The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.435 W Main St.HPC5-9346 6, ED. ma.-4 ~ L' Auberge d'Aspen HPC Exemption 2735-124-50-053 HPC5-93 -2 -ikh .. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee /-7 From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Office~ Re: Minor Development: 435 W. Main St., Swiss Chalet facade windows Date: October 14, 1992 SUMMARY: The applicant is seeking HPC's Minor Development approval for new facade windows for nine of the 10 structures that comprise the Swiss Chalet. They are also asking for approval for chimney caps. Repainting is proposed, however, all surfaces proposed to receive paint have been previously painted, therefore the HPC has no review over this aspect. Recommendations may be made on color, however. APPLICANT: ALH Holding Company (Audrey Haisfield) for Swiss Chalet Kitzbuhel Partnership, as represented by Gibson and Reno. ZONING: "0" Office, Main Street Historic District ~ PROCESS: Staff made the determination that this application meets the definition of "Minor" Development, due to the consistent, singular window change proposed for each of the cabins. DISCUSSION: The Development Review standards are found in Section 7-601 of the Land Use Code. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay district or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark... Response: We support the new owner's desire to preserve this lodge, and upgrade the small units by bringing more light into them. The preservation of this parcel's use as a small-scale, affordable lodge was considered to be of utmost importance in the Main Street Historic District Study (1989). The Aspen Area Master Plan also supports the preservation of small lodges, finding that they contribute greatly to the diversity and friendliness of Aspen, the Resort. We are not satisfied that the proposed window changes meet the Development Review Standards, finding that they significantly alter the character of the individual units, and therefore, the entire parcel. The existing windows are very small, (6-pane, divided) but have a distinct horizontal proportion. With the addition of shutters to either side, this design element is a strong horizontal community. However, staff is concerned that unsympathetic changes to small resources in our historic district will eventually erode the cultural value of the community. HPC COMMENTS': 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: This parcel is not a designated landmark, therefore staff's architectural comments are found above, under standard #1. HPC COMMENTS: ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider the following alternatives: 1. Approve the Minor Development application as submitted 2. Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations should be offered). 4. Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the development review standards. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC table Minor Development approval for the proposal at 435 W. Main, to allow the applicant time for restudy, or grant approval subject to specific design revisions to be approved by staff and the project monitor prior to the issuance of a building permit. A project monitor should be assigned at this meeting. Additional comments: memo. hpc.435wm.md 3 1) 1*ject Name *5 041 '545 6+IALET- 2, Project Locatism 4 55 \,4. MAIN 5-E LaT-5 A.3 8,-06 M. 38 (indicate street address, lot & block nunber, legal description Wiere apprupriate) 3) Present Zoning 6OM MI OFFICE 4) Iot size 269 88 5. F. 5) Applic:antis Nane, Maress & It*xe # ALH 14060/Ne COMPANY *NowMA56 VILLAGE , 6.0 923 Â· 6526 6) BepÂ¥135=Itative's Nane, Aairess & arcie # Gl BSOrâ€¢/ 4 REND AWCH/TBUTS 418 E. CoopeF- ASPEN, CD 9 25 Â·5968 7) UYI" of Application (please check all that apply): Conlitional Use - Conceptual SPA Ocncepppl Historic Dev. Special Revier Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline - Conoeptial FUD _~ Minor Historic Dev. .1 Stream Margin Â· - Final POD Historic Demoliticn M'nntain View Plane Subdivisirn _ Historic Designation ~- axgic:niniumization - Tvodi/Map Amendment . (2*33 Allotmant Int Split/Iat line Â· -_ GliS Eboamption Adjustment 8) Des:eription of Existing Uses Â· (Inober and.~Â· type of cori Bting e+yÂ·"tures, appruxiinate sq. ft.; amber of bedrooms; any previous approvals granted to the property) U EX/67-196 6095/ STS OF 9 OVE Â· 5TOAV CA61NS 8â‚¬TLIEV 180 5.F-Â· 70 400 5<*. FT. AND I 5/N 6 LE 5-Tbgv OFF\ Ce ~ {2.-25( DENCE 9) Description of Development Application C.) To cHANGE ExTER/00. 130,1-0,Ne COLog-s OF The 8%1617#Je (AS,NS Â¢ OFFIcâ‚¬/Itâ‚¬50. 171 -16 Exewo EXPUTD!6 60665 IN CABIN5 -lb ADD HogE WKED'ZAL 616'IT/,/6 10) Have yOU attached the following? Response to Attachment 2, Miniann Subnission Corr~nts 1/5- Reqponse to Attachment 3, Specific Suhnission Contents 9â‚¬ t> Ihesponse to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application ... A AzeqÂ¢3$29.*,4 3047*... " '4 :.IÂ· 9.. i. *Ap. : 7, I'l l ' . Â·- 1 1 -1 ... 2- - ..i 04*N: -t . -I.//1/**//,i~1 4 :Steker.6 . 0. 1.1 : 12919:-#*4,47 ... 12 :, . . ... 4,4. :2949* 3/ 4 - . 4- . . b.,1 ... 1 9 '.1. .. . . :.4/ L. 1 : '- - /:. *... ;el .==1 .. >: I r / /7**â€¢-r~* 1'22-t-=I.*e-~d'Â·2~/â€¢2~211.&/1 , *71. Â· ~ -4 I ... . li I . 0 r 1 - . . "P+."4. . 1.â€ž,1,â€ž 0 4""4Â· f ' - .*4 . 