The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.423 N 2nd St.HPC27-954 al 4-bl N 1-1 W O Z M X N 1-1 0 Z ao 00 rt o I ki 7- . . -1 . - iall = 6* A P.0 5-6 HPC27-95 R EVELOPMENT .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 9/19/95 CASE NUMBER: HPC27-95 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2735-124-14-003 PROJECT NAME: FIGGE MINOR HPC REVIEW Project Address: 423 N. 2ND ST APPLICANT: TOM & JENNIFER FIGGE Applicant Address: 423 N. 2ND ST. 925-1155 REPRESENTATIVE: GLEN AUERBACHER Representative Address/Phone: P. 0. BOX 8735 ASPEN 923-6342 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: . MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 423 N. 2nd Street- Minor DATE: September 27, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to add approximately 110 sq.ft. at the existing mudroom. The house is a local landmark. APPLICANT: Tom and Jennifer Figge. LOCATION: 423 N. 2nd Street, Lots G, H, and 1, Block 41. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVI EW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. NOTE: Applicant must confirm with Zoning Officer the existing F.A. R. of the house. A sketch found in HPC records shows approximately 139 sq.ft. of F.A. R. available for the site. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with the designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a historic landmark.... Response: The Inventory form for this house (attached) shows that there have been major modifications, namely through the addition of the garage and the wrap around porch. Windows and roof forms also appear altered. The applicant wishes to add a small addition to expand the mudroom. The addition will be visible on Smuggler Street. It is very difficult to determine from old maps and photographs whether or not the wall that is to be demolished to make way for the expansion is historic. .. Generally speaking, the addition is a minor change, however there has been substantial compromise of the historical integrity of the structure to date. HPC may wish to discuss material differentiations or other subtle ways to detail this addition. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The addition will not have a significant effect on the character of the neighborhood. It does in a sense expand the size of the garage along the streetscape. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: This addition should not further detract from the historical significance of the structure. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: This small addition should not have a substantial impact on the character of the structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. .. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the minor development application, pending a site visit. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the minor development application for 423 N. 2nd Street." ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: 0 -ke M.4 Ti A ff -11, 09,4 $ Al Cll.t.t â‚¬- Â£ *ro vn + jew M.,4 8 Â· 725-//Sy â‚¬23 7~(56Â· Ase<>~~ 0 T AL 249 4 Â£ Se.40, ii#l GGAM Aue,buke D BA. Cavfk;47 "- k. 4 1 F o , tax 877 35 A Â¥74 00 37&/1- 9 1 3'63Â¢2 2 0 Pay_o~4-_-je~c (of,-*4 92462- 5 423 Qw,3 54. A,r" GE) Co- -# 4 Mo k- 4 A-~0 2-6 . B *k_ChgÂ· $1.- 4 ' 1 2 77 4 su- Lk //4cke. of t Toi Ce I g W 6.- 9.'- Ut.~- 4 ' V ; U 11 MI up , itt A tic. JA.cj E 417 I t 6 ActelÂ·,40 4,4 x **" At,*-.0,- foo- f/osk) ~=~ Ikv~ ~3 4 24 1 4 /9192 x )6 34, 2,4- i ov ,c 4 Le ~pt;,93.40 '~wi Sci 5 12 %* 5 4Â¢*Jvt- . 0~~cl, ty 3 â‚¬)06 1,-3 3.8/41/0 016, doLL) , (0 46 040*4 6 +~flut Q La~17 u Api 4, Thi> LJ< 4 c#/1,/Sfyi file~*9 8~~o-- 1 '19460.-01,~ 4 ~u.3-toow>. / lill- lit Cbve#cto~ 01 4..1/ -Ft.& a.00(,~kot. 1 5~~im Xyuffi,V- 6 4/J- .Sel locq,~ |01 Â¢Â·10,+2- auc~ 9 2 h 6.0-4 â‚¬ 4 tet . Ak'10*604,002, jennifer fiffe :seÂ¢t: 11 1915 W howâ€¢, ijb 3_ CÂ°neâ€¢A 213, Bin-G* fiff a.4- - h.abâ€¢-12 -11.oâ€¢nk Owhie 03, 4255 D. St,o"'NdSâ€¢ . in ASPigifitti' f*"~* 6 4 19 -tt56, QJB,ut 1'Â£*misw 40 D l..