Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout*landuse case.HP.435 W Main St.HPC29-93HI 1 0 �uwZ1-R3 3s 1;2 1-1- sO C�VV400-- �- `i 3S w a s3 0 • CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET 0 City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 10/14/93 DATE COMPLETE• CASE NUMBER: HPC29-93 PARCEL ID#: 2735-124-50-053 PROJECT NAME: L'Auberae Minor Development Project Address: 435 W. Main St.; Lots A - I, Block 38 APPLICANT: Audrey Haisfield, ALH Co. Applicant Address: 435 W. Main St., Aspen 925-8297 REPRESENTATIVE: Gibson & Reno Representative Address/Phone: 418 E. Cooper, Suite 207 Aspen, CO 81611 925-5968 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 435 W. Main Street, L'Auberge- Minor Development DATE: October 27, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for a 250 sq. ft. addition to the main residence, a fence and landscaping. This lodge is located in the Main Street Historic District. APPLICANT: Audrey Haisfield, represented by Gibson and Reno Architects. LOCATION: 435 W. Main Street, Lots A -I, Block 38, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: This property does not have individual historic designation, however it may acquire significance in coming years and is important to the effort to preserve small lodges in Aspen. L'Auberge is surrounded by Landmarked and Inventoried parcels, including the Mesa Store, Floradora building and several other Victorian residences. The proposed development will not be visible from Main Street (therefore no north elevation was supplied by the architect), and is of a similar design and materials to the existing structure. The landscaping plan appears to help define the parking areas and provide each cabin with a small open yard. A tall wooden fence will be built in a 'lull shape to the rear of each pair of cabins. This fencing will not be easily visible from Main Street, especially as it is at the rear lot line. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The development is consistent with the scale and mixed use character of Main Street. Also, the location of the addition appears to protect the new bedrooms from street noise. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: This plan does not detract from the cultural value of surrounding parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: This development does not directly affect a designated historic resource. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered.) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted. Additional Comments: SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear, fully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11 "x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11 "xl7" format. APPLICANT: L "A v-3 11 i` ADDRESS: 4 3 S w "A. S-r R ;` F_ -r fk S'Pr� iy Co . ZONE DISTRICT:G- LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): S "i�3 -7 Sc, • * i— . EXISTING FAR: l 2� ALLOWABLE FAR: 3 ZsA v < rT PROPOSED FAR: -5 v EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): EXISTING % SITE COVERAGE: Z 2 0 PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: z . TJ EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): __ A//A PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): /fF EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: PrincipalBldo.: Z o I Accessory BBl g: Al,l-A PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal Bldg.: I Accessory Bldo: N/A PROPOSED %OF DEMOLITION: A//A EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: O EXISTING ON -SITE PARKING SPACES: N/A ON -SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: &/4 ' SETBACKS: EXISTING: Front: / .y ALLOWABLE: , Front: PROPOSED: , Front: Rear: 41 .:9 Rear: /s ' Rear: Side: 8 , 9 • Side: .5 ' Side: Combined Front/Rear: 42 . 8 Combined FrVRr: ;Z5 , Combined Front/Rear: 8 ' EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ ENCROACHMENTS: VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eligible for Landmarks Only: character compatibility finding must be made by HPC): FAR: SETBACKS Front: Rear: Side: Combined FrtJRr: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: Parking Spaces: Open Space (Commercial): Height (Cottage Infill Only): Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): k-= GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS October 6, 1993 Ms. Amy Amidon Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 RE: Permission of Representation Dear Amy, UAVIO F. GIBSON, AIA AUGUST G RENO. AIA SCOTT C. SMITH, AIA Please consider this letter