Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
agenda.hpc.20000809
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION August 9,2000 REGULAR MEETING, 5:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SITE VISITS - NOON- Meet at the first site. If you cannot attend, be sure to visit the properties on your own before the meeting. 5:00 I. Roll call II. Public Comments III. Commission member comments and project monitoring IV. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) V. NEW BUSINESS :05 A69 435 W. Main Street, L'Auberge - Minor review VI. OLD BUSINESS A. NONE VII. WORKSESSIONS 5:35 A. 432 E. Hyman - Aspen Drug 6:05 B. HPC awards 1 9,1 - , 6:30 VIII. ADJOURN X / OJECT MONITORING Susan Dodington 240 Lake Avenue- Greenberg 930 King - No Problem Joe's 121 5th & North - Ernie Frywald 330 Gillespie Ave. 232 E. Hallam St. Suzannah Reid 117 N. 6th St. - Coulter 414 N. First- POLE 240 Lake Ave. 312 S. Galena 7m and Main 330,Lake Avenu~£=*\ \A \ 99 Jeffrey Halferty 414 N. First- POLE 920 W. Hallam- Guthrie 101-105 E. Hallam 212 W. Hopkins Ave. 0 31% S. Galena Heidi Friedland 232 E. Hallam St.- Pace 117 N. 6th St. - Coulter 7th and Main , 213 - w 6144» Lisa Markalunas 939 E. Cooper- Langley (work stopped) 240 Lake Avenue- Greenberg 214 E. Bleeker- Brumder 330 Gillespie Ave. 520 E. Hyman Ave. Christie Kienast 735 W. Bleeker- Bone 426 N. Second 330 Lake Ave. 330 Gillespie Ave. ~ary Hirsch 930 King 114 Neale Avenue (not active) 920 W. Hallam 400 W. Smuggler Street - Dodge residence 419 E. Hyman Paragon Bldg. 0 Gilbert Sanchez 312 S. Galena 333 W. Bleeker Street 501 W. Main Christiania Lodge 330 Lake Ave. 121 5th & North - Ernie Frywald Rally Dupps 419 E. Hyman - Paragon 501 W. Main Street - Christiania Lodge 520 W. Main Ullr 129 E. Francis 93 5-ft, /46£'» ' Melanie Roschko_ 232 W. Hallam 520 E. Hyman 3 (-4 u.;1 4,fl~ 0 0 CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: 4 W. Hallam (Poppie' s), expires April 26,2000 9 W. Francis, Lot B (Vickery), expires August 12,2000 735 W. Bleeker old house expires Oct. 14, 2000 302 E. Hopkins- September 22,2000 HPC Legal Procedures (Submit affidavit of notice for PH - conceptual) Swear In Staff presentation Applicant presentation Board Questions and Clarifications PH opened and closed Board Comments Applicant Comments Motion Resolutions 2000 330 Lake Ave. January 12,2000 . 333 W. Bleeker St. January 12, 2000 3. 221 E. Main Street January 12,2000 4. 312 S. Galena January 26,2000 5. 501 W. Main St. Christiana Lodge Feb. 9,2000 6. 130 S. Galena Street, City Hall Feb. 9,2000 7. 520 W. Main Street Ullr - Minor Feb. 9,2000 8. 110 W. Main Street Hotel Aspen Conceptual Feb. 9,2000 9. 417 E. Hyman Ave. Paragon Feb. 9,2000 10. 330 Lake Avenue Feb. 23,2000 11. 213 W. Bleeker - Landmark Designation Conceptual March 22,2000 12. 7~h & Main Affordable Housing March 8,2000 13. 333 W. Bleeker Street March 8,2000 14. Aspen Grove Cemetery - fence April 12,2000 15. 834 W. Hallam St. - extension of conceptual April 12, 2000 16. 920 W. Hallam Lot A - April 12,2000 17. 920 W. Hallam Lot B - April 12, 2000 18. 213 W. Bleeker Final - April 26,2999 19. 240 Lake Avenue Parking Variance - April 26,2000 20. 505 N. Eighth Street - Fence Variance - April 26,2000 21. 943 Unit C E. Cooper variance parking - April 26,2000 22. 819 E. Hopkins Ave. partial Demolition-May 10,2000 23. 330 Gillespie Ave. - Minor Development - May 10, 2000 24. 110 W. Main Street, Hotel Aspen Conceptual - May 24,2000 25. 221 E. Main Street, Explore Booksellers - Final - May 24,2000 26.945 E. Cooper Ave. Unit D - Variance Parking - May 24,2000 . 609 W. Bleeker - Conceptual - May 24,2000 . 1006 E. Cooper Avenue - Landmark Designaiton - June 14,2000 29. 129 W Francis Strreet - Extension of Conceptual approval - June 14, 2000 30. 609 W. Bleeker Street - Final Approval - June 14,2000 31. 424 E. Cooper Avenue - Minor Development - June 14, 2000 32. 330 Lake Avenue - Outstanding issues from final - June 21, 2000 33. 419 E. Hyman Ave. - Paragon - Minor Development and variances - July 12,2000 34. 620 W. Bleeker Street, Aspen Historical Society - Minor Development - July 12,2000 35. 406 W. Smuggler Street - Minor Development - July 12,2000 36. 520 E. Hyman Ave. Minor Development July 26,2000 37. 232 E. Hallam Street - Variances PH July 26,2000 38. 129 W. Francis Street - Final PH July 26,2000 39. MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Appeal Committee THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director FROM: Nick Lelack, Planner RE: 232 East Hallam - Variance from the Fence Residential Design Standard for a 6-foot Fence and a Berm in the Front Yard Setback - Reconsider Resolution No. 37, Series of 2000 DATE: August 9,2000 SUMMARY: Last meeting on July 26,2000, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) approved a Residential Design Standard variance for a 6-foot fence front of the front facade of a house and denied a variance for berm in the front yard setback for the Pace residence at 232 E. Hallam. The resolution requires the Applicant to remove the berm in the public right-of-way within 14 days of the approval (today) and to grant the City a trail easement by August 26. A separate condition requires the Applicant to "submit a landscape plan for review by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) Staff and Monitor, Parks Department, and Engineering Department, and approved by the HPC." Since July 26, City Staff and HPC Monitors have been working with Linda M. Pace, Applicant, and her representative, Mt. Daly Enterprises, LLC (Julia Marshal), on a landscape plan. The Applicant is requesting additional time to remove the berm and convey the trail easement until after HPC approves the landscape plan so that alllandscape work can occur simultaneously. The reason for a delay in granting the trail easement is ensure that the subject and neighboring properties have been correctly surveyed for an accurate description of the trail easement. Staff and the Applicant will present a landscape plan to the HPC at the next meeting, on August 23,2000. Staff recommends approval of the request; the only changes to the Resolution would be the timing of events and not the substance of the decision. Specifically, Staff recommends the S revised conditions: 1. Prior to any additional work on the fence on the subject property: a. The Applicant shall grant a permanent and non-revocable trail easement to the City of Aspen for the existing trail across the property located at 232 East Hallam within 30 days ofthis public hearing by October 15,2000. Ifthe trail easement is not conveyed to the City of Aspen within this time frame, this approval shall be rendered null and void and the portion of the fence forward of the front facade of the house shall be removed immediately at the owner's expense. b. The existing berm in the right-of-way shall be removed within 11 days of this publie·heaFing-by October 15, 2000. 