The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19990728AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION July 28,1999 REGULAR MEETING, 5:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 12:00 NOON - Site Visits City Hall Norwest Bank 5:00 I. Roll call and approval of June 23,1999 minutes II. Public Comments III. Commission member comments and project monitoring IV. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) 0 V. BUSINESS 5:05 A. 400 W. Smug~ler - Minor Development, (no menlo) C , SA_ 9- o Dic WN+u~1- 0 9â‚¬ I 5:25 B. 500 W. Main St. - Mesa Store - Minor Development #40 , fl+yÂ«- bt{'9~' L 1 s. a ki - 5:40 C. 121 N. Fifth - Conceptual, Partial Demolition, On-Site Relocation and Variances Eli i 54- Afnk 6:20 D. -330=Lake-Avenue worksession, no meme A rn Dul 60-Â». u jÂ»,J~ 6:50 E. 302 E. Hopkins - woPksessionrao-memo flvaa t' P k 4, aft I 1 44, MauÂ» 12Â»~2 s -a 7:15 H. Adjourn 0,44 INab.tt j il,ug/- 300*dAU'Â·Â·~7 3.'.l,70& REMINDER: NEXT MEETING WITH NORE WINTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 3RD, 5-7p.m. PROJECT MONITORING ger Moyer 406 E. Hopkins - ISIS 920 E. Hyman - Veronika, Inc. 930 King Street- NPJ 706 W. Main- Goldrich Susan Dodington 234 W. Francis - Mullins 421 W. Hallam Street 240 Lake Avenue- Greenberg Suzannah Reid 406 E. Hopkins- ISIS 117 N. 6th St. - Coulter 414 N. First- POLE 240 Lake Ave. Mary Hirsch 420 W. Francis Street- Halperin 930 King- NPJ 920 W. Hallam-Guthrie ffrey Halferty 234 W. Francis- Mullin 414 N. First- POLE 920 W. Hallam- Guthrie 101-105 E. Hallam (not active) Heidi Friedland 420 W. Francis Street- Halperin 232 E. Hallam St.- Pace 117 N. 6th St. - Coulter Lisa Markalunas 520 Walnut Street - Greenwood 939 E. Cooper- Langley 240 Lake Avenue- Greenberg Christie Kienast 520 Walnut Street - Greenwood 735 W. Bleeker- Bone Maureen McDonald 920 E. Hyman - Veronika Inc. 214 E. Bleeker Brumder CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: 4 W. Hallam (Poppie's), expires April 26,2000 3 W. Francis, Lot B (Vickery), expires May 12,2000 214 E. Bleeker Street, new out building expires August 12, 1999 920 W. Hallam Street, expires February 12, 2000 735 W. Bleeker old house expires Oct. 14, 1999 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS 1999 1. 117 n. 6TH St. - Coulter 2. 920 E. Hyman Ave. Lot N Block 32 3. 435 W. Main St. Lot A-I Block 38 4. 930 King St. 5. 920 E. Hyman 6. 735 W. Bleeker 7. 234 W. Francis 8. 205 S. Mill . 210 S. Galena 1.ISIS 406 E. Hopkins 11.234 W. Francis 12.234 W. Francis 13.424 E. Cooper Ave. 14.234 W. Francis (Mullins) 15.DEPP 16.834 W. Hallam 17.2 Williams way 18.531 E. Cooper 19.134 W. Bleeker 20.450 S. Galena 21.710 N. Third St. 22.234 W. Francis St. 23.123 W. Francis 24.312 E. Hyman 25.930 King Street 26.117 N. Sixth 27.234 W. Francis 28.520 E. Durant St. 29.308 N. First Street 30.533 E. Hopkins 31.330 E. Main St. 32.315 E. Hyman Ave. Su Casa 33.121 N. Fifth Street 240 Lake Avenue .920 W. Hallam Street EXHIBIT 17,2 5 -99 APPLICANT: 1-3 LOCATION: 400 W. Smuggler ACTION: Minor Review All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet alljour Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Standard 2: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. 32 8, MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce 0hlson, Deputy Planning Director...JAO FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 500 W. Main Street- minor DATE: July 28,1999 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to add new windows on the west side of the Mesa Store Building. The structure is located in the Main Street Historic District and is a designated landmark. APPLICANT: Rankin Consulting, LLC, owner. LOCATION: 500 W. Main Street, Lots R and S, Block 30, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "HI' Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The applicant proposes to add two windows on the west side of the building. Previously, all but three of the original windows on the building have 54(6,1 7 1 A been replaced. There is one tall, narrow double hung window on the east side of 0 the building and two on the back. Because the new pattern of a fixed piece of glass flanked by two double hung windows has been established, the architect proposes to use that same style and proportion for the new windows. Staff recommends that HPC discuss whether it would be more appropriate to match the original window style, and begin to restore the building's original architectural character, or continue with the existing style so that the it is clear the windows are new to the building. If available, the applicant must supply the HPC with a historic photograph of the building, prior to the alteration of the windows. This photograph may be available from the Aspen Historical Society archives. Additionally, the west wall of the building should be examined for evidence of previous window openings, such as patches in the clapboard siding. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The property is located in the Main Street Historic District. Most of the surrounding buildings have been adapted to new uses and have had minor modiEcations. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed changes will not effect the historic significance of the property. The building was built in 1890 as the Gould and Grover Grocery. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereoÂ£ Response: The replacement of all of the windows with a different window style has already had a significant effect on the architecture of the building. As noted above, the HPC should evaluate whether it is appropriate to perpetuate that character change. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 0 â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that the minor development application for 500 W. Smuggler Street be approved with the following conditions: 1. If a historic photograph of the building is available, the applicant must provide the photograph at the HPC meeting. 2. The architect must examine the west wall for evidence of previous window openings and describe that information to the HPC at the meeting. 3. The HPC must evaluate the items required above, and determine whether the proposed window style is appropriate, or whether double hung windows which match the size and proportions of those existing on the east and back sides of the building 0 should be used. Exhibits: Resolution No. , Series of 1999 A. Staff memo dated July 28, 1999 B. Application C. City Inventory form + Fice,jU vtz> \2, 44 FVFFLEA V.ga [s COU/1 ~ * agÂ»1 1-- \"ul ~-4 Uu-o -9 1 4,1Â» ria-- Li~~ 1-0 - Â»4- -E~l/11 S 44% u,JIMA . 9-1--tu-e- 4(Â»tl Bed<37 Wwl/Â» 60 l/LA 0 .. Lbl l'~-18~ Câ‚¬2*>\(41*110 LA - EXHIBIT 7- 1 1.2 9-19 APPLICANT: [-1 0 LOCATION: 500 W. Main Street ACTION: Minor Review All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet allfour Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Standard 2: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 0 APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT TO ADD TWO NEW WINDOWS AT 500 W. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 1999 WHEREAS, the applicant, Rankin Consulting, LLC, represented by Graeme Means, has requested minor development approval for the property located at 500 W. Smuggler Street, Lots R and S, Block 30, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is located in the Main Street Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 0 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated July 28,1999, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and ~ recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 28, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of _ to _. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: D That minor development for 500 W. Smuggler Street, Lots R and S, Block 30, City and Townsite of Aspen be approved with the following conditions: 1. If a historic photograph of the building is available, the applicant must provide the 0 photograph at the HPC meeting. 2. The architect must examine the west wall for evidence of previous window openings and describe that information to the HPC at the meeting. 3. The HPC must evaluate the items required above, and determine whether the proposed window style is appropriate, or whether double hung windows which match the size and proportions of those existing on the east and back sides of the building should be used. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 28th day of July, 1999. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 0 Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 Te lE 1 Â£.d; . . 4/: .. - N h f i 0 1, - - 1 1 11 1 9 *OF -LE) R ~O' <422'Etc N 'ble/*I:4~1 e 1 d i - It'', 1 . .' lili -1*2 ----- - -, 4--" - 1 , P.---- - ---------- - -96- - - -4- - 4-*-7 - ~ 1 /LL. I.-- - -g 1 4 -- --â€¢16 - - - 1,1 1.11 *-I.-/ at - 1 - -- - --- - I. - I - W-- 1 1., . -- - \y --- - i j- --- -- 1 1.1 -- - - 99 - - --- - 1-- -- 1 2.- -- - -411_-_ i __ - - - 44'-- ---- -- - ' '1 1 0 2 - - 1. -I- 1- % -i - . ~ - - - 1 - - -16 9: 95' ChQUMEE 9'-34 DOEMER I , DA ES 7/26/441 .4/6 REvmN ~ '.6. DeIGE RESImENCE i~allia"01~ ERNEST C IELTI INSIGHT CONSTRUCTION-,UILDER ARC,tirter 400 W. I~UGGLER 1-0 ROAD 109 070Â» 4.0021 ASPEN, CO /1611 GLENWOOD -RINGS, CO *1801 . 54.49 ..,Â¢! - ..:4 -.~~j'~2 4 Z'.....â‚¬12/.# 2.Â·5 . 66#/ali"hu- /Â»frll ~ 1181,4*Et 1~ /MOTOriA,Ad 0-Ili,V/1 [NI Â©) 0 AWA *13] *] 01] A IM (U) [Rf] '' 1 ~ ~|T|~e'1,1 ~ ~,â€ž, ~ ',1,~ 4 %* ~ 1, ,~, ,11i " ,'4J ~ 4<L 1,1~41! lili%111 <lilli! 1 4''" ' ""C '' ' 114 1 1 11 1 1 1 j 1 1 111 1 ON 133HS Â« 1 11 lili 411 1 1 11 1 1 9 1 11 1-11 11 1 1 11 a 1 11 1 I[1 1 1 1 & 11 th 1 11.Clu D ' 1 4 . Â¢ 4 1 11 1 11 dll S 11 p 1 1 11 ~ -L~ -1 1, 11 -4- ~l - L It 1.1 1 1 1& 1 - p L 1 -1 0 1 1; rid O"IM-Id ___ -_- - -------- --- --1 ON'16,1*3- 4|9,1.e,St ~ - 6.-- 1 11 , -.-4.-.-.-~. ---..----It-i-.-i- ---1.... .- - ---I- .. ---- = 5-2 11.~ 111 \11 - - -- -,1-- 7 U i .. 11] \. lili , Â·,11 - - J.I . - 1- ~ -- -- --- .~ 111 \ 1,11 / 11 8!1. - - - ---_-_p.NY'-le) WO D c.4~3mt 3 - -- --=dEE=--- -- Mil,W 01. 1-1,44,9 1 m --- 2, bl -t 7 -1-1.35 lic --- -- - - 1.----4.--- - n. 97.3 w-Nre ri=11 1 \ .m 27Â£ 0-3-Â»OF"Vl li-1,849 DOC , Â¥ -- 1--LY),4 0.1 .1-NtÂ¥.1-*NIOIC, 02 11!A.30 17 4 1 .0.11=.,/1 [NI (Â©JOLVA*11*1 0=[1,1 [il (Â©)~ 1 4-1 1 11 Al-1 .1 r. 1 * 2 ~------- ------ - 36 914â‚¬ 161*3 ---1- 11, '111, 11 1.1111. 1 1 lili '1111''b 1.i fl' IIi'll-!.Â·1 1 '111 1 ''1 1 1 '12' ' 4<.,f~f:1<~If ~ ''' 1. lili 1 1 1 lilli I ! lilli I b 37/13 9 '141 *3% 0 [J~ - 1111 1 -----11- 1 1 11 11 11 1.LI MM ; ply,1 -- , . 11 / 111 \. It 1.1 1 Irl '7~.1- 0/~,Op, re. 1 - - - -- _ _ _ 111\ 1.1 / " 1 - 11 1 * 1. 1 , 111 --- -- / - A - - - -- . 1 lilli 74\*2 r,17W 01 1991 - 44.ez, . 7, 14773rl , r'1,4 .- 'W'*2 H 9-1.9 1,4 01 3'>Irl.LKal + 110-10 9 r-f37 67ft'H< ily,Ide,>1 00% - 09 AO W'321 39 01 00.,VABOO -'. rl-m,ru.,9 .11,171'89 - 15307100 0-3 r4 ,-c.1 * a 1 .0 1 + r/1 1. [m(@0 43Â¢21 MY M A M W M 1 1 1! ,111 d i, '~ 1 111''I 11.11''', 1,1 f, 11'11~11,1,11111,1111,11'1 11 1 1 11,1 1 1 1 , 11 Iii 1 11,11,111'1 11, 11 4 1 1 Ill . 11 11 11 1 1 1 1 , | |il J 1 1 ~ il ~11 : 1 11 1 4,1 1 1 .1 .1 1.1 11 11 1 , 1,1 1 1 1 2-= L (3 1 } 12 - - --7 3->f,0-0 14 1 ya 1 1 111, -- 3 1 I M 11 Ae'lvel / --9- ---- ---L- -2---- 1 -2- --- ---2~ 4- %4 17) 1- 71 31 171 07 p W 1 -_ .â€ž- 4. --9 1 1 al Ill. 1 11 : 0, 1, /1 \\ - -- Hilâ€¢-1 \ lt4 11 1 L -1=3 11+ - ---- I- ====luZZ~-Z_.2._I--U-ZE 7 --+ZÂ·r--7-11:Z...7-7- -~ -- -2 +--Z~2Â·2~-~2~L~2~*---Z-.n- - 01 -1-N,Â»d - *7 tor,i.c ,-49 -1-9 W 01 1 \ lt//.d-.N-git-*01 1.0 1 0 m -------- -*- 4 1 -'O' 'Â¥ed O OOM/,knel ..e==-- Â»3 L 10 1 - 4/ . 11 f ONO>,39 (3"6, J-'-ly) 1 1191* .,1111111114#*842 .. C. Â¥ . 1..'le. ATTACHMENT 1 0 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM fn 1. Project name ~ S PF,<.1 L W 8.353 0 C A M.E 2. Project location 5644 /$-C, 1\4 A 1 4 . A-5 0 5- c- 1 (indicate street address, lot and block nurhber or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning <23 4. Lot size /0006 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 6077% ~ AidÂ·â‚¬ 1 64 90 03 \+11 14 A t la <9 1 0 - 9 'Ph 459 , 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 4 02 x K' M u_ H r A Lâ€ž t '4. 