The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.447 E Cooper Ave.HPC029-00t 447 E. Cooper Minor HPC . I 8Â« f to, 5- 7 1 â‚¬ f 0 4 CASE NUMBER HPC029-00 PARCEL ID # 2737-182-21009 CASE NAME 447 E. Cooper Minor HPC PROJECT ADDRESS 447 E. Cooper PLANNER Sarah Oates CASE TYPE Minor HPC OWNER/APPLICANT Guido Meyer REPRESENTATIVE James Colombo DATE OF FINAL ACTION 11/8/00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION HPC Reso. 51-2000 ADMIN ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 2/2/01 BY S. Oates .. 3 Â· irl *:t'4Â¢346 ~f?: ... I . I . PARCEL ID: |2737-182-21009 - DATE RCVD:~10/2/00 # COPIES:~ i CASE NO~HPC029-00 CASE NAME:|447 E. Cooper Minor HPC ~ PLNR: PROJ ADDR:|447 E. Cooper CASETYP:!Minor HPC ~ STEPS1_2 OWN/APP: Guido Meyer ADR 403 E. Cooper C/S/Z: ~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:|927-3803 #. REP:IJames Colombo ADR:~520 E. Cooper C/S/Z:]Aspen/CO/81611 PHN;925-7806 FEES DUE:~480 D ( FEES RCVD:|480 (Put in Timeslips) 1 STAT: r, REFERRALS ... REF: BY| 1 DUE~ I ' .i:_0 MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED - --- 1 r +17<2~ DATE OF FINAL ACTION :Il'/a /001 1 CITY COUNCIL:: REMARKS~ i PZ; I.-1 Pr. RÂ«o, 54-2+23 . BOA: CLOSED: |~0/0/ BY: lie k --)6~Es DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN:j 11.. M ..14 - '.442: .. DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order. hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement. or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Guido Meyer, 403 E. Cooper Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 Property Owner' s Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lots E-I, Block 90, of the Citv and Townsite Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Minor HPC Approval for Door and Window Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan HPC Resolution #51-2000,11/8/00 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) November 18,2000 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) November 19,2003 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 18th day of November, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community Develanment Director. Julie Ag~Woods, Community Development Director . .. PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lots E-I, Block 90, of the City and Townsite of Aspen, by Resolution of the Historic Preservation Commission numbered 51 series of 2000. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. s/City of Aspen Account Publish in The Aspen Times on November 18,2000 . .~A MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy DirectorUAK) </0 FROM: Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer =p RE: 447 E. Cooper Avenue (Guido's) DATE: November 8.2000 SUMMARY: The Manrico's Cashmere is taking over the space formerly occupied by Stefan Kaelin at 447 E. Cooper Avenue and proposes minor alterations to the exterior of the store. The applicant is proposing replacing a glass door and window on the east elevation with a large window to match the others on that elevation. replacing an off- center door with a large window with a center door with windows on each side on the north elevation, and adding several small windows to match existing windows on the south elevation. The subject building is not historic but is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Guido Meyer, represented by James P. Colombo. LOCATION: 447 E. Cooper Avenue. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.415.010(B) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H." Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with .. dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The applicant requests HPC approval to make an exterior change to the storefront. The proposal is to make changes to the windows and doors on the south, east and north elevations. Staff has no issue with the changes proposed. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The change proposed is consistent with the character of the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the historic significance of any building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. .. RECOIVIMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve replacing a glass door and window on the east elevation with a large window to match the others on that elevation, replacing an off-center door with a large window with a center door with windows on each side on the north elevation, and adding several small windows to match existing windows on the south elevation at 447 E. Cooper Avenue." Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated November 8,2000 B. Application j:\planning\aspen\hpc\cases\minor\guidos.doc .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT AT 447 EAST COOPER AVENUE, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO.5 4 SERIES OF 2000 WHEREAS, the applicant. Guido Meyer, represented by James P. Colombo. has requested minor development approval for replacing a glass door and window on the east elevation with a large window to match the others on that elevation. replacing an off- center door with a large window with a center door with windows on each side on the north elevation. and adding several small windows to match existing windows on the south elevation for the property located a032-We*Main-Street. The property is a historic landmark and located within thÂ¢'Main Street Historic District: and L 44/+ 5 - dit,Q.-- A 1.Â»u g AA WHEREAS, all development in an 'H." Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010(B) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. namely: dLl m. -2'ru-- 0Â£- f;61-7 Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume. scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard. side yard and rear yard setbacks. extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof: and .. WHEREAS, Sarah Oates, in her staff report dated November 8,2000, recommended approval without conditions, and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on November 8,2000, the Commission considered and approved the application without conditions by a vote of to . I- -- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development approval for 447 E. Cooper Avenue. Aspen, Colorado, be oved as shew--November 8.2000. without conditions. .3 16 Cral'/.L*CA N--+1 191/74-12.*frtiÂ«- Section 1 4-Â« 67Â»r ey)Â»-r & 4 All material representations and commitments made oy -42 applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded. whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Historic Preservation Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein. unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 2 This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided. and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3 If any section, subsection. sentence, clause. phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereoÂ£ 0-90:{*11 s Â£Â£99 1 17 5-496 i Y-noÂ» APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 8th day of November, 2000. Approved as to Form: City Attorney Emul .. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Chairman ATTEST: Chief Deputy Clerk r': 0 0 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM /1 1 1. Project name ''1, /,570 21 CO S (~~~49,141 629 2. Project location 44-1 2 - C.Â£Â»Peg Ruecue n/7-- 03/Pâ‚¬-AL.3 Acy-r 14 + I : R>~.cic< aG (indicate street address, lot and block nutnber or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning CL 4. Lot size - 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Gri, 1-CED ix- /27EFC ACb E .CDC.Pet- Acauu<E FL+c.v ( L - - 6--7.- - 47.-1 ver; 3 4 Dr 6. Representative's name, adÂ¢,ress. and phone number -3,-4..liES \- LCLE. -'1''ac CDÂ«G . Cocioce , A-bilâ‚¬'C /42â€¢LE - r.1,153 --7 S.-16 7. Type of application (check all that apoly): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Speciai Review . Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD 226 Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment ; 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate 39Â· ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the propet) k *,9-7-1 Ao c, EE-:79, L SPALG . 9. Description of development application /4!Ceâ‚¬ Â£27 72-2,câ‚¬ . i UE-u.J DCAP â‚¬ 10 8 9. 1%17('Cr DCZOâ‚¬ LJ A Y , 1 â€¢/110[Doue -re> E G PLAL-2 .zz *Al-i*Gr-r Dec Z 10. Have you completed and attached the following? J Attachment 1- Land use application form 30 Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form u Response to Attachment 3 Â«f Response to Attachment 4 .. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Address: / Zone district: / Lot size: / Existing FAR: / Allowable FAR: / Proposed FAR: _ / Existing net leasable (commercial): / Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: l Proposed % of site coverage: / Existing Â°/0 of open space: / Proposed % of open space: Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: / Accesory bldg: Proposed max. height: Princioal bldv" Accessorv bldg: Proposed % of demolition: Existing number of bedrooms: . / Proposed number of bedrooms: / Existing on-site parking spaces: / On-site parking spaces requir* Setbacks Existing: ~,/Minimum required: Proposed: Front: / Front: Front: Rear: / Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined FronUrear: Front/rear: Front/rear: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined / Combined Combined Sides: / Sides: Sides: Existing/honconformities or encroachments: 1 \,~ions requested: /(HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, / FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variatioris under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) ~~1, 1-1 1 Tr 7 /, .. September 28,2000 Historic Preservation Commission City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Guido Builidng minor exterior alterations Dear Staff and Commissioners, I authorize Colombo International. Inc. to represent me in all matters reiating to the minor exterior alterations proposed for the Guido's Building located at 403 E. Cooper Ave. in Aspen, Colorado. (30ido Meyers- Guido Swiss Inh . â€ž~.r ..........uu ... W ...1 - 1 6.4,11\ 1 1.1.-6- I.