11tt'Ih . ., I ..... . A = i 0 M AIN 1 1 I===~ 1 k===== FOU AD: CITY MONUMENT S 75 09' 11" E 0 /565 // ---3 1 1 ~j,Â« ONE STORV/7 1 \\\ WI / / 1 iÂ¥:ba-' I t 4 1 ' -* i i Y~k_ ___1| 1 1 S LOTS 1 1 9 CCD -CD LO - CABIN LOCA- 1 00 O E--- -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ------ A 59.97 BC D L U N 75Â© 09' 11"W C -- -- -24'1*-35" LINESÂ·Â·, --. G 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 c- Q,*BH EA[) POWER TELE 8 TV. , : i.i L 6- GIBSON & RENE) Â· ARCHITECTS 418 E. COOPER AVENUE Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 NI4 5 ' 49" E 100.00 00 001 4 th ST E-r (75.66' WIDE) . .. . -I....I ......p:.I . - .. -4..- . .Al 4 '. , -A .... ...... M.7./1 t..ElÂ· . tivv -- .---Ill-)---- - <pa::ft. I .. It . . ..../i"'ll.........................................- ..... . valli:.â€¢49#4 -11. I . 1 ~.L. 1 4 -- 1 ir .. 24 .. . .1/. b.... i. 1 . * 4 . 4 ' ,WfL . T...1-,trj 4 *2 4~P ..-40Â«ff: . V " b - ... . 1-, . '.. -I *. -: ..4.. I. 1 .--1. 1,<...- Pli,....:t.lut~11 .5-:Off.~-92*037<49 â€¢Â·11. ... 4 .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 01/25/93 CASE NUMBER: HPC5-93 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2735-124-50-053 PROJECT NAME: L'Auberge d'Aspen HPC Exemption Project Address: 435 W. Main APPLICANT: L'Auberge d'Aspen, Audrey Haisfield Applicant Address: 435 W. Main, Aspen 920-6823 REPRESENTATIVE: Representative Address/Phone: TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: ~ 41- 3% 34944 1-4-73 . 811 /4-1/4 4-1 1/( 44 A44 HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: . 130 S Gatena BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIO~ General Construction 1 Aspen, CO 81611 ASPENIPITKIN AEGIONAL BUILDING DE MENT Permit 303 920-5440 PITKIN COUNTY [3 CITY OF ASPENEÂ« --42 Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. No. 0 -, ) ~JOBAD;flt q o '04Â·'4~j--/47/4//t'Â« (3 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR SUBDIVISION . C ' SEE ATTACHED SHEET) - ~ 1 /1 , . DESC \ Y-kai<~it~b z=u_,lod/66;0.it' 2. zi,- MAIL ADDRESS PHONE OWNER , 1 -3-5- li,//5/ /49 /0/ 34 74-41 :53 7.-7 - 10~9.;C '~ CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS PHONE,~ 3.300 - LICENSE NO _ ' 4.( <( f'Ex/JrÂ·pu,\ f it'-~ Ffulf,4 cut,yâ‚¬~7 Fi._/'7~60 ff,i> .t.4 i-\ c A f,0 1Cf, 14 . ;'336 60.E68#3 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER / MAIL ADDRESS #HONE LICENSE NO. ' 5. i'\4,1Â« 1 \/ 4 911 f-L-j -3-3 7 3 /1 ju-A 91 4-- c.,</4 ritjÂ· \4-- 91.3 1-713L i &14 ENGINEER ' MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. -,/ 0. CLASS OF WORKÂ· SQUAREJ AGE ZONING EEE '-1 r . CENSUS CODE 7. U NEW L] ADDITION ~ALTERATION L REPAIR E 8. 9 93 USE OF BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE 3% USE TAX DEP / 9Â· t; e q Iil t.,/0 ~ Id l /34. 9 1% fj, 49 VALUATION OF WORK ~ Type of Construction Occupancy Group Lot Area 10. $ 9412 *Â© 7 -- t Size of Building No of Stories Occ Load 11. Remarks (Total Square Ft.) r. - Liz.,â‚¬1 0â‚¬1.-Â·~Li~ '. ,97-,~r, ./6.4/ .41247/E 2 57 NO. OF BEDROOMS Use Zone â€žÂ·-f~ . Fire Sprinklers RequiredÂ· EXISTING ADDED () 4.,(fl ' 2 Yes No 11 '743 1 U - ij , < L :fÂ·47/ Uk- f. fi t OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES Covered Uncovered 9 Loct g._ Ul*~'li SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATE i 066,01 - - ' 4 ZONING DHUEDING 460 4 f (11*Â»1 i 1.92 \3Â»U? 4-t.Â»--- )24#26~COtÂ£/ ..,:~ , Of-AD<UC<14Â¢f '~ /-029- 73 Fixture Count: 2/6 %4113,6-8 /7,>67-2,2-46<5 , PARK DEDICATION , HEALTH DEPARTMENT 0 E Er C \ ) -3,3-/ cf -31-J t FIREPLACE 4 w ~ A PRESUBMITTAL,/ APPL CATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED APPROVED FOA ISSUANCE FIRE MARSHAL /92/. r SPRINKLE R i,4/ /-7 /4 -3 Â°ATEL f i ~ -~ 1> 0,<TE - . DATE ___ 1 t. , , A : 1 WATERTAP - It 1-4-f-J NOTICE OTHE SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, NL 11- 04 4 411(,CÂ« 4. l.Â«Ai- #fc c~**lÂ·* HEATING. VENTILATING OR AIA CONDITIONING. SELECTION Of METHOD FOM PAYMEN-~OF USE TAX 4711,:Ccll THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IFWORKOR CONSTRUCTION LJ MONTHLY USE OFQUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED.' ; AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120,180 DAYS, OR IF CON- STRUCTIONORWORKISSUSPENDEDORABANDONEDFORAPERIOD - L DEPOSIT METHOD: 3% OF 25% OF PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOW OF 120 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. AT ISSUANCE. FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL MATERIALS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND COST MUST BE FILED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WORK. GENERAL CONTRACTORS CHOOSING THIS METHOD WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT THE GRANTING.OF A PERMIT DOES NOT MUST REPORT AND REMIT TAX FOR ALL SUBCONTRACTORS PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF THAT DO NOT OBTAIN THEIR OWN PERMIT. ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PER- FORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. L EXEMPT STATE & PITKIN COUNTY RESALE NO- f. #Ir, 1 ,/ EXEMPTORGANIZATION / S GNATI JAE OF COMAACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT DATEÂ· -TEiis f â‚¬2104'Â· 9 ,Â· Pt-1-4FcÂ·,i-' Â·)4'l'Â·C v.'Â·- I '.:41 !!.il' . 2 ' 0 WORK STA P.1 5-12, 61Â·:7 Fc.,.