9 1 6-4 / 420> 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD M Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC 0 - Subdivision Tex#Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) /3 F F ; c zâ€ž tÂ· i Â£1.0 A-nO fÂ· n... 1: ACC_ - L.2 V ' 9. Description of development application k D 13 0 c 'ibto*, \,v C A.1 60\,</ r TA *N I Ch U.r 10. Have you completed and attached the following? ><~ Attachment 1 - Land use application form >4 Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 4 Response to Attachment 3 -X- Response to Attachment 4 -6-44\- B llllllll ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: 150 8 12 ult lAi Address: 3- 66 \AA Â« Ad /4 5-f , A-â‚¬ 0 2 41 Zone district: 0 Lot size: (O0 03 (b Y, 7Â· 1. Existing FAR: Arm pLo K 3606 Allowable FAR: H ' 4.906 Proposed FAR: A-i?Jo n.j y. 360(34> - HO O.; A 1/ 4.F Existing net leasable (commekfal): Aj80/1 r .Â¢' 3% 4 60 Proposed net leasable (commercial): 9 1 â€ž 1 Existing % of site coverage: A, 5 8 3/0 Proposed % of site coverage: .1 6 90 Existing % of open space: 7 Proposed % of open space: Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: 3 Accesorv bldq: Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: Z Accessorv blda: Proposed % of demolition: ki o Al E- Existing number of bedrooms: Proposed number of bedrooms: .- /5 - 0 Existing on-site parking spaces: D On-site parking spaces required: 7 Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: Front Front: Rear: Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined FronUrear: FronUrear: FronUrear: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: l-3 53=, i %Â£-,E- 12 (U C & O A. C UL HÂ¥ t;%.,t 1- 0. M A- 1 4 -S:-r-: Variations requested: MouS. (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O 0 zone districts) 07/13/99 00:30 FAX 9709203009 CYBERCARE 0.01 To: Aspen Community Development Department The attached application for modification to a historic structure is being submitted for your consideration by: Rankin Consulting, LLC Robert E. Rankin, Manager 500 West Main Street Aspen, CO. 81611 970-920-3009 The following is authorized to act on my behalf in this matter: Graeme Means 210 South Galena Aspen, CO.81611 970-925-9150 Thank you for your attention to this request. Robert E. Rankin Rankin Consulting, LLC The applicant wishes to add two new windows to the second floor ofthe Mesa Store Building. The proposed windows are on the west elevation and are needed to tighten some offices which a currently severely underlit and under ventilated. The Windows are very similar in character to existing non-historical windows on this elevation. The proposed windows are utilitarian in nature, which is in keeping with the historical pattern for some elevations of similar buildings. This west elevation has undergone numerous changes in the past, and we are not aware ofthe original fenestration. However, we feel that the proposed windows are compatible with the historic nature of the building and the neighborhood. .11 a'*r itti 1.4144 AU d 3,1,1,11. F # 44 1' tÂ·.1.;..' 1 1 ' 1 111 1 .u . ..1,- , 4. le , Ill j *114 3.:: :1 12 9 11// il. if i # 1 1 1 1 9 -: Â¥4- I'li: ity' 1 j.# ..-- 11443:15% ill-11 h f j :f . M ~... 1 '11= - 11411/jift,-il 4\ ' )=n Ill I .1 1 f I i.t 1.1 \'till ~ 4 ., i 111~ U 4/ i Â·11 1.1 i i '1 1 1 Â· ' ' - Clf ~ 1, Â· 4 ' 'J ---='- Ir'171111- -t 11 li% 4 " -'ri- 1,1111111'l i 12.-,2 illÂ·4:44:2:1' ~111!illim . 12. I. .11 . id:4. 11/1 : ! 1,14; 1144 1 11 1 it.' : >4 9 :111-lilli. FET 1-7-2-1 1 1111 12,11 4 1 2*gy 4*-Â« I .4/1*. 1 ...4 1 $ 14% : . . 2 ..11.1 9 11 t. . .. * e. 4 41 , m /1// , I ' 9........P 4, 9 '11.31 : 1 1 1~ 46#~gl.#~aN=B amiwi-tw 4 - 74, r f 19 4 il,4 - Ae:&6 -r . 1 . b . 9.' lA. . 1 . -1 1 El $ 0 N *13,3, f.//////*[f5'r~, r *$.20~1-49 - 1 -1 .1 . Â· 11 4 0741.0â€¢:4WR'*PR,10 14 1. 1 J,+ 4 9, 9~'4 - 11 i laill Wip. L 1 1 -111 q P ' 1 / EvE--It// lit~1 1 - z 3.<$ 4 =@.1 m Ul, i ':41 1 lIlli ./. <jr I ifiti; 16==-**M:lil !-93 2.y!! 91 1 'le/"1 tit lit' M'141111{ Il f b W I .r. 1 P LIlli j \"111/tatin~ ' 3 J 4 43 fj - 1*tEO' f .1 - . 1109= 1 6 1,1. ?LN 1 , 1,4,Â¥. W..i.:'1.4, 1 t, ; ; 5. r: kt.41(3411: '87:giliblb:. 4 ; 4 0 ~oir,.0 4514# r'â€¢. . 2 -%.- .....1~ â‚¬9.1:~9&1* 4,MY.g.~Fi*473wi*err,br..1, 9.12 2.Â£.u g.;Â·,i ot;. U < 1 1 . 01*31214*50~/Cy*Â·2 74 + 4 41 02 20/ 001 i 4 51Â· - 4 IN H -117 (%.) ~- * -tiN O 6/1 tic 9/1 1.:1 t kÂ© >5 ----c: e+ /~f 4. 4.3.4,12(1.-2.)/ 5 %$1 24 --. y./ 2 - v ;1 A 71 Ally 7---7 ,1 <3 9 22 1 r.1 % 2 . .1 1%.111*-M - 3 --. 1 Â·ef '*004 Ch : 4- 4ki 6 4 Â°li 4 244*61* al F--4.3-787--444 1 1. 21 Ll .- - Al i i - 327:*43 5--- 1 w + 0#bf<'4~ p, A-117 0/74.9 x flitic % 1 5 7-1 J F-.1 how Â»11 1. b I 0 - 9 -p u Z 9 r C ek I . L 9 - k / 7 46 00 4 9 f 41 . --2 - a r - I M% 1 rw - - N li A F AL_-i =1 2/ a M 0 01 al te- - SIN - 4 r--I e. - .-I N _!:=0 .0 a U A I- lei L.7 1 Â©Fi -9 At 1- 01 -13 n 1 11 4 20 91 Mi 011 20, 90/ to, bol 00/ ' 9 9 t 09;' %01 toi 901 dig' N il 4 b W 2.0 51? 9/1 10 EDI 601 Sol 90: /01 10/ to, go/ l.0, 11 A â‚¬1 ~ 11 41 'r. \ LL--1 2 11 0 ; Nld Y *v 6 1 6 1 4 % 4 11 1 b hi .. 0 re, i/ CA 11 701 35 <, 11 16: ts fl . !3 ~ _ _r-7. ' 1.-23; 119 1 P 1 - al.. 6. . *, 12 1 1 9 p~ -4414- 0 A ibt U 1: 4i -91 N 1 % 11 ET--L 1--77 -1-, 8 11 VA -R U 5' \ 1. 1=79 -3 N If . Of--371 /7-yzr-273' Ar l:9 9 8/9 039 3 . .tf29 97,9 82,9 0% =41. 9/*3 910-1 ' C>-10-0 ' 1-1-4 d S-9 -Ls 441-444 441 079 4 r-4 1 a-11 TI Q 3-3 CZLe Â¥â‚¬4 1,4 -- 6 661 ' 7 1 1711.0 1-101-1 +A-319 .1 91Â»\ , 1 =1191 /9 1 41 444- 99- 1 -, Il - L-t T P 1 ! 1 , /.., 1 .,Al-Tlt>-9- r*CP Â»,90-n I /4 -El I.,4-V-21zj: 0 00/.4 A 1-fl Â»31, 10 .M.40 0 1-~ 1-4 cl L* 1-2 - L + 9-9 -L+1 -0 *-rl-Acl /1Â«= 1-4 72 1,4-Â¥21 4 C <DO/9\ 1-1 2 1-9 107 --9-7134 d /9,â‚¬-34 th[ 0 0 0 FOUND 5/8 STEEL ROD WITH RED PLASTIC CAP MARKED HAROLD JOHNSON 9018 N 06Â°28 29 * W 0.19 OF THIS SURVEYOR*S CORNER ,.,ALLEY Rl. 0"T.or POSITION .*AY A 75.09 4 74Â° '11- W 60.00' RECORD 59 10. W 60 0, , FIELD SET 5/8- STEEL ROD WI TIÂ· YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MAR) BUETTNER 13166 1 4 00 1 33- PORCH #44 4 0 9 .0 ~ 5 ~ cONCRETE 1 -6 00 3 1. 2 2 2 49 1 0, & Â§ 24 3 / / 1881 tO 30'k_ 4 12 1 ju i 0, 94 7. Ok' M V * 44 4 i- . I Â£2 - 2 y 2 9 / 00 0 2 l 2 CO 2 a 4 n >r L % 4 l 4 4 4, 4 FOUND 5/8- STEEL ROD WITH t/, RED PLASTIC CAP MARKED ~ 2 / HAROLD JOHNSON 9018 4 N 21'04'40' E 0.24 OF THIS SURVEYOR-S / / 1 , CORNER POSITION / k l 1 5 75a ~ 1 - < 3 74*09'll- RECORD 55 /6- E 60.00 3 SIDEWALK COVERED PORCH/WALK E 59.97 ' FIELD POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENT 24 3 10 30 Â¢0 57 B ACK OF CURB ~ BRICK S7Â£ ps \ WALK / - 3 STREET SET YELLOW PLASTIC DISK MARKED BUETTNER 13166 WC IN CONCRETE GHT.OF..AÂ¥ SURV 1 S 75Â°09 11-E OF TRUE CORNER DEPO BOOK 01M1 RECORD NIRE FENCE *300 ONV 3138)NO) luci HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM ~ State Site Number: Local Site Number: 500.WM Photo Information: ASP-R-9 & 10 Township 10 Sol]:th Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Gould & Grover./Mesa Store Full Street Address: 500 West Main Legal Description: Lots R & 4, Block 30 City and Townsite of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: Main St.reef Nistoric District Owner: Private/State/Federal Owner's Mailing Address: ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Grocery Architectural Style: Western Storefront Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 2 Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Rectangular with open front & side porches Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Occupies corner lot. ~ Associated Buildings, Features or Obj ects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): None For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Single gahle behind false front paraper.; asphalt shingles Walls: , Ship lap Riding Foundation / Basement: TTnknown Chimney(s): Brick at center gahle; rear 1/3 Windows: lat flr. front: two-over-two large double-hling and large pict.1]re window with 4-life f.ransomi also at southeast corner; And flr: large pi cturre window by one-over-one double-hung, none original Doors: Double wood panel, not- original; transom Porches: Ful l front w.idth wraps southeast corner-open with* wood shi.ngl e shed roof supported by turned posts (not original) General Architectural Description: Typical western Rforefront with frame construction giving ill usion of greater size with "fake" front; open stair on west side gives acess to second floor. 0 5,6 (b r 4- 0 Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number E.Q.Q.INM FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Commercial Architect: A.G. Still Original Use: Grocerv Builder: A.G. Still. Intermediate Use: Bakery Construction Date: 1890 Actual _ Estimate X Assessor Based On: Tax Record/Sanborn Maps MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor ___ Moderate _X- Major Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Window modificatons ( date unknown ) 1 2 corner finials and statute in center of ronfline (1975) ; subsequent. removal of finials & statute (post. 1.975) ; replacement. of porch roof screen with paneling and replacement of single front door with pair (all somewhat in keeping wit.h archi ter,1-1]ral character) NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; ___ State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A __ B __ C __ D __ E Map Key Local Rating and Landmark Designation Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or A architectural integrity. 0 - Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment: Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this structure is at.trihlited to both its historical and arc:hi t.acl-u ral merit. Mr. James Could and his partner E.G. Grover established the Goul d and Grover Grocery on the Mesa in 1890 dealing in grocariest meats, fruits and vegetahl est hay and grain. They maintained 1-he Â· husiness t.il 1924 when it sold to Julius Zi,panci A. Tn more recent years J the estahlishment- has heen known as The Mesa Store Rakery (selling hakery and rleli goods) and then as The Mesa Store & Put.ney Gal l ery (a furni 1-ure st.ore anril art gal l ery) . Thi s struct.irre is an excellent example of a western storefront of frame construction whi ch typifies the early commercial buildings in hoomi ng mining com- munities. The "fake" front gave the appearance of a larger struct-ji-re- Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Tnsurance Maps; Aspen Daily News; "The Crystal City of the Rockies," 1905, p.29 Archaeological Potential: ___ CY or N) Justify: ~ Recorded By: Date: March 1991 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Commi ttee - Ci.ty of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Rflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner e ml GRAEME D MEANS 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN CO 81611 10- 2/-1.7 {999 TELEPHONE 970 925 9150 RECE#VED JUL 2 2 1999 ~Â¥Akf - COMAt.#6Â¥ C.16., 1,;ENT p 4- #62 ;I r , ~/ Loohno &5#L/64 A-T *14-12- \At lt-Wr FAC,40 12_ OF -r!*02_ MAJA- Ston-2- 15/JILOID; ARD COLLFRM@O 1~1-JAT -11+E#U- A-(202- 130 0/1 A-U 7 9 14.-lit+ES Po 4- AL 4 DrLA.60 A-1.4.u~ COUCXUSCONS Ml,0 411~ IA 14'~7- M+fL @flt\Â£(045 f~Ufc*fA.64.-910.U Â¢,415 Colk fÂ¢6{to O,6. 2-6 15 0 8 l/Â£06/ S -~f+04Â·=r- 11tlf,PLE l+A-4 L 13>tr v MOMArt-O 0% 0-6!**t% C.S. ZE tze CLOSE. Â¥Ut 73,267- p l-te,le u 2. 1414-UIL V.GHCH- SCAew=5 GluiLE. A-Un 9A-L'-9K,6 0005Â£,E- Au Lia- W LA-LAOW-$ v \#A- A-0- t- Cul,4/A@ den- pflo po-sal. -tE S Gletv ilf,LE 2- 9 AaÂ£98 0 004/136Â£- 6+U/Uc< S A-3 SWOJU 0 4 79Â£- A-7Â»Le 6#ZO 2 Lt VA-710 #u , Coottab I G.jo LI--Le 61Â·kfi_ 40 1-AÂ·-LE CA/(1-64- 7'od Atbok/-7- Aft44 0 k., Fh-LE:>* A-1 1 4/LL UOT 7>â‚¬- fk CLE- \Alt 19 . r~AAS Â£ 11022 012- A- CIU- LA#,Li- 4Â© P/,8- th PABLDLE - f (diA R 4... -763 CÂ· - 1, V ... 