.NO Ila SECTION 02(KEED â€¢124 .E,EL ':_2:A =LAN 5/ m# CENTGUE CL CER,4~C TILE C.T. 747/7/wk 2><C u CUWAIC WALL 77<E C.W.T. ... W u, COLU- COL 0.- CONC~TE CONC CO-â‚¬elloN /0.L GRAVEL BRICK ROUGH CONTIIJOUS CONT, A 16 JACESED 109 ~LOOF; 2Â·_1,1 DETAL 16Â·: --CPOSEC IDC. GARAGE 'LLCA 2LlN 2/4.2 DETAL Dll DOUBLE DBL SECTION :6.2 2(OPOSED 40 9 .pcER FLCI: rLAN EACH WAY EW CEVAT,01 EL . ElEV 17 NORTH S ECU-4 ELEY,;IONS EXIST- EXTU EXTEAK>R EXT BACKFU STONE SLOCKING Â· -MIAL--0 0 EAST 5 WEST ELE:ATIONS DETAL 19 EL ELEVATICNEPROPCSEN R.0001 PLA FkOOT'.a Fri /9+1 PRCPOSED AOU ELEVATIONS REFU:ENCE FOUNDATION F,Â«1 La.,6 POOPOSED ADU ELEVATIONS 7/4//'4'7//A -524%23 L.>LI.V.- 0.-1 19.2 MUGE GA. GWE-U 410 'EXISTING ACCESSORY NIT ELEVATIONS GYPS- WALLICAFO OW.1 SAND ASPHALT FNISH SECTIONS S DETAILS mEV. MARK IMT FLOOR All ,/30/11 Hm. HOA~ONTAL HOIU a. 100. , .12 CiTEAIOA ELE'VATIONS HOT WATE~ HEATER H.W. 113 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 414 INTERICA ELEVATIONS l/OA*710,4 Npolli NGUATIN I,SAL CONCRETE PLYWOOD DOOR SYMBOL ~ 30.t 351. FINISHES INSULAnON MISC. LEâ‚¬AM RJOT L.F. LIVE LOAD LL 1 LON@IT~IIAL LONaT. Wwwkw 72AW WILOOW SYMBot ~ NOT N CON,RACT MIC GYPSUM BOARD BLANKET NEW WoOO WALL ' CONSTRUCTION NTERK]R OPPOs,TE op'P EL MARK 441 PANTED .TIX PE-DIATE /6/ 1 ' V -'1= ~LYWOOD PLYWD. PROPEMTY LIE M. PLASTER RIGID REÂ»*OACe,ENT RE/*. FIEQIRED Rel METAL MOâ€¢nt A-,041 NESLLENT Rel REVMED REV. numim 7771 1 1 DEET METAL SAL Sed<-AR SIM. SQU*/1 kal LF. STANDARD ST[1 CEFAMIC STEEL Slm-3 STL ROOM I.IMBER r-ii--1 THICK #K TOP OF PLATE T OF TOP Of WALL T O.W. WS;fffÂ»fl | 1 1 1 lew cowrotms Towa. P.A TA mANSVER)E TRAMIV. TYPICAL TYP. STONE EXISTING UPLESS OTBe,WISE NOTED UO.M. CONTOURS VE-Y N FED V.LF. VIE,ITICAL VEFIT SMOKE DETECTOR ~ VNYL WALL FABAC VIA STAIRS SYIXOL - WATUIPMOOF WP WATER RE=TANT WA- ..==1- -COW WIÂ®. Mâ„¢ W / WOOD WD GENERAL NOTES PROJECT DESCRIPTION . 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION *ID IIATE,liALS SHALL BE AS SPECmED ANDIN ACCO#WANCE WTâ„¢ ALL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS ZONING ANALYSIS -PUCABLE CODES. 000-,CES. LAWS. PER.rra.AND THE CONmACT DOCU,ENTS. el- -,9.7. 1.Cur Zoiqu 101â€¢NNUM 018TANCE 0EIWEEN @UU-8 Z.