The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19990324AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION March 24, 1999 REGULAR MEETING- 5:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 I. Roll call and approval of March 10, 1999 minutes II. PUBLIC COMMENTS III. COMMISSIONER AND STAFFCOMMENTS IV. Disclosure of conglict of interest (actual and apparent) 9 + M b n irbi i Aj fl Ul) 1 *0 V. BUSINESS 5:05 A. 134 W. Hopkins, Budinger-Variances, Public Hearing (Continue to April 14th) 197, ujÂ» 6/ /6 vi 5:10 IS B. 424 E. Cooper Ave. Mountains and Streams - Minor Development 1~4*lkÂ¢1.j_ al,0(1(-5.0-Â«i, Pt/c,<.7 YULL,oc-- 3 1 * 4 4 a ts ' â‚¬r- J L L.C ca S L,-4 5:15 dâ‚¬VEL 135 W. Hopkins, Conceptual Development & Variances L~ f t,\04 6:15 / d Dâ‚¬ 5 234 W. Francis (Mulligs) Remediation Plan Ek y YA, F.)11 5 IkE 1 62--h-f bli<LeÂ£--i~/ k~-h 1 ctâ€žj- - 7:00 E. Project Monitoring - discussion item 7:15 F. Workprogram discussion 7:20 G. ADJOURN REMINDER: Special HPC meeting April 7th 5:00 p.m. - DEPP PROJECT MONITORING 4 jo ki'riAn Roger Moyer . 406 E. Hop s - ISIS 514 N. First - Ringsby 920 E. Hyman - Veronika, Inc. Susan Dodington 712 W. Francis - Hughes 811 Meadows Road -Tennis Townhomes 234 W. Francis - Mullins Suzannah Reid 702 W. Main, Pearson 414 N. First - (POLE) 406 E. Hopkins ISIS 117 N. 6th St. - Coulter Mary Hirsch 811 Meadows, Trustee and Tennis townhomes 420 W. Francis Street Halperin - 920 W. Hallam Guthrie 9 30 0 n S Filbert Sanchez 414 N. First (POLE) 232 E. Hallam St. - pace Jeffrey Halferty 234 W. Francis, Mullin 414 N. First (POLE) 101- 105 E. Hallam (not active) 920 W. Hallam - Guthrie 240 Lake Ave. - Greenberg Heidi Friedland 420 W. Francis Street - Halperin 712 W. Francis Street - Hughes 514 N. First - Ringsby 232 E. Hallam St. - Pace 117 N. 6th St. - Coulter Lisa Markalunas 520 Walnut Street - Greenwood ~hristie Kienast 520 Walnut Street - Greenwood Maureen 4*Donald 920 E. Hyman - Veronika Inc. Mci)414 CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: 834 W. Hallam (Poppie's), expires April 26, 1999 123 W. Francis, Lot B (Vickery), expires May 13,1999 214 E. Bleeker Street (Greenwood), expires August 12, 1999 920 W. Hallam Street, expires August 12, 1999 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS 1999 1. 117 N. 6th ST. Coulter 2. 920 E. Hyman Ave. Lot N. Block 32 3. 435 W. Main St. Lot A-I, Block 38 4. 930 King St. 5. 920 E. Hyman 6. 735 W. Bleeker 7. 234 W. Francis 8. 205 S. Mill 210 S. Galena 10. ISIS 406 E. Hopkins 11. 234 W. Francis 12. 234 W. Francis 3 MEMORANDUM 122=J TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 424 E. Cooper Ave.- minor DATE: March 24, 1999 SUMMARY: The applicant, Mountains and Streams, requests approval to add another door into their shop, to enter from Cooper Avenue. The subject building is not historic but is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Mountains and Streams, represented by Kevin Heinecken. LOCATION: 424 E. Cooper Avenue. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The applicant requests HPC approval to add a double door to the East Cooper Avenue side of the existing store, which is in the building where Kemosabe is located. Staff has no issue with the new entry door. I . 64/1 LL li- /Â« 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The changes proposed will not have a significant impact on the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the historic significance of any building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the new entry doors for 424 E. Cooper Avenue as proposed." Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated March 24, 1999. B. Application. C. Resolution No. , Series of 1999. r==a APPLICANT: Mountains and Streams, represented by Kevin Heinecken 1--I LOCATION: 424 E. Cooper ACTION: Minor Review All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet allfour Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than ' would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to - Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Standard 2: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. <EXHIBIT 1 -ft Lt / 7 1/ FrAT -4 94 of \ . 1 47 Y : 1 4 I li ': r, , . 1 -1- 11 '. .1 --Â£1, .mi'..1... ... . 1, , 4 '.4 4 1. 1 , ... .. 1.194 .. YP E *. ' ' PW 1~~~T7epjÂ·A. ~V... r. , -,21-4. . '.. .11 - '1 e.. 4- f. - 24 1-2 2 17'4 :142â€¢ 4. Wiâ‚¬S~#d Â¢*~3~ ~***li/"-Ari'01.~~f *4 :lit//Al -4- 1 r 'k- ,\ Â·Â·* 1. *,~ }Ei, . I Â¥ 42 ' 'w,4. - . 2 #i# 4 - 1-i.1 **D ~Il~Af. 23:1 1 Â« . 9.56 ~. * 1 -3 i . 0 4. 2,71 ,-1 P. m. 7;'f-v,t *03 â€¢lifM /4/IRM'llika#/V# I. At: 3 -35-*' 1'-' 'flt ~ .&2 . 1 .1 411 ' 4 6"1 4 ~A t /1.J: I Mil F. ' - b :,1 . 1- 1, ..Ilt:, i . . mip *le= 111 4 0 t:U '15-:9-01302â‚¬'/6 2 . 8*15 , ' 1 5 1- â€¢'Â·â€¢.em,IA~pia~~ 0~ 4 4., *4 i - 1 ./. :1'.:1.1.- - 4*.0.- ~ 4 4- .'1Â·~1' 11 Â· 44#EVEFA-I,la#HIWL ,= I ' i ' . 'F .8. ...2.24 Â· U ly.4 1..:Â·2 2.Ri%EE=-pg---~-a.4-6-1--hz.b.#.- - *Â§ 8Â§*SM@Â§**i#Â§ Â§Â§3Â§%Â§9%&59#2&Â§98 92 9@**9** 2@g;*3*E @Â§ Â§Â§@@ -- @Â§Â§Â§{Â§Â§Â§}M@ *Â§Â§Â§3Â§*Â§9 1# Â§* @22Â§-1# al ~*@ Â§9@@* gi ** AE@Â§*Â¤Â§*M @3Â§ r I . 91 g*33*3Â§32Â§Â§Â§Â§922298 8& 88Â§Â§85 8 84&@23Â§283 8 3188 313 8288 (noocno O 00 -4 4 N 4 1 .. , 2 I 510%181818}818}83}814%81*8ig gly h.gg gabl.g h g,g g git :t& 89& 8 92 8%81 %4815 81# WgEM I ./ . %, ..r go#*8181EttlegEME521Â¢WidESNO&'12Â§2WWAE.%58156%.huggrER}EWIN:88850:018 502Â§88Â§Â§@M@ 21Â§ Â§Â§Â§ Â§8 81Â§ Â§Â§38 6} S Â§23 31 8-B *g -Â§Â§@Â§Â§Â§@8Â§~Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§# #01 V o O,000 N wa) * W60=N= CAWC) - 01 N O, W C) Cn N W N Crl U, Crt N 01 W C) ' Crl 4 Dz vertical Sz Vertic~60 Aspect left Aspect Aspect right Slope Max Slope Avg Wi Area Above Â»~Iriaw 02:..=â€¢-51*,et 164.% 11 j N , * 0 . 4 i i .1.0.:1*404+ *mi . 13Â« 4%1 1 % 1--3 r .; 4. r..4,1 4 Â·. 9 & . 0 4 - 9--1 i"13..F'fte- 1- 4: . -1 '2~*Â·1~79/ % / . .â‚¬*4*~191. 7 . " ...: ' M f ''74'r I. I Â£ Fri 2,4<,1 1 . I -, Â¢;4 " )9.4.:.:5~~ . ..... - 61*ft ."& It. ':lie.,2. r ' i .. : 4 ... i 4%- : fIÂ·.aÂ·'Mi 4 . i i .1 1 3.1 19 . AA ./**M*A. Ill ./- 01*,Â» t . 1 -66*- - -' r.y, . , . '01Â·Â·Â·Â·'-4 4> Path Number Path Name Zone Elevation Bottom elevation Vertical Max Vertical 91 UPPER HYDE PARK Temerity 11720 11440 280 92 HYDE PARK Temerity 11240 10920 320 92.5 CANOPY CRUISER Temerity 10860 10000 860 93 MUSHROOM LEFT Temerity 11650 10660 990 94 MUSHROOM CENTER Temerity 11620 10660 960 95 MUSHROOM RIGHT Temerity 11620 10660 960 96 NOT SO LUCKY Temerity 11580 11240 340 97 LUCKY FIND Temerity 11530 11170 360 97.5 POWER LINE Temerity 11170 9800 1370 98.3 SO. CASTLE THERMAL Temerity 11160 10920 240 2810 98.5 SOUTH CASTLE CHUTE Temerity 11000 10160 840 2650 99 SOUTH CASTLE PODS Temerity 11000 10250 750 2650 100 A PLUS Temerity 11520 10700 820 101 FAR WOODS Steeplechase 11540 11000 540 102 JR'S Steeplechase 11560 11000 560 103 KESSLER BOWL Steeplechase 11480 10900 580 3130 104 MONUMENT HILL Steeplechase 11480 11360 120 105 MIKA'S Steeplechase 11360 11000 360 3010 106 SIMPSON'S Steeplechase 11320 11000 320 107 LITTLE GERONIMO Steeplechase 11340 10920 420 2990 108 UPR SNYDER'S RIDGE Steeplechase 11480 11360 120 109 UPR SNYDER'S GULLY Steeplechase 11470 11320 150 110 SNYDER'S GULLY Steeplechase 11320 10600 720 2970 111 THE NOSE Steeplechase 11280 10600 680 2930 112 THE POD Steeplechase 10975 10600 375 113 SODDBUSTER Steeplechase 11400 10600 800 3050 114 SUNNY SODDBUSTER Steeplechase 11080 10600 480 115 HARDLY EVER Steeplechase 11080 10850 230 116 SHEPARD'S Steeplechase 10850 10600 250 117 HOT ROCKS Steeplechase 10800 10580 220 118 GLADE CHUTE Steeplechase 11360 10840 520 3010 119 GARMISCH Steeplechase 11300 10840 460 2950 120 MIDDLE GARMISCH Steeplechase 10840 10540 300 2490 .. 121 THE WINDOW Steeplechase 10800 10680 120 122 GARMISCH BANK Steeplechase 10680 10520 160 123 GRABBUSH -Steeplechase 11240 10900 340 124 ST. MORITZ Steeplechase 10960 10500 460 2610 125 PORK CHOP HILL Steeplechase 10680 10470 Â· 210 126 FAR OUT Steeplechase 10840 10680 160 127 FURTHER OUT Steeplechase 10760 10600 160 128 LAST CALL Steeplechase 10620 10440 180 129 LOGJAM BANK Steeplechase 10465 10430 35 130 BOOMERANG GULLY Steeplechase 10720 10420 300 131 BOOMERANG WOODS Steeplechase 10620 10320 300 150 SOUTH CASTLE BOWL Steeplechase 10820 8550 2270 2470 151 ONE-FIFTY-ONE Steeplechase 10820 10120 700 2470 152 GRAND ENTRANCE Deep Steeple 10680 10080 600 227.1 NO NAME ONE No Name 11200 9400 1800 2850 227.2 NO NAME TWO No Name 11200 9400 1800 2850 227.25 NO NAME TWO AND A HALF No Name 11200 9400 1800 2850 227.3 NO NAME THREE No Name 11160 9400 1760 2810 228 HEAVENS No Name 11000 9400 1600 2650 229 SNAGGLEPUSS No Name 11000 9400 1600 2650 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Projed name J. f 0 04 ;07)1- r AK Â¢ 5 riz- e.4-m S /85-,41 a D eit 2. Project location 49 4 gr; 0-00 feL A )2 ; i Sll { 715 10 1 (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 4. Lot size 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 73 W O (XO4 & 4 14 E (ionfam A-0 e. ; foo | 1 ASFEd Co g ibl I 9 2 0- 3-528,0 K(-- 13/0 t-(st-HE-q-/010 6. .Representative's name, address, and phone number 1 -- S-31 S. -2,juD STÂ· c 64140'NDAUT, 10 SIG-63 379- 423 7 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD ~ Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliVLot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) 1 9. Description of development application 13 Aksr-N#QT b o 4 8 c.jE FI/LE 011-1- h o d L 0 15 20 6 P EL MALL 3 j DE of- 3 FACE. 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment-2=-DimerlsiD-nahegirementsÂ·form- Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4 56, ~ol 6 .II 0 Â«polt gluat o u alia LA-1 i u Ul.0'Af Acov i 1111111'llmIll lilli lllllllllll ||||| ||||||l:00F lllllllllll lilli 11111111111 lilli RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 424 E. COOPER AVENUE, MOUNTAINS AND STREAMS, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 1999 WHEREAS, the applicant, Mountains and Streams, represented by Kevin Heinecken, has requested minor development approval to install new double doors at the property located at 424 E. Cooper Avenue. The property is located within the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and 0 WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated March 24, 1999, recommended approval without conditions, and 844 clo (4 0 0 WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on March 24, 1999, the Commission considered and approved the application without conditions by a vote of to . -- I- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development approval for Mountains and Streams, at 205 S. Mill Street, Aspen, Colorado, be approved as shown on March 24,1999, without conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 24th day of March, 1999. Approved as to Form: City Attorney mSTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Chairman ATTEST: Chief Deputy Clerk 0 - tl - r' 9 MEMORANDUM 4-8 7 1 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 135 W. Hopkins Avenue- Landmark Designation, Conceptual, Partial Demolition, Temporary Relocation, Variances, Residential Design Review-Public Hearing DATE: March 24, 1999 SUMMARY: HPC has reviewed this property in two previous worksessions. The applicant requests landmark designation, conceptual approval, partial demolition, temporary relocation, variances, and "Residential Design Review." Staff recommends the application be continued to address areas of concern with the proposal. APPLICANT: John Key, represented by Gretchen Greenwood. LOCATION: 135 W. Hopkins, Lot A and the west 22.5 feet of Lot B, City and Townsite of Aspen. R.-6 zone district. LANDMARK DESIGNATION A.Historical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or event of historical significance to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. Response: This standard is not met. B.Architectural Intportance. The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character, or the structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type (based on building form or use), or specimen. Response: This structure is a good example of the traditional Aspen miner's cottage, built in the late 1800's. The historic form of the building is intact, including a gambrel type roof which appears to have been added in the early part ofthis century. 1 1306,64 A C. Designer. The structure is a significant work of an architect or designer whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Response: This standard is not met. D.Neighborhood Character. The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: The structure is part of the Shadow Mountain neighborhood. Miner's cottages still exist on all corners opposite this house, making its preservation especially important to the character of that area. E.Communio; Character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: The majority of Aspen's historic resources are Victorian era homes. These resources contribute significantly to the town character by representing, through architecture, the lifestyle, values, economics, technology, and aesthetics of an important period in Aspen's development. The house at 135 W. Hopkins is part of that historical record and its preservation therefore has important value to the community. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) PROJECT SU1MMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District and all development involving historic landmarks must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2 Response: The proposal involves restoration of the existing house, lifting it temporarily to add a basement, construction of an addition on the east side of the house and to the rear of it. A non-historic shed is to be demolished. The following variances are requested for the project as proposed: a 300 square foot floor area bonus, a 5% site coverage variance, a 4'10" rear yard setback variance, a 17'10" combined front and rear yard setback variance, west side yard setback of 6'6" for the historic house, and a combined side yard setback variance of 7'0" for the historic house. Site Plan No trees will be removed or relocated as part of this proposal. The new addition is set towards the back of the house, with the exception of an area proposed to be added on the east side of the old house. Staff' s only concern with the site plan is that a sidewalk is shown leading to a new entry on the west side of the house and no walk is shown at the front door. This is not the case on the floor plan, but it should be clear that other entries into the building should be treated as secondary to the original means of entering the house. Old House The house will need some significant restoration work and the applicant's effort to do so is appreciated. The applicant proposes to remove the board and batten and asphalt shingle siding from the house. If the original clapboards are still underneath, they will be salvaged if possible. Otherwise, new clapboards will be added. The existing bay windows on the north and west sides of the building are to be restored and repaired as needed. A bay on the east is to be reused on the addition to the old house. A new roof asphalt shingle roof and new flashing are to be installed. The existing brick chimneys are to be "removed and restored to their original location on the building." Clarification is needed as to what this means. The fascia boards will be salvaged where possible. The same should be true for any original trim which is found under the existing siding. The iron grillwork which has replaced the original porch posts is to be removed. Replacement materials (posts and brackets) will need HPC approval. No railing should be added as shown because it is not a typical original detail for these houses. The single window on the south fa~ade attheporch should not be replaced with a pair of double hungs as shown on the plans. Once under construction, it must be determined whether the house had two front doors, as most of the miner's cottages did, and if so both doors must be put back in place. 3 The applicant suggests that the removal of non-historic materials, particularly siding, will take place prior to the temporary relocation of the house. Staff recommends that this be delayed until after the building is placed on its new foundation. In terms of design, staff is concerned with a few elements of the proposal. The first is the proposed kitchen addition. The architect has placed living, dining, and kitchen functions into the historic house. These three functions might fit well into the old house if the rooms were defined as they were historically rather than as an open floor plan. It appears that a significant amount of the original house is used for circulation, so that an addition is required. While an addition like the one proposed is not incompatible with the house, it does change the character and massing of the old building and does encroach more towards the front of the structure than HPC has typically allowed. Staff also has concerns with the re-use of the east bay window on the new addition, since this confuses the age of the new construction. Also in regard to the use of the existing building, it is staff's understanding that there is currently upper floor living space. It appears that this is to be eliminated and the old house will have a vaulted ceiling. This wastes an opportunity to accommodate some of the needed space within the existing form of the house. All three of the upper story windows on the west faGade are shown as removed on the new plans. The floor to ceiling windows and full light glass doors proposed on the east side of the house are not in character with the detailing of the rest of that building. The entry that is added on the west side ofthe old house is placed within a historic portion ofthe building, so it should not be treated in a modern way, with clerestory windows. More importantly, the historic porch which existed on the west side of the house in this area should be retained and restored. Finally, staff is not in support of the brick chimney mass proposed to be added on the west side of the old house. The existing chimneys should be utilized if possible, or a metal flue through the roof should be added. The west side of the house is an important and very visible elevation of the building. It is being restored and no new non-historic elements should be added to it. Additionally, code requirements for new masonry fireplaces make them out of scale with the way chimneys were sized historically, so staff finds them incompatible with the historic architecture. New Addition The placement and general character of the new addition is acceptable, however there are some areas of concern with the design. The long roofline which faces north helps to bring the height of the addition down to the plate height of the historic structure where the old house and new addition are closest together. This is effective, however the space that is created on the second floor in that area is unusable (there is not sufficient head height) therefore staff would prefer to see that roof area eliminated, to reduce the overall bulk of the addition. 4 The house is being designed for the use of two families. While the use is not HPC's concern per se, there are certain elements that are apparently needed for this function which HPC may see as problematic. There are two major staircases in the house to allow each family to access their space, which is not a significant issue. However, there is also an exterior staircase to allow access to a hot tub and roof deck from the outside of the building. Staff finds this element, which is visible to the street, not architecturally compatible with the house, which is also true ofthe flat roofed structure where the hot tub sits. All vents, exterior light fixtures, and a landscape plan will require HPC approval when designed. PARTIAL DEMOLITION 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Response: The demolition to occur is the removal of a portion of the east wall for the new kitchen addition, the removal of a lean-to porch on the west side towards the rear of the building, and the total demolition ofthe sheds. Staff is not concerned with the sheds, which are not historic construction. Issues with the other demolition were raised above. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: a. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. Response: This issue is addressed under the conceptual review standards. b. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: This issue is addressed under the conceptual review standards. TEMPORARY RELOCATION 1. Standard: The structure has been demonstrated to be capable ofwithstanding the physical impacts ofthe relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. 5 Response: A specific plan, stating how the building will be braced and how it will be supported will be needed before building permit. This plan may be prepared by the housemover and architect. 2. Standard: A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. Response: Said plan and security shall be a condition of final approval. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS The project is in compliance with the design standards, with the exception of a window on the east elevation and the transoms over the new doors on the east elevation. Generally speaking, the regulation regarding "volume" was meant to prevent large windows which carried from the first floor through the second, creating the appearance of large vaulted spaces and a poor relationship to pedestrian scale. STAFF SUMMARY AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends the application be continued to address areas of concern with the proposal. If the applicant desires, the HPC may make a recommendation on landmark designation so that process may move forward at Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated March 24, 1999. B. Conceptual Application. 6 Fx~'s"B7 13-2 9-99 1 APPLICANT: John Key (represented by Gretchen Greenwood) LOCATION: 135 W. Hopkins ACTION: Conceptual, Landmark Designation, Partial Demolition, Temporary Relocation, Variances, Residential Design Review Significant Development Conceptual All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet aUfour Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Standard 1: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Standard 2: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Standard 3: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Standard 4: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Landmark Designation To be eligible for landmark designation, a structure or site must meet two (2) or more of the five (5) standards contained in Section 26.76.020 of the Municipal Code. It is not the intention of HPC to landmark insignificant structures or sites. HPC will focus on those which are unique or have some special value to the community. Hivtorical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or event of historical significance to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. Architectural Importance: The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct, or of traditional Aspen character, or the structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type (based on building form or use), or specimen. Designer: The structure is a significant work of an architect or designer whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. I .. PARTIAL DEMOLITION Standards of review for partial demolition. No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the HPC finds that aU of the following standards are met: (Note: "Partial demolition" shall mean the razing of a portion of any structure on an inventoried parcel or the total razing of any structure on an inventoried parcel which does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel). Standard 1: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration, or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Standard 2: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: A. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. B. Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. ON-SITE RELOCATION Standards for review of on-site relocation: No approval for an on-site relocation shall be granted unless the HPC finds that the following standards have been met: The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure, and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation, and The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation, and A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting of a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. . OFF-SITE RELOCATION Off-site relocation shall not be granted unless all of the following standards have been met: The structure cannot be rehabilitated or reused on its original site to provide for any reasonable use of the property, and The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure, and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation, and The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation, and A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation, and repair Of required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation, and The receiving site is compatible in nature to the structure or structures proposed to be moved, the character of the neighborhood is consistent with the architectural integrity of theÂ·structure, and the relocation of the historic structure would not diminish the integrity or the character of the neighborhood of the receiving site. An acceptable letter from the property owner of the receiving site shall be submitted. EXHIBITIE 1=1 ~ 3-,4 4,99 March 12, I999 Ms. Amy Guthrie Historic Preservation Officer 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Ms. Guthrie, Gretchen Greenwood of Gretchen Greenwood and Associates, Architects is authorized to act onbehalf ofthe owners Dana Caridi and John Key. The office ofthe Architect is 520 Walnut Street, Aspen Colorado, 970-925-4502. Please direct any questions you may have regarding this application to her. Sincerely, 23* H John Key County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATION State of Colorado } SECTION 26.52.060 (E) I. 0 1/tc 4/ /1 0 A 'C /1-l L te O,1 , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U. S. Mail to all owners of property with three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the /3 day 199_7(which is 4/ days prior to the public hearing date o f jitutik. 4-9, 8 79 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the /31>~ day of,/4%/lk , 199~ (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph ofthe posted sign is attached hereto. , 2 -3 1-~---- SigrfaCre - czEL--Â·0' 1 0} TH - Signed before me this L / day M A Rt-.4 ,199?by ~7111Ht{[{1: afÂ· , 4, rettilâ‚¬ A C,fee-/(-lÂ©Oc~ : k WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Â·Â·4.. 8 My commission expires: /--7 4--2:ze,7 Â«DO A. l-Â» p,uc Noncâ€¢ 4 Ill m Z *1 -LU tiv 92 Notary Public / -. /*Pue'A I - 4 Notary Public's Signature / 68:Â·./.--*..4.'On . ... 0 47' . ./4 . I ., . .4 - .. - J>.................. <, - A'E OF Cd, - , 09:ts . PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 135 WEST HOPKINS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, March 24,1999, ara meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen Hisroric Preservation Commission in the Sister Cities meeting room, basement of City Hall, 130 S. Gatena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by John Key requesting approval for conceptual design. The property is located at 135 West Hopkins, and is described as Lot A and a portion of Lot B, Block 60, City Imd Townsite of Aspen. The application is to restore and add onto the existing house. and includes the following variances: floor area bonus of 500 square ket, site coverage variance of 5% or to 2,480 square feet west side yard setback of 6.5' for historic house only, combined side yard setback variance.of 7' for the historic residence, rear yard setback of 5' and combined front and rear yard setback variance of 18'. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Asped Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@ciaspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on March 6,1999. City of Aspen Account 1 Â¤-1 Fl 2 1 1 1 4 ~-T- 1 1 1 E #- - - r F 1 AL~- 1 1 . 1 j 1 i 1 1 1 : i 1 1 1111 1#H IKÂ«--- --*--F--- -- - ---1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 4 1 1 It 1 f i $1 1- 1 ' I i 1 1 1 1 1 l\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 !'1 ----1 4 ~~I F En t 1~12'fi tr~ti 1- ---1-1-1 .lilli t It 11 1 1 4 L--21 11 1 1 1.