The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.534 E Hyman Ave.HP-1991-29534 E Hyman - Pitkin BAnk 2737-182-004 -Flack 9 4 192 @/0 â€žfl \\ 62>x H f- 6( P , '- .022 C-LINE #52564 4"*6" PRINTS IM 00 2//un ... I . 466Â·i' ill'Mh FA. #*111411 '. , 1 Â·1.1.1.:ib.#411 W I VA- .24~ 0111Â¥rli!â€¢11611!I - L . ; 140*!Pile plib â€¢ r - ..........8 ..... . 2 1 PUBLIC NOTICE DATE Aue 12 . !914 WEDNESC:*r TIME 5 00 ..1 -FER 'A,*r' 6Â»Â¥,efe. M./.LENâ€¢ PURPOSE 4\SLORIC PLACE :7.::.j- Of CONCEPTUAL Ef.. - I Wi- ..1 . b . I. .V - OF 534 E Hâ„¢AN AWE - PrT-kIN ,-4 COUN-rf *AN, AN. ; 6. u =. T e ....: . / I. 1 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer Re: Final Development: 534 E. Hyman Ave., Pitkin County Bank addition Date: April 10, 1991 PROJECT MONITOR: To be assigned at this meeting APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Final Development approval for the addition to Pitkin County Bank. PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: Conceptual Development approval with conditions was granted on August 22, 1990. Please refer to the applicant's submittal for their response to the Conceptual conditions. Staff finds that the applicant has met all the conditions. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider the following alternatives: 1) Grant Final Development approval as proposed 2) Grant Final Development approval with specific conditions to be approved by staff and the project monitor prior to the issuance of a building permit 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time to restudy those areas specified by the HPC. 4. Deny Conceptual Development approval finding that the application does not meet the development review standards. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant Final Development approval as proposed. Please assign a project monitor to this project at this meeting. Additional comments: memo.hpc.534eh.fd 0 . HPC PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST Does the Project meet the Standards for Development? Does the Project meet the Development Guidelines? Does the Project support the Community's Preservation Goals? SITE PLANNING ROOF Siting of the Building: Shape (gable, lean-to, etc.) Setback Pitch Facade width Overhang Spacing between buildings Dormers Skylight Chimneys Delineation of street space: Creation of continuous street WINDOWS edge Separation of public, semi-public, Type (double-hung, casement, etc.) and private areas Shape and proportion ~ Fences Rhythm and balance Blinds/shutters , Garage placement DOORWAYS Placement and orientation Landscape plantings Type (paneled, etc.) Site improvements: EXTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL Walkways ELEMENTS Driveways Retaining walls Door platforms and steps Porches BULK, PROPORTION and Exterior stairs and decks SCALE (building size) Roofwalks and platforms MATERIALS Height Facade proportions Wall surfaces Scale Foundation Roof MASSING (building shape) TRIM and MISCELLANEOUS Mass of main portion: DETAILS Form Roofshape Trim Orientation Gutters and leaders Louvres, vents, etc. Additions: House lights Placement Public utilities Form Bulk SPECIFIC DESIGN SUGGESTIONS: : IDEZONd :HIVG *rneâ„¢ENr 1 ~ LANI) USE APPUCATmN EDâ„¢ ~ ' 1) Pro j eat Name Pi +164 c-~uM,ljaav,k Â¢ -Tr,jst Ad d dio,A. 2) Prn ject Location 634- TE:aeÂ¥ 44Â¥'nan Avenue> Lot Â¥2 + 9 *p\ock- 614,0Â©r-i~(nout Aswe.~, Touinsil= C indicate strbet ad~ress, lot & block number, le@Al descriptioll where appropriate) 3) Present Zonim CO 4) Lot Size 6019 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # AerÂ¢* Epan L Â£61,ares Livnited paeox %77 1 Aszm, Cbter~ole A>IGI| 1 726- Cloo 6) Representative's Name, Address & Fhane # *ust 6.12.not AIA 6,6.soM Â¢ enno Archileck 1 415 e, Cearr; Aspe.*50 925-5968 7) Ty~e of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA X Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Concept181 RID Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final FUD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivisian Historic Designation Condcminiumizaticrt Tect/MÂ® Anprxhant - GMOS Allotment Lot Split/Iot Line - 0,33 Baartion Adjustmerrt 8) Description of Ekisting Uses (number and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft. ; mEter of bedroans; any previous approvals granted to the property). tax 14 riq k>anL 4~ arprow imale\O 4-locrar of' E Ali. 9) Description of Development Application 48 itional epan k ef'Ae,2 epace 89 arimo,dmÂ¢121 7 4-329 1. f r.4.12 . Ioco-4.A .print,xri (3 ovi cz neu)-~ Secovtal finer 10) Have you attached the following? --20' Response to Attachment 2, Mini ann Suhaission Contents _Â¥_ Resporse to Attachment 3, Specific Sulmission Contents Resporse to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application .. - PITKIN COUNTY BANK & TRUST CO. 1991 FINAL H.P.C. REVIEVV J ~ GIBSON ~ENO Â· ARCHITECTS 418 E. COOPER AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLOAADO 81871 ' INight Deposit] 11\),1,1/,14,1,\ 1 < Sandstone Path \ . - Existing Spruce Tree + '4 4 , -A Benches / 44 1 3 % t 1 t / , 1 /. Low Shrubs Stonework - Groundcover -Â« Flowers f Sod C / Berm . 1 j 2 j 1- Flowering Shrubs 1 1 *â‚¬213 r 7 1.- 9 Â¢ C - City Sidewalk " NEV%/ CORNER PARK - PITKIN CO. BANK O 5 10 20, Â«ON 7 .1 C 1 1 J / .. L r + L..1. O. ADJACINT -UILDING L--- -- IXIIT. PAVIMIIVT Â¥0 -1 MIPLACID AND LANDICAPID --- 1(/ 1 h:J.: r--\ C-= # noÂ«Â« Â· Â·-r,Â£-ilit- 'u. 2,.3 4 4 4 NI~N IIK~I â€¢AD.Â¢ A T /LL//5// TRASH/IIAVICI r -1 VIhIL,68 - L. *-. -I-. - 1 49 ~ 1,1 2 - lu > jf / 21%=4 0 -- - â‚¬ MAIN LOIBY ~ 1 1 TELLER. NES---~- uy 2 , 1,1 /T tt,6.77\ l m 3 Â©/4392 H 1 1 1 - 1 / N.*v,4 M ' , Lut> EEVIS 0 LU~ bÂ°46#MA-I ,Â¤pÂ·., i 1 I ~ 1 471 rl . -----m------r -. -- - W== ==-at~ \ IXI~T. l/mucm Tmil O.-CIA N/W ACCOUNTI L ..._ --__ __~<< IXIIÂ¥ CmAIA-PLI Tlil TYP. -4.-6 - 44 0 HYORAN'r Â· ~~ *thu ba bug 51 Li i COP.., 1 jil LIGHT POLI - - -4â‚¬y ' 1.- 9 :.1 LIGHT POLI LEGEND: MUNTIFI STREIIT MAIN FLOOR PLANdo. e AREA TO al ADDID | O 10 20 OR REMODILED r--~-i r- i 1 -1 r --1 2Â»/. *la OP-00 ARIA VAULT ... t 11 LOWER LEVEL PLAN A-IIV .. â€¢t39 illl!1 : 1 --- Iff-51 ..imfl I L-47 - 27 0/..IC.. U m E 2--- "45% 4 ;i==h9~ Â· Â·Â· i r T 0223 lill <1 5 2ND LEVEL PLAN O 10 20 30 .I flow 1 Cop..3 T=F=Â¤ ; ~~ 2 1 / -r--04 -'.- COPIN TO ..LOW] MIZZANINICC rl 1 . 71 ~ 1 OFâ€¢,câ€¢ 2 11/ 1 T (Op..3 I i-- ihi-[ILLS TE) 1 31] -f T -RPTNE_lk- *1-.1 MEZZANINE PLAN -.12 - -Â£=:24 477- r- I-Zil-'- t- -:-: : 1 . BAWCUT QUARTZITE COANICE ~ Â·ifÂ«C _':'.~~,I 1#M'~ ib-w, M 11-43 SAWCUT QUARTZITI --- â€¢111.9 6 LINT/La -4-- ' - - FACe-AICK - - Ilz BRONZE ANNODIZED 11[ 1!li~*Ili ~11!1111& 1 lili i ' ; 4' m..': 4 . WINDOW FRAMES -- PH':1 :181 HI I 41* rÂ»f. mUARTZIVE & BRICK r . 1! 1 -%-. BTAING COURSE ---~ 1 4'.11111;:111'W,1,111!11.11 1,11 11,41,1, 1 1% 11,1 -at-1: 12 4.-2-222311[4.1121.LLLE LLUISIUI l' 21~1*1 T T 1' T "IN -13-r, i au,AIIAY BACID ~rl '111,''lili"Â·Â·' r"2 77TUTPUTTITfITTT|JUINEUCCJ)71n17*7 1 13111 '1, 4, auARTZ,Â·r. 0---232 CANVAS AWNING --~ :, dÂ· 1 m.mt,i~ml i h'.M+WHI/"iÂ·' 1'','i.i,! ~i.'~Â·~~1' I:3~1Â·I-'n 14"Nt,liill|~,i #|:T *6,4,' )IIi li ,1.1321.4.- 1- 1 lili lili lili 1 lili 1,1 111[1~ 1111! 11: 1 1 1 1 11'1111'11111':- 11. 11 11111111144611).1 1 -- --- EE:EEE-~ r '111'111' Â·_3~ _ [12231--4~--- mbr--z---_ ~-- -2-22=741 - 1 1 -73, - F 6- HIGW AAII=g MITAL I -r-- , ------1 6,Â·r'"AINE. - - k..=1==71' 1,1111111'hh,11 lili lilli' 1 ; 2 71,~ii; E--1---,I--3 ' || 1 111 11 E= E V |~ 81F b VI, 1 41 4111.1'bl rd_ -- Dll Ill"--/ rlÂ· L LIMI--1. SOUTH ELEVATION EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION PROPOSED mâ‚¬--m 4 7 ....... = - ~EIL+2 - ---~ 011.1 L i I ! _l i l i LK- ff imt rili/b 0 -- 3 - 41 1 111 :11:*Lj= 1 4 34 9Â£-4 51 --] 1 lay - SOUTH ELEVATION . D C X f q' 1 11111111[ ~ 1 1 11 ~G=Pk--- ......I -- .6 Â£133'.4 Tâ€¢- - 240/5/ M R m m *-f lilli-k-1 14=_t IHI!!~I+IlliliOI~lll,Ilii,~i,Ill,Ii,~I,ii,I,~,1~~~,-i, i"11,11,111 '1 11 1 1 3'./.00. -- EL 120'-9- MEZZAMNI LEVIA, -_ 110'-4- EE!1: 1 1 1.-4 - - - F - -L-al, ..IL-1 L - .x-- ----4/kE] 44 - it=---iL---2-2 MAI' --Oom - - I. 10.-O- EAST ELEVATION 4-2.9â‚¬EFE-_ NK #lilr;IMIi):T:Fi!'13;iE . EL. 133'-2" - b-_L_u_--L__L.__~.,L___ _L,___-__~- r=-r -- 14--=2*jjF- WfiBI~1 11-/ -,-- L- 17--2-fgfgr:':JL'-Filb +EE-; _ _. - =====t~~a~ EL 120'-9" 0/1~ZZAN]NE LEVEL J MAIN FLOO. etic:16072' , NORTH ELEVATION Bil -t 20 30' -6 P..APET L==1=Ur-3.-2./141/.IJ ' , ' ' ' Â· -=~~EEB EL 134'-8" ======4 11,111 h====== i ~1 ~ lilli' 1 - pl' =litj lEi 010@1Â©El mi~ 21Â·J[) FLOOA _ 5-44.4/4*4~ EL- 120'-9" 9 -Â·~--ill m'r------mii~----1/..I-/.-/..... MEZZANINE LEVEL 1 7.2 #6 1 lei. 110'-4. ' ** - '0(4004 19,;Â£6~~'d-'1"%11 2*4- -46413 1 4-1 7 4>~ 'lu 1 61-' A 6.1 1.; ,:. ~. :.,pNLL-1~I*~@Â¥1 ' ~ - MAIN FLOOR ____ _ _ ____ IZRBE. LEVA ---+ EL. 89'-cy' A . $ P ,:.1,111 - c~:sser-1 2- / aÂ¥- = .. u &+i=E ~3~b~ 1- *-,1-7- -.- - E-m 5 1 a '1.14 1---Firk 1~i +-== ~i!.]1;~i: ~~t~~~~_--~<f 4 k __I_ 3---1_E-*fl -ft- A__n__6_-Im lEi_--,=c_-y + MI--* 17.17 4- /-- -2 -6-El].111,21~'41 &1 YA.;r-1,4-:%4Â·44,65Â£~ ri 1 f-- ...1-71 E--Â·; .AÂ»W ! 1 11 i ~LE,L-4. lili 1 LI , 1 EAST ELEVATION , 200 BLOCK SOUTH HUNTER fÂ» i :2 1-lor-19 -3 ~7-- --p-Tlf=nt-1 It-=111 . - --9 - 190=R -= Jj.: :' E ESSEFAM#7 L- -==r, . â€¢--fkr _ - -. A ' I 12.19 0 _- ...L--2-4 f~i ~FF -i Rjjutti-~iÂ«~~-~~*~~ r'~ ~ ~~ 3 7 2 - 1---. 1 1 -3[- ET=21)AL# - -3 , *' 4 E111 1 F: - i.i 13 4Â«-t[,1.1-211 _31 E .-3: - 11 1-Ju_- 42-4=.14= â„¢711 22! ------------- --1 1- . 11~M///9//f/ 95//Trf--1. Icl. !4131 ' 1 --1 i /13. /i 1 1 i -=-1 1 -:-- E ~ r.' 27 *11,, , 111 11 11 ~ 1 i 1 - ~=4- ' -- 1 1 3,--4| ~ -Jk Â¢] 1 r P : 3 j. 1., .1 . .: i--4-174- f-Â· ,"-r-1 ..4 1.. 9 - 1 1-2 LL 6 #V 8*.1.. 1 41; . 1 11- ir 71 k - - I SOUTH ELEVATION 500 BLOCK EAST HYMAN ~E (,IBSON 61 RENC) Â· ARCHITECTS A- N: I ASPEN C......00 lie,i PITKIN COUNTY BANK ADDITION .. ~- GIBSON & RENO â€¢ ARCHITECTS February 26, 1991 PITKIN COUNTY BANK FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN STATEMENT A. Restudy area dedicated to vest pocket park with simplified solution and elimination of berming. Response: The vest pocket park was restudied. With the fence and sculpture being removed and the sign being relocated, we feel the space is improved and more appropriate for pedestrian use. The berm is proposed to remain as originally shown. This berm deters people from cutting the corner of the park and creating a muddy path. B. Relocate bike racks to north of present location. Response: If the bike rack would be moved more to the north, it would require more hard surface and eliminate more of the vegetation. The bike rack actually has been moved to the south where there will be more public use. It also has allowed an increase of vegetation on the southwest side. C. Exact material representation shall be presented for brick, mortar, roof, windows, awning and benches. Response: The new brick, mortar, roof and window materials are to match existing materials. These are shown in the accompanying photographs. The park benches will be wood. We propose the benches to be heavy timber, similar to the enclosed photographs, without the back. The stone and awning samples will be presented at the meeting. D. Restudy the large southwest stair/elevator tower considering separation from the west wall plane. Response; A separation was consi dered between the tower and the rest of the west wall to define the tower as more of a separate unit. The separation is difficult t o achieve without violating open space requirements. This separation was developed by placing a small vertical element between the tower and the rest of the wall plane. This component is made up of a 4" wide cut brick running the full height of the 3-story building. The openings in the west wall on the second level are to be limited as much as possible to a pattern of brick and small screened openings, for mechanical equipment air requirements. Please see the West Elevation for brick pattern. This will simplify the elevation and isolate the stair/elevator tower even more. 418 E. COOPER AVENIUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLOAADO 81611 . 303/929'5968 â€¢ FAX :303/925-5993 .. page 2 E. Open Space Clarification Response: The lightwells for the basement windows have been reduced. The open space has been reviewed and accepted by Planning and Zoning. F. Add horizontal mullion to third floor windows to make them more consistent with windows on the first two stories. Response: The horizontal mullions were added to the third floor windows. G. Study possibility of unifying mortar color throughout the entire structure and present at final. Response: The mortar color on new addition Will be as close as possible to the existing building's mortar color. The mortar color on the old addition will also be adjusted as much as possible to match. H. Mechanical equipment shall not protrude above parapet. Response: The mechanical equipment will be located on the west side of the existing roof. This will allow the west wall to screen the equipment. I. Call out location of sculpture if it is to be retained. Response: The sculpture will be removed. J. Restudy possibility of sign location and sizing. Response: The sign is to be located on the building on the left side of the main entry. The sign is to consist of individual 6" high raised metal lettering or a metal plague with 6" high raised lettering. K. Clarification of fenestration and detailing of entire west wall. Response: The window details have been unified with the use of horizontal mullions. The openings are to be limited as much as possible to a pattern of brick and small screened openings for mechanical equipment air requirements. 4 t f f. Ar . 1, 5 -3 . 1 4 - - -- 1120 . -- I 1% --1/. -7* . - .....h. I . Â» 1 Mi'$---. . . Wi . + : I 1 3 â€¢11. t., 4 . 4 -U. 4 /- , - 1%. 3. M* -- , . - _11 -mmn/,5121 .f' 5 Ir ./TR,I- mr -Ev ..-- 1,6 ..t Eli - - . 0-:6 + 4 - - - /$.444 G. . I... - . ... , I T 1 04 - A - .$ :44991 ~ ' . -3*9- 6#1 - I.- er..we.*.3 Â· . 3423.4 11 , I ......- L,=B ..... p. ' ./af#% ::., ./'c <rck. , *- 3 --5.' . & - g .-1- 1 ..=..-m.-- VVINC}OVV VVOOD BENCH [BACK TO BE OMITTED] 79â‚¬9â‚¬X\- NAL-% i . r / -4.- .16. . ~1 .4 412.0 .4 - .41 ' -I'llill 2 'Â¥2. 71.--Rn, .: - /Glip:/6.2/1~1 ,/1~. -~- i 4 '1-5.r. ...- 4 14-in//U" r 1 t â€¢4 4 1 11 0 1020-0- t640000 - .r METAL ROOF BRICK .. L MAR- i m ~*-- GIBSON & FRENO â€¢ AACHITECTS TRANSMITTAL LETTER PROJECT: PrT-Ki,4 cou~rer ARCH. PROJ. # 902| 2,Aut, Et -reusr GO. To: HierowLIC, pFegEÂ©VArleÂ»4 DATE: ~ ') 9| COMMITee- ATTN : 120)<AWNEs, EPUU WE TRANSMIT: Herewith Via \Â·\AUt> t>e>L\Veleâ‚¬ ( ) Under separate cover ( ) Per your request FOR YOUR: (*0~0> Information 3 Record/Use C :/f'Approval C Fl Review/Comment ( ) Dist. to Parties THE FOLLOWING: ( ) Specs ( Pff Report ( 1/F Drawings ( ) Change Order ( ) Addenda ( ) Other COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 5 5Â·1Â·91 AFFLICMTION Fog- FINAL te/ELDFM6*r- PLAU 52â‚¬.VIEU . IMCLUDES tplaA\41,Â·146 <DF At=OUSTMEWPS , PINAL ~be>VELC>PME*tr-M-AU er*rEFIekn- ~ Pllcy[OS oF SAMPLES REMARKS: We Hopb -lb Aer 41 -THEs AG~66112* FoRs ReVIEW kle> 1*rET -THAN MAECH 21 , iq91, Â¥t>12- 1116 eckle,DU LE 8:)12:- 114\9 PIZa.JEk=r 19 EXT12EHELY TIaHT. IT IS VeleX 612~~cAL 71*er wa eaT APPRovAD AS fooN AE> 709312>LE. TRAWK-12)l) FOR. Youti ax)11EWilloU COPIES TO: *11-6 (w/encl.) B v : ~~48,5/~1 418 E. COOPER AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ 303/925-5968 â€¢ FAX 303/925-5993 .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF 534 E. Hyman Ave. - Pitkin County Bank and Trust NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 22, 1990, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the Second Floor Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by Aspen Bank Shares Limited for the conceptual development of the property known as 534 E. Hyman Avenue, described as Lot R, S, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen. The proposal requests approval for additional bank office space of approximately 4, 325 sq. ft. of FAR located primarily on a new second floor. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/William J. Poss Chairman, Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - Published in the Aspen Times on August 2, 1990 City of Aspen account .. IL 6-- GIBSON & RENO â€¢ APCHITECTS TRANSMITTAL LETTER PROJECT: Pitkin County Bank ARCH. PROJ. # 9009 Aspen, Colorado TO: Mr. Charles Israel DATE: (~-13-90- Box 3677 ---W./ Aspen, CO 81611 WE TRANSMIT: (X ) Herewith Via 1st class ( ) Under separate cover ( ) Per your request FOR YOUR: (X ) Information 6 ) Record/Use ( ) Approval ( ) Review/Comment ( ) Dist. to Parties THE FOLLOWING: ( ) Specs ( ) Report ( ) Drawings ( ) Change Order ( ) Addenda (X ) Other COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 Public Notice 1 List of adjacent property owners REMARKS: This is the list of owners, and the public notice we sent Friday, 8-10-90, as per the requirements of the HPC. COPIES TO: (w/encl.) By: - I k -ll -lel-(- Augup/G. Reno< AIA 418 E. COOPER AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLOAA[30 81611 â€¢ 303/925-5968 ' FAX 303/925-5993 .. BLOCK 93 St. Mary's Church City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Warren J. Conner Claude Conner 534 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Margaret & Warren Conner 534 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 BLOCK 94 W. G. Bullock Grant Bullock Trust Box 609 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Maurice Beriro 3475 Mountain Street, Suite 912 Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G2A4 Aspen Plaza Co. Box 1709 Aspen, CO 81612 Elks Lodge (BPO) 210 S. Galena Street, Suite 21 Aspen, CO 81611 Mason Morse, Inc. 514 E. Hyman Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin Center Subdivision SJA Associates, Ltd. 520 E. Durant Avenue, Suite 207 Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin Center, Ltd. Box 4948 Aspen, CO 81612 .. . BLOCK 95 Arcades Associates Jerome H. Michael c/o AAIRSCAPE LTD. 314 S. Mill Street Aspen, CO 81611 T&Â£ Restaurant Corp. Box 4069 Aspen, CO 81612 Jean Ingham Mt. Resort Trust 730 17th Street, Suite 730 Denver, CO 80203 Richard Volk, Trustee 5847 San Felipe, Suite 3600 Houston, TX 77057 Andre Ulyrch Box 2202 Aspen, CO 81612 Heinz & Eliane Wolf Wolf Family Trust 1221 Myrtle Avenue San Diego, CA 92103 Leonard Weinglass 525 E. Cooper Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 W. T. Ray, Jr. J. B. Speed 50 Scott Avenue Cookeville, TN 38501 Robert E. MeNeilly, Jr. 6th Floor American National Bank Nashville, TN 37237 Tennessee Three Mrs. A E Miller 3506 Honeywood Drive Johnson City, TN 37604 Donald B. McCann One Bratenahl Place Cleveland, OH 44108 .. Porter R. and Carol Rodgers, Jr. 1300 S. Main Street Searcy, AK 72143 Harold & Martha Caldwell, Jr. Caldwell Campers 5147 Hickory Hollow Parkway Nashville, TN 37013 William A. Van Orsdel 400 Locust Street 8th Floor Des Moines, IA 50398 James B. Nowery Harold Quinn 100 Travis Place Shreveport, LA 71101 Mary C. Oliver c/o Ken Brock, Executor 270 County Farm Road Little Rock, AK 72212 R.P. Fitzgerald 600 Palmer Drive Lake Havasu City, AZ 86403 Kern Tompkins & Co. 520 E. Cooper Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Lester Turner 101 Broadway Nashville, TN 37201 James R. and Elaine B. McDade Box 3099 Aspen, CO 81612 Douglas Tompkins Aspen Art Supply 520 E. Cooper Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Lester Morris 100 Sunrise Avenue Palm Beach, FL 33480 Aspen Cooper Wall Mortgage & Finance Corp. 200 Fillmore Street, Suite 110 Denver, CO 80206 .. John H. Cheek, Jr Box 564 Aspen, CO 81611 BLOCK 98 Thomas D. McClockey & Bonnie McCloskey Box 7846 Aspen, CO 81612 Dayton Heidelberg Distr. Co. 1518 Dalton Street Cincinnati, OH 45214 June Ellen Kuper 624 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 BLOCK 99 Gary G. & Leslie J. Troyer 601 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 W.R. Walton Box 665 Aspen, CO 81612 Norris E. & Goodrich H. Taylor 602 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81612 Charles Cunniffe 520 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81612 Furngolf Ltd. 616 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Frank J. Woods, III 205 S. Mill Street, Suite 301A Aspen, CO 81611 BLOCK 100 Gerald P. & Patricia Long 7251 E. Dessert Moon Loop Tucson, AZ 85715 Spring Street P 0 Gulfco Ltd. 616 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 .. Robert L. Kopp & Martin Cerise Box 100 Aspen, CO 81612 Hunter Plaza Assoc. Anthony Mazza 205 S. Mill Street, Suite 301A Aspen, CO 81611 M & B Co. c/o Garfield & Hecht 601 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 HYMAN MALL BLOCK Ransom B. Woods, Jr. Justine F. Woods Box 12288 Aspen, CO 81612 Levant America Colonial Navigation 2240 17 Battery Place New York City, NY 10004 Harley Baldwin II 205 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF 534 E. Hyman Ave. - Pitkin County Bank and Trust NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 22, 1990, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the Second Floor Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by Aspen Bank Shares Limited for the conceptual development of the property known as 534 E. Hyman Avenue, described as Lot R, S, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen. The proposal requests approval for additional bank office space of approximately 4, 325 sq. ft. of FAR located primarily on a new second floor. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/William J. Poss Chairman, Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on August 2, 1990 City of Aspen account f# , )t 9,1.Â¥. CLI-~r -:grlfEUSroo. V August 21, 1990 HAND DELIVERY Bill Poss, Chairman Historic Preservation Committee 605 E. Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Pitkin County Bank Addition Dear Mr. Poss, I am the President of Pitkin County Bank & Trust Co. (the "Bank"). The Bank is the tenant of the entire building located on Lot 4, Pitkin Center Subdivision commonly known as the Pitkin County Bank Building. The Bank is also one of the owners of the building, and in that capacity acts as agent for the other owners of the building. This letter will confirm that I am authorized to act on behalf of the Bank and the ownership of the Bank building in regard to this application. Very truly yours, PITKIN COUNTY BANK & TRUST CO. BY: Bid#am b.Vuc.~ Charles B. Israel, President lt\pcbt.his 534 E. HYMAN AVE. â€¢ POST OFFICE BOX 3677 â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 â€¢ PHONE 303/925-6700 GIBSON & FIEND Â· ARCHITECTS ~~Â° J f'.if,4 E. 2 5 E 418 E. COOPEA AVENUE . ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PS METER 5083511 U.S. POSTAGE Harold & Martha Caldwell, Jr. Caldwell Campers 5147 Hickory Hollow Parkway Nashville, TN 37013 CALO147 370130003 1489 08/16/30 FORWARDING TIME EXPIRED 4 :CALOWELL CAMPERS - BUDDY 1044 PARKWOOD TER ~ NASHVILLE TN 37220-1417 RETURN TO SENDER PUBLIC NOTICE ~ 'ji,#-, PUBLIC NOTICE RE: CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF 534 E. Hyman Ave. - Pitkin County Bank and Trust NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 22, 1990, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the Second Floor Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by Aspen Bank Shares Limited for the conceptual development of the property known as 534 E. Hyman Avenue, described as Lot R, S, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen. The proposal requests approval for additional bank office space of approximately 4, 325 sq. ft. of FAR located primarily on a new second floor. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/William J. Poss Chairman, Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on August 2, 1990 City of Aspen account ~<s-FT>~ AFF=112=ram:ffper& CN - -04 A ~ GIBSON & RENO Â· ARCHITECTS ~ AIJGIO |j AUG!0'E~;~ _ 1'400 X -,Â·-+4.~=~Â·=---..,=----- 418 E. COOPER AVENUE . ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 \ ~~ /< _ --6-&*/Eme, --.- * <.1.2.> NCQUP' pii~0~eR-~~~ 5083511 US. POSTAGE j Thomas & Bonnie McCloskey Box 7864 Aspen, CO 81612 PUBLIC NOTICE .1 , r PUBLIC NOTICE RE: CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF 534 E. Hyman Ave. - Pitkin County Bank and Trust NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 22, 1990, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the Second Floor Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by Aspen Bank Shares Limited for the conceptual development of the property known as 534 E. Hyman Avenue, described as Lot R, S, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen. The proposal requests approval for additional bank office space of approximately 4, 325 sq. ft. of FAR located primarily on a new second floor. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office at 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/William J. Poss Chairman, Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on August 2, 1990 City of Aspen account ... al l./6.-Libil#. 1~ August 21, 1990 F HAND DELIVERY Bill Poss, Chairman Historic Preservation Committee 605 E. Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Pitkin County Bank Addition Dear Mr. Poss, I am the President of Pitkin County Bank & Trust Co. (the "Bank"). The Bank is the tenant of the entire building located on Lot 4, Pitkin Center Subdivision commonly known as the Pitkin County Bank Building. The Bank is also one of the owners of the building, and in that capacity acts as agent for the other owners of the building. This letter will confirm that I am authorized to act on behalf of the Bank and the ownership of the Bank building in regard to this application. Very truly yours, PITKIN COUNTY BANK & TRUST CO. BY: zEÂ»d C,Ua Charles B. Israel, President lt\pcbt.his 534 E. HYMAN AVE. â€¢ POST OFFICE BOX 3677 â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 â€¢ PHONE 303/925-6700 .. IL 6-=- GIBSON & RENO â€¢ AFICHITECTS .2, 19(= 1 TRANSMITTAL LETTER PROJECT: Pitkin County Bank & Trust ARCH. PROJ. # 9009 534 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado TO: Roxanne Eflin DATE: 8-14-90 Aspen/Pitkin County Planning 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 WE TRANSMIT: (X ) Herewith Via hand delivered ( ) Under separate cover ( ) Per your request FOR YOUR: ( ) Information (X ) Record/Use ( ) Approval C ) Review/Comment ( ) Dist. to Parties THE FOLLOWING: ( ) Specs ( ) Report (X ) Drawings ( ) Change Order ( ) Addenda (X ) Other COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 Existing east & south exterior elevation 1 8-1-88 Title Insurance Commitment REMARKS: I hope this information will be helpful. If you have any questions, please call. COPIES TO: (w/encl.) By: --jr '9.0-1 August d. Reno,\AIA L L 41 BE. COOPER AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLOFRADO 81 611 â€¢ 303/925-5968 â€¢ FAX 303/925-5993 ~IL_ -a_ '01 , 1 1 e> 4,2 V.-27 TE'-67 'le- 6Â·' V . DOLITE--1 BLeÂ»*moN Â· f - M<i,16 7, t.4,94- *1'4 .1 1 rel 0,1.w Jmp ,-231 30 1 Crl WEiP' Wi-7 \64-17 /91 iveJ'w< 0~00Â·K k/----1~ 1 5010â‚¬A - 9---9 041#14*1â€¢|6 700 Â¢Â®rlrid ; T . tio ' 6,Jte* F 1 - NW AleÂ·1* ARÂ¥ e le 11 A-7 7 ,Â·'/ frek A f,â‚¬,04 4 - 1 10 0, 11 4 . - L - CACK _ _ ___ i' t' 44 k.*p'ddl,Ne 1, 11 , 49/ 21 1 1 ;i 1 1 i 1 ~' 5 i 1 . +6,0*te 1 1 +OUM< MICK â‚¬. Ch / i 1 11 . ME.--- /11 *! 1 11 1-21 +9. 7 1 I I 1 r 1/// 11 L 11 + 150,41* 0 1.-L_' l======= -- .~ -- -- - -- or -,1 56!A /, 60 % - leo 2-/// MI , e 90 \E> @ 0, Â© Â® Â® 4 * - 0 - --# : *Al 05*1~ 490.W | f Â· ' MIN<--1 1401â€¢*< [ 1 TME,IOU L. 1 _ -- -- 40 - --- 64,25-9, - 1--l - 01 p.remje\15 - & 56*f> Ve>dIY 4'fpervit â€ž1 04%3 ~.-1/ -- , .- - - 1 *' -I----I-- 1 41 1 1 1 'fi,el ' I Lk D+A# A 1 F-=2 -T i i Â«-1~7 1 A Ker 1 1 11-2 -=41 1 1 Lik ~ 0Â« j I 11 --7=Jr- F.f#Iul 1 4 :r=r==11 1 11Â»-46 1 1 1 , 1[ (63 11 1 99 11 6 =20-2 1 11,7 3=21 1 i L-_ g-t=_1 1 - 1 1 4 1 1 IiI 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 i 1 59 9 -__11 *<1 +Tr NG EAST -PL e 7,491 04 -h*16 11.011 Plf KIN g>oUNT>' Â·h>Â«41<~ =f Tftl/9-7 . ./(Ii 4.L '1' 1 ! Imuyers litte Insumnce @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective date: 08/01/88 AT 8:00 A.M. Case No. PCT-2464 C4 2. Policy or policies to be issued: (a)ALTA Owner's Policy-Form B-1970 Amount $ 715,000.00 (Rev. 10-17-70 & 10-17-84) or 10/21/87 Premium $ 1,533.25 PROPOSED INSURED: PLEASE REFER TO EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MApE A PART HEREOF (b)ALTA Loan Policy, Amount $ (REV. 10-17-70 & 10-17-84) or 10/21/87 Premium $ PROPOSED INSURED: (c)Alta Loan Construction Policy, 1975 Amount $ (Rev. 10-17-84) Premium $ PROPOSED INSURED: Tax Cert. $ 5.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: PLEASE REFER TO EXHIBIT " B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOT 4, PITKIN CENTER SUBDIVISON (A Lot Split), As shown on the Plat thereof, recorded February 22, 1983 in Plat Book 14 at Page 36. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO Countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 303-925-1766 Provislons and Schedules A and B are attached. Authorized officer or agent 144 irrn 100 Lltho in l I S A AKÂ·~' Imuyers-title Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA ENDORSEMENT SCHEDULE FOR OWNERS POLICY The following Endorsements will be issued in connection with the Owners Policy to be issued hereunder. FORM 100.29 $155.33 EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1,2,3 & 4 WILL BE DELETED FROM THE OWNERS POLICY NOTE: Mechanic's Lien Indemnity agreement executed by the Seller and Borrower must be delivered to and approved by the Company for deletion of Printed Exception No. 4. NOTE: Current survey, certified by a Registered Colorado Land Surveyor must be delivered to and approved by the Company for deletion of Printed Exception No. 3. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule A-Section 1 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-2464 A and B are attached. Â·- Â·- ---- - Â·Â·---Â·-â€¢ .,..1 5,-.1. -11--,9,91Mn-1117.1,â€¢Mâ€¢â€¢Imâ€¢â€¢1.=71â€¢111â€¢1â€¢1,1:99MRipYRILI'-99]11044;ir--411â€¢-1,11-91[,9,41"'9â€¢T[-r,UTF rm 100 Litho In U S.A. 4 156 . kwyerglitle Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA EXHIBIT "A" PITKIN COUNTY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, A Colorado Corporation, As To An Undivided 50% Interest; ANITA G. CHAIKIN, As To An Undivided 5% Interest; GLENROY PARTNERS, A California Partnership, As To An Undivided 20% Interesti HOWARD ENGLEMAN, As To An Undivided 10% Interest; BRUCE H. KONHEIM, As To An Undivided 10% Interest and SAMUEL W. HIATT, As To An Undivided 5% Interest This commitment is invalid unless Schedule A-Section 1 PG.2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-2464 A and B are attached. KIEZEEiZiEEmEEEXICIE~ -orm 100 Lltho In U.S.A. 1.Ill' 1.Ill: 1.111 .1-11(~ 1.Ill'. 1,11('Â· Illt' El ICÂ· 1.11(Li .Ilt 1-11(. 1.11(. 1.lit. 1.11( 1.11( 1.111' 1.Ill. 1.11(' 1.1111 till 1.11(. 1.11( 1.11(: 1.11( 1.11(. 111(' 111( 1-11{ 1.11( .