Â·--t~ER,Â·49 N PF' I.1/-,l'!41 ' DATE] SIGNATURE Of CMIFF* MF OWNER BUILDFA) Zoning Validation Plan Check Validation Permit Validation 3% Use Tax Deposit Validation WHITE FIt-E COPY GREEN FINANCE DEPT PINK BUIt DING DFPARTMEN1 YEXLOW -ASSESSOR GOLD-CUSTOMER .... M q i R Street - 1 f - 4> f n a \22 FOUND 6---- 1 1 j IRRIGATION PITCH Ch'.4 CITY MONUMENT~ OSEWER O FOUN C'TI /0/UN'i' 9 5 75'09'ICE Â· C Â· k .1 ~ ~faS41/1/1-' E 209-91 5TDNE LL /133-\ POIT O \ 00 11 \ ~MONE PLANT i / /43 quARTER- L-- U / 1 jfCABIN 9/- 1 \ (444 / Ik~ 1 *1/ ONE STORY/// 1,1/Illill'/ilirÂ·Â· l 5TON E WALL =:,5)L,C:,z]132F=ohc,<c~:go~&:,=$0= 41 //7 Na 74 x OUNP LIGHT O ~ -~ 7 F 4////.142'5~550 f 4 + ll 42-j- 01 = f 1/l LIGHT ~ GRAVEL ~ DRIVEWAY ICI) l 0 GROUN> OGROUND LIGHT NEW SPA ~ 1 4,45014 35/4 Â» i -0 2 1 NEEW EGRESS < -- /,1, liliI itilir' I. --~i~ ---i 1\ -- / LU ---- ------1 --u ~.ji-~ /1 0 3242//Â»449 2 t O GROONLLIGWT WINDOWS 4 8 0 12 rnE Â°13 - tdÂ· B QwLY-443 ~1 57.004 9Â»97/ 06*1 &*. 71 !.ill'lli' 1. Ah OGâ€¢OUND 11 5/4 /Â»2 -05 \ 11 0,11/2, /. ./fropipi Z .1-_ 1 I 5, E= f .1 ~~ 14 -3-jâ‚¬Â»2~-A.~~ . 0 ll_ A990 c. W . // \ 6 0-1 .T 3 \lillith'tr. ,\ 1 -0 t till ,* - 01 ~ t ~6Â·.771 ~ ~ + 'AULLL.17 0 =0 - ) L *, /2435 00 / 1 10 t%*14.104915 4 i 382*14-96*4- CONCRETE PAD \.111}1111'lill -3-m-- 1 . /447-9 Â£%39 1 49 15 1 \ 4 1116â€¢ #CABIN 1/06, LmidIN 235@ sk,/Wil ///1/i, Â·/ I 44-24910 we/,Au.U//4 1 4 1 Mm 1 171, *\37 /-Â£**ELT, , er- rr '1, il */CABIN 3/8 1 |~ Z>CABIN 4' 2 i N L** BIN ~~ ~ 1 . //:*,24-2/92 / 11 ~CABIN 6'0 1 1 L-12/Vt-Ad , 6)5 UNE /â€¢~3,1 - A 59.9~ 0 2 42.- .63 'L- //4914Â·10 ~00Â», 1 N~z. to,4 1 L____2 L. DWA. RON MFE :UÂ· AR .fl 0 / 1 LLI/Jov J | 1 11\1\ 1 209Â·91 1 | four ~ N 75Â°09'll"w \ J â‚¬ SET: kEBAR cTIC CAP L.5.9164. C â‚¬ 4 TO S ~ ----------- -- ------Â· Â·- -+Â·Â·-- -- --- ALLEY _ ~___ _ _~ __~_ ~_~_~ ~ __..____._ CENTREE LINE ' --- BLOCK 36 W d 1 li'=9 20' 11/ SITE PLAN = "L'Auberge" 1 +115-+97 0 001 M â€ž65 ~ ~ ~~~ *~ INIVGAÂ¥4 30 N 14 50' 49" E - L bs g - sz 12 (e 04) OC]VE|(31#7 Madsv '19 11'YPN 9Â· 921.- ' El\ i 6Â¢â‚¬20Â£96-[0Â£ â€¢ f2918 OPâ€¢0100 '01;Puoqi,0 â€¢2~319 4!EM Cle T "Yof T 1[K~]Fli\-ITI.r 41!utS VA &01141 kitk Je k]1-=12,11-#(Cll V . Â·~ ~PlacÂ»9 U 11-0-2] Â·a(9409 3 8 ' 9 89 P Ga 19-3-21 91 -2131~ Mo 1 -- rl , , 1, . , . 1 32~, 1 4 ZA " , . li Ij h 'F ~ 11-3,4 1_1 ' 1 .,1113*;be-a .* 0 11 1- 342â‚¬flD'*) 3 ID 5.1,4 .1.0 Of 12~ Â£ ..3-x1 .Â» 4 Al,$**54*, #)3~ - 4 Â· I~~4.AIA + 1... M 1 '- j 0.44 41kT.. i. '' 101,Â·,' 9 *vÂ· 2,â€¢ '-:A 7 4 4 '*F % I 1 -j 4,8-7,11 - f.,1 2.1? 11... 1 4 3-* J 07 C R L rip. N. 24; .~M k,Fi '44 -7.7~+- -4 - -:t- =Â·-Â· U~- 34;~ I Â· 3 1- 3 03 3, 6 919Â¥11*Â¥> 36Â¥3 Na I , 10 m r--1 r 1 w . 4 111 .,71,2.4.0 0 .0:i- 40 3 1 . - Mr 08 5..3 Â·I N,r .,L. 1 4 '12Â©2 3 *clow-le .1 '42 /Â¥(31Â«) ' g TIOj 2 6 0 1 2 -21.4 - P - va 4 + 3 . 3"02. 2 4 Â· 0 $ EL --1 --.I 5 -9 6 4 & m 6 3 5 4 - li \ 4 --Â·p 7 -2 4 6 , 4 -. Al j f E# 1 4 0 f 1 / r# 3 {1 ': 4 u >hj d 8- -- Ot -0 . 44 1 f in - 4 4 1 * 6 -â‚¬ Â£ d -1 â‚¬ -2 Rh -4 -1 % k ' 7< *N 6 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1-1 " . Mr -1 + - u% 014 Ut- (73 '' 2 /1 1 3. i N U- 4 --I -Il - - - - / -- & 3 4 -- -- -- - ---- --- -- - LD Â¥ 3 1 CO 3-r 0 \11 7 Si& r, r --- ;-7 I~~ d v- 4315 1 41 1** r 0 - 6 y 4 -- . 11 -,Co - .- 1 Ji 4 4 A â‚¬U)\D ('dAL) ehtlla'02 -2 4490-mli4 01 4 F -2 (13 0 Â»9 439 Aa *af . 1 1 Â»2 \3 f, I A) El 10 u i eu_11- f-1 K 2 '1. 49:A=A / 1**ey.. , <18*941-INal'eeÂ¥7 01 004 19,*LSIX2 O 2,9 e 491142 . 1 tif rÂ«~a _2100351 .. 11 11 ------ / m 86 UMove, 7 GÂ·Kigr ING, WINDOW ~ , 5 NoWN PolfeD I) J .A NEW Ge,%56 -/ 0- 1 WIN DOW, CASE rtelf'5Â· -- 7 f Ke' 4'-9 kv *3'-1* H ~ i ~ PRIMED Â¢ PA# 74-TED.. i 1 W eATHS:f.tlsH 'SUP , 1 CA- ECRUAL Â· /1 1 I 1 1 i PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION / 1 1 1 i i h 1 iilt 11 1 1 HI/ 11 11 1 Â¥ 1 . 1 - PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION "L'AUBERGE" PROJECT TITLE: 333 VVEST MAIN ST. SCALE *,~~ ~ ) // 2, / 93 DATE; 1 (Formerly Swig= Chaletowâ€¢. OUG DRAWING NO. L 6- GIBSON & RENO Â· ARCHITECTS PROJECT Â¥120 1. 2- I)-I 418 E COOPER AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN COLOAAOO 81671 , Â»1+91. . . 21 . . '0 .- - . 4 -1 tr Â§4~ P avaM.'.*.0, -=m. . 0 W I er-. tâ€¢ I .45.,1~i.~t'Â· -I'.3: -' . t . 1. Frw .- 44 -- e '/. 1-*. 0 '*.. - i. n i-i .,r . m - * / t.. . I - i <.-*-3.-f - 2. 4 -1 -. ...3 .' - 11 & 6 - & 3 '' . , I. -4 , .. , - I -- '-21*4}U'- it: Fri I 42:.-1 . . . -f' . 1 T R i.,df . A .. - - . &./. t./ - 1 &-. 1 16 i 1 , 1, , , ..4 I . 4 : Â·34 ...4 - I . k 4 1 r 4 Â· 41, 1 1,1 -,. I - . . . 79.. L' AuBER.Ge 313 W. MAIN 91-* - 1 -: -'--.---*------ D. r I r : - .4 L : 1 . .4. . h. r K /1 4Â£ Â¥; . 'L .6//6 ./&. tlt-' 1 .2.. 2 '1~1 ./.k ' U . -1 . .m 8-# t f 4. 4 ?:f,t, -. . 4./.Ill"I-- r --- i -- / 4 f . I .: -- _ - 1 'â€¢ 2 . &5 - r 4 Â¥ ----4 .74 4 9 2/ ' '1...1 Â¥ I I e. 4. , & . 1 -.. 7 , - .1 - 1 1 t 1 - 0 1 i . - i. 1 . 44, - R 1 1 1 1 1 .. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Minutes of October 14, 1992 Meeting was called to order by Les Holst with Linda Smisek, Karen Day, Roger Moyer and Jake Vickery present. Bill Poss, Don Erdman, Joe Krabacher and Martha Madsen were excused. MOTION: Roger made the motion to approve the minutes of August 26, Sept. 23rd and Sept. 9, 1992; second by Linda. All in favor, motion carries. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Les: Having been gone I wanted to thank the Committee for their decision on the Thalberg house. 