The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.20000209ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION February 9,2000 REGULAR MEETING, 5# p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SITE VISITS - NOON - 5:00 I. Roll call II. Public Comments III. Commission member comments and project monitoring IV. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) V. OLD BUSINESS 5:05 A. 501 W. Main Street, Christiana Lodge - Minor (cont'd from January 12, 2000) Reso 5, 2000 VI. NEW BUSINESS 5:20 A. 130 S. Galena St., City Hall- Minor Development - Reso 6,2000 5:40 B. 520 W. Main St., Ullr - Minor Development - Reso 7,2000 6:00 C. 110 W. Main St. - Hotel Aspen - Conceptual PH - Reso 8, 2000 6:45 D. 417 E. Hyman Avenue - Paragon - Minor Development Reso 9,2000 7:00 VIII. ADJOURN PACKETS ARE READY TO BE PICKED UP AND ON SCHEDULE. OJECT MONITORING Susan Dodington 234 W. Francis - Mullins 421 W. Hallam Street 240 Lake Avenue- Greenberg 930 King - No Problem Joe's \11.3.11 flf#N . ~ fin/ c (04~ Suzannah Reid 406 E. Hopkins- ISIS 117 N. 6~ St. - Coulter 414 N. First- POLE 240 Lake Ave. Jeffrey Halferty 234 W. Francis- Mullin 414 N. First- POLE 920 W. Hallam- Guthrie 101-105 E. Hallam (not active) 315 E. Hyman - Su CASA 212 W. Hopkins Ave. Heidi Friedland 420 W. Francis Street- Halperin 232 E. Hallam St.- Pace 117 N. 6th St. - Coulter Lisa Markalunas 520 Walnut Street - Greenwood 939 E. Cooper- Langley 240 Lake Avenue- Greenberg Christie Kienast 520 Walnut Street - Greenwood 735 W. Bleeker- Bone 920 W. Hallam Mary Hirsch 930 King 114 Neale Avenue 920 W. Hallam 400 W. Smuggler Street - Dodge residence Gilbert Sanchez CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: 4 W. Hallam (Poppie's), expires April 26,2000 123 W. Francis, Lot B (Vickery), expires May 12, 2000 214 E. Bleeker Street, new out building expires August 12, 1999 920 W. Hallam Street, expires February 12, 2000 735 W. Bleeker old house expires Oct. 14, 1999 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS 1999 1. 117 n. 6TH St. - Coulter 2. 920 E. Hyman Ave. Lot N Block 32 3. 435 W. Main St. Lot A-I Block 38 4. 930 King St. 5. 920 E. Hyman 6. 735 W. Bleeker 7. 234 W. Francis 8. 205 S. Mill 9. 210 S. Galena .ISIS 406 E. Hopkins .1.234 W. Francis 12.234 W. Francis 13.424 E. Cooper Ave. 14.234 W. Francis (Mullins) 15.DEPP 16.834 W. Hallam 17.2 Williams way 18.531 E. Cooper 19.134 W. Hopkins 20.450 S. Galena 21.710 N. Third St. 22.234 W. Francis St. 23.123 W. Francis 24.312 E. Hyman 25.930 King Street 26.117 N. Sixth 27.234 W. Francis 8.520 E. Durant St. 29.308 N. First Street 30.533 E. Hopkins 31.330 E. Main St. 32.315 E. Hyman Ave. Su Casa .121 N. Fifth Street .240 Lake Avenue 35.920 W. Hallam Street 36.332 W. Main Aug 11, 1999 Sara 37.400 W. Smuggler - July 14, 1999 38. 500 W. Main St. July 28, 1999 39. 121 N. Fifth Street July 28, 1999 40. 121 N. Fifth Street August 25, 1999 41.7th & Main Conceptual API September 8, 1999 42.426 N. 2nd St. Minor Review Sept. 8, 1999 43.406 E. Hopkins Ave. ISIS Theatre Sept. 8, 1999 44.426 N. Second Street Designation Sept 8, 1999 45. 7th & Main Street Conceptual Oct. 13, 1999 46. 205 S. Mill Street. Telecommunication Oct. 13,1999 47. New Bus shelter Oct. 13, 1999 48. 735 W. Bleeker, extension of conc4eptual Oct. 27, 1999 49. 114 Neale Avenue Minor Oct. 27, 1999 50. 7th and Main Street Oct. 13, 1999 51. 510 E. Durant Ave. November 10, 1999 . 332 W. Main Street Minor rear yard variance August 11, 1999 - 3. 616 W. Main September 22, 1999 54. 735 W. Bleeker-November 17,1999 55. 302 E.Hopkins September 22, 1999 56. 419 E. Hyman Ave. December 15, 1999 57. 212 W. Hopkins Ave. December 15, 1999 Resolutions 2000 01. 330 Lake Ave. January 12, 2000 02. 333 W. Bleeker St. January 12,2000 03. 221 E. Main Street January 12, 2000 04. 312 S. Galena January 26,2000 IlilliSTORE Pfl~SERÂ¥AF~ COMXMiliSSIZO)Il MEETING DATE: 171Â· D A-*--1) NAME OFPROPKI: /30 5- 6,8 b1/,4 6Â» CLERK: 9~Â£44 4 V STAFF: WITNESSES: A M E LA,ti 4. C A in (2) (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report C v}' (Check If Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice ( 1 (Check If Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet ( 2'(Check If Applicable) 4 5 MOTION: LKAL O-0 9 u.1 +~L,~4 0- h~~, VOTE: YES NO - I SUZANNAH REID YES Li NO MARY HIRSCH YES NO SUSAN DODINGTON YES / NO GILBERT SANCHEZ YES NO LISA MARKALUNAS YES 1.4NO JEFFREY HALFERTY YES 6/410 HEIDI FRIEDLAND YES 4 NO CHRISTIE KIENAST YESM< NO YES- NO - YES NO ' HPCVO'IE ~ 3 0 5 6 61 /4-LL- r-Ezim~71 Ila a 10,0 1 County of Pitkin } ~ AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATION . State of Colorado } SECTION 26.304.060 (E) I, Mic.&4*ABL 0 Alk) , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property with three hundred (300) feet of the subject \/\ ~ 3 property, as indicated on the attached list, on the day of , 199_ (which is _ days prior to the public hearing date of 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen . from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously 2000 from the 2 7 day of -JA Al , 199:..(Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. Nuct~cut C.Â«~O Signature (Attach photograph here) - - Signed before me this c~A- ~i day M \ C (4 ~1-- CA/A-~ \ ~ PUBLIC NOTIC B ' WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL DATEEBBIL My commission expires: 41 1-1- ) e TIME 5-6(21Â£ ~ ~ ~ PLACEJ _Adfi e U -r}+70*j .. ~ PURPOSEmn,1,1 Notary Pub}*Bss=*th, /2 - u_/ NY !'423~g;- 1 * ~ ~23%Â£ A Mi/,t.5.- 7,9 uv.\ OPâ€¢ W bar Sl AJR,"4'U%-/ CS,4.Plk' VUL.... A--, 7~an#1*lic' s SignAN@h N f JACKTE \ a ~ T.brro ~-~ ~ l LOTHIAN J # 9%2~F - I -11 - 11 dz'-20Â£2- 1 ACTION: Minor Review 130 5. GL|Lu_- All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet allfour Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by upto five (5) percent HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Standard 2: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereoÂ£ -W-A) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce 0hlson, Deputy Planning Director Jto FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 130 S. Galena Street- minor review DATE: February 9,2000 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to modify a non-historic entry shed on the north side of City Hall, which is a designated historic landmark. APPLICANT: City of Aspen. LOCATION: 130 S. Galena Street, Lots K, L, and M, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(21 for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: In 1974, a new entry shed was built on the alley side of City Hall. The e structure has a hipped roof so that snow and water drain onto people as they come into 1 Unibl 1.- 6 0 the building. The proposal is to extend the existing ridgeline to create a gable roof, which will shed water away from the walkway. Staff has no concerns with the proposal. Conditions of approval shall include a requirement that the new materials match the existing. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed changes will not affect the character of the neighborhood. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The project does not affect the historic significance of City Hall, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereoÂ£ Response: The entry shed addressed by this application does not detract from the 0 architectural character of City Hall, which is an industrial style building. The shed is located on a secondary fa~ade ofthe building and is set off from the historic structure by the fact that it is a different material. THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION Because this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the HPC is required under Section 26.420.080 to make a determination that the following standards are met: A. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use the property for its originally intended purpose. B. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, site or its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. C. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an 0 earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 2 D. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. E. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity. F. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures. G. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. H. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to, any project. I. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. J. Whenever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. Response: Staff finds that the project is consistent with the "Secretary of the Interior' s Standards." ALTERNATIVES: The HI'C may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3 â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that the proposal for 130 S. Galena Street be approved with the following conditions: 1. The new materials shall match the existing materials on the entry shed. 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 3. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 4. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated February 9,2000. B. Drawing showing proposed roof change. 4 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT FOR CITY HALL, 130 S. GALENA STREET, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID# 2737-073-31-851 RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2000 WHEREAS, the applicant, the City of Aspen, requests minor HPC approval for an exterior alteration to City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Lots K, L, and M, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is a designated historic landmark and is located in the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.09003)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and 0 WHEREAS, because this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the HPC is required under Section 26.420.080 to make a determination that the "Secretary ofthe Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation" are met; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated February 9, 2000, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 9, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of_ to _. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for the property located at 130 S. Galena Street, Lots K, L, and M, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the February 9,2000 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. The new materials shall match the existing materials on the entry shed. 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HI'C staff and monitor. 3. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC 0 resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 4. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of February, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney 0 Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Modification of Back Entry Porch Cover to City Hall 0 - .. .* I-) Extend the Front Section and -~ 1\0 ./ Structural Elements Per UBC Remove Front Section of the Existing Roof ~ i I l 11 11 11 11 11 0 11 '1 IL ------,--*.' , -7.-7- 1. - ..32..4.4 .....%.....%4 0 ROOF-MODIFICATION-9901 Ed/Illal A- B msTORILÂ©RESâ€¢veâ€¢â€¢Imil&$11â€¢ 0 MEETING DATE: NAME OF PROJECT: 5 0 / k) - PrO A i \n CLERK: ~'~ STAFF: 2- WITNESSES: (1) 96â€ž6dtutfÂ» (2) /Â»1,Â·MEÂ·/1., AL-V.iwi IN, ob 8--. 6. ~ - A 91 (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report 0-r(Check IfApplicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice ( ) (Check If Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet ( 4. (Check If Applicable) 4 5 MOTION: ~J- 1 3 - 7 66-v~44.--0 - r~1-4, 2u-.f U I' LL-,LRU u zv-.cu -A... 91+.v- /Ui-4,1. 4, Cu@L-Â« 6~ VOTE: YES NO .- SUZANNAH REID YES 4 NO MARY HIRSCH YES NO SUSAN DODINGTON YES -~NO- GILBERT SANCHEZ YES - NO - LISA MARKALUNAS YES t:/ NO JEFFREY HALFERTY YES ~NO HEIDI FRIEDLAND YES ~NO CHRISTIE KIENAST YES>0'0'- NO YES - NO - YES NO 0 HPCVOTE EXHIBIT 1-1 1&-9- 10Â« ACTION: Minor Review All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet allfour Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Standard 2: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Va. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce 0hlson, Deputy Planning DirectorWAO FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 501 W. Main Street- minor review DATE: February 9,2000 (Public Hearing continued from January 12,2000) SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to replace exterior materials and make modifications to two non-historic buildings at the Christiana. The Christiana is listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" which notes the presence of a very early 1880's log cabin on the property. Other buildings on the site include the main lodge, remodeled into its current appearance by local architect Charlie Patterson in the early 1960's, two Pan Abode kit houses built in the early 1960's, and the duplex and fourplex that are the subject of this application, which were built in about 1973. At the January 128 meeting, the HPC directed the applicant to simplify the proposed materials so that the buildings would not compete visually with the historic cabin on the site. Revised drawings are attached. APPLICANT: 501 W. Main LLC/Austin Lawrence Partners LLC, represented by Stryker/Brown Architects. LOCATION: 501 W. Main Street, Lots A-I, Block 31, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: Office Zone District with a Lodge Preservation Overlay and Historic District Overlay. Listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures." MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side 1 yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(21 for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The project involves a "facelift" for the two most recently constructed buildings on the property. The buildings are currently very simple in character, with low pitched roofs, stucco on the ground floors, log siding on the upper floors, and metal slider windows. Most of the exterior materials on the two affected buildings will be replaced, and large dormers, new railings and other decorative features will be added. Stone is proposed on areas of the first floors, and wood siding on the upper floors. All windows will be replaced, mostly with double hung, vertically oriented windows. The primary period of significance for the Main Street District is the mining era, the time in which most historic resources on Main Street were built. A major part of the character of the district though comes from the motels and commercial buildings developed as part of the ski industry. Generally, the buildings on Main Street are wood and brick for the Victorian era structures, and stucco and manufactured logs for the early ski era buildings. Staff finds no historic significance in the buildings proposed to be remodeled at the Christiana, and has no issue with the concept of the alterations as proposed. The materials have been simplified from the previous application. Log columns, "wavy board" siding has been eliminated, and there is less complexity in the use of the materials. Further information is needed about the appearance of the railings. Staff also recommends the HPC discuss the areas on the first floor of the fourplex where the stone veneer is only on one wall and does not wrap around the corners of the building. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Staff commends the applicant however for working with the existing lodge complex, which has been part of the history and character of Main Street for 40 years, rather than proposing to raze the structures. With the revisions to materials, the buildings will be consistent with the character of the historic district. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. 2 0 Response: The project will not affect the significance of the historic structure on the site, the Callahan log cabin. This cabin is not directly affected by the project and remains a good example of an early 1880's log cabin. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The project has been revised so that the buildings provide a simple backdrop for the historic cabin. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. 0 RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that the HPC approve the application for 501 W. Main Street, as revised for the February 9, 2000 meeting, with the following conditions: 1. Further information is needed at the February 9th meeting about the appearance of the railings. Staff also recommends the HPC discuss the areas on the first floor , of the fourplex where the stone veneer is only on one wall and does not wrap around the corners of the building. 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staffand monitor. 3. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 4. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated February 9,2000. 0 B. Original application. C. Revised drawings. 3 0 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT TO REMODEL A DUPLEX AND FOURPLEX AT THE CHRISTIANA LODGE, 501 W. MAIN STREET, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID# 2735-124-49-001 RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2000 WHEREAS, the applicant, 501 W. Main LLC/Austin Lawrence Partners LLC, represented by Stryker/Brown Architects, request minor HPC approval to remodel two buildings at the Christiana Lodge, 501 W. Main Street, Lots A-I, Block 31, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is located in the Main Street Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," 0 Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and 0 WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated February 9, 2000, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 9, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of_to _. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for the property located at 501 W. Main Street, Lots A-I, Block 31, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the February 9, 2000 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. Further information is needed about the appearance of the railings. Staff also recommends the HPC discuss the areas on the first floor of the fourplex where the stone veneer is only on one wall and does not wrap around the corners of the building. 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 3. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 4. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of February, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney 0 Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 0 Â£,729 192 ..9*3 . Â·A,1~ Â·2Â·9Ni~(- 52. 4014 01.'-3 IEWEE'E #. 04 \ .616,50 C , 104 . 