-- Njrr ),1, hwyerg-litle Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA EXHIBIT " B" ANITA G. CHAIKIN, As to an undivided 5% interest; GLENROY PARTNERS, A California Partnership, As to an undivided 20% interest; HOWARD ENGELMAN, As to an undivided 10% interest; BRUCE H. KONHEIM, As to an undivided 20% interest; SAMUEL W. HIATT, As to an undivided 5% interest RICHARD N. ELLIS, TRUSTEE, Under Trust Agreement Dated April 17, 1968, As to an undivided 20% interest; DR. CHARLES KLEEMAN, As to an undivided 10% interest; RICHARD N. ELLIS, TRUSTEE Under Trust Agreement for LISA BETH GLICKMAN, Dated April 17, 1968, As to an undivided 2.5% interest; RICHARD N. ELLIS, TRUSTEE, Under Trust Agreement for JEFFREY LOREN GLICKMAN, Dated April 17, 1968, As to an undivided 2.5% interest; RICHARD N. ELLIS, TRUSTEE, Under Trust Agreement for DAVID PAUL GLICKMAN, Dated April 17, 1968, as to an undivided 2.5% interest; RICHARD N. ELLIS, TRUSTEE, Under Trust Agreement for BRENNER JOSEPH GLICKMAN, Dated April 27, 1971, As to an undivided 2.5% interest; This commitment is invalid unless Schedule A-Section 1 PG.3 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-2464 A and B are attached. I. ,,I Â·. ,-U + I. 4 .....JI orm 100 Utho In U.S.A. ~Let.~- Imuyerg-title Insumnce @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B-SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: 1. Deed from : Anita G. Chaikin, As to an undivided 5% interest; 1 - . : Glenroy Partners, A California Partnership, As to an undivided 20% interest; : Howard Engleman, As to an undivided 10% interest; : Bruce H. Konheim, As to an undivided. 20% interest; : Samuel W. Hiatt, As to an undivided 5% interest : Richard N. Ellis, Trustee, Under Trust Agreement Dated April 17, 1968, As to an undivided 20% interest; : Dr. Charles Kleeman, As to an undivided 10% interest; : Richard N. Ellis, Trustee Under Trust Agreement for Lisa Beth Glickman, Dated April 17, 1968, As to an undivided 2.5% interest; : Richard N. Ellis, Trustee, Under Trust Agreement for Jeffrey Loren Glickman, Dated April 17, 1968, As to an undivided 2.5% interest; : Richard N. Ellis, Trustee, Under Trust Agreement for David Paul Glickman, Dated April 17, 1968, as to an undivided 2.5% interest; : Richard N. Ellis, Trustee, Under Trust Agreement for Brenner Joseph Glickman, Dated April 27, 1971, As to an undivided 2.5% interest; To : Pitkin County Bank And Trust Company, A Colorado Corporation As To An Undivided 50% Interest; : Anita G. Chaikin, As To An Undivided 5% Interest; : Glenroy Partners, A California Partnership, As To An Undivided 20% Interest; : Howard Engleman, As To An Undivided 10% Interest : Samuel W. Hiatt, As To An Undivided 5% Interest and ~ It" 1 -1121!11121!LEJ.lili,=61.li~ orm 100 Lltho In U.S.A. - 1 1 2 I{guyers title Insumnce @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA : Bruce Konheim, As To An Undivided 10% Interest 2. Duly executed Trust Affidavit for RICHARD N. ELLIS, TRUSTEE, Under Trust Agreement Dated April 17, 1968 for LISA BETH GLICKMAN, A Trust disclosing the name of the trust, and the names and addresses of the Trustees empowered to act pursuant to '73 CRS 38- 30-166 as amended. 3. Duly executed Trust Affidavit for RICHARD N. ELLIS, TRUSTEE, Under Trust Agreement for BRENNER JOSEPH GLICKMAN, Dated April 27, 1971, a Tbust, disclosing the name of the Trust, and the names eind addresses of the Trustees empowered to act pursuant to '73 CRS 38-30-166, as amended. 4. Duly executed Trust Affidavit for RICHARD N. ELLIS, TRUSTEE, Under Trust Agreement dated April 17, 1968, for JEFFREY LOREN GLICKMAN, A Trust, disclosing the name of the Trust, and the names and addresses of the Trustees empowered to act pursuant to '73 CRS 38- 30-166, as amended. 5. Duly executed Trust Affidavit for RICHARD N. ELLIS, TRUSTEE, Under Trust Agreement dated April 17, 1968 for DAVID PAUL GLICKMAN, A Trust, disclosing the name of the Trust, and the names and addresses of the Trustees empowered to act pursuant to '73 CRS 38-30-166, as amended. 8. Certificate of Nonforeign Status of Transferor signed by all of the appropriate Transferors. 9. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) has been paid or exempt. 10. Certificate of Incorporation or Certificate of Good Standing of PITKIN COUNTY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, A Colorado Corporation, issued by the Secretary of State of Colorado, must be delivered to and approved by PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., and LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 1 PG.2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No.PCT-2464 A and B are attached. nrrn 1 AA I Ilhn In 1 1 C A ~ TrnrTTTETE"EN-mETTTETTTETTTETIm& i rn int i ,~c t.~tc t.nt. ~.ttt t ntÂ· ~.~u t.,u ~.nt 111( tilt .1._111 1.111. 1.11(' 1.tlt,1.11{~ 1.111. InE[nE[EnIEIE[Ilic''llicilill.iliZII., 1.111: 1.11(' Ell{' 1.111' 1.lit' 1.It{'1.Ill' 1.11(' l.lit' 1.111 3,1 T ',fÂ·Â·.i C. Iml)yers title Insumnce @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B-SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service, or for any other special taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in Deed from the City of Aspen, recorded in Book 59 at Page 56, in Book 59 at Page 157, and Book 157 at Page 212 as follows: "Provided, that no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws." 8. Easements and Rights of Way as shown on the Plat of Pitkin Center Subdivision (A Lot Split), recorded February 22, 1983 in Plat Book 14 at Page 36. v//10. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Statement of Exception from the Full Subdivision Process, recorded February 22, 1983 in Book 4.00,1,/EU&2@al,48'. fIT. ~Affidavit of Agreement betweeii Llic .fuiellieir.=wiI=,-perties--25 -contained in instrument recorded November 23, 1983 in Book 456 at Page 332. ( 1 **ease Agreement, and the terms and conditions thereof between -Lessor and Lessee, recorded November 23, 1983 in Book-456 at Page 346. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 PG.1 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No.PCT-2464 A and B are attached. -971., Â·-. 1â€¢ tik~ 1.~ I i e I '17,1 Illuyers 11Ile Insurance @poration . NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B-SECTION 2 CONTINUED Exceptions numbered NONE are hereby omitted. The Owner's Policy to be issued, if any, shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. ( 2) Uslpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing issuance thereof; Water rights, claims or title to water. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No.PCT-2464 A and B are attached. ..-, IAA I *~ Ir. lie A 1.11(' 1.TIC'4.1.1(:.Â·.1.llc.a.Ill' ~Ill(* 1.11('1! 11(' 1.11(* I.lit I.lit' 1.11('tl.Ill- 1.lit 1,11( 1.Ill' 1.111,,1 ..11{ HIC 1.11(' 1.11(Â· 1.11( 1.11(Â· 111{ 1.11( , API.' r --- -Ir':,1- 446 1ml)yers litle Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND. VIRGINIA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject totheprovisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identityof the proposed Insured andthe amount of the policyor policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the timeof theissuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of sucli policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever firstoccurs, provided that tile failure to issue such policyorpoliciesis not the fault of the Company. This Commitmentshall not be validorbinding untilcountersigned by an authorized officer or agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage," when used herein, shall include deed of trust. trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail todisclosesuch knowledge totheCompany in writing, theCompanyshallbe relieved from liability foranyloss ordamage resulting from anyact of reliance hereontotheextenttheCompanyisprejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, orif the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at itsoption mayamend Schedule Bof thisCommitmentaccordingly, butsuchamendmentshall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to tile named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith(a)tocomply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or(c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered bythis Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and the Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein, 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortijage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. imu>~rs 11(le InsuÂ¢64(e (Drporation 1 BUte. oda*Â»-ao-*c President 4 1 Attest f.1-(si .\1 131\ 1.-,\ i.:. /7 tgpÂ£ ip '4. . Secretary. Im[M,Illimillumilathileitattelialimil*abilwaa,Inibilâ€¢,1*11â€¢61&,tâ€¢WA,141*11111(01141#1[i,NAilim#,ilaN@li~~A]ImiRitalilla*i-Rili,ilm*iligiRE*HIN,<EN Pâ€¢ r. 3 $ 1 :f, Imer*le Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA COMMITMENT OR BINDER ENDORSEMENT RE: LOT 4, PITKIN CENTER SUBDIVISION Commitment/Case No. PCT-2464 C3 The Commitment or Binder in the above matter is hereby amended in the following respects: THE OWNER'S POLICY TO BE ISSUED UNDER SCHEDULE A 2(a) IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ: PITKIN COUNTY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, a Colorado Corporation, as to an undivided 50% interest. The total liability of the Company under said commitment or binder under this and any prior endorsements thereto shall not exceed, in the aggregate, the amount of liability stated on the face of said commitment or binder as the same may be specifically amended in dollar amount by this or any prior endorsements, and the costs which the Company is obligated to pay under the Conditions and Stipulations of the policy committed for by said commitment or binder. This endorsement is made a part of said commitment or binder and is subJect to the schedules, terms, Conditions and Stipulations therein and in the policy committed for, except as modi fied by the provisions hereof. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as extending the effective date of the aforesaid commitment or binder unless otherwise expressly stated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be signed and sealed as of the 22nd day of September 1988, to be valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. Issued at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS ASPEN, CO. 81611 303-925-1766 COUNTERSIGNED:~ LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION mmlâ„¢m!mE11,5!mmlm!1!mmvwvmlA1 rorÂ¢n 100 Ltlho In U.S.A. -4 9 r . Inn An , i i 1 -0 0 IL 0-- GIBSON & FIEND â€¢ AFICHITECTS July 27, 1990 Ms. Roxanne Eflin, Historic Planner c/o Ms. Kim Johnson Aspen Pitkin County Planning Office 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Conceptual Historic Development Pitkin County Bank & Trust Proposed Addition Dear Roxanne: I have enclosed for your review ten (10) copies of the application for Historic Preservation Commission conceptual review; a project description; a letter authorizing Gibson & Reno Architects to represent the Owners of the Bank; a disclosure of Ownership; a vicinity location map; and floor plans/exterior elevations explaining the project. This project is scheduled to be submitted for GMQS on September 15, 1990, so, I would appreciate your cooperation in scheduling this project before H.P.C. on August 22, 1990. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you again for your consideration. Sincerely y~urs, A ugu<tb G. Reno~A AGR/sl CC: C. Israel S. Vann 418 E. COOPER AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ 303/925-5968 â€¢ FAX 303/925-5993 Â¥% 0 1 t f ATÂ£ACHMENr l ~ IAND USE APPLICATION POEN ~ Pitkin Gounty Bank & Trust Addition 1) Project Name 2) Project location 534 East Hyman Avenue Lot R & S, Block 94, Original Aspen Tbwnsite (indicate street address, lot & block rumber, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning CC 4) Lot Size 6019 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # Aspen Bank Shares Limited P.O. Box 3677, Aspen, Colorado 81611, 925-6700 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # August G. Reno, AIA Gibson & Reno Architects, 418 E. Cooper, Aspen, CO 81611 925-5968 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use - Conceptlial SPA x Conceptilal Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptial FUD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final POD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivision Historic Designation Condcniniumization - Tect/Map Amrxlment GUS Allotment Lot Split/Iot line (2433 E,029]ption Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (rlmber and type of existing sttuctures; approximate sq. fts; nmber of bedrocms; any p[revious approvals granted to the property). Existing Bank of approximately 4,700 S.F. of F.A.R. 9) Description of Development Application Additional Bank office space of approximately 4,325 S.F. of F.A.R. located primarily on a new second floor ~~Â·NoÂ¢ 1 00#Â£0'J n'fl e,1,*ta i\Â·Co frAow# AR; 4 A{ct.0.>44. 44,(i<.4,44(4- 22410 F kÂ«uvactjyi ; iu~ C /4,40-440Â£Â£) 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Submission Contents ves Response to Attâ„¢*mrnt 3, Specific Suhnissian Contents )/PA Response to Attadment 4, Review Standards for Your Application .. ~-- GIBSON & FIENO â€¢ ARCHITECTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Pitkin County Bank & Trust proposed addition consists of approximately 4,325 square feet of F.A.R., which will be located on a second floor directly above the existing bank. , r. 1 The existing bank currently contains a sub-grade floor and a ! .0' I street level floor that accounts for approximately 4,700 square feet of F.A.R. The proposed second floor addition will bring the height of the building to approximately thirty four feet (34 ft.). The existing building is currently twenty one feet (21 ft.) in height. The design of the second floor will locate the majority of its massing set back from both the Hyman Avenue and Hunter Street elevations. The new floor will begin at the upper portion of the existing sloped metal roof, which will set back considerably from the property lines and sidewalks. This will allow for the pedestrian scale to still exist. The proposed addition Will be very similar in height to the adjacent buildings located on east Hyman and south Hunter. The proposed materials for the addition are anticipated to be brick to match the existing building with stone detailing. The stone will help break up the brick walls at a horizontal band between the first and second floors, the roof parapet, and also at the window heads. Another aspect of the proposed addition will be the development of a small vest pocket park located at street level adjacent to the corner. This park Will be well landscaped with vegetation and small berming. Also included in this park will be areas where the pedestrian can relax and sit at benches and enjoy the beautiful views of Aspen Mountain. The proposed addition of the Bank fits in very well with its adjacent neighbors with regard to: materials, height, massing, and quality. 418 E. COOPEA AVENUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ 303/925-5968 â€¢ FAX 303/925-5993 ..AFJ= a 1 F~ 1~91*J 4rRUSTÂ©o V July 27, 1990 Ms. Roxanne Eflin, Historic Planner Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Office 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Pitkin County Bank & Trust Proposed Addition Dear Ms. Eflin: Gibson & Reno Architects has been commissioned by Aspen Bank Shares Limited, the owner, to design the proposed bank addition. Gibson & Reno Architects, 418 East Cooper, Aspen, Colorado 81611, 925-5968, is authorized on our behalf regarding this project relating to the development application process. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, U--4,Ub ALL_ Charles Israel . 534 E. HYMAN AVE. â€¢POST OFFICE BOX 3677 â€¢ ASPEN. COLORADO 81612 â€¢ PHONE 303/925-6700 . 70 U AÂ· D 2.--4/< 1 ----4 f - l L____--1 A L - R- r -- t ; A.Â·-'Â·,1 - -I-Lk-_r-_r~ :/1.,4 -, \-------------i-------0- F~~1 ..1 2 ~'. - J Â·Â·, ~ f\-/ 1 f - ' r :,t7 -) T:, .1 ki --9 - . 1=rli i j.,44 wâ€ž. 1 1 L-% .---1 21_33# 15 , 4~. ~ tiz Z JU V L_[ t]~L-LIUULÂ«232-6 1 I 1 1 2 &6-1 133.1, ... - 4 ~ ,-w....1 r'V, ..r---hÂ·cf.DI i.- . .3 - 014-6Â»7/11 f- 24 -f 0 3, 4 - m 2 1-3 I. ... 