HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.533 E Cooper Ave.HP-1991-28-- 11541 4 4 0- \99 i - 2 9 533 E Cooper 2737-82-22-004 .1 - 2737-182-22-003 gay NO-6 C H P
- e.~I- ' LONE PINE . ¥, -,1 81 DEC 20 r 1,1 CONSTRUCTION IX-':f - 73€ CLALEnt- 29 /911 I . r ~~15-~tb~t~, ~Bif,Lu..1-:ow M_ i.14-ut £30 s.AL G.le.4 Ase-1 G GIGI' . 4 ELE. 8-C +L. £ n...1.J, NY o l.·05 d.,4.L.j , 405 *- 407 50*11 Fluwk- 50· -7-kc V %,1604 41.+ w.-s 1.s-*,£.O .u gr„vd~ 4 -A£ N owE *66.L 14,199 i, Als. tkil W t'UL 00-,4, 4 +CAL Mt'llc /902/6., 1 0 d L '64 Cit„N t.¥f .g../te * Novc,-log- 18, AT , a. Atv '.w £02/ 0 N S I '-r A L A-Vt ,-7 1 uu how s c..AA M £ 1 4 Y OU - C~>j 2,0 c 6 1 N -2/ 7 N< *<1*+ K. 4.-,v,7 L~ / :i 9«go:jkzkc~ C- 1-90 Ll; ~2 v K. f/-4 720 E. HYMAN - SUITE 302 • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • 303-920-4284
1 1 1 1 i 1 : 1 1 ., 1 1 1 1 1 1 . -------- -*---- -----1- -1----:------i . : i. 1 ---.-1 !' . r ... -i :i : IiI. t . 1 4 + 1-4.- 0'fri/ i- 4-- i 1 , i 1 i ' 1 i : · 1 ./ 11 ,/ '' ! '. 1 i I 1 '~-· ' - - - 1 1 '1 1 . . 1 i 1 --- 1 L cnn f I e==1 1 7 til Li 11 - i 1, i . 1 1 : 4 io , 1 - -- - 71 1 -1 --- . ; 1 1 1 l . 11 1 . L' 1.1 ... r , ! i - -4„+ *4„th lu- 4-En 11 856-1 -- . 1 - 1 -brAL ) J,L) 'YA- 12. s C.1 .---------- - -
t i 1.4 ' iii: 1 it , ! ----L----i-· · i .1.-- -1---_1 1 At · · · i : 1 · i 1·. ·i ' :i 1 i /91 ' 1 / .1 . 1 CA--p .i - ' - - --- --· r- ' 1 111 - i · ··-4 Crl-n 1 i to 1 C t- 1. 9 1 i 4 - »-71 1 ..t- li L; li :t i 1 i : ilt? i o ./ 71 -r 1 _ .-.I- /1 ' -- l .. ·i .....E¥,54. 'ELE-vAl-•00 ~w~En E-U-&54 - 1 hy.£ S.N.:8 31, r-, ,-4-1--- -- ------- . 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' i .t r 1 - -1 9, . 1! 11 .1
1 , - r h 0 1 - 4, 0 . 1 . 1 4- j Ill , 1 1 1.7 3 . 1 i 1 . , 11 1 1. 1 . . . . ;i i , 1. 1 . 11 i i 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 i . 1 . . . 1 1 1 1 1. t i i 1' '! 1 - - -- t - . - -. 4- t. 1 50 J44 €<icv-*to . ___ -- hl - 1
:~ : L__ j L__J -19 - - 0 °4 < 1 - ./,ht\J \ C 0 - , Ch,< } (r- 11 --1 1 --4 i i 1 - iii 1 . 6 1 1: 1 1 ! 1 i $ - --- 0 -1.-- * *.i ... i. - iii ' ' 1 1 1 , 1 1: 1 1 11 1 1 , . . 4- . 4 3 1 Ell i 1 5 , .i· .. !' :i ' ' . 1 ilifil iii i JI, 1 11 1 4 i.-1. 1 - _-- -__1 ./ Suj,A.-_F { Bv 49 2 hrn\ --
4 - i i 1 0 1 - L_ i i -1--------~ -11- V--7 €=P , j ;143 7 ' 04 : I. 11 ! i - knun T i 7 - - 1 1 - 7--- 1 1 ! :1 1 : .. i 1 : i , 1: :; :0 :Di; i --1 iii i i 1 1 --_ ---- -E•SA. E\£-VA.\- , D .J \4 4 ™ 14 •4364 1.,12.4.~ 1%0~ osic# AltrAN.+E_ .1 643 1 -11.)'11
1 1/ . i ' 1. :11 1, i : i I 1 - 1 ; 1 --- i i 7. 1 . 4..1 1 1 1 1 i, 1 : i i , 1 · i 1 1 , 1 1 / i. ·.t J , f 4- 1 1 1 ! -1_. /.-2 - I ! 1 i.! 1 11 : 1 1 /9 1 - - 1--L-----I - A -- - Ill--I---·-I -' I .-*£--- . m-~+It-- 1 11 i t · I 1--- -= 1 7=-11 1 ' --- -- 0 -- - d==23 - --- 1 11 I ./ 7 : . -- !-- 9 --f ! It' 1 1 11 : i Iii i i . rn- 1 ! 1 2 1 A 1 . . i I Ast_ E i EVA 4/ o ._ -1... \LN +ELR . 14 FL.t -1- C co-14,1 j -- TE-Ats +,6, 5 - .r- ; f , 1 :. 1 --t- 1 1 .1
. £211 ' 91 1 iI ' 1. . 1 Pl . .-4 i , 1 0 E--7-, 1 ! Ly ! I ---Il * 1 t 1 1 4 i ' 1 b'~ i lin! £ 0:: 1 1 F=== , · H it ii 1 1 1 1-i il - TE. s -4- E i c v .4 , 0 0 -- 1 \toN 4 E- m L-la-Ot-~ __ c-Ey:s.L,J,s '-rehow osti All-t•-Natt 'A 1
* f Ch 1 h..1 - 4 ---1---. E» *19 R --- -~ --- i CIDE] L__-- - 1 CUE-3 li Li •: 'i i- i il: . I 1 ! ; .4 1 i li 1 .01: 1 , , - - -- - -- -3-4----22 -f--22_ 2-21: ; F -=n 1 ... - 1.11 H , ill i a . 1 L-- - I .5 4- lE 1 £v. 4, o o WV. 4 Er< 51 a.&&4 - ZE-1.-rs-L:....r 'fe.ovesti Alit•-NA+EL * 2
r - ' - i 0 i - sou41 Eliv.4,00 (Ane7~ -Rrv,3£1 7..oposal AW,44 4 *3 - Ank
