Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.434 E Cooper Ave.HPC13-95- 2 5€: N Pa 13- 9-5 (7 <3 </- 22 (// ir ep'·. KEMO SABE MINOR HISTORIC DEVEL. ~ 2737-182-16-011 U/E /3 750~8-4€ 1 ¥*x R ?-- 91 1 1 TU' - . /. _LY- C> MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: 434 E. Cooper Avenue- Minor Date: May 24, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to install an evaporative cooler at the rear of the structure. This structure is not historic, but is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Tom Yoder of KemoSabe. LOCATION: 434 E. Cooper Avenue. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Section 7-601 has recently been amended through Planning and Zoning Commission, Resolution 6, Series of 1995. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H, " Historic Overlay Di.strict or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: The proposed cooler will be located on the rear of the building, at the loading dock. The unit is 34"x:36"x:34." It must be painted to match the building. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The dock area, and therefore the cooler , are not visible from the street. The cooler will have little impact on the alleyscape. J 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 0 0 Response: The proposal has no impact on the historic significance of any historic structure. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal has no impact on the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any Of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the Minor Development application with the condition that the unit be painted to match the building. Additional Comments: j ATINEHMENT 1 4. B. LAND USE APPLICATICN FUM I 1) Project Nane -42&6 -GA e Zota coll« Caole c 1 2) Project I.£)cation 1,1 ©1 E- l-60 ~e t _ 12,?ic_~ 1 A CQaf ¢1141 (indicate street address, lot & block Inma,er, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning C--C-~ 4) Int Size 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Bxne # e--~~~A Ya de i ter#o %2149 · 434 E (goge< 49 17 %-1 611 92:--797% 6) pe%':esetltative's Name, AddrEss & Riaie # <A'11,& \3(k | I Man ; <01 A~CAL ~0 •/ ble L *e- 0-+ MQ~12 1 2-9- 2 419 Typd of Application (please check all tilat awly): . anditicnal Use Ocncept ual SPA Ccocep~al Histaric Dev. Special Ieview · Final SPA Firal Histcric Dev. 8040 Greenline Ocncept:121 ED ~><~ prinar Historic Dev. Stream Margin · · - Final FOD Historic Deginl ition MOUntain View Plane Subdivision · Historic Designation ation · Text,/Map Ammhent . - (2*33 Allotment Iat Spli:t/Ict line a:33 Ebo~ption Adjustment 8) - Lion of Ekisting Uses · (number and; type of existing structures; ~~~ate sq. ft; nmber of bedroans; amr previous amrovals granted to the prriperty). 9) Description of Develogpent Application -41--a c_Lti 1-195-0 04 eva~oroo-+ue. 06-6 64 40 (2&( 0-2 L,/drt,-], 40* lee_4 24 011#1 < 649 & l4M Street 10) Have you attached the following? Respense to Attachment 2, Mininnm Sl]Emission Contents Response to Attadmerrt 3, Specifi c Submi ssicn Contents Response to Attadnneit 4, Review Standards for Your Application 1 1. lilli S 000 KE~ kl 1171 19 \ lowL idder 9 owne< ' 6~®11 os 423 gre,14 40 rk,A' C a* 81*ocathot <66'el dik 14 f Q#f ¢# 16- 6.1£[6~ 16141 0+ 4 44 £ 6.Oper c 49,\ ~ 44 (04£6 dj ),Iwkiled A JiM 10-//wan )Ge it- Ue d Mrk-¢ , 1 43<8 SS,Red,J 6 *40, 4 4-Spon 9 29 - 24&4 z 't· 'd/· · 44 GOJAO; 5# 4. L,1 ifi r®*0..« 2% left 1 ald E i cr IAA< LLit k *« ME piA,uiCIA. ck M/4 94 ia·.,·i. . : I . <:9, A 114; ' .. . 1 1 I .4::.A ./. :... i:l? 4<r A. i·: Y 434 EAST COOPER • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • (303) 925-7878 hpar-~3 i°,453 *931-.9 »,0 0-4 4)19 dp unif 9 4 i /-0 -1.-0»45 w-0119 * f -0602 3 t -' 4*h ~0> ,"j +-9 3--)93 J - i ... * --4 .. " I - 4. -- 4 A - 4 ' ?1 i 1 1 *ard M a // ' 0,1 4 617 rl * 4 ~,9 »v 3 9 -) N~Ove 91.9 6 1 1 3,9 il Vy 31)™Usnar'JS t D *3+65 Whal-9 ,7-ZFF #9 793 9?r-3-'5 79 % -4-9 1 1ra117' l wic/£1 a a~/1~ U + 91 \A \0-) '7 ~ 1.9.-) ,) pun ?731/ OP \4 7 ~) I 4 d*DP .,6% /41 1 1.? i 4-vol t w hf J b) 9-D ) 4] l D A V-b J wl 1 3/09 39*-09*AS ro- 1,3 n-9 ©1- f ad 20 3 ht h -303*:5 019 .. i,~L 1 1• .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAY 24, 1995 435 E. COOPER - KEMO SABE - MINOR Amy: This is an approval of a swamp cooler. MOTION: Les moved to approve the minor development for 435 E. ' Cooper with the condition that there will be no aluminum shining surfaces showing at any time. It should be painted out or whatever and any existing aluminum should be painted out also; second by Melanie. All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Roger moved to adjourn at 7:30 p.m.; second by Les. All in favor, motion carries. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk j 11