27-r-1 . t .% i lfINUL--Â·- . . , ,/0.----- .... -- -----' . + 8 - ' t- .*1. d - ~-6=/17/2.24--- - .--1 4 \ 40'.':31--all=A/k- 2.-1-vt ..our--2 4--1 -1 42Â· Â· / . liLi V 0 , 6 70 6.n' 111 0 1 . .lAi :,A / I. t ' ll 11/ /4/ r-j It ... / / 1 J 1 -/ 1 1 f -,h-Lkh&____2 '~di- t ~ 29922 i.'1.-, L , - 00 / Â»=lf. j . 1- .ip--f~r k....â‚¬:i!; lic--lj ' -0 7 I 1; r, -,1 1 lili I , -I /1 2, i -4 '11 - 1 08- / L. W 6:1 4-.' -' / I . h: , . \ - .u - 9 . i . -- tl''Ill! '' I ./.4 -11 , . f . 1 H 3/0.- - ./ . 1.1 laN)" , 1... 1 blÂ·.4-4,-tt It , i : 41 ---0 / 0 1,1-, , 4 7/1 TEL- V. . -z)<V,pr t tÂ§ Lâ€žJ A- 2 -1 t ' 1 f 47 1 4142211 f- 1,4 -2 4-t_F~fj -q-- ~~~'- ' lit n.k:Lu L--E - t 1 ' .. 0 -m'.2 11*in =ir. ' dil--Â«22 1 'tnE-21-2 2-U - ---- Â· 42.-FO.. 7 *z. - .:ft#-Â« -3 -2- 2.--01, F-5 .1 : 121 :.1: R.- .., ~...--e--,- --1 -- , 1 4-:- 11\7 " 1 I: 2 / . , L I Â· : MAI NVEAM 1~:4*Elfut ..J-- f _2_, .- a . .... j - 4~ r ! WT , 1 1 UL., , 1 , 1 N [7 - t- L-_3 -_.1.--c._.._ICEL_ I - - , -- 2 -Â¥ -Â·.& '3 .--7'I- ~~-It :-7-- - . -1 ....4 ( < / P -j lk,Â· } 1 f- ) Fi, - I , . /1-4 - U , . 1 --+5 =--2.-I==44 -Â» Â· / ' - * I . / / 7 08)61â€¢ /1.0 ..3â€¢V ."U . ... ,!â€ž . -0 j r-V. 1 01 -1 / - --lo~---TOLL 3 2 ~t-/ Di r - r.... r-17".7 14; - 0 ''di! , . . r=-=>=ff:---irÂ·Â·r.-uijÂ· 2 : .1 to 1 - 3 j .-xf--Â·, i '-1. v,Â· 23:22Â·1 -./ 1 li i Â· L--1 1/ 1. i b /N E) n U Sh x \\E . J 0 ~. 1 h r 2 0 ... a. 91)11'~~Â« - i --Nle , -- i 1}Jig ... . 1. -Fl_~~_ f -in ./f 1 I I.1 [ 7.1 91.031.IHOEIV â€¢ inNIAÂ¥ Mic,000 2 8, .. 1,- 11*80~92~Â»413 r- [--7 1 rku -F -1-1 1-7 A - ./-- - . 21 V-m.ULa J 2 > 4 '11Â»6 r i MAIN LOBBY ~ ~LLI-; 2 -12 1 P 1 1~27 X 1233 1 , v..g,2,Â·r * cc,*..4 r -4-*1 I P**52&>\ 2 .-- --T---r---- NIW ACCOUNrri 52 9 53 9 1 0-4 1 Li 1 ; 1 0-00-000 0 0 . HUNTER STREET MAIN FLOOR PLANJo, 0 0 10 20 UG//rrW/LL T---1 T--1 r--1 i-- F./CIC- 00=M MICM. 1 a f 1 1 - 1 LOAN LO-mY 21 â‚¬ IOQI KIIPING - 6% VAL..7 11 -%6 11 il- - 11 : 1_1 0 1-1 LOWER LEVEL PLAN I -00 0 00 .. m r-11 m . . . OFFICES =M U I 16. 1 1.. 1 1-1 1 .. 1- 1 - 2ND LEVEL PLAN ~ 2.--fo 20 30' 1 1 r 7. -1 opmCE ~ Copon, . ch 91 31 - - -70 -aM MIZZAMff ~ EÂ»1 - 1 1 7 11 -1 Cop.ni 71/ FEEI-88.-EEd MEZZANINE PLAN 2. .- ... - .-- - \' 7 4- ...= I.=. st~~$11 - - .. -- \*N . 2 -il . -- I . -A- - . =A . a . . 7,â‚¬,Z~>, -a42*9402.*tÂ·*SE:ZUWN.... t47 64Â»L 0//$4-K ' aA,0 'Loon &'mt - < - M~ZZAIWIn- LAiVIL il.-Â¥ibâ€¢-4= MAIN --00;1 'LÂ· 107-0- SOUTH ELEVATION f---f~. f . LI ' DA/51;41,Irt -=='=34 MA-1 PLOC-11 4329=Zr EAST ELEVATION PARAPIN Fil' 'a'' "'I UTH-131 24=m--- F~IZZA-F- L/lvjiL /1- 110'-4. MAN .LOCE L~EFFE T D Jil-1%,5/55%5,&/,5,;,;,;,&,//1/lillil//ili.///il///i . NORTH ELEVATION 1 1 0 0 20 30' /1- 134'-8" - 1 --- 11111111111111111 ~1.[Tri-1.1 - =f Im,1 '1" i,"u li~ImIHI ImI,11,1 li~,1,1,11 ,~w,Ili, Im,1,1,~ plmim, M .1,un 1111 11~111!Clim, 1111 ~I~Im 1111 1,1,11,1.mH 11,1 11,11,11[,hm' 1,11 1.11., I i , ~, . 4.mimill,lum,mmil -~fil'llil.UE=4 .- 120.-9- - ~LOOA 1=1 --MM--:-1' 1'\"I"I'l"ll'""""""Illimill,IJ,li â€ž,~~'JIM "ll'll"ll!11!1"I'll"ll"'ll~'I~' '-11 lilli - '* . loq-, LOIA//m L//I//1 . 8.-2 \,JOK C.ad& 4.,4.-'bLigvfc- ~ WHST ELEVATION 0400&<%4 ~~1111,11,11,18,Immi,mili,1,1,1,178:I,ilffill,lil 0 up-ft 9 0 9 0 + S m W 17'll i A. 88= oz Il Il 114 1 4 4 I li I 'L r 0 71TJ-7 -4- 1 1 z m CZ '0 fdgyvhÂ« 1~ ~111 1 Ill 44 g 1/ I 111 1 1-1 28 Ici - i M ,+11 11 11 111 , 1 11 0 1 11 1 Â·=12 - 1Â¥- immimmummnami~mammmwimamlit'!- dE 91 3 -1 - .. i I 1 Ti~- Eli - , Ids i .3 LL_-, 1 4 0 3 ~ lim : 1 J, 44#11@ Ul Irmt #6//#%4 trkfU .-U.... 32-~1/11 + i J Ul 11 HI 111' 1Eib~~1*Fl--41 2- Q liE' .Flt ...i.....,Ii@lir NII!ulliGE 3 --911 1| 4 -~ j Â®91>11111=Ta '1 L.LE / 11 111111 1 - 01 Â§ 5 -1 1===1'm 2 2 OI .C==411" :litt[7 11] 0 0 Am ~AJUMIMÂ®'il Ah'TY,t Mr g ; 6 - C m< ..iar-- *h c Â» =~jurm/~*iffri,j: 2 4 b -11? 4 *d l/t/EllitiNW~MIWU b JULULL gl /0 _WE' LL 2 2 7~ m 11 17 8 Ei IL=7 g 4 <Elf 6 2 O31IHOE - 04'J .IA Â¥a 248116 STA!'1-MI.NT ')1Â·' 1.>3-1 PI'!'4 1'2,41 Ft.11,1. SIJ'll'[V!.S ION 1'11(W'I.:4:, 1.~')14 '1'111Â·. LORETTL BANNER PITKIN CTY. RECORDER 1'1.1 141'")SE OF I)1'V! 91 ON OF 1,1)'ri WITHIN '1'1!12 OR! Gr NAL AS PEN TOWNS I'l'1'. INTO S I.P.2.11:U'l- 1}Aitel<LS fro 22 2 26 PM '83 WHEREAS, the provisions of Â»retion 20-19(a) of thrÂ· Aspen Municipal Code, as amendrd, provide that, following receipt . u of a recommendation from the Planning Commission, the City i '' 1179 Council may except particular division of land from the full -,j 1 ., 7 subdivision process set forth in Chapter 20 of the Code, when, in , 7. 4 r, the judgment of the City Council, such division of land meets 1. , ik (~1.1 certain conditions as contained in Section 20-19(a); and . I. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 20-19(a) of said Code, ! ' Iqi.... , William G. Clark, d/b/a Hunter Street Associates Joint Venture, :IA '518%~ requested such an exception for the subdivision of the real LVLRHL property known and described as: Lots O, P, O, R and S, Block 94, , ilt City of Aspen, Pitkin County, ./ Â·4314 Colorado WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning ancl Zoning Commission, at :r,.41ur~ f -4 its meeting held December 7, 1982, recommended approval of such request, and la 'fabl 1 - . e *, Â· 1 9 0 #1Â¢ WHEREAS, the City Council (referring to an earlier .Ablial exception granted to this property by the Aspen City Council on November 21, 1981) has confirmed that the proposed lot split is . d ' avfil! , t' . .r.# t Â· I''jl: Ir within the requirements of Section 20-19(a) and should be 1 ..~%1: ?:,4, : .excepted from the full subdivision approval process. THEREFORE, the Aspen City Council, pursuant to Section 20-19(a) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as amended, dops hireby ~ 11''C determine and declare that the proposed subdivision of the property above described into four (4) separate parcels to be - known as Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Pitkin Center Subdivision (a lot 'ttl.:; split), is hereby excroted from the strict requirempnts of Chapter 20 of the AstÂ· 1 Municipal Code, subject to the following . . ....1 condition: ~31 As provided in Section 20-5(b) of the "i,?,f I Aspen Municipal Code, the lots described below cannot be transferred without a developnent allocation or credit. The li k.' Al; ..... L. m , 2~k , 4 Â·'. iii? Cllrill (Â·(}Illinfu-,71.11 16-/plopment erndil: 3 *anted on Novemb,Â·r .3 1, 1991, by the City Counci 1 lor fÂ·,wh lot ar, a; 11.1,11,1 follows: Lot O (Lot 1): 2,511.4 square feet ... '114 Fl Lot/P (Lot 2): 2,758.25 square fert Lot Q (Lot 1 ): 1,997.15 square feet~p, ~ , Lots R&S (Lot 4): 8,522.49 square feet . :e:-Ili { 3 The foregoing commercial development credits, or portions thereof, cannot be transferred :;.1:r 1:11* 0 among the five lots or cumulated on one lot .Ad)4 unless reviewed and approved by the City ot z :- i :1!1.+1 Aspen Planning Office. Said review shall be made solely to ensure that each lot is not left without a reasonable development right, 443 d or, if no reasonable development right f i ' Ill i.|i J exists, that a covenant is recorded to e prohibit the transfer of the lot without first obtaining a development right. The 14.91 W/ : commercial development credits may be .n 1.1 1 increased if the owner of the lots competes and obtains a commercial allocation for additional square footage in accordance with the applicable procedures from time to time il :* rt - existing. - 1 1..ti/,1/. 1 Â· Ati r / 13. '1 1, 7 r DONE this 27th day of December, 19'82, by the Aspen City Council at its regular meeting held on said date. .(= .1 4 Mul."/75 hit vi 41 0' 451 i :Â·l l __1212-LL=Dz_'1-1 V. . 9.. , ,(41 '11Â·'I 4â€¢ : 1(41:4Â·1, 1.r . HERMAN EDEL, MAYOR 11 1. . . . d. 111.~lf.2.--* t 'pal" ~, Â£5&4.-3 ,Â«4Â£ j KAT~RYN ~7 KOCil, CITY CLERK DIJ-5>-10. 1. . 411 : 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1,201 4 PAULJ TAD{XWE , % a.... Paul J. Taddune, fr~ ,1, 11h I ' 1,5 ' t it . ' / 4 ' 1.1, .M 41'j City Attorney .h, 14 P 'I, 1,;:;1-6-1"1 STATE OF COLORADO ) f!''dwk' 2, . ) SS. 12 44* COUNTY OF PITKIN ) /; .-'ic 01/ The foregoing instrument was duly acknowledged before -&' ' !Â·41Â· t me this Il--' day of .3*2:,208Â¢&9 , 1983, by HERMAN EDEL 4.-' :Â· k..514 f .. and KATHRYN S. KOCH, perionally known to me to be Mayor and 9%*5440 City Clerk of the City of Aspen, Colorado, respectively. !1lt i, P, - A r.* .11Â· 11 ... Witness my hand and official seal. litt~ ~ f{/41% Â· 4 My commission expires: B ...4~, 1 0. 1,4 i ,/ . r .iNâ€¢'1% Â·S"'11 I _l ~1- lD,hul h., U. _L:-i'LU,Led-LI . . \T. i't':,Â·141 /07 Notaryjt'ubl rE-- 1. P.filÂ·.4 R :C: . Add ress 2..0.-240+----3------- i 'll'11[114 1,1 ' 13.- : 1'.. 111111111'Qr .. 11 1,111111! . t + :; -11 lili - i 1 *i.,Â©dal Â·' -2- , f., i.,H'.1 ' F Z 04 6 Ix--EL-**It,e.., Â»4â‚¬ $als'Ver,Wdif 1 1 PITKIN COUNTY mANK a TRUST Ca 1 1 1990 1 CCNVIMIERCIAL GIVIGS APPL.!CA,rION 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 .1 .1 1 1 1 J 1 VANN ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning Consuitants September 15, 1990 Ms. Leslie Lamont Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company Commercial GMQS Application Dear Leslie: Attached for the Planning Office's review are twenty-one (21) copies of the referenced application and a check in the amount of $3,250.00 for payment of the application fee. Please note that the check also provides for the applica- tion's anticipated referral costs. Should additional referrals be required, we would be pleased to provide the appropriate fee. Should you have any questions regarding our application, or if we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. On behalf of Vann Associates and the Applicant, thank you for your assistance in the preparation of our application. Very truly yours, VANN )6 CIATES, INC. Sunny Vant< AICP V SV:CWV Attachment ._ -u cast MCCK,-S Avenue â€¢ licer Co,Grace 8161 ' â€¢303 925-6958 I A COMMERCIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT APPLICATION FOR AN ADDITION TO THE PITKIN COUNTY BANK & TRUST COMPANY BUILDING 1 1 Submitted by Aspen Bank Shares, Ltd. 534 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-6700 Prepared by VANN ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning Consultants 230 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-6958 and GIBSON & RENO ARCHITECTS 418 East Cooper Avenue, Suite 207 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-5968 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. PROJECT SITE 2 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 6 A. Water System 6 B. Sewage System 7 C. Drainage System 7 D. Fire Protection 7 E. Development Data 8 F. Traffic and Parking 12 G. Affordable Housing 14 H. Stoves and Fireplaces 16 I. Location 16 3. Impact on Adjacent Uses 17 K. Construction Schedule 17 IV. GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW CRITERIA 18 A. Quality of Design 18 1. Architectural Design 19 2. Site Design 27 3. Energy Conservation 30 4. Amenities 31 5. Visual Impact 31 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 6. Trash and Utility Access Areas 32 B. Availability of Public Facilities 32 and Services 1. Water Supply/Fire Protection 33 2. Sanitary Sewer 33 3. Public Transportation/Roads 33 4. Storm Drainage 34 5. Parking 34 C. Provision of Affordable Housing 35 D. Bonus Points 35 IV. ADDITIONAL REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 36 A. Special Review 36 1. Off-Street Parking 36 2. Trash and Utility Access Area 38 B. Vested Property Rights 38 1 APPENDIX A. Exhibit 1, Land Use Application Form Exhibit 2, Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company Ownership Letter Exhibit 3, Permission to Represent Exhibit 4, Adjacent Property Owners ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page B. Exhibit 1, Schmueser Gordon Meyer Engineering Report Exhibit 2, Pitkin County Bank & Trust Employment Letter C. Exhibit 1, BFI Waste Systems Letter iii I. INTRODUCTION The following application requests a commercial growth management quota system allocation for two thousand two hundred and forty (2,240) square feet of net leasable area which the Applicant proposes to add to the existing Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company building which is located at 534 East Hyman Avenue in the City of Aspen, Colorado. In addi- tion, the application requests special review approval for a payment-in-lieu of parking, a reduction in the proposed development's trash and utility access area requirement, and vested property rights status (see Land Use Application Form, Exhibit 1, Appendix A). The application is submitted pursuant to Sections 8- 106.F. and 7-404.B. and C. of the Aspen Land Use Regulations by Aspen Bank Shares, Ltd. , a co-owner of the property and the existing bank building (see Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company Letter, Exhibit 2, Appendix A). The Applicant's representa- tive is Sunny Vann of Vann Associates, Inc., Planning Consul tants (see Permission to Represent, Exhibit 3, Appendix A). A list of property owners within three hundred (300) feet of the project site is attached as Exhibit 4, Appendix A. The application is divided into four (4) parts. The first part, or Section II. of the application, provides a brief description of the project site, while Section III. describes the Applicant's proposed development. The third 1 part, or Section IV., addresses the proposed development's compliance with the growth management review criteria of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. Section V. discusses the special review approvals which are also required to develop the project. For the reviewer's convenience, all pertinent sup- porting documents relating to the project are provided in the various appendices to the application. While the Applicant has attempted to address all relevant provisions of the Land Use Regulations, and to provide sufficient information to enable a thorough evaluation of the application, questions may arise which require further information and/or clarification. The Applicant would be pleased to provide such additional information as may be required in the course of the application's review. II. PROJECT SITE As the Vicinity Map on the following page illustrates, the project site is located at the northwest corner of Hunter Street and Hyman Avenue near the periphery of the City's downtown commercial area. The site is legally described as Lot 4 of the Pitkin Center Subdivision, and consists of Lots R and S, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen. The lots are in single ownership and are deemed to have merged pursuant to Section 7-1004.A.5. of the Regulations. The site contains approximately six thousand and twenty (6,020) square feet of land area and is zoned CC, Commercial Core. 2 r 41 1 1 11 -Jr 1 ~~ ).~'. ~5 ..' t"h,-,/34-~~ls* 1 ~ .. .. ~ Â·IT~~79-Tr-71 1 1 ~J LtÂ»fi-Â»fu - g , m.a MAIN BT. 51/11 i .... : , 13449 4 6 F 2 Â· ./ .... . 0 . (. .9, .~ 1 Â»,1. .649 tri-1.-[ f .1 1 1 P1 3.91 - \ ...01\j k =74%2Â»- t 1\ V e , 1 l -. .... i 1 t.- -- Exilk ~brLY- 4v Ift ] 1 . 1.1 -.Tr- --Flr i ~ ~ 1 ~' , Ill n il 0 1 1 . 1 1 ," _., 1-=2 7 1 f]1-42-,1 ---. /-wh.r j Le T Al,2, (-i t~ ch , ,{1_J)[4 1 . /1 t : 'Â·4 I !, C '7 1 1 i /. , -1 ' r--i ' 2 4 - . ' . /2-LI E 222- - , . -I.-6.-- - ' ....JE - \ ' b ..0.0 / f - r --Â·Cl, '--1 ' -- . h '61 f 1Â«fl- 19 - 1 4. 1 9-?If 1..11 .' . 1 ~!11 'i t.1 Â». ; % I--i,1~ 4Â£1~ -flr-1,~ .-4.-~!-i~ .-1 " C . i t J .j: .l.1 . . i t..1,Â·ip.,., '/-,' u-- 40- 1. 'I .L_; :L_u ' ~1. :Lr 4.--4,- . E_.1 -i-cl-41_. _C-Q~.Â£--2, ~~I~ri e . ---4.- 01 Â· - - r -Â·-:.,9.-~.p e Tm . f - - I. 1 3 .:J. -â€ž. 1 . . 1 1 1 .1 o EL- r P J rl./ .... (r- ./ <71191 Ci- a G K -J LU,:11 Â·Â· Â·-Â· ,-L Â· 0 J I j . -A M.M..1 Av. AVE~UE - A. J --. U I h 1 1.h r-j , c 3 c. 7 .7'. 