63.44.59 wiz25 Â·Â·- 312- 5 r>, ....... . At- 2.... â‚¬ .1,17 - . 8 4. /,r '-IÂ·%*-EN.Â·:4,â€¢Â· - f. --I D 4 . I 11. 11 *-11 --2 .1/F- , ./ 9:4% , 11 1 (11 * CERIESâ€¢MEAT - 41 -7 -MED:5. g- *Al- 4 -Il# - P I. PF:630 I EXHIBIT L l 22222_ P tmt--1-4 19 4 7 D k-1- \WOO D f= 2-*-M *- IN #1*A/ PW-1-A TE- 1 P LE 194-7 DH 56/ 1 Al iD 43Â»/ OR- 15LÂ¢kl--IV Â»400 D f=92-A-MI E- \6/ 1 41.D Ov/' O k -9-41.LLIV 17<3 \6/DC> D -t-12-3 M / 1 I . / 0 - ~ W. - - 1 - I 1 1 4 $ WA (427 0 gvou iated lo~ op 9\\< (/19 f)Â»V- 3/ 16"= 11 . #4 067 ELEÂ»- 71 ok+ . TI-ker li, 1999 M *BA 6-1-D R.E. 3 Ill LD I +4 â‚¬T 5-00 4/, MA-14 5-r Asp *4.4 / COLO, I ~i- ... 11-J fil- - 9- N 1MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 121 N. Fifth Street- Conceptual, Partial Demolition, On-Site Relocation, Variances, Residential Design Review-Public Hearing DATE: July 28,1999 SUMMARY: The applicant requests conceptual, partial demolition, on-site relocation, variances, and "Residential Design Review" approval. HPC has reviewed the historic landmark lot split of the property and jl~ held a worksession on the design proposal on July 14, 1999. Council recently granted final approval for the lot split so that the historic house is now situated on a 4,500 square foot lot with a maximum floor area of 2,339 square feet. APPLICANT: Small and Large Fries, LLC, represented by Mary Holley, architect. LOCATION: 121 N. Fifth Street, the east M of Lot H and Lot I, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen. R-6 zone district. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) PROJECT SIJMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District and all development involving historic landmarks must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section 1 exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(13)(2). Response: The proposal involves demolishing non historic additions to the existing house, shifting the house slightly eastward and excavating a basement, demolition of the existing secondary building, and construction of a new addition. Following is the staff analysis ofthe project. Site Plan The applicant has previously indicated trees that are to be removed due to poor health or conflict with the existing or proposed buildings. On the subject lot, it is anticipated that a tree that is growing too close to the house on the west side will be removed and that two sick or dead spruce trees will be removed on the north side ofthe house. Staff' s only concern with the site plan is the indication that a flagstone terrace would be located in front ofthe house, which is not a typical landscape treatment for these cottages. A simple stone or concrete path to the front door is recommended. The applicant should also note that fencing, if proposed in the future, will require a permit and HPC approval. Old House Maps indicate that the original portion of the house is the area labeled on the new floor plans as entry/dining. By 1890 an addition was made on the south of the original building, in the area where the kitchen is proposed to be located. Around 1952, it is believed that a historic cabin from another site was moved onto the property and attached to the west side of the building. This structure is labeled as the living room on the new floor plans. The proposal is to keep all of this construction in place. The areas proposed to be removed are an enclosed porch which was added on the southern end of the building (1952), and an enclosed patio on the west side (1983). The apartment building, believed to have been built in 1954, is also intended to be demolished. Only minor modifications are proposed to directly affect the historic areas of the house. The original front door off of W. Bleeker Street is to be rebuilt and where historic windows have previously been removed, new replacement windows are being installed. The character and location of the front door will need to be confirmed to the extent possible by framing evidence and photographs, and the new windows must match what existed originally. New Addition The new addition is largely one story, except for a carriage house type of structure along the alley. In general staff finds it to be very successful and appropriate to the historic resource. 2 Staffs only concern is that windows on the west side of the new one story addition are oversized, compared with the historic windows. While this fagde is not visible to the street, the whole addition should be designed to be in character with the historic structure. Variances The following variances are requested for the project as proposed: a 7' combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 2.3' west sideyard setback variance, a 3' west sideyard setback variance for lightwells, a l' east sideyard setback variance, and a 3.3' combined sideyard setback variance. The variances are needed to place the bulk of the new construction as far back from the historic house as possible, and to accommodate the width of the existing structure. Staff finds that the variances are compatible with the historic landmark and the neighborhood. PARTIAL DEMOLITION 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Response: As described above, the areas to be demolished on the old house are recent construction or have been altered in the past. The apartment building which is proposed for demolition is thought to have been built in 1954. It does not meet the 50 year old threshold for significance and has no other special architectural merit, therefore staff recommends that it be approved for removal. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: a. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: This issue is addressed under the conceptual review standards. b. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: This issue is addressed under the conceptual review standards. ON-SITE RELOCATION 1. Standard: The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure, and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation. 3 Response: The relocation of the house on the site is minimal and is done to avoid certain UBC requirements that would have resulted from it being less than three feet from the new west property line. The relocation will not affect the historic character of the neighborhood, however staff requests further information about how the new foundation will be addressed, including whether the relationship of the floor level to grade will change. HPC must discuss the new foundation treatment, which is proposed to be stone rubble. Historically, where stone was used, it was a coursed stone. In previous projects a new rubble foundation has not generally appeared appropriate to the structure and staff would therefore recommend concrete, with or without a lattice covering, be used instead. 2. Standard: The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. Response: A specific plan, stating how the building will be braced and how it will be supported has been submitted from Bill Bailey Housemovers. Staff requests that further information be provided as to the implications of removing the house from the existing floor structure. In the past this has resulted in the loss of historic siding along the bottom portion of the structure and other similar negative impacts. 3. Standard: A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. Response: Said plan and security in the amount of $30,000 shall be a condition of final approval. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS The project is in compliance with the design standards. STAFF SUMMARY AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends conceptual, partial demolition, on-site relocation, variances, and "Residential Design Review" approval be granted with the following conditions: 1. Eliminate the flagstone terrace in front of the house and instead indicate a stone or concrete path to the front door. 4 2. The character and location of the front door along W. Bleeker Street will need to be confirmed to the extent possible by framing evidence and photographs. 3. All existing historic windows in the house must be retained. Where the historic windows have previously been removed, new replacement windows must match what existed originally. 4. Revise the windows on the west side of the new one story addition to be more similar in overall size to the historic windows. 5. The HPC grants the following variances: a 7' combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 2.3 ' west sideyard setback variance, a 3' west sideyard setback variance for lightwells, a l' east sideyard setback variance, and a 3.3' combined sideyard setback variance, finding that the variances are needed to place the bulk of the new construction as far back from the historic house as possible, and to accommodate the width of the existing structure, and are compatible with the historic landmark and the neighborhood. 6. Clarify whether the relationship ofthe floor level to grade will change when the house is relocated. 7. HPC must discuss the new foundation treatment, which is proposed to be stone rubble. Staff recommends concrete, with or without a lattice covering, be used instead. 8. Provide more information as to the implications of removing the house from the existing floor structure. In the past this has resulted in the loss of historic siding along the bottom portion of the structure and other similar negative impacts. 9. Provide a relocation plan, detailing how the house will be securely stored during relocation, and a letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 with submittal for building permit. 10. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 11. Submit a preservation plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating how the existing materials, which are to be retained, will be restored. The requirement is to retain/repair all original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage. 12. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staffand monitor. 13. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 15. The preservation plan described above, as well as the language of certain conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of 5 approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 17. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Exhibits: A. Staffmemo dated July 28, 1999. B. Application. 6 r-EmE-371 2/ . APPLICANT: L- 1 0 LOCATION: 121 N. Fifth ACTION: Significant Development (Conceptual), including variances, Historic Landmark Lot Split, Partial Demolition, On-Site Relocation, Off-Site Relocation, and Residential Design Standards variance. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) Significant development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet allfour of the development review standards in order for HPC to grant approval: Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into Â© the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Standard 2: the proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. 0 PARTIAL DEMOLITION Standards of review for partial demolition. No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met: (Note: "Partial demolition" shall mean the razing of a portion of any structure on an inventoried parcel or the total ming of any structure on an inventoried parcel which does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel). Standard 1: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration, or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Standard 2: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. ON-SITE RELOCATION Standards for review of on-site relocation: No approval for an on-site relocation shall be granted unless the HPC finds that the following standards have been met: The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure, and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation, and The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impactsÂ· of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation, and A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting of a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. i!5& t=77.,-U ~-- â€¢-c NonCEÂ»-- 0 DATE P-..4.0 TIME A-- ' r# "APOSE / D. 4 . .. r EXHIBi*- Attachment 8 LaJ County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.52.060(E) . 