The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.514 E Hyman Ave.HP-1988-19...~ 514 E HYMAN, MASON & MORSE BLDG- METOR DEV. 310Â« 99 05/4-1 il-p-Cqsq-lf 5'#4 C~ A if#41 al)Â£ A 06 tor AP -5 7 H pi :P t CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 6- Q.0 6 PLANNER: 9-E 1 eft DATE COMPLETE: PROJECT NAME: ,/t ,&4Â£3 1: 1 *014-qâ€ž 6041 Project Address: â‚¬ N F ; t.fLA yr.fle.*, APPLICANT: LikUG-.r* 1 FA 17 , Itn c . Applicant Address: /990 0-~9 0, Ff) 11 + '1, ff' /0 /1 V REPRESENTATIVE: . 495 4 4, n irm Representative Address/Phbne: /0 +4 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: u/" 2 STEP: 3 STEP: Description 2~-UAOL - ~~0-4,4 10 &11% r~c ~ 941 0 HPC Meeting Dates: i /Â« 4 P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Date: Planning Director Approval: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFERRALS: City Engineer Parks Dept. Bldg:Zon/Inspect DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Engineer Bldg. Dept. Zoning Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: F~i .. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Minor Development, Mason and Morse Building, 514 E. Hyman Avenue Date: August 23, 1988 LOCATION: 514 E. Hyman Ave., Lot N,, Block 94, Townsite and City of Aspen ZONING: CC - Commercial Core, Historic Overlay District APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting HPC minor development approval for the entrance plaza renovation of the Mason and Morse Building, located at 514 E. Hyman Ave. The east brick "wing wall" is to be removed as well as the two street trees, which will be replaced with maples to match the trees proposed for the adjacent building at 516 E. Hyman. The existing Plaza area will be replaced with a new raised plaza (same height) accessed by 45 degree angle stairs on both sides. what currently exists, and will be constructed of brick. Planters will be incorporated into the design, created as a "pedestrian space". The project will eliminate the "visual barriers" that currently exist in this plaza space. It is the applicant's goal to enhance the plaza area as the inviting focal point of this facade. PROJECT SUMMARY: The contemporary approach for the redesign of the entrance Plaza is unique to this block, and should enhance the main facade of the Mason and Morse Building, in Staff's opinion. With the removal of the east "wing wall", the adjacent building (516 E. Hyman - previously approved by HPC) will be visually unimpaired. The Development Guidelines have been referred to extensively in staff's review of this proposal. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS: Please refer to the Standards for Development in the Land Use Code, Section 7-601 (D)(1), page 7- 24. Each standard has been reviewed in accord with this development application. 1. Character Compatibility: Staff finds the proposed development compatible to the adjacent structures. As stated in the Secretary of the Interior's Standard for Rehabilitation: "All buildings, structures and sites shall be recognized as produces of the own time. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural, or cultural material, and such design A .. is compatible with the size, scale, color, materials and character of the property, neighborhood or environment." This building's strong, angular character is further strengthened by the proposed graphic design of the plaza, yet softened by low scale plantings and trees. Page 35 of the Development Guidelines states: "Plazas or courts that break the continuity of the facade alignment should be avoided. If the best design solution requires a plaza or court, the alignment created by building facades should be continued through the use of architectural elements such as wells, planters, arcades, etc." It could be argued that due to the 45% angle of the stairs, the facade alignment of this streetscape is broken. However, staff feels that since the plaza is accessed by three 7" risers, the finished height of 21+" is not dominant enough to warrant a restudy. Also, the setback is in keeping with both adjacent structures. The bold, contemporary design of the building also dictates to a large extent the redesign of the entrance plaza. However: Staff's concerns regard the sign base, particularly as the applicant's goal is to create a "pedestrian oriented space". The proposed sign appears large in relation