Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.426 E Hyman Ave.HPC036-98I r'. *'.~ .. PN: 2737-073-39001 Case HPC036-98 426 E. Hyman HPC Exemption f p --5--24 ;<H €*L.. tt. 1\ ._-..'r. ZA ... · P 1 m/*,11/.*9#/dialial' -I-/4..pil -1 . -0. . - 0 ./.I .. '*i- / 14 *. 7,49./0 1.364 - or -- i ' 1~, 4' 4-S • l D .. .1 - PARCEL ID:~2737-073-39001 DATE RCVD: |10/15/98 : #COPIES:~-- CASE NO|HPC036-98 CASE NAME:~426 E. Hyman HPC Exemption 1 PLNR:|Amy Guthrie PROJ ADDR:|426 E. Hyman ~ CASE TYP:|HPC Exemption ' STEPS:r OWN/APP:IT&E Marshall Ent. 14 ADR1426 E. Hyman 1 C/S/Z:~Aspen, CO 81611 1 PHN:|925-7847/379- i~ REP<Eric Casper/Tom Marshall Al)Rl C/s/Zl PHN1 FEES DUE:|62 (hpc) : FEES RCV[462 ~ STAT: m¥ * -7 REFERRAL~ REFI § BY' DUE:| ~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED ./ 11 1 1-4 1 : 11 1 - - DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| CITY COUNCIL: 1 REMARK4 PZ: CLOSED:| i BY: j BOA: .+ DRAC:] PLAT SUBMITD: | PLAT {BK,PG):1 ADMIN1 4% .... .,4/46* 1.- i - C©/Proid W ~21 0 ~ MA,19 it,}U ---- ~adr. J-- 1~ 675 7 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION *rNE=31 PMENT REVIEW 23 (/7 Application Package Contents Following is an application for significant development review at HPC. Included in this package are: 1. Attachment 1- Application form 2. Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 3. Attachment 3- Description of general requirements for a complete development application 4. Attachment 4- Description of specific requirements for a complete development application for conceptual review 5. Attachment 5- Description of specific requirements for a complete development application for final review 6. Attachment 6- Applicable review standards on which HPC wiil base its decision 7. Attachment 7- General summary of the HPC review process 8. Attachment 8- Public notice requirements 9. Attachment 9- Definition of significant development A pre-application conference is strongly recommended so that the appr:priate review process and submission reauirements can be discussed. In adcition. other reviews, such as those before the Planning and Zoning Commission.-which may be required by the Aspen Municipal Code can be identified at this time. A consultation with the Zooing Officer and Building Department is also = recommended early in the application process. Significant development review is a two step process. The -irst step is a review cf the prooosal at a conceptual level. For this meeting, public notice is required. The second step is final review. No public hearing is required. and at this stage the project as presented snould represent what will be submitted for building penn it review. To submit a complete application for conceptual review, fill out Attachments 1 and 2, include all items listed on Attachments 3 and 4, and provide any other information necessary to clarify the project. Address the public notice requirements. To submit a complete application for final review, amend Attachments 1,2, and 3 if necessary, and include all items listed on Attachment 5. TWO COPIES OF ALL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS IN A FORMAT NO LARGER THAN 11"X17" ARE REQUIRED. FOR GRAPHICS WHICH ARE LARGER THAN 11"X17," SUBMIT TWELVE SETS OF PRINTS. I , .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name C./U/0 116/doh 2. Project-location 43 C / U¥ MA© ff»41 n U - (indicate strdet address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 4 3. Present zoning i 4. Lot size 5. Applicanfs name, address and phone number grE- - 729 7 -1-63 6 /16/U·b#+~£¢ £ 4-r i u c. 379 5990 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number/,2 { c C 41> # t' -T~En N A+1514,+U 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA X -toglcgptual PrEC ., Scecial Review Final SPA - Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Finai PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic LandmarK GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line - k}Al E-ye,n Appeal Committee - Adjustment 87/9 0%7 8. Description of existing uses (number and type cf existing structures, approximate sq. ft„ number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) 9. Description of development application Mud VvisH Tb pir -5 #In-114 A c u u n 5 o.~ R, 0 0 el 13.t, 11.4 ph Allov ~TNe, *, a / 4367 63 V 15 Atbit fng>-1 Au'l *4.K 2410-7 7Wu lb, Floc,•i. £+ , -T-U + uv Wao le-- 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachments 4 and 5 11111111 .. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant Address: Zone district: Lot size: Existing FAR: Allowable FAR: Prcoosed FAR: Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Exisring % of site ccverage: Prccosed % of site coverage: Existing % of open space: Prccosed % of open space: Existing maximum height: .Princioai bidc Accescrv blde Proccsed max. height: .Princioal bldc Accesscrv bida: P=cosed % of demolition: Existing number of bedrocms: Praccsed number of bedrcoms: Existing on-site parking spaces: Cn-site parking spaces recuired: Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Prooosed: FronT: Front: Front: Rear: Rear: _ Rear Comoined Combined Combined Front/rear: Front/rear Front/rear: S ice: Side: S ide: Side: Side: S ide: Combined Combined Combined Sices: -- Sides: Sides: Existing nonconform ities or encrcachments: Variations requested:_ (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAIR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone distncts) . ATTACHMENT 3 GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS All development applications must include the following information: 1. The applicant's name, address, and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of any representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the development review. 