. C. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer )L~., Re: Minor Development: 533 E. Cooper - Bowman Block (Stein Eriksen Building), window modifications Date: November 13, 1991 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Minor Development approval for the design modification and replacement of four non-original windows and one door to the National Register structure located at 533 E. Cooper. Staff wishes to acknowledge the applicant's desire to improve the historic building through the modest changes proposed. We also thank the applicant for submitting an accurate and easily understood application. APPLICANT: Stein Eriksen ZONING: CC, "H" Historic Overlay District PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The Development Review standards are found in Section 7-601 of the Land Use Code. The applicable Guidelines are found in Section IV. Commercial Buildings - Renovation and Restoration, beginning on page 19. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay district or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark... Response: Staff finds that the proposal meets this standard, with the exception of the rectangular replacement window indicated on the east elevation. Although the window being changed is not original, staff questions whether the proposal is an improvement. The Guidelines state: "Maintain original upper storv windows. The size and shape of these windows contribute to the character of the building front and create a visual unity when repeated along the street. In examples where they have been altered windows should be restored to their original character." The building is characterized by typical vertical, narrow, double hung windows, and staff finds the proposed replacement window to be out of character due to its proportion and horizontality. We recommend that the HPC consider requiring a restoration of the
.. original window, or a replacement window to match the proportion of the historic windows, or at the minimum add a center vertical element to divide the pane into two vertical portions. We find the remainder of the proposed alterations meet this standard. HPC COMMENTS: 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The neighborhood, defined here as the Commercial Core Historic District, strives to maintain appropriate proportions to strengthen the historic character of the district. Particularly in National Register buildings in the core, staff feels all changes should support and strengthen the character of the neighborhood. We find that this proposal does just that, with the exception of the east elevation replacement window as discussed above, under #1. HPC COMMENTS: 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structure located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: Staff finds that the proposal does not detract from the cultural value of the structure. HPC COMMENTS: 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff finds the proposed changes on the alley elevation architecturally appropriate, however, continue to recommend a design revision of the east elevation replacement window. HPC COMMENTS: 2
.. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider the following alternatives: 1. Approve the Minor Development application as submitted 2. Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations should be offered). 4. Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the development review standards. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant Minor Development approval for the proposal for 533 E. Cooper St., with the condition that the applicant revise the drawings to indicate the large east elevation replacement windows design to be compatible with the vertical proportion of the historic windows, and receive staff approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Additional comments: memo.hpc.533EC 3
