The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.534 E Hyman Ave.77-241.---:.il ,----............... .............I A (47â‚¬ 1 17/,2 q <161%21131*WiRS<j - 534 E. Hyman Ave., Pitkin Bal'~- 7 Center Project, P&Z Reso. Bloc]~El t'~ -- -4* ~2~ a O 74 9- r ~,1 L j 4 1/ 6141 H 8 4 4 9 4 i P i- - ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 78 ~ RE: Evaluation of the 1977 Commercial Projects Under the Regulations of the Growth Management Plan (Ordinance #48, Series of 1977) WHEREAS, the City of Aspen adopted Ordinance #48, Series of 1977, to implement the Aspen/Pitkin County Growth Management Policy Plan, and WHEREAS, the Ordinance permits the construction of 24,000 square feet per year of commercial space in the Commercial Core and Commercial One zoning districts of the City of Aspen, and WHEREAS, two commercial projects (The Aspen Grove and the Pitkin County Bank and Trust Buildings) applied for building permits for the 1977 commercial square footage allotment, and WHEREAS, the two projects were evaluated by both the Historic Preservation Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission as specified by Ordinance #48, Series of 1977, on the dates as presented below: October 25 - preliminary presentation of the Aspen Grove Building to the HPC for design analysis and comments. November 1, 1977 - Continued analysis at an HPC Special Meeting November 8, 1977 - preliminary presentation of the Pitkin County Bank and Trust (Pitkin Center) to the HPC for design analysis and comment. November 15 - HPC study session to continue review of the Pitkin Center project. November 22 - public hearing and assign HPC growth management points to the Aspen Grove project. (14.4 points) November 29 - HPC public hearing and assign HPC growth manage- ment points to the Pitkin Center project (13.8 points) November 30-December 20 - preparation of planning office memo to the P&Z. January 10 - presentation of the Aspen Grove Project and the Pitkin Center to the P&Z and allocation of points, and WHEREAS, the deficiencies of the Aspen Grove project are namely in the provision of community oriented services and energy conservation, and WHEREAS, deficiencies of the Pitkin Center are namely the provision of community oriented services and energy conservation, and -1- 1 WHEREAS, the two projects together do not exceed the maximum allowable annual commercial square footage of 24,000 square feet, (Aspen Grove addition - 9,255 square feet; Pitkin Center - 8,530 square feet; total 17,785 square feet). NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission submits the following point allocation to City Council for their consideration for review of the two projects and allocation of building permits for 1977. Aspen Grove addition - 31.46 points Pitkin Center - 32.2 points Since the maximum points available to any one project is 40.8 points, and the minimum required by Ordinance #48, Series of 1977, is 21.6, this Board unaminously recommends that development allotments be granted both projects and the applicants be complimented on the high quality of preparation and design presented. ATTEST: ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 7 By , 1~5//I:'f:~7~.1 >93Â«/ t/>3/7/L~--Â·v d4--10 -4.f Â©Z/1*.Al'-2~y~ J LU J . 2 1, Â», 1 J .., )~ 79 A -- . 4 Deputy (G'tty Clerk Chic Collins, Chairman- APPROVED AS TO FORM 2 . -..... . 1 .:Irl C Dorothy Nuttall, City Attorney i -2- RESOLUTION NO. / (Series of 1978) WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 48, Series of 1977, Section 24-10.5 (e) requires that the City Council by Resolution provide annual development allotments; and WHEREAS, by Resolution dated January 17, 1978, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has completed detailed reviews of two Commerical projects filed for the individual 1977.commercial allotment of 24,000 square feet; and WHEREAS, these two projects in combination do not exceed the stated quota; and WHEREAS, aÂ· special meeting, on January 10, 1978, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission did conduct a duly notice public meeting to consider applications under the Growth Management Plan, and at that meeting did consider -the Aspen