435 W. MAIN STREET - SWISS CHALET Kim Johnson, Planner: The proposal is to replace the facade windows Of nine of the ten cabins. Also included in the application are new chimney caps. They also intend to repaint the structures. The cabins have been previously painted. Staff has concern about the proposed window changes not meeting standard number one which is finding that they significantly alter the character of the individual units. Dave Gibson, architect: In the memo it states that this small scale friendly lodge contributes to the ambiance of Aspen. Fortunately, it has found a new owner that wants to keep the cabins. Where the memo states that the swiss cabins are being changed to victorian I would have to take a little different departure. The only thing that makes these cabins swiss are a few dabs of blue paint. once you take those away I feel they fit in a western resort cabin tradition. Very vernacular that came up during the first part of the century and there are numerous examples of it throughout the area; Woods lake, C lazy U, Frying Pan Anglers cabins, Elk Run Lodge and T lazy 7 guest ranch, all exemplify architecture that I feel this project fits into. Native stone work, heavy shakes, roof sawn siding and the exposed rafter tails together with a steeper pitched roof mark what I would call a western resort cabin. The T Lazy 7 guest ranch is very similar with the steep roof lines. They have small windows and also have larger windows. We would like to build on this tradition and enhance the cabins. We are proposing the small pane windows but larger windows and the interior of the roof will come out so that you have more head room on the interior which will make the cabins more amenable. We will keep the exposed rafter tails, rough sawn siding and will add a chimney cap. We are preserving what is best about the cabins and also enhancing them. The north elevation is the only elevation getting this treatment, the other elevations will remain as is. Les: Is there a proposal for the main lodge? .. Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of October 14, 1992 David: The owner desire to live there for a period of time then decide on a growth management application. Roger: They could move the cabins toward the street. Les: They could also build an office building on the open space. Kim: This is not an historic landmark. Jake: But it is in the overlay district. Linda: Would you loose the fireplaces if you moved the buildings? David: The way that I understand it, if you move a building one foot it has to come completely up to code. Roger: You could have a gas fireplace. David: We do not know the owners long term plans at this point. Jake: Are you removing the exterior? And are you keeping the shutters? ~ David: No, only the interior and redoing it for more head height. We consider the shutters too picturesque. Roger: If you use the lower design the shutters would not be applicable on the lower window. David: The cabins were built in the 50's. The windows have no insulation. Les: Will the windows be true divided light or fake? David: There is a new window out that has true divided wood with glass between. On true divided you get very fat mullions and they may get bigger than what is historically on the property which is about an inch wide. With the glass one piece we can do historic sized mullions which look much better. Jake: In terms of your perspective are the windows the same width as the windows already there? David: No, there are very small windows there presently. We are still keeping elements of that scale. Jake: How do the openings relate? 2 .. Historic Preservation Committee ~ Minutes of October 14, 1992 David: Width wise they are relatively close but height wise we have expanded. Commissioner Comments Jake: If you look at the window it has two vertical and one horizontal. Roger: I do not have any problems with this because it is not a swiss chalet. Jake: There is a uniqueness of these cabins with the size and scale. Roxanne relates in her memo that there are sliding windows in there now and they have a horizontal proportion. The proposal is tending to be victorian windows. Roger: I do not feel the upper window fits in any kind of historic reference. Linda: I agree that the lower diagram (B) is more in keeping with the original design of 1952. The chimney cap is not in keeping. It needs a flatter chimney cap. I also feel if shutters could be incorporated it would be more in keeping with the early ski history and enhance the cottages. I assume the shake roof will be retained. Karen: I have stayed in these cabins when I first started coming to Aspen. They are the darkest, coldest and draftiest, least expensive and most wonderful places in town. I wondered if David considered skylights as alternatives to giving more temperature warmth and also getting more direct light since they are in the shadow of Shadow Mountain. David: We hope to triple the amount of light and raise the window up to direct the light into the interior as opposed to a horizontal window. The skylight was not a consideration. We are also insulating the buildings. Karen: I feel the lower drawing (B) depicting the proposed window is more historical and I would support it. Regarding the chimney cap I am not qualified to give you an answer. Les: The Board feels (B) illustration is more historical and I also agree with Linda that the chimney cap should be square as it is more relevant for that time period. I have no problem with the windows. Possibly Staff should look at the new true divided light window proposal to make sure they work. We have not talked about the colors but I feel they should be lightened up. What makes -~ Aspen work is the small lodges. I also like the idea of shutters 3 .. Historic Preservation Committee ~ Minutes of October 