2. Prior to the construction of the proposed fence in the public right-of-way, the Applicant shall apply for apply for an encroachment license from the City Engineer's Office. 3. The Applicant shall submit a landscape plan for review by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) Staff and Monitor, Parks Department, and Engineering Department, and approved by the HPC. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE STATED IN THE POSITIVE): "I move to reconsider Resolution No. 37, Series of 2000." "I move to approve the revised Resolution No. 37, Series of 2000, approving the fence and denying the berm Residential Design Standard variances for a single family residence at 232 East Hallam." A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTING AS THE DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMMITTEE APPROVING A VARIANCE OF THE FENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD FOR A PARCEL LOCATED AT 232 EAST HALLAM, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. Parcel ID # 2737-073-14-050 Resolution No. 37, Series of 2000 WHEREAS the applicant, Linda M. Pace, represented by Mt. Daly Enterprises LLC, has requested variances from the fence Residential Design Standards for a 6-foot fence forward of the front facade of a house, and a berm in the front yard setback, Land Use Code Section 26.410.040(A)(3), for the property located at 232 East Hallam; and, WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 must meet one of the following criteria in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals ofthe Aspen Area Community Plan; b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or c) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints, and WHEREAS The Planning Staff, in a report dated July 26,2000, recommended approval of the variance for a 6-foot fence forward of the front facade of the house, and denial of the variance for a berm in the front yard setback; and, WHEREAS a public hearing, which was legally noticed, was held at a regular meeting of the Design Review Appeal Committee on July 26,2000, at which the Committee voted six to zero (6-0) to both approve the variance for a 6-foot fence forward of the front facade of the house, and deny a variance for a berm in the front yard setback. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Design Review Appeal Committee: That the Residential Design Standard variance for a 6-foot fence forward the front facade of the house, Section 26.410.040, is approved and berm in the front yard setback is denied for a historic landmark at 232 East Hallam, Aspen, Colorado, with the following condition: 1.- Prior to any additional work on the fence on the subject property: a. The Applicant shall grant a permanent and non-revocable trail easement to the City of Aspen for the existing trail across the property located at 232 East Hallam by October 15, 2000. If the trail easement is not conveyed to the City of Aspen within this time frame, this approval shall be rendered null and void and the portion of the fence forward of the front facade of the house shall be removed immediately at the owner's expense. b. The existing berm in the right-of-way shall be removed by October 15,2000. 2. Prior to the construction of the proposed fence in the public right-of-way, the Applicant shall apply for apply for an encroachment license from the City Engineer's Office. 3. The Applicant shall submit a landscape plan for review by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) Staff and Monitor, Parks Department, and Engineering Department, and approved by the HPC. APPROVED BY THE COMMITTEE at its regular meeting on the 9'h day of August, 2000. APPROVED AS TO FORM: DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMMITTEE: City Attorney Chair ATTEST: City Clerk 08/08/00 TUE 16:23 FAI 9709278487 LIPKIN WARNER @001 6 ... '' 9.N· .t >i:N··ti S CA P E A R CHITECT Post office Box 1.537 ·JIW.'1:A 'MAR f HALL 73400 Two Rivers Rd #43 MT DALY ENTERPRISES LLC Bosolt Colorado 81621 lei 970 977 3138 Fox 970 927 8487 irildrlly@Gop,io. Met V ~ -0 August 8.2000 Mr. Nick Lelack Community Development Department City of Aspen Via: Fax 920.5439 Re: Pace Residence. 232 E. Hallam Street Mr. Lelack, As a result of the meeting held yesterday at the Pace residence, my client Is requesting an additonal extension of time 10 remove the berm from the Hallam Street right-of-way. HPC's motion originally requested her to dc within 14 days of the motion and you previously granted us an extension until yesterday's meeting. Now we are requesting an extension until October 15,2000 to remove the berm. This additional time will allow us to address outstanding issues, including the trail and easement, encroachment license and complete all necessary construction. Please call if you have any questions or concerns and please caU as soon as possible to let me know your decision on our request. Sincerely, Julia Marshall cc: Unda Pace and Laurence Miller MEMORANDUM vlv TO: Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy DirectoN-*00 FROM: Nick Lelack, Planner RE: L'Auberge Residence Minor HPC DATE: August 9,2000 €>failt'.c~ APPLICANT: -U.k;=1•14/8//7.../......=....--i - - ALH Building Corp. REPRESENTATIVE: KUP{= :: 4.- Gibson Architects 12....5.*<21 1 |i 1£*11 6·.-,il LOCATION: 435 East Main Street #<:15: w'~ , I : 4 ' LAND USE: ,4122% 2, 4 ~~; 2< U Lodge & Residence ;1741//"/di)' *94~ M-4 1:~ - ZONING: :1 1 . -.44 3 /1 Office One request to add a carport to this residence by extending the roof over the gravel parking area shown to the left. This photo was taken from Main Street. LOT SIZE: 6,000 square feet , 'V '. T e. . 1 ' ./. . %1 1 111 1 4 4' FAR: Existing: i ·f *- 1 - Proposed: + 1 € .. .. .«iN . ' .4 7 SUMMARY: 44 4 The applicant is requesting to add a 4,1 porch and cari? ort and to expand the - master bedroom on the residence at 435 W. Main Street. ./- ...- - 4 '9 .. . A second request is to add a porch to the west facade of the building - facing 5th andMain Streets. <33$89*¥.39150/ REVIEW PROCEDURE The Historic Preservation Commission may, by resolution, approve, approve with conditions, or deny a minor development application at a public meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: ALH Holding Company ("Applicant"), represented by Gibson Architects, is requesting approval for a minor development application for the residence located at 435 West Main Street - the L'Auberge property. The property is in the Historic Overlay District, but the subject building is not a historic landmark or on the City's historic inventory. The proposal is to add a porch and carport to the residence as well as to expand the master bedroom by approximately 120 square feet. The carport would be located in front of the vehicle shown in the - Pul' 1 picture. The master bedroom - . -# 4•12* 4,- ;1' . i. . ..11.dij#,51133:4iri. i'. . -,4. the two windows at the rear ofthe ~ ~~ ;~ ~~~~-f-,4 *;E¤~8.424 ' -~ property - is proposed to be ~·a ':Le?:.4 :.*v 1 426 .7*4,6.~.