4 , 1 -94 4 4 4| U : 1 '- ' '/~~1 1 4- -1 - - --L _. d 1..1 , 1 -15 ; 1 L.1 - J.-/ 6 W.-K. 5374 4-.Jr 9-1-1 . 2 .. , . . -7 C , 1 - il . r .1 / ".ro lail' A / 1 - L , .. 1 . /- 1. : ?, r Â·Â· . M 9 . C.9, ' 'AC.NE' ~% *'O L L-, 44 &1 w-,7-*7-11-~~~' f''s 767 /2, A r,-t==.:r 77 . r -- . .4. - 'A . 4.1 9 .In. I - 0/ , 11 ,~Opt. -Si ..... .VENUE ... --rn- 1 I. .... â€¢ â€¢ â€¢,9 1.t I - D . ) 6 , FlÂ· 0.7 / (Â·p g .. .1 2/.-1 1 - 1 -' ~ l' ~ --lf-- / 1 , 91 1 ./ - 3 /74 -B 3 11 , 4- i 3 J -/ Ill . r # 3-' /./ 3 1 <'U / " 1- .., .1 i. 1 .13\j, /1 0.-r 1 . ..f , - Â· -_fl~Pi -----)I 3 2 H ' / 1 ,\t /1 f 2 11-4.11 Y Li â‚¬ lÂ· O Avf Nul - .---- AV[NUE '' r . f ($ ... Â»5- 60--3.ill Aj /1.. \'. 1 Jr 1 & /,- 1 -4/ :1 1 - CLEA#('h j-l,JLjll kkÂ«n .... 6.,1 1 I -' r--â€¢-4~4'1 1 -71 . lu, 1\4*A-.t '1 -7-,\ 1 --j .,10 .....Et .33.,6 ~42- ' -1 1 Man-made improvements to the project site consist of the existing Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company building which contains approximately forty-seven hundred (4,700 ) square feet of floor area. The one ( 1) story structure contains a ground floor, a mezzanine and a full basement. The building's existing net leasable square footage totals approximately five thousand four hundred and sixty (5,460) square feet. NO parking is presently provided on-site. As the Survey on the following page illustrates, the project site is essentially flat. Existing vegetation includes numerous crabapple trees, which are located along the western property line and within the Hunter Street and Hyman Avenue right-of-ways, a large spruce tree, which is located within the open space area adjacent to the building' s en- trance, and a variety of seasonal flowering plants and shrubs. The project site is served by all utilities (see Engi- neering Report from Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc., Consulting Engineers, Exhibit 1, Appendix B). A twelve (12) inch water main is located in both Hunter Street and Hyman Avenue. An eight (8) inch sanitary sewer and a four (4) inch natural gas line are located in the adjacent alley. The area's existing electric, telephone and cable TV service has been relocated underground, and is also available in the alley. Fire hydrant number 784 is located immediately in front of the building at the northwest corner of Hunter Street and Hyman Avenue. 4 ALLEY IbLK 14 .&.IJ : ~4241';'~~:1'...11 - r 441...'.v '42- 8 .: 444. J 1 27 TWO STOAr ~ 2 LJ MICK DUILDING 1, l. - 19 4 . INâ„¢IN 994'/71 lul'li .I _4 Z ! r , ' I .. ~â€ži, pio, SUAVE-YONO CEMTIFICATE, M 1 It. ' i dD. ./. ,4 - 01 2, D 1% , 0,2., routts Â¥1./. .: h. â€¢ "Â· HYMAN AVE.MU[ rICOTt ixi~NEÂ» P,101,Im'rY,id,I,ni,Y 1 Afne Suveys, k. ..... 7 a v C I ..... TIâ€¢â€¢ wirk,"Â·i,1/91 33'vt' ..10 10 U Or.'. 7 4 â€¢_ C i (./ '.0/ 1/'I.L Pret off- eci 1730 LOT 4 =12= 8.11 PITAIN CENTEA 5UDDIVI31011 UIT . IWN. UL#'flicÂ© I ' I - i III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Applicant proposes to add a second floor to the existing Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company building and to remodel a portion of the building' s interior. The addition is intended primarily to accommodate the bank' s loan department which will be relocated from its present position in the basement. The new addition will alleviate a serious over- crowding problem which currently exists at the bank. As the expanded structure is to be occupied solely by existing bank personnel, no rental space will be available for tenant purposes. A more detailed description of the Applicant's proposed development is provided below. A. Water System Water service to the proposed development will be provided via the existing twelve (12) inch main located in Hyman Avenue. A four (4) inch service line presently provides water to the building for domestic and fire protection purposes. The Aspen Water Department has indicated that the building's existing service line is sufficient to accommodate 1 the proposed addition, and that the municipal water system has sufficient capacity to serve the development (see Engineering Report, Exhibit 1, Appendix B,). No improvements to the existing water main, service line, or treatment plant will be required as a result of the Applicant's proposed development. 6 1 B. Sewage System The proposed development will be served by the existing eight (8) inch sanitary sewer located in the alley behind the project site. The building's existing four (4) inch service line is sufficient to accommodate the proposed addition. According to the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, anticipated flows can also be accommodated with no improvements to existing sewer lines or to the treatment plant (see Engineering Report, Exhibit 1, Appendix B). C. Drainage Stormwater runoff from the existing building's roof areas is presently collected in an on-site drywell. As the proposed second floor addition will not increase the build- ing's footprint, nor the amount of impervious site area, historic flow rates with respect to surface water runoff and groundwater recharge will be maintained (see Engineering Report, Exhibit 1, Appendix B). D. Fire Protection Fire protection will be provided by the Aspen Volunteer Fire Department. The project site is located approximately two and one-half (2-1/2) blocks from the fire station, resulting in a response time of approximately three (3) to five (5) minutes. The Applicant will replace the existing hydrant located in front of the bank with an updated 7 model which will enhance fire protection in the immediate site area (see Engineering Report, Exhibit 1, Appendix B). As noted previously, a four (4) inch service line presently provides water for the building's sprinkler system. The Applicant will install sprinklers in the proposed addition to further enhance fire protection. E. Development Data As Table 1 below indicates, the proposed addition will increase the floor area of the existing building by approximately four thousand one hundred and fifty (4,150) square feet. The corresponding increase in the building's net leasable square footage is approximately two thousand two hundred and forty (2,240) square feet. The resulting struc- ture, however, is within the maximum allowable external floor area requirement of the underlying CC zone district. The maximum height of the remodeled building will be approximately thirty-eight (38) feet, which is also less than the maximum allowed. The building's existing open space presently meets the minimum requirement, and will increase slightly due to the proposed removal of the building's entrance canopy. Table 1 DEVELOPMENT DATA 1. Existing Zoning CC, Commercial Core 2. Total Site Area (Sq. Ft.) 6,020 8 3. Existing Gross Building Area (Sq. Ft.)2 9,240 Basement 4,540 Ground Floor 3,910 Mezzanine 790 4. Existing Floor Area (Sq. Ft.) 4,700 Basement3 None Ground Floor 3,910 Mezzanine 790 5. Existing Net Leasable Area (Sq. Ft.) 5,460 Basement 2,220 Ground Floor 2,830 Mezzanine 410 6. Maximum Allowable Gross Building 12,000 Area (Sq. Ft.) 7. Maximum Allowable External Floor Area 9,030 @ 1.5:1 (Sq. Ft.) 8. Proposed Gross Building Area (Sq. Ft.) 13,430 Basement 4,540 Ground Floor 4,140 Mezzanine 1,170 Second Floor 3,580 9. Proposed Floor Area (Sq. Ft.) 8,850 Basement None Ground Floor 4,100 Mezzanine ' 1,170 Second Floor 3,580 10. Proposed Net Leasable Area (Sq. Ft.) 7,700 Basement 2,220 Ground Floor 2,830 Mezzanine 740 Second Floor 1,910 11. Minimum Required Open Space 1,510 @ 25% (Sq. Ft.) 12. Existing Open Space (Sq. Ft.) 1,510 13. Proposed Open Space (Sq. Ft.) 1,520 9 14. Maximum Allowable Height (Ft.) 40 15. Proposed Maximum Building Height (Ft.) 38 16. Minimum Required Parking @ 2 Spaces/ 4 1,000 Sq. Ft. Net Leasable3 17. Proposed Project Parking None 1 All numbers have been rounded to the nearest ten (10) square feet. 2 The sum of the gross horizontal areas of each story of the building. 3 AS the basement is one hundred (100) percent below natural grade, it is excluded from the calculation of floor area. Pursuant to Section 5-301.E., fractional parking space requirements are disregarded when less than one-half (1/2) space. Pursuant to Section 5-503.D. of the Regulations, financial institutions are limited to a maximum of twelve thousand ( 12,000) square feet of "gross floor area". Although the Regulations contain a specific definition for the term "floor area", and provide direction as to how floor area is to be measured for "floor area ratio" and "allowable floor area" purposes, Bill Dreuding of the City's Zoning Enforcement Department has taken the position that the term "gross floor area" as used in Section 5-503.D. refers to the building's gross square footage. While this interpretation is obviously debatable; if sustained, it would preclude the Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company from occupying all of the proposed addition which is the subject of this application. 10 As Table 1 illustrates, the gross square footage of the expanded building is approximately thirteen thousand four hundred and thirty ( 13,430) square feet, or one thousand f our hundred and thirty (1,430 ) square feet greater than the twelve thousand (12,000) square foot maximum limitation. Given the significance of the Zoning Department's position, the Appli- cant will request an official interpretation of the Planning Director as provided for in Section 11-101 of the Regulations. While we believe that the use square footage limitations of Section 5-503 should more appropriately be applied to "net leasable" square footage, the Applicant will designate a minimum of one thousand four hundred and thirty (1,430) square feet of the building's gross square footage for rental purposes in the event a more favorable code interpretation and/or amendment is not obtained. It also should be noted that the building' s existing trash and utility access area is arguably non-conforming with respect to the dimensional requirements of the CC zone dis- trict. Pursuant to Section 5-210.D.6. of the Regulations, an area twenty (20) feet in length, with a minimum depth of ten ( 10) feet, is required abutting the alley for up to six thousand (6,000) square feet of net leasable floor area. While the existing building contains only five thousand four hundred and sixty (5,460) square feet of net leasable area, its existing trash and utility access area measures approxi- mately twenty-two (22) feet by nine (9) feet. 11 The proposed addition will increase the building's net leasable square footage to seven thousand seven hundred (7,700) square feet. As each additional twelve hundred (1,200) square feet of net leasable area requires that the minimum twenty (20) foot length be increased by one (1) foot, the expanded building would theoretically require a twenty-one (21) foot by ten (10) foot trash and utility access area. As the area to be provided by the Applicant will measure approxi- mately twenty-one (21) feet by nine (9) feet, special review approval to reduce the minimum depth requirement by one (1) foot is requested as part of this application. The specific review requirements of the Regulations are addressed in Section IV.A.2. A financial institution is a use permitted by right in the CC, Commercial Core zone district. As the expanded building is to be occupied by bank personnel, or other permitted commercial and/or office uses, the proposed addition is consistent with the use requirements of Section 5-210.B. of the Land Use Regulations. The proposed development's afford- able housing requirement is to be met via a cash-in-lieu payment. No residential use of the property, therefore, is either required or proposed. F. Traffic and Parking The proposed development should have no adverse impact upon the existing street system. Assuming a trip 12 generation factor of eight (8) vehicles per day per one thousand (1,000) square feet Of net leasable area, the proposed addition would theoretically generate approximately eighteen (18) additional vehicle trips, or thirty-six (36) vehicles per day. According to the 1987 Transportation Element of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, existing peak traffic levels on Hunter Street and Hyman Avenue were two thousand one hundred (2,100) and two thousand two hundred (2,200) vehicles per day, respectively. As both of these figures are substantially below the allowable capacity level of five thousand (5,000) vehicles per day, the addition of thirty-six (36) vehicles per day should have no significant impact to the street system (see Engineering Report, Exhibit 1, Appendix B). With respect to parking, the current requirement for commercial uses in the CC zone district is two (2) spaces per one thousand (1,000) square feet of net leasable area. As no parking is presently provided on-site, the existing building is non-conforming. The building, however, was constructed prior to the adoption of this requirement, hence no parking was either required or provided for in the building's design. As no parking can physically be provided on-site, the Appli- cant will satisfy the proposed addition's parking requirement via a payment-in-lieu as provided for in Section 7-404.B. A detailed discussion of the off-street parking requirement is provided in Section V.A.1. of this application. 13 G. Affordable Housing As Table 1 illustrates, the proposed addition will increase the existing building's net leasable square footage by two thousand two hundred and forty (2,240) square feet. Based on an employee generation factor of three and one-half (3-1/2) employees per one thousand (1,000) square feet of additional net leasable square footage (i.e., an appropriate . employee generation factor for office uses in the CC zone district), the proposed addition would theoretically generate approximately eight (8) new full time equivalent employees calculated as follows. 2,240 Sq. Ft. Net Leasable/1,000 Sq. Ft. = 2.24 2.24 x 3.5 Employees/1,000 Sq. Ft. = 7.84 Employees As the attached letter from the president of the Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company indicates (see Exhibit 2, Appendix B), no new employees will in fact be generated as a result of the proposed development. As discussed previously, the proposed addition is designed to alleviate existing overcrowded conditions at the bank and to accommodate the bank's existing twenty-eight (28) to thirty (30) full time equivalent employees. Since it can be argued, however, that the proposed addition does not preclude a future increase in the bank's employment, the Applicant will mitigate a percent- age of the new addition's theoretical employee generation. 14 The Applicant proposes to satisfy the affordable housing requirement of Section 8-106.F. (3) of the Regulations via the payment of an affordable housing dedication fee, as provided for in Section 8-109.I.3., based on the formula for such fees contained within the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority' s 1990 Affordable Housing Guidelines. More specifi- cally, the Applicant proposes to pay a dedication fee which is equivalent to housing approximately 4.7 low income employees, or sixty (60) percent of the additional employees theoretical- ly generated by the proposed addition. The exact amount of the dedication fee will be determined in cooperation with the r Housing Authority prior to the issuance of a building permit. THe fee will be based on the Authority's guidelines in effect at the time the permit application is submitted. Pursuant to Section 8-109. J. of the Regulations , the City Council must approve the method by which the Applicant proposes to satisfy the proposed development's affordable * housing requirement. In the event the Applicant is eligible for a growth management allocation, and the proposed payment of an affordable housing dedication fee is determined to be unacceptable, the Applicant will provide affordable housing in an amount consistent with the representations of this applica- tion (i.e., sixty percent of the full time equivalent employ- ees generated by the proposed addition) via an alternative method acceptable to the City Council. 