13 - . t.0 49 \ ~7 , ~ 1 rÂ· 1. _ Z.b-~_ _'kÂ·2._-4~ < Jalp 200 404 Yfi 21..,10 3 1. - '4, \ 9 0 ...............A.9 . , \ \ I.Â·J.'' 'Kâ€¢.#. '1 -_ i i . -I-- - ~ ... ..._.. ...... ..__.._-............-.~1 ...4/Ke.'P....._-_ Â·Â·' ------0- 1-T---7 %.. 0. 11 \ (IlÂ· 1 9,4/I .0 I ' ~ N '5 09'111 270.00' +A . 0... 0 1 . 74#- \ I Al .7/ It'. 1 \. - , i I #2.1.#Â£-- 1 1 '1 4 . 111 \ 11 + 0 1 - y . T \ -- 1 61 \ / t.11 1 7 - , I 1521- l d ; f \ U. --j. ' , 4\ 1 LA 41. â€ž1 4.i'. i ' C i I \ \ 9. \0 1 '0 to ,â€¢.. G : t--1,- r Trj 1 .. 7,1.3 - 1 ~~- \ 19.4)41': '. 1 \ -O z t - 1 +091% 0 4... 1 \ 1 % 1 ! .0 1 - 6 - \ 7 .1 . \ k'. _ ,+ r,> ../ r-1,- 011: EyÂ¥.@39 .i' 1 - 0 .1. ; . 1 0 -- to,[Iti@--1 44 JAA I 34 1 194,-lifx 1~ Â·%4"6 -~p*ig i *1&4 d iÂ· 39,~~ - 3.:s. f i e,'Â°Â° 1 42 - - 1 2%. --12,%. 1 1 tj5-% 74:'-Â°Â° so .9. L.1.-- 1 -- e ./ ~ 1.-row< r .~ .~ ~ ~ ~ 1.. \ 11 \ f '.1 ,..1 1 \ 1 / 921... 41 / ,. 1.11 4 1 .91 I \ 1.. 4.4~41., 1 259*Â®i. ... - 0 75 09'111 270.00' '1* 1.Po ! 1 6 ... ea. All?/ 1\14 ZAP '7144_61-lfoÂ« 'FIC <6 0~- 01 /6k~' 224 I 2- - 3 0 / UJ WId / in 46 1 1 5<6 ~ L 2 1 CK<Pisge'On CL 40<44_ ~~,â‚¬24=iri INÂ· -p.,712:-41 .. $,0 4/1 Â·p~-75 ~''I.V ~<1912' 17,1 fi brown e e 177 or ARCHITECTS . - ----.--- e C ' ' A ~ A-d HORIZONTAL LOG ' 114 0 tz* 0 1 bil . 1 - '1 1~ i Â·li; i 1 r HORIZ. WAVY BOARD CEDAR SHAKE SHINGLES - iii "Il !1 12 1 1: .1 4 2 T-Â·:i~ Eli flif--1-â€ž Li_]1 rqI WOOD EDGE TRIM I - Z-0 - = j b- -1. ... 1.,1. 1 . 'F- 1 109 0 - 8"11 VERnCAL LOG - 11---Â· --- -- ---- - -0- - 1.- 5>' L~ 39 " 'R Â·-Llkl,=r-1-2 1 5 . -- 7 -T=-1--1- 'â€¢â‚¬~ ~rn- - 2 X 12 WOOD FASCIA . ROARD 27i-~rrit , DE==rE L--1 -]C- ~ !. ~. 1 'f 1 11111 - le VERTICAL- BOARD & BATTEN 1. 0 1 r==1 MI--74 11 13 d Pr I 'lu.j' 0 1.U----12!L 5 14 Q: 111 1 Ii=GU . e 11.,,0 1 1 5 1 100Â·-(r -1-1 lc==1 1 9 - --Â· e CHRISTIANA 501 West Main Street Aspen. Colorado WEST ELEVATION DATE: ISSUE: 12/21/99 HPC APPROVAL 126'Â·6' 128- 1 Ill 1:.1 11 1,41.1 . ' -+ CEDAH SHAKE SHINGLES ! I I Il" 1 1 11, ! i .. 127Â·V 1 1 11.1. 1 -4?Me - . iii.1 '~ ~- :~: : -a>--~=c.'/'"' .ef?;Tal/8793'rzrrr.r".LL-2,2...F :~~' ' 1 ;1i/- LÂ·Ll I ..12 -2-4-*T.L i 4- -EXISTING ROOFING 1 1 Â· Â·. 1/1., M Vt'Ant Â· 11*r-OÂ· !11 1 ' 1 1 v-----.0--L.-Â·000/~, 1 ' 1 11:, 1; t 1L-- CEDAH SHINGLES , , , --- - 1 , L.-1 Ir -1'--,THIN Ill lili a=-Mil rot 21' 11. p--Liz 1 It I I Di Ill- - - ~j)4*4 L- 11 4-4.11.-Aurful , 1 It - -: 1 i i Â· 111 f j M n, M 111 0, 1 , 111 111 m 11-1 ' 34> '09,0- THUF~ f ~ . 1 -- 44*44*Iill . f . . 1.11 - -....1 1 11-1 LittI-trl/Â·== =-1 1 1 HI Ill Ill 1 11 111 111 lit 111 1 11 11 - - ...1- * - .... I . -- - -0 11 1 1/ 6 111 1 1 L ; -1 5 455-//9![t%Â£aar~~LL.1 ' 12'1| VERTICAL LOG 3 1 .j:~i i , 1 ': ~- ~ ''~ ~~~ L | Â· BOARDS BATTEN Duplex 1.4 9 1, 1 1Â·- 16- VERTICAL 4 4 fr - 4 , 1, 1/TE /_. 1 h . 1 f West Elevation South Elevation 0 4 1 1 L._L.] t]1-lll-I.irrtitrUCT/ncrilll-/ 1 *, MAY = 1 }WEibW~WEECii!0280: l_ 2% 1/fr , 1 0- SCALE -r-,AR, A 3.1 fit;* O*Â· - 794* . i *0*-t:.LIZ ' 1%Â· V. .~~1. 176' 6 '.3 e 17'i' 9 brown 0 Â¥, K Ste 0 A.VA Â· . .. ARCHITECTS - EXIST]NG ROOFING 1.6 .....4.-4 ' , , . .1 ~ ' -,/ 8-~ HORIZONTAL LOG ...L.r-+rL'.r r |18--0 ' 1 1-ill LIA % Â· / Â£*Tjal 1 WAÂ·JIL{\ c - , :1Â·Ve*, 2...l... *4414* r. .0 Uit--1 i 1 1 .1 -4.27-'it.12:Â» Â· Â· CEDAR SHAKE SHINGLES , T T: --- I .AUN ~ ' r.,-....... 1 Ik 11 1,- 5 J 11 \ 11 1. . 11 - 8- HORIZ. WAVY BOARD ~ #dY Â·â€¢-Â·t-4. m 11 ,- 2*4 WOOD EDGE TRIM +. t. r.. =4 - 1-iM ./</0- 6--Limr-Â·p- 1. .1 LrrllffIE H,1 , 12-# VEATICAL LOG 1,1 11, . logo. Â· 1 1 , F. #69â€ž.F 2344,/lifr ~ 2,44--Â» r - +---1---i x,iWOODIASCIA i,/ 4 I f Â· 16-VERTICAL - BOAHI} BOARD & 8ATTEN 41 , -0 n 11 ~1- - -- ---~1 N 0~1 - n 1 U 1 -- 4- RIVER nOCK VENEER . ' . I . 2Â·-1 ./.m- . LAY 4:, : -gue.*92. .. 1.. CHRISTIANA ~~ .:Â·:Â¢4:; -1-(2.I- 501 West Main Street Aspen. Colorado EAST ELEVATION 9.1 .26=ly-~.-/4.-:1/8</:i.-- 126 6â€¢ $30+1 44*+ANE~. i. . 125'~0' DATE: ISSUEÂ· r:Â·~Â·Â·i-~- ~~ir- ~01 :. ".,E?421 1 .1 1 111 : 1 1- 1 CEDAR SHAKE SHINGLES 12/21/99 HPC APPROVAL 1 Ill ' .. '22Â· tr 1 1.1 1 1 - A-./nfror/Asivrror/al.'zÂ·~ fl.0 -11 1,/ 1 - EXISTING ROOFING _-00-,0~ 11 I i T 1 1 , 7A ,~LII11LiI.-IInmâ€že.-_ __0-_1.--4177-TfT-NTT-7177171 ,21h~ N 1 11- 111 11 TH I -1-Tr-.. - Â· Il ' 1 U,---' 11; 111 111 111 111 11 115-0. iii iii iTr-T-Tr->râ€¢r iii iii iiiÂ»ri iii 11Â· iii iii iii ip W tri ,!11 ./ *r122**EÂ©haii i ~15*0**11;'LE --1 ---r 1" i iU-111[19 -- 8*Yeor'llot I :- -2[-111 111 1 11 111 U U 1, F CEDAR SHINGLES 1 ': E WAVY BOARD sh--*-2 W,U.1-Aul,1, 4.~~ 1 I e--- 12.' VERTICAL LOG - 8-~ VERTICAL LOG --Ti IttÂ·i:Fit . 103'-0- 777] ~ vi-h~TE] le,.r r-Â«4 UL_Ill 11) 111 Ill 111 HI IU UL_lU f 11&,1 16' VERTICAL I BOARD & BATTEN ----UL--_11 1 P 1 11 1 4Â· RIVER HOCK M*22**24 ~et--- > |~~Z- VENEER L=] 111 , 11 111 111 Ill 111 J 11 11"./SM.. ..' -UITIA :RE111=UNRAVJ" 1"&"1 ~" "' "1-" 1 '~~~~~ ~~~ U-/Ulp?/k... Â·--Â· Â·Â· .Â· Duplex =. .*V,hundm'tmrih. %4-tri InY' 'i' ~44~4Ii, - In :j , ~ , East Elevation . , f u,qi ni H, i':I '*IÂ·Ulb 4Wf,I,,0,CIL'~,,91, i, 100'-4 , '11 .,1 , lit - -- North Elevation 42/"11"; Lio .4-..5 4-Â·t. â€ž:4.. . -4 - 1/8- = 1'0. SCALE 1.1 471; I .....W.//4emIL .C'. . Alli'MICy*ik--?</Y21rt...LÂ·Â·â€¢ ' <*2 6.'I: .R - A .2 0 ' . . 4. 1 1 J.6 '70 I f '.1,4..Clal .1 1 - E C - 4 brown 1/7 0 e I.1 lan /2,/Â«: 1.' :, 1 ARCHITECTS &29- F Ils'IN. 1Â¥,r * 1/7.8 ... 414 e -- VjÂ¥* + , It 1. lil 111 111 Ill 1,1. . i .falljile - /261 2 X 17 WOOD 1 ASCIA , 1 ."e 1180 0 . It 1 41. - - CEDAR SHINGLES 4 - T~ ill , r r . -- - 12'f LOGS IMEDmE 1 ./. 1 . 1 (8'-0- .-11.rk-44./ F 1 -- 0 â€ž1. ':Fi,F.-1 ?61 1 0,"- .- 7 /4622 -b=h\ E/F -- 16' VERTICAL BOAHD & BA11Â£N i~*w- -I \ 1 i -- - -D r ,- 1\1 N - '. t 1~1-' ~ .li- E- F f --- 1 1~ I - 1 1.1 2.1.- 1. - I -- 1_L . 1 - 1 7..0 f 1 - i , i -. mr FT ./ , mil ' I ' e CHRISTIANA 'Â·Â·Â·*S-*t 100-0 ; :,tt. L , 501 West Mah Dell Aspen, Colorado 7:Â· EAST ELEVATION , r.1 01Â· ~ DATE: ISSUE. 127'-0Â· 1.14 mÂ© 12/21/99 HPC APPROVAL 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 . 1 , 1 - CEDAR SHINGLES 1 .:t 1-9: CLMILH" 'Â·r '--'L!...Â·111:,1.-r'-r-'f~*7~... ' 1 127-8. r,J~4__' -L_ 0 7 1:--T- = EMISTING ROOF 11 .1 1 1 1 . 1 ./1111.. '.I 1 1-/ 111. . . - 1 111 .... p ty'.> 1 ; /"t!'. 1., :.4 *4.,li '.,1..'. 111 U.e-, 1 ., 2 X 12 WOOD FASCIA ttEÂ·0~ ~~~1-Â·r- 1 4-- 0 wr7111 Re 1 11 1 0 -- )11 -i .-I , m Ill!~ 1.. 8:' WAVY BOAAD ___ ----1 - -----1-4-- -<- -- CEDAR SHINGLES 21= --D - ...,eÂ®E '' .===1 - 1 ti /=F76-7 -, i ilii' 1 - . " . ---IM- ..22 4 - - . - - 0 =quEEI[I . = i...1 1 il<..#9 .../F.1 L=-=I 'TH.kiltiNH litltinTRTITh.... * Â·--cazifff:Â·IHH -- 12.1 LOGS 1 11 lili 111 - -1 11 109-0' Si, 0 1 *takikikil Â· --- - - 16. VERTICAL - . ////*41, //I.*4 1--<,1 ---- - BOARD & BATIEN . .-- 7 11**Â·:45&. I "../ U Â·=I=r=== Ir-=~ === ~~ r------/ , - En ======r 1 L 1 1 Four plex I ...Ka@314>1:j/Â·-i 4 01 , r=rcnnI 1 //â€žâ€ž,ill:,li/,;,/,/ 8 1-1. =.1 ; 11 , L-_-Â·Il 1 1- East Elevation 12====t i .-iri==.Ta 13' It,0.-0- South Elevation , ===c== 1 , - It 1 .1*: 1% 11'.0- SCALE I 4~ i.i.**' ,=01.3,4 SOUTH ELEVATION A 3.3 6, . -- 0.9 , . #9.1,1 i. 2.Â¥ 3. ~ 127 0- 1 1 11'1~ 'illiNGt I Â·4 brown ..f- - 77 8- -- - - 1 *,Slt#.110,/ - ..0. :.I ARCHITECTS 4--// - _1.LL--L~~- ' ~ '1% 17Â¥~tin FA54,Â·IA , t - -0 ' - -,/ Athjty 118 0 . , - . . 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 .,.. CEDAR SllINGLES 2.em,36 -=-MAA -- rimniflibITI, 111 Itt 111 111 111 111- 12Â·~ LOGS trFFi'VAT/,0#11 Ill 1 1 1 Ill 111 111 1 -~ \/ATili21 A ) ) 1,1 111 111 1 ,44.Wk -'9. Mâ€¢>ai~~Ul~411! - - -1-1 - *47 , 8' WAVY BOARD 244%* 39, -Ill.-I .-I.-I. 4 t= '2:*c, Â·*t 100' 0Â·Â· CHRISTIANA 501 West Man Street Aspen. Coloodo 2.â‚¬444. WEST ELEVATION AL-- . r :tz ~ DATE: ISSUE: 50: .,-104 127Â·-O --------- -- -- 12/21199 HI'C APPROVAL 1 1 ' ~ _ CEDAR SHINGLES i T.,:, i'll j: i'J ' Ill .1 *. EXISIING ROC* 1 11.,11 â‚¬:*i: , 1 --- '1 1-1 If '1 0 44?41 1 1 I' : --- - r-rÂ·Â·TrT--1 1-T TI 1 111 It I L---1 LL--_11 1 11 . m'Tin. gn- ._.-- 2 X 12 WOOD FASetA . Blit- 10rmr-7--72' 1 -11'---- -- 110Â·-0~ , - I ~J~~t)&Hy~. '' r.'Ul- ... - ----.6-- ... - -0 ..2 ..1-. -'.----4 ..... ..-......... ......-â€ž.1 - -*. . -.-- -.-- --.- -e- , 4...0 , - 1 .lili 1 -jil, 1 M .*A-- 46 . 8194#'r#46Â£174"rT41474/T22411 11 1 t, 81'1111-- Ir-1 Tr-Frl 3 11 1 11 1 11 1 Il 1 11 1 0 1 11 11 11! I 11 lili CL .IN. It! 1.lili. '79 - 44$ '111111~1~1 1~~111'~111'111 "211111 '/1, '~'646-Â·Â·'Â·H~ ~===, IN. ... -_.- ---Â· - CEDAR SHINGLES .*Il_ mrni in ni in â€ž1 111 111 111 111 111 111 Ill__111 1 111 I lili 111 Iii 111 111 11 1 111 1 U lit 111 M littill.U-hanT[r ~ 11 Ill 11 111 111 111 111 )11 111 111 Â·~111!ime#Mt In#66E9fEtrnt17,5Tt~Ah&#trtf79' "' "' " L_~0~ ~***r~ - M 2,;'71-7 1 12.1 LOGS ,=3.,4.-1_Ii Ill 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 1 109-0. - - IKTRFI'IN*RArlit 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 Ill It! 111 111 111 It! - -1. 42' #/ 1 1 \% AV Â» 1 11 1 - ' 1 -- -- - ------- 16' VERTICAL fill, L- \ 1 1 BOARD & BATTEN /. 9.rLY-,-1 =A ~ - 1,1':f West Elevation 1~1 14 1 11 - , 1 ," '., . --k i i 10Â¢Â·T North Elevation 9â€¢14.0. - fil,752 93*44 1 11 1131215:iallu. Olitk i~Il 1 11 1 O 1# 127Â·El trrIC#*-**62-M--rt , i, in i i iii 11 ~ 1 1 1 11 --i -- WYn~IWYrrur'. 19;*AN##AA . Ak - .lf i _ - Four plex 0 %23-N.-02Â· 18- = 1\O SCALE ;4~tiI, 3.14'51 3-9 NORTH ELEVATION A 3.4 AV, -*1 En . Â¢55*iff#~ > 7/244,9 45-9.14 dti t f 4,4-> 47Â£5#72#44 4IT 11 4 Tfl ?b/*9 A dr41"#-Efedi. 1\1 %--SKM- ~ $.-I --7/ ~~-FI_ u il--01 #F~ Â·:1 l. li~ 'f~*]DUFfij_ij; 1 - -IiI 1/ , r] - 144 0-v--rÂ«_t:Â£ill --_-- 6-itt 19Â«*GUOIF[1 1 111 - 41. P - 1 - --......-----'..... ---77 - ... 1=-+4 rf~t-jf,-1-219,- I Itf Fi ~ fj{Pr j=- â€ž~i i.1 - -~Â«*:= --511 _---3--i -4-~- -~11-- -444)j~ Avu-fi-TliLi1121V-fri-Ir:[ri.11--- 111~~al ~3- w-_~ ~--fâ€ž,L_---_4Â»-Â«~P- 31â‚¬-Â«t-{_ ji------Â» f~-L#t54&22*~6&#-~TfjfbT?g â‚¬{i#2~~~Iligil ,/ --- - -~- i~'~Ij -.- ~ ~"~ ~~-. [ELÂ· :., 21 L 1 -YIJ'~'r TED OI:.Ii.1=1[.l i Â·. 1 UJ 11 td ; 1 -.r i hi M --- 1 -L- J r .dJ ........-.- .~ ~------f 220231 24=1710]]Â»1=41-i=/4 k-ri -idlf.]F~ -_ r=mr~~~132]~44 956=dL.41=11 F--~1 -1--- '1 --~734 --: ~tipli~.[:]UQ~LE/*1/I -g~1 <<<- i~-~=~~~~~4kÂ»-=41Â·:*~~Â»RÂ«- fqi - 002 - 3551 1 T- p2-7-11-- --1'f-" 1 4 1 1 1,5 0 \ 1 * I A /1I 241 (LL 4-- O . fjf~Â£,4~=\13\I<11%*~ - / r Nt -- -*t | Tvon.ft-TION-Tig:=4[ 1 ... \0\. \ 234=1~114%1814[14#L,-11~ 1.ill 44 -1~;~=21 --lj~~ ~~ I ~. Iblf~ --1- '129 U .11[r .1-11,11 I Ili )E,ilÂ·|- Ilf~,~it : 1 li I 1 H $: ~p_ i l~:j:~Ji ~==L - - 217 .f 2-4-ilitl 1 1 k.u.â€ž4-fil j 1 7/ .- ~F 461 * 1 - 1 .- r -u L..6-Lt i.4-1:Ull... 1-l 11 0_01-FSHME~*Ii f-t][1~Jr~1 -i~-ic-.62f.DC.#-If 266~~ 1 r EEL-4 -9- / t. f -3 i i -9Â» - i h puuÂ»33[139*f El-=i=~14Â£6 71*7 - -2 449*3 31. 0*04#4 -icÂ»=~WELL>--61 u:=- ~--~~2.235~-Â»55-0--~- --LÂ»PLILI- J J rÂ·=rÂ·= i- 160 . ~ __ __.~_~- .- IL-JL.-Di ==- e--=1-41-i-?-43=Ly- Â£-~ 1 1 21 1 ..Â·') f ,- r &/' L Ir ,- 1 LL./1 __..,..,-in,Tit13IX mES.*,46---- /VÂ·-â€¢â€¢~------ --fl*nlu-*.,â€¢â€¢~,i'447 Â·i U~Uk.U A - / ---r:--//44;fiezil#:piti'*99;Lfle#'IikÂ·4Â« 494 02/1--/if 19Â»zoi=*1-6 - - g [I 7 1 1 i--------= -- - --~~Â«773%npia -,~,-, - re----- I~~-...... 111 ---- -1 d. iff Il'I.'fll-L Â·711'-[l 4-1 7- 1 1 1,11.111 1 ==t== - =]11- 11[ti--il == ==:t:.1: .N rk 411 1 2<:. F lv.U.Fitj'| 1 r - b j JO 1- :. ---11-1 1 - LI [1 -. f 7 11 -1 1 -Â»3 T 1 J Â·Â· - 1 11] 22-1-2-Â»Ifr=21 -lt -) ~ ~ ~ - i =~ ~---,111 ~229 JÂ£ 111 ~ ~ - -~ -" ~-~ uprnacr_----ziJ[-El - .RE,C==/ki =LIU-=3 J - -61-222-Â·-=hOO- 4 'l[ I ... .. .Â· r r =c;t---11 - : ----==L-- 2 - LEÂ« z 4 9 w 1/7 LIC L- 1-7 1/1 2 f ~ ##-*/*2%6%2~.%~....p..%....7-.\0~ 1%A-1 Â»24,7 â„¢. %/ $ .. I 4% . k. .. -**Â·-.VV. %>,246 ili li; I I / Â·*v ~Vk\< tried#*: p â„¢*2~,634/&/IK ./.XÂ£X//V/*I,Il# 39:1341-33$-*.. -Â» 3 1, *BÂ»h#*Â»1*4~*2%,QÂ¥**4~X:~â€¢.Â¥d~Xf,>24>4Â¥-â€¢4>.I 44/ 4 9~--1- -2.4:JlÂ·Â·(25Â£02;941$*~4~~~~ 4**1*1"~*%~.1kw#*A#I+MNT+*AptÂ»,.ZE:. 1, Câ‚¬) - -r~>Â·~~-&02 2*:prp=> -2==-#.+~r 2 5F joyfâ€ž--*+3-0 - - fig: '~0~(Ofe~Li- ' -#*Ah'.=---.----- 11 ..1/1.11/in ki" 44-1-1-li i 12494't 7.02 /9.34 *2-:til imy la ~~ 'Qi'./:/*'/* E -eme<E:Ki'. 1/:':In/:1/9**2,31/1/ C.t.Â·:f â€¢,>Â· fÂ·i:,~/./.r :le.~::.:: r. *Â© 1293-1 *. â€ž,16 11'El{ alli~ilfâ‚¬%111 ..t 15 ./6't m" 0" : trfloqi-ilillifiletr./* E. . El 13 .1 . El */ i 12.81 ~ i ill f ~i 04% i i 1% .1- 0(4 3. 11 . 13 .mr - 4 D...... .'6{*~..tif -- Â« - -1 tor -u -'*.*1#069 6.41.,a. 4,>77*i:#36975:6916'06<1 6. 1 / ./,*2/ ':02. v v.1.'4* *'4214~'***f~fi#**MW .w'W. 4-=re,M,M.-'-1<5Â£0*ffldÂ£*TLFA1,69. i 11*, st'.0.. - . 3314*1119- f#2*:PeskÂ» E."*40 - . 0%416 (0*0=: #40, 111111i3. - t=."kel= - . amy~~~~Mitit f~*Fijg~ "11 i .21* 940 ip 1-.8 EN 11 i Â·si' INA': I.~Sit am= %08&53*:m/////76Â«-47~ 1â‚¬ 10Â¥ 53 A t â‚¬ C63 0 n .4 11 54 R . *Ar' 33 - m et; 4 ' 4 - I il Pl SM ki:~â€žÂ·*4. Â· ud : â‚¬ ' * I . :'. 0 7/31 j -Â»ft. 14 4, . 533'<Â» : :1 4%44 *0* * 11 4-- : __*__~__m n 139 Pr ~><Â« -- [ff , Mc~c=L Jl 13=lE__ir[JIUU]Ez_%8~Im[1_._1 cILIEL~ i "T-11 F164 ET-111r--' 1 r-mr--- 11Â· -1--Il[ r=....--~' 1 fT== P--- LL--1 .EL_dr--==--[3'-- I! -L~123 |Efi.23=U--99.-â‚¬Â£Â»Â·JGRpatÂ·. I: -]FR=+ . 1 1 E -{1937: : I i. f-1 i---t'_'9'13 f-1~1.[~1;r~7 [.1 111 - ' I. ''' H'-I.â€ž. 1,Â¥. 11 i frn)]1=17 Ir-- 1 F [[Â£: i j p p- Ul li L I L,|._Â©F r; ~ . 'Cilg01Il 1 1471'r k i 1 -- 1 1 'r 1 . t 111 lil i 11 *Ii i 1- 1 4 IP' rl '11 -1 â€¢ I I,i IllIF I. 1 L_]12 ' '..12--.ui il 'il~731.1' ~~ r Ii' i LE-1~11}f?YA~Irin -7==- Â·=il _p_. Yd-u-Ht-Milk:===4=---,~L~~~ 1 *fi'Ll==14 ~ir . - *77Â«1.1 12 EFFEEÂ«*33Â«EFTyEUrTETEFFEEÂ¢g n-CUINI]r~Al-31 TT'-Tri trli- m...Or-trttllf JII-ir *-Lr, r-4 , 1 11 1,1 ill 111 1,! 1 I.' 4)Tr~tif2i~~4~1~193J-F~=I---~-L*â€žr.I h.i,1 "'i J I~W-1~QfhEd*~ fÂ«14Â»tpo _-'(<.....____________........~.. _~~____~~~---- .Q/atzpfipt#4*4uj_4 _313 Ct-_I/2 I staLEEkO=097,9 4 - rl 1 --J-- 1 TI-ltifl -E-~ ~110-1----- r-- -- - L & M * 1 11~1~,11;~~~E.-i;il~~i] </ 0 1 0 1 1 ; 8 I I'l.~EEZEZZIEBEEZEU ' .- -~--Â·Â·---Â·-- -Â· - --~ 1.21Â·41.Â·.L-U_-1.Llâ€žL! 5_d-.U_:,_1 11.-1 ,L-111' lij . 1 t*~1_, -J:~ 39 ~quÂ©yA ~' I MA~- - --- - 1 pun.. ~-_$-5 i. 2 - - -<1 Â«2=1 22]Edu 1 . . 11..2--III=q ~UZZLIZZLIZE-21_ I ... ...1 6--L-R C]! I rl-----| U_i- tr - _{*L_Fo23~92/ kqci.__1 -4 )f t -) 2% 1%11 c 11/0 11 11 0./ 1 â‚¬ 11 9/1 -. el L.1/' 34 -/' Â«41. f j 1- 1 - h r-'lE=9[]Crl -111 1 IL - 11>di-[[-/ 1 L__i 'E---'' . 1 --+9--: EÂ¢JJI~I Lfg i Aft.rI -'.. in t==== L_U ~1 1 I lili Il J,:i ,t=- 21-1 - -=E=z-/ - ; ~ -38.1-YO 14 . - --:or=i=rt:-97-r-i=~r - - t X - 141.1 L H f.y.91. /1-4-1 r33Â»*394~~â€¢rlâ‚¬-114Â·Â·r'~I*I~of~I.I9T~ T~Â»pittoT*Â¢4~041 -~T- -.~-l-7-7 V; _ w_.-u_4621651 9 fo: 25rl n- - /4//4*~ilt//1 - 0 Vw . 417*Lor-Tn:I~#044 ~LF ' --~~~~~r--itt~rÂ©GUff~-1933Tf~'I i 75,47,ntjffI~]_?I, ~~~~~hzj 7Â·ti-17-IÂ·7Â·r r ' i ji ~ ~ I -'11 1 lid .: L.1.1 i 1 11 r[Zilt[.1[07 i ~==~ Tlt}rhI~'1 121211.2412 twk'. E _~indliI]NITIf- ~ r]Â£9 ! T-T ~'T 1-I-'-~~404itdul--LI LiL'~4ij u.-0.- -3 I.....I-1-1-3 --- ~- 11 - ti 11 11 11 11 _ 11-- IL 1 r===========1 i 11 It 11 111 1 Il~ =dll [ %12= -] '1 11[11]~ 11111111 1 Il 11 111 1 -- IL1_l! ----------VLUF ull.Â¢%7Â«~ ii ti " i Il i rÂ·- --- i: Ti 1%2211 r=T-'ir-----------Â·1-,=' --1 Ill lili h i r - .-670211Â·14 :1\ f -/ / \/ V' r 1/>7.11 â‚¬ 1 L.liti-71---- p .aa.~- . - f - , t----3f--4-*4'.,- - ---- 11 7 -lk 11: 1 4 , ./ 11 1 0. ./ r U 1 \ 1Â· , - -- - ----- ==1 -- t \\\: A. I ' .E .r ...'-.....................~~~4:....... ~~..........ILL.... ........, -.-......=22=2.399% 11[ /'6 i'jil 4.-,0- ANI #i Â£ f /19- 11 9 *w Â·A ili 111 4 1 1/1 Lj i 0/10 H 1. Ill 1 - IHI 141 FI-- T Ti i | I Ir-'3- r 3--li 1 11 Il 01 -- - + -1--- - -lit,pt 7 1 - 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 111 4 jf~1/ J := 1 1 1 4/'' â‚¬ /..A 1 1 dll \ 64 .' 11 j h AC._-at- 11 :. ine ' ull rÂ·\2 ' 64 il Ah., \ :2 ... .4 '.=1--- .I# '2- 1 11 1 1 1hlf--17-l ; 30 =1 6 r L [' -"" 3.----- ----"--- --TE--- 2 --- ---#--31 .. ... r - I . , . 14> 61 -izj__t k &49+ - --~:~~.-~::.~~~~~~~~~E i . ....4 -Ck . 11 94 - 2 h ff .2 1-=â€¢=1--==m=Â·===m/ 41Â»31 \ 1\\ ~jrt--Â·'ru-Ui---\ 6 \ 441 HPIM r-77-0-1--r-;-4.-3..7 /1 - .... *=-11 -- 2-- ' .:=rU Â»4- p-LL - 1.111 - 1,1 -7--1 tr-4 A..1/ / M ./. . 1~Fi-5-.--'Flifkvb,#f~/ ,-1-~ 1.-r I FLL-:1-~19FRA1)4 z Prl~~LJ1-&Â·rri --~lf~ftÂ« c. fi--iL-r-I...1=:t~~~~LErâ‚¬L"11 F Flft**3*===::EL@528:P , 1â€ž-1 1 1 14 ... . T .4 1 3'llix, 5ill rl I i : Ij'111 11. i 4. Il r/'i///71'jill 141, f f '/f///iii 1/ i /1/ f Ii,jillit; 4 li iii I '' i . ~ 1 r : IiI ' 0'jill'/1/0/111 l'~1'jilli 1 f ~~Li- F V# / i j' i 1 11 L==1_'1 b. i 14 1 1 ~j . .1 j' i I j .Ij'. / 1/ f// 1 i/- It dii i lili '111 Il Â£ f / d_.2 1 'j wl j ,1 i 1 1 ya lilip! 11 . *, A 1- 1 4 1 . 1 141:lilli\ 11;111,\ f 1 \ .\........ ............................... .. J 1 I // 4 4, HACT; 1' 11 J= /7 2.%. 2 50 11 / ~ ./%PX*j#Fia#~*,i...ip#=PA~~i#F&;f$04664:~:~\Spa'Zf~931-Â»- r- - # I t#.VILin<. 3 g 1 ZE 43 i 9 5; Frslill #~3 a Mic' I' ~~--I~=r% *.....W-- Â· -' ~ - e.-49 - -4 ./ /4,4*21# I 11:'.44(i :6, Â»: 6 2, 1.s* r . 2, ...arl/&1 __ 0, - Rm'll'll".'IM M.... '28).'' 449*#1' 5,1-1.- Il .P~ 1-/1, \ , au %,tp#*2 ' M 4- 2 , ill"/5.# 4/4/1 3 . 1 i ...1 iF-- ~ 1 3 .... ls@4 34 0Â· '6Â·Â·Â·* I. Â»,ass. Si r :r . 9% /8 : 433'/re a k .. 1 . i. 11 - 1 m U. U t e-tit '" 1,1 111 1,1 :1, 11 |gr ' TI 1 - L_i -a Â·r,antÂ¢tnt#nbotit*%Â¤Mtit,Â£5GfitÂ¢ltitwicizi511~ 4 >44~tiGHiEM,<YI.IilIIil[Ii*:194[4II>Â¢MI:j~-~44%Â£104*Ir340.II,641.~5t[It{29 3Â©CI 023 1.*Y-'tÂ¢y-~ : 1 ," , - ~ rn'~-TTI .[ il ~ 1 $ ~ , l_ j U U..L_-#PS&f/11&121 ... ~augra=Emrz~~~rr-T 4-1.-CRI*Ji.~~~teg '<20-42-r ~ Liff-ft- 242 1 ~:U 1.i' T_,Idfi&62~~~~4~%~ij~~~~ 1 T myrlj ~~23&L=.L.1-L--'- --- i~*f.:: 1 1-lifi 4244tpr tltdgEEL?- -1- 1_ - UU7/rifismialt//I/FILÂ£4Ii /!: -Â·:IttuttEIC , ' :tur....nthict*-2**-~ 41-1..4 1~It? 1'- Tr. - z....ktht:I*.1.1 I flfif'flt-11Â£ fl. .1. 1~7 ' TI -9-1 309Â»11--M -Â«,1 'll I I i 1 J.Lt..1 .. / 1 j 1 1 Â®1 i I .4,1 h 1 I,it. i :r 4 I ' i' jÂ·i-) i,tÂ·ici L,Â·47 11-11 7-2- 1 1.-11 n.'INE 1 02==lili 1 -, 1]tl'JII]h~_ri 1.'h - I' ~ r----1 11 4-: -1 1 4 Ulul..,r-1~ 1 i LF ri.-ir"p VE-{13:LIE]11 ~ 1.-ill / 9 1 11 i i 1 1-- SMI,-Â©2II-LTUCL=~~141rVVIiI~I~| E-3 1 11.t[Â£ t[Tr.:1~[IJIb i ,-1 ,, i 2%]72-= 1 220-1401-.Ii H..11!T- !T'Â·l E--f : : E LE=Ezz=z~#==:==:~.!==irr-12--'-il IF==== Inri-[TinÂ·t.litrÂ·2-44-1-'-4Â·Prrq 1 i - :-111 + 1 1, 411 119 1 .0- * 9 , ro-IZIT-TTT-TTT-rEI7171--3=-r-Tr-Tr7-IIUIT-'' "- '7'T'"TTI - " : . 1 i.f- i 11-131121ILJ..1-F -Ll._1] ' . ........... .--M-.-11-m-----1m-.~+#1+M. WWj-W~jWj&j~ 1 . Â· 'In - 1 11 Mr ril--- -=- --1 Il.i .~-P' 1~ ~~*gjft-+IffinÂ«i~~ 4 r I~ .am. 11 .TJ [,-lIt 1 li-~~-----6- u- int['12#-1 11. 1:r2'Ill F~-'ii -- f:i. 11 1 1 -- i rk 1 : f l Lau=2=2.84 4,1 J - 1 Il' ~~~~.I'.,~~i~~-I IL.. 11 1 d - - 1 1.lpic/%10 611 ?4'. qi.] 1 Lk-~ 134 i i - 1 '11 .bi.h ' 5 )'ripj-.Ill.1*- - - 21#1141 1,41111.1 htf2-4&432&39841-JI~,~376.