-1 ll' 1 l--9 1 1 1 1 i r ~11 / 1 1 i Itt E----- 1--- 7------]---- ----i --- ------ - -- --1 1 f ---7---1 -- - 1 -1 1 -1 - \ \ - ~-~ ---------------~-----------------------1 \ 2 /// -; 3O ANDRES RUTH ODONNELL KEYJOHN CRAWFORD THOMAS 8 JR 4400 VERSAILLES 6476 MIMOSA LN PO BOX 8110 DALLAS, TX 75205 DALLAS, TX 75230 HORSESHOE BAY, TX 28654 TIPTON JOHN KTRUST NUMBER ONE MARKUE JUDY STRAUCH ELAINE B 1/2 C/O POOL JUDY 4327 S YOSEMITE CT 6477 E MANOR DR 10 MEADOWVIEW LN ENGLEWOOD. CO 80110 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 LITnETON, CO 80121 BERNSTEIN POLLY A NICHOLSON WIU F JR & SHIRLEY B CO STRAZZ LEWIS BRETT H 37 POLO CLUB CIR 548 FRANKUN ST 1271 LAFAYErrE DENVER, CO 80209 DENVER, CO 80218 DENVER, CO 80218 MUUINS MARGARET ANN CHISHOLM EDITH 1/2 INT MELTON DAVID 1909 FOREST PKWY 205 WMAIN ST 135 W MAIN ST DENVER. CO 80220 ASPEN, CO 81811 ASPEN, CO 81611 KAUFMAN GIDEON GODFREY PAULA BARNETT SAUL H & SALY A 315 E HYMAN AVE #305 505 N BTH ST 200 W HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 S WMâ„¢HOMEOWNERS ASSOC SHADOW MTN HOMEOWNER ASSOC SHADOW MTN HOMEOWNER ASSOC C/O COLEMAN CHRIS CIO COLEMAN CHRIS CIO HAL MORROW 232WHYMAN AVE 232 W HYMAN AVE 232 WHYMANAVE ASPEN. CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SHADOW MTN HOMEOWNERS ASSOC SHADOW MTN EQUITIES SHADOW MTN HOMEOWNER ASSOC C/O COLEMAN CHRIS C/O COLEMAN CHRIS C/O COLEMAN CHRIS 232 WHYMAN AVE 232 W HYMAN AVE 232 W HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SHAE)OWMTN HOMEOWNER ASSOC SHADOW MTN HOMEOW.VER ASSOC CHRISTENSEN ROBERT M &CANDICE L C/O COLEMAN CHRIS C/O HAL MORROW 204 W HYMAN AVE 232 W HYMAN AVE 232 W HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SHADOW Mâ„¢ HOMEOWNER ASSOC LEWIS EILEEN JDJ GROUP UC CIO COLEMAN CHRIS 108 W HYMAN AVE #9 300 PUPPY SMITH ST #205-220 232WHYMANAVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN. CO 81611 SMITH CHRISTOPHER H W!61-â€žMAN WENDY L NEWKAM CLAIRE M BEUTTAS DIANA H 10|~ AVE#B PO BOX 2808 PO BOX 12366 ASPFIr, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81812 FRIEDLANDER & SINGER LTD LEE DAVID W MARK CAROL KRAUSS SINGER & *RIEOLANDER PO BOX 9283 LEE DORA 12.4 RIDGEWAY ST 13562 CAMINITO CARME L ASPEN, CO 81611 LAS ISLE OF MAN, DEL MAR, CA 92014-3849 CASSIDAY BENJAMIN B BEAVER R HART AND JOAN S RANCE CAROL CASSIDAY SUZANNE B 937 WILLOWST FLAT 4B MOUNTAIN LODGE POBOX 11110 PO BOX 1140 44 MTKELLEr RD ASPEN, CO 81611 LEBANON, PA 17042-1140 THE PEAK HONG KONG, KOENIG RAYMOND J AND GLICKENHAUS & CO HARE TERESA J TRAGGIS ELIZABETH G 6 E 43RD ST 20 E 74TH ST PHB POBOX 284 NEW YORK, NY 10021 NEW YORK, NY 10017 NEW LONDON, CT 06320 ASPEN KAY ASSOCIATE:3 DE TURRIS EMILIO BUDINGER WILLIANI & PEYTON CO KAY MARVIN L 31 BRAMBLE LN 2306 DELAWARE AVE 5610 WISCONSIN AVE APT 1403 MELVILLE, NY 11747 WILMINGTON, DE 19806 CHEVY CHASE. MD 20815 HAAN R E TRUST SPEARS NANCY M BIRDMAN DIANE 7115 LEESBURG PIKE STE 309 530 MEANS ST #405 307 S 21ST AVE FALLS CHURCH, VA 22043 ATLANTA, GA 30318 HOUYWOOD, FL 33020 BA-,4 SHIRLEY R POTAMEN ALAN BOWMAN AL 3 GROVE ISLE DR #108 467574TH ST 3580 NW lOTH AVE COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 MIAMI, FL 33143 OAKLAND PARK, FL 33309 SNARE WILLIAM D & MAI%GARET W 50% BARZELL WINSTON BUTT CYNTHIA W POBOX 595 7300 POINT OF ROCKS RD 944 HARMAN AVE BOCA GRANDE FL 33921 SARASOTA, FL 34242 DAYTON, OH 45419 FABER ROBERT G & EUNICE N COLES ELUOT L VAUGHAN HEIDI 1996 TRUST 1921 BOULDER DR 2929 E HARTFORD AVE N2322 SYLVAN LN ANN ARBOR, Mt 48104 MILWAUKEE, WI 53211 LAKE GENEVA, WI 54137 UPTON DONN H*& MARILYN G WEIGAND ASPEN TRUST WEIGAND ASPEN TRUST TRUSTEES 150 N MARKET 150 N MARKET LIPTON DOUGLAS GREGG&RANDALL WICHITA, KS 67202 WICHITA, KS 67202 CO TRUSTEES 1000WOODSON RD ST LOUIS, MO 63114 B N JAMES C GUERRA DONNA SHOAF THOMAS & SUSAN N 4 ALEST 4220 GLENWOOD AVE 4616 ABBOTT N_....1.EANS,LA 70130 DALLAS, TX 75205 DALLAS. TX 75205 . 1 t8 SMITH CHQSTOPHER H GROSVENOR DENIS COLORADO AZURE LTD BEUTrAS DIANA H PO BOX 11236 PO BOX 3071 PO BOX 12366 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 FARLAND MARISA J DEAN MARY EMMA ASPEN SKIING COMPANY POBOX 3542 PO BOX 8035 PO BOX 1248 ASPEN, CX) 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 SEGUIN JEFF W ROSS PAULINE ERB JANE SEGUIN MADALYN B AS JOINT TENANTS PO BOX 9969 PO BOX 3207 PO BOX 8852 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN. CO 81812 ASPEN, CO 81612 WARSHAW MARTIN R& ALICE M DACOSTA MAUREEN C PIETRZAK ROBERT J & SUSAN R PO BOX 8976 PO BOX 1 1796 E SOPRIS CREEK RD ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 BASALL CO 81623 WILKE JOHN H AND BONNIE K HITE HENRY H & ANGELA R OLIVER WILLIAM THOMAS & ANN GARY TRUSTEES OF WILKE LIVING TRUST PO BOX 155 542 WARNER AVE WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 153 S BEACHWOOD DR LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 LOS ANGELES. CA 1 1 DIMITRIUS RALU S_._-R DENNIS J & LEAH E MENDELSON ROBERTA L & MEL I HUEBNER-DIMITRIUS JO-ELLAN 26642 LATIGO SHORE DR 5412 FRANCISCA WY 200 S SIERRA MADRE BLVD MALIBU, CA 90265 AGOURA HILLS, CA 913Â£.1 PASADENA, CA 91109 ' 32Â£21 John Key 6476 Mimosa Lane Dallas Texas, 75230 March 24, 1999 Historic Preservation Commissions 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 To the Historic Preservation Board: I am sorry that I am unable to attend the meeting tonight. However, I feel that it is important for the Board to understand the process and the effort that we have made to arrive at this hearing. A year ago, the HPC had a meeting at the house and discussed the design guidelines as a method for designing a new residence. It was understood that the building would be razed and that an appropriate new residence would be built. The members of the HPC were generally in agreement with the direction presented. After hiring Gretchen Greenwood to begin the design, she developed a full design including plans and elevations with these meeting notes in mind, as well as with discussion with Ms. Guthrie. The first design was in keeping with our original desires to build a completely new house with the Living Room etc. on the second level. Through research, Gretchen uncovered that the house was historic, but had been changed in materials, and that it was unlikely that it could be torn down. This was much to our dismay. After that, Gretchen confirmed that the rules regarding our house were different, and would require a more thorough design review. We were even further dismayed because prior to purchasing the house, we were led to believe that we would not have to keep the existing house. The result ofthis first meeting at the house with the HPC led me to buy this property in Aspen. This resulted in a waste oftime and money. We were also very discouraged and uninterested in the house to the point of selling it. After 8 months, we were starting over. Through Gretchen, and her commitment to the historic preservation process, she was able to convince us that we would have a better project, ifwe explored a design to preserve the building, and to add our needed additions for our two families. She educated us through the historic process, sending newspaper articles and information on the HPC meetings that had transpired in Aspen in the last year. Although Gretchen has been able to design a project that meets our needs, the scope, complexity and costs have increased considerably. I was somewhat taken aback by the memo from Ms.Guthrie, regarding our proposed design. I felt we had met the historic preservation guidelines while utilizing the property for our needs. I urge you to approve the design as proposed. Sincerely, 0 6-4- k,-7 John Key 0 The Hopkins House 135 West Hopkins Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Historic Landmark Application Partial Demolition and On Site Relocation Conceptual Development Application Submitted by Gretchen Greenwood Gretchen Greenwood and Associates, Inc. 520 Walnut Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 970 925 4502 U,>chibil- b ATTACHMENT 1 -1 LAND USE APPUCA11ON FORM 1. Project name 7-Re Ho#k//21 /</0 Ure 1 Prgecocaton /.85 9/690 /66Â»50,/1/, tkqne). Â£ 07 + f 1./-1-1 11'/6407' 8 -Town s,A. 07' ~spe,9 (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning /â‚¬ - dp 4. Lots\ze 4 250 2,. *. 5. Applicanfs name, address and phone number J 0/Â»V kg y 6 418 Al IM Â©SA LAN â‚¬ PALLA & 769/-S -7 52.10 1/+ -150Â·/BiB 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 4/<7~4 e. 4;2,re/,Woo~ 5.10 Wainur a. *pcn 9 15Â· *SOL 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA ~ Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 804O Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexVMap Amend. V-< Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption 4* Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Une Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the proge*A 2. 2Â¥/ ST/AIG 871eucTUâ‚¬â‚¬ S lax#171Nce JA FT. = ,+FF#AT AAENTS* /1183>5914 H1576&/c- FRONT BLD G.. '.4&04+ 3-04 78794- â€¢ 9:-7 07 st. 'e. 9. Description of development application Â» 6 4,05Â£,#rd 10. Have you completed and attached the following? ,/- Attachment 1- Land use application form 100'~ttachment 2- Dimensional requirements form "-Response to Attachment 3 *.I 1/- Response to Attachments 4 and 5 11111111 HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION ATTACHMENT 2 MARCH 12, 1999 1. Applicant's Name: John Key 6476 Mimosa Lane Dallas, Texas 75230 214-750-1838 Dana and Bob Caridi 1210 N. Oakridge Drive Palatine, Illinois 60067 847-776-2551 Included in this application is a letter signed by the applicant that Gretchen Greenwood is authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. Street Address: 135 West Hopkins St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Legal Description: Lot lettered "A" and the west twenty-two and one-half (22-1/2) feet of lot lettered 'sB" in block numbered sixty (60) in half and to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. 3. A disclosure of ownership is attached to this application. 4. An 8-1/2" vicinity map is attached locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 0 0 9 7 i R 4 /' -trt#rce#Â£*o* i - <901 16 . 4 u AO,40 , 0"V,O'U' 44 9qn â€¢-oarim,i, Bul# Â«*% # 7.00 -1.L.-1 .tf#B=m, 4 22%20/* 9 7 1 '40/ C 130 El 017.W bt:l,W~ i ? 401 ,Â¥91 V.10 -11% * W W_ru~UMI;144Â°LIEPEE. . UMIJÂ«LM re .1 ~921 - 4 3 - a 0 q.- a *lgioothÂ£]Â£]Â© ur /#c 4.-421:3-9vu~: '-,0 4.r 0-7C-3'$>-Â¥41'El-Â¢ r-4 ....â€¢ARP 1 0 lay-- /Afh#\ , 4 44 1ON . lulld'll 9%2 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant *,Aken *,et. we.5 4, John 69.1 f Ou.,di Address: ( A S \Mot #,pkint Zone district Lot size: .5. 45 0 =9.1Â¥Â· . 1 Existing FAR: a .-7 0-7 4,/ tÂ¥ I Allowable FAR: 3.030 a g Â· fr. Prcposed FAR: - 3; S BD 9 Â· tt Exisong net leasable (commercall: A//A Proposed net leasacte (ccmmercal): Existing % of site coverage: - 3 So/D of /, B %3 49. Pr" 50 90 0- a, c. as 99. rr Existing % of open space: 40/h Prccosed % cf cpen space: U lA Existing maximunl heigrlt Pencical oldc: 4,0 L Â£> # Accescrv blaa: /,R Â·Â£ O # Priccsed max. height Princical bida: eg 9 10 " Accesscr, bids: A,/4 PrtzosedÂ°& di nemoracr: 50,6 4 0*-572>,4/C Abu.r e. /0096 Aue.ts,wy Existing number of bearccms: 4- P==sed number of bedrcoms: 9 Exts#ng on-site parking spaces: 0 Crl-site parking spaces recuired cil 26*2 Existing: Minimum required: Proocsect , I, Frcnt 1:form / O Front 7 1 0 Rear: Rear. /0 Rear Ji 2 0 Comcined Ccmtined Combirled Framimar. 30 FtsÂ«-r. /al,~ " F~~ ~ \Wast- SW.L3~*- CP '9>" Ntw la. 55,;41 Vold : O' Side: , East Ser. ateâ€¢ %46=. 932=Pia=.91-2>\ 9 1/0" Combined Combined Combined 5Â£85. -- S\det /41 te" Sides: Existing noncortfbonities arencroachmer* ,jkpa,06â€ž::00- .E,//W/,py tA {-,0 Uullia , n 4/ /*1 4 Variations requested:-See #*baÂ» J 04PC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings. FAR bonus ofupto 500 sq.1. Site coverage varlance up to 5%. height varialons underthe e cottage Inlm program, parking waivers for residentlat uses in the R.8, R-15, RMF. CC. and O Zone da:tricts) HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION ATTACHMENT 4 STANDARDS FOR DESIGNATION "Any structure or site that meets (2) or more of the following standards may be designated as "H" Historic Overlay District, and/or historic landmark" The Victorian residence located at 135 West Hopkins, (not including the detached buildings) meets the following 3 standards as outlined in the Aspen Land Use Code. B. Architectural Importance. The structure is representative of the architectural style that is unique to the traditional character of Aspen. The front structure is typical of the mining era buildings of Aspen at the turn of the century. It is evidenced in early maps and photographs of Aspen that the footprint of the front building is still in place at the end of the century. Through thorough interviews with the past owners of the building, it is known that the front historic building has been maintained in historic form primarily, yet has been changed in the siding material, windows, roof materials, front porch,etc. C The conceptual and demolition review in this application describes in more detail, the historic parts of the front building that have been maintained throughout the century. It is evidenced that the back buildings, described as "Apartments" on the improvement survey were altered by past owners to modern "ski bum apartments" as described by the past owner. Therefore, the architectural importance for designating 135 West Hopkins lies in the historic and original form of the front building only. D. Neighborhood Character. The intersection of the corner at 135 West Hopkins is fortunate to have four historic buildings on the north, southeast and west corner of this neighborhood. Therefore this building is a significant part of the history and permanence of the neighborhood character. E. Community Character. The building is critical to the preservation of the historic fabric of Aspen. The front building has been preserved in its original location and form, and as stated in Standard "D", it allows an important corner of Aspen to continue the historic story of Aspen's early mining days. 0 4 '' I . 1 e : 1 ., : i w A,9 h . 1 9 . -4 g 4 4 36.; 1% 9 .4 /4 4 , df, '*92 4 '1 , C..P 4, S â€¢ 5.4 0 4.Efffi-Ph, KJ -f 4 . 4, 1 â‚¬ , /,7 2, t 25.- j .- i\.' - , 'yi.2 , 16â‚¬-â‚¬.4.9,9:30-ry:.121 2~ ' 1 9Â£ 1 + 401 4 I . 1 12 0 , 2 1 ...1 ' 'P . e./ I 1%, A: 'e , ) , ' t. i:V .' 4,, . (b 1/ 4. 2 lit .K ' 1 .. =4< $ , . 13Â£, 2%2 %4.1 . * &4/.0 4 4< , Â«, b . 4*3YOilak , 22\4/ ~3 7 ./. 4 ,- 6 1 - b , 0-22-1 K ' 6. 