The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19990310AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION March 10, 1999 REGULAR MEETING- 5:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOTE: 12:00 Downtown Enhancement and Pedestrian Plan (DEPP) worksession 12:45 210 S. Galena Street (Elk's Building) - site visit 1:00 Adjourn (lunch will be provided) 5:00 I. Roll call and approval of Feb. 24, 1999 minutes II. PUBLIC COMMENTS e III. COMMISSIONER AND STAFF COMMENTS IV. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) V. Assign monitors to 920 E. Hyman & 735 W. Bleeker VI. BUSINESS 5:05 A. 4 6*205 S. Mill Street (Campo di Fiori) - Minor Developmentl 11_ ) _m 5:10 B. A 210 S. Galena Street (Elk's Building) - Minor Development-I,li 5:30 C. 706 W. Main Street (Goldrich) - worksession 5:45 D: / O 40ttroft?trre ty?~k- rffiA 11 /16~* lo < rrj-ft 6:05 EW 1 1 234 W. Francis (Mullins) Remediation Plan ]-13,/,(pij~ s @4-LTâ‚¬ Â£ i# 6/ te 7:05 E. ADJOURN EMINDER: Special HPC meeting April 7th 5:OOP.m.-DEPP 14 0 SUK-i: to ZOJECT MONITORING 910 K /4/,7, A.p7 Roger Moyer 303 E. Main, Kuhn ISIS 514 N. First 112 S. Mill St. Susan Dodington 712 W. Francis 918 E. Cooper, Davis Meadows Trustee and Tennis townhomes 234 W. Francis 203 S. Galena, Gucci 516 E. Durant Suzannah Reid 303 E. Main, Kuhn Ah A- 4+4 702 W. Main, Pearson 33*5 218 N. Monarch, Zucker 414 N. First 1008 E. Hopkins, Bellis Mary Hirsch Meadows, Trustee and Tennis townhomes 420 W. Francis Street 203 S. Galena, Gucci 920 W. Hallam Gilbert Sanchez 1008 E. Hopkins, Bellis 414 N. First 303 E. Main 520 E. Hyman 112 S. Mill St. 307 S. Mill 232 E. Hallam Jeffrey Halferty 234 W. Francis, Mullin 414 N. First 701 W. Main 101- 105 E. Hallam 920 W. Hallam 240 Lake Ave. Heidi Friedland 420 W. Francis Street 712 W. Francis Street 514 N. First 232 E. Hallam St. 117 N. 6th St. Lisa Markalunas 520 Walnut Street Christie Kienast 520 Walnut Street At 26 0/2.1- 9 1-0 L //- 1 1 hn <- CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: ~34 W. Hallam (Poppie's), expires April 26, 1999 123 W. Francis, Lot B (Vickery), expires May 13,1999 214 E. Bleeker Street (Greenwood), expires August 12, 1999 920 W. Hallam Street, expires August 12, 1999 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS 1999 1. 117 N. 6th ST. Coulter ~ 2. 920 E. Hyman Ave. Lot N. Block 32 3. 435 W. Main St. Lot A-I, Block 38 4. 930 King St. 5. 920 E. Hyman 6. 735 W. Bleeker 7, '234 W. Francis - --4 1,s-Ir T. 340 4 3 (Avi li \/ 1 Â· kl (3 5 6 1 ) ill_., \ 1 . -11 3 11 5 L) b L A- Plo F Rfl h C. 1.1 - D -1-3 i l//0 90- 1, c r 3 3-1-Cr -7 3- '83(7 14--9 1 '9 These old buildings do not belong to us only, they belong to our forefathers and they will belong to our descendants unless i we play them false. They are not in any sense our own property to do as we like with them. We are only trustees for those that come after us. -William Morris, Oxford, England, 1876 James M. Fitch Proposed Academic Program for Craft Workers in Historic Preservation A n acute shortage of adequately with art history and architectural classes and field trained craftsmen in the preserva- trips. The curricula would include optional tracks tion field conceals an even graver for students wishing to specialize in carpentry, shortage-that of craftsmen who masonry, plaster, metal work, etc. are both technically proficient and artistically lit- Historically, in the modern building industry erate. This condition (of the so-called "headless as a whole, this process of producing "the headless hand") is the consequence of the industrialization hand" might have been inevitable. There is, how- of the building field during the last century or ever, one sector of the industry in which such a so-a process which effectively ended that symbi- condition is not inevitable-namely, the preserva- otic relationship between designer and fabricator, tion and restoration of historic structures. Here, all which had always characterized architectural and the pre-industrial norms are fully operational: the artifactual production in pIe-industrial epochs. crafts of brick and stone masonry, plastering, glaz- Such a dissolution might have been inevitable, ing, metal work, water, and sanitaor, heating, and given the ineluctable demands of standardized ventilation systems all employ pre-industrial mate- serial mass production; but it has not been rials, methods, and theories. When the conserva- achieved without costs, the most serious of which tionist employs these historic means of restoring a was to rob the craftsman of any role or voice in historic house, he is in effect reviving a dead tech- the design process itself. Robbed of such partici- nology. He is simultaneously recreating the condi- pation, the craftsman was also rendered illiterate; tions for a revival of the lost symbiosis between denied any functional access to the expertise and building designers and building craftsmen. literature which characterized any craft-from At first glance, this might be mistaken for the gold smithing to cabinet work and stair building sort of revival which John Ruskin and William and ultimately to architecture itself. Robbed of Morris visualized in the 19th century, when they any opportunity to apply his own talent and train- proposed handicraft production as being a viable f ing to the solution of day-to-day problems in the alternative to the industrialized mass production field and workshops, the craftsman's critical which was sweeping across the Western World. To capacities simply atrophied. Such a communal a limited extent, Morris did succeed in craft pro- illiteracy has seriously compromised the ability of duction of some elegant, upper-class products such even the most competent craftsman in the field of as fabrics, papers, and carpets. But his shops were historic preservation. In the contemporary build- never able really to compete with mass industrial- ing industry, this process is controlled by its ized production. The situation is different in working documents-specifications and working America today, when a large and growing percent- drawings-covering in minute detail every aspect age of the building industry dollar is already repre- of the process. Any creative participation by the sented by the preservation, renovation, and building trade workers is explicitly forbidden. The modification of buildings. This provides the objec- craftsman becomes a "headless hand" and the tive basis for visualizing a closing of the gap atrophy of his critical capacity becomes between designer and craftsman, at least in this inevitable. sector of American life; and thereby the possibility What is needed urgently today is a nation- of restoring that symbiosis which characterized all wide network of training programs for historic artifact-making before the industrial revolution. preservation craftsmen which would complement the existing system of 57 colleges and universities Dr. James M Fitch is Professor Emeritus, Graduate offering the professional degree-M.Sc. in Historic School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation, Preservation. These proposed programs would be Columbia University; and Director Emeritus of for a two-year undergraduate degree at the commu- Historic Preservation, a program which he estab- nity college level. Curricula would aim at producing lished in 1964 and directed until his retirement in technically competent and artistically literate grad- 1979. He is currently Director of Preservation for the uates. Curricula would combine handicraft, work- New York firm of Beyer, Blinder, Belle, of which he is shop, and technology lectures and lab classes along a partner. 8 CRM NQ 12-1997 Ken Follett Why is the preservation industry so incredi- bly lopsided in favor of intellectual occupations, to the neglect of hands-on craft? O A Contractor's View of potentially more lucid moments, suggested that Henry Miller, in one of his less erotic and children should be taught first to use a hammer. CraftTraining men but taught with pride to use a hammer in the Children should not only be taught to use a ham- best way possible, to build or rebuild in their own environment. Instead, children are taught to build ~ ames Marston Fitch, commenting on with virtual hammers in an imaginary world where the need for a national program of training of craftspersons, has noted the there is no pain, no gain, no blood or mud. I have not met many people who think that following: "Such young workers as are entering this very important area are doing so on a young person following a trade career is not headed on a difficult way in life, especially where a personal, ad hoc basis, picking up what train- higher education is available. Granted, physical ing may be assimilated by observation and apprenticeship in small, scattered restoration pro- labor makes a person tired. But it does not reduce brain cells. On the other hand, too much schooling jects." This is true. The September/October issue of the National can dull the senses, inhibit thirst for life, and Trust for Historic Preservation's newsletter, forum inflate an individual's self-importance. And how- ever much is spent on an education, it does not news, contains a chart of degree programs in his- increase the quantity of brain cells. toric preservation. Of the 60 programs listed, two The harsh reality of years working as a programs indicate that they provide hands-on training. I find this disheartening. It appears that a stonemason, including a lot of backache and bashed thumbs, defines the framework by which I large number of consultants are going to be pro- duced, and that only a small amount of resources gauge education in the preservation trades. It is also the basis of a complex set of rules, gained by are going into assuring a future supply of skilled experience, that I apply when I evaluate the com- craftspeople. The question I have is, where do we petence of individuals, including design profes- all expect the craftspeople to arrive from? Where will those individuals who are essential to actually sionals, to do historic preservation