*~#4~* ",+ expanded to fill-in an ~ '1 ,•12gWilb*I#.fl...;*ti * ** *,a undeveloped corner in the residence. Similarly, the porch would fill-in an undeveloped section of the west facade. .~11#@I:11111111, 1-.~- .6.- -= ..ll a .LI=. Staff believes the proposals are compatible with the (1) existing ......im.FEW ..2 4+ 46./. S residence, (2) historic buildings at r56443483,EA.~4 0# -U,2. - the rear of the parcel constructed -.. 1 in the late 1940s, (3) the historic significance of Main Street, (4) the neighborhood, and (5) adjacent parcels. Staff supports the application, finding that the review criteria have been met. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending approval of the minor development for the L'Auberge property located at 435 West Main Street. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE STATED IN THE POSITIVE): "I move to approve Resolution No. _, Series of 2000, approving the minor development of the residence at 435 West Main Street." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Development Application EXHIBIT A 435 E. M~IN STREET REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS SECTION 26.415: DEVELOPMENT INVOLVING THE INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES OR WHICH OCCURS IN AN "H", HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark 0 and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(21 for detached accessory dwelling units, and Staff Finding Staff believes the proposed can)ort, porch, and master bedroom addition are compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with the (1) existing residence, (2) historic buildings at the rear of the parcel constructed in the late 1940s, (3) the historic significance of Main Street, (4) the neighborhood, and (5) adjacent parcels. The carport consists of a flat roof with two posts. The master bedroom addition fills in an undeveloped corner on the backside of the residence; the architectural designs resembles the existing structure. A porch fills in an undeveloped space along the west facade of the house, clearly identify the entrance to the residence. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development, and StaffFinding Staff believes the proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of Main Street. The carport will be largely shielded from any Main Street view because it will be set back from the house between the residence and a lodge unit. The flat roof and simple posts will not draw attention to the carport. The porch will make the building more pedestrian friendly to passersby on Main and 5th Streets. And, the master bedroom addition will only be visible from the alley immediate behind the parcel. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding Staff does not believe the proposed development will any way detract from the historic significance of adjacent parcels or the historic structures at the rear of the property, constructed in approximately the late 1940s. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding Although there are no "designated" historic structures on the site, Staff does not believe the carport, porch or addition will diminish or detract in any way from the architectural character and integrity of the historic value ofthe late-1940s buildings along the back of the property. A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING A MINOR DEVELOPMENT FOR A CARI'ORT, PORCH, AND MASTER BEDROOM ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE ON A PARCEL LOCATED AT 435 MAIN STREET, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. Parcel ID # 2735-124-50-053 Resolution No. 3 ~ , Series of 2000 WHEREAS the applicant, ALH Building Corp, represented by Gibson Architects, has requested minor development approval for a carport, porch, and master bedroom addition for the residence on a parcel located at 435 Main Street; and, WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a property listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the *lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Community Development Staff, in a staff report dated August 9, 2000, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on August 9, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of_to_ CO. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for the property located 435 E. Main Street, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the August 9, 2000 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. There shall be no deviations from the architectural designs or materials as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 3. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of August, 2000. APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Suzannah Reid, Chair Historic Preservation Commission ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Application Package Contents Following is an application for minor development review at HPC. Included in this package are: 1. Attachment 1- Application form 2. Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 3. Attachment 3- Description of general requirements for a complete development application 4. Attachment + Description of specific requirements for a complete development application to HPC 5. Attachment 5- Applicable review standards on which HPC will base its decision 6. Attachment 6- General summary of the HPC review process 7. Attachment 7- Definition of minor development 0 To submit a complete application, fill out Attachments 1 and 2, include all items listed on Attachments 3 and 4, and provide any other information necessary to clarify the project. A pre-application conference is strongly recommended so that the appropriate review process and submission requirements can be discussed. In addition, other reviews, such as those before the Planning and Zoning Commission, which may be required by the Aspen Municipal Code can be identified at this time. A consultation with the Zoning Officer and Building Depanment is also recommended early in the application process. TWO COPIES OF ALL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS IN A FORMAT NO LARGER THAN 11"X17" ARE REQUIRED. FOR GRAPHICS WHICH ARE LARGER THAN 11"X17," SUBMIT TWELVE SETS OF PRINTS. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name 1- ' A u R>m 12 Ge / 21261 Deuce 2. Project location 4-34 EJ · MA/A) 9C. Lo-Te A+ 6. 81-oc~c 38 , Cret DU lsFGIJ (indicate street address, lot and block numbir or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning O 4. Lot size 6000 5. Applicanfs name, address and phone number AL# *'OLD/N 6 01, +16 E, HA/4 Sr-· AE>Pau. CA 8/ 4 11 920'1977 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number (3/B,Egu 0,42£ 2<TE€rs, /OP l N. M ( L,L. 171-~ , AS;f'EN Co 8/ 4/I . 120 - 3601 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD >C Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC 0 - Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) RES / 025 A /CE WrrM % 1258:012.DOM':6 , Af pRoxi M RTE ,*1 /4 8 D SF. 9. Description of development application ADD(71©N OF PerecH -CARPDRM, AMID EX PA Als/ou er=. M. embve>04 7 AppED,6. 