341,4,4; :,4,21 9#90}94â‚¬4~2 '*62, 9%.â€¢ff , . ,$ 1/ I &3:.... -a 42'- . ,Â©i Â»94#1#74/49<40 2434%1-4 . re. , *. .t I .el a vit,*D~ u 4 - - - '' \\ . 6#*29% '.A , 5 - 4 1.DIA V , h 2- y ja i 1,0 i 4, g.~i,?9 534 1/ ~r. *cyâ‚¬"t ~' ~ 9'4~ AR::Nt.rJ. i,<,.,I~Oczo;,4 ~:. 1 2~4 mt in./R>~,"4 z f + 1 1 i .' A.*Ma-, 244 :1 g Â»*Â·,6 . 4% & f 'Et , 0 ..M 34Â· h L '1.4~ = 9 Zid 9 , 0,4 I. 4127:5277<2.-44'.. Â£ i 'VE.,<ip",9Aje,ki P 3~-,4 A: ~ 1 \ ~ , ..~ ~ 44 44 4 - A.IrI r 1 , 3**fit@,f .. 52 4 = I- , , Flk, . 'e. . .-- , h â€¢â€¢ 3~1 .4 . . *9>#255 Sh , 1. 94 1~mr/. . AM e. r Â£ 1-5~1~:A 4, ' A. â€¢ 4 :1 tb i' - 1. el . 1, 4...'L â€¢ W/' 2 .1 .f//:A~~22. -G.....0 BLIE *81*1Â¥gÂ·Â©,Af. >ft*wi~ 1 =21- .- I. ~ 17 1 j A:*44-U- ... I . .... I .---I. Â¥ 91.. . '3*/ I , ARNE.Mi.lummi,4. .1. , 72 , e,2. ' b' 0. -41 1. , * L ~1. / .,k Â¢ . r 4- , 'il <, 134* Itum, i U 2 Â·ls' , ) , ~ fir tr:t. ' \/, l -9/ I .44 ee.~. p %,3 c / 3. 21 -â€¢. r ~~f --1- 4 1 6 ?=14 4.4 f t r a. 4" 1 0&. Â» *ic.- : .2 \.ft:TA' 1/â€¢ 1.66 . u 4 - \ . ,/ c r .Ar. I 1 7, Â£ *WI+Ii, 42/1 .. #~A. ~3~ :'. i' 9.~ 0 ' 3 + 4 4 . 24* . " I 9/14 f tk , . 1, , /4 \ I. : kth: 4 --- 7 1 I Er, r :r , r >â€¢./.. I i I ./ ./. .5 . . t , .4 ''/ i t. . JÂ¢,9 t~tfp{3 Â·''he:N"i/~r v. 6 161Â£0 - . 1 2 r 4. . - ist, .c , 1 Ae - ./ 0{ 9, 1; 42 1. 9.2 41. I 6 3 16*1'Ff Â·.4~ 4 4~~~J~I~ 45- Mâ€¢ *,-4 f I ,< e -Â·9Â¥Â£ 6 , , 2 ~~ ?Â·. ..td.: . , f,f ., 1 7 ,/ rt' 9 11 2 r 'lil A.M / f â€žtt FlU Kli 6,+>-> 1 - Arr#An#,#4 94344* 4/3 :, te u. 14 * -I# r ... ' ' '/ [=. , 11, ' 'f I bÂ· ~ A -* .ik #twi 01 ,.. .2 9 . f, , , /!. 'fj l. ' 1. 0 a-4 -' ~-<4~864 .y a #Â·, 4'-h.ty,%Â«b .<....1~ . m 4 2.79 2 , i*19-~Â°~ 1%.<1 'tjt~~91#54 4-~~~~~26i/it-~~ 0~ ~ Â® ':U fr e .?f 2 - ; ,,P I r '11 X V . A A r M - * c ' .f 411*77.3 :,- I>,f:;:tjg In,â€¢'.6,11 5,- '1.'. %.. Â£- k t 31 A / ' -0. 9 Ntt : 1 9~(44<i,t , . 4 W ' dit . ~ , 4*ht-; se :4,2:ty.; TkyÂ»bÂ·(4.:4Â¥40 B - 1 4. . 1 . , 1 4Â» I I I i.10 ~ ..' ./ '/I . I -1 . â‚¬ ,. - /1 I. p<, Â« 3/1 i 'X/:' I '3 : 744 Â¢ 011 , M k . =. p 16 , 1 1 . -P . 1"10) 1 11 4 W C "cs. .l 14 4 fl h . .i#u#%1,4 14. . .- r Â£ 1 '3 ~ :,MF.Ofi #< 14 4 ' ,$.tv<i. Ftf,fi;274*.tr'I.'1'ydrifF*04*; .,z 1- ~ '~ r,)~ ' 4.--4 , 4, . ~:~013 "~32~ â€ž"~1~4294*tifitifflt 2Â· Â·- ~~. CV- 1~â€ž.- 2.3 1 -A' Â· , . 13 ia-' . 3, . 'i # ./* P'Ap, â„¢'9'.Ph 1/lil'IN,3~ke.1 \/. % \ 9.Â» 7 0* "P, Yflil~ ,-Â«Â¥â€¢r'~2Â·,~f~~60: Afi *R * 44.14 y,,c , I. P, T *Eklit,lait.Â·to , AN' -/ 4 1 1 ~44L /~ C- 1 1Â¢4,: f Li + .an fick'Â·f,>MA r . ," Â· J 1 \ 157 -- 141 & 9 . 6*V, .'- . 6 10 1 10. 4 :P .CD. ..7, 1 I . = U ., .2 , Â«\ 0.(.44%: .., re-4. 2 f *1 tibe I . 1 f.fi A f 4 7 1 'I...'.. A 41%\ 1 94 r,t, 7=RIJF T ..>Â·f t. .- 4 . I I ' 1 - .AA Y-*,1.t'=,Crojl~k; i*i>.Â£j:--4<205%Iaffib,- - I -04il ., - 1 4 , 4 -7 .~ 4 ..- , .ff* ?7.,97y. .3 te-wt:-, I- 4- ,/ 6 * r 4 .1 V W p 4Y T , 711. 1 r.e *9 1'' 1 3-0 1 Â»+~ 4 EViti j~ ' 21-f 4 .44Â°'j I 44~ i 1-Â· 1 4 . I 1- - itb*/f i 4-- - Y a 1 r -,16 %: 2 J ... W fl A. ./. ( . C * *A e .iÂ· 4, r..gir.9~ '1Â· ..../ A.29 4 . Â»4 liaLFul - t.4 = *Cd . k...5 it?, 0 , -35 4 V J Nks' 33**1,9..>90,1-'t,Lf-Â»43?Â»%92>tillf. S **alft 1 +5 it. Â· jur EF Â·36 , r 0 3 M:/ ji*WAY&<:2 , j ~ -= ~>.~C .1 I .1. +1~~ ~ 61Â»ts - Â»ft'/3 .j 4 .~ .~.~ t~~ p - .4/all//tiftdk\N&aj 1/55,"R/iptia;TI*911;lii,1 â€¢R 6/' 1/.541- 03 W , % f - J. - . \-1 \ :21*41*tal . , 47+0099*f-t, , .21. 1 1/ 4// 1 / 19/1,..th - a. 141 4 .Vffig~ 1-4 5 -D; . _.11,b - 177%,+ , ~ . .*t -1' -4 - .,0"Ill tel : Cil= ..1 tgula:29:,, .4 .k - A Â· F.0-1,3*7,/ 1 -1 '' * 4/</61Â£3~4 $-Â£,4.4704â€¢ 44 4471 .4~72412*Â¥41* *ke: 4 . Wit,+ 6 . .3*f I.Â· .73&7441Â¢Â¢43- i - 92,074 - 44 14 .t,A~~ J /21. I , 2 + 1. â€¢'r~~#54~N.''t , t.-)21) -1B 1 4 ...r ' 4 % I. I /4 .\ 1, . 'w &'u2F.~~*47~%~&*~+~ re 4,<:i iffi 13*2*Meze, A. .0 9 ' 1%4917 - 3 10 4 .% * ~ti 4% ~, 1 40 - ~ 42.-Ii ' ~ ~Â»4<il , ' h ; -y?jo*%~ Wlia /,i r Y_ 6 1.3 T. '4, 0 2 . 1.- I - 1, " .--- 9.11 . V. 4 ,Â£ M i ~,~ ..> *Â°S, 5 8%54:31 ~ ~*.,fa imiged< 4 9. 4 4/ 1, B 2 ~ri J , 11- 273 : 1. 1 -4 1- )' 4 219 , 9 3,,-\ 7 ,34Â· '4 '1.,AC tlt>%,71%. '. 0,,. 84.1 .TE*,rit,4 2449,. Â£7et i , - , 17 5 1Ft,1 {4 . . Â· 4.Â· . :22;A Ae --- , 2/ Uay, - Al-30.~' A--45,57 ~0*'41 17-901 2-Oil Â·21-1711 91-91/ 02-231 v-:, Gl / 2-28,/ 002 r-7-Â· * a-' * of-; S 14 --- R'71 51â€ž ,yC ,). 0 2-4)611 1771 .r-7- ~.z] 2-1- .,#0 4 9-4 1 2- gtl. --E iLL: . 112 2 dij \3 ~--4 0 2 12 71*5 - # 3 4 0 1-UN W el TW x 4.k . 0701 re F *Ir 46 1. m xb<T, 1 --7 r k / IX /1 L./ \J x /1 X /l /0 220 ~ 09 L,6 5, ' I ' 3 1 * D><~ ID><f Iz-Â£~zO<~i N W.=r imbL a 1:4 -:t I 8 lit- . / H 0 0 6 6/ 44 h , Ir71 f :FF x / 1 F-Ir mxi IA' 1% 0 / ~ is 1 --r- - L/--w-'---- & 12 IL EQ I C 1.27.07 P /1 S LOCZ KILL E:EluL 1 1Â·A :4 0 . S I gul 1 *444. 4,0, SW y-LO/ 6-/11 5/-6//: 1.1-611 #â‚¬21 9-421 52-16! E-9%1 102-%04 .. - - f I tÂ·.. 3, A 4. u 42 4.v .CD; 9-oil 2/-011 94.-2/f 02-221 0-92( 92- 02# 2-DEI %HG 4 00/ 003Â·20 F *122-1. 4 1 â‚¬*GLÂ·Â· ,-Nk-, . R71 rin x , 41 4 #* 9.... 147-7- ix -/1 1* , 2~-1- 2- 1 k 'r 71 ft e *t?.... Â§ . MI [6 L Ag- 1 i â‚¬1LE x lÂ¥-7 qi x . 4 N \ 11 p . :1. 1,-7 â€žI -- tz- 0/ CD g- L v ~- ~~ -ra-~ I z i v ' 10 /2-r : A I 10 '1 --Â£1 15!~ irl- / i k_ 11 ./ I 0 0 99%, A \/ k 1 -1,-il- 40- r U b ~2--bl- O N W 1 4 9 liE X O L, '1 31 6,x ir . N / / 69 40- --1 2-4 n ./ - . O 0 I . -1 4 \ 0 1 -02-1 97 0 /1 P<f ix / (0 --/**I.. .. - . . 1 30 0 gul -2122.1 04 83 211 07 205 2 20) /09 , 6.- 613.LN30*S .4 . 44 Lo# 60/ or/- 108 16 aiLL '3 ~*il#Kifi , i/fillilival'. ' 6212'49?"r'M- 043/901â€¢ ifriT~ 17 \\ 0.0-Ar -6 ~ LAS' 0 MALL, M 2, --'a. i. â‚¬ yal'149 Wilir .[Ul LW'] .Cd.le 't,14 , 1 Ti - ,6 -fl - F- '1'ffi i gr T , ' ' ,-4 . 9 1'.,1 i.kk :.ogelif " tlit L *1 r 4,41.1.1.,~' ./12 1' $ C.root / 4 'll J . 101 ~ L./v .0.41/Â¢1/W/-"* ... r â€ž re-"R 1, /4. , 11 40//.*.14 L.ili*1 ,"1% 1.1.*Ct./.1.11, 141,1.1 M -i n it 21 J iph] 1 Li i. .L /2 â€¢ ] Ui illik=:0 1 1 1 , 44 1 1% --r.. + 37. ...4~ ; Al ..,1. .t .III ~,1.1 ."t tf~...,3,-'th'.4 1,Â¢,~,al . 1 1 1 â€¢Al A 1â€¢ *Je T~e;,%~ ,1.41. 1 p:~4/1 :41 9~,~ 1, p -1621 +Pt. t H .~~,141 ' 14-1 u u ~ Ul K . u, ' i i. lu]104 K . 1 1 4 7 . 0 .; .2 A Â¢Â¢41 Â¥'** t*ir Â¢0jÂ¢&:r *91â€¢â€¢Jij r L~ t r Tr " Pll 4 d QI'EM e It. 0_.--1. p f a, , 12~ jktr * t 1 [ b. 1 Ei j rh 41 t.1-2 14.1 6 1 1 f 9..d M 1 1 06 ..4.- *Â«Ar.1 2, - ~ CA47 1 HYMAN AVE. $Â¢!t##!f~ I~p~,Mf~~ t ~~,~~~:TP'14 P;s~ t 5e~ l4 ~ 1Â· 4 ,L-lrh , P.1.ro rt. : . 1.,1,# 1 ./fi<lub/88 3 JILI'll"'ll/661' e,~ .4 6-1. 0_2 ....... 1 ./--Il Â¥ A 1.6 , TIÂ¥0 5 Coor//0 5% I k 1 Â· '/T f 1 .ai.;E E 'F,fal i 1.19 13131"lill//11'lill i 1 f. id 91+ M*-1...1/877-liati . 44,410 i. :' 1, 9- l. 1 9,4 I . 1 -1 4 le lk/, i ~351'1--' 4 , - f -/Br,7,O7Firl.. 0 < E-iii "~ft--FR * Eiit.-9./.-935"I ' 1 . 14 +451 r-7â€¢-I!21â€¢Si'[fi 141, mn. - /4 4 7 f r. 1 1- tâ€¢Â¥v - _ ti.!7.'1, r-ls'ME''ff*t * 1,1/1 '- -- , h t -..0,CLU-m-~ i cri-~--1/$'7~~1-*--1-r- .--r-1 ' '-PL~ . 1 â€¢ t . . 1 / 1 -= 14.F)** 1 . A - i -51-â€ž~MT-r7517 ~ AM***J: + 4.0,1 6,11..\ -lili.,21-1._==.-a--1 4~ ,-- --*-1.7# 73445 -" _t_-"' ~\ p.2Â£*:.:4-12 4 r.. .6. 1 i U. 1 k 75 77 PARTIAL DEMOLITION/TEMPORARY RELOCATION SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ATTACHMENT 4 1. A written description of the structure proposed for demolition and temporary relocation is provided here. The front historic building is not proposed for demolition, but temporary relocation while a new foundation is built underneath it. It has not been determined at this date as to whether the building will be lifted up in its original location or moved over on the site and then moved back on to the new foundation. The extent of the material demolition and restoration to the building is as follows: Existing Siding: It has been determined that the existing siding on the building is not historic. It has also been determined that asphalt shingles added to the building in the 50's still remains on the building. Both materials will be taken off the building, prior to moving the structure for its new foundation. If any old wood bevel siding is found (supposedly all the material had been discarded in the 50's) it will be saved and reused on the street corner sides of the building. Existing 3 Bay Windows: The existing bay windows on the west elevation will be removed and restored to maintain the historical quality. This will include the glass as well as the woodwork The bay window on the existing East Side of the building will be restored and relocated to the new kitchen addition. The window will face Hopkins Street. Existing Windows: There are no historic windows or doors that have survived the two remodels of this house. All the windows (not including the bay windows) have been replaced in the 50's. This is evident in the front bay window and other historical photographs of the building. New double hung windows are proposed for the the historic building as well as the new structure to the south. Existing Bay Window: This form will be removed, restored and reapplied to the original fagide of the historical building. As can be seen in the photographs, the wood can be restored to its original condition. Existing Wood Fascia: This material will be taken off the building, restored and reapplied to the fullest extent possible. Any new wood that is needed for the proposed addition as well as the existing historical building will be remilled to match the fascia detail. Existing Brick Chimneys: The chimneys will be removed and restored to their original location on the building. Asphalt Shingles: The existing shingles are not historic. They will be removed and new asphalt shingles will be added to the roof along with the applicable roof vents, scuppers etc. that will be required for the proper construction and function of the roof. Apartment Building: The apartment building to the south of the property and that encroaches into the alley, was built as "ski bum " apartments in the 50's. There is no evidence of any historical materials on the buildings. This building is slated for complete demolition. In summary, the known historical materials as outlined above will be removed from the building prior to the building being moved for a new foundation. The outcome of the dismantling will result in a skeleton frame, possibly with parts of the asphalt roof and siding maintained on the building to give the building shear strength during the move. The back non-historic apartments will be removed to allow for the restoration of the historic building and the proposed development. 2. A report from a licensed engineer or architect regarding the soundness of the structure and its suitability for rehabilitation. As the representative of the applicant's and a licensed architect, I submit that this building is sound for temporary relocation on the site while a new foundation is built. The building has been remodeled many times, involving changes in siding, and roofing that has maintained the integrity of the wood frame of the building. There is no evidence of the existing walls failing, rotting deterioration or damage. The existing foundation is old rock and inadequate, yet by moving the existing frame on a new foundation, that problem can be remedied. Having been involved in many relocations, and restorations, this structure is suitable for the plans as outline in these applications. Prior to construction, a complete structural plan will be submitted as part of the final development application outlining the exact method of relocation and subsequent location on the new foundation. 3. Not Applicable 4. There is no effect of the temporary relocation of the historic building on other structures on the site. The non-historic buildings to the south will be removed allowing an open working area for the restoration of the historic building. Since the building will maintain the Victorian neighborhood at the intersection of First Street and Hopkins Street, the neighborhood character is maintained forever. ATTACHMENT 5 STANDARDS OF REVIEW FOR PARTIAL DEMOLITION 1. The partial demolition is required for the renovation of the historical structure and does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. The partial demolition includes; the demolition of the apartment building to the south of the property. These buildings were built to accommodate the "ski bum" history of Aspen. According to past owners these apartments were built sometime in the 50's to accommodate the skit industry traffic. No evidence of historic materials exists on these buildings. On the front historic building, the areas slated for demolition include the front porch and the rear enclosed porch on the south side of the building. An iron grill as porch posts have been added sometime in the 70's and is not a historic material. The south porch was enclosed by some tenants to create a makeshift mudroom and has no evidence of historic materials. 2. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: a. Impacts on the historic significance of the structure .... There is one addition planned for the historic residence on the East Side of the building and one addition planned for the South end of the building. f Both areas have already been remodeled as is evidenced by existing non- historic windows that were added some time in the 50's. Therefore the impacts to the architectural character have been minimized. b. Impacts on the architectural character ... The proposed design is a minimal impact and of less architectural importance than the original building. The conceptual development application details the addition and its minimum impact on the structure. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW OF TEMPORARY RELOCATION 3. As a licensed Architect, I submit that the structure is capable of being relocated while a new foundation is built. See report above. 4. A bond as determined by the HPC will be submitted to the engineering department to insure the relocation of the structure. b SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:CONCEPTUAL REVIEW ATTACHMENT 4 1. A Site Plan and a Survey showing property boundaries and predominant existing site characteristics are included in the application. 