.. c-~ ci-- MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer ~LL--, Re: Minor Development: 533 E. Cooper - Bowman Block (Stein Eriksen Building), window modifications Date: November 13, 1991 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Minor Development approval for the design modification and replacement of four non-original windows and one door to the National Register structure located at 533 E. Cooper. Staff wishes to acknowledge the applicant's desire to improve the historic building through the modest changes proposed. We also thank the applicant for submitting an accurate and easily understood application. APPLICANT: Stein Eriksen ZONING: CC, "H" Historic Overlay District PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The Development Review standards are found in Section 7-601 of the Land Use Code. The applicable Guidelines are found in Section IV. Commercial Buildings - Renovation and Restoration, beginning on page 19. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay district or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark... Response: Staff finds that the proposal meets this standard, with the exception of the rectangular replacement window indicated on the east elevation. Although the window being changed is not original, staff questions whether the proposal is an improvement. The Guidelines state: "Maintain original upper story windows. The size and shape of these windows contribute to the character of the building front and create a visual unity when repeated along the street. In examples where they have been altered windows should be restored to their original character." The building is characterized by typical vertical, narrow, double hung windows, and staff finds the proposed replacement window to be out of character due to its proportion and horizontality. We recommend that the HPC consider requiring a restoration of the
.. original window, or a replacement window to match the proportion of the historic windows, or at the minimum add a center vertical element to divide the pane into two vertical portions. We find the remainder of the proposed alterations meet this standard. HPC COMMENTS: 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The neighborhood, defined here as the Commercial Core Historic District, strives to maintain appropriate proportions to strengthen the historic character of the district. Particularly in National Register buildings in the core, staff feels all changes should support and strengthen the character of the neighborhood. We find that this proposal does just that, with the exception of the east elevation replacement window as discussed above, under #1. HPC COMMENTS: 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structure located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: Staff finds that the proposal does not detract from the cultural value of the structure. HPC COMMENTS: 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff finds the proposed changes on the alley elevation architecturally appropriate, however, continue to recommend a design revision of the east elevation replacement window. HPC COMMENTS: 2
.. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider the following alternatives: 1. Approve the Minor Development application as submitted 2. Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations should be offered). 4. Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the development review standards. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant Minor Development approval for the proposal for 533 E. Cooper St., with the condition that the applicant revise the drawings to indicate the large east elevation replacement windows design to be compatible with the vertical proportion of the historic windows, and receive staff approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Additional comments: memo.hpc.533EC 3