Grove Addition, a project of some 9,255 square feet and the Pitkin Center, a project of 8,530 square feet for a total of 17,785 square feet; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 48, Series of 1977, requires that sixty percent (60%) of the total available points be assigned to each appli- cation to be considered further, and this sixty percent (60%) consti- tutes 21.6 points, and the Planning Commission, at its January 10th meeting did assign 31.46 points to the Aspen Grove Addition and 32.02 points to the Pitkin Center; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 48, Series of 1977, provides for an opportunity to protest findings of the Planning Commission in their review of growth management applications, and to date, nochallenges have been made and no challenges can be reasonably expected since all applicants under the Ordinance were approved, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: That the Aspen Grove Addition and Pitkin Center be granted the full square footage allotments sought in their applications presented before the Planning Commission under the guidelines of the 1977 -1- Commercial allotment, and that each of these projects be authorized to proceed further with any additional approvals needed by the City of Aspen to secure building permits. -2 U.' A Staty-Standley III < Mayor CE...//,Â£ I, KATHRYN S. HAUTER, duly appointed and acting City Clerk, do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that Resolution adopted by the Aspen City Council at its regular meeting held Cia-y'ac,< cy.ja-~A .-/22 4 0 , 1978. 0 -4 3 U ~4/5~--e-=I/4Â« Kathryn S.b}lauter, City Clerk -2- Sm.â€ž .1.-7. . CITY.01~SPEN 130 s~~03ii*16"hJ,~ treet aspen~~~~~,1~--81611 TO, Historical Preservation Committee FROM: John Stanford Planning Office SUBJECT:Preapplication review - Pitkin Center DATE: November 3, 1977 Pitkin Center Bank is proposed for development on the northwest corners of Hunter and Hyman Streets. The development is located on two town lots and comprises a total of 8530 square feet of building space (9000 sq. ft. is allowed by zoning) and 1985 square feet in open space (1500 sq. ft. is required). Included in vour packet are drawings submitted by the applicant. A model of the building and the block on which it is located will be Dresented at the preapplication review this Tuesday. Planning Office Comments are as follows: 1. Massing and Texture - the proposed building is comprised of three rectilinear massing elements of different sizes. The largest mass constitutes the main public banking area and is slichtly lower than the two attached smaller masses, one of which is located on a front portion of the lot and the second which extends along the rear portion of the lot. The two smaller elements have a vertical appearance from the street and the larger mass is more static in appearance. The overall appearance of the building is consistent with the objectives of the massing guidelines in that the massing is broken up and is not out of scale with the surrounding buildings and overall street scene. 2. Materials and Color - major building materials appear as warm colored brick, dark toned metal roofing and glass. The applicants will present more specific samples at the meeting. 3. Details - Fenestrations in the second floors are vertical in orientation, and building details, brick parapets and window sills, are minimal. 4. Architectural style - the architecture complys with the guidelines in that it is a contemporarv design and is visually compatible with the scale and visual predominance of nearby historic structures (Ute City Banque and the Elks Building). .. Page 2 Continued The proposal appears to be by in large compatible with the design review guidelines. While our office has no problems with the covered walkway along the street sides, the proposal will be submitted to the Engineering office for their comment. A final observation is that the small windows appear to relv on a variation fo Victorian window design; perhaps a more con- temporary window design would be more appropriate with the overall contemporary appearance. BENEDICT ASSOCIATES INCMIFORATED ~28 November 1977 -- MEMO TO: Aspen City