2. Conceptual selection of major building materials to be used in the proposed development is follows: Historic building: Wood siding: 4" exposed face bevel siding. Through historic research, it was the original building material of the historic residence. Roof Shingles: Asphalt Shingles, color to be determined at a later I)ate. Building Trim: Fascia: Wood to match original detail North Bay Window: To remain, restored and repaired West Bay Windows: To remain, restored and repaired East Bay Window: To be removed, restored and relocated on addition New Brick Fireplace: Original face old brick to match existing brick Porch Columns and Detail: New Wood Victorian detail. No original materials are present. The porch has been re built from the original porch. Details will be presented at the conceptual hearing. Original Windows: Maintain original windows Non original windows: Windows to match original design as evidenced in oldest known photograph. New Construction: Wood siding: lx4 Vertical wood siding V Groove And 4" exposed Horizontal Bevel Siding Fascia Detail: To match original fascia design Roof: Asphalt Shingles as proposed on historic house Windows and Doors: Clad 3. A written description of the proposal is included here with an explanation of how the proposal complies with the review standards as applicable to the structure and the context of the neighborhood. Unlike some settings for historic homes in Aspen, 135 West Hopkins borders historic homes on the street side of the property and large condominium developments on the immediate borders of the property. This building was not considered to be a significant resource to Aspen as its historical usefulness to Aspen was overlooked due to the development of large ski resort condominiums. The building found itself on the non-landmark historic sites and structures for many, many years and was slated for a tear down as of last year (1998). For this reason, the building has fallen to disrepair, as it was always considered a building that would eventually be torn down. Historically, the building was never considered to be an important building to Aspen's Victorian architectural history. This is evidenced in the many owners that remodeled the building throughout the history of the building. The last owner (prior to the present owner) changed the siding on the building twice. In the early 20's, wood bevel siding was torn off and an asphalt siding was added as well as a new porch, columns and roof. The north porch was ripped off and enclosed with aluminum window and doors. In addition to that, new windows and doors were added to the building. The buildings on the rear of the property were transformed into apartments for the burgeoning ski bum business that became Aspen's identity. There is no evidence of any historic material on any of the apartments to the rear of the structure. The third siding material is the current wood that is a board and bat material that was installed over the asphalt shingles. The roof material has also been changed in the course of the building's 100-year history. The original roof was a sheet metal panel. It was changed in the 50's to a rolled asphalt, then changed in the 70's to an asphalt shingle. It is the intention of the development proposal to restore, remodel and add on to the historic residence at the front of the property. The development details are as follows: (Please note that architectural models, drawings and photographs will accompany this written text at the Conceptual Hearing. Zoning Characteristics Existing Floor Area: 2,707 Sq.ft. Allowable Floor Area: 3,030 Sq.ft. *Proposed Floor Area Ratio: 3,330 Sq.ft. Proposed Above Grade FAR: 3,180 Sq.ft. Allowable Site Coverage: 2,362.5 Sq.ft or 45% *Proposed Site Coverage: 2,625 Sq.ft or 50% Old House *Proposed Front Yard Setback: 7' 0" *Rear Yard (New Addition) 5' 2" *Combined Front and Rear: 12' 2" *East Side Yard: (Chimney area only) 1' 0" West Side Yard:(East Addition only) 5' 2" *Combined Side Yards: 6' 2" New Addition to South *Front Yard (Old House) 7' 0" (same as old house) *Rear Yard: 5' 2" (same as old house) *Combined Front and Rear: 12' 2"(same as old house) East Side Yard Setback: 7' 6" West Side Yard Setback: 5' 2" Combined Side Yards: 12' 8" * Variances Required PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1. The front historic building will maintain it original location on the site. The historic building will become the Living room, Dining and Kitchen area of the proposed development. The existing building is a 1-1/2" story and the existing 22' height will be maintained. 2. One thirteen foot by twenty-two foot addition will be added to the East Side of the building approximately 14' back from the front of the building. The height of this new roof will be the same height as the lower portion of the existing roof. 3. The front bay window will be kept and restored. The windows will be replaced to more closely match the historic windows as documented in the historic photographs. 0 - The front porch will be changed and restored to an appropriate historic design that is consistent with the Miner's cabin porches found in Aspen. There is no historical documentation of the original porch design. 5. All three bay windows will be restored and replaced on the building. 6. The existing fascia detail will be matched and restored where the materials can be kept and reused. 7. The roof shingles will be removed and replaced. 8. The existing brick chimneys will be removed and replaced. A new brick chimney will be added to the West Elevation for functional and aesthetic requirements. Technically, the chimney will allow the flat roof to drain to a scupper that can be located and hidden by the brick design. In addition, the new chimney is venting the boiler to the roof. There are many examples of exterior brick chimneys on old Victorian buildings in Aspen. These photographs will be presented to the HPC at the hearing. 9. A new two-story addition will be added to the south of the building that will include the bedrooms, garage, and mud room. The building height will be 7 feet higher than the original building. The proposed design concept of the building will be presented in model form to the HPC. 4. Scale drawings of the proposed development including plans and elevations are included in this application. 5. A photographic visual description of the neighborhood with an architectural model of the proposed development with the adjacent buildings will be presented to the HPC at the conceptual hearing in order for the HPC to understand the conflicting contextual relationships of the buildings in this neighborhood. ATTACHMENT 6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing, volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures on the parcel. The proposed entire development includes the restoration of an historic house with two proposed additions. The existing main floor of the old house is 950 square feet. It is the intention of the proposed design to restore the main floor of the building and remodel it into the Living room, and Dining room with a one-story Kitchen addition to the back and East Side of the old building. The existing historical space does not lend itself to accommodating a new kitchen within the old space, therefore a kitchen addition will be added. By utilizing the old house for the main living areas, the largest square footage requirements are maintained in the old house and on the ground floor. This is historically accurate for the development of the house and creates less mass for the southern proposed addition. The Residential Design Standards are also satisfied with the street entry off Hopkins Street, a one-story entry element, street facing principal windows and a one-story massing for a distance of fifty-five feet to the south. It is also proposed in this design to build a rear two-story addition, to the historic house. This two-story addition to the rear of the property creates a complementary massing between the historic house on Hopkins and the immense three-story condominium building to the south that surrounds this historic property. The new roofline begins as a one- story element that becomes a two-story element at the rear of the property. This design maintains the integrity of the old house by visually moving away from the old house. The three story condominium buildings to the east and the south dominate the existing historic house as well as the proposed development. With the two-story addition to the rear of the property, the dominance of the three-story condominiums reduces the impact of this these tall structures on the historic house by the addition of the two-story addition. This proposal addresses both the massing of the historic homes on the corner of First Street and Hopkins as well as the condominium development to the south, across the alley. Therefore, the bulk of the square footage is developed in the old house with a small addition to the east of the building. The south and rear addition that connects to the old house with a one story link is planned to have a bunk room, bathroom, mud room, powder rm., laundry room, and one car garage on the main floor with a master bedroom at the Upper Level. By designing the addition to the rear for bedrooms, the size of the addition to the rear is lessened. An FAR bonus of 300 Square feet is required for this architectural design. The FAR bonus is required in order to preserve the square footage of the old house, and to add the two-bedroom addition to the south. By asking for a minimum FAR bonus of 300 square feet, only two bedrooms, and a mudroom and laundry room can be added to the historic house. The remainder of the square footage must be developed in the basement. Two families requiring 4 bedrooms as well as overflow sleeping will share this house. The entire basement area has been developed to accommodate these two more bedrooms, bathrooms, mechanical room, storage, and overflow sleeping rooms. This basement development requires three exits, thus using up 150 square feet of FAR for these lightwells. In addition, the basement bedrooms have to be located in such a way that the lightwells required by the Uniform Building Code do not infringe on the historic house. This plan separates the bedrooms resulting in some of this additional basement space that is required. Therefore, the bedrooms are located under the front east kitchen addition and to the rear under the Bunkroom. The square footage at the lower level in order to accommodate these spaces is 2,800 square feet. This is more square feet than the Main level square footage. The FAR Bonus is not only justified by the following facts: 1. All of the historical square footage is being kept on site and being utilized, thus reducing the amount of square footage that can be built. When an existing building must be utilized, the plans and subsequent square footage is never as efficient as if the design was started from scratch. Therefores a small above grade FAR bonus of 150 Square feet is needed. 2. The additional FAR that is being asked for does not affect the mass or bulk of the historic residence, because the two story new development is to the back of the property and in scale with the massive three-story developments that surround the historic gâ€¢11 property. The 150 Square feet above grade bonus will not affect the massing relationship with the historic house or the condominiums. The FAR bonus only helps the incongruous relationships of these neighborhood buildings. 3. Due to the necessary size of the basement, the space uses 150 square feet of FAR, in order to accommodate the additional bedrooms and exiting requirements for a space of 2,800 square feet. 4. The existing square footage in its present plan, does not utilize space efficiently, therefore to design a workable and acceptable Living area, a kitchen addition was added. This addition with a two-bedroom addition puts the FAR over by 150 square feet, yet preserves ali of the historic house on the site, while giving the owner a two bedroom house above grade. The setback and site coverage variances requested follows the reasoning of the FAR requests above. The historic house will remain in the original location, thus requiring setback variances. The existing residence occupies the first 55 feet of the site, thus requiring all development to be off the alley. The site coverage variance allows more square footage to be developed at ground level and less mass at the upper level. The overall combination of the FAR bonus with the site coverage and setback variances, produces a significant historical resource (that does not exist now) while allowing the owners to utilize the house the way they need to with their families. 2. This proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. This development maintains the historical integrity of the neighborhood at the corner, because it restores a Victorian residence forever in this neighborhood. In addition, the neighborhood character around this historic property is two-fold. Historic residences dominate the corners of this intersection at First Street and Hopkins Street, and large condominiums developments dominate the south and east of this historic property. The large condominium developments to the south and east of this property completely dominate this 1-1/2" story building, but with the development of the rear addition on the historical property, the dominance of the large condominium building on the historic building is lessened considerably. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with two aspects of Aspen's history, the mining era and the prevalent ski industry. The desigir is consistent with the neighborhood. 3. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel. The proposed development is designed to restore the building to its original materials as documented by historic photographs, as well as to maintain the original form of the building. The proposed addition on the historic residence is 2 feet below the highest point of the historic roof, or the same height as the lower historic roof. The two-story roof to the south is only 7 feet above the existing historic roolline. The proposal enhances the historic building by maintaining similar details and building forms. Therefore this proposal meets Standard 3, as the historic building will maintain the significant historical details and lay the foundation for the details on the proposed additions. 4. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the architectural integrity of the historic structures. The proposed new development has been designed to be sensitive in form to the existing historic building. The architectural integrity of the old building is maintained by the restoration, the simple lines of the one story and two- story addition. - SECIIÂ», 12. 