~_ BIL,Â£Â¥ 6 nele -6 *will Â£102â‚¬*60'.1. +0 0Â£4 hâ€¢'-t. P45 (1224**191 aut r03"45/7 01. a, /Wupe-,> 0 r-0- (7357 AS*'Eu, Ien. K"41 12_ 970-923-6.K 42_ 640**f-Ji- 'Ju-twik- <:SNi.,4111i Tut~ 1 . P. 2_QJ Ft o o ' D , 2 n d F/oo, Po, ch . 1 ---- 7 -4--M- / E Aoof ave-4 1 51 flow 204.4 1 1 1 42/ 4 f tb 0 3 Â£ 0 L 00 1 A #4 Jx ! 61 + L Ag PAK?4 0- Dr (' u e k.)C, 7 No, 1 k â‚¬ 1 ~la_+ 91- 96-tol c.0 it is E y ictlhq pot to '*16 7Â°2 'Â°Ou ts i noo yow 2%86\*+ j 1 .c> 2,~& floo, ?0,0- 3 . 3 A,i 1 0 *1 S -+ GA,Â¢+L. 4 d h /11 0 1 0-4 \ i 4 31 A Â¥49 Dr : 44 Url . F %Se tlouu, (Ank) AD,]1 51. 94% A A 1 8 4 34 Nut h jeolt- Â· (27 '1'*)59 67 1 00 25 TZ tz- h 4 (634 67221) ~~1 Â¥10/9 -9 nci g 2 )(,3 Il i t./7 (6 M 092+ 8109010 40Â¤ O '7nw 55<51 ~ 6 joyroojoâ‚¬ . 1 8 71 hof LJ=,1 J t> L <4 00 1 , 5L#Â£11310 1 11'oM~rj eEN *,3.'8331 01 55 34 0134/ f . 1 Fly vid * * 3 1 84,-JF75-Â·T-WlUEZI= . I ,/22 + *;,03 1 ~ -2-2.3-...., _~- tkY?,?lf 02- 1'Â£- . < 1 1 1 J 1. I' 2 \1\1 j I 11 li ~7 1 i W/*4127 ./ J ' Ok *3 . rr 1 U n 1 7 1 1 -1 7 111'll 'lln 11 f In 1 1 lidll !1 11-1 1-4 * 1 -1 - 3,02 f . Im 1 SKETCH OF SUBJECT 22 .. Garage 12 23 24 Mudroom 8 Covered porch AREA CALCULATIONS: 1 - --- First Level: Stairs - 8 Bath W/D 12 x 8 = 96 Cl.' 15 35 x 19 = 665 19 28 x 8 = 224 30 X 30 = 900 11 Redroom Family room -(16 x 2) = (32) 4(8+11)x,2 = 19 1872 Kitchâ€¢n Dining - Wrt -- bar - 8 ~Stairs JO Unfin. 21 Stairâ€¢ 36 basement 30 Living Covered room 31 | 4 porch 16 Bath 14 9 7 - el. Foyer - Basement: 14 21 - 30 x 30 = 900 16 -16 x 9 = 1134) 756 Bath ~7 Stairm 19 19 Second Level: Bedroom Bedroom 27 x 19 = 513 28 x 8 = 224 4 22 x 32 = 704 3 4 8 x 14 = 112 8 Bath Bath 16 x 6 = 96 8 Bedroom - 4 1649 12 1- - Dren.ing ~12 U..ble attic 1---40--- 1 1 StairM 16 22 l 2 Bedroom Mi,ter - bedroom 2 40 x 17 - 4 80 --7 Not to scale; dimenstons are 12 x6 - 72 8 Ct. Bath approximate; for descriptive R x 12 = 96 | Purposes only. lh f " i ; 4 1 i .. 1 0 7 2- 1 42+7 35 2- l .. HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 423.NS Photo Information: ASP-Q-24 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: * Full Street Address: 423 North Second Legal Description: Lots * City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Hallam Lake Historic District Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Victorian, Modified Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 2-1/2 story Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irregular Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Front (east) 2 cottonwoods Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Cross gabled with wrap-around shed porch; asphalt shingles Walls: Clapboard with fishscales at qable ends Foundation / Basement: Unknown / Yes Chimney(s): Center rear, corbelled brick Windows: Nine-over-one double-hung wood with simple crown Doors: Center panel with 8 light side lights; 2 sets of 2 pair each, french doors to east front porch Porches: North, east and south wrap-around shed with shallow gable at entry; turned posts with square baluster railinq General Architectural Description: Large Victorian with extensive additions and modifications .. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 423.NS FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original Use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Construction Date: * * Actual * Estimate * Assessor - Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Roof form, windows and doors; dates unknown Additions and Date: Garage and porch; dates unknown NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Zl - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: * Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: Date: March 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner - -. r P. 4 4 -- L 14- --- PYRAM]k I --I . - - , 1- IGHLANDS PEA]sr. 1,~ PEA}{ r \11 3%2 e /4-, /.+dee ., . ./- f â€¢ - 1, -4- . .,r ~~~ ASPEN \22â€¢~ 4. HIGHLANk -/AS.