15 As the Applicant would prefer to either construct deed restricted housing, or to convert free market housing to deed restricted status, we are actively pursuing alternatives to the proposed payment of an affordable housing dedication fee. In the event an acceptable alternative can be identified prior to City Council review, the Applicant will amend this application as may be required. As the percentage of employ- ees housed is the relevant issue in the GMQS scoring process, the substitution of an alternative housing proposal which houses an identical number of employees would be consistent, we believe, with the provisions of Section 8-107.8.1. of the Regulations. H. Stoves and Fireplaces The proposed development will contain no wood burning fireplaces or stoves. No gas fireplaces or devices are proposed. I. Location The project site is located near the periphery of Aspen's downtown area. The Aspen Mountain Ski Area is located approximately two (2) blocks south of the property while Herron Park is located approximately four (4) blocks to the northeast. The City's commercial core area is conveniently located less than a block to the west. Rubey Park, the hub of the City' s mass transportation system, is located approximate- 16 1 ly three (3) blocks to the southwest. Hunter Street, which abuts the property, provides convenient access via Main Street and Highway 82 to the community's schools, Aspen Valley Hospital and the Pitkin County Airport. As commercial development is generally considered to occur in response to growth in the residential population, no significant impact upon the above facilities is anticipated as a result of the proposed development. J. Impact on Adjacent Uses The project site is zoned CC, Commercial Core, as are the adjacent areas located to the north, south and west. The area east of the property is zoned C-1, Commercial. Existing land uses in the immediate site area consist primari- ly of retail commercial and/or business and professional offices. The proposed addition is consistent with the intent and purpose of the CC zone district and is compatible with surrounding land uses. As a result, the functional character of this mixed commercial/office area of the City will be unaffected by the Applicant's proposal. K. construction schedule The anticipated date for commencement of construe- tion is the spring of 1991, with completion occurring by the end of the year. Should circumstances permit, construction could commence as early as the winter of 1991. 17 IV. GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW CRITERIA The following section addresses the various review crite- ria against which the proposed development will be evaluated. The information contained herein represents the Applicant's best effort at compliance with both the letter and intent of the criteria. We believe that in every category the proposed development meets or exceeds the minimum applicable standard. Based on our understanding of the various criteria, and the project' s compliance therewith, we have requested what we believe to be an appropriate score in each review category. Please reference as necessary the appropriate headings in Section III. of this application for detailed information in support of the Applicant's representations and commitments. A. Quality of Design The quality of the proposed development's building and site design is discussed below. As the project site is located within the Commercial Core Historic Overlay District, Historic Preservation Commission approval of the project's exterior architecture is required. Conceptual approval of the proposed addition was granted by the Commission on August 22, 1990. The conceptual application was well received by the Commission, as evidenced by the relatively minor conditions which they attached to their approval. Final approval will be obtained upon the successful receipt of a growth management allocation and prior to the issuance of a building permit. 18 1 1. Architectural Design. The proposed addition to the Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company building provides a unique opportunity to redress a number of weaknesses in the building' s design, to emphasize its existing strengths, and to give the resulting composition a more pleasing and contextual overall character. These obj ectives are to be accomplished as described below. a) Scale. The existing building can be characterized as an uneasy blend of small-scale classic/victo- rian elements such as individual window openings, sloping roof forms and the use of common red brick, and large-scale modern/international style elements such as- vertical window walls, asymmetrical fenestration, flat roofs and a lack of brick detailing which conveys a monolithic aspect to the building's brick surfaces. We propose to resolve this juxtaposition of scale by preserving the building' s existing classic/victorian elements and revising the modern/internatio- nal style elements as follows: 1) The south elevation entry facade will change from a two-story asymmetrical window wall to a symmet- rical masonry wall modulated by horizontal masonry bands with integrated window openings. 2) The prominent flat roof cornice lines which presently mark the existing building's south and east elevations will be replaced by symmetric, pitched gable ends. 19 4 1 ====:#i~ i 1_~-UllI Ill] h. - , 2 er...== 1 3--- IOUTH ILIVATION f ELLELLLEN ....... r - = 1. lir J u 44 ---1 9==. | -~@Ik=Ft- -3-=.4 A r r> 1 --la*,0uu= 11 IAIT ILIVAMON -Illillillillilillillilll,1 NORTH ILIVATION 6 1 0 /0 *0â€¢ f !1 1 ' I ' '_n-rYm. -1-- -- - --z"=~- 0 1 ' - I.1, - - 5/ 11,_ q 1.-L- e -* ...7 16'VAnON 4 1 ; ; 1.: LIU <'-2 r ri--= 0 1 ' -- bl==7= -1---- j , kL]AH--[~ y 1 t -- - l.'llill ill iii 1 i.triliff.l 1-1 BELIP-TIT, 11"tÂ·,1 "TLILP'T"1111,1111111,1,11 Tlil.* ly-TZ .IÂ»-~ 1 laÂ£42 . 4 JA Iil}. J j f 1 M-1-~!,:11, I , IT-T-T'-:-grÂ®---- - iL-mc ~il 1 1/11.-_L_, ,- - 1 EAST ELEVATION 200 BLOCK SOUTH HUNTER 0 ,0 20 30 40. --i- --:111% trin 4 FF E - 131 E RE plu 2 1-1 L E i iii H k 1 ./ NAL rl . .1 .Ft-1----1-]EU~~~ 11 4 Jilit)illilifilmgmra 1 1 ; , 11 -1 L ' 7wit'}1.11+1~ ' - pin - -- ' 2 I i~ ' - 2 ;1*ili~*1/1-~ 01.F~GTAIFE r/4 1 1 1 1\ 1 ,~-~ 111 3 4 1 I b 11 -Â£0 J 1,4 3 1 . Illa- 11 1 .i ' I 1 ~ . 2 .'Â·j,*._aL--1 . 1 SOUTH ELEVATION ll{ 500 BLOCK EAST HYMAN ~= [ ;Il-50(-]N C 1 4[-1\10 - AF-q[JEIITECTS t.(HI't.AVEN.JE Abl't. t-[Al-Â»4ALXJ 8161, PITKIN COUNTY BANK ADDITION X X ii : 0 C I 4: HYMAN AVINUI 8i 1 0 0 /\ a i o '0-10 - 00 44 4 + O 1 1 1/h--1-1-- 22.1 - \ 1 1 1 It 2> Flial h I 1 ---1 1~: i %1 J d....- .2.- eRT' 'int,1 2.1 'TI ' ..i i *&11_27_1 1 1 -Uull_110 1 C :ER g 2 0 1 0 â€¢ 2 /*9-1 1 / ~ 0. FULL | _~ 1 a , ELLI-1 ' 1 -1 4- Ill= 1 1] 1 7- "- 4./r 42 11 1 - 2 r 21 . m itoi L-4-11 1' w ~ 11 3-0 1 0 f , <1L lÂ° ' I'joi 11 1] 40 1 K-03 / 0 .. -1 Z Â§.( L-4 11 F~---[i-]fi f m J 2 78 2 Ir : I L---1 -7 ~ D d . 2, I 1~~ 4.1. Flkm] M.' i ~ lu'll F i Ir i Â·Â§----i---m4-11- ---: r)'. C 1, ~ 1.-tll'1111.11111 d z 4 Q r 1 9 Alloy G 1-'GaND: CIA-A//LI 1. 02 V..V NIW IlICI RAOK Viuv ioluo , LINi 0/ ADJACINT I NÂ¥ld 71Aa-1 BIAAC]-1 il Irs,&1/-JAM7 I I 1 c -fljl-iL - : 1 -m 1 lili 1 1 11 1 2ND LEVEL PLAN 1 O 10 20 301 luy 1 11.-=I#,2 Imt r----- - 1 1 - 1 2 (0/IN TO ImLOW) - 4- -- J 1 I .M ------11 - I 0..IC. /0.-/ I <f,- MEZZANINE PLAN 3) The existing mono-chromatic brick color will be enlivened by the use of quartzite accents in sills, lintels and cornice work. 4) The monolithic running-bond brick wall treatment will be given scale and definition through the addition of brick detail work at soldier courses, heads, sills, recessed bands, and projecting cornice areas. 5) A forty-five (45) degree "porch" has been introduced on the corner of the second floor to help turn the corner and to add human scale at this highly visible spot. b) Siting. The building's existing footprint will remain unchanged. The Applicant, however, proposes to strengthen several good features of the present design, including enhancing the accessibility of the corner open space, removing the fixed awning over the entry area, and introducing additional landscaping into the public sidewalk area. These improvements are discussed in detail in Section IV.A.2. of this application. c) Massing. The massing of the existing building may be characterized as two vertical masonry forms which visually anchor the building's recessive low wall and the horizontal sloping roof areas which step back in deference to the corner and large spruce tree. The addition of the new second floor will reinforce this portion of the building by 25 creating a stronger vertical masonry anchor at the end of each street front elevation. This taller massing will more nearly correspond to the size, height and character of the vertical forms of the neighboring Pitkin Center buildings to the west, and to the height of the masonry building to the north. d) Height. The cornice line of the proposed addition will match the cornice lines of both adj acent masonry structures. At approximately thirty-four (34) feet , the cornice at the building's west corner matches that of the Pitkin Center building. Similarly, at approximately thirty- three (33) feet, the building's northeast corner matches the average height of the building located across the alley. The roof at the center of the building is set back from the corner, and steps down to approximately thirty-two (32) feet to allow the building's two ends to read as vertical masses as discussed under "Massing". e) Building Materials. The commercial core area in general, and the adj acent buildings in particular, are constructed of red common brick with generous use of quarry- faced quartzite for sills, lintels, cornices and decoration. Although the existing building is also constructed of red brick, it conveys a certain monotony and monolithic character due to its present lack of detail. The Applicant proposes to enrich the existing palette of materials by introducing horizontal courses of red quartzite into the south facade and 26 integrating quartzite sills, lintels cornice caps and gable end decorative work into the new brick wall construction. A similar treatment is proposed for the east gable end, with a continuation of these elements on all facades of the new second floor. Although the adjacent building to the north is constructed of "jumbo" brick and contains few details, the Applicant believes that the smaller brick and richness of material and detail which are to be utilized in the proposed addition will make an attractive neighbor and will respond well to the overall character of the City's commercial core area. Based upon the above, we believe that the proposed development's architecture represents an excel- lent design which deserves the maximum score available in this category. Requested Score: 3 Points 2. Site Design. As the proposed development consists of a second floor addition to an existing structure, little or no opportunity exists to address basic site design issues such as site coverage, building footprint, access, and efficiency of circulation. The Applicant, however, proposes to enhance the quality and character of the building's existing landscaping and open space areas. More specifically, the fenced and landscaped area located at the southeast corner of the property will be 27 converted to a "mini-park" for the general public' s use. In addition to being a visual amenity, the park will provide an inviting sheltered space beneath the existing spruce tree outside of the main sidewalk area. As the landscape plan on the following page illustrates, the mini-park will contain several small benches, a stone pathway, and flowering plants and shrubs. In addition to the mini-park, the Applicant proposes to reduce the expanse of concrete located at the southwest and northwest corners of the building, and along the sidewalk located adjacent to Hyman Avenue. These areas Will be replaced with sod, thereby enhancing the quality of the building' s open space and extending the "park-like" atmosphere which exists in front of the neighboring Pitkin Center buildings. The existing mature crabapple trees which parallel the property's east, west and south boundaries will remain. Two (2) additional trees will be planted in the area to be sodded at the northwest corner of the building. 1 As discussed previously, the amount of existing open will increase slightly upon the removal of the structural flat roof located above the building's south entry area. The existing canopy will be replaced with a retractable canvas awning assembly. Given the Applicant' s proposed site improve- ments, a maximum score in this category is also warranted. Requested Score: 3 Points 28 ~ GIBSON & RENO Â· ARCHITECTS 418 E. COOPER AVENUE â€¢ A-O-41. COUJANDO Ilm - - INight Deposit] 1 - 41,1,1 /1,1,14 1,) >11 1 Sandstone Path Existing Spruce Tree , b 4 I \ Benchee P A 1 . 1, , *' 1 , . , Low Shrubs Stonework Groundcover FloweM f Sod . 4 Berm / 1 Y j , j . Flowering Shrubs 1 /( 11 {Bank Sign) | f- < .-. ---- City Sidewalk ' NEVV CORNER PARK, PITKIN CC BANK 0 8 10 a= Â«==i>N hh , I l 3. Energy Conservation. The proposed development will meet all applicable energy related requirements of the Uniform Building Code, and will significantly exceed normal standards for commercial construction as follows. a) Passive Conservation. The building's existing entry area will be enlarged to include an elevator lobby and stair foyer. The redesigned entry will serve as a south facing passive solar receiving and storage area for both winter heat gain and for summer heat buffering for the interior main lobby space. All new glazing will be low-E triple glazed, and will consist of Argon-gas filled units whose U-value will equal 0.16. The equivalent R-value of these units exceeds 6.0. The new windows exceed the existing energy standard for double glazing by approximately two hundred (200) percent. b) Active Conservation. The building's existing heating system utilizes a gas fired boiler of approximately sixty-five (65) percent efficiency. While the existing boiler meets all present code requirements , the Applicant proposes to install a new high-efficiency "Forced Draft Combustion" type boiler which will be placed in series with the existing unit. The new Power Combustion boiler has an efficiency rating of ninety (90) percent, and will provide heat for the entire building during all but the severest weather conditions. As a result, energy consumption per 30 square foot of space for building heat will be reduced by approximately forty (40) to fifty (50) percent. The Appli- cant' s commitments to energy conservation deserve, we believe, the maximum score in this category. Requested Score: 3 Points 4. Amenities. The proposed mini-park discussed previously constitutes a valuable public amenity which will provide a welcome respite for people looking for a place to sit for a few moments away from the activity of the adjacent sidewalk. As such, the park should be considered a positive addition to the area's urban streetscape. A new bicycle rack will be installed adjacent to the curb near the building's entrance for bank patrons and users of the mini-park. The federal express pick-up box will remain in its present position at the southwest corner of the property. Requested Score: 3 Points 1 5. Visual Impact. The proposed second floor addition will have no impact on any designated scenic view- plane. As discussed under "Architectural Design", the new addition will step back from the street corner, reinforce the two existing masonry forms which anchor the streetfront facades, and match the height and cornice lines of the adjacent structures. The resulting building will visually complete and enhance the appearance of both the Hyman Avenue 31 1 and Hunter Street streetscape. Given the proposed addition's lack of adverse visual impacts, and its positive contribution to the streetscape, a maximum score in this category is warranted. Requested Score: 3 Points 6. Trash and Utility Access Areas. While the proposed development's trash and utility access area is approximately one ( 1) foot short o f the minimum depth require- ment, it is more than adequate to serve the needs of the expanded Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company building. As no new transformers or utility pedestals are required to be located in the trash and utility area, the entire area is available for trash purposes (see Engineering Report, Exhibit 1, Appendix B). The area will conveniently accommodate a two (2) cubic yard dumpster, which is larger than the present dumpster and more than adequate to accommodate the trash generated by the expanded use (see BFI Letter, Exhibit 1, Appendix C). Both the trash area and alley are paved, thereby permitting convenient all weather access to collection vehicles and personnel. Requested Score: 3 Points B. Availability of Public Facilities and Services The proposed development' s impact upon public facil- ities and services is described below. 