4. An 8 1/2" x11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. .. ATTACHMENT 4 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: CONCEPTUAL REVIEW All applications for conceptual review must include the following information: 1. A site plan and a survey showing property boundaries and predominant existing site characteristics. 2. Conceptual selection of major building materials to be used in the proposed development. 3. A written description of the proposal and an expianaticn in written, graphic. or model form of how the proposed develcpment complies with the review standards relevant to the development application, inctuding a statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure (if applicable) and/or character of the neighbornood. 4. Scale drawings of all elevations of any proposed struc:ures, including a roof plan. 5. A visual description of the neighborhocd context through at least one of the fcilowing: diagrams, maps. photograons, mccels. or streerscape elevations. with the intent to provide HPC with the necessary informarion without adding excessive costs to the applicant. i . ATTACHMENT 5 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: FINAL REVIEW All applications for final review must include the following information: F 1. An accurate representation of all major building materials, such as samples and photographs, to be used for the proposed development. 2. Finalized drawings of the proposal at 1/4"=1'0 scale. 3. A statement of the effect of the details of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure (if applicable) and character of the neighborhood. 4. A statement of how the final development plan conforms to the representations made during the conceptual review and responds to any conditions placed thereon. WI'· -#- .. ATTACHMENT 6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met: 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic stuctures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a 14," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to 500 sq.ft. or the allowed site coverage by up to 5%, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhccd. than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed thcse variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dweiling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(8)(2). 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development: and 3. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated histoMc structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels: and = 4, The prooosed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architec:ural charac:er and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. '4HISTORIC DISTRICT AND HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGN GUIDELINES" HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE CrrY AND ARE AVAILABLE ASA FURTHER EXPLANATION OF THE INTENT OF HPC AND GENERAL PRINCIPALS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION. ALL APPLICANTS SHOULD CONSULT THIS RESOURCE. COPIES OF WHICH ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. .. ATTACHMENT 7 GENERAL SUMMARY OF TWO STEP HPC APPUCATION PROCESS 1. The following are the types of development applications which are processed in two steps by the HPC: • Significant development review • Partial demclition or on-site relocation when it is a part of a significant review • Demolition • Off-site relocation 2. Development review procedure summary. The two step HPC review procedure is as follows: • Attend a pre-application conference. The purpose of this one-on-one meeting with the historic preservation planner is to determine the review process into which your development proposai fits and to identify the materials staff will need to review your application. • Submit conceptual review application. Based on your pre-application conference, respond to the appropriate portions of the application package and submit the requested number of copies.-and fee if applicable, to the Community Development Department., • Determination of completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, the application package will be reviewed by Staff to determine if all required information has been included. You will be notified in writing when additionai materials are necessary. •Complete public notice requirements. • Review of development application. Once the application is determined to be complete, the item will be scheduled on the sconest HPC agenda available. The submission due date is a minimum of nine days prior to the HPC meeting date to allow for staff review and memo preparation. It is the planner' s task to review the application with respect to ifs compliance with land use regulations and to write a memo to the Historic Preservation Commission. In the memo, the planner will recommend approval, approval with conditions, tabling, or denial of the application. The memo is normally available at the end of the week prior to the HPC meeting. The planner will call the applicant or representative when the memo is ready and can also provide the expected agenda time for the item. • At the meeting, staff will make a brief presentation of the case and then the Chair will ask the applicant or representative to make a presentation or to clarify any aspects of the project. HPC members will comment on the proposal and then vote on an action. • Submit final review application. Determination of completeness, staff review, and HPC review will be repeated. 