10.~S- 10 1111â„¢. RNCE 05 21, [F TIE :INTH POBICIP,4 1â‚¬mmAN -1., LOT A AND WESTERLY 22,5' Elf LE]T B h.,1, 0, ~ , BLOCK 60 HOPKINS AVE M ~- ORIGINAL ASPEN TOWNSITE IM WE 11 irrills AVE A -- i[,Nr le..7 fin 1 M â€¢Â¢,Tts ./f 1 -Itt AUTN MtÂ¥Â¢ trnâ‚¬P A .19' 1 â€¢P' (3 . Ilifil -1 1_ _ 1 In'Kil 'lllâ€ž,"mil Â¥ , .' CIE'Ir. Fl'tl 91 +'tf' ' M - â€¢crrs Ine 1'.9 CÂ·Â·m -4:7Â· 4,2 1- 2 AN /BDIAL (120 SK-rt# AlÂ® St,V[Yt--S SE#i. IEF~m.KCTIEN CtrltS Cr A Gretchen 1 Al, rmg&,1- PLAT Ove PRINT FMPNED AS A FICTImIAL REPIFY 3, SLNVIÂ¥ INPS PLAT 04//7 NÂ»,1 be.P,1 11-VEÂ¥,1 ZIGIATUIE AND SUL ,~, COCANN FRAL,UL[WT. BEI,SECT. ERROEOUS. 01 MISLEANI,G DE[m-Tnk POSSESS, Greenwood IÂ»WAngliZIÂ» B WMY{R 11]W<WS HIP-D P SL0MY[El - MTIOFT A 01 SUCH REPI[DITION C[FIES *O DE USE gl= TIâ‚¬ 0~[m#Trtil DEPECI, 1% 310*n< AND SEAL AM TO IE VIED AS -[ U,0401Â¥ VITH N.L D~CPMATIM . A-Ii. in 1,OWN SUBIC, TO CH/INI ..Ii"....t Folla 5,8- 11[[1 mon VITH --4. t:52#ZV- ef-rp /9,/0 M.. 2376 2 TIC INmOS INO BISTAICES MAIPI KCEÂ»D *IMI Ul INCÂ»1 1*E Men EFFEOAL Al- Chil-.1611 / '. 10p ar DE TOMI 3 ASPrk 1,â‚¬ 10411Â«,S AlÂ® MSTANCES Ivan AS FILD Ntt .â€ž.4/00 2/ /9 \ 11Â·â‚¬ 1Â«*Ult, IARDIDS AMD EISTNEES :l,Vt'rl, 16â€¢8[ IETWEEN THI[ rt,Â»D M Stl -0â€ž...O MAR:*TRS At TIE ENDS [r TMIT MOTI' CO-*â€¢St 8,2 4. 7 1 TIE Lint / E-Â»Â«11 /0, â„¢11 MMENDENT St"11Â¥ VAS TI -COPO INar w laTH 78 DEGREIS 09 111*JTES 11 SICINS WMT ITVEDâ€¢ F[Uen 1/59 al' / ASFEN BLOCK IHER IOUENTS I Dâ‚¬ tall,MSTINLY Nt, 3,3,11â‚¬ASTERL, CO-FS tr F,151 STREET aD ,EF,(IMS AVE TIE BASS / LCIATI~ r) r,E PROTHÂ¥ WAS Tz FOUG IOUENT . SAjB lan,EASTINLY CO-R A. T.-t 4, 4. 110:VEY[p RCID EN TIE IrILE COMTI,INT nal MT,r, Calrly Trn-E. Â»Â£. CASI 4, le PC T 12611 FOI W[Â»*TIIN RECNImlU EASDENTS NED ~1614TS-Il-VAÂ¥ 01/[R CPOSSNG DOS Pel'ERTY. ti h mar ~4 1 Tle *99,1Â¥ 11 LOCATE, m TIE MTKIN CallÂ¥. Cal#10 all Dia:IRIA,U f NiCAS, NATI-L nce De,#*I PROON- rum Inl-9 RATE 1- =TED 1Â»Â£ 4. 1~7. COeUCTY-PAIÂ«1 IUKR 0007 CO] M C nE F-ERTI M VIT}CM TIE ZCÂ»E 1,0. 8 M TIE APIA CUTS,II TIE --Â¥EAR r-Um PLAUL , TIE LOCATIÂ»41 rtÂ» TZ WATER IM. SNITAT- SEVEN. ELECTIE /O.0 - I Ta:Mag Z I L=*111& nES, Ullmn VET le FIELD LOCATED F-01 SLDVE,M. 1,1-OU AN' 1,11* WE- 9/ COISâ„¢Â£11~ 11 L, .GINA,ES DE SIZE. m,11, CE,arl= .1Â¥ Na TRIE LOCAT. U DE UTILITY,Â¥U,LIC SERVICE r,Â£111, 5,01.D 1 37,41â‚¬n 1,1. ..01Â¥ TZ ZOE WRID Val H niNT YARD 10 FEET 11 mâ€¢CK VAN. 10 FEET -- 8 + 6 Tic cmem,En r,Â¤41 4,6 *,Ot INas Al, TO 1 30 FID Immul ---.1 SHI YARD B /1/11 -Bul WEL W Uct n 5 FECT .11' 1 j EAST 7.5' OF LOT B IMIS DIMMI)= mall X OE=ED FM Nma~Â¥ *F~= N~~ =~~ m ~~. i p l' ESTALIDED vt, TIE FNErt*ly. 4.6 BLOCK 60 0 FIE OUT,Ul,]118 01 TIE *ACK , 11â‚¬ PH~POT, ENC-OES 01 11 ALD NÂ® ...C 1.1. 1 STREET .,19111-tr-VAN. ORIGINAL ASPEN TOWNSITE * li .- eip R --- M f:i 13 4/ - affies . 4.* 2.0 - 2~~2/ 4 ---9-x ~3.-â€ž. ~~Â«422- ....C~......-- SCALm r-106, -'â€¢#...fUSNe f9 VI'll --I - -467 Sittl --V slmvricmÂ·s c[ImricATE . $ O%~6- .....1,4 - A.*D ..= ... ALLEY - - IER[ Er, Ce,Im, T}441 TIOS R,~CIENT Sl,VEÂ¥ PLAI WAS *CE Fl- rm, IOTES U A ... 00 I. L[1111 el I,EIT~R. A REGIST[N L#*n lt,IVE,1, IN TIC STATE U Cll-Am m St*VEY DY TIE ABOVE PESC,1!In PrgERTY MACE I IfrSELF. [, 10â‚¬IR Ir, DINECT -m-& 00 RESPOIS]BILITY. SLFERVISDI. AND CIECKING DE 100Â»ENIATION DOWN IERECM FOO TIE FRIFIRTY C[mIERS WAS FEUE, 02 SET rm THIS -VEr. AL 01ENSHâ€¢S Al,D - ZETAILS SH[MI KNEEN AK CORMIT TE] TIE 1151 / Irr Mlig~LIOOE LOUIS R 0LE1TIâ‚¬N LS 13166 .ATE slm'/n ril M rr grIFICAH IuoUTED briS _ __ DAY Â£1 -___..___... 199_. AT __... ..14. 14 SURVEY IN" __ .._ C* l'E MIKIN Ca#li LAND StmVE, PLAYS/TRIGHT-a-VAÂ¥ Sl,VEYS AT PA[*I 'M'I ..11.' I-â€¢0~ ~ A-2 Mp. a.4 " ... I ....211...11.1-,0... mmldoH ls,A ger SIC,Bl le. TO,/,maP Â» SEVâ„¢. 00*01 98 VNT 01 4 11*TH FOINCIPAL Iâ‚¬mt,NI LOT A AND WESTERLY 225' Elf LE]T B G BLOCK 60 HOPKINS AVE ORIGINAL ASPEN TOWNSITE 135 WEST *<171,0 M N A 1 - -- AEFEN, tel-01*!Il . FUNB 1959 LITÂ¥ / 41 Alnt; ./. I 1Â· - 10 Atfri, m.- r Urlâ‚¬f; /' / * i , O 911/1 1 flâ„¢/ Hyg --1 1.-27 --TU]7372 -Un-] to,~,ENT giwir,rsTEâ„¢' i ~ rewr.2 utat ~~ . .,r. -- - O/10 7 1 1,31 ST *,0 7 ... ~ -- _ 2_ ASPÂ·EN 1 B - i M tDaeL ZA <w// pein VeltÂ®ID 06 & Rnrm,M. m<m 91 v/Wvt' E//1 ,Â¢11 â€¢ 11,1 Avt Â· al J 7 I. ....441 Icfts I 1,0-4 am> tic,an.M NED St.I,ki,-s zo,_ .DIDUXTIE,1 Urlts , A Gretchen 4,4. FRIABIRINT. DEXPSâ‚¬CT, EPGalt18. C~ IIUIABIIÂ£ WC~a~TEÂ»L POSSESSIEÂ»I FLAT mil -50 1,0.1,â‚¬1 SL-VEY{-1 :KÂ»Un.M *D ELAL -Â¥ CO,IANI 11 SUCII *FICIU:T![DI C[PIES AMD DE USE 91 1/ Dâ€¢13-TIN DER{04 M Greenwood A U-,11-10 1, Slâ€¢VE,OR mi PiPâ€¢RED BÂ¥ Stevt,M 0,0 Wrian A BA-=-~bâ€¢ SIOMAn# Al'D EAL K TO I VIZWFID A: PVCUWD-n VITH â€¢ll t~'[m4â€¢TKN DeÂ·A SUBICÂ· TO t.44/Z mow-*al,â€¢t Ii-~41~ Frum 3,87 1,En- 1,00 VITH A.m Chilldo *1011 r r,â‚¬ ]CASÂ»â‚¬11 0,43 mVIDÂ«11 â€¢40*rÂ» FIC!,0 ZERâ‚¬m, AR FPEN T,E NED Crru:1AL 7- n. 1 ~42*-- Aw rAF MAR'IB PES**0% WF U; TE TOWN [F ASPEIL T,E 1[%11Â«GS NÂ® MST#aÂ«SES Mvert, AS r ILD - 1,â‚¬ I,EASUM D NAPII,1 RED 8!STAIrIS Sl,VE,r, MACE NTWEEN DE FOLÂ»* CE SE, .10â€ž29.0 IUPâ€¢teS AT THI ENDS Or 1,481 Pefrrm Â¥ COPSE 1 TA lili m EARDÂ«11 FOR â„¢11 -10/11<MT Sl~VEÂ¥ VAr TIâ‚¬ riCCÂ»0 1[AIDI CF DTH 73 LIGEEIS 09 11Â»01Â·TES M UCCNM WEST IMP, 0,1 1959 CrlÂ¥ CT AS'01 BLED[ =.P IOUENTS . DE =11.1,11Â¥ AN, 80111â‚¬â€¢STE", 0.'S 1 Fom STRIET 014) Mp<85 AVI nâ‚¬ RASM DI LOCATIm, rup nâ‚¬ pe[+Ter, WAS TIC Fflk, MIN)ENT Ck SAID UlrIZAS,ltÂ»LY CCINâ‚¬P 4. st-PvtÂ¥Ip R|lriB 0,4 1,â‚¬ lrILE CC,â€¢el,â‚¬*7 r,c,4 prnes, CEUITY TITLE, DÂ£. CASE 8 21/* Il PCT 12601 FC, D/Cm,~11[,4 IENMW] EASDENTS AMB Rle,TE-,-VAÂ¥ Ek/N CpossÂ»*; nas perr[Pry 11 t. I. 5 7141 M-ENTÂ¥ 13 LOCATE, ED, 11Â« PT,KIN COWY. CIt.CIAn 08â‚¬0 1,Â£Â£~â€¢C,Alt, NICAS. MATIMAL FLCILD INSUIANCI PRM~AM. rlmÂ» INSL/MICE PATE 1- DATIB .u, 4,1,07. CEÂ»,ue,TY--p#,0 lu,MR 0007 Co = c. DE =Bm n in vlne, 71 ZIX or. cm M TIE *61 â€¢ OLITSIOE TIC 5--Â¥t- FLE- PLAik L TlÂ£ LOCATilla M W b*TER WAIZ *A~TAT- UVU. ELECTIK mil all ~ ~ 104011*GRIUm mEPIOE - APPPOIDâ€¢â€¢TE LrIâ€¢1194 THESE 1,1,1,11% VE,1 107 FIELD LOCATED ,Â·Ill SleVrrt, ]Er[IM AlÂ¢, IC*tral V[Â»g CÂ» CD,ITE/,1,1 11 MiGINATED DE SIZE. BEP114 COGID. CAP,LITÂ¥ *3 101/ LrIATICÂ», 01 DE UTILITYAWUC SE~VICE FOR WUD 12 $*IR '1 l. - i? 1.1 IN TIE KIâ‚¬ ZIBLIÂ» VAS Â»-6 7. St.evt,M WAS St,=PUED Viâ„¢ TIE Falo.,10 1/Glel,1,1 NE-1,5,1 ZE,â‚¬9Â«1 rt, r,ENT YARB . rm 4 10 FEET III CEÂ»Int,En reoll IND IKY Â¥098$ 0,2[ TO I 30,IrT Mtâ€¢6:Ul A Z m. TA.0 . m. M.Ul 0l . S FEET I EAST 7,5' OF LOT B TWIS Dflm#TICÂ», 0018 K C,Ear[D FOR ACCURACY WErtmE Nr, BES, IS ESTABLISIED F[mt 1% /CrollÂ¥. BLOCK 60 8 FIC OUT,lill!< 04 TIE BAOr W TIC plan,ENT, 00(1*CIES rÂ»l nâ‚¬ AlrY AlÂ® â€ž / :,REIT .101111-1-VA, ORIGINAL ASPEN TOWNSITE n N.'r' al 1 55: 18 /"""I:Illilill//.- 1 0140Â£ illillillillillillillillillillillillillimillil &63'ZC ~ ~~~~hCT<:5 --43 --L 7.0,41<R~Am- SCAL& r-We ALLEY m nin I In~*l SURVEÂ¥001 CERâ€žFICATE --70 1. Ul,Il IL Aâ‚¬rnll A /61:TER t.01Â® 310,VIMM â„¢ 7/I STATE O Ca-0*AIDâ€¢ DU IER[Brf CD,lmâ€¢ nal nlls D#mal),1 3,vtÂ¥ PLAT WAS -1 Fla, rl,u IONS Of A "A=In 00 SteVEÂ¥ 0/ TIE AMIVE ISCR!0ED MOOTÂ¥ 1641 1, IRSIL.r, Cm u,ill m mel 00 RESP0212!UlÂ¥. SLPERVISII,4. AND Clic,17,1 71 2,0*INTAT,m, s~rm IC=Do FtÂ»1 TIâ‚¬ FMFiM, COINERS WAS F[Ue ER SET FC, THIE St,VEr. 04.L 0113411Â»15 NED ... METAILS 11Â«]WN IER[1Â»4 AIC CINNECT TE] TIC IEST / 11, â€¢,CMEDOE DEMOLITION PLAN Louls 14 81ITTIEN LS 13166 TO I DI'l"tillhe~ BATE 0 -%== Dirlm,in TRit . _ DAÂ¥ [F __.__..._--, 199_, AT ....._. __M. IN SUIVIV trn' _ _ 1 Tâ‚¬ riltâ„¢ CONTÂ¥ LÂ»{D <tr.Ti r, Arsiri,GHT-Co -vaÂ¥ 9/VEÂ¥; AT PAGE prOF/,IN Mer' .__ ._--_. A-3 6.- .........1.- .....6 -- ./.1,... I . r.Â·.N I . FIRST STR 101 9Â£1 1 1 3 -- 4- - Z. = 01 . 1 1, J 4-s= Â«1[ I==--1 ------ 2116Â« Greenwood T Gretchen 1-â€ž & A.locin. b - 1 =OW-*al"- 3 0- --- - A"/4001-im Still 111 - -- - - TTI 11 1 1 11 1 1 . I 1 1 11 - 111 ---*1 1 1 11 ~EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION ~EXOSTING WEST ELEVATION ~ ~ i Stat 1/4*â€¢ r-0 SC/LE: 1/4'â€¢ r-0 1-1 C. g 0 1 I 'll [1~ r - Ill Il Il Il Il Il Il ~I , 11 1 11 lul[ ~ 111111111 1 1 1 1 7--' 11 = 11 r,-.*-----...'j 6-J-J- -J- SCALA UN'-O 1 - rmi =m= Â¥t~ a ...1... 1 mA=m m 08 ~EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION < EXISnNG EAST ELEVATION SOLE: 1/4' - M SOLE: 1/4' -1'-0 0 A-5 WEST HOPKINS AVENUE Gretchen '3* Greenwood 3 4/" /- 102 1 4*kil A..(.01.80.1611 e . iNT///, li'* 4 F - 22~ / 0,1.4,4 /Â·47/,1Â«# -ECT / 9/*ilt. /57.1.- 1 1 12Â¥mt -- Â¥iiÂ¥~ .-' f..1 1 / 1 U... 1. 1, 1 0 1990.0 Nom I,~ip Vi| 0 FOUÂ®....,CAP....m- o imul m / 0 -,01 4 - W&~*â€¢19//ta.,â€ž~,~,0~ / N â€¢ cowmo, poll" A . Ill.lou 1"ZE I,Cm,mON plo~ED en 0,6.& mN:- M. -mLE. BC / ICAI' Uliblq 1 1 4 0 0 ma a AU OIle UlUO LOCATI â€¢ AUEr 1 1 .al"IWilM TRIE ... 00 00 / , / f i 0-\ . e Proposed Site Plan ALLEY BLOCK 52 *0 ~~ ~ Scale: 1/8" = 1,-00 A-7 SOUTH FIRST STREET I1lll11lIlllllllll1Illllllll11I1II1l1II11IIlIlllll1II1Illll1IIIlIll1II1lll1lI1Illlll1II1I11ll11llll1lI11l1IiilllllllIlllll1lllllllIllllllIl1II1lil1lll I 1-1.1.1.1.1.1-1 1-1-1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1.1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1.1.1.1.1.1-1.1-1- -1 1.1-1.1-1-1-1.1-1.1.lilli.1.1.1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1.1-1-1.1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1.11.1-1-1-1-1-1-1 1-1-1-1-1.1 El. IDC-00 UP - EL 105'-2' 0.=31: UP- / - EL 1-00 , / Gretchen Greenwood EL toy-00 Corport . A.0.0,- b 0.103'-00 Ski Storage N..1. A..40dl-*1811 owder e S .....9.4 Npid N. FikE/#diah 1 C rage P UP EL 1041-0' El. 103'-0â€¢ [1. 105'-9' 4/41 1 UP- / -0Â£1011 ~7. 11 1 11 G~-U lj-O-0-' S I.* ... IWAIrI 0 0 l. I.1.1, 1 1 1 J. i P 5, X El. 102'-60 N. - lllllll lilli DOUN -0 ) i DOIN 1-. a loN' D U 11 1 El. 103'-00 UNâ€¢ -ilibdpil-4 1 1111111111 111,11111,111 1111111111'11 111111111,111 111111111111 1â€žlilli. "A.- lity" I l l'1'l'I'1'1'1'I'I'I'I'I'I'1'I'I'I'I'I'l'1'I'l'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'1'1'I'1'l'1.l'I'l'I'I'I'I'I'1'1'I'l'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'1'I'I'I'1'I'I'l'I'I I ... m -n 00 0 /hMAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN L./sc.[: 0,.r-0 A-9 -- 1---.1 1 -Iâ€¢ lâ€¢ 1 1<,ip-râ€¢ -Im Une of Deck Abo,e ~ \IP- & Won Below Master Both 2 Gretchen Greenwood & All.la- 1~6 111,C Steorn Shower A.'40*Ii'mmt Moster Closet 2 .1......0 / EL .0 2-1/0 Exterlor Comed .-Da f m f Master Bedroom 2 1 .imil ...C i. 1. 1 21 1 A i P Ed ICALL 1/4614 a 0- .to. IAâ€¢In 00 =. 00 ~UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SUAE: 1/4.- M e A-10 Ir -- 1.1.1 1 -1. 1. 1<.1, Id 0 - - 1 0- Greenwood Gretchen BA,"01"'41- 70' .4. Al-ON....11 0 - ill / , i i .... a U 1- --2.1 + Al 14.1./ 1 \ 406 1 <. i P 5,1 . .Ckul U-4 DAU- VIO. "A-0, 08 00 ROOF AND ROOF DECK PLAN O e A-11 .... 1.1. kir:lip 5, 1 ..rjigi.VI. .1 . 1,1 .It I . --- 1.7- ..1 ~ 111111111111 f..1 1 111111111111 1 ..Ii,â€¢ /â€¢ J -- 2*1"111"1 ** ~ -<11111- @ 1111111111111 M.1111~2 11 ./. 11'll//11+ iii mmHIIim11111mimi~1111111111............==i==....=.,ff -''All "....1,_'- ..1 11 . r 1~mii[Il Imilitilll i~ir------TTIE-/Le'$0/Wit<ily#'wi lilljlilli .*H :ma 9Â£! ilhâ‚¬11 l.9. Ill I agnoH~lidoH @U I 1' â€¢illl I 112 Wk 00 8 9 -- 3 -1.1. Gretchen Greenwood BA-0-4 - A.'40'"l'.1011 li! ' 3%, 4. i 12 LE aN -naLUE 1T -- ~ EEÂ®El lilliâ€ž 2--. .~11 -- I W -thi. ", i P 5, ................... 1111.1.11.1.1.11.111,1111111.1111111 11.11111 11 ~South Elention Saut 1.0 â€¢ 60 UNâ€¢ mA-= 00 00 A-14 iEFEEREEi 1'.ill 1 1/.Iâ€¢ 1, .~ tr--Ill#-- .Ell'~1 1.1&71 ...C i. 1. J 1.'li.~ 12?:d 111- 1--i -1 -1-i--- -.gl 1 , e Gretchen Greenwood & A--t,; ba "OW-* 8-t A./40*./."011 F~,001-7/0 --, 1 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1- r -,1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . :OP OF PLYWOO 0 UPKN LIVEL ~~~~ n JF --- --. 72 ~ - TOP OF PLYWOOD O ENTRY LEVEL - ~IT - 0 North Elevation/Bldq. Section A-A SCME: 1/40 - M SCALE, 1/444 a -Uon C=/In 0 A-16 1gs 0 . at. . .. .. I. .. up Gretchen 2 -1. 1 N - Greenwood 7Â· & Aes-tes, Inc. -,1 1 - 520 Wahut Street 3 Aspen. 00-0 81611 . 070923-002 0 Fax 9704247490 4 Fil - D Owner's Storage North Bedroom I ' in Family Rrn. ' ~ 1, 1 - 1.IL=1 = 4 /-1 * al- - 1 ,/ / Top of Concrete Slab â€¢ ~ ~ i / a. 93' y - UP t North Bothroorn I ~ 1 1 ~L__-~ F 1 - 1 0000 6 6: Lower Level Holl \-1 \ r-il South Bedroom 2 Bar Owner's Storage ~~ ~ 6=21 .oundry R South Both 9 177 t â‚¬ I Mechanical Rm. - I I .: I I ... 1 . .. ':.1.1 . . 1.... ..r- .. .. .... , ~ ,, ,~., SCAM 1/44,0 a DA15 812 WIC/99 m=BY: 00 a[ECINB# (10 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SOLE: 1/40â€¢ 1'-0 e 0 A-8 :[clicÂ», Ie. M,vws,- fl mnA INg $8 vcs, Or nE :tir,â€¢ POÂ»Â£!PA Câ€¢Imâ€¢â€¢ LOT A AND WESTERLY 22,5' Elf LOT B - . BLOCK 60 HOPKINS AVE N -* ORIGINAL ASPEN TOWNSITE w./.. A -- 179 VES, 10/1,â€¢$ AVE Â¥- A.EN. CEL!~'m roâ€¢40 1-â€¢ rITY 1/ 1 -* 4.54 477<1 lilli 1. - 19 AsrrI Itâ€¢EK CtÂ¥'Iâ‚¬F ~ rum.9--*0 ~ ----*f- 07 --* n tirrr i â€¢ir,if I'llip=.i=.-=--ny=.=a ,Â«Duâ‚¬â€¢i Â·Tll, fi,vrs,Ert . ,Â· ... -4. 0114, firt, 11 IN" / ,. . *i- ' Ft, .TCS L NI )16-4. PLAT 41*M POWT Per,00<D 4 A PICTIFI,4 0[pORY OF SUr,[Â¥ IARS 0,1 MN rt=, gal,MiÂ« AlÂ® Sl,VErt/'1 SUL. Nt,IDZ*Â£7!31 CM,CS 9/ A PLAT 0-, m- Dâ‚¬,VI< IMIPXÂ¥-1 IND~TUI Nll Ital *â€¢, CE,#All, Gretchen FPALSAINI. Â»CPIECT. CRIOCCUS. [m *SLEADI,6 -Cm,#TIZ POSSESSIEN ) StÂ£,0 <.10Â£11- C-18 â€ž4 Tic 19 of THE WDm~TICÂ»I DERCEN 11 Greenwood le<Amallt, P -veÂ·r= m: PAT PNED li sti//'rrcm 0- VIT,0.r, A SK-Tlmt - SCAL *E To I vtâ„¢rn AS MICUM-, VITH ALL !1/111,ITION . A.-,4 1= / : *P C 32- m- s,/ mit. m= VIT,â€¢ 1,0- SURICT TO CRANK ...... 2 1% I/,Â«a *' llâ„¢CES /0.*0 1[Â¤/,MU/) D~ 'ItÂ», TZ "19 91/A A.4 0*I' Stoll ALM CAP M-ED PED- 2276 MU Of DE TCM, , ASPER 1,â‚¬ IE#%11Â«.S AlÂ«) MITANCES Il*aO AS FIL, 00< ......2 4.7 1 1â‚¬ 1â‚¬AUE, 1â€¢10,1$ AlÂ® RIEâ„¢CES St,VE,C' 1-E ".VE[,1 THE r,UÂ® C. SE-1 IMARS AT TIE Ellos cy Ill PoryÂ·un, Captt 1 I. .m . ....1 10. 1,1. 1/Ic,VOEIT ..9.Â¥ WAS T~ 10-0 E--3 01 . 01 78 0,01.11 00 M.JTES 11 SIC.es wEST KTVCD, F[u. 1- CrlÂ¥ 0- AVEN 11.03* C[/O 1Â«Â»UENTS [,1 DE S,ln,4,[VENLY NO Soll,EAST[XLY Ct,1â‚¬/S tr F;IST STRECT Ne #p.16 AVE- DE -Sts , LEZATIÂ», r-m nE MlticÂ»TY VAS TIE FIU' 11Â»UENT . SAI] SE1,1,EASTE,lÂ¥ COÂ»/R. 4. upvrrED gal, 04 1,â‚¬ 11111 aINTIO,Â·r fla, pmrÂ», CCUm Trnt. 1Â£ CASE IC PCT 126,1 FOR Â»,Cm#TEÂ», IE.