work. A favorite tool of mine is to ask people their opinion do all the fine restoration work that the best and of the intelligence of a wet rock as opposed to a brightest have been trained, at great expense, to dry rock. The test is to see if the individual can eloquently chatter about, spontaneously going to think outside of a standard framework, how cre- appear from... if there is not a conscious intent on ative are they, can they laugh, and do they have the part of those with the monetary resources to character. Character, desire, and a good attitude, develop a skilled workforce capable of doing the work? in my opinion, rule over technical competence, which can be learned. I don't look for people that Sadly, I imagine Mr. Fitch felt compelled to simply go through motions without asking ques- hedge his bet on the future of the preservation industry, since he was not able to say that droves tions. Sometimes the patronizing of craftspeople of energetic young workers are flooding the preser- vation trades, and that these droves can expect to takes another form. From a lack of life experience, the book-educated take refuge in a hearly, back- make a decent living and receive the enduring slapping idealization of the craftsperson as an respect of our nation. Indeed, I can attest the updated version of the Natural Man. This mythol- opposite from personal experience. The very idea that any modestly literate young individual should ogizing of hands-on craft fosters a trend whereby middle-class youth complete their undergraduate choose anything but a college education seems to studies and then take up their great-grandfather's run contrary to an economically-driven myth of tools. Hands-on work is not a refuge in a simpler our education system. (In crude terms, I think the life and it is unfortunate if a vital national myth runs something like: Pay up, and we will resource, the skilled craftsperson working in tradi- teach you how to capture the golden goose.) As tional trades, is allowed to be stereolyped as a well, respect paid to the trade of an artisan theme worker whereby anyone carl take it up as a becomes a threat to the dreams of hard-working parents. Parents who work with their hands, espe- hobby. Construction contracting is not trivial; it is cially, hope their children will not follow them in a highly complex and demanding. There is an unde- career of physical labor. niable amount of pain in the fully engaged practice of hoisting two cement bags at one time; this is CRM NQ 12-1997 35 not a pursuit that comes easy. Progress is mea- of the construction industry, not to return. For the sured, not by a high grade-point average, but by most part, I do not see this as a loss to historic food on the table. The gap between those who preservation, as there was little gained by the design and those who implement, between those preservation industry to begin with. These were who think about it and those who have a constant not individuals who were drawn to the business backache and dirty hands, is a convergence of two simply because they felt it was the right thing to economic classes. The educational ideals of these do to fix up old buildings-they were workers two classes, totally foreign, collide at the building putting one foot in front of the other and expecting site. And neither system of ideals seems disposed good wages, health benefits, and a pension. to admit the validity of the other. There are few Amazingly, these middle-class workers, suddenly exceptions. without work, saw no honor in poverty Their exo- A few educational programs are made acces- dus from the trades drew into the preservation sible to the trades, but nowhere near enough to industry large numbers of immigrant workers. satisfy the actual needs of the preservation indus- Many of these workers begin without the needed try Also, these craft training programs, which skills and acquire them, if they are lucky, on the emphasize technique, do not provide a remedy for job. The unlucky ones are put to work by contrac- the problems of career valuation in our society. tors who don't know how to do the job, either. They do not motivate the creation of stonemasons This brings us to the issue of contractor pre- and carpenters out of a world of television adver- qualification, which speaks directly to the need of tisements for sneakers. They do not get involved the preservation industry to maintain a resource of in a young person's life early enough to create that workers skillful enough to do the right thing. The first life altering spark, the flaming desire that only way a skilled work force can be maintained is causes an individual to drop other future by making sure that skill is a factor in getting the prospects in order to pursue careers as craftspeo- work. If low cost, and not quality and experience, ple. are the determining factors in the allocation of In the United States I do not see a national work, then skilled craftspeople and responsible program of training craftspersons in preservation preservation contractors cannot compete against trades, such as Mr. Fitch recommends, and I do unskilled laborers and inexperienced general con- not believe there ever will be one. Despite this, the tractors. Unless design professionals and property example of Europe in many ways provides an owners become more aware of the different skill inspiration for all of us. An associate of mine, a levels among providers of construction services, Polish-trained preservation architect, told me that the preservation industry will not be healthy. after World War II his people had no choice but to There will be a lot of desire, a lot of need, and no start a national preservation program, 40 years satisfaction. Too often, design professionals and prior to America getting warm on the idea. The property owners seem to be unaware of the differ- reason they had no choice was that they had lost ence or of what is at stake. everything. As a society, they felt a very human Of course, my bias is showing-I have to compulsion to rebuild their past, with an intensity deal with this every day. of spirit that I believe is exceedingly rare. We have to show respect for the trades. As a contractor, I employ mechanics trained Those who understand the world through their in hands-on application, and I perceive craft train- hands and shape the language of materials in our ing programs as supplemental to an ongoing day- buildings, don't deserve to be treated poorly. to-day training mission internal to our company. Without a clearer understanding, the preservation The important questions when workers return industry will remain the responsibility of individu- from a training class are, "What did you learn? als with a desire-or those driven by the concrete What can you teach? Who did you talk to? Who immediacy of survival as best possible-along with can you call? Was it worth it? Did you have a the example of some contracting organizations good time?" If the answers sound muddled, then that build, train, and maintain a work force capa- we have to question either the ability of the ble of doing the bull work of historic preservation. worker to learn or the ability of the educator to teach. Sometimes the students return with enthusi- Ken Follett is Vice President ofApple Restorations asm to teach their peers on the work site, and and Waterproofing, Inc., Brooklyn, New York , sometimes they are deathly silent. Attitude counts Founder of the Preservation Industry Network, New York, and on the Board of Directors of the for most eveorthing. Association for Preservation Technology In the late 1980s in New York City, with a International (1997-98). downturn of construction following on the jitters of Â© Ken Follett 1997 First North American Serial an overinflated market, droves of workers, finding Rights rewrite, reprint, and republication rights retained themselves suddenly unemployed, stampeded out in full by author. 36 CRM Ng 12-1997 , 1,2 - 4 OYA 9 -- -: 1 -9, 4- 1 - - 1111 1111 :41 11- 1 - Coloradoft >44 31 , % 4 rk,0-â‚¬ ,â‚¬4. .... 0- 4 ' ~ 1.Â·1LF. Â£ 'Â·:-1 t'. ''43 .54/ -1 1 P 11 1 1, - 1 ' I 1 -3|' ~2 1~ 1 1 1 4 -1 1 111 - 5-11 1 1-1 1 111 1 1 1-1. 1 11- .EL- 4 y . . - lilli 1 1 i- 1- - r-in L < Â«94*langered-PlacÂ«Â«/ 4 ' 1<7 1 1 t , 42 i 1 T all.14 t~-1, 1, , Ill -- 1 14,i <vAS~*Lyl'rl' ' 0 - 14 lili '1~~ ! 12-~ 11,.-+ 1 â‚¬ 1,~ '6.- 1 m o m i ~,41-â€¢- ' ~ 6 fÂ«IT '111-1[1 -91 4:,r 4- 41 7 11/ BE<il :51 i 1 14 9; l~~ -T~ 1e - 1 r'. ,"6 4.41 1.4- FJ --:u:7'j ' il +. ,- p'Â© 66 dl Fs .--2-C' 3, 64 U!1 141 I -11,0,11 0/# 11 11 11;11 - 116 4 1 ti~'t.,j .~ 7,.,t~'. it'~' 10~ 1~1='.1 41)11 L. ll'{11#{1~i.,~ ~,~~.-.' ," A ~,1~1 |Al' .1 1. 11,1 'til~d'41-Â·-Tâ€¢1,Â· 1 .,r >44'4'4Â·Â·7:'' El:j k'r-,t~111"le.11;,F'' t-'i 4*ki.~ 1 7,1' A #1 11% 7 Deaftfield (Weld) . i , il.p I li â€¢Â· 4.--i, i.6.1.-,-*,.. .. "1.-., 1, , 1 -1~11 t 0211 Ptl 1 The f*tr 1910-1930s African-American farming community of Dearfield needs attention from the 11 2 -'IF r 1 J t' r aa,Ale.2/"3:ME"/ Li- preservation community now. The buildings that remain, including the 0. I Jackson home (a National Register 1-4/.41.hill 'r,will/'Imimitillizi/r : 1 1 site), are in desperate need of stabilization. Dearfield survives as the only African-American agricultural colony 1,1 4 PAâ‚¬ F-~=-2/19- f'~'i,- on the Colorado High Plains. The Black American West Museum owns some of the structures, including the , .~, ~*- ~--0---*-,itpre~L~~~ ~ O.T. Jackson home, but needs the assistance of the Colorado preservation community to acquire other sites and raise the funds necessary for stabilization and maintenance. .,< ) 11, C,a /2 ~ -4 *,i'L:' _Â·1'' 4.1* '1 -1 41 U '14 1 6,1#b #% '26_ 4 k 4 'E L'** W '-1 ' 4<43Â·' 1941'It -t i '14.- ~~Al#1-1 -16 61&11*211 k..1&1111'1111411,1,1 : 4*rand*iew Terrace Neighborhood (Boulder) 1%'i Oneel,m, parking lot expansion threatens an historic site. This time, an emire neighborhood of 1900s-1930s w .., I' (â€¢râ€¢ Ili./.mi,"'2Vial/b.li -l/163 ' era bDRgalows and apartments will be lost if no action is taken. Thirty-one of thirty-nine buildings are Â°in the ..111.12-1,r-UL////--L-2 .