ATIAa IMINT 1 ~ LAND USE APPLICATION FoleY ~ . 1) Project Name · Stein Eriksen Building 2) Project location 405 & 407 S. Hunter and 533 E. Cooper 0 ~4~ Aspen, CO 81611 ( indicate street address, lot & block ncmber, legal description wliere appmpr:Late) 3) Present Zoning C C 4) Iat Size 6500 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # Stein Eriksen P.O. Box 708, Park City, UT 84060 (801)649-8401 6) Representative' s Name, Address & Ehone # Vincent Partyka Lone Pine Construction, 720 E. Hyman, Suite 302, Aspen, CO 920-4284 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): acnditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA r'-- Hi=toric Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual FUD _X_ Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin ,-' Final RJD Historic Demlition Mountain yiew Plane Subdivision - Historic Designation condaminiumizatic,1 Tact*Map Amendment - CMOS Allotment Icrt SpliVIat Line - GUS L...rticn Adjustment 8) Description of bisting Uses (rumber and ~ type of ecisting structures; apprcodmate sq. ft. ; rumber of bedrocms; any Pmvia= approvals granted to the property). 4 Residential apartments, 3 Offices, 3 retail stores, Approx 9000+ 9) Description of Develgnent Application Application to modify or replace some existing windows 10) Have you attached the following? X Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Submission Contents X Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submissian Oorrterrts X Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application Illilli 5/irrix
.. Attachment 3 This proposed development will occur on property with the address of 405 and 407 South Hunter and 533 E. Cooper, Aspen, CO 81611. It involves the change of two windows on the upper level on the east side (Hunter Street) of the building and the changing of two window structures on the south side (alley) of the building and the removal of one of two doors accessing the upper deck on the south side. On the east side (Hunter Street) the small operable window shown on the drawings will be replaced with a window unit that is similar. This is necessary because the present window is not functioning and is irrepairable. The trapezoidal shaped fixed window will be replaced with a fixed rectangular window. No new materials will have to be introduced. Any new material needed for patching will match the existing materials. Colors will remain as they presently exist. Because the building was just recently repainted in the last two months the color matching can easily be done. On the south side the wood window units and trim will match the existing wood window units below. The wood siding needed for patching will match the existing materials. This proposed development will be more compatible with the original design of the structure and character of the neighborhood because the windows that will be replaced were not part of the original structure but were part of a remodel done in the early 1960's. This proposed development will more accurately reflect the original character of the building. The geometry of the existing structure consists of lines and patterns in the horizontal and vertical. Therefore, removal of the trapezoidal window and the window with the cross lattice mullions will make the structure more architecturally consistent. The windows to be replaced are presently single glazed. The replacement windows will be double glazed insulated glass. This and the fact that the total glazed area will be reduced will contribute to less energy consumption by the building. Also the present glazing which exists in the south windows with the cross lattice pattern extends to the floor and is adjacent to operating doors is not tempered. This represents a safety hazard which will be eliminated and brought to compliance with the building codes by the replacement of these windows.
