The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.470 N Spring St.0024.2005.AHPC470 N Spring St Addition/Final HPC -273707308000 Case 0024.2005.AHPC - ~ -11 A -Illill.*- Il-#.*- .. City of Aspen Community Development Dept. CASE NUMBER 0024.2005.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737-07-3-08-002 PROJECT ADDRESS 470 N SPRING ST PLANNER SARA ADAMS CASE DESCRIPTION FINAL PUD OLD CASE HPC013-03 REPRESENTATIVE LIPKIN WARNER 927-8473 DATE OF FINAL ACTION 7/28/2005 CLOSED BY Denise Driscoll "Exhibit A: Relevant Design Guidelines for 529 W. Francis, Conceptual Review" 11.1 Orient the primary entrance of a new building to the street. 1 The building should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern of the site. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. o The front porch should be "functional," in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. o A new porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. o In some cases, the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street; nonetheless, the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. o Subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. u The primary plane of the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. u The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property. u They should not overwhelm the original in scale. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. o Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roof forms. u Flat roofs should be used only in areas where it is appropriate to the context. u On a residential structure, eave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. u Exotic building and roof forms that would detract from the visual continuity of the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. 5 .. DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Dennis and Andrea Young, 470 North Spring Street, Aspen, CO 81611, 920-4706. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number 470 N. Spring Street, Lot 2 alone with a metes and bounds parcel on the southerly side of said lot, Block 4, Oklahoma Flats. City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property HPC has approved plans to rehabilitate the historic Victorian era miner's house, construct an addition to the north of the historic house, and granted a 500 square foot FAR bonus. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Approved per Resolution #27, Series of 2005, passed on Julv 27,2005. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) August 7,2005 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) August 7,2008 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued iii accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) [ssuid this 7th d~y of August, 2005, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. 3/0Mj 14 j Chris Bendon, Community Development Director .. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Council THRU: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Sara Adams, Historic Preservation Intern RE: 470 N. Spring Street, Resolution No.27, Series of 2005 DATE: July 28,2005 Section 26.415.120.B of the Municipal Code, Appeals, Notice to City Council and Call Up, states that following the adoption of a resolution approving, approving with conditions or disapproving a development application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Major Development, Demolition Approval or Relocation Approval of a designated property, the HPC shall promptly notify the City Council of its action to allow the City Council an opportunity to avail itself of the Call Up procedure. The City Council may order Call Up of these actions of the HPC within thirty (30) days of the decision. Consequently no associated permits can be issued during the 30-day call up period. Attached is the HPC resolution passed on July 27, 2005 regarding an addition to a historic Victorian era miner's home. HPC granted Major Development Approval and a 500 square foot FAR bonus resultant from rehabilitation of the historic residence. The project was accepted by a vote of 4 to 0. .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 470 N. SPRING STREET, LOT 2, BLOCK 4, OKLAHOMA FLATS ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, ALONG WITH A METES AND BOUNDS PARCEL, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 27, SERIES OF 2005 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-08-002 WHEREAS, the applicants, Dennis and Andrea Young, represented by Lipkin Warner Design Partnership. have requested Major Development Review (Final) for the property located at 470 N. Spring Street, Lot 2, Block 4, Oklahoma Flats Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, along with a metes and bounds parcel, Aspen, Colorado. The property is listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Final Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.4.of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report dated July 27,2005 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended that the project be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 27,2005, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants approval for Major Development (Final) with the following conditions: 1. Staff and monitor must be notified if there is evidence in the framing that relates to the location, size, and proportion of the windows on the historic structure. 2. The material o f the windows on the historic building and any new front porch railings must be wood. C / .. 3. The posts on the west and east faQade of the new construction are to be simplified. 4. The round window of the new addition wilI be altered to a shape that is more in character with the Victorian era, to be reviewed by Staff and LIPC monitor. 5. The molding around the large double hung window and the window above it on the primary historic faQa(le will reflect that of the 1968 photograph. 6. Exterior doors must be approved by HPC staff and monitor before purchase or installation. 7. Fish scale shingles in the south gable of the historic house will be restored as per the historic 1968 photograph. 8. The exposure of the clapboard siding on the historic structure will be between 4" and 6". 9. The applicant must submit a detailed landscape for approval by staff and monitor. 10. HPC staff and monitor must approve any changes with regard to the type and location of exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 11. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 12. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the existing house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 13. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations or materials as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 14. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 15. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to LIPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 16. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 17. The applicant shall be required to finalize all necessary lot line adjustments before any building permit will be issued for this development. 18. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific .. development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 470 North Spring Street Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Ilome Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of July, 2005. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 470 N. SPRING STREET, LOT 2, BLOCK 4, OKLAHOMA FLATS ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, ALONG WITH A METES AND BOUNDS PARCEL, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 27, SERIES OF 2005 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-08-002 WHEREAS, the applicants, Dennis and Andrea Young, represented by Lipkin Warner Design Partnership, have requested Major Development Review (Final) for the property located at 470 N. Spring Street, Lot 2, Block 4, Oklahoma Flats Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, along with a metes and bounds parcel, Aspen, Colorado. The property is listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be ereeted, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Final Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.4.of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report dated July 27,2005 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended that the proj ect be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 27,2005, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants approval for Major Development (Final) with the following conditions: 1. Staff and monitor must be notified if there is evidence in the framing that relates to the location, size, and proportion of the windows on the historic structure. 2. The material of the windows on the historic building and any new front porch railings must be wood. 4\Al (NPY * .. 3. The posts on the west and east fa~ade of the new construction are to be simplified. 4. The round window of the new addition will be altered to a shape that is more in character with the Victorian era, to be reviewed by Staff and HPC monitor. 5. The molding around the large double hung window and the window above it on the primary historic fagade will reflect that of the 1968 photograph. 6. Exterior doors must be approved by HPC staff and monitor before purchase or installation. 7. Fish scale shingles in the south gable of the historic house will be restored as per the historic 1968 photograph. 8. The exposure of the clapboard siding on the historic structure will be between 4" and 6". 9. The applicant must submit a detailed landscape for approval by staff and monitor. 10. LIPC staff and monitor must approve any changes with regard to the type and location of exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 11. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 12. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the existing house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 13. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations or materials as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 14. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 15. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 16. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 17. The applicant shall be required to finalize all necessary lot line adjustments before any building permit will be issued for this development. 18. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 470 North Spring Street Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of July, 2005. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 1-rrr . =.111- 8 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Joyce Allgaier, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Sara Adams, Historic Preservation Intern RE: 470 North Spring Street- Major Development Review (Final), Public Hearing DATE: July 27,2005 SUMMARY: The subject property is located in the Oklahoma Flats neighborhood and contains a locally designated Victorian era home which was moved to the site in the 1960's. The application proposes an addition to the rear (north side) of the historic home. The project has been granted setback variances, a 500 square foot FAR bonus, and a variance from the "Residential Design Standards" relating to setting the garage back from the face of the house. The FAR bonus was awarded with the condition that specific restoration measures were to occur on the historic resource. Staff finds that the project meets the relevant design guidelines and restoration requirements conceptual approval, and recommends HPC grant Final approval with conditions. APPLICANT: Dennis and Andrea Young, owners, represented by Lipkin Warner Design Partnership. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-08-002. ADDRESS: 470 N. Spring Street, Lot 2, Block 4, Oklahoma Flats Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, along with a metes and bounds parcel on the southerly side of said lot. ZONING: R-30. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Final level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to tile HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve 1 .. with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant Staff Response: Recently, the HPC has been contemplating new tools to analyze the appropriateness of proposals to alter historic structures. The following questions are likely to be the center of future discussions, and may be helpful for HPC to at least reference for this project (note that the questions do not serve as formal decision making criteria at this time): 1. Why is the property significant? 2. What are the key features of the property? 3. What is the character of the context? How sensitive is the context to changes? 4. How would the proposed work affect the property's integrity assessment score? 5. What is the potential for cumulative alterations that may affect the integrity of the property? The property is important as an example of housing built during the mining era. It was moved to the current location, and a number of alterations to the building occurred after that time. Some information about the footprint and design of the house as it was originally constructed is available. Key features of the property are that the original roof and building walls on the front portion of the house are intact. There is some original trim, windows, doors, and porch elements. This house stands in a neighborhood where the 19th century context has been eliminated. Only one other designated cabin is within the vicinity. Most of the adjacent homes are new construction and are significantly larger than this one. The proposal before HPC will create an addition linked to the back of the original house. Very little of the existing building fabric will be removed. Restoration work is envisioned for the Victorian. There is no potential for expansion beyond this application. Design Guideline review Final review deals with details such as the landscape plan, lighting, fenestration, and selection of new materials. A list of the relevant design guidelines is attached as "Exhibit A." Only those which staff finds warrant discussion are included in the memo. 2 .. Landscape Plan: The existing parking in front of the house has been removed as required in order to receive the FAR bonus. A landscape plan was not included in the proposal and can be approved by staff and HPC monitor as a condition of approval. Lighting: Light fixtures have not been indicated. When available, a review of these fixtures can be handled through staff and monitor as a condition of approval. Approval must be achieved prior to purchase and installation. Fenestration: Historic Structure: The applicant proposes to remove the bay window on the primary fagade and replace it with a large double hung window as illustrated in the 1968 photograph, restoring the fagade to its original window configuration. Staff recommends that HPC discuss the appearance of the window molding in the 1968 photograph with the client to confirm that it is in compliance with sections 3.1. The molding around the large double hung window and around the upper window in the gable as represented on the proposal does not replicate the subtle lintel and sill as seen in the historic photograph. 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. o Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operation and groupings of windows. Staff recommends removal of the window located partially beneath the porch and the window beneath the restored large double hung window on the primary elevation. They are not historic and are inappropriate on the primary fagacle of the historic structure. The skylight on the south elevation will be removed, as required to receive the FAR bonus, and will be patched to match the existing roof material. The inappropriate multipaned storm window on the west elevation will be removed, uncovering the historic double hung window, as per Section 2.10: 2.10 Consider removing later covering materials that have not achieved historic significance. ' Once the non-historic siding is removed, repair the original, underlying material. The kitchen window bay on the west elevation is to be removed and replaced with two square windows that are flush with the wall. The northwest corner stair and door are to be removed and replaced with a square window. The applicant proposes to replace the non-historic living room windows on the east elevation with new windows that replicate the adjacent historic windows. In the conditions for receipt of the FAR bonus, Staff recommends that the size and shape of the new windows be determined by framing evidence that will be exposed when residing, and approved by staff and HPC monitor. The applicant's report states that some of the interior finishes were 3 .. removed and reveal mostly modern framing on the east wall, and the north and west walls reveal both modern and older framing. Staff recommends that HPC comment on the proposed windows, if in fact there is no evidence in the framing that is revealed when re-siding the exterior. 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. o Reducing an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or increasing it to receive a larger window is inappropriate. o Consider reopening and restoring an original window opening where altered 6.5 Do not guess at "historic" designs for replacement parts. o Where "scars" on the exterior suggest that architectural features existed, but there is no other physical or photographic evidence, then new features may be designed that are similar in character to related buildings. o Using overly ornate materials on a building for which there is no documentation is inappropriate. o It is acceptable to use salvaged materials from other buildings only if they are similar in style and detailing to other features on the building where they are to be installed. The applicant proposes to replace the existing dormer with a smaller scaled, lower dormer on the east elevation. The four small square windows successfully differentiate the dormer from the historic resource. Staff finds that the new windows proposed for the east elevation of the existing non-historic addition to the historic home are wider than the historic windows creating an appropriate relationship and gradual transition between the old and the new. New Addition: Staff finds that the size, shape, and proportion of the windows on the addition appropriately draw upon the historic resource, yet are recognizable o f product o f their own time. Materials: Historic Structure: The materials selected for the new windows on the historic structure were not included in the packet. Staff recommends wood windows for the historic structure. 3.5 In a replacement window, use materials that appear similar to the original. o Using the same material as the original is preferred, especially on character-defining facades. However, a substitute material may be considered if the appearance of the window components will match those of the original in dimension, profile and finish. Staff finds that the standing seam zinc roof is appropriate for the new dormer on the east elevation of the historic home. It differentiates the dormer as a new addition on the historic structure and successfully creates a relationship between the old home and the new addition to the north. 4 .. The material proposed for the reconstructed porch was not included in the plans; Staff recommends wood as an appropriate material. As per Section 2.7 of the Guidelines, the applicant proposes to remove the existing siding on the historic structure and add horizontal wood clapboards, improving the historic Victorian appearance of the home. The exposure of the wood clapboard is not represented on the final plans. Staff recommends that the HPC determine an appropriate exposure for the new siding, probably in the range of 4"- 6". 2.7 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. o If the original material is wood clapboard, for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size, the amount of exposed lap and finish. o Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced, not the entire wall. Staff recommends that the fish scale shingles in the gable end ofthe south elevation are restored as illustrated in the historic photograph. The fish scales are a significant architectural feature that should be incorporated into the restoration. Staff finds that the doors on the historic structure and the new addition are uncharacteristic of the Victorian era. Staff recommends that existing historic doors are restored. If no historic material exists, then doors that are reflective of the Victorian era should be used. The new doors can be approved by staff and HPC monitor, and listed as a condition of approval. New Addition: Window materials were not included in the proposed plans for the new construction; Staff recommends wood or clad as an acceptable material. The main portion of the addition is 4" horizontal wood siding. Staff recommends that the exposure o f the wooden siding on the addition be different than that o f the historic house, providing a subtle variation between the old and new. Staff finds that the standing seam zinc panel material selected for the connector piece provides a distinct link between the new and the old, and an interesting juxtaposition with the horizontal wood clapboard. Staff recommends that HPC discuss the aesthetics of the horizontal band of zinc along the bottom of the roo f o f the existing addition on the east elevation. The roof form of the connector piece has been altered from what was approved at conceptual. HPC approved an angled roof form that reads as a gable from the street. The south elevation of the addition on page A5.1 of the final plans shows a half-barrel roof on the connector. Staff recommends that the applicant return to the roof form that was approved at Conceptual Review. 5 .. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant Major Development Review (Final) with the following conditions: 1. Staff and monitor must be notified if there is evidence in the framing that relates to the location, size, and proportion of the windows on the historic structure. 2. The material of the windows on the historic building and any new front porch railings must be wood. 3. The proposed windows on the primary fagade beneath the porch and the large double hung window will be removed from the drawings. 4. The molding around the large double hung window and the window above it on the primary historic fagade will reflect that ofthe 1968 photograph. 5. Exterior doors must be approved by HPC staff and monitor before purchase or installation. 6. Fish scale shingles in the south gable of the historic house will be restored as per the historic 1968 photograph. 7. The exposure of the clapboard siding on the historic structure will be between 4" and 6". 8. The roof form of the connector piece must reflect that which was approved at Conceptual Review. 9. The applicant must submit a detailed landscape for approval by staff and monitor. 10. HPC staff and monitor must approve any changes with regard to the type and location of exterior lighting fixtures by reviewing a plan prior to wiring, purchasing, or installing the fixtures. 11. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 12. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the existing house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 13. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations or materials as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 14. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 15. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of 6 .. approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 16. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 17. The applicant shall be required to finalize all necessary lot line adjustments before any building permit will be issued for this development. 18. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within I 80 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 470 North Spring Street Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2005 A. Relevant HPC Design Guidelines B. HPC Resolution 24, Series 2003 C. Section of connector piece as approved at conceptual review D. Application 7 .. Exhibit A: Relevant Design Guidelines for 470 North Spring Street, Final Review 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. u This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. o Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. 