Historical Preservation Committee, c/o John Stanford FROM: Mike Dakan, Benedict Associates Incorporated DATE: 28 November 1977 RE: Pitkin Center Bank Building Regarding the comments and questions raised by various members of the Committee at last Tuesday's meeting, we have the following responses: 1. Signage: We have identified two places on the building where it would be appropriate to have a sign for the bank: One high on the west brick wall of the entrance tower, and one on the low brick wall_under the walkway at the :southwest corner of the building. The owner doesn't feel any necessity for having thZ-sigfE--itt- at night, SO they can be very simple and unobtrusive in the overall character of the building. We have not decided on any parti- cular design for the signs, but of course they will have to be in accord with the sign ordinance, and in keeping with the dignified image of the bank. The HPC can have the opportunity of reviewing and approving the final design of the signs when thatis-decidid Â®ori. - --- 2. _ Building Ughtin-:_ We have discussed the overall lighting concept for the building and have come to the following general conclusions: We do not feel that we want much exterior lighting on the building beyond what is neces- sary for the safety of passing pedestrians. The overall feeling of the lighting would be a dark building with soft light filtering out from within. Tlie greenhouse portion could be lit from below by a few up-lights to hit the foliage very lightly. The intensity of the light would be much lower in the greenhouse than on the back wall of the Bank beyond, in order to maintain a transparent feeling through the greenhouse and into the softly lit interior. The entrance tower must be brighter than the green- house area for security reasons, as it is likely that there will be an _after hours_money machine ("William Teller") and the night depository in this area. Even this can be a rather low light level as long as the exterior is kept dark, making it easy to see into the brighter vestibule area. The feeling in this area will be a pool of light with the darker greenhouse/stair area behind. This can probably best be accomplished with some "up-down" type can lights at an intermediate level in the tower. The interior night lighting will be a very low level overall light, at about 10-20% of the working light level, accomplished by turning off most of the interior lights. The back wall will be lit at a higher level to accent a possible graphic or decorative treatment on the wall. .. * Memo Page Two The area well to the lower level on the west, and the stairs down to the well can be lit by some recessed lights in the retaining wall, and by low landscaping lights within the planted areas. The other planted areas around the spruce tree in the front will be lit by a couple of low landscape lights within the foliage, and lighting the ground plane. The rear corners of the building adjacent to the alley will be softly illuminated by the use of simple downlights attached at each side. 3. Metal Roaf: We haven't made a final selection of the material that we would like to use, but since the last meeting we have received another sample of a material that is very similar to those we showed you but has been weathered a little more to a darker and more uniform color than the others. We will have to take into consideration the costs of the various products that are avail able before we can make a final decision on whi ch one we would like to use, but we will weigh heavily in favor of the preferences of the Committee. We certainly agree that we don't want to use a material that will be shiny or that will detract from the design of the building. . [4 r / 1 U, JVt ' 8-10 - h/.et--o>vurdl-- -Â«301 ~tti 11Â£6'ul, l- 0. ~Ul,4.