1, tSr A , e. *7~~~ cu'Le/ , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060(E) ofthe Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy ofwhich is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated onthe attached list, onthe /5/Zi~yof .32~ , 1999 (whichis /0days priorto the public hearing date of *61>49 1 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the /92#ay of 1-4 , 199.1, to the20ay of %69 , 1991Â· (Must be posted for at least ten (10) 1~11 days before the hearing date). A photograph ofthe posted sign is attached hereto. '. 92-8 51Fnature ,/ / Lj (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this 2fdy of ~la-~-, 1999. by dc/k,t,2 4 9/466/~ . WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission expires: 29 18 iz-oâ‚¬Â» NW:*MiffE- / OFFICIAL SEAL KASEY S. MICKLER 1 . NOTARY PUBUC-COLORADO MY COMMIMSION EXMRES AUGUST 8, MOO AARbNSON JEFFREY CRAIG ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY AOYAMA TETSUJI AOYAMA AKIKO PO BOX 10131 620 W BLEEKER ST 6105 NE KESWICK DR ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 SEATTLE WA 98105 0 BAILEY RYAN 1994 TRUST 50% ASPEN MTN RESCUE BAUER WALTER F FAMILY TRUST C/O JANUS CAPITAL 630 W MAIN ST 15935 VALLEY VISTA 620 E COOPER ASPEN CO 81611 ENCINO CA 91436 ASPEN CO 81611 BERR LLC CITY OF ASPEN COSCARELLO ROBERT & ELIZABETH 611 W MAIN ST 130 S GALENA ST 515 E LAS OLAS #800 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 FT LAUDERDALE FL 33301 CROCKETT ANN R TRUSTEE OF THE COULTER G LYNNIE CUNNINGHAM INVESTMENT CO INC PRICE LIVING TRUST PO BOX L3 605 W MAIN ST 10898 MORA DR ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 LOS ALTOS HILLS CA 94024 DUNSDON S MICHAELE EMERSON LTD DUNSDON S MICHAELE BORKENHAGEN DAVID A SWEENEY C/O 617 W MAIN ST PO BOX 2225 533 W HALLAM ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 0 EPSTEIN MARC L REVOCABLE TRUST FELD ANNE S FERGUS ELIZABETH DAWSON #1 PO BOX 1515 1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 4100 205 N 6TH ST DALLAS TX 75201 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611-1103 GOLDRICH MELINDA HALLUM AUGUSTUS F & MARGERY L HAYES MARY E 706 W MAIN ST 608 OLD PLANTATION RD 209 E BLEEKER ST ASPEN CO 81611 JEKYLL ISLAND GA 31527-0721 ASPEN CO 81611 HENRY KRISTEN HILLMAN DORA B TRUST HILLMAN TATNALL LEA 525 W HALLAM ST 504 W BLEEKER 504 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN CO 81611-1246 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 HUNTINGTON TRUST CO NA TRUSTEE ILGEN EILEEN L & JACK D & ELOISE IGLEHART JIM C/O NATIONAL CITY BANK ATTN CE ILGEN IN JOINT TENANCY 610 W HALLAM ST WIGHTON 518 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 155 E BROAD ST 5TH FLOOR ASPEN CO 81611 COLUMBUS OH 43251 ~N DEBBIE KRUIDENIER DAVID & ELIZABETH S KOELLE ALICE ~/LORADO CORPORATION PO BOX 2871 3409 SOUTHERN HILLS DR '~ MCSKIMMING RD DES MOINES IA 50321 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 . LE BLANC SHERIE MATILDA LEVIN WILLIAM A REV LIVING TRUST MAC DONALD BETTE S TRUST 634 W MAIN ST #2 1 PENN PLZ STE 725 15 BLACKMER RD ASPEN CO 81611 NEW YORK NY 10119-0799 ENGLEWOOD CO 80110 0 NATIONWIDE THEATRES OLSHAN BURTON D 1/2 PEARSON MARK M & LEES M CORPORATION OLSHAN KATHLEEN W 1/2 702 W MAIN ST A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 5408 OLD LEEDS RD ASPEN CO 81611 120 N ROBERTSON BLVD BIRMINGHAM At_ 35210 LOS ANGELES CA 90048 RANKIN CONSULTING LLC RUDOLPH RICHARD E THOMAS TODD M 336 VINE ST PO BOX 3080 605 W MAIN ST #00A ASPEN CO 81611 CAREFREE AZ 85377 ASPEN CO 81611 THROM ROBERT & PHYLISS 1/2 INT TOMCICH WILLIAM VERLEGER MARGARET B & PHILIP K JR THROM DOUGLAS 1/2 INT PO BOX 1498 105 MATTISON DR 617 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81612-1498 CONCORD MA 01742-4138 ASPEN CO 81611 VIEIRA LINDA 50% INTEREST VICENZI GEORGE VILLARI JOHN TRUST HALL TERESA 50% INTEREST PO BOX 2238 PO BOX 2941 605 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 0 WOOD HELENA YOUNG DONALD L C/O AMBIANCE LTD 617 W MAIN ST 1548 SLOCUM ST ASPEN CO 81611 DALLAS TX 75207-3615 0 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 121 N. FIFTH STREET, CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, ON- SITE RELOCATION, AND VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, July 28,1999 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Small and Large Fries LLC requesting conceptual design approval to remodel a historic structure. The proposal includes the following variance requests: a 7' combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 2.3' west sideyard setback variance, a 3' west sideyard setback variance for lightwells, a l' east sideyard setback variance, and a 3.3' combined sideyard setback variance. The property is located at 121 N. Fifth Street, and is described Lots G, H, and I, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen. For fuither information, contact Aniy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Conimunity Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on July 10, 1999 City of Aspen Account RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 0 APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, ON-SITE RELOCATION, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW AND VARIANCES TO REMODEL A HISTORIC HOUSE AT 121 N. FIFTH STREET, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 1999 WHEREAS, the applicant, Small and Large Flies, LLC, represented by Mary Holley, has requested conceptual approval, partial demolition, on-site relocation, residential design review, and variances for the property located at 121 N. Fifth Street, the east M of Lot H and Lot I, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is a designated landmark. The project involves removing non-historic additions to the house, restoration ofthe original cottage, and construction of a new addition to the rear of the cottage; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 0 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; 0 and WHEREAS, all applications for partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay district, must meet all of the Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.020(C) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1.Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel; and 2.Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: a.Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. b.Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, all applications for on-site relocation of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay district, must meet all of the following Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.020(D)(2),(3), and (4) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1.Standard: The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure, and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation; and 2.Standard: The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation; and 3.Standard: A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation; and WHEREAS, all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.58.040 must meet one of the following statements in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or c) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints, and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated July 28, 1999, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 28, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of_ to _. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That conceptual, partial demolition, on-site relocation, variances, and Residential Design Standards review for 121 N. Fifth Street, the east M of Lot H and Lot I, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the July 28, 1999 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. Eliminate the flagstone terrace in front of the house and instead indicate a stone or concrete path to the front door. 2. The character and location of the front door along W. Bleeker Street will need to be confirmed to the extent possible by framing evidence and photographs. 3. All existing historic windows in the house must be retained. Where the historic windows have previously been removed, new replacement windows must match what existed originally. 4. Revise the windows on the west side of the new one story addition to be more similar in overall size to the historic windows. 5. The HPC grants the following variances: a 7' combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 2.3' west sideyard setback variance, a 3' west sideyard setback variance for lightwells, al' east sideyard setback variance, and a 3.3' combined sideyard setback variance, finding that the variances are needed to place the bulk of the new construction as far back from the historic house as possible, and to accommodate the width of the existing structure, and are compatible with the historic landmark and the neighborhood. 6. Clarify whether the relationship ofthe floor level to grade will change when the house is relocated. 7. HPC must discuss the new foundation treatment, which is proposed to be stone rubble. Staff recommends concrete, with or without a lattice covering, be used instead. 8. Provide more information as to the implications of removing the house from the existing floor structure. In the past this has resulted in the loss of historic siding along the bottom portion of the structure and other similar negative impacts. 9. Provide a relocation plan, detailing how the house will be securely stored during relocation, and a letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 with submittal for building permit 10. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 11. Submit a preservation plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating how the existing materials, which are to be retained, will be restored. The requirement is to retain/repair all original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage. 12. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 13. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 15. The preservation plan described above, as well as the language of certain conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 17. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 28th day of July, 1999. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved at to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk . ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPUCATION FORM 1. Project name ,*Wk * (Â·0fee FINe, BelvE,168 2. Project location 14/ 9168:1'H 19 MH arÂ· PÂ®FEN CO. EN,1 94 Or LOT H *D lOT Tr, P/WCA< 14 OMell~M,To\NtÂ¥9WE OF +0?58 (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning flÂ·0 4. Lot size 41 40 *F 5. Applicanfs name, address and phone number 4*4.4 6466 fFIG, UÂ»Â· â‚¬81416 F*WM,P 14000 MOIANTKN VIEW DRÂ· herE,4 60. 146 Â·Â·*02,+ 6. Representative's name. address, and phone number MAFÂ¥ A'/>401'+4 0,1Â¥H[129 fo. MMFY Mouet ge MVER tlâ€¢449 LN. f-40;F co. 0(0,* 141' 0401 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA X Conceptual HPC Soecial Review Final SPA .