~ .1-!13,1 way" of a proposed parking and campus expansion by the University of Colorado. Rehabilitation and lesignation as a local and National Register landmark as well as cooperation among city government, Arizi u,~lr;f,i:,''3 preservation groups and the university will help preserve this locally important district. 1,- 11,91Â· ILI .3.13.j<FI''I,5~'-1,~~7~-~;''ji':(.''i 3442â‚¬UV9Â·EX ~ 1 91: 041':1, tri 1 014: 1 5,41-*V,St.4-.4, 3 : ly '0P , 4*d)Mmuntain Mining District (Ouray) 1 1111 1,7 11 lili . 11 1-.11 1 1 ~ Ili--1~-~11111-:i- Â°FESner $10,000,000" states a recent advertisement for a large parcel of privately owned land in the Red 1â‚¬7:t' 3</HAL~..4,11191/1.91,6.m: ::.Ifi; Moundin Mining District. Potential new uses are trophy homes and private ski slopes. Add this to the ravages 1,4'924.N#arf% j~*~~ 7.F of mining site reclamation, time and vandalism by looting and the threats to this 1874 mining district keep mounting. Today, over two million travelers visit the district per year -- its loss could damage the tourist lili 1 11#1 1 -1. ~ ill'r,/, " ~ t, â€ž4 , l. economies of Ouray and Silverton. CPI and local historic groups hope to cooperate with the district's private ,% 51,0,3 1-41 1 4 ..1 1 and co[Porate owners to obtain the site as open space for future visitors to enjoy. 7 FF,1 4/"_ I A"llul.111 /11 1111: 11 P :114 ' 6' 63, 1 +11.11 1WE ~~ t614#&.10 Fuel and Iron Plant (Pueblo) *,2,1 4-h, A p 53*1.+43*9 ~: Rhiltg*; tit the United States are vanishing, and with them the jobs at the Colorado Fuel and Iron (CF&1)Â· VI *llili. Al 5 'Â·'Pi . 44 411.11 , ,71 1 11, Plandowering over the 1-25 corridor in Pueblo, CF&1 no longer produces the vast quantities of railroad steel W,' 4,4' I '71 it did when the company dominated local coal production and steel making in the late 19th and early 20th ac,â‚¬ULL-i . imbil. 9 centuries. CF&l represents the challenge and reward which can come from preserving America's vanishing industrial heritage. CPI, local preservationists, and owner Oregon Steel can work together to document the site, determine alternate uses for significant buildings and preserve important genealogical and historical documents. -1111 11 U -AV |1Â« li, 44~2*,Jant: <he:InEling Flume on the Dolores River (Montrose) Frbil/to 1891, 1.8 million feet of lumber was used to construct the Hanging Flume, 100 to 150 feet abov6'the Dolores River. The flume was constructed to convey eight million gallons of water per day to placer '; Â©4 gold deposits. Visible from the Unaweep-Tabequache Scenic Byway, it is a significant asset to the history and beauty of this route. Without immediate stabilization, mother nature will insure that this unique mining structure will be lost forever. Atf,<'~9,4 ' lit .1 . , %3 b,*A~, ff-,lijw '..' I'.711 iul. 'Â·-'' A r 0-~4 ~: Ak,tvlwol '#quiclif :Â·i , 2.Mt t 4.â€¢ , i'' " 2 4 i '4' 1 CPI Colorado's Most Endangered Places List .1 Trd CPI .1 ..47 1 -1 I. 77- 41 - .111 4. Program wins award in first year .-!: Ill 11 1 --1 211.1- 6-141%4 / T.% 11 -3111.4 - 2 1-' ,-ZA -1 -r - 1 - CPI's program, Colorado's Most Endangered Places List, is a winner of a 1998 Stephen H. Hart Award. Two ._42*2*y> 714\ 4* , sites from the 1998 list have been saved and removed: Preston Farm in Fort Collins and the town of Cripple At- P *'z#14 1*44$4%4 #uite, *ton <~ I 1*4 Creek. The sites remaining on the list from 1998 are: Black Hawk/Central City, Leadville Mining District, t~' 1- '-i , I *49Â¢4~01*_90*Ok 4 4 1 LI'-7 Hispanic Cultural Landscape of the Purgatoire River, Christian Science Church in Victor, Lewis Mill in Telluride and the Toltec Hotel in Trinidad. Sites for the 1998 and 1999 list were selected by a statewide committee of ~*+F~Matti,it:Â©prÂ¢5100'89'cbm;" , jA preservationists from the many nominations that were received. EVA 49 -2 1 Er'-52. '4 â‚¬ 14--0' .itt i 'V#f'' 44 N'li, L. -i.,IM 43;5-,*p 2 11 .Â·i,Â·i'., ' i,;,i ,# I'Â·, I.,- fi xi ni Nut:9 '1Â·i i " ':~ 4.1~%1-11 ' 934*tiftft#fig-iÂ¢4Â¢j89~~.~gl~CÂ¢dÂ¢*161%iÂ¥9tf#%03*bf@ r-~,p,d-6~unie~ p~ ,â€¢,an~,- . - 1 Pl.r;* U~mU~10;manal guu/,1/1/MID ' itmr**DIN/"194".1/1131*lifullikprll#IIll 1,=1~..1.14< 1-1;11 ..7 11 1 r 1 1,1 11. 1 4 5. . 1 titf~ f~Jitt.*-4 ~. 2 rw; 1- t-~2 ~i#lit 4 4 &1,11.11 1 Colorad*K fl 4 f n ... &229 -kÂ®Â·94,424i;ti'~,Â»~9:fÂ·4~ â„¢ A ., 2. ' i 4 - * . 4 - 1, 4 +41 . 1 3-'. ' 4.1 ,Â»7 ~L~ ~'~~-!2-,i,:~Pi'~-~.' ".1~ .'~-2~4~ - ~~-L.211 43+ 0 ~r-1 EW 549 0/ 6- 31928- @14--~ 7- 3* â‚¬*34 tt '1- -a , -4~' ti '1.L. ., '9k' 1-"C' â€¢:1 1-7 1 k - k. 51 31 r 'fi-: Ir" ,%61= :Â£.. 4- .*: ri 63 1-11- Mrt~r~.45. -1 21 - ' - Â« TI "glangered-Piae I -- 7./0. 140- r- - . lili - 1 .' -1 mig *MÂ·- .2 1 L- 11 1 1. . . 1 9 9 4' 4'1 . i,i, 4'gl 4-I,/ 1.1 - 11 11, ~~E_6 ~6~-,i r-,1Â» ~01 -zi 4 ~ * . =te ./Imillil:mill//2/pry<tr/-230.7. it-* "' f . 0. /1 1 I ~9. 9 2.-, 9,2,~11*I-111- -1 '46--111-1*I'*211-1'Al-1 -1- m 1 -1 7 1 11 - Ilâ€¢---1 I/45,7-11!-,it.[1~ Ed-13032.12 Colorado Preservation, Inc. 910 16th Street, Suite 1100 1 -1,6 +11*1114 191, 1 Denver, CO 80202 303-893-4260 'i*Lull'i~ ~ 14191.1 16. :26 303-893-4333 Fax R.&2*1- I -1'.+ 14.-1 r 1- 2/Viâ‚¬-~ i 1 'rlw',41. k -,1 1 1311 1 . 1 r t. UV--7 4- 1 41- r.- lf?~~Â·41 - -1 - 1 % bilt/GAI |,4 4: 45,2 *-it i2Yi'-ji.:p"1*r444Â·Â·Â·'~T Ll.t-,E#*~11=1 1--4,..*~..raft~Jj~~i~ : : PHILIP REED HODGSON Att February 23, 1999 HPC L J o q ' ' f :# 9 130 South Galena street : m - 7. rl 1 .6 -2 7 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Members of HPC: During the last two years, my wife and I have attended several HPC meetings concerning proposals for renovation and development of historical properties. In each of these hearings, we have found, diSIUrbingly, that the applicants have misrepresented their intentions. In the case of the Half-House, at 218 North Monarch St., the owner was described as desiring to occupy his residence for skiing and golfing vacations with his family. We were told that the new owner was looking forward to his historic home; indeed, his son "who worked well with wood" anticipated finishing up the Victorian details. Since completion of the project in September 1998, the house has remained vacant of family and furnishings and is now on the market. An historic residence has been needlessly compromised for a seemingly quick profit. Last spring, application for considerable renovation on the residence at 101 West Hallam Street was presented to HPC by a young couple with their infant child in tow. At the hearing, this couple emotionally professed their intention to remain in the house to raise their family. In a letter to HPC, Sven Allstrom questioned the applicants' intentions regarding the renovations on the Bush house; however, approvals were granted to the couple. Subsequently, the property was listed in the local papers with "HPC Approvals" as a selling point to potential buyers/developers. We wondered what had happened to the couple's intention of raising their new family in this historic home. Additionally, we include the Waite House hearing in May of '98 during which Mr. Wheeler, the contractor, unequivocally stated that he understood the necessity for retaining and storing the original materials that would be reinstalled on the site. As there are various products available which are manufactured expressly for repair of rotting or decaying wood, it is difficult to accept the expedient path chosen by the contractor and owners whose promises of reinstallation ring hollow six months later. Everyone is aware of what has transpired since that meeting; however, we would like to inquire about the status of the Bayer fence-is it still intact awaiting reinstallation? The point is simple. It appears that some developers have no interest in the history of these properties, short of profit motives which we find, at the least, unethical. We have heard that the Half-House is being marketed with development potential, i.e., garage/apartment units from earlier HPC approvals. The renovated house already has a separate apartment; any subsequent development should require additional review. As public participants at HPC hearings, we assure, on the record, that our statements -2- February 23, 1999 are accurate and truthful. In a review of your taped hearings, we feel that you will find that your applicants have been less than candid in their intentions as stewards of historical properties. We are forwarding a copy of this letter to Mayor Bennett and the Council in hopes that a framework can be implemented to make applicants (owners and developers) more forthright in their requests. Specific measures must be implemented immediately if we are to retain an historical significance in Aspen. Sincerely~ 212 NORTH MONARCH STREET â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADOâ€¢ 81611 PHONE: (970) 925-7642 51, 111 02 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Sarah Oates, Planning Technician-S~Q, RE: 205 South Mill, minor review DATE: March 10, 1999 SUMMARY: The applicant, Campo De Fiori, is taking over the space formerly occupied by Aspen Sewing Service and proposes a minor alteration to the exterior of the store. The subject building is not historic but is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Campo De Fiori, represented by Elizabeth H. Plotke-Giordani. LOCATION: 205 South Mill. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The applicant requests HPC approval to make an exterior change to the storefront. The proposed change is to replace the existing windows with sliders that match the rest ofthe Campo De Fiori's exterior. Staff has no issue with the change in the windows. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The change proposed will not have a significant impact on the neighborhood because the shop does not have a direct relationship to the street. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the historic significance of any building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereoÂ£ Response: The proposed development does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve new windows for 205 S. Mill Street." Exhibits: A. Staffmemo dated March 10, 1999 B. Application j:\planning\aspen\hpc\cases\minor\campo.doc APPLICANT: Campo di Fiori LOCATION: 205S.Mill Street ACTION: Minor Review All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet allfour Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Standard 2: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. EXHIBIT--p -4- 13- I 0- 2 9 - . , ==,49.=01=W,9,42:ED,1 "V.91~ 7 r.'~'1~ ~ NAME OF PROJECT: CITY CLERK: STAFF: WITNESSES: (1) Â£ /, 2 bt- lit #l (*o igfFil (2) (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report (cd~ (Check if Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice ( ) (Check if Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet ( ) (Check if Applicable) 4 ~) CI~b)Lt-3 5 MOTION: VOTE: YES NO SUZANNAH REID YES EINO _ ROGER MOYER YES 121 NO_ MARY HIRSCH YES - NO - JEFFREY HALFERTY YES - NO _ SUSAN DODINGTON YES .523 NO _ GILBERT SANCHEZ YES _ NO - HEIDI FRIEDLAND YES 2--No _ MAUREEN MACDONALD YES - NO _ LISA MARKALUNAS YES t=f No _ CHRISTIE KIENAST YES lz:j NO _ . â€¢r gil- EXHIBIT 1 8-1-2~:5Â» t rili~ 4. - 'AL - -2-,14. . 1,1 1 ",r 1 - /1 '. I Y I . I *11 J 1 ',- 0. .... - 'i f . 1 I , 3 . T 1 I 4 1 0 1 14 1 1 .*,9 6.12 1 / I-Y-4 .... h 1 1 -,11 1 11 , fe A $84/- /1-10=!R, -- -2- - . 9 9 k't 69&<Elip 1.- kip - 1 1.1= . 1 /~7.14 - 1 1~Â·KrY.1.-f A ti <*-2 Lo _ -0 ~Lf,ifirÂ¢%\ l.- -â‚¬~jod., l' ilf<, ~ i=; T.i~'.4.b'.-~j.ji *ilti. V ,2 . . r 17-41 .Â·t -1 LUA814 AIEA Campo de Fier' fe'*&&,22 KrroeL m#pl/& amjaff#/S U - 8@n@Â¥ag ED(laTINd DIN*d '1087 NOBO'mgf ~- 1 MNA:Wili, E 4 = - -trl-~ CI N -2 11=10Â§ 088mt!*am El a-- ....4 â€¢â€¢ 0 1121 b=Zi'-0-"~ - 1 .... 1 LK; 1 =el-4941.- MHAW. NOI,18, Imma-- ...L--W'.-4- =-ir 0 46"ow'"-Mâ€žN.M.-4.- .-............ u I=â€¢Im-=- , m.. - IIi - - -L- . In -1.-- 1 -m i 1 =mmqi -41*=44*ITÂ·.Ma-'IA"Din.,1-1-Intl,1 C===1 1.1.1-1.....DIL.I.,Al-Ty-M.mi....1 â€ž 1 =En. 1#11 1 FLOOR PLAN r7Mmimmi----7 Al.0 9 4/.qaft? 9/ 21 11 3229_ 1 MEMORANDUKI TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Pa RE: 210 S. Galena Street, Elk's Building- minor review DATE: March 10, 1999 SUMMARY: The applicant, Elk's Lodge #224, requests HPC approval to create a better accessway to the roof ofthe building than currently exists. The subject building is a designated landmark and is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Elk's Lodge #224, represented by Jack Miller. LOCATION: 210 S. Galena Street. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage kill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: Please be aware that there are several notes on the drawings that relate to previous work. The only issue being reviewed is the new stairway. The applicant requests HPC approval to extend an existing stairway to the roof of the Elk's Building, including an enclosure for the stairs. Currently, the only way to access the roof is by a ladder to a hatch. This has posed safety issues, particularly when installing or removing mechanical equipment from the roof. The proposal is to extend an existing staircase on the Galena Street side. Another stair in the building, which is on the Mason and Morse side, is thought to be more visible to the street. The existing elevator only extends to the third floor and to take it to the roof level would involve significant costs and require an addition on the elevator tower. The architect has designed the staircase to have the lowest profile possible. On March lott in time for the 12:45 site visit, the Elks will place story poles on the roof so that HPC can study whether the stairs will be visible to the street. HPC members can also go into the building to see the current roof access. Staff will reserve making a recommendation until the story poles are viewable. There is already significant mechanical equipment on the roof, none of which is currently painted a dark color, as HPC has requested of recent installations on other buildings. It would be appropriate to address the roof as a whole with this review. Staff requests the applicant address whether there is any possibility of installing a snow melting system on the steps to the roof or any other method that avoids creating a stair enclosure. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed stair will not have a significant impact on the neighborhood, but its location so near to the parapet wall and its visibility from the street must be addressed. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the historic significance of the building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development must avoid having any affect on the architectural character of the historic structure by having a very limited visibility. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOM1MENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that HPC conduct a site visit on March 10th to see the story poles and existing conditions at the Elks Building. The applicant must provide information as to any way that the stair enclosure can be avoided, such as snowmelting the steps. Exhibits: A. Staffmemo dated March 10, 1999 B. Application JACK .... ,-LER & ASSOCIATES, A.I.A. ARCHITECTURE/PLANNING JM P.O. BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO. 81612 303-925-6930 February 24,1999 Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Elks Lodge Roof Stair Enclosure Dear Amy: Please consider this letter as a request for approval of a stair enclosure on the roof of the Elks Lodge 224 to access and service the many pieces of mechanical equipment installed there. Currently, there are two commercial kitchens, Hardrock and Elks, with three commercial bars and lounges in the building with extensive associated air circulating and filtering equipment located on the roof This equipment requires frequent maintenance and is currently accessed by a ladder and roof hatch which is in itself a very dangerous situation for workmen access, but is compounded when equipment has to be removed or installed. This is a major liability to the maintenance people as well as the lodge. The proposed location ofthe stairs is limited to expanding the existing Galena Street stairwell rather than the Hyman Street stairwell due to street visability. The stair has been designed to turn 90Â° on a landing which creates an angled roof perpendicular from Galena Street on the building fagade. This creates a minimum of street exposure and is probably most visible from the third floor of City Hal along with the multitude of existing air handling units. This location creates the least visible intrusion while other solutions bring the enclosure nearer to the parapet. The enclosure will be painted a low impact light aqua or blue whichever the HPC favors. The access to the roofis through a locked, secure door on the third floor controlled by an oficer ofthe lodge. The Elks Lodge will install a framed story pole replica ofthe enclosure for members ofHPC to visually review. Please contact me with any additional questions. Sincerely, --1 *k_ F+~ck Miller JACK MILLER & ASSOCIATES . 1 0 4 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name 611= Lodge * 324- 2. Project location 610 5 54 Â»10 h (indicate street address. lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning NA 4. Lot size NA 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number el k.g Lodge 125 -3544 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number J Gk MI I te y 42 9,449 0 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA -2- Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD < Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. 1 Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line , Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. R., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the * property) 9. Description of development application Af,fuÂ·er//p, 9 4 #70,1/11~Â£mÂ·, 414#24 OKUV â‚¬,1016(Ure 46 4'CLe a 42 rer/\Ge MAeCh;WUCO| 21(-JIT' 61 + P-66 4. 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4 Ii'TINT 11111111 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Â· ~ Applicant: Elks LadyÂ£ 4 13* .:: Address: 1510 2 U, A.'wlayl - ~ Zone district 1 N CA Lot size: Existing FAR: Allowable FAR: , Proposed FAR: Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: Proposed % of site coverage: Existing % of open space: Proposed % of open space: Existing maximum height: Principal blda: Accesorv bldg: Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: Accessorv bldg: Proposed % of demolition: Existing number of bedrooms: Proposed number of bedrooms: Existing on-site parking spaces: On-site parking spaces required: 0/ Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: NZA' Front 1*>1 Front: NA Rear: Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined ~ FronUrear: Front/rear: Frongrear: Side: Side: Side: S ide: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: 4 Sides: )/ Sides: %..1/ Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Variations requested: /â‚¬2,~ ue r~4 Mf di ;14, Pl}PWUM, 4014>/ -filt'/F -6 y)016<oye +0 accer.r %142Vul Ge VARGIAAVUCal emnr Â¢Â» radÂ·~, 0-1PC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.fl, site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) - r leu ASPHALT SHINGLE Roof= 1 ./.' 7.f-1 1'- --'c =2---,-i--- '.,r i.ft>,c'-'5,2- ~~2~k-YE;;1*12~0 - 511Â«1&16 - j.,I.~~2~1<:,3+. ~rb~911~314#.51.11-6-17~1--- -- 11. . 01 1|t''ti Il I Yr.[m , EL.lt,6/1-EÂ·l-trvOUE- " ~L..2.0,2 ~ \\1're ./ - .4/ I : \ \ - 1 1 1 Â· 4 1 i j 1 1.' . L.Ks melpr In -. 4 1 \\1 2..ii\..4\\\01 /7 J 11 1 / / NE-U CDMIBUÂ·. , 54 - Â· N A.6960 -fl, ..... lili N 19492ttfl 11\ ' 1 01 . 26-- -- 5njÂ£ Sr / 1 1 1 , MA~,4446.W Â«#: Al/z. X r a: fli)2 i' .3/r Â· YI~&RE,<'4&~:pe. - 1Â¢WN*152 f *04+44*P ;NI 01*FTS / \ LC>WEAL , 4 5- 4 + 1 1 11 ~ 11 A- 2@F>2. . ~\..%. /1 1 1 1: 1 1 :Filer, 4444, . Â«\.1~ * >1* 4:2111 1 1.; 1- 1 1, fe>K t:)12'k .. MEMEDRANE \ 7-2â€¢_- P.~*EMNAL ' 24*2%,1 t-4 -7 -Rf 1 11 . 1 - E<or: a ' 1. 46Â£21 4 Â·' '. h , ..4,9.-,- 1 7 1.1 vi"<:1 ~Â·.::moc., tre:St -44>Ly kx - 1 4 6 NA /6 0 0 . 11. , 1 1 1 1 . 