-I ./ 1 1 .....Ug r... STENWIBT TITLE OF ASPEN INC. OWNERSHI-IND ENCUMBRANÂ¢E REPORT , Order No.: 00027539 1 PREPARED FOR: 0006348 STEWART TrILE OF ASPEN, INC. HEREBY CERTIFIESfrom a search of the books in this of\ce that title to: See Attachid Legal De,criptian situated in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, appean to be vested in the name of. GUIDO PAUL MEYER as to Parcel A. and GOIDO'S SWISS INN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP as to Parcel B and that the above described property appears to be subject to the following tiens: 1. A Died of Trunt dated May 19, 1993 executed by Guido Paul Mayer and Guido' s Swies Inn Limited Partner,hip, to thi Public Trunt- of Pitkin County, to secure an indebtedneâ€ž of 21,350,000.00â€žin favor of The Bank of Upen, recorded July 7, 1994 in Book 754 at Pas# 884 am Reception No. 371851. NOTE: Aa,ignment of Rents recorded July 7, 1994 in Book 754 at Page 885 as Reception No. 371852. given in connictioii with the above Dead of Trust. EXCEPT am and all taxes and assessments. IEXCEPTall easements, rights of way, restrictions and resevations of record. This report does not reftect any ofthefollowing matters: (1) Bankruptcies which, from date of adjudication of themost recent bankruptcies, antedate the repon by more than i fourteen (14) years. (2) Suits andjudgments which, from date ofentry, antedate therepon by more than seven (7) years or untilthe governing statue of limitations has apired. whichever 3, the longer period. (3) Unpaid tax liens which,front dote of papnent, antedate therepon by morethan seven years. Although we believe the facts stated are true, this letter is not to be construed as an abstract offitte, nor an opinion of title, nor a guaranty of title, and it u understood and agreed that Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc., neither assumes, nor will be charged with am; financial obligation or #ability whativer on any statement contained herein. Dated: Auguat 16, 2000 at 7:30 A.M. , at Aspen. Colorado gOFF, me, 4 11 1 AImdmed Signature i bir. 27. LUUU 11â€¢ U 2-1 1 4, 6.-r.r-11 \ 1 1 .. 1 ..I- 1 1.-, .-1 1 SCHEDULE A .. Order Number: 00027539 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: Lots E, F and G, Block 90, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN PARCEL B: Lots H and I, Block 90, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. â€¢ 6.-Iâ€¢ 6.WI'll - 4 - w 11-,i i 4 , ur,r,1 ~ 1 1 .. 1 .1- r,Â»,1 6-11 1 IV â€¢ 9 UU r. -1 INVOICE ~ STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. 620 E. HOPKINS ASPEN CO 81611 (970) 925-3577 0006348 PITKIN COUNTY DPT PUBLIC WORKS 76 SERVICE CENTER ROAD ASPEN, CO 81611 Buyer : Seller: MEYER, GUIDO Property address: Subdivision: CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Section: Block: 90 Lot: E, F,G,H,I Sales Amount: $ 0.00 Loan Amount : $ 0.00 09/29/2000 File Number: 00027539 Invoice #: 37855 Income Code Description Amount Ownership and Encumbrance Report 125.00 Invoice Total $ 125.00 . STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. .. PROPOSAL FOR MINOR ALTERATION The Guidos Building is located at 413 E. Cooper Ave. at the corner of Galena St.. on the Cooper Ave. Mall. The building was built in 1954 and remodeled in 1990. It is a non-historic structure and has a non-confomring architectural theme with any of the surrounding historic buildings. The building has a Swiss/Bavarian architectural theme which is not consistent with the Victorian influence of the surrounding area. The prooosal does not call for any architectural change to the existing theme, The applicant request the replacement of the existing main level entrance with a new wood framed glass door and sidelights along the Cooper Ave. Mall frontage. The