The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.513 W Bleeker St.HPC042-01.A 2735-124-43-003 HPC042-01 - 513 W. Bleeker Minor HPC & Var. - j'UT__- 1 41 aff 90 H 7 I '4, A '' 1 4, .. CASE NUMBER HPC042-01 PARCEL ID # 2735-124-43003 CASE NAME 513 W. Bleeker Minor HPC and Variance requests PROJECT ADDRESS 513 W. Bleeker PLANNER Amv Guthrie CASE TYPE Minor HPC. Variances OWNER/APPLICANT Thomas Bailev REPRESENTATIVE Brad Randall DATE OF FINAL ACTION 7/25/01 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION HPC Reso. 33-2001 ADMIN ACTION Aggroved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 9/27/01 BY J. Lindt .. PARCEL ID: |2735-124-43003 :~ DATE RCVD: ]6/21/01 # COPIES: CASE NO|HPC042-01 CASE NAME:~513 W. Bleeker Minor HPC and Variance requests PLNR:| Awty 6-41/Wk t PROJ ADDR:|513 W. Bleeker CASE TYP:|Minor HPC, Variances STEPS:1 OWN/APP: Thomas Bailey , ADR|620 E. Cooper C/S/Z: ~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:]920-2910 REP:[Brad Randall ADR1 C/s/Z: i PHN(379-2664 h..1 FEES DUE:|500 D FEES RCVD:| 500 STAT: E~ REFERRALS~ REF:l 1 BY DUE: ~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 1 ........I- 1 1 DATE OF FINAL ACTION:1 *~03 -- * CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ PZ: HW. 9 + fe 33 -100) BOA: CLOSED: rr379 BY: |CJ ' UMCHri DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: | PLAT (BK,PG):L_ ' ADMIN: - AlejÂ« .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 513 W. BLEEKER, THE EASTERLY HALF OF LOT E AND LOTS F AND G, BLOCK 30, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2735-124-43-003 RESOLUTION NO. 33, SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Thomas Bailey, represented by Brad Randall, has requested minor development approval for the property located at 513 W. Bleeker, the Easterly half of Lot E and Lots F and G, Block 30, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures," and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated July 12, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 25, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 4 to 0.. .. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for 513 W. Bleeker, the Easterly half of Lot E and Lots F and G, Block 30, City and Townsite of Aspen, be approved with the following conditions: 1. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. Clarification is needed as to how existing openings will be patched if siding is historic. 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 3. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 4. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 5. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 6. The HPC hereby grants a rear yard setback variance to allow for the modification of the dormers. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 25th day of July, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 031[3 41 . MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director Jt~ FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 513 West Bleeker- Minor Review, Public DIearing DATE: July 25,2001 SUMMARY: The proposal includes minor exterior alterations to the house at 513 W Bleeker. These exterior modifications are being done in order to make the appearance of the carriage house more compatible with the surrounding architecture. Staff recommends HPC approve the proposal, with conditions. APPLICANT: Thomas Bailey, represented by Brad Randall. LOCATION: 513 W. Bleeker, East M of Lot E, All of Lot F & G, Block 30, City and Townsite of Aspen. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-43-003 MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant 1 .. to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The historic house is not being altered in this project. Alterations are being made to the landscaping and the existing historic carriage house. The proposed exterior work, and the staff evaluation, is as follows: â€¢ Change the dormers on the carriage house to match the main house. Staff views this as an improvement oV'tr the exi sting architecture and an alteration which is in keeping with the design guidelines, which recommend that dormers match the primary roof form and be subordinate elements ofthe roof. â€¢ Change windows and doors on the carriage house to reflect the character of the main house. These alterations will help the outbuilding resemble the type of architecture present on the main house. â€¢ Extending a deck and adding flagstone at the base of the deck stairs. This has no impact on the historic structure. â€¢ Grass paver path at existing grade. This has no impact on the historic structure. â€¢ Removal of hot tub. This has no impact on the historic structure. â€¢ Removal of roof between office and garage. The guidelines support maintaining outbuildings as detached structures. Staff finds that this standard is met. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed changes will not affect the character of the neighborhood. The development taking place will make the character of this house more consistent with its surroundings. Staff finds that this standard is met. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on tbe parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the significance of any designated structure. The construction date of this house is estimated at 1888. It is representative of the type of home built for the upper class in the Late Victorian era. Staff finds that this standard is met. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: None of the changes negatively impact the architectural integrity of the historic structures. The addition of the dormers and removal of the roof between the 2 A .. office and the garage will go a long way towards restoring some of the original character of this house. Staff finds that this standard is met. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the minor development application for 513 W. Bleeker, and Resolution #_, Series of 2001, finding that the review standards have been met with the following conditions: 1. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. Clarification is needed as to how existing openings will be patched if siding is historic. 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 3. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 4. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 5. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building pehnit. 47. LuldMU' vÂ».v quv-J 9â‚¬04(a:00Â· -te al lou'J '0+IU i f-ic.g, la LA RECOMMENDED MOTION: '4 move to adopt Resolution # 3#, Series of 2001, 06 finding that the review standards have been met." JOV UAâ‚¬VS . Exhibits: 0 41.24 MAO LA t 1-0/ Resolution #31 Series of 2001 th A. Staff memo dated July 25 , 2001. B. Application. W .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 513 W. BLEEKER, THE EASTERLY HALF OF LOT E AND LOTS F AND G, BLOCK 30, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2735-124-43-003 RESOLUTION NO.~ SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Thomas Bailey, represented by Brad Randall, has requested minor development approval for the property located at 513 W. Bleeker, the Easterly half of Lot E and Lots F and G, Block 30, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures," and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subj ect site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adj acent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated July 12, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 25, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIOP~INUTES OF, JULY 25, 2001 14. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC stajf as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 15. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 16. That all new windows on the historic house have a different size trim to differentiate them from the historic windows. Motion second by Melanie. Yes vote: Lisa, Rally, Melanie, Gilbert Motion carries 4-0. 513 W. BLEEKER - MINOR REVIEW Amy said this is a minor project and there are alternations to a non-historic structure on the property. A breezeway is being removed and there is an expansion of an existing deck and modification of dormers on the carriage house to a more historic appropriate shape. A gable shape that matches the building itself. Staff supports the project. Chief Deputy Clerk, Kathy Strickland swore in Jill Strang. Jill said she is guessing that the siding is not historic regarding condition #1. Amy said she can do an inspection with Jill to determine i f the siding is historic or not. No clarifications from the commissioners. Lisa clarified that the carriage house is historic construction. Vice-chair,Gilbert Sanchez opened and closed the public hearing. 5 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIO~INUTES OF, JULY 25, 2001 Comments: Melanie indicated that it is an improvement to the existing carriage house. Rally dittoed. Lisa said she agreed with staff that the historic materials need protected. Gilbert said this is a great proposal and will contribute a lot to the historic property. MOTION: Rally moved to adopt Resolution 33, 2001 finding that the review standards have been met with the following condition: 1. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval ofstaffand monitor. Clarification is needed as to how existing openings will be patched if siding is historic. 2. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC stcdf and monitor. 3. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 4. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 5. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 6. Waive the rear yard setback offive feet. Melanie second the motion. Yes vote: Lisa, Rally, Melanie, Gilbert Motion carried 4-0. 6 't TTIT_3 r , ...1 , Fl' Â·m,i, i , 1#'14 - ./ 4 .: 1- - . 41,1 - . - *4 1 *i: ir--- -r c J: 4 Â·.. 4 .. A- . S. i .:/4 .... dr..7:Â¢ 4- 1. iâ€¢ 1Â£ 92 f W-,1 i .- A- 4 4 1,1 1 -1 ./ #61 : 4'54~i~ . 4 r.'.,1 3 91 . '.*9. '1 1 I .- 4 21*' <~ 4. 42 . ''. 4 . A E g t 44 1 1,1 i_ 1Â» I:'Â»: '*42 . *41- 2 " ' % 43*il#- :ur 2 4 - _ 1 1-1 1Â« I. 1 - . r- . HA;N Wo,LE (515 Kl. BLâ‚¬Ek.~r.) 9 + .1.- ' A I '7:71Â¥;C :1>-f:* 2. 24 * ..9 . f:~ ..IZX& 4 . - 4 *"Dlf t.ki I I .% i *lA #f,*",-f/-. ~,~ ~~~, .*5:5.*i~ -: ...4.2 11 1 1 1 4 ' 4&. -:Al' ' ' ' I . I ./4 I 'S, - 4 ./ - 1 1- . 4 1 . ... Â·42 ' - 1 -I - -4 ..... .. 1 r r , i- -__. - --1~~*---*,7,4""' 1 4 3 * 32Â· . :1 .... I 9 '- 1 R . ..f. 7 â€¢ 9 60 9-r.4 . 'E &'/9, Â· e .. Wâ€ž . 4~ -- - 4. . , . I'. :Ii}J.'y 9-' E - 1 I 1., -:/ Â· Â·- r.7'4Â§31*.iMÂ¥-Â·*$ ' .~.... 1 211/1&0 -' ..P '22165912'Wh-#f:504:1*2*;jit-*R- *. 1- >4475:,4.4.4.4,62-.1.f'93*â‚¬c . -Â·. ".;i,:jt:s'Â·,~4+~ )1Â·~'6.997,~4.1 I , i i.+I - r ' I 111 1-1Â¥.'rtud 1 1 e ''1. 1 .+1. 1 -7-: , ... '1'=33 1Â« ./464~,tolltili.4, i.â€žm:,0.:,4 ,>'3Â·kiLV*--:.'*r'~'i 14410.2:APA Â· ./. Â· . ./3,Â· 9:1$2 . 2, 0, i.he-- . I . . I - I. 5'. .,r' t,-4:14- t, .0. ' + , A. Ii':441 , . 4. 2 1 , 4 1 r Â·. ,~ . ~ .*L/.'.,9 V , ' ' D- -A -2- 4 10:1 ~Ef?20.-/33*U . ! A- 1- *:32* m lf. I *:I , 1 .... d . - i. 4.t"t..-Irm'mr- 1 1 r ...Z ./. r--- }4"r - Â¥ I . I-..- 7..- I h.292 - i *~X.. %..~ "Â·t~- -4/ *. 1 - 1 r ' - 1 + 1 & r--< jil: -1 - yâ‚¬/4 1.-Â» - 1 11&2 t. . :.... e - - 2.- ... i, r- 1 --+ 4Â© & , 4'Gly. . t i.... A 44â€¢ i. 7'h Â· Ir I K . 1 1~ 11â‚¬1,14* -LÂ· . .~ ~ ' 61. , '' '0' AVMB# EA,T t 41:i, , k .. :,ra.~E ':Al<4 *: ' ' 4, , 2â‚¬ 1- *4 '. 5 am.-Wxle.. ,%. 6. I Â»4 21& i I ... I 4 .. '4 A . 1, :Ag:*41 .5 0'44Â»=4 . ... - - -%+ 2, . . MY.4 1% 19. 06- 1- h ve %4604Â£-0. 2 I 't i . 4 *fr Â· f; 10, 1 . I :1 .:#1* :#. I :*. I. I. - A- '- it f i , .gr, 4 *f. f 11.:, I.'Â·Â·,tw 4 \1113. - . .44.i . , 4- .: . N .4 * 2, :4 1 :45, -*+ -4 'V 0 - ' 4 0/-- 9:22452 1 1. >4 klfril.:* '/*~1297-Â·r---1. e.i..... '. 4. 44, . '1:44,~ 91 .4 b ' .' r. 4 1% ~04.Â» tit c. I- i . 1 45 , '//1.L ' r . 'VW,& '-Sts . . Â·k : " 1@*% ~ . . r 'diaot fire...6Â£'*'627,~ . :LJI, J. t:t 04. p , v.. I ; . I 3% i M i.li I Â¥44 2 '99* % , f 1 0 -c fe. 9, zip,+ . 04 , t, 2 1 i~~:1 2: 1% a::I' ~I Zt .j i k Â·64 Â»L ; AF Z &. .-7:30 Z.*44 4 1 r .Atic f.:ic =reoÂ·,~eÂ·*~,aÂ« $ eit 7. 4 9 . 49 8 :g~ 4/ Fdl . /~ir ~Ac /; - :' 941 7 1 . 14/':44..1<Â· . t/.Mid,J./.t# 1- rÂ· p c.y..Â·t:Â·Â·Â·Â· rs; Â·Â· ..: ;. -- I. I. 4. A .MN'. -. // +-4 --- Â·4 ' __ '..... f./ 1â‚¬et .1.14 Â£ ..7 4,='* i : 7 7 0 *Â·.:.25<Â»2~1.U.~r i. a < . . /.Ab . I ..0/*: Ii-- -Il.* 4;' I: -5.-i L- M.-. 1.* C'..~I i I / 4. r 0 7 I 'f , .23.~ ~~3.5 , i.:55 \ \ .04 -- - . Nk-Ae ' 7.-V . , *. 9 9 1 -=me ........eâ€¢Â·t.~tr'* 7~4Â·Â».-/ 22,x, - 2Â·5, : . 2 12 , li 4 49 , \\ 1, , . 1 ,.1*bÂ· .Al.22,24 . v I If - ..Celi~ .j 2?f V B 0 $, - \ 0:+0 -4.,Ii.: 40*t%4~ ~ 49.Â» fr, Al 4 4 2* 11 + , t 59Â· 441&4 j U 21.{ -,1,4 .14,~'0~*0?3rht â€¢, ..U.f,Â·.Â· .4. * er ) â‚¬271~ i,'t,_5: 942 r . 42 .4 1 ,â‚¬, . * ' * .r,1. .1 . + *.I . ~~ 'Â·-1 11 . -"pÂ«:.34.1.,4 4*1 *l i,- PA Â»-3 ' =Â» â‚¬#~ri~~t=--*~~6- le .- i. h - '1. 6 44, /44 'F* 2Â»re *FO Â».p U v U ~01 x; ~ : :f )41 - <Fi- Â£,4 40 - - . 6 16: - C - 4 - Â¥& 14 Â£ Â£1 1 1/a A lit -IM-=Im' 42 AAD~Uat~t.*- 4** ly AM,07'Â¥1 Aucei , ..4,4:rt 1.35 : ./t /4.--/ 'U . , '*NOP * + * .# I :2.- Â¥4L~ Â»ft , -IM.... ... - -Il ..+1 4, 441*IÂ»''Â¥21 rt ///Ar â‚¬ .... .Â· , ~ .1 ' la, 00â€¢5~~' , r â€¢JU&191*Â©*91*1 Â£ ,â€¢ 1 6, g.. . 3/ ..00, f 3 - r , .jt Â·Â¥34141,- ....4 1 / 7 -3_ â€¢ 4:' ' 0 "64 I V . Al >40 - . G - h t :4 22'ftÂ·'. 11,Â· p 6--i' Â· eu : ...1 ' 4* 4 1 - ' 3. f .5 . -A *Z" * 13 ~' <427:27: t.?%'4.'3.'4 _,-> 7 ,â€¢:p r â€¢--1~11-k~le#- r . . I 9 :3*, Â¥ 1.r: . - 1. -E - .-Irt :Se/ 3... 4 f . :. I ,â€¢1~:2 4 Â· A. -1.. z . --V . t. 4 1,2 le Â¥ t 0 1.r a 4 ~ . 