32 1 1. Water Supply/Fire Protection. The Aspen Water Department has indicated that the existing twelve (12) inch main located in Hyman Avenue is adequate to provide domestic service to the proposed development and that system upgrades will not be required. The existing fire hydrant located immediately in front of the bank, however, will be replaced by the Applicant with a new model which meets current standards. According to the Water Department and Fire Marshal, the replacement of the hydrant will improve both the municipal water system and enhance fire protection in the immediate site 1 area. The proposed development, therefore, improves the availability of services and facilities in the area (see Engineering Report, Exhibit 1, Appendix B). Requested Score: 2 Points 2. Sanitary Sewer. The proposed development may be handled by the existing level of service in the area. The Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District has indicated that the existing eight (8) inch line located in the adjacent alley is adequate to serve the project and that system upgrades will not be required. Requested Score: 1 Point 3. Public Transportation/Roads. The proposed development may be handled by the existing level of service in the area. As discussed in Section III.F., the surrounding 33 street network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development. Rubey Park, the hub of the City/County mass transportation system is located approximately three (3) blocks to the southwest. A number of existing public transit routes presently pass through the Hyman Avenue/Spring Street intersection, which is located one (1) block east of the Requested Score: 1 Point 4. Storm Drainage. The proposed development may be handled by the existing level of service in the area. The project will maintain historic flow rates with respect to surface water runoff and groundwater recharge, thereby complying with the storm drainage design requirements of the subdivision regulations and the City' s Engineering Department. No improvements to the City's stormwater drainage system are required. Requested Score: 1 Point 5. Parking. The proposed development may be handled by the existing level of service in the area. As discussed previously, no off-street parking was required when the existing building was constructed, and no practical ability presently exists to provide parking on-site in connection with the proposed addition. The Applicant, however, proposes to make a payment-in-lieu of parking as 1 34 1 provided for in Section 7-404.B. of the Regulations. As all monies obtained via this provision are to be used for the construction of parking structures and facilities within or adjacent to the commercial core, and a new such facility has been recently completed, the Applicant's payment-in-lieu effectively mitigates the proposed addition's off-street parking requirement. Requested Score: 1 Point 1 C. Provision of Affordable Housing As discussed in Section III.G., the Applicant proposes to pay an affordable housing dedication fee which is the equivalent of housing 4.7 low income employees, or sixty 1 (60) percent of 7.8 additional employees theoretically generated by the project. Based on the Applicant's proposal, and the provisions of Section 8-106.F. (5)(c) of the Regu- lations, the proposed development is entitled to ten (10) points, calculated as follows: 60 Percent of Employees Generated Housed 6 Percent Housing Factor ='s 10 Points D. Bonus Points The Applicant believes that the proposed development has exceeded the minimum review criteria of the City's residential growth management regulations in several catego- 35 1 ries and, as a result, has achieved an outstanding overall design meriting the award of additional bonus points. Specific areas in which we believe the project excels include architectural design, site design, energy conservation, amenities, and visual impact. Detailed discussions of the project' s merits in each of these areas are provided under the appropriate headings in Section IV. of this application. IV. ADDITIONAL REVIEW REQUIREMENTS In addition to a commercial growth management allocation, special review approval is required for the proposed develop- ment's off-street parking and trash and utility access area. Vested property rights status for the approvals granted pursuant to this application is also requested. A. Special Review The Applicant requests special review approval to satisfy the proposed addition' s of f-street parking requirement via a payment-in-lieu and to reduce the dimensions of the building's trash and utility access area. Each of these requests is discussed in detail below. 1. off-Street Parking. Pursuant to Section 7- 404.B. of the Regulations, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve a payment-in-lieu of parking in the CC zone district. The relevant review criteria which the P&Z must take into account are whether there exist practical limita- 36 1 tions to the provision of on-site parking, and whether the Applicant's parking requirement may be met by an off-site parking facility. As discussed previously, the proposed development consists of a second floor addition to an existing building. As no off-street parking was required when the building was constructed, no provision was made to accommodate such parking in the future. As a result, it is physically impossible for the Applicant to meet the proposed addition' s parking require- ment on-site. Given the availability of the City's new municipal parking garage, and the inability to provide on-site parking, the Applicant's commitment to satisfy the proposed addition's off-street parking requirement via a payment-in- lieu would appear to be appropriate in this case. The proposed addition' s o f f-street parking requirement is four (4) spaces calculated as follows. 2,240 Sq. Ft. Net Leasable/1,000 Sq. Ft. = 2.24 2.24 x 2.0 Spaces/1,000 Sq. Ft. Net Leasable = 4.48 Spaces Pursuant to Section 7-404.B.1., the Applicant will 1 make a one-time only payment-in-lieu of parking to the City of fifteen thousand ($15,000.00) dollars per space, or a total payment of sixty thousand ($60,000.00) dollars. The payment will be made upon receipt of a growth management allocation and prior to issuance of a building permit. 37 Trash and Utility Access Area. Pursuant to 2. Section 7-404.C. of the Regulations, the P&Z may also approve a reduction in the trash and utility access area requirements of the CC zone district. The relevant review criteria include the adequacy of the proposed area for trash and utility purposes, accessibility, and convenience. As discussed previously, the building's proposed trash and access area is arguably deficient by approximately one ( 1) foot with respect to the minimum depth requirement of the CC zone district. As the area to be used for trash and utility purposes is more than adequate to service the expanded building, the dimension- al deficiency described above would appear to be irrelevant. No additional utilities are required to be located within the area, and more than sufficient space exists to accommodate a two (2) cubic yard dumpster. Both the trash and utility access area and the alley are paved, thereby providing convenient access to trash collection vehicles and personnel. B. Vested Property Rights In order to preserve the land use approvals which may be obtained as a result of this application, the Applicant hereby requests vested property rights status pursuant to the provisions of Section 6-207 of the Land Use Regulations. It is understood by the Applicant that final approval of the proposed development must be granted by ordinance of the City Council to establish such status. It is also the Applicant's 1 38 understanding that no specific submission requirements, or review criteria other than a public hearing, are required to confer such status. 39 1 1 1 1 i APPENDIX A l I AITACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLEATION F[104 EXHIBIT 1 1) Project Name 62)./59<Â»504 779_3%7- co. 2) Project Incation ~'E50 25. 44%AblkqvÂ«, 407- 4 A-Intd ce,-17â‚¬A Â«->PirprvtÂ«>16/4 1 (indicate street ackiress, lot & block rumber, legal description where apprcpriate) 3) Present Zoning CZE- 4) Iat Size 4% <32=3 5) Applicant's Naine, Atkiress & Pticxie # /~â‚¬/E3<-~,~ClÂ·p9>i- Â·54~/*29:&, 65721 , â‚¬23 0-2, 4444*,444 925 -422~5 6) Represe~ativels Name, Address & Phone # '~*-->%49>-~. V:*9544 VÂ¥/1/,le<*3044755 ,+2. 72 5 -&95& i 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): aorditional Use - Conceptlial SPA - Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review - Final SPA - Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual RJD Minor Historic Dev. 1 - Stream Margin Final PUD Historic Demlition Mountain yiew Plane Subdivision Historic Designatian 00~xianiniumization _ Text/Map Amendment -2~ ecs Allotnent Int Split/Iot Line _ GMOS Eboevption Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing struch Tres - approocimte sq. ft. ; Inmber of bedrocms; any p~revia.]s approvals granted to the property). 0366 4-77-Ahsg-/er) il rrud17-221% l 9) Description of Development Applicatian 60]085 4,-r~g Her-3 4rrt-Â»KlÂ»U 10) 45>re you attached the following? A- Response to Attachment 2, Minimmt Sulnission Ocxltents Respense to Attachment 3, Specific Submissicn Contents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application lllllk 1 ?.1;. Iii - r EXHIBIT 2 Â· . ~ 'dE *, 'T; .1 2 2. 'KA,Am '' 9 ' -i /21#119 t= 1 faLU.U, 1 1; t =.3 1 :9 1 1 ...11.) ..RV ./ 00. ' 1,1:270 2-1!'~'MÂ£. p . 1 , ' P .". Irt. T 'L' i 'v" L ,;1: 1 1'; i ..7': :,!':,1 ;~.:i~ '' V' ! i'l :,~. t t,}; 1 I 1 11:,1 1 . L# August 21, 1990 ~ HAND DELIVERY 1 ' . I El Bill Poss, Chairman Historic Preservation Committee 605 E. Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Pitkin County Bank Addition Dear Mr. Poss, I am the President of Pitkin County Bank, & Trust Co. (the "Bank") . The Bank is the tenant of the entire building located on Lot 4, Pitkin Center ' Subdivision commonly known 'as the Pitkin County Bank Building. The Bank is also one of the owners of the : building, and in that capacity acts as agent for the other owners of the building. This letter will confirm that I am authorized to act on behalf of the Bank and the ownership of the Bank building in regard to this application. Very truly yours, , PITKIN COUNTY BANK & TRUST CO. 8221&,4 6.440&~ 1 BY: Charles B. Israel, President lt\pcbt.his 1 1 534 E. HYMAN AVE. â€¢ POST OFFICE BOX 3677 â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 â€¢ PHONE 303/925-6700 EXHIBIT 3 1 VANN ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning Consultants September 12, 1990 HAND DELIVERED Ms. Leslie Lamont Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Permission to Represent Dear Ms. Lamont: Please consider this letter authorization for Sunny Vann of Vann Associates, Inc., Planning Consultants, to represent Aspen Bank Shares, Ltd. in the processing of our application for a commercial growth management allocation for an addition to the Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company building located at 534 East Hyman Avenue. Mr. Vann is hereby authorized to act on our behalf with respect to all matters reasonably pertain- ing to the aforementioned application. Should you have any questions, or if we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Aspen Bank Shares, Ltd. i &94444*u Charles B. Israel, President Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company (303) 925-6700 1 sv:cwv 230 East Hookins Aveue Â· Asoen Coiorado 81611 â€¢ 303 925-6958 1 EXHIBIT 4 BLOCK 93 St. Mary's Church City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Warren J. Conner Claude Conner 634 E. Hopkins Avenue 1 Aspen, CO 81611 Margaret & Warren Conner 534 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 BLOCK 94 W. G. Bullock Grant Bullock Trust Box 609 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Maurice Beriro 3475 Mountain Street, Suite 912 Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G2A4 Aspen Plaza Co. Box 1709 Aspen, CO 81612 Elks Lodge (BPO) 210 S. Galena Street, Suite 21 Aspen, CO 81611 Mason Morse, Inc. 514 E. Hyman Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin Center Subdivision SJA Associates, Ltd. 520 E. Durant Avenue, Suite 207 Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin Center, Ltd. Box 4948 Aspen, CO 81612 BLOCK 95 Arcades Associates Jerome H. Michael c/o AAIRSCAPE LTD. 314 S. Mill Street Aspen, CO 81611 T&E Restaurant Corp. Box 4069 Aspen, CO 81612 Jean Ingham Mt. Resort Trust 730 17th Street, Suite 730 Denver, CO 80203 Richard Volk, Trustee 5847 San Felipe, Suite 3600 Houston, TX 77057 Andre Ulyrch Box 2202 Aspen, CO 81612 Heinz & Eliane Wolf Wolf Family Trust 1221 Myrtle Avenue San Diego, CA 92103 Leonard Weinglass 525 E. Cooper Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 W.T. Ray, Jr. J. B. Speed 50 Scott Avenue Cookeville, TN 38501 Robert E. McNeilly, Jr. 6th Floor American National Bank Nashville, TN 37237 Tennessee Three Mrs. A E Miller 3506 Honeywood Drive Johnson City, TN 37604 Donald B. McCann One Bratenahl Place Cleveland, OH 44108 Porter R. and Carol Rodgers, Jr. 1 1300 S. Main Street Searcy, AK 72143 Harold & Martha Caldwell, Jr. Caldwell Campers 5147 Hickory Hollow Parkway Nashville, TN 37013 William A. Van Orsdel 400 Locust Street 1 8th Floor Des Moines, IA 50398 James B. Nowery Harold Quinn 100 Travis Place Shreveport, LA 71101 Mary C. Oliver c/o Ken Brock, Executor 270 County Farm Road Little Rock, AK 72212 R.P. Fitzgerald 600 Palmer Drive Lake Havasu City, AZ 86403 Kern Tompkins & Co. 520 E. Cooper Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Lester Turner 101 Broadway 1 Nashville, TN 37201 James R. and Elaine B. McDade Box 3099 Aspen, CO 81612 Douglas Tompkins Aspen Art Supply 520 E. Cooper Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Lester Morris 100 Sunrise Avenue Palm Beach, FL 33480 Aspen Cooper Wall Mortgage & Finance Corp. 200 Fillmore Street, Suite 110 Denver, CO 80206 John H. Cheek, Jr Box 564 Aspen, CO 81611 BLOCK 98 Thomas D. McClockey & Bonnie McCloskey Box 7846 Aspen, CO 81612 Dayton Heidelberg Distr. Co. 1518 Dalton Street Cincinnati, OH 45214 June Ellen Kuper 624 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 BLOCK 99 Gary G. & Leslie J. Troyer 601 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 W.R. Walton Box 665 Aspen, CO 81612 Norris E. & Goodrich H. Taylor 602 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81612 Charles Cunniffe 520 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81612 Furngolf Ltd. 616 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Frank J. Woods, III 205 S. Mill Street, Suite 301A Aspen, CO 81611 BLOCK 100 Gerald P. & Patricia Long 7251 E. Dessert Moon Loop Tucson, AZ 85715 Spring Street P 0 Gulfco Ltd. 616 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Robert L. Kopp & Martin Cerise Box 100 Aspen, CO 81612 Hunter Plaza Assoc. Anthony Mazza 205 S. Mill Street, Suite 301A Aspen, CO 81611 M & B Co. c/o Garfield & Hecht 601 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 HYMAN MALL BLOCK Ransom B. Woods, Jr. Justine F. Woods Box 12288 Aspen, CO 81612 Levant America Colonial Navigation 2240 17 Battery Place New York City, NY 10004 Harley Baldwin II 205 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 1 1 l 1 1 1 APPENDIX B -- P.O. Box 2155 / SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER /NC.