1 20 SE 10. Have you completed and attached the following? J Attachment 1 - Land use application form 0 4 Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form / Response to Attachment 3 G Response to Attachment 4 11111111 ATTACHMENT2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: ALM 1401.1-); de cONCANy Address: 436 \AL N At A.1 91- Zone district: Lot size: 4000 91 Existing FAR: .28 : C Allowable FAR: .75: / Proposed FAR: .30:{ Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: , 30 Proposed % of site coverage: .35 Existing % of open space: 45% Proposed °/0 of open space: 11 90 Existing maximum height: Principal bida: /5 Accesorv blda: Proposed max. height: Principal blda: /5 Accessorv blda: Proposed % of demolition: Onr Existing number of bedrooms: 3 Proposed number of bedrooms: 3 Existing on-site parking spaces: 2 On-site parking spaces required: 2 Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: J.5 Front: Front: M Rear: 30 Rear: 15 Rear: 30 Combined Combined Combined Front/rear: Front/rear: FronUrear: Side: C- 55 Side: Side: C.8 S ide: 14 - 6 Side: Side: 2 4,6 Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: PRow-r 9*Te,Ack \tA/'©A-NOB -Tb E*-/f.1-/AUG Fha-rf'R 1 An- /71 \Ii. A[ / 4 199 + . Variations requested: (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of upto 500 sq.ft, site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R.15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) ATTACHMENT 3 GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS All development applications must include the following information: 1. The applicanfs name, address, and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephdne number of any representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the development review. 4. An 8 1/2" x11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. ATTACHMENT 4 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW All applications for minor development review must include the following information: 1. If determined appropriate by the Community Development Director, a site plan or survey showing property boundaries and predominant existing site characteristics. 2. An accurate representation of all major building materials, such as samples and photographs, to be used for the proposed development. 3. A scale drawing of the proposed development in relation to any existing structure. 4. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application, including a statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure (if applicable) and character of the neighborhood. 0 0 ATTACHMENT 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met: 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to 500 sq.ft. or the allowed site coverage by up to 5%, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those vaMations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.040.090 (B)(2). 0 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development; and 3. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and 4. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. "HISTORIC DISTRICT AND HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGN GUIDELINES" HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE CITY AND ARE AVAILABLE AS A FURTHER EXPLANATION OF THE INTENT OF HPC AND GENERAL PRINCIPALS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION. ALL APPLICANTS SHOULD CONSULT THIS RESOURCE, COPIES OF WHICH ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 0 ATTACHMENT 6 GENERAL SUMMARY OF ONE STEP HPC APPLICATION PROCESS 1. The following are the types of development applications which are processed in one step by the HPC: • Minor development review • Partial demolition • On-site or temporary relocation 2. Development review procedure summary. The one step HPC review procedure is as follows: • Attend a pre-application conference. The purpose of this one-on-one meeting with the historic preservation planner is to determine the review process into which your development proposal fits and to identify the materials staff will need to review your application. 0 • Submit development application. Based on your pre-application conference, respond to the appropriate portions of the application package and submit the requested number of copies, and fee if applicable, to the Community Development Department. • Determination of completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, the application package will be reviewed by Staff to determine if all required information has been included. You will be notified in writing when additional materials are necessary. • Review of development application. Once the application is determined to be complete, the item will be scheduled on the soonest HPC agenda available. The submission due date is a minimum of nine days prior to the HPC meeting date to allow for staff review and memo preparation. It is the plannefs task to review the application with respect to it's compliance with land use regulations and to write a memo to the Historic Preservation Commission. In the memo, the planner will recommend approval, approval with conditions, tabling, or denial of the application. The memo is normally available at the end of the week prior to the HPC meeting. The planner will call the applicant or representative when the memo is ready and can also provide the expected 0 agenda time for the item. 3. At the meeting, staff will make a brief presentation of the case and then the Chair will ask the applicant or representative to make a presentation or to clarify any aspects of the project. HPC members will comment on the proposal and then vote on an action. 4. Receipt of building permit Once the approval of HPC has been received, a building permit application may be submitted. At this time the proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the Uniform Building Code and zoning regulations. Fees for water, sewer, park dedication fees, and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document, such as a plat, deed restriction, or other agreement which is required to be filed, must be recorded before the building permit will be issued. 