11/ 1,4 *Fr- 2*1*T. i . -D.fl d ~71=$*./. * # 4 11> \ k. .. â‚¬aorlow w :-8HZ*.ha.-- ...lili ' . 1 1 lili -1 1 37 01Â¤V 2 11 r 11 E . . 2 . >1.. . i *J,P - 1 < . R/Di~.9:'~~7~ #5, I . 4 - 1 .1 11 :1 11,~11:<1111#titill''p'.Vil . .:1. '1 .' ' . 1 1,J :-1 111 111 I I . W ' '. . ./. ' I "' I ' ' 2" c :1:, 11 7. - : t. . r 1 : 11 11,1 1:904#1,1.4il-,1.1 1 # , ' I. â€¢ 1- Will 11-11 -fri~ 1. , - i - )/1.1 -1,1 1 1 I --- - - - CANot 11 11 - - , 1 1 11 :-1,1 ::1 11 - 1 111 1 1 1 .: .. I 4 13. f: vk\~ ~ ~1 ~'i'~'~'|2,+'14 \XI. 1 91 '.1~.~.j:.1.14.B~~r \1 \ 1 4/11 1,1 11 11 lilli 1 1 ~ 11 1 -1 I .ke..41' .. .- 4; hi . C , i .. 1111,11111121;I,49/52:11:1!M'Fit. ' ' ......4 1 1 tl--= -~ pN,- <- ID(191: 517Â£141 Y- cÂ£*lAtter' â‚¬ 0 , tÂ«L- /rn) . /0.1 Â·_ -'-2~~~ 7 . . 4- r HYMAN.*ENUE Water, W . W 12=pr FU 44 @>1455 Bult.PINGi JACK MILLER & ASSOC. ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BOX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 ;t t. Itillf r I. . He60' LT,11< glk*Uge- . .. . A. '- 1-14" 50â€¢404 F:MEM Fa~6FET , ., . -- ......----i---il--- - 2 .0 G , -/ H - ~7 2% 1 1;miiiiiii t .-0 - - - 1 - 0 --- ----0 ---- --- 0 -4- I ./------ - -0--0--0 - - 0-- ---- -0------ lli -.-MOOF EXIST SLOG &0, 0 3- ... I . .-- $- 01 - . . ..1- 110-"777 Â·- -. 14-5 '.O,4 1 13-- - ~~-1-- 1.- fir - _ Ir::lk=F=~3 - Â· ~- InT- rd - i 4_STS ~ RAFEek - A4-0 im:St' 058 F - 0- BES='08*970 1 - : i r t, 7/41 : -.= - 11. 11 !1- li 6- CLEANI NG. - BUS- /9 2 ..49!LUT*-0 -BEd- =-- -: m. 1 . - III- 4 - --- .- 5.Ro Le:046 /219 -C ' ~515,- L. -1.-40 - 1 0 - ' 7-7 f . # 2 - 'Lj -' L.3 WINDOWS Al.Â·122, -0- 0 ' =,Ill 9 0- 3.-Fll - - - NEW CLAD WOGe -11 1 2- B 1- -IN - j[_I - J ' -- iL] {- U - -- U - 1 1 --- --- ~- ~ ; , ' LEVELS . INGS and 64~*r , -2-na Leual Ng . ./%:.lk 7-L... -p#.1 - ..0 .Im:-$Â£-Ii'&// -1-Â· a - - 06Â· 56-3 66. A. -6 - 1 . 24, 2 - -- 1 - 1 Li . 016 . .- - NeN 55 - - Â·- -. =*ZERÂ· _ _ _ --. --- \ - 1 -----I 1 Â· - 41 4 $ 666 Uum BL. GL. - 4%211-1â‚¬.WemK- -EF-1 t-' 146 0 P L 1{61: .1 @ F. .2.- ....41,--~--Trlm- -_ ! 1 1 . .1 1 . .. 111It 11 111; 1 Â·111 i. l:' La .4 ---1.- - 9 - , .- Ground 1.a)%1 486- 1 - 1 - NEYV Er=NE SILLS 6- TNA-L - 2 lE[**i*@2_ L-- P~INT ECTST. CMU M 1 -----1-MACK MILLER & ASSOk WEST ELEVATION ~ ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS X4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 j ' 5/:3/11 0 .4 - '803-*Ack- rPM %615& Gla/*re:*l ----7 < 7 NAY *TAW.' SH,sÂ·I-O#Lf 1â‚¬ 1#'~ 4-V- - 4 . 1 +-1-: All * HANDLIN G #dtRY: T{*ER BEYON" 1 - -, '.' . _.| ,- UN IT{_ki *1- -1 1 . - -- 2 1 - ----I - T--1 * r- I 1 * 0, - . +3: '#CLEE ; . .Â£:_ 12 ....~EE-EÂ«29Â·132Â»1.te*2199.IÂ·C=3Â»bit##EEEfE#buta}- 1 2.Â·37*#9-*~-~L: -.*-~~---3-2 -.- r:.11) >12-49-6--3--Ed-6.-I .1.--Â·3'-2,--i ----_6. ri-ELE--2--~3-9 -r-1. 7.6-Â· zLE 7- -- 9 . ---- ~ ~i_ij Â»prigE-ZlkAFE EffTN@3-3-==523~332:El! ~11!.FSEEZiNG -RE:FE~ --:A:.=22-2.-U: i i E-EET./j#PtÂ»-':fÂ»~11/*49#-226&LTH ,]F#*-3=-s -abI~f ~*28-31 '* fâ‚¬:31-.20 L ~:--I- =Â·=-----I=- Â·:=2~11_..4.6.-_ â‚¬_LE-ZE#---*-- ~.= Â·--â‚¬7 - Â· - -LEOâ‚¬.5 2_.__ -- _w-2 2-ILTT-2-.-.-, --.-3 6723 ..D~i* 1 3*-*- ---~3--T]i~. 11 +- I. - .. . lil :,1 / I h UÂ«---91.11 : .Â· HÂ·.~ I.-Â· -- - -- - - 0 . 19*3-* Â· fE---t.-~1 4-7.'Â·76 7 IE--_ 1. 7- -...... - --1 1, -Â·--- .--4 Â·11Â£:..6 1/Â·74--~ 4.3-2 7*~HOT.7- -d*M= ...1-1 1-%.1- -E; 4 1:22 5 -922=z: --. _..---1_-mi=r-L#k=-r=46==EbTiT r :. 2 -3 -- . 77 J. -: ..=Â·:/-Â·- -Â· - ~f. -33~r..722&92..,.-z-.-225'25225;XE.*.=1=n-rE--==7-7=:-77--:Â·zmr=zÂ·-1-27.-Â·-7 Ln==REEHE=ErÂ»- -21. I . ---1.---2=.1-2 =-7- .=- , . 42/1.An,--4- -Â· ' P;'' 4-r*-3 aN.-E-- 7-6 3. meâ‚¬,2 2.+ 1** Â·Â· -3-Â· Â·Â·-Â· '-2-EM--2.-2 2. * .*+E..1'51.--.- =~.-Cll.-42 2..2214.-3~9.9~7S-Z~~-7> :lull_ULWAÂ¥~15[ 12.4.4*=2...940~ .fa...tr - 1 . . 1.21 - -27 ----LI<792 3 ,09- -z-#*----- :,-:-~-----.-I--I--=Er=-=*LI.227--f--32.4319.4-Â»59.I-f- .. ... .- ' : .- ---r Â· ~ 1 3.. . 11: r-*â‚¬.91. 1 - Â·~ . . t.. ..C,=*2='CE, _ItlaMPI--3 8%40%8_2>H (AL.L.MY) . 0/10" 5 1' - oN 1 JACK MILLER & ASSOC. ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS OX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 \ 2/92,/19 . 4/.4. / 2- A:Z:f t-' ... -{ 5 1- , 000\ \-Ae'*[06) --24?Â»I Â«,Pa .. tA f -9-- li R e El.<4 1Â»i-*5E=- * 534 49129 ~Ca::,S k. 1 - a#11'71 Â¢5141 j E i 4?( p â‚¬62*UP AcCEKS To 4 2- Ber (h:,976 00#) /2 6 .1 /f Lf # f i . - 11[ 1 . 1 - \ ~4&=rtou 4, 13 . ~ 1 |1' | 91 k ' ~p<n -1 ,$,ew iwÂ·iu. D/Mo/N~6 yj li | --472Mei ~P~ -r- ,-â€¢::r ~T~r 11 911- pÂ»,uy g AP - h. 1 rE),It (1451 VDog~' 13 4 AN I / 1 -1 1 i , 1 . . -4 1.-2-12 -1 i 11 1 li 1 1 7-- 4 . b --- Â·mÂ¢~â‚¬12% 5-rAI B#vpki. >~ P mc iT 9 GF@10}10 FLall Â«Al g f <2- Cnit AP FLÂ·62Â» Â·-10 1* F) 11 1 = 3/1611 7 0 Ellâ‚¬ Bull,P'Ha JACK MIUER & ASSOC. ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS ~OX 4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 ste&/14 1 0 0 f . t . + 1- 2., .} li L,p ~ . , 41 V/4 9*4 1 ~ Et, 1516 rAIWar t Â· .102* VAN . .+41> 0- . 1Â· EÂ¥ 1â‚¬r-4 FiD: -22 ik<t>.--4.-Â· 4 X - \\ . i Â»* OÂ· - lit, :.. -1 . 8'Z/,74 /*I.\ 1! N>,14.- _ - -- 1, ; / .] r 1 '44 2 9 4 1 h -21. <- - EX I SiT 1 4 & MAT, 1 0, ft . 1 /MASON'RY WALL 1 -- - , 0 ..: IC i 1 1, P , ---- . -4 1 11:. 4401/1, EIL ;CEr 1-L- 1.1 ' 10 Ma 11 4 ,.. il- / -- - - 1 [g R H54/ 1.a-it~N a c 11 1 5 4 0 i _ . 41 X 0 2 - 1-J -=,r f 13 1 1- I 1 ID, Fid. /1 0 /19 -0 , . 90 - . 1/9 w , 0 /23'-440 t f/4 1 72/r- j - - TW 4 AA "91-//>7, 03/ p - - 5,1/8. _ 1 - Af /1 I 7%@k 4 29 wIR N 0 I,6- f on >â‚¬ \ L-?23411 1 1104 Â»K N=244 IrÂ» 1 e -# 19 -- to 0 110.- iD 4 1 1 - in X 6.we. f-34' 1 1 1 1*f . ~ tos 1- 802 43*ll!) th~N, = -\42111! |1% \11 11 11 1 . F4241,1 tw \ N \!11 1 ~el'\344 18 w Â»6Â· al-KQ.â„¢-*U-1-1Â»1N B ~ S'PAIR #2 - SECTION JACK MIUER & ASSOC. 5/1< ' FL; 3~ ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS BOX4285 ASPEN, CO 81612 , - 2 -8-11 F .1.:~:2 .Â· '.Tojl~& ,..ga, { ~0 4 0 0. 21211 . 1 9. 1 111 u p ! 1 i . i 1,1 !4. 43 03, 0.6 Fooe -- . Ay Â¢ 91 4 69 L. -= e i,4..DZ 1 . F 1 I - 1--3.1319 -- -.4- UNe of <3*124 J i li 1 -1 1-11'Ip, -- \4Â·- 1: .8-1 -1 n -7- -\ 141.0 1 L .000.1 t----- 3144 Â« I \/4 ' h L--1 1/Â» a gÂ¥/rra WAUC-â€ž 2__.-1 -1 - , /2. -Ae//:1.11 --6 - , i! 1 1 \41 1 1.\ 0 1 1 1 - .in = 212 -. [ L-]91 EEG - 1 7.- .--r . i T 1. I. I L '1.1- --- ---- Xlf,TibJ, - -#--9 -- /ALL , , ---- I +- - -~--* - m. - i E.1.4<4 -13;1-111,01 H:S JACK MIUER & ASSOC. Â® STAIR #2 -SEOPION ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS B0X4285- ASPEN, CO 81612 11Â·* I %\ 74% MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission kt/ FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer 0->CD RE: 706 W. Main- worksession DATE: March 10, 1999 SUMMARY: In summer 1998, HPC approved a remodel of the historic house at 706 W. Main Street, which is currently under construction. The approved site plan included a hot tub in the yard. The tub was located in the setbacks, which was permitted because it was no more than 30" above the ground. The owner now wishes to add a roof to the hot tub, similar to the one showed on the attached photograph. The roof would require a setback variance and the owner would like to introduce the idea to HPC and receive feedback. HPC may grant setback variances on historic landmark parcels if a finding can be made that "such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements." K 13* LY- 9/ 70 G co Vil*/1- 2* 1 .1 1 1 0 17.â€¢0!" ' ' : I~,I ' :1491 : 12*c/MIC-yA,IANâ€¢*M.. 1....LA.L-C-:4*4-n:.46<-L : 3Â®1- . .1 -ExleT'AÂ· Tgâ‚¬a 1 . . . 90 4 0 2966 OIL . '' + PT*W< 18 / X. PROPOSOP 0 * P:2OFWSE-P , -6*ZEPO . .11' I. W , 1 . 49 &-422:121. ' : #Xler'A â„¢eae . . + ....CekmÂ·La -=Aâ€¢w--n; P 1-r,TrSE . ' 10 1~AU! N 1 . : J.*ki.1 +91.4, i.lil,4 , ll. . . -uu t./8 ', #*tkih/Â· - 1LL.ilib)itillubi - : 1 ,;:; 4%5-44- +111.43'. * Â·rÂ·r ? *p~,111 'ir" , . . I 1 4. e *,4 .. I. . 1 .. p I . ..I. 1 f : 1 1 d 3329"on,El.*4*1* i: I , ArK -1 1.1 liii 14,; :.90 ? 0 . Be .2,4 fk o %:' 0 1Â·Â· . - ..- -- ....... .. --- -- .. 1 la ,--. -- -1.- . - Â£11 . :.Egit gil A. .... . Â· -1.11Â·Â· 42 , ED*ne=rr UNE ....... Â·t DO - . .â‚¬- F,e,;4NlET'I30. 4,1= -rFL.</72.. 9 ~FOPU.J.<-7rM 1 1 1- 1 1 IL ik. iÂ· !1--H!*!i tliC-- .1 '~25,trli OA row-11'191-1'17, !ii;,i Â£ tli l. : '..'t252.d,J,ir,k- r , '-.... i NAT--I[Zi>lpcp.Poite -'[ . . . 1- - 2*#2 00 de L 'Â· IÂ· . 43:irÂ· Â· Â·- t . 1 1 ... 1* 11 11 I - -V , 1 *-1 --t.T-fil.'t-t-- i . ' ' bleÂ¥/ 11ENT'Pr? 0 /==4: 1. 1, 1 4 Â· Â· 1 VEâ‚¬.Itewl.121 6161,2 -, -*44 .1 . 4+4 . Â· Â· 1 EMULEA&,MZL~.5.1. - -- tiÂ· 41. i,! .1 i .Â·Â·Â·1 444 1.- . I. '4-Il .- - --'ti- Â·Â· 1 Â· +Â·.1 1 1**T~+ ~-1-~Â·~.4 1 1 , ' 4.â€¢ Il 4 }El-860( i 1- 1-r Â·Â· Â· . , f 0 '' Â·Â·:!rÂ·?t Â·Â· 3.$-1.1.UL].-L..t=&Â£1~~1*E..*~A.k~k likE : , 1-4 12*vieep erre FLAN APVER=iED' $2NEANC PÂ»:SK- Main St r Â£ r> dFK-â‚¬y 0 APPROVED: 1915 90. FT. EM.KEQUEEMEN[&; PROFOSED COVERED DECK: 175 Sa. FT. = 2090 90. FT.TOTAL ALLOWED FAK: 2960 SQ. FT. FUKK / FO69 CHANGE ORPER FRQJEGL PATE SHEET NO architecture Â· susan furr 970-927-2530 JA,Puzct-760;ZE,Zw _ ,The Goldrich Residence 2/10~41 1 oF & fax 970-927-5354 ' 706 West Main St. Aspen, Colorado 140 821 0 ' W 71.4 1 + -. . / 559-4,3. - 1 57614 Â¥02 - /12&38... I g 41-181'P- Â£: I oi GueÂ©lee <i' 23?BAER i _ 1 i . 1 3 PRN H A-0 9 - t: 1 1\ i . 1 145\# 1- CAK 6,406&130 : ./ , 0 \ 1 UF~ Ft . 1221-0':aTa ma-ray:6- z SLIM dr/4 -172/EL--7 AND ZABLE . DE+47 1 ./ PaK Â«Al)25 , 11 / 1 - it *103 -- 2- 20 Â· * 0 Â· ~4~~ *F . 0 11.357*- .. 6 00. i /\ A 543/l21 N \1- 3 1 4 ~**#390<fi\Â»\4Â»â€žMNKÂ¢09Â«*Â»~Â«441* . "Â·-Â·- -I.-4- 1 . - 2 '65....2 -*79*46" 1Â»7.- 1 ., ... 7 1 1 -A 49-355EEA 2 O - - J *BOAA 6.4~2-â€¢ --d~@ti _*LOOK -- Na\,4 *FE nic.E ..7 441 up - (* 1 14%21- 2 1 \ 0 1 /0 k- -u Y *; C :14 3/Â·10 1 Pt c +F i j M 0 g .//1 1. ~Â»VT -4, L 210 -- d. 1. 1 10-60 i 1- ,&1 1 -- 'b -41&41 / F 331.e'-~4 Â·1 /M-, x iser-=1_i i ' 1-56-â„¢e/L,@r. -Wi \ 2- \NOOVÂ· 9'669_ \Al,Wej,h. 7 >\. /, i i .u~ ~ .p...1105~ 14 1~ ~~t . 1 mLULÂ·/SSL , i 0 Â¥ U /7 JA?' 1 , 1 / e#AE Hol. - 1 4-7 1 -4-Ej&%*49%*aw.