14, 1992 on the lower windows. David: We were trying to go toward more of a European feeling. Les: Every window in Europe has shutters. Karen: On the colors what is the purpose for lightening them? David: Dark brown did not seem welcoming. We wanted to do a rich medium grayish tan. They would all be one color and the trim another color. Karen: To me part of the history of these cabins is the color. The ski architecture would be lost by making the color more contemporary. I agree with lighting them up inside though. Linda: I feel if they were lightened up to a medium brown that might be appropriate. Normally a cabin is build out of white wood and then it darkens and ages with time. A natural brown would be acceptable. Les: We cannot dictate color but working with the monitor on the color would be the way to go. ~ Roger: It is almost getting too late to paint; if the paint freezes at night it will fall off. David: We are certainly going to try to get it painted soon. Jake: Serving on this board I try to encourage the architect to key off of what is going on in the buildings and stay loyal to that. That is the general principle that I am trying to apply. As a suggestion rather than keeping the lower window possibly you could take the existing height of the windows that are there now and have an off-set kind of situation in which the lower pane is larger and the upper pane the same size as the existing, that starts to utilize the window that is already there in the new design which is consistent with what is going on. I do not know what you would do with the upper window as I know you need light. The chimney cap should look like it is added on and not something that sits on the top lightly. Les: We would like the applicant to restudy the shutters in order to keep some of the character of the cabin. MOTION: Roger made the motion that HPC grant minor development approval at 435 W. Main with the following conditions: One, that shutters be restudied; the cap on the chimney be restudied; that ~ the applicant work with the Project Monitor and Staff to finalize 4 .. Historic Preservation Committee ~ Minutes of October 14, 1992 both criteria. Staff and Monitor should review the new wood divided light windows that are proposed. The Board approves of plan B as submitted 10-14-92 ; second by, Linda. All in favor, motion carries. Karen Day is monitor of the project. MOTION: Roger made the motion to adjourn; second by Karen. All in favor, motion carries. Meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 3 5 -- 4 35 03 110. , A 5 9 { 1-..,7 . A FC--29- 93 -4 c.v,mâ‚¬' , ~ 1 ~ Ill/Â»Y/~b PU-FL# *f c 2,1 -1 3 9 53- w 'W-, 273 9 -JUL) -90 - 0 53 \ 1 1 9 .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 10/14/93 CASE NUMBER: HPC29-93 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: 2735-124-50-053 PROJECT NAME: L'Auberge Minor Development Project Address: 435 W. Main St.; Lots A - I, Block 38 APPLICANT: Audrey Haisfield, ALH Co. Applicant Address: 435 W. Main St., Aspen 925-8297 REPRESENTATIVE: Gibson & Reno Representative Address/Phone: 418 E. Cooper, Suite 207 Aspen, CO 81611 925-5968 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: . r . LL MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 435 W. Main Street, L'Auberge- Minor Development DATE: October 27, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for a 250 sq. ft. addition to the main residence, a fence and landscaping. This lodge is located in the Main Street Historic District. APPLICANT: Audrey Haisfield, represented by Gibson and Reno Architects. LOCATION: 435 W. Main Street, Lots A-I, Block 38, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: This property does not have individual historic designation, however it may acquire significance in coming years and is important to the effort to preserve small lodges in Aspen. L'Auberge is surrounded by Landmarked and Inventoried parcels, including the Mesa Store, Floradora building and several other Victorian residences. The proposed development will not be visible from Main Street (therefore no north elevation was supplied by the architect), and is of a similar design and materials to the existing structure. The landscaping plan appears to help define the parking areas and provide each cabin with a small open yard. A tall wooden fence will be built in a "u" shape to the rear of each pair of cabins. This fencing will not be easily visible from Main Street, especially as it is at the rear lot line. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. .. Response: The development is consistent with the scale and mixed use character of Main Street. Also, the location of the addition appears to protect the new bedrooms from street noise. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: This plan does not detract from the cultural value of surrounding parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: This development does not directly affect a designated historic resource. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered.) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted. Additional Comments: SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear. fully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11")<17", OR one dozensets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 1 1"x1 r format. APPLICANT: L k u-Fs E- <7 6. E ADDRESS: 4 3 5- w . MA i â€¢u Â«riz fEET- A 9-17â‚¬/D 43 . ZONE DISTRICT: CO MM E 120 ; AL. c, F F 1 CLD- LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 15- 91 9 59 Â· el- - EXISTING FAR: I ; 345- 43 . Â¥==r . ALLOWABLE FAR: 1/ 14 0 <9. fit PROPOSED FAR: 2-,5-0 99. Pr - EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): NlA PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): N 1 k EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: 22% PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: 7-6.