5. HPC assigns a member of the Commission to be the ~project monitor" for each project. The monitor (and Staff) may periodically visit the site as work is under construction. If any aspects of the project change after the HPC approval, the applicant, Staff, and the project monitor will attempt to address them without returning to HPC. ATTACHMENT 7 DEFINITION OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT Minor development shall be defined as follows: • Remodeling of a structure where alterations are made to no more than one element of the structure, including but not limited to a roof, window, door, skylight, ornamental trim, siding, kickplate, dormer, porch, staircase, and balcony; • Expansion or erection of a structure wherein the increase in floor area of the structure is two hundred fifty (250) square feet or less; or • Erection or remodeling of combinations of, or multiples of no more than three (3) of the following features: awnings, canopies, signs, fences, and other similar attachments; or windows, doors, skylights, and dormers. Erection of more that three (3) of the above listed features may be defined as minor if there is a finding that the cumulative impact on such development is minor in its effect on the character of the existing structures. • Erection of street furniture, signs, benches, public art, or similar development which is to be placed throughout the Commercial Core or Main Street Historic Districts. The community development director may determine that the development is to be reviewed as a significant development, pursuant to Section 26.72.010(F). Public hearing requirements will not apply. . PUBLIC NOTICE DATE ~u/&9 994" + TIME 5:00 . 2 ,__U,~ 3415*MaN'M j~4~3't1~ PLACE cry HALL &~*4 . PURPOSE Mmo~_0'!6~ 4.4 H.C. R REVIEW FbR A Eftk : ,£'.4 FORCH + CARPDRT ADDA, . , County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT 0 } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATION State of Colorado } SECTION 26.304.060 (E) I, PA-u i D (91 850 k) , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners ofproperty with three hundred (300) feet of the subject 1000 property, as indicated on the attached list, on theR/Yllay of JiAL¥, 199= (which is 19 days prior to the public hearing date oftlvat 9 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 2 C g¥ day of ER/1--f ,·,1~st be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph ofthe posted sigpd; a*ched hereto. U *-- St¢nature (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this cA/'~ /*Ag#*F~ CrL 7/ 4.*79-by .2*,8 4/AsaJ U*,9,$ _ / ~ »,2lk/60/ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFI~54 My commission expires: All :72./z-w cooo <:/ Notarf Public 67 Notary Public's Signature 0 1 2 0 20 40 LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED ~ MANHOLE ¤ STREET LIGHT 0 UTILITY POLE A SURVEY CONTROL G CITY MONUMENT GAS - · - CAT¥ - - ELECTRIC - - PHONE 1( WATER . 1 MAIN STREET UTILITIES LOCATED BY VARIOUS SOURCES Mts?ViXT'IONE FIELD VERIFIED BEFORE ~ ~ ~ . L THERE ARE TWO WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS ~ ~ ~ BOTH ARE ARE IN MAIN STREET \INVERT 7907.92 UNVERT 7907.31 TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: ~ ~ - \ \ I 2 1- J SNOW ON GROUND AT TIME OF SURVEY 2/98 ~ NE 1 \ PO CH » / l 44 \ / / ~Frr« 4 9/7 1 209.85 , / CABIN / 5 1 CABIN / Uy / 15 / '4.3 \ Z P 1 wl 450 1 h 1- f ®10 5 / 1 at / I TCABIN J 00 -'- - f 12 1 \ \ INVERT 7900.67 2 1% 1 L-r.--1 RIM 7917.59 1 \ 0 / 11 C."4 L 1 STONE WALL - 1 1 t INVERT 7911.34 ~ \ 4. < - NEW # 14 /- \ b- 0 A~ 1. \ e VL\ 1 7/ /3 1 1 \ 1 - - - - SEWER LINEE \ EXPANDED ~ 1 ' ~ \ OFFI ROOM 1 \ \ 399.76 • 2.2744 --v. ~ ~~ 1 0 i=0'll if .\ N \ GRAVEL DRIVE \ CONC n- ~ 25947 1 LIN -6 \ CABIN \ w 11 9 1 3 / 4,09\ \ L..5.. r CABIN . .. 1 )*ECK I W // PI'/ - Cy .Al ./. 3 11 4 \ 4 3\2 • CABIN --02/dz©.1- I \ e i %97 7 97 b 4.. -,4 - 4<42-IL - ICA~IN MECH. \ 2=2~ ..2 --2 - i - /.2 f d I Jt it i: ... 1 ,CA~IN 3 6 1%\ CABIN t.7 - --4-74)· 42.- / -2-44-J~- ka*VED-€ 7 - -- - -- SEWER LINE 397 1 4 RIM 7 INVERT 7902. -4422%:u»-.-1 - · m=.imt 84.32*~~~--~ 0 -> 46#31 221 30.. - 1 r ..095.- 0- RIM 7892.58 \ INVERT 7885.98 m - : *-%-0-- SITE IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF CERTIFICATION -· - OF THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS LOTS A THROUGH I, BLOCK 38, CITY AND TOWNS]TE OF ASPEN, FIELD SURVEYED DURING 1998 AND IS ACCURATE PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. ~ ~~E~~SFOFL-RE~~~BEN:QUADARFUAE'~N~0~T~HE~:CR~AC~ENTS, CONTAINING 0.620 ACRES E#6*7 0%REoN sUC.'uNDERGt~)548 6¥ OV~s'wITF~ Asott&RouND APPURTENANCES, AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED PREPARED BY WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. DATED:- ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. JOHN M. HO'NORTH F.L.S. 25947 SITE PLAN 2 IO SOUTH GAi.ENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 1/toll = 1 5=4·00 NOTI~E: ,£CORDINg TO COLORADO LAW You MUST Ct»-~KE ANY L.ESAL PHONE/FAX (970} 925-38!6 WE¥;@Rt*E,741/1* DATE JOB 2/98 12034E =&2 1 10 VOID IF NOT mE·T .™I. WI™ THE 0EAL 0~ THE -I.. 8#no 1 14 IN 1,4¥d 1¤*d~ 3801 REVISIONS LEGEND: 6 u. 3, 6 5- It .co EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN A EXISTING WALL TO BE REMOVED A NEW FRAME WALL ~ 0 ,* a'- O" t 1 + JOB NO. JOB# DRAWN BY: DRAWN DATE· DATE 1 1 CHECKED: CHECKED -- SCALE: SCALE ~- ~~~ ~-~- - -- -- --- FILE FILE ID: l It 1 11 11 il cop™GHT © 6®4 020/0 1 11 It ' 11 It i NEW CARRORT ~ It It I 11 11 31 lilli 11 It 1, 1' , -v , 1O 0 ] + + 1. 1 - . ' 1 0 . : -L -E: 1 U J \ -r---0 EXPANDED KITCHEN , a b- ' .OK 1 1 »·L 1 1 P_ A, i ~------~-~----0----1 1 11 1 01 1 C 1 © L I OUU |EXIST. MANAGERS UNIT | ~ _ ~ |EXIST. MASTER BEDROOM I EXPANDED ROOM + 0 Ir 0 h. :,1 r HO NEW CLOSET 1 [d L I 1: I V. ¢tflk«-------- m 1*21~-=r·-~ ICLOSETI [lilli - 1 ~! NEW PORCH i H 5--1-! 1 91 D 0 211] 0 0 - GIBion 4 /9 El __ ___-___ __ _- ARCHITECTS lIC. „ 21'- C 7~-Z" i lIli 1.1 k 1, i 2,31 ki MAU. sr SUITE # 0 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 92.1-1007 w ~SfEEMODEL FLOOR PLAN FAX 0) ~ (1970) 920-„O, 0, P.O. BOX 278 117 N. WILLOW m SUITE # 2 TELLURIDE, COLORADO 0 81435 (970) 728-6607 2 'FAX 0 (970) 728-6658 = SHEET # CID A-1 W ~ FLOOR PLAN REMODEL PLANS 50 11 2~ .,0-,tf - , 1,- t; I.'. O 1.INA SHHOVNVN - 391IE[E[fl¥,1 laaNELS NIVIAI REVISIONS 11-3.98 F / DRAWN BY: DRAWN JOB NO. JOB# ======.1 DATE: DATE li =:39>40«03:z E--- -a CHECKED: CHECKED SCALE: SCALE FILE ID: FILE COPYRIGirr© g, 2000 NEW PORCH *) PEST ELEVATION 1/4•.1'-0· --- InT-7@ MEILI E~ --E - t: Inl 22, NEW CARPORT TZ== *j~ORTH ELEVATION -4 1 @LE@ 1 3 E- E- m I- .,- -E - 1 1 -_i ¤¤ i - E EXPANDED ROOM k__ (* 196-r ELEVATION ~ 1/4..1'-0. 61Bf 0[1 ARCHITECTS l IC SUITE # JO I ¢10/ N · Mi u. S·r- 81611 ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 920.3007 FAX (970) 920·%103 m hj 441 0. m O P.O. BOX 278 -1 117 N. WILLOW ..1 1 0 I SUITE # 2 TEUURIDE. COLORADO . 81435 __~~ ~ (970) 728-6607 'ii 1 -P NEW CARPORT . (970) 728-6658 a SHEET # ro 2 (TjSOUTH ELEVATION A-2 REMODEL PLANS ELEVATIONS 0 . [1 - 397IHELAV,1 O 'NE[dSV ISBIAA SE* REVISIONS A El a a a JOB NO.: JOB# DRAWN BY: DRAWN DATE: DATE 10·1·IS CHECKED: CWECKED SCALE: SCALE FILE ID: FILE COPYRIGHT © IRA 1 997 U U U -2- 422--¢---- r -CO - - 0 3-0 3-Q --1 1 q/- 1====d i 1 DI===r'lE===rl===1 J 9 8 - EXIST. MANASERS UNIT I |EXIST. MASTER BEDROOM.J ~ r= 1 - - Vt U 0 Ilt_jitz=LiEJL~------- - -.a--_&4-44 2 |CLOSET| 1 -11- 0 9 0 L.__~ GIBSON·REI ARCHITECTS· e 0 LL.C. 210 EAST HYMAN SUITE # 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-5968 /*EXISTINS FLOOR PLAN /:43/) FAX (970) 925-5993 ~ i/.=1 -0 4,1 P.O. BOX 278 117 N. WILLOW SUITE # 2 TELLURIDE, COI.ORADO 81435 (970) 728-6607 FAX (970) 728-6058 SHEET # A-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS AS-BUI:U FLOOR PLAN NVMI - 3DNEL CIVMO~IC,0 'NIE[d REVISIONS 1 .