9; - .~4-:C .1 4. : 1.*40% . . , V tif (di~ 4 4 49- . .. 1:3 r-*. tr r .%...Ell'93*5<:44'ke V 4 4 0 ./. .4 h. 4 Â¥ 424 4 ':Â¥4,4 ' / 1 . *34 A . 1... = . t. r- . . 1-Ii...W Â¥ 'AVI~ 0 -- -- 6.-A,4 Â¢ -7/ GA/**'45. A- i -9- Â·-2Â· Â·Â·3:F~$3 Arjk. . dr ..f '4~24,2 ' = ..44 W :.11. e .. .1 Â¥ d. 4.4- -LACM.4*5:DUÂ© ...' 0 t=~ lif 'Vi *} - -,1 Â· -15/4 4 .~i'".4,"9 '- 4 i 2 , m' . - 88 - . " rÂ« Â· 4, lit , ek.43~.*i~, t.*M--Li n-aL.,i t. it? .. 3 . -1 m. 04' , 4 rl \4 - Ir *4 '~iil.*& 7 4 <Ilin lillilli : ' .4 ....4 ipr ' p-Il/4........f .. .. 9,"Il + ...r.'* I..:79~~~8'll"Ir: Â· 9 : :iI 49 4 + Â· '* i. I 4 $ ++ . I ..1 1 ,1 ..::= 4 . 1/ + 1 19':11,1 11 ~ . 1 11. 4 1 lili 11, 11 1 1 1-1 11 111 J, . 1 1 1,1 4%114, $ 7 1 1 101 1 11 f / 2 14,Â· i 1 j. 1 ' / 1 4 1 1., , 1. 1 1 4-= -- . 4 : t. .1 , . I -4 , -- J - ikjj-1 - I - -- -- i , --- $ 4 1. â‚¬*21 - r 0-- - ... :29"ll'll g 7 , ... .... ++. .1 " .- . : t.-2.6 ....... 11/ 1 -- i I + 3 '2116- 4 2.9/..... . ...... - . 6...Â»ACEB=&.7 4 #A- 4..2...+WIR/*RI' + th- 207- P - ./. i . imi-~ '%iF Â· â€¢*Â·=mâ€¢' 1 Â· :Â· :Â·Â·t.Â· 4.1//ip- 1...UL.4.,4,1 ..7.ill,&9.- .3.fER,~ 4% F Â· . 1,; t~90*itl~i'*r' :;: -*-r?.Â¥iw 7 I ... i ..4 Â¥ .....le- +.4. ... Nk:4*4--52 - Â·+ , 1 4 lillifft . I. ty:. Aba ...elÂ¢F , 6 , 3,4,*,I:* 0.; . I r -4 . , + 4 , .1 + . . 04., 2:. 4,0,0-f. 1 Â· 'Mâ€¢...1 Â· . ..1 Â· I %. .e... . I . t.. lili . I I i 9 4 4 3... . . .. ... i + .....p : Â¢ 2. -21 * kv#//1&3.*t 4-,nÂ·, - -M~'~u=<1-rf ~~Aft\'Fi~*~-64-:-t?/Â»1- 2+ .42{</c .. -> -P 10* 1 4 , 41.4441.Fge.k' i \.. X ./ 4.49*. - %3% .... : *. 0 I .- 4 F I I *..Â»U Â¥ (f > 11 ' 0,7 - . 2 -. te . ->- 13--- -.1. . -4 - 220 , 4. 33:\6, ./ *,y i >t %'-7- B.- . I *. -2/ 4*4.31 34:-aqi i *-' 4 Â«,1 .-- . 1:r 1 4 .. ~r r . - . ' ...... $ 1 ./* ) E ./ . V 44 04 % 60 1-".7/ Z 4 la 4 . . 9 - .10 7 . 1 1 A-< 2< : ../. 0.0.-4 Â· / j . \!.:24 ./g J Â·,4 .h" k 0 / 4 i â‚¬ 11 .1 + * 3 Sif' -=..... *.:.. 9.h 7/ ; ti, - A i .-* -- , - r 4,6, 0 1 * :4. .' .r 6, 4.* 451*,4...4 *49 L Le, I Â¥*h-J, . * . I .4 .t y~ 4. Â· 4'2. / -6411<"4Â¥ 2 .4 / .3 ' 4-4,./ I I!'â„¢0!' ./r.SErÂ¥.*it.? '4'N *t. : ,AS,4,< .:2 , 80 4,/9 . %/4 $ U 4-1 9 0 4 I 0 8 4,# :3 : <.4 7 48.9 ..A. '.Va.9 4,2 f ' I. a. ....tht 48 F Ah<-1 6 : ' . *1 Â¢?:,2 9.,7- 2: -,5/ Â·r>, 1~ 0,#';441< ,/ 't/' .mâ‚¬ Â©4, 47.. 3 I I I ./ .7. 7Â¥* f t. 4 4. f... <441 X.' . , . .1. I J fiN: r , 0/El/* h ... ' ii, , / ; 8/,5* I t. foft, 4 'f." 4,/ 7 4 0 :1 '.:. V a .. 4,/ ju ./ . ..4' jit , f : 1 . -. . . ' #4:. . *9*ir=: 7 ..4 1 I ~<N, j /1266-%%- 1-- 14" ' *It@*4 0 4 P#h 4 .,A. .4 6 4 It, . 22' ./.-I .-r'r - A ' i < ....1.. 1% 0 'p J lit ..1 4 i .9 , 6Â·,0 11.AA' 11 ' 1 .I~ 41.fr-'. 1 .11 > 1 4 . ki~ 'I , 134 . I. ..4 11 '1. 11 1 11,;1*t' 11 4 1 41. 'â€¢1 ,%1 J' i ' 'i'' 1 il# 1 I . - , X . . I ili 1 1/1 - 1 .1 . > I \111\1~1 : 11 11 i 1 1 1 lil'll ':.,1!ilill 44 lit --a: 10\1!1,1.1 1 9.7 4 1 ' 9!li lij 4. 1 ,It 1 4 '111 . , ....\ 'li. 1/ Â· Â·I trU-17// 1'â€¢ J i Â·Â·1 11 *01 1-m- ./11 - 1 M *g~ ' Â¥4*Â£::4 1 b Â·t 1 . .! lili,1 1, I * 1 11 r 1. 1 I .4 *,4 ./ .1 . vÂ·: 112 Â·r 46. mil / 4,4. 1 ~. Cti . IiI . 1 .. $ :p< 'I 41.4442*0Â·Â·Â· We , +1 8 1~ a u 0 2 649ol ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for d R.no v A 90 (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City ofAspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration ofthe CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ 500 which is for 1 Â·13 hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing ofthe application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days ofthe billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension ofprocessing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPUCANT ~ji> I/LP 4 By: By :/<20*:15>FEE34,441 Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director Date: 9 ~t. 0 leol / Mailing Address: 02.-C> 9 C.oppk r AsiCÂ»r C.0 91 U i i g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01 Monday, May 14, 2001 Showletter - Page: 1 Yahoo! Mail for jmkamas@yahoo.com Yahoo! - Mv Yahoo! Ootions - Sign Out - Help P{=Aa |Q Mall 653 Addresses E Calendar k Noteoad Attachment View -- Powered by Outside In HTML Expect Back to Messaae ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 44 t.)Je-4 Application Package Contents /,7 Following is an application for minor development review at HPC. Included in this package are: 1. Attachment 1- Application form 2. Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form j 3. Attachment 3- Description of general requirements for a complete development application 4. Attachment 4- Description of specific requirements for a complete development application to HPC 5. Attachment 5- Applicable review standards on which HPC will base its decision 6. Attachment 6- General summary of the HPC review process 7. Attachment 7- Definition of minor development To submit a complete application, fill out Attachments 1 and 2, include all items listed on Attachments 3 and 4, and provide any other information necessary to clarify the project. A pre-application conference is strongly recommended so that the appropriate review process and submission requirements can be discussed. In addition, other reviews, such as those before the Planning and Zoning Commission, which may be required by the Aspen Municipal Code can be identified at this time. A consultation with the Zoning Officer and Building Department is also recommended early in the application process. TWO COPIES OF ALL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS IN A FORMAT NO LARGER THAN 11"X17" ARE REQUIRED. FOR GRAPHICS WHICH ARE LARGER THAN 11"X17," SUBMIT FOURTEEN SETS OF PRINTS. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPUCATION FORM 1. Project name 2,A,LE-7 513 4, 84-c[(-012. 08,4 / LA-â€¢SCA-râ‚¬ 2. Project location 551 -2, W - B le rE-Â¥-en â‚¬t Â· / 74 6 d-4 6 /c, t., IM .1- 40 u v Lots F k Ca :6(â€¢UL 31) (1 nl 2 -i-6~.- 01<- < 4,10.-n (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning A- G 4. Lot size 7 S 0 0 s i= 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 7-1 - 13. , 7.<07 g 13 W . Blic L,1 57*. 920 - 2.9/0 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 8, a J 2-4 424 11 ' 379 1 G el 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use - Conceptual SPA-X_ Conceptual HPC http://us.1134.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?box=Inbox &Msg I d,5607_2 09288__3419_1266_60023_0&bodyPart=2& YY=38912&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&ViewAttach= 1 .. Monday, May 14,2001 Showletter Page: 2 Special Review - Final SPA 1_ Final HPC 8040 Greenline - Conceptual PUD ~L Minor HPC Stream Margin - Final PUD - Relocation HPC Subdivision - Text/Map Amend. - Historic Landmark GMQS allotment - GMQS exemption - Demo/Partial Demo View Plane - Condominiumization- Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximat@ sa. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) Z -9/0/4-1 li. ree /2,1.9+"C Â£-16($Â£ /2-(. 0.: 49 +r"k.ix 3 (E- 6,2,00 -ne ) 44Â© C.,u r.,6/441 (4104Â£1 01â‚¬256'7 -ej f-*0"-1- 4,.1040 4<644) Aver, 1 9. Description of development application 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Y~- Attachment 1- Land use application form _!~. Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM 4 Applicant: I orvt #4*'.161 Address: 6 13 lv; 4/,4 I. i Zone district: R Â· L Lot size: -1 1, c c Existing FAR: 29 DO Allowable FAR: 3 7 5-0 Proposed FAR: M O 6.1~ 4 r, C ,<L O Existing net leasable (commercial): - Proposed net leasable (commercial): - e1 Existing % of site coverage: 277Â» <1 90 4 .1,D (C Proposed % of site coverage: f , A.7 E Existing % of open space: -78 % Proposed % of open space: C Amo .r . 12 1 (P,- G Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: Accesorv blda: V y .4 /1 Proposed max. height: PrinciDal bldg: Accessorv blda: l 9 4 L Proposed % of demolition: 69Â© Existing number of bedrooms: 9- 0 Proposed number of bedrooms: .. http ://us.f 134.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?box=Inbox&Msgld=5607_209288_3419_1266_60023_0&bodyPart =2 & YY=38912&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&ViewAttach= 1 Monday, May 14,2001 ShowL~er Page: 3 Existing on-site parking spaces: ~/ On-site parking spaces required: 1, Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: |0~ Front: Front: Rear: |5' Rear: Rear _ ~ Ng LUAA,-/ FJO a Lut>4- 00 4 4 â‚¬'4 UUDM.C. 5,~Â· fl , A con fet ,,1 +-41 Combined Combined Combined ----i- .... FronVrear: FronUrear: Front/rear: 4 0. - 6-11 2.+ &10.1 (Â·Â£*Y~t.11. 0 04 - Ley C-J Side: 5- l Side: Side: ) 6 4,4 f i.~,v-, -- --- Side: ~7 Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments(003 jl 26 :In 5/ 0,;f a a Â«k. 4/ 4 Â¢ .4, ' (1)9Â¢Voy 34 03 al ce.,7,1,4x e ,Â£&,Â· sÂ£.lu,~t 04 i)Â£.t Â£4 aL. Variations requested: (let ..1 f .' C L, 4,1.r. 4 - 9,1 1,\ , 1 49 c t ,T, i BdI A1b, #1 %1 1 : 61 0 4 ,x < :. t, ;O 5, 1 , 14 ni vit 1 4*~. . (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) ATTACHMENT 3 GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS All development applications must include the following information (Section 26.304.030): 1, Contained within a letter signed by the applicant, the applicant's name, address and telephone number, and the name, address, and telephone number of any representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address, legal description, and parcel identification number of the property proposed for development. 