to the elements of the plaza, beginning at three (3) feet above sidewalk level, reaching a finished height of nearly seven (7) feet. A smaller scale sign surface is recommended, to maintain the pedestrian-oriented character of the plaza entrance. It should be noted that HPC has an advisory role only in sign display. However, the large base for this sign is incorporated as an integral element of the overall design of the Plaza. Any questions the applicant may have on signage should be directed to the Zoning Official for a determination of compliance with the sign code.) The Development Guidelines state: "Because it is such a prominent part of the business image selecting a concept for a sign is one of the most important design decisions for a building. Position signs to fit within features of the facade. So they do not dominate the building that they are trying to identify, signs should be carefully located. due to the pedestrian orientation of the district, signs should be incorporated in the first floor design of the building. signs should not overpower other facade elements in size and they should related to other signs in the block. The applicant should refer to the Guidelines section pertaining to signage: "Commercial Buildings, New Construction - G. Signs", pages 43-45, for further information. 2. Neighborhood Compatibility: Staff finds the proposed development in keeping with the renovation/new construction activities currently in place throughout this entire block. The 2 .. domino effect of development/facade enhancement begun by the Pitkin Center Building is carried through in this project, which will continue to strengthen this streetscape. In this proposal, the applicant has made an effort to bring visual continuity to Hyman Ave. and the Commercial Core district. Staff recommends that the plaza reconstruction coordinate time- wise with the final facade/sidewalk renovation project of its next door neighbor, 516 E. Hyman. The coordinating trees lend continuity with these two facades and Will compliment the streetscape in an understated way. The wing wall demolition will greatly enhance both the plaza renovation and the main facade of the 516 building. TREES: Currently, two trees (one crabapple/one pine) exist within the right-of-way. The proposal reflects the removal of these trees, to be "replanted within city limits" (as the applicant states). They will be replaced with two large maples, identical to the ones proposed for the adjacent development at 516. Staff has informed to applicant to contact Bill Ness at the Parks Department to discuss their criteria for tree replacement. The trees proposed are hearty, slow growers, and proven to be good urban street trees. The coordinating trees lend continuing with these two facades and will compliment the streetscape in an understated way. "Up Lights" are proposed; these are flush to the pavement and will illuminate the foliage from the ground up. 3. Cultural Value: The proposed development does not diminish the cultural integrity of the adjacent historic landmark, the Elks Building, in Staff's opinion. The Guidelines state: "Creative expressions of modern design solutions are sought, rather than recreations of 19th century architecture." 4. Architectural Integrity: Staff finds the proposed development enhances the architectural integrity of the building, creating a more inviting space through the use of compatible materials, seating areas and plantings. The removal of the existing informational kiosk will open up the central entrance area. MATERIALS: The applicant will present a sample of the brick pavers proposed to be used in the plaza reconstruction. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the Minor Development proposal subject to the reduction in height of the sign base, recommending the applicant redesign an effective, smaller scale sign more in keeping with the pedestrian-oriented elements of the entrance plaza. hpc.memo.514eh 3 1101. t C.r . 