* I '3 - 4. ..4 4 . LA yp'TS *' J - , 6 - 1, f â€¢ f 4 . .P .r 44. 4 -.- . K.1 0.-- 1- 4 6.-5//7/"f#raw , D . 7 / 6 fl,â„¢ 94464.4 I \ 0 ~ 731.0/li.PA-- , 2 ;. 4:9<u-Â· ' ' IM 9*4 1 r 41* 8 - ' // a 4 " 4 1*lit SliTO-1 - 9 0-1 12 l' A . . . i Llama Treks 74%1 1,40: - 12: A Pine Creek Cookhouse ... 0- .. 1*&*ibl. P V .i'.62 li I : 2,30 , a - 2,4,/re. -4 - 3:*.. 2 7 6 :3 'di J. U ' ... 4 i /3 - 7. ar . 4 v 2 9, A ./1/ly f Jf I ' IWI: 4 - I + 42-ke /'-LL * Â· .... 6. 3. 1.. . .*f Pugples .. t. .4 . i, Â¥- h . - . ..L - ..1 L t af :, rkk- # il' 4~'~* eA*ountry Daf 44 402111/719 * 7/IMA*bdv<R. 1 Scha.1 i'-1 - ' 3.... Aspen Hi;I,lae â€¢ . a-,i Asp.. I.00~ d'*11, 1 "121 t Â£9 spen 4 1--~9 4,9. , G Music f 4>i.. 001 . - , 1 A.. i 'X 'Â· 64Â· 7 d.1 2 , . 0 L D 0 Â· -/ ..... 1.- . i * I.- 1 ....... ./ '-r St .Me,Hz 1 .0. 7 .4 Shadow - ../. 2 - Mormons o 1. r * 1 4-% 17 1 -N/ 4 Mountain Lodge Â· 7. V U . 4 y C.4 - Â·1'* Â· . Aspen High â€¢< Hen,4,â€¢r#%Â·d L Â¥ School Iselin Parl Boomerang Lodge - 4 â€¢* 4 . e soe, aâ€¢ey Elementarv 11 O-~n~uck ~ L'Aubeqe.i. tt;t -7 9 44 10,01ta i Schâ€žd d ORâ€¢â€¢Amâ€¢ Swimm~n 1% 1WY. 82 '41* 1.-T .90 /--4-0 ..L=.2. ':, 9 11 1-5. t IR'. OrÂ· 1 -n Hollse , 4, â‚¬ 4. unr - Hickal, ~ , filawk- 60,4 i*Â· Ch,latmas r 1 comgowra o A>ren Chapel Kingdom Ml~,~, 1,8 Â· 8 . v * i ./ 3 ....1 Z S Ul}DO-* -- . .~ --.6. BLEEKER Â¤ STREET I (n f 7 W I 2.3 ... 0 I. % 44~ tl ... . ... - 0 1 A -1 m-m m .. . 1 5 -- a - GOLF S m . Stallard w ....1 HALLAM STREET Muuum 4% .. AI--Â¥ COURSE /1 -m . POppies S Bi.â€¢o ar - : 8444440**CT ~ ~<~~ . m m 4 0 - Aspen . -C + m Forest 1 1 X-(Center POWER PLANT 2 Sen+-2 -4 + G. 0 1. â€¢ FRANCIS STREET m w 4 4 t.n O 2 First Baptist Â·* 16 90, / 6 - m 0 r -T I. e E - - N : SMUGGLER STREET ..133 + 80 = r . *2,2. 0 -<44* Thangle . . Â·* 1. Christ 2 4 -S Episcopal . c ~ *61bed Butte 4. V PA k#Cemetery HOMES- NORTH STREET ; fâ€¢ 4 . - - C.le $ . 1 - (.1/0. 96 Â»4Â·Â«. <-. A Ek-*q* o GILLESPIE STREET Physics , 5 101,~ :Ins~fute Ailin tioadows Tinni, Contif '6 d Hmis 4\EW DR Aspen Meodows Co,imt 11.11 - Music Tent 4 48 MustÂ¢ 1.'Ad Aspen 0 :*14' ' -4 Â· ~... agy;:Institute 1 - .. L.. 9/ . 7.- 11 A -12 13â€¢Â·24~~ i54 .-i.:;01~ 17 -,Â·'0 18:w ;.. 49 DE, 20 1 4 2-lf 22 * --Â·9 99*Â·tÂ»--9- < I , .:/2 11. 1 -=Eâ„¢. I--fty.tr~-m~ Durant -4-Mdidin,1.,- I 4 .VÂ· 9. b - - -: 9.thtÂ· N..4 i.:.4.-3- i -'Â·c;:-i-SgIondominiums&4~~~j21- Fifth A.enue *EN nodom:mums - I.*of |tlluildfng Â·' 31'3,.tÂ· ~ 197~ F - JE~camlp~ IAN Tipple Lodqe Li~h.%11 i:=Lttrrjfl*illag<) - 144(* AD 1 *Denblick Cotido, flt ~----Ii- -.flirmlm:m~ 1 + * V :Â·# Vt.- -*ili 'EmEm~I-il -- Alpine Shirt Compangh The Silver Cirde .Al,11~ s*me|~~~~ Crystal Skftento[ Colorodo Riff-Reil-- unmr Mountain Sports Alternative Edge ~ Ice Rink 1~G~~ ~= iner Book Store, Skin, Oxbow Outfittinq .,t*~p~ (Nov to Aorj T-,6 f,-1, A.ki., flim,-8.4 , 3381S 1SWI 13gz356 ~22/93 11:59 Rec *5. OC, Bl ~ F'G 870 21:via ..eis. Pitkin Crity Clerk, Do. $270.00 GENERAL WARRANTY DEED I.' % GEORGE HAMILTON FOR TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable r consideration, in hand paid, hereby sells and conveys to Thomas K. Figge whose address is Carriage House, Roberts Avenue, Davenport, Iowa 52803 the following real property in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado to Wit: Lots G, H and I, Block 41, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. with all its appurtenances and warrant(s) the title to the same SUBJECT TO AND EXCEPTING: Water rights, claims or title to water; exceptions and reservations as set forth in the Act authorizing the issuance of the Patent for the City and townsite of Aspen recorded March 1, 1% 1897 in Book 139 at Page 216 as Reception No. 60156; encroachment of planters and driveway into West Smuggler Avenue as shown on the survey by Carl Carmichael Surveying dated October 6, 1993. ~ SIGNED thisg:? 