â€¢Rm,0 EASE]ENTS AlÂ® IllaMTS-Cr-WAI mul CROSSÂ»16 T- MNFEInÂ¥. 4 1 1 Yll' Pllt'DITÂ¥ ]8 LOCATE' . T. MT,rl, autÂ¥/. C[1.%/ /. 1IC-t-lE" All[AS. 1,4,1-L runD [ICLPAICE PRIDAK rlm, 11,SUINEZ RATE 1- a,lt, il In .UE 4. 1987. CO~IMTÂ¥-~NEL IUIIER 000~7 CO Re C Tli N/on 11 VID- M ZEÂ»E Â¥. / m TIE *EA -SUI TIE -4tm FLE- ,t,ZIL '1 , TIE Lt/%o)# Ft" TIE VAm' 11,/. SNITATE" 97). nECTNE MI,0 0,1, 4. ~#~ t"â€¢ING,Nt- Talâ€¢40< NE ,â€¢Flat,â€¢TE LED,=s. n.. trtin.: VIC Ill nno .. mavt,- 10-E -â€¢ 1,Â¤m, vo~ ~ maâ„¢Â£1-18 ~ i jf [,Moll,In nÂ« s:ZE. DIâ„¢. COW,rl=. CNÂ¥cni 0,11 11â€¢Â£ LOUTIC= , TIC |14=k b unUTÂ¥â€žu,LIC SE,v= r,a.rry Dake / c,Imu 7. Sl/#M, WAS 9/FLIED Iâ„¢ li FliLOV,1,1 ,/1-.711Â», IN/,0 m/0 rE, r=le YARD 10 FEET 8 + 11 .CK ..R, 10 FECI -- ./ w cal=,0 ren - Mae i-: 9 w Ic 30 rcu ,0,0,u, 02 'ARD s FE= 101/1/" -A ..1 1 - .1 5 FEET EAST 7.5' OF LOT B 114$ IW)!IT- DOAB I CIEOr[D Fl *CCUm#CY IrmE NIT KS!191 1$ ESTAI.NIED FE~ TIE Flgklly. 4.3 BLOCK 60 & TIE I,Tigull~O, VIC Noe , TIE Finxin OIC=*IES I TIE *LEÂ¥ Me ...1. 1 â€¢01 . .1- pâ€¢EXT ma#*-Cy-Wa. ORIGINAL ASPEN TOWNSITE 0*'. 6 4 + &43110 444#,L /94 4%:>.â€¢Â» SCAL, r. 1,Â·r ..... .--%40;11!:En m- a ....=C 44 ..= ... SLINEÂ¥-S CERTIficATE ALLEY- -- L Ulm IL alâ‚¬nle. A ,[01110 LNe *l-Evt' N 14 STAX W UU#In 10 IER[YÂ¥ CE,fIRN T}Al DES DIPR[MIENT SUIVEY PLAI WAS INE Flal rtill FTES 3 A ... m SIVE, v 1% A,OVE 11:cnin,Iapoir, MI M *99. M IMEâ€¢ m mic, ... m KSPOISINLITÂ¥. SWERVIS-. AND OECKDO TIE IOUENTATIEÂ» SCWN CREOO M TIC MI[rERTY (ImERS VAS Falt, C, SET /[Â» TH,S SLIVEY. 0,L Cl,ENSDES NID = 0,Tuls SIOWN IÂ«Il[EN NIC CE=â€¢ECT TO TIâ‚¬ BEST 91 - rliat/LEIGE LOUIS K allne LS 13166 .TE StÂ®â€¢,EV nt ING CE,FTInrATE DEFOUTER TH!& .._ &4Â¥ I _.-_.----.. t~_. AT ._... -JL IN St*VEY Itnf .--- I hâ‚¬ MI:(IM C[10,7, l/ID St*M, PLAYS/R!61Â·T-Er-VAÂ¥ Sl.EVEYS AT PAIK --- -- Ir,PrIC. lu,BER . A-2 ./4, Il" *' .- . SEC'"" 1.. ""/Sll~' " 01â„¢. RNCE m VAT I. TIE "In' ".Â£.0. I:met". LOT A AND WESTERLY 22 5' OF LEIT B l~ BLOCK 60 HOPKINS AVE N- ...1.---- ORIGINAL ASPEN TOWNSITE tls WEST ,â‚¬rrIMS AVE A ADEN. CCU).23 ro,10 1.9 ctiÂ¥ / , 10â€¢f 1' 0 17 831Â·IN m."4 Ct,ne / , O illit' 11â„¢/ Ll'Ill. 1_ 1 IouENT 2,Â¥HMST,Pt, / / r,me,Fs,m -----.Â·Â·...m,ri# -*i- CI,210 , IRSi ST AND / . M . ,,.r.â€ž# #. 4 .f. , .r. 1.Â¥9'r,4, -/ -*. , 11!TE: 1 NI tmjg* PLAT All pl mr MiN*El 0% A ICTI~la 101;1 0/ al/~VEÂ¥ -C I .101,4 (010 1,C.â€¢Tt. 0,Â® =VE,t- SEN- M.=%.-= . A Gretchen 1 r'i,rp i,)Â£- ---77-*'M FLAT ../* F.in naVT- 11~9.19. 1 110*Aug m. =04 -i ct=TA= <00 FIMILLD#. linliCT. Immill. E~ NSLEABBIS WI~-794 MmESS- / SUCH REn-ICâ„¢Â»I CEPIES Ald Fl tnE / li WDI-TI~ T)Â«00Â»* 11 Greenwood 1/*%7*Bax, P s-vâ‚¬,1. BILÂ»,1,11 PRE>*I, V Slli4/nm - vino,7 A AA,1-t~&91 -- SK,urt,1 AM, SUL * 10 11 VIEVE, Al Pl{UNDoilÂ¥ VITH â€¢41. MmIT!01 1 -Il----- Ded' ...C' .0 0-'t Al/40*=M'.1011 Flue s, 11.1. Non ./. . ,Â»- t #frp N.1.1 043 1-*C, FES,- *276 , 4Â« 1-Â»Â¢11 0,41 NITICES KI-rI accols }ENCEN 1 PPOI T+E !101 EVT;CWL Â¥ 4 IP = DE TOVII I ASPEIL TIE 1[AP,Â«3& AlÂ® MSYNICES I-,11 AS FILD 01[ 97â€ž-4.2 . 11â‚¬ *AN#1 1/1*em AND RISâ„¢â‚¬21 51~VEÂ·rm MIC IETWEEN DE FDlleD 1 SET .10â€ž...0 I.,10: AT nE EN= Cr na, pgap,mi mps[ 1.. . 1 9< 1*111 , ,//net /0, â„¢rt -,O.0/w, iu,vtÂ¥ V,1 T.lt elgÂ», 11//0 0, 1â‚¬*lâ„¢ 75 DICKES 09 NDISTES St SECOCBS VIEST ErvE[M F 0Â»a 1,59 CnÂ¥ M Asrot ILCD[ Ctmil 10â€¢*IrTS 01 DE ta,TH,EVOILY NIS SarhOSTENL, CtmENS , FIPST 511[r /1,1 paâ€¢rDES AVE. 7,Â« *SIS or LIXATI) Frm 7,â‚¬ MIEMPTY VAS DE 'CUâ‚¬3 104Â·'ENT , WO U!,7,Â«AS,EM.Â¥ CCmÂ«/. 4. SIPÂ·/trtm ~li, 01 11(C liTIC COe,11â‚¬111 nE.1 PIâ„¢91 Ca,ITY Im[. Bc. CASE 8 1,1 PCT 12*81 ,[Â» Wtm,â€¢1104 â€¢CO/%11*1 EASOCWTS Alm â€¢le,rrt-Cr-VAâ€¢ t~voâ€¢ CPMWSÂ»6 Das PPIPEPTÂ¥. i 1 i i nes ml 11 LOUTE, I TIC prTKIN mÂ»,IÂ¥. al-Al IM llc-OIATE, ti N@LAS. 11*TIC,AL FLE,3 1,UNCE PRe)* rUI,1 1151-,CE PATE 1- ITU .UE 4. 1-7. CEMUITY-40â€¢41. IUIER 11097 cO m C TIE P-CITY 11 Â¥18,1 7,â‚¬ 271< 7. Cm Bl TZ ADEA OUT:101 TZ --YUI FUXÂ» PLAXIL 0 -1 L TIE LOCAT*la FOR â„¢[ VA,ER *All# INITA,Ell IEVO. ELECTIE *OWEI i 4 8 l#*06#21,92 YELIP,O, 4 *M=imm LD,94 -SE Wrym %,DE 0 FIELD LOCATED r[, El,IVEÂ¥-. 1,-tmE *' 1Â£*tom, W[,0 0. Coeâ„¢Â£,al It f urn.inal,kle sâ€žvu FACE.m 2,1,0 12 -1,1,0 MIGNATED DE SIZE. EIPT,4 Ce,Ing# CAPâ€¢=ITY *3 Mi LCILAT, W BE 5 1.-p= Â¥1Â« 101Â« St-LIÂ» VAI Â»-6 7. Sllf/EYM WAS SUFfUED Vtâ„¢ 11â‚¬ FaL~mI WtÂ»*111!= IE-Ima Z!Â»mo rtÂ» ruad .,aD 10 FEET 4} wa 'AND 10 FECT i# 1/ .DE 'Ae , FEI~/ Inlolul â„¢c CO,St,El Flat! AND ,Â£1 Â¥-1 - TO K 30 FUT Imt,Ul Â¢3 9...7 -01 11 3 FEET r T)81 1,/1-ATH :1010 1 0<DED FOR *CCL-Â£Â¥ Irrumâ‚¬ - Intel ts t/ EAST 7.5' OF LOT B ESTMLISHED FER 71 MICM*lÂ¥. "4 & 11â‚¬ OUTE)%11* 01 TIE *le W T# MIOMERTY Elon,CHES EN TIE MLE, AlÂ® BLOCK 60 STRIET .0.1-1-90, ORIGINAL ASPEN TOWNSITE n *,3 Gl i Wit 1/ - &13118 , . , 01+ SCAL& r. 1,4, _-cULZZ>~4-Â»<L. - sc, 4 - Sl-EMPS CERTInCATE . .. 844.- -VA:'ll- --~-Â·at:c3 2-ar-- IA=- *nul L Laill H. AEÂ·rT~:11. i M TIE *TATE / . m ALLEY , IEREN, CEN 9,4 naT r,Â«s Â»,pR,MIOIT su,VEÂ¥ plAT b- I,~a< r,- rm_l loTES / A .AN. 00 Slitvt, 01 TIC AEOVE ZISCRIEE) Pli,Orr MAD[ TY -SILT. 1 1,2,1, 11, mccl ... m NESSO#)~ML $1*TRVISOL - CIECKZNG TIC 100*WTATIC,1 S,CWN 10,04 FIP 1,â‚¬ Flit,2,1, CCm,08 VAS rtlÂ»,B 1,1 SET i, THIS St,VEr. ALL -E]11106 - - INACLS S,EMI *lim Al< Clm,EZ, TE, 1* IEIT 01 * *MM.Â£00<. DEMOLITION PLAN Lins M mETTIER LE :3166 4244/4** ITE <3/>/'20:410Â·7 70 â€¢0 9./I01./'A #InK rrprm Dic DtratITEn â„¢It . - DAY , ........._._.. 199_. Al ---_.. Jt 111 Sl*VEÂ¥ HY, .. -_ tr Tâ€¢E Plt,14 COM, LAMB <U,vtÂ¥ 19â€¢rS,IMIÂ»IT-â‚¬lÂ·WAÂ¥ SiNVEÂ¥* AT PAE ..........I-'. , A-3 ,.... .... ./.i - . --. Cnll'. =1 1//4 9Â£/ --/ 1 1 1-- 1* ....44~ ,-- A ~// 0, 1---1-- I t Gretchen U.=-- lull '. 1 Greenwood 4 7-4 11 Â«1~~ .J & A--1,~ 1- A..40010,"40 81011 01//,4002 - F* 970~220* - - - T[1 -W 1 H I.,I Il I, 1 1 11 1 11 1 11 11 E)GSTING SOUTH ELEVATION C)EXISTING WEST ELEVATION SOLE: 1/4.â€¢r-0 L./SCAE: V,Â· . r.0 in n -- C. g A 1 1 I'J' 1 lilli Ct l Ill) 22- - .-0 11 1 Tm- .1'-0 a all= Vi 1 1 1 1 - . 71 1 111 WA=n alc=n *EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION ~EXISTING EAST ELEVATION hou: 1/4Â·. r-O SCA[: 1/4Â· - M A-5 /88 SOUTH FIRST STREET % -a~ - 4 '40 0,7, *12.-101 - =ely \ 7 Â¥22 ' / 1 \ el ki 1 '1 . '/i ! /0 1 6- d-/ \4 1 1 I> Z ) 0 0 .6100 0 a iP,d i M i i I i 1 E 4 1 a .......P 11: i. 1 ~.-, â„¢~Â·Â·Â·*.= illi:fi 1 :81 1 - =a; @ i:,: 135 West Hopkim -1 . =iw..4 4 bapel Ckdon.60 0 11,1/ 39 X0078 ARTIV WEST HOPKINS AVENUE 00-,1 =.9/1 Â»POS uold el!S PasodoJd Il1lllllllllllllll11IllllllillllIll11II1Illll11II1II1I1I1l1llll1l i ll11Illl1I11l1II11]111llll1Illl1Ill1I1I1111lIlllI1lll1ll1Illlll lili lilli t lilli i lilli' = 1-1.1-1-1-1.1.1.1.1.1-1-1-1-1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1-1-1.1.1-1-1-1-1-1.1.1.1.1.1.1-1-1.1-1-1-1-1-1.1-1.1-1-1-1.1-1.1-1.1.1.1.1.1.1-1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1-1-1-1- -1 1.1.1.1-1-1-1-1-1.1-1.1.1.1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1.1.1-1-1.1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 EL 105'-9' El 104'-00 UP - EL 105.-r I.. UP- - El MW-00 , / Gretchen Greenwood Carport & Ailoal,4 1=1 EL 103'-Â¢ EL IOr-00 9 ./.*ellit Ski Storage Al/40*.-01011 lEa / Â°* . ..1.4= 61 / Â¥00111= Mud Room Garage*2* El. 104'-00 EL 103'-0* El 105'-9' U 11 # up- / - an 0 0\. th Ir -=vi â€¢- 00Â¥81 4 -OUOU 11.8- 1 .imbl Ii-mcr-- lil04 0 0 1/Ii'.1.1 1 1 IL.1, L'I Tan of Pl-od . 3 -9 8 0 Ta Elmcr- Illllll ""'44 Do/1 -I 0 C - ) DOâ€¢1 6-. El 103'-00 EL 103'-00 .CAta U"614 a 1 1 1 1 1:1:11:11111111111111) lili))111111:1111 1:11111:11:1:111:111.1,1,1 Ill lilli.1,1'lili I 111 1111 1.1 1'.1. -- ..11 Co =in m /hMAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-9 1 Lble of Deck Above i & .01 BeÂ»i Master Both 2 Gretchen Greenwood & Al-1.- b â€¢C Steam Shoier A..0...m.11 Master Closet 2 ,=m.-40 ill 1 -7Â£00.1 Ne, 1 : 1 & Heded Deck 0 /E 1 ICALA VAN a ... I 00 /nupPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-10 Gretchen -DO"M Greenwood , 6 Nlocal,4 116 A.'40*â€¢-01811 RED 1 11 EL 124' 6-5/8' / 1 \ / . 1 1,0,Ji , / , / ~ 1, -- 0 ..9 1% 1 2 1 1.--9 ...C ,â€¢41â€¢ 1 ''ipt,1 0 - r- . 050 m - 0.- ... ' .AN. 00 =n OB ROOF AND ROOF DECK PLAN 0-4 A-11 ...7 1. l.* "25:lip lIN 1 I./4.k.:.. --- - 11111111111~~~~,~,~E-----== i *--- - -9 F - ..1 .. F. limbi'V 11111111111111, 111111111111] 1'' i P yd =1 lili Billi=@3 -11111111111- I. I, 1 2 .-. .-- 11111111111111111111111'llill'llill'll'lli -....................iin: i~milifil Ilillillillill ....0 .... ...... I=.4.- il,1. ----1 6 --- 11"lill.~ ..1.....i.. ,=g==29 - 1111111111111111LI0Q0;0+0+0V....illiblali...I-'.iwill-I.....Al -1â€ž-mill'llilillllillill -r==aN\~1111 lili-11111111 1- /~11 'll-Ilillill [Ht 1111111~ Ir....1 ..b 1 1 -1. 1, 1 - --- V. ~ ........... - L'.ip rd 11.1 -I-.1...I.- ~~~~~.E.E.:~~~.:.:i~~~~~Iliwilill 111 i I 1.1 - ~ 211- 9 F F- ~.Ill--I---I~- ~Il-~i= I---.Ill..=~ - - --/--.Il-------I---Il-- Rne----I -- f f 11:11 >A -'I lilli"Â§11111"11"lilli . WIUM-2 - i:.*I.*/*i*l.li~.i lillill'11111'lili *11#0*. i 1111111111! 11111111111111111111111111111!1111 1 1.r -. - .a 1, 1/1.6 mmillillil Illillillill =,1 1. 1.Â« li i i.,1 -1. 6 -1-11{0 Yr- - .Fillillillillillilillillillillill .-1 1-. ---Ilillill---1... - ililillillillilli - A-A lic.. 11111111111 ~ 1111111111111-- 11,11.1.1 1. - 1/,M' .1/1 111~11lilli 'G,12,11 .1[ -. I - ill 1111- m ~ C..::Ii' r, ... 1. 1. . f e Gretchen Greenwood & Aloo-% h A.'40010,- 81811 F==IM/0 TOP OF PLY,000 0 ROOF DECK . . 11 . 11.111.1 111 111 1111111 11.11- 1. - - i-E TOP OF PLYWOOD *ENTRY LEVEL. - 11 1 ~North Elevation/Bldg. Section A-A scale 1/40 â€¢ 1Â·-0 SCAU; 1/4.14 a -9. am:DN A-16 mAIdoH 'SDA G I !88 7 ... I . 1 . ... .. u i.L Up- e-0Â¥ . Greenwood Gretchen 1 .1 7 & Amoc=$0~ 10,6 820 Watmt: Street 4 Aspe* Colorado 81611 \ .. 970Â·40Â·4502 Â· F~ 970â‚¬m-7490 7- 10 - m tr=i Family Rm 1 1 1 1 Owner's Storage North Bedroom I L.ZI , . ~==1 I .. 0.-1 *bi .t. r- 1 . Â£,6 / Top of Concrete Slob / ags y - UP 1 North Bothroom I r 1 11 1<2111 2 1. 1-1 0000 Lower Level Hcll Owner's Storage Bor ~ ~ South Bedroom 2 0. Loundry R South Bath 7 M.1 . S Mechanical Rm. e . . . .4. I:.4 -- -- 1 SCALE: 1/4â€¢10-0 .. a DA,Emm 8,1 DIAIN 1 01[Iman m=B LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCMLE: 1/4'. M e A-8 . 1 . .. . ... /88 ~%-ay- ls_ 1 MEMORANDUM 6-00 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 234 W. Francis Street- Remediation Plan DATE: March 24, 1999 SUMMARY: On February 2401, March lst, and March 1 0th the Commission resolved several issues with regard to violations of permits at 234 W. Francis Street. Attached is the resolution which covers HPC's March 10th approval. Following are staff recommendations on the remaining items of the remediation plan. STAFF REVIEW: 1. South faQade: d. The replacement glass for the transom over the front door must be approved, with an acceptable sample to be provided by the owner. h. The Historic Preservation Officer is attempting to contact John Gatos, who did 0 repair work on the house in the past and who may have information on the origin of the concrete porch floor. If Mr. Gatos built the concrete floor, it will not be required to be recreated and HPC will approve a new floor. Staff recommends a wood porch floor because that is the historically correct material for buildings of this period. Furthermore, Joan Lane has been contacted and has stated that at the time of Herbert Bayer's occupancy, the porch floor was wooden. Mr. Gatos may also be able to provide some information about the earlier porch floor. 1. The replacement glass for the small window on the south facade must be approved, with an acceptable sample to be provided by the owner. 2. East Fafade a. The replacement glass for two broken window panes on the east facade must be approved, with an acceptable sample to be provided by the owner. b. The replacement glass for the transom over the east door must be approved, with an acceptable sample to be provided by the owner. 3. West Faâ„¢le a. The replacement glass must be approved for the bay window on the west must be approved, with an acceptable sample to be provided by the owner. b. Staff will contact John Gatos in regard to the origin of the concrete porch floor and a construction date for the porch itself. The applicant will be required to return the porch to its previous appearance, however Mr. Gatos' input may influence whether the original materials will be used. If the porch is historic, the applicant's will have to work with Stephen Kanipe to determine whether the porch roof can remain a 2"x4" structure as it was before, rather than 2"x6" as the UBC requires. In regard to the porch posts, a report from the structural engineer is attached, which proposes to remove and replace the top and bottom portions of the columns and add a steel rod down the center of the column for structural reinforcement. This is similar to what was done on the front porch posts. If the porch posts are historic, staff recommends that it be determined whether the existing top and bottom portions of the columns can be retained and strengthened with an epoxy injection before insertion of the steel rod. Otherwise the structural engineer's proposal is acceptable to staff and to Stephen Kanipe. As for the porch floor, the same comments from "lh" apply. Miscellaneous Items A. The HPC will inspect the fence to evaluate what repairs are needed. 1 0 10 U. Fl| Fle d B. Acceptable with a dark brown patina applied to the copper. C. Wood frame screens (painted to match the windows) which attach to the window with the kind of clamps that were traditionally used are acceptable, with drawings for the screens to be submitted for HPC approval. D. Acceptable. E. Acceptable. F. Acceptable. G. Acceptable. Attachments: A. Remediation plan for 234 W. Francis. B. Resolution No. , Series of 1999, including all decisions made on March 10, 1999. C. Progress report forthe week ofMarch 10-ir. D. Structural engineer's proposed repair for the columns on the west porch. , U Â£1 4 ; mul Â· 1 - :=fu 1 . .tul 1;1 J 1 -age Â£ i.1 0. ' .2. T,I:Iip.:Ii.,2.