Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.430 E Cooper Ave.HPC005-99..r- PN: 2737-182-16011 Case HPC005-99 430 E. Cooper Street Minor HPC -1 d T %1& A P-5-4 P 7 - 1 - .. PARCEL ID:~2737-182-16011 DATE RCVD: ~3/18/99 # COPIES:11 CASE NO~HPC005-99 CASE NAME:~430 East Cooper Avenue HPC Minor PLNR:~Amy Guthrie PROJ ADDR:~430 East Cooper Avenue CASE TYP:|HPC Minor STEPS~ OWN/APP:IMountains & Stream ~ ADR1430 East Cooper C/S/Z: ~Aspen, CO 81611 PHN:~ REP:| ADRt C/s/Z:1 PHN1 FEES DUE:| 120 (hpc) FEES RCVD1120 STAT: r- REFERRALS| REF:| BY| DUE: | MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 1 DATE OF FINAL ACTION:~ CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS| PZ: BOA: CLOSED:| BY: | DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: | PLAT (BK,PG):1 ADMIN: .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 424 E. COOPER AVENUE, MOUNTAINS AND STREAMS, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 13, SERIES OF 1999 WHEREAS, the applicant, Mountains and Streams, represented by Kevin Heinecken, has requested minor development approval to install new double doors at the property located at 424 E. Cooper Avenue. The property is located within the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, narnely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated March 24,1999, recommended approval without conditions, and .. WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on March 24, 1999, the Commission considered and approved the application without conditions by a vote of 7 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development approval for Mountains and Streams, at 205 S. Mill Street, Aspen, Colorado, be approved as shown on March 24,1999, without conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 24th day of March, 1999. Approved as to Form: City Attorney HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Chairman ATTEST: Chief Deputy Clerk C 1 V. B, • MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 424 E. Cooper Ave.- minor DATE: March 24,1999 SUMMARY: The applicant, Mountains and Streams, requests approval to add another door into their shop, to enter from Cooper Avenue. The subj ect building is not historic but is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Mountains and Streams, represented by Kevin Heinecken. LOCATION: 424 E. Cooper Avenue. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The applicant requests HPC approval to add a double door to the East Cooper Avenue side of the existing store, which is in the building where Kemosabe is located. Staff has no issue with the new entry door. f*~i/1 (6 l-V /A .. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The changes proposed will not have a significant impact on the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the historic significance of any building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: • Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. • Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. • Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) • Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the ,. new entry doors for 424 E. Cooper Avenue as proposed. Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated March 24, 1999. B. Application. C. Resolution No. , Series of 1999. .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name 44 9 0, 0 77Ff AK ¢ 5 7-ja-e/:knt S /16-/14 a D eL 2. Projed\ocation 4-0-4 41, 000 fet /4.JE: . sc{(72 /0/ (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning Of.~ 4. Lot size 5. Applicant's name, address and phone nl~Imber 75>f O C.ro,0 . %41 9 6, Cor>fER- A-0 e #61/01 , Ase€d ¢6 Git),1 92 S-1- 5-*73 KE kliO t-(6(4)154-Kt,6 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 1 1 3 - - -131 S. -2.Not·F, 64060442 i e.b iNG= 379--(3-37 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD ~ Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) (1-ann N\€ AA{ 41.- 12_ETA-to 0 0111)006 1.-LaTI+ (06- 9. Description of development application 9 ds·r/-tole-E b o 14 8 LE F/LE 01-14- h 0 3 L o V (10 6 fEE M A-U_ 3 j DE of-- 1 FAE-. 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1 - Land use application form Attachment-2=--Dimenst~trequi~ements-ferah- Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4 St\*ilM E> .. 0 Linc44 €J/A/63-4 O Ut sllo L,11 i l~f~blb- koow f 1111111111111111 1111111111111111 lilli 11111111111 11111111111 lilli 1111111111 111 .. ~iBeIU ~mw€LL qn«Tmenq- emg~-m» POST OFFICE BOX 567 • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 · {970) 925-3591 March 15, 1999 Building Inspection Office City of Aspen Aspen CO 81611 RE: Mountains & Streams proposed structural modifications To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that Tom Olson of Mountains & Streams has my permission to install a doorway on the mall side of 430 E. Cooper St. provided that the architecture is consistent with the building as well as the immediate area around it. Ifyou have any questions, you may contact me during the day at 248 273 2000 ext. 305 EST. Yours truly, L.-9 92 William Bidwell 2055 AVONCREST DR • ROCHESTER HILLS, Mi 48309 • (248) 375-2666 .. ..11. r 1 1 · . 1 uo 4 1 :; 15 :En 12 01 m ' " DISTRICT '9!J•T, PITKIN COUNry OF ...1. 4 6 c= 3452©£*1 -0 Division - 94-Afv i n. PIt:...5, 11) LETTERS ASPEN. ent Ap. n IN THE MATIEROF ® THE ElrrATE OF BERTRAM A. BIDWELL, alias Bort Bidwell and B. A. Bidwell ~ Deoe-d O Protected Penon O Minor O In,=pacitatel Person Willian Bid•ell. Jr ~ 9- 2 40'-,91?'- - ® P=,00*1 R~~Ient•tr•t O Th= arc Laters of Administation. (The d..dit did - M.w a .411} Q Th- •re Letten Thit•=ttary- Crhe deczatmt lell „pitl) O Spocial Administrator in O an informal O a formal proceeding. These are Letter, of Special Administration. O Comervator. Thes® arc Letters of Con-vatorship. O De protected pifion i a mioof whose date of birth i• 0 01,„dian. Th- are Lctten of Ouardianthip for C] ani-pacitated pecon. 0 a minor whose date of birth it Appoin,Knot or quatiO,•tion Is by O coult order. O will. O written instrument rl Tb- Lain evidence M authority, except for the following limitations or restrictions, if any: 7 C. . 1 r. r ' . . Dk.: ' 4 -7f .222=# 4* CERTIFICATION Certillcation Stamp or Certibed to be a true copy of the original in my custody and to be in Alll force and effect u of: 4 - ;44-23 y 03952,9/ -e: . A , . e I-#LA#WK* 'I•, UL-0/' 04--bt••40*4 , A- .. Outdoor Clothing March 18, 1999 City of Aspen Building Department 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Building Department: As per your request in Attachment 3 of your General Submission requirements for a building permit, the information is as follows: 1) Applicant: Tom Olson Mountains Er Streams 424 E. Cooper Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 925-5580 Representative: Kevin Heineckin Elk Peaks Construction Co. 531 S. 2nd St. Carbondale, CO 81623 379-4238 2) Address: Mountains Er Streams 424 E. Cooper Ave., Suite 101 Aspen, CO 81611 Building Name: Mountain Plaza Building 3) Items attached 4) Not requested Thank you very much. Sincerely, ~34< (Fog*«·· Tom Olson 424 E. Cooper Avenue Suite 101 Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: (970) 925-5580 Fax: (970) 925-5205 patagonia®Authorized Dealer