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL M PIESPONSÂ®LE FOR TWE ACCURATE PLACEMENT OF ALL ,â€¢EW SITE -------- ---------6000 5 F ... Al -EDRJU DEN#ITY AESI]ENT~L ON Tlf LCTS FT CONSTAUCTION ON DEE NTE 411 ALLOWAa.E FAA -----3240 5 F 21,01 9~ZE*090 UK 11 J--IUM, OPEN SPACE. No REQUIRE-ENT 1.T,â‚¬ CONTRACTOR SHALLYEAIFYALL 0-ENSIONS Alâ‚¬> 8112 COPENTIONS IEFOAE ITARTING EXISTIIÂ£ F.A.A. 2811.25 5 WO,K SHOCAL) A DISCIFNICY APPEAM IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. OM SEâ„¢VEEM THE 3-ME-#TTED USES: 12.EXTE-,AL FLOORNIA RATIO<FAR CON,vcroocuwalts Alâ‚¬) E;65â„¢6 CON</770/6.14/rn/fÂ·nE haatrrECT AT ONCE FOR 'OTAL AREA OF DECKS--------389.61 3 K 40ETACIED IBIOISITVL DIVIL,JI -TRUCT=OM HOW TO PNOCIED (15% OF 3240 6.F =486 if. THEREFORE DECKS :(EMPT) NCUPUX .~CESBOAY DWEUNG MIrTS: 41-0 ATT/cHeD #Ill/jernAL clall- Ne .1.- A~.4.# IMICTOR H~ 0.'../.IED 4.SHOULD A COf~UCT OCCUR N OR BETWEEN OAAW,408 AFÂ® SPErmCAT=48. THE CNLOTOF *000 V OR WIATIA TluT EACHOFTNE Ie-E FAI*~MOIDENCIS IIAY SPECIFICATIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. UltÂ£58 A WliTTEN DECISION FROM THE AADITECT TOTAL AREA OF GARAGE---------425 5 3.F HAVE AN A.011 ve,CH W. . DEED AESâ„¢CTED ~a BEEN OBTAINE MICH DE,CRIBES A CLAFIFICATION OR ALTE;*IATE METHOD AND, CA 4--al LOT GIZE=00 16 UIOER THE ROAF-0 flfl HOUSI- AUâ„¢OATY. -TE;VALEL (250 S. F EXEMIPT 175 5 SE 2 5= 87 -5 39 ACCOADIAY,EACH REÂ»10â‚¬NCE W,1 le ALLOWED &-ma,1 LOTA-A P'EM DÂ¥,Ell.mle UNT: BOM, PAR POn l* li â„¢1 AAU @AO- AAIA ETHE CONTRICTOR SH/u CONâ€¢Flfâ‚¬)18' HER OPEMAIONa ON TBE UTE TO AREAS PGÂ¥,TTED BY Iell! DETA<l,ED InalÂ»al- i, UPTOAMAXÂ»*NOF,loy,ENum TIE HOWLY<NOID &8*XCIATION. MAIN LEVEL 4,0/ ENRY--------91 5 Ill OEr,lie UNal,Illi- LPARÂ«T IUPPER LEVEL A D.U INIT-------516 5 7 1 2.(WildER: ATHE.101 SITE SMALL BE MAINTA,~ED N A CLEAIL OADER-Y CO,Â®1110,4. FIEE OF DEBF,S AND ajaii,IM,Mon& M*YANk AGAM-OF-TO.,08"ALLOWEDP-0/'1*e UrTER. A,0 8-.6 NOT BE U-EABONABLY e,C-BEFe Â¥MTH ANY MATEJUL-8 OR EQUPMENT. EXISTING MAIN HOUSE---------2373 5 MOM -NC/AL BLAD/488=10 FT. TOTAL- -â„¢OUT OOL*al TOWAI F Afl EACH SleCONTRACTORIAEDIATELY ON CO,-LETION OF EACH M.A.E OF HI, â‚¬14 WON SHALL MINA,O Pr -Ial, EACH SCe ...... TO.................. Fe,OVE ALLTIWSH A,â‚¬> DEI,8 FetR.TÂ»*1 mOI Im HEM OPERATION. Al O. F Al fUP TO '..OF FAM-Y - GE AMil OVEA Â®0 - ColÂ»01 AS MAI FAM A#~A 'J"'00* SOE YAD 7.ALL WIATE*W.8 STORED ON THE SITE 81*LL BE PROPERLY STACKED AFÂ® PIOTECTED TO MNEVENT 11:11 F.A R --3068.25 S C lin <ACM "DI-4 DAMAGE AND DETEIWORAHON. FALLIi TO PROTECT MATER,ALS IIAY 82 CAUSE RD,1 MJECTION OF WOFK -EET Trr E 6.