Â·:.It:.4, Nit< 11. fit B architects 4 March 1999 Remedial Plan for 234 West Francis Street, The Davis Waite House: PrioTity Issues: 1. South Facade: Front Forch: -he front porch shall be brnught back to its original charactet via the following: a. The existing secondary comice fascia trim is largcr than the original and shall be replaced with a new trim that matcheR exactly that of the original. An existing piece of that trim was salvaged and new trim will be made from that by ADW Design Works. A aample was reviewed at last xeeting's work session and ADW was approved as a qualified Bubcontractor. This trim shall wrap the front porch and return back to the house itself as per the original porch. b. The 2 free-standing columns and the 2 pilaster columns have been salvaged and are currently installed with new top and bottom portions that are identical in proportion to the previous columns. A small wood detail relief needs to be added to the top and bottom to match the historic columns and that sample detail was reviewed at last meeting. Ihe new piece of vertical wood behind the pilaster has been added which matches the historic. This is consistent and serves as blocking for the siding to butt into. c. Thedetailed case and corner blocking a,vundthe frantdoof shall beremoved and replaced with the same flat case that measured 5 1/4 inche;. Thia will be replitated from the photographs. d. The front door and transom are in storage and will be re-installed. The transom window at the front door was broken when the house was purchal,ed. The transum window shall be replaced with the 'seedy glass'. Ihâ‚¬ proposed stained glass window transoms will not be used. Ihe original door hardware is not operable or lockable and the owners wish to replace it with a proper locking hardware. The architect shall select an entry hardware that is compatible with historic atandard, and review the selection with staff for approval. e. The detailed scrollwork that supports ihe enliy roof canopy has been saved and will be installed per the same detailing. Â£ The underside of the porch shall have the game 2 1/4 inch beadboard criling installed per the historic porch- g. The roof of the poch shall*have a copper roof installed at the smne 1/12 pitch as the previous porch. The copper shall be patined to a dark brown and will not be visible from the street because of the low roof pitch. The former porch had a metal roof with many leaks repaired by tar. The evidence of leaking ls visible in the photographs from the rotted wood behind the pilasÂ©ers. Heat meltshall be used as in the previous pot,ch. 856 . mill st. aspen co. 81â€¢11 870 Â§20Â·9428 f. 970 920Â·7822 6 1 ]- l. JA F , 0- South Facade continued: h. The porch Roor material was removed. This was a patterned concrete to represent 12" x 12" tiles. The clients would Uke to replace mis with either recycled brick or Colorado flagztone, both are historic applications, L The new siding above the front porch shall be removed and replaced with the remaining salvaged historic siding. Some of this siding will require patching, epoxy'g, and sanding. The installation of this shall begin under the cave and work its way down as this is the most visible section from Francis Street. The amount of historic siding remaining is very close to this amount needed. j. The small trim detail around the easing of the large picture windows shall be removed. k. The new window trim, sills, and comer boards are new but are of the same dimensions md profile as the removed historic material Their were measured by Studio B ArchitedÂ» at the site on 17 February, 1999 to verify. Thcse dimensions are; 41/2" window trim, 5 1/4" door casing, 11/4" winduw sills, and 4 5/16" for the corner boards. 1his is typical throughout the project and address many of the same points on other elevations. 1. The small fixed window al tile upper portion of the facade is a single pane window that has been cracked prior to the owners purchasing the house. The owners would like to replace this with the 'seedy glass'. m. The new aiding that has Ieplaced the removed siding 13 of the exact same dimensions and profile as the hhturic, This is typical throughout the project. The samples were again mviewed at last meeting. The owners would like verirication Chat the d,14ng that is currently installed may remain. n. The copper roof fleâ€¢hing shall all be patined to a dark brown. o. The copper window head drip caps shall remain above all windows on the historic main house The historic window dcbail had a tin cap. We will patina the copper to the dark brown again. 2. East racade= a. The two smaller window panes that were accidenlally broken, are to be replaced with the mme historic glass supplied by the Bendheim Glan Company. b. The saved historic door and transcm at the small porch shall be re-installed with the eme trim and easing. 3. West Facade: a. Thc large broken window pane is to be replaced with a new 'seedy glaÂ»H' pane that replicates historic glass and is being made by Bendheim Glass Company of New Jersey that specializes in historic renovations. UL' 6 ./. a,JU'/9 & 6,1.441/LILL,/J, O '.U =CU 1 0.4 , Mel i ' -4 1929 1 '4+Qi-Â£.1, taye 4/4 b. The small historic porch shall be re-built per the drawings and incorporate the sized columns and door. The same door tIim as tile front door shall be used. The samc detailing will be used per the photographs. Like. the front perch, the floor material will be replaced by eitherÂ· the used brick or the Colorado nagstone. 'the porch that ts eurrer~tly built, has the roof structure built of 2 x6 material and not the 2 x4 framing as in the original porch. The. 2,c 4 does not meet current code or the structural engineers approval. 'The roof material on the porch shall match the roof shingles per the main house. See the enclosed structural engineers details. 4. North Facade: a. Similar procedures previously mentioned. ' Â· -0 I -, - Â· r ' f u Â° l.;+3 9 J~ I .6-' ... architects e 4 March 1999 Remedial Plan for 234 West Francis Street, The Davis Waite House: Miscellaneous Issues: 1- Notes: a. The historic fenc â€ž haf; been saved and is under approved protection on site. This shall be installed ut on completion. It should be noted that Borne portions of the fence may he zeÂ·built because some areab of the fence were weathered beyond repair, but will be built to the same dimensiong. This remedial work Mhall be perfornled by Aspen Design Works. b. The approved set uf drawings show a small 6-8" stone veneer at the bilse of the house. 'lhe odginal house had a metal flashing at this area because the rubble stone foundation had settled and may areas were repla,ed by concrete block The current detail is a copper flashing that M'hall be patined and once backfilled and landscaped will reveal approximately +6 inches of the dark patined copper. To use an apphed *tone veneer is not really practical and the patined copper flashing better replicate the condition of the historic house. c, The clients wish to use exlerior screens as per the original house. 'Ihe screens that were savcd shall be re-used and any new screens shall be built tu exact dimension.bi of those. 'Ihese wood-framed screâ‚¬ns shall be installed within the wlhdow jambs per standard mmovable screen details. d. All guner& and downspouts shall be painted per the historic house. e. Scott Lindenau personally visited the site on February 17th and reviewed these directives with the owners and contractor. Scott also measured a]1 of the siding, trim, comeIboards, sills, gutters, and olher details of concern to verify dimensions. Â£ The new non-historic north elevation stairway dormer was approved with a 10 foot 4 -pane fixed window, Once that window opening was framed. it made the scale of the stairway uncomfortable with a height of 16 feet 'I:hat window was then installed as an 8 foot 4-pane window and lowered two feet g. The window wells on the east side of the house show a ralling by owner. The owners would instead like to address this code issue with a metal grating flush with the 6" concrete curb aad slone cap. This would be considerably less visible, 6" versus 36". The intetior of the window wells shall bea painted stuceo that matches the window well at the carriage house. m n mill $1 aâ€¢pan 00 81611 970Â·920-9428 la, 970â€¢920Â·7822 t RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING ELEMENTS OF THE REMEDIATION PLAN FOR 234 WEST FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 1999 WHEREAS, the owners of 234 W. Francis Street, Don and Gwen Mullins, represented by Studio B Architects, are required by the "Stipulated Findings of Fact and Order" to receive HPC approval for a remediation plan addressing violations of Building Permit No. 8-49; and WHEREAS, a remediation plan was submitted for review by the Historic Preservation Commission at their regularly scheduled meeting of February 24,1999; and WHEREAS, the HPC approved elements of that remediation plan as defined in Resolution No. _ and Resolution No. , Series of 1999; and WHEREAS, the architect submitted a revised remediation plan, Exhibit A, for the March 10,1999 HPC meeting; and WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled HPC meeting of March 10, 1999, elements ofthe revised remediation plan were approved, as described below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That from their regular meeting ofMarch 10, 1999, the following issues have been resolved to the satisfaction of the Historic Preservation Commission, as related to Exhibit A. 1. South fa*ade: a. Approved with the condition that the replacement trim be identical to the original trim. b. Approved with the condition that the missing trim detail be added, matched identically to the original trim. c. Approved with the condition that the trim and corner blocking are identical to what existed historically. d. The broken transom glass can be replaced, with the exact glass to be approved at a future date. The door hardware may not be replaced, other than the deadbolt. The historic door jamb must be reinstalled along with the door and transom. e. The original scrollwork must be installed to match the original condition. Â£ Acceptable. g. Acceptable. h. Not approved. The Historic Preservation Officer will contact John Gatos, who may have information on the origin of the concrete porch floor. .-1\ \O<39 1 4 l,/1/1~14= 6 i. Acceptable with the condition that the contractor meet with HPC for technical advice. j. Acceptable if made to match the original. k. Approved. 1. Not approved. Further information is needed on the character of the replacement glass. m. Acceptable. n. Acceptable. o. Acceptable. 2. East FaGade a. Not approved. Further information is needed on the character of the replacement glass. b. The historic door, transom, and jamb must be reinstalled. The trim around the door must match what was there historically. The glass in the transom may be replaced, once the glass sample is reviewed and approved. 3. West FaGade a. Acceptable, with confirmation that the replacement glass will match the original. b. Not approved. Staff will contact John Gatos in regard to the porch floor and a construction date for the porch itself. 4. North FaGade a. Approved. Drip caps will be darkened and new clapboards will be installed to match the original exposure. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved at to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Sent By: STUDIO 8 ARCHITECTS; 870 020 7822; Mar-17-QQ 4:59PM; Page 2/2 architects 17 March 1999 Progress Report #3 for 234 West Francis Street, The Davis Waite Hollae: (Submitted by Scott Lindenau of Studio B Architects.) There was no exterior wâ€žIk performed during the period of 10 March -17 March. 0 555 n. mil| 91. aspen 40 0161 1 0/0-920Â·9428 fe* 070Â·M20Â·1822 1 -ber QO~A Litle.4.6 PATTILLO ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS PAOJECT MUUmb 0:561 0~CE 33,4- 64Â· FRMâ‚¬ 7â€¢5 GAANO AVENUE â€¢ 0.0.SCOX 751 CATÂ»FE 17/1 119 ey ~4#3- GLENWOCO SPFUNGS. CCLCAACO 81602 0 9031 945-8896 1 1 SHEET OF (1}847- facti COLUMN BEF/*1124 A#imlymn'!40,4, *i uN HEbÂ· p,-'4>. : Â·i.9.4. -6.-e..#*43?kk./.4.-Â» .- .0,%.9 4 27,1*c' e.=-r- epr P#04 Pc34,~4.+9,Â¢ e .. .59â€¢Â· ~Â· Â· Â·--- -- .._...:. - . -/ *: " 1~ (63* 1. t. i .r 2*:,4 1076 t:*. i .. %306- te. 0 S RL...2 1 . ~ i Â¢9-9; . - I .. .. . -4 7*0 -Â«CA#All ' I T â€¢e 3 14 1%495?F C O%00Â® ..,m'tat. - .0 t.322~40/vroU; +14 C rd-3,4 Â° 2.-16 * - 1.-15 .<f = : 85 2; .Â·;2 /3 -- A: ~ 9201* , 24' 4 . in : fÂ©,Â· ipedÂ· c 04-ri-?:d ' . 1.... - - -11F.,--- +: . -- -9--4- +7]8~11*149 dSK &:Jl 5 -:*- #. 212 82513/(75+ 15>- ; 1 , :. .\ 4 / r 'tip 0 . :f) 0-3 2&45 66=f + :i 4 1 : . ' i / (*Uol Ujood) -Â·.p, 151Â·rsiÂ· Â· '76 - 3,9 9- 91093- - .... +:i __-_ 4, 1.- ~Reroove .ckpd-* reflack ..4,9.jgb.It.".'teÂ¥*A- cf-*Colyd Â¢Â·Ais) 4/ irm_ted.. St'bÂ¢R _.. _ ...... yedwoÂ» .heo,yt.. ebar~al- - pl,Dv)*.*Irn,]39 .134Â·Â·'*...hof*.twr,4,18.CgÂ»/ Uilte ,~>i Â¢41 94'9 .fÂ©plgqkt.,end >,*... 6;Lue ukth.axacrp*f.gdby.St.ve _ ....... _..._........ .... 4......s. ._ (f.85(>rci/.0(0 .ef fet#.4*UnoÂ«t)....472 5,~Prbyâ‚¬Â·JOGAt: Â·- 41.. -f(AL'F *TACF~t o.tig.0,'Aty hate. *o.jd'h Â¢t\>OP{.?acteÂ· YYQk>,i,%41. , 9!CU,} ~4#t.T~ t~~:. - - -01,. IMe,14- MÂ© re,ba# gy ._1~* cul-frlyâ€¢ad. fhyough 60,400.<cf. 40241.46 r.de':0'/6 4:@166 4 6.9094. .-'V.* .(ALTE*, - -Latk..4 6~812,0,/p ms,vt.94.4/4.4- ..554 -.-,t0rd~??Jh#dfie##4.. Ill,__ - 2Â·~Â«~96:-54*&40'tÂ·lut,_.986-9,Ev ,lkcÂ»+j g~44~4(A bf,f:Tv 41.1 31** tocal,eno yo\N t. ~ Ogairs o:Ad ridir 'Suq-#1 0 diftect .600)5 900â‚¬ok.e.SpoÂ»1 01â‚¬1* . 5201.(90& 0.,2?: Â»*ta 6Â»1-\- b TOTAL P.02 tillult,/,3 - 1 _.*-- - 52 Ezz-*z yÂ» -- I.:-;. I. 7- :' - 1. rI -. i - - 2 -- I .. - LÂ·i*?1*Nil/19966/./- -zA--i_'/. _9-' , Iirrtrittrrr rrrrf[rIf[frrfliilIirtii 1 1 11111ij-1111 .1/7- *8 1 ..Iâ€ž. k.ir. -, . 4- , -9 i ~'' If ,, 1 1 .jil lili . 111 1 1. il 11 11 -111 . 1 i 1 1 1 1 11-1 '' 1 1 ' !; 1 1 11 I'llfilli 1 1 l[ 1 1 1 1 1.11 116 ' 1.w, 1,~1 flf lilli 11 1 1 1-!11 11 li ![.~ 1 Ill 1 lilli 1 lili.1 11,1 11 1 .1 III 1 111 1/ fl /1 '1 I lilli M 'lili ill j f lilil.lili ~ 3-1 1 1 lilli 1, ru 710 1' â‚¬ e k-7 . 1, 1 1/ f , 1 ' M . r#-*- *.- - 2-, , 6 1,131 Li j i i I i 1 -i i i i_d . 1Â·71;'. linA' 1 1 1 -1 11 ~0. i f. 'Ip-42. rair 34*' . vuummituu=\11 1 i YNalriUP/#Micill / M - . r- -56 4-1 1 141;Fl 1 '11 Â» /1959.. . 42 --T, ty Ill ' . . '2.4 i '. Ililli- - -~ ~t>{ ~ C_. tllt l.l It , . '11 - r ... 1 1 r 711 11 '. 1 ' * 1 %3 .-11 0 9/.IL .mill 9 1 I il l111111111 il ~~~ ~~ '' 2- .. 446 2 -9 0 10-4 g-nd* -ipp~ =E-- 0Â«04) -4-0~na 3 1-4.A A_â‚¬_ (Â¢6Â» 6=-au_*O 1-AbL; 64Â£1 U.-Y(litruL,â€ž-1-Av,~ Sau_-a-Â»-. bil=CL Ojb-Â·046ma* 0,4Â»Nyul EXHIBIT-L I L.99 99 94 tri . a