~11.,44, ,1 \ 1 3 1 le- 0. E C-7 tÂ· Â· d H FE)Q42 DN 10-r- h . .4 y r z , .4 - --\17/ - ' --pwoviaff#WatZ k ' . -' *012 55<T: UNEr/NA 11 E>crÂ« 64-13 ~ ANP JAUIZII 727 Aller 1 ' i - - - #*.071%300&/8 -* f r- ,1 \ . - 3 -/ t / New l'k#Dult:rÂ£$*2804*- 1 -1'0 09 *#GrALLet, A~ Gtiths I 44 j I Eer\AJEEpl Brrer 1~~'' _ New *rous 70=no. 1 0, t.. -Â· # 1 \ 17%4Â« 1. NOT 1-'WD' - l.:6, APIA. Â· ; f 1 6,0Â£00 â€¢al< 4,r':IU. 10 .-/r> 2 r W.ze,o 12:.Â¥ r & 01,4. / 1 12BV leEP 614< F'UN. ' xecrt *MALL 1064 F - / TO 28 1,#LOCE:1* \ \_ /Â· / 3- a 11 Â£>OVER#P-#212. 98Â£44Â· ~ .-/ ---- . 1 ./ 4 , . - , V 2 \4 ,. .. / FEN 1 5 1959 FUKK / FOSS CHANGE ORDER FKOJECT PATE SHEET NO. architecture The Goldrich Residence â‚¬101 11 2 09 susan furr 970-927-2530 -IJACAAZEA GAJ-32*O 706 West Main St. fax 970-927-5354 Aspen, Colorado .. .. 7 . 141 --- LM iri 1 1 Ki 4.V . i#!1 : : f ,. . . ~~~ '.-~Â·>C .'.'*Â·14.2.t'f f-1.4~429(14 .. 12.,irs,1.f 1 7:.1â‚¬2401'fi.i,~t...;AMM 1 - - , iÂ· ''~~ :u,Â·'Â·2: **Efteabita;123=11 -th~,3.4 6 ' r~ Â·Â· ~.'.0 1 1 1 1 4 Â¥ 1, i Â· 2 1 th , +.Flim.1 ..1 1.6,4,0,47 Â«1 '. Th:,Â·.~.19+424.!: 13% 1. I 1 , .. I.' #. I. * I ./. i . \Â»+ r:,4 ., ~.:.4itlit':...~398>4322*ff"%1442 21 4: #21 1 â‚¬Â¢444'a. , . Â· *t: b. ,., scuo, 4;9. 11.~, 7 LIN 4. rf)"216B#kv.SIDE I. '..1.Â·rÂ·:J~Â·'. ;:...0+>j .5.~, '2~,7 '~. ~ 1|ti8!1V.1 :. 016?dfameter-8 sides (shown above) *41*RilidiÂ£eter+10 sides (shown inseO 6 gdoorswith is k~ '.24: I:#SCRN--PAL,.~ ~ .,~ .~ ''.1:th.:%. ...L Ul I P I ~.2Â·*.p..: :~''~'r.' 1-Â·-~~Iek'--'- ~:ij,$6.-Â·4..... 2' 9%1210 J:, + . - Deâ‚¬*dtiVE dpindle styling ,r ':Â·2243,3: MnÂ·StÂ¢Â·.,Ift.t:Â·22~ 2,219, :D:.ar:~~.Â·c -- -,.i- ,~~~, + . 1~11 11& il Â· lili , '<Â¢Q--- --- ;T-__------ Â»*64 :n , 44,~'41,' i,-,Beveled,dedar roof includedÂ· 432 A ., F,0~~FT: i.~..177:;741Â¢114/ h .~. t'.11+11 I 1.11 <: 'Â·''. ..?Â· :' .< 2 ..' ., Â· Ijuidkkrl,cy#â€ž11(PNOL'tl .Â·~ ",6+.. Â·9'91 <49.lt Eff#11 Â»*onl select tight-knot BC Â·Â·.:'b.=2~45"Â·<:'t .-"(t; 43Â· j. ~ k..Â·f kle 9<3~3:'r.<-;:fi-yjll~Â·S..4.dn.Â·74.-Â· Â· 4*4â€¢ F 0 5 1 - ir) UKK / FOBS CHANGEORDER FKOJECT DATE SHEET NO. architecture susan furr 970-927.2530 4'~2~uzz:E-6*z/8â€¢ 2_- The Goldrich Residence toiÂ« 59 09 9 fax 970-927-5354 706 West Main St. Aspen, Co!orado EXHIBIT APPLICANT: Elk's Building ~~ ~-0 9,72 LOCATION: 210 S. Galena ACTION: Minor Review All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet aUfour Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.09003)(2). Standard 2: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. - 311*mmz Uflayal//0/ 41&Â£/ ~ NAME OF PROJECT: CITY CLERK: STAFF: WITNESSES: (1) 5 ALIC- 1\At \\ J (2) (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report C L.4~ (Check ifApplicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice ( ) (Check if Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet C / (Check if Applicable) 4 5 MOTION: VOTE: YES NO SUZANNAH REID YES _ NO - ROGERMOYER YES - NO - MARY HIRSCH YES - NO - JEFFREY HALFERTY YES _ NO _ SUSAN DODINGTON YES _ NO - GILBERT SANCHEZ YES _ NO_ HEIDI FRIEDLAND YES - NO - MAUREEN MACDONALD YES - NO - LISA MARKALUNAS YES _ NO _ CHRISTIE KIENAST YES _ NO _ 4-- * r-<'#*23 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer 24/1 RE: 234 W. Francis Street- Remediation Plan DATE: March 10, 1999 SUMMARY: At the last regular HPC meeting on February 24*,and ata site visit on March 1 st, the Commission resolved several issues with regard to violations of permits at 234 W. Francis Street. Attached are HPC resolutions which cover the approved items. A revised remedial plan has been submitted, which identifies the remaining decisions for HPC to make. The remediation plan will be scheduled on regular HPC meetings until every item is resolved. As decisions are made, they will be formalized in a resolution and removed from the list. Following are staff recommendations on the items identified by the Mullins' as priorities. STAFF REVIEW: 1. South faGade: a-c.The proposal to reconstruct the front porch is acceptable, however more specific information is needed for the board to confirm that an exact replication is occurring. d. Replacing the glass in the broken transom window is acceptable, however with all of the glass replacement that is proposed it must be confirmed that the new glass will reflect the character of the original glass. It seems likely that the restoration glass is available in a variety of degrees of distortion and inclusions like the "seeds." In regard to the hardware, the original hardware should be retained, with a simple deadbolt or similar mechanism added. (6. The original scrollwork must be installed to match the original condition. (E Acceptable. g. Acceptable. h. More information is needed on the origin of the concrete pad that was the floor of the front and west porches. There is the possibility that the scored concrete was something added during the time Herbert Bayer lived in the house, which would mean that it had some significance. The architect should contact Joan Lane for information on the porch floor. ~i, Acceptable. (j) Acceptable with photographs to confirm the original appearance of the windows. k. How was the dimension of the original materials confirmed if they have been discarded? 1. Acceptable with confirmation that the replacement glass will match the original, as stated in "d, " above. U. Acceptable. Â® Acceptable. (Â§. Acceptable. It has been discussed that the drip caps may be better for the long term condition ofthe building. 2. East FaGade a. Acceptable with confirmation that the replacement glass will match the original. b. Acceptable with confirmation that the original #ppeprance of the porch and entry is being replicated. d.00 r # f-PolÂ«7 30 pi A-'fÂ·*2244Â£.u,F. -741.47 h"sto. ice//3, /0 St 0*4 3. West Fa~ade /70,ult Â® Acceptable, with confirmation that the replacement glass will match the original. b. The porch must be detailed exactly as it was originally. No alterations may be made to the original columns without further HPC approval. The porch floor will not be approved until item "lh," above, is resolved. More information is needed as to why a 2'44" roof construction will not meet code, for instance under exemptions for historic structures. If no other method is available, the architect must provide information on how the additional roof thickness will be addressed. 4. North FaGade a. No historic materials remain on the north faQade other than the window sash. The window guides and drip caps will be darkened as on the other facades. New clapboards must match the original clapboard exposure. Sent By: STUDIO B ARCHITECTS; 970 920 7822; Mar-4-BQ 1:10PM; Page 1 T i. 11 1 -1 0 ' 1-3 '2 architects 4 March 1999 FAX TRANSMITTAL: To: Amy Guthrie/HI'C Director From: Scott Lindenau/Studio B Architects RE: Progress Report 1 and Final Remedial Plan Fax #: 9205439 Pages: 6 Dear Amy. Here is the Ent Progress Report and the Final Remedial Plan with 'Priority Issues' and 'Miscellaneous Isaues'. I w ould really like to address and come to a final resolution on all of these issues on the March 10 meeting. Please review these and seelf you have any comments or changes. Ihave serif these to Gary Wheeler and the Mullins. Regards, CA L * Scott Lindenau, Principal 555 n. mill 51. aspened. 81611 970 920-9420 fax 970*920-7622 Sent By: STUDIO 8 ARCHITECTS; 970 920 7822; Mar-4-QQ 1:10PM; Page 2 architects 4 March 1999 Progress Report #1 for 234 West Francis Street, The Davis Waite Hou5e: (Submitted by Scott Undenau, Studio B Arehilects.) 1. Notes: a. The architect, owners, and contractor have copies of the Resolution regarding tile approvals from the MPC staff site visit from Murch 1, 1999. b. Wofk contmues on the interiors of the house regarding interior nullwork, doors. anct other carpentry issues- c. Thece is no work being performed on the exterinr other than the mock-ups for the fireplace vents for the 1 March meeting. d. A detailed final Remedial Plan wilh Triority Issues' and 'Miscellaneous Issues' was submitted to the owners and HPC staff for insertion into the HPC package for the regular HPC meeting an the 10 of March. It is a gomprehensive plan that we tue hoping will be addressed and approved in its entirety that evening. Sa5 n. mill st. a*pen en. 51411 970Â·920Â·9420 fax 970Â·020 7822 31!L ," 41%9% Sent By: STUDIO 8 ARCHITECTS; 970 920 7822; Mar-4-90 1:48PM; Page 2 Â·~~536-ifi,.. i~*m~/*' 8 architects 4 March 1999 Remedial Plan for 234 West Francis Street, The Davis Waite Ho~*e: Nority Issues: 1. South ]?acaste: Front parch: The front parch shall be brought back to its original charactei via the following; a. Tlke existing secondary cornice fascia trim is larger than the original and shall be replaced with a new trim that matÂ¢he* exactly that of the original. An existing piece of that trim was salvaged and new trim will be made from thal by ADW Design Works. A sample was reviewed at last meeting's work sessicin arid ADW was approved as a qualified Bubcontractor, This trim shall wrap the front porcb and return back to the house itself as per the '*iginal pordi b. The 2 free-standtng columns and the 2 pilaster columns have been salvaged and are currently installed with new top and bottom portions that are identical in proportion to the pmvious columns. A small wood detail relief need!* to be added to the top and bottom to match the historic columns and that sample detail was reviewed at last meeting. lhe new pie~e of vertical wood behind the pilaster has been added which matches the historic. This is conslstent and serves as blocking for the skiing to butt into. aL The detailed cage and comer blocking aroundthefrarltdoof shallberemoved and replaced with the same flat case that measured 5 1/4 inches. This will be replicated from the photographs. d. The front door and transom are in storage and will be re-installed. The transom window at the front door was broken when the house was purchased. The transom window shall be replaced with the 'seedy glass'. The proposed stained glass window tranaoms will not be used. The original door hardware iG not operable or lockable and the owners wish to replace it with a proper locking hardware. The architect shall select an entry hardware that is compatible with historic standard, and review the seledon with staff for approval. e. The detailed scrollwork that supports the ent,y roof canopy has been saved and will be installed per the same detailing. Â£ The underside of the pc,rch shall have the yame 2 1/4 inch bezdboard ceiling imbtalled per the historic porch. g. The roof of the pofch shall have a copper roof instâ€¢11â€¢,d at the same 1/12 pith as the previous porch. 