â‚¬04 EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): AjjA PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): N /A EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princioal BlÂ®.: Z 6-- 1- 0 " / Accessorv Bldg: A/./4 PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal Bldg.: / Accessorv Bldg: 1/A PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: ,// A EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 15 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 0 EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: NIA ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: N /A SETBACKS: EXISTING: , ALLOWABLE: , PROPOSED: Front: ~Â· 6 Front: /0 Front: 1.8 Rear: Rear: Rear: 33'- Side: 6.15' Side: 5 ' Side: 4.5-' Combined Front/Rear: 47.6 Combined Frt/Rr: % 5 ' Combined Front/Rear: 34.8' EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ ENCROACHMENTS: VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eligible for Landmarks Onlv: character compatibility finding must be made bv HPC): FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commercial): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined Frt./Rr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): .. L ~- GIBSON & FRENO â€¢ ARCHITECTS DAVID F. GIBSON, AIA AUGUSTG RENO. AIA SCOTT E SMITH, AIA October 6, 1993 Ms. Amy Amidon Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 RE: Permission of Representation Dear Amy, Please consider this letter as a letter authorizing Gibson and Reno Architects at 418 E. Cooper Ave. in Aspen, Colorado, telephone number (303) 925-5968 to represent ALH Holding Company at 435 W. M ain Street, Aspen, Colorado telephone number (303) 925-8297, in the processing of an application for a Minor Historic Development of L'Auberge at 435 W. Main Street in Aspen, Colorado. Gibson and Reno Architects is hereby authorized to act on our behalf with respect to all matters reasonably pertaining to the aforementioned application. Should you have any questions, or if we can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, 0-Ki ki- 1,{i JuIC 1463 Audrey 1~aisfield( Date ' C 418 E. COOPER AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLOFRAC)0 81611 â€¢ 303/925-5968 â€¢ FAX 303/925-5993 .. 6--- GIBSON & FRENO â€¢ AACHITECTS DAVID F GIBSON, AIA AUGUST G FRENE, AIA SCOTT C SMITH, AIA October 6, 1993 TO: Amy Amidon Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 RE: Description of proposed addition The proposed addition for L'Auberge's one story residence consist of a master bathroom and a master closet equalling a total square footage of 250 sq. ft. As per the elevations, the addition is located on the west side of the existing structure - 4th Street. All materials and color will conform to the existing building. The new roof is but an extension of the existing one as indicated by the elevations. I made it a point, in the design of the addition, to compliment the residence so as not to detract from the exiting architectural integrity of the home. As a result, I find that the addition does not, in any way, create a blemish to the beauty of Main Street. Additionnaly, it is located out of view from Main Street minimizing any aesthetic scar to Main even while under construction. Regarding the lanscaped site plan, the design concept introduces a fence, no more than 6'-0" high, along the alley. The courtyards are designed to appear organic. Hence, the choice of trees, bushes, flagstone, and grass were selected. Please contact me for any questions or assistance regarding the project. Sincerely, Â£91-_c,~Â»ty- Alfred N. Beadleston 418 E. COOPER AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ 303/925-5968 â€¢ FAX 303/925-5983 4#~SAS~ Bunny Ct To Basalt ,~,tion ov 'Â£4~ 43% 4 Aspen 46.- 5 5 u--y' 00 1-4 Institute Hunt. D p \ 1: e Roarin A CA \ 0 v %01 1 =0 ir 4./ /4 1\- W . * Not all streets or roads are 82 Hallam & c Golf Course ~~ ~ , named on maps. Construction P rl St progress In certain areas. of streets and roads may be in ~ Sm ' S P 'St ..4 0 4 W. m 4 V, t * "M S, 7 #fe ...P i es 4 4 '44 5 800 81 1 0 C Maroon Creek Rd -1 -J ' Smuggler Mtn Rd Aspen 5* 82* 1 1 e b b 4 2 kanâ€¢ 8 Hospital .4, 14 4 - 00'~' St f Ist I 0- 1 Al 1 SITE e & 4 -4 0 1 * 4 c j To Maroon Lake 0 .4.4 , r 2 9 Mall â€¢ (, 7/ /â€¢ S, D spur Ln "111 n a. 0 4, 6 U ) 1 R j ..1 J #A . 1 0 Wut,1- 00Â¢ 9 Crystal Like Rd CD 1 r ~41. i q 1 - 0 q 4\1 sbee 82 100 Aspen 16 Music School ALPHA MAPS In, 1 'EAGLE. 1.170 kit\PS To Twin akes. To Ashcroft ~ Independa ce Pass 8(h t 04 â€¢â€¢pur~* Castle Crlek Rd . L. 7.,-r'4Ffr~Â£'. e.2.7,1.:2 13,7.52 #350178 10/28/92 14:29 Rec $15.00 BK 692 PG 829 :- Silvia Davis. Pitkin Cnty Clerk. Doc 0127.50 GENERAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made this ~(c~~- day of October 1992, between SWISS Â·~ Â© CHALET/KITZBUHEL PARTNERSHIP, a Colorado general partnership of the -4- County of Pitkin and State of Colorado ("Grantor"), and THE ALH HOLDING COMPANY-GUNNISON, a Colorado corporation, whose legal 81 1 05 address is ./5 5 vt. /r lat./. -4-5 021.