existing glass door at the Galena St. trontage would be replaced with a new wood framed window to match the existing windows. Two new wood framed windows would added to the southern elevation . These windows would also match the existing windows in style and size. Given the non-historic, non conforming architecture of this building, the applicant feels that these changes do no detrimentally effect the Historic Overlay District and are consistent with the general architecture of the existing building. IÂ·Ull- I iz PAEP >-2 - 1112r L.4' 2~11]2_Li--8 11Â£342-Hilll-LI L'Ialilh+ - - Fl |Ii i 1-â€¢r-tri E,7 *_l ~_-1_~ '~' [13 -- _ - IL_ I ff] '-'='~- r -imr,-r i 1--- ---- -~ --t ii_214ij~ ~-~-_4mf> Euil- 1 111 pi 1 -r v11 L~rp_-~FÂ· _r ~- ~JEERI~.â€¢2'MIF~1 1]f~EP[lit [B-]I[[E TF~DE E[[[fffl!01LIE-I Nilll] 1[ff[LE Jr lili i ------ ,vpo'.1 1- 9- 14Â·,WAN AVE \ [ III[% ibil ~ ~ il'~ 1 47]li 1 -~ ~ -7 r - 10 . . . % i 'FLJ & [ffÂ© li] i-_111.-fl] i, 1~L-1 >[[8 la ! r' 1416EqgLII]T~ELL[LER~#11-Â®-lu], --T -f-3: DE ~ 1: rT-T- 'BITT-! 1 ~A*,ER AER Â·Â·E A------J--- 1 11 IF .-h r I . 1 D;I 41 ) \L . I Â· [IMZE[l_% 1 [[*tlill i [*[[J U[g 1--r 6-4 - *lilli. k :42---- u. -7.- -- 11*PL~---1415 212 1 I Cm-filljif~~ Ill 4-L [114 8] EL 'l 12'al.,I I .I*'Vil 1 10/ @1: '441 U L-LF (PUD] nfl i 7 1 1 â‚¬) -- Â· I r Al.1:1.134+A++*t jf~Â£40 -fÂ¢] -4 1 4 ; 1/' / . I. I l ti ' ../>. 1 11 1 I 1-LUL-1 . Â»PT-ftÂ¥- r 1 . --1 ' -1 t -- - L.<. 2 29 1 *1- 1 uil -ff] 421 _ff j - , -= I 6 3 C 1 e ....J.'/[T-Fl -7- 7 4 Is j j. r . 2<'\,' ' -' Y " ' 1% ' ; . 1'_1 -222 1.- .... 1 '5-1-- t !7~-172 i [12- [liti L Lf- - 1 r. / 411 1...., (P' P:a) N /#\ .Unt / 1/224~ . r-.... 0 5,4 \ -Ir-43 1 a I ., .#..4.. -21,4,Â»,6 \ 1. 9407; ft'72 -1/i#--- 12 \---J X< 1 i :R : ASPEN VICINITY MAP .... I .. 1 i. ; - -1 - 1 i Pâ€¢ E P C.â€¢-E I _ ~FiÂ· r 1 ru _4~3 +;11.635221.% *L. I -1-3 1 -7-5-11-71 .U<7-' -t OzliLELLs--~12*. IJ:I | ED.T HI i] 11# L-*97- dlilli. F0,*1 1.I.. ----- ......., ~ EA.4 : ' .-' - I /21 1 1 99 1 i #Lt ?f- T-N-1 1 I 1 C,inÂ·- 1 -1-Ti 1- E K ! IN AVE â€¢\ 4 14.411 1 -1;4.--6--M-------Ai9 -- 1 -Cl:Â®T-M Li 1 ! __ 1 1,5~ 1 1 L_--L-e 1 #J Z *~-- ~ IE C .-I Â· I 1 im r~) 0 0 r . rv 1 -1 Al 1 34.J P 1 _ 64 1 11 1 - 11.Y- ij i - 1 4 V Po, 7 \ ~ | - ------4 .... N E HYMAN ~ AVE u \~ 1 1 1 -1 j) 7-I-- 1 -- 1-/I - ---,-- . 1 1.CIN 1 1 ~1 | 9. W . H.A; 2 z 4, 1-)C f) -'i . , IGN F !1 . D r= 1 lig/-2.I 1 -1 & " Â· . 1258 . rit,4 ~--'=TE--t - ; 0 1! 1 1: .11!54 -m F'K[-T MANRICO'S L.- 1 'ji , 1 Lg I il A HMERE | 4â€¢4 *, ER | 1 4 E Â· LLut t;---CULC_ 1 - - r L111 i r] 1 I l ~~_-1Â£Dk E AER A.,E C 1 | I Â·TAL. 1 w. 1. H 1 76./*,7./ - rru-1 ~ 1 1 1 1 J * W 1 D,T. H.) 1[14: z C >6~ -4]1 .I.I.~. 9 1 " -1 I " El I i :1 Â¢Â© i i NM i [TTI j LE ----------- . 1 - 1 ' "Â©c 1 1 1 -[-1 -- -- 2.~3 2.il' 4~ m1439.-4 2-f Fl 11.1 ; 1,1 fi pk'~ ~ 1 ~ Qi-L. 2 i 9% @I I J 1 _11-@ 1 lilli 1 3 R-152Â° t#,4,T F[ 31 1 i | 21 3 141 M s 17 | 8 | g l iu| I l Â· lit 7-1-iÂ·-14.9 1 ' 11 . 7 3 141.1116 1 2 L| 1 &24 -- 91.1 *- L-.1 Ul.4.-!R J - ,v 4 1 1 1 fl 2 4 - (PUD) 77- 1 -'- 38 / //r 1 AU'M S-, *1* 9 L) --')-- U...'llf.,0-*1.1'.- 1 - m '2!314 4 6 'i A o ctlill2~~ I 7 316 I'lod-2 71 - 1 - 2 2 4 1 - ~fl- ~ ~ T10(~1 412 ~1% : p- _____-4 4 | #. . L 11 r H . 1 , I.I- . . P ,.. 1. 0 f L ~_L-1_ m 1P \\ /, - , 1. 1 J J.LA-,1 7 - - S 1 1 /1:Jjil-/TI/Jil-j - .1 1 . *L-!9i-1 Â· r-i. 1 -r-1 J. 1 ,. . p;-;, _ .