1 Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. a The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. 1.11 Preserve and maintain mature landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. 3 Protect established vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Replacement of damaged, aged or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. u If a tree must be removed as part of the addition or alteration, replace it with species of a large enough scale to have a visual impact in the early years of the project. 1.12 Preserve and maintain historically significant planting designs. u Retaining historic planting beds, landscape features and walkways is encouraged. 1.13 Revisions or additions to the landscape should be consistent with the historic context of the site. Select plant and tree material according to its mature size, to allow for the long-term impact of mature growth. Reserve the use of exotic plants to small areas for accent. Do not cover grassy areas with gravel, rock or paving materials. 1.14 Additions to the landscape that could interfere with historic structures are inappropriate. u Do not plant climbing ivy or trees too close to a building. New trees should be no closer than the mature canopy size. 3 Do not locate plants or trees in locations that will obscure significant architectural features or block views to the building. =1- It is not appropriate to plant a hedge row that will block views into the yard. 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. Site lighting should be shielded to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Focus lighting on walks and entries, rather than up into trees and onto facade planes. Preserve original building materials. Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. Only remove siding which is deteriorated and must be replaced. Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations, should be preserved. u Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. 2.5 Repair deteriorated primary building materials by patching, piecing-in, consolidating or otherwise reinforcing the material. u Avoid the removal of damaged materials that can be repaired. 8 CCOM C 00 0 .. o Isolated areas of damage may be stabilized or fixed, using consolidants. Epoxies and resins may be considered for wood repair and special masonry repair components also may be used. 2.7 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. u If the original material is wood clapboard, for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size, the amount of exposed lap and finish. 1 Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced, not the entire wall. 2.8 Do not use synthetic materials as replacements for primary building materials. 61 In some instances, substitute materials may be used for replacing architectural details, but doing so is not encouraged. If it is necessary to use a new material, such as a fiberglass column, the style and detail should precisely match that of the historic model. Primary building materials such as wood siding and brick should not be replaced with synthetic materials. Synthetic materials include: aluminum, vinyl siding and panelized brick. EIFS (synthetic stucco) is not an appropriate replacement for real stucco. 2.10 Consider removing later covering materials that have not achieved historic significance. u Once the non-historic siding is removed, repair the original, underlying material. 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operation and groupings of windows. Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them, whenever conditions permit. Preserve the original glass, when feasible. 2 Preserve the position, number and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. Enclosing a historic window opening in a key character-defining facade is inappropriate, as is adding a new window opening. This is especially important on primary facades where the historic ratio of solid-to-void is a character-defining feature. Greater flexibility in installing new windows may be considered on rear walls. Do not reduce an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or door or increase it to receive a larger window on primary facades. 3.3 Preserve the historic ratio of window openings to solid wall on a facade. o Significantly increasing the amount of glass on a character-defining facade will negatively affect the integrity of a structure. 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. u If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window should also be double-hung, or at a minimum, appear to be so. Match the replacement also in the number and position of glass panes. Li Matching the original design is particularly important on key character-defining facades. 3.5 In a replacement window, use materials that appear similar to the original. 3 Using the same material as the original is preferred, especially on character-defining facades. However, a substitute material may be considered if the appearance of the window components will match those of the original in dimension, profile and finish. 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. u Reducing an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or increasing it to receive a larger window is inappropriate. u Consider reopening and restoring an original window opening where altered. 9 00 OWEE O C U O .. 3.7 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. 1 A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window's easing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. 5.5 If porch replacement is necessary, reconstruct it to match the original in form and detail. o Use materials that appear similar to the original. 1 While matching original materials is preferred, when detailed correctly and painted appropriately, alternative materials may be considered. 3 Where no evidence of the appearance of the historic porch exists, a new porch may be considered that is similar in character to those found on comparable buildings. Keep the style and form simple. Also, avoid applying decorative elements that are not known to have been used on the house or others like it. u When constructing a new porch, its depth should be in scale with the building. 1 The scale of porch columns also should be similar to that of the trimwork. u The height of the railing and the spacing of balusters should appear similar to those used historically as well. 6.4 Repair or replacement of missing or deteriorated features should be based on original designs. u The design should be substantiated by physical or pictorial evidence to avoid creating a misrepresentation of the building's heritage. o When reconstruction of an element is impossible because there is no historical evidence, develop a compatible new design that is a simplified interpretation of the original, and maintains similar scale, proportion and material. 6.5 Do not guess at "historic" designs for replacement parts. o Where "scars" on the exterior suggest that architectural features existed, but there is no other physical or photographic evidence, then new features may be designed that are similar in character to related buildings. 1 Using overly ornate materials on a building for which there is no documentation is inappropriate. It is acceptable to use salvaged materials from other buildings only if they are similar in style and detailing to other features on the building where they are to be installed. 6 Replacement of missing elements may be included in repair activities. Replace only those portions that are beyond repair. Replacement elements should be based on documented evidence. Use the same kind of material as the original when feasible. A substitute material may be acceptable if the form and design of the substitute itself conveys the visual appearance of the original material. For example, a fiberglass cornice may be considered at the top of a building. 7.7 A new dormer should remain subordinate to the historic roof in scale and character. u A new dormer should fit within the existing wall plane. It should be lower than the ridgeline and set in from the eave. It should also be in proportion with the building. u The mass and scale of a dormer addition must be subordinate to the scale of the historic building. 10 00009 0 .. 7.8 Preserve original roof materials. o Avoid removing historic roofing material that is in good condition. When replacement is necessary, use a material that is similar to the original in both style as well as physical qualities and use a color that is similar to that seen historically. o Specialty materials such as tile, slate or concrete should be replaced with a matching material. 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to those used traditionally. u Replacement materials should be similar to those used historically on comparably styled buildings. If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. If copper flashing is to be used, it should be treated to establish a matte, non-reflective finish. 4 A garage door should be compatible with the character of the historic structure. A wood-clad hinged door is preferred on a historic structure. If an overhead door is used, the materials should match that of the secondary structure. If the existing doors are hinged, they can be adapted with an automatic opener. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. 1 A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. 1 An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. 1 An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. u A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 14.3 Keep color schemes simple. Using one base color for the building is preferred. Using only one or two accent colors is also encouraged, except where precedent exists for using more than two colors with some architectural styles. 14.4 Coordinating the entire building in one color scheme is usually more successful than working with a variety of palettes. o Using the color scheme to establish a sense of overall composition for the building is strongly encouraged. 11 CC C 00 U C U 90 00 0 .. 14.5 Develop a color scheme for the entire building front that coordinates all the facade elements. 1 Choose a base color that will link the entire building face together. For a commercial building, it can tie signs, ornamentation, awnings and entrances together. On residences, it can function similarly. It can also help your building relate better to others in the district. u The complexity of the accent colors should be appropriate to the architectural style of the building. Doors may be painted a bright accent color, or they may be left a natural wood finish. Historically, many of the doors would have simply had a stain applied. Window sashes are also an excellent opportunity for accent color. Brilliant luminescent or "day-glo" colors are not appropriate. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. u The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. 1 All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. Do not wash an entire building facade in light. Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. 1 Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. u Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. u Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. 14.12 Provide a weather-protective finish to wood surfaces. o The rustic bare-wood look is not a part of the heritage of the historic districts or individual landmark properties. o Painted surfaces are most appropriate. Stains may be accepted in combination with materials that give a well-finished appearance. Use water seal to preserve the porch deck. a Rustic finishes will not be approved. 14.14 Minimize the visual impacts of service areas as seen from the street. When it is feasible, screen service areas from view, especially those associated with commercial and multifamily developments. This includes locations for trash containers and loading docks. Service areas should be accessed off of the alley, if one exists. 