~,Mi- YC/5,1 '-L--Â·--; < t C \ 1 4 ia (36 2 4 61>1 f P* R<,i Â¥n- <1.1~'SÂ£-7 ) j 9 494% Â¥ -1 f - *0484 Â«-tuL 41 + tuÂ» *1.2/ Â· 4 -3â‚¬421 .U U r,â‚¬ Afes bod .23 9-1 1 bulhoe 0..ar+1- -EFF. d ,= r _-r-~--D ' ir' Benedict Associates Incorpor~~d [LE[FFIE~[F CF[EAR]6[0]OFFAL P. O. Box 40 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 DATE JOB NO. November 14, 1977 77-28 (303) 925-3481 ATTENTION .Tohn Stanford RE To City of Aspen Planning Department Rill Clark'q Rank Ruilding 110 (inuth Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 GENTLEMEN: hand delivery - WE ARE SENDING YOU m Attached U Under separate cover via the following items: U Shop drawings El Prints El Plans [3 Samples [3 Specifications U Copy of letter C] Change order 161 Memo COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 3 Memo to the Aspen City Historical Preservation Committee THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: C] For approval E] Approved as submitted m Resubmit copies for approval it] For your use El Approved as noted El Submit-copies for distribution - El As requested C] Returned for corrections m Return corrected prints Â£ For review and comment U U FOR BIDS DUF 19 El PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: y ~Mike akan It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. FORM 240-3 Available from ./. Townsend, Mass. 01469 Project Coordinator zb .. MEMO TO: Aspen City Historical Preservation Committee, c/o John Stanford FROM: Mike Dakan, Benedict Associates Incorporated Regarding the comments and questions raised by various members of the Committee at last Tuesday's meeting, we have the following responses: 1. The covered walkway: The architectural model has now been finished, and we feel that now that the walkway portion has been painted to closely approximate how it actually will look, it blends in with the building design much better. We still prefer to have the covered walk, mostly Decause of the amenity it provides for customers and passing pedestrians, but we are willing to give it up if the HPC prefers, or if the City Council will not grant permission to do it. We certainly don't feel that the design suffers at all without it. 2. Signage: We have identified two places on the building where it would be appropriate to have a sign for the bank: One high on the west brick wall of the entrance tower, and one on the low brick wall under the walkway at the southeast corner of the building. The owner doesn't feel any necessity for having the signs lit at night, so they can be very simple and unobtrusive in the overall character of the building. We have not decided on any parti- cular design for the signs, but of course they will have to be in accord with the sign ordinance, and in keeping with the dignified image of the bank. The HPC can have the opportunity of reviewing and approving the final design of the signs when that is decided upon. 3. Building Lighting: We have discussed the overall lighting concept for the building and have come to the following general conclusions: We do not feel that we want much exterior lighting on the building beyond what is neces- sary for the safety of passing pedestrians. The overall feeling of the lighting would be a dark building with soft light filtering out from within. The greenhouse portion could be lit from below by a few up-lights to hit the foliage very lightly. The intensity of the light would be much lower in the greenhouse than on the back wall of the bank beyond, in order to maintain a transparent feeling through the greenhouse and into the softly lit interior. The entrance tower must be brighter than the green- house area for security reasons, as it is likely that there will be an after hours money machine ("William Teller") and the night depository in this area. But even this can be a rather low light level as long as the exterior is kept dark, making it easy to see into the brighter vestibule area. The feeling in this area will be a pool of light with the darker greenhouse/stair area behind. This can probably best be accomplished with some "up-down" type can lights at an intermediate level in the tower. I . .. Memo Page Two The interior night lighting will be a very low level overall light, at about 10-20% of the working light level, accomplished by turning off most of the interior lights. The back wall will be lit at a higher level to accent a possible graphic or decorative treatment on the wall. The exterior covered walkway will be lit by. a few downlights under the walkway roof, but these lights should be kept to a minimum, and be of low intensity so as to not interfer with the feeling of the light coming from within the building. The area well to the lower level on the west, and the stairs down to the well can be lit by some recessed lights in the retaining wall, and by low landscaping lights within the planted areas. The other planted areas around the spruce three l'n the front will be lit by a couple of low landscape lights within the foliage, and lighting the ground plane. 