- C C â‚¬ c c q of -D_ the County of â‚¬,fkÂ·4 and State of (_( ( "Grantee") : /61 dj WITNESSETH: Q That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of TEN Z 41 AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which 4 33 C is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, 1 * ;*- CU Er and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and % u 6 3 confirri, unto to the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, (.9 *3 J h! all the real property together .ith improvements, if any, situate, - 'k- m 8 1. . lying and being in the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado 0 i. Q Â§ 42 described as Lots 1 and 2, Perkins Subdivision, consisting of Lots 4 -- A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I, Block 38, City and Townsite of Aspen, [4 8-4 DJ -1 shown on the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 10 at Page 25. - >1 05 -2- TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurte- B -: 4 nances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the g-1 reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues Q and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, ~~** 0 claim and demand whatsoev2r of the Grantor, either in law or 6 equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hered itaments and appurtenances. R. (\ TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and i tr described, with the appurtenances, unto the Grantee, its successors j and assigns forever. And the Grantor, fo. itself, its successors -) and assigns does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the Grantee, its heirs and assigns, that at the time of the : 1- - ensealing and delivery of these presents, is well seized of the 0 premises above conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, absolute and [ 11 indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grar,-, bargain, sell and convey the same j.n manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, tpxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except those items of record listed on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. The Grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the :W above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of 1 the Grantee, its successors and assigns, against all and every r..1 person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the 24. f singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all 1 3 I. I. , genders. ~..~, ;- 1. i.jr : 1 'k '1Â· t,21 ~ -T f.'.4.4 : - .1 1. . </4 1 , 269/ 431 . 1247141 DITY OF ASPEN HRETT PAID sfer Decl aration Received ... RM"aohots/CAL'.'..%9 1.22 4.:t. U.-. ,Â·.4,414 . 4. 2,Â·.. 4.-9. .....,4- ~1.1~:36Â·Bt~ I. - . . ..4/ #350178 10/28/92 14:29 Rec $15.00 BK 692 PG 830 . - Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerr. Doc $127.50 .:, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the 2, 1 date set forth above. . 7 A . 'IR... i SWISS CHALET/KITZBUHEL PARTNERSHIP, 1 3. ... A Colorado general .partner*ip ., I --*15-~30 Norran Bacheldor, as attorney- in-fact for partners, Karen Melville Batista, Craig W. Melville, Julie Melville Inman, Frank H. Melville, Nancy Melville Bacheldor and Susan Melville Peguero i 17, I I STATE OF COLORADO ) 92; ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) 1-60 The foregoing was subscribed and sworn to before me this /~r i day of October, 1992, by Norman Bacheldor, as attorney-in-fact for ~, . $ partners, Karen Melville Batista, Craig W. Melville, Julie Melville j Inman, Frank H. Melville, Nancy Melville Bacheldor and Susan i Melville Peguero, of Swiss Chalet/Kitzbuliel Partnership, a Colorado ~~ 0 general partnership. I , i Witness my hand and official seal. , My commission expires: 31, i. AD/i, 1143 Jj1 Ck'*ac- ../0 .- 4 1<,46 Notary Public ,,5, *. Â·i 01 0 j ., t .. : <1 -Â« : 3 4:0~ 1 ' I \ V 210 W / f 1 ... '. I LID r 3 : 1.-1 f:.. ill~ Ly<t 4 M. I. LL'.- -2- 1 ~%6Â·W~~Â· BÂ·Â¥.:Â· W . . - 44% 4/6, 4-,w f I Â· rj . 14*': - .44;4 1 ,.4.f ~rwtf<119:8..,sÂ· t ,~ .-,- 4 -Al *lia-/ME.U.m5M #350178 10/28/92 14:29 Rec $15.00 BE 692 PG 831 *4 Silvia Davis, Fitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc: $127.50 iii j EXHIBIT "A" f.u,4-:-<Â·.1 1. Real estate taxes due in 1992 and payable in 1993. 2. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed front the City of Aspen of record, providing as follows: "That no title 1 41'> 1. , 1 t. shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws." i 3. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded in Plat Book 10 at Page 25. . 4. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Statement of Exemption from the Definition of Subdivision for Perkins Subdivision as set forth in instrument recorded in Book 391 at Page 574. 5. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Subdivision Agreement as set forth in instrument recorded in Book 393 at Page 43. 6. Any loss or damage as the result of re-subdividing of Lot 2, Perkins Subdivision. > 2 meldor\alh.gwd i . 2. P . 4- r 0 6Mt i-li ./ 3-41. 1 -11 1- , i . #2*57/ li:*& ./ .. 1 24.- '41:.3 14 4.4 s I ./. 1,r,014 4 â€¢ I . 1 - . 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 / -1 1 /1- 1-- 1 1 i 7 f. 3 - PECK 1 - I - 3Â·1 Till 1 1.-Â»:41 - 1 ..1 - 1/1 1 1 /d I \C 1 1 3 .- , 11 lilli 1.1 47 11 - . 11 t 1 1 Â£ 91, F - MASTER BEDROOM 4 - - 11 r 11#-- 1-.- 4 1 L( o ) 11 Â·Â· U 11// I - 1 --7 1 J*.'i.+Il - -lilli,) 4 1 11 Al! 1.11 1 -1 :5.11 :u- 3 1 \ Â¢ 1 \ 4 13)~ - L n- L.6- Â¢ .21-2.41 1-4.M t---44'- I 4-242. i;.'