'Ihe copper Shall be patined to a dark brown and will nut be visible from the street because of the low roof pitch. The former porch had a metal roof with marty leaks repaired by tar. The evidence of leaking fs visible in the photographs from the rotted wood behind the pilaskrs. Heat melt shall be used as in the previous pordh. 555 1 mill St. ampen CD. 81611 971-020Â·9428 fax 970 920Â·7822 Sent By: STUDIO B ARCHITECTS; 970 920 7822; Mar-4-09 1:49PM; Page 3/4 South Faude continued: h. The porch floor material was removed. ais was a pattemed concrete to represent 12" x 12" tiles. The clients would like to replace this with either recycled brick or Colorado flagmtone, both are historic applications. Cth L Thenew siding above the front porch shall be removed and replaced with the remaining salvaged histot:ic siding. Some of this siding will require patching, epoxfs, and sanding. The installation of this shall begin under the cave and work its way down -h:X ~as this is the most visible section from Francis Street. The amount of historic siding remaining is very close to this amount needed. j. The small trim detail around the easing gf the large picture windows shall be removed. & k. The new window trint, Bills, and comer boards are new but are of the samr. dimensions and profile as the iremoved historic material. 'rhege were measured by Studio B Ard,ibects at the site on 17 lebruary, 1999 to Vet:ify. These dimensions afe; 4 1/2" window trim, 51/4" dooreasing,11/4" window sills, and 4 5/16" for thecomer boards. 1his is typical throughout the project and address many of thesame points on other elevations. 1. The .mall fixed window at the upper poftion of the facade isa single pane window - * that has been cracked prior to the owners purchasing the house. The ownets would like to replace this with the 'seedy glass' m. The new aiding that has Ieplaced the removed siding la of the exact same dimensions and profile as the hiatutiC. 1hls is typical throughout the project. The samples were again reviewed at last meeting. The owners would like verification Chat the siding that is currently installed may remain. n. The copper roof flashing shall all be patined to a dark brown. o. Tile copper window head cirip caps shall remain above all windows on {he historic main house. The historic window detail had a tin cap. We will patina the copper to the dark brown again. 2. East Paeade a- The two smaller window panes that were accidentally broken, are to be replaced with the aame historic glass supplied by the Bendhcim Glass Company. b. The saved higtoric door and transom at the small porch shall be fe-installed with the Game trim and easing. 3. West Facade: a.lhe large broken window pane is to be replaced with a new 'seedy glaâ€¢a' pane that replicates historic glass and is being made by Bendheim Glass Company of New Jersey that specializes in hiitoric renovations. Sent By: STUDIO 8 ARCHITECTS; 970 920 7822; Mar-4-99 1:49PM; Page 4/4 b. The small historic porch shall be retuilt per the drawings and incorporate the saved columns and door. The same door trtm as Ihe front door shall be Used. The same detailing will be used per the photographs. Like the front porch, the floor material will be replaced by eitherÂ· the used brick or the Colorado flagstone. The porch that ib currently built has the roof structure built of 2 x6 material and not the 2*4 framing as in the original po,ch. The 23Â£4 does not meet cu,rent codie or the structural englneezs approval. The roof material on the porch shall match the roof shingles per the main house. See the enclosed structural engineers details. 4. North Facade: a. Similar procedures previously mentioned. Sent By: STUDIO 8 ARCHITECTS; 970 920 7822; Mar-4-9@ 1:11 PM; Page 8/8 0 architeÂ©ta 4 Marnh 1999 Remedial Plan for 234 Weat Francis Street, The Davls Waite House: Miscellaneous Issues: 1- Notes: a. The historic fence has been saved and is under approved protection on site. This shall be installed upon complelion. It should be noted that some portions of the fence may hert-built because some areas of the fence were weathered beyond repair, but will be built to the same dimensions. Thls remedial Wâ‚¬Irk Â»hall be performed by Aspen Design Works. b. The approved set of drawings show a smaD 6-8" stone veneeir at the buse of the house. 'lhe oziginal house had a metal flashing at this area because the rubble Stone foundation had settled and may areas were replaced by concrete block. The current detail is a copper flashing that shall be patined and once backfilled and landscaped will reveal approximately +6 inches of the dark patined coppet. To use an apphed stone veneer is not really practical and the patined copper flashing better replicates the condition of the historic house. c, The ctierthi wish to use exleriorscreens asper theoriginal house. The scmens that were saved shall be ze-used and any new screens shall be built tÂ£, exact dimensionE of ihose. 'fhese wood-framed screens shall be installed within the wihdow jambs per standard n=novable screen details. d. All guiters and downspouts shall be painted per the hiStOriC houg. e. Scott Lindenau personally visited the site on February 17th and reviewed thae directives with the owner, and contractor. Scott also measured all of thesiding, trim. comedboaids, Bills, guiters, and other details of concern to verify dimensions. Â£ The new non-historic north elevation stairway dormer was approved with a 10 foot 4 -parte fixed window. Once that window opening was framed, it macie the scale of the stairway uncomfortable with a height of 16 feet That window was then installed as an 8 foot 4-pane window and lowered two feet. g. The window wclls on the east side of the house show a ralling by owner. The ownerm would instead like to addrms this code issue with a metal grating flush with the 6" concrete curb and slone cap- This would be considerably less visible, 6" versus 36". The 2*ietior of the window wells shall be a painted Rtueeo that matches the window well at the carriage house. 5GS n, mill $1. aspen ce 81611 970Â·920Â·9428 :ag 970Â·920Â·7822 Â« 21 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer,Z><35~ RE: 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Isis Theater- amendments to approval DATE: March 10, 1999 The architects for the Isis Theater, Charles Cunniffe Architects, have recently brought forward amendments to the exterior of the free market unit that will be on the roof of the building. The amendments are to add more skylights on the roof, and to add more windows on the west side of the unit. Staff provided the changes to the monitors, who felt it should be referred to the full board. Attached please find a series of drawings that show the proposed new windows and skylights, request approval to make already approved windows on the south elevation floor to ceiling windows, and show where a window is to be deleted from the east side. Locations for light fixtures as well as a cut sheet for a proposed light fixture for the free market unit only are also provided. MEMORANDUM /9 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS /2 610 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, CO 81611 970/925-5590 970/920-4557 FAX ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS TO: Amy Guthrie, HPC FROM: Geoffrey Lester DATE: February 4, 1999 PROJECT: Isis Theater JOB NO.: 9841 REGARDING: Free Market Unit Window and Skylight Additions NOTES: Amy, We've been crossing calls lately, I assume you must be very busy. Our rooftop Free Market Unit Owner has asked us to pursue adding windows on the west side and adding several skylights. The idea of these added windows, which are partially blocked by the parapet, is to capture the western light. We actually lowered the head height of all the doors and windows by 6" and we feel these windows will be rather difficult to perceive from ground level because of the parapet and the Fox Photo building obstructions. The added skylights are toward the north end of the unit and should not be a controversial issue. We would appreciate your thoughts on these items because we would very much like to pursue these added features for our client. Feel free to give me a call to discuss any of these issues. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. -"''"It'' 1-- _-/ '""'"I""- -1- 'I-I~I'"I~7 - 1"'ll~l -J.' - ~ Uijr .-I"""""1,- 1 . E IL_JIL) i F JO Fike j 4 HE] C]Fill J TUJ. i.---- ZIP 4141Qlh f Â«1 *33] -- immi . - - .-il --Il V= 1 - IP?11 '=râ€¢'i=*23 *63 no iNII rd.4 1-LIA Ert rl-4 All Itil En L d p .1 +4-1 1-17 RETE H_L LIZ- Cin DY; -/-O na Lin blig - Ii-*==Â¥==*=4L_1-==m-=r-4-c:~<.8 2- Mic ftlb-R> FlÂ¥â‚¬ *MiAN - il=11 r 1 11 r- -hi if-'~=<11 1 9 reÂ· J -111!11 4=;ED F ~ ~ 11 1 r-,r-, nL----1 0 - 5-1-tinzzlf- -20: p.-z-z-La: 7--2-~: -2--33~--7-t~. wEqr ~ (,irr-1.1=I=i~ ~U-,5~t' i LL -9 r - R~i-~tfed Vr -4 r.-- LJU 1 1 El,a/RnÂ© k -49~ 2 /1 1 1 r:J I Ilt -J 7 .1 Lit 1 , 1- -1-1 AP.0 â‚¬=Pr 1 1 C - : -><r i r : 11 rl FRE We,e~ _ 64 1 UOrr : I M I- 111*111 -1,~ 1.Pr 7-4 l. 1 14#ft i 1.91 r f :T 0 -- .1 n =41 4 1. -/.- : - - 4/1//.1#--bi-/L / 31 11 Imill FOOF 1.aa- 8,008- ft.NJ \(le'l (1-011 1 - D O I r--- 1 1 FWE â‚¬!Aff610 3 6 T Pooee r-'h ~~/111 71-_ f *fllarrs - t. ~cl=Il (=-3 3~ O Â» 7 - 31 11 Imlll ROOF 5.Ackl 4* 1 t 1-0 l' OFtelhjhl- Ela/Mr16,1 1 I I * Wy.li~44i+EL : 1-le-1 1 r 11711Â»dll\lili -. .1-~ 50, 1 - 1 ./1 1 21 -- 1 '1 1/ 1 1/ 1 --- "rd'Ph~ '" '.11~L;2~1~'';i--"~ 2.'.'i' :i;E:~i;1~1111:1~1 1...4 1- -- 2 r.dw.WIN,2 - WL' 119Â«41 9 1 :MI'll:g :~64,91, T 15 A-6,8 ale 4,1 1 1 11*"1.99 lilli, 1.. 