4. Metal Roof: We haven't made a final selection of the material that we would like to use, but since Tuesday's meeting we have received another sample of a material that is very similar to those we showed you but has been weathered a little more to a darker and more uniform color than the others. We can show you this sample when we come in for the next meeting. We will have to take into consideration the costs of the various products that are available before we can make a final decision on which one we would like to use, but we will weigh heavily in favor of the preferences of the Committee. We certainly agree that we don't want to use a material that will be shiny or that will detract from the design of the building. , f MEMO TO: Aspen City Historical Preservation Committee, c/o John Stanford FROM: Mike Dakan, Benedict Associates Incorporated Regarding the comments and questions raised by various members of the Committee at last Tuesday's meeting, we have the following responses: 1. The covered walkway: The architectural model has now been finished, and we feel that now that the walkway portion has been painted to closely approximate how it actually will look, it blends in with the building design much better. We still prefer to have the covered walk, mostly Decause of the amenity it provides for customers and passing pedestrians, but we are willing to give it up if the HPC prefers, or if the City Council will not grant permission to do it. We certainly don't feel that the design suffers at all without it. 2. Signage: We have identified two places on the building where it would be appropriate to have a sign for the bank: One high on the west brick wall of the entrance tower, and one on the low brick wall under the walkway at the southeast corner of the building. The owner doesn't feel any necessity for having the signs lit at night, so they can be very simple and unobtrusive in the overall character of the building. We have not decided on any parti- cular design for the signs, but of course they will have to be in accord with the sign ordinance, and in keeping with the dignified image of the bank. The HPC can have the opportunity of reviewing and approving the final design of the signs when that is decided upon. 3. Building Lighting: We have discussed the overall lighting concept for the building and have come to the following general conclusions: We do not feel that we want much exterior lighting on the building beyond what is neces- sary for the safety of passing pedestrians. The overall feeling of the lighting would be a dark building with soft light filtering out from within. The greenhouse portion could be lit from below by a few up-lights to hit the foliage very lightly. The intensity of the light would be much lower in the greenhouse than on the back wall of the bank beyond, in order to maintain a transparent feeling through the greenhouse and into the softly lit interior. The entrance tower must be brighter than the green- house area for security reasons, as it is likely that there will be an after hours money machine ("William Teller") and the night depository in this area. But even this can be a rather low light level as long as the exterior is kept dark, making it easy to see into the brighter vestibule area. The feeling in this area will be a pool of light with the darker greenhouse/stair area behind. This can probably best be accomplished with some "up-down" type can lights at an intermediate level in the tower. .. - U Memo Page Two The interior night lighting will be a very low level overall light, at about 10-20% of the working light level, accomplished by turning off most of the interior lights. The back wall will be lit at a higher level to accent a possible graphic or decorative treatment on the wall. The exterior covered walkway will be lit by. a few downlights under the walkway roof, but these lights should be kept to a minimum, and be of low intensity so as to not interfer with the feeling of the light coming from within the building. The area well to the lower level on the west, and the stairs down to the well can be lit by some recessed lights in the retaining wall, and by low landscaping lights within the planted areas. The other planted areas around the spruce three ;n the front will be lit by a couple of low landscape lights within the foliage, and lighting the ground plane. 