Attachment 4 a) Elimination of the cross lattice windows on the south side and changing the shape of the trapezoidal window on the east side to a rectangular window will bring the building into better perspective and character with the surrounding structures and b) because the surrounding neighborhood consists of all newer structures with a more contemporary style, unifying some of the architectural details (i.e. a more consistent window style) would have a positive effect on the character of the neighborhood. c) The same reasons cited above for the positive impact on the neighborhood can also be argued for the enhancement of the cultural value of the historic structure. d) The proposed changes to the historic structure will be taking place on a part of the building that was added to the original structure and as such will bring this section of the building into better architectural compliance with the rest of the historic structure.
0 '0 11· #LE w 4, ,w , 0 4 >90=1 1.0 2 ~.N e ..6665£ 1 Art,·A 5, _»59,14 iCi *./701'·2* 1 0*-"I 4,ft&~50:~ d.2qthrl-,20 ¥ 4 #11~224 *732.1/.19/tlt-4.- WDE,3.1...MEN, &~:Ir» 25 -~.2~.al 64 4,1 1/44 .. 4. ' .4 1, 1 - 1- -- r; .4'' 742tz.ull , /. 27694' . 1 i , b' , 4 4 n . 11 / W. ./ 9, f . 67. 4 ¥ 4 - 1
.. Agl -~~4-Uy v rbila . .11 2. / 1,61 '1'k*.R 17:fr .do-VIM- . 1, . '. : 001 , 4.·201.6. ., f. 1 J . ./ */ L.. - D:.' 1,*~Ak¢,Vt 1 & I I . 1,1 Kic.*.*16-A ur-2·'4•· . 4. ., 1%3 60041 (Al tal~ Stoll 4< 0 > 'liG'.,%043)*02.-i-,.fl:-%3%~ 4, ' ,, ' 1:4/lue 4.9 , 1 1 , 20.e-: . , , 14 r.0 r='LA u . ·- 24 ~B : ·4:,ilk, *ftm-9.~ * .41=*' T ' i.. +', . 4 - "1111 S ou\4 (A11271 + \.luotty,
1 v n 1 % I t., 04* 4.96. l/1 t I , .t X• Ch -- I & - -2-- , 47 - 1 4 - f > C 4 . - , + 01 101 iE- 4 -92' 1 4 4 -1., k Z i 5 a ly:,6 - t kc - 1., '3 1 - r,2•1 - a ii,1/1 91£ ~.41 1 , 1 ..9 .4 1 ...2 ..¥4 4 4 . :.*,2 L....1,1 4, - , :,1 £ 1 .- 4 . D 11- ' . - 1, L. Le"10 37 9 13•11 -3, An No S Arr,1 r,) ~,mo·\1 9 -03-r° 8 ' 5
r multe'l ,: ti'/*L~/*M=.'1' 'i~~~''J 4 . ...01*414~~430Mi;~1%~~ L Qi'ium 1 ' Afy¢¢24/1 Z.,;~11~ ~.....Frmlit . .-FIEEZE" huifi, 4 &* **MAT#·1 6 04 1 42·6!F·*!0+15. 1 ; .i 1 1(Il~WMIIEZN/ftr~~V It, Mi, 1 - ; e.·'7 *0 , , ' 1 t.t 1, IllilitaiM/lalmililliNl !. 4 5 0€-9.1. . ' 1,1 th: i il A.,4 9.1/P- '.~ , u ./4 : ../.1 1 - 1,0. · <th¢ 4 %:3 * 2 . 4 /0 > !....f.,4 1 mil | 4< ,.i.~·16.11 4 i· D.U ,/ 4 0 + i i.. 1 1.I d 1 11 ,-5 1 6 . i.:1 1/ i 1 wr 131 -Jig:%*44 4 - -1 1 5 -4 11 •40-2 *Ae 3 Ill= ,•,u. 1, : '41-- 1 + \1 iR..dd,TRk 1 4 · t. )-...1- 1 6,14' 1.4 1-!16.3 , = ':..,Il'LJ'. . 1 14'' 4 -3 . % 41 -Uk l/1 A. I /5 1 ' '~ . . l.¥ 1%. N J '.1 , T. 1 . 1. . 5 .1. j ·->. -21 ~ 1/ A ' 4 44 1 A--.3 ...1 1.4. j . ' 6. 41 7 L+~ 'D J 1 9 1 3 A 1 1 )/3 j An & 9 5 Wre: 4 ret l<v,poys -·3+MAN 5
, - 0<-7334.O/24.-" 7.1..~f ' 9, 9 2.*41 6 ~~W#h ' 0 ..*' / ."- i ,·. 9*J AE,¢2:4· - :7./ .:5,01- · 1-:118 I Yvil./6 . -5 - ; ·4 11* . - »4 >i}-hka,Jil.L-4W67tif14=#q- 174451,63* 4~ 4 :TIO,1/~~#9~.E/- r. ~r . . I ... i . 41 e»~1 4 -: JI'~.1 tr..*.nj...-dz'212 *i· 12· ;,iek' - S "46&' 1- i .2- , f.erLA*CLL). *~ ," AN Jithkt- -i~21, I ittl 1.1 *. 24.~~4~ .r'*A. J./HUL=P/£100444)78/9//I L*. 1. ' 0/1 .: - AFGY.*-'~ .. 1 .. 4 L. furgag"m'* - 0 82 11 41 , 32,4 4 I ; . - 511*1~ 1 - . , I ' -- 174 --424 -- 4/F + .. '4»44-7:4- -2,- ...6- 66011 (Allc~711 9.14' ~,7 7- 770'9~57-3.- 2:.1 -1 3.- 24 -1 3~ . 1 -' 14 - --¥-5..46-6.21 - . ' *'11*.ild€,214 **~)~24 i . .1 - t. *~S~@44:1*£0 . 11 34 . .-5 ':'-1 - :456 1·., c 4 1% 2., - --4/~i"/W.A. .. .4/.. ..t . I 0. 9- 1 1. W . bit:%*4241*2% 9 ta o# 20 I ain'<-RW -0-·3:4~ = 4 0 2,2 1 1~4% , ir.,4 . 4,1 t r' , - 0.,7 164/4.-»ki :C- pr- ;'·10948,4 -: , 4 -7 -*,~2.1,1-::t'i kxite>i-~-c.€ -, ..~- g·.trt##% 4 6-11 2 61. b. 4.... tb•.1 . :ir- ¥fgf~, I ./ . le, -v. 4 4 19 ,~01-7 -0,4/4~1 0 . 2/, . t<irtfo:/2 J X/LS, u 1 i '01 Obbiffti' Unt:t · ' L J 4 , W... 4 - 1 10 - Bou* 4 (Aliar) 4.\-lu 0.1-E ~ >fi; I 'Pfilk,YE . '*Vt 1?Zi' .