1/j j 1 I R ~ AUG 1 9 I988 ~ and associates A 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL: (303) 925-4755 , August 189 1988 Ms. Roxanne Elfin Planning Office Citv of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 516 E. Hyman Insubstantial Amendment to HPC Approval Dear Roxanne: As we discussed yesterday, after reviewing the plans for the remodel of the Mason and Morse plaza, I feel the planting area shown at the southeast corner of the above referenced property should be deleted. Originally, this planting area was to be usea to screen the raised plaza of the Mason and Morse building. Since their proposal is to remove this plaza at the property line, this planting area no longer serves a purpose and in fact detracrs from the continuity of the site design. I have enclosed a copy of the drawing showing the proposed new plaza and the planting area we wish to delete. I-inal HFC approval was granted June 14, 1988. rhere are no recorded documents affected by this development. If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, t Khâ€ž4le i 1 Project Manager KW:gak - Â· , e '-* f~ ' 4 L Â· ...1 ... I , . . . / 'If, 1'3 -5,7~Â·17.- ft .1.1 A A.I.47:t~.94.R: -.. SON>&'MORSEBUILDING- 516 E. HYMAN BUILDING -41~Jâ€¢Â· :rfu. A - ./ ... ... f NEW ..1.3,7,2,1; 1 b. :412*C :..'.-1.. C 1 i > A %, Â·Â·- i. 7 P A -.5-:.. Â· &.. lit I .01 . , - 6 1 I' 11 f .... 7. .:.Orrk. : 4144 4 4 , , 1:.14 1: 5 1 4 , ul-* t... Â·111/ - '44 . I f.3.i -,11 ~ .1 1 p , 0 r. I , 3. \ <-1-f-Â»Â» 1 4. I; 0 9' ..Â·4 63Â¢--32 Â»~*f.:Â·. 41â‚¬ /' t tiEW ~NT* ~ 4 .. . ' f '6' '1. .:wl i' k 1 . . TI , 1 LD tNEW,BRICK PAVERS; -< 1 i <20> 2 2 . . \ 4. :3~ji-~~6*ME:~.Â·~: .6 - . 44% ...... - 1 1 - -IL./- > 1 - .- - 1 . . 6,0 Ft*...1.,1.12::2...4...,t.f 33. '' A> x.,6~ . : i, 1 .1 11\ M 6. , ..4.'. .v... Â·. 1 , I 1 , A, 01 I $ . 9fit. 1 ; 1 Â»: %.I- I . It. . g. U. ./. I i I. ':. . 1 \ I . S .ly 'l 1 -1, 1Â«08,#I hl3:_ Aflet .t:1; - -r.*--r.r=.-~r--- -. t~f----*t,mn-r-.--*--= t~:-1 - teitry~~4.- LZÂ·~-k=--11. - I=-----~Â· + \-It *0 -RE,"~ES--19-4Ee,-4.0~/tia"SES-2/i) - 3 . 1 . t ,J Â» .tl . .11 i h 1 1 . ::\ 1 . ,, Â·i:, larN . 1 .,-~OPERTY"UNi.--7 p Â¢ 1 I e . 4 4 ige.64; 1 .-I L > , i Mt ..0 ~~1~444,2 i 11 -f-+ yll lj,'**U:.4/ . 7 2...'4'fitÂ·+ L...,iÂ· i *'- li I . , -1 - \1\ , , , ' 468 477 4. 71 r - i r1 ---Â»Aetem.t Ely + ' -11 I. 6 4,6 '-i?,1.'.<34:..i;.jiÂ·Â·: ;.; fi-Â·.1 91-1 . . U .. . Â·Â¥ Â·2 - 7--: f -Â· 1- 2 6 - / /1 -:'. .* t.7/ *40 .~ ARE-'mIERALO li k ,/4. I /. ' MOF"%AT=; i 0 1 fl' ~791*163 1 1 f ' Â®- th [-18 / 1 i ' 11 1 .. n 1 L . i ' 1 1 , ", PLANTER i . 1 1 , 1 - . I I. - , /Â·'','./VI' /*. .~, â€¢ ' 1 , 41 k i:241.'U E , I. '..., 62: :~~~,~~94 -f; ." S 14'50'4Â¢'lly im' r I t.1 , ,, -.#A ~ SUTHERLAND, FALLI ~C. 1......"Milr 0=IEF11Â® Â®[F F[EAEÂ©[000'UÂ°~TA[L 1280 Ute Avenue ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 DATE AL)0 1 0/ PA JÂ°E~ 01 9 (303) 925-4252 ATTEULION EDA Al\i NE EFLIN RE: TO 1-1, F. C., MASON * 110296 BL. CIE< RANNI {40 4 -ZO N 1 N C-* CE Â·R E, 1-3 Abfal co. co ioi 1 07 1 RJG / 61988 1 : 1 / / 1.- - WE ARE SENDING YOU *1 Attached [3 Under separate cover via WAND FEL the following items: [3 Shop drawings El Prints C] Plans U Samples m Specifications C] Copy of letter C] Change order 1-1 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 616 28 - LET-1-82- 1 NDI CAT-] NO f-*coF CF 23>64*VE29-1 1 F> I go' 1 02 3/' - Aft 1 c trY ON 45 239*NSE_ -1-0 An-ACH M ENTE> 1 0 (9Â· Fin - 043 -1610 â‚¬*FL A-12. (<Fl_EA-Â«E (FET--O 24~) L -- 1 94 63 -lâ‚¬- 86 - 126-PUCT-laxâ‚¬7 oF -Ck[C, 9 - MA,0 14 e Moeoc / HWEE 0.60- 5 0 * 20 6 mA 1 N < THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ~05 For approval U Approved as submitted C] Resubmit copies for approval m For your use U Approved as noted El Submit___copies for distribution C] As requested C] Returned for corrections El Return corrected prints m For review and comment C] m FOR BIDS DIJF 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS ~Okl)2_9 i f?)12_ TI-te, C)E-(_--A U , At\[D TNAN L Â¥61 { fbF OVEN? - L I L MIL- 1 NA 1.T i / %<.- COPYTO SIGNED:444447 4 PRODUCT 240-3 %21*7 Inc. Groton, Ma" 01471. 41~. If enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify us_at once. 0;Vt O . 1...1:>2>~ . 2*4.4, !4:JÂ» 0 . A -. - "13Â· 15 '9 5.- 48 f.; rpiri 11 j jl ~;(*\ AUG 0 61988 '/l MINOR HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT Application Package Contents Attached is a Development Application package for submission of your application. