The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.516 E Durant Ave.HPC026-98~ L PN 2737-182-21009 Case HPC26-98 5/ L 1- tbul Â¥,-1-- Kaelin Pro Shop Minor HPC 5 /6 E T> 1,4 '/ 4 4'. + AUF /1, se 8 1 0- PO- 43 26 - 92 (ED K (40- 5 7 IH P 7 .. PARCEL ID:~2737-182-21003 DATE RCVD: |08/05/98 | # COPIES:~-3 CASE NO|HPC026-98 i CASE NAME:[Stefan Kaelin Pro Shop Minor Development PLNR:~Amy Guthrie i PROJ ADDR:~516 East Durant CASE TYP:~Minor Development STEPS:~ OWN/APP: Stefan Kaelin Enterp~ ADR~447 E .Cooper Ave. ~ C/S/Z: IAspen, CO 81611 PHN:~925-7266 1 REpl ADRi C/S/21 PHN:~ FEES DUE:|120 (hpc) FEES RCVD:|120 STAT: E- REFERRALS| REF~ BY| DUE:| MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 1 -7 11 1 i . DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| CITY COUNCIL; REMARKS| | PZ: BOA: CLOSED:~ BY: | DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMINi .. - RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 516 E. DURANT AVENUE, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 4 9, SERIES OF 1998 WHEREAS, the applicant, Stefan Kaelin, has requested minor development approval to alter the storefront and patio area for the property located at 516 E. Durant Avenue. The property is located within the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated August 26, 1998, recommended approval with conditions, and WHEREAS, the application was reviewed at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on August 26, 1998, at which the Commission considered and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 7-0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development approval for 516 E. Durant Avenue, Aspen, Colorado, be approved with the following conditions: .. 1. That the new doors and awnings match those used on the rest of the building if there is a consistent style, to be approved by staff and monitor. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the day of ,1998. Approved as to Form: ".4 1=lit City Attorney HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Chairman ATTEST: - ' Chief Deputy Clerk .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 1 r , /0 tj THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development DirectoIU FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 516 E. Durant Avenue- minor review DATE: August 26, 1998 SUMMARY: The applicant. Stefan Kaelin, will be opening a new store in the space formerly occupied by Christy Sports. As part of a remodel, the entry into the shop will be reconfigured and awnings will be added. The subject building is not historic but is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Stefan Kaelin. LOCATION: 516 E. Durant Avenue. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District. or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(13)(2). Response: The applicant requests HPC approval to removed the existing single door entry and replace it with double doors. New awnings with the store name are also proposed. .. Staff recommends a condition of approval; that the new doors and awnings match those used on the rest of the building if there is a consistent style. Additionally,sign permits will be needed for the awnings and any other signs proposed. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character o f the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed development improves the storefront character of the shop, which is located in Aspen' s main shopping district. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the historic significance of any building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereoÂ£ Response: The proposed development does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance o f a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the proposal for 516 E. Durant Avenue with the condition that the new doors and awnings - match those used on the rest ofthe building if there is a consistent style." .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name 5 1 â‚¬ FA v KA EL)9 PR O 5 ko P 2. Project location ..5-/6 EAtt U AN A # 6\:nâ‚¬v CO 9/611 (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 4. Lot size 5. Applicant' s name, address and phone number 5 Â·16 pe w Kam L y Eu+. 447 Ceopt,% A v. A:<v. Co f/6// 91-f~ -71 66 6. Representative:s name, address, and phone number 7. Type of application (check all that apoly): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greeniine Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partiai Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) Co/kgasiaL - 922#Ail. ,5#096 9. Description of development application /KtÂ« E .FAvoe 060 p 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4 11111111 49\\ - -NER BkININGS. i 7= 1 \ 1 51-EFAN KAEUN PRO SHOP GOLF & SKI , 1, - I- OLD DOOR 11 - --1- 10 . 3, /,1 2,1 2,1 -'I'. 2, 1/ 2,5. i 4 1 1 VEWDOOR FRONT ELEVATION t./ --:f*#- DURANT GALENA BUILDING 1:,; 3 1998 COGUL, il-1 1Â·02_Â·2' 'ENT STEFAN KAELIN PRO SHOP ~ , UNIT 102 - 103 -1[) 11 p i A., D 67. p l .41 O 94 4 1 W EN 6 0-w A| ' WI,Joow 1 93~ Nek) ENT R.ANCA --1~-- -i--di--- --I 1) --- --- - - ----,-1 43 V 2.14 Nâ‚¬ W co R C 2.. aT-e I L/9 8 : E*,17,1, a 0 \ E'951Â£ 6 44 ze C A-TE 1 gpc. k /360 i P 722â‚¬Es X \ tin-,A,& /3.wc./4 c \ O 0 (44 C 13'>7Â¢Â»ek C 0 40 7 *-\1~7 Â»tr77 0 o.â‚¬1 /- orÂ» fl r Grl=(51 9 F:ZZLIâ‚¬:,4 C.V . I - â€¢â€¢F A L K /