-LJEIrtÂ»RK*%*44Â£-411ij~ ~1%44-~44Â·44Â«-[l*ft*%Â«t- Â·Jll*Â«4] *Ll 1 1 '.I.dr~Lit[Il-ilIfffllifi#~~1~%3~2.13 4 3:, t.. t : 4%.~ ._ .i~~Obi''VI--t*&.. 1 N- ---FrJ'*AE,trM~E.'3.I<&#4<Trrtin Tr 1--1-ULI~~U-L.--- ~alfificrIDJ~t-fl_ --- - - -17+225492##-: -41001'-"Zi p-i----- . 4 - 1: .3 fle f.t f- 1 44>29 i :1 0 R 1 1 A I ~ ~1- R 27==Irr=== - - :- -- i r-r-n, iÂ«3ftif~FlI:~i'1111 i lili I Il[4=4111 1 1 1 1 IE-Ull . 1 , lip Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·44 E li '1 1 1 1 1 111 lilli 1 !t6=*==!1: L 111Lill_U : -9 â‚¬ 1 1-Oil ISSUED FOR: ... 1 H.P.C. CONCEPTUAL HOTEL ASPEN A DDI T ION CLâ„¢~ ~PR0V~ X REVISION: A A A A A 10 West Main Street A PROJECT NO: 9810 DRAWN BY: ANB CHECKED BY: Aspen, Colorado ISSUE DATE: 12-14-99 FILE NAME: k L -=0- -*/*SkeÂ®rfi~ -~ *-ill*'.:101 1 1 1.,--2:71"i.....I11 OUR-7 4 1 1 L ' 1 - 9 - -d==al =\2â€¢fmlk 1 1 11 1,1 U / Ul J ir,446<â€¢~ | ~ ,I~,1 ~ TrrÂ».Â·~11LL..4L~illiLL' ~ 7-7-1- C==:==~ 1L 11 u m O I l 1 11 1 + t Jin' 1111 -711 ,- , -~- - _ -//,7,;X///'&. 1 lili I 64 1 21 .Ii,g~ Ank- 11' i Â·-1 ., 1 l i l i lilli E- 11 1 - 11~[UP. 1 111;14 ~.'...r-:) 1 -1- !1--7.r- ~' 1- 1 Ir--u 1--1 r-I"'Â·, Â·rÂ· 9 1 .Â·--1,1 '.,Â·1 rE=rrr'rl r,rn In[ IrrrA ' 1 5*ihO:07- -4 11 'It,k,1. 1 1 - .:I -j ..-i-; ---.1 1,_ . gill . 1 1 1 1 ~ Â»%*r 1 .f(11 -1% ' ~ ' 42Â»Lt l. e=â€ž 1 , ~A#Â§%&1,11~~~ ~ 211 5. 11 r lili 11 0 1 11'11 1. J 141,11,;, 111.:101 1 1 nf--1 . p r-1 r71 0 1 .Â· i Ph..~~ . 411 1 p-L- 111, C~ 1Â· 1 11 Â· c.,4'/i' 1'/ it":'11' 'h'~ii:t'L Â· d. 14lili :1 1 'Jili, hl; 111 4 -44 11 1, 'D' h 21 Mull=r'.1 i'q f . 2 4 11 I . 1 1 1 1 1 11 111 R 4 1 1, 1 11 4 , 1 i;i.' MN *i -7 Â»4' i h 1, 11 - 1 -- MT, .64 ,L I It MX----&----*$-9-<-- pil1---*--i-i-f-pi-LI--$%- - 1 1 '1 .. -1 -----$ 0 ----22===> RENO Â· SMITH ARCHITECTS 3 DC L.L.C. 210 EAST HYMAN N 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-5968 FAX (970) 925-5993 I / 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE N 101 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 H.P.C. Conceptual Submittal (970) 927-6834 FAX WEB SITE www.renosmith.com EMAIL ADDRESS office@renosmith.com 12-14-99 SHEET TITLE: PROJECT TITLE SCALE: SHEET NO: AO.0 . IIIâ‚¬IaV NadSV VWHIVWO)'NidSV ISSUED FOR: ABBREVIATIONS DIRECTORY SYMBOLS LIST OF DRAWINGS CONCEPTUAL H.P.C. A-0.0 COVER OWNER Gui SYMBOLS used I abbreviations / A-0.1 INFORMATION SHEET OWNERS NAME 1 CLIENT APPROVAL & AND L.H LEFT HAND L LENGTH STREET ADDRESS I SURVEY X ~ ANGLE LT UGHT CITY, STATE ZIP @ AT LT.WT LIGHT WEIGHT 1 st LEVEL FLOOR PLAN C L. CENTERLINE LIN L[NEAR CHANNEL TEL: AREA-555-5555 A-2.1 â€¢.DEGREE. MINUTE, SECOND M LINTEL ~ FAX: AREA-555-5555 A-2.2 2nd LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1 REVISION: LOUVER A-2.3 3rd LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~ ', â€¢ FOOT, TNCH L.P LOW POINT # NUMBER PERPENDICULAR A-2.4 ROOF PLAN NÂ·1] MAN-"OLE ARCHITECT PL. PLATE hÂ·FR MANUFACTURER (ER) A Ai OR 0 ROUND OR DIAMETER 1, AS MANSONRY & 0 MASONRY OPENING CFA A-3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - SOUTH & WEST' MAIN BLDG. ABBREVIATIONS Â£ ATL MATERIAL (S) A-3.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - NORTH & EAST MAIN BLDG. NAX MAXIMUM 710 E. DURANT STREET 3 A.F.F ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR 5 ECH MECHANIC CAL) AP ACCESS PANEL & ED MEDIUM ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ADJ ADJACENT k F.MB MEMBRANE PROJECT MGR: PM'S NAME ADIT ADJUSTABLE A ET METAL AGO AGGREGATE Â£ EZZ MEZZANINE TEL: 970-925-3021 NC .AIR CONDrTIONTNG 1, rN MINIMUM,MINUTE FAX: 970-925-3110 ALT ALTERNATE 5-IR MIRROR A ALUM ALUMINUM 1,1SC MISCELLANEOUS E-MAIL: PM'S ADDRESS A.B ANCHOR BOLT .LD HOLDING.MOULDING ANOD ANODIZED N T MOUNT (ED),(ING) APPROX APPROXIMATE & OV MOVABLE ARCH ARCH]TECT PLAN IN,-ULL MULLION SURVEYOR - PROJECT NO: 9810 A.D AREA DRAIN ASPH ASPHALT NAT NATURAL AUTO AUTOMATIC NAME DRAWN BY: ANB NOM NOMINAL- N NORTH N.1.C NOT IN CONTRACT COMPANY N.T.S NOT TO SCALE STREET ADDRESS BSMT BASEMENT NO NUMBER , CHECKED BY: BM BEAM CITY, STATE ZIP 0L EE2 PLATE,BASE PLATE 87 8MciFER Cs) TEL: AREA-555-5555 B.M BENCH MARK OPG OPENING FAX: AREA-555-5555 ISSUE DATE: 1,-14-99 BET BETWEEN Opp OPPOSITE E-MAIL: name@domain.code BVI BEVELED O.D OUTSIDF DIAMETER FILE NAME: BIT BITUMINOUS O.A OVERALL BLK BLOCK O.H OVER}IANG BLKG BLOCKING BD BOARD SOILS ENGINEER PfS POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT B.S BOTH SIDES P.L.F POUNDS PER LINEAL FOOT BOT BOTTOM P.SF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT NAME BO BOUOM OF P.S.1 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH B.OW BOTTOM OF WALL P.L PROPERTY LINE COMPANY BLDG BUILDING PTD PAINT (ED) B.U.R BUILT UP ROOFrNG PNL PANEL STREET ADDRESS P.BD PARTICLE BOARD CITY, STATE ZIP PTN PARTITION PVMT PAVEMENT TEL: AREA-555-5555 PER, PERIMETER FAX: AREA-555-5555 PERF PERFORATE ID) , CAB CAB[NET . PLAS PLASTER E-MAIL: name@domain.code CPT CARPET (ED) P.LAM PLASTIC LAMINATE & CSMT CASEMENT PL PLATF. C.1 CAST IRON C.B CATCH BASIN CK CAULK ~~'6~ ~tg~*ss STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CLG CEILING PWD PLYWOOD CLG.HT CEILING HEIGHT NAME CEM CEMENT PT POINT , PVC POLYVTNYL CHLORIDE COMPANY CTR CENTER QT QUARRY HLE STREET ADDRESS C.T CERAMIC TTLE CITY, STATE ZIP CLR CLEAR (ANCE) RAD RADIUS TEL: AREA-555-5555 CLO CLOSET RECP RECEPTACLE co CLEAN OUT RDWD REDWOOD - FAX: AREA-555-5555 COL COLUMN REF REFERENCE E-MAIL: name@domain.code CONC CONCRETE (CAST-IN-PLACE) REFR REFRIGATOR C.M.U CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT REG REGISTER CONN CONNECTION REINF REINFORCED CD).(ING) CONST CONSTRUCTION R C.P REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE 1~ CONST.JT CONSTRUCTION JOINT REQD REQUIRED CONTRACTOR VICINITY MAP CONT CONTINUOUS OR CONTINUF RESIL RESILIEN'T COORD COORDINATE RET RETURN C.rT CONTROL JOINT RA RETURN AIR NAME CPR COPPER RET REVISION (S),REVISED COMPANY CORR CORR[DOR R.H RIGHT HAND C.W COLD WATER R.O.W R]GHT OF WAY STREET ADDRESS C.Fl COUNTER FLASHING R RESERRM. ROOM R.D ROOF DRAIN CITY, STATE ZIP R.0 ROUGH OPENING TEL: AREA-555-5555 ....t 33.-- 1 1 l.il Un=Zz:~9 -J Â· 1 1 I 11 1 - 1 FAX: AREA-555-5555 ; I C -[7,1 1 2-g i -Â·P ' li I D DEEP,DEPTH SEC SECTION DEG DEGREE SHT SHEET E-MAIL: name@domain.code DEP DEPRESSED SIM SIMILAR Dll DETA[L S.C SOLID CORF DIAG DIAGONAL SP SOUNDPROOF - -1 # f >1 if E - ---~-4 - .u o l._ --Â«47 DIA DIAMETER S SOUTH DIF DIFFUSER SPK SPEAKER , -P--~.>42 . / 11 DIM DIMENSION SPEC SPECIFICATION (S) 4//f ./ ...Â»29 1 DR DOOR SQ SQUARE 9 1 DBL DOUBLE SQ.FT SQUARE FEET fi722 --Â° I DWR DRAWER SY SQUARE YARD DWG DRAWING S. S STAINLESS STEEL vt;Lill; 0 STD STANDARD STL STEEL % 1 -- f#44 ~til--31 JI -1 STOR STORAGE - r=44'. 1 i E.W EACHWAY S.D STORM DRAIN E EAST STRUCT STRUCTURAL ' E em ELEC ELECTRICAL STDS STUDS EL ELEVAMON SUSP SUSPENDED ELEV ELEVATOR SYM SYMMETRY (1CAL) . . 14 1 EMER EMERGENCY SYS SYSTEM ENC ENCLOSE (URE) , i Â·--, - -- 77---4--=62 - ='lltÂ»/ Fl lÂ»% 45 - I Lf i 1 EQ EQUAL TEL TELEPHONE t.lk- 1 1 EQUIP EQUIPMENT TV TELEVISION TENIP TEMPERED EXH EXHAUST K EXIST EXISTING THK THICK tNESS) -- 1 1 -L=J Â· ~ rÂ»Ly . .77' 77 E.B EXPANSION BOLT THRES THRESHOLD - - . M mi- EXP.n EXPANSION JONT FXP EXPOSED ~} TONGUE AND GROOVE , TOP OF EXT EXTERIOR - ed Â¥1 T.O.B TOP OF BEAM 'r....C. 1 /./ ,--1.- .......... - TOC TOP OF CONCRETE ~~-~C~ 7 ; A --4 --/ T O.S TOP OF SLAB T I GENERAL NOTES / F.D FLOOR DRAIN T.O.STI TOP OF STEEL I t 1 -41 1 p. _ P.L 61- I r /11<:>4 4 , Il.,-7/.Al F.OC FACE OF CONCRETE T.0 W TOP OF WALL F.O.S FACE OF STUDS T TREAD .CJ . Â· ---- ' . 1 1 7 ill L,,-3Â»rn fill i j FAS FASTEN.FASTENER TYP TYPICAL LF \-4 FGL' FIBERGLASS 0-. r FIN FINISH (ED) UNF UNFTNIS}TED 7pÂ·q j . fL jiT 1 1 -1 11.I , - -1 j 1 '1\: 1- 11! 1 1 L .1- 93\ Uu / A F.F FIRE EXTINGUISHER t ~ianÂ·Â·--- 'FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINE, UN.O UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE / N li ./.7-/ 4,//244 f Nt,212Ai:54 , F.H.S FIRE HOSE STATION FP FIREPROOFING V.B VAPORBARRIER 1 1 ,// , ~~,4/ l-F>.CE~ / /,mSpel'PÂ»<2-2Lzz: .-/,rÂ«L, 1 , M.. 1. INFORMATION TAKEN FROM TOPOGRAPHIC MAP PREPARED BY JACOBSEN Fzry UllE'I' PIL--r' Â«1 r.64.- ASSOCIATES FOR LOT 332TELLURIDE MOUNTAIN VILLAGE, STATE OF - Â·319/niLArn..,1 FIL FIREPLACE VNR VENEER . COLORADO 7- -ll[IIVhm,rl\NI[lk',~- i- F.P.S C FIRE-PROOF SELF-CLOSING VERT VERTICLE Â»Ll i rnÂ·eit -Â·1>1 j f~ . ~ F.R FIRF RESISTANT V.I.F VERIFY IN FIELD FLO FLASHING V.G VERTICAL GRAIN 11 1/ A .44:--2 N ~--*Â·44 -r-ilat,1 ~:I 1/ 0 2, BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS TO BE LOCATED BY A CERTIFIED SURVEYOR FLR FLOOR (ING) VEST VESTIBULE -- p L _. r - - F.D FLOOR DRAIN V VINYL - FLUOR FLUORESCENT V.C.T VINYL COMPOSITION TILE 4 i CU -M 2 RENO Â· SMITH Fr FOOT , Ap j 1 4-n'...2 - 7 -. ....lit:ji .E L FTG FOOTING WT W WALL TO WALL lul,1 42} 1--I Lil 2 - 3. ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND ON THESE PLANS AND WHERE THEY EXIST ON FND FOLNDARON / W.C WATER CLOSET THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION ARCHITECTS F.A.1 FRESH AIR INTAKE F.S FULL SIZF. WP WATERPROOFING 1 OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK ( ) WR U'ATER REPELLENT ii 10Â»Â«i~jifil>.----- , i L i/-7.( \AL h-31 1 FURR FURRED (ING) WS WEATHER STRIPPRO wr WEIGHT . 0 / L.L.C. 4. LOCATE ALL UTILITIES WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF EACH INDIVIDUAL W.W.F WELDED WIRE FABRIC UTILITY COMPANY OR PROPERTY MASTER PLAN OA GAGE GAUGE W WEST,WIDE,WIDTH - ' .~Tl:FÂ·Â·Â·Â·43.;33'1211Â£f_ill i re=Â©2-TE4411 il 1 GALY GALVANIZED w/ WITH 210 EAST HYMAN GL GLASS,GLAZrNG WDW WINDOW GL.BLK GLASS BLOCK WD WOOD 5. VERIFY SIZE AND LOCATION OF UTILITY LINES WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY N 202 GR GRADE GRADNG W P WORKING POINT ASPEN, COLORADO GYP GYPSUM COMPANY OR CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM UTILITY WORK GWB GYPSUM WALL- BOARD 81611 IiI)W BUILDING SUMMARY 6. ALL UTILITIES ARE TO BE BURIED (970) 925-5968 HARDWARE VAX }TWID HARDWOOD HDR HEADER 7. ~ INDICATES POINTS TO LOCATE PRIOR TO FINAL STAKING FOR HTG HEATING OWNER APPROVAL AND VERIFICATION OF ACTUAL GRADES (970) 925-5993 HV.A.C HEATINGNENTILATION/AIR COND. HD HEAVY DUTY '.. HT HEIGHT H HIGH 8. DO NOT DISTURB SITE BEYOND 5'-0" PERIMETER FROM BUILDING FOOTPRINT H.P HIGH POINT 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE. II.C HOLLOW CORE N 101 ~ H.M HOLLOW METAL 1 st LEVEL- EXISTING 7,041.00 sq. ft.. EXISTING RECOMMENDATIONS RE: SOILS REPORT BY BUCKHORN GEO'TECH FOR BASALT, COLORADO 9. SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE AS PER SOILS ENGINEER HORIZ HORIZONTAL H.B HOSE BIBB 81621 H.W HOT WATER H.W.H HOTWATER HEAR LOT 332 TELLURIDE MOUNTAIN VILLAGE, DATED FEBRUARY 16, 1999 HR HOUR (970) 927-6834 HYD HYDRANT 2nd LEVEL- EXISTING 8,021.00 sq. ft.. EXISTING FAX (970) 927-6840 IN [NCN ~'DEL %MMIYiwN 3rd LEVEL- ADDITION 3,373.00 sq. ft.. NEW ,~~ INSUL INSULATE *MION) WEB SITE INT INTERIOR INV INVERT www.renosmith.com EMAIL ADDRESS JT JOINT JST JOIST office@renosmith.com KIT KITCHEN SHEET TITLE: K.O KNOCK OUT PROJECT LBL LABEL LAI LADDER LB ' LAB BOLT TITLE LAM LAM[NATE LAV LAVATORY SCALE: SHEET NO: TOTAL 18,435.00 sq. ft. AO.1 , I +EDT NOI.LIGGV KGMSV 111OH 1311115 9/0Â· 9, v-----.-------~Il~ BLEEKER STREET S 75Â°09' 11" E - rn kinnAAI All killl AA AA AD Ag M N 3 LTD., A COLORADO N COUNTY, ) OF LOTS E AND O, r IllÂ·04 FEET OF EN, PITKIN COUNTE -HE HOTEL ASPEN - PURPOSES 1 ASPEN CORDED IN BOOK 4ND RECORDER OF Rly DESCRIBEr *REIN TO mIE SPECIFICALLY DEDICATE To 1HE FOLLOWING PARCEL: ERLY HALF OF THE NORTHER.er 1 JNDARY LINE : ET, THENCE NTAINING 2294- â‚¬ ------- 6-- - - Ay OF_ ___ _._ 1985, , Ert)., AND TD. Y PUBLIC- ---- al- ----- - -- - --- - i--- N ANC' lTD Pi MANk, A ON Â©EFTEMeâ‚¬K 14> L MY SUP-EgYP51(N f AND NO ALLEY )KATI ON NO NO NOTED 1Ut-Pr MAVE. 3 F -THE [DESIGNATED TRASH AREA 11-IAT ON )Whi E>CEFT AD 8>]2, - A.(.4 0 illillilldo-111111: 47 G C.E .~fl lilli F %.2 Qi--cot/- 1 0-=dils I 1 1 . Â·Â·e 40Â·1 / / 1 / 11 j / 1 1 / 1 Ill - * SCALE ; I"= to' DATE: 1 / Â· *92,---*99 2 Â« 1 1 1 BASIS OF BEARING: FOUND MONUMENTS AS SHOWN. 1 , 1 / / tb ~rES 1 L C.E. LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT. G.C.E GENERAL COMMON ELEMENT. /////// 1 1 KIOTE 5 1 HOT TUB I C.H. CEIUNG HEIGHT. < G.CE. / 2 6 // 0/4/4/ ZONING : L-3 PITKNI CCUEÂ·JTY- TITLE, INIC, CADE HO. FET 13)435 0 WAe> USED I N TI-IE FMEA!Â«TION.1 OF TI-lie OUIMEr 1- ./ / /./ z /, GCE i . - 2// 1''llitiliTWO STORY BUILDING~ // / / '192> . / // / / M ~ 1 1 HALLAM STREET In 0 to t ////Ii//////1~/11.FIA- 0 ./ 1 ii''li / M t; 5 4 Tw 50 W 57 w 65 W 72 cr . INDEX I ./ / / /. 4 BLEEKER STREET - - SHEET 1. - SITE PLAN AND DEDICATION LANGUAGE . 2 SHEET 2.- SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLANS AND CROSS SECTIONS. i 44. 81 66. 73 Ill MAIN STREET GCE. ~~~G c Ell 5 -----11 o H e PAEPCKE Z R .1 PARK w 7& 5 52 toÂ·0 - ' r 1 f . 11' r 1. . . M e | | | HOPKINS AVENUE to 9 Q 134Â·go | R ~pu>wERED< S ~Re~ 1 1 1 | 1214/9 I f ' 444, . j . ,. A . gj:~r;/,Â·I , FOUND: REBAR AND CAP D SET ; CHISELED"X' IN CONCRE'rE. VICINITY MAP 7 1.4.1 '1 L.S. S/84. N 75Â°09' 11" W 1"= 300' MAO M STREET SHEET I OF I JOB NÂ°' 88Â·60Â·3 .. 0 0 El I A. A . D. 1, U.Vi- 1, *19 ' (0,-1. tillc tiE C E It i 1 F I C i iI.PJ .P I.*E /1 0 j.1 1 * A.. 74 ) *\.4 r ]Cip .1111* . D- .. . -- I . . .. ... .. -r- . - .1 . . = .-I- I. - ..-. I . ... -1. .. .. . .-1 . - : ..1 . . . . 0 ... - I .1 I . . .... .. . ..... I. -: - -. . 6 . . .-.. ... .. ...- I ...-.. .... ... .. - - .. . I -..... - ... - . ..... 1 . .- . . . - .... . 0 ... . ..-. . . I . 6 . i I . I - . .. 4 . ..... . . .1. 4 . .2. I - . - .... . ... 0. I. .-.- . ... .... r r 1, * vi 1 - I - I-- -- . . I .. . - I . 1 .-= D C E- ..... LLI .. - - L.LI . . 1 .- P 4 - /; - - /-- + -- . . . I . - k- ... Ul - P L A F J[ JINO /4, [ 1 * ,/ *NI p'.1 G ,,k ' 31Â¢ iVA L e . I . .... - . ...-- . . a. . . .. : , D D. 0 1 1 . ,. 6 Â·, 1. L P] Cl Y (3*U['SCIL A I'PX* VAL UÂ®.4 - -RTIFIC-kIES A f.rÂ·],1 /%+CO ~i 1'~ T ili [.CE . - -0- . .. . A. A - .... . I . - 0. - ..... 0 0 -6 -. .. . 0 A . 0. 0 - 0 [,L*CK 31 .. . I ... .. . . L ... bl . - - . .. C L E [' K A[4* M EC* I'~ * 010 ~t Â·4 C CEPTA [4 CE - . . I. . ... - , --. I - - ... 0 D - ... 4 - 0 0 ---0 - -. 0 .. : 1 A ' 0 . . . I . U . D . 1., - S A.: ...... F.-; .f - , I 1.44 .>r, I . 1 ' 4 - .4 â€¢1 f - 1 . 71 .3 0.-br 1\ ~".6- F ... // Fl . A B 1--'T 1 1 1 1 1 1 # i .1 1. ,..1=Li.lr ' ': 1 . 1 1 i 1 - \\ 1 . 1 I u.1.-1444=:-r Â· , ..,Lt~ 11 -,azE i ''' 77 1 1 I lit: 123}r , 0 t' 6 & A W,AFT rt ~ Â·'Â·, 1:' /'i 'ill.-I. . F r r a r.t...4 L p r tr 2%:\ i ~-10.â‚¬77==. 7.194:4:* $ Â¢4?t I.ij. 1% , . tr 3 t k + r. 03 e , r , r - '' : tr : 1 ,) r. FF . 1\ r, -1 E- L , . .1, .:r- 4 6, . r t. Fr --~ ~ ~ "- ---- ilL 1 UBL-~~' ~~~ 1 LL[24- 1411=JL 1 ~ 1/ 12 &16-. Im.Z..4 Â· Â· 0 , Tri & 11 1 / 1Â«// % 1 I. - i n--ir-7-7 .9, -.1 6-=-==r==Â»=- i BES#T-# '~< 1-7ft - irÂ»-- ~lt F--LIE~ r --2 .rfit r Prr ....-~L*. ---Jil- .[ FlrBÂ¢rr r 0 1 -- 1-- - M.- 1 11 1 1 a (1.7- !111 *1--1/ X-& Â·J, LBAA~ . r. 1 t ->43 L ,Â· r r. - -0- -- /1 1 . >K __]l._.- t t # 0 v =~2-r;- 1-E j-_ f~_-72/~~ _i --9 --Z 3-1 3? ill 1 1 : 1 - 1 E-1 1 , L 2 Â£ -,11- f lel 'M-'-1 L--- $-*-I - $ 9 -- r- 7/ Miiq --_ ~~~~~~F - 6 . ---7 F 1 J. 4 r 1 1 1 gri=~Tr.11 11 E LEÂ»lir 11 inE 1 -J-'. .r'l--TI I z -- -I , -- p i y- pttivir'* tr ~ rr~ r 0 r 'h |'1~h :11 - .- 11111!' 1 - 1 t<~'t~ Pt' r , b t. 1\' 1 1 -1- - I.- -- ..--- ./-- . 1 ~%21 11 1 11 7 k ... 90/, - 4, r . p i |' Fil ./1 11 :1,1. 11 1 1 1 - , / ./ 1,1 - i A .t. B tâ€¢â€¢* A i , '1-- r r f ---- -=== 1 -Trtrf. J -7 21412=#231 0-70 4 A ' r, C Â¥ t. 6 , A - B 1 br .' A F --- -- r---- E-T=11 F.. ft ;, 1. t~ -F FO A Ar A --=-. -1 r. 3N t. 1 4 4 6 ~00/ 4:rt,- '2Â·if ft'f f i '1,0 di 'li :if 1:- 1 - 1 1 - .R / I , i ' i l' 1 i '1. : , , Â·Â· Â· Â· Â·Â·Â·.'~!1..~~I~'i:hi!~~~rt 1-!Il",I' p'jÂ·'i 3 - : i : 1 I.: Â·11 .1 Iii. 'lf. li .1 i i I - .. .r- 1 -F- 1 1 [--11. 9 . --0 "C-, b --- *- A r rN B.,P B // -- .- 1 n .----- , I , . h ,/ 11 1 ; }ill~~tâ€žn'jl.. 1!ri, - 1 '1 ' Ill 1 l iii 4 11 1 ' 1 r. 6 0 C.42 . 7 4 E & p, 14 h r~-,A-=,-r-/ rer.5 t - --- 12 1 1 11, ' 1 1 ..,A . 4 B ~ t.,rt A A* --2235-- - E----*- . 11.-- - ,"lil' 1,63 11]Ii J i , 1111+ 1 1!Iii jiIi'i L . #THIIHI i , ~1;11!HLE['.lil IÂ· 111111jl ~= i-Â¥i,nii Ii!!111111il!11;!11111,111111 . / 111111111111]1111111 1111)111111 lilli'111!IIN1111- 533 ---11 --- -' 1 11 ..,1'..11,11, 1 T - h r A .-..1$. r-m lilli . +4*1 r. % ty Nt. . t * A l~ 1~ =:=== i t==... -lEi 1-IL m r.-11 7 1 2 '4 4, *,94 9 Z AD 3 7.e 6-k.-a , 3'2 - -1[-21[3 l 6 Ii.#->r - D-Â£ BTRI ,N: D, D.0 .5 .1 ' I j r-,-1 1- 1â€ž)4 wa E 1 lip ~n ,~~T-Tlicipuiia ~~290-rifF~fil~7JFÂ·-~~~Â·71.1:;lrl]7.1,1-1'ifv-TTrf~~Ir.'llIF~iiEF T f ~- - 1 1 -..-- -fouu-P AE--20-~11 h ta 1_111__ - 7-4 _ ' . E 5 + B 14--9-4626//fil,2 Â£'47 ' 9 r 4. 11.11 1,11-u 143 . 21.1.1 1 11*1111111111 ' 11 j 1 ' B F D -#441-Ll- B, 11 11 11-3 1 1 1! 11 11 11 1 11 1 1 -. . . til t 02 plk' -' - 11 - i' 111 , : ' ' L --l ': f. ' - [1 1 11 . .:42,24 /1/ ,~ 4''J?Mi 132 WEST MAIN STREET ___ 126 WEST MAIN STREET 7. .... 4 .,64* 110 WEST MAIN STREET r, , , SOUTH MAIN STREET ELEVATION 1 , , . 1.9 'lit ' .4,2-4.. ., 3 '45 ..U 19*4 - 4 <f 114 - ./,4 I.yk' '' 4.*f 4.' 4,keÂ·â€¢ ./*i/% NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK ELEVATION + -- 4*ALEÂ·: 1/80 = 1'-04 1 4.a 1. ISSUED FOR: H.P.C. CONCEPTUAL #Â· 1, V CLIENT APPROVAL X 1 ...,14. 1. - ...Â· I '01. f .4% 1.:mi REVISION: g ,Â·35* A I 1 1 - , A v, LIMIT OP | A 1 VACATED ALLEY PARKINÂ® 11 1 1 1 0 6 - EXISTIN. STAIR 1 1 I 1 1 â‚¬ I G PROJECT NO: 9810 ----------------7--,rT, i/, 1 1 722%101 ---1 1-- ---------------------------- CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: ANB PARKIN* 10 PATIO PATIo PATIO PATIO 1 ---7 - - I jilillillâ‚¬ff~ ~//f / -f ISSUE DATE: 12-14-99 ' M-6-2-CE~ i FILE NAME: PARKING q PARKING B 94-Â»13 - lim#/ 4l# /Ii /li PARKING 1 EXT'G 2-STORÂ¥ BUILDIN6: 1Â§t FLOOR PLAN: 15 ROOMS lilli 7,041.00 .4. f.t ~E-E| Ilj 1 / 1 PARKIN* 6 :1 1 . I / - 0 - / / 1 Ill 7/ / - ' / 11\11 /ffj/f/f/l//bi/i/l I / 2 â€¢ARKIN* 0 1/1,1111111,111,11:I 9 K . uu///jill//lil/l//i 0 4. 11 / 8 1 .4 / 1 / P l ' ilillifill '1 1 lill .rt 1/ 1 / mt / 1 1 PARKING B \ i i / Ft 44\ 0 . Z \\ /i \4\ \\ 3 \, 10 . 1\\ 1 \\ \ON \IÂ»'M4.././9 PARKING 2 - bh. //9 ~'~ i I.-r-4 Ill/El/111 21---4 \ 4 I . /7 e-0---~h 4 M 11,4477,0&1-71. - 1 \1 - 1.Â· Yr-\7 . Fic=awl- f / PARKING 1 RENO Â· SMITH 4 -\ 1 0 7 .:f 1 / ARCHITECTS L.LC. l l / 210 EAST HYMAN N 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-5968 BUILDING ENVELOPEO- 134.48' VAX (970) 925-5993 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE. N 101 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 (970) 927-6834 VAX (970) 927-6840 WEB SrrE www. renosmith.com EMAIL ADDRESS office@renosmith.com l MAIN STREET r SHEET TITLE: 1.t LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- MAIN BUILDING SCALE: 1/8" = 1' - 0" 1st LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- MAIN BLDG. ~~ ~ a SHEET NO: A2.1 7 1 . '224. le .44 4 12. 