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Application Form 2. Description of Minimum Contents of Development Application 3. Description of Specific Contents for Submission of your Application 4. Copy of Review Standards for Your Application 5. Public Hearing Notice Requirements Summary 6. General Summary of Your Application Process Generally, to submit a complete application, you should fill in the application form and attach to it that written and mapped information identified in Attachments 2 and 3. Please note that all applications require responses to the review standards for that particular development type. The standards for your application are listed in Attachment 4. You can determine if your application requires that public notice be given by reviewing Attachment 5. Table 1 of that attachment will tell you whether or not your application requires notice and the form the notice should take. Your responsibilities in this regard are summarized in the cover explanation to the table. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planning Office staff person so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described to you. Please also recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. appcover ATÂ£Aa]MENT 1 ~ IAND USE APPIIanai RIM ~ 1) project Nane MA*ONÂ·et MoefrE- EpLIE:G PLAZA 12EN OVAJI C:Â»l 2) Project Iocation 914 E .1-194AN eT ASPEN CD Lor N , 15 LIL â‚¬)4 (irdicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning CO 4) Lot Size *0 0 5) Applicant' s Name, Address & phone # MAÂ«)El 4 M DIZOE- INC, REAL E 47-Al E- 814 E. H-Â«VIA KI cbT. Aâ‚¬jt.N â‚¬)â‚¬B -1 068 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # GUTWF=21.AN P FA U-114 ING . 1950 1-frE AVE AÂ«PEN 60 52 6 42 ED'2 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 7 8040 Greenline Conceptual R]D Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final RJD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivision Historic Designatian Conckniniumization - Text/Map Amenlment (2433 Allotment Iot Â®lit/Iot line (NOS E]oâ„¢ption Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (runber and type of existing structures; approod_mate sq. ft.; nmber of bedroans; any previous approvals granted to the property). ONE , TE\10/1-OG *reuan_12â‚¬- tal /.FAETIAL EASEMIENT cortelen NO OF I2OUÂ£>ALv'' 4-500 * OF F. A , 2. 1-10Â¤61 N,6 A PEAL EÂ«-A=Ta OFFILE (1-146 Â¢ 69 FEÂ©7&06 1,1\U-NORONANGE.0~ 9) Description of Develoiment Application 1-NE AfFIIANT INTE-N IES TD KEN OVArt TUE ExtÂ«n N 6 -RA 74 93 6/7 17) MA ZE. IT MDeE- L N Vill KI,6 A-NE> AlTRAa-]VE. -Tb fEÂ£:Ph -1-2-1 AN TEAFF, 6. 10) Hpe you attadied the following? 4 . Response to Attad=mt 2, Mininua Sulnission Contents 0 . Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents Respanse to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application .. ATTACHMENT 2 Minimum Submission Contents for All Development Applications All Development Applications shall include, at a minimum, the following information and materials. 1. The applicant's name, address and telephone 4 number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice. in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the , owner's right to apply for the Development Application. INA\VE.O 6~l F~ De) 4. An 8 1/2"x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 5. An explanation of why the proposed development complies with the substantive development review standards relevant to the Development Application. .. ATTACHMENT 3 Specific Submission Contents: Minor Development to Historic Landmark or in Historic Overlay District A Development Application for a Minor Development Plan shall include the following: 1. A written description of the proposed development. 2. An accurate representation of all major building materials, such as samples and photographs, to be used for the proposed development. 3. A scale drawing of the proposed development in relation to any existing structure. 4. A statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure (if applicable) and character of the neighborhood. .. ATTACHMENT 4 Review Standards: Development in H, Historic Overlay District or Development Involving Historic Landmarks No approval for any development in the H, Historic Overlay District or involving Historic Landmarks shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met. a. The proposed development is compatible in character- with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when- the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend intoz front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area, HPC shall find that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements; and b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development; and C. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic struc- 4 tures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. e. Historic District and Historic Landmark Development Guidelines have been adopted by the City Council for use by HPC. Applicants should consult these guidelines in addition to the above standards. .. Attachment 5 Public Hearing Notice Requirements There are three forms of notice required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations, these being notice by publication in the newspaper, notice by posting of the property and notice by mail to surrounding landowners. You can determine whether your application requires notice, and the type of notice it requires, from Table 1, which is attached to this summary. Following is a summary of the notice requirements, including identifying who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least 15 days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Planning Office Administrative Assistant and we will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done 10 days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Planning Office, to fill it in correctly and to bring proof (preferably a photograph) to the hearing that posting took place. 3. Mailing Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development parcel by the applicant. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Planning Office, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearing (in the form of a signed affidavit) that the mailing took place. Standards for notice shall be as follows: a. Any federal agency, state, county or municipal government service district or quasi governmental agency that owns property within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 15 days prior to the hearing. b. All other landowners within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 10 days prior to the hearing, unless notice is given by hand delivery, in which case it must be sent 5 days prior to the hearing. C. Subdivision applications only also require notice by registered mail to all surface owners, mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners of the subject property. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty days prior to the date of public hearing. TA1BLE 1 L __1 OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PROCEDURES APPIICATION TYPE PUBLIC HEARING REWIRE[Y? BY WHEM FURM OF NOITCE* Conditional Use Y Commission 2,3 Special Review N 8040 Greenline N Stream Margin N Mountain View Plane N Conceptual Historic Development Y HPC 1,2,3 Final Historic Development N Minor Historic Development N Historic Demolition Y HPC 1,2,3 Historic Designation Y HPC, Cammis. HPC-1,2,3 & Council Cammis.- 1,2,3 Council-4 3 Conceptual SPA Y Council 1,2,3 Final SPA Y Commission 1,2,3 Conceptual PUD L Y Council 1,2,3 Final PUD Y Comnission 1,2,3 Subdivision Y Commission 1,2,3 Condominiumization N Lot Split Y Council 1,2,3 Lot line Adjustment N (24QS Allotment Y Comission 1,2,3 GMQS Exemption N (except for see above for lot split lot split) Map Amendments Y Oomnission & Cammis.-1,2,3 Council Council-4 Text Amendments Y Comission & Cammi=.-1 Council Council-4 * Nurrbers refer to the following: 1 = Publication in newspaper 2 - Posting of property 3 = Mailing to surmunding landowners 4 = Ordinance adoption procedures 81*i~4~N .. Attachment 6 General Summary of One Step HPC Application Process 1. Application Types: The following are the Development Applications which are processed in one step by the HPC: * Minor Development 2. Development Review Procedure Summary. The one step HPC review procedure can be described as follows. Stage One: Attend pre-application conference. The purpose of this one-on-one meeting with staff is to determine the review process into which your development proposal fits and to identify the materials staff will need to review your application. Stage Two: Submit Development Application. Based on your meeting with staff, you should respond to the appropriate portions of the application package and submit the requested number of copies of a complete application, with the appropriate processing fee, to the Planning Office. Stage