-- Final HPC 8040 Greenline - Conceptual PUD - Minor HPC Stream Margin Finai PUD * Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. HiSIOMc LanamarK GMQS allotment GMQS exemption X Demc/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lct Solit/Lot Line Appeal Committee - Adjustmen 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, acproximate sc. ft.. number of bedrcoms, any previous approvals granted to the property) tgRE droll:1 t-twIZ)121Â£> erMerMFÂ·6 v/ 4 Ita)Ita;Me : Pff&))< FDZE> *rÂ· -640 aro,Y MOK ther,FIC, 004Â£nt BE Vf 4'EMPM 4 1 IDEOFOOM ,â€¢fle:rMe4126. (Mtpe keEM Pfff#VED faF A ete * 86Â·8Â· NÂ»lue. 9. Description of development application /416â‚¬f'rK. two Fanâ‚¬w op 129*50 4 F,frIA, DeMO Und/4 OF ftler,1216 erRUCTIFE; DEMOI,mOA OF Norttyl,Flo er,#erupe ; FBOMT * rEPA 4*3re*A< \#bed,Nab. Blget ED 'Er,*A4 4*Pace'; l#*tr\We6 2~erf*t< 48Â·\MUGe 68 *leT tbite; fil.0(Mlot< aF tÂ¥OPAQ.6Xfl#COAfe 10. Have you completed and attached the following? * Attachment 1 - Land use application form * Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 0 . _A Response to Attachment 3 X Response to Attachments 4 and 5 11111111 I ./ ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant eM,Â«. 4 )48â‚¬ f:19Â·ee OloÂ· Address: . 14.1 N. ripnt erÂ· Zone district: Lot size: . 4000 ee Existing FAR: 4%11 45 Allowable FAR: 4001 er Prcposed FAR: _ 4,Â®te *IA Existing net leasable (ccmmercal): Procosed net leasable (commerciai): Exisring % of site ccverage: 41 7 Prcocsad % of site ccverage: evyÂ· Existing % of open space: . Prccosed % of open space: Existing m aximum heignI: .Pincical bicic: < 40-0" Accescrv bida: lelaâ€¢ Prccosed max. height: princical blcic: 4~<-01' Accesscr, bida: P ceased % of demoliticn: . 407Â· Existing number of bedrccms: 4 P=ccsed number of bedrcoms: e Existing on-site parking spaces: ~ Cn-site parking spaces required: 0 Sertacks Existing: Minimum rec~ired: P:coosed: , , FrorZE ('4Â·*' Fronr. , 10 Front: 1'60 Rear 4-Â®' Rear: 10'-64 - Rean to. O Comoinea Combined Combined i Ill Frcnt/rear: 10* Front/rear 450-0 Fron#rear: 40,0 Side: . 1-1' Side: â‚¬;-ou Side: *71' Side: 1Â·0' Side: 4-011 Side: 4.0' Combined Combined Combined Sides: 1Â·1' -- Sides: 101-oIl Sides: . 661' Existing nonconformities or encrcachments: 1wo 00,9 er#,crufE: I.Â·2 EMCF#,HMENT 4 6Â· PHF 1,/825, 1Â·. e 194#t XYP E,K".d/MelrÂ· _ Variations requested:~fe#â€¢111182fU28dgltlm~~.~>0(zpl Â£#MellteD efoeM#. (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft.. site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R.6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) Historic Preservation Committee Aspen City Council Aspen Building Depanment Planning and Zoning Parks And Recreation City of Aspen I am the developer and property owner of 121 North 5th Street in Aspen. My representative in all matters penaining to this project is Mary Holly, Architect. She can be reached at 927-8589. I, Ernie Fyrwald, managing partner for Small and Large Fries, LLC (owner) can be reached at 379-4531. Respectfully, (3 3 / Ernie Fy*wild . . 1 ~PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. t THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER Please find enclosed a commitment or commitments to issue Title Insurance. Please review the enclosed and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to call us at the number listed below. TO: COATES, REID AND WALDRON ATI'ENTION: CRAIG MORRIS DATE: Mafch 15, 1999 1. - OUR CASE NO.: PCT13981 SELLER: AUGUSTUS F. HALLUM and MARGERY L. HALLUM -UYER/BORROWER: NIE FYRWALD LENDER: LEGAL: LOTS G, H AND I, BLOCK 24, CITY OF ASPEN COPIES TO: 1. MASON AND MORSE/BOB CADGER 2. 3. 4. 5. . SCHEDULE B'S DELIVERED TO: COMMENTS: : 601 E. HOPKINS ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1967 970-925-1766 I 970-925-6527 FAX 1. f Aspen Street Afop 101 N. 9&1 Â«. A,pen St -1 Gu ide -U p-Â· U U 0 0 U U U Aine CL Pâ€¢......................Â·Â·Â·.....)47 M:cland Av H.6.7 A#AV 4.6 htdt-,d Park M H.7 Al:co Le: H7 Mill st 44.5 Aspen Nta Vist. 8.Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·â€žÂ·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·J.2.3 Mon-h St.----GÂ·H-5 ; 4 - *- â‚¬ t r C --.~~ 4 -'- Afdmote Ct, Dr..................__.M-7 Mount.: V- B......--1-2.3 1 , / 16 ..61,4,4 --Â· 0 At9h04*4 â€ž- â€¢1 ~ , 404~~~ ~ . ~ . . .. Be r,ne,1 knch CL A Rd .. â€ž....1 4 5 Night-k R......... ...â€ž.-.+.......1 5 --95*$_ i .., 2. :4>4 474 '. East . . Aspen St..............--.........GÂ·H-5 Min Laulel CL Dr.......-+ ./Â·J.8 1. .. A*p.n AIp,M.,,,,....,_..........,â€žH-1.7 Mtn O,4 M -_........_.._......H.2 Neati Av H.6 -- . * 8// St.~................... .....................G.6 Nicholas ln.......-*..........._GÂ·67 0-1 eeg Rd C,66 ~ Black Blich Or..............___.1+FÂ·2 3 No,th SL.............â€žÂ·Â·Â·Â·Â·â€žÂ·-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·FÂ·}4 '.2$>r Bleeker St..........~...................G-3.5 Oa Ln....-.....................G+6 >b. 44-Â·&16~%24/1, 1 0, 9 1) %44.- ~\ 422-~ .,12'tri--- . ..if%Â·*'44 E Bleeker St...,...................6.HÂ·5Â·6 Or:ginal St 144-6 Bluebonnet Ti..... .................H-2 Ove,look Dr .' 0 6. Brown Ln 4.8 Pan,Ay C# H-6 1- 'f 3pto. 1 1 \ 4.44.5 1 :3 1 I Bunny Ln................................EÂ·2Â·3 Pearl St 1.4 4* ~ Snow aunny Ct . (16 *4 , B Nut â€¢// id.1.6 m.1., 6, dmuÂ·n or n.,mid ,Â»1 mÂ·:p Castle CieeR ......................_FÂ·3 Peck Rd..............................EÂ·5 , 4' i k @ 0, luied in jirmpu,6 6,4, ro.1.4 m., 6, Castle Creek Rd........ ..........G-JÂ·1-3 Aul Wit ..F.4 1 -* 44--50% 4,998,. Vi I . 6-1 4 pnww. p,opo,Â¢4 0, uder,Onisrâ€¢*Â·110,1 Centenniat Cd................Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·1+7 Pitkin Mesâ€¢ R r)Â·E-2 | * -. Circut, Aw.... ...................1.7 Pow. PI/â€¢ Rd.-...........-F-G+3 --*- ~k~0 A:rport. B.,.it hk '' ,- . Clovel,nd St........................Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·HS Prewo.0 Path..._._.....---.....H 2 ~ 2 Chattiold Rd............- ............EÂ·2 Placer I â€¢ F-5 1 \ Aspen t.st.lulu * 1 . - C.tonwood Or .... ......, .........I.4 Py,Im:dN.....-...â€ž.â€ž....â€ž...........5.1 .4-. (11 Coope,Av.... ........................H 4.5 Pupp,Sm:th St..............--...GÂ·S 4. -1 801 ,~. 14 N T-0 1 11 , 'FO'*~ ~ 11 -10$~~ 4. CottonwoodinÂ·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·...............GO Queen 51 Â·-**--*'~~--*~~ ~~ < ~ ~~ < c ~~ ~ ~ Â·52 ~ood Duck li ~ ~.~ ~1 Ovital Like Rd 1Â·7 Race St Date St H.6 Red Butte Dr * Deans: H.5 Red Mour-o Rd......._-_D G.W 1 Glitâ€¢.spiâ€¢ SK IÂ»in .%1 - 24 .- . 4 - RedÂ·. Rd..........__.._-DE-4-6 0â€žwot..,..~........................,.......E .5 Regent St --'*.......- N. 7, , Durant A,~...............Â·-.Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· H...6 R,dg,PiRd..-.............__ E 5 Eastwood R..................-.......1.7 Rio Grande Pl E N >/ i Â·- ~* f; +!**4 ! % \6 .IN . '04 . r' , 8 44~4 'W Riverside,Av H.6 ~~\.. 9./.a: lag'. Q.H.~ \PÂ·~ RNer Di -**f:tul 1\ 414:Sr i: ~ ttfit,J-Â»A ,-Â£3 4 <~ ~ver Ct.-.....-..........GÂ·6Â·7 R:vers:de Dr 'Al - Sout,1,4,~6 0 Â·f. , p .-Â· .' G:b.cr, Av 41458 Ross Ct f.g Roaring Folk 8 11 Maroon Creek Rd ; d~ - 70 5 1-4*$,7 2-4 t ~0-1Lb. 11~ , ~1"""1',, 44)5'V : 1 :,1 G,tbait St H 5 S.,bin D. n...A t Â·. Garmisch St .............-.....GÂ·HÂ·4 5 Roarug Fol Rd F.4 5 $ Soum A, I ~ I 84' st , 44; Tt;Z<* f Â·3 , tl ~ ..... 1 9%; r;*.a . , 4 Giltespie St 4 Sage Q..........----.-1.2 5.' 1.. 6 Fli .2 44. Mill Heathe, Ln ... _ ... - ,G H.2 . =1 3 84 7 - CE Â·Â· 44'h stâ€¢ Eli.- 40 - 01-St1.....--.-- - .... H 2 Salvabon B Ring.4/i .1 0 35 S /w Mill Ct G.3 Sh.Cl 2 ! 1 1 1 3,7- f ~ i.i.f i -Â»i:ir-.~"*&#I~si- ,4 OU'en St . *volaId P.n, p, Herron Hollow' , 0Â·' ' Shadowood Dr 1.J.7.8 <_1 -Â»j ,4213-3 #1*~-1 -37/, if:=u Holden Of.........- .â€ž ..................GÂ·3 Sha,ty Ln F-G 5 ; 70 Al./.O/ L.Ar B.*I.12ik> / 144 51;Â·1- #1- i -*L;:1 1 + 6-gRd Hophm Av.....................â€ž.GÂ·HÂ·3Â·6 S:Ner King Or / Hunter St.................. ................. H.5 SkimmIng I â€¢ Hume, Creal Md...... -.â€ž........EÂ·FÂ·B Smuggler St F.G-3.5 -4 cÂ¢ Â·Â· +t' 4 0 â€¢ Smuggler G,- Rd........._ .3.6-7 0 4/6,1 1 Aspen 4~'-=dil~z, coo.w~UL 8 1'..._- + ; 5-9.*r.' 4 . 1 1 Juan St........â€ž........................HÂ·4Â·5 Smuggle, Mo,Nzin Rd....._EÂ·H,6-8 â€¢ Larâ€¢â€¢Pw Ln J , 5 S.'*2----â€ž--JiÂ·Â§ , Lace:CLL..........................HÂ·tÂ·W sneeky I I F.G.3 2 West -f ~i 1.. '..F .....--1 . Q, f ig ~~~2,-- ' AGn Glowl .. Lake Av F+GÂ·4 Snew Bunny Ct "â€¢ L i ,_. ad .~Â·. '. 44 South Av ..6 Summit St L . Spring St G-H+5Â·6 1,5. ..91.,4944 4. e' L",1 L/ HÂ·2 1 ilte p' 4.. 204â€ž4/ %01,4> er -4/ i ~- . \ ~ Lupine DI.â€ž................---.1Â·JÂ·8 Summit qi ..5 Aspen AIPS 8 Lone Pine Rd..--.._...-..GÂ·5,6 Spruce .1 0 MwoRM H.2.3 Twin Ridge R ..2 4 u'. m .. 0.1 n n, - Casul Like Rd ~4* - Magnit,co Rd li \ .1 Maple Ln 4-6 Tru.con M $Â·F-1-2 Main St .........................- .GÂ·H 3.5 Toby Ln ... 'fc 14\-4, Msroon Ct, Dr '41 Ute A.M ... Mwoon Ck Fla -*GÂ·HÂ·1Â·2 Vr- /1 n.8 Mascotte Ln H.7 Walnut 1, 4 . 4 0 Bi#3Eer- *.0 West End St .----...._)14Â·C -4 Matchless DI................â€ž-â€žâ€ž0Â·11.0 Water:Av 4 L#virloN MÂ¢Sk-neR. .w West.1- 01 L'. 4 Midow Or. .......â€ž................ GÂ·H-2 Walought,WY :F.3 5 re r.vin ukes via lndependence PAPâ€¢ ,~ Moodows Rd FG 3 Wi,ght Rd 0.8 9 /1 8 5 A â€¢1 -A 0 a ~ Map Â©US WEST DIâ€¢. Inc !993 M.,p OUSnESTDIA.tn, â€¢998 141# St Marg A Agian Architects, F.C. MEMORANDUM To: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer From: Mary Holley CC: Ernie Pyrwald Date: 07/14/99 Re: 121 N. Fifth Street; Small and Large Fries Residence The proposed development for the above property includes demolition of the existing two story structure, partial demolition of the non.historic additions to the historic one story structure, permanent relocation of the historic structure, and additions to the historic structure. In order to accomplish this, we will be requesting variances for the west side yard, the east side yard, a combined side yard variance, a combined front and rear yard variance, and a side yard variance for required lightwells. By most accounts, the original historic structure is a T shaped structure approximately 18 feet by 31 feet and was built in 1888. The house is currently about 35 feet by 45 feet, so it is safe to assume that over the years the structure was renovated and additions were made to it. The most recent additions were as follows: â€¢ 1952: Elsa Fischer remodels the house and encloses 6 feet of open porch at the end. â€¢ 1967: Martha Fischer reroofs the house. â€¢ 1983: Gus Hallum replaces the clapboards on the front of the house and replaces four windows on the west and north side of the house. â€¢ 1983: Gus Hallum also encloses the patio on the back side of the house. At some point in time the taller gable end, which faces Bleeker Street, was brought on site and added to the original structure. After extensive research, I was unable to determine when that event actually occurred other than a cryptic note stating that in 1952 four houses were brought together. It is safe to assume that this happened sometime after 1924, as the footprint of the house remained the same on the Sanborne Fire Insurance maps through that time. Although that section of the house is not part of the original structure and may have been added as late as 1952, I would prefer to treat it as a historic resource for the property and do not intend to remove or significantly alter it, other than replacing the aluminum clad windows with wood windows more in keeping with the structure. 50 Kiver Oalcs Lane 13>asalt, Colorado 8 1 62 1 Vhone: (970) 92.7-8389 ~ax: (970) 92.7-8589 E.