~ :133 IB ~ ili Fl~ ~~ EÂ° 5 ! f., t. * .1\ I Al --- 1 :44' .1-1 IffÂ¥tÂ»F A -1 P 'lf-Iz ; Lf ' 17 1 uâ€¢RM i . --k 1 1%. / rvira.) \ / ,Â·~~C 11 - Ir- 1 - / 4, ..1 , , P Nv' , 0 \ , 4L 24 / 4: 1 tlf<- p u a:1 k F. 41 1 91- 5.-3 % 1 / A ' 1 11-13 , 11 12 ~ 5 -==S- ,--00.- / A r // 4 /> 1 + j../ ..... -Ill - i! ASPEN VICINITY MAP 41;KH .. .... IT TYPE IT NO EXISING Sâ‚¬ER ETAL ROOA Â·IG C#.S.....';~~,1g -1F.I=.j E:M.5:mmilma %2~ 2 /~I. - 5 4 Â®0 - Il II'I '11 111 111 Illl l'l 11 111 14 me=m tip *______._____---HORIZONTAL WOOD SIC)ING EtE+11Â¢1 --------- - - '. 4 - j f 9 4 DOSTING STUCCO WALLS lo MI t 1 Â· 1 .1, . rpcfilit 11,,11,11, 1,1 1 1 1 1 6 183-IE DATE TC EXISTING STUCCO SIU-S 3'-0Â· -Â· 5'-0- 3'-0" 5'-0Â· 3'-0- 81-[" 3-0 4'-2" ~ 8 -2" 7-9. [ 3'-3' f ' ' ' 1 Â·Â· -YSTACK SANDSTONE PLANTERS 17'-7 1/2Â· 14'-0. 24Â·-8Â· . *NTRY TO GUDOS RESIMAANT EXISTING EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4Â·' 17 SHEET TI-LE EMSTING EAST ELEVATION JCe hUMBER 001 0,2000C DATE 09/06/00 DFAWN EY FEWSEN FECO~C Otâ€¢NIE DATE 8, CCMME\'rE ...... ....... E[NHWHSVD-S,ODINNVW 00Â¥210103 'N3dSV 12'-1 5/8" ........... .... r. ETTYPE ET Na - --1---I- -I--i- i" ill *ell . . E:pfrING~Q<YON74L WOOD SIDING 41 111 111 5*co 1]' li' E)*TING '~ 47 ENTRY lam'.I 6 1 1 ,7-1-1 lilli lilli N 11.1 11' 1,1 1 1 lilli Im.E D./E ... ..1, 1 --L fill, TO [ 8-11/2" L -"1-0. - \,41-0. L r.e 1 DRYSTACK SANDSTONE PLANTERS 15'-2Â· 12'-8â€¢ I 15'-2" 430-0* i . BOSTiNG NORTH ELEVATION 9EET TITLE JCB FINGER 001*200X DATE 09/06/00 DRAWN BY EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION ~ NO 04*lQE DATE BY FEVISICN RE XFO SCALE: 1/4" 1'0" OOMMENTE ... 31[E[ALHS VE) S &03 007210103 'N3dSV ........... 0 . 0 + 12 ~ET TYPE ITIO /ff i f/f/N>ti~ '4 \ --L\3 IiiI IiiI 'll Ilil 14 4 111 11' 14 14 14 111 ilitillillillillillili + - EE*lillill f-71 b 1 // 1 Alix EX]STING STUCCO WALLS 11 . ./ 12. 1 1 1-t 16-J â€¢r Â·' i , 9 1 N i â€¢ 1 ----â€¢ 1 STUCCO HEADERS 2'-r|. 3'-0" ~ 1 -1 7 10'-10" 19'-9â€¢ 3'-0" 19Â·-9 1./. DATE TO 42'-6" EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION SHEET TILE EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4" 1'0" JCEd Nl.NBER 001 0=200'OC DATE 09/06/00 DRAM BY REVISICNRECORD NO DIAN~E DATE BY CCIAMENTE ...... ........ 343Ih[HSÂ¥-3-61031 00Â¥30103 'N3dSV SET T,PE ~ NO 01 BOS ING S-IEEERETAL ROOFNG - - Irin 11 111 1'1 111 111 l~ ilil Il 111 111 Eallillillillililillillillill I' HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING al. .- h 11, DOSnNG STOCCO WALL S* /*. M ~ /3 - It 9 --- F", """1",9 ~2237T ,-.Ill-r."....I- .---I./1 -/ / 1 IEE DATE TO EJOSTING STUCCO SILLS ~ NEW WINDOW TO MATCH EXISTING 5Â·-0â€¢ 3'-0" 5'47 3-0. 8'-0" 3'-0" . 4'-2" \ 8'-2" ~ T -9 3'-3" . ~N)RYSTACK SANDSTONE PLANTERS '. 1 17'-7 1/2 14'.0. 2~'-8" ~*NTRY TO GUDOS RESTAURANT PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SCALE:1/1â€¢ 1'0. SHEETmLE PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION JCS MISER 0010-2000C DATE 09 06'00 DRAM BY REvISICN RE XAD NO CH/"GE DATE 5 COMMENg ~mt: EigiE?ED:E**ii :aM:~:i:i:~:i:~:ii*i 353// ff ~-4-IM I --- 111 IIiI Ilil Iiii lli 10 li' EXETINpQRIZONTAL.FOOD SIC)ING - /.: lti Iltl SÂ·*co d / f/Liff , It W#LS, 11 M 1,11,11 11; I lillil Isa* -0 6'-1 1/2 71-6 DRYSTACK SANDSTONE PLANTERS 15'-2' 12'-8" 15'-2' 1 43'-0" ~ NEW ENTRY TO MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION NO SCALE: 1/4" 19 9!2 2% 0 .