Three: Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, the application package will be reviewed by a member of the staff. You will be notified in writing of whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not you have submitted what was requested, not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. Stage Four: Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, a date for its review by the HPC will be set. The submission due date is a minimum of 12 days prior to the HPC review date, to allow for staff review and memo preparation. It is the planner' s task to review your aipplication with respect to its compliance with the Code and to write a review memo. In the memo, the planner will recommend approval, denial or tabling of the application and recommend appropriate conditions to this action. The memo is normally available at the end of the week before your hearing. You will be called to pick up a copy of the memo when it is ready, or we can mail it to you if you so request. Your project will be presented to the HPC at a regularly scheduled meeting. A copy of the agenda showing where during the meeting your application is scheduled can be obtained when you pick up the staff memo. .. The typical meeting includes a presentation by staff, a presentation by you or your representative, questions and comments by the review body and the public and an action on the staff recommendation, unless additional information is requested by the review body. Stage Five: Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received final approval of your development application, you may proceed to building permit review. During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It Will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is issued. For more information on the Building Permit Stage, please visit the Building Department to obtain handouts on their review procedures. 3. Consolidation: Minor Development review may be consolidated with the designation of a historic structure. However, actual consolidation of HPC review with review by the Commission is not possible due to the different review bodies required to approve such applications. However, staff recommends concurrent application review to reduce your ' overall processing time. Applications which you may submit for concurrent P&Z review include: * Conditional use * Special review * ESA * GMQS exemption for historic landmark or affordable housing If you are submitting any of the above applications along with your one step application, you should also obtain the application package for that type of submission from this office. lstephpcsumm , Recordâ€¢d at .11.1 1 9 0'ca.ck..,A M., .. M,ny 2, 1979 f Recorder. 8(101(Â·~l ,agEMjS Reception No. 21Â·1063 Loretta Banner 1, RECORDER'.4 STAMP $ r. J.:'. TH 14 1)}11} Made thif 2nd Ila> c,f May , xy. 9.5 19 79 , bet wein R. THOMAS WARI) 4.. er. 3.1.00 li , fit of the PR#P . County of Pitkin and State of Coln- . rado, of the fint part, and 4-, 9 V 9 ,/41D M.' Â·Â· .i, /4/'fli Mason & Morse, Inc. ' /fÂ¢'.71â€¢,C.4 corporation organized an,1 ; 9.r..207 Ga= exiating under and by virtue of the lawn er the Stnte of Colorado , of the lecond part: . u' 44,1, WITNESSETH, That the Mald party of tho first pnrt, for and In ron,ideration of the Eum of TEN DOLLARS and other good and valuable consideration 9066ABS to the Mid party of the firâ€¢t part in hand paid by the Rmid party of the *ecomi part, the receipt whereof k VT:â‚¬4'22 hereby confemoed and acknowledged, ha S granted, bargained, Rold and convoyed, and by these prements do #.f I. 19'Â·. grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the gaid party of the second part, its nucce,sorm and aanisrn, forever, 92.3 all of the following deâ€¢cribed lot or parcel of land, situatâ‚¬, lying and being in the 49~NKÂ· County of Pttkin and State of Colorado, to wit: 011?4 Lot N, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado '345 SUBJECT TO, the lien of the deed of trust from The Gargoyle, Inc., a Colouado corporation for the use of Walter C. Stroud and Helen E. Stroud, 6:>1.1,633... .~~~ recorded in Book 289 at Page 118, of the records of Pitkin County. The first note in the principal sum of $67,906.63 has been paid and a partial '1 '~4 Latisfaction of the deed of trust, securing the payment of this note has 5 64. I been filed. The second promissory note in tile principal sum of $136,093.63 has not been paid and as to that promissory note tile deed of ti ,Â·9 truot continues to secure the payment of the princiapl and interest *45* \4, secured thereby , and R. Thomas Ward agrees to pay the same. 1 ..' 