4. Metal Roof: We haven't made a final selection of the material that we would like to use, but since Tuesday's meeting we have received another sample of a material that is very similar to those we showed you but has been weathered a little more to a darker and more uniform color than the others. We can show you this sample when we come in for the next meeting. We will have to take into consideration the costs of the various products that are available before we can make a final decision on which one we would like to use, but we will weigh heavily in favor of the pre ferences of the Committee. We certainly agree that we don't want to use a material that will be shiny or that will detract from the design of the building. k .. MEMO TO: Aspen City Historical Preservation Committee, c/o John Stanford FROM: Mike Dakan, Benedict Associates Incorporated Regarding the comments and questions raised by various members of the Committee at last Tuesday's meeting, we have the following responses: 1. The covered walkway: The architectural model has now been finished, and we feel that now that the walkway portion has been painted to closely approximate how it actually will look, it blends in with the building design much better. We still prefer to have the covered walk, mostly Decause of the amenity it provides for customers and passing pedestrians, but we are willing to give it up if the HPC prefers, or if the City Council will not grant permission to do it. We certainly don't feel that the design suffers at all without it. 2. Signage: We have identified two places on the building where it would be appropriate to have a sign for the bank: One high on the west brick wall of the entrance tower, and one on the low brick wall under the walkway at the southeast corner of the building. The owner doesn't feel any necessity for having the signs lit at night, so they can be very simple and unobtrusive in the overall character of the building. We have not decided on any parti- cular design for the signs, but of course they will have to be in accord with the sign ordinance, and in keeping with the dignified image of the bank. The HPC can have the opportunity of reviewing and approving the final design of the signs when that is decided upon. 3. Building Lighting: We have discussed the overall lighting concept for the building and have come to the following general conclusions: We do not feel that we want much exterior lighting on the building beyond what is neces- sary for the safety of passing pedestrians. The overall feeling of the lighting would be a dark building with soft light filtering out from within. The greenhouse portion could be lit from below by a few up-lights to hit the foliage very lightly. The intensity of the light would be much lower in the greenhouse than on the back wall of the bank beyond, in order to maintain a transparent feeling through the greenhouse and into the softly lit interior. The entrance tower must be brighter than the green- house area for security reasons, as it is likely that there will be an after hours money machine ("William Teller") and the night depository in this area. But even this can be a rather low light level as long as the exterior is kept dark, making it easy to see into the brighter vestibule area. The feeling in this area will be a pool of light with the darker greenhouse/stair area behind. This can probably best be accomplished with some "up-down" type can lights at an intermediate level in the tower. . .. Memo Page Two The interior night lighting will be a very low level overall light, at about 10-20% of the