14.15 Minimize the visual impacts of mechanical equipment as seen from the public way. o Mechanical equipment may only be installed on an alley facade, and only if it does not create a negative visual impact. 1 Mechanical equipment or vents on a roof must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. 12 00 0 00 00 0 0/ C .. Screen ground-mounted units with fences, stone walls or hedges. A window air conditioning unit may only be installed on an alley facade, and only if it does not create a negative visual impact. o Use low-profile mechanical units on rooftops so they will not be visible from the street or alley. Also minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Use smaller satellite dishes and mount them low to the ground and away from front yards, significant building facades or highly visible roof planes. J Paint telecommunications and mechanical equipment in muted colors that will minimize their appearance by blending with their backgrounds. 14.17 Design a new driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual impact. D Plan parking areas and driveways in a manner that utilizes existing curb cuts. New curb cuts are not permitted. u If an alley exists, a new driveway must be located off of it. 13 00 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 470 N. SPRING STREET, LOT 2, BLOCK 4, OKLAHOMA FLATS ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, ALONG WITH A METES AND BOUNDS PARCEL, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 24, SERIES OF 2003 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-08-002 WHEREAS, the applicants, Dennis and Andrea Young, represented by Lipkin Warner Design Partnership, have requested Major Development Review (Conceptual) and Variances for the property located at 470 N. Spring Street, Lot 2, Block 4, Oklahoma Flats Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, along with a metes and bounds parcel, Aspen, Colorado. The property is listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of setback variances, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code, that the setback variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and WHEREAS, for approval of an FAR bonus, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code, that: a. The design of the project meets all applicable design guidelines; and b. The historic building is the key element of the property and the addition is incorporated in a manner that maintains the visual integrity of the historic building and/or .. c. The work restores the existing portion of the building to its historic appearance; and/or d. The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found in the historic building's form, materials or openings; and/or e. The construction materials are of the highest quality; and/or f. An appropriate transition defines the old and new portions of the building; and/or g. The project retains a historic outbuilding; and/or h. Notable historic site and landscape features are retained; and WHEREAS, for approval of a variance from the "Residential Design Standards," according to Section 26.410 of the Municipal Code, the HPC must find that: A. The proposed design yields greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen area Community Plan (AACP); or, B. The proposed design more effectively addresses the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or, C. The proposed design is clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated December 17, 2003, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended that the project be approved with conditions: and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on December 17, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Major Development (Conceptual) and Variance approval with the following conditions: l. HPC grants the following variances: a 500 square foot floor area bonus, a front yard setback variance of up to 25 feet to accommodate the existing location of the house and the proposed location of the garage, a rear yard setback variance of up to 14' to accommodate a portion of the new addition, a north sideyard setback variance of 8'6," and a variance from the Residential Design Standards related to setting the garage back from the face of the house. 2. In order to warrant the FAR bonus, the applicant must undertake: â€¢ Removal of the canopy over the front stairs, and reworking of the railings in that area to bring them up to code in a manner that is sympathetic to the historic house. â€¢ Removal of the non-historic west side porch. â€¢ Removal of an inappropriate multi-paned storm window that obscures a historic double hung on the west. â€¢ Removal of the skylight on the front roof plane. â€¢ Removal and revegetation of a parking space in front of the house. .. â€¢ Patching and removal of vents on the east wall as described in the application. â€¢ Replacement of a non-historic door on the east fagade with one that is more architecturally appropriate. â€¢ Relocation of a satellite dish that has been placed on the roof of the Victorian to a much less visible location, preferably on the addition. â€¢ Relocation if possible, or at least painting a mushroom vent at the back of the Victorian. â€¢ Removal of the existing siding, which is not historic, and replacement with clapboards. This would dramatically improve the historic integrity of the house. â€¢ Restoration of windows that have been altered on the west and east walls of the house to their original size and location, based on framing evidence that will be exposed when re- siding. (Particularly on the west at the kitchen window bay and gable end, as well as the living room window on the east.) â€¢ Remove the front bay window and install a large double hung window as shown in the 1968 photo, with all details to be reviewed by HPC staff and monitor. 3. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. 4. The applicant shall be required to finalize all necessary lot line adjustments before any building permit will be issued for this development. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 17th day of December, 2003. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .... -/2577/0* AÂ«Â«04 121=P i - '9â‚¬-7-*C. 1 47-t * . Â·Â«4 - 9.2=.-19 -1- .*HM-+.*- l- C - - 1-4.1 - - 2.2-2-1-Ti~Ir-7;'~Â·'74>:*fr~~ ji/&413~=ifizi-*~-~~*..v--drifier&,131Â£2SE,5522MERSfjrr63frijKL --1 -: P.2,gi ~-- h. ji Â·. ---~0:r~:~-~------2-3-2 - --. t~----'~"fp;=.973â‚¬115.2~2##24/LD&,224=Â·,agi-,4&1~~-- . - -. . . /.-464-4......... *' 11 - a.-p. -- 5=1329./.>,5Â»4~7 1 , , i tiÂ·ftyÂ»02-t.124---i-1.Jr~32.,Â»3.-Â«4~EEâ‚¬Iil,ES;F;FE~~-A--,44 2 -~4 'e.- - ; 1 &44323/4 [0~3.-INA*,55;,me<:-- 9-2312*-*Tr- i#'64*6<LAW -k-*f#<FI 1 I.- 1 1. I.F.....,------I-- 4.--Â·r., -- -3- -f Â£z "14% - . ---2 -I-.-I.... - - .9 *t=u..=U -.Ut~' 1-"TZ'n---4-->I -7-trjrte.--=13-:v- 44 U L MIl - - ,-* 1 A , It' 1 . i: ---- -- r irt-*11:25-0.2---.li :,. i r. I /. 1 b. i Â·Â· 4 . -A -F-1.--'.4.-2 9.----11.2-,~23.,ti,~~-â‚¬44.u ---44.44,_iÂ·Â£=_---4.tr.a 4 1 ~- Â· -347.&~ -AT:--*....$9521*- 1- 4 - - 1 I â€¢ r .:.,- -c -2 '.Z ./ ti -31-0â€¢71 - NE T--. -' mActr-â‚¬Â£.EAY-Al<kj#EL. .2'33;4'-cff~~~ . .2 , 7/ 9.-ty- -1 *I -97-,;:':r--Â·3:T<Â·fe- 7-37 J--~Â·K-~-21~35.' -1 ... 7-4 , z â€¢Pki wi * 4- -....- .'.'- -I )32&,-*.--511.;--1 -- - Knte::'7*/0 --4-'Fr--S--'.,7-Â·2 -'<---1-â‚¬.-c' 9.---'--r-~:-r Is.'r- ' - - i . ,~ - 1 1- fli - - 91; -k'&14.#..7 :'.Â£,1.3-:...2-1-'j'*-i<C.-'.-~'~--.~.-4- 1.Y. i 92 ' M.~,5.~~~-27 RET- t--Dim-'---~--2.,ek-,--16- '3 .% / 1,2- "4+1#27 7 - 7 I. Â£ - f :- 913 31 0 -5- / I , 5 Â£ 7 -Â· 0 -Il' , 4 , 4~3/7/1 81 - U R 22-,-~1,214.c[/7 tic:-*-51%Â«ULS@--- i U' 42 1 iÂ·46, Frâ€¢72-1 :2... - -- 4 '- I K 4 1 7-=-==r-- -1 ---/ Jui ;d u#toÂ»Â«604 16 - I ' ./1 -r ,- . j . 1 - .5 - 1*yi i -' i , i. ..jt t "' Â£ 1 1 '132+-jil~ 7 - 1 1- -21-I :, ..1-r--1 - m- - - I- Â· -- -- I --- i 1 --/ .6 - - - 1 - r i -- 1 - ..r i - , 1 . P - - -L_ - _ 9 1-=1//4;7,---=-=--- - 9 --- - - - Â«44 ~ A #= r - 3 3.4 g % :7 5/Pre: #592-8 - z.,22Â·J -- 2 6 -3 -4-----2--1 ---1 :ritittl ' - -- -1 * ' ----* - - Fir- I ... -1 - '' It - -I- Z. --r - - ------ #4%#Â®933*4.429*;i,~id~-.-~.~,4 --ff--4-E r--- -i---y=E-14-19-ZO- -6.-,ti '62044 11:.4..44:ffÂ·.-942'-tur-Â·siES..1-1- id=Â·.0- -<535_- ErRU- F - - - - - - -'=77 ~J:2 65-10=afirâ‚¬ 162- -5 - - -/. .- 1 I - .- - I- -IL /1 1 -il .7.- 7.7 ..i'&=.= SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0" u ./41'., Â· i I i 1Â§}490/AM' 4Â¥{t.6. 213'~'t,i''ft'k "."t NA â€¢ r--ZI~~ ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: A-7-0 N. 6 AR\Ack , Aspen, CO --3 SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: -77 Â»- Jo_S , 200_ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 31 Acke< / i 11 off (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: .-~% Publication of notice. By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. t Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Sectjon 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U. S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title5 or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses o f owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Sit&ature i +14 The -fgmgping "Affidavit of Notice" was *knowledged before ulq this 1 1 -day of a ol.~ , 200-5 by OaL-cs L, 1-Â·r-he:3A PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 470 N. SPRING STREET - MAJOR HPC DEVELOPMENT (ANAU WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public 1 hearing will be heid on Wednesday, July 27,2005 ' at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the As- , pen Historic Preservation Commission, City i Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., As- i My commission expires: 443/09 pen, to consider an application submitted by , Dennis and Andrea Young, P.O. Box 133, Aspen, ; CO 81612. The applicant is represented by Lipkin Warner Design Partnership, and the project af- -=2)~ L /Zf Â«.1 fects the property located at 470 N. Spring Street, , 21 0 0 'Â·Â·.9~ Lot 2, Block 4, Oklahoma Flats Addition to the Notary Public # 2/ Â· 1k City and Townsite of Aspen, along with a metes and bounds parcel on the southerly side of said lot, City and Townsite of Aspen. The proposal is to demolish and replace an existing addition. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at ; 941 the City of Aspen Community Development De- partment, 130 S. Gatena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429- ./ R 2758, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. %-tti~, s/Jeffrey Halferty Chair, Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in th, Aspen Times Weekly on July 10, 2005. (2845) ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL .. ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 9-70 0 Le A fu 6 97- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 3* i y 27 , 200_~- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) Â£ 52 ~ 60 cne/- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: C Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. ~ Posting of notice: -By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 9 day of jolly , 200_530 and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. ~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(IE)(2) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. 2 Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ~CAA-R4 Ofl>vaÂ«_~ Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this \hay of :3 97 , 200Â£ by --T)-Wa- -R> Ly->â€¢c N,p .-* WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL fly.. 16*Â¥ i. 1 N .tv 2 My commission expires: -=51 l.:Â§ }cu ixiÂ·Â· buse: 91~9 474 60 255' ~L"Â«er Al--- 0% 0 Notary Public '180%0,0 13, Lh ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL .. 4.27../4 .<...... - 6-lv I i 1. 1 I ,.:..,.4 Â»Â¥ill - 2~Â·t . ~*-33.. ~Â· {r..-~ f ,.-42/1 0 r..1 Â· . . si.4**1$911 . f ..2411;~9 1 42:,1 & a â€¢<f .4,. i<& -9 tte-jl 1 0 . 11 2.9...vs t ..0 1 19 Â·': Hti i ~ ~ g 0? f -0 & i a 1.0 4 % p.-I ... 9 /4 4 + 1 -St . 1 4.1 . Â· Â· - - Posted July 9,2005 PUBLIC NOTICE DATE ~ U[_~ 2-~ 2005 TIME -+4' UU Pd C-ITÂ¥COUNWL 441/â€¢PED PLACE 13,0 6 49Ate/A s-r PURPOSE 470 N SPRING ST HI>C- ANAL REWEW - P,\A}glE A ts,-0 Rju pevE,opÂ«4 r r .