-. ' . 4. ' :-,; ':01.-4 24-81>37 - :.~77,0-•*th~£1' 7* 3 r ''06#. 032-9-«20.0.3 2 ~ '490.4 4 O VACQ. VIC. w 1 ¥ ' 1/ j b r<EAs .,3 f ¢t-6 J c SC i 9.932 ~~:;SLf, 1231'1*1:~Aft x dE.UL', orc.'0~[. '0 1 , '%,a,%:t,-lf£78 .im .16 111:-6- b .- .'..-6... - ./,. ~ , 04.1 € 61.tiv#,61?12 - *# . i4i'. '· 11 M 6' -•1 '. .......14.9 4. fk-- " ~:s€·40*45, 84-mi .. ,•*,·,t; :» .,0,~44 *AA¢ ~:1?675,44 *WAN , ir., . 1 . ".11 /4 2..,t €244,7--1~61/2 piA 44- - .r,~t~~gra -- -----4, .2 -r# rG.W 4 4 - - .:i 4-1 . f. I t. .re.» 9 I & le-I 1:::im:m::1 - , 11 - r.. E-- . .. 4 1"-'t.,rE,2,24~8,2 12-/61 -7-J>t=//1/*LAU - 1 -Depa?~~ tr, 4 t.-- - #24 ~ -91.- , ~ ---cr-->2-L *'Ial'- .--,ro 1 lili 1 j#e./-1/ill- Ak 2 0, _1.9771.- te- t ' 7/' . 'C .11411.2... 1 -; tk .3 ./.1 4 I I .... , 6= i u.er D--z-'·s---:-QU,•22&-t-*Zi-1 1 1 4..... - .- i.7.,ir=r·---~ 14'' . .*38%.rf *·, 0 - .r9<ki-i~WWT#&&---- *41/6/.. - 2, I 2710 y. , =. ---/ 0*2921 ~ 1' -1 .-40 49't m - 1 --27-re V ·· 1 -'193-.4. f . / WhES ---0- 4.+36.5 411 E *..... .,a .W''llit-%~mIERA .. t:-<523~**12·/. /* ~ t ff#=e. 1 - - -- 1-L~-IL.....1 6.- 6.12£_u.,~:sr 4 1 1.4.
£221 1 1 fL- I 1 .. ~ L_.: Gez:h 1-- --1-/A LE==71 Cal , » V 1 - I r 4 m 1 E-ZEZ-3 CZE=] i 1 -3 . i 1 - i 1 1 14 1 : i . 1 lilli i lei U 4 2 71 r- i 1 01. -t + i 11 2- R 7, 1 1 . 1 I z 1 1 - ----- -- · l.... · . I •st 'El £ ve--4 0 0 - 1 ' \10-4.-ER... Sla..c.ti ..4.---L ~-1 , - 4 ~ 4 -4 -- - - i 1 1 i I, 1_-L_i.._--.:. - -1_____L_- i ._ ~. __. ~__ _4..~. i hts-l,hjj .--_f _-2 - 111.7 1 :-1.7
--4-- . - i 1-_ -i t.- } I 1 1. 1 ! i I li t.k.w W. e J OWS J £23 L_ + tx 1 f , 1 1 1 2/ r=== I*==21 CT==73 1- 1 i I czrn 1 C C F J 0 1 - 4-- -- -: -l lili I a 1 1 1- .1 1. -t I i r -- T , 1 11 - 1 1 . .- It 1 0 4- 0Ii _ _ 1 . 1 1 - li , i I I i ...- 4_-1- EAL¥.52(v#-tioN_.__ -1 _1 8 1--_ 1__1- L...1 - 1 1 : _L_--_ i - 1 j . . i : ! i 1 . 1 lili f 1 ! 1 11 1 11 .it : 41 iii ' 1 1
6rn¢51 *3 C g 0 3 1 = iK r lie °S ) ~1.3 11W ) C' 04-98 3\3 1-1 not - 1.1 - 1 1 \ NX /9 1 H i / 1 1 /0 1 w /; o b{4 ,« c ! 1 e i I 14 444/ «\ 42 k 1: % /1 --04 \\ 4 /\ . j 1 «\1 1 ///5 11 1 1 11 ty 141 .· X. 1 t /6, 11 16« li 6/ \A V /7 »0 1 44 ,/ 1 * tb -- 1
N.7 1 1/ -. 1 : 1 r- 1 ! Soutl FE\EvAL,o„ .._-- - _ ~ScA{£: ,>,~ 1 2-0" ~ 78 0 -98 55 5-
.. I stein eriksen, ina 720 E. Hyman., Ste. 302 · Aspen, CO · 303/925-7575 · Fax 303/920-4801 NOV - 1 :i Minor Historic Development Application Stein Eriksen Building 405 & 407 South Hunter and 533 E. Cooper Aspen, Colorado