2, NOLLIGGV NldSV 11.LOH BUILDING ENVELOPEO- 10 133HiS NIVW 1Slm OII OaVHOTOE) 'NldSV ISSUED FOR: 1 H.P.C. CONCEPTUAL ' ~ CLIENT APPROVAL X .4 121,1 REVISION: A -A lA A A A ~ PROJECT NO: 9810 DRAWN BY: ANB j CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 12-14-99 FILENAME: f NER STAIR - EXISTIN* brAIR 1 1 11'' j/1112111111111 . J t ~-- -J~ ~ ~ ~I Ij I. 1/ 11 It - -.flljij11/ll ~ I'ji 1 1 / / 1 l 1 1 261 ' M -- - NIM STAIR 1/ 9 1 1-. - i. 1. 1 1 /1/ % 1, 1.11 284'LA/14/U*. 11/11#UMB Â£1~ / 34. 8,021.2.f n 9 7 $ // 4 1 1 \ 1// 1 1 - \ ... , 9 0 0 \ 1 / RENO Â· SMITH \\\ Â·ARCHITECTSÂ· 0 000 L.LC. 9 1 1 4 3 210 EAST HYMAN N 202 4 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-5968 r 2 (970) 925-5993 VAX \ IN \ 1 4 1 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE. t/ BASALT, COLORADO N 101 j / 81621 .// 1 - f /ff (970) 927-6834 ~ ' (970) 927-6840 PAX WEB SITE , www.renosmith.com BUILDING ENVELOPEO- 154.48' EMAIL ADDRESS office@renosmith.com SHEET TITLE: und LEVEL FLOOR i PLAN- MAIN 0 -- BUILDING SCALE: 1/8" = 1' - 0" 2nd LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- MAIN BLDG. ~ SHEET NO: A2.2 NOI.LICâ‚¬[V STS[dSV la.LOH 12[OnI.LS NIVW J.Sl/WL 01 1 OCIVH01O0 'NSIdSV BUILDING ENVELOPEO- 10 ' " ISSUED FOR: H.P.C. CONCEPTUAL 1-1 CLIENT APPROVAL X REVISION: A A 6 NEW BRIDGE ~ VACATED ALLEY f t. NM STAIR lia PROJECT NO: 9810 .. I ON DRAWN BY: ANB CHECKED BY: BAL.CONÂ¥ ISSUE DATE: 12-14-99 O c FILE NAME: NEN STAIR \ 9---- , ------ 0 0 0 0 I HAU.WAY WOOM 801 SUITE 301* / SOBA ROOM 909 ROOM 3001 ROOM 310 ROOM 311 ROOM 812 - 11 1 DECK PECK -~ DECK PECK 0201< 1 11~1 11 1 i // /1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1. 1 ....'' 1 1 - - 1 1 h /1 9 f .I.. /7 91 / / 1 t>~ / /'~ --------------------~ 9 // i 4 1 - 2 j - / i I ----i....~ . .- 9 1 :1/ t -- 1 i l - i L 1 i I 1 1 . - - 11 11 i N \\ \\ 211 , m 1 1 h t\ 01 2 1 FA 447 ----- \ 9 - 1 1 Al ... /7 1 - ------- --- ---------- ------------ ~ 1' - X. \\ 1 1 1. - -2.Clmic /1,62.St/-\ _ ' 1 /2 z---Â·Â·<2-43Â£~P'~21- 1 / RENO Â· SMITH 1 + Â·ARCHITECTSÂ· 900 L.LC. l 210 EAST HYMAN N 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 BUILDING ENVELOPEO- 134.18' -J - 1 (970) 925-5968 / FAX 4'm 9245993 . ~ 9 / 0-/ 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE. BASALT, COLORADO 81621 (970) 927-6834 Â¥AX (970) 927-6840 WEB SITE www. renosmith.com EMAIL ADDRESS office@renosmith.com MAIN STREET I SHEET TITLE: 3rd. LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- NEW 1.* SCALE:18"=1'-0"~ 3rd. LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- MAIN BLDG. ~ NE,4 SaUARE MOOTAGE: 8,3,4.00 .4 R. - SHEET NO: A2.3 BUILDING ENVELOPEO- 100'-0" NIOI.LIaâ‚¬IV NIGMSV UGLLOH 11AILS NIVIA ISEM .LETEWLLS HGIWhIVS OUVHOTOD'NEdSV ISSUED FOR: H.P.C. . tfil CONCEPTUAL - CLIENT APPROVAL X REVISION: 1 ~1 il A . .1 / 12 11 2 1 1 ....4 VAGATE# ALLEY A - Â®TANDING BEAM ~ ~ ' a A METAL KOOM PROJECT NO: 9810 DRAWN BY: ANB I - CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 12-14-99 lilli 11- -- FILE NAME: 4 11 1 41 1, . 14 . 14' 5 1 1 1 lili 1 1 1 :1 1 '1 1 rÂ·, 9 /2 "~ 1 1'. 11' 1 1 il ill - Ill - l 11 - 1 - 1 m 1 U-- W#i--Willi-- --- A + 1 1 1 1- il 1- 1 \ 11 .4. // 1 b I I o w / 1 I 1 /- i'~ 1 Mo 1 / 1 /1 - / h / -1 %@ 111 1 00 \4 - - Z - 1 0 W :: -- 9 1 1444 14 1 1 - lili - 4 411 â‚¬ 0 -4 22 // ---7--7----- - it 9 7 222 1.2 / \ \\ f/7, / 11 1 \\. / 94/ / RENO 7 SMITH 7 : 1 l- Â·ARCHITECTS 0 l' P ~~~0 ~ LLC. - 1 1 2 210 EAST HYMAN N 202 / ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 BUILDING ENVELOPEO- 134.48' / (970) 925-5968 VAX (970) 925-5993 . 1 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE. N 101 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 (970) 927-6834 VAX (970) 927-6840 WEB SITE www.renosmith.com EMAIL ADDRESS MAIN STREET office@renosmith.com SHEET TITLE: ROOF PLAN- MAIN BUILDING 44 SCALE: 1/8" = 1' - 0" RQQE_PLAN- MAIN_*Iil: ~Â© SHEET NO'. A2.4 '~71Â·. i~.:PI~-Â» ' 'r =re'l~ Â¥20:---.2;7~-:L;*"742 D'NildSV */ - --m--7*reN.3. 4 t. 49'1<EA'~ ISSUED FOR: H.P.C. CONCEPTUAL CLIENT APPROVAL X 7 1 tv 94 2 3.0 REVISION: . 4.,. t: A . I la '' A l.- 1 PROJECT NO: 9810 j DRAWN BY: ANB 1 i =6= CHECKED BY: - ~/3 J ISSUE DATE: 12-14-99 ''l l,~1 '1 1 1 11 K.4 11 ~~~~~~'~~~~~~~~~ ~ | ~~ FILE NAME: 1 1 1 1 L=!- 1 lilli Ul'Ni l 'Il.. it'' 1 1,Â· .1 11, 111 1 't. 11.1 111.~ 11 //'~~/ LL--9-44_---2--14-'i.=:~31 Q . 1 111 2 â€žPr,:frrr E~!ELE TEFE,Iffl 1 lilli 1.+C 11 1.1 - 1 lillill , !:Mill:'111111Â·IllÂ·:,1 1 J 'Ill l i . i I i : 11 ' i tl 1 I 1 1 1 92 L ............. rfÂ« >Ait ..... 121.nAnt.~.R...................0 1111111111111111111111111111111111.1.1111111111111111111'11111,111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.111111'lili '11.11 11111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111.11111111111.11111.11lilli'111111111111 WEST ELEVATION- MAIN BLDG. ~ STANOWe SEAM < MTL. ROOP - 1 X VERT'ICAL li..)) 1 xe HORIZ f-- SIDINe TO MATCH SIDING - EXISTINe C C =ICÂ«ZE= T.O. RIDGE * . 1.10 HOBIZ. SIDING 9 1/ 140'-6' T.O. RIDeE '11~41'. , 4 \1:* 1 1 , 1 I i 1,1 #Ill 1360-6" ~ RENO Â· SMITH p 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 ARCHITECTS 00 0 1 1 . A 1/\.. A 11. 19- 1 77*Pt -h<<3~~ON Igl~i~#4-~Â«i 1~_rÂ· pTT- F L.L.C. -\:0. .62&52â‚¬44 : Â¢:M=-- - i4t *@44%140 210 EAST HYMAN m .Ii.- ."I-- 1 1 Il-1==sfil.-6.3-1 1 U [nus:*U::=25*--9 , ,_ [-- i 2~=:41 P l_.-] ~ 1 M---1 Â·1 ' _L 1, 1 , 4 1 TL.3 1-0 Â· 1 '-2 41 IHE,1 4 1 N 202 - ASPEN, COLORADO .il -~-*+ -1-- ~-1-- ~ 1471.l f I - -=-...... -- - E- ~ par-vt ~ â€ž-~~ qi 2 L I 81611 It --.---- -- 1 1 21 1 1 -1,-- -------9---1 - - (970) 925-5968 ..p 11-11 FAX 1 k. <i~~~'~~~f~~'i~li Tik#31 41+ '11 1* 111*Ilillir 11 h 3111 111-[~ 1 (]]1+1, 111-44# 1111 1.1!!1 11 L 1 4.11 -t -1. 1 .1,11 11-=-111 ---1- -~ 3 DIAM. STL (970) 925-5993 1 J: 1:1 1 &1 11:, - 1 ~ TUBES | 00. 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE. lili 4 1 !{1 11 - 0 1 I | 1 Et F i .I N 101 1 11 . 1 a 1-1 11,!Ij! BASALT, COLORADO 1 ~ 11 L 81621 11 11 1 NTRAT{11112.i:urn#ifinli#~ . tiT2 #:liHIIUINHAIilll:-:Hili~OC'i IL. '19 1 F' 111"111111111'ull 1111111111111[111111.111.11 FFM-*i-ifiiiiiiiimi i1111iri1111-1-11111111111 ..EIT E-31 El ~ 11 71[ 11 (970) 9274834 TIMBER BEAMS 1 -- 11!1111 111111 ki-%<%**#--*-- FAX w E---1 + b----- I -~--L - ' ' -- 1.-1 7 (970) 927-6840 8' DIAM. STL ........... .......................L.......11..........1..........11............... 2 ' - TUBES 4/' . 0 I '_L WEB SITE T.O. SLAB . www.renosmith.com 100'-O* 9 EMAIL ADDRESS office@renosmith.com SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- SOUTH & WEST SCALE: 1/8" = 1' - 0" SOUTH ELEVATION (MAIN STREET)- MAIN BLDG. ~ SHEET NO: A3.1 0' i NOUIaCIV NIG[dSV rIGLLOH 13[3HLS NIVW SSAX 0 I OUVHOTO~j 'WlÂ«IS~ EXISTING ISSUED FOR: H.P.C. CONCEPTUAL CLIENT APPROVAL REVISION: A A A T.0. WPBE . , A !1 14 .1 . T.O. RIDGE . t. 1 1 77= i ..~r.-.-~-~EEE=-EEsE---FE==-=Ii PROJECT NO: 9810 ~ | DRAWN BY: ANB CHECKED BY: I lEi ,|| 131~ lic| FT| H 11111 121111 El *111B lilli ~111 FILE NAME: NER BRICIE 1 1 td 1 111'1 ;111.121!~111'1111'i:i-'Iii; 11 1:Â· ------Il:.323-4 25 - EAST ELEVATION (GARMISH)- MAIN BLDG. ~ @Â·. 1 7 A. IA 1% W STANDING SEAM 1 8- *u MTL ROOF $ W 1 x VERTICAL ~ SIDING TO MATCH ~ EXISTING ... //9 - T.O. RIDGE . ~61&73TZ. 136'-6. V 1 1 ~-----h in Gff 2---~--\2321'411, Â£-rh- r 1 11331 0.- /7* G PIll : r , It ' 1 il : 1 1 1 IM; f, 2,1-- 1 4 RENO Â· SMITH ---- Â·ARCHITECTSÂ· . ---- ~ -_ _ 1.--. _ H \ L.L.C. 210 EAST HYMAN 3' DIAM. STL 3 202 TUBES ASPEN, COLORADO 1 /11 1!11'i?;'lii.'|| 11 i l!11!11' 1; 1 lili.: 81611 4 '1'*t il' I *~;~ ~-i ~~~~ !~~~ -~~ 1r 'r.1 1 1: ~ 11111:1 1!fll'-1~1 11 1 4, 1, 1 1 111111 11.1,1 L ;11!14111! ilill, 11 lirli i 1 1,4 - 1111111111 (970) 925-5968 2iii.111111 1 illill --- - 1 li' il lilillilli p '11''bu 'llif - 1,1111 0 fli fi ll' ill! 1,1 2 'lil 11~, 1~litital!~~ - 1 i,i N ill illl, FAX 111 It 1 4 1 ~ (970) 925-5993 +I'l}11! 1~I:' 4111111 lilli 1 +1111 1 TIMBER BEAMS 1 111.11 E 371 SOUTHSIDE AVE. ~ 1 81621 11 1 11 lililil Lilli 11 1111 1 111 Â¢0 Iii' '' '' "11!111!till 1 111 -1 Â¢ 1 1 111 111111 11 1 8" DIAM. STL. TUBES 01- Hil lihilifill' 11111~11!!111~litillii'H R i ' r 1 9 1 ! l i l i l l i l 1 1 1 I l i l l i 1 1 ! 1 1 ! 0 1 1 i i - - --LOSLAB . (970) 927-6834 N 101 lilli BASALT, COLORADO NEâ€¢4 eftÂ©*2 , dE-2 FAX (970) 927-6840 WEB SITE NORTH ELEVATION (VACATED ALLEÂ¥1- MAIN BLDG. ~ EMAIL ADDRESS www.renosmith.com , office@renosmith.com I. 91 2 1 4 -994 I tt SHEET TITLE: ..144 4 1Â·. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- ..104% NORTH& EAST +G,/9."/ W. S.449 SCALE: 1/8" = 1' - 0" . | A3.2 \1 19 ill)MIS N UISTORIiÂ©â€¢mERÂ¥Am: Ccoimii:31milmli MEETING DATE: NAME OF PROJECT: 3 ao VJ , Itt R 1 [1 9, l{ it . CLERK: STAFF: WITNESSES: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report ( ) (Check If Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice ( ) (Check If Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet ( ) (Check If Applicable) 4 5 MOTION: 0- 31-/54 VOTE: YES NO .- 3 SUZANNAH REID YES Â£-0-/NO <J MARY HIRSCH YES NO -. I- S SUSAN DODINGTON YES L NO JGILBERT SANCHEZ YES 2/ NO -7 LISA MARKALUNAS YES A NO ~ JEFFREY HALFERTY YES Z. NO ~ HEIDI FRIEDLAND YES C._ NO 3*HRISTIE KIENAST YES 6--- NO YES - NO - YES NO HPCVOTE EXHIBIT El ACTION: Minor Review D o tO c 11{ci 1 4 All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet a#jour Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Standard 2: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereoÂ£ N E m MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director J 89 FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 520 W. Main Street- minor review DATE: February 9,2000 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to make minor exterior alterations to 520 W. Main Street, Ullr Lodge. The property is located in the Main Street Historic District, but has not been identified as having historic significance itself. APPLICANT: Carbondale Affordable Housing Corporation, represented by Building Solutions and Bill Poss Architects. LOCATION: 520 W. Main Street, Lots K, L, M, and the west half of Lot 0, Block 30, City and Townsite of Aspen. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. 1 1244/ll~ ~-0 tal Response: Page 5 of the application identifies the changes proposed to the exterior of 0 the Ullr lodge building, and to the site. There will be two new exterior stairs to access apartments created by an interior remodel, as well as additional windows for these units. The swimming pool will be abandoned and new landscaping will be installed in the courtyard. New lightwells will be built to provide adequate light and air for the basement level. Staff has no concerns with the proposal. Conditions of approval shall include a requirement that the windows and railing match those on the rest of the building and that HPC staff and monitor shall review the landscape plan when it is developed. Note that the building will be repainted, although this is not an issue reviewed by HPC. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed changes will not affect the character ofthe neighborhood. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The project does not impact any designated historic structures. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: No historic structures are affected. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. 0 2 RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that the proposal for 520 W. Main Street be approved with the following conditions: if The new windows and railings shall match those on the rest ofthe building. 2. HPC staff aAd monitor shall review the landscape plan when it is developed. 3. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 4. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 5. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated February 9,2000. B. Application. 3 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT TO REMODEL THE ULLR LODGE, 520 W. MAIN STREET, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID# 2735-124-43-005 RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2000 WHEREAS, the applicant, Carbondale Affordable Housing Corporation, represented by Building Solutions, LLC and Bill Poss and Associates, request minor HPC approval for exterior alterations to the Ullr Lodge, 520 W. Main Street, Lots K, L, M, and the west half of Lot 0, Block 30, City and Townsite ofAspen. The property is located in the Main Street Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated February 9, 2000, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WIIEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 9, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of _ to _. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for the property located at 520 W. Main Street, Lots K, L, M, and the west half of Lot 0, Block 30, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the February 9,2000 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. The new windows and railings shall match those on the rest of the building. 2. HPC staff and monitor shall review the landscape plan when it is developed. 3. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 4. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 5. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of February, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk , 4 W Â· tir . i: - Â·11,. MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ir-- ... BY ff- I-. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION For / N. ULLR LODGE EMPLOYER SPONSORED AFFORDABLE HOUSING Prepared by: Katherine L. Updike Managing Partner Building Solutions, LLC y F4 .1 On behalf of N h j $8 Â·*L--/ CARBONDALE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION 41 A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SERVING THE ROARING FORK VALLEY January 2000 4 - 1-1 1.â‚¬ . I '/ 1,1 .1 11 - 1--0 . . -L.- ic:.2 1, 7%3 CARBONDALE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION a community development corporation serving the roaring fork valley January 25,2000 Ms. Amy Guthrie Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Ms. Guthrie: Enclosed please find the Application for the Ullr Lodge conversion to employer sponsored employee housing. We have included all of the requested information from the HPC Minor Development Review Application Package, however, please let us know ifthere is any additional information that is needed. This application is being submitted by: Carbondale Affordable Housing Corporation PO Box 2001 Carbondale, CO 81623 Our representative for this application is: Katie Updike Building Solutions LLC 8300 County Road #3 Marble, CO 81623 (970) 963-9511 phone (970) 963-9170 facsimile kundike@rof. net email Thank you very much for the opportunity to help create another vehicle for affordable housing in Aspen through the sponsorship of area employers who have a parallel interest in the welfare of their employees With regards, - to[A C+-65~ Ift 0 â€¢ Kay Philip katie Oi}dike Chairman Managing Partner Carbondale Affordable Housing Corporation Building Solutions LLC P.O. Box 2001, Carbondale, CO 81623 Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Land Use Application III. Pre-Application Conference Summary IV. HPC Development Review Standards and Applicant Responses V. Attachments 1. Responses to Minimum Submission Requirements Photographs Title Report Vicinity Map Scale Drawing Site Plan Site Improvement Survey 2. Elevations 3. Dimensional Requirements Form Ullr Lodge Minor HPC Review 1 January 25, 2000 I. INTRODUCTION/OVERVIEW Carbondale Affordable Housing Corporation ("CAHC"), a community housing development organization approved by the Colorado Division of Housing, has contracted to buy the Ullr Lodge, located at 520 West Main Street, from the current owner. CAHC requests approval from the City of Aspen to convert the lodge to employer owned and operated affordable housing under a Minor Planned Unit Development. This program has been initiated by the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority as a possible private sector model for addressing affordable housing needs. It has been determined that the alterations will comply with guidelines appropriate for a Minor Development under guidelines ofthe Historic Preservation Commission. The actual building envelope will not be altered. The exterior ofthe Lodge and the Floor Area will be modified only slightly. The modifications are the result of interior changes, i.e., the addition of a handicapped accessible unit, the removal of the pool, and a net increase ofthree units due to conversion of a large bi-level 'owners' apartment into four units, which will necessitate the addition of exterior stairs. The architectural character ofthe building will remain the same. Exterior alterations will be similar in character to existing features. The interior space will be upgraded for life safety code variances and certain units will be modified in order to more appropriately house permanent residents (e.g., consolidation of laundry facilities, conversion of office area to common space, upgrades to housekeeping units). The housing to be created has been sponsored in part by the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority (APCHA) through its advance of early predevelopment capital and through a loan for the earnest money. Sponsoring employers have now reserved units and the loan for the earnest money has been repaid. The sponsors hope that the Ullr will serve as a model for future support of cooperatively sponsored affordable housing by the employer community, furthering the goals ofthe City and County of housing more of its workforce. The Applicant thanks the HPC, APCHA, the employers, the planning staff, and others who are helping create a new model for housing in Aspen. Material requested by Staff is included in this application. Please let us know if additional information is required. 1, Ullr Lodge Minor HPC Review 2 January 25,2000 II. LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: Ullr Lodge PUD Location: 520 West Main Street: Lots K. L. M. and the west one-half ofLot O. Block 30, City and Townsite of Aspen Zoning: Office/Historic Preservation Overlay APPLICANI: Name: Carbondale Affordable Housing Corporation Address: PO Box 2001, Carbondale, CO 81623 Phone #: 963-0380 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Building Solutions, LLC do Katie Updike Address: 8300 County Road #3, Marble, CO 81623 Phone#: 963-9511 TYPE OF APPLICATION: GMQS EXEMPTION FINAL PUD SUBDIVISION OR SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION (includes condominiumization) FINAL HISTORIC DISTRICT DEVT. EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) The Ullr Lodge is currently a 27-unit 14.730 square foot enclosed building that is being used partially as permanent housing and partially as a lodge. There are no known previous approvals. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed building, uses, modification, etc.) To convert the building to 30 employer sponsored affordable housing units with approximately the same FAR as the existing building. FEES DUE: $2825 Have you attached the following? 8 Pre-Application Conference Summary (Section III) 8 Attachment #1, Responses to Minimum Submission Requirements(Section V) 9 Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form (Attachment 3) B Attachment #2, Elevations (Attachment 2) 0 Response to Attachment #5, HPC Development Review Standards and Applicant Responses (Section IV) Ullr Lodge Minor HPC Review 3 January 25,2000 m. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY Ullr Lodge Minor HPC Review 4 January 25,2000 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY* ANNER: Nick Lelack, 920-5095 DATE: 12/8/99 PROJECT: Ullr Lodge Affordable Housing PUD REPRESENTATIVES: Katherine Updike, Building Solutions, on behalf of the Carbondale Affordable Housing Corporation Richard de Campo, Bill Poss and Associates, Architecture & Planning OWNER: Ullr Lodge TYPE OF APPLICATION: Ullr Lodge Rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay, PUD Review, Special Review for Parking, Subdivision for RMF (Residential Multi-Family), Historic Preservation Review, Growth Nfanagement Quota System for Affordable Housing DESCRIPTION: The Lodge currently has twenty- seven (27) units on a 13,439 square foot lot. The applicant is requesting to rezone the property to PUD Overlay to establish a PUD to convert existing lodge unit to employer sponsored affordable housing units. The proposal would require Historic Preservation review either by Historic Preservation Officer or by the Historic Preservation Commission. and Use Code Section(s) to Address in Application: uection 26.304.030, Application and Fees; Section 26.310.020, Amendment to the Land Use Code Regulations and Official Zone District Map, Standards of Review; Section 26.410.040, Residential Design Standards; Chapter 26.415, Development in an "H" Historic Overlay District; Section 26.430, Review Standards for Special Review; Chapter 26.445, Planned Unit Development (PI-ID); Section 26.470.110, Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) Exemption, Affordable Housing; Section 26.480.050, Subdivision Review Standards; Section 26.610.04, Park Development Impact Fees; Section 26.630.040(C)(6), School Land Dedication Standards; and Section 26.710.180, Office (O) Zone District; Review by: Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council, and Historic Preservation Officer or Commission Public Hearing: Yes at Planning and Zoning Commission and at City Council, and possibly at Historic Preservation Commission. Referral Agencies (fees): Engineering ($160), Historic Preservation Officer, Zoning Officer, Housing ($160), Parks, Fire Marshall, Water, ACSD, Streets, Electric and Environmental Health ($160). Planning Deposit: $2,220 (12 hours; additional hours are billed at a rate of $195 per hour) Historic Preservation Flat Fee: $125 for Minor Development; $312 for Significant Development il Deposit: $2,825 if Historic Preservation Minor Development; $3,012 if Historic Preservation Significant Development SUMMARY: The purpose of this project is to convert lodge units to affordable housing units, and to expand the number of units on the property from 27 to 30. Specifically, the new affordable housing units will be 42 employer sponsored units, meaning that local employers will purchase the units and rent them to their employees. The proposal requires the creation of a Planned Unit Development to provide the applicant with flexibility to establish dimensional requirements, increase Floor Area, and more. It also requires review by the Historic Preservation Commission whether it is a minor development or significant development because the property is located in the City's Historic Overlay District. In addition, spdcial review will be necessary to consider the parking issues related to this proposed development. The Special Review will be combined with the PUD review. The project is exempt from growth management scoring and competition because it is 100% affordable housing. * Theforegoing summary is advisory only and is not binding on the City. Tile opinions contained herein are based on current zoning and regulations, which are subject to change in thefuture, and uponfactual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not, in any way, create a legal or vested right. IV. HPC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS AND APPLICANT RESPONSES 1. The proposed development is compatible in general designs massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H", Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: There are no changes proposed to the over-all exterior dimensions of the building. The changes to the exterior which fall within the purview ofthe Historic Preservation Commission follow: Conversion of Owner's 3 Bedroom Unit to 4 smaller units: 1. Minimal opening/access through Main Street Screen wall in order to provide no-step access to handicapped-accessible unit where sidewalk grade matches patio. 2. New and/or shifted windows done within the context ofthe existing windows. 3. Add two exterior stairs (one in courtyard and one on 5th street side) in order to provide access to upper level of converted unit. Modification of Lodge to meet code requirements for residential use: 4. Abandon pool and demolish pool room 'add-on' structure. 5. Open new lower level unit to sunken patio in the former pool area. 6. Enlarge/add light wells to NE lower level unit in order to meet egress and light requirements. Other minor exterior modifications: 7. Some new landscaping at courtyard and "healthy pruning and cleaning of existing landscape. 8. New color scheme (e.g., window and door trim color) and new sign/name. Although the actual building envelope will not be altered, the floor area ratio will change slightly as a result ofthe reconfiguration ofthe light wells. Currently it is estimated that the FAR will actually decrease 20 square feet. The increase in FAR resulting from increasing light well areas to conform to residential requirements is offset by the removal ofthe above-grade pool building which is about 200 square feet. 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: The building form and massing is consistent with the area at two stories and has excellent solar access with most units facing the southern courtyard. The lodge has increasingly been used for housing employees in recent years. This PUD formalizes a transition that has been taking place in order to fill the severe shortage of housing in Aspen. The PUD is fully consistent with the community character ofthe City of Aspen and will help in creating a largely private alternative solution, through the sponsorship of local employers, to the public subsidy of affordable housing. 3. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: All ofthe primary architectural features ofthe exterior ofthe building are being maintained. Specifically the archway entrance, the "Bavarian" character ofthe woodwork, the street presence of the building. Ullr Lodge Minor HPC Review 5 January 25,2000 4. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: All ofthe primary architectural features ofthe exterior ofthe building are being maintained. Specifically the archway entrance, the "Bavarian" character ofthe woodwork, the street presence ofthe building. The pool is being removed because ofthe lack of use ofthis facility and its operating costs. The intent is to make the remaining open space more usable as a common amenity for the building residents. ID Ullr Lodge Minor HPC Review 6 January 25,2000 V. ATTACHMENTS Ullr Lodge Minor HPC Review 7 January 25,2000 ATTACHMENT 1 RESPONSES TO MINIMUM SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 1. Contained within a letter signed by the applicant, the applicantLF Cover letter. name, address and telephone number, and the name, address, and telephone number of any representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address, legal description, and parcel identification Application form - Section II number ofthe property proposed for development. 3. A disclosure ofownership ofthe parcel proposed for Title report in this section. development, consisting of a current certificate from a Title insurance company or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners ofthe property, and all mortgages, judgements, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8" 1/2 by 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within Vicinity map in this Section. the City ofAspen. 5. A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the projectLF Site Plan in this Section. physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. 6. A site improvement survey certified by a registered land Site Improvement Survey - submitted surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado, showing the current under separate cover. status ofthe parcel including the current topography and vegetation. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Director if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) 7. A written description ofthe proposal and a written explanation of Section I - Introduction how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Ullr Lodge Minor HPC Review 8 January 25,2000 1 1 Ilill 1 11 1 ' .1 -17 il â€¢19- : =) 1 ; r I f It 4 " r :. ULLR LODGE - MAIN STREET VIEW (EXISTING TO REMAIN AS IS) e :9Â· , . 1 ~ L.*1 .:tr 1 , . ; 51 : Â· 4.9. i .. t- 1 GWN- *1 . 1111. 2~1*AV. 116-.Milf 1 2:mer.Will:"Imill'llillillilillillil""I"lillilli'"Ilill"'ll -44*44 1 en- 0924.3 + 3 7 20EDÂ· dy.- . Â·r 4 i .1 V 4 ' '.Al -- ~>*1*i: â‚¬*2<21=.~iÂ· _ 1.-,4-91<,. 1 fs#.*tr 14/44.2 -rk'.-LU- %4 3 . 0*'.-acl///9///m/&~. ay. de-ii;~ 42; 0 01'Iia -Â·')1 h r ..% 1 'k -4 r 1 h. El%~â€¢FR/E/////RES/ZEAM///////////1/// 54.44 1 -- .1 rÂ¥* .11- ..... .... - -6- . *,Uat.. ... #....Rk,&&035m- 1/k_---a5*ft Â«t T -'/ iliti .24 . ~17.5,"r).4- -f 5TH STREET ELEVATION (EXISTING CONDITIONS) 1 F 1 I ' 1 - 3,4 4 694-li.,51,1 . 4 ...il/i// '....../, ilf..../... 4 I %~.V ./ 63.r m= I- 1 ~FL-~c=i=;'121- A - , 1 \1. 4 - I.,~ 41 Â» 41 , f .D,3,4,2#j::1~) .. 03 ./k - - - 1 - 1.lip, ./ Illillk* - 2,-=~~, 2. . EAST COURTYARD ELEVATION I 7/'Ill' 2 '1 =.iMWet . I la 1 . -e,4 -- .i= - 4 -f L- 4 . 1 1. . b ..... 1- 1- - 1 -2. r , . D--1- Â£ I -7.- . -- 4 -21. - L e L- 1 t .. . 4.. . . . Commitment for Title Insurance ~~-~deli4 National litle Insurance Company --1 Stock Company h COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, herein called the Company, forvaluable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiumsand charggstherefore; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. ' This Commitment sha// be effective only when the identity of the proposed /nsured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitmentis preliminary totheissuance of such policy or policies of title insuranceand allliability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or ~thorized officer or agent. /icies isnot the fau/t of the Company. This Commitment sha// notbe va/id orbinding unt// countersignedbyan .. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed,to ~dome valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-taws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Dat'e." Pltkin County Tide, Inc. 601 E. Hopkin# Avenim 3rd Floor A.pen. Colorado 8 I 611 Fidelity National Title InsuranceCompany 970-925-1766 Phone 970.925.6527 14.x BY (SEAL: i J P I 1,/4.:$ f + ATTEST , ~49 71 1 tr 4 1 Countersigned Author#*kture Secretmy |~ORM 27-83-66 (9/94) Valid Only if Schedule A and B are Attached TA COMMITMENT - 1966 The condition, oithh commitment require that the premium and charges be paid prior to the lisuance of the Utle policy(4 Therefore, no potky(â€¢) â€¢Dul belâ€¢ued until the charges have been remitted to the Issuing agent. 4%.4,2:01*B.Â·~1 70 1 ./. 11 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A Effective Date: 07/13/99 at 08:30 A.M. Case No. PCT14306C21 Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 4,110,000.00 Premium$ 7,164.00 : Â·.- Proposed Insured: Rate :STANDRAD 2'0 Â· - 4 CARBONDALE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 3,225,000.00 Premium$ 100.00 Proposed Insured: Rate:COMPANION t TO BE DETERMINED . Tax Certificate: $10.00 Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: ULLR LODGE INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOTS K, L, M, N AND THE WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT 0, BLOCK 30, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 61/ 1--_--22 - -- Provisions and Scheddles 970-925-6527 FAX A and B are attached.,, AUTHORIZED AGENT . 8 'I . . IT ~ ~ SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS ...4 The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors vt of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ". ITEM (b) Proper instrument (s) creating the estate or interest to be, insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: ...G- Â·6:.:I--2:' i ~~ - 1. Release by the Public Trustee of the, Deed of Trust from : ANTHONY J. PERCIVAL AND FREDERICA M. PERCIVAL . to the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN for the use of : EARL C. SCHENNUM, JR.; CAROL M. SCHENNUM AND DEBORAH J. SCHENNUM original amount : $740,000.00 dated : March 1, 1978. recorded : March 1, 1978 in Book 344 at Page 174 , reception no. : 202214 , The Beneficial interest in the above Deed of Trust was assigned to The Schennum's Company by instrument recorded March 14, 1978 in Book 344 at Page 738. The Beneficial interest in the above Deed of Trust was assigned to Earl C.Schennum, Jr., Carol M. Schennum and Deborah J. Fletcher by instrument recorded February 17, 1983 in Book 440 at Page 688 undivided 26.88% interest in the above Deed of Trust was assigned Earl C. Schennum, Jr., Trustee by Deborah J. Fletcher by instrument -ecorded February 17, 1983 in Book 440 at Page 689. - . 2 Release by the Public Trustee of the, Deed of Trust from : ULLR LODGE INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION to the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN for the use of : FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN ASPEN original amount : $50,000.00 dated : January 25, 1984 recorded : March 28, 1984 in Book 463 at Page 673 reception no. : 258332 Extension Agreement recorded in connection with the above Deed of Trust on May 9, 1990 in Book 620 at Page 188. 3. Deed, executed by the President or Vice President or other designed+ authorized by the Board of Directors of ULLR LODGE, INC. a COLORADO Corporation TO : CARBONDALE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION NOTE: Corporate Seal or Facsimilie should be affixed. 6. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that CARBONDALE AFFORDABLE HOUSEING CORPORATION is a duly existing and valid corporation isting pursuant to the laws of the State of , must delivered to and approved by the Company. (Continued) th 4 --- I. - I 9 #hy Â·: 2..Em-Â·Â· 'e I . eed of Trust from : CARBONDALE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION o the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN or the use of : THE LENDER TO BE INSURED HEREUNDER * 1* to secure : $3,225,000.00 6. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer' Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990) has been paid or exempted. . 7. Certi f icate of nonforeign status executed by the transferor (s) . i (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 8. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale,* l, Notice to County Assessor as required by H.B. 1288 has been complied , with. (This instrument is not required to be recorded, but must be delivered to and retained by the Assessors Office in the County in which the property is situated) 3. Completion of Form DR 1079 regarding the witholding of Colorado Tax on the sale by certain persons, corporations and firms selling Real Property in the State of Colorado. (This instrument is not required to be recorded) .. ' t - , ./ . 4 .. r SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 , EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to theIVS*Â»3Â·. following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the" Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public recorddr- ... 2,2 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records . r 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records .' , 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subs&quent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City Â·* of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 356 & 357 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held ..under existing laws". Ill/Mineral reservation as set forth in Deed recorded February 18, 1964 in Book 206 at Page 27. (Affects Lot N and the West one-half of Lot 0, 9. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in ' Easement Agreement recorded December 11, 1986 in Book 524 at Page 842. 1 ' . . r ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 4 ''. 1'. to>'% AND DISCLOSURES u Owner' s Policy to be issued, i f any shall contain the ,following -: cems in addition to the ones set forth above: . (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1.-'.; (2) Water rights, claims or title to water. (NOTE: THIS EXCEPTION :Â·- f WILL APPEAR ON THE OWNER'S AND MORTGAGE POLICY TO BE ISSUED ...~ HEREUNDER) Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-2; NOTE : Each title entity shall notify in writing every prospective < insured in an owner's title insurance policy for a single family residence (including a condominim or .townhouse unit) (i) of that title entity's general requirements for the deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to unfiled mechanics or materialmens liens, except when said coverage or insurance is extended to the insured under the terms of the policy.. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the .Company against unfiled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons indicated in the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. Upon receipt of these items and any others requirements to be specified by the Company upon request, Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the ' .' Owner's policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requirement upon any title insurer to provide mechanics or materialmens lien coverage. TE: If the Company conducts the owners or loan closing under circumstances where it is responsible for the recotding or filing of legal documents from said transaction, the Cdmpany will be deemed to .have provided "Gap Coverage" . 44& Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122); (a) The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District; (b) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained form the County treasurer of the:County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (C) Information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: A tax Certi f icate will be ordered from the County Treasuren 'by the Company and the costs thereof charged to the proposed insured unless written instruction to the contrary are received by the company prior to the issuance of the Title Policy anticipated by this Commitment. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT14306C2 A and B are attached. 2%44, P . 1 *. [2]4 4 47 1 1 1 , 1 1 ~- -- | 1 FÂ£-172~ ~ia-~-~-2 4 .3--1 A%4&J16 L rÂ·Â·-'r-Â·:1 1 = 11 It 1! It 6 /- @>17-]--~ L[--2 22-22---=2-LE-1-~ ~-f-% 09-1 - 11 4 BLEEKER STREET I r ~0727---1 F-rr--------1 L i 2 0 I 4 EP , lap' 1&011 0 r 11[41 111=Am, 1 -1*,3.*ELIJ-=--teâ€¢Er/-2291---=4 ; 4-it/) ff=i*..222~1~1* [i~ -- 1 1 -,j . 16 1 1%1 09/ ~ . 1 1 1 4. 91 u &,*.3 1 r t, le â€¢ -1 1 13 *le 1 }1 9 /1 i VEZEL.7-fitdt--425*1 43:.IL.zÂ·21.,23~-ci~1=32=&Â£2236=2=PJ C\, <I,-- - -w-- _j MAIN STREET - STATE HIGHWAY 82 /Z _-I-f%/.3~717-:t~C- E--- ..................1.--7--------.--.---rm. C====:r-- 1 4-2 - 23@-6-1 i 146/Ii,. ~3 1 4,~- -1. - 7 â€¢ 1 lili : - 1,1 6 151, -Hi~ r ~41-*A gf. M [ 111 , 13*1* 1 11 It HOPKINS STREET _ 1/ L i i 7--4 /31 4 f i -17 ill I 4-;I L_......# I . E- 1 4 3 EXISTING /61 35, 300 52* 100 VICINITY MAP Â°.U___ 1, 3-illi~ kel ; and assoc~ates *ANâ€¢r/'01.fanâ€¢Un~- ALLEY BLOCK 30 WA O,10-0 /011 - PARALLEL 1 - COMPACT 1-Ull 1 PARKING - Ill 12-05-fig : LONG SPACES. NEFY LIGHT-~~ INELL PROSRESS ~ ELECTRIC ~ TRANSFORMER I[4 0 1-:=9-1 to 11 14 15 16 1 1 I '. lo 11 1 4 ---PROP. LIN21 ' LIGHT 1 EXIST. EXIST. 1 AILLS TO BE CORRIDOR 1 REMOVED r1 a L NEÂ»I L!6HT f 1-- UNIT â€¢19 I n MIELL 11 1 71 =En /////////b \ \ NOTE: 0 EXIST CONCRETE 6 ~ r 1- - ---!~ ~REE~tli~~t~*~~5/ 1 Â¢ eXIST. STilb . PARKING THIS PLAN IS TO SE AREA UPGRADED \0.13~ /// PRELIMINARY. ONLY BASIC FUNCTIONAL \ -EXIST. SPA I f FEATURES ARE SHOPIN. X TO REMAIN I EXACT CONFIGURATION , 3 COURTÂ¥ARD AMENFTIES /r UNIT #24 UNIT #30 1 ~ 1 | TO BE DETERMINED. 4 LIA 0040 4 LANOMAPIN6 TO BE ~ ~ h . DETERMINED. 4 COURTYARD 8 11 DESIGN ~ T.B.D. ~ ENTRY 1 Â» 1 --- --NON 541/6 UNIT , - ~ ,LROOF ULLR LOOSE 2 ENTR~ BELOR ~~--NEÂ»1 STAIRS ~ FORMER . ~ t OVERHANG 1 1 ~ POOL 1 0Â¥PICAL) 1 1-3- \\1: '- 11 - -,11LIGHT WELL - ASPet COLORADO 1 HANDICAP -7 1 BUILOINS -TO I f 4+ PARKIN6 BE REMOVED) EXIST. STORAaE - 4 \ OPEN!26_ _ __. L. .1 _ JU W . '1] FLAT PATIO 11 I ARCRED / Â£*\ST BALCONf j (ROOF OF ROOMS 0 1 L--072>395-Â¤- BELOW ~ NEY[ C - . AISLE tl li n u U Z 0 - C r 1 \ r X LOC>de NEM -- EXIST. FENCE 1 SIDEMALK TO REMAIN RHEELCHAIR ACCESS 40900-I,N EXIST. CURB CUT \L-CONCRETE CURB 4 SUTTEME-~ PLAN .AL. p. Â»4, WEST MAIN STREET 1 Al.1 NORTH FIFTH STREET 15'-O" 8'-O" 8.-64 a h it g DEPOSIT CERTIFICATE i &ZENT 4 DEr*:IrED â„¢11 DAY . .1/_IN looK Of TIE Col*â„¢ I - Ull SURVEY KATI IT - P- Al RECortoll NO. .â„¢11 LKÂ® SURVEY ILAT Co-LIES nâ„¢ SECTION Â»-51-10* COLOUOO REVISED STArUES. â€¢Ello,11 I: 1 -- - A Cou,rn CLERK - rioisH,i i. swni. IN,06 .s In 8,6 - .. a . .. ALLEY BLOCK 30 . .... ..... . .... . ...... r... . A .. . . r SCALE .. .. 1 INCH - 10 FEET 1- . ~ ' 0510,520 .... CO,AIUMICAT ION Â·/ELECTRIC A 1 - EASEMENT ELEC - BOOK 524 PAGE 842 '0'.2 ELECTRIC 4.. lOT k ~ - TRAN:Folll 4 .. 1 1 / 2 STORY .0-dERC I AL LODGING BUILDING C 6 . .. LOT Â£ WITH BASEINT .14 / 2 I. 'INDOI~ --i 5< . / . ... 1 1 1 1 - WALK 1 3 F--- LOT 4-1. 1-/ fÂ«\1 ..2. 1 LOT N f .... 2 / 4 / 11 1 1 0.- / 1 1 h l Lop O 1 8 < . f / / 0 1 f 'FA I / 6\\\\ 2 l Â£ 1 / 0 LOT P 1 -1 / / \ /0 1 I 'les. 1 1 1 .4 ... 1 /4; 1 1 1 1 1 32122 N I / LEGEND & NOTES / . 3% 4 1 1 /1 1. 1 STORAGE k 4 . '01 I FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT REBAR WITH CAP AS NOTED 1 9 ~ 8 SPIKE OR P-K NAIL SURVEY CONTROL CITY / k C Woâ€¢aENT L. 24.0 Â· r ---1 1 SUBDIV I S ION PLAT WAS SOLE SOURCE OF RECORD INFORMATION HORZ. CONTROL - -- POSTED ADDRESS IS -520 WEST MAIN STREET- 4..11 1 - A 1 15 0 5ET PROPERTY CORNER NO. 4 REBAR RED CAP -16129Â· . y . -1 1 WArER ~ -e- WOOD FENCE ' a â€¢ ZTER i FNEe, ~ ' 0 1- WIRE FENCE .. O UTILITY BOX ~ b ~ . . 1~ PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. TITLE Col-ITIENT PCT-14306C2 â€¢ ~ ~ DATED 07/13/1909 WAS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS CONCRETE *ALL .~-' | - SURVEY CERTIFICATION / I ... .....#i I ... CERTIFTY TO: KLI LODGE INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION CAR-C~LE AFFORABLE NOUSING CORP-TZON ' @, Â¢01.271 . . Car : /-KIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. a.8 . I a t. DAVID I. M.NICE. I REGISTERED LAND SURVIVOR IN nE STATE of: WEST . GUTTER COLOUDO Do )'ERSÂ¥ CERTIFY THAT â„¢t, SURVEY WAS HELD SURVEYED .. OUR,Ne AUG*JiT, 1999 ON nâ€¢E GROUÂ»Â® OF THE MPERTY Â· : . " . 1 LEGALLY DE,Calle IENEON. /NO 15 CORRECT BASED ON TIE FIELD EVIDENCEE MAIN - 3,40- 4 R,UÂ® 18Â£01. AlÂ® â„¢AT DERE ARE NO DGI SCREPANCE B. Co,FliCTS. ICITNIES 111 AREA. IOU,Â®ARY Lilli CO-LICTS. ENCROAO,ENTS. STREET OVERLAPPIN@ OF Or,OyeENTS . EASEPENTS OR RIGITS 0, WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE * 00- TO 4. EXCEPT ,4 HEREON SHOVI. MIDERGROUBID UTILITIES IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WITH NO Â¥1$11LE A/1.ATEMANCES AZ DOCUIENTI OF RECORD NOT FURN;SHED To TIâ‚¬ st~Â¥Er[1 - CE,TED. THIS CERTIFICAr,011 11 Â¥010 UMESS Â· U L LR LODGE ~Er STN,w ir ~ SEAL OF THE IMVEYOR//0~/~**A 0910 Â¥ Al#* ALI#29 ip#*414 st.Dâ„¢Isa w * -Aug-- #%r4&). LOTS K, L M N Ind the 01:1 W. 44' WEST 1/2 OF L.OT O BLOCK 30, 14 CITY & TOWNS I TE 04 ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO AREA - 13,500 30*RE FEET Â·/- PREPARED BY t ACÂ©'-1- . 9:'*1" L"'I ... CC~~1. 'ff t.-'L '"1- - lae ,- ./ DIFET i. â„¢. ... .....1 n./ rEM. AFTEÂ¥ roe ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 'ti. st,cll........ t' 10 E'fOIF, I.l /. 1Â£11- ... - 210 5. GALENA STREET '9 04 '. Â¥ i. CE-'Fle*rl- .'- "."11. ASPEN, COLO. 81611 PHONE/FAX (9701 025-3816 job ... 10200 AUGUST 24, 1999 ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: _Courtyard Commons Applicant: Carbondale Affordable Housing Corporation Location: 520 West Main Street, Aspen. CO Lot Size: 13.500 square feet (per Assessor) (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 0 Proposed: 0 Number of residential units: Existing: 27 Proposed: 30 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 37 Proposed: 41 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): NA DIMENSIONS: Floor Area Existing: 1 1,920* Allowable: 14,850 @ Proposed: 11,900* 1.1:1 FAR Principal building height Existing: 25'+1- Allowable: TBD Proposed: 25' +/- Access building height Existing: N/A Allowable: N/A Proposed: N/AÂ· On-Site Parking Existing: 16-18 Allowable: 41 Max Proposed: 16 - % Site Coverage Existing: 38% Allowable: TBD Proposed: 37% % Open Space Existing: 62% Allowable: TBD Proposed: 63% Front Setback Existing: 10' Allowable: TBD Proposed: 10' Rear Setback Existing: 9' Allowable: TBD Proposed: 9' Combined F/R Existing: 19' Allowable: TBD Proposed: 19' Side Setback Existing: 9 Allowable: TBD Proposed: 5' (East): Side Setback Existing: 23' Allowable: TBD Proposed: 23' (West): Combined Sides: Existing: 28' Allowable: TBD Proposed: 28' , TBD = to be determined during PUD Review Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Existing and proposed parking does not conform and is currently partly in the right of way. Variations requested: To accept parking plan as presented in Section 6. *Floor Area is an approximation based on rough assumptions of exposed lower level light well areas, and ot, :lurveyed unit areas, which do not include wall thicknesses and duplicate internal stair areas. Hence, an accurate number could bc , 1- 200-300 st however, the difference between 'existing' and 'proposed' should be minimal. Ullr Lodge Minor PUD Application January 2000 1 1 1 EXIST. NER FOW < UNCHANSED NEM / UPGRADED EXIST. FOM TO REMAIN m n NEW FOFN 1 NER DOOR 111 lili 111 lili lili l'Ill 111 ]111 1 Ill 11111 111 M lili 1 11 lili lilli lili lilli 11 011 lil li 1111 1/11 (1 11 IlÂ· ' 11 Il IM I 11 1 N Ill r I!/ 111 11 1' 1 ~: ' 1/ 11 1 Il Ill 11 'li li Ill 11 Ull lilli 1 1 1.11 1 ' 111 i lill I ~ 1 1 1 lili 4, I Illi 1 1 I 11 Il i Ill, 1 lill Il i lill 1 1 F HI il 1 ill Il 1 0 A 1 11"Il ~ Il~'i i li i 11~11.11 lili i Ii'il/11'11 I '1 1 i 1 11.11 XHI i iii I lilil i Ii 11 Ill H Il Ill 1 H li lli 1 I.1 Il 1 .J Â£ I i d 1| 1 1 6' || Il Il || |~ I Il Il || l|im Il l |I || 1 1 I! 1 Il U 1 ~I 7r 1 I| 1 1~ li ill| l || ~ I| Il I| 1 1 1 li lill 1 11 Il Il Il 11 1 Il H VII Il Il 11 Ill il 1 11 X 1 l ili 1 1 Il 11 11 1 l ili U , EXIST. FOM b II Il iii ii Ill Il li~ Il H kill li 1 i PI'l li i ~i ii; il il i H Iii h H i Hil Ii i li ilil 11 ~11 Hil lili Il i f 1111 1 Ill lili i lil ili~ lill li R Nr 1 1 1 11 i ii Il 1 1/1 i ii li i i illi illi Il Il li / TO REMAIN i i 11 111111 111111 111 111 Illl l' 111 11 li ;1 1 1111 lili 11 111 I lili 11 1 11 i Ill'll i ! 11 Il 11 11/11 a lili 1 11 f 1 7 11 Â£ 1111~ lili 1111 ~mlli Un lili Il/~11~ 11 H IllT ~111 U /11 i 11~il lili 111 81 "1/ 11 1~ 1~11.11 Ill Il lili I~ lili ~ 11~I 111111.11 Ull 111'1 1 ~11 '1 1:Â£ 11 Ill~ U lili 11 lili ~I lili Il mII .1/~ 11 111,1 U 111' 11 Il/[1 ~ 1~M 11.11.11.11 ~Ill 11 lili M 1111.11 1111 KA I~ Il 11~1.11 Il~i ~/1 1~ 1~1 11 1111 Il ~11 1~ lili ) 11]/f ~ ~ 1 11 11 1 1 11 Il 1111 ~UN HH HFD #MU ID E 81 I b MUU lel~b 111~ Â·1 ~~ ~ 11 ,111 HU 1 1111 10 7 Im li ~ UNET 11 I 11 01 111: 1; 11 11 11 lili / 1 b 1, 11 11 PH- 4~i ]>M-'~ii U J u LJ - i.j L L.~ ~ 'L/ I.-I ' L~ /L U / i / , 3 0 I - .1 - 9 - , - - ~*~ -~- _ _-- __ - EXIST BALOONÂ¥ TO REMAIN _ + TO. PLY.O EL. 742-71-0. 1 2> / \ / 1 NEPN FOR \ 1 \ \ \ fl' 1 1 \ / \ .,1 1 11 11 1 V 1 11' 11 11 ~ 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 1 11 11 ~1 1~ \ ,*111 1 "' P\" 1 -'r Illi lili I'll 'I IJ " M i! M lill i ~h. 1 '6 . i . / 8 11 11 1111 1 1 11 \11 ~11 11 lili 11 ~11~ 1! lili 11 11!1 li 1 11 ~ lili 11 A.1 \ \11 11 1 \ EL. 79Iq'-35' / 11 11 11 It 1~ 1111 \ 11 111 1111 11 ~1 ~ \ It 11 11 111~ 1 1 H 11 11 11 T' 1 11 l' Il Il Il 'll \i, lilli! \ 1 1 JL. 0 - 11 1 1 1 \ \ 4 1 1 1 ~ 1/1 1 1 ICZEZZEDI 1/ 1 1 1 1 1 0------4 1 1 1/ 1 1 1 1 1 t-----MI NEM STAIR 4 i___1 1 1 1 IC.-2223 1 SUARDRAIL 1 1 1 L-----41 DESIGN T.B.D. L---L___ I -_____ T. O. 60% EL. 7qltÂ·-4- NEW HANDRAIL DESIGN T.eD. NEW ADA ~' Dll LOCKERS EXIST. DOOR TO REMAIN TO REMAIN I ./,0/60/:'alÂ·.Â·J rih WEST ELEVATION 1 l35,/ SCALE, JAI"=I'-0â€¢ Tn: fÂ»74 -5.- b < NEW / UPGRADED UNCHANGED EXIST. EXIST SKYLIGHTS EXIST. Appe r-1 1-1 TO REMAIN TO REMAIN . PI| Pll| |||||~| ill i /~- 11 1 P 4yll 11[ 41/ 11 \11 -1 11. 11.11 '11 . . , 1 1 Li ]Pl 1 1 1 1 : 1 111 1 1111 11 11 1 1111 11 Il 11 LL..1 1 11 11 11 >r 1 111 1 Mill' lili 111111 11111 11110.1.1 I'll\, Ilill! 1111 !lilli Ila ............ Illill 111'M lili lili Ill'll Ill'li 1 111 11 lili 11 111 11 WI 11 11 lili 1111 I' 5â‚¬12 11 i 11 1 11 Ill li lin Il lili 1 111 11 A 1 1 11 1 11\ lili 1 11 1 11 11 li Il l' 1 Il .............. lill i 11 11 lili 1 lili 1111 b i 1 1 11 11 1 lit 1111 1111 11111 11 I 11 3737 1 -t I 11 I I 111111111111111' lili/lilli 1111 \111 1111111111111 ...........1 Ul 111111 ~11 1111 11'l ili i 1 --T 11 :1 11 11 11 ~ 0 lili 11 111~ 11 11 11 ~1 11 lili 11% 11 11 11 1 11 i 11\ 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1111 1 11 . a .... .... 11 11 ~1 11 1111 lilli 11 H libl! 11 li 'r H 111 11 lili 11 1111 11 R 11 11 Il 11 11 11 1111 li & 111 1, M 11 Wl' 11 1111 11 1111 H 11/ 11 lili 11 Il 11 11 811 11 lili 1 111~ 1 lili 11....... ....... 1~ 11 11 11 11 lilli lili 1111:1 11 111 lili ~ Bil & I~I I ~t l Il.I H PI I Nk-.8 Fl B u.1 ~ ill - U Ii ll ~1 4 ~.t im 0 H 2 l i I1 I ~lii Ul i li h Bl I~ Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â· 9 8 ~I G k~l U ~I ~ MI Il *i ixp bl' 1111~ ~1 lilli,1 1 1~ IN 1111111 11 1111,11 11 1111 11111~ 1,11 l' 11 1111 1111 11 1111 1 111 11 11 11 11 11 1111 1 111111 11 9/ 11 l' 11 1~ MI lilli 1 11 11 11~11 11 1111 1 1~ 11 Â· .Â· Â·.. ..... 1111 ~ -:~ { * lili lilli 11 - - 0/ a l.-1 U U U ~ ~ L -LI L ' U i' . '-1 LI J - NEÂ»1 DOOR ~ 1-J~ ~ ~~ 1 , ~ *~. ~*. --- \ 1 11 EÂ«BALOONÂ¥ 028 ~~~~~-.~~~~I~''I~~~~I~I.I,- ~4; TO REMAIN TOI Calâ‚¬. ..... 9 1 EL. 1427'-0. ~ - - - - - - NER STAIR 8 SUARDRAIL NEW DOOR 4 ad 1111 illjÂ»:A 1 CLOSET - ~ EXIST. DECK. / TO REMAIN ~ ' /'\ 1 1 1 Tet= Â¢ - - - - - - - - - / 4. 11 \ 11 1 1.94 MAIN ST. / : 21* Â· ~ -1 -In I -Prl- \ \1 / tdi#wrji . 1 1 1 -09 6/ 1 I N. \. \ 11 NER STEPS 11%1 0/ -- ill 1 TO BE . I REMODELED \ ~-NEM GUARDRAIL ~ DESIGN T.B.D. EL.lqll'-4- ~ - - - ~ '- - - / EXIST. VOWS 1 1 EL (4\828<5 . , ' TO REMAIN / 11 NEM POOR 211221 .câ€ž.2..14'3 , 4 ' / .9 . S . T. D. COL EL. 1408'-OÂ· ~ . I : 5 /- . 11=6-111 NEYX LIGHT - 9.,am&*S~i,12~323431 INELL -11 Etl I El i 1 =11 2 JLTE-w EFE, 1011=111=!11-11 =11 =11 E I lEi I !Ell Et I Eli 12 11~ i Ir =i].*.1.*Im =P**Lly -111=dill=dll=LU=111*11EWall:=111=lifE,I[EIRIP'=111-11E11,Ell'=-11= 1 -EFEI[EÂ»[27ml l iai I lal.[IEEE; 1 El i lei I 12.2-1 ~ ma l a l E!11-1 E EXIST POOL TO BE FILLED IN - ELEVATION 4 ..1,4, 4,Â¥3('3.0,-7 / 2 j SECTION o MULTI LEVEL UNIT / COURTYARP **Id-Â¥0â€¢110â€¢~- < A3.I ) SGALE: ttl==1'-O' i---= *AU' 'I.I. cal'.O i,11/ rn: f.- Â·t bil ~ and associates 01***540...i"t - I= W = ALLEY BLOCK 30 1.1 m. =Ii/:- PARALLEL COMPACT . PARKING - 11. LONS SPACES. 12-05-44 PROSRESS ~ ELECTRIC ~ TRANSFORMER - IS 16 o li 1 1 11 1 EXIST. AP. LIN~ ~ 11 1 LUSHT , - EXIST I RELLS TO BE 1 ' 11/ CORRIDOR 1 REMOVED L__ L~~~ LleHT UNIT â€¢101 | 91 MIELL Il extsr NOTE: PARKIN6 PRELIMINARY. ONLY AREA UPSRAOED ir Z j THIS PLAN IS BASIC FUNCTTONAL EXIST. SPA | FEATURES ARE SHOWN. TO REMAIN EXACT CONFIeURATION 5 YYALK TO BE DETERMINED. / UNIT *21 UNIT *30 ~ h 1 1 4 LANDSCAPINe TO BE COURTYARD AMENITIES f ff DESIGN 4 'COURTYARD ~ ~: DETERMINED. 1 / -NE),4 UNIT r.5 0 ~ ENTRY ~ 3 , --1-----7 MALK M",---4 1 + a - 0'l- 4 ULLR LOOSE ---- --NEYV 54/C LIMIT 2 L~~eg STAIRS -~0% FORMER 1 3 OVERHANe ENTR~ BELOW , 1 - POOL , IL 1 (TYPICAU 1 , L 11 -2Â¥=1*.19.43 -ret-L........ J ~ 1 f 0.4 Got.Al.A,DO C# 2-:ZE: 0 IT up' - POOL HANDICAP ~ . , SUILOING -TO 1 PARK]Ne BEE REMOVED LEXIST STORAGE - ARCINED AL % 1/11/1 1 FLAT PA'ria O OPEN!Â».L_______Jud I L_ ROOMS Â¤ ISA SALÂ»P~ j (ROOF oF X -- \114 M TR N 1- r 5= i BELOIN) O 1 NEW )46 - . AISLE ! er- - - -- - u il U U = -- -- /1 \ c NErt --EXIST. PENCE 1.. 4 -EELCHAIR SIDEWALK To REMAIN LODGE ./'...1 - EXIST. CURS CArr ~CONCRETE CURS â€¢ GUTTER-~ PLJWN WEST MAIN STREET il. 1 -3]Â¤ ~-[-2 NORTH FIFTH STREET -0- 8'-0- 8'-6" 8'-6- TY a 13 it M DEPOSIT CERTIFICATE ' Lw- ~0Â¥rr PlAT, Ar _ P- . -c/Tr... â„¢1. . LAIÂ® amlY MAT COÂ»~10 -14 11010,1 3,-Sl-ill Call,al REÂ¥,16@ Stinjll. - - I . I. . N ALLEY BLOCK ...... -.. .. .... .. . .... .. A 1 I. Â·Â· Â·Â·t~/ SCALE .11- .. . a. \ 1 4 - .00. , INell - '0 FEET 1 . .. I. - --1 ,/ ELECTRIC L BOOK 324 PAGE /42 Call,MICATION EASEMENT S 1 6='*.v--2 1 nIc,nic ... 1 . .. . Tle#Il"U 1 LOT K / EUC Â·j . . : STOIr C-ERCIAL LOCal 48 3111 LIllie ,, -1-- I. I - .1 *. - .1 LOT L IMI IASE]ENT / .44 .. / 1 -1â€ž 1 . 1 j~1 - 3, 1 1 .. . 1 2 ; LOT ON 1 ... 6 11 1 1 1 1 h 1 l LOT Q : / 0 / . . . VAL, ; 1 C / 1 / \ /3 LOT p .. / i /0 , 1 14 --,1 f-4. 1 1 .. Illk 1 l / LEGEND & NOTES / / //2 / V:/6 2 / \ .. 3,0.- 1 1 t' 1 1 .. /* / 4 0 FOUND SUIVEY â€žUNIRENT REBAR ,Â£714 CAP AS NOTED (\1 / * CO /1 9 sPIKE OR P-K MAIL SURVEY CONTROL , Cirr 1 ~l 1 I k & SUBM"ON Pul 'AS SOLE souNCE OF HCORS \MFO~it\On N . â€¢01â€¢â€¢ENT L 2. o MORZ. CONTNIC 0 ~~~~~2 -7 'CO / / POSTED ADORESS IS 520 IEST EN :TREET ' 1 3 1 W 0 5ET PROPERTY CORNER 40 4 REBAR RED CAP - '6 IZ# . ... -1 1 -5- wOOD FENCE 4 -4- .1 RE FENCE , . ITER / ROOF OVERHANG . . . . 11' 1â„¢'CAL' t O UTILITY i= 0*4 < ~~m,N COUNT'r rlrLE, fNC. TIrt.E Co-Inâ‚¬MT DCT-tâ€¢300C2 ~ - ,~ j~ DATED 07/13/1999 WAS USED IN nâ‚¬ PREPARATION M THIS SURVEY CERTIFICATION . . . "-#. 1 . , ' / I & . *I.- / 1 1 Â· 35 ' Â· CERT 1 'TY Toi 61-U LollE INC., A COLORADO CORPOUTION . .......... ... 4% i - C--U AFFORULE *-MOR-nol COAt*t ... pirÂ·KIN CCUrrY Tllu, 41â€¢C. Q./. 0 l. OAVID I. 1%MICE. A Rel:STENÂ® LAIO IllylÂ¥01 11 11~ STATE * 4157' Â· k / COLORADO DO IesÂ¥ CERTIFÂ¥ T~T â„¢11 -Â¥EY w MIEU, SURVEY. â€¢il.-I l DIAM A-JIT, 10- Gll TW -Ough 00 Tli PIN#I L~LLY DEIOIW *49*N. ME) IS CORRICT MIED 0,1 114 FIELD EVIDENCE MAIN Â»10- AS N. 1-,0,1. 31Â® THAT ng, AR, 40 091,CREPANC: ES. -42.... Co,04. ICTS. IHIT/-1 Iâ€¢ A)11â€¢. IOUOI/Y LII~ Col~ICTS. e,CROAOIUTS. STREET - Ove*LA,/1- / lillovllem. EA--TI OR RINIT, 0, IAY IN *lat, MDENCE Ol Um- TO It 0Â¤FY AS ,*11Nll m-1. M~llilluÂ® UTILITIES IMPROVEMENT SURVEY 11â„¢ I Villâ€¢U A~UNTE,64*ds A,Â® DOCUISm W *10010 NOT FUU,me m ne sul-r= ME i,0,/W. â„¢,i Cm/,PICATHÂ» is volo t,us: ULLR LODGE L:CA?!.3 2,"'*79'1;0~~ LOTS K, L M N and the CZ.:1 W, 1 ' -4.- t. 4 WEST 1/2 Op LOT 0 8LOCK 30, CITY & TOWNS I TE 013 ASPEN, DAÂ¥$0 I. MWI,01 lil lilli : ./:. IIi f PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO VÂ¥:te*:U AREA - 13,500 50Â£11 FEET â€¢/- PREPARED IY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC 210 S. GALE}u sT MEET UP- *- . -W. -1- - -I- ASFEN, CoLO. Stall â€¢10111/â€¢AM t 9701 925-3816 j..... 10200 4/01/T 24, Ill -Ill--- - m NORTH FIFTH STREE .. r -. .. EXIST. NEM FNDA. UNCHANSED NEYN / UPBRADED /9 2 / EXIST. 04001 TO REMAIN mr-1 NEW POW. - NER DOOR 1 p U N '| 1 4 'I 1 Il d 1 4 'l d :l v 11 11 11 I li 11 11 * 1 11 . 9 1 1 & 1 â€ž .4 1 '1 i' 1 1.11 1 Fil '! 1 il J I i: Â·/1 Il 11 1 li 1 i 11 i Il ) 4 d 1 i li Ik il iIA &, it 11 . 4 /41 i it I il 1 1.11 11 11 Il Ul "'" l"l HU lig 'Ei'" ~ij U''IC J:1 1111'i 111 1111~ lal liili 111 UÂ·i It'/11#.11 li2 lily j~.1 lilil Ul 1::i, li~ 11~ii Ili~/lilli 111 ~1111 fi! 111;i ll! Ii!li lli 0 11 ill lill ~I nll 11 02 ~1 01 It1 ~1' 41.11 ~1 U u~ ~1 ~ Il VI'~ ~1 ~1.11 m 1, "111 :d /,1 1 1,1 I~ '1.11 l~:1 !1 I~ ~ ~I'~ ' ~'1 ~{;' '1 '~~~ L 9~I /~ ~I ~ "9 ~~:~i 1/# 11 'I D 9111 4~In I ~' 4 EXIST. 04DY,1 i l H |l a I M I~ I I ' 1 4 H || ~1 * H' ~ I , 1 I' ~I U, ~| ~ ~ 1 || ~| ~ ~ '~ |~ d * 11 ~ ~ " IL '| L |~ ~1 I |1 H l i 1 1~ i| ~ ~ Â·~ ~ M ~ ~ 1 ~ 1~ A i' 9 1 2 ~ j< 1 i ,! 1~ Il ] a j '~~'~ P '~ 1$ 1 ~ ~ U N ~~ 1 N ~~ 4 ~~ TO REMAIN 24 VEN 8111 'I~11 1111 ill'll hi. 11'F ] !