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 470 N. SPRING STREET- MAJOR HPC DEVELOMENT (FINAL) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, July 27,2005 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Dennis and Andrea Young, P.O. Box 133, Aspen, CO 81612. The applicant is represented by Lipkin Warner Design Partnership, and the project affects the property located at 470 N. Spring Street, Lot 2, Block 4, Oklahoma Flats Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, along with a metes and bounds parcel on the southerly side of said lot, City and Townsite of Aspen. The proposal is to demolish and replace an existing addition. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429- 2758, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Jeffrev Halfertv Chair, Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on July 10,2005 City of Aspen Account .Jam and Smudge Free Printing - www. avery. com ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Use AveryÂ® TEMPLATE 5160Â® 1-800-GO-AVERYA COLORADO PROPERTIES LTD AUDINGER PEYTON E REV TRUST CITY OF ASPEN C/O KLEIN & BARENBLAT 728 E FRANCIS ST 130 S GALENA ST j 504 MILAM BUILDING i ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205 CREEKSTONE ASPEN LLC DCR FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GOLDSTEIN GERALD H & CHRISTINE S 4545 POST OAK PL STE 100 1873 S BELLAIRE ST #700 PO BOX 2045 HOUSTON, TX 77027 DENVER, CO 80222 , ASPEN, CO 81612 GRIFFITH PROPERTY LLC GRIFFITH PROPERTY LLC HEATH JESSE B JR & HETTA S 225 NMILLST#8 709 N SPRUCE ST 606 N SPRING ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HUNT WL& GAYLE G LVG TRST MAYER HOWARD & PAULINE PEEPERS HOLLOW LLC 4939 MEADOWLARK DR PO BOX 333 728 E FRANCIS ST EL PASO, TX 79922 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 11 SEYMOUR EUGENE H & JUDITH K SLADE STEVEN G TAYLOR LAKE EQUITY VENTURE LLC 390 N SPRING ST 3900 ESSEX #101 728 E FRANCIS ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77027 ASPEN, CO 81611 1 VOLK RICHARD W FAMILY RESID TRUST UHLHORN FLORENCE M VOLK SUE J FAMILY RESID TRUST 1/2 | 1/2 991 ISLAND PARK DR 2327 MIMOSA DR 1 2400 SUGUSTA #340 MEMPHIS, TN 38103 HOUSTON, TX 70719 HOUSTON, TX 77057 WIENER WILLIAM B JR YOUNG DENNIS & ANDREA 333 TEXAS ST #2375 PO BOX 133 SHREVEPORT, LA 71101 ASPEN, CO 81612 1 AMEIAV-09-008-L Â®09L5 1!Jeqe6 el zesmin Â®09 Ls Â®AMEAV ~ luo]*ABAe'AMMA - eP!.de.1 8624)es e Je eBeunoquue uo!sseidiul 23400 Two Rivers Rd. Il/$ â€¢ P.O. Box2239 T 970 927-8 CJ LIPKIN WARNER DESIGN & PLANNING, LLC Basalt, Colorado 81621 F 970 927-8 Young Addition 470 N. Spring St. HPC Packet Final Review Packet Index 2-6 Project Description 7-9 Historic Resource Research 10 FAR Worksheet 11 Land Use Application 12 Dimensional Requirements 13 General Information 14 Agreement of Payment 15 Copy of Payment 16 Authorization of representative 17 Legal Description 18 Certificate of Ownership 19 Vicinity Map 20 Site photos Surveys Al.1 Site Plan A2.1-2.3 Floor Plans A5.1-5.2 Elevations DI P 23400 Two Rivers Rd. ~ â€¢ P.O. Box2239 T 970 927-8473 Ca LIPKIN WARNER DESIGN & PLANNING, LLC Basalt, Colorado 81621 F 970 927-8487 Young Addition 470 N. Spring St. Lot 2, Block 4 Oklahoma Flats Project Description The Residence The Young Residence is located at 470 North Spring Street in the Oklahoma Flats section of Aspen. It is a relatively small one and a half story miner's Victorian house. There is a main structure with crossing gables and a front porch facing south. To the north there are multiple additions with a variety of roof shapes. House Moved We know from a contemporary newspaper article accompanied by a photograph that the house was moved in 1968 from Aspen's West End. In addition, we know from the building permit on file that the house was known then as the "Tagert House". A 1965 phone directory lists a W. C. Tagert as living at 535 West Bleeker. We found a biography and obituary in the Heritage Aspen archive from which we learned that William Tagert and his wife Cora lived in Aspen from at least 1895. The House's Original Location (?) An isometric drawing of Aspen dated 1893 shows a house at 535 West Bleeker with some similar familiar features to the house now in Oklahoma Flats. A 1904 map of the city, which includes building footprints, shows presumably the same house. We have found no other documentation for this lot, and we have not found anything that confirms the house depicted in these renderings is actually the Tagert house of 1968. There is no verifiable documentation for the existing house prior to 1968. The most recognizable feature of the isometric rendering is a gabled structure with two windows facing west and additions to the main volume to the south. If indeed this is the same house, it indicates that it was rotated 180 degrees when moved to its new location. 01.Project Description.FR.HPC.lwdp.doc 6/10/2005 2 DI P r f 23400 Two Rivers Rd. /lit â€¢ P.O. Box2239 T 970 927-8473 --LIPKIN WARNER DESIGN & PLANNING, LLC Basalt, Colorado 81621 F 970 927-8487 1968 Changes 4 i 1- 1*#*./ 312 ' -=94Â£- .%â€¢Al .= L-.-- 52=.- IÂ·.. ..12..Ii,~:921.13 1 -2*32 -1 - ..i-i:r.u,J# - 9 . - â‚¬ 5Â· '... ,'.-Le.'1:1 A 1968 newspaper photograph shows the house as its being moved from the West End. In this photograph the building has no south porch or south window bay. We conclude that the somewhat frilly (neo) Victorian south porch and the south window bay are both 1968 additions. The south bay looks to be an historic artifact. The porch seems less authentic. Unfortunately, the newspaper photograph shows nothing of the other three sides. When the house was moved it was set on a new foundation with basement. The house now probably sits higher above the ground than it did originally. The somewhat crazy stair configuration on the west, which is part of today's tangle of northern additions, we guess, was added in 1968 to account for the new ground floor height elevation. Historic Parts of North Additions As for the rest of the north, the only section that may be historic is the part below the hipped roof. By pealing away some of the interior finishes we have found mostly new construction but also parts that seem to be older. The east wall when exposed shows modern framing. The north wall appears to have modern framing with older vertical planks connected to the top and bottom plates. The west wall is made of old planks with plasterboard and drywall on either side. The west wall seems to be lacking any discernable structure. The east and west walls have been internalized by additions to either side. The north wall is an exterior wall but it has a new window and new siding. Preserving the Historic Resource Our approach to preserving the historic quality of this house is three fold. First we propose to restore parts of the original miner's Victorian volume. We intend to remove portions of the modern additions on the west, which extend beyond the original structure's facades. This will also help to emphasize the 01.Project Description.FR.HPC.lwdp.doc 6/10/2005 3 23400 Two Rivers Rd. ~ â€¢ P.O. Box2239 T 970 927-8473 Ca LIPKIN WARNER DESIGN & PLANNING, LLC Basalt, Colorado 81621 F 970 927-8487 original entrance on the south. On the east we will reconfigure the reversed shed roof to a regular shed roof, which will be more sympathetic to the original shapes. We will remove the modern bay window on the west and replace it with windows of more historic proportions. With the guidance of HPC we will remove the modern gingerbread detailing on the south porch. Second, although the additions to the north are at best compromised in their historic significance, they nonetheless represent a common practice of adding rooms with lower roof forms to the back of a main structure. We will leave the north additions as they are with the above exceptions and add a connector that overlaps only the west corner of the wall below the hipped roof. New Construction to the North The new addition we are proposing is located to the north for three reasons. First, the north side is furthest from the historically significant portions of the original structure. Second, the north side seems to have very little discernable original building remaining and so by adding here we are minimizing contact with the historic structure. Third, the lot configuration is such that expansion is only possible to the north. Space Between Connected Buildings The new addition is conceived as a distinct building form not meant to compete with the original. The two will be separated by a minimal connector. Building Height This northern migration, it should be noted, is limited in that the "flat" of Oklahoma Flats ends right here on this side of the house. The new addition runs directly into the side of the steep embankment, which defines the Oklahoma Flats boundary. Since there is no more opportunity to expand horizontally the new addition rises vertically. Nonetheless the new addition measures 24 feet at its highest point. The original structure measures 9 inches higher. Scale The streets in Oklahoma Flats are narrow and residential. In fact, most of the new houses, which have replaced the smaller ones ofjust a few years ago, seem out of scale to the quaint streets, which remain. This is not the case with the Young Residence. This small Victorian on its new foundation is reminiscent of the demolished houses that used to populate Oklahoma Flats. The new addition is of similar scale and does not overpower the site or the street, particularly as it recedes into the hillside. Garage Included Parking on the street is nonexistent and to park openly on site appears sloppy and congested. To alleviate this condition the new addition is using the ground floor as a garage. There is no other access point for a garage on the site. To minimize the garage's impact on the street it is of small scale, it is set back from the historic building and a "porch" screens it in front. The look is more of a carriage house than a modern day garage. 01.Project Description.FR.HPC.lwdp.doc 6/10/2005 4 DI P 23400 Two Rivers Rd. ~ â€¢P.O Box2239 T 970 927-8473 --LIPKIN WARNER DESIGN& PLANNING, LLC Basalt, Colorado 81621 F 970 927-8487 Original Historic Use We think it is important that the original structure not only maintain its historic use but also its historic functions. To this end, the south side of the historic house is being revamped as the main entrance. The addition removes the west side stair and door, which had become the de facto way in. Of no less importance, the new structure does not replace the main internal functions of the original. Facing the street are the kitchen and stair hall, and the living room and dining room remain in their original location. The attic room remains as a bedroom. Work At Home The new addition has, as described above, a garage and above that a modest master bedroom. In front of the master bedroom, facing the street is a study where one can work at home. We think it is an important point that so many of the homes in Aspen are not lived in much of the year. However, the Young's are active participants in the community and Aspen is their home. This house with its additions is not large and it is meant to represent a modest upgrade to today's lifestyles without sacrificing the beauty and scale of the town they love. Conceptual Review At conceptual review it was suggested that this addition would provide an opportunity to restore the south faGade to its original configuration prior to the addition of the bay. We plan to honor this request by removing the bay and replacing it with a window to match the photograph from the 1968 move. It was also concluded that the south porch was an integral historic element and should remain. We plan to restore this porch upgrading it to meet current code in the process. Material Selection As we mentioned before the new addition is meant to be viewed ---- as a distinct building from the historic structure. That being the Â·Â·<22Â¤â‚¬~~ case we feel the connector piece is integral in delineating 32:EEZ:~ between the two buildings. Along with its diminutive size in -*irl-J<-1 -1-~ relation to the two structures we plan to clad the connector with EZZ - 3... ., -*- 1-t 1 .11 a standing seam zinc panel similar to the adjacent photo. We - - -- 01 91 1 .....