~ Aspen, Colorado 81612 (303) 925-6727 1 CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYOR EXHIBIT 1 September 12, 1990 Mr. Sunny Vann Vann Assoclates, Inc. 230 East Hopklns Ave. Aspen, Co. 81611 RE: Pltkin County Bank Building Commerclal Growth Management Appllcatlon-Englneering Report Dear Sunny: Thls letter comprlses an englneerlng report on matters pertinent to a Clty of Aspen Commerclal Growth Management Appllcatton for the Pltkln County Bank Bulldlng. Thls report represents a compllatlon of 1nformatlon gathered from slte vlslts, 1ntervlews wlth relevant uttllty of f 1clals, revlew of proposed expansion plans and dlscusslons wlth the project archltect. I have organlzed the report to reflect those items included in my proposal to you of August 16, 1990 as well as additional matters resulting from our subsequent discussions. Thls GMP appllcatlon 18 for a project whlch will expand the extstlng Pltkln County Bank Bulldlng located on the northwest corner of Hyman and Hunter Streets 1n Aspen, Colorado. The proposed expansion involves the creation of an additional 2,240 sq. ft. of net leasable office space. The proposed expansion 18 accomplished via the addition of a second story to the existing structure. This conflguratlon results ln no substantlal Increase to the footprlnt of the existing building. Engineering items pertinent to thls application are as follows: 1. Water Servlce. I have spoken at varlous tlmes wlth representatlves of the Aspen Water Department including particularly, Judy McKenzle as well as Ron Ferguson and John Mcdermott. Based on those discussions I have gathered the followlng general 1nformatlon wlth regard to water service to the project. A. The Aspen Water Department has sufflclent capacity to provlde water servlce to the proposed expanslon. B. The addltlon of 2,240 sq. ft. of net leasable space to the Pltkln County Bank Bullding w111 requlre the payment of addltlonal tap fees to the Clty of Aspen. C. The exlstlng servlce tap to the 12 Inch dlametermaln 1 lne tn Hyman Avenue ls a 4" tap in order to provide both domestic supply and fire flows to the existing building. The increase in office I square footage would permlt the owners, should they wlsh, to increase thelr domestlc service line from a 1" line with a 1" meter to a 11/6" line and meter. (The exlstlng 1" domestic 1lne 18 separated ~ from the 4" flre supply 1 lne 1nslde the exlstlng structure. ) 1512 Grand Avenue, Suite 212 â€¢ Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 â€¢ (303) 945-1004 ' 9-1 September 12, 1990 Mr. Sunny Vann Page 2 D. As 1ndlcated by John Mcdermott on September 12, the exlstlng flre hydrant No. 784 1n front of the Pltkln County Bank Bulldlng requlres replacement to a current standard. The Pltkln County Bank project may incur the cost to upgrade thls hydrant as an improvement to the public water system ln the 1mmedlate area. Thls hydrant replacement results ln an Improved water system and upgraded fire protectlon for the 1mmedlate nelghborhood. 2. Sanltary Sewer Service. I spoke wlth Tom Bracewell of the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District on September 6, 1990. He provlded me with the following guidance regarding the availability of sanltary sewer servlce to the Pltkln County Bank expanslon: A. The Aspen Consolidated Santtatlon Dlstrlct has the capaclty to serve the proposed expansion. B. Expansion of available office space wlthln the structure will require the payment of additional tap fees to the Aspen Consolidated Santtatlon Dlstrlct. C. The exlstlng servlce 1lne, whlch appears to be a 4" 1 lne, should be adequate to provide servlce to the existing structure and the expanslon. D. The Aspen Consolidated Sanltation District may require an addlttonal surcharge for future Improvements to the Galena Street crossing of the sewerllne tn the alley adjacent to the Pltkln County Bank Building. These improvements are tn antlclpatlon of the constructlon of a trolley service on Galena Street, and the surcharge would be applied on an equltable basls to buslnesses and other structures tn the area servlced by that maln. E. The existing sanitary main in the alley behind the Pltkin County Bank 18 generally ln good condltlon and does not requlre any addltlonal upgrade by thls appllcant to provlde servlce to the expansion. 1 September 12, 1990 Mr. Sunny Vann Page 3 3. Storm dralnage. I have revlewed the proposed plans for the Pltkln County Bank Bulldlng expanslon as well as coples of the ortglnal bulldlng plans supplled to me by the project archltect. The orlglnal bulldlng plans 1ndlcate that the roof areas of the exlstlng structure are served by a drywell located on the slte for purposes of detalnlng roof area storm runoff and provldlng recharge to the exlstlng aqulfer. Slnce the proposed expansion involves an additional story on the existing structure, and the structure footprlnt 18 essentially unchanged, storm runoff w111 contlnue to be controlled as it has been historically. In short,.this project represents no change to the impervious area of the Pltkin County Bank Building and its slte. Dralnage control both on and off site will continue as it has since the Pltkin County Bank Building was orlglnally constructed. Based on my inspection of the immediate neighborhood, there are no apparent opportunities to improve dralnage in adjacent rights-of-way. 4. Flre Protectlon. Based on my dlscusslon wlth Wayne Vandermark, the Clty Flre Marshall, on September 12, 1990, lt would appear that the proposed expansion of the Pltkin County Bank does not represent significant concerns from a flre protectlon standpolnt. Wayne 1ndlcated that the following items should be considered in the expansion proposal: A. Expansion to a 2 story office structure above grade will require the Installation of an alarm system. (The exlstlng structure may already have an alarm system, I was unable to verlfy thls before flnallzing this report.) Thls alarm system may be manual in nature, but w111 be a requlrement for a 2 story offlce structure. B. Wayne was aware that the existing structure has a sprinkler system for the basement area. He recommends that any additional office area be sprlnklered but would not requlre that the expanslon have a sprinkler system. C. Wayne also agreed wlth John Mcdermott that the flre hydrant No. 784, fronting on Hyman Avenue, requires replacement. He 1ndlcated that thls replacement would also represent an improvement to nelghborhood flre protectton from the standpoint of flre protectlon scoring. 1 September 12, 1990 Mr. Sunny Vann m Page 4 5. Roads. Expanslon to the offlce space ln the Pltkln County Bank Bulldlng will also result in some additional traffic associated wlth bank business. Generally speaking the Pltkln County Bank Bulldlng ls well located tn the downtown area wlthln walking dlstance of many adjacent buslnesses as well as close proxlmlty to existing translt 1 lnes. The most frequently clted source for area trlp generatlon flgures ls the Alan Voorhees study of 1973. Thls study forms the basls of the trlp generatlon flgures utllized ln the Pltkln County Code although a comparable trlp generatlon analysls has not been codlfted by the Clty of Aspen. Utilizing the Voorhees figures, and assuming a strong transit system for thls area, would indicate an appropriate assumption of 8 addltlonal vehlcle trlps per 1000 sq. ft. of proposed offlce expanslon. An expansion of 2,240 net sq. ft., therefore, result in an additional 18 trips per day on adjacent streets. Slnce each addltlonal vehlcle trlp results tn 2 trlp ends, thls project therefore represents an Increase to adjacent dally trafflc counts of just 36 vehlcles per day. The Aspen Area Comprehenslve Plan Transportation Element as publlshed by the Aspen-Pltkln Plannlng Department in 1986 1ndlcates exlstlng trafflc counts on Hyman Avenue at 2,200 vehicles per day and on Hunter Street at 2,100 vehicles per day. That same report indicated projected traffic for the year 2000 on Hyman Avenue at 3,000 vehicles per day and on Hunter Street at 3,700 vehicles per day. Hyman Avenue and Hunter Street are both paved urban streets tn a 2 lane conflguratlon wlth an assumed total trafflc capaclty of some 5,000 vehicles per day. It 18 apparent that this proposal for an office expansion does not represent a significant impact on the traffic loads of adjacent streets even projected to the year 2000. Construction of the Pltkln County Bank Bulldlng expanslon, therefore, w111 not require improvements to adJacent streets ln order to handle the addltlonal trafflc generated by the project. 6. Trash Uttllty Area. Based on you subsequent request, I have revlewed the proposed trash utility area for the bank expansion. It would appear from the prellmlnary September 12, 1990 Mr. Sunny Vann page 5 schematlc plan that the proposed trash ut111ty area abuttlng the alley on the north end of the bulldlng w111 be between 81/Â§ and 10lk feet deep measured from the alley and 18 feet wlde at the alley entrance. It 18 also 10 feet hlgh at the openlng whlch meets Clty code requlrements. Wlth the proposed expansion the Pltkin County Bank Building will have 7,700 sq., ft. of total leasable offlce space. The Aspen Zonlng Code would requlre a trash area 20 feet long measured parallel to the alley for the 1nlttal 6,000 sq. ft. of office space and an addltlonal 1 foot ln length for each additional 1200 sq. ft. of floor area. As you are aware, the requirements for trash utility area dimensions may be reduced persuant to the special review provisions of Article 7, Division 4, of the City of Aspen Land Use Regulatlons. We would recommend that a reductlon ln the trash ut111ty area commensurate wlth the avallable space would be appropriate for the followlng reasons: A. All utilltles in the adjacent alley are currently undergrounded and have adequate transformer and pedestal locatlons elsewhere in the alley. As a result no additional pedestals or transformers are required in this trash utility enclosure and therefore the space 18 generally needed only for trash fac111tles. B. Trash requirements for this office expansion as well as the exlstlng structure are essentially offlce use ln nature and do not present the problems associated with trash for uses such as restaurant facilities. 7. Other Ut111tles. I have been able to contact all of the other utility companies relevant to this expansion proposal. Generally speaking they have 1ndlcated that servlce 18 avallable to the project and that the expanslon ts easily accommodated wlth either exlstlng fac111tles or mlnor Improvements to exlstlng fac111tles. The following itemization represents a breakdown of specific utility comments: A. Electric Service. Don Gllbert of the Clty Electrlc Department indlcates that capaclty ls avallable to serve the expanslon to the Pltkln County Bank Bullding and that exlstlng transformers in the alley can probably handle the increased requirements. B. Ray Patch of the Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company Indicates that the exlstlng service ls probably adequate to handle the expansion and that the only improvement required may be an upslzed meter. September 12, 1990 Mr. Sunny Vann Page 6 C. Wayne Johnson of the U.S. West Communications tells me that phone service, again, ls not a problem to the proposed project. He notes that lf increased phone capacity requires a larger service cable, the Bank would need to Install condult to the alley pedestal. Internal conduit systems should be installed during the expansion construction. D. Representatlves of Canyon Cable Televtslon Indicated that the existing structure may not have cable service. They noted, however, that any contemplated 1nstallatlon of cable televlslon 1 lnes ln the future would suggest that the expanslon be prewtred for cable ln order to avoid additional wiring on exterlor surfaces at a later date. Thls completes my report on englneerlng matters pertlnent to the Pltkln County Bank Commercial Growth Management Appllcatlon. I hope thls report proves adequate for GMP Applicatlon purposes, feel free to contact me lf I may provlde any additional information or further assistance with preparation of the application. Thank you again for the opportunity of working on thls project. Respectfully submltted, SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. 1 ~97 944=ZIZE~ f li ~30 W. Hammond, P.E. Prlnclpal-Aspen Offlce CC: Charles Israel, Pltkin Co. Bank & Trust Co. JH/ja90190 i EXHIBIT 2 1 - 4% 0=-~~RUR"---X*r p CHARLES B. ISRAEL President September 13,1990 Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Dear Members: I am writing you at the direction of Mr.Sonny Vann to explain the needs of our bank in our proposed expansion of the banks' premises. At present we employ between 28 and 30 full time equivalent employees. Because of our strictly enforced record keeping requirements, vast areas of storage space are needed to house the years of records generated by our customers. These areas are unused by employees except for research done for depositors on a periodic basis. 1 At the same time we are truly crowded in work space areas because of the nature of our business forces us to keep large areas of space available as customer, traffic flow areas. We presently have no plans to expand our staff,but rather we hope to give exisiting employees proper work areas. Factually a banks' growth is deposit driven and all recent reports indicate Aspen is presently in a downward deposit cycle. With the recent closing of Aspen Savings and Loan, tens of millions of dollars of deposits left the Aspen financial area. If this trend were to continue we could be forced to reduce staff rather than enlarge. I sincerely hope this brief explanation clarifies our need for our building expansion. I f there are any fruther questions, please do not hesitate to call me. ,~pec; fully, A- i IUA~Ae 6 4-60- 5â€¢"Charles B. Israel ~ President 1 1 331 E. HYMAN .\VE. â€¢ 1'.O. 110X :1677 â€¢ AMI'EN. Cal.ORAI)() 1411;12 â€¢ :to:1/925-6700 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX C 1 1 1 4, ~ns EXHIBIT 1 BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES Aspen District Mr. Scott C. Smith Gibson & Reno 418 E. Cooper Aspen, CO 81611 September 5, 1990 Dear Scott, After reviewing plans for the addition to the Pitkin County Bank Building, it is our opinion that there will not be any effect on trash removal. We have no objections to your plans as reviewed by us and wish you well on your project. 2/Fry Truly Yo~~ff Anthony>/4. Vagne,f'0~ Distritt Managef / 9 405 AABC, SUITE E Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â· (303) 925-6505