--,1 .... SET TYPEE SET NO / /2 /6\ \4 - /Otc/4 4' , 4/ f l'PI~ . - [5-1 1\3 4 /l % f I,/ #, # i;ii 4 Il f f ~ NEW WINDOW TO MATCH EX]STING ExlanNG~*/W&~~t - â„¢2311% -1; Ar#iff~# ~1~. r 1~711 \':C=k 2 11-71 i 1-71 c Zill 32==1~ i #444 # 1324 /4 M l-LJJ , N STUCCO IEADERS ~Ew wiNDOFÂ·S TO MATCH DISPNG 2'-3"[ 3'-0" 1'-4' 3'-00' 1'-4Â· -li '1 1 1 10'-10' 19'-9' 3'-0" 19'-9' ISSUEDATE O 42'-6Â· PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION S+EET nTLE PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/4" 1'0" Jad NLMEER 0010-2000C DATE 09 '06'00 C,RAWN BY FEMASON RE XR[, NO CHAI.EE DATE BY A m COMMENTI ...... SINHWHSVE) S,031>INV]A[ 00Â¥60103 'N3dSV 937 TYPE iT NO IndlimmmL-millii .A lA off ~Â»ft REE * *am-La mi,ill Il' lE li' li' Il' E>]STIN.*1Â£R[ZONLkWOOD SIDING , 4/ v hv- EX]9114G 9 CO J A Â£ i i h, f f - WALLS . ~ 11 1 -1.-1-7 1 A,2444 . li:>:C,>: ,/91/11/14"% ImE DATE Â»I A 6-â‚¬ m 6'-1 1/2Â· 1 1 Â· â€ž ~ RYSTACK SANDSTONE PLANTERS 2,-sÂ· i 847'-,4.5Â·\1 . r.â€¢ I .1 15'-2" 12'-8' 15'-2" A 43'-0~ - 1 NEW ENTRY TO MATCH DOSTING SIâ‚¬ET TrTLE PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION JCB hUMBER 001 02000C DATE 09/06/00 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION NO 04.AFOE DATE BY FEISIO,1 REEXFu SCALE: 1/4" 1 '0" CO-ENTE 3[HE[FiHSVE)-~SW-OOTHNVW 0(]VEI0103 'N3dSV 1 PLANTERS PAT'10 ON SOUTH SIDE SET TYPE E â€¢3 ~0+NEW WtNOOWS TO MATCH DJSTINS . /1 - E 6- RAMP DOWN 74 1/2. ~ 111 DUMB e FrmNG iÂ· - ROOM - 8ENCH 111 ..kent /\ 199.E DATE TO -rÂ«/ / 7 =~-2 i ~ -ON- 12 N DN 1.- \ EMERGEMY EXIT 9 N d - 8 JTRY TO ~ ~~~ ger rt'llE GIJI~O~S- PROPOSED MAN FLOOR E 001*20= .Ce N.*/EER DATE C ovowoo f u DRA-I BY FE~SIONFE DOR) Na OUNGE DATE BY ELEVATOR NEW 'NINDOW TO /1 MATCH E)<1$1186 11 COMMENTS :**4::E:i:i:i:i: NEW ENTRY DOOR & 1__1 WINDOWS PROPOSED FLOORPLAN SCALE: 1 /4" ----1'0" t[SVL) SiU 00Â¥HO1OO 'N3dSV 6'-4â€¢ 4'-1 5/8 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT AT 447 EAST COOPER AVENUE, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 51, SERIES OF 2000 WHEREAS, the applicant, Guido Meyer, represented by James P. Colombo, has requested minor development approval for replacing a glass door and window on the east elevation with a large window to match the others on that elevation, replacing an off- center door with a large window with a center door with windows on each side on the north elevation, and adding several small windows to match existing windows on the south elevation for the property located at 447 East Cooper Avenue. The property is a historic landmark and located within the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010(B) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and .. WHEREAS, Sarah Oates, in her staff report dated November 8,2000, recommended approval without conditions, and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on November 8,2000, the Commission considered and approved the application without conditions by a vote of to . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development approval for 447 E. Cooper Avenue, Aspen, Colorado, be approved as presented in the application attached to the staff report dated November 8, 2000, without conditions. Section 1 All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Historic Preservation Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 2 This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 4 Materials used must be approved by staff and monitor. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 8th day of November, 2000. Approved as to Form: City Attorney .. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Chairman ATTEST: Chief Deputy Clerk