3, A disclosure of ownership of the parcel proposed for development, consisting of a current cer-tificate from a Title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the propelly, and all mortgages, judgments liens easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development ApplicatioA. ' 4, An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 5. A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. 6. A site improvement survey certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado, showing the current status of the parcel including the current topography and vegetation. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Director if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) 7. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. 8. Additional materials, documentation, or reports as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director. ATTACHMENT4 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW All applications for minor development review must include the following information: 1. If determined appropriate by the Community Development Director, a site plan or survey showing property boundaries and predominant existing site characteristics. 2. An accurate representation of all major building materials, such as samples and photographs, to be used for the proposed development. 3. A scale drawing of the proposed development in relation to any existing structure. 4. If applicable, a statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure and character of the neighborhood. http://us.1134.ma il.yahoo.com/ym/ S ho wtetter?box=Inbox&Ms g Id=5607_2092 88_3419_1266.60023_0&bodyPart=2 & YY=38912&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&ViewAttach= 1 Monday, May 14,2001 ShowLetter Page: 4 ATTACHMENT 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met: 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to 500 sq.ft., or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to 5%, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development, and 3. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and 4. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. "HISTORIC DISTRICT AND HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGN GUIDELINES" HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE CITY AND ARE AVAILABLE AS A FURTHER EXPLANATION OF THE INTENT OF HPC AND GENERAL PRINCIPALS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION. ALL APPLICANTS SHOULD CONSULT THIS RESOURCE, COPIES OF WHICH ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. ATTACHMENT 6 GENERAL SUMMARY OF ONE STEP HPC APPLICATION PROCESS 1. The following are the types of development applications which are processed in one step by the HPC: â€¢ Minor development review â€¢ Partial demolition â€¢ On-site or temporary relocation 2. Development review procedure summary. The one step HPC review procedure is as follows: â€¢ Attend a pre-application conference. The purpose of this one-on-one meeting with the historic preservation planner is to determine the review process into which your development proposal fits and to identify the materials staff will need to review your application. â€¢ Submit development application. Based on your pre-application conference, respond to the appropriate portions of the application package and submit the requested number of copies, and fee if applicable, to the Community Development Department. â€¢ Determination of completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, the application package will be reviewed by Staff to f determine if all required information has been included. You will be notified in writing when additional materials are necessary. â€¢ Complete notice requirements. â€¢ Review of development application. Once the application is determined to be complete, the item will be scheduled on the soonest HPC agenda available. The submission due date is a minimum of nine days prior to the HPC meeting date to allow for staff review and memo preparation. It is the planner's task to review the application with respect to it's compliance with land use regulations and to write a memo to the Historic Preservation Commission. In the memo, the planner will recommend approval, approval