working light level, accomplished by turning off most of the interior lights. The back wall will be lit at a higher level to accent a possible graphic or decorative treatment on the wall. The exterior covered walkway will be lit by a few downlights under the walkway roof, but these lights should be kept to a minimum, and be of low intensity so as to not interfer with the feeling of the light coming from within the building. The area well to the lower level on the west, and the stairs down to the well can be lit by some recessed lights in the retaining wall, and by low landscaping lights within the planted areas. The other planted areas around the spruce three l'n the front will be lit by a couple of low landscape lights within the foliage, and lighting the ground plane. 4. Metal Roof: We haven't made a final selection of the material that we would like to use, but since Tuesday's meeting we have received another sample of a material that is very similar to those we showed you but has . been weathered a little more to a darker and more uniform color than the others. We can show you this sample when we come in for the next meeting. We will have to take into consideration the costs of the various products that are available before we can make a final decision on which one we would like to use, but we will weigh heavily in favor of the preferences of the Committee. We certainly agree that we don't want to use a material that will be shiny or tliat will detract from the design of the building. MEMO TO: JOHN STANFORD PLANNING OFFICE FROM: DAVE ELLIS 10 ENGINEERING OFFICE DATE: November 8, 1977 RE: HPC Review of the Pitkin Center Project The engineering department has reviewed the proposed ca,nopy along Hyman and Hunter Streets and feels that con- ceptually the plan is acceptable; however, the final en- croachment must be granted by the City Council. The final plans should provide for sufficient setback of the struc- ture to allow for parked cars, traffic signing, street lights and fire hydrants. Also, required boulevard land- scaping should be replaced by equivalent on-site landsca- ping. We have also looked at the proposed drive-up bank window in the alley. There are several factors of which you should be familiar. First, the alley has been one-way eastbound by convention for some time, and at times has been officially signed for one-way flow. This was done from a concensus of the trucking and service firms which regularly use the alley. Secondly, this alley, like most of the core area alleys, is frequently blocked to through passage. Because of the location of the drive-up window, customers will undoubtedly be tempted to back the normal flow of traffic and find themselves bottlenecked without any exit. Thirdly, trash receptacles in the alley are a severe problem in the winter and the drive-up window appears to eliminate the ten foot setback provided for this purpose. jk k - 1 '1 ! Illij!!~jifi / 'I iIi#hfula#i i'~'~ Â·Â·~!'~'~'Â·~;''' , ' '77 4 4 Ill Arc r- 4 : ''.lk,1: , j/1#11 1,1 1Â·''4'1'; Â·i ' .'il '1" Â·~.11â€¢ p ." ., .,."1 .4 42't~!111; 7 2- ~ : :lit; , Ti'Â· ~., ~ ,1 :i, i,Â·4,:,;,i,1,i' .'~Â·t'i,L'i, lilli 1 , - 9 1 11 lit.111'j f lilli .1111'VII 1 2 J U ' i )' i'/ 1 WIT-=-liprÂ· 4 1 1[1'~1 ~16.- Ii'14!illi0'.PH~' ,7., .ti. .. .,1.Â·'111- 6 4 11 :4.---- ., 11.1 111 ; -i, ----4*V,-E '- - 11 : / 3- ' 21.Ii. d 1 1 1. hw ' '< 1~ 3 '' 1:;11 11,1,11, ~111!111 11 1- IrT-=3-3~11 ;:ir 4- &|7~111! 7~ 1 "1 f., . 1 11 . A 1 n--?it'~{-(i~i:,4 ::.- ; r yqfj - I i\\ E - - --- -1- 'lk -7---Â· F'441 Â·- A -.- 4---- i:1~ Â·Â·Â· y- 11 . 1 :3 --- --- 1~ 4 i N -4,Â· -1 .*,496.,'1Â· r-= A ...:111,1,1, F$ C.'. : 6 1''i'i ~ N i - '+ a E 4 - --1 - U 2 1- -- -- - - r t-1 -Iz 14/ ...1:-u /' A 411 '111 . , 1 Â£~1 1 -1.N:.1 : r .F 1 g / 1'4: Â·â€¢ .11. Â· :Â·L~.__~, :,1:,1-- 11. 6 Â· ,:-94Â· 't ": 11 .1 ddl... 1 2-1 1 d f Ilk, 11 11,1 14 :-. I r liL 86 ' i.~ ~,~ ~~ ~~ ~ __2 - - - 44, 1, 1 1, '1 1111~111111:li:,1.1 4. 01.. , 4#111~ 2 2 1 n - - I ' Â· 7~t---:~'~1'-1 ill 1 , f :1 . .iT-7-14 1 gi -4-=41 1- 1167-- t : '1 1 . h t.... 1 1 1 + // f~1 - . 1.4-- N. . 1 N .... 017 . . â„¢,f er N '24Â¥k . \ -1 1. 4,f V -., 4 1 P IIi 1 1 hill 11 1 - 11 174 1. i lift...13 1 X 1 11 1 .