..4 CLOBET e- 4 1 11 -t t-1- 4,9 1 T-4 1 ' AL 'A" --â‚¬:3104- 1 1 1 1 ;.t- i 1 t-Â·4+1 2 1 1 lili !_li p.. -' . t# 1 - .1 **t. 4 -1 --9 + -\ 4 44!11- -' â€¢ 3-1-, 1.1 , t CUh ~0''UN L $ 3-0, .t F 1 I . ix-=dk~ - .. . FLOOR PLAN ADDITION 4411 =11 -011 A I 1 1 I -- li - - 6 , rb. i 13 0 - 0= tls --- - E. 6 C 1 44*==4 0 \ \ 14 1. 1 \ f 1, P.4 t., 4"~ Â£ Â· "reh k.j;t'# , '. Nal.LVAa-18 H.L EST ELEVATION &141*11616 #TkLIC:rURE 1=T*11=râ„¢1Â» 0964#13*B â€¢9,14 0Â¢vrlog*0 D'* .. '4\ 1 ~Abj M< O SOUTH ELEVATION Ad 1/40. 1'-O, Ar,PrrIOAJ 1 049'4#7#9 427<WerLIAZE-- t AQI -ri, r-LD<TE.H EX 1~rN- FL.-14*Na Â·rk, t,â€¢=12Â»1 0 , *446&44 -10 HAIU-1 -Iq' 11 1 ,1 -1 uPPM- fv #4424 E3 1, *,â€¢~r-rER -D 64'11%4 1 - /5 1 *9101â€¢102=, 'PE,9<04 1 1 1 . 1 11 1 11 t#f- a , 41 11 . 7 EAST ELEVATION e) ]All = 1 1- 011 *'ZE- 3 . I 1 A . - ' 1 I Â¥ 0 2 1, - -3 - leÂ¥,-04 7 - 6 tuEV?44=4 - W t . ... , 91.E..>I *. .>fel., . i %076. 4Wl= -râ€¢ 64â€¢24 .f x. -tor- 9/A 15 raft â€¢4~,1131(1*L- kIK-i26Â»18Â·18. 4 1 :23 1 i . - - Â· 441 c *s' Â·Â· Â· 1% 2- rtiFI , .__.C,U~~64 o MOL-4-.L 4 00(TIOMVIN#â€¢61 ADO!71Â¤N .~.~ Â»-,~46>(pvi .,li.* Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of October 25, 1993 834 W. HALLAM - CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT MOTION: Don made the motion to continue 834 W. Hallam conceptual development until the December 8th meeting; second by Linda. All in favor, motion carries. 435 W. MAIN - L'AUBERGE - MINOR DEVELOPMENT Amy: The applicant is requesting 250 square addition to the main residence, fencing to the rear of the property and landscaping plan. I recommended approval finding that the addition is not visible from Main Street. Alfred Beadleston; Gibson & Reno: The construction is on the main house of 250 square feet which is mainly the master closet. In terms of the cabins he would like to enclose each one of the courtyards and create individual courtyards which would require fencing. We are treating it in bushes and stone and grass lawn. Donnelley: The north arrows are inconsistent and should be oriented so the Board knows what exactly is happening. Martha: I am not sure where the fence goes. Alfred: Behind each cabin to the alley. The applicant wants to create something that is more romantic. Donnelley: When 'was the house built? Amy: It is an early lodge built int he 50's. Donnelley: It is a small addition to a one story structure that does not have historic implications. Karen: What about the fence design. Alfred: I didn't want the standard picket fence and would be made out of redwood or cedar. MOTION: Roger made the motion to approve the minor development for 435 W. Main Lots A - I.Block 38 as submitted finding that it meets all the standards; second by Linda. All in favor, motion carries. 228 S. MILL STREET NANCY HELLER BOUTIQUE - MINOR Amy: This is a request for an awning over the alley entrance. Richard Wax: The awning projects 3 feet 6 inches from the face of 2 151809 MOD m[D J If)lf) mm 2-Ul 015rg, /3 -ir--1 a 16 6 C--Gra , .0 f:ta : 9 U- - '<42-N 4 ~C , mc) ~...109> r'ado*U' 19 (a* 31>:.ii' ~Â¢4.,9 J,k â€¢.- ... - ~~- Ill al AA m 7.Wb - MA/Â» 'Â·' Â·Â· Ar v MR V .t- 1 -- r.-4 Pld,Il -:11 1 ,- 6*%:23~ -#f':~ *6:dE< - li 11 ----- . _l 'FLO 11111,11111 -,:,:Slm-= ~VI!1114?44,.:*fir-*-= ----1~4'+i|ill''a 1111'lilli, 1'Jix' 00 r __ ,4'rn," + --- 1(1 0 1 994'*%*13 --*.2 ~gywsywr- -r! 04#p~.4.le_ + 1, , 7 77 U :!ir 6&2~Â»7Â»,â‚¬ 2 . .1 H - . ioic){9%4 47.-I. - 1,1 , 4 r.01< 11 i i IF 1&-- RS ~ --_ - Â· .. 11(VerlCUM V-1 -1'ha .1 }/ "-1~-- : Il.~: : -- 22- 11 ! '11[ 1 !: rlil. 19*LJ~)71*yw _ - 5 - 41,31 . vr-u,t.,tee, , ; a.. ,.:F)Muh Hii' 1 1 -- 4 C 4 1 11 - 1,- u .11 1.- .. Z U.0 > Â£ 3 - 1 1#;Â·14132,1, -4. A. - ---- - 1 11, 1 1}r y - 11 , , *. ir I n ... .. - - f iIi /1 I,3 -I- ' ' dE - ' 140tpil= E; T 0 1 1. -1 - 1 -17ft' t: j -- 1'' 8 0 h Â·Â· 1 11,1,1";N h. 7 ---- 1 1 - 04 , 1 1.3 3-, T '' i ~ - .1, 1 - , 11 1,0 27-.4.t 2 -1- . 18 ' P. ir yv~ ' -- 11 :5.;P -2 - > W 1.' ;11 - - Ft . 64 -1/1 -Â· --- I - ': , - 1 ' 44 + .:'t *%4 - ' 2 ./ - 27.-17.16 - 1 - -i-~ ~ 1 -1~--~ 14 i 11 71Â£.Rl-:ts.:1-.1 11,111 0 941 - - w -$ _~ 7Â·7 ~ -_._ . lili fr=Â¢72-Er=39/L E-ECT.74*<../&==1 f p - 4 97- 1. 111 - f ' i <s #%*-.*a+I in~-31 + 2- .-â‚¬.grit - 14- 4 8 2 '31 1 CM 44 --~1- 1-IQI - 1 .f/.14-1 140 4 3-Pfla 1 6 r ..11 4 4 , 7, 0 -e,,V~1.62/ ' ' / 43~ Wbo:% A'7:4 [.4 . ~~6~-6-ly. 0 ;g ~ r....5-~n - /yr -74 14 - Fl- 1 Â· -Â· k ....2 R m \ r =22 - - Â»JU Â»34 . a, a, 't --5 -1 Z2WUJ O <003 V - oz 4 a m 4 F w 4 Â·- M lij W -~ Â· DE4IO @ f . 44Â» 3- - 1 0 0 0 0 9 ... - E ]1 4 1 11 1,11 - -- _x x â€¢ -1 -I' I CAUSERGE - - lilli; 1,1 ' I u--+-. -I~i-*.*.- --i.~ 1 1'4 ILl 1,11 ./ =-1. 11 1 11,111 . lili - A 11 4 1 lilli '1 - . . . --- - 11 1: i , . - MAIN HOUSE 11 t 1,1 1.111 h.11 i , 1 '1, , -. I \ . 1 11 11 1 1 1 il ! -i Il' 1 1 11 1/ 1 , Ir X 11 billi .=Li 11 1 1,1111 1 . 2 24..'lld + 1 I LANDSCAPE PLAN - 111 = 101 - 00 u *1,3 D r~ A \)1.20 A /$%2 2 . 2 5 i .A 7.Al) 4 b 41Â¥ 3 h /Â« ~ .ft Ir ~ 12Â¢?%41~9;22 4 ':4 jo''NÂ« Ul 9 3+0.1 %1 1 11\ 1 D. 1 11 ><3 1 1-14 0Â«-ALLD>11 044 1 10371fil *444 <1*4*9 12'L#fj:'T~IN*Zayf - 11 1 111'r <01 \ b -00Â¢f i 3944 Ja .i~ H 1 1 114- 1 v /5211 IN<\ , ' ) jilli 1 1, 1 4-th-~MN -~-"-iW-9-~r-~~~ 1 |~ ~ ~ 2 4#-t E :11 J 6Â£46444=43 ELUZZ] ~ tvp;MTY*Ad~# 4.*LF,44+469 /4.4*-45*.12-â€¢=71 CZEZUR . . Ill 0 02 -Ally STREET ELEVATION U/d / 111 . 101 - o. Ill E 0 EN:" - Mm J <14 SHEET NO: L1 . N Hda-lai ElnNEIAV t=ladOOO Ll.9/8 Â· 00480100 'N3dSV