~11 mil! 1: ~11 lilli 111'w Iliill 1~~1 FLID/N 111.1 M I /1~ 5L uu'l I'lll' Ul' 1~11~ IHI ,1111/,F a ~~,1 ; ~<i ,rlk 9 1 1111 HH 11 j'I ~ NI 111 lilli Iii s i~ i 11 il Ill ! IE Il lillia I Ill 1 il I Il! 111 11 n Il 1 11 1| 111 0i ! Il m B 111 Il I|A 1 11 1~ |I Ul il li li i F 1! Il !I Il Ft i Il i| 'i d,i i. ii k 11 1 Ill l i|i lili 1 I VU 1 1 ~ 1 1 li 1 1 1 I il !I 1 9 J I & Il 1 i ~ 1 Il li 1 ,~ 11 il I~ ~ 1 1 1 Il Il 1 1 1 ! A '1 !1 8 1 1 l 11 4.11 ~ 1.11 1 1 & VI :1 I 1.11 Â§ 1 ! Il ~ Il 1 1.11 li I l 1 1 X 11 11 Il 1 1 1, d I i~/I l I 11 1 I 11 1 I 11 1.11 11 1 / 11 'U" h~'a '!M 1.]i~ Lill,1]-i'i'11'0||J I|Ill MIi# '111it ~Ill, ~)IN:iii 11Illl i~. 4~:' 4 /0i~111~1111'h,1//1~ ~1111 ..11~ tll! i~i /' I'~' 1 1 / U J U .U --LJ LI--0- L /lull LI-->/0 9- u 11 , 1 .-I f- - \ 1: - / 1 1 ~ ERST. BALCONf TO REMAIN * TO. PLÂ¥)â‚¬K -7 1 - - 1 EL. -7'â€¢21'-0 , / / NEW FVDA. \ / , ; , , .4~ A Ab n ~~il JI~ ~~r|#||~I~i~1â€ž ~11,4 2 1,\ 1 1 /.19 & Vill! ~\! I - Il ~i' i~ i M j ~I 'I Il - I *,~t 21,~ N ,En \ /1 bl liâ€¢ ' ~Ii '1 ill ,!,Ill''ll .i Mlit lili .1 / .1, 1 \ / \ \ \11 11 1 1 _ _ _ _ ~T O PLY}O EL. 1â€¢lel'-3' , || I !~1 1 4 11 .All 11 11 |I, Il , i,i ',. , ,j~ i ,1 1~i: /' 69 1 11 i 11\It 11 11 1 1 1 -1- \\\ 1/1 1 1 1\ IEZE.--31 1/ 1 1 1 1 \11------4 1 1 1 1 1 \1 t------1 1 NER STAI R 4 1/ 1 1 1 1 \I CZEZZE] 1 GUARD)RAIL DESIBN T.B.D. 1 1 1 \It-------1 1 - - - - Â¢ T. 0. Colâ‚¬.. EL. 19ll'-4 NEM HANDRAI L DESIGN T.B.O. NEM FOR . 19,1 EXIST SK f LOCKERS EXIST. DOOR TO REMAIN TO REMAIN P95 rn HEST ELEVATION 4*40.-S- C AS.1 j SCALE: 1/'=1'-0. 37&' - .1 L. 7-3 EXIST. < NEYN / UPeRADED UNCHANGED 1 / â€¢ 1 EXIST. SKYLIGHTS ,i~ EXIST. PNO)â€¢Is r-11-1 TO REMAIN TO REMAIN 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1/ 1. lili 11:. lilli It.. lili 1~:1 \,lilli ' ~11 U NCPI! A Ffill' hi ~ '1111 I ill iIN Hi AB.;i M\1 lilli! 11! 11111111'1141 ............... 41111 lilli 'iliii 'll'll ,~.Illil,t..1~ 1 4 1 lilli Il:I Il All III H IIi :, ,/ u 'i i| i 1 11 111 1 |111 11 1|| 1 lili 11 0 11 1 i| 1 A 1 1 1 11 U I! il || 111 1 ............. 11 Il' 111 il 1111 1 U i 11 1! B , 1 1 11 t 1 1 I ~1 3 111 1 11 i i i 7-T-T ~ I N 1 1 1 1 Il 11 1 Il 1 " ]11/ i ' ~ i \ 1 I i 1.1111 ..... .11 i i 1 R lilli 1 .11 ; 1 1 11, i Ill ill lili EN 'll. 11; A 11 11 R 11, 11 111 M 1. 11 1:1 ; lili :~ 4 111 2. lillia 11 1 !! 1 i' 1 1 IiI 1 117 11 11 11 11 ~1 ~ 11 All 1 11 1 i' 1 11 li lil It.............. f Il 1 ~ 1 li li 11 1 p I li li: 11 4 # 1 1 - I CT 1 11'll 0 I'll i 'll l' E TI--. 8 Fl Il 11 1 1 1 - 2 4 i ii Il l i 1 1 1 :0 1 H 1 I I ' 1 Â· i 1 ! I j i I q i' 1 1 - ... Â· .... 1 ,~ , 1 , 1 1 1 I! 1 1 11 U I 1 9..+ Ill lii Ill~Il "all 1 Iii ~il ilill Ilull ullu 114, 1!Ilil 11#111 lilli Ila Itur ig* ii *,1 ,pi Y.111 #il lill! 11-*~Â·.:-Â·:. Ii:~~f l#t Ill!:~ lull, I!-D>E/-r- 1 L.1 --1 1--1 i 1 L , 42 U~" J 1-2 ~ U' ' ' '~~~Â·.Â·'*~*Â·*Â·'J Â·LI .. NEFN DOOR 7 - i- I. / 1 1 1 TO REMAIN 1 r........... - - - li - ll' 11 f~AYL|liq 1 - NEM STAIR 4 SUARDRAIL DESIGN T.5.0. NEFâ€¢1 DOOR & . .. CLOSET -Nae - - ... EXIST. DECK TO REMAIN \ . -1 1 EL. 74101-3- 7 --11 \ - - 1357 4 4 LIli \ V +1 1 - . T. 0. 00.:. Â¢ . . .. Z . . .\ I I . 1 / '-1 / 1 \j EL VERIFY 1 .- 1 4 . . 4 . a Â·r -1,- -i - 1---- 41 11 1 r. \I h EXIST. ROONfl ~ NEM STEPS \ itf.Fy TO BE 4. REMODELED ~ ~ Â· ~NEM GUARDRAIL ~ ' 1, DESIGN TB.D. :. To. co, A _ _ ._ EL.1â€¢11'-4- ~ .. \ / EXIST. 90'NS :S. ZIEEIA _. - -1 / - TO REMAIN NER POOR i ,-2/-L--I - 1 4- ~24% - i 4 T. D. CONC. ---6 NER LIGHT - -imp- --7- 1 . ' . 1 1- /=LU=2-2-27-2.711 - 7 .--=-- INELL 'rfer-FE~FBERCIS~irrfgr*r tjÂ«=4Â«21 Â»97%43~~44&#SM&2574Â»3Â» â€¢ bil EXIST POOL TO BE FILLED IN P,5 - ELEVATION 4 / 2 ) SECTION o MULTI LEVEL UNIT / COURTYARD ~R~ SCALE, 404% I'-O' -8.-- *AU" -6 =.m= EXHIBIT , 0/b kid KÂ¢NFF- 24: 4112*[6\\\1 x61(6 INÂ»12(2161&*Rguffer 4 / 01(47 kip .1'WID fofÂ¢ 64[,NI 19*50,1 , ,/ ~ 1'4* i :* A k 4TP E - Fl[4182 1:3Â·'616 . ~~~~~ ~~~\~ / ~4 HWF - PIN-[60 8- 1 1\~ , 1 It\ f f I )1 \ Y 1 . Â· I 1 : r //\ 1 1 I I i 4 1 : 1 1; i 1 1 1 I- 1 1 1 11 1,1 - i l, r . 1 1 - f. ------A -, ~ 404% 97 ~4 1LÂ·~ 94*t[ 1 aff23---10- 1, 1 9/111 ~ 11 j-0 l' 146*l.00â‚¬/ 1111 IFIESERVATILCONI 500*~mu MEETING wuÂ£: NAME OF PROJECT: // O {P , / 4 4 1 4 CLERK: STAFF: WITNESSES: (1) (2) (3) 0) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report ( 4 (Check If Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice ( 0- (Check If Applicable) /3 lile (2~ 8 1?~t~~Af543 3 Board Criteria Sheet (-j (Check If Applicable) 4 5 MOTION: A/64 ALk *41 VOTE: YES NO .- SUZANNAH REID YES ~'-NO MARY HIRSCH YES NO SUSAN DODINGTON YES NO GILBERT SANCHEZ YES A-- NO ' LISA MARKALUNAS YES 1/ NO JEFFREY HALFERTY YES L---NO HEIDI FRIEDLAND YES NO CHRISTIE KIENAST YES 1-NO YES NO YES NO HPCVOTE FROM : Buena Vista FAX NO. : 949 723 1667 Feb. 09 2~ EXHIBIT Al and Denise Frink 9 Oceancrest Newport Coast, CA 92657 February 9,2000 CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO Re: Proposed Expansion - Hotel Aspen TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: We have asked our friend and neighbor, Tim Semrau, to deliver this letter to you and speak on our behalf. We would like to express our vehement disapproval of Ihe proposed expansion project at the Hotel Aspen. When we purchased our townhouse at 101 East Bleeker we were led to believe that building and remodeling requirements were so strict in Aspen that no such expansion could ever take place. If indeed this proposed third story is added to the Hotel Aspen, our view of the mountain will be completely obstructed from our townhouse. This would most certainly have a negative effect on the value of our property, as well as those properties surrounding our home. If this project is approved we fear the City would be setting a standard for new higher level density for Aspen, as is the case in Vail. An expansion project such as this would greatly detract from the wonderful Victorian flavor of our neighborhood. Thank you for considering our viewpoint. Siuggrely, rrtuu-,14-L UkA Ult Denise Frink 1-mmirl ACTION: Significant Development (Conceptual) SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) Significant development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet allfour ofthe development review standards in order for HPC to grant approval: Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Standard 2: the proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. - ALL 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce 0hlson, Deputy Planning Director \AO FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 110 W. Main Street- Conceptual review- PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 9,2000 SUMMARY: The applicants request HPC approval to add a third floor on a portion of the Hotel Aspen, which is located in the Main Street Historic District. The lot is approximately 27,000 square feet, half of which is along Main Street. The other half of the property is the alley and lots fronting on West Bleeker Street, and is not included in the district. Through the Planning and Zoning Commission, the applicant will request approval for a few additional hotel units and affordable housing on that part of the site. Formal HPC review will not be required. APPLICANT: Hotel Aspen Condominium Owners Association, represented by Reno Smith Architects. LOCATION: 110 W. Main Street, a portion of Lot F, Lots G, H, I, and a portion of Lot O, Lots P,Q, R, S, Block 58, City and Townsite ofAspen. ZONING: "O, Office Zone District, Lodge Preservation Overlay, Historic District Overlay on part of the property. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) 1 square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(21 for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The property in total is almost 27,000 square feet, which is exceptionally large for Main Street. The allowable floor area is 20,231 square feet, or up to 27,000 square feet by Special Review. The applicant will be pursuing the Special Review bonus to create affordable housing for the lodge on the Bleeker Street half of the property. The proposal is to add a third story on one section of the existing hotel, to house seven new lodging units. Note that because the building is "L" shaped, the area with the third story is set back approximately 70 feet from the front lot line. However, since this is a corner lot, the third story will be fully exposed along the Garmisch Street side. The applicant proposes to depart from the architecture of the existing building and to incorporate some references to the rest of the historic district into the new addition, particularly by using a gable roof. Staff finds that the roof forms are increasing the overall bulk of the third floor unneccesarily and that the addition contrasts too significantly with the rest of the hotel. Additionally, the barrel vaults and large transom windows are not typical of the district. Staff s recommendation is to restudy the addition to lower the roofline as much as possible, even to a flat or shed roof form. The third story should recede from view rather than make a major architectural statement. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The project as designed is not consistent with the character of the neighborhood. There are few three story buildings along Main Street, and where they exist they have a significantly smaller footprint than this structure. Staff finds that to accommodate the additional height on this structure, the design must be simplified. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: There are no historic structures on the property. The office building at the western end of the block is historic, as are structures across the street and on the other side of the alley. The proposal will not impact their historic significance. 2 0 d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: As stated above, staff finds that the project is not in keeping with the architectural character of the Main Street Historic District. The primary period of significance for the Main Street District is the mining era, the time in which most of the historic resources were built. There are some 1940's and 1950's lodges on Main Street which are considered historic in their own right, and other buildings, like this one, which are contemporary in character. Staff finds that the most appropriate solution is a design that reflects the modest character of the existing building and does not try to make just one floor of the Hotel Aspen relate to the surrounding buildings. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to final review. 0 â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that HPC continue the review for 110 W. Main Street to allow for a restudy of the design. Exhibits: A. Staffmemo dated February 9,2000. B. Application. 0 3 December 15, 1999 DAVID Ms. Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer GIBSON Aspen/Pitkin County Community AIA Development Department 130 South Galena St. AUGUST Aspen, CO 81611 RENO AIA RE: Hotel Aspen SCOTT 110 West Main Street SMITH Aspen, Colorado AIAÂ· Dear Amy, I am submitting the enclosed application for the H.P.C. Conceptual IZE* Ezra Submittal as part one of the Two Step Minor P.U.D. Review for the Pl Hotel Aspen. Therefore, we have enclosed the following documents per GIBSON Â· RENO Attachment #4 and Section 26.304.030: Â·ARCHITECTS. L.L.C. Â· 111 1. Survey. 2. Floor plans. 210 E. HYMAN 3. Exterior elevations. NÂ° 202 4. Roof plan. 5. Neighborhood block elevation. ASPEN COLORADO 6. Color Xeroxes of the south Main Street elevation. 81611 7. Vicinity Map is located on the Index Sheet. 8. Conceptual material selections are indicated on the 970.925.5968 elevations. 9. Statement of Effect of proposed development FACSIMILE 970.925.5993 10. Letter OfAuthorization. 11. Disclosure of Ownership 12. Legal Description. P.O. BOX 278 As you know from our pre-application meeting, it is the owner' intent to 117 N. WILLOW add a third level above the existing hotel facing Main Street. NÂ°2 TELLURIDE Respectfully yours, COLORADO 65:*-,447- 81435 Alfred N. Beadleston IV 970.728.6607 FACSIMILE cc. R. Morris 970.728.6658 T. Brown H. Klein .'*Â®11111*~ December 15, 1999 Ms. Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer DAVID Aspen/Pitkin County Community GIBSON Development Department AIA 130 South Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 AUGUST RENO RE: Hotel Aspen Design Intent AIA A. History: The Old Nugget Motel SCOTT SMITH The Hotel Aspen used to be a 2-story structure, L-shaped with a AIA very shallow roof pitch, called the Old Nugget a motel. In 1984, Gibson Reno Architects designed the first remodel. It consisted primarily of a face-lift. In 1986, Gibson Reno ....' Architects added one new building behind the Old Nugget, and IN II â€¢ added two additional floors to an existing structure. B. Today: 3rd floor addition It is the architect's responsibility to design a building GIBSON Â· RENO according to the context of its neighborhood, whether it is a new Â·ARCHITECTS, L.L.C. Â· 111 structure or, as it is in our case, an addition. Our design intent is to be sensitive to the Hotel's surrounding history so that it may compliment, not compete with the neighborhood block. 210 E. HYMAN However, our goal is also to introduce a fresh and new design NÂ°202 that will enrich Main Street's elevation. Expressing Today's ASPEN design is as vital to a community as it is to retain its history. Our COLORADO ultimate design intent is to have the Present, the addition, and the 81611 Past, the Neighborhood, coexist in harmony. The Hotel Aspen's new addition is located directly above the 970.925.5968 existing 2nd floor of the main hotel consisting of 5 hotel rooms, a suite, and a roofdeck. It is setback approximately 81feet from FACSIMILE 970.925.5993 the edge ofthe sidewalk The addition's linear mass is broken- up with gables and arched dormers, which complement the adjacent buildings. The changes in ridge elevations mirror to a certain degree the context of the block. In order to break up the P.O. BOX 278 mass even further, we propose changes in color schemes 117 N. WILLOW between the main linear body of the addition and the gable ends. N" 2 Colorful accents such as painted trims and fascia will add to the TELLURIDE vernacular language used by the hotel's neighbors. COLORADO The function of this addition and the existing conditions limit 81435 the extent to which we can physically break up the mass. But, we believe that the design approach we have taken as mentioned 970.728.6607 above, will generate a harmonious existence between the old, the new, and the block. FACSIMILE 970.728.6658 ... = 4~ '5 . >I ~' 1. =-27,1 e .t f . I. I 1 .._: it F 24 ..3 U . if ~ =..rd.-I"- t 'f 1 4: 1.-n\--Â·-131/~.Sh---TEDe r:il ./ er r 1 1714 1'.i. j 9, . t RENO Â·Sh*TH 1 21 .. 1 - .... .. U ..C==. . . , Â» * ' j 1.% 3 24 4 . ARCHITECTS . - -1 i.4- 000 i...42 ... 44 11 -k - Z.. L.L. C. 4 : .a -9: - . - . a a ~ -&*. HOTEL ASPEA - ---4 110 W. MAIN STREE ... inH Â¥NvwvNOW -i- I. & 1. *A -- 22~_ __.~. /4 - 71 1 -9 . . I. , 01 - 0-1 . / 9 r , --==5, -404 tiall , (AUÂ» 1.0 l 1 bo 1/Ou.#- ud\* U_*il iltue_ ds /104- 003 0-4-2 cid- uitlâ‚¬x 46-ty /j V MiNamara Hut ~~lil.~- I ~~) T 11 M O UN TA I N D IV I S I O N H U T S Y S T E M f MeNamara Hut Cio,360 ) was built in 1982 in memory of Margy MeNamara with funds provided by her husband Robert, their family and many friends. Ir The 10th Mountain Division Hut System is a series of backcountry ski huts, some built in honor of WW II veterans ot the IJ.S. Army's i oth Mountain Division, in the mountains between Aspen, Leadville and Vail Colorado. \\ % 7 0.- 06 1Â£280 Ute Avenue â€¢ Suite 21 Â· Aspen, Colorado 8I6II Â· 970/92.5-5775 EXHIBIT 3 -4 00 TO U.3 Pul-* 4 41(21~ Cal ck-K : I Link effht Â°prol d 4 44.L fyDroX- 32 C*l Stlu- 3>64<- 4447 /MÂ·~- 6 Coux_ a flu- .tttl-0 A eh ~ li) g ( i ve ~4 * d. a 6*uit j -65 -(Au'- - a de Cly)44 40~- will obs-Ld- 1-b_e cork dutu-0 via,06 -tkd- 02(04,4~ ye_opt 1 214 luu_/ -(D 90 De. 022-2 213 C**' Lt hee- d /)1â‚¬/LL 418 4"no k #64 -#U/)L- 7)1-t /10 1 k 0/2 45(Lba,n CAD 46451 Â¥(ie ju<.0 Uk#luc- Jiri Parduba EXHIBIT P.O. Box 9903 Aspen, CO 81612 Telephone: (970) 925 2455 Fax: (970) 920 2317 Aspen, February 9,2000 I would like to oppose to a new construction project at Hotel Aspen. I don't think that with the ski industry on decline we need more hotel rooms in town and I don't want to go through more construction again - I lived close to the construction of a roundabout last year. I don't want to have my view obstructed by another floor ofthe hotel, which is already built up to the maximum height limit. Please take my opinion in to consideration. Thank You Jiri Parduba ~ 9 116 N. Garmisci\ / Slv ,/A i,2 ~0*41,Â·1 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATION or representing an State of Colorado } SECTION 26.304.060 (ID Applicant to tRFEity of Aspen, personally ceRifflhat I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepid U.S. Mail to all owners ofproperty with three hundred (300) feet of the subject 2000 property, as indicated on the attached list, on the24 day ofÂ·:341 ,Â·!9t (which is 110 days prior to the public hearing date of21 -00 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously gaCCE> from the 2 ~ day o f JAI~. , }990 (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photogragh of the poste~ign is attached hereto. Sigrature 1 Signed before me this c:5~~/0 day aGO 0 ,+99-by 4 1/ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 6--2,0-206 A- ( 5444--- G ttjâ‚¬Eo-{\j Notary PA41-/ (Â»1 PUBLK NOTICE . ?gil. Notary Public's Signature PLACE ./i ' t D'.POSi .r PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 110 WEST MAIN STREET CONCEPTUAL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, February 9,2000 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. GÂ·alena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by the Hotel Aspen Condominium Owners Association, requesting conceptual approval for a 2nd story addition to the Hotel Aspen. The property is commonly known as the Hotel Aspen, and is located at 110 West Main Street in the City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on January 21, 2000 City of Aspen Account g:\planning\aspen\notices\920whal.doc illimball,r...vi.i,m Gal:IMIRSICal MEETING DATE: NAME 0Â¥ PROJECT: 9 ~96 /4 9/11 LU CLERK: STAFF: WITNESSES: (1) de/d G \AL (2) (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report ( 4 (Check If Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice ( ) (Check If Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet ( ) (Check If Applicable) 4 5 MOTION: L.via,4- LA 1 L A ir A 3 34 - ,:3 - VOTE: YES NO .- SUZANNAH REID YES G NO MARY HIRSCH YES NO_ -1- SUSAN DODINGTON YES NO GILBERT SANCHEZ YES L-' NO_ LISA MARKALUNAS YES 1- NO JEFFREY HALFERTY YES L_ NO_ HEIDI FRIEDLAND YES NO CHRISTIE KIENAST YES 1= NO _ YES- NO - YES NO_ HPCVOTE 7EEIENNE~%71-11 EXHIBIT -1 ACTION: Minor Review All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet aU,tour Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(13)(2). Standard 2: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. VE.