with conditions, tabling, or denial of the application. The memo is normally available at the end of the week prior to the HPC meeting. The planner will call the applicant or http:/us. 1 134.mai I.yahoo. com/ym/ S howLetter?box= I nbox&Msgld=5 607_2092 88_3419_12 66_60023_0&body P art=2& YY=38912&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&ViewAttach= 1 Monday, May 14,2001 Sho,wletter Page: 5 representative when the memo is ready and can also provide the expected agenda time for the item. 3. At the meeting, staff will make a brief presentation of the case and then the Chair will ask the applicant or representative to make a presentation or to clarify any aspects of the project. HPC members will comment on the proposal and then vote on an action. 4. Receipt of building permit. Once the approval of HPC has been received, a building permit application may be submitted. At this time the proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the Uniform Building Code and zoning regulations. Fees for water, sewer, park dedication fees, and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document, such as a plat, deed restriction, or other agreement which is required to be filed, must be recorded before the building permit will be issued. 5. HPC assigns a member of the Commission to be the "project monitor" for each project. The monitor (and Staff) may periodically visit the site as work is under construction. If any aspects of the project change after the HPC approval, the applicant, Staff, and the project monitor will attempt to address them without returning to HPC. ATTACHMENT 7 DEFINInON OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT Minor development shall be defined as follows: â€¢ Remodeling of a structure where alterations are made to no more than one element of the structure, including but not limited to a roof, window, door, skylight, orr-~amental trim, siding, kickplate, dormer, porch, staircase, and balcony; â€¢ Expansion or erection of a structure wherein the increase in floor area of the structure is two hundred fifty (250) square feet or less; or â€¢ Erection or remodeling of combinations of, or multiples of no more than three (3) of the following features: awnings, canopies, signs, fences, and other similar attachments; or windows, doors, skylights, and dormers. Erection of more that three (3) of the above listed features may be defined as minor if there is a finding that the cumulative impact on such development is minor in its effect on the character of the existing structures. â€¢ Unless the community development director determines that the development is to be reviewed as a significant development, the erection of street furniture, signs, benches, public art, or similar development which is to be placed in the Commercial Core or Main Street Historic Districts. ATTACHMENT 8 PUBLIC NOnCE REQUIREMENTS http://us. 1 134.mail.yahoo.com/ym/S howLette ,?box=Inbox&Msgld=5607_2092 88_3419_1266.60023.0&body Part=2& YY=38912&order=down&sort=datedpos=0&ViewAttach= 1 Monday, May 14,2001 ShowLe#er Page: 6 Minor development review requires notice by posting of the property. Following is a description of the notice requirements. Posting. Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done 10 days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department, to fill it in correctly and to bAng proof (preferably a photograph) to the hearing to show that the posting took place. PLEASE NOTE THAT A PUBLIC HEARING CANNOT BE HELD WITHOUT PROOF OF NOTICE ON AN AFFADAVIT FORM PROVIDED BY THE CITY, PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. Back to Message Yahoo! Messenger - Send instant messages to friends ! Address Book Â· Alerts Â· Auctions Â· Bill Pav Â· Bookmarks Â· Briefcase Â· Broadcast + Calendar Â· 221 Â· Classifieds Â· Clubs Â· Companion Â· Domains - Exgerts -Games Â· Greetinas Â· Home Paaes Â· Invites Mall Â· Maos Â· Member Directory Â· Messenaer Â· Mv Yahoo! Â· News - PavDirect - People Search Â· Personals Â· Photos Â· Shoooina Â· Soorts Â· Stock Quotes Â· IM Â· Travel Â· Weather Â· Yahooligans Yellow Paaes Â· more. Privacv Policv- Tenn% of Service - Guideline: Copyright Â© 1994-2001 Yahoo! bic. All rights reserved. http:Uus.1 134. mail.yahoo.com/ym/Showletter?box=Inbox &Msgld=5607__2092 88_3419_1266_60023_0&bodyPart=2& YY=38912&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&ViewAttach=1 >f~33>3 992-- O/V-fl ARCHITECT: Strang Architects 393-B 102 road Carbondale. Colorado, 81623 tel.: 970.963.9822 fax.: 970. e-mail.:lathropstrang@earthlink.net