-mail: aardvark@sopris.net I Web fage: http//mt.sopris.net/aardvark Marg A. Agian Architects, F.C. MEMORANDUM The portions of the structure that we are proposing to remove are both of the recently enclosed porches. This wiltleave the original structure and the "Bleeker Street Gable". Due to the highly historic nature of the neighborhood and the prominent corner location of this house, it would be ill advised to try to alter the corner appearance of the house. The intention of the addition and remodel is to highlight the historic nature of the property on the corner of Fifth and Bleeker Streets and to relegate the newer additions further back towards Main Street on the alley side of the property. By locating the additions here, we will not be changing the facades at the corner of Fifth and Bleeker Street and will thus help to preserve the character of the neighborhood. The additions have designed to both complement and enhance the original house. By allowing the historic portion of the house to read as a complete entity and playing up the additive nature of the new portions of the house, the intent is to have the additions read as another element in the evolution of the house. The newer portion has been designed to allow the history of the house to read from the exterior: a visitor can easily discern where the original structure stops and where the addition starts. The material choices on the addition are intended to make its history less clear: was it added five years ago, or was it fifty? By giving the whole project the appearance that it grew over time the hope is that it will form a harmonious whole, while still allowing the uniqueness of the historic structure to be prominent. In addition, our responses to the requirements of Section 26.72.020, Demolition, partial demolition, and onÂ·site relocation, of the City of Aspen Municipal Code are as follows: â€¢ Section G: exception for demolition of structures within an "H" district. Structures may be exempt from meeting applicable standards if the following conditions are met: 1. The structure is not on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. 2. The structure is considered to be noncontributing to the historic district. 3. The structure does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district and its demolition does not impact the character of the historic district 4. The demolition is necessary for the redevelopment of the parcel. 5. The new development is reviewed by HPC. Response: The two story structure slated for demolition is not a historic building (it was built in 1954) and does not contribute to the character of the neighborhood. Demolition of this structure is necessary in order to obtain floor area to build the new addition and to locate the addition in a favorable location on the site with regard to the historic structure. 50 Kiver Oaks Lane M>asalt, Colorado 8 1 62.1 phone: (970) 927-8589 rax: (970) 917-8589 E-mail: aardvark@sopris.net I Web fage: http//mt.sopris.net/aardvark h . Marg A. Agian Architects, F.C. MEMORANDUM Demolition of this structure will also remove the nonconforming rear and side yard setbacks. The redevelopment of the parcel will be reviewed by the HPC in a public session on July 28. â€¢ Section C: Standards for review of partial demolition. 1. 'The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration, or rehabilitation of the structure. 2. The applicant has mitigated to the greatest extent possible: a. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure by limiting demolition of original or significant features or additions. b. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: The partial demolition is required to remodel the existing structure. In addition, the parts of the structure to be demolished consist of areas that were added to the original house within the last fifty years. No part of the original house is to be demolished. Finally, the additions have been designed to complement the original structure, as stated above. â€¢ Section E: Standards for review for on site relocation. 1. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure, and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation, and 2. The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and resiting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. Response: The existing location of the house is 2.7 feet from the property line. The Uniform Building Code requires that structures within three feet of the property line be one-hour rated and have no openings. If we were to keep the building in its present location, all of the windows and the siding on the west side would need to be removed in order to accomplish this. The new location is approximately 1.3 feet east of the existing location. This will avoid the problems associated with the proximity to the property line as well as 50 River Oaks Lane Ibasalt, Colorado 8 1 62.1 f'hone: 070) 927-8589 Vax:(970) 917-8589 E-mail: aardvark@sopris.net I web rage: http//mt.sopris.net/aardvark Marg A. Agian Architects, F.C. MEMORANDUM allowing the overhang on the west side to clear the 2.7 foot building setback line. Please refer to the enclosed attachments for statements from the structural engineer and the house mover regarding strategies for moving the structure as well as anticipated structural upgrades. I hope that this serves to address any concerns you may have. If you have any questions or comments regarding this memorandum, please let me know and I will be happy to discuss them with you. Ce Ernie Fynv:ltd. 50 River Oaks Lane ibasalt, Colorado 8 1 62.1 Thone: (976) 917-8589 ran(970) 92.7-8589 E-mail: aardvark@sopris.net I Web Fage: http//mt.sopris.net/aardvark 07/12/1999 16:35 9704349763 BAILEY Bill Bailey BAILEY HOUSE MOVERS * UCENSED â€¢ WGUEED â€¢ BONDED Wm. O. BAILEY 3140 B Rd. Oyand Junction. CO 8 ISol 970 43â€¢-9703 2-Â£40,1 9 19 9,9 . 0/Lâ‚¬ C 01'mj d,Â£-0 0 -f-2 60+46- Air- 614Ag 04,0 ecRO t -rAL +6.st- Ar /61/ A: s-th K),LL .RE- 42Â£.,04& i.6 60,7,4 Al. c.96 LAws 641- Â£90Â£,ta 75 7;4-Â£ A.'â€¢Aa- 57-,2) 9 AN h S.4,-AR. 05.,Ae/,06- d),u & 1,444 Efi -ra i C)#wEAA -+ANEÂ£5 Â£'3.0,or-,eA e 7-2, â‚¬ : 24,4.â‚¬4 +4â€¢ 5 L fy\WUL'h to ILL -7=0,0 A, 62~7r- 212*.45 /6,7-6 +44â€¢st Aeout #r"oot ZE,Â£4 (-As 60â€¢, SW c Ar 42Â£) 4.1 *&*bÂ© 50 SNEÂ¥24. 7142- 40â€¢est- 03,44. 62- 19*n.A Up 0-fF OLS /Loe Apb ALLi-b off /4.4 4*ub*-r,-> 8,/1 4â€¢,0 --TG-~) 26*citÂ·~ A th>m 7/Eu i 4;.1 r - C "J-r, 1-; &24 -EA,Le Ke,ifid/1100Â£02.5 . .4214 - . 07/12/1999 16:35 9704349763 BAILEY PAGE 01 0 T111â€¢ C 4 /L ' '1 / 11 , F f M. 0 V M'm N 1 - dE*Â£5 (*44Â© 1 ~4* 944 6&4 12 0 2.. â€¢|BE:20 66 80 1â€¢r Jul-14-99 02:57P KAUP ENGINEERING INC 9709459633 P- P.O. Box 2235 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 KAUP ENGINEERING INC. (970)945-9613, fax (970)945-8633 July 14, 1999 Mary Avjian Architects 50 River Oaks Lane Basalt, CO 81621 Attn: Mary RE: 121 North Fifth St, Aspen, CO Via: Fax Dear Mary. Per your request, I met you at the above referenced sile on July13,1999 to review the condition of tile existing structure. The intent of the observation was to assess structural viability of the existing framing. The existing structure Is approximately 100 years old and the original construction is typical of buildings from that era. Original roof framing is typically 2*4 tie chord trusses at 24 to 36" on center. Floor framing is typically 216 or 2x8 @ 24' on center. Wall framing was not observable but varied from In width In various areas of the building. Most of the foundation was concrete or masonry block, which had been built at a later date. In general, the strudure has performed well considenng the era it was constructed and the actual sizes of the framing members and connections. The roof and floor framing have amas of large deflections, which am indicative of long term overloading and settlement. The odginal framing was also modmed when various additions were constructed. It is possible that areas of deterioration due to long-term water contact exist behind the current Interlor and exterior finishes. Floor framing is very susceptible because of inadequate drainage and ventilation. These areas will need to be reviewed after allfinishes have been removed and the floor joists have been exposed. Other areas of performance problems should be expected as removal of finishes isperformed. In condusion, the existing stniclure is typically underslzed for cullent design loadings and will require modifications to meet current codes. The existing roof rafters will be reinforced with a slstered 2*12 rafter (minimum) andwill besuppotted onstrudumlridge beams. Theexisting floor joists willeadibe reinforced with a sistered joist or bear directly on a new floor framing system. The existing wall stu{is will be sistered with a new 21Â£ stud. Areas of new roof sheathing shall be 5/8" plywood. Areas of new floor sheathing shall be W TaG plywood Please call with any questions or If I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, 44~"~~92&140 Date D. KaÂ® :.E. 25740 1- 16 %*.1 A+L..40 *Â·%343,3Nlt*%# '..11/R .,4,44111,1111,04*~~ !82 , Â¥W'77~fmt 4 - 6 '90Â»32' 197265 '30:K ~~-25~rÂ¥ r#eN ely ru, 1.,OPE /9 /70-M Ar#A . 9%39 1 '*10'~ 70/ Gnof* 4 â‚¬349:B- 9? r 40*f -'2.2-~9 e93Â° N i.# 41~ .p.r' 9,9,91* A-7 7,- 11.l-,a,Grlf - â€ž guâ€¢=, â‚¬74'garisy QFF *t 9Â« 9 4909 47 92ms ' 9)47 702 t '*567 Y . 23#, /9 Â¢14Â¥ ezrÂ»,1.9'0 ~ 4 -0 9.67 Up- -amv E V Â«otly * ' Â»71Â¢90Â»1,4 + 9Â»2082 Ter '1, 14. R' tf 'Py- 9P'rf-or Â» ff lar â‚¬9 V<46 T~TPro 4 -04rh ~44 66 - 81 -7 %4464 (68) (8093 _25.62 63% 629 627 625 628 69/ 6/9 6/7 6/S 607 6// 68â‚¬ 605 . 60/ //- l Iii-1 -7--W~E -7-7 7 177 3 6 / 3 1. 5 1 Ch $~Â¢ "br~1 .3 1,1 11 1-1 N Irl 2 11 b h FO Lo L__1 r 9 0-0 It /1. 2 e. -. 61 /0 L 1/x,1 11 / X-/ 24 T 1 4 '3*49, L LI al lai ~ !21 64-61 1*9 2 11 ~ A' ~ L. M. N O. . 41 2 4. & 11 % 4 HANO HOSE 1/ % 4/ 1 Cmers. 400. 11 44 1---1- - 2Â£22.2 7-il - ./ / S - +71 4 2.-*L-_L HOBE //27 3 Ho. / / c 2-_PIE 11 0 2---4 .. Li 9 634 632 630 612 626 629 5%% 6%0 618 6/6 614 6,& 610 608 606 604 602600 . OR. /6,8) * =4 qig"'~x 11~ - - -- - ===== -========== 11 Â® Y .0 @ 11 11 (627 625) 1624 635 633 69 628 6%5 613 615 619 677 6/5 60 60 609 607605 603 60/ 11 2 ~ 11 -U /6 11 .r ' 17~ 5 'l lk Ll w 11 . .:49 5/ R ' 4 -I ............Il PL' 1/ * 1 1,1 4 11 G. 0-1 1 -4 =4 . Z 1-1 El -3< i Â£Â£Â£ iziÂ· 1 *12. 0 -- U) 4 411 Â¢ 0, V 24 1 /. a 0 A MA Al ~7-4~ Flzz 'R_' f 0 25 1... /JX i 7=f# 4 R L--11 9 \ N. 6. 1 11 0-41 0 (9-10 4 / 7,1/ Â£1 A 0 17 co -- 1 1 X 2Jf 1-3Â¢J 1 % ' f $& r? r 28 gil 6" 011 20 ' 90# bul eut uu, I SOI BOI (01 Â£01 901 401 V' I. lili ......... ...... 0. I . I ........... I . ... .. . . .. . .. I . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . I . . . . I . . . e . I ............. ......... ... .. ... .........*'.*''-/. B..2.. I . . . I . .. . I .. . I . . I . . . . I . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . I . . . I . I .................+:2.2 ....... 12)14 I ... ............. ... 1,Â¥O I ........................ ............ ................................................. ..................................... ................. ./ I . I . ..... . â‚¬t...... . 9 l / 4 129294 :. 1/ 02 ... ........ ..... I .. ... ... ........ .. ......................... ......... . 0. ..... .. . .. .............. ... I .---- I . . .. I . . . I . . :,A/470'20: . tt +2 77 0 .... .2-;9 'â‚¬>: 1: 07 . ........ .......... ....lili . ...... ............ ........ ...... I ..... ................. .. ............................... ..................... ................... SCALE (AAA) PARCEL NO. (AA) TYPE (AN) DESIGN (AO) ROOMS (AP) BDRMS (AQ) BATHS OF- CARDS = R. Il 2 4 70,4 --- I . 1 IONS 1:WALL*:,ONiTBUCTION:*t, Â·*=,0.1 cool 1, 1. 121 TYPE Cong SQ. FT. AREA| UNIT COST TOTAL COST TOTAL COST X I FIRST FLOOR/MAIN AREA IAB 1/F) M |AA MÂ·I '55Â·.-1 BA I re, m| 20 14 3,0 4 r' It 91 4 U.Al vu â€¢V v ii *. .u,u'Qi,j'Â·Warial-ibl Â£2;=Elti.*4426,-60~16~thEUR;.4::d i 66.....C j 42>iv'YA#&;*2d~~~.'-ir----1..N. ~Mt@!E -- ... - (AA) TYPE (AN) DESIGN (AO) ROOMS (AP) BDRMS (AQ) BATHS :AZ) CARD OF CARDS = R. 1/ / S Â»Ay a. 1 SQ. FT. CALCULATIONS WALL CONSTRUCTION CODE TYPE coo[ SQ. FT. AREA UNIT COST TOTAL COST Â· X FIRST FLOOR/MAIN AREA AB 2~ M AA .. :5 ..