44ay of 2041Â« , 1993. U 13 --~ 08466. MAn; 946Â«; *6rge Hamilton by his attorney-in-fact, Jane Ellen Hamilton STATE OF (CLOCADO 3 )SS. COUNTY OF ~'Tit u 3 The foregoing General Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this Â£622. day of Det-O 62 r , 1993 by Jane Ellen Hamilton. attorney-in-fact for George Hamilton. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ' 1 My commission expires: //- 5---lis ,-----A~ ,00~ ~ - /1 o < '- \j Â©Â«Aj /7 ~ARY...9\ Â¢Notary Public - cle~Efit/fl 10'9044 b Colaal q 1 1 44 2.1 DATE R DATE P NO. 24 6 HRETT PAID ... SCHEDULE A -ORDER NO.: 00020456 POLICY NO.: O-9993-117361 .,DATE OF POLICY: October 22, 1993 at 11:59 A.M. vAMOUNT OF INSURANCE: $ 2,700,000.00 NAME OF INSURED: THOMAS K. FIGGE 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: Fee Simple 6/3. TITLE TO THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND IS VESTED IN: THOMAS K. FIGGE u4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, COUNTY OF PITKIN, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Lots G, H and I, Block 41, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. 620 E. Hopkins Aspen, CO 81611 303-925-3577 AUTHDRIZED SIGNATURE I. SCHEDULE B POLICY NO.: 0-9993-117361 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE (AND THE COMPANY WILL NOT PAY COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES OR EXPENSES) WHICH ARISE BY REASON OF: 1. RIGHTS OR CLAIMS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2. EASEMENTS, OR CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 3. DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGE IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, AND ANY FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY AND INSPECTION OF THE PREMISES WOULD DISCLOSE AND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 4. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. /5. UNPAVENIED3MIN<DNGXXXXKINEW WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER. LÂ·6. ANY AND ALL UNPAID TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS AND ANY UNREDEEMED TAX SALES. v7. THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSIONS IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. - 8. Exceptions and reservations as set forth in the Act authorizing the issuance of the Patent for the City and Townsite of Aspen recorded March 1, 1897 in Book 139 at Page 216 as Reception No. 60156. .9. Encroachment of planters and driveway into West Smuggler Avenue as shown on survey by Carl Carmichael Surveying dated October 6, 1993. r â€¢ ~ ENDORSEMENT TO TITLE PO- -~ POLICY NUMBER: O-9993-1-.361 CHARGE NO. 00020456 FORM $ 50.00 Issued by STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY HEREIN CALLED THE COMPANY /SCHEDULE B, EXCEPTION NOS. 1 THROUGH 4 ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED OWNER'S TITLE POLICY ARE HEREBY DELETED. ./SCHEDULE B, EXCEPTION NO. 6 ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED OWNER' S TITLE POLICY IS HEREBY AMENDED TO WIT: Taxes and Assessments for the year 1993, not yet due and payable, and subsequent years and any special assessments not yet certified on the tax rolls of Pitkin County. This Endorsement is made a part of said policy and is subject to the schedules, conditions and stipulations therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as extending or changing the effective date of said policy, unless otherwise expressly stated. Signed under seal for the Company, but the Endorsement is to .be valid only when it bears an authorized signature, effective as of the date of the policy thereto. Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. 620 E. Hopkins Ave. 474/4 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-3577 Authorized Signat=se .