The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.424 Cooper St.HPC0013-001-*.egamifirl//5/1 I A> x H- P - 54 P 1 .. CASE NUMBER HPC013-00 PARCEL ID # 2737-182-16011 CASE NAME Brown Minor HPC PROJECT ADDRESS 424 Cooper St. PLANNER Amy Guthrie CASE TYPE Minor HPC OWNER/APPLICANT Brauntaal Associates REPRESENTATIVE Same DATE OF FINAL ACTION 6/14/00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION HPC Reso. 31-2000 DATE CLOSED 2/25/02 BY J. Lindt .. PARCEL ID: 2737-182-16011 , DATE RCVD: 6/8/00 #COPIES: 1 CASE NO~IfC013-~90 wmmmwmmmmmmm.mmm.mA CASE NAME:|Brown Minor HPC PUIR:13 ~y kMAget- PROJ ADDR:|424 Cooper St. CASETYP:~Minor HPC STEPS:~ OWN/APP: Brauntaal Associates ADR~218 E. Valley Rd., #21 C/S/Z: ~Carbondale/CO/816 PHN:~704-9464 REP:~Same ADR:| c/s/z:1 PHN1 FEES DUE:|480 D FEES RCVD~480 STAT: E- REFERRALS~ REF:11 3 BY --- DUE:~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 1 1 1 | DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| 9/9/cru CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS .~ pl. CLOSED:|24*Â¢02_BY: 1 -3. t_l,~d-1- Bok H Or. R,< r> 31 -2-000 DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN: --4PGVâ‚¬ i , MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 424 E. Cooper Avenue- minor review, PUBLIC HEARING DATE: June 14,2000 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to modify existing doors and windows entering the former Flying Dog Restaurant space. The building is not individually designated. but is located in the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Braunthal Associates, represented by Richard Braunthal and David Johnston Architects. LOCATION: 424 E. Cooper Avenue, City and Townsite o f Aspen. ZONING: Commercial Core Zone District and Historic District Overlay. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Presen ation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. .. 4 . Response: The entry to the restaurant space currently has a single door and two fixed windows. The application is to install double doors in each bay. Staff has no concerns with the design and finds that it is consistent with the review standard. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The space is below the street level and the changes will have no impact on the character of the neighborhood. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The project will not affect the significance o f any historic structure. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The project will not detract from the architectural character of any designated historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that the HPC approve the application for 424 E. Cooper Avenue, as proposed on June 14, 2000, with the following conditions: 1. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that 2 .. I , all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 3. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated June 14,2000. B. Application. + 604 44-47 3 .. . RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT FOR 424 E. COOPER AVENUE, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID# 2737-182-16-011 RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2000 WHEREAS, the applicant, Braunthal Associates, represented by Richard Braunthal, requests minor HPC approval to remodel the restaurant space at 424 E. Cooper Avenue, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is located in the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adj acent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent. HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood. than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie. in her staff report dated June 14,2000. performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions: and .. WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on June 14, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of_ to _. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for the property located at 424 E. Cooper Avenue, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the June 14, 2000 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 3. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 14th day of June, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chairman .. ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name 14*Al 1 Bart- 4-Dlk) d 6 2. Project location 494- 9. CoofER_ Â«r, Aâ‚¬fe-ra 1 /13 6 1.612- (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) r 3. Present zoning Of/ 4. Lot size 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 9*W ArÂ»L. /%atks{ A-OES 21 5 6-41Â»l MD. *00 0~30'JOAL.6 0-3 9! 6 2 3 124 -941- 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number ktÂ»-#0 f:*AÂ·UNAEIÂ·40 940 08. CLAUGEN Â¥-O 0 *0Â© p)\20,40-Atâ‚¬ r rb 3 161â‚¬7 -70+ 946+ 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final EPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD 2 Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Textiriap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condcminiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures. approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms. any previous approvals granted to the property) Sperc-G WA-6 -A Kesi-Au RAM-r + Nienrr owe . PE:1\AA;.00.6,4 or- Bolle))401 '5 kA\X -37 0'~-Fc LE'S * Kerr A- 3 L SÂ¢ 91 6â‚¬S . 9. Description of development application Pep LA/,12 , EX\STIAJA Feouf 124:-re-4 130062. 4, El l-AsS Ain] 626 FJ 1-r Yt 3 06 w Se,% Cr trEEÂ© CM OLMSÂ·*C/~1 Exv-r Pases 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4 n /41(11~,4/4 . 1 ;. ' .4 '.N-r- 7 '.4 Â£41'â€¢1414:.Biâ‚¬-ft)-t 34 17*k t'.4:/ . . I :~ ... r........i... 4 . . . 1 . '11; .3 .1 .0 , A . - : 3.-. - .- 4-â€ž-r -i . I 1 6 :er f I +1411] le*t 170WL! 4, - FFc~tzPWP 6-LÂ·Oo Â¥ '*!b~' ' A' a M 4,9 7 4 '' 54/5.H . 0,4.~.2 r. P Â· 10 0,/im- 1 ---L 21 : b 4 1 4 r r [ 1 <4' I -4 * Â·Â·rÂ»' 4: 1 I ///// U . 44* - * -9 1*4*Â·t.4 5 +' Z â€¢- . i'0*41, *,4:0* - - IiI*21 r . , 4'L j @*k /. :,1,04 4. /0 41#* co# 0 - i . ' ~, 44;A' S ., , 52 k 2 , ..:1=: 1 , fts'* a - fy 41 1 : -1.444 . , , #'*Â¢, f..4 ,?Â¢ 11 1 ./% 1 1 * .F i * f il . h , 4 /** e *1 +.Ir . 9 . r .0 4 4. 9%- k .#131 . ...13&Er, ; . /%4 1 4 -r .1.41.6 ),1,1&1 /1 tjÂ«+ - I-+Er I ,%" *9 =4 't,1 0 '09.1kf , I,#L. '4 'N#.ra'.010 4 A . 4- l ut 1.i - .it. 1 - 11 r - i- 4 # Ad 7%4 . 4 Â· I . : 4 'I~.I' 44" 94 2 1,-I -- 4 ;4% ICi. ...4.