3. Receipt of building permit. Once the approval of HPC has been received, a building permit application may be submitted. At this time the proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the Uniform Building Code and zoning regulations. Fees for water, sewer. park dedication fees, and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document. such as a plat, deed restriction, or other agreement which is required to be filed. must be recorded befcre the buiiding permit will be issued; 4. HPC assigns a member of the Commission to be the "project monitor" for each project. The monitor (and Staff) may periodically visit the site as work is under construcrion. If any aspects of the project change after the HPC approval, the applicant, Staff, and the project monitor will attempt to address them without returning to HPC. . ATTACHMENT 8 PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS There are three forms of notice required by the Aspen Municipal Code, these being notice by publication in the newspaper, notice by posting of the property, and notice by mail to surrounding landowners. You can determine whether your application requires notice, and the type of notice required from Table 1, attached to this summary. Following is a description of the notice requirements, including identifying who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication. Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least 15 days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Community Development Department Administrative Assistant who will also be responsible for delivering the notice to the newspaper by the deadline. The City pays the cost of publishing the - notice. 2. Posting. Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done 10 days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department. to fill it in correctly and tc bring ps-:f (preferab!y a photograpn) to the hearing to show that the posting took place. 3. Mailing. -Mailing of notice is to be made to ail owners of property within 300 feet of the subject parcel by the applicant. It is the aoplicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department,. to mail it according to the following standards. and to bring proof (in the form of a signed affidavit) to the hearing to show that the mailing took place. Standards for notice shall be as follows: • Any federdkagency, State, county, or municipal government service district or quasi governmental agency that owns property within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 15 days prior to the hearing. • All other landowners within 300 feet of the subject Rroperty must be mailed notice 10 days prior to the hearing, unless notice is given by hand delivery, in which case it must be given 5 days prior to the hearing. • Subdivision applications only also require notice by registered mail to all surface owners, mineral owners, and lessees of mineral owners of the subject property. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than 60 days prior to the date of public heaMng. PLEASE NOTE THAT A PUBLIC HEARING CANNOT BE HELD WITHOUT PROOF OF NOTICE PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. .. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PROCEDURE APPLICATION NOTICE REQUIRED? BY WHOM FORM OF NOTICE Conditional Use yes P82 2,3 Special Review no 8040 Greenline no Stream Margin no Subdivision yes P&Z 1,2,3 GMQS allotment yes P&Z 1,2,3 View Plane no Lot Split yes Council 1,2,3 Lot Line Adjust. no Conceptual SPA yes Council 1.2.3 Final SPA yes P&Z 1,2.3 Conceptual PUD yes Council 1,2.3 Final PUD yes P&2 1,2.3 Text amendment yes P&Z, and P&Z- 1 Council Council- 4 Map amendment yes P&Z, and P&.Z- 1,2.3 Council Council- 4 GMQS exemption no (except for lot split) see above for Ici split Conaominium. no Conceptual HPC yes HPC 1,2.3 Final HPC no Minor HPC no Relocation (off-site) HPC yes HPC 1.2,3 Historic Landmark yes P&.Z, and P&Z-1,2.3 Council Council-1,2,3 Demolition HPC yes HPC 1,2,3 Partial Demo. tiPC no Design Review Appeal Committee yes DRAC 2 (5 days in advance) *Numbers refer to the following: ~ 1= Publication in newspaper 2= Posting of property 3= Mailing to surrounding landowners 4= Ordinance adoption procedures , .. . ATTACHMENT 9 DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT Significant development shall be defined as follows: • Erection of an awning, canopy, sign, fence, or other similar attachments to, or accessory features of a structure that in the process of erecting, cause significant features of the structure to be permanently destroyed or removed; • Erection or remodeling of combinations of, or multiples of any single feature of a structure which has not been determined to be minor; • Expansion or erection of a structure wherein the increase in floor area of the structure is more than two hundred fifty (250) square feet; • Construction of a new structure within an 1-1, ' Historic Overlay District; and • The development of any property Which is listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures and which has received approval for demolition, or off- site relocation, when a development plan has been required by the HPC pursuant to Section 26.72.020(J)(5). 8-25-1998 10:29AM FROM GRND VLLY CONS ENGRS 19702454450 P. 1 Mati Ad~ 001 . Poit-Ir Fax Note 7671 Det• U. ,0, 4 pager 1 C u,LE Ou S U 60 *1~0 CO./OOpt ,- MA / 4 4 4, ~ * 1 , CC. <¥ A., 'Phon" 11 0 117. Be-1, Phone # 4 1,-1 ¢-1--3,17 Fix# 9 16 ' trL-7. 891, Fax # 990 -1-4,--44·re 7 /2 ; t- 8 2 2 24 M N St -===-~-7- W .T.. 1 1, 1 1, 1 1 C 1 1 h Ud g i $ A 1 161 · 01/SE W. T lesund'~2%1,3 ~~ NV-Id dOOM -IVOINVHO3M m 4/" 1 8 01 11¥,R .;Oaino E.