-r~ DRAWN BY: DRAWN 108 NO. JOB# El | ' DATE: DATE 10+95 CHECKED: CHECKED El- -- El SCALE: SCALE FILE ID: FILE Zfzfzfzs lEi COPYRIGHT © GRA 1997 (*AEST ELEVATION L-j 1/4..11-0. E<- 8338 8~ ---1- 8 il# 46 22 e Wmo *INORTH ELEVATION ~~~ ...14 Ill EU 4 0 0 /4 0 1 1 ©4 0 11 1 W W 'i 0311 ~I QU@ il E E- g =91 4 -- 31 2 --@ 5% m 1 g !Q 0 00 4 4-4 1 441 12 , (g'j.EAST- ELEVATION U 1/4»•1'-0 GIBSONIREN2 ·ARCHITECTS· 001 L.I.C. /USE=Z«~SF~~ ~~~ StirrE # 202 210 EAST HYMAN M--*--;LW. 1.$*-~ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 - -- -- (970) 925-5968 ¥Al (970) 925-5993 1 , P.O. BOX 278 117 N. WILLOW SUITE # 2 . j : TELLURIDE. COLORADO 81435 (970) 728-6607 ¥AX (970) 728-6650 SHEET # ~SOUTH ELEVATION A-2 EXISTING CONDITION AS-BUILT ELEVATIONS 44444 FINAL PLAT CENIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP Ii. DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: AUBERGE D ASPEN HEREBY CONF I RMS ITID ACKN0WLE6GES THIT IT 15 THE SOLE OWNER OF THE 1 . THIT THE ALH HOLD1 NG COMPANY-GUNNISON, INC C -DECLARANT- ~ ALH HOLDING COMPANY-GUNNISON INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION I THIS PLAT /MENDS PERKINS SUBDIVISION PLAT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIeED AS FOLLOWS PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN 1 S THE OWNER OF THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN P I TK [N COUNTY, 1--20 A COMMON INTREST CO~lUNITY COLORADO, AND LYING SEC710NS 12 T 10 S R 85 W Alt HOLDING COMPANY-GUNNISON, INC OF THE 6tH P.M., COUNTY OF PITKI~, STATE 6F COLOR.60 1-PROPERTY-], 0 20 40 RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10 AT PAGE 25. LEGAL. DESCRIPTION 8/ AUDREY LEE HAISFIELD, PRESIDENT LOTS I AND 2 PERKINS SUBDIVESION CONSISTING OF LOTS A, 8, H, AND ], BL6CK 38, CITY IND TOWN6!TE OF ASPEN, AS SHOWN ON TAED#LA¥' F,G St ATE OF 1 THEREOF AECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10 £ PAGE 25, CONTAINING 0.620 ACRES, SS MORE OR LESS. LEGEND COUNTY OF 3 2. THAT DkC6ARANT HAS CAUSED SAID REAL PROPERTY TO BE LI! D THIS PLAT HAS BEEN DULY ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS .- OUT SURVEYED AND SUBDTVIDED AS U AUBERGE D ASPEN ( SUIDIVISION 1 IN DAY OF , 999 BY AUDREY LEE HAISFIELD AS PRESIDENT OF PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO SUBJECT TO THE EASEMENTS AND OTHER LIENS FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED AH HOLDING COMPANY·GUNNISON, iNC AND ENCUMBRIN~ES SHOWN JR DESCRIBED ON THIS PLAT OR 1 THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS: CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, RECORDED MANHOLE MY COMMISSION EXPIRES C -DECLARIT ON- 3 IND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE HEREIN WITNESS MY HAND ANO OFFICIAL SEAL AS RECEPTION NO. STREET LIGHT UTILITY BOX THE RESERV/TI ONS NOTARY PUBLIC SURVEY CONIROL THE DECLARANT HEREBY RESERVES TO 1 TSELF IND I TS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THE FOLLOWING· CITY MONUMENT 2 LENDER S CERTIFICATE 9 DEVELOPMENT. THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE PROPERTY FOR GAS DIE UNDE R S I GNE D F OR THE MS Ei VE S T HE 1 R S UCCE S S ORS . AND AS S 1 GN S A S THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY WORK FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANY PROPERTY BENEFICIARY IR ASIGNEEi OF THE DEEDS OF TRUST OR ASSIGNMENTS, RECORDED IN AND THE RIGHT TO GRANT ADDIf IONAL EASEMENTS AND RELOCATE AND/OR El ECTR, C OF THE FINAL PLAT OF C AUBERGE D ASPEN IND AGREES THAT NO FORECLOSURE OR SPECIFICAL,Y SET FORTH AND RESERVED IN THE DECLARATION OULARINT BOOK 692 AT MIS 832. 834, 840 AND 86 HEREBY CONSENTS TO THE RECORDING SUBSTITUTE EXISTi NG EASEMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY AS MORE W T BOUNDARY THESE BOUNDARIES ARE AT THE ENFORCEMENT OF ANY REMEDY PURSUANT TO THAT DIED OF TRUST MS RESERVED THE RIGHT TO DEVELOP AND SELL THE DEVELOPMENT AS RIGHT ANGLES to THE EXTERNAL PROPERTY SHALL IMPAIR INVAL 'DATE, SUPERSEDE, 04 OTHER# SE AFFECT THE APPROVED IN THE DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS AND RESERVES THE R GHT TO LINES COVEN~NTS RNTRICTIONS1 IND EASEMENTS ESTABLISHED HEREIN GRANT AND RELOCATE EASEMENTS I MAY IE NECESSARY FOR THAT DEVELOPMEN-T ZONE DISTRICT O OFFICE PARTNERSHIP VECTRA BANK FORMERLY PITKIN SWISS CHALET/KITZBUHEL COUNTY BANK AND TRUST 2 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SUCCESSOR AND ASSIGN OF WATER LINE IS LOCATED IN MAIN STREET ALL OTHER DECLARANT, AS USED HEREIN SHALL BE DEEMED A SUCCESSOR AND ASSIGN OF UTILITIE5 ARE LOCATED IN THE ALLEY I DECLARINT BY AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN THE RECORDS OF P I TK IN DECLARANT FOR THE PURPOSE~ HEREOF ONLY I SPEC IF ICILLY DES IGNATED 8¥ BY COUNTY COLORADO AND ONLY TO THE PARTICULAR R 1GHTS AND INTERESTS SPEC IF f CALLY DESf GNATED THERE I N ./CH GRAT.3 STATE OF COLORADol 1 SS 3 WORDS IND PHRASES THE MEANING OF WORDS IND PHRASES 122[pt,%40MHZ.*m. COUNTY OF P 11KIN ) USED HEREIN SHALL HAVE THE SAME MEAI NG AS THOSE DEF NED J N THE DECLARIT:ON THE FOREGOING FS ACKNOWLEDGED THI S _.__DAY OF - 1999 BY a* coiNK\N EASEMENTS 4 S<~f 'Er *I TNESS MY OFF ICI AL SEAL DEC.ARANT HERE8Y RESERVES FOR ITSELF l S SUCCESSORS AND MY COMM:SSION EXPIRES: ASSIGNS AND GRANTS, SUBJECT TO THE E~SEMENTS AND OTHER ENCUMBRANCES SHOWN OR DESCRIBED ON TIS PLAT AND OTHERWISE NOTARY PUBLIC CREA TED OR RESER VED HE RE 1 N, THE FOL L OW I NG D TCH UT]LITY EASEMENT A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT TO DECLARANT, 7 h i f //Cal. STATE Of COLORADO] ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS (·DECLARANT-), THE ASSOCIATION AND TO ) SS UTILITY PROVIDERS OVER, ACROSS AND UNDER (Al ANY PORTION~ OF THE ' - 222 422------- COUNTY OP PTK N PROPERTY DESIGNATED AS 'UTILITY EASEMENT- ON THIS PLAT FOR THE 9 p- LIMITATION ELECTRIC GAS, CABLE IELEVISION, YELEPHONE WATER AND INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL UTILITIES INCLUDIAG ITHOUT 4' g b HOUSE , .20*- THE FOREGO I NG WAS ACKNOWLEDGED TH I S ____DAY OF 999 87 SEWER: AND' 11 ANY P6RTI0NS OF THE PROPERTY WHICH MAY AE DESIGNATED UNIT I j UNIT Cu. CIR AS ~ CHALET/ 89 DECLARINT PURSUANT TO RESERVATIONS AND RIGHTS OF DECLARANT 12 1 289 8 -- -- KiTZBUHEL PROVIDED HEREIN OR IN THE DECLARATi ON CONCERNING THE PROPERTY I NCLUD I NG THOSE TO BE L OCATED i N THE COMMON AREAS 1 N NO EVE~-T f z / 9 frrl f.-4 WITNESS MY OFFICIAL SEAL SHALL THE UTILITY COMPANIES EXERCISE THE RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED SO AS Mr COMMISSION EXPIRES TO INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE UNITS PURPOSES EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT . 57 J DITCH GRATE NOT#RY PUBLIC PRESENTLY USED FOR OVERHEAD UTILITIES BETWEEN, OVER, UNDER AND ACCROSS / L CAB I N H REASONABLY AND TIMELY NECESSARY INO (C 1 INY PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY Wl 9 1, THE CABIN UNITS AND COP#·ION AREAS THE UNDERSIGNED FOR MEMSELVES THEIR SUCCESSORS AND /SIGNS AS BENEFICIARIES 2 URRIGATiON *ID ORA!NAGE EASEMENT A NON-EXCUUS T IE COMMON .Ball.i 4 c_ l! 0 lit' N -Ly.T-»:. i~.2'· b «1-°«-16%-Trl,) 'REI ~ CONSENT TO THE RECORDING OF THISPINAL PLAT AND AGREES THAT No FORECiOSURE OR ASSOCIATION, INCLUDING THE RIGHT OF VEHICULAR ACCESS TO MAi NT/IN 4 24 r; 1 301--~ 4 1 OF THE DEED CF TRUST RECORDED 6N JULY 21, 1986 IN BOOK 5 i 4 /1 PAGE 790 HEREBY I RR IGAT ION AND DR, INAGE EASEMENT TO THE DECLARINT AND THE THE ENFORCEMENT OF ANY OTHER REMEDY WILL IMPA! R THE VAL 1DITY OF MiSF~ MAL PLAT THEM AS MAY BE ADV I SABLE FOR THE INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCT ION IND <*243 R -*3-- 1 MAINTENANCE OF ]RRIGATION *ID DRAINAGE WITHIN THE SUBOtvISION. CO„40,1, UN 1 T 4, , 4 CABIN 1 ,/ r.·h 3 HOUSE UNIT ACCESS EASEMENT. A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT 10 6 MARY 6 PERK'NS ACCESS AND PARKING PURPOSES OVER IND ACROSS THE COMON AREA ARE' . $ b 11 1:4\~. 1:.1 li im ,~5! 12 4 fi1] .ocATE6 BETWEEN THE BOUNDARY OF THE HOUSE UNIT IND THE COMMON 462 <! ~~ 1HE r OREGO ING WAS -CKNOWE. EDGED THIS _ DAY OF- , lili 8. THE ASSOCIATION FOR THE PARKING OF ONE OPERABLE VEHICLE FOR THE USE OF THE 43 :11 27"7211104 12 4 4" j I K COUNTY OF PITKI 1 / / CABIN W i ·' STAJE OF COLORADO! bOUNDARieS OF UN,i. 20 24 AND 23 SOiL*:CT (0 1Ht ASSOCI/ ION S RULES THE OWNERS AND GUESTS OF THE HOUSE UNIT FOR DRIVEWAY, PEDESTRIAN CAB'N / AND REGULATIONS DESCRIIED ~N THE DECLARATION - f i & tr J 4.-* , l-,24 b 62 1 <ji 4 COMMON AREA PARK UNG. THE COMMON AREAS BLL 85 MADE AVA 1 LA8LE BY THE MARY E PERKINS OF THE OWNERS AND THEIR GUESTS OF EACH CABIN UNIT, FOR A TOTAL OF .. PARK I NG SPACES~ AS SUCH TS FURTHER DEFINED AND DESIGNATED IN THE DECLARATION THE 420 R ko, WITNESS ,© OFFICIAL SEA_ ASSCOI AT ON MAY RELOCATE AND DESIGNATE SPECIFIC PARKING AREAS FOR USE BY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OWNERS IND GUESTS AND IMPOSE REGULATIONS FOR THE USE THEREOF Ujj:F . I UNIN .O1ARY PUBLIC AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE OWNERS AND THEIR GUESTS FOR I SP'A AND DECK 5 COMMON IREA SPA THE COmON AREAS SHALL BE MADE COMMON AREA AS SUCH IS SHOWN ON THIS PLIT IND AS FURTHER DEFINED AND DES IGNITED 1 - * i. -11 £421 r- 031-7 f \./ ROOF :4CRIC-EN! AGREE#T WITIN THE COMMON AREA AS IT DEEMS NECESSARY IND ADISABLE IND 3 T,TLE EXAMINER S CERFF CATE IN THE DECLARATION THE ASSOCIAT ION MAY RELOCATE TH I 5 SPA IIID DECK 21*h 1-7 0ECEeloN No _ I VINCENT J. HIGENS, AS PRESIDEN1 OF PITKIN COUNTY TITLE INC DO .MAY IMPOSE REGULATIONS FORTHE USE THEREOF. \-----\-. -- -------»11 li,2 4 40071 :5»7 f...' 1 r 4 PROPERTY '.e bMED M TRI EUatIKMON ALH HOLDING COMPANY & PEDESTRIM PATH THE COMMON AREAS SHALL BE MADE H(REBY CERTIFY THAT , HIVE OUSED AN EXAMINATION Te BE MdE OF THE GUNNISON INC I THE OWNER IN FE SIMA.E OF THE PROPERTY FREE IND AVAILABLE FOR A PEDESTRIAN PATH AND WALKWAY AND MAINTENANCE Lj MECH ON TH.S PLAT AND )N TITLE COMMITMENT NO PCT 674/P, WHICH WOULD ASSOIDIfION MhY RELOCATE THIS PEDESTRIAN PATH AS I DEEMS NECESSARY 42449 Ek 14 4 0;y CABIN / r-. :- ·REA , , i/¢ 18 70 /4/ AW CLEAR OF ALL ~IENS AND ENCUMBRANCES EXCEPT AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED THEREOF OVER AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF THE COMMON AREAS. THE 411 ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTENDED /SE OF THE PROPERTY to WHICH OR IDVISIBLE AND MAY IMPOSE REGULATIONS FOR THE USE THEREOF . " UN 1 T \/ L · 4 DEDiCATIONS ARE MADE TO THE Mile 7 COMMON AREA A RE AREA SHOWN ON THE PLAT PA¥EMENT DATED THE -.-- DAY Of· 1999 AS -COMMON ,~REA A-MY BE MAINTAINED BY THE S 75'09 Lk-i N " 4 +42! R-_.)1AE-w':~-- ' ll/l 4 ASSOCIATION AS SET FORTH IN THE DECLARATION FOR MECHANICAL ik CABINT,-rn / Q... BY EQUIDMENT AND STORAGE £ ~8. %9152i A. " 11 21(, tv L-1 - VINCEN1 J IGENS 8. BOILER ROOM. THE ASSOC]ATION SHALL OWN THE BOILER ROOM AND i TS CONTENTS ALLEY BLOCK 38 0 - - - <796-3 it wi NO. LOCATED WITHIN CABIN UNIT 17 WHICH SHALL BE USED FOR THE BENEFITS OF CAB,N 2, 0, STATE OF ColoRIDO 1 UND'S 13 THROUGH 19 INCLUSIVE ) SS P Ij - COUNT'f OF PITKIN I 9 RESERVED OPEN SPACE NO PIll(ING OR STRUCTURES SHALL BE PERMUTHED , / i WITHIN THAT AREA Wi THIN HOUSE UNIT A DESIGNATED AS RESERVED OPEN SPACE THE FOREGOING TITLE EXAMINER S CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN DUL¥ . LE 0-4.-f ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME 7/r 3 - __ DAY OF , 1999 87 V;NCENT J HIGENS AS PRESIDENT OF /TKIN COUNTY TITLEj INC BOILE' ROOM 25947 -»Cy----==:0 A- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. Mv COMM 1 SS,ON EXP IRES V PLAT NOTES 1. ALL REFERENCES TO THE RECORDED DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO THE REAL ESTATE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNT·o NOTARY PUBLIC COLORADO V SURVEYOA S NOTES 4 COMMUNIwY DEVE_OPMENT DIRECTOP IPPROVA, 1 DATE OF PREPARATION AUGUST, 1999 TH'S PL/ IS HEREBY ~/PROVED / THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF THE C·TY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF 2 BEARINGS ARE BASED ON NORTH LINE OF BLOCK 38 4 SHOWN 1999 PURSANT TO OF THE Abl le, 4206* 6= THE CITY OF ASPEN 3 RECORDED EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY IRE SHOWN ACCORDING TO PITK IN COUNTY TITLE INC TiTLE CASE NO 674/P, EFFECTIVE DATE ~.01/96 VICINITY MAP NTS 4. THIS PROPERTY HS SUBJECT TO MINERAL RIGHTS AND RIGHTS OF DREC"OR WAY FOR ITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UN TED STATES IN UNITED STATES PATENTS RECORDED I N BOOK - Al PAGE 9 CITY ENGINEER S APPROVAL 5. N ACCORDANCE WITH C.R 5 3-80-105 NOTICE ACCORDING TO l Hallam 1 + ~' COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACT·ON BASED UPON ANY THIS PL.AT I S HERESY APPROVED FOR CONTENT AND FORM ONLY AND DEFECT INI TH~S SURVEY WITHIN THREE £3) YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST Di SCOVER m Lake \8 ' NOT THE ACCURACY OF SURVEYS CALCULATIONS OR DRAFTING PURSUANT TO SUCK DEFECT IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT I N AM-0 -- ' CRS i973. 38 5; 102, AS ~MENDED, BY THE ENGINEER Of THE CITY OF ASPEN, THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN ( 10) YEARS FROM THE DITE OF COL ORADO, T H 1 S .- . DAY OF , 1999 THE CERilfiCATION SHOWN HEREIN ' .hr- I \q-2 ' 7 CLERK AND RECORDER S CERTIFICATE. ATTEST CLERK STATE OF COLORADO I COUNTY oF PITKM I 8 8, O CLOCK, M THIS --- DAY OF --_-- ---. 1949 i-ITY ENG!NEER 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TH,S INSTRUMENT WIS FILED ·N Mr OFFICE AT AND IS DUE¥ RECORDED INE-rf Bo6K £ PAGE _ __ AS 6 SUIVEYOR S CERTIFICATE RECEPT ION NO IN l HE RECORDS OF PiTKIN COUNTY, COLORADO ·, JOHN HOWORTH, A DULY REG STEREO PROFESSIONAL. SITE/h P; TK N COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CHECKING. WHICH SURVEY WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DRAWING INDEX -IND SURVIVOR 1N THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS P AT OF- h AU8ERGE D ASPEN' TRU,Y AND CORRECTLV REPRESENTS THE SHEET 1, SITE PLAN, CERTIFICATES RESULTS OF K SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECT RESPONSIBILi TY, SUPERVISION ARTICLE 5: Of TITLE 38 OF THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES AND THAT THI 5 SHEET 2, UNIT DIMENSIONS PREPARED BY WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFUIAL SEA. PLAT CONTA! NS ALL THE I NFORMAT ON REOU RED BY COLORADO ~EV i SED MY COMMISSION EXPIRES.