Â·~~ BA //66 ~ 32 $49.300 .................................... .......... ..... I .... ... X ABOVE FIRST FLOOR AD F M AD BB b X M STORY/FINISH ATTIC AD F M AJ BC ............. X BASEMENT - UNFINISHED AC F P N AK BD $ X BASEMENT - FINISH AL BE [Il $ $ . ... ...... .. ..... I ........... X 81-LEVEL/TRI-LEVEL UNFINISHED At. BE [b $ R ) ... . TOTAL BASE COST $ X QUALITY ADJ. - DES. (CA)- EXT. (CB) INT. (CC) NET (CD) X-% I. . ADJUSTED BASE COST $ . ,. . ... .. , ...,. ., X APPLIANCES AND MECHANICAL $ 96 9 g DOLLAR ADJUSTMENTS $ , I .. . ... .. I . .... X NAT. STONE/MOSS ROCK (FJ) FRAMING ADJ. (HF) ~ ~ $ X WOOD SHK/SHGS (HH) 4 X BRICK TRIM (FK) CONC. BAR TILE CHI) SPANISH TILE (HJ) MISSION (HK) X BUILDUP (INSUL) (HL) ASBESTOS SHGS. (HM) . . X BUILT-UP (3 PLY) (HN) SLATE TILE (HO) X CON. SLAB (AB. GDE.) ul) CARPET UJ) ' ) PORCHES CODE CODE TYPE 11 12 13 IMPROVEMENT APPLIANCES coDE -PE No. UNIT COST PLUMBING â€¢001 ..PE No. UNIT COST COVERED (OPEN) PORCHES (25 AM A NA /10 It] $ :+ $ 16% 0 INVENTORY COOKTOP KA BASE COMP LA /1 ~ -3-500 WOOD BALCONIES ~ AM NB FOUNDATION SMOOTH CK. TOP KN 3 FIXTURE BATH LB ENCLOSED PORCHES ~ AM NC INCRETI BLOCK DROP-IN RGE/OV. KC % BATH LC TERRACE (PATIO) 03 AM ND IONK ABRICK WALL OVEN KB 2 FIXTURE BATH LD CONC. STAIRS OR STAIRWELL ~ AM NE 1 -- - I.8 k.luo s,ws DOUBLE OVEN KI , LAVATORY LE WOOD DEC:K O AM NF SELF-CLN OVEN KO ~ TOILET LF - EXTERIOR WALLS CARPORT AF P F AE BF [b $ $ MICROWAVE KG ~ BATH TUB LG - e WD SH ~t" A..T ELECTRIC BBQ KH ROMAN TUB LH 4 Blucto 01?r VEN - HOOD (STD) KD STALL SHOWER LI LK PAINT OLK STUCCO GARAGE AHF MAI ADBAG - 3.. HOOD (CUS-STR) KE ST SHWR2W/DR LJ .â€ž 4* ON IRK ..I ON .LK KITCHEN SINK LK BUILDING PERMITS OTHER ITEMS:r :tyâ€ž.ESTÂ·- RCN-Â· 7*~4./b"egl'* (HOOD CUS-CON) KF .6 METAL CENTRAL VAC KJ WATER HEATER LL DATE AMOUNT REASON FIREPLACE N'o ZA $ WINDOWS INTER (AM-FAt) KK LAUNDRY TRAY LM $ YARD IMPS. ZB ~ INTERCOM (AM) KL DISPOSAL LN -200 $ Ze ROOF & ROOFING INTER (REM STA) KM DISHWASHER LO (-/) -500 $ ZD AT BHED TRASH COMP. KP RI. 3 FIX BATH LP - REMARKS (FAE) ON IMPS: ZZ ABLE K H. HEATING SQ. FT. UNIT SEP STACK LQ ~40- 0 TOTA. R.C.N. $ 5.562 6 FORCED AIR MA SLID TUB ENCL LR A...EL ASPH SHGn i H ous=- *. / AREA FACTOR % (HAM) ADJ. R.C.N. $ GRAVITY MB WATER SOFT LS INTER OR FINISH DEPRECIATION HAT WIR/STM~4 AC //66 160 4/90 SAUNA LT â€¢FINISHED PLASTE. i~ BSMT HOT WTR MD BIDET W ~PAff /:98 /9 51 YEAR BUILT DA,*gÂ£NORM % GOOD % Â¥â€¢All WALL 8.ARD WET BAR LV â€¢92. /91>JUSe:s ,#6.5,/O /0 6t;4.4 YEAR ADD/REM DB 52-fOND. FOR AGE DE 56 ELECTRIC ME /.eD , HD /0 PANEL WL/FLR FURN MF ECTRN AIR CL NU MIN Re - * RercHFA % REM ADD DC %FUNCT. OBS. DF % -LOORS & FLOORING AC (IN }IT DUCTS MG HUMIDIFIER MK ADJ. YR. BUILT DO Ark CON. OSI DG % loD JOIST&<m,LOOR ~C AC (In own ducts) MH EL WALL HT 80 â€¢ATY ML ADJUSTED PERCENT GOOD X 70 % rT/000 A HAâ€¢DWOOD 1 - EVAP COOLER MI EL WALL HT â€žDowâ€¢'t MM 1 HEAT PUMP MY AT FAN W/TIM MN APPR. BY (AV) DATE (AW) LAND VALUE -- TOTALÂ·li.E@~ $339110 . RA*C Till .,81,111'dia Mz ~'DJC (DA-- LJMO 1~~~00- REV'D BY (AY) DATE (AX) $ i "Ass COON \ APPLIANCES & MECHANICAL TOTAL $ 1~~~ 0 *- 0: t v- .-dir -. , T ... , â€¢Â· .Â· 1 ,Â· Â· Â· Â·Â· .z:,tÂ·Â·;~~C;Â·11,â€¢,EI'..4 .'.t-~Â¥...1,1;~ . - I .... : f I. â€ž -.2 ~:.141.-VJWE:9%6*i-**2-: './. : -4 F -2 1.; :t :..,6,/f/,21 8.1/â€¢ h . ./ - I '.%-'**A/. .-UPJA' -1-/'. 41 â€¢ r. -Â· '~31 , cÂ· i Mrs. Teleo .Capparell*r-03$49 --77 1-- wee 4 . 2 4 9 ' 4 - *-21,3- i 1. Penonable''retaÂ¢*ti#,tomet,1' tting> in . 0 r ) greeter at Jlorway:i,Ikdge'-1 this ent&-Mi his home Iii-Boitom 9. 47' :I,41 . h.....r ,,- 41 -Â·-- 0 , 4- z,m,mon:-will-leave-Aâ€¢BWma-Nr-~18_ . 7. .:- ti :14 + :12-0 -32 4 + . ': ip . -- I f. 5 4 -4-' 2.7- 1 -' . . 5 - r Mra. :Anue .Ta,1015=Rwite of week. . -TVirnon L. 7*!00' of Denver_is ~ Had ... 4 , here- this " veek .Worwime '00 an this w & -f :picture story, for-:Vog,Â¥f~ilagat Where : . ~4 ,(of herâ€¢ own design)..aid kki. Mr:- ! zine She -is modeling ski elotlia busines . 4. A , . I ...'. A -4 ' 4 equipment, alid- Finn# 3-.*16 li hove. 1 -:. N~-- doing the photography.-.4.2 daf-to . 4 1%. t N. P. Feinsinget .6 enjoying.a Meda 1 4 . . , . . 2- . 7.,t, B rest and visit withÂ·his family this Masoni 1~ 2 , week. , -4-_ " A Â· 4 atta ' 9 .The. Thrift , ShopÂ·needi more Stritiof ' :... I ' .'90.&-I 1 '. .....9.-0/.-Â¥ ~JiÂ· , merchand,ise! Dle,Uhat.itÂ»pring loviing Â«k . house-cleanint time, bring/thosâ€¢ Mrs. B . - z. r. 4 c. C, --' ; space-consumir;&.: dd*kdÂ¢+ing Nospiti . F , r I ...,.7 42 j articles' to the shop.-* All.*mfita of Mrs . 4 Ab*-C~~~:~100~8~-~.iwf:$** *21- 7- 4.30, ... c.m...,u.m.......3 Jr /.:Li.~4â€¢65:6 ~~4.-i from the 11,rift ShÂ® (A,Den's livan's . . I 41__1 second_hand_ debartment store) aid St Â«Don,t ask me why, Gertie, but rm sure he'*-a kentlemâ€¢n ' go to the Pitkin CountyÂ·Hipital Mrs. S Tony Deane is home this week, gery a For one thing, his shirt looks as neat as' if it had just come back e njoyingÂ·spring - vacation '*om Friend . f rom the Aspen Laundry!" adv. Denver University. + He brought her a - - y'-7-->~~ a friebd. Tom Branch 62 Omaha;. it in c with him -to-try-out-Asaen 929 0 Aroiind Asp n Miss El. Fischer has been- en> Mr and Mk'Rob;rt B:Â· Lange Dist tures and comedies., h iin (Tom loves tEl. . h tion. Cbntinued From re 1 joying a visit with her t*ro gis- 1 of Du uque,la., who spent their eourth Â·Â· t ters Mrs. Paul Leffonhop ond hone oon in Aspen a year ago, ed ov, Â·Mia:, Da, 1,ant Il, u..", M Ma- Mitig Frioda Fiwohgr, bothioflin Are ple thi, Â· w,blr fm . fr,rt. ford F rolt and teddy Armstro g are coln. Nebr.' The trio had a line nig stayÂ· at Norwanibege. nei li in--Sun_Valley_this..weekâ€ž ractice j.ime mulling idead for remoddl. Gui o P. ~Â·MeyerÂ·was host at liehult ' , ing with the' Colorado . nior ing .thet house Miss Elsa purdhas. dinne last Thursday - evening to with t Tearns under Gordon Wre for ed here last fall. the htite faculty - of the Aspen Mincei the annutil American ion Mr. and Mrs. Donald Fergus ools. Â·He served them the Glenw steak dinners which have bfought L Sh Races.to be held there this wee - nd f mily retu ed 1 91 ~ deserved fame to Guldo's. . - -Jases, entl,, David Barbee and Harry fr e,. a will makA Itgcn took the trio of otchro ,- 01,61. dibirÂ· in A rr~*- â€žfi=i" 7 r Lesley :Roder, field reprehehi:a. Wor Steamboat Springs Monday, Misses Karlin Reic}ikg~~an : 4Ve of State Selective Aervteer Jaiste where_they_joined-other-Colorada liausaman_-of-_Denve~inembers was ig Asben last Friday to *ta son o racers for the .drive to Idaho. of the Se*â€¢H,ailb.,j0Fistie ..Club, tenti "a - meeting-of--Lotal=Bea.1 hal g< C E. Rader has' instituted new are Douseguests o~v. and M=. Â·N,0.64 EC. E. Rader, Michael Ma- on thi . entertainment at the Eagles' for Siglir71;u-rbli--thl~Â»uâ€¢Pk. , ull, Ed Illull d 64-baz>. 2 Â· fui 11 tr members and their familes. On Date 'Brown /2 expected to Louis Wille's adult class which Midd: meets Monday evenings at, the' Myrt], . Monday evenings, after the reg- come from Clfiax Sunday for. a ular Eagles meeting, Mr. Rader couple of d*s' visit ' with his. Aspen Art School has finished a will r - series of lessonM dn figurn_draw=. home. shows--aducational films: On family. ing and is Aw starting to work ' -- ~~dneskiay gvenings at 8 p. m. Mrs. Willard Clapper and baby members com6.v>ill their child- son, Chipper. came from their 1 in,oils. - COMA ren to see full-fength.eowboy pie. Leadville homA last weekend for Mrs. J. B.-- Snobble (who EAST . .. Â· Son: -the C 739 4--directi ..... , ' hearsi .. 1 1 DQ~ YOUR CAR NEED A deemi ~--*Thorough -09*rhaul ~1 V- churel _ eveni, Anderson Reantv Shing, A F Comn . ...... rF-//'.--I' -. 1. , . . ..0 1.? ,â€ž . 4 ... .. Â· e . . .. . 4.1,-_TAS..DAOut.t 10.136 '.: . i . 1 . .. -AROOM D- A S P~ E N'%{ . Jblm' Barnard (6401qfot Ma ... J. -=47=11 shall. Barnard) Â· clae<truelle . I from.Chicago for a.week,fr'te Mr. ind.Mrs. Paul Palmer M bara~ Dorman 6*Colorado liprings d:, Asperrstay Â· ~' '~ ; ->B ' Seattle spent seve,al days th were Weekend duests of Mr. and -- Aspen 18st week, renewing ae- Mrs. Thatcher Shaw. Â· - County Attorney Gebrge Pet chuve up ft'om]tnmIWOOd-Sprin -- â€ž-quaintances.:' Both,Mr. ind-Mrs. - Tall 9oung Kenneth Shelton, Monday to api,eal; at the Coun Palmer were raised here. She * a pupil .of Martial 'Singherrwill Commissioners' meetink. __ -lhe former Pearl Phillips. Â·Â· .thg special numbers at the,Sun- John Der?mus and RobertÂ· Col- day morning service-of thel 'Asp. Mr. and MrsJ Leroy Berens_ en h41 a luxuridus two days' at en Coninuhity Church. 4 . Littleton visited' thit' weeR, Wi the Broadmoor-Hotel in CoIE URaie Feinsinger deft-Non(lay ens:is a 4,4â€¢in of Mrst Magni s the Mike Magnlfieos._MisCBâ‚¬ ~duc~~~f~ ~WAnke'sday and for Wa*hington;' D.Â· C. after a co. fortnight's visit here with Mrs. Mr; *nd ~ Mrs:. Tom:Xlhdhll Mr._and Mrs. John Germain Feinsinger and the children. r Denver spent severil'da*it he for a visit Â·w#h her -Darenfs, Mr. sixteen months absence - f . came fromÂ· Denver last weekend Ir, weleomp home - after. a laht week visiting vith-the> Be and Mrs_Anton Baltizar. amilies. Mr. Kis,ell, who w - 1--philÂ· Wright }fis -been gone a in Aspdn Tuesday. , THe younit nephew of John and Tom Bee _ -__ Jimmy Markal#45-who ar#yed born- and-rat#687tn"*speit* couple,61 weeks on a buying trip.man ih a hamiy ciÂ¥ilian again Mr and Mrs.Â· Whipple JOM -,--10_New_Yofk_ City_and_Concord (though stillin>the-reserve). i~t.took 'a ,partyÂ· to''Bnow,di,~2 (borne- of the:Qriginal Country ler service with the airborne U: week on a-camping and fishil 13*re), Massachusetts. And the S..Marines, .whicti included some colorful new merchandise he has front line duty in Korea. Mrs. R. C. Rounds..Mr. 120.Ml trip. The group include Mr. ai been purchasing is already *tart- Miss Lois Skiff arrived Sunday D. N. Rounds,* Miss VIPRin ipg to pour 'into Â·the Aspen Coun- from . her h*hiL-in_. -Richland, Coleman, and Dr. and Mrs.,Ma try Store._India madras swim Wash., for a' fortnight'rvisit with on Morfit of Denvet. '.0 4 shirts, checked. gingham,hats are and sisferj and brothers. short; and shirts, Hemaker her mother, Mrs. Margaret Skiff. ,Mr. and Mrs. Ras, Pickett , giving a gay new tollcb to the Mrs. ' Harold Rowland and visit with Â· their daughter ' ar Lakewoodâ€ž came Monday for fascinating, Â· traifition - - steeped children left Monday,for Denver ~son-i;EY&*i>Â·Mr. and Mrs... L( shop. to_gnerid,ErÂ·4:agfih/62-'Weple*,-With .4 . . David.Lay of Santa Fe. ramo, },Ir -12-8- -- j .... . y----rf..-Deter. Monday for a few days of fi~- Miss Elsa Fischer expects Eir Foutth Weekend here. Mr. 'an %any Denverites_ spegt Â· 11 - ing, i attendingÂ· concerts, and 312=' father, Edward K Â· Fischer, to Mr;~ Fletcher Brown; Mr. an itind with his aunt and her %5m- come today from Lincoln, Nebr. Mrs. 3 Charles Lowed Fesided i ily, Mrs. -JamE Hum,e and *ens. He- may decid; to spend the Mr-/ D, R. C. Brown'r "pin Mr.. and Mrs. E. T. Cartwri*ht Whole summer with. her,. in her 't-' , of Denver were weekend gue%Â£-Bewly remodeled house. 'Berger were Jerome diests. -Th rouse. L. Mr. 4nd Mrs._Georg of herbousin, Floyd Callahan. ( We had a pleasant visive:*f William Hodges family occupie . Mr. ahd Mlt. Clarence Jolley'.daylthis weekâ€¢.1~itlvlwo-sons of their"Airn AspenÂ·house. Mr. an af Leadville spent the Fourth the iktâ‚¬'gikin Borg, Â·who was Mrs, Fr#nk Ashley, were hqusâ‚¬ with the Henry Hendricksons. . a machine man in the Smuggler gu@iTs of Carl and Tukey Jona: Mrs. Tom Crosby, and son, milk--Mack.in--the-old . days. Ed-_ And Lhe Hagner family reside Clint, and Tonuny Crosby, all 01 mund Borg was born in-Aspen in over the weekend in the I Â· New Castle, spent the weekend 1895, and ),is brother John was George Robinson house. here with Mrs. M. E. Crosby. boin here in ,1898. The family Gavin Borden left Monday fo Young Tommy was rec*iving home was then at 300 Smuggler hfshome in Chicako, after sympathy'for a broken right arm, St. The Borgs (who are cousins month's visit her~vith*Anthon -'.Â» incurred last week when he fell of Miss Anna Borgeson) left Hume. . f.. . -off-his bicycle. ' , Aspen iin 1909 ind never, until ,Mrs. Walter Haug left Monda -- .4- Mr. and Mrs. Anton Baltizar. now, have returned for a visit. for her home in San Francisec returned last week from FOrt- They now live id San Francifo, after a fe,v days' vihit here witl land, Ore., where they enjoyed Â· a Calif. 