*a."'*;!4 '4:'Jt, t"'t i. JI t/7 1 - . Y4 1 En , 1 V.. . ... p , , 114 I''31 1/3 .. 4 I , 4 4 lu a.". ./ 4 7, 4--7 - 41 + 1 . F 4 m -1-W.//- 1',41 037!*0>4:,1, 1 Vt 1 P 1 . Ailb 44. 1 -,4 i /4 4 .H -1 .*R' I 616*# p ..1 i~ : A *4 ' 'Iii, 2,2. A . . 1 r * .. r 1 1 I. .44*444 -4, 1 -4- . 1.. 1 - I I. 0. 4 1.. 4 . I' -It.*-#**'**,6-* r '0144 64 . fl ' 1 I. .... L SOUTH SALENA eÂ¢15.< / h< \ 1 - *--eLL':3':. .:i/. FF-'Â· 4: - -~1. ,*:: 1-4 -:Â·ti ~:.-'*.,:'*-Â·rk::;.fL'- . ..Â·F.- Â· .2.-Â·fa :.Â·90Â·,->c ..f>~:~~ Y-t--1 ? .11 f,. .i.2~. fl!Â· i:it .Â·UM.Â·FL~fiAÂ·.Â·?ic .f ~' (Â·:~-9. 4-~-' %9Â·:71 Â·4~ -' , f.i .L.zÂ¢4 -4* --- Â· .. 3 --Â·,t>f.;-?- 6- ~ 324..fÂ·tifi~~'.'~Â·~f,~A~~~'~~~.:**Â· ~~dt939~ e,g 9. 1 1 1 . MILE, r.q,pr4 ma> 43; {0) b .2 Wkbert:Â·2 j : th. Naâ€¢ ' STfS<-1 44-3 ni r -17%-30, rn: C- 1 1 STAÂ·noN ~ 5 pm ' ii :- <7%Â· 2*9 IN :'* .Alâ€¢G;42 ' W - F st,-1/6$2962* -'tÂ© ...8. 30 -11 *1 - : 1 70)<0-03 ( } il j U : 1.- - -I- 0 - - - I- -'ll' - NB1---- -l 1 ---'&-4 what,06,/I .'/'It bh. npr- , -6- p.- L.ju L I 000- li -~ <CED') 20 0% (0 01) =-,1-u 1 . 1 .4 cni.to.ad to for 0,4 0,IÂ·po- 30.14 2-2. ~ 2'-1, .i I a /4 1.-50 -*.4 ' t -ltt- afthorflation of â‚¬ U 1 \ Â»-- - -- ..... -- --....e +- ....------- 6 *#**rÂ·,ha~* f.* .-ki,4 1 i :: 1 /1 ' . r & EXISTING -c ar, %=P t===-.0 TN//f - 1 lIt 1: i 3.4--2 22 - - d ') COO) 1 00 (23(00) E i, Â· .. ~ :: --=~-Â» i : : 7 -4 -CO U)10 i 2,OSTI- ? 9 STAGE ~ DINING Â· a~ ' 40' $ TO. SLAB 1431- 7 .59* Â© E.Ev. 00,0 0 08 f / U U O) 10 0) M=LE / ./F- 1 1 4,16 ,-10- - - EXIST*, p.1 . \ PATIO Â·1~ - Â» 21<MS<IGR'--b i ' ' STAâ„¢N + '' 2/16 n - 3*3 1 1 14 4 BRI PATIO .: :Il'\ 2-fl'-3(n 94 : ' ' 2,18&27 : 'i iâ€¢-5Â· ~'-2â€¢ lu,Â· : ~ ~ "0/fs#rM- LL--4-1 - '' 'N l- - ~LAMBTONE n i i ..Mir -- leiFA---=Â· 014/' 4-=11 - 32 L , 1 KEÂ». .;/0 1 1 1 117TE' ~ 1 TING -' -' ~~r... ~1223,~ â‚¬ 7-cr ~-N 7-0" ,,, / ' 1 =2 449~ NTAIN ~~Â· -2 jaw i ir. *-0--1 z lit.7 1Â·-cr 1b 1 00' 1- g 04 .L ./. 1 \ 04 11 1/7 REZU- 1 2.Ne i. *lulu ,. / U..4, W# A 1 0 7- 2-7 Sly.. I 5* 23321 W 0 1-%4 ,- j~i - A Â·Â·O 9- W t- :&1 1 NO . 1 4 4, - r ' rlr-+ ' ' -- -Â·%3.=I-)I P .11, 0 %+ ': I. 1 H Uoo m O -A - Â»00. 1 11 : Ir-n i .. 1 IN, 21 ,: ~ ~to:~~s:;> BAR Ll) i / 3~ STAIRS 46 - 1 ' SENEIVAL OCCLPANCY NOTES 1 1 -03 ~ 1 1,#. I -1 O Â©32% 'k. 4.-4 2 *31 1 6ENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES . 4.< mt...0~a=# 1 1 Â·46: 4/ 1 72/- - -4 L . lerrp .. 1\ 1 11 110 . . /,7,1 76% 1 t 1 . .1: .,0 7 0 h . r ~J 0~1 HANNIBAL E ,/ 7 4 (:9 VI , f 72' TL ViOMENS - ~ WENS BROWN 'S -- n 1 1 2 - 0/t â‚¬:1 3 #EIGHT lb**1.*6 v ' -3 -7 -5- 0 4.1 1 . , .. .re L,-//7 - 13--- .. *e=7Â£Â¥-- 419 -4 - tÂ«*3253 4 11 4/4 [ID t 19/rt-n,-~ 11'-5~1 3, a ' : R V,EkiUN6 2 URFE)//p~AL- ,(0 0 430 UtÂ· 1 1 1.4--I - 7.-1 - x ~ . 424 E. COOPER ST. 2,-{ .-*-- r B i L :. : . Tzrw,&:r ; Â·Â· :-i..Â· 6- .Â· 01 aEAEE 1-p .----------1 -4.Â»3 1 / / a. 371/1/ . f 4% 7-Â£,O,0 tar ~ BA71 gr 4<*f- f . :/1, 1. , ik, 1 f MIZP- 2 i, 1 STING /7.\ . b- f Fusâ‚¬_ ; 1<~TO i O -: *Â·2'Â»'-QzcH~~1~~6Roorâ€¢1 PMIALK-IN 4-- ~~,r~. Â· i.'Â·,IÂ· I+LL Â£~~.Â·1-7-- i E 3 j.-4Â·76, Â·Â¥Ii i ASPEN EXISTINe_ ++RÂ·:.. 7,%.Â·752.:.