-X-,11 811Â·E COV--et TrILE SHEET 8.THE CONTRACTOR IMALL DO ALL CUTTING. FrrT,4 OR PATCHING Of 1,18/ 1â‚¬R Woll THAT -Y SE 1,331.109 TO MAKE [18 aEVERAL PARTS FIT TOGEDâ‚¬R PRope,LY AND eHALL NOT eâ‚¬,ANGE!,ANY Almaul He@HT: Cne, Â¥40-( DY CUTâ„¢4 EXCAVATWIG~ 0/ CnÂ·EmÂ¥16E ALTERING TIâ‚¬ TOTAL WO. OR ANY PAMT PROJECT INFORMATION JO]~ Nl-EN 1715-07R 0,;.O/Al Em I,Indaril FT OFIT. ALL PATC-40. FeAI-G. OR Ret.ACING OF MATE,~LS AMID St-ACES CUT OR DAMAGED ACCESSORY WILDIZS: 17 FT. m EXECUTION -' DATE 09-15-97 8.KEDÂ¥4.L . HAI-PERIN RESIDENCE i,dopom,0,40,7-wo~{0~câ€¢.<Ies,Â«r Â£ 420 W.FRANCIS STREET 0.- m nÂ·E ARCHTECT. ALL SUCH ASPEN,COLORADO REVI,ON FECOAD poRT,ONS or .0 23-,aâ‚¬ OATE - OWNERS: BARRY & ELLEN HALPERIN ~ 1 O.D-DiSIONS: PHONE: (970)544-1793 ~ALL DIWHISIONS SHALITAKE PRECEDENCE OVEB ICALE OF DRAWN@ ~ MALL 00Â£Me,ONS AFE TO FACE oF STUD U~ES, Cm,EFIWISE SPECIFIED *Ce.Ne HEIGHT 00Â£4810*48 AFE FROM RNIGH FLOOR SUâ€¢B TO FACE oF FFISH CEL- DESIGNER/CONTRACTOR: i WATE-4. lmLE,8 00â‚¬RWISE SPECIAED COLOMBO INTERNATIONAL 7:K 11.CONâ„¢ACTORTO ,~0Â¥[,EALLNECESSAAY BLOCKING 8ACK,Â«3. APÂ® FAA-qu RD,I LIGHT 520 E. COOPER ST MXTUIES, a.ECTI,CAL MITS. AA EQUr,ENT RECESSED frea, AND ALL al}le frEMS SUITE # 205 E ~EQUIED. ASPEN, CO. 81611 ........ 1 ,THE PHONE: (970)925 - 7806 l.~AGE,1 9-t.Â© *ZE OR FU,~ING SHALL EXTE,O T,e FULL SURFACE OFTHEWALLWIDTH AMD FAX: (970)925 - 3972 Â· Â· Â· ... Â· Â· LE,IGTH WIâ‚¬~THE M.~ OCCURS. 11PR0VIÂ©EALL, â€¢ ENGINEER: MAGGERT & ASSOCIATES INC. voin ArtieS. ETC VE,Â¥FY TY,â‚¬ PEQUFIED mâ„¢ AACINTECT PRIOMTO ..STALLAÂ¥16*4- 580 MAIN ST. SUITE # 300 :Â·:-: 7-0 :::::' 14ALL AMIH MATE,ALS SHALL BE *El.ECTED BY TIE OWNER. FUR,46+Â·ED ANO NSTALLED BY CARBONDALE.CO. 81623 ::::::.....:.:.:. .... CONTRACTOR UIUM OT/FWISE NOTED. PHONE : (970)963-9643 :LUL SED#UCMS AND SATHROOWS TO HAVE SalÂ»O DATT Iâ€¢SULATION INALL WALLS. CEUN@3 All FLOORS. ......... *Nfla NIH d'IVH El ~ .3. 1Iit O Ely~Iâ‚¬31 3 L 1.3 8%.EEz. ... 0 0 (00- gdE 00 r REMOVE WINDOWS ANC DEPLACE -9 '01 Crl SET TYPE SET NO. / EXISTING STYLE. SIZE & COLOR 30'-9" /1 101-41/21 20'-41/2' C + N h d.â€ž W- +3 4 I i . 1 . 1 1 Â§ RE'Â·'Â·I,E WALLS ' ~ BEDROOM Â© KITCHEN . .. i Â§ L j SHED : c. i . ~ SKI .â€¢Il-Â·-Â·-Â·-Â·-Â·-:-r'â€¢â€¢.lili- i 9 ROOM Â· - . ri R DARKROOM -,<:- = d < #:t '. i 8 24 ...-- -4 N 2 1 1 h EMOVE WALLS : 1 i - 1 DOOR 1 (C) . R LIVINGROOM 1 Col 4 1 . '01Â£ 1 1 , ISSUE DATE Ul) 1 1 17 1 TO 5'-6" . 