10/21/91 16:20 FAA 501 649 3523 b 1 1, 1 1NI iS,K i A < t IN 461 91 1 1.2. 191 .. October 31, 1991 CiM of Aspen Planning Department 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 91611 To Whom it may Concern: I am submitting an application for Minor Historic Development for the property which has the address of 405 and 407 5. Hunter and 533 E. Cooper, Aspen Colorado, 81611. The legal description is: The Easterly 5 feet of lot 9, all of lots H and I Block 96, Ci¢v and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pilkin, State of Colorado Acting as my authorized repregentative is Vincent r-arryka, Lone Pine Construction, 720 E. & 7 Al Ii- 4 -~ 3 1•che,ne 920-4284. .:-mail, Suile h.,£., A.,i.,c n, u.(. 81611. Tu.. Sincei ely, Stein Efiksen Awl »4?»1.- UUAVD.t,„ P.O. Box 708 Park City, UT 84060 (801) 649-8401
~ 50[1 pAC834 <~Q 1 -7 - 1 /36 4 9 00, 2 e <CA 2 7 3 7 1 8 -- , 99 PAGE737 2Z34I2 LORETTA BANNER LORETTA BANNER PITKIN CTY. RECORDER PITKIN CTY. RECORDER &8 4 11 08 AM '85 1104 25 3 02 FM '85 [Space Above mis Line For Retording Data] DEED OF TRUST THIS DEED OF TRUST ("Security Instrument") is madeon November 20 19 85 , among thegrantor, Stein Eriksen J ("Borrower"), the Public Trustee of Pitkin County("Trustee"), and thebeneficiary, Aspen Savings and Loan Association , which is organized and existing underthelawsof the State of Colorado , and whose address is 225 N. Mill St., Aspen, CO 81611 ("Lender"). Borrower owes Lender the principal sum of SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND AND NO/100,~ Dollars (U,S. $750,000.00,/ ). This debt is evidenced by Borrower's note dated the same date as this Security Instrument ("Note"), which provides for monthly payments, with the full debt, if not paid earlier, due and payable on December 1, 1997 . This Security Instrument secures to Lender: (a) the repayment of the debt evidenced by the Note, with interest, and all renewals, extensions and modifications; (b) the payment of al] other sums, with interest, advanced under paragraph 7 to protect the security of this Security Instrument; and (c) the performance of Borrower's covenants and agreements under this Security Instrument and the Note. For this purpose, Borrower, in consideration of the debt and the trust herein created, irrevocably grants and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale, the following described property located in Pitkin County, Colorado: The Easterly 5 feet of LOT G, all of LOTS H and I, BLOCK 96, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASIEN COUTTY '-7 FITKIN STATE 03- COLORADO This document is being re-recorded to include the Adjustable Rate Rider which has the address of 405 AND 407 S. Hunter & 533 E. Cooper , Aspen [Street] [City] Colorado 81611 ("Property Address"); [Zip Code] TOGETHER WITH all the improvements now or hereafter erected on the property, and all easements, rights, appurtenances, rents, royalties, mineral, oil and gas rights and profits, water rights and stock and all Axtures now or hereafter a pan of the property, All replacements and additions shall ako be covered by this