-- L -- I .1 1 1.1 12. .-- - I. -1111, I b =-11- EJ . lit:U i ,ri- j ..".H, :1.*.1!11. 1 -11:,1,1 bill' 11 -1 11 _ 1 1. 'll- 1' , Ill. 1111 19,1 11 11 ~ , ... L , _!IIi .i. , 111:,iN!1 :1' : 1 I | , 1 --- 3% 4 # 1, 1 ~1 ' r I U =/= r ..1 i ! iâ€¢L V ' .1 0 Ir., 81 # 1,= 1 . 1 \.3 -- 111:jil, ~1,1. 1 -- 0 L_ p .2 i,,n: z id *1 j -. -1 i 1 1- . . F -\ 01 , L 11 . 231 7 = b -- 4 - - 1 U l . 1 i ~ Oil__*m - 7 I ill J Â·4. 4 h u 1 7 7 # r 1 1 111 4 "AH I 1 + hi....* 11 11:,97 11 ."7 .----5 , 1 1 i' j ,-P - 1-1 1 Â£23. 4<Met,94/Ir 9 - , r. 1 17 1 ;7â€¢ ~. ... '$,11Â· i :- 4- i j -94/1-4 [1 T L i//9 fi:.2 j.4. EL evATONe job no. 11.3 6 1 Fil T KIN GE'hkTER Â» benedict associates Inc. drawn 1-ILINTEK 1 WYMAN â‚¬725. checked k:Fer.4 L.~PW)RA:15 aia architectsÂ·plannersÂ·engineers/box40aspen colorad081611/303Â·925Â·3â€¢181 date WILL-!AM c.fÂ· c.SLARIA , .2 k 41 612 I NN. 11 I 24 0 UN/1 92 NollÂ»217 41_21 H Â£12&~ .it -4-2-f~ -72.-12 6-9Â».6~.d:K#=':ELy; -,2101"111 1 9 0 1 1 E 1 P 11 11 4 ' ---- - -... - --- - -. 9.---1. r U Ill 3 lift 111'L, 0 !1 9 1 4 9 0 111 11-1111111.:lilli. J $ 1 FIji 1 i T' 4 ., 4 ir 11 0 2/11 1 - 1 1.-4 11 'Arâ„¢= 1 1 1 w I I~ 1,3/ 11 ./ , 1 1 t â€ž *Ill 7 i t-1. ..4.-4.- -0 411 1 1 1 2 i: 1 -==- -1 , . . . . .... I ..Â·- r-Â· u [ 11 $ 1 7/'ilitili: 3 h I A 9 N i n i -==7.j..fli~!&144. 1 ' ' 11-i'littlk : i 1 1 1 E li . 48 IJ~1 1 r Mili! Z l\\ f -A 0 E t 11--L- 1Â»-11 2 d L~ t + 1 kil. - 1 r 1- 4 1 .% R I ~Â· | t job no. MEZZA'41'45 4 1<25â‚¬ PUNE, 11-ZA drawn PITKIN GENTEâ‚¬ Â»t:2 checked benedict associates inc. 1-1 UNTER 4 HYMAN â‚¬55- aia architectsÂ·plannersÂ·engineers/box40aspen colorado81611/303Â·925Â·3481 AS195>4 1 (231*LACA.0 date I VV- 11 WILLIAN' G. 0-Â·42*L : Â· Oki *4 ec I. ' 1:..... 1 ./. Â£ ihil f.a.1-:w=JE- .. *-/ r. . I.>,~* I#a l ./ - :: . -:.--4'......1- A.1 . - %13 ,2-.APÂ»twaÂ»., 44*9; 11,52- "4, . 5 L prN 1 21GNMO 3#Â¥27 -9 >4Â¥1111 M e,ep &81â‚¬Â·986Â·EOâ‚¬/Ud*gope,oloo uedse ot,xoq/s,eeu!8ueÂ·s,,euueldÂ·sioel!40'e ele 00Â·:tÂ·,cr or, ' Agg:19â‚¬ mou! seje!0osse 10!peueq P@Moe43 -549 NWHA-1 + '2121-99 M 1 1 64 ( 2 3 Â· st .1- 1 y ed - ) 1 11/1- 1 a UMeJp GO- chÂ·Â·4~r'*-s; 7 3/gl DaMP'l .Â·r , 1 'Ou qof - AJVH 1 : 1 A Â· -7 1 0 n U , 1 . Â· . Litk Â° L_- . - .-r - - 9. 2 11 , _ 11 -11 0 h.i - 1 4 ir-Â» - L Ib 1 774 lt.4,7 =-= 1 I j i LI'~--~~E27 9 133-7-=:CIP---UEr--:UEN=EEJ 'll - - U. -- - 9 \\.j liL4 - '11 1 _/ 39 1 1 -Â» rf 17- Â· \ V .re k :I 2040- L . -4. ,% .A . 1 NJ ..-1-...... ...... -k t..4 Â·644 ~ 490 1 6-Â«-r . ..' 1 Â£11Â»i j ik---Li....b*= Ch...+C],--ED---2-r-T--=ir-6-..EZ} = COA- Â£3=d + .- ,, X fli ' th .B- . ..4 P U Â· 41 4- ' :77 0 '- I 0 - - - 1-2 0 ' Â©:,FleÂ«, d .4.14 J 1~ .':,~ I .V,f. 1-2#~ 4 /- -. tt....1 e \\5 / 4 -1 .7 1 3 / --5.- I ' 1 ./ I. 934. 4.- . . el 1 - j Â«.4'j h. 43 1/0 - 4.i. 11., i , .1 f i 1 ... n t 2 1 Â¢--7~ - -~ ~ , ... .. . 0 'i F tÂ·-Â·- AS=" UL- 4- 1 -F 4 L Â· Ill -4 1 -11 1 1 $ i 44- i c k 11 1 1 -11 _21_L__. 1-- -- A ff /1.9 Â¢ 6..4 Â·<.10 -.I 2.+A 4-4149 197,4 21 11,AN \ .a< 1 \- --1.4 ' 4, -7 1 16 1 .. ...9 1 7174 - Â»3153.-W,frvfâ‚¬I*-=*17Â« ' :lili / 1 1 ffi 1 tit- 1----f-------1#Ir--& FX- 4 - -11. .....,- 99** 1Â«30] 3*Ag'01 1*'12 12/Ng E* 1-+ 0 F~ 4 11-4 ft 6-F ib Â· Â· ' -4 1:'40325 .9.5 t '41* - Â·-, M:W Â·-- *#W'I .Â· 1 : 7 . .. . 1 9 :K ' m 8 0 60 c Â® ' c Â· * i\ â‚¬12 gl- .2 21 0 2. r .6 0 .0 id 1\ /29 Â¥- ta 4 -9 7 lo M 1 / %36. 1 .* d 1- 4 + d ht 4 L % 1~ 1 0 0 -3 4 f . 1.p. .O ' ' T ;... a. *,14 PL- 6.,hi D-/UY 1 -1 ucy 'A HUN rHOM TRESE PLANS MUST BE ~ t. LS- JIMITTED FOR REAPPROVAL. - 1\J 1/ ./. 'mi. = 4 4 R of 4 sheets 7-!*1 612326(37:u*~'91. mou! seleposse 10!peu 18*EÂ·926Â·COE/U918 ope,oloo uedse o,xoq /sueeu!6ueÂ·s,euueldÂ·sjoe, LL -he.11 *'*....4 3 1 ~ '' 4* 4,11 -2 #â€¢hi. a 4 % 4 - 4 ..t. ~ t . I 1 '4 Â¢ 4 b f .* 4 1.6 P.9, â‚¬ . r .l 1 A ...: I I. 4 , 4 + .2.< 4../ 1, AL :.2 3/*AN#h.. ' I.4. . . 4 4 ' 9 N. 3 4 4, , C f. H Â·4 m . .11 .2 Â·N ,. , .4... 0- i. 3 *'11â€¢ i -. 4 2 K Â·0 Â· 4& fe '. L 1 4 1 W 102#'... , ' 6 34,1.; '71 M h. 4 ' - F*. ' t, ,â‚¬ r 4 '' 4 : k . 7 4 4 1 . 14Â·Â· M Â· - I 4 4 2- f 4 I , >. ' 4 1-0 a - 7 2- Le, - " I '. 1 , I , A, 1 1 'Plf'.'C; 4<~ ~'-. , , .be .7 . . i*'914Â·3Â·"Â·*â‚¬82