1 Mr. and Mrs. Fred Glidden attc . . visit with their daughter, Sylvia. , Mrs. Irene Green was-released other Asven flteridsl She wa 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE TABLE 5-A TABLE 5-A-EXTERIOR WAU AND OPENING PROTECTION BASED ON LOCATION ON PROPERTY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION TYPES1,2.3_(Continued) EXTERIOR WALLS Bearing ~ NonbearIng OPENINGSS Distances are measured to property lines (see Section 503). OCCUPANCY CONSTRUCTION GROUP4 TYPE x 304.8 for mm 1-F.R. Four-hour N/C Four-hour N/C less than 40 feet Protected less than 60 feet II-F.R. One-hour N/C less than 60 feet III One-hour NR, N/C elsewhere III-N IV-H.T. II One-hour One-hour N/C Same as bearing, except NR. Protected less than 60 feet H-52 N/C 60 feet or greater II-N One-hour N/C less than 60 feet Same as bearing Protected less than 60 feet NR. N/C elsewhere V One-hour One-hour Same as bearing Protected less than 60 feet V.N One-hour less than 60 feet Same as bearing Protected less than 60 feet NR elsewhere I-1.1 I-ER. Four-hour N/C Four-hour N/C less than 5 feet Not permitted less than 5 feet I-1.2 II-ER. Two-hour N/C less than 20 feet Protected iess than 20 feet I-2 One-hour N/C less than 40 feet I-3 Nk N/C elsewhere II One-hour Two-hour N/C less than 5 feet Same as bearing except Not permitted less than 5 feet I-1.1 One-hour N/C elsewhere NR. N/C 40 feet or greater Protected less than 10 feet 1-1.2 I-32 V One-hour Two-hour less than 5 feet Same as bearing Not permitted less than 5 feet One-hour elsewhere Protected less than 10 feet 1-1.1 II-N I-1.2 III-N I-2 V-N These occupancies are not allowed in buildings of these construction types.7 I-3 I-3 IV-H.T. Group I, Division 3 Occupancies are not allowed in buildings of this construction type. I-1.1 III One-hour Four-hour N/C Same as bearing except Not permitted less than 5 feet I-1.2 NR, N/C 40 feet or greater Protected less than 20 feet I-2 I-3 I-1.1 IV-H.T. Four-hour N/C Same as bearing except Not permitted less than 5 feet I-1.2 NR, N/C 40 feet or greater Protected less than 20 feet I-2 II One-hour One-hour N/C Same as bearing except Not permitted less than 5 feet NR, N/C 40 feet or greater Protected less than 10 feet I-2 V One-hour One-hour Same as bearing Not permitted less than 5 feet Protected less than 10 feet I-RR. Four-hour N/C less than 3 feet Four-hour N/C less than 3 feet Not permitted less than 3 feet II-ER. -Iwo-hour N/C elsewhere Two-hour N/C less than 20 feet Protected less than 20 feet III One-hour One-hour N/C less than 40 feet III-N NR, N/C elsewhere IV-H.T. II One-hour One-hour N/C Same as bearing except Not permitted less than 5 feet R-1 NR. N/C 40 feet or greater II-N One-hour N/C less than 5 feet Same as bearing Not permitted less than 5 feet NR. N/C elsewhere V One-hour One-hour Same as bearing Not permitted less than 5 feet V-N One-hour less than 5 feet Same as bearing Not permitted less than 5 feet NR elsewhere 1-ER. Four-hour N/C Four-hour N/C less than 3 feet Not pennitted less than 3 feet 11-RR. 'I\vo-hour N/C less than 20 feet Protected less than 20 feet III One-hour One-hour N/C less than 40 feet III-N NR, N/C elsewhere IV-H.T. II One-hour One-hour N/C Same as bearing except Not permitted less than 3 feet R-3 NR, N/C 40 feet or greater II-N One-hour N/C less than 3 feet Same as bearing Not permitted less than 3 feet NR, N/C elsewhere V One-hour One-hour Same as bearing Not permitted less than 3 feet V-N One-hour iess than 3 feet Same as bearing Not permitted less than 3 feet NR elsewhere (Continued) 3..Â· 1-51 0 0 0 0 Mary A. Avjian ..MG, ermeâ€¢r 30 River Oak, Lane Architects, P.C. Ba.k. Co. 81621 (970137*6067 Pen pooâ€¢ Ar .-- 10 OR~INAL LOG,Â·.TION O ' 1 ISSUE: HPG CONCEPTUAL, 1-14-101 -1-CLO ;=-Â»Â«..1-I- 0-7-0 . ffi==0 j 8/-- Â·re,/,.04 4 - f wl M,rm,lee \ ORISINAL MI}C Pri yllâ„¢ - eMOKEN al.AZI la TO M efoum . REPL,â€¢â€¢Ce Â£ 6.E. m./.- L tÂ© - ORI*INAL MINCOM / TO REMAIN V -11 Â¢.1 J EXISIDÂ» MALL TO me *De'ED 12>1 95% 1 , .2. I U L 21*5 2 . le.â€¢*fy F upt,4, 1 - - 4 .:=4915+Â·[1 1 (03 L (Abirk,H 1 ; r 7.6 . - Â· - Â·.4,rltkf. vaÂ«.ee HWAARD ORI/34AL Doot . I / TO REMAIN - Li -1---i. *pierM,e )#tri-:T.T-15*t Mt - e'lb<.frep n.404. 4 U--- 1 C= ==1 ALAÂ»41*M CLAE ' "11~00- ; 114- m,rnâ€¢*AT,1 uz/<119N TO BE RBI2.ACIQ MITH ho MOOD MI*t-TY.. THIS /4/71-1- t-1 60,4/490/0,4 tH 0 tz < n f n '4 --1 L -1 -mi.4**CUÂ® 7140*BM 7 -1 **,0114/0 519 or *Rvawle-r, tte 1* - 1Â»4HÂ®- THÂ».-red , u lit '40 -1 0 LL O Pet~l.tfwip -1 U A 0 ~*Â«f @-0 , M Feâ€žur . / See t.a"*1< - th 5*- L-----41 11â€ž .12 -- - 61 D< 6 52 6/-0. O FBM M:,t 0460%00 t Mee 6 0 c. = 3 EZ =9 +6667 ~~ DEMOLITION PLAN C A.1 j SCALE, 1/4~â€¢11-0' 0 0 /~I~ SITE PLAN/bâ‚¬(awt,N FlÂ»+1 PROJECT: < All ~ SCALEâ€¢ t' â€¢ 11-00 SMALL 4 LAReE FRIES RESIDENCE DESCRIFTION: SITE AND PEMOLITION PLAN P- 0 0 SHEEL Al.1 0 0 931 3=1 3@h!* 1 6 0 -0 r BUILDINS SETBACK 21----------- NE,4 CONCRETE "V w Ll 1 x. - PÂ°/CH A?O STEPS ~ NEVI ENâ„¢- DOOR A. 4 1--3 -IN HISTORIC LOGATICN O 0 453 ->4 1 ~ Ellil Mary A. Aviian 1 r- 0 r.1.-1 1 -jl Architect:s, P.C. BATH ~ 50 River Oak: Lane 1 _ - 1 wa, 4 1, a Basalt, Co. 81621 1 (970)-3794067 LIVINS ENTRY M OFFICE A Jj j = gel O 0 ~ 37-1 ISSUE: 1zzl] - Ej 41' HPG CONCEPTUAL: 1-I 4-94 i LAV i ME~0NICAL _...1.1 LL % 11-0 -=-11 230 271 1 2 1 i [El 1 1 01/ \ 11 - -4 11 _LI AINE STOR~ -1-F gal . 616HTPIELL ~ Lie/T//IL | ~ 4 99Â«0 ' 4 6 DE F-2 ~ ~*PJOI~(21 00 101 = 9 (323-3 01 r----1 I - HALL - ---~~< ~ 4=11 L NE/CONCRETIE - ~ | EXISTIW L Plof=,1) 1-1 t-- - - - 7-1 EXISITNe *ONSTRUCT~ON LIGHTr'IELL LAN[Plble LI L + nIH 8 /30=till--10/ 2/ -[....I =PROOM . .1 1FN- --; NED'I C.Â¤4~~CTION (1=======0 1 1 ho 1 1 M 0 LAUNDFR~ : ~ Ed W < I r -- 2 0 4 =â„¢r 1 f=44-1-4 - f , h= --J U FE p,rn...NI it> 2 2 -1 = i.2211 11!2ij -n /2/ poi,U227- ~ 11 011 r A 1 1 a H C ...7 CIO 3 8 W.// // - h ~ ff - -8=3-CE-2- ~1 ~ 1 =f~ 4 3 " Â· Ill M g UP - 11 I 7:91 1 IR/MUD ROOM - A ....... 19,1 - -23/* 1 -- 11 . R 4 6 MEDIA L--rb---- (963 4 ---- 0 0 4 T. 0 CO~. PROJECT: 7 EL-'. 0 +~ E-. SMALL 4 LARSE FRIES . ~ 0 RESIDENCE DESCRIFTION: LIGHT'â‚¬LL MAIN 4 LOMER LEVEL PLAN 0 0 SHEET: 91 LOBIER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~ ~ /Th MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~ ~ A- 0 8 SCALE: 1/4 =1 -0 ~A2.~ SCALE, :,4â€žW,-0 95313:1=1 3@hIV 30 00'NEdâ‚¬V 0 0 I. ORIGINAL STRUCTURE MITH ~ NEI ASPHALT SHINGLES VA 0, L - - --1- MA --------7 FF L/1 1 . 1-:-r- f 9--~ e - -----,-- - L lip 0 - - 1 -Â» 1- 3 Mary A Avjian ~ | | Architects, P.C. 50 River Oaks Lane ~ Bas.14/0. 81621 21 1 (970)Â·379Â·6067 4 1 F o I Pri = ISSUE: . | HPC CONCEPTUAL: -7-14-qq 1 1 1 --- - 4-1 ST=- P 1 1 1 ,10-1 CRICKET 2-L-------7 1- 7 ------ -/ 1 1 1 1 11 1 41 - 1 1 -1 1 11-1 L --1 0 Â· L Â· 1 -i'-r -- 1 L- ----1-2 < NE 1 U 2 111 0, i 3:122 3,12 7 - NER METAL ROOF | 1 0 Â» ~ 0 0 1. -4 0 - 2 3 n Â«]i TU 112 20 A LLO 1 1 JU 7 - -Â·m -- _.----21-Â·----L - - - -7 < G L Z. ,Url IALT SHINGLES ee Ey=r=TJ I 11-1 Z. 12 1 -1- --- 4 -- -1- /3.== =1 61 1 g < - 63 12:12Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·- -~Â· MASTER BEDROOM ( 99>< 0=~M=====0 -4 23 1] m-+ 7 1 :,2 1 | ~' : \El -1 R 1 1 1: 0-- 1 r lili 1 - ----7- L.__ _ _-1 ~-* 0 0 1 IIi/.II. PROJECT: | | SMALL 4 LARGE FRIES PECK RESIDENCE 1 1 1 ~ 4.Il - 36Â· HIGH GUARDRAIL 1 DESCRINION L_______ -r! UPPER AND ROOF PLAN ---- ~ CCOK --*222 SHEET: 0 0 $40-4 T E-AL ROOF r.33 ROOF PLAN (Th UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A2.2 ~ SCALE, 1/4-=I'-O ~ SCALE. 1/4.=11-0. A2.2 Â£ 0 0 0 , 0 0 Mary A. Avjian Architects, P.C. (_--- -- .44â€¢1*# 15VILÂ·Pt,40 Me*â€¢IP 50 River 06 Lane Basalt. Co. 81621 (970)Â·37%067 . 0 0 . ' -NG./,ar,Y+K ..1-440 ISSUE: 1 ,, LL.Â·ke-- 11 --=6-2 04er40â€¢40Â·A,IGMN**1141â€¢1 , . itt '<, - 19<. -ar-41 -:-._-X --1-=>r- *4 0-C) affr,f R* Â¥ TMIM P .60Â¢.+11'.1,4,4 MINC.44â€¢ .itik- FP'EM *00 .PF-4 40 1 - 1 - - - NeR wA,p WirÂ·15*4 7 =-4- lk- =- r./ge, Of*â€¢6 --HeWâ€¢rete Lâ€¢+18,40 4 #RefÂ» -7-3 ---Ck~!L 1/~~~~h. -- r----- N~~Fvme,e-r,HÂ»f MAN LD/PU Â·,1 11 ~ - kn--6 Â·4-71=~ ; 4-~-2- r-r L _Ial.. A NOPI *Drle fÂ»400 T.,Â·fur. - - 1 - 10.1.trf .plk:.4 1-4; . .- L-/ 14.90. (p NOFTH Uu-rlel (Plt#e, 013 11 - - . 9 6- < : > 13 0 C) 486/TION LA,14,1, t*FrH ~.4, Z Nt. Ill 0 â€¢*NI-6,4,Â¥,2 -1.,.6, - -PR,4 01 lu 1 '1, / . .'. ..1 ... . ' 1 L..0,/ ~6â€¢FA~â€¢â€¢rBPMmâ€¢OBel#,40 \ A il g < -Mal,44.*DIN, *TPM 1 1.-1 Iâ€¢*t' TTâ€¢Â·ArÂ· 1 -'--1 r* f E 4 ri -7,-r ,~ -.- M -- -- -- .......6, *P ..4-4 1 '. 11 1, 11/ki,1 1 1.-Â·- 11 3-3 - ----1.- - - - -1 -I . 14$4 MI â€¢t- Cpf - - Nekt M .* 1 1*4,1. 6 z, 11.r- 0 0 1 ~4-1,4 --Â· 71 PROJECT: -4- 1 Â· Â· RESIDENCE 2//r-- Ln 94-=~ ~ "cle.t=~L=1 + ~ ik> /441 t- 7/'81 T 1-0. SMALL â€¢ LAReE FRIES 1=Un- lEi -4.1.4.-44.1-/ ~ ~ \ DESCRIFnON: Me-'.... < -----,OPAW//~CM MÂ®DA- /'v#$ ~ EAST AND NORTH ELEVATIONS 1 1 - 11 1 1 4 1 11 - 1 / 1 1-- r*-4 -7- 1 1 SHEET: 0 0 -L, t. 1- 1 1 1. 1 WHÂ» 844 1, A:1.1 lowÂ¥* 7004 ~ ter 84,8~*TION 0 0 93 INd EightÂ¥-1 9 -11* 132!316 Hld IN 0(*290-100 'Nactc 0 0 4--7--1 ' 1 ~ i ~ MA# Â« --M*MMN, .JIll 1 0 0 -PNPT,M Mary A. Avjian . luj 1 1 --91.4- Architects, P.C. (970*379,6067 50 Riwr Oak, Lane --3-1 - VEM~Â·Â»*P *'PIN' E__j ' t ..M-* 1 B..alt.Co. 81621 '1 .!: 4 1~1 4141 0 : 4 9 , i ISSUE: -11[ 1 1 9.M. 0,14 6"* 6-6- 1 Hft; 6â€¢re,OfTW-6 -7 i.., 11 '1 ! r 91'Ful - 9)1 1 U / 0/1 -Papt- I N.# : j !/,0- 4------ --4--1 1 - 11 1111 1.411 **00 1111,4 L ' - - MNA t.~86 6 1 1 111 -- -2 4- I-f-1-2-1- -- d--1, 2- 2.-- 1 i \ 1PT 1 1 1 L ~ ~-~ f.- T,Â· AlÂ· 1 W'-0, TA /WÂ· eLJ 5,,rrÂ·v..SP Mer# 2931Â». - 1. 2%!Cl wm- 11.-Ar fi l.0 LLI IX i_| l'"I*60,â€¢Ul . U Â·6â€¢ M T ** r --7 U.,40, 6.VD- 2.1 2-4 1-21 0 _ e ~goe,rre,N {2 111 0 3 ill IMA 0 1-{Y tt)- z lf) O 1- -| / HDÂ¥1 ~â€¢6'f~-X efla,\ew. -/I FNP 1,Â¢M -dul FO ' '' , LO l.ili 1-112 1 11'r- -- VeM/(4,4. rkÂ®0 401,40 -9 Q Â£ i , 7 201,1-~-1- -----~~+~p~8,~,P0, P 8 -2 E - lf) 1 I '1 1 2 ~ ~ 4-1--_-~ E LE) D< g < -8 1 1 1 1 'il 1 111,1 1 11 1 ' Â·1:.11 1,1 ' 1 91% th'BL 14 r -66 fur 1 J~.1 M- 1-, T -7-7 -- mâ€¢*p*~rrE,41â€¢.p *Al 4 0 m 1-4-237 ,@PFM/4480 )*17â€¢4â€¢ PÂ»46' t- --:%' I 1. - ' 7 0 0 t - o'\ ~ 1 ~ :7-11--=if-= MM,4 Â»~6â€¢ 1 PROJECT: U. - 1 . Â· ' Â¥ - - -0-- Tâ€¢ M T'-1-.0 SMALL 4 LARGE FRIES r . t. 1 RESIDENCE 1 1-, M- HAO.te FYIEST ANCP SOUTH ELEVATIONS DESCRIPTION: 0 0 SHEET: L____ 1â€¢w- Te*J LOW.IL I.D.Â®6 1 113.2 /77 kle#r eueÂ»moN - ae+Aplowad 94 al-9494 :&0 9 Ol h,?01 - .Â»,e@ U Mpl *81Â£11:bkd 1 ao eou'Mong,1 Â¢3%ojeda - ,Â»1 1AW /+AG l 1-1. 1 . 4944â‚¬41 4404 84 01 91400 0.9 944 9*W'*:110 >40Â» mur-4 45â€¢44104 1444 . >FtÂ«Â»1 41\00\\ 1 1401.1>11591 '*1141 d*>4;0861 N/11>0Â¢el 4 /414 0,44*100 4 191 . 1 -0-Iin~ 1 -1--- | C N N'Waw 21- 9,1AÂ»hile ON'714,1 k' h t 01. . ..1 1 ...1 .. , 04 r ... 0 l/2 \Â» 1 i -11\.21; ------fFottr/4~~~~*5- . 1 WaffT Wal# 0 L H ler#rlo BTFKUU,VI4>~) \ \ I \ \ 44 I ,Â· . \ 1 41Â¥1*4 .r h ~4 L.New loN*78~ f~ 3 /0 9~~~~1L 611..1.1 -Ut \\\ (,New 1740 41*fl 6014*TF4O1!ON -3 U,/ ;i #:AE:. CCLiTT watp D I j Ld'54 aerr*,1 9* 10 640/6 eqlimrr' p' - rwrfFIrrTVWft.+Ee - ffofoeeP ffet,r 4 M,+ eerpof l0091Orle t 90 io' 7DTAL -4 1 1 -11 04' ~4~/ F -:.h i ~r 0 0,9,99 -1 till L \6 444\ i - /2/1 111 6\\ 1 r lik 11 1 1 . ; 1 1 1{ 9-11-; : 1 ~ i 1- * ,. ------- Â·~~~~ ~ 1 , 1///v.Â· ,-,~.4.-1-&Â·-/tA-t-/-"-0' . 11 1 Â· ' 1 I i i , i i , 12 //1/LA-,1.-vu-UL.VL, 4 r - U"~~' X . .â€¢7 //L -11.- 6- -A_4.-tvÂ·/vu UL. L,UU, \ 1* .1 1 1 li:.- 1 1 11 i! i U k kl 1 9 ' ~3 -EN -ER'~ 11 2~ ~ 4~~-~i ff---Â¢ 1 , 1 1 1 V 1 111.~ i 111 1 Il ~!~42~_ ' 31 H! 11 - lilli 4 H i d I P Il 1 1 i{ 1 1 4- 1 1 It I 1 1 - 1 8<. ~Â·6â€¢ee, i~ ~fiheD rtÂ»IDSO Â«121/al/Fce 1 4 \ 51401 DIT_'O- _Immil-wrfeeT BleÂ·4â€¢m orâ€¢1 - 'VIA"%11 He '44/0 FFOF,4.17 eâ€¢rp:Per v,e,+ee 111. 2 - . Â· 'Â· -4- - ' ~ Wettl- wetâ‚¬. '2, b . \.- Mrem /#IrÂ«or,iff.3) A j . 1 - 1 . -P 1- 9,-1.32%~349% -4Â§4iojtÂ»; 1-\ I ..\.444-1 WefiT Welt I - m 21 C ... . 6*HIBIT ' P'- 126*HIPED *Errepâ‚¬,1<& - 00'-0" rfoAT 4 pEÂ» COMP,1/443, . .... -ID Ite Ay 3-4 3-â‚¬O% 1 1 lili 2 1 9/~ li I \X 11 1 V f u___u .14\ P b. 4 1 2 6 . L 4% 1 1 1 iLl b --- i ' 1 1 + , i i!,11 - 1 , 1 1 --*HIDIT'-51- -- ---- -fil_.2-1-7 c -15<tenNe 14'*41140