*Â·h-yitiÂ·:~~~C : 919-4 \ 1 1 4 1 -1'Ir~'P~i:'IM #fill p,=ZER 211/ I R..11 "111 .42_.2 1 it ~ 11 t LA# 1 5'-224, di/0 1 9 1 .==1&2,1 -11 1 \4 1 02 /< C ExISTINe 51-5, 4.-01 1 44! 4 1 11 --CE 0<AWINeâ€¢ IMLE. 4 4&*14 W IY S-atite di,9-6 3 - CORRIDOR 1Â·.o" . 1.-0. \ 1 , f.r 1 0 -/ 6 N~DOW .7 mi- - 4*Krl ~3 . 0 - N Â»7 - NEW i -4 11 -0-/1 ... : /Th L =11 i 1 -11-]1"11=01- 1 EXISTING â€¢4(ALLS TO REMAIN / --XE*237 -397 COOLER -4 i di MliNA"niz-'ill--- Â·' MALKAN -4 PERMIT SET Â£*i&11*Wk,ESTO-Z REMOVE, ./. . '.1 ------- 1 Â«1 -ki~421-4-1- -- DATE: 5/22/CC 1\ . 1 6 11 ' , 4.41 ..El./..,.7..'e:". i.-I ...1 *./. -/ I.#.I=.* LAI'.A *.Â·:.6 .4U :Â·Â·, I. *... I. ' ' : 4 EMICTING M~ \14_ ~ 0-, + HOOAM:Â·r TO REMAIN MIXER 4// 4,2 SHEET NO. . 6,1 &40 SE,Fia/**OVE= (Es . ti /Th PROPOSED PLAN 1/4- =1'-0- SHEET OF ALLEÂ¥ 331IHOMVNO1SNH 11*H EnNEAV a--7-- .. RECEIVED ASPEN/PITKIN Ouly 0 6 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ASPEN / PI f KIN Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees': rÂ· ..1,-- I -0,-9,1-1 r'-P .P. CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and BiLAUATIONL- feeD e) A-Â»a 1 Ll- L (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. , APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for flk) kh AA-0 12>Boumb (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 1999) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposea project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of S which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By:~~~ /7julie Ann Woods >' Community Development Director Dat -lt,/ 43664 l Mailing Address: 2/ & D - GRIAg k) 3 4 (Â»Â©NOÂ¢l-,9 1 C.ID 6 [6-~ 3 g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 12/27/99 .. ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2000 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CATEGORY HOURS DEPOSIT FLAT FEE Major 12 2,310.00 Minor 6 -_ 1,155.00 Staff Approvals 480.00 Flat Fee 265.00 Exempt HPC 65.00 Minor HPC 480.00 Significant HPC <1000 sq. ft. 1155.00 Significant HPC >1000 sq. ft. 2310.00 Demolition, Partial Demolition, Relocation 2310.00 Referral Fees - Environmental Health Major 330.00 Minor 170.00 Referral Fees - Housing Major 330.00 Minor 170.00 Referral Fees - City Engineer Major 330.00 Minor 170.00 Hourly Rate 195.00 .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name -1-~A'#Al 1 BAL Â¥Â£-Olk) A)1 6 2. Project location 49+ 13. Cooffenâ‚¬_ 9. ASÂ¥â‚¬-A 1 CD 8 1.4,12. (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 4//M. 4. Lot size 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number RA)Â¢U474*L #624 A-PES 21 9, 5- 4A1/LE~ AD. 4/210 *ao.OALG 00 Bl 6217 104 -94+ 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number KI.Â»190 NA<Jwl;9Â·40 919 9. \;Robel Â¥oÂ· *'2,0 (*2040Â·ALE , rn 916027 -70+ 946+ . 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD '* Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) SpAC-G WA-6 -A, KesrAU EAAJ-r + Atem-r C.,u; d . PEMA,Ajoâ‚¬14 or- [SOILC>14(1 )5 M \X 07 ~T-r=< cas * Kâ‚¬-TA~ L SpFr-DES . 9. Description of development application Pâ‚¬pe,/12 , EX\STIA \61 FROâ€¢Jf 12~-rgxl Doof + auess FARELE BJ'-r# 3 06\0 Se-6 Op EYEK)CM 001@9, 44 excr Paots 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4