CLIENT: Tom Bailey 513 W. Bleeker St. Aspen, CO 81611 0 Al 1 ./ 96\ 1Â© rp q BAIL Y 1/2/ / 513 WEST BLEEKER 698Â« -- -Â« OFFICE/LANDSCAPE ~--3Â« roLe \U 1~ Latm~ (64\.0 \\E - \*3 40 DATE ISSUE C~ LE-*E _k_jEE___j 21\3 a.,~ 06.61.01Permit-NOFOF-Construction ~ - --_ Â©ME 4%2 ~~i-Â«3-6-~ - i-jl~3~3~22*32 749 30[Fop- V - 0 9%Â»i 12 p _Â« 0 ~*~4~%61FH ADB ~4 14 1 009 Â° 11 Q P 21 Â« [14 0 -- 44% *2 -~1 'Mca-2-ZJ li%-19--1 O EEmFJ i gEl ilidpi liEillifi ~H UbkiÂ»JI 1 (Ang A "1 513 W. BLEEKER ST. GENERAL NOTES: ZONING 1. THERE IS NO CHANGE TO THE TWO-STORY HOUSE ZONE: R-6 2. THERE IS NO CHANGE TO THE EXISTING GARAGE LOT SIZE: 7500 SQ. FT. 3. THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO THE EXISTING TREES/GRADES NOTE: THERE IS NO SQ. FT. INCREASE. SCOPE OF WORK LEGAL DESCRIPTION A. EXTENSION OF DECK WITH NO ADDITIONAL THE EASTERLY 1/2 OF LOT E AND PORCH ROOF LOTS F AND G, BLOCK 30, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO B. CHANGE DORMERS TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE. REMOVAL OF LOFT LEVEL. CHANGE WINDOWS AND DOORS TO REFLECT THE CHARACTER OF THE MAIN HOUSE. 4.36 deg. C. FLAGSTONE AT THE BASE OF DECK STAIR @ : 14 EXISTING GRADE , D. GRASS PAVER PATH @ EXISTING GRADE ~ E. REMOVE HOT TUB TRUE NORTH F. REMOVE ROOF BETWEEN OFFICE AND GARAGE WEST BLEEKER STREET $â€¢ bylaw , lL- RmAÂ»h~:~*+5~ .74 3 rÂ« P<21 ) 74 .hâ‚¬29-7-Ck*L 1 \ ..X 11 EXJSTING TREES Â» 74 4/ 1- CHAN*/ L.4.---3-- 9, 1\ - W v .6 -4) - Â¥9' 11#E â€¢.â‚¬>-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·~ â€¢ 10( , , .8>Â»: a . ; t . LOT G *-2=FT- ' bl ~r=-ITÂ«*. 1 -7 / 1 ---7 1 b 71471 /1 -9 1 1 \ 1 1 - b.4- 1 / 77) AN N. . 5'-0" 1 y 16 -D>---7 Â·- 1. 9 1-51-0,1 -A /% 1 -6 + . \ m .ik =) - 1 \* A-*7 1- 1 1 1 6-=41 .=xy,L' 1 4'491-- 1 1 i 1 EXISTING TREE I**01 Â·A 1 1 1 1 NO CHANGE 1 1 1 El - ----- 1 1 /-1 1 1 1 1 /1 / lili ! - 1 / 1 1 4--- 1 1 1 / 1 6' - 0" WOOD FANG'E \ \ 1 -/ \ 4 HOUSE \1 L__-7 1 81:2- EL25 - 1- - - 2 -4 \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 1/ / 1 *.&-===Â»t~ ' 1 1 / I '422EX<STING #R~kh~ EXTEASION OF 1 1 / f,/ NO pHANGE ~ 11 / EXISTING DECK i : i 1 11 / // 1 \ 1 1\ 1 1 .--/:1 -*-#--Â» 1 j] 1 1 1/ 1 1 /0 1 1 1 1 11/ i , i - - - - 1 < % 1 / 1 / 1 Â«4 /1 \I./ ./ 1 1 WOOD DECM , EL = 101.11 I / 1 / 1 / 1 1 \ + 1 / .1 GARAGE - - - - - - - - - 1 NO WORK ONESTORY - REMOVE WOOD FRAME i ~ . - HOT TUB , 1 9 BUILDING W/LOFT _ _FlSTFLEL= _ -1---___-~I - 1 ~100.33 1 I j 4-REMOVE B. OFFICE AND GARAGE I i ROOF BETWEEN l -1 1- i-------L---- N 75 09' 11" W ALLEY - BLOCK 30 0 10 20 40 SCALE: 1"= 10'-0" 31'-11/4" t 0 0/\ 3./. a Â»2 V V- 7_4=0 =r lip -=T- 1 1 - W. - 1 1 -- 1 1 1 - _1 1- -/ PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION I - ---------------1 1--/ :J I PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 0 5 10 15 SCALE: 1/4"=100" T.O. PEAK 116.83' T.O. PLATE 109.83' 1 1 \ 0 /1 1 W \ - i f lA r / 1 1 \ 1 -1 - \ i i 1 1 / / 11 / / 1/ / F.F.E. 100.33 L -1 1- -, PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION t--4 4 L -, /---------------\U.1 - 1 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 0 5 10 15 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 1-LJ "11 1 1 BATH ~_ 1 STACKED - Â£011 W/D OFFICE 0 REF. KITCHENETTE B UP I V 23'-3" 1 . EXISTING OFFICE PLAN - LEVEL ONE A LINE OF DORMER ABOVE --1----- - LINE OF DORMER ABOVE I 1 1 DN 1 1 1 1 23'-3" . EXISTING OFFICE PLAN - LEVEL TWO 0 5 10 15 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 4-2~deg, TRUE NORTH .0-, I I ..0-, I I 00 L-V 23'-3" I. .......... ......... ....................4 line of shelves above 5 el 02 LIGHT TABLE 88 X 34 MAC SCREEN DESK 73 X 33 4 11 co \ . co i 0 + il V 2 1 1- 11 1 i PROPOSED OFFICE PLAN GENERAL NOTES: The intention of this office project is to bring this building into the same language of design as the main house. 1. All siding and trim details to match the main house 2. All windows and doors to match the main house. 3. The height of the building remains unchanged. 4. The gabled dormers increase the non-compliance as indicated by the dashed lines. 1 0 5 10 15 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" ..0-, I I LOE-V TO. PEAK 11683 T.O. PLATE 109.83' F.F.E. 100.33 1- ... - U -1 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION .ul _1'<t" 1 4 J EXISTING WEST ELEVATION 1 0 5 10 15 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 1 1 1 1 7 1 11 1 . - 1 1- -, L -1 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 0 -- 1 1 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 1 0 5 10 15 SCALE: 1/4"=100"