-Q-17 1. V. think this departure from the horizontal wood siding cladding Za -" 1-. the addition and the historic building will help to highlight the 21:imm..4,/26//ail/di buildings separation. A Little More Space As we mentioned at conceptual review despite the restraint used in designing these additions we do request some help from the HPC for FAR considerations. Hindered somewhat in this respect by including the garage, the Young's need 500 square feet of bonus FAR to complete the project. The scale of each new room is modest and in no way approaches anything close to "monster' status. The proposed project is meant to rehabilitate the historic building that the Young's are proud to own and anxious to preserve 01.Project Description.FR.HPC.lwdp.doc 6/10/2005 5 23400 Two Rivers Rd. MI/4 â€¢ P.O. Box2239 T 970 927-8473 /1 LIPKIN WARNER DESIGN & PLANNING, LLC Basalt, Colorado 81621 F 970 927-8487 Thank You, David Warner Dennis Young Andrea Young t... 01.Project Description.FR.HPC.lwdp.doc 6/10/2005 < DI P 1- P / a l R./ a. C 5- |4:>ty,4 -649 5,-"*t.*,nÂ·.Â«arZZA 1 rmLE -BOPX'~T L. M J 'ily' :39 i %71 â€¢ ...e-' .....r- 8. r. U :iÂ£*44.5;- -1.49-Â«...l q. I a N 4 CD *4;**5*13(#9102, ' 4 00 Nt4 0 04 N 1 -4 1: 1 2 Â·Â¥,T 71Â·11=4~' ..5*,4211 . a ...2 # Rrt FRY b 0 | 1-1~: %39.,=u 424 7 0 2/6//7-.r.Â·ELEC HEAVY FURNACE 00 4 N m 1 N. 0 4 %1 lili 0 a 0 N k 1 . 1 614 61% 610 608 606 604 602 600 634 532 20 52 556 524 62 5%10 5/8 5/6 514 67% 570~303 506 504-30Z-32 434 41 .0.+1. 00.H ================ === = ~========== - . W.BLEEKER Q 0 . (613) (6091 77 6/5 607 611 . 6(g' 607 605~(m 60J -O -,M.V,IY,V,fp,filfmi,r27 5Z5 52 53# 93 Si 5~ 513 6( / 509 507 505,503 6-0/ 435 0. i J 0 c 00 /4,0 ;f i 1 7-77: , i ~ ~ V*-4' 7-ld@ ~ 2 2-1 3 131 1 t- Z Z O F-- 1Â»Â«1 --1 1 ATI [2<11 4 Z 1/X BILKI Al i a Jp 14 -~ 9 1 1 10 0 rr LIx [--- , lu 0 0 00 h -1 -J et- N b 04 . Z kk ' - e 2 1 E. *t I G H ~ /. k r.1 R _1__ - 74 . Â§ 77-3251. .- 1 11 1 17-3 , 1 % 4 1/ ./ 4 .9571.7 1, 30 lai 1'"''A 6.--2 % t.- /-23 | C IL_Z F x 1/ 1, 1 1 @1 1/ 0/ i / irm LJ K 2 8 3 M. R. 6. K. 1.IPLP - Q. ,-O g & 7-1 r,- Gr 43 0 7-a - .-il- 1 -- 0 1.-1 /0 [73 1 h //, 1 / 1 k -- 4 / -D lim iv DUEL_./ Lv=Lu 3 //59 'h j 2321_ M PH- ed/f [i / K. Â£-1/1-â‚¬J % 17 03 Z---25 i / li S. 7 stbrage NG,0. Gro. r 00 o I el, 'o . Fz 8" x 1. - 6,2 60 608 606 604 602 600 534 538 530 5'J .526 52# 522 590- 5/8 96 374 5/2 8/075*=50 500 \ a 434 41 . d--4 En.box - = = Im= = == = = == === ./. 1/6 117 119 601 601 90/ toi 4 80 901 Do' 20/ 00/ .. HOUSE ORIGINAL LOCATION Corner of 5th and BLEEKER I. .4 ./.,J, ./ I [/7 } 2 .' , 14 - , 152 1 .g'. . : 1426 K , 1 1 4 . r /1 4 2.1.1~ .: 1 41, ' 1--14 ' I . 2 ' r 7,72,~.ya--7 1 8 CD--5 0 EL-1 01 A.'14#.-L fflA/t~ ~ BU<O /60 * Â£770\.7 h/Un, S t 7-E- i A- dtL,11 1741/7 1 -F~29*17 5 rE*z=n/81 4 9=2 (fP91 LE (/,votÂ»- .s(fto 6,Â«fF- 57Â¥Â«/ Ar r IE<2~ - I Pl CIT ULURADU ADDRESS GENERAL .\ OF JOB Lot 2, Block 4 Okllhoma Flats 410 0 *nt PERMIT CONSTRUCTION WHEN SIGNED AND VALIDATED BY BUILDING IN5PECTION DEPARTMENT THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES THE WOKUESCRIBED BELOW, CLASS OF WORK: NEW O ADDITION 3 ALTERATION 3 REPAIR O MOVE E WRECK C OWNER NAME Marvin Moriarity ADDRESS Aspen, Colorado PHONE 925-2964 LICENSE LICENSE NAME (AS LICENSED) By owner CLASS NUMBER INSURANC 1 90-3 EaLL. prti/1,'t-rtÂ£1'3 fL ADDRESS - -- PHONE* --_--0___.. *.~ O SUPERVISOR FOR THIS JOB . DATE CERTIFIE,. NAME ~ -Dt-2-~17) 09 0 5Â©6, 7 6,9 2,02*,fe:/~L LEGAL e )\ -4-\ DESCRIPTION LOT NO. 2 BLOCK NO. 4 /'l/ ADDITION Oklahonta Flats SURVEY ATTACHED O DESIGN < Tagert house to be inoved i A Llc. BY None BY as constructed 3 PE No. AREA (S.F.) HEIGHT NO. ~.-TOTAL OCCUPANCY: AT GRADE 2700 (FEET) 21t STORIES umÂ·rs--1 - GROUP Res. DIV. SINGLE m ATTACHED ~ TOTAL TYPE FIRE BASEMENT UNAN. ~ GARAGE 9 DOUBLE CJ DETACHED C] ROOMS CONSTR. Wood ZONE DEPTH 1 # FIRST 5!ZE :PACING SPAN AUTHORIZED BELOW R AGENCY DATE GRADE FLOOR BY BUILDING REVIEW EXTERIOR Â¥OOT\NG ~ Â£~~ !2 CEILING SIZE ZONING EXTERIOR CONC. ~ PARKING FDN. WALL ROOF THICKNESS ~ MAS'Y Â® THICK n CAISSONS n ROOFt NG PUBLIC HEALTH SLAB L.J & GR. BEAMS U MATERIAL MASONRY ABOVE ABOVE ABOVE ENG:KEEPING THICKNESS IST FLR 2ND FLR. 323 FLR. EXTERIOR WALL STUD SIZE ABOVE ABOVE ABOVE & SPACE 1 ST FLR. 2ND FLR 3RD FLR. REMARKS NOTES TO APPLICANT: FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATION CALL 925 - 7336 FOR ALL WORK DONE UNDER THIS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCEPTS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR, VALUATION COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, THE COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION OR CITY ZONING ORDINANCE, AND ALL OTHER COUNTY RESOLUTIONS OR CITY ORDINANCES WHICHEVER OF WORK ~ 1,400.00 APPLIES. SEPARATE PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND HEATING, SIGNS, PLAN TOTAL FEE SWIMMING POOLS AND FENCES. PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM DATE ISSUED UNLESS WORK IS STARTED. FILED T P <2 CO REQUIRED INSPECTIONS SHALL BE REQUESTED ONE WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE. DOUBLE CHECK _~ .. ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE ON ALL ITEMS OF WORK BEFORE OCCUPANCY IS PERMITTED. FEE - CA.3- 7 $14.00 9 THIS BUILDING SHALL NOT BE OCCU~IED UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCut ANCY HAS SEEN ISSUED. ~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT Fu PER/,AIT SUBJECT TO RE VOCATIONâ€žOR SUSPENSION 1>~1~OLATION *f ANY LAWS GOVERNING SAN.E, SIGNATURE i ; OF 11 it B 17) 2 j V i ck/~L /1 /lj/ APPLICANT: 44Â»;Ilu 1%20 4 1 ' DATE -L PERMIT NO. LICENSE t RECEIPTS CLASS AAOUNT THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED HERE ~M. 9/17/6~ BA-170 Cil 1 1 9 0. FOUNDATION CONTRACTOR â€¢m 0 23400 Two Rivers Rd. 174 â€¢ P.O. Box2239 T 970 927-847 CJ LIPKIN WARNER DESIGN & PLANNING, LLC Basalt, Colorado 81621 F 970 927-848' Young Addition HPC Final Review FAR Bonus Allowable FAR = 2,241.60 site sqft{per survey} 2,195 + 607 (80%) {per R-30} Existing + Addition Total FAR= 2,629.46 - [327.61 + 1,085.71 + 1,216.41] HPC Bonus = 387.86 required to meet Zoning FAR Basement Level FAR = 327.61 = (.276) 1,187.01 Square Footage: gross = 1,187.01 = 1,100.46 {Victorian} + 86.55 {addition} Wall Surface: gross = 1,207 = [170] 7.1 {wall height} Wall Surface: exposed = 333.54 = [75.5 + 97.04 + 34.64 + 126.36] Factor = .276 = 373.37 / 1,089.85 Main Level FAR = 1,085.71 = (.830) [1,683.08 - 375] {garage bonus} Square Footage: gross = 1,683.08 = 1,031.74 {Victorian} + 651.34{addition} Wall Surface: gross = 2,166.89 = [1,317.22+721.87] Victorian = 1,245.95 = [126.75] 9.83 {wall height} Addition = 920.94 = [105.25] 8.75 {wall height} Wall Surface: covered = 369.29 = [186.42 + 156.63 + 26.24] Factor = .830 = [1.0 - (369.29 / 2,166.09)] Upper Level FAR = 1,216.14 = [(.969) 831.93] + 410.00 Square Footage: gross = 1,256.45 = 410.00 {Victorian} + 831.93{addition} Wall Surface: Addition = 944.00 = [118)] 8.00 {wall height} Wall Surface: covered = 29.12 = [18.42 + 10.7] Factor {addition only} = .969 = [1.0 - (29.12 / 944.00)] 10 01.FAR.HPC.FR.lwdp.doc 6/10/2005 DI P ~ Land Use Application ~ THE Crn OF ASPEN PROJECT: Nanie: )'Gu.vwâ€ž A.U. Th'aÂ« Location: 4900/. tifrixi S-[râ‚¬â‚¬+ Lot 2, Bloce 4, ok lake,i,v,a Flat-r (Indicate street address. lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) cl 3 3-1- -of-3 - C .(tb APPLICANT: Naine: 0.2:fwl IS ~'~5> ('"'l ~ Address: 1 90 Al. C.pr,Ub â‚¬+r.60 phone #: 9 20- 49-06 Fax#: 120- 2.5-09 E-mail: REPRESENT.iTIVE: Name: _~kerd 14-0.4â‚¬1 - 9 6.-ir k.14 60â‚¬lt-Pler De< ir, 4; P/1*AM,0.5 Address-.701_ -9 1/.11Â£., 44_jt@P l ., 8>asat-f t.o Phone#: 919-3195 Fax#: 6>7.9 - 0409 E-mail: 30Â«44 /4 . e //,pul'.1.(A.Jit-Ple-r. Â£-O,01 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): C] Historic Designation 0 Relocation (temporary, oIl or off-site) Certifi cate of No Negative Effect J Demolition (total deniolition) Certificate of Appropriateness E Historic Landmal Lot Split -Minor IIi.storic Development -Major Historic Development -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses. previous approvals. etc.) \'(2- 5-4,5 1â€¢00'narts F ;04'Wa howe u fed a< 2 râ‚¬ 51'441.teâ‚¬ . PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings. uses. modifications, etc.) 451&61 ip.1 -4 4-1 Pwy/1 4412,0,0.7 >= 04 1 61/6, c-- 09*-054- c.c,iÂ¥A A *94-â€¢Â·y- wd.k.vn 9148 162 Â·vus en Â·fitc- . 46,v 44747-0 z !4#1Â£44*4- 0 rl nÂ«-4. 40 old 4 n 4,0/. FEES DUE: S 2,Â¥ 05- o â€ža RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD 11 pQMME 0 0 ..Â»1 4 1 .. Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: - Young Addition Applicant: David Warner Lipkin Warner Design and Plannning LLC Project 470 N Spring Street Location: Zone R-30 District: Lot Size: 2,802 sq. ft. Lot Area: 2,802 sq. ft. ltÂ· or the purposes oi calculating Ploor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 0 Proposed: 0 Number ofresidential units: Existing:_1 Proposed: 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 1 Proposed: 1 Proposed % of demolition: 5% DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing: 2,558.71 Allowable: 2,241.6 Proposed: 2,529.45 Height 22'-10" Principal Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Accessory Bldg.: Existing: NIA Allowable: NIA Proposed: NIA On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: N/A Required: NIA Proposed:N/A % Open Space: Existing: NlA Required: N/A Proposed: NIA Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S. E. W Existing: WA Required: N/A Proposed: NIA Side Setback: south Existing: 15-7" Required: 10'-0" Proposed: 15-7" Side Setback: north Existing: 5'-6" _Required: 10'-0. Proposed:1'-5 Combined Sides: Existing: NIA Required: NIA Proposed: NIA Distance between Existing: Required: Proposed: buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: 19.5' encroachment (case #02CU237 court filing #474555) Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): 387.86 square foot bonus ; front, back and north side setback ; residential design standards/qaraqe 12 .. General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. i ms mformation ijill heli, us review your plans and, fnecessail, coordinate with other agencies illat may be involved. YES NO Does the work you are planning include exterior work: including additions, demolitions. new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? C Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitation. or restoration? 0 >~ Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? k In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit: are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilization or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? 0 0 If yes. are you seeking federal rehabilitation invesrment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) O 0 If yes. are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of .Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: C Rehabilitation Loan Fund 0 Conservation Easement Program ~Dimensional Variances 3 Increased Density 0 Historic Landon . Lot Split O Waiver of Park Dedication Fees U Conditional Uses g Exemption from Growth Management Quota System 3 Tax Credits 13 .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ACreement for Pavment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN Chercinafter CITY) and 13 EkiNG k .drÂ·woeâ‚¬A Yo o N 6.- (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: l. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for A - , 49-0 N Ki:)Â·c~' N 6 -EÂ¥,FLGET- MQff- w (hereinafter, THE PROJECI). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Ubc applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent lo a determination of application completeness. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size. nature or scope of the proposed project, it is nor possible at this linie to ascertain the full extent of Ihe costs avolved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it :s in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional :osts to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs arc incurred. CITY agrees it will be benctited through the greater certainly of recovering its full costs to process APPL]CANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is :inpracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally requnred findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determig,@Don of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in th: amount of $ 2406 which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit. APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reiniburse the CITY for the processing of rhe application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall b: made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT furlberagrees i that failure to pay such accrited costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, anil in no case will building oermits be issued until al! costs associated with ct,>]Di~Â¤0rEisi~YETIDe t>:91< paid. 41\ j /4 //ifyi j *4 CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: 4/ 461â‚¬/,414(-z~ i T VY 1 KN By: Julie Ann Woods /< Community Development Director Date:\ f'&79-~*,r~76 too-b j / Mailing Address: , 26 -2,0, ! 33 i -14<FoJ (20 fal Gl 2-- g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01 RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD 14 DJ43 YOUNG BUSINESS SER *ES, INC. U.S. 3.'A PO. BOX 133 ASPEN. ~611 ASPEN, CO 81612 82-164/1021 PHONE: (970) 320-4706 4/23/2003 . Citv Of Aspen d.. ...WW i 8 DAY TO THE DRDER OFÂ· 9 ['wo Thousand Four Hunared Five and Ol')/100****'********Â·:<*~k'*wiÂ·*"***4:**"64**il**"******Â·**llcÂ¥*******,w*****,~******44*'***4 E DOLLARS i 1\ a ~ YGONG ~USINESS SERVICES, INC. \1#L /11 f--lfU 44 B Ew.O 1 (,1 r tr i CL . * 4 1 1'Â· N; p,9 AvTHOP:ZES SIGTAIERE 61*Uldj-,ri'?lj; d,f,} f'u'-ikA~63 ijm. N,DDUUUÂ·-li~U.Â© 1% 0 '-1 , Ill j ..f 9 00 5 3 4 5 il' I~ 10 2 10 1 6 11 SI~ 1 2 5 4 108 6 58 3 1 7 15 rAM? la 'tiv * .m 23400 TÂ·,4Â·0 RiÂ·v:is Rd. N ~0 80)2259 J 1- 970 927-82 .li'KIN WARNER I.)E S 1(..1.~~'LANNING. l. 1.C Basalt, Colorado El 621 7/I | F 971 927.84 Applicant Owners: Dennis and Andrea Young Address: 470 N. Spring Street Phone: (970) 920-4706 Representative: Lipkin Warner Design and Planning David W'arner and Aaron Hoffinans rhe almaffrm and individâ‚¬ifi are authorized to a~t on my behalf for all matters relating to approvals A-, yequiFed Br a constrl.~tibli perrait within the City ~f Aspen. 04 110 - - - D#nnis Young, applicA A . i 4,Â·vt?003 0 1.applicant rep.HPC.ah 1 Page 1 . - ... -..... 16[Fl D - ., 1 - .. EXHIBIT "A" I.EGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 4, OKLAHOMA FLATS ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN AND A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGiNNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK 4, OKLAHOMA FLATS SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, STATE OF COLORADO, SAID CORNER LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE LUX PLACER, BEING IDENTICAL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE J.R. WILLIAMS RANCH; THENCE N 15Â°30'00" e 28.36 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2, EXTENDED NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE S 43Â°07'52" E 11.39 FEET; THENCE S 53Â°54'53" E 1.69 FEET; THENCE N 46Â°06'07" E 5.40 FEET; THENCE S 53Â°54'53" E 10.50 FEET; THENCE S 41Â°57'03" W 5.50 FEET; THENCE S 59Â°03'57" E 22.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2, IDENTICAL TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE LUX PLACER AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THE WILLIAMS RANCH; THENCE N 89Â°54'00" W 44.74 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. . . 3/4 :. - . 4>~:' , #- * 17 14.7.4- 4 . .7. .. t CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP Pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the State of Colorado hereby certifies that DENNIS YOUNG AND ANDREA YOUNG are the owner's in fee simple of the following described property: AS SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT 'A" ATTACHED HERETO ADDRESS ACCORDING TO THE PITKIN COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE: 470 SPRING STREET ENCUMBRANCES: Deed of Trust from : DENNIS YOUNG AND ANDREA YOUNG To the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN For the use of : U.S. BANK Original Amount : $500,000.00 Dated : NOVEMBER 27,2000 Recorded : JANUARY 2, 2001 Reception No. : 450182 Deed of Trust from : DENNIS YOUNG AND ANDREA YOUNG To the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN For the use of : WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A. Original Amount : $1,170,000.00 Dated : NOVEMBER 21, 2002 Recorded : NOVEMBER 29,2002 Reception No. : 475444 Subject [o easements, rights of way and recorded matters. This certificate is not to be construed to be a guarantee of title and is furnished for informational purposes only. PITKIN COUNTY TUTLE, INC. authorkersignature CERTIFIED TAM~ch 20,2003 @ 8:00 A.M. - 2 2.6.- 5Â»t,. 18 I,3.:L %, I-r ./. 1 12* -&43 \-2211$- '43Â¥0*#) WILL W 470 35/3 m O N. Spring 2 \ AX>D 0 \ EDER L ",2.:Â·ti Z SFIE AvE\~ .8 r-Â¢1 r 1,6 * 2 V m , 5 3 8 Â£04*. 144 A 8 H'mIOW +40>I L 9, C..Ailt,41*NEN IT O/8 7 /' 640 - 10 Li- 9,104-Tcr 1-4 Pt;Py ~ i t " I +RANGS ST , 1â€¢ I.H'Ft *ILVER CT a 12 W 41,AMS RINGÂ·, CA ed and< 0,444 0 . 2 Sd*0 5 1 0 A 0 p Rjo [Â»toÂ»rark .- 4 , AWMILL C reE 4% B# 64' 4 O .4.E *Iny O 4, 4 H 1 4. 40 P 1. RCEINâ€¢fIN Ito 0- 4 . 2 4 2 Alf'114 t.t 40 1. MAFLCIVE,1 U 4 Cl'Ic/law â‚¬ HOPKINS AVE 5 Z,KNMING LANE P 3 4/44 P EAN P Nr . AN r ~* E C -R l,E A 6 G mERT r 0 ~ ,- 44 S 7Â· 01,!Inte P,1 -' O WATERS 60 4 AV ar . 4 1 r ASPEN VEND r 0 +4 3 0. 65 = 0,14 '141â‚¬ . ~k OrE 0, LACET COURT t. UTE COURT .d f 6L #EMHEL* b '3#.Od W " - 1;VO EMUGGiER WN HO -~4 NORTHWAY DR 2 N 1.-r'â€¢ N3 V . ID e ..4 - - 2qi#w.*B'*#1*167.0--"-- 74 -9.- . I. PLLY<,Ii. 1\Â· . / - ./. 'an...2 ' b -6 -4.. 4 4 ~7 1 f i eNy:/ :mr .-5 y. , 80 *:, N -Â· 4, r 94 :Â·; 7.,4-:.:'42 i : 'I: E /1 ./:a f * 9 tÂ·. 3 .f ./. j '.r ' .7,-::340 ...21 9% ,<24* h. .. '.1.. VAÂ·Â·Â·â€¢4 .: -. 3' t.3.< 2 k t , 6 : - f\1 )1 ~ :.1.-, u - . 411\\11\, - t.*tp/ t ~4 -2 I -14,2 6. . 1 1 1.i - I-<42=241 1 9 1. 1,> 0 :,li, M 'Ul , 31% :1 154# 4 . 1 +4 -r . 4~ ... 4Â¢41171. * Avil:. : '2 Â· %- .r . . -' 1&20 I - . '..Z 9 U f Â· ./ t ' 1. 1 4 ./ Jie'*4 1 t' .- - .1.-Ful , 4,111â‚¬414 . 1 1, P : . 1 14, * .4 , 611 0 6 1 - 1 8 A 7 10 ~ i.r g ~~c~ '23 i 2/ t., 1*v . 6 9 I .- - -2 7 .- *13 Â£*1144# * I -3 ' L..t V a~. *4. . M y.. ... .. -Ar'.- 'oa ' .rr--.-Â·i- 0 -1â€ž ...â€ž 0.* de - . m.... . - 1 - ... . I w - .le. e *>>f 4. t..... ...B . ... I. ..4 2.- ... NORTH SPRING STREETSCAPE WEST VIEW 1 -Â·pi..NE,1-ir Fi,Amip~y,=- - - *,2 2. *''ll .. -- , ' 471. i Vi - tirri 'f , . , / t. /...-- i..=r, -- -al Al 1 r , 1 1 -- RE -- ~, %1 + 4 -,6 t . -'/ 4 0 1 - .. . I. r .4. fry 13 -, fl. . ' . 31 / t .1 9.1{4 - 2 - % 4 - / \7 ... 3 f V'' , ; N 4 - 4 . ..16 1 C 9 tip I r ' --AÂ» - 12-13 - i Â· ; .1/ 91 6 1 -* I ke. -4 fe . ,-1. W. ... 1 . - 1.....Immill' ... 1 , , 4*34% ./ te. t I 4. â€¢} ... # f 7 /7 1 I. b ... 1 i , ''' f i /.9 1 . 2-1 - ------=-- - - . 5.-/Ea~ ..@rte h 4,- , * 1 4~ 1 -7~, I ' '' Â¢ 4 0 6, 4 7 --Im#,*. , + 1 1 4. ,-3 -t e C..2.lill'IMIX.* -1.,7/10- Â© litill---=*1.Miull t --- ...b Â· - 0 +94 i i '7.r- C -- ....0- 314* '' 41,4,1 f , U **:. 1*jj':/ it' f r W ap, 3 :~ t 1 ./ ... - 12&Â·Â·Â· 1 2 NORTH SPRING STREETSCAPE EAST VIEW . 0 C Permils .7X ...... Eile Edit Becord Wavigate Ferm Reports Format Tab tielp . Module Help . 2 â‚¬j *39 0 .Â·49 23 114 49* â€¢ I 1~133(9 24 43 'i ?~ 4 B >1 121 61 0% :u , 21 1 . 9 *46 cler * . Conditions ~ Subtermits j Valuation ~ PuÂ¢]lie Comment | Attacbments Main ~ Routing Status } Afch/Eng ] Parce!5 1 Custom Fields | Fee; 1 Fee Summa) 1 8Â©tions | Routing Hetory Permit Type ahp<L A:pen Hictolic Land U:e 2004 Permit #:0024.206511Â·Ipc . Address ~470 NSPRING ST _3 Apt/Suite{ ~~U,Â«<â‚¬.Â«~4,*~~~,Wâ€ž~%Â¢*Â£=â‚¬(~,X.â‚¬U.(*(~4Â«2666UU(XUU,2UUÂ«~Â«~2UÂ«<4eeeec<Â«<UÂ«0Xeec2e Cw jASPEN PerftÂ·,t\<Metmation -Â·Â· Â·u Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â· Mastef Pe,mit 9 ZJ Routing Queue lahpc Applied j06/16/2005 j project 1 . j Status ~pending Approved j i Description jFINAL PUD OLD CASE HIEâ‚¬073-03 Issued } 4 j :~ Final j Submitted ~LIPKIN WARNER 927-8473 Clock ]Running Days I--6 Expires ~66/iwiboi j F Visible on the web? Permit ID: j 34624 ' Ownec ' '- "'-'- - - - -â€¢~'-"â€¢ .mmâ€žm-wâ€ž---< -- i Last Name ~YOUNG DENNIS & ANDRE 21 Fut Name | IPO BO><133 ASPEN CO 81612 i phonel Z 4~wâ‚¬f : i< > Enter the permit type code I./iew Record 1 of 9 1,0, ,~ --W-- ---- â‚¬ ACORDâ„¢ CERTIFI*TE OF LIABILITY INSL*ANCE 03/23/2005 DATE (MIWDD/YYYY) PRODUCER (303) 237-5445 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE MILE HI INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 4045 WADSWORTH BLVD., #306 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033- INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURED INSURER A: AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE BROTHERS ELECTRIC, INC. INSURER B: PINNACOL PO BOX 2973 INSURER C: INSURER D: EVERGREEN co 80437- INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADD'L POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LTR INSRD TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DD/YY) LIMITS A GENERAL UABILITY 32-0031 03/22/2005 03/22/2006 EACH OCCURRENCE 1,000,000 -~ COMMERCIAL. GENERAL LIABILITY PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ DAMAGE TO RENTED 100,000 | CLAIMS MADE I X ! oCCUR ~ ~ ~ ~ MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 11 11 GENERALAGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 r--1 pRo. r--1 1 1 1 1 POLICY I 1 JECT I 1 LOC A AU-OMOBILE UABIUTY 46-277168-00 03/12/2005 03/12/2006 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 1,000,000 ANYAUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS RtoÂ¥wt\.> ~ l ~ BODILY INJURY (Ea accident) $ (Per person) SCHEDULED AUTOS MAR 2 5 2005 HIRED AUTOS 1 1 1 1 BODILY INJURY (Per accident) NON-OWNED AUTOS $ 1 1 PROPERTY DAMAGE BU\\DING giesmENT ~ ~ $ (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO 11 11 OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY: AGG $ EXCESS/UMBRELLA UABILITY 1 1 1 1 EACH OCCURRENCE $ --~ OCCUR 1 1 CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ $ ~ DEDUCTIBLE 1 1 // $ RETENTION $ $ v I WC STATU- 1 IOTH- B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 4077178 05/01/2004 05/01/2005 A I TORY LIMITS I 1 ER EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 100,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? 05/01/2005 05/01/2006 E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 100,000 If yes, describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000 OTHER 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION ( ) - ( ) - SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT CITY OF ASPEN AND PITKIN COUNTY FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE 130 SOTUH GALENA STREET INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTAnVE -LFZ- - ASPEN CO 81611- ACORD 25 (2001/08) Â© ACORD CORPORATION 1988 ~TM INSO25 (0108).05 ELECTRONIC LASER FORMS, INC. - (800)327-0545 Page 1 of 2 TELEDYNE POST N39294 BUDINGER PARCEL MAH CAt RECEFTION No. 44034.5 1-INS vjIL.L.\AvtÂ© J.8 90 01* H 1Â© N e TIFUZE ~--*- 2326\ . 79Â»* 01*\ LINAH l.553~54'555'!5 1.61' / â‚¬.. 01 5 95' 54 55' E 10 507 - FOUND: 4 46 6 N 4*- Cre'07" 5 5,40'ltâ‚¬52:2~4.~f . 10 20 5410 57'05" W BBC)' ~ - REBAR W/PLAS.CAP 8| 007 ea- FI L ---1 04408'E ---- --~ - - 1 BASIS OF BEAR[NG: FOUND MONUMENTS, NE COR. LOT 10, BLK. 1 LS 12707 SCALE: 1% 10' 62-2 - PLANTER TONECOR LOT 14,BLK. 3 374Â° 30'00"E , 583 01 . ~ SURVEYORE CERTIFICATE 1 r - 0 1 HEREBYCERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS A - AS.1/ji- 1 GAS * SURVEY PERFORMED ON OCT. 28TH:1975 AND AVISUAL INSPECTION 1 284 / / lili MADE ON DEC.19TH,1989 OF LOTZ, BLOCK 4,OKLAHOMA FLATS ~~ D SUBDIVISION,CITYOF ASPEN, COLORADO. THE TWO STORY HOUSE b WAS FOUND TO BE LOCATED ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ' r p AS SHOWN HEREON. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL o BUILDINGS,IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN fo AREA= EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCRJACHMENTS BY OR ON 0 F TRACT_A-LURP-21- o THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN. SEE STEWART TITLE 2195,0 SQ. FI* 4 / TWO STORY 1 1 la- POLICY No. 17054 FOR EASEMENTS WHICH MAY AFFECT THESE '~ PREMISES. L =ME // /1 - //0 20' LOT 2, BLOCK 4 // 00 CHIMNEY ALPINE SURVEYS, INC. BY: DECEMBER 19 , 1989 LS s OKLAHOMA 7.. FLATS D "' N 74Â°30*00"W 60Â·00 i INSPECTION WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION OF THE - I HEREBY CERTIFY THATON MAY BTH,1993 AVISUAL ENCROACHMENT ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. NO CHANGES WERE FOUND @ EASEMENT Bk. 340Pg.298 ~ ~,~ CHIMNEY THEREON. lilt 7Â·4 1 |"0 ~0' 4,3 Â·Â¢9' -3,Â·2. ~ ' 6-- 5q ALPINE SURVEYS, INC. BY: N74Â°30'00-W 60Â·00 4 MAY 2OTH, 1993 Iq .3 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE : l 1, JAMES M REDER, HEIKEDY CERTIFY THAT Tl-115 MAF ACCURATCLY OEFICTS A SURVEY FERFORHED % DY PIE ON HAY 31, 2002, OF THE AÂ©OVE Â©r-â‚¬)612~ INP Flâ‚¬DKFTY t#*4. /,49 f'.. 8)23 ALFINE Â©UKVED<e, INC. 84: t ,~le- 4 A.1 $-v sen-C: /0 Â· 2-7-02- J,4,â‚¬61 tematy. L.*141Â·04 Â· 1.. r NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon any defect in this survey within three years after you first discover such defect. Alpine Surveys, Inc. Surveyed 280CT 1975 Revisions 19 DEC. 1989 Title Job No 89 - 189- 2 Drafted 19 DEC. 1989 2OMAYI993 LOT 2, BLOC K 4 Client YOUNG In no event may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced OKLAHOMA FLATS more than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon. Post Office Box 1730 06 05.02 Aspen, Colorado 81611 10.27Â· 02 510.5 9 607 Â©Q. FE CITYOFASPEN,COLO. 303 925 2688 e....2.22.3 SPRING--STREET - 4.Â¢......... 49. 1 N 15Â° 30'00"E-28Â·28 Fiss! 33% *Rig laiet 1 I 1 1 lik Â£4% 1 1 / \\ 1\1 lillilli lilli l / \ l 1 i 1 / 1 / / 0/ 1 1 / / 1 / / Â¥21 31 1'1 lili 11' / 2/ V/ / 0 I / I / / / / / 1 2/ -1 8/ ilil //1 / / / / / / / 1 3,' / / *RB It 1 / 1 1 1 2 5% 1 i , 1 / / 1 -1-1 - W m 2% 1 / / 111'1~'ililll'lilijill'll,lili lili,1 1 111 11iIil/l1II. JO fc=m il ' 1 f \ 1 1 1 1 1 \ ~ 1 Ii!,1111 1 f /1/.11, ?ftÂ¢/1/'i /1,1/11'! j tltiffili, / f EXIST\NG j. ilill' 1 Â· ill jililii ilill, titiÂ¢(ifit? itil?111Â¢ i Â¢{?ilil Â¢'t' / 1 1 1- PROVERTY- 00>0/ . 2/Hurt \ . 1 1.1,lilli I 1 1 1 1 .f'V / / 4 / i .2~15Zuv ..1 9/3/2 ./. n~p# u u . 5: 15927< 1 i LINE 41!141)111/1/1/11't \ 51/11'. 1 1tl,i;lftiItfflili t il/,ill'i,/1//flf,jjill' Â·'. hOACy/Vh:PÂ·t+2/ht V+NVÂ£Â·Â»Â·Â·6(hâ‚¬<Â¢~'4Â¥y'/3/Nly < lili / i / / .. . 1// 1 ~i 111(jfjt;IjI; j ,~i ijtij, i ililt firt,j!111!11(4 j f)/jl, .iff'14 41; 11, 1,11114!21,1,))11.i 11'f'' 1.11{'11!1 'lift! drift# 1/3 \'/lillilli//,45"" i i j' ft'jill i t~ftil,\I!Â¢1,1,1,111,1il!'51; '111'lilltilftfi 111; 1 1 !1Â¢11141%!ilill|j|11{12 11' 11'1;,fltlt!'111'11â€¢ 1 , 1 It , 1 1 / itÂ· ' jifi|/11''jilt|Illij ' !/11ij, jill /1/1/1/ I itilf/,1#' i ,1,11/: /ft Of,/ -4-- f// i- --f-/~~f//f/, 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 ./ .... ... I I. ... .... I I....... 1-Ii'IlllÂ· 1 ' /j,1,,21" it 441 '> 1Â·154>,>,/>/"472>5 VÂ·u ifi, / / / / / , 3-* XK 'IC *~ ..), k.,X,U.\x.x.~~Â· .x x. "x <â€¢."'1 A' } "rk- 4'.~Â©e,. ;1' (11';31 , ,*ii,liji itillif~,1â€ž"r ''1""I'JI'j'"'i' , 11 /,t i})<fli/ / / Iff,}1: i ; ilijflilitillittilill 1 1 11ittlit!101'lilit,1, ils,ff, 111 '11 ji flijilift,!111* 111,11,11''ll,!1!tf/f' 1 1/jilitil, lilli i f 5/> 0//fic<3>9 / / f lili!iii(j,lij L Ii!, . 7 . f.,Â·,4:44.1~.9~~ f /f.f,~39~ Â· >~0 Â· , ,Â·1:li//1/ j ,(fi'# I t//il# '4 il'11, 1Vy'- 1111) 1 'll .- I In 9%6.....A .......â€¢'Â· ' 11111,11,!It/filfilill, 111/fj '1 1!11!l' 1 Ul i '1} /1111) 11111#il/111)ilit / I / 1 / A, 1 1 11'111/1/1//11 1 i j & i i't il! ' 1| 'I' + Il;#111 11 .1 . . / f,111,1/1/1%11111/1/l!1 1 i /5, 4055>4>dil>/9 .1 ' f' ~~~~~,lf /fo '45*f//. / ////70, 1/ //7// / 49/ 'fj/,111?,/11111;11,1,1 t#il#ill,511'111!141!1 :filitil'llicill, Â· ..... / / ZERO LOf LINE / DEVELÂ®MENT ' . ,: 3Â·32'~44:Â·:*fl.<3>~9:Â·30:2:Â·:233:;f:.53:2Â·Â·9Â·? ' ~ Â».vyÂ©.:Â«x. 1 4324/frf~ Â»/ 3 /.fofffÂ»///2 1///. 1 1 1 1 .2....020Â» 455%4044Â·95.0 v4,9//i'/f/f/j/~ // 1 1 , 1 97/7/7/i~ BOUTH BAY 0 /6/,/11'J fill#J,/f/,1 /'' 1, 3 It L. tliliffl / / 09%39 TO BE REMOVED , lili , , 1,11111 111'11, , ,!ili??1 1 / 0%09Â«23 ;1tlti1lt1,t / \\\ / / 1 / 1. . 0%0%094 lilililliIi, 3/// 1 /1111,1,1,1,1,1 FROF05ED â€¢ / / LOT LINE / Â· m . 1 ~ EXISTING /Â«~/4 2 ,ADJUSTMENTV , - MCTORIAN - Â«Â«0109 f/'40/fÂ¢Offt,0/5~7, 0 / / I., J -.4 . 111 1 'li/#11121;lfillitil,l, / -~ 1 /0/y//// /// // //////1 1 1 1/1,1,1,111/1/Ii' I / i 1,1111 hi jj/1(litti '|/}' 74 5> 35>,0 4*1,7.''t, 5>Â·LIÂ« 1 ,- , 2 7 x ........... / .till/11 1 1, / / f..' 3,-RN,Â·Â«7+2Â·,+Alib,&AAA~,2&01Â·24+21.9,40 )/1 â€¢-L' 1'14'/ 1,/011?11 fli 1, 1.hill 11'll; dil!PIll 1 1 \ 1 il,111!/ili/' X (0 // / , 05,70*5 /// /7 1 D 1 V - 'ililiVIVN' / ' I '111t;1sl,jÂ¢ilI#t11f1jl 1 1 1 , EREANG , , 1 1 't?OFERTY " 1 #5949* .Â£10. - / LINE , / ~ ':ewik -BYÂ»Â»iNL 18$050*W \ , 1,/ /1 f /1,11/'/ ./ 1 , A - ...u /X,Vq 6,~/i A /. ~ A A .Â·. AA pt A/%2%,)%AMAA/~ 4.K)7 1,1 '- 1 1 .4 111 i'11 1,1!,lififl'I; 1 1 3*1$0 i i /1 1 /V\6Â·'~'AAA/VVh/Vh/V~AA/.hAAA/VVIVIVVVI I Â£ ;1'1)111/12111,1, t / 1 / / D D \ / â€¢'fifi#li!ilÂ¢I)iii/ / / / ~. . / / It ... ... .. / 1 1 , 1 Ift lillij/'11 j 0 1 1 1 FROFOSED / i. . ...\1 1 1 / r YED?ESS< itll' ' /7/1 /0 1 1 4/iliti}fit;jijiffii SN'(P WI-1-19--,d 1 1 1 ..i...:91/ I - 1 1 1 Lat<slis.ki .... '11#/41' Jit'11 .,1 )11 t 12.11.21 tit 1 , ft t r t f t Â¢ f j i i + i I /NEIGHBOR / / 1 1 1!!!!i1*1!1)i! / It ~j}55'jix /// / ./ / / / '11â‚¬ i}jit'tt\//tl#/1/?1.111411(tl i j 1 1 // 1 '/ ././////// , 11/f/, ,/.tp ,//littillti//t. , # , ' ' REMOVED // . / / 1\ V% Â· /li j f j / / / t ~ WEST STAIRS TO BE ilill -ill %, 1/JfÂ¢?} $11}#Â£ '1,1 '5 I #'il/11'1211'111Â¢Â¢!/lifti{, ii' ' " , ,/I t,;1 t, 1,1,111! li,il!, i il#11:1141/5,1/1,11 1 , 1 1 ~!;Â·111 ijilililit'' . //1/3 1 1 1 / / 0 f##fl/ iii/,#ffl#t#f 'f, t $ f Â¢?# 7 / i l< / 0 1,2,1. 1 ,Â·45 0 0 0Â·Of 1 1 1/// 11# t //// 'ji i,4. -7 I#. 50505$4292:5 5 5/4/ 1// '753 11 ti)11,1/11-11!-1 / / /1 // GO// // / / / / ort:/#tijit#/0 1/1 1/Ill 1/1 1 1 \ -t' 1 ,$1 13$ ft, f'#,i,si, I 111/1+11Â¢'' t?,8, q? i 4111/,;/f i;ft/, I / I \\ iiI Ill lij)' ijltil % 4 / 1 / 'fl/ .~ '~ ,~5Â·fÂ·' ~ 1.i!!lij, iii /'1'' 11t 1 I !1 1 1 \\.\1\ i ..\ ~jiti...~ 1),i'111/t/Zfttllt# N J 1/,/1/#,1/ PROPOSED , LOT LINE -(j iIi 1/,iliti, ilil, , %1, 1 Â· . ADJUSTMENT 2/ij!/ lilli / NEW PROPERTY LINE , 4 1 111 ,(!1,111, 11,11'flfill // /// / ////// //////. /f//>fr / /// / / POSSESS/ON / .-j j & 0 , , fiji }rf Â¢ . / / / /////4//r// ft/,tt,3, , PROM ADVERSE - -~ / / ///7/ , 1,1 . . 0 ' 0'!// ' /'ill'lim. :''i it , ''/,ii'ii. Ittlet' 'il - -A-tifil!1'Illi 1111,#1,;ft,/ , ) 11 j {,1,1 11 ,/,fil] 111, 1 1 1 / f j , 1, fl i 'l; i'filliti \ 1 1111lt $~l l~Ill I i'llilitili' clill ;it 1 / / ',1JtI1flII { 11} * f 1 1 $ f f , f ! t , 1 )Lkifililihld# jlit<,t, \71 \' i I L|l ill!11 fl'j'j'llj! / ### !114'111% , ' 39 , 1 ;1.j'j,~i ' sâ€¢itit'$1 / / 1/\ // 1 4}J / jilis hil'Irt .11-1,1[11111 / 4 / /1//4442*i/~ /' 1 i j j f f i 1 1 # 1 I i illf#fpjftii i ,#. 1 / /././.5 // 1 7-19*,IN'/41/""1 DATE ISSUEREVISION 11 /1/liti#t' 'ij litill' 11/1 06.10.06 HFC FINAL REVIEW I / 11Â»Nufft>f~ / ' N. SPRING STREET 04'll 1 SCALE 1/40' m r-O" BITE FLAN Al.1 DMINNVId 19 NOISEâ‚¬I UNEVAA PaN,[1 Nly,19 N OLÂ·K I OE 31IflS CH ARTIV 00Â¥30100 'NEUGV IZ9I8 1 .Ct= .. EU Op = 0- E I -10 R 0 000 0 1 011-8. I .. , 4'-11" . 12'-4 3/4" 1 WY W ' ... I . I . -- ------- -- ------------ 1 - FO 1 , 11 I EGel-ING EXIEITNG 1 1- BEDROOM 71- I ... .:a ... D r I I ./. ... . 1 i 0 * 1 -r a A TOF OF Fly 4' 95'-0" 1 v l ' EXISTING EXISTING BASEMENT ENTRY REC ROOM EX.STING A BATHROOM 0 1, 1 /41--- CD . 4 /*4 . 2..6 + 4 1 0 k' d (3>-- - i---- - ----- - -- - -- 0 0 -6 I I 11 1 1 ~~ ~ 0 DATE Im 06.10.05 HFC FINAL REVIEW SCALE 1/4. = rÂ·Of BABEMNET Wr.q . A2.1 DNINAIVCId Â¥ NDISW[a ~I EL#81Â£6'OL ~ IOZ ELLInS CnIAH 00Â¥30100'NEUGY L848'LZ6'0L 6â‚¬ZZ XOE['01 13918 00'11Â¥SVE NOI1IddY QNAOX 914121,19 N OL* 33'-10' 24'-11" R&Â§ 2*g 0%5: S i j.0 t eRm 00 0 0 63-9 , 26 , 5-5 0 12-434" , 28'41/4' , .. . 0 Â«f- I f 1 11 H 11 11 11 _____ ______ 31-*41 <04 - 2 -II L EXISnNG (5 OFFICE 2 EXISRNG GARAGE LIVING L V lf) TOP OF CONCRETE Ift ~ Z ge-cr 11.1 0 h UP - rt -9Â¢ 0 71/2' e A TOF OF FLY 1 DN V 103'-0" 7RO 7'EA - / ~ Â«9 1 + 11 rt t 1- 1 A i e t' \ :1: 1 11 1~1 ~ MUD ROOM C 111 1 E)(15TING 1.1 = DN " KITCHEN M ' 7%@PEA 1 c X ... \v139 ~i EXISTING = FOYER 11 1 --- 1 -1 1 1 Imm*i IL Lr-~ L i I -1 - no LJT. ItEEEEEEESeall iME- il#EEESI| 1--41 -' 44 0 Ab.2 AE 155UE/REV[SION 06.10.05 HFC FINAL REVIEW SCALE 1/4' = r-0- GROUND FLOOR A2.2 .,UE~*,04 DNINNVId V NDISE{I Hi IZ9I8 NOILIddY QNAOL 00Â¥30100 'NEUGV @ e 33'-la" ~ 91/2'1 3'-51/2" , 29'-7' fk F----------------------------------7 1 'r---1 -- Ill- 1- L----1 1-/ma~11 1 1 -- I. O 010 010 1 1 Or) CI) U W/D 1-i=.,I.-I....le-Zi-I....M i 1 11 - 9% -- Ph\\ - - 1 0 ' u-i=Ma=....ili-= annit i 1 @M - 1 1 O 1 -91 1 -1 ._ ---P J [ 1 1 % 1 1 I 1 / \â€¢ 0 11 m~ 61 0 lima=mEEE.-1 /70 \1 1 1 11 0 1 6 24 li -,f-1 %% I al 0 M.1 82 .4 1 S! lili lili lili l 119 1111 1111 1 1-1 e-- - - - -L-1.-- T-:~2-172'__-__L---'9-17'-2-2--g~_-/-_-"I_-1.-L- _"_"L_-1-3 $ e 1 1 101012 1 01 r.[---- 1--------- .w- .--.L__ Coh-- ---- - -0- - _ - I - & '--4~ * -i - - i . 0 1. /1 1 1 \ 1 \ / 1 1 1 / 1 1 3// )11 1 1 -1 1 1 /1 lAg 0 1 1 4 4 1 2 1 1 9 1 \ 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 AL--------------2-4 1 1 1 1 11 1 L 1 E-7 -r------- -7 i 0 1 \ 1 1 1 1 83 1 INE 1 1 1 1 1 1 pm 1 1 L. 1 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 g . 1 9 It 1 1 1 , 1 E-1. - Â§0/1 U -- % 0 1 . 1 E-~ fly-1 1 1 1 1 1 OTO 1 r e E I 452 mil 11 1 1 1 1 / 1 --1 il I 1 1 Cm --1 1 ---------Â«1 -3 1~~--Gll 1 - - -I- N : e 1 - 1 1 + 1 i a c 83 L W 1 Rm YOUNG ADDITION m DP % 29 11 m LIPKIN WA1RNER DESIGN & PLANNING r 470 N @FRING 0 i ASPEN, COLORADO 701 EASTVALLEYRD SUITE 201 T: 970.927.8473 RO.BOX 2239 F: 970.927.8487 BASALL CO 81621 W: lipkinwarner.corn CLOSET I 301330 9'EV , El v . ,Â¥- .'.............'.......,Ii-di-Ki.....~ I. -- - imilm"IIIMI,Wilil ..1- 1 -1 mm.. ==t....w Il - --1.~I------'1 1=........=........-........--- 1 -----------------------------------y-,.--1--34,~.11 - 9 ..; I v .:.il-I=.5.=...I.--------=IM........-.-IiI.,9/. -------------------- , 0 ------------------- -11=~===m---~1~~1~- .::.' = 11-INI-11111!,11~1â€¢ Ilt-i;---1-"" ;0Â· ~~Â·0: 0 . 0 E. 0 0.0 . or o 'Al LW LW a DP . . - 0. P. :0 -, .~ 1 00, , .7-111 0,1 0 - 002000~00401010.40~049- -5444*:44:>+44:*52 ...0... a ... - -0-0. /%~~fi' Al, 0 0 A A L W DP 2&1 2 Rt g 1% 0: f -------------------- 50% m m 64 STANDING SEAM ZINC -- 1 0 30< ROOF h A-; m 41/2' 5HADOW BOARDS -{Yll Â«Â«Â«---~--------------- ---- - ----------EE------ 1X WOOD TRIM TYP ~'-- -- ---- ----- -- ---- - 113'-6" A 1 -~ 2 4'HORIZONTALSIDING 41/2' CORNER BOAR[)5 TYZ -~------~----------------------+-----~--------------------*-/- --.~~~--~~~- ---~~-------~~~--~~---~---~--~-~------------ - - ---- 4 108'-8" _ __ -UmELL~ZIZILL-LIE-LIZUI--IZE ZIUZIEZ~~1322JILL-CILJ---IZE.ZE--~ ' TOP oF Fty ------ ----=------ -- - ----= -=- -=--------- - - ---=--= --=--=--=-- - i immm @_O WOOD COLUMN -iL_LI -_O_Li ~ 1 14 - W Tor OF MY - ==1 22] 22] fol STANDING SEAM ZINC EU LE] PANELING 9 TOP OF CONCRETE ~ ~ ~ ~ Z FROFOBED ADDITION PROPOSED CONNECTOR EXISTING HOUSE ~ Tr O 0 92 6 02 ~ 02~ < &58 C-) WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0 26 0. 2 1-6 O Il--------il----------- --- 123'-6' rk RIDGE V STANDING SEAM ZINC KOOF -- 41/2"SHADOW BOARI)5 TYF: m m i ------- n~- 1X WOOD TRIM TYE 11 11 -Ii-titillt~-* 2- 4" HORIZONTAL SIDING VTOF-OFFLY ' 1-YE 41/2' CORNER BOARDS ~-541Â»44{ 1-YE ~ ..-- '1-IM.- -366---m--Tr IJ-J--*----2-& LIE Z~Z~~~(222~~i~~2.W6~ -~J.I~-I~~ICILLIEF--- 32---- ' EH-. ... 4 108'-81' A prwir71 06.10405 HFC FINAL REVIEW TOF OF Fly-97 STANDING BEAM ZINC , En ~0 PANELING , 99-0 Ah TOF OF CONCRETE--97 - I r--82*lk 1/4.1%0Â» 1 I EXISTING HOUSE PROPOSED CONNECTOR FROFOSED ADDITION , 11 ELEVATIONB C-h EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" - SNINNV'14 19 NDISWIa ITWEAR1IVAA N[,I,WI IOZ 31InS mI AETIVA IZ918 00