as a letter authorizing Gibson and Reno Architects at 418 E. Cooper Ave. in Aspen, Colorado, telephone number (303) 925-5968 to represent ALH Holding Company at 435 W. M ain Street, Aspen, Colorado telephone number (303) 925-8297, in the processing of an application for a Minor Historic Development of L'Auberge at 435 W. Main Street in Aspen, Colorado. Gibson and Reno Architects is hereby authorized to act on our behalf with respect to all matters reasonably pertaining to the aforementioned application. Should you have any questions, or if we can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Audrey hiaisfield( \ 10AX?3 Date 41 B E. COOPER AVENUE • ASPEN, COLORADO B1 61 'I • 303/925-5968 • FAX 303/925-5993 0 • k-t= GIBBON & KENO •ARCHITECTS DAVIO F GIBSON. AIA AUGUST G. RENO, AIA SCOTT C SMITH. AIA October 6, 1993 TO: Amy Amidon Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 RE: Description of proposed addition The proposed addition for L'Auberge's one story residence consist of a master bathroom and a master closet equalling a total square footage of 250 sq. ft. As per the elevations, the addition is located on the west side of the existing structure - 4th Street. All materials and color will conform to the existing building. The new roof is but an extension of the existing one as indicated by the elevations. I made it a point, in the design of the addition, to compliment the residence so as not to detract from the exiting architectural integrity of the home. As a result, I find that the addition does not, in any way, create a blemish to the beauty of Main Street. Additionnaly, it is located out of view from Main Street minimizing any aesthetic scar to Main even while under construction. Regarding the lanscaped site plan, the design concept introduces a fence, no more than 6'-0" high, along the alley. The courtyards are designed to appear organic. Hence, the choice of trees, bushes, flagstone, and grass were selected. Please contact me for any questions or assistance regarding the project. Sincerely, Alfred N. Beadleston 41 B E. COOPER AVENUE • ASPEN, COLORAOO B1 61 1 • 303/925-596B • FAX 303/925-5993 c � o m Mt L, m o .0 -M ,; m co vC a oco 00cCc V �a O,i2r a o E c b �•'WI.e m ccc .Y wo��aa mm;;oe ♦^ 3 �a 2con i� Q 4J • Ja�"14 a d Ar Pwp� V N � N (D a Y co v c `9 3` H o'D � c "�^1 a �y a I u Q`•o� py ul•tun P•& Silver Queen Gondola / u ppi lob�!1 � po � c e s peM c 4 Ar y is r� P4 c i e is 4ig PH won W castle croo or I 41g m cN++*to" Ln - a b PHA I7SE� C V po 0 h cl O �•i7� = Qic� �Aoo,wOPPOIN c L J V! a u7'•4tm" i o CD a U OC m O 8 J f0 `� • cocn cb •� g c/ � o 0 u L Q 0 a35O178 lo/-e/92 14:24 Re-- s:S.VO BK 692 PG 829 i� Silvia Davis. Pitkin Cnty Clerk. Dcc 4127.50 J '• ,•.S GENERAL pARPANTY DEED THIS DEED, made this i day of October 1992, between SWISS CHALET/RITZHIIHEL PARTNERSHIP, a Colorado general partnership of the / Z i County of Pitkin and State of Colorado ("Grantor"), and THE ALH ;. a. HOLDING COMPANY-GUNNisC a Colorado corporation, whose legal LLO ¢ address is VT, // !n ,�. -f > >.. <. � /C // of cc �_ the County of ✓,+�..` and State of _ ("Grantee") - _ . 1fITNESSETE: That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which Q- is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and (AGZ7-0,c confirri, unto to the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, 2 7-all the real property together .ith improvements, if any, situate, a o lying and being in the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado o CDC described as Lots 1 and 2, Perkins Subdivision, consisting of Lots ri A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I, Block 38, City and Townsite of Aspen, n 00 ' i� =_ sh^wn on the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 10 at Page 25. y "oG TOGETHER with all and singular the 1,ereditaments and appurte- nances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the 0 U A - reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, Mro r claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or n equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances, m a x . TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the Grantee, its successors !