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 where you add onto the existing building is important. In this case it has been reduced to a gable end on a new building. Linda: Do we have a method of adopting Jake's letter. Amy: I feel that letter is the ultimate end and we need more discussion. Donnelley: That should be part of the site visit Wednesday. Les: Could he get a registered letter immediately that he is under his own liability on and any fUrther construction in any areas of this building. Amy: It is in draft form. Les: I feel we should get a news column to address particular issues and we all would have to participate. We should talk about that in a worksession. 423 N. 2ND - MINOR DEVELOPMENT Donnelley: We did a site visit today. Amy: What was discussed was the desire to instead of having the mudroom addition completely fill in the existing corner by the garage that it should be pulled in on each wall surface by 18 to 24 inches. Contractor: So that you get some definition. Amy: It was also intended to preserve the pair of aspens. The materials should match the existing building and the windows should be reused. Donnelley: It was a clear cut issue and Amy stated our response to define this new enclosed area by stepping back both corners. This al-so means that the hip roof would be changed and it would be a slightly awkward situation and should be studied because the eaves around the entire house are horizontal and if you step back from the corner you would have a slightly higher eave elevation where you step back and it would slant back down over those 24 inches so it might be a little more complex roof than the simple hip that has been shown in terms of reframing that area. I would think it better to keep all of it horizontal. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC approve the approximate square fdot addition of the existing mudroom as requested at 423 N. 2nd Streets lots G, H and I Block 41 with the following conditions: 3 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 1. That the new addition be set back on the north and east side 18 to 24 inches. 2. That the one tree be removed and possibly be replanted. 3. That a planter be retained and reviewed by Staff and monitor. 4. That the roof be studied for final approval by staff and monitor. Susan second the motion. Discussion Contractor: We can have smaller planters and one would be on one side of the tree and one on the other. Something like that. Donnelley: The placement of the planters could be at the discretion of the owner. VOTE: All in favor of motion. Motion carries. Amy: When Glenn comes back in town we can redraw the plan. 820 E. COOPER - CONCEPTUAL, LANDMARK DESIGNATION Amy: We did do a site visit'today. For standards of historic designation it meets standard B, a gable end miners cottage and it appears to be in its original configuration with one early addition and one later additions. There is not much detailing on the house; however it seems to have original materials and windows. Standard D, there are relatively few remaining 19 century structures in this neighborhood and only two historic landmarks. It is important to preserve structures like this one. On standard E community character it is representative of the modest scale style and character of homes constructed in the late 19th century and it is also on highway 82 which is important to the perception of the character of the community as people enter the town. Under conceptual development the applicant is proposing to demolish two additions which are noncontributing and the exist-ing shed which is noncontributing, to shift the kitchen addition to the east and to construct a new addition to the rear. In general the proposed development is an excellent solution to adding the required space to the historic building. A lot of the space has been allocated to the basement and the massing above ground is quite appropriate. Two elements of the proposal need further discussion. The shifting of the kitcÂ·hen towards the east and I do have some concern with this but do understand the advantage to the applicant as it improves the livability and the site is right. They want to take advantage of the views toward Aspen Mountain and the fact that the adjacent building has little open space on that side. I believe 4