5'-0~' 2'1-117 ~Q#' 21-11/Z' 9'-6" J REPLACE WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING STYLE & COLOR S,â‚¬ET TITLE ADU FLOOR PLAN ADU FLOOR PLAN(EXISTING&DEMOLITION) ~ .,106 PAMBER SCALE:1/1Â· 1-0. - 1715-97R DATE 11-03-97 DRAVINGY ~EVISION RECO*v NO CHANGE DATE SY t co,lkâ‚¬Mrs iHEÂ¢rre::.: : :r:Â·:E:i ..... SION)GISSIN NIHJIdlVH 1.J~MJ OH N9700 133El.LS Â¥8:1'MOZ, 3'NBdSÂ¥ 34 IMÂ·13131 N34' *1 , *7419 17N N 31,8 -2,1*'1-6 XV=1 SET TYPE 23'-0- SETNO 10'-6- 20'-6" =ne=r--T Â· - 1 1-1 777'r:-45 2 - 124 -49= d' I y . 4 / ---------- 4*,3. /* .,enl Z.---=- 1 \...1 I f ,/ 1 6 r :f:. I -4 '-5-'f.Â· Â·4. ---*-#4 pla 1 --/1Â· 'TXJ' .Â· 7 EXISTING BULDING P TOTHISLNE - ... ..141 1. i- r. 11.4' '10., 1- i A I EXESTNG -- El . , I u j b 1 SHED h .â€¢'k/ Â·. 14.04 .*44, '10 GARAGE / 0 iN 10 - 1 TOP OFCONCRErE 1,8 - m q'F . \'j ----1 .-Jer-f 3 100'-g I h \ 1 1 'R FIRE ./: r L L i 5-6 Â·Â·-f -~ MECHANICAL FIATED DOCR--)1Â·Â·41 ri ' 4-f.-4 11 6 1 4 1 1 - 11 1 1 5'-0- , i \L=-1 \ 11 Â· i / MUD ROOM I 5 ' Â·~. ., ./~ - _. EXISTINGBULDNCI A ' ~ - 4 \ !1 ~ r TOTHISLNE - STAIM 277~ " I ... f..1 IN 21>. ~ ~b UPF-1.|t|5 ~ ~ ~ ~ Â«f..04.\9 ISEME CA-'E 14'-0â€¢ 4 . TO : PAVED PIT\O--- ZE'JA .9 r.--1/, 1 + 1 HALPERIN ADU MAIN LEVEL(PROPOSED) -1- BEETTITU e SCALE:1 /1â€¢ 1'0' a KIEâ‚¬ 1 DATE I. bl .Â·:. .6 Y / DRA# Bv 4:E. : 7 v NO CH 1.39 1 1 COMMEN-1 twEET,h LJC11/FL1 1LJLJ .... O @= 0 U) O M 20 7 <O SETTYPE~ r SETNO 10'-6- 12'-6- 2 -6- 1 1 -- 0 <WW--1 1---avb F < 4 DEC]< ~ N i BEDROOM 6 -~LIVING ROOM 111 . 7 4 TOP OF PLYWOOD ---..P TC8'-6' KITC}Â·ENETTE I 1 1 01 rY-F u I .â€ž99)_.LLE .1 1- cri-9 3 ! STUDY Wi-7-1 -5_~ 1 4 10 â€žâ€žâ€ž,u~~;,:-dul ST-0/1/ 1 140-0 9-0- HALPERIN ADU UPPER LEVEL(PROPOSED) ~ SHEET-!TLE SCALE:1/4â€¢ 197 A.D.U. UPPER PLAN J Ce NUMEE' 1715-97R DATE 12.1-97 DRAWN : gEMSION RE DCAÂ© NO CHANFÂ£ DATE 3. /1\ % % COMMENTS Mt)NlaIS OE/VFC)10 ' 133U1S 11919 .9 9 . .... GÂ© ~ TOP OF ROOF RIDGE ! TOP OF ROOF RIDGE -4 ------- - ------------------------------------- 41127=67 4 iiiÂ·Ze - *-1--------------- --------------------------------- -------------&----- 2 12 1Â·,1 20.-O. fn ib:-6-NEW SHINGLES TO MATCH - 8 ~ .071. 8934 ' 468 1 1 - Mc EXISTING 6 - 8 C.= 1- TOP OF BEARING PLATE .Â¥' , TOP OF BEARING PLATE ----- *' 115'-6- NEW W000 DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS T 115'-6- 2 X 8 WOOD FASCIA 80 \TO MATCH EXISTING ~ ~ * * SLIDING GLASS DOOR ~ 2 X 12 WOOD HORIZONTAL TRIM WOOD HANDRAIL TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE ~ TOP OF UPPER FLOOR , TOP OF UPPER FLOCR 108=6- 108'-6. EXISTING SHED 6- REDWOOD CLAPBOARD 1 TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE lilli 1 111 1 WOOD GARAGE DOORS 111 1 1 1 11 11 11 SET//pE SET NO ~ 11 1 1 11 1 11 1 111'111 TOP OF GARAGE SLAB/ GRADE TOP OF GARAGE SLAB/ GRADE 100.