1 lilli' 11 19}*Y'3-~~Â»R*jij'LÂ·-:tim~ wegr elev~moÂ© NOT 16 630Â«.e * Elâ‚¬*610 4114 ep ININPOW* 1 R R 1 1 1 1 11 11 11 1 -~ lilli -% |~ i: ~_, - T Ill,Ill,Ill,ill,Ill.11 . 111 - 9 '1111.1 ~1~1~111111~~111'11'~1~111~1~~~ 111~ Â· Â· Â· 1 _â€¢ 1...11 7 1 7 -I L~I E/-J PE**********29 ill-1 1 11,1411 ~~ 1,-:311,111 1.42 1 1,**44 r.12-E ber' 71-an 11,1 APÂ£+ - U+4 /atiÂ«13: ---rls 11 11*=@~ia 11Â» 5 4 -2-GÂ¢Â¢4.-,4-Â»lillill L- - - ---1 lillill . 1 11 -1 _Ii,1,1 .*2 Y.L. -- 7,4 t. 1 6 0 91 1 - m< 816-16 M[LIKE - d -4====f - - - -a- Ililil L..'ll-tz:~~-1 I .!; ti>t. --W...../*...T~ \0â‚¬5-r EEVArlok) MT To Â«Ale MEMORANDUM /4. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ,/1 610 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, CO 81611 970/925-5590 970/920-4557 FAX ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS TO: Amy Guthrie, HPC FROM: Geoffrey Lester DATE: February 12,1999 PROJECT: Isis Theater JOB NO.: 9841 REGARDING: Free Market Unit Window Additions NOTES: Amy, Per our conversation, attached are several exhibits demonstrating the Free Market Unit west facing windows should not be visible from the adjacent street level. Therefor the potential night time illumination issue may be much less significant than previously thought. 14,9 Ffâ‚¬E HMFÂ¥EFF U M\T --~ 6 9 11-111 I w L.=,z.j RK M{616 ~ -.AL*~m~re I lmUUAUAUAMAMAUJGJGima-EXUaRKEEEDGGRKi: .-r -r / / / -Fl R R F.1 llEi- n In / / / / LINe OF ' u 1111111il / 11 -20 3'Ll 212 + -'UILI 22 LIL. i UID LIL]1 -dIE- - .Ill / 1 . 1 ..1 / / .0 - /51/=51 I. I .hilÂ·l i ~ Ffi - I-4-I -0- 1 E 1. Mill 9-reâ‚¬er U*ST F#01166 lA)1 K)00109 CAN FT 00 geâ‚¬Â© 10 1-tf,5 ZONE. 1, [119 : 1((* 1 L |'Dll 0 0 0 12>r fbgr\DA OF: FFEE FIM421- l)UlT 820Jeer[Ne, M&*5 14(9 FNEMer AS V[4113(E FFal 4-mE[ le'VEL- - 1 11 -+ 1 - jv =' -1 U 1 .... 1 14 1 1 1.1-4. 4.1- 1/ + 6 - -- 1 161 -r = I If..1. ! !T i ...1...1 ..........4/"I'll'. 7- 111. .0 -1. 1.1 - I - ~ =- 19~tr#.19#491, .:-LU: 1-- -- 3 1-2 i 1 1 . I. 4111' 44- 1 -4 1 , ...Â«TU ~ -rÂ£.4-1; 4 I - .1 * + 06, %Â»12*1 - 1 ' 1-.VE-- -~p~i~~1;7~7 g -- 1. -122 . t . .=/2 1 - lill *&%1--1-1-~~ ~ "I 1. - - 4 C ll)INDOUÂ» ARe epliwIT el fMAft-r.) 1, 11. 11 MEMORANDUM I. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ,/3 610 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, CO 81611 970/925-5590 970/920-4557 FAX ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS TO: Amy Guthrie, HPC FROM: Geoffrey Lester DATE: March 2, 1999 PROJECT: Isis Theater JOB NO.: 9841 REGARDING: Free Market Unit Window Additions / Light Fixture Locations NOTES: Amy, Attached are the South, East and West Free Market Unit elevations that have been modified by glazing additions or deletions. The primary elevation we are asking approval for is the West side. (Refer to our previously submitted drawings.) Just for the record, we are illustrating the minor revisions to the South and East sides as well. In addition, we are also including the exterior wall sconce locations and catalog cut sheet for your records. Note that the upper hemisphere of this fixture is masked to prevent an upward and outward glow of light. 3 1 4 n 1 1000 6.Â·r Â¢â‚¬Felz -16 â‚¬Heer 2 Ft>12 Ele/knoW eef661 P 0 *1*110 0 Un 00 0 0 C El LIC LE] LE ILIE]112]IE] LE]1 LE [I] 11 0 00 Eff / 1 1 4 41 k .. , 00 ./ i' 1 1 1 1 1 1 SOUTH .-I I. lus to'-64 3.1 99 EXHIBIT- 1 001 NAME OF PROJECT: L 1 b 4 9/ / AJ, 91 -( / g CITY CLERK: STAFF: WITNESSES: (1) (oq off Le 5-134 C (2) 0, a j, (43 2 4 li / /l 4= (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report ( ) (Check if Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice ( ) (Check if Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet ( ) (Check if Applicable) 4 5 MOTION: VOTE: YES NO SUZANNAH REID YES _ NO ~ ROGER MOYER YES 1510 - MARY HIRSCH YES - NO - JEFFREY HALFERTY YES - NO - SUSAN DODINGTON YES - NO _kr-- GILBERT SANCHEZ YES - NO - HEIDI FRIEDLAND YES 2 NO_ MAUREEN MACDONALD YES - NO - LISA MARKALUNAS YES -k'*0 _ CHRISTIE KIENAST YES kf'NO - //<-MOD Ul/NQ11*15 UGHT /1 Figrcle Â·~ f - R 1 1 rf-- . t-r_ i ' iwt:=p-1*,--4.- 1/, 1 , ' .77777"..,..i,, ,,,~~~.~~~~, ~~~~~~~~~Â£~~.~~;~f ~'~'i~''i'~'~i'''ii,i,'i,'i'',i'','''i''i'''i' 74*BLE,2~:1:~:,:~47.MB =:'t:13::IX |./. || 1 t'''''''Â·'''Â·'Â·'Â·'.....'.,.i......' .'/'~~~~~ ~~~~~ 11.1 11. 11111 1111111111111111111111 1111111111111,1111111,11 -- I.I 2, Â·â‚¬:22-' 625* i!-0 ,Â· -d; % ' & 09 4 1 -1 ~18-1 (7: '|Acift -2 4 ~5----*~9=4~13 - 4.,~. - 217Ptil#'.--.id i 22'223-'*2'--'id&7 p /&/-. -4-4-11,11- ~ i -----il F. ' I ->-50-6-124 L.ti<:--,-4'Ze.34 ril I=*' - 02-2-4.Â¢t'~L~114- --rÂ· I fl---41-., i':,1->il--' ;-1~ IÂ»051 * 3.1Â· 99 0 /4., 0 LJ 2 2 6 3 (1 0\ 34 70 ~ e-~ c Lkkr F ROCE[3) Ull Al(Â»8 5 AL/3 I 7 461Â·11- /-16 F:IrrdFGÂ· \ 1 ~~==u~ R R .:... jill Ill 111 1 1 r.r....111.1111.- ,-~-L_-r--Ilr45*11[Â·IYE<(Mi ' ' I~~0~. I. ~KE, 11**t. *- -66Â»46=E *it:,-Â·i,JRKH'14Ecl--I~~~~-- r'Â·US" I'-24*12- 240-/R~/Ti : M= Â£ 1 - I.... - - ------ #===nx=-G-A--Al '1 --- 1 INV51 T. 3.1 Â· 91 FFâ‚¬E MAteÂ¥er uN IT erre@(de- UCACT Fi>Cliffe ...,Â«%& 6 (1 u PlhMerge-) . Bi : 10 1 1111 11, 4 4 4''il , 41 -' 1 4 1 VII = - i Il. 1.. 1 1 .ic =1 1-EL*... T -2- -011 9-~1-1~1: 2-1111 4- 1 - 1 L 1 - 111 - +4 -- .|||||||,6 -- I':. i . - EWE+i--IMA ' 1 '21 1.1.4 + 1# +12 Â¥E I - 'k- - 1 - 11 -1 11 .,+ v<_1, 44./6.1'j .j -Jr Â¢ = 2 . - =4- 11111>~Â£ 1/ 1 1% -1 '1.6 '-= = = I :11 t ~J-(/IlÂ« - 44/**1111~1, fair - - - V -JI I. 4 Â· 141 1 - ' # 14 ~- 41 -_ - 11"I-F~ ~~/# 4 44 .10 -3 11,4 =*3111 1, 1 El 1 -+ â„¢.1,1,1 '1 - aniall],1 I - 1 =.1.1.11111'11 i0mwai -'k' 2- 9. r' 204- ..~-1.rl-1-F , IIi - Â¥~- + . -I %41 + -1 4 + Â·tal ..!m~0'F'= 1 4-1'W-11 . 1 1 1- i \ -1 ~ -11 Â£ 2% 2 I mic I 2 % #' :2 , 4= i ./21 7 14 LI I.4:lilli . lilli 111 I -- - 1 4 11 4 -dll 4 1 & I ,41' I 1 01 1- - .,!!11 +=fF- 3Mfi - 1.9 9- ili 4 :le. 1 "ir :n.11:P -1,911 - 14- i -mil I r .14 .: - I'l - 4 - - gule, t# '1 4 -4 - /1 - '' ~- 1, - 1/,g5-2 -~42--ltâ‚¬*-* = ....*37Â» 4 .1 G I -~ --19716*T~xy##Im/4#6'45#13-3,110 1 f lili 2,6 +1 t'll/i + -9 -2-4 1 f 1 - ..A 4 1- I. -' 1- - F I --1 ..111 1 â‚¬ ..1.1~1111, 11~* = 1.1 1 %. -I+t, I' 111-1 'E,111 Ir - --1 Â¢ 141*2-11 4 - *:j i -4, -- 1 4 --1~1111'. - - 3 1,1 4 9 -jlk' ff' L I e '144 - 1 + 1, I ,+ lili + Â·42. 7- 4 , 11r _ - fl 12-j-- 2 2-44)1 /7 10,4 Ar . Â¥ 15 - = 3?4-** - -12~z-Â« ' - i \ L 4 11 11'I'N,1~11~ Â·21*c' 1-4 211 ip i *4 . , 18 ' .1 1 0 - 7 9 -+ - - ./. i i 1 .... 5/ 6 - Â«262 J. 14". --'%1i.... I'll 1 - k ..1 -1 % . 4;-61*.,92Â· 73* r .Â£,7,-/ 4/39 El. x./r.~2 9 1 1 te'lÂ».2- 1 -Th 4/ 32 "*Jrr~ -1 1-'4I '1 ''lilli* . , .' *F--r. -- - i hil 12$ 1 11 1 1-1 iii *â€¢420. 4,4 . 1/642 2 * 3~ 3 mR=il- 1 If ' 1 9 111- 229. - 1/ 1,/til .... - .. .25*.1 5- b * 149 2-fr .-- F '94 . .L . p tri I .1.7-/2..1 9 1 -c.. , ..:!:./ 6.JM: ~ 66, Seattle, Washington ~ k.jko[ 4-zill & (Ceiling. Desic,r-Â·Â· lk' 1/C Colors. Silver, Black & White Installation A heavy gauge precision clie cast hemispherical liuikilt'lid shaped Wall or ceiling mounted directly to the finished surface over a standard recessed 4" octagonal Iunction box. HID ballasts Lumin:lire housing with irllegr:111\ 111(91(-led cross }lilit- tace gu:ircl. are remotely mounted and installed in a NEMA wet location enclosure provided by others. Electrical: Fabric.tled flom Clie cusl alunlitium continue)LI.* se.tled with a CF versions are provided standard with one integral 120 or 277 V, encapsulated ballast. HID versions are provided with neoprene gasket. The diffuser is 9 4 6 1" "F" Can Style Ballast 1 20/277V for remote mounting. , Refer to technical data sheets for further details. J UN formed of vandal resistant high LampsÂ· Max: 1 /60*/Inc. (Asymmetric) Max: 1 /75W/Inc. (Symmetric) --~ impact I TV stabilized pol>-car- Max: l/18W/CFQ Max: 1/7OW/MH/HPS For lamp specification see section 12.01. LampholderÂ· 94-~ 1 bonate. Finished in a durable Incandescent and HID: Medium Base Pulse Rated baked on polvester enamel. Fluorescent G24d-2 Labels. cUL, Wet Location 1 5' A, ailable with half masked face Co,0,09 mousing I Foce Guaic guard with asymmetric retlector for downlighting. or symmetric Number SIlver White Block ams Base Dismoution Ditivir SKT-,07.- !26 +100 , 0 [ -102 1/75*/Inc Mediwin Svm.efric DO. reflector with clear or op:11 diffuser for general illumination. 5<7Â·108/122 r,JC -,31 +132 '/6014/Inc ./.dium .Asymmelic C ear 26 -100 - 0 -102 1,18*/CFC,720/NPF G)4dÂ·2 Symmetric Opal ~~ 1 30 -i 3 + 32 1/18*/CRL/120 NPC 32Â»-2 L>ymme.~c Zes bA:- Ze, k -:vL +101 -102 1/18\N/CFQ/277Â·+PF 32402 Symmeinc Al SKT-:29,/-20 - 30 -131 +,32 '118W/CPQ/277 -IPE G2,ld-2 Asymmefric Jeer SKT-1:0/126 +,00 -101 .102 ' /70*/BAH i.% lum ...rneÂ·ric 'Jool louis SKT- 1 1 1, 26 400 401 -]02 /70*/.Â·Â·/,F Vied: Jm Symrreiric Orsc pouisen 1o m milim:, / 1 1 1 1 2 2 5 1 3 1 1 1 1 4 B 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 B 1 1 1 1 w w w w w -- UGHT FIXTUFâ‚¬ Illill'111 I'lilli 1 1 1111,11'1~'L '- =41 \ 1 1 1 , DI \1 11 11 /.\ 1-- . - -:--- r.t \ 1 // - 29**- I Y, 11 1 1 4-- 1\1 ~, - T f Norr,6,1,lu C 01 \ 03 l 0 ~ GWN 4 6.2-91 eouTH 2. l'% tolD" - 2 - FefagÂ· 1-0 9Â¢016ETT 4 Pts. 611,41(QJ eeÂ·(600 i --~ p30** L'/Z@I-43= :::EU- FNNN*c- E---E- 4-----Â· 3 '22 -13' -2-3 --- IMM/Blpir- E 3- -r -\ - 1 1 11 11. 11 1 4/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-==E~ il g _ziz_---3441-1 1-4- - - i Dgi .*EF 2: r>Em=maaaam==maaaama : I '1, 31 I 1 I \11 __L__1__L__1___L__L__1___~~*~~~~~~~~~unIE~~~ri~~~ E-~55-2.. 11-2-Zi' 4 t-ZE ~, 4:2~=~F+UCE-' 4= Mi~3 F.TR%*112 d.-I-- 32-GIÂ¥-_3 "808 ~41.tkfitÂ«J--- 2-- "I'll'll'll'll'll'~11'1'1'IMM'll1111111IHIN m ~ ~Im ~ n uiN m ~ ~I ' WEL' I ' LE' 11112,1' 1 '112" '1212' 111!L' 1112' 121!L" LEE' 11221 ' 12[2,1 ' I '2El i 112E" '22" '2 2' i 'LE' 11112' I '12 ' 1 I LLE! 11291!1 1 111 u l ~L! 11 llE ' 1 ELE " ELE " """"""""""""""""1"""1""'1" ' 1111111111111111111111 1 1111111 111 ----Ill-I---- 4/ rABIRI 26 4..J.zÂ»- - - L 'TE 1- 11-Z ZE= --Â·r <EJ-ET-5-~ --1-1-e---~6 5.2. lot 6 10:09 - i'i, Inâ€ž,--â€žâ€ž â€ž,-â€ž imilip, DIGH-r F Vel-URE 1111111 1..~ - 1 1 1-1 1 -\ \ /1 I 1 . 5 i i E-p 111 1111111 PELEreD Â£*te 'Al<NCD'Al @Err 4.1. 99 It (61/h -