-51 1MEMORANDUM 0 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce 0hlson, Deputy Planning DirectorJAO FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 419 E. Hyman Avenue- minor DATE: February 9,2000 SUMMARY: The applicants have recently received HPC approval to modify this historic resource, including adding new windows and garage doors. A proposal to extend a staircase and elevator to the roof has been put off for further development of the design. The applicant is being required to provide a second means of egress from the building, in addition to the staircase that runs through the center of the structure. Plans and elevations of the fire escape are attached. 0 APPLICANT: 419 E. Hyman LLC, represented Guy and Associates. LOCATION: 419 E. Hyman Avenue, The Roaring Fork Arms Condominium, City and Townsite of Aspen. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be 1 development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040/)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The application that was approved on December 15th, 1999 included a general clean-up of the back of the building, including removing mechanical equipment and an old fire escape, and re-opening two windows that had been bricked in. Building code requires two exits from this structure, and requires that they be distanced from each other by at least half of the diagonal dimension of the building. The historic stairway is located in the center of this building, so a second stair would have to be located right up against one of the exterior walls. This would cut off access to windows and creating problems with other code requirements, such as light and ventilation, and would require a major structural intervention. The only reasonable way to meet the exiting requirement therefore is to locate the fire escape outside of the building, along the alley. The proposed fire escape is metal and stands out four feet from the wall. Staff finds that it is an acceptable solution. The applicant will be required to provide information on how the fire escape will be attached to the building to minimize damage to historic materials. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: There is a concentration of important historic commercial buildings in the area of the Paragon Building. The HPC was concerned in the previous review about retaining the overall character of the south 1*ade. Staff finds that the character is retained and that the proposed fire escape is a typical alley side feature for historic structures. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The project will not affect the significance of the building as a prominent 19th century commercial building. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff finds that the project retains the architectural character of the building. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: 2 â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the request for an exterior fire escape at 419 E. Hyman Avenue with the following conditions: 1. Provide information showing how the fire escape will attach to the building so as to minimize damage to historic materials. 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 3. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 4. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Exhibits: Resolution #_, Series of 2000 A. Staffmemo dated February 9,2000 B. Application. C:home/amyg/cases/minor/419eh 3 0 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT TO REMODEL 419 E. HYMAN AVENUE, THE ROARING FORK ARMS CONDOMINIUM, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel ID #2737-182-160-30 RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2000 WHEREAS, the applicant, 419 E. Hyman LLC, represented by Guy and Associates, has requested minor development approval for 419 E. Hyman Avenue, The Rearing Fork Arms Condominium, City and Townsite of Aspen. The project involves adding a fire escape to the exterior of a building listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures," and located within the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the 0 parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; 0 and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated February 9, 2000, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WIIEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 9, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of_ to _. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for the property located at 419 E. Hyman Avenue, Condominiums, as presented at the February 9, 2000 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. Provide information showing how the fire escape will attach to the building so as to minimize damage to historic materials. 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 3. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 4. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of February, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney 0 Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 0 THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Memorandum To Amy Guthrie ,*154 From Ted Guy -<440' Date January 28,2000 Re Paragon Building, 419 East Hyman Avenue We are requesting approval of the metal fire-escapes and ladders as shown in the attached plans, elevations and sections. The fire-escapes and ladders will replace the previous exterior metal stairway that has served as the second exist from the upper two stories for many years. The Paragon building at 419 East Hyman Ave has had a single interior exit stair from the time of its original construction. A some point in its past two separate enclosed basement exit stairs were constructed within the alley. An open steel stair was also constructed in the alley to provide a second exit from the second and third levels. The city of Aspen would like to reduce or remove encroachments into the alley. The current remodel will remove the two basement exist stairs and the prior metal exist stair. They projected over five feet into the alley at the metal stairs and four feet with the basement stair enclosures. The proposed fire escape ladders and stairs will remove the obstructions at the alley and will lessen the above grade encroachment by one foot. The clearance under the fire escapes will be about 9 feet. The building code requirement that exits be separated by one half of the diagonal dimension of a floor the second interior exit stair would need to be at the exterior wall and require new parapets and enclosures above the existing brick wall line. The building code allows the use of ladders and fire escapes on historic structures at the . discretion of the Chief Building Official. The building department and fire departments were approached to determine if the fire-escape design would be acceptable as a secondary mean of egress. We are happy to report that we received permission from both departments to continue the use of a metal exterior fire-escape. We will bring additional details and photographs to the HPC meeting on February 9th. Please call me if you have any further questjons. TKG/tkg 99155 M13 -14(64-162, 23280 TWO RIVERS ROAD P.O. BOX 1640 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 [970] 927-3167 . . -- '-'--- -----HHAHHIÂ·ill ___-_- --... - -2 --_2 _ '=-2-- --1 - j--7-2--Â·-2--X- 1.-_9 Z.-14- -1-----MMrifltlMJI - ---I-Ill- Il pl-.----------- -------- --- i 4 94Â« 441 +4 ' 2_Im_ |~~~~t-Ft 1~---- 1.bl~N--_-_ - 1 - ,1- ---- 1- 11 ;, r ' / f Al 2 224Â®2- 1*Â»31 1- -1.7= ---2-2 9-2-222 pox 2 y 0 ---1UUM-- 1111---'2~- --- 41 88 PO C/3 - M .0 \ - -- 1 M M .0 trJ O \ -----22--- \--2- CIO 0 --- 1 -N )11[1 11 - , fofÂ«14339 -----------1----- --ANK 0% 3% 3% r .0 Â· -<- -- -- -------r------ --Ml-rÂ·-1 } Mw "to 70 I _ -_2_3__11__.4- - 1-1-LÂ·1 - In - ng ME -/---- -11- -- 0 20 08 i L P 23 *ca 26 h M M *0 GV1 0 .Irl 5 @ E[dVOS.1 G[HILI ,LIA NOI,LVAGEIN H,LflOS LADDER - "-7:rX,ff,UU'1-0 Ca aNnOMO 1 THIRD FLOOR ... THIRD FLOOR ........11, -N~ SECOND FLOOR 3 - FIRST FLOOR 1 ./ : 11 i i : 11 11 BUILDING SECTION WITH PROPOSED FIRE ESCAPE PALA 4014 Sull-01 4 PEURIC WEDLicl< Ar-014. 1- 19.00 -1]11-1-11111111'lll ... 1 1 1 1 1 1011 1 1 J 1 1 1 1 4 â€ž I I r--- E 1 WEST GARAGE ~ B WEST UNIT ROOF IeffE q Ell -9 1 1 UP 1: ~ IVIVil I DN. - - -- ' 1 1 13 === ~16 I 1 01 EAST GARAGE EAST UNIT I I 1 1 -,-C=]I'Il ] IUII 1 1 =1 FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR ROOF PLAN WITH PROPOSED FIRE ESCAPE FARA40w 5(/1 LDitag, PEKINIS WEDLICK AtcH. 1-(9-00 ALLEY 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARD 10-3 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARD 10-3 EXIT LADDER DEVICE Test Standard of the International Conference of Building Officials See Appendix Section 3407.1, Uniform Building Code SECTION 10.301 - SCOPE SECTION 10.305 - RUNG-STRENGTH TEST (.:1. This standard for exit ladder devices is applicable where such de- Rungs of retractable exit ladder devices shall be capable of with- vices are permitted'by the building official for installation on ex- standing a load of 1,000 pounds 0448 N) when applied to a isting apartment houses and hotels in conformance with Appendix 31/2-inch-wide (89 mm) block resting at the center of the rung. Section 3412.1 of this code. The test load shall be applied for a period of one hour. The ladder shall remain operational following this test. SECTION 10.302 - INSTRUCTIONS 4 Installation shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's in- SECTION 10.306 - RUNG-TO-SIDE-RAIL SHEAR --' structions. Instructions shall be illustrated and shall include direc- TEST tions and information adequate for attaining proper and safe installation of the product. Where exit ladder devices are intended Rungs of retractable exit ladder devices shall be capable of with- for mounting on different support surfaces, specific installation standing a load of 1,000 pounds (4448 N) when applied to a instructions shall be provided for each surface. 31/2-inch-wide (89 mm) block resting on the center rung as near the side rail as possible. The test load shall be applied for a period SECTION 10.303 - GENERAL DESIGN of one hour. Upon removal of the test load the fasteners attaching the rung to the side rail shall show no evidence of failure. The lad- All load-bearing surfaces and supporting hardware shall be of der shall remain operational following this test. noncombustible materials. Exit ladder devices shall have a minimum width of 12 inches (305 mm) when in the position intended for use. The design load shall not be less than 400 pounds SECTION 10.307 - RELEASE MECHANISM TEST (1780 N) for 16-foot (4877 mm) length and 600 pounds (2669 N) for 25-foot (7620 mm) length. The release mechanism of retractable exit ladder devices shall operate with an average applied force of not more than 5 pounds SECTION 10.304 - PERFORMANCE (22.2 N) for hand-operated releasing mechanisms and an average applied force of not more than 25 pounds (111 N) for foot-pedal 10.304.1 Exit ladder devices shall be capable of withstanding an types of releasing mechanisms. For these tests, a force gauge shall applied load of four times the design load when installed in the be applied to the release mechanism, and the average of three manner intended for use. Test loads shall be applied for a period of consecutive readings shall be computed. ' one hour. a 10.304.2 Exit ladder devices of the retractable type shall, in addi- tion to the static load requirements of Section 10.304.1, be capable ~ SECTION 10.308 - LOW TEMPERATURE OPERATION TEST of withstanding the following tests: 1. Rung strength. Representative samples of the exit ladder device shall be sub- 2. Rung-to-side-rail shear strength. jected to a temperature of -40Â°C in an environmental chamber for a period of 24 hours. The release mechanism shall be operated im- 3. Release mechanism. mediately upon removal from the chamber. The ladder device : 4. Low temperature. shall function as intended without any restriction of operation. 1 i 3-293 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE ' APPENDIX CHAPTER 34 Appendix Chapter 34 EXISTING STRUCTURES Division 1-LIFE-SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS OTHER THAN HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS SECTION 3406 - GENERAL faced with wood lath and plaster in good condition or 1/2-inch (12.7 mm) gypsum wallboard or openings with fixed wired glass /77 ' 3406.1 Purpose. The purpose of this division is to provide a rea- set in steel frames are permitted for corridor walls and ceilings and 122Â·41? sonable degree of safety to persons occupying existing buildings occupancy separations when approved. Doors opening into such L-~ by providing for alterations to such existing buildings that do not corridors shall be protected by 20-minute fire assemblies or solid conform with the minimum requirements of this code. wood doors not less than 13/4 inches (45 mm) thick. Where the ex- EXCEFI'ION: Group U Occupancies regulated by Appendix isting frame will not accommodate the 13/4-inch-thick (45 mm) Chapter 34, Division II, and Group R, Division 3 Occupancies, except door, a 13/8-inch-thick (35 mm) solid bonded wood-core door or that Group R, Division 3 Occupancies shall comply with Section 3411. equivalent insulated steel door shall be permitted. Doors shall be CIP) 3406.2 Effective Date. Within 18 months of the effective date of self-closing or automatic closing by smoke detection. Transoms :4:IJ.~; this division, plans for compliance shall be submitted and ap- and openings other than doors from corridors to rooms shall com- proved, and within 18 months thereafter, the work shall be com- ply with Section 1004.3.4.3.2 of this code or shall be covered with pleted or the building shall be vacated until made to conform. a minimum of 3/4-inch (19.1 mm) plywood or 1/pinch (12.7 mm) gypsum wallboard or equivalent material on the room side. SECTION 3407 - EXITS ' EXCEFilON: Existing corridor walls, ceilings and opening pro- tection not in compliance with the above may be, continued when such 3407.1 Numb6r of Means of Egress. Every floor above the first buildings are protected with an approved automatic sprinkler system throughout. Such sprinkler system may be supplied from the domestic story used for human occupancy shall have at least two means of water system if it is of adequate volume and pressure. egress, one of which may be an exterior fire escape complying with Section 3407.4. SuMect to the approval of the building offi- 3407.4 Fire Escapes. cial, an approved ladder device may be used in lieu of a fire escape 1. Existing fire escapes that, in the opinion of the building offi- when the construction feature or location of the building on the cial, comply with the intent of this section may be used as one of property makes the installation of a fire escape impracticable. the required exits. The location and anchorage of fire escapes shall EXCEMION: In all occupancies, second stories with an occupant be of approved design and construction. load of 10 or less may have one means of egress. 2. Fire escapes shall comply with the following: An exit ladder device when used in lieu of a fire escape shall Access from a corridor shall not be through an intervening conform with UBC Standard 10-3, which is a part of this code (see room. Chapter 35), and the following: All openings within 10 feet (3048 mm) shall be protected by 1. Serves an occupant load of 10 or less or a single dwelling three-fourths-hour fire assembliek. When located within a recess unit or guest room. or vestibule, adjacent enclosure walls shall not be of less than 2. The building does not exceed three stories in height. one-hour fire-resistive construction. 3. The access is adjacent to an opening as specified for emer- Egress from the building shall be by a clear opening having a gency egress or rescue or from a balcony. minimum dimension of not less than 29 inches (737 nim). Such 4. Shall not pass in front of any building opening below the unit openings shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key being served. or special knowledge or effort. The sill of an opening giving ac- cess shall not be more than 30 inches (762 min) above the floor of 5. The availability of activating the device for the ladder is ac- the building or balcony. cessible only from the opening or balcony served. Fire escape stairways and balconies shall support the dead load 6. Installed so that it will not cause a person using it to be with- plus a live load of not less than 100 pounds per square foot (4.79 1 :.Â·; Â·Â·1 in 6 feet (1829 mm) of exposed electrical wiring. kN/m2) and shall be provided with a top and intermediate handrail on each side. The pitch of the stairway shall not exceed 60 degrees 3407.2 Stair Construction. All required stairs shall have a with a minimum width of 18 inches (457 min). Treads shall not be minimum run of 9 inches (229 mm) and a maximum rise of 8 in- ches (203 mm) and shall have a minimum width of 30 inches (762 less than 4 inches (102 min) in width and the rise between treads shall not exceed 10 inches (254 mm). All stair and balcony railings mm) exclusive of handrails. Every stairway shall have at least one shall support a horizontal force of not less than 50 pounds per lin- - handrail. A landing having a minimum 30-inch (762 mm) run in eal foot (729.5 N/m) of railing. f 3.* 1 the direction of travel shall be provided at each point of access to the stairway. Balconies shall not be less than 44 inches (1118 mm) in width fÂ· with no floor opening other than the stairway opening greater than i EXCEFI'ION: Fire escapes as provided for in this section. 5/8 inch (16 mm) in width. Stairway openings in such balconies f j Exterior stairs shall be of noncombustible construction. shall not be less than 22 inches by 44 inches (599 mm by 1118 EXCEMION: On buildings of 'Iypes III, IV and V construction, mm). The balustrade of each balcony shall not be less than 36 in- provided the exterior stairs are constructed of wood not less than 2-inch ches (914 mm) high with not more than 9 inches (229 mm) be- (51 mm) nominal thickness. tween balusters. 1 34073 Corridors. Corridors of Groups A, B, E, F, H, I, M and R, Fire escapes shall extend to the roof or provide an approved 0 Division 1, and S Occupancies serving an occupant load of 30 or gooseneck ladder between the top floor landing and the roof when more, shall have walls and ceilings of not less than one-hour fire- serving buildings four or more stories in height having roofs with a resistive construction as required by this code. Existing walls sur- slope of less than 4 units vertical in 12 units horizontal (33.3% i 1-413 r-