-0. 100'-0. + 1-0-UJIQBIB_ELEMAI[QN_(EBQEQSED) SCALE M------- ------------------------ ~ TOP OF ROOF R IDGE TOP OF ROOF RIDGE ------------------------------------ ,- -----------= --- ----~121'-6* 121'-6* - -----------------------------------f. 14 120'-0- 8~~~~8 NEW SHINGLES TO MATCH EXISTING - TOP OF BEARING PLATE -=U -2 X 8 WOOD FASCIA 1 TOP OF BEARING PLATE 115'-6- 9 115'-6* ISSUEDATE 7~ 2~: p NEWWOOD DOUBLEHUNGWINDOWS TO 6- REDWOOD CLAPBOARD - , TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE - j====-1 hd TOP OF UPPER FLOOR t---i , -&*A l TOP OF UPPER FLOOR 108'-6 9 108'-6- EXISTING SHED - NEW WOOD DOOR 1 11 El M REEIEEEIIEEE- El[Il NEW WOOD COLUMN SHEET -,TIE A.D.U. ELEVATIONS TOP OF GARAGE SLAB/ GRADE _ ULUU.U.1 I ~TOP OF GARAGE SLAB/ GRADE .a@ NUMBER 1715-97R 100'-O- DATE 12-1-97 100.-0 DRAWN BY S.B. REISION ICCRD NO CHANI DATE 3Â¥ 2 A.-0-1LSQUI]ziELEMAnON_(EBQEQSED) 3 4 SCALE IMÂ·---1.-0. COMMENTS twâ‚¬ET!9 ::::::::::::: .... A9.1 3 ov#oiot#mt:Z .... ~ TOP OF ROOF RIDGE i i TOP OF ROOF RIDGE - '10 121' Z ~ - *~Tibco ~W~}~la~STOMEI I i EXISTING - 1 - 'EE -- 1 0 0 0 2 X 8 WOOD FASCIA < ~ TOP OF BE,AING PLArE | TOP OF BEARING PLATE ~ ./ -----------------------W----- $ 00- Â¥ 115'-C .V 6- REDWOOD CLAPBOARD 03 0 NEW W000 DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS 115'-6- gdE ~ TO MATCH MAIN H0USE TO MATCH EXISTING ~ 2 0.6 ,2 IE~11 H - CZ 11 11 0 - U-UJ NEW WOOD HANDRAIL >; a- TO MATC}4 MAIN HOUSE , CO 1 TOP OF UPPER ALOOR -_------_ TOP OF UPPER FLOOR 0< C\11 -------- 108--8- 2 X 12 WOOD HORIZONTAL TRIM ' 108-6 I TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE NEW WOOD COLUM 6- REDWOOD CLAPBOARD I L.-11 H SE'TYPE Ser NO TOP OF GARAGE SLA{3/ GRADE TOP OF GARAGE SLAB/ GRADE ~ 100.-0- 100.-0- A_DULEASI_ELEMAI[QN_(EBQEOSED) SCALEIMÂ·---ltc, ~ .. ---- --- 121'-6 ~ i.41. TOP OFROOFRIDGE Â£ TOP OFROOF RIDGE ------------- 120'-0= 3 NEW SHINGLES TO MATCH EXISTING TOP OF BEARING PLATE -------------------- 115'-6. ISIUE DATE 6- REDWOOD CLAPBOARD TO TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE - 2X12 HORIZONTAL WOOD TRIM TOP OF UPPER FLOOR 108'-6- - EXISTING SHED SHEETTITLE A.D.U. ELEVATIONS TOP OF GARAGE SLA8/ GRADE TOP OF GARAGE SLAB/ GRADE a NUMBER 9 100'-0* ,-. 1715-97R 100.-0- DATE 12-1-97 DRAWN BY RERSION RECORD NO CHANCE DATE BY 2 LD._LU8LESLELEMAIIQN_(EBQEQSEW 3 4 SCALE:IM--1'â‚¬ 5 Ca.IMENTS :27# : U: i : i I ~ i Aw.2 30Na{[ 133W1S