� and assigns forever. And the Grantor, fo. itself, its successors and assigns does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the Grantee, its heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, is well seized of the \J premises above conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, absolute and C1 indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grar—, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, lien;, t,xPs, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except those items of record listed on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. The Grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above -bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee, its successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. M #k s r S #330178 10/25/?Z 14;29 Rec $15.00 bK 692 PG g30 Silvia Davis, Pit�-in Cnty Clerl• Doc $127.50 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. SWISS CHALET/KIrzBUHEL PARTNERSHIP, A Colorado general •partner- ]Sip Y:— Nor,^an Bacheldor, as at_torney- in-fact for partners, Karen M•lville Batista, Craig W. 'Melville, Julie Melville Inran, Frank H. Melville, Nancy Melville Bacheldor and s-isan Melville Peguero STATE OF COLORADO ) •L's. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing was subscribed and sworn to before mehiF day of October, 1992, by Norman Bacheldor, as attorney -in -fact partners, Karen Melville Batista, Craig W. Melville, Julie Melville Irma,an, Frank H. Melville, Nancy Melville Bacheldor i,nd Susan Melville Peguero, of Swiss Chalet/Kitzbuhel Partnership, a Colorado general partnership. witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 941-L �/�� Notary Public -2- Y #35O178 10/28/92 14:19 Rec $15.00 BK 692 PG 831 Silvia Davis, Fitkin Cnty Cler1:, Doc: $:21.50 EXHIBIT "A" 1. Real, estate taxes due in 1992 and payable in 1993. 2. Reservaticns and exceptions: as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen of record, providing as follows: "That no title shall be he"eby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws." 3. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded in Plat Book 3.0 at Page 25. 4. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Statement of Exemption from the Definition of Subdivision for Perkins Subdivision as set forth in instrument recorded in Book 391 at Page 574. 5. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Subdivision Agreement as set forth in instrument re,:orded in Book 393 at Page 49. 6. Any loss or damage as the result of re -subdividing of Lot 2, Perkin^ Subdivision. meldor\alh.gwd 11 • OOR FLAN ADDITION WEST ELEVATION 1 = • 0 ;,&w Y+o MAWMH 1 AA tww?t-'Tp MAATr* av*srrrT%" -W 4&bin rx Al q () SOUTH ELEVATION i is . 1' _ o - EAST ELEVATION O. 4k.&6 OL loo'_O" �riT. rj/A'� t01z He.�fcie.L�. vS�E�T1-R[,TMRu .ADO TION 7-17 s I , O Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of October 25, 1993 834 W. HALLAM - CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT MOTION: Don made the motion to continue 834 W. Hallam conceptual development until the December 8th meeting; second by Linda. All in favor, motion carries. 435 W. MAIN - L'AUBERGE - MINOR DEVELOPMENT Amy: The applicant is requesting 250 square addition to the main residence, fencing to the rear of the property and landscaping plan. I recommended approval finding that the addition is not visible from Main Street. Alfred Beadleston; Gibson & Reno: The construction is on the main house of 250 square feet which is mainly the master closet. In terms of the cabins he would like to enclose each one of the courtyards and create individual courtyards which would require fencing. We are treating it in bushes and stone and grass lawn. Donnelley: The north arrows are inconsistent and should be oriented so the Board knows what exactly is happening. Martha: I am not sure where the fence goes. Alfred: Behind each cabin to the alley. The applicant wants to create something that is more romantic. Donnelley: When'was the house built? Amy: It is an early lodge built int he 501s. Donnelley: It is a small addition to a one story structure that does not have historic implications. Karen: What about the fence design. Alfred: I didn't want the standard picket fence and would be made out of redwood or cedar. MOTION: Roger made the motion to approve the minor development for 435 W. Main Lots A - I.Block 38 as submitted finding that it meets all the standards; second by Linda. All in favor, motion carries. 228 S. MILL STREET NANCY HELLER BOUTIQUE - MINOR Amy: This is a request for an awning over the alley entrance. Richard Wax: The awning projects 3 feet 6 inches from the face of 151809 APE PLAN MAIN STREET ELEVATION d_ o» -- — mm m(D mm in '10 NN mm mm m 00 .. I Xw 0 z LL0 Q oIn as 0 w Q �© w � m Z m w Q Q 0 a 0 o ° o a m U o Z - w .. Q Z W z w U J w Q m 0 m I U U) ) 0 0 0 0 q Q IF- W H W N C� ? Qd W u Z w 11 Q mN SHEET NO: Ll