--_- STATUTES 38 33 3-209 SURVEY PRECISION GREATER THAN I : IO,000. r- Ely -r ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. DATE i NOTARY PUBLIC COLORADO REGISTERED PROFESS,ONAL 1.IND SURVEfo R NO 25947 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX (970) 925··3816 DATE J08 0/99 12034! SHEET I OF 2 FOURTH ST L AUBERGE D ASPEN H o 10 20 A 1 11.1/ A 8 37 STREE I En 1 + 6 88 HO:SE / UNIT A 25 1 /i / i CAB'N f~ UN!1 i': F----1 22 / 07»4. , -7.-1 1 fi /11\n 7 3.09 ac-- I 26to . f + D»-1 h~ CAB IN i /9, COMMON ~. L / - : 4 / CAH,N ,~ /7/ UN T / AREA UNAT '. f j 24 p- -4 1 j 26 'i i 1 2-%.2% · 1 1 4--- i 1 j : »\--r.% :29 & 1 If 11 9 \ , 4/ CABIN '. i i l ' CABIN , l COMMON A R LN£ 3 i 1 4 -77.-- 1 -1; 1 i j'' ~- -. 111 £' 1 ri / CABIN / 1 i- / 77 J I UN O i 1 1 JN' T i Iii n m. 1 i 19 1 9 - ' 1 1 LARIN : 1 -p ~ 1 CABIN l 1 : L ~ . 28 - 1 4% if - 7-»z~7--n f / £ 20 UNIT / 1 k : 4 1 t g 20 1 l epa I N L ~ r- 1 --4 -7 K- ; b L-_ -7-1 1 a :% j RESERVED OP / /' UN I f / ~ P a.. -·-L' 4 i 4% SPACE ~ j i. . h....-' 9 1 1, 3 42 f 2 Lf. /,4/ CABIN // COMMO> f LU=---- - l i N L UNIT / , 4 ARE h 0 - 43 / _i CArB i N / / F:-5 I : 0 1 11 1/ / I :' e 'a r....«5 1 4 / j. h. 0 1 1 g i ON'· . '2 COMMON AREA 621' 1 0 3 . IN.. : , l d 8 36 i - 4---7 4 47 CABIN / a (i Op{ d il COMMON AREA 'A 1 \8 i c * / UNIT , 2/1 -/Ct~ 2 // 8 66 f.~r-~7 L- -_- i qi .H. 1 1 ~-3--LUL 1 i :F- 342 11 8,2 : ----rzn £-4.- f f cer : j - : ; ~ : .j-CABIN i 21 1 1 I...*./ Ab UNIT / Al LEY HI OCK 2-·.J 9 17 6 7 "2 ~IJC~A~~4N- f F.-17.I.79. LL - i b._. \7 L:ZJ : · i 96-•--42.2/ - ~~~- BOILER ROOM PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH Gh,LENA ScREET ASPEN, COLORADO 816 NOT/CIE ACCORDING To COLO~ADO j. You MUST C-€NCE %... PHONE/FAX (970) 925-38'6 ACTION .ASED UP- ANY DEFECT 0~ .1, P.AT ./TWIN 1,~EE YEARS AFTER You FORST Di.OVER SUCH .EFECT il» No EVENT .¥ AM' ACT•ON 8.SEO UPON ~MY DEFECT 1111 THIS ..T . CO~ ENCED Mo. THAN TEN YEAR5 FROM T~ DATE 0, T€ CER.FIWION SHOWN HeEON TRE CE" ':u.;ON .6 .,0 F .T .T STAMPED ¥1 TH T. iCAL O. 'MF SHEET 2 05 2 I 2034H SU.E.OR DATE J08 8/99 'REET FOURTH Sl 4'50 49 6 00 00 Woods Building/ Aspen Drug 432 East Hyman Street Aspen, CO HPC Work Session 9 August 2000 Massing/ Volume Studies Studio B Architects 555 North Mill Street Aspen, CO 81611 n. ./. 11.bl/- »48. : 4 1 E -/ /1 L- . 4 I . 1~1 i mi .......................... _ E E-§5- 0 4 - 0-1 4 1 - ,1 r- 271 ' i 11 =NO Ii:1 l. i 1 r L L- L - -1 - i -. 1, t- 1 1-· I - + 1L.6- t Z: 1 ---ULLL- : 1 - I-/ ™W»FlffiN*-D~| ||*||~2£m..Ir /. Ilik)*IM,le#*1= + -4-69 *942]7% 11 Jt--Iii / 1 ~ _25* I: .. 1-7 _i _11 --12 - 1 - -.. 2-*44/ JI J * 2 -1 26*J 0, -4 9- 1 :31¢11,- 4- f,-6. i!, ~-~~ -- . tu:~=b~'bba=iL + I ,~*:'ji'* I $- 4 -'f~-j~~thf{1~q-~. F~ [III 1. €23 1 2 5 314 - 4 -f; 1 - *f' 1 . f Nfil- r_L,4 44 - ' ~ I L. 2-f-« 44·-i'iqi,9- Usijtitti* 4 +_r--==iritti, 'r#:iii 7 'IMI-~~-~~~ .3 -- ~& 9-L! fi-:111....lir ' _ IL,- ' 0- M41 11 J : ' i - · =~f-2· -, i FU/=f " . r A"- I , L ·P¢~ -11 --6 --4JZ--4-.11 -6 114 - fc- 4- 2, 4 -- 4-Eil}i--~3;P~ '' ·~*'1) '1 .i, .-: i: :LL. I r'f~*l@ I · 4 M il. i '~ ~ :12- ·· ~ ~~:~*23t181 1 - - 1+4 * *...41-11414-1'.da.,i,- · i, ~~'*12. '*E,·' "'l!11:11'i „ '"· ,~ ~ i,L+- -1!Jpl=4 - 1--1 4 . 1.2 - -1 - -_- 1 - ™64'.4,21@,d.'EZ:3iy- 1 L, li· _r~ 1 ~-~ j~i,·. ·1 · 1:; 74flia - - 4 1-1- -1-11- 9-41-it<C~-~}-'l t~i'*' t' -1 ' "=lutlia ' -- -,1 i j.=/; -1 - 1 1 =r 11 - 4 A €- ' 4- 1 -13- I +6 2 1 - 1 -t 1 1 41 4 ,-11 .,- 4 .'·f*7 1 / 1 -1.1 - 1 - 1 -,killu 1 1- - 0 11- 3-* - 4 It ./ I i/ 12 -· . i M 0 #_:tiT -# .,1 1-4 lilli .11 1 ¥ 11 + 131*+ i -r.:rkr-lk: + '4 -3 1- 4*:2 1 -E *1, - 4-* 4 141 K ' I. 1 + 1 ./. .1 r 1_ 1 ~ =" 1 - ~ -1<' ' 7,~I~-~,:~J~1~"2 ' ' il-J & ~-~ "= ·-472~ 1 1 + .6*~~~~-L 1.1. 53/&1771 'TY"IM'/101 In'.EM.' IMI'Il' 4*/Ilt/t' k i ~ 4- *11. -!.11 1.4 #*-&4-- f--- 1--„-- .- - -,11 +Z - '040 f + 1 ·-- _ i /.p,J 44111-4 I # F.1 - 2 C | 1~-- .4 lifj' 1~-_ li tff ·~tj~~f i ~1 .~. 1 . 1 + 1 al/Giwutri LA+- 11 : 0 i .2 + -tle! 4 1 + . ¥.4,1 /5. f 1 .1 . ~ 4 **4% + 1 illi i-t ; i :~04 ~ ~ --i i --, _i~j~ 1 11*'i 4141 f - -:- - -- - -114,1 f lk, + 1 +J F.14/WA#*f"/1.1?:t-.* + + , 11 -2 - P.]11 1 f - .H,4 f 1 + 1 liul 4- + i jiti - + + 0,_ '4, _._ _ . i -IL i.- 14 i,-u .* +41- + 1 -+ 1.12-:Alil =3.7 ... 4, tili *"".1.__ - 11:-4 .1 11.. 4 1 + -1 - 1 ,-4 - ·· ~..· . -t.1~|~~|~~~6- '·1- T ·1[F.~ · .. : 4 r .=- + - -T'- iw , .9# i'-p,~,lu'lli,ii#,41=4.1,•Pq . I ~ Ei + 1 1 21 1 -121 7 *-.1 -t=- 1 -11-?.I~+4 - - 1 1 4 1 - 1 -I -1114.4 .. 1 1, I' PIA-, 1, 9 11 1411111 1 - 13 0 0,! lIE#4,~~MRFI.M..1111 1.1,41 +1.1 - 1 -- J- - - 1 ---/ .Ilifir trl/**A %, 0 -1 : - .--4- If E i It -;:E:~ 1 - 1 '1 1 i " 6.-r /. 21 1 1 r.7/ 111- __ . 1 f L__ I -1 '12 1 , 0 1 = i I l $ 112... 1 , .. 1 !' -. $ + 1, 2 . 1 6'L # L ~, - f- 4- 0 9 4-. 4f, rrm~gs,-3 77-3-- ~17 nfi -' - ~ ~5$~411 4=-T+'-3n:.'~.; ·~114 4-~T -1. . kil~f>31--~"-#,~ttl.-·la T= - l '-! fil 44...r ~ .M- &.4*%14<.. 1 Ellie 1 - 1 ~C491*4 32% 1 - - 4 . 1 01 1 »:'clri':·i_.!~'·F: '-11~,9'' ·1 ir!1;'~ilijf-lEMEf*tij,-7-'~ : 14 '' 1;. +_·Li-'~|1~E~ 4 1 - 1. 1 ~ --'i·..AJ li ..:1*..6-lili.1 -- r .7.11!Ii« 0 ' ' 4. 6:k!9 - !4 4.*,4 4/IM 4*·---- ~ _.11 .1 1 1- a. 1-)4~ I 4114. 1 I f 4.1 1 . 'I .2.1 1 1 - -4 - i - 11 + I.. * 11 + r C. 1 1- 1"11 4 4.- 1 1 +T 1 + - 574# 1-1 *a,i 4- + + il I F'I~' 1.-k ' !40411, it i ' 4+•t-iL*,$41 € 1 - :w + C * ~u~' 1 -1:*1' -= %.ME; f -1.+ .7- t ''7,4- b ir 3-141+If'*94=1=_ 4 9 = *13 44-1-KI=€-11 - 1 - + i *1+ + + , P' 1 1 1! I ~ '.. It t it- 1 ·i '-4 + i 7 -1, :i L - - A + . I r J. i 4-1- 1 11 -- 1 1 *i.*04' ~ 4!4.2 lili,-114 D 4 r „i -1-1 1 1 1 . - 4 - 1 + 11,1. 1 4 + 4 + 11--+ r. + 1 * ..144:41-4-1-444 - 1 -061+1-14 f.f' 44 -4.t ~ ff , ~ ~ ...4 - --r __ 11 4 1. - + + + Bu l i - | *' I 4.- 1 4-In_ ': 4-r #'I + - I i tir 1, 3 5 112 -11 4,3'- 6, 1 h' 14 '. 4 1 . 1 1 1. 'I -1/14- f A ll '. 1 4 + ~ 4 ulk - 1 1 1 1 + f $+Ji + 1. 1 1+ + 1 - I : Il , ; / 14; . 1 4 /-,41 111- 1 1 .1 .it 1 i'« 4 11 1 1 1 9 14 1 1-14~ 1-P.- 1 1 + i liiI' ' - rt:tt 1 ' 141 -1 -1, 1 -4 -1 - 1 1 11 1 ' #11 + + r ; : i 4 i .1 *+ -1+H-14 M ~. 41 14 --1 144, 1 4!.2 .2.+ |'2: 1 ~~I: ,1 1- ; 4 1 11 1 „/ I L 4 1 I f 1., * L $ + 2'-1 11' 16+1 11- + + + +,Ill ir-,2 11 ~~ 41 ir i- 12 1 ~'it 4 11 $ : 1.4. t" I ' / 1~ %'_' ' 1 1 1. - c.4-4 1 -1 L 12,3 f,1114.1 Jf 11 f 1 11 - -0.~t.2 ~,~ill..~:irr 1 -24 -,t 9 + 3-4.8- tr 4 ·· ;11' il·:i.i,z'!£104=!1!Ill=llilii£71!,1!!i .I' , + 2 1- 11,11% 41 ..1. -</ . 1,1 lip Ill)»41-9 1, , : f ~! +- ~ -I ~&, 1 '~~| 'i #f I·i~ 1 *i&: +411 1 fltill~. 4r . .++UL' 1,-i:41= ~1'1~11··f·. i: 4... im- 1 ,| ~ i ·I- ~~..' 17'/ 2 1.-1=JIi'D -1 11 - 1 11 11,1-7+ *- + /- 1:=C . -fkt~~ *- -C'»N ' Tiu :* #=t·72 -pp : 4 7