Security Instrument, All of the foregoing is referred toin this Security Instrument as the "Property." BORROK'ER COVENANTS that Borrower is lawfully seised of the estate hereby conveyed and has the right to grant and convey the Propeny and that the Property is unencumbered, except for encumbrances of record, Borrower warrants and will defend generally the title to the Properly against all claims and demands, subject to any encumbrances of record, THIS SECURITY INSTRUMENT combines uniform covenants for national use and non.uriiform covenants with limited variations by jurisdiction to constitute a uniform security instrument covering real property, COLORADO-Single Family-FNMA/FHLMC UNIFORM INSTRUMENT Form 3006 12/83 Firtincial La. Forms'm Form 1852 /4 P 708 - S
424 -31/.1/-/-l.ITT. I· r.»Oil N**S--3 - 9 i ~1986 UPO~ AGUME 10.2 - *4-1 1,980 IAWENT~~*4 spIES AND STRUCITES: LEGEND -+ ==1 ASPet coL . 1 3. f , -- % 1 •01 -d--W a de'lonit.d . .. 0\ 4 . - 4"/9//1/4 / Li-7-liM -11 - 0 . 1 . 37... .. 4-hal"n L". Ge@ A A 1 :211, C....1 3 J-'. 4- - -e-.... Li£22 uE·:-f.'31% fltrE r~ A. - ;TTIC:.1 LT., T.,1- MIrl T-=C~ 21 Of .\~ t~ / Un.ICEJ.NE 2389 1,1,L. 9834-imit i_ =A 1 21*111 -4 v * 1/ 1/ . 4 \ --3/ my-»- Il - ! 31.jii,J.STITE~glm]ID EMERBID [Inilil!J t=*Lt liliEi alha,u, 1--j - ' ' fhA ulubtl·NIWIN [~1101&]E@, Eliaim naril {Immi f#KEE-~JiiJ ~-- i - r= ' M 'IU[flil [Imt[0111FWJ€mlm]-[Imm iali:}/F@81&@iD]m imHOMING[0~IlltlimitE*I[Z MB WIS' -000----». C Ulfid] '464 Wl~sti~iliINEI@7EES@j!.2-1-Glmil· 11&'l® 6'Elli~~ildlia litittilll 1®81!1-mmim -- 2 h€ *t -Emml mi[10 [EEI·[1Ii[II[i Opun:[9mD [FLB ' · &!ITH,€[~11 miNIE ff'rEINI [Emb - 82·-- ™UQI=]1120' [IENNif721'EB E~ CIWIN]-[tiI]] :011U1!~R•li=11] 41UFM -m-lm| ELDLE,E-[Effim.Q[[11121 ELE Wil[12 81111* %11[1111 %,Mu UM*11161• ™tuidfil Olong [almi QIDIOD [Fulfil ImuD OE®#mEI]Il GouspiongoD-11909: WIDIJI]< F 1 -GINglill[IED·Ii[I[Ill _ ~ [1I1]Eli Wle EE!!Il'*1 41 0 {{ilaREF !1111Bm-··ImJm ililll Illwim f-IHIDIm Ununn - 1 ron, 3--Eliti* 46.14.11 - 1 rl,Trri ' -- - .. .Elif i UN #mtm GD-1 · - 1 1 ..4 - b ..... 25'47 - //2.-u . :'4411/ 111. 19 $ Putaid ------ · - L 004 & 4 -0-
.. Attachment 2 This proposal for the property at 405 and 407 South Hunter an 533 E. Cooper is for the replacement and modification of some of the existing windows. A more detailed written and graphic description of this proposal is contained in the pages which follow.
.. 6~m£j ~0~* 9 St*ocut« 9 -6. 44*49#6400-66 120 2.4'*~mv Staute. <flde 302, 54®,vtle.6 81644 303 925-4290 April 8, 1991 To whom it may concern: I hereby verify that as Stein Eriksen's C.P.A., I have personal knowledge that the space in the Bowman Block Building at 407 South Hunter St. #4 East, has been used as an office since 1970. Very truly yours, /3*mds K. Daggs 60·P.A. JKD/sy