431, U ./ TOG ErHER with all and â€¢ingillnr the hereditament, and appurtonances thereunto belonging or in anywise , appertaining, and the reversion and reversiong, remainder and remainder:. rents, Issues and profits thereof: and att the eâ€¢tate, right, title, Interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the maid party of the first part. either In law 6,; 1 14 5% or equity, of, in and to the abo,e bargained premines, with the hereditament, und appurlenance:, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premi,ee above bargalned and described, with the appurtenancel, unto the 4 , said party of the zecond part, ils Ruccesaors and annign: forever. And the said party of the fint part, for him :el f, his heirm, executors, and admlnutratorn, does covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and with the Raid party of tho hecond part. ita sueceâ€¢*or. and unigna. that at the time of thu ens,aling and delivery of theae presents. is well Beized of the premisom above conveyed, as of good, aure, perfect, absolute and 4.. 44 Indefeuible â€¢atate of inheritance, in law, in fle simple, and ha S good right, full power and lawful authority to 0;, 1 1 <4 11Â¢ r rtÂ·*nt. barirain, aell and convey the Rame in manner and form aa aforesaid, und that the. aame are frne and clear from all former r,nd other grants, bargraina, iales, liens, taxem, an,r#Amenta and encumbrancem of whatrvf,r kind or nature ooevor, except, ad valoren taxes for the year 1979, due and payable January 1, 1980; any assessments due by reason of inclusion in Aspen Fire Protection, Asgen Metro polit& Sanitation and Aspen Street Improvement Districts . Mineral 44...= . Re ervationi or corel, easements ana rights of way of recora or sit:date an~ 1 u 449 amd &. ail; bargained promises in the quiet and peae,ful posiennion of the Bald party of the mecond part, Iti p@.itt.. luce#*MorM and aulgna, againmt atl and every person or personâ€¢ lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, the said part y of the first part *hall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The maid part y of the firit part ha 8 her,unto Bot his hand and.â€¢1 the day and year first above written. 9. Nka,C\1SZ~ Signed, Sealed and Delivered in th, Prowneâ€¢ of LSEAL] 4.441. â€¢ R. *11(MAS WlRD Â¤931) I Â¥6#4#R ..........[SEAL] . : 5,191 Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· .... ......[SEAL] 4 , 4 .1 1. 4. STATE OF COLORADO, A 12 , r ... 5, County of 28.0, .,f. . . 1.,1 1 1 1 The foregoing inatrument wn# acknowledged before me thi4 2Iid day of H#V.- r 3 9 0 3Â· , 2 /// 19 79, by R. T}!OMAS WARD . ..#wk Â·. r FUr *- P# 1 My commission expirin 91 05,\0 80- -. . /4 I . .El . WITNESS my hand and official .,al. a' AT?Â¢ ..L ................... .+1 1.6 J - Now, r.bil.. ..4 10 1 _ l ' No. 982. WANRANTY DIED TO CORPORATION-14. Ph.1..i..ble R..rd. --Breford Publlihlog Co., 1*24-41 Stout ntriet, Dâ€¢aim Celeâ€¢â€¢40 1 1' + .411: 4 .4, N â‚¬ .7' 9 4 0 4 , 4 ' 1 4 *42'516'4ffÂ·Y'.Â· ,; ...'*A'.Â·.. 1*1 1 Â·e,4,A ' , f. J' N ED~ Er #2. 52 r~ T- 3-2 6-6 1 I i 3 j 12 3 . , 1 - l r-- , .... i.ill -7,; 1 1 11 11, fi 11, AUG 1 6 1988 August 15, 1988 Aspen Historic Preservation Committee 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Roxanne Eflin Dear Roxanne: This letter will serve as confirmation that our representative will be Sutherland & Fallin, who will be presenting our application before the Historic Preservation Committee, regarding the proposed remodel of the deck in front of Mason & Morse, Inc. Sincerely, 00 / Robert A. u=v.i-~ President RAG/dh Enclosure mason &MORSe INCORPORATED REAL ESTATE Main oFFICe: 514 E. HYMAN AVE. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE: 303 925-7000 , SUTHERLAND, FA~, INC. [LIE~[EÂ® Â®F F[EA[MISEI OFFA[L 1280 Ute Avenue ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 DA:416 1,2 625 JOB 29> Of KI (303) 925-4252 ATT ION _ c ROAXAN Ne EFU R ~ TO EANNINC, C~ ZON\NG PE-fr 6-i rq) REMA'boN 40, WREÂ£66 --C>C A*On CD. li i \ AUG 1 2 1988 .. Ili\ f- WE ARE SENDING YOU ,% Attached 0 Under separate cover via liiAND AZL. the following items: m Shop drawings IK Prints m Plans m Samples El Specifications m Copy of letter [3 Change order [-1 ~ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 3, D Â·10Â·26 1 4 2- Fl.AZA PENOV,Â¥47 ON P]Â«9. - ~0 0.35.i (c acHe 7 ,>tor_bq - it V- THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: C] For approval C] Approved as submitted m Resubmit copies for approval C] For your use C] Approved as noted U Submit-copies for distribution r A- C] As requested El Returned for corrections C] Return corrected prints El For review and comment El O FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO U REMARKS 0 A- -1 j )A/n 164 j ~, COPY TO SIGNE-' --Wilt*Xl/ ~ PRODUCT,-3 /1923*linc Gumn, M=&01471 -11,11~ If enclosures are not as noted. kindly no~ce. D.Â¥IC) .~~..1,4Â£.5 #*J 4 1 ~ AUG ; 2 /988 - /4 - ./ 1 1 , 1 a> - 4 - 1 i 4 961 - trâ€¢ t f--F 1 1 -/.-- - 1*---/4//-- -Im'.$*//.1 - m - 1 --4 n 1 -*- 1 --1. 441 "6861*1-#MIC*to/5.4 it NuÂ·~ i 'tin h . 1 - ~M Im r' w i MAT A~ fi 1 F All~,11<1 1111~ 1~11 - :1 li~ 11 W 1 I. ''ll 1 1 -1 Â· 1 -447'rr' 137 - Z7t41# AE=======r,4~.i#LEE_ ip ~ - EZE Â· 1Mrill" 1 1 Illl I )-- 1 - ' -r f =4=. ..1-41111111 NI 11 1 ELKS PARKING MASON & MORSE BLDG. 516 E. HYMAN BLDG. . SOUTH ELEVATION . -1 ..4 1 1/4"=1'=0" r ' r. 4 #El j. rj R ! 1 ti 7 W 5/3/ rk** 93>. J Un F.: <VV,-Â£ (1 + k .- Du .1 ,â‚¬ f. D U + I L- M~ 4,*-1 ~LA 4 44 3 1 4 41- 4- f , Ilt~'01 t i b :A . r r 1 ' ' r. AfÂ© , il: 1 Â£ r 4 1 '76P 2 t! 1 11 4,4#*4#11 _,i ki.~f' fi. 7- - 4, 111 r . 41, 1! 1 1 1 1 r K t- i' 1 ~ : 14-11, J -4 'Ft /3 1Â£ brÂ·7/ 1 12 .â€ž,r 1 i '41' I thi/ \1 1 I ~! T \!f ~ ~ ~ ~ri ~~ MSr-~- 8 . E 0411 z 1. 11 -11, TBAA-*r'100#6, >44-04 ~i_~r3~~~ __~Â» ~( -1 00 t 3,- 11 . Â« . j . --I-/1- I. -- 4 , r -7'.-.. - R n -19 1, - b . .*-1 . .it .---11 -i E .. . h--- - T /<1 --l -/~ i ----Czz-Â·* ~T7E77' mt",Al_Â£%=ul.. tj.UdfiS-UkJ , ./.- i - 11 . li /1,1 ' , 19 11. 1 1 :- -/.9-4221.---iFT / Â»77--27-1 - 4-. y f job 87-01 W - . -S- 6 6-, 11 ASPEN-liIATORIq PRESERVATION COMMUTEE | drwn DEKP date 8-10-88 1-//f- 4 4.-_-22.4 Il -ir , I . , I-- .. -- - .. , ~<---- - -Â·Â·Â·- - _-â€¢OWRMAN L.W *f , DATE -42122 chkd - ~APPROVED WEST ELEVATION ~!CONDITIONS - ~ENIED -------~ 14*1, PERSPECTIVE SKETCH 1 b AN" D~VIATION FROM THESE PLANS MUST nk ' 1 ;Ar ...r FOR REAPPROVAL 9 p. fiN A , . of . sheets .#la&Â£41 , + 1'........t/Â· ...........- A XÂ· -- 411. .....de... I~. 40.p~0~gâ€¢, -- @u! ue 01 ein 3@1. 0'| e ...... NO I1VAON3EI VZÂ¥ld '9018 3SHOW 00 'NadSÂ¥ 3AV NVAAH 19Â¥3 f LS *8 30018 N ..4 MASON & MORSE BUILDING 516 E. HYMAN BUILDING PITKIN CENTER EXISTING NEW EXISTING . 5 1 f L -EXISTING STOREFRONT TO REMAIN J 4%. - 111 11'KNLII 11'lli.1.'.. rl'Â·41/ 74,- 11 !W[PIL HPHI -31,91 . _.-LI U__E_ ttÂ¥44 Imr--- EXISTING VESTIBULE 1 [14 -- --41.CUL'- -- , ~| i '7-221 =1= -4 2-4--- III r.,1.* -_ 1 @5 8 1-1-92-an ELKS BUILDING ELK'S PARKING ~Ut-FA-l~ a i* 111#4 0 C 1, 7-7-f FILL-IN i -,lk-fliw=,-~ ...LÂ· Il I U-.4 , I.#I-4 I K._----k- 3~ :.. 0, (D g Â· Â· 3Â·z- EXISTING ~ 4 P - f . PLANTER.~ CD 0 1 0 C 4, IN ~ 1 0413 = 744 1 11 - (2=] 0 0 ./ / Y ...' , / NEW PLANTER < ~ 2! eli ?' '421 4&22*IÂ·. F. /4-22'L..3 L 1 1 SNOWMELI i MEW PLANTEB~F' Â·Â·:. ";Pe?< . NEW BRICK PAVERS -- V, 34, I 1''i .<#A L-0 f F J -? ---erT AREHOSE . 0 CONNECTION / f 0 A ID, 4 /V *14 44 1 . (0 a â‚¬:Â·102.0' , 1 ./././. 'I. 0 B 1 0 .0 1 0 -42% ... 1 I :t.< I 1 /1 1 V . / F 1 1 1 1, .1 , /11 116 .. /4- . . t , , ~ f " NEW Stel 1 i LINE OF EXISTING . 1 - NEW BACK .~.i., PLAZA ,~ 1 .. - C PROPERTY LINE '~ PROPERTY LINE D , I ~ PLANER <TO BE REMOVED) 1 99 5 ~ , / - 99.5, Il : 1 N 75â€¢09'11" W i / . 30.05' l, 1 , r x L 1 5'-0" EXISTING SIDEWALK ~ f,NEW EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE /' L 1 1 , ' SCORED TO MArCH ADJÂ¥ENT PATTERN, U I - Li ' : SNOWMED- ~ 1 - 1 1/ . 1 t1 1 1 , NEW METAL TREE GRATUS & TREE GUAROW \ 1 . , 1 ~TO MATCH ADJACENT PROPERTY V f ; i , Â·Â· A- 1Â· 1- 4.: r $ Mtâ€ž*. i . 1 I Â£ '6 ~ ~~~ "---- ~,~'~EW EMERALD QUEEN HAPLE TNEES 1 4 j " CAL. (REMOVE EXIS~ING TREES) r j (03 - 44-â€ž.29.*h...1â€ž .141*.Â¥~Â»mtw~**I ' Â¢ "~'+J'~' " ~ ' "'--'i~."-'-*~~ ~ - ~--4'.-**4-----f----- . \1</ : , *NEW RECE*SED UP-LIGPâ€¢IB - ~ li 1 2 14 HYMAN AVENUE job 87-01W date 8-10-88 ,<'.* ''t# drwn SL chkd 802398=00=0Â®841 Â«1108Â©Â© 391*Â·936Â·80Â£ LL